Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.15 Geologic and Soils Report1517 Blake avenue, suite 101 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-945-8676  phone 970-945-2555  fax www.hceng.com An Employee-Owned Company GEOLOGIC AND SOILS REPORT The proposed small contractor’s yard within Parcel 1 of Rifle Village South, according to geological hazard maps provided by Garfield County, is not a slope or soil hazard nor is the surficial geology a geological hazard. These maps are provides within Tab 9 of the application. The attached soils classification map from the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service’s “Soil Survey of Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties” shows the entire site be Arvada –Torrifluvents-Heldt. This soil is not ideal for community development due to high shrink-swell potential and should not be built upon with structures. However, since a proposed gravel area and some leveled areas for storage is all that is proposed, there should be no concerns with the proposed usage. The applicant has noticed that the soils are prone to erosion and the land around the yard has a number of sinkholes. The manager of the contractor yard will be responsible to monitor the 1.26 acres of land to watch for any subsidence in the ground. The site should be examined quarterly at minimum as well as after any major storm runoff events. The applicant has agreed to fix the access paths and storage areas when subsidence is noted and fill with imported structural material until the areas have stabilized and storage materials can be returned to the location. The retaining wall that currently existing and which will be modified on the site is a gravity block system. These systems are suitable for scenarios which we have on this site. This location has the top of wall at a high point so there isn’t a large loading on the wall from a uphill slope. The grading at the top of the wall also allows drainage to drain to the west away from the wall and the grading at the bottom of the wall flow to the east away from the wall. This type of wall does not require geogrid for this scenario of a 1-4’ tall wall with minimal loading. The drainage to the south of the proposed contractor’s yard is sheet flow towards the north/northwest. The deep draws on the contractor’s yard begin abruptly within the limits of the contractor yard and to not have a large drainage basin associated with them. The only runoff appears to the portions of this draw on the proposed contractor’s yard is approximately 0.33 acres of land between the driveway and the draw. This land is difficult to establish revegetation. The applicant is proposing to place a dry seed mix as shown on the grading plan on the disturbed ground not covered in retaining wall and gravel. If the revegetation has not taken hold after a field inspection 12 months following the seeded, drill seeding and irrigation may have to be considered. The applicant is willing to follow the recommendations of the County Inspector. Daniel Dennison High County Engineering Land Surveying Civil Engineering