The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3618• J' GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 8th Street Su lie 303 Glenwood Spring a, Colorado 81601 (303) 945-8212 ) -~~~~~~~F~i=l=in=g;:_:#=l~,=r.o_:__t~S~,_Mi~tchel~~l-er~eek~~~C:-~,~S~,~~~~~~~~~~ Job Address Buildim PSlllllit Nature Of Work __ _!;!!,!,!,!'°""~~'1-!5'---""'---------------~~ Us.eof Building ----s;l'f'-Riesfden:ce~---------------------------~--- owner _.:_ ____ ,Lr~~iQ...-la~.lid:lU~P~aat~rriicc~iaa • ..._u~r~b~~~111l--------- C·ontractor ___ __rn).!ML.._jb))l~,lllS'Oi:!ll;aaJnQ.cCoO'.Jl:l"llStl:t-J:plJ1icctltJi~onlll.-_____________ , ____________ _ Amount of Permit: $ _s .... 1._1......_. ;.,5110 ________ _ White-Treas. Canary -Office Pink ·.Appltcant GOid -... o·uplicate 310.00 Permit 201.50 Plan Date: J 0/2•1/BA E Haring Clerk ~ ·-;"'"" ~"~ , . _,,, .., .. I • GARFIELD COUNTY APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT PERMIT NUMBER .ft//7 DATE /(7 &s;/tP please print or type I TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT ~~-ADDRESS~~~~~~~----~----~ SUBDIVISION Mitchell Creek Project FILING # ~l,---'~~L~OT~~#~~~5~~B~L~O~C~K~#~-- TAX SCHEDULE # LEGAL (SEC/TWN/RNG) NAME George & Patrl-cia Urban .MAILING ADDRESS ~S_0_6_9----'J---"'H""wy""--'6°"-~~=~~ CITY Glenwood Spgs PHONE 945-9545 a "' NAME Drawing B.oard ~ ~ ADDRESS PO Box 12 2 7 CITY GS 81601 "' NAME OM Neuman Construction ~ ADDRESS 4 3 N. Meadowview Court ~ CITY Glenwood Springs CO i!5 PHONE 945-7502 LICENSE # " CLASS OF WOPK NEW x ALTERATION ADDITION DEMOLISH REPAIR MOVE MOBILE HOME (ma.ke/model) S.F. OF BUILDING 1300 S,F. OF LOT l,i acre # OF FWORS 1 HEIGHT 18 1 ± # OF FAMILY UNITS # OF IJEDROOMS 3 INTENDED USE OF BUILDING resj dentia 1 GARAGE: SINGLE_ DEL _x CARPORT: SINGLE_ DBL FIREPLACE metal type/brick facing DOCUTTS ATTACHED PLOT PLAN NOTE: Show easements, property line dimensions, all other structures, specify north, and street name. For odd shaped lots, or if space is too smal.Z,. provide separate plot plan. # OF BUILDINGS NOW ON PARCEL )\.&z '1 e_ ' USE OF BUILDINGS NOW ON PARCEL -------- FRONT PROPERTY LINE STREET NN!E/ROAD NUMBER C--eekvcle s6 CHECK IP CORNER LOT DESCRIPTION OF WORK PLANNED residential log home I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and the above is correct and I agree to comply with all county ordinances and aws regulating building construction. ~ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY VALUATION 5"4 Bl!i>O.ao FLOOD HAZARD ---------------- PERMIT FEE $ 3/P#"" PLAN CHECK FEE $.;k;>/Ls-o CERTIFIED BLDG ELEv::::-~~-~--~..---- TOTAL FEE $ 57/.:!/''o SCHOOL IMPACT FEE $,2t10.~" ~,CONDITIONS ... ~=--:OS::U __ ~f-1.JJ~~-K~~-~ DATE PERMIT ISSUED ~~"'-"=-'~.,.;J"----~,,1,._~'-'-"-'---·'------------- ZONING DISTRICT /:'tJ{£5 PROBLEMS w"/iH PERMIT -----------~ TYPE OF OCCUPANCY ___ ... f<..._,~,....1.__~-r-------~ TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1/-1\.J ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED S.F. OF BUILDING '1-G7!p s.F. OF LOT o~'i.S'a.c--< -------- MAX. HEIGHT ,.._. /iir ROAD CLASS.-~-·_,___ CERTIFIED BY COLORADO REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINE: FRONT Se-e P/ ......... r OR ENGINEER REAR RIGHT LEFT ' ----- OFF STREET PARKING SPAqEs REQUIRED ------- PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE -e.IVMt1 I .t:\.rN inc. 1,;onsu111ng t:.ngrneers ana Hyt;Jro/ogists October 24, 1988 Duane M. Neuman Neuman Construction Company 0043 N. Meadow View Road Glenwood Springs, co 81601 RE: Urban Residence Foundation Design Dear Duane: ~""""~ ...... ~&~ ~ .... We have completed the foundation design of the Urban residence to be located on Lot 5 of the Mitchell Creek Subdivision in Glenwood Springs. The foundation design was based upon recommendations contained in a soils investigation report prepared by Chen & Associates (Job No. 4 118 89). No attempt was made to review the structural design of other portions of the building. At your request, we "red lined" the drawings you supplied to us that were prepared by "The Drawingboard" (dated 9/30/88). You updated your drawings and returned to us the original "red lined" drawing for our records. We have not reviewed your set of the updated drawings. Thank you for the opportunity to assist you in this project. If we can be of further assistance, please contact us. Sincerely, ENARTECH INC. c%aL ;?~---;:- Charles =n P.E. Structural Engineer 163-20 302 l!lghth Street. Suite 325 P.O. Drawer 160 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 (303) 945·223$ Chen &Associates Consulting Geoteohnical Engineers Neuman Construction Attn: Duane Neuman 0043 North Meadow View Court Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Gentlemen: 5060 Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 61601 3031945-7456 Casper Colorado Springs Denver Ft. Collins Phoenix Rock Springs Salt Lake City San Antonio October 19, 1988 Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Residence, Lot 5, Mitchell Creek Subdivision, Garfield County, Colorado. Job No. 4 118 89 As requested, we observed the excavation at the subject site on October 17, 1988 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our work and recommendations for the foundation design are pre- sented in this report. At the time of our site visit, the building excavation had been cut in one level to a maximum depth of 6 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The natural ground surface slopes down to the southeast and the excavation was daylighted along the south side. The soils exposed in the excavation consist mainly of sandy silt and silty sand with scattered gravel to cobble-size rock fragments, In the northwest corner of the excavation, relatively dense sandy gravel was encountered, When observed on October 18, a portion of the south footing trench had been excavated and a backhoe test pit was dug just outside of the southwest building corner. The footing trench was dug to a depth of about 3 1/2 feet below the building excavation grade and the backhoe pit to a depth of about 7 feet. The soils exposed in the backhoe excavations were similar but the moisture content increased from relatively dry to moist with depth. An existing irrigation ditch that was flowing is located about 10 to 15 feet south of the building site with a flow line about 5 feet below the building pad excavation, Relatively undisturbed hand driven liner samples of the sand and silt material from the cut grades were taken and subjected to consolidation testing. The results, presented on Fig. 1 1 indicate the upper relatively dry soil has a high collapse potential when wetted and the lower moist soil has a low to moderate collapse potential. Based on the soil conditions exposed in the excavations made at the site, we believe the building can be founded with spread footings placed on the moist sand and silt material with the risk of some settlement, It appears the settlement could be on the order of 2 inches. The footings should be designed to impose a maximum bearing pressure of 800 psf. Foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span an unsupported length of at least 14 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to --~ Neuman Construction October 19, 1988 Page 2 resist a lateral earth pressure corresponding to an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least ~5 pcf. In footing bearing areas, the dry loose silt should be removed to expose the more moist soil and the exposed surface should be moistened and compacted before the concrete placement. Perimeter wall backfill should be compacted to at least 90% of standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum and the backfill surface grade should be sloped to prevent ponding within at least 10 feet of the building. Landscaping which requires frequent irrigation such as sod should not be planted within 10 feet of the building perimeter. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation and backhoe excavations. We have assumed the conditions observed in the excavation represent those within the depth of influence of the foundation. In order to reveal the nature and extent of variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavations, addi- tional exploration by drilling would be required. It is possible the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations contained in this letter, If you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please let us know. Very truly yours, CHEN AND ASSOCIATES,-INC. C:-1--~ c /,} /JI By~~--~lt Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. SLP/ec Attachment Chen &Associates ''"r.;"t.''7.'."· , -•· CA-;..;o9' ... ' .. ---r--... r--h o\O 0 " 0 2 ..... "' "' " ,.. ~ 4 0 u 6 8 1.o 12 14 16 0,1 .,. 0 " 0 ..... 2 "' "' " ,.. ~ 4 0 u 6 8 10 12 0.1 4 118 89 chen and associates, inc. Moisture Content ~ 5.8 percent Dry Unit Weight = 84.2 pc! Sample of: sandy silt From: southeasl: corner, ,... -.. pad grade ........ ,_.......,. AO. lLlO fia. cor ores sio In 1 D IElr COT st an 1 Ire: sore OU~ to Wel: ltii g ' "" \ \ "\ I'\ - 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf Moisture Content= 13.6 percent Ory Unit Weight= 93.1 pc! Sample of; sandy silt l From; middle of south footing trench grade . - ~ r----. \. t"---- '\ -,dditio hal con •re s: io· ~nder c nnst llnt pie slr ., ' ue· ·ro Wert nf ~ \ ' 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf 10-17-88 -200-64% 10-18-88 -200-669; SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig._~1- . ·;i .. 1410 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY BUILDING DEPARTMENT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Issued Without Fee Permi.soion is hereby granted to --~G=t!O,,rc..,,,·e~,.&_..P~autr-..i.,q_·~1a...._,._!l,.._.rh..-nC<--'------------------ Building Permit No. __ .,,1.,_(=f' _________________ zone District ____________ _ situated at 0039 Creekside Ct. menwnl S\X:XB Lot--Blk.--Addition Mtwell er for the following purpose __ .,,cvr~-· ~Re"""Bic:-..lence...._ ..... .__ ____ =-____,,,-----_,..,.,.-., ___ ~----------- tstan ·~aturt of U!lo&) Contractor D.M. :'leunan Q:mstruction TAKE NOTICE No l;han9111 ttlit1ll bl made in th• US!it of this building with· out Pflor notict and certifi- cate from th11.8uildlng Official. Whitll!!: Owr'ler Oreen: Lending Agency Gold: Contrai;itor Ytllow; Sulldln.g Dep11r1ment Pink: A.sasnot GARFIELD COUNTY Bl,JILDING DEPARTMENT BY-~----~-------~-