HomeMy WebLinkAbout5563'·
GARFIEUJ COUNIY
BUlLDING, SANTTATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT
109 &th St""" Swtc 103
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(JOJ) 945-8212
No. 5563
Job Addrcs''---"0'-'6'-'8'-'6'-!B!'a!.!t~t'-'l!.!e~m~e"°'n<ot"---C~r=-=eooe=:,kc..=T.!cr-"a~i~lM--..!B!'a!.!t~t'-'l!.!e~m~e"°'n=.t"---M':Oe~sa"'---lr-,.,f:::_-----.,,C.--
Nature ofWorkc_B::cu=i=l=d-=i-=n"'g'--=P-'e:.:r-=m::i:.:t:__ _____ H--------d---,JL"----,--'-;f--"~--
U"SC ofBuildin • ..__,,_S=i,_,n""'°l"'e'--"F-"a"'m'"i'-'1"1---"-'"-"'~"'-""--"-'-"'1~"'-'='-"""-""""""'"'----l/,.<L-1-\--.,,t-l-,-H------
Daniel Owner ________________ ~+"-----?"---+--!.-----'--------
Amount of Penn;!$ 2 , 2 7 3 • 7 0
Permit: 13
Plan 8
Paid $895.70 2-28-95 I
f
1995
S. Archuleta
Cl"'k
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
Jo!;f,:".~'"'.';:::AZ.,fJ.b:A•li!d_rrLe. ""'tfl./f-l},d t!:-6*1 71'~! .. <.
LEGAL LOT NO. i ,~ I ·~
DESCR I '~/ -· I BLOCK I SUBDIVISION /~1,;;~/·' i /'') 11!/'.l/t· ,.·•''' ~?~ "~ ... ~·<
2
' ~ -~ .-!..1" OWNER' ,; T.l-ADDl1ESS q ~ A
3
' ,
CONTRACTOR ....,-A. ...... _
-
ADDRESS /?; r/,J.>, C(;} "''~ . ,_ .~ /"''. _, ,,, .J' Pll f,,;J~ ~ LICENSE NO ' '-{ ~ X ,
4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER· n/J ~ 1 i.1-fl":'I P>YA~ 9z!J,..1D LICENSE NO
5 ENGINEER i', h l. 1 L. ADDRESS PH LICENSE NO
6 SFOFBUILDING ~ _jJ j'Oij 3:/.iJQ SF OF LOT tJ(/._ ~ HEIGHT~ I NO OF FLOORS ~
7 USE OF BUILDING fl() j1(/)
8 CU.SS OF WORK'. fNEW oADDITION oALTERA'l'ION nREPAIR 11MOVE nREMOVE
9 DESCRIBE WORK: 12.:., ~.~,,.
I
10 GARAGE
~~
SINGLE fooUBLE ---·--.--~-CARPORT SINGLE DOUBLE Cj ti!_
'
DRIVE\ VA y PERMIT ON SITE SEWAGE rnsrOSAL PERMIT 8.1 i L> SllEPlAN )
'-:i:1/.t3-0. 'f' TJ
VAlUATIONOF WOR~: s-1/rs, oOc1. ADJUSTED V/\LS 11
.. .
PERMITFEE / 31f, 0 ?J
SCHOOL IMPACT FEE JV/a NO. OF BUILDINGS ON _
PARCEL ---
USE OF BUILDINGS l·lOW ON _
PARCEL ____....---
TOTALrEE ~ 2'71. 'Jt OCC GRll-J. l"I • / CONST. TYPE JZ:' f'/
/ /
NOTICE WATER SUPPLY OA"fEPERMIT!SSUED ~-lb -9s,-,
SEPARATE PERMllS AHE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, R<.ou'"'' RE"E'"''' NmREoo'"'"
YENTILA TING OR AIR CONDITIONING. •--"8'.'.C'""''°"'-'' A;::':c'"°'"'"°'"'"-' -1--='· ="'---+--="='"'---.f---'===""'--jl
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS ZONING v
NOT C.OMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK !S SUSPENDED a--------•-------+-------+-------<I
OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF HIO DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS
COMMENCED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW
THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. All PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES
GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK Will BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED
HEREIN OR NOT THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE
AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PHOVISIONS OF />NY Ol"HEI~ STATE OR LoCAL~w RE?U~NG CONSTRUCTION OR 'Tl;lE··,. PERFORMANCE OF
CONj{~TIOtj, /!-;'.£/ ~ . _ . -_ •
,r r i\)a[e) '~.-JI, T-V<
Sig ' · -J r, Contr~r au~zed ag~nt ha~inAtJ'Vd undff!ood notice <ibove
//,JZ._ :~.'f \J !+:'>!.:. M/ I '--·
""""uilding Deparl?o/Approvatdai Planning Department Approv<1lld;ite ~
f!E.ALTllDEPT
FIRE DEPT.
SOIL r~EPORT
SETBACKS
FLOOD HAZARD
"'ANUF. l·IOME
OTHER
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO
CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWEO BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE
REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER
AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPLIED WITH IN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE. THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT
SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID.
THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM
THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING
OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS
JURISDICTION.
THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN
ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER,
BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST.
Garform.003 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE REAO AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE flNITIALJ) f '
----···--~"--
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
for
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERA TIO NS
and
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit
application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that
complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information
will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the
discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant
may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with
building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide
this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays
because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention
before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to
the Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information
to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan
review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a boo)< titled 'Dwelling
construction under the Unifonn Building Code. This book is available to
you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a
design professional for assistance in your design and a construction
professional for construction of your project.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine
compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants
are requested to review the following check list prior to and during design.
Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit completed
check list at time of a11plication for a permit:
1
1. Is a site plan included that indicates the distance of the proposed
building or addition to property lines, other buildings, set back
easements and utility easements?
Yes _j, .. __ No _____ ol Not necessary for this project _____ (2)
2. Does the site plan include the location of the l.S.D.S. (Individual
Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to property lines, wells () IA'
(on subject property and adjacent properties) , streams or water fr\
courses?
Yes _____ No ____ (() Not necessary for this project __ X....m
3. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or
private road accessing the property?
Yes _£:.,__ No _____ ol Not necessary for this project _____ <21
4. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location
and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform
building code or per stamped engineered design?
Yes _'J:__ No _____ (l) Not necessary for this project _____ <2)
5. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for
under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood
and e~~th?
Yes _JJ::,,_ No _____ ol Not necessary for this project _____ (2)
6. Do the plans indicate th~ size an location of ventilation openings for
the at~ic, roof joist spaces and soffits?
Yes _!.!::,.__ No _____ oi Not necessary for this project _____ (2>
Do the plans include des1 n oads as required under the Uniform
Building code for roof snow loads, ( a minimum of 40 pounds per
square foot in Garfield County) floor lo · /J. t':.
,,._ No _____ m nece:; y for this project _____ (2)
30 4: '/.tflG-. IS~ O.e11Dwl'
8. Does the plan include a buil m c ion drawing indica n
founqii;tion, wall, floor and roof construction?
Yes _s__ No _____ o) Not necessary for this project ____ (2)
9. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor
joists" wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes __ 6,.._ No _____ 01 Not necessary for this project _____ (21
10. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method
of positive connection of all columns and beams?
2
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Yes __ x_ No ____ oJ Not necessary for this project _____ (21 ·
Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition
from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid
span between the ridge and the eave down to existing grade contours?
Yes _:;/;.__ No _____ rn Not necessary for this project _____ (2J
Does the plan include any stove or zero c earance fireplace planned ?
for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase 11
certifications or phase II EPA certification? ./-'
Yes_____ No _____ 01 Not necess7,qry for this project --?:~(2) f,J..,A...-.£>
G!Js Hc!/WftTer<.-te/CI/ (;,!f-s 1-07 rttZ~ , ·-"
o an include a masonry
section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code
Chapt('J: 37?
Yes __ !:::,... No _____ 01 Not necessary for this project -----"J
Does the plan Include a· window schedule or other verification that
egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements
complY with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code?
Yes --~ No ____ oJ Not necessary for this project _____ (2)
Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that
windo....\Ys provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms?
Yes __ 0,._ No _____ 01 Not necessary for this project _____ ai
Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact
such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors;
glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface;
sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub
enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas?
Yes -X--No _____ 01 Not necessary for this project _____ (21
Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces,
boiler\'Land water heaters indicated on the plan?
Yes --~ No _____ ,!) Not necessary for this project -----"l
Have two (2) complete sets of constructions drawings been submitted
with !IJ..e application?
Yes _:f-,.._ No _____ (l) Not necessary for this project _____ m
Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering
buildi~ and other construction code requirements?
Yes_____ No _____ (3)
3
----------------~--------·-
20. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and
what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield Building
Department?
Yes --~ No _____ c11
21. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction
chan1;tt;_s are required prjor to the application of these changes?
Yes _£:':;:_ No _____ t,>
22. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan
Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be
required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "School impact" or
"Septic system " fees required, at the time you pick up your building
permiJ.L Yes _____ No _____ (3)
23. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections
required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a
final inspection--IITior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and
occu~~ncy of the building?
Yes _J::,._ No -----t'>
24. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application whether
the "Owner'', "Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor'', "Contractor"
or otherwise, signing the application is the party responsible for the
proj!!,_c,! complying with ~he Uniform Codes".
Yes _.:p.__ No _____ (,,
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these
questions accurately to the best of my ability.
date
Phone: 6)5--194 (days); (;,¢5=-/d-09 (evenings)
Project Name: a+7lrK HO 00e ct}/{6~//'ef>oA
Project Address:
4
-
Notes:
(1) If you have answered ·No~ on any or lhese questions you 1nay be required to provide lids Information at
the request of the Building orncla.I prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays In Issuing the
pennlt are to be expected. Work n1ay not proceed wHhout the Issuance of lhe per111lt.
(2) If you have answered ·Nat necessary for this projecC on any of the questions and 1t Is determined by
the Bullding Official that lhe Jnfonnatlon Is necessary lo review the appllcallon and plans to determine
1ninln1urn con1pllance with the adopted codes, please expect lhe following:
A. The applJcallon niay be placed behlnd more recent applications for building permits In the
review process and not reviewed until required lnfonnatlon has been provided and the
application rotales again to firs! posltlon for review,
D. Delay In Issuance or lhe pennlt.
C. Delay in proceeding with construction.
(3) If you answered "No" lo this question the cJrcu1ns1ances described Jn the quesllon could result in a ~Stop
Work Order· being Issued or a "Cer!lUcale of Occupancy" not 1:>elng Issued.
PerAppOl.94 Effective May 1, 1994
5
•
RESIDENCE PLAN CORRECTION LIST
COMMENTS OR ASSUMPTIONS:
eorr_.,.,. en.ck.a below •• to a mad• en pi.. beklNo permil ill inued. nw apprgv• o1 p111n9 anc1 •P"C~ aa.a "°' permit 1hl
vialtdiDn GI tll"f MCtiOnof h 8uildrig Code or °"* cm, Ofdinllnt• Of •lat91-
GENERAL
tutty dimenaioned p6ot plan.
LIGHT, VENTILATION AND ROOM
DIMENSIONS
P"""* .......,, vaana GPenftJI tar Nhna lioh1
loS*W* •llenor openr'IQ9 tor Nhnl WNMbon• m
the toiowwiv RIOml a 1pecdied .. .s.ct.Dr\ 1205 Cal .
lb).,,. IC).
~~~isUl.ainroona
CllllllMlino • .now. or tub. Md in tmnmy morns. _ ..... .._ ......... _'° .... °'*'*·. ~--........ antyfor "'°"" W9lh •~or-•-.... Secbof't 1205
le.
Pn:Mde • 7' .e-(7' -01 minimum cei11ng n..vr-.. the
........ ~"*"·-&eca.on
1207 (al.
M...,..,.. n:iom atus: 70 tQ. i. wr111 J.fool: mnmum
wtcilh~ one •20 1q. t. room "9qUnd. s.ct.. 1201 (b) ...... ,.
10. lY .. _ow. ......... opennga Pfovidnl igttl Md _ ... _final-~---...... --'°.......,.
.... -ICM(ol.
FOUNDATIONS·· ..._._ ... ____ ,.,,
. /
p ........ .,... ............. __ .....
_..,_. ot -tndlft. 5-c:bor'I 2907 (a).
s.-;i,,------~·.....,. Pl •WIDundmon ...
and aittl.-a.ctiotl 2511 (C).
.--;::::-.
1e. )Bott toundmion ptMes and 1il11 to the toundMlon.With
~ IJt• bolll 11)9Cad not l"l'llX9 thM I' apart. Embed bofts
11 Niut~r in concret• or muonry, Secuon 2807 1n.
, 7. /Speedy gar8gl 1Dundaacn to meet.....,...,.. ..
y/_,, for a one-tlory Duikftng, PrcMctt Cftlll 1ecuon on
.,-. T-No. 21M .... -002 (b).
•••
~·/
v'
·y
/
lV
3]>----
-~.--------
/
.
~
..... ""io.
I
'l;/
~ -
PnMde under·toor ~~to t sq. a. ot '*
opentf10 kw 1ach t 50 IQ ft. Of under•toar ....
VenbltlllOn operuno1 •MM be ~-11QUa1tv dilJAbUtea on m &eat twv GPPOll•• Sldn. Secbon
19 (C) 9.
Pl"OVlde unaer-ftoor ~ a 1PICl(led in 8ec:tian
2511 (C)
FRAMING
'Spealyo woad IP9Clel Ind klmblr .... tDr -.,..-
eno venlCli ~ turnt.. Seclion.1509.
Specdv ~ IPM Nf:lnQI tDr Dlywaoci euDlaar Md
root ..,._htnQ, Sec:sian llOI and Table No. IS-8-1.
Piv-IDDf•--ba-11¥-
iutcu;; .......... Vfue ......................
....... on INuna.rtide. In Which aH ii lhllM De
bonded...., ftlenar ghM. 89Ctian 2918 (f). '
Speolfy the ..... Md tNe:lmrlell at pa I ·-and lutdaot lt.Mhing. TltNea·Noe.15-N ...n-:
25-T-2.
PnMde .... bnlcing: ......................... Md
29' ~center. Secllon 2517 (Q),
..-----Pn:Nide ~ .... $ I liaogW.wdl• ..........
Section 2511 M.
/~
Pn:Mde eppnftlld drdltopping m the CCI •• ·~ .......... CldinO Md loaf: .... -~
1peclted • S8ctton 2911 (f)i 4 A .
Show double --• top at stud • 7 • I ' 2s111a1 .
~lin of,,....... lbr..,... owr·•·-r Wkle.-·
s.:lianH171Q)I.
Prolfid8o 22" • 3cr (30"' s :soi m....,,.... la8e._.,,
[,.--Section atOa CaJ. CUnitoml MeeftllNOll Code~-
Sectian 109.)
Sp!IClfy loor IDlll IDMI ID confl:Wm Wldt Table No.·-
29-U.J.1. Sacbon2S17 {d),
L
34.
,.,
37
30.
'
FRAMING
Specriy C•rl1nq io••t 1e>aftt ~o comCKV wn:n "f &b1e No
:25·U.J~. s.cttan 2!17 lh)
S99CdY toOT raft• ·~ to comOIY wttn tneo
appj!CaDle labi9. Tabietl Nm. 25·U·R·1 throuqh 25·U·
A·14. Fot Ullt Df'Opect, ,.;., to TabN No. 2!-U·R·
Secbon 2517 (hl.
F loot !0'111 U\&ll bt IUDPOl\9CI latW~i'!' M !M V:icK
and at each wuppon Dy 1iOhd blocKlf'IQ. Saclion 251 7
(d),
Root trus1M tnall be 1ucoonita laterally at poirm o1
beanng riv 1011a blocking. s.ct1011 2517 (h)
Purt1nt ano 1tnn1 thllll be tupponea by t>eoanno
wds. Stctton 2517 (hi
flft., Tiff Where cetl~ !OltlUI ana raitltf9 are
allel. Ties shllll compty wnh 5ect1011 251 7 (hi
Cloubia !Oi•l• ul"ICMI parallel bffnnQ
mont. Sect:10n 2517 (d)
Prowia a structuraa 1ection which thOW'I typ.K:&I
framing cona1tion1 tor 0''111 PrDIOC\. SectM>n 302 lbl.
GARAGE
Oia:i1nos .,. no1 anaw.d "°"' 081'90D no roorna UMG llcf
' ·~ purpceee. Secban t 1 °'·
Fini11h Oll'AQI •D of ..... Mei C*ilnQ lldj9Cer'll to ot unaer
dwiMIWMJ wnn rMIMMI ~ tor on.naur ilre ,. • ..,..
Soclionl!()Old).-0. .
~. bghl·itlinv 1 ~· loMd WDaCi 0. .u-
'nut..,.ed door tor oplNnQI .,....,.. ~Md dweill.~;,.
SecUon 503 (d), ~ 3.
EXITS AND SMOKE DETECTORS
Doon: bl:enoroocn mua ,_..,.... noi men tMn a·
low. than loor ...... anci uw Clool' may nol l'Ml"IQ av.'
landino-SectlOn 3304 (i).
Still~: Mmanun nae 1•: minimum run v: minimum
ht.aroom e·..e·: minnnurn wdlt :sr. Sectton 3308.
ProW:ie • oruPM* handrd tor •tuwaya on m i.ut one
1ide. Aetum ..aa of....,.... ot tenn1nae.n a MWM poal.
HllnCltalta shall not be .... u.n s.44
• nor mor. cnan a;a4 &bav9
lhll notlftCJ ot trUGs. a.cuon 330!1 CO.
Pl'tMCM • 111a1 one ~ wwllCicM Oii" ... ...,, dclaf
llpprOWCI tl:lr •••P90fl aCIP9 Oil rwCU9 trom ba ••••
~%'~----·-
Additional Corrections:
~:;...aw locauon tor wnotc• oetecton. Ewry ~Sn.Iii be
prCMOeC Wllh agptO'IMd ·~ o.t.eclln ~ .......
banerv DaCkUO iocmeo 1n accora.ance wnh SectlOn 1210 (a).
WEAI'HER PROTECTION
Pl"Oll'lde 11n approwd ~ner-pn:icsct.._.. Mmer unaet wood
Q. Sedion 1108 Ill
Specify an approwQ ftuNnQ IOr ll'lenot ~nge. 8Kllon
1708 bl
llll'CnQI. ll1enof ltaM'Wayt and l&mW
1urtacn ••~IKI 10 1ne weAJner anc:: 1....a unaem..&n.
Section 1 7011 (CJ.
Oam~1 touncw..on wall1 encio91nQ a DU.,._. ..,_
vu'l 11c--rftNS oraoe trv.,, ~ mei:noci. Secla1170I fell.
O IM Aooendl'I S.C.IOf\ 2911 _)
Root cownng 1hala be a tauna in T-* Na. 3244 and u
ctatrfled In SeclKW\ 3204.
~ m«nod o1 sncnorage llor root bit. ConcrMe -..,
Me shoulc:i comorv wnn an ICBC Evalu.lhan ~ 6nc.
or otn1r ll)pC"OWd d&I• to ll"ICM cornpi..,_ With
.C. Stanaata No. 32·12. Tab4n NOii. 32·0·1 and 32-0·2.
Sh1nt;;1I• Ind 1111 1Ut9f\9tl lh&tl bl corrosion , .......... and of
the 11ze ~Spacing u tound 1n Tabin Not. 32·8·1. 32·8·2.
32·0· and 32·0·2
Speedy 1 minimum Slope of_· 1n 12" tor __ TatMn Nos.
32·8·1. 32·B·2. 32-C. 32-0·1. 32·0·2. 32·E. 32-F and 32-G.
Inst.al maonrv wneer to campy with Section .ae. Prwcie
~ to Shl:Nr now w WIM be .nactMICI ID •• ...
/llNC:H.sr•.
.. "9lll"!" -_.. jl'DU
Post apptOWCi numoeni or llddr•• on the ctw81ing. Addrm•
shd be ~ 11111&Die and "91Di1 '1:111'1 thll UNM or road _ ... _.-.... .-.-----·
The gtazano In ""~ klCIDanl IN.at .. Mlllr....-.0
111 ~ ..... Sec:hon IMOe. .
Wal•of9l•IMI VYPSum board Shall nae ...... -•
bck1n9 bOan:i tar 11111 or waM PM9'9 111 the tolloMng
kc;allions: (al CNel' • V9,por NW'det. (bl in.,...,.. t:igh
numic:irty cw 1c1 on cetilnOI. Sect.on •712
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
109 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
(303) 945-8212
Plan Review Correction List
Thompson Residence Permit #
0686 Battlement Creek Trail Ma~l7,
Uniform Building o e sH 11 be resbf"~ prio
of the The followi~j#jts~d !n<i:f/-1 ~ ~.
issuance of the 'ld ng permit. e purpo review
is to provide fo minimum prot tion of fe, limb, health,
property, environment and for the safety and welfare of the
consumer and general public as regulated by the UBC.
1. Provide revised window size or type in bedroom #4
to comply with light and ventilation reqirements of Sec.
1205.
2. Specify exterior wall window and door header
sizes, grade and species of lumber for spans over 4 feet.
Sec. 302, 2517. Sec. 302, 2517.
3. Plans provide two foundation details, CMU and slab
on grade cocnrete.
Slab on grade foundations are not permitted under the ~"'"'~t?
prescriptive requirements of the UBC. Provide engineeringtft&-·~o
~ · plan for apparoval for this system.
The CMU specifications call for dur-o-bond walls or for
reinforcement to be specified for approval. Provide
justifying calcs or engineering for the dur-o-bond system or
a reinforcement schedule for approval. Sec. 302.
4. Specify materials and spacing of lateral bracing
for walls. Sec. 2517.
_________ _... 5. The assumed design load for the roof design does
not appear to be specified. Please specify the assumed
:JOt:I. design load and verify rafter spans specified on sheet 9 of
s,-1C~1/\ffr!:} 11. It appears that the rafters will meet the required snow
<J'(Ow/J'f~ load but may not perform as designed if the design loads are
CJµ~µr.eH less than the 40 psf minimum required for Garfield County.
J.. • J I I I.Jar 6. The deck floor beam on the front porch appears to
/S ,<.. e undersized. Sheet 2 of 11, Detail 2/3. Provide fit!~n"111t1 justifying calculations, engineering or a revised plan for
approval.
7. Beam "X" in the garage appears to not be
specified. Please specify for approval. Sheet 4 of 11, 8
of 11. Sec. 302.
8. Refer to the conditions of permit and redlined
plans for other code requirements.
WESTAR, INC.
Professional Engineers
448 Will !\venue
RIFLE, COLORADO 81650
(303) 625-2774
FAX (303) 625-0651
SHEETNO, ___ ~-----OF __ ~/ ____ _
~A•L._
CALCULATED av __ ~ ....... .._=----"--DATE 5-t:.-~ .$.
CHECKED av _________ DATE ______ _
SCALE
······ §~I'd, ·~···• iB~rz.:T~ :1 ~1~f;8~Q0 >5-k;~~a~,..,
' ' C'<?f7§. 'BA.T'1"4'~01,:!:l',J! ... 7lf-:4..i..L ..
i ! ! ! ! : : . . ' ' i i !
c6CZ.f...t-@ ..... v4'·1'··· P;?, ........ .
!
.......... , ..... ' .... t>.:t .. iLNT:!im'1"1'~ .. :6-TW.Dti:..:~ ... ·
;t.....J[ ~"'~~ ···~ J~' CJ'.,,
i ........ L .. . ... 4.... -i-·-----................ ! ............. : ............. , ............ l ............. , .......... , ..... , ... , ... ,: .. ······
: .....• s;;:.~it·· .,\";!~!P4' .. ·4 1.1 .. ~.D ... ~.S· .. ~.: .•••..• t.~iQ•.••••'··~·~~L,·~·1·· .\M~~ .. S
... ifl.'y'm±4?,T?~ir •••!•••• ••·ibt'.~~11~ '~~ ... ~ ~~~(,••~•~~~) ..
······1 i~P~~:,:~~~:··.4'~'q ' m-§;'; :?'xit9''.J~JZ:1 L$qeif .....
f::.P.-6..Y~ : 4P , TA i e 1+A. , ,:-B : .'7:.~J.'.'.Z--c J::i r,,. . JS.ti<? -:f
: i ' ' : t ! ! :
········i· ·······~~~<-..{;?! ·.·~······e"J· .. ·.:·······
] i
.........
PROOUCTWo4·1 iSlng11 S~llal!I ~1 IPlddtdl IMflllllrJJ In~ .. BrQtlln, Mm C!471. TQ Cri:l1rPHONETOLL FAff 1-000-22!-0380
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
109 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
(303) 945-8212
Plan Review Correction List
Thompson Residence
0686 Battlement Creek Trail
Permit #
March 17, 1995
The following comments based on the 1988 edition of
Uniform Building Code shall be resolved prior to the
issuance of the building permit. The purpose of this review
is to provide for minimum protection of life, limb, health, ./
property, environment and for the safety and welfare of the
consumer and general public as regulated by the UBC.
the /f'}<"/;0
VV//-·.tloc;
1. Provide revised window size or type in bedroom #4
to comply with light and ventilation reqirements of Sec.
1205.
2. Specify exterior wall window and door header
sizes, grade and species of lumber for spans over 4 feet.
Sec. 302, 2517. Sec. 302, 2517.
3. Plans provide two foundation details, CMU and slab
on grade cocnrete.
Slab on grade foundations are not permitted under the (rT711'f'"e?
prescriptive requirements of the UBC. Provide engineering ?..:!'t&1•lf'o
~ 8 aauisun plan for apparoval for this system.
The CMU specifications call for dur-o-bond walls or for
reinforcement to be specified for approval. Provide
justifying calcs or engineering for the dur-o-bond system or
a reinforcement schedule for approval. Sec. 302.
4. Specify materials and spacing of lateral bracing
for walls. Sec. 2517.
---------...-5. The assumed design load for the roof design does
not appear to be specified. Please specify the assumed
:JO-ti. design load and verify rafter spans specified on sheet 9 of S/'~<:1Fll7!) 11. It appears that the rafters will meet the required snow
(J '( o WP -r"1.. load but may not perform as designed if the design loads are
OIJ Cflr.Y: 11 less than the 40 psf minimum required for Garfield County.
• .!' 1Jo r ~ 6. The deck floor beam on the front porch appears to ~~sr 1
t1.-be undersized. Sheet 2 of 11, Detail 2/3. Provide fl~ ~IT,,rt1/J justifying calculations, engineering or a revised plan for
approval.
7. Beam ''X'' in the garage appears to not be
specified. Please specify for approval. Sheet 4 of 11, 8
of 11. Sec. 302.
8. Refer to the conditions of permit and redlined
plans for other code requirements.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
CTL/THOMPSON, INC.
CONSUL TING GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERS
Job No. GS-1493
SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION
Proposed Thompson Residence
0686 Battlement Creek Trail
Battlement Mesa, Colorado
Prepared For:
Mr. Daniel Thompson
920 Edelweiss Court
Rifle, CO 81650
April 28, 1995
234CENTER DRIVE · GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 · (303) 945-2809
•
•
TABLE OF CONTENTS
• SCOPE ....................................................... ·
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS ........................ , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
•• SITE CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
:'HOPOSED CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................... , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
• SITE EXCAVATION ......................... , ................... , 3
FOUNDATION ................................................... 3
FLOOR SLABS AND EXTERIOR CONCRETE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
• BASEMENT CONSTRUCTION .................................... , ... 5
SURFACE DRAINAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
LIMITATIONS .................................................... 6 • FIGURE 1 -LOCATIONS OF TEST HOLES
FIGURE 2 · SUMMARY LOGS OF TEST HOLES
FIGURE 3 -EXTERIOR FOUNDATION DRAIN • TABLE 1 -SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TESTING RESULTS
•
•
•
••
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
SCOPE
This report presents the results of our soils and foundation investigation for the
proposed Thompson Residence to be built at 0686 Battlement Creek Trail in Battlement
Mesa, Colorado. We explored the subsurface conditions to provide foundation
recommendations for the proposed building. This report includes a description of the
subsurface conditions found in our test holes, a recommended foundation system and
geotechnical criteria for it and construction criteria for details influenced by the subsoils .
Our report was prepared from data developed during our field exploration, laboratory
testing, engineering analyses, and our experience. A summary of our conclusions is
presented below.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
1. Our test holes penetrated 1 foot of organic sands underlain by loose,
moist, silty sands underlain by medium dense, moist, clayey gravels with
cobbles and boulders, A sandy silt layer was found in the gravels at 1 O
to 16feet at ourTH-1 location. Free groundwater was not found in our test
holes the day of drilling .
2, We recommend founding the building with footings bearing on the
undisturbed natural, clayey gravels. A maximum soil bearing pressure is
presented in the 'Foundation" section.
3, Slab-on-grade floors can bear on the natural sands or gravels free of
organics or other deleterious matter.
4. A ground surface slope away from the building should be maintained at
all times to reduce wetting of below foundation soils .
SITE CONDITIONS
The Thompson Residence will be built in a subdivision of comparatively large
single family homes. Approximately six other houses had been built at the subdivision
at the time of our investigation. The subject lot is bounded by Battlement Creek Trail to
•
the east and Roan Creek Drive to the north. Ground surfaces are comparatively flat and
slope down to the southwest at grades measured and visually estimated at 2 to 6 percent.
Vegetation consists of native grasses and weeds, sage and some small pinon trees .
• PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
A large, single family residence with an approximately 4,400 square feet footprint
• is to be built. The building will be wood frame construction. The main part of the
building will be two stories tall, with a basement under the main part of the building.
Floors will be slab-on-grade. Foundation loads we assumed for our analysis were
• between 1,000 and 3,000 pounds per lineal loot along bearing walls and maximum
interior. column loads of 1 O kips. We should be informed if the actual construction or •.
loads are dlfferenNhan described above to allow re-evaluation of criteria recommended
• herein.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Our field manager directed test hole drilling at the locations shown on Figure 1
and obtained soil samples for testing in our laboratory. Summary logs of our test holes
are shown on Figure 2. Laboratory testing was performed on selected samples of the soil
to judge volume change characteristics and verify field classifications. Samples tested
represented the smaller grain size (maximum 2 inches in diameter) portion of the natural
soils. The larger gravels and the cobbles and boulders were not sampled.
Our test holes penetrated 1 loot of organic sands underlain by loose, moist, silty
sands underlain by medium dense, moist, clayey gravels with cobbles and boulders. A
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
sandy silt layer was found in the gravels at 1 O to 16 feet at our TH-1 location. Free
groundwater was not found in our test holes the day of drilling.
SITE EXCAVATION
We understand stte excavation for the basement will consist of approximately 8
feet deep cuts. Excavation for the basement should be possible with a front end loader
or backhoe. Fill may be required below exterior slabs-on-grade. Areas to receive fill
should be stripped of organic soils. Fill can consist of the on site sands or gravels free
of rock larger than 4 inches in diameter, organics or other deleterious material. Fill
should be placed in 8 inch maximum loose lifts at 2 percent below to 2 percent above
optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of the standard Proctor
maximum dry density ASTM D 698 .
Free groundwater was not found in our test holes. Depending upon cut depths
and the time of year water may be present and enter the excavation. If free groundwater
is encountered, we recommend excavations be sloped to sumps where water can be
removed by pumping. Excavations will tend to flatten to 2 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) or
flatter below the water table .
FOUNDATION
The building can be founded with footings bearing on the natural gravels. Footings
bearing on the natural gravels may experience 1-inch total settlement and differential
settlement of about 1/2 of the actual total settlement. Due to the granular nature of the
soils, settlements due to dead load will occur during construction and those due to live
3
•
•
•
. --.... ·-. ...
•
•
•
••
•
•
loads upon first application of live loads. Footings can be designed and constructed with
the following criteria:
1.
2.
3.
Footings bearing on the natural, clayey gravels can be designed for a
maximum soil bearing pressure of 4,000 psi. Material loosened during the
excavation or forming process should be removed from footing areas or
compacted prior to placing concrete;
Foundation walls for continuous footings should be reinforced top and
bottom to span undisclosed loose soil pockets. We recommend steel
reinforcement equivalent to that required for a simple span of 10 feet.
Reinforcement should be designed by a qualified structural engineer;
Minimum footing sizes are desirable. We recommend a minimum width
of 16 inches for continuous footings and at least 2 feet by 2 feet for
isolated column footings. Larger sizes may be required based on the
structural loads;
4. The soils beneath exterior footings should be protected from freezing. We
recommend footings be at least 36 inches below finished exterior grades.
The local building department should be contacted to verify required frost
protection depth .
FLOOR SLABS AND EXTERIOR CONCRETE
Lower level and garage floors will be slabs-on-grade. The organic sands should
be removed from below slabs. Organic soils are not suitable to support slabs-on-grades
or exterior concrete flatwork. Fill below concrete slabs can be with the natural sands or
gravels free of organics or other deleterious material. Fill should be moisture treated to
within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of
ASTM D 698. We recommend the following design and construction criteria for slabs-on-
grade !loo rs:
1. Slab-on-grade floors should bear on the natural sands or gravels free of
organic or other deleterious material or fill built with the same material;
2. Slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing
members with a joint to provide for free movement. Trench backfill should
4
•
.-
•
•
•
•
•
3.
4 .
be moisture treated and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard
Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698);
Plumbing and utilities below slabs should be pressure tested prior to
concrete placement and isolated from the slabs with sleeves;
Frequent control joints should be provided. We suggest using the
recommendations outlined by the American Concrete Institute (ACI).
BASEMENT CONSTRUCTION
Basement walls will be up to 8 feet high and will be subjected to lateral earth
pressure. These walls are restrained and cannot move, therefore, they should be
designed for the "at rest" lateral earth pressure. Assuming on-site soils will be used as
backfill, we recommend using an equivalent fluid density of 50 pct to calculate the lateral
· earth pressure. Backfill of the foundation walls should be moisture treated to within 2
·.
percent 0:-optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent of standard
--~--
Proctor maximum drj density (ASTM D 698) .
SURFACE DRAINAGE
Performance of foundations and concrete flatwork is influenced by moisture
conditions within the subgrade soils. Surface grading should cause rapid run-off of
surface water away from the building in all directions. The following precautions should
be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the construction is
completed:
1. Wetting or drying of the open excavation should be avoided;
2. Water should not be allowed to pond adjacent to the building. The ground
surface surrounding the building exterior should be sloped to cause rapid
run-off of surface water away from the building. We recommend a finished
ground surface slope of at least 12 inches in the first 10 feet;
3. Plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface
immediately surrounding the building. These membranes tend to trap
5
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
4.
LIMITATIONS
moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geotextile fabric
such as Mirafi or Typar can be used on the ground surface immediately
surrounding the building for weed growth control while allowing
evaporation to occur;
Roof downspouts, drains and other water collection systems should
discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Splash blocks or
extensions should be provided at all discharge locations.
Our test holes were spaced to obtain a reasonably accurate picture of the
subsurface conditions. Variations in the subsurface conditions not indicated by our test
holes will occur. We should observe the completed excavation to confirm the soils are as
we anticipated from our test holes. Placement and compaction of fill and backfill should
iJe observed and tested during construction.
Our report is based on conditions disclosed by our test holes, results of laboratory
testing, engineering analysis and our experience. Criteria presented reflects the proposed
building as we understand iL We should be advised if the final design differs from our
assumptions to permit us to re-evaluate our conclusions and recommendations.
This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and
skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing under similar
conditions in the locality of this project. No other warranty, express or implied, is made .
If we can be of further service or if you have questions regarding this report,
please call.
(3 copies sent)
6
• PROPOSED THOMPSON RESIDENCE
0686 BATTLEMENT CREEK TRAIL
BATTLEMENT MESA, COLORADO .-
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-PRClPDSEO
BUILCf!NG
FOOTPRINT
TD GRAND
JUNCTION
TH-1
•
TO GLENWOOD
SPRINGS nm ;u )> rn ~ rn ~ r;r rn ~ :;:
;u rn
)> z
~~ r
VICINITY MAP
ND SCALE
I
f-er
2
SCALE: 1. '~ = 50 I
• LOCATIONS OF TEST HOLES
Job No. GS-1493 Fig. 1
•
••
•
•
LEGEND: •
•
•
•
•
TH-1 TH-2
() ()
~) ,. :39/ I :c: ;,
• . .. .,._, . tJ '" . .
<lJ (])
~ '" r'"
17/12 ~ ;:::
j (I 1 ()
,.;::: ~
+'
0. "" <lJ n:
Q (])
r'"
15 ID/ 12
15
35/2
20
NOTES:
Organic sands, silty, loose, moist,
brown. (OL)
Sand, silty, loose, n10ist, brown.
(SM)
Gravel, clayey, silty with cobbles
and boulders, medium dense,
moist., brown. (GC)
Silt, sanely, very stiff, moist
tan, brown. (ML)
Drive sample. The symbol 17/12
indicates that 17 blows of a HO
pound harnmer falling .10 inches
were required In drive a 2.0 inch
O.D. sampler 1:2 inches .
Drive sample. The symliol l '.J/ 12
indicates that 19 blows or ;J 1 ·I()
pcrnncl lrnmmer falling 30 inches
Vl'l!re l'PCJllired to drive n 2.:l inch
0 D. sampler 12. inches .
lndic·ates hulk "'rnplc.
1. Test holes were drillecl on April
21, 1995 eit.h a four inch diam-
eter continuous flight power
auger .
2. No free l!roundwater was
found in .. our test holes the
day of drilling.
3. These Lest holes are sub-
ject. t.o the explanations,
1i1nit.alions and cone:lt1sior1s
as contained in this reporl.
SUM!v1AHY LOG."; OF TEST HOLES
I fob No. GS-1493
Fi". 2 ~
•
•
•
•
••
•
•
·•
•
l-·:::::::.::·:-:-:.:-:.:.] SLOPE ' ............... ,
PER REPORT jH ]
----~======-----r·: ............. ::.l= ~ ............... ·I r· ::::. ••••:·:·::::: \-r·: ....... :.::::.-::1 :l i .. -............. -io
t } :::.-:::::::::::::f. \ ·::::::::::-:-:-:-:.:-:~
\ ~BACKFILL' l{·t<>•)I \, L·: ::::::::-:-:-.. :-::-1
1 !" :::::-:-::1) :::::::::::!
'
\, BELOW GRADE WALL~ H ~H !
ENCASE PIPE IN WASHED t < :.:•:: :i SL~~~ \ CONCRETE AGGREGATE (ASTM i I
OSHA C33, NO. 57 OR NO. 67). :: ... ,
l EXTEND GRAVEL TO AT LEAST I . . :: l
\ 1/2 HEIGHT OF FOOTING. '· · ······ .-.. •
NOTE:
DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 INCHES
BELOW BOTIOM OF VOID AND FOOTING AT
THE HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE OOWNWARD
TO A POSITIVE GRAVITY OUTLET OR TO
A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE
REMOVED BY PUMPING.
PROVIDE PVC SHEETING GLUED
TO FOUNDATION WALL TO REDUCE
MOISTURE PENETRATION.
REINFORCING STEEL
PER STRUCTURAL
DRAWINGS.
\ ::·-.:::::::: :::.::.:-::1 \\ ! ' i L PROVIDE POSITIVE SLIP JOINT
1·· ... ::::;::.. i BETWEEN SLAB AND WALL. m:;,[:fi~ ~:~ 1 I +; i 7" L cwoe 'LA ··.BL... ~ ~~~~·.··~~~~i,,,,~~~~F:O:O~T:IN:G~O:R~PAO
2" MINIMUM
8'' MINIMUM
OR BEYOND 1 '1
SLOPE FROM BOTIOM
OF FOOTING .
(WHICHEVER IS GREATER)
4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED
DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD
BE LAID IN A TRENCH WITH A
SLOPE RANGING BETWEEN
1 /8 INCH AND 1/4 INCH DROP
PER FOOT OF DRAIN.
EXTERIOR FOUNDATION WALL DRAIN
JOB NO. GS-1493 FIG. 3
• • • • • • • ~-•
JOB NO. GS-1493
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RES UL TS
I
I
ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCQN;~INED PASSING PASSING '
I DEPTH NATURAL NATURAL SOLUBLE
HOLE I DENSITY LIQUID PLA.5TICITY COMPR 1:::SS1VE SULFATE N0.4 NO. 200 SOIL TYPE MOISTURE
I (FEET) LIMIT INDEX STR'.::NGTH (%) SIEVE SIEVE
' (%) (pd) (%) (%) .. (p' f) (%) (%)
f----;_1--r· 1-2 15'.7 23 3 78 SILT, SANDY (ML)
48 GRAVEL, CLAYEY (GC) ~---· i. _o ___ J ~"-., ·-----~------
=~ -~ -::_ -~ : t 23 2 89 SILT, SANDY (ML)
. .. ~-----~-·
26 11 50 CLAY, SANDY (CL)
~
=·== .: =-=~-=-t= .. ·=~-·-
1--·----1------
~---=-=~~--====<:£ . -~=== ·-•.
' r----------L-------------f---------..-.---------·
r------1'-------·
!
-
'
..
i I 1--·---
+·-·--··--· ..
'l---