HomeMy WebLinkAbout04603GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT
108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 4603
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Permit
Phone (970) 945-8212 Assesso 's rel No.
()j,t13.31)1'i3'oc1 ----Ncl. y
r "INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT This does not constitute
a building or use permit.
PROPERTY
Owner's Name -V IL,Cq'j -FAM jI—i I (JV•
System Location 1 D 1 C R He6 akrzSD0 DA i t
Legal Description of Assessor's Parcel No. 2L1 �� " 1DT"0?
SYSTEM DESIGN
o'DAL-c
Present Address I DW 1--Irt,233k.1 Phone
Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) Other
Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other)
Required Absorption Area - See Attached
Special Setback Requirements:
Date
Inspector!/ u
FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed)
Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Installation/ �/ �f
System Installer .,(� Cz e-C/`S
s.ear Z ..4 v "
Septic Tank Capacity uee'"- a' e/i' A -r1-71%% A10°7
i
Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name
Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface
Absorption Area
Absorption Area Type and/or Manufacturer or Trade Name
Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements
Other
Date Inspector
RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE
CONDITIONS:
1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage
Disposal Systems Chapter 25, Article 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revised 1984.
2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and
building requirements. Connection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and
Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action
and revocation of the permit.
3. Any person who constructs, alters, or installs an individual sewage disposal system in a manner which
involves a knowing and material variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of
permit commits a Class 1, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine - 6 months in jail or both).
White -APPLICANT Yellow- DEPARTMENT
GARFIELD COUNT%SEPTIC'PERMIy APPLICATION
108 8th Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601
Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 970-384-5003
www.Rarfield-county.com
1
Parcel No: (this information is available at the assessors office 970.9459134)
2. 463/0300084 Cfos/ditv, 6 ))
2
Building Permit #:
11214
Job Address: (if an address/has not been assigned, please provide Cr, Hwy or Street Name.&/City) or and legal description /j /'') / o
G�acyRoo //Ca 6a,7fQ/GYM Cocw , — /"ar•Cd / /'CPPV.Cog4J Xeincl,
3
Lot Size: Lo o: Block No: // Subd./ Exemption: / /_
E7aC ,atee/ i
4
W/09
Owner: (property owner) _
fiorditer a`Mr4/ f Fives -1 Ain*
Mailing Addres
/000 E///✓e fice-o .v
Cat ^4 cw de to !.J/& t3
Ph:
Alt Ph:
5
Contractor: p
TOCO6e0-Le-eljers Cma�sol+r e/ro..
Mailing/�Address
JQO. r' /e)71 Geo We Sit e.,"
Ph:
%C3 AZZ Cs
Aft Ph:
6
Engineer:
.nisi�(y ..vee•pv .G e C•
Mailing Address
S02 �lahvxr' Car%aon n/e
Ph:
70 * 03//
Alt Ph:
7
MIT REQUEST FOR: r O' New Installation- ( ) Alteration ( ) Repair
8
WASTE TYPE: ;(jewelling ( )Transient Use ( )Commercial or industrial )Non- Domestic wastes
( )Other — Describe
9
BUILDING OR SERVICE TYPE: ''Bui/e/.
G fri • Evn9Jq /4-57Number
,rr
of bed/6oms 7 I Garbage Grinder ( )Yes ' (04
10
SOURCE & TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: ( )WELL ( )SPRING ( )STREAM OR CREEK ( )CISTERN
If supplied by COMMUNITY WATER, give name of supplier: Tocc,AL/ o/'r e-4oman/a-le /Yilcrw-r7citie.f/
11
DISTANCE TO NEAREST COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEM:
Was an effort made to connect to the Community System?
YOUR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT WILL NOT BE ISSUED WITH OUT A SITE PLAN
12
GROUND CONDITIONS:
Depth to 1' Ground Water Table S Percent Ground Slope ,%
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
October 30, 2008
Iron Rose Ranch
Attn: Linda Randall
1000 Blue Herron Lane
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
5020 Counts, Road 154
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone: 970-945-7988
Fax: 970-945-8454
email: hpgeo@hpgeotech.com
Job No. 108 480A
Subject: Percolation Testing, Proposed Ranch Facilities, Perry Parcel, Mount
Sopris Ranch Road, Garfield County, Colorado
Dear Ms. Randall:
As requested by Paul Rutledge with Sopris Engineering, Hepworth - Pawlak
Geotechnical, Inc., performed percolation testing at the subject site. The work was done
in addition to our agreement for professional services to you, dated August 17, 2008. We
previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented
our findings in a report dated August 29, 2008, Job No. 108 480A.
Percolation testing was conducted near Apartment No. 1 and near Apartment No. 2. Three
percolation test holes were excavated at each site on October 21, 2008. The test hole
locations are shown on Figure 1. The percolation test holes were excavated adjacent to
previous exploratory borings (Borings 1 and 5). The subsoils encountered in the
exploratory borings below about 6 inches of topsoil consisted of silty sandy gravel with
cobbles. An 18 inch sandy silt layer was observed in Boring 5 overlying the granular
soils. Boring 1 was drilled to a depth of 6 feet and Boring 5 to a depth of 9 feet. Drilling
in the dense granular soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and
drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit in the bottom of the borings. No free
water was observed in Boring 1 and free water was observed in Boring 5 at 8 feet one day
following drilling. Percolation test holes were hand dug and soaked with water on
October 21, 2008.
Parker 303-841-7119 m Colorado Sprues 719-633-5562 e Siiverthorne 970-468-1989
Iron Rose Ranch
October 30, 2008
Page 2
Percolation testing was conducted on October 22, 2008, by a representative of Hepworth -
Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. The percolation tests were conducted in the silty sandy gravel
subsoils. The percolation rates varied from 10 minutes per inch to 40 minutes per inch at
Apartment No. 1 and were 8 to 13 minutes per inch at Apartment No. 2. The percolation
test results are summarized on Table 1.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Louis E. Eller
Reviewed by:
Daniel E. Hardin, pHs! _ 2 " 43 _
t 6/9191:1
FSS%....�EuGa
OMAL ko
muunpont
attachments Figure 1 — Location of Percolation Test Holes
Table 1 — Percolation Test Results
LEE/vam
cc: Sopris Engineering; Attn: Paul Rutledge
Job No. 108 480A
Gtech
APPROXIMATE SCALE
1" = 100'
PROPOSED
CATTLE PENS
EDGE OF
DRIPUNE
BORING 8
H: HAY BARN
HORSE PEN
BORING
HORSE PEN
ICLE WASH
BAY
A: VEHICLE
STORAGE
HOLDING
PEN
BORING 4
ISeANDON
EXISTING ROAD
TO PASTURE
G O S:
MAINTENANCE
SHOP
FUEUNG
STA
G2
ASAN 'ON
00 NG
ROADS t- ADE
ANi
RE -LAND APE
AQUADUCT
LEGEND:
D: HAY
EQUIPMENT
EXPLORATORY BORING 0
O PREVIOUS SUBSOIL ST DY, :/29/0
BRING
EXISTING
STRUCTURE P 2.
DON
SONG ROAD,
AND
RE LANDSCAPE
TO HIGHWAY 133
108 480A
~ LOCATION OF PERCOLATION Figure 1
Ha.Wart6—PaWIaR GeotecnnTaal TEST HOLES
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 1
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
APARTMENT NO. 1
)OB NO. 108 480A
HOLE NO.
-
HOLE DEPTH
(INCHES)
LENGTH OF
INTERVAL
(MIN)
WATER
DEPTH AT
START OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
WATER
DEPTH AT
END OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
DROP IN
WATER
LEVEL
(INCHES)
1 VI L
AVERAGE
PERCOLATION
RATE
(MIN./INCH)
P 1
36
5
Water added
10 1/2
9 1/4
1 1/4
13
9 1/4
8 1/4
1
8 1/4
7 1/2
3/4
7 1/2
7
1/2
7
6 1/2
1/2
6 1/2
6
1/2
11
10 1/4
3/4
10 1/4
9 3/4
1/2
9 3/4
9 1/4
1/2
9 1/4
8 1/2
3/4
8 1/2
8
1/2
8
7 3/4
1/4
P 2
36
5
Water added
8 3/4
7 3/4
1
8
7 3/4
7
3/4
7
6
1
6
5 1/4
3/4
5 1/4
4 3/4
1/2
4 3/4
4 1/4
1/2
10 1/2
9 1/4
1 1/4
9 1/4
8 1/4
1
8 1/4
7 1/2
3/4
7 1/2
7
1/2
7
6 1/4
3/4
6 1/4
5 3/4
1/2
Note: Perco ation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on
October 21, 2008. Percolation tests were conducted on October 22, 2008. The
average percolation rates were based on the last two readings of each test.
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 2
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
APARTMENT NO. 1
JOB NO. 108 480A
HOLE NO.
HOLE DEPTH
(INCHES)
LENGTH OF
INTERVAL
(MIN)
WATER
DEPTH AT
START OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
WATER
DEPTH AT
END OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
DROP IN
WATER
LEVEL
(INCHES)
AVERAGE
PERCOLATION
RATE
(MIN./INCH)
P 3
48
5
Water added
10 3/4
8 1/2
2 1/4
8
8 1/2
7
1 1/2
7
6
1
6
5
1
5
4
1
4
2 3/4
1 1/4
10 1/2
9 1/2
1
9 1/2
8 1/2
1
8 1/2
7 1/2
1
7 1/2
6 3/4
3/4
6 3/4
6 1/4
1/2
6 1/4
5 1/2
3/4
Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on
October 21, 2008. Percolation tests were conducted on October 22, 2008. The
average percolation rate was based on the last two readings of the test.
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 1
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
APARTMENT NO. 2
JOB N0. 108 480A
HOLE NO.
HOLE DEPTH
(INCHES)
LENGTH OF
INTERVAL
(MIN)
WATER
DEPTH AT
START OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
WATER
DEPTH AT
END OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
DROP IN
WATER
LEVEL
(INCHES)
L. VI L
AVERAGE
PERCOLATION
RATE
(MIN./INCH)
P 4
48
5
Water added
12 3/4
9 1/2
3 1/4
10
9 1/2
7 1/4
2 1/4
7 1/4
5 1/2
1 3/4
5 1/2
4 1/4
1 1/4
4 1/4
3 1/4
1/2
13
12 1/4
3/4
12 1/4
11 1/2
1 1/4
11 1/2
10 3/4
3/4
10 3/4
10
3/4
10
91/4
3/4
9 1/4
8 3/4
1/2
8 3/4
8 1/4
1/2
P 5
58
5
Water added
10
4 1/2
5 1/2
40
4 1/2
4
1/2
4
3 3/4
1/4
3 3/4
3 1/2
1/4
3 1/2
3 1/4
1/4
3 1/4
3
1/4
10 1/2
3 1/2
7
3 1/2
3 1/4
1/4
3 1/4
3
1/4
3
3
0
3
2 3/4
1/4
2 3/4
2 3/4
0
Note: Perco ation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on
October 21, 2008. Percolation tests were conducted on October 22, 2008. The
average percolation rates were based on the last two readings of each test.
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 1
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
APARTMENT NO. 2
JOB NO. 108 480A
HOLE NO.
HOLE DEPTH
(INCHES)
LENGTH OF
INTERVAL
(MIN)
WATER
DEPTH AT
START OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
WATER
DEPTH AT
END OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
DROP IN
WATER
LEVEL
(INCHES)
AVERAGE
PERCOLATION
RATE
(MIN./INCH)
P 6
42
5
Water added
9 1/2
8
1 1/2
10
8
6 1/2
1 1/2
6 1/2
5 3/4
3/4
5 3/4
4 3/4
1
4 3/4
4
3/4
4
3 1/2
1/2
10 3/4
9
1 3/4
9
7 1/4
1 3/4
7 1/4
6 1/2
3/4
6 1/2
5 3/4
3/4
5 3/4
5 1/4
1/2
5 1/4
4 3/4
1/2
Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on
October 21, 2008. Percolation tests were conducted on October 22, 2008. The
average percolation rate was based on the last two readings of the test.
September 17, 2009
Sue Mathews
Iron Rose Ranch
Perry Parcel Cattle Handling Facility
1000 Blue Heron Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
RE: As -Built On-site Wastewater System (OWS), Building "G" Iron Rose Ranch at the Perry Parcel
Cattle Handling Facility, Mount Sopris Ranch Road, Garfield Country CO.
SE Job No. 28152 Parcel No.246310300084 Garfield County Permit No.11214
Dear Ms. Mathews:
Pursuant to County Regulations, this letter provides documentation that the new Onsite Wastewater System (OWS)
recently installed is in general compliance with the permitted design. Sopris Engineering has documented the as -
built conditions of the constructed system. We have performed site inspections and as -built surveys. The system
was inspected prior to backfilling and after component installations were complete. The as -built conditions and
installation of the new OWS components is in compliance with the permitted design specifications for the system.
The System was installed in accordance with State and County Regulations; the design presented in the Sopris
Engineering design drawing, specifications and details, dated December 4, 2008. The septic tank was installed
adjacent to the northwest side of the house. A 1000 -gallon dual compartment concrete septic tank has been
installed with an effluent filter installed in the outlet tee. The tanks risers have watertight lids that rise to the newly
graded surface. The risers are 24" and provide access to the two tank compartments. A new gravity line from the
house to the tank was installed. A two-way was cleanout has been installed near the building.
The absorption field was constructed with 1 bed containing ,3 rows of 8 Elgen In -Drain units, for a total of 24 units.
The field is approximately 9' wide by 33' long These in -drain units are placed over 24" of select filter concrete
sand over scarified native soil, free of organic material and rocks over 3 inches in diameter. The sand filter medium
is approximately 246 sq ft. The Elgen in -drain units were installed at a level grade. A distribution box was
installed at the Northeast end of the field the box has adequate risers with the access lids at finish grade. The
distribution box allows for equal distribution between the three in -drain rows. The effluent is distributed along each
row of In -Drain units by individual, 4" perforated laterals placed over the centerline of the units. The perforations
in the distribution lines are installed at 5 and 7 o'clock to ensure equal distribution. A 4" observation peizometer
riser is installed from the bottom of the sand layer at the south west end of the distribution field. The peizometer is
a 4" PVC pipe with a threaded cap and saw slotted perforated to the top of the sand layer. The In -drain units are
installed per manufacturer's requirements. The treatment units, sand layer and distribution pipe is covered with
filter fabric. The bed has been backfilled with excavated material with a slightly mounded finish grade
approximately 18"-30" above the distribution pipe. The construction was completed utilizing specified materials
installed according to design. The constructed field is being re -vegetated and the mound provides positive drainage
off and away from the field. Attached is an as -built layout of the installed system.
502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax
(970) 704-0313
SOPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC
civil consultants
Sue Mathews
Building G
Perry Parcel Cattle Handing Facility
SE Job No. 28152
September 17, 2009
Page 2
OWS Operation and Maintenance
All components of the engineered OWS shall be inspected on a regular basis and be properly maintained.
The reestablishment of vegetative cover over the field and responsibility for operation, inspection and
maintenance of the system will remain with the Lot Owner or the owner's representative. The owner shall
periodically inspect the OWS and perform all maintenance and repairs as necessary to ensure that the
system is in good operating condition and performing as designed.
The OWS should require minimal maintenance. Several factors influencing the need for maintenance
include: actual wastewater flows versus design flows, the volume of kitchen/domestic waste (excluding
human waste and toilet paper), excessive household chemicals and other toxic liquids. The tank, sanitary
tees and effluent filter should be visually inspected bi-annually for clogging debris, damage, leaks, or other
potential problems. In general, for a properly utilized system, septic tanks should be pumped and inspected
every 2-4 years. The effluent filter should be cleaned every six months and at the time of pumping.
Absorption fields should be maintained with suitable vegetative cover and kept free of root invasive plants.
Positive surface drainage away from the absorption field should be maintained.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please call.
Sincerely,
SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC