Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.0 Correspondence & ConditionsBLOCKWICK EISENSTEIN KRAHENBUHL, LLC DAVID G. EISENSTEIN dge@bek-law.com , 2672 NORTH PARK DRIVE, SUITE 200, LAFAYETTE, COLORADO 80026 PHONE (303) 449-4400/ DIRECT (303) 443-4434 October 13, 2017 VIA email only to ghartmann@gar/7eld-caunty.cam Glenn Hartmann, Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Department P.O. Box 791 Glenwood Springs, CO 80306 RE: Zurcher ADU(GAPA-04-16 8444) Dear Glenn: I am writing to you on behalf of my client, Antonia Zurcher, to explain that the BLM Right of Way grant provided to her as reflected in the documents I previously provided to you is the only and the best "easement" that can be provided to a private property owner from the BLM to confirm access over and use of the federal lands in question. The Right of Way grant from the BLM authorizes Ms. Zurcher to use the "public land" for the driveway that has been in a place, as we have discussed, for many years, at least since the original farm house was constructed on the property. The federal laws and regulations governing the granting of these kinds of rights of use do not allow a conveyance in fee or a permanent easement to be granted. Rather the grant of use, in this case in the form of a Right of Way grant, is for a specified term. The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), is the federal law governing the BLM's authority and ability, among other things, to grant rights of way over federal lands. FLPMA requires a right of way grant be limited to "a reasonable term in light of all circumstances concerning the project." The grant of the right of way must also specify whether it is or is not renewable and the terms and conditions applicable to the renewal. See FLPMA, Section 504 (43 U.S.C. 1764). As per the BLM Manual governing terms and conditions applicable to FLPMA grants: "[t]he term of each grant shall be specific and is primarily dependent upon a reasonable period needed to accomplish the purpose of the authorization" and "no term should exceed 30 years" except for certain specific instances that are not applicable to this situation, such as grants to governments for highways and roads, reciprocal grants, and where lands are being transferred out of federal ownership. Glenn Hartmann From: David Eisenstein <dge@bek-Iaw.com> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 11:55 AM To: Glenn Hartmann Cc: bridger smith; Toni Zurcher Subject: Zurcher ADU (GAPA-04-16-8444) Attachments: BLM letter to Zurcher approving ROW Grant, signed 9.21.2017.pdf; Zurcher ROW Grant, signed 9-21-2017.pdf Importance: High Dear Glenn: Attached are copies the approval letter and right of way grant from the BLM. The attached documents constitute "documentation of an easement granted from the Bureau of Land Management for the existing access driveway shown on the site plan" and are provided to satisfy Condition 6 of the Decision by the Director of the Garfield County Community Development Department regarding the above referenced application. Please provide these documents to the County Attorney for review and acceptance as provided in Condition 6. I presume we have now satisfied all conditions of the Decision but please confirm that as soon as possible. Thank you for all your help in this process. Sincerely, David Eiienste z. David G. Eisenstein, P.C. Blockwick Eisenstein Krahenbuhl, LLC 2672 North Park Drive, Suite 200 Lafayette, CO 80026 Phone: 303-443-4434 (direct) Phone: 303-449-4400 (main) E-mail: dge@bek-law.com TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: Under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations, we are required to inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this email or any attachment hereto is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, either (i) for purposes of avoiding penalties imposed under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) for promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any tax -related matter addressed herein. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is attorney privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. 1 IN RL`PLY R! FLR TO: COC 78653 281001 United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Colorado River Valley Field Office 2300 River Frontage Road Silt, Colorado 81652 September 21, 2017 CERTIFIED MAIL 7015 0640 0006 5780 6621 RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED Antonia Zurcher 4110 County Road 243 New Castle, CO 81647 Decision Right -of -Way Grant Serial No. COC 78653 Right -of -Way Grant COC 78653 Issued Rental Determined Monitoring Fee Determined Enclosed is a copy of your right-of-way (ROW) grant, serial number COC 78653 which allows the use of public land for a access road. It was approved by the BLM on 9/21/2017. The advance rental for the ROW is determined to be $195.42 for the period from 10/01/2017 to 12/31/2047. BLM has received your advance rental for this period. All subsequent rental billings will be due at the beginning of the calendar year starting 01/01/2048. Future billings will be based on the rent schedule in effect at that time. The monitoring fee for this ROW is determined to be a Category 1, which is $123.00. BLM has received your monitoring fee. This decision may be appealed to the Interior Board of Land Appeals, Office of the Secretary, in accordance with the regulations contained in 43 CFR, Part 4 and the enclosed Form 1842-1. If an appeal is taken, your notice of appeal must be filed in this office (at the above address) within 30 days from receipt of this decision. The appellant has the burden of showing that the decision appealed from is in error. If you wish to file a petition (request) pursuant to regulations 43 CFR 2801.10 or 2881.10 for a stay (suspension) of the effectiveness of this decision during the time that your appeal is being reviewed by the Board, the petition for a stay must accompany your notice of appeal. A petition Foran 2800.14 (August 1985) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY GRANT/TEMPORARY USE PERMIT Issuing Office LLCON04000 Serial Number COC 78653 . A (right-of-way) (permit) is hereby granted pursuant to a ✓❑ Title V of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of October 21, 1976 (90 Slat 2776, 43 U S.0 1761), b. ❑ Section 28 of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920. as amended (30 U S C 185); c ❑ Other (describe) 2. Nature of Interest a. By this instrument, the holder Antonia Zurcher right to construct, operate, maintain, and terminate a Access Road on public lands (or Federal land for MLA Rights -of -Way) described as follows Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado T. 4 S., R. 91 W., sec. 35, SEI/4SEIW. receives a b The right-of-way or permit area granted herein is 20 feet wide, 30 less If a site type facility, the facility contains N/A acres feet long and contains 0.01 acres, more or c This instument shall terminate on 12/31/20-17 30 years from its effective date unless, prior thereto, it is relinquished, abandoned, terminated, or modified pursuant to the terms and conditions alibis instrument or of any applicable Federal law or regulation d This in trument❑J may piny not be rene‘Fcd. If renewed, the right-of-way or permit shall be subject to the regulations existing at the time of renewal and any other terms and conditions that the autheritcd officer deems necessary to protect the public interest. e Notwithstanding the expiration of this instrumcnt or any renewal thereof, early relinquishment, abandoment, or termination, the provisions of this instrument, to the extent applicable, shall continue in effect and shall be binding on the holder, its successors, or assigns, until they have fully satisfied the obligations and/or liabilities accruing herein before or on account of the expiration, or prior termination, of the grant. (Continued an page 2) EMs. n •..•.10-4•0 ©v ...of.-.. Colorado River Valley Field Office 7/1212017 COC 78653 Location 0 0375 0 075 1a 1.117r.'11 ■ nn 51 to SI OSLI UM 'WWII uv n.. r.q sa}ir Orm'1 .Y 1J 9! Y�11 nra 000111 GA vM.31e9111:1-rsa 1 VT0:1 wrn. T?.a t=xrJZS'1 r1.] nce u Am= [']y A77XlL7':Zb sm. m. cos cot row g(a1+R 8+1 rca.31' 7i'btl9A w mce 015 1:4,000 N STIPULATIONS. 1. The holder shall contact the Authorized Officer (AO) at least 180 days prior to the non- emergency anticipated start of any surface disturbing activities. It is the holder's responsibility to comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations existing or hereafter enacted or promulgated. The BLM will determine if any surveys or inventories are required. As necessary, the holder shall demonstrate compliance in writing, i.e., with surveys and inventories completed by qualified individuals, with the following laws including, but not limited to, the Endangered Species Act (if potential habitat is determined to be present), the National Historic Preservation Act, and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. Evaluations and inventories can be completed by BLM, or by the holder in order to meet the holder's schedule and subject to approval by the AO. Inventories may be time sensitive and may require US Fish and Wildlife Service concurrence, therefore this process could take longer than 60 days to complete. 2. Cultural Resources - Education/Discovery Stipulations. E. Pursuant to 43 CFR 10.4(g) the holder of this authorization or its contractor must notify the AO, by telephone, with written confirmation, immediately upon the discovery of human remains, funerary items, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony. Further, pursuant to 43 CFR 10.4(c) and (d), the holder must stop activities in the vicinity of the discovery and protect it for 30 days or until notified to proceed by the AO. F. The operator or its contractor is responsible for informing all persons who are associated with the project operations that they will be subject to prosecution for knowingly disturbing historic or archaeological sites, or for collecting artifacts. If historic or archaeological materials are uncovered during any project or construction activity, the operator must stop work in the area of the discovery that might further disturb such materials, and immediately contact the AO. Within five working days the AO will inform the operator as to the mitigation measures the operator will likely have to undertake before the site can be used (assuming in place preservation is not necessary). G. The holder shall notify the AO at least 180 days prior to non -emergency activities that would cause surface disturbance in the lease, ROW, or TUP. The BLM will determine if a cultural resource inventory, treatment, or mitigation is required. H. A "Notice to Proceed" stipulation shall be required for any non -emergency activities as defined above that would cause surface disturbance on the lease, ROW, or TUP. Any request for a "Notice to Proceed" should be made to the AO, who shall review the proposed action for consistency with resource management concerns such as wildlife, big game winter range, paleontology, threatened and endangered species, and cultural resource protection. Additional measures may be required to protect these resources. 3. Paleontological Resources — Discovery Stipulations. Page I 1 8. Prior to termination of the lease, the holder shall contact the authorized officer to arrange a joint inspection of the lease. This inspection will be held to agree to an acceptable termination and rehabilitation plan as necessary. This plan shall include, but is not limited to, removal of facilities, drainage structures, or surface material, recontouring, topsoiling, and seeding. The authorized officer must approve the plan in writing prior to the holder's commencement of any termination activities. 9. The holder shall be responsible for weed control within the limits of the ROW. The holder is responsible for consultation with the authorized officer and/or local authorities for acceptable weed control methods (within limits imposed in the grant stipulations) including pesticides/herbicides approved for use on BLM land. Use of pesticides/herbicides shall comply with the applicable Federal and state laws. Pesticides/herbicides shall be used only in accordance with their registered uses and within limitations imposed by the Secretary of the Interior. Prior to the use of pesticides/herbicides, the holder shall obtain from the authorized officer written approval of the applicant's plan showing the type and quantity of material to be used, pest(s) to be controlled, method of application, location of storage and disposal of containers, and any other information deemed necessary by the authorized officer. The plan should be submitted no later than March 1 of any calendar year to cover the proposed activities for the next growing season. Emergency use of pesticides/herbicides shall be approved in writing by the authorized officer prior to such use. 10. As directed by the authorized officer, all road segments shall be winterized by providing a well -drained roadway by water barring, maintaining drainage, and any additional measures necessary to minimize erosion and other damage to the roadway or the surrounding public lands. 11. The holder shall seed all disturbed areas with the seed mixture(s) listed below. The seed mixture(s) shall be planted in the amounts specified in pounds of pure live seed (PLS) per acre. There shall be no primary of secondary noxious weed seed in the seed mixture. Seed shall be tested and the viability testing of seed shall be done in accordance with State law(s) and within 12 months prior to purchase. Commercial seed shall be either certified or registered seed. The seed mixture container shall be tagged in accordance with State law(s) and available for inspection by the authorized officer. Fire Prevention and Control Stipulations 1. The Holder shall indemnify the United States for any and all injury, loss or damage to life or property, including fire suppression costs, the United States may suffer as a result of losses, claims, demands or judgments caused by Holder's use or occupancy of public lands under this grant or permit. 2. Holder shall maintain the lease in a safe, usable condition. Page 13 F. The duty to provide information upon request of BLM and/or its counsel concerning the construction, monitoring, inspection, maintenance and/or repairs of any of Holder's facilities located at or adjacent to a fire. G. The duty to provide information upon request of BLM and/or its counsel concerning the monitoring, inspection, and or alteration by Holder of any condition on public land, including but not limited to, public land adjacent to any of the Holder's facilities. H. The duty, during BLM fire suppression efforts: to defer to and follow the instructions of the BLM's Incident Commander regarding activities within the boundaries of the fire and checking in and out of the fire; and to recognize BLM's primary authority over the incident scene. Page 15 Glenn Hartmann From: bridger smith <smith.bridger@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 7:14 AM To: Glenn Hartmann Subject: 4110 county rd 243 Hey Glenn, how are we looking on fulfilling all requirements for the Zurcher ADU land use changes? We completed our final inspection on sept 22nd. and sent you everything that day as well from the BLM approvals I11 give you a call later today. thank you!! SMITHBUILT Po Box 8616 Aspen Co 81612 smith-built.com 970.379.9400 1 Glenn Hartmann From: David Eisenstein <dge@bek-law.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 6:36 AM To: Glenn Hartmann Subject: Zurcher ADU (GAPA-04-16-8444) Hi Glenn. Hope this finds you doing well and having a good summer. In follow up to the phone message I left for you last Friday, I would like to talk to you about whether there is a way to obtain a temporary CO for the Zurcher ADU. We have filed the Form 299 application with the BLM for a right of way over the BLM lands and I am told by the person at the BLM handling the application, Monte Senor, that there should not be any issue with receiving an approval, only that it takes time. Currently I am out of my office, on vacation with my family in Montana, but I will be back in the office tomorrow, Wednesday, 8/2/2017, and was hoping you might have some time to talk about this. Please let me know if you have some availability for a call on Wednesday. Thank you for your help. -david eisenstein David G. Eisenstein, P.C. Blockwick Eisenstein Krahenbuhl, LLC 2672 North Park Drive, Suite 200 Lafayette, CO 80026 Phone: 303-443-4434 (direct) Phone: 303-449-4400 (main) E-mail: dge@bek-law.com TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: Under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations, we are required to inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this email or any attachment hereto is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, either (i) for purposes of avoiding penalties imposed under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) for promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any tax -related matter addressed herein. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is attorney privileged and confidential information, It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. 1 August 2, 2016 Bridger Smith 381 Isabel Hay Road Aspen, CO 81611 RE. Zurcher ADU Application Update — Existing Site Access Conditions 4110 243 County Road, (aka Elk Creek Road), New Castle CO, Garfield County Dear Mr. Smith, Per Garfield County's Planning Department request, an onsite review of the existing access conditions is also required in addition to my site review letter, dated July 13, 2016 along with any non-compliant issues and recommendations. My site review of the existing access conditions conducted on July 28. The access drive between the County Road and the proposed new ADU access drive is approximately 200 feet in length. The asphaltic pavement surface varies from 9.0' to 11.5' in width and appears to be in good condition. The shoulders consist of an unimproved hard surface native ground a minimum of 1.5' wide. The driveway comes off the edge of the County road with an approximate downward grade of 13.4% transitioning down to 12.0% in a distance of 28 feet and then flattens to a grade of approximately 7% at the new ADU access. Surface drainage along this stretch of existing driveway appears to be a non -issue. Two trees, one on each side of the drive way, near the county road intersection, do impact a drivers visibility of traffic he approaches the County road. Traffic from a single family residence along with the proposed ADU typically generates 20 vehicles or Tess per day and would fall in the Primitive/Drive category column of Table 7-107 Roadway standards. Based on my site visit, the existing drive way complies with the minimum requirements stated in this column with the exception of where the driveway grade exceeds 12% over a distance of 28 feet as shown in the attached sketch and indicated in red in the following chart. Design Standard Primitive/ Driveway Existing Access Design Capacity (ADT) 0-20 20 Min ROW width [feet) 15-30 Single Lane 12 feet On Prope(no ROW) 8.5' Asphalt plus two 1.5' Native Shldrs = 12.0' Lane Width (feet) Shoulder Width (feet) 0 0 Ditch Width (feet) 3 Dash not necessary No runoff anticipated. Varies -Adequate n/a Cross slope 2% n/a Design Speed Minimum Radius (feet) 40 No Curves Maximum % Grade 12% Varies 13.4% 12% over 28 feet Surface Native Mat'l Asphalt + Native 923 Cooper Avenue, Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 I 970.945.5252 I www.bu-inc.com Bridger Smith Zurcher ADU Application Update — Existing Site Access Conditions August 2, 2016 Pager 2 of 2 I do request a waiver for the non-compliant road grade since I would not recommend any driveway grade improvements, since the drive is mostly asphaltic pavement surface and the drive grade only exceeds the 12% max grade by an average slope of 0.7% over a short distance length of 28 feet. However, I do highly recommend removal of any trees or brush along the County Road ROW within 50 feet from the drive way centerline for improved visibility. I appreciate the opportunity to complete the requested review. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or for additional information. Sincerely, BOUNDARIES UNLIMITED INC. a.�. '?01 1.4.E *&1113c -° 1908 Ift"G'i Pg -2 4 ', Bruce D Lewis, P.E. Project Engineer 923 Cooper Avenue, Ste. 201 1 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 1 970.945.5252 1 www.bu-inc.com Policy 01-14 Waivers for Roads and Demonstration of Compliance March 3, 2014 Section 7-107, Access and Roadways, of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code (LUDC) requires all roads to be designed to provide for "adequate and safe access" and reviewed by the designated County Engineer. The LUDC defines "road" as "a County road, State highway, public road, street or alley, or private thoroughfare which affords primary access to abutting property, excluding a driveway accessing a single property." The LUDC defines "private road" as "a right-of-way constructed, established, owned, and maintained by a private party for access exclusively to private property." Many of the roads in Garfield County are private roads in that they are gated and do not serve the general public and they pre-existed the design currently required by the County's Road Standards as defined in Table 7-107. The LUDC allows for the waiver of specific standards provided that the following criteria have been met: 1) an alternative design achieves the intent of the subject standard to the same or better degree and 2) the proposed alternative will impose no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific standard (Section 4-118). In applications that include roads that do not meet current County road standards as outlined in Table 7- 107, the County has asked that Applicants request a waiver of Section 7-107.F, Design Standards, and include in the Application submittal sufficient information, prepared by a professional qualified in the specific discipline, to demonstrate that they meet the criteria outlined in Section 4-118 for granting a waiver. In doing so, the application must include: A Statement of Adequacy - The evaluation of the existing roadway and waiver will need to include a clear statement that finds that the road will be adequate for the proposed use. This statement must be signed by a professional engineer qualified in traffic engineering and licensed by the State of Colorado. To support this evaluation, the following information will be required to be provided: o Geometry of the road — A description of how the private road does/does not meet the design standards in Table 7-107. This should include a chart that compares the private road design to those standards in Table 7-107, as well as a map that shows the existing road design and highlights those areas that deviate from the standards. A narrative may also be helpful in describing the characteristics of the road as they compare to Table 7- 107 design standards. Unless available, this is not intended to imply construction -level drawings. 1 1 P a g e o Safety/Structural Issues — A description of obvious safety and/or structural issues observed and a statement about how these issues will be addressed. o Maintenance — A description of how the road is and/or will be maintained. This should be supported with the submittal of any existing or proposed maintenance agreements for the road sections. o Travel Demand — An accurate count of the existing peak travel demand as well as the Average Daily Traffic on the road. This should also include the types of vehicles that currently use the road as well as the additional amount and type of traffic that the proposed use will generate through all phases of its development. Other Evidence of Compliance. In addition, Sections 7-107.A, B, C, D, and E are required to be addressed, which includes documentation about legal access. Sufficient evidence will be required to be submitted to demonstrate compliance with these sections of the Code. 21 P a ge July 13, 2016 Bridger Smith 381 Isabel Hay Road Aspen, CO 81611 C rvii Engin' SurveYing & 9eyond RE: Zurcher ADU Application — Site Access & Drainage Review 4110 243 County Road, (aka Elk Creek Road), New Castle CO, Garfield County Dear Mr. Smith, Per your request, I have reviewed your proposed site plans A1.01 & A1.02, revision date 7-10-16, for the ADU proposed at the existing home site located 17 miles northwest of New Castle at the above referenced address. It is my understanding that the County is requiring code compliance verification for the proposed ADU's driveway access and drainage. The site plan shows the ADU's proposed 2 -car garage to be serviced with a short 12' wide gravel driveway and turn around area. Our analysis, utilizing "AutoTURN" software, indicates that the proposed turnaround is adequate for two garage parked passenger vehicles to successfully back out from the garage and then drive out forward from the garage turnaround. The proposed culvert crossing under the turnaround area will convey intercepted surface runoff away from the garage area toward an existing drainage swale east of the turnaround. To the best of my knowledge the above referenced site plan complies with the driveway design standards referenced in "Table 7-107: Roadway Standards" in the Garfield County Code. I appreciate the opportunity to complete the requested review. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or for additional information. Sincerely, BOUNDARIES UNLIMITED INC. Bruce D Lewis, P.E. wC.:>-- . e�f Project Engineer / 1.y 923 Cooper Avenue, Ste. 201 I Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 1 970.945.5252 1 www.bu-inc.com August 2, 2016 Bridger Smith 381 Isabel Hay Road Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Zurcher ADU Application Update — Existing Site Access Conditions 4110 243 County Road, (aka Elk Creek Road), New Castle CO, Garfield County Dear Mr. Smith, Per Garfield County's Planning Department request, an onsite review of the existing access conditions is also required in addition to my site review letter, dated July 13, 2016 along with any non-compliant issues and recommendations. My site review of the existing access conditions conducted on July 28. The access drive between the County Road and the proposed new ADU access drive is approximately 200 feet in length. The asphaltic pavement surface varies from 9.0' to 11.5' in width and appears to be in good condition. The shoulders consist of an unimproved hard surface native ground a minimum of 1.5' wide. The driveway comes off the edge of the County road with an approximate downward grade of 13.4% transitioning down to 12.0% in a distance of 28 feet and then flattens to a grade of approximately 7% at the new ADU access. Surface drainage along this stretch of existing driveway appears to be a non -issue. Two trees, one on each side of the drive way, near the county road intersection, do impact a drivers visibility of traffic he approaches the County road. Traffic from a single family residence along with the proposed ADU typically generates 20 vehicles or less per day and would fall in the Primitive/Drive category column of Table 7-107 Roadway standards. Based on my site visit, the existing drive way complies with the minimum requirements stated in this column with the exception of where the driveway grade exceeds 12% over a distance of 28 feet as shown in the attached sketch and indicated in red in the following chart. Design Standard Primitive/ DI'iveway Existing Access Design Capacity (ADT) 0-20 15-30 20 Min ROW width (feet) On Property (no ROWj_ Lane Width (feet) Single Lane 12 feet 8.5' Asphalt plus two 1.5' Native Shldrs = 12.0' Shoulder Width (feet) 0 3 0 Ditch not necessary No runoff anticipated. Varies -Adequate Ditch Width (feet) Cross slope 2% Design Speed n/a 40 12% n/a Minimum Radius atttl No Curves Maximum % Grade Varies 13.4% 12% over 28 feet Surface Native Mat'1 Asphalt + Native 923 Cooper Avenue, Ste. 201 1 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 1 970.945.5252 1 www.bu-inc.com Bridger Smith Zurcher ADU Application Update — Existing Site Access Conditions August 2, 2016 Pager 2 of 2 I do request a waiver for the non-compliant road grade since I would not recommend any driveway grade improvements, since the drive is mostly asphaltic pavement surface and the drive grade only exceeds the 12% max grade by an average slope of 0.7% over a short distance length of 28 feet. However, I do highly recommend removal of any trees or brush along the County Road ROW within 50 feet from the drive way centerline for improved visibility. Base on the above findings and recommendations, the proposed driveway is adequate for the proposed use. I appreciate the opportunity to complete the requested review. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or for additional information. Sincerely, BOUNDARIES UNLIMITED INC. W,, -4 141x Etv Bruce D Lewis, P.E. Project Engineer 923 Cooper Avenue, Ste. 201 ( Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 1 970.945.5252 1 www.bu-inc.com i.-;tinpoockiti ('d/ vs? Z 11 z.. , } z y+ � is 2710-4 • � ' $fit el d � A v_p 1 AQUA TEC SYSTEMS, INC P.O. BOX 488 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 PH# (970) 984-0311 FX# (970) 984-0312 JULY 18, 2016 ANTONIA ZURCHER 4110 COUNTY ROAD 243 NEW CASTLE, CO 81647 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: WELL LOCATION: NEW CASTLE, CO, P#288085 THE WELL WAS PUMPED CONTINUOUSLY FOR 4 HOURS AT A CONSTANT PUMPING RATE OF &GALLONS PER MINUTE. THE TOTAL DRAW DOWN OVER THE 4 HOURS OF PUMPING WAS ,20'. THE WELL RECOVERED TO ORIGINAL STATIC IN 5 MINUTES. DATE OF TEST: 07/14/2016 APPROXIMATE STATIC WATER LEVEL; APPROXIMATE DEPTH OF WELL; 53' THE WELL RECOVERED TO 24,$' AFTER 5 MINUTES HORSE POWER OF PUMP: .75 HP APPROXIMATE PUMP SETTING: 44' THESE TEST RESULTS CONFIRM THAT THE WELL AND EXISTING PUMP IS MORE THAN ADEQUATE TO SUPPLY THE HOME AND ADDITIONAL ADU. THE TEST DATA OBTAINED IS REPRESENTITIVE OF ONLY CONDITIONS OBSERVED ON THAT DATE AND DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR POSSIBLE SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN THE AQUIFER NOR LONGER PUMPING DURATIONS. R SPE TOM PLATZ STATE UC SE #1106 John W. Hickenlooper, Governor Larry Wolk, MD, MSPH Executive Director and Chief Medical Officer Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado STATE OF COLORADO Laboratory Services Division 8100 Lowry Boulevard Denver. CO 80230 PO Box 17123 Denver, CO 80217 303-692-3090 www.coloradostatelab.us Laboratory Results For Sample Number: ENV -2016008753-, Site ID/PWSID Site TONI ZURCHER Address 4110 CO RD 243 NEW CASTLE Site Description CollectionNum Customer ID 00002128 Customer Aqua Tech Systems P.O. Box 488 CO 81647 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Test Name Deluxe Colorado Package* iv -Arsenic, Total L _ Cadmium, Total Calcium (Carbonate) --Copper, Total Iron, Total Lead, Total Magnesium, Total iv -Manganese, Total L, Sodium, Total _ Uranium, Total 1Result <0.001 <0.001 150 0.0048 <0.003 <0.001 15 <0.002 1.2 <0.001 Zinc, Total 0.011 >Hardness Total 220 Nitrogen, Nitrate/Nitrite 0.48 ][Units -MCL Contact Phone Fax Email Collected By DAB Collected 07/13/2016 10:45:00 Received 07/14/2016 11:54:00 Reported 07/29/2016 00:00:00 Bottles 1 L NEUT,1 250NUT,1 250M,1 BACT Matrix Ground Water Field Fluoride Residual Chlorine Temperature at Receipt 19.8 RL I1Method Name Date Analyzed mg/L 0.01 0.001 EPA 200.8 07/21/2016 00:00:00 mg/L 0.005 0.001 EPA 200.8 07/21/2016 00:00:00 mg/L No limit 0.01 EPA 200.7 07/20/2016 establish€ 00:00:00 mg/L 1.3 0.004 EPA 200.7 07/20/2016 00:00:00 mg/L [0.3] 0.003 EPA 200.7 07/20/2016 00:00:00 mg/L 0.015 0.001 EPA 200.8 07/21/2016 00:00:00 mg/L No limit 0.02 EPA 200.7 07/20/2016 establishE 00:00:00 mg/L [0.05] 0.002 EPA 200.7 07/20/2016 00:00:00 mg/L No limit 0.1 EPA 200.7 07/20/2016 establishE 00:00:00 mg/L 0.03 0.001 EPA 200.8 07/21/2016 00:00:00 mg/L [5] 0.01 EPA 200.7 07/20/2016 00:00:00 mg/L No limit 1 Calculation 07/20/2016 establish€ 00:00:00 mg/L 10 0.05 EPA 353.2 07/18/2016 00:00:00 MRL - Minimum Reporting Limit. MCL - Maximum Contaminant Limit per EPA regulations. BDL - Below Detection Limit. H - Holding Time exceeded. Q - Quality Control limit exceeded. NT - No Test. Units: mg/L - milligrams per liter (ppm), ug/L - micrograms per liter (ppb), pCi - picoCuries LSD Internet Address: http://coloradostatelab.us Qualifier John W. Hickenlooper, Governor Larry Wolk, MD, MSPH Executive Director and Chief Medical Officer Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado Laboratory Services Division 8100 Lowry Boulevard Denver. CO 80230 PO Box 17123 Denver, CO 80217 303-692-3090 www.coloradostatelab.us Laboratory Results For Sample Number: ENV -2016008753 - STATE OF COLORADO Test Name ��Result ��Units jMMCL JjMRL JJMethod Name jlDateAnalyzed kalinity, Total 200 mg/L NA 5 SM 2320B 07/20/2016 00:00:00 mg/L no limit 5 SM 2320B 07/20/2016 establish€ 00:00:00 t,...„pH 8.2 N/A [6.5-8.5] NA SM 4500 -H+ -B 07/20/2016 00:00:00 L Solids, Dissolved 260 mg/L 500 10 EPA 160.1 07/19/2016 00:00:00 b.„ -Conductivity 440 uS/cm no limit 0.5uS/cSM 2510 B 07/18/2016 establishE 00:00:00 - Chloride 1.2 mg/L [250] 0.2 EPA 300.0 07/25/2016 00:00:00 L__ Fluoride 0.15 mg/L 4.0 0.05 EPA 300.0 07/19/2016 00:00:00 Sulfate 30 mg/L [250] 0.2 EPA 300.0 07/25/2016 00:00:00 L- Corrosivity-Langlier 0.45 Calculation 07/29/2016 00:00:00 Sodium Adsorption Ratio 0.04 mg/L Calculation 07/29/2016 ,, 00:00:00 Test Group -Total Coliform ug/L PA** Escherichia coli PA E. coli NOT ug/L SM 9223 B.2.b. 07/14/2016 DETECTED 00:00:00 Total coliforms PA Coliform ug/L SM 9223 B.2.b. 07/14/2016 ABSENT or less 00:00:00 Alkalinity, Phenolphthalein < 5 than one (<1), indicates a microbiologically safe sample Gross Alpha/Beta Package (Water)* Gross Alpha < 3 pCi/L 15 3 EPA 900.0 07/27/2016 00:00:00 Gross Beta < 4 pCi/L 50 4 EPA 900.0 07/27/2016 00:00:00 Comments: Water Package Interpretation HUMAN HEALTH Arsenic, Cadmium, Copper, Lead, Uranium, Fluoride, Nitrate/Nitrite concentrations are below EPA health -based standards. Iron, Manganese, Zinc, pH, Solids -Dissolved, Sulfate and Chloride levels meet EPA aesthetic -based standards. MRL - Minimum Reporting Limit. MCL - Maximum Contaminant Limit per EPA regulations. BDL - Below Detection Limit. H - Holding Time exceeded. Q - Quality Control limit exceeded. NT - No Test. Units: mg/L - milligrams per liter (ppm), ug/L - micrograms per liter (ppb), pCi - picoCuries LSD Internet Address: http://coloradostatelab.us Qualifier H John W. Hickenlooper, Governor Larry Wolk, MD, MSPH Executive Director and Chief Medical Officer Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado Laboratory Services Division 8100 Lowry Boulevard Denver, CO 80230 PO Box 17123 Denver, CO 80217 303-692-3090 www.coloradostatelab.us Laboratory Results For Sample Number: ENV -2016008753 - STATE OF COLORADO Hardness >80 mg/L. The water is hard and may cause scaly residues and soap scum, and decrease the cleaning action of soaps and detergents Based on these results, the water is safe for human consumption. CORROSIVITY -0.5 to 0.5 The Corrosivity Index is 0.45, which indicates that the water is nearly balanced (will not deteriorate plumbing or cause scale build-up) Registry Comments: MRL - Minimum Reporting Limit. MCL - Maximum Contaminant Limit per EPA regulations. BDL - Below Detection Limit. H - Holding Time exceeded. Q - Quality Control limit exceeded. NT - No Test. Units: mg/L - milligrams per liter (ppm), ug/L - micrograms per liter (ppb), pCi - picoCuries LSD Internet Address: http://coloradostatelab.us AQUA TEC SYSTEMS, INC. P.O. BOX 488 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 8/1/2016 ANTONIA ZURCHER 4110 COUNTY ROAD NEW CASTLE, CO 81647 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: RE: WELL PERMIT # 288085 ON JULY 29, 2016, WATER QUALITY TESTS WERE RECIEVED FROM THE COLORADO STATE LAB SHOWING ALL OF THE ITEMS TESTED FELL WITHIN THE MCL ESTABLISHED. ITIS MY OPINION THAT THE EXISTING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM IS MORE THAN ADEQUATE TO SUPPLY WATER TO BOTH THE HOME AND ADU IN THE FUTURE. IT IS ALSO, ASSUMED, THAT SINCE NONE OF ITEMS TESTED, WERE IN EXCESS OF THE MAXIMUM CONTAMINATE LEVEL (MCL), THAT WITHOUT FURTHER TESTING, ANY HUMAN CONSUMING SUCH WATER AS WAS SAMPLED FROM THE ABOVE WELL, AT SUCH DATE, WOULD THEREFORE, BE SAFE FROM GETTING SICK (ASSUMING THEY DID NOT HAVE SOME IMMUNE DEFICIE.NTCY). IT IS ALSO MY OPINION THAT SUCH A DETERMINATION SHOULD REALLY BE DONE BY A MEDICAL DOCTOR. COLORADO DIV.OF WATER RESOURCES LICENSE #1106 Glenn Hartmann From: bridger smith <smith.bridger@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 12:18 PM To: Glenn Hartmann Subject: Fwd: Zurcher Attachments: Cottage - A1.02.pdf; Cottage - A1.01.pdf; ADU Access.pdf; ZURCHER BACTERIA JUL 2016.pdf; ZURCHER NTL 2012.pdf; WT 4HR 1HR REC ZURCHER JULY 2016.pdf Hey Glenn, hope you had a great trip. i've attached the engineer's letter and the corresponding adjusted siteplans with notes that address item #5 on the conditions of approval letter - feel free to give Bruce a call if you have any questions or i can have him add additional info i needed. i've also attached the well pump test to address item #3 and i've attached what i've been given so far for item # 4 the water quality test, which is just the bacteria portion. Im wondering if we can move forward with a building permit with the condition that i get you the Colorado deluxe & the Alpha/Beta test portions by mid Sept. they take a very long time to complete apparently (see below - we submitted results July 14th) and that is the only thing that we're waiting on. Given that this well has been an actively used well with no issues and we completed a water quality test back in 2012 when Toni purchased the property with the a the national test laboratories, Ltd. and everything came back ok (see attached test from 2012) im hoping we can somehow move forward with our permit with the condition that we will get you everything as soon as the Colorado dept of health completes it. I would be happy to sign something that says we will bring the well up to the necessary standards if there are any negative results from the water quality test. I'll call you to discuss more and see if we have any options. I can print everything and add a formal letter and bring it all in if you like. But i thought i might be best for you to review and let me know if you need any additional info prior to coming into the office. thanks, Bridger Forwarded message From: <aquatecsystemsinc@rof.net> Date: Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:19 PM Subject: Re: Zurcher To: bridger smith <smith.bridger@gmail.coni> Bridger, I just got off the phone with Aberta from the Lab. She said whoever gets the samples did not let the chemist's know this was a rush. She is putting on the board now. She said if they get them to us by the 28th or 29th they would still be considered a rush. She also said the Alpha/Beta takes 2 months & that can't be rushed. I will get it to you as soon as I receive. Lisa Original Message From: "bridger smith" <smith.bridger@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 5:20pm To: acivatecsystemsinc@rof.net Subject: Re: Zurcher ok. thanks. do you have an examples of what your suppose to get? On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:45 PM, <aquatecsystemsinc @ rof.net> wrote: Bridger, So far this is all I have gotten. I have left a voice mail & emailed them again. I will let you know. Lisa SMITHBUILT Po Box 8616 Aspen Co 81612 smith-built.com 970.379.9400 SMITHBUILT Po Box 8616 Aspen Co 81612 smith-built.com 970.379.9400 2 ).\\71104: •�R-��" \ rr 1 t f = Existing ravel Driveway ti '` i .s�x'+Eg crx TD r ti ��4 olvez�+i SYSTEM y \ I • i, SES• y $Si0N WP 25 FT N (1500 • V L �rF`6FL.E,1 �-RStAEGEII FSNC:NG & • • . NAGE S WALE TO BE GARAGE zucisr R COMP ATB CUT AT n , EWAY r 4 vt pMa, ,1 I �i� f OMR fWAid A 964 11 DRAINAGE. EROSION CONTROL & UTILITY PLAN TA1.OL 1/0„_1. ZURCISERADU 4110 243 COUNTY ROAD NEW CASTLE, CO 81647 SITEPLAN 1. THE 0150150 CONDITIONS AND 0160/9335 5HINN ON RIE5E PLANS REPRESENT ACTUAL EXISTING 0090111095 AS ACCURATELY A5 105995, 800019R, IT IS THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NTRIFY IN THE FIELD ALL BENSONS AND CONDIRONE PRIOR TO DEM0111ION, INCLUDING BUT NOT 1611ED TO LOCATION OF UDURES, SEWER UFE5, WATER LINES, IRRIGAMON LINES AND ELEC199 91 5ERMCE. L 1NT O.MIR SIG lit VW OT DE, LANDSCAPE DRAMNCS OR SRECIF1CA1I0N5 ARE TO BE CLAMED 013 11E ARCHITECT OH LANDSCAPE DESIGNER BEFORE PROCEEDING 11111 THE WORK 0 ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY 595 ALL STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND ORIANPNCES AND SHALL BE PREFORMED TO THE HIGHEST STANDARDS OF CRAFIMANSHIP BY JOURNYMEN OF 1HE APPROPRIATE TRADE 6. CONTRACTORS SHAD PROTECT EXISTING TEES AGARIST DAMAGE DURING CON51RUC1ON. ROOTS OF EXISTING TREES MUST BE PROTECTED AGAINST EXCAVATION AND MGM A5 1306 03 DINSNE 101[ 0690002 ISSUE CATS_ •.7 1W REVISICN DATE: 7.10.11 SMITH BUILT w111360, YRmGEW SWIM '01 1.6.1119.61. T RD ASPER CO 016111 SmWMtlp®gmul,m Office: 970319.9100 DRAINAGE, EROSION CONTROL& UTILITY PLAN A1.02 ROPRRNDESCRmRON - wESSEEM s'muroal = 46 rr =sem ra ffi14.41a A ierar'imu. =.1.7r dc��rw�m•al r rs rrrb ����wr,xwaw _ `rurvte>r'�irwsamts. _ — _ =wyrew r ===== n PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1.0 116"=1' ZURCHERADU 41IC 243 COUNTY ROAD NEW CASTLE, CO 61647 SITEPLAN 1. THE EMISRNG EUNDIl10N5 AND DIMENSIONS SIOAN OJ THESE PLANS REPRESENT ACTUAL 0851141 CONDEMNS A5 ACCURATE), AS POSSIBLE IOWEAER, IT IS THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSBIUIY TO lfl6FY IN 1HE FIELD AL DIMENSIONS AND CO1DIRONS PRIOR TO DEMOIININ. INCLUDING BUT NOT UMIIED TO LOCATION OF UPLIPES, SEWER LINES, WATER LINES, 4111061106 LINES, AND ELECTRICAL MIKE 2. ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING 112E INTENT O 112E LANDSCAPE DRAMNG5 0R SPECIFICATIONS ARE TO BE CLAIM 'MIH 112E ARCHIICT OR LANDSCAPE DESIGNER BEFORE PROCFEL81 WITH 112E WORK. 11 ALL WORN SHALL COMPLY NM ALL STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND ORDANANCES MO SHALL BE PREFORMED TO 112E HIGHEST STANDARDS OF CRAFIMANSHIP BY JOURNYMEN 17 7t *moult i7+WE 4. CONTRACTORS SHALL 740101T EXISTING TREES AGAINST DAMAGE WRING CONSIRLICTON ROOTS OF RUNG TREES MST BE PROTECTED AGAINST EXO44811014 AND OIG0'G AS El AS STOVE TO 112E ELEMENTS. ISSUE DATE: 42216 �ISIMN DATE: 7.18.16 DATE: 1.16.16 SM1THBU1LT CONTACT'ARIDGER MINI 141114421.1641.1,61 ASP214 CO 61611 Se4154466106944,460 • Office 610376.9100 PROPOSED SITE PLAN A1.01 Laboratory Services Division 8100 Lowry Boulevard, Denver CO 80230-6928 Ph: (303) 692-3090 fax (303) 344-3008 CA1afa , https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/cdphe/lab of Public (Festal and Enrirannu ra Lab ID No. ENV -2016008753 SAMPLE SITE SAMPLE INFORMATION TONI ZURCHER 4110 CORD 243 Collected 7/13/2016 10:45:OOAM Received 7/14/2016 11:54:OOAM Reported Collected By DAB Matrix Ground Water CUSTOMER COMMENTS Aqua Tech Systems P.O. Box 488 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Contact Name Contact Phone Purpose Special PChlorine residual Payment Type Receive Temperature 19.8 Test Name Escherichia coli PA Total coliforms PA Result Method Name E. coli NOT DETECTED SM 9223 B.2.b. Colifonn ABSENT or less than one (<1), indicates SM 9223 B.2.b. a microbiologically safe sample If you have questions about this report, please call the Environmental Microbiology Lab at 303-692-3490 If you have ordered Chemistry Tests: Results will be finalized in 2-3 weeks, For more information contact Water Lab at 303-692-3048. LSD lnterent Address: http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/Ir/lrhom.htm Modification Date:7/15/2016 4203 l J Informational Water Quality Report Watercheck w/PO lient: Antonio Zurcher 4110 CR 243 New Castle, CO 81647 Ordered By: Aqua Tec Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 488 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602-0488 ATTN: Tom Platzer Definition and Legend 4I National Tes Laboratories, Ltd. Q utcaity water A 6571 Wilson Mills Rd Cleveland, Ohio 44143 1-800-458-3330 Sample Number: 830864 Location: Type of Water: Collection Date and Time: Received Date and Time: Date Completed: 4110 CR 243, New Castle, CO 81647 Well Water 9/17/2012 13:30 9/18/2012 09:15 9/26/2012 SP.e• 1444 170tily. This informational water quality report compares the actual test result to national standards as defined in the EPA's Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulations. Primary Standards: Are expressed as the maximum contaminant level (MCL) which is the highest level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are enforceable standards. Secondary standards: Are non -enforceable guidelines regulating contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as skin or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor,or color) in drinking water. Individual states may choose to adopt them as enforceable standards. Action levels: Are defined in treatment techniques which are required processes intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water. mg/L (ppm): Minimum Detection Level (MDL): ND: NA: ti Unless otherwise indicated, results and standards are expressed as an amount in milligrams per liter or parts per million. The lowest level that the laboratory can detect a contaminant The contaminant was not detected above the minimum detection level. The contaminant was not analyzed. The contaminant was not detected in the sample above the minimum detection level. The contaminant was detected at or above the minimum detection level, but not above the referenced standard. The contaminant was detected above the standard, which is not an EPA enforceable MCL. The contaminant was detected above the EPA enforceable MCL. r; �y These results may be invalid. Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level Microbiologicals Total Coliform by P/A Total Coliform and E.coli were ABSENT in this sample. Inorganic Analytes - Metals Aluminum ND mg/L 0.2 EPA Secondary 0.1 Arsenic ND mg/L 0.010 EPA Primary 0.005 Barium ND mg/L 2 EPA Primary 0.30 Nr Cadmium ND mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.002 • Calcium 64.6 mg/L -- 2.0 Chromium ND mg/L 0.1 EPA Primary 0.010 Copper 0.010 mg/L 1.3 EPA Action Level 0.004 • Iron 0.024 mg/L 0.3 EPA Secondary 0.020 -® Lead ND mg/L 0.015 EPA Action Level 0.002 Li Magnesium 15.70 mg/L -- 0.10 Manganese ND mg/L 0.05 EPA Secondary 0.004 V Mercury ND mg/L 0.002 EPA Primary 0.001 V Nickel ND mg/L -- 0.020 Potassium ND mg/L 1.0 Selenium ND mg/L 0.05 EPA Primary 0.020 • Silica 5.4 mg/L — 0.1 Silver ND mg/L 0.100 EPA Secondary 0.002 Sodium 1 mg/L -- 1 Zinc 0.018 mg/L 5 EPA Secondary 0.004 Physical Factors Alkalinity (Total as CaCO3) 180 mg/L -- 20 Hardness 230 mg/L 100 NTL Internal 10 pH 7.2 pH Units 6.5 to 8.5 EPA Secondary • Total Dissolved Solids 250 mg/L 500 EPA Secondary 20 • Turbidity 0.2 NTU 1.0 EPA Action Level 0.1 Page 2 of 6 9/26/2012 3:24:52 PM Product: Watercheck w/PO Sample: 830864 Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level Inorganic Analytes - Other V Chloride ND mg/L 250 EPA Secondary 5.0 Fluoride ND mg/L 4.0 EPA Primary 0.5 oer Nitrate as N ND mg/L 10 EPA Primary 0.5 % Nitrite as N ND mg/L 1 EPA Primary 0.5 Ortho Phosphate ND mg/L 2.0 • Sulfate 55.0 mg/L 250 EPA Secondary 5.0 Organic Analytes - Trihalomethanes • Bromodichloromethane ND mg/L -- 0.002 Bromoform ND mg/L -- 0.004 Ntr Chloroform ND mg/L 0.002 Dibromochloromethane ND mg/L -- 0.004 Total THMs ND mg/L 0.080 EPA Primary 0.002 Organic Analytes - Volatiles • 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND mg/L -- 0.002 4". 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND mg/L 0.2 EPA Primary 0.001 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND mg/L 0.002 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.002 1,1-Dichloroethane .er 1,1-Dichloroethene ND mg/L -- 0.002 ND mg/L 0.007 EPA Primary 0.001 • 1,1-Dichloropropene ND mg/L 0.002 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND mg/L — 0.002 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND mg/L — 0.002 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND mg/L 0.07 EPA Primary 0.002 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND mg/L 0.6 EPA Primary 0.001 1,2-Dichloroethane ND mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.001 1,2-Dichloropropane ND mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.002 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene Page 3 of 6 9/26/2012 3:24:52 PM ND mg/L -- 0.001 Product: Watercheck w/PO Sample: 830864 Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min Detection Level - 1 1,3-Dichloropropane ND mg/L -- 0.002 .1 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND mg/L 0.075 EPA Primary 0.001 rr 2,2-Dichloropropane ND mg/L 0.002 2-Chlorotoluene ND mg/L 0.001 .� 4-Chlorotoluene ND mg/L 0.001 Acetone ND mg/L — 0.01 41. Benzene ND mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.001 Bromobenzene ND mg/L — 0.002 ✓ Bromomethane ND mg/L — 0.002 Carbon Tetrachloride ND mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.001 Chlorobenzene ND mg/L 0.1 EPA Primary 0.001 Chloroethane ND mg/L 0.002 .� Chloromethane ND mg/L -- 0.002 .4( cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND mg/L 0.07 EPA Primary 0.002 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND mg/L 0.002 • DBCP ND mg/L -- 0.001 Dibromomethane ND mg/L 0.002 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND mg/L 0.002 Dichloromethane ND mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.002 EDB ND mg/L -- 0.001 Ethylbenzene ND mg/L 0.7 EPA Primary 0.001 Methyl Tert Butyl Ether ND mg/L --- 0.004 r• Methyl -Ethyl Ketone ND mg/L -- 0.01 Styrene ND mg/L 0.1 EPA Primary 0.001 Tetrachloroethene ND mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.002 Tetrahydrofuran ND mg/L 0.01 Toluene ND mg/L 1 EPA Primary 0.001 4• trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND mg/L 0.1 EPA Primary 0.002 Page 4 of 6 9/26/2012 3:24:52 PM Product: Watercheck w/PO Sample: 830864 Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min Detection Level trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND mg/L 0.002 'I' Trichloroethene ND mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.001 ✓ Trichlorofluoromethane ND mg/L -- 0.002 N( Vinyl Chloride ND mg/L 0.002 EPA Primary 0.001 se Xylenes (Total) ND mg/L 10 EPA Primary 0.001 Organic Analytes - Others 1 2,4-D ND mg/L 0.07 EPA Primary 0.010 1 Alachlor ND mg/L 0.002 EPA Primary 0.001 r/ Aldrin ND mg/L -* 0.002 Atrazine ND mg/L 0.003 EPA Primary 0.002 Chlordane ND mg/L 0.002 EPA Primary 0.001 Dichloran ND mg/L -- 0.002 • Dieldrin ND mg/L -- 0.001 ▪ Endrin ND mg/L 0.002 EPA Primary 0.0001 Heptachlor ND mg/L 0.0004 EPA Primary 0.0004 Heptachlor Epoxide ND mg/L 0.0002 EPA Primary 0.0001 Hexachlorobenzene ND mg/L 0.001 EPA Primary 0.0005 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND , mg/L 0.05 EPA Primary 0.001 Lindane ND mg/L 0.0002 EPA Primary 0.0002 Methoxychlor ND mg/L 0.04 EPA Primary 0.002 Pentachloronitrobenzene ND mg/L -- 0.002 Silvex 2,4,5 -TP ND mg/L 0.05 EPA Primary 0.005 Simazine ND mg/L 0.004 EPA Primary 0.002 NOir Total PCBs ND mg/L 0.0005 EPA Primary 0.0005 Toxaphene ND mg/L 0.003 EPA Primary 0.001 Trifluralin ND mg/L 0.002 Page 5 of 6 9/26/2012 3:24:52 PM Product: Watercheck w/PO Sample: 830864 Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level We certify that the analyses performed for this report are accurate, and that the laboratory test were conducted by methods approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or variations of these EPA methods. These test results are intended to be used for informational purposes only and may not be used for regulatory compliance. National Testing Laboratories, Ltd. NATIONAL TESTING LABORATORIES, LTD Page 6 of 6 9/26/2012 3:24:52 PM Product: Watercheck w/PO Sample: 830864