HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application•
NAUGLE /TRI-STATE
TRUCKING
Special Use Permit
Application &
Supplemental Submissions
•
•
•
Naugle Tri-State Trucking
Special Use Permit
Supplemental Submission
August 24, 2007
•
•
• LANID DESIGN PARTNERSHIP
918 Coc per Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
970-945.22461 Fax 970-945-4066
E-mail: -alist@Q.. ret. net
•
•
August 24, 2007
Craig Richardson
Building and Planning Department
Garfield County
109 Eighth Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: NauglefTri State Special Use Permit Application
Supplemental Informal ion
Dear Craig:
Attached herewith is an updated summary of the Tri-State Trucking operations, a new
sound analysis from Engineering Dynamics Incorporated (EDI) and a Revised Site
Plan/Sound Exhibit.
Last summer the projections .:or the scale of the Tri-State operations, as described in
the original application, were overly optimistic as compared to what has been
experienced since that time. Therefore, the attached summary was prepared with the
assistance of the Tri-State owners to provide a more realistic description of their
operations. This updated summary was used as a reference by the sound analysis
prepared by EDI regarding truck activity at the site.
The attached Revised Site Plan/ Sound Exhibit is submitted to document revisions to
the original site plan that were made to assure compliance with State Noise
Regulations. The plan revision was very simple. The area proposed for truck and
trailer parking and materials storage was reduced in size resulting in this activity area
being moved westward away from the boundary of the residential use property. The
reduction in this use area also reflects the revised Tri-state operations projections. This
plan also notes the location of the three sound measuring stations established by EDI.
The following is offered as an overview of the EDI report and as a reflection upon some
of the practical considerations for noise levels at this site.
The attached EDI report includes a summary of the results of sound measurements
taken at and near the proposed Tri-State site in mid July and scientifically projected
sound levels based on proven engineering formulas. The report documents how the
proposed Tri-State truck activities on the Tri --State property can be expected to comply
with the State noise regulations.
•
•
•
The EDI report describes that it was not possible to measure, from any of the three
Measuring Stations, the noise generated by a Tri-State truck entering or leaving the site
because the high dB level of 'the background (1-70) noise. Alternatively the report
projects theoretical noise levels that could be generated by a Tri-State truck located at
various distances from the truck. These projected noise levels do not take into
consideration sound reducing factors such as topographic elevation changes, character
of the ground surface, obstacles, wind or background noise.
Based on these projections, the report then discusses truck generated noise levels at
Measuring Station #3 where the truck dB levels were projected to exceed the residential
use area daytime limit as Tri-State trucks enter and leave the 1-70 ROW and travel
along the access drive to the subject property. As an entering truck moves along this
access drive, and thereby further from the residential use property, the noise levels at
the residential use property boundary will decrease. The reveres would of course be
true for a truck exiting the property. EDI was not able to confirm these projections when
they were at the site due to the high background noise from 1-70.
The EDI report compares the projected noise of a Tri-State truck to the average dB
level of the background noise at the location of the #3 Measuring Station which is the
measuring device location closest to 1-70 and the access drive. The majority of trucks
will leave the site and return during one hour peak periods in the morning and evening
(7:00 -- 8:00 AM & 5:00 — 6:00 PM). EDI's projections show that the loudest Tri-State
truck will theoretically create a noise level 2 to 4 dBs above the average of the
background noise readings during the morning peak and 4 to 6 dB above the
background average during the evening peak periods. The significance of this
comparison must be considered with the following paints in mind:
- The projected individual truck dB level was projected based on the loudest Tri-
State truck which has a base noise level that is 4 dBs higher than the quietest
Tri-State truck.
- The average background (I-70)noise during both peak periods exceeds the
daytime limit for residential use areas as defined by the State noise regulations.
- This point of access is also utilized by a number of other industrial scale trucks
entering and exiting the commercially zoned property, the industrial special use
permit site located to the west and a drill pad located on the residential use
property.
- It was not possible for EDI to measure the sound level produced by a passing
Tri-State truck above the background Interstate noise levels at Measuring Station
#3 or the other two Measuring Stations.
To bring the implications of this potential impact on the residential use property into
proper perspective, it is important to understand the potential frequency and duration of
the noise impact. Assuming 16 trucks leaving and entering the site each day based on
the Tri-State Operation Summary, the total elapsed time that the Tri -Sate Trucks take to
move between the Tri State property boundary and the 1-70 ROW in the morning and to
make the return trip in the evening is about 16 minutes or about 1% of a twenty-four
hour day. That time is of course split between the morning and evening peak hours of
• activity when the majority of the trucks are exiting or arriving at the site. There will be a
small number of trucks returning and exiting the site during the day and occasionally
after 7:00 PM. That additional traffic could conceivable increase the total period of the
impact by twenty-five to fifty percent. Even with these additional trips, the total period of
potential actual impact by the Tri-State trucks is relatively small (1-2 %) on any typical
day.
•
•
Should there ever be a concern by the owners of the adjacent residential use property,
the Tri-State trucks do have the option of using the existing drive located adjacent to
the 1-70 ROW that services both the commercially zoned parcel and the existing special
use permit site. That existing driveway (noted on the Revised Site Plan) enters the Tri-
State property about a thousand feet to the west. To fully utilize the existing drive, a
short section of drive would need to be constructed to access the proposed truck
parking and shop area from the west. Use of this driveway would further reduce the
time period in which the trucks could potentially impact the adjacent residential use
property since upon crossing the Interstate ROW the existing drive turns west, away
from the residential use property.
In my reading of the State Regulations, it seems significant to me that the noise level
impacts refer to areas of residential use, not zone districts. The area of the noise
impact projected by the EDI report is in the very comer of the residential use property
adjacent to an existing commercially zoned parcel. The residence of the owner of the
residential use property is located in excess of 800 feet east of the location of the
Measuring Station #3. Given the terrain conditions in that general area, the location of
an existing residential access drive, the location of the existing drive across the
residential use property that is used by industrial traffic and the proximity of 1-70, it does
not seem at ail likely that the southwest comer of the residential use property will be
used in a residential manner in the reasonably foreseeable future. The County of
course has the opportunity to revisit an issued special use permit should conditions in
the area or if the operational activities at the approved site change.
Although engineering projections indicate that Tri-State Trucks will exceed the State
limit for residential use areas in the southwest corner of the adjacent residential use
property, during much of the time at which these noise impacts are likely to occur,
background noise from Interstate 70 is at such a high level that the sound generated by
the loudest Tri-State trucks can not be identified above the background sound of
Interstate.
pc: Tri-State Trucking, Inc.
Tri-State Trucking
Industrial Truck Operations Summary — Rulison Site
July 2007
Typical Number of Industrial Scale Trucks Utilized 16
Typical Number of Industrial Trucks Parked Overnight On -Site: 15
AM Peak Hour of Activity — Majority of Trucks Exit Site: 7:00 — 8:00 AM
PM Peak Hour of Activity — Majority of Trucks Return to Site: 5:00 — 6:00 PM
Typical of Trucks Idling (500 RPM) at Any One Time
During the AM or PM Peak Hour of Activity 8
Typical Number of Trucks Running at 1,200 RPM at Any One Time
During the AM or PM Peak Hour of Activity 4
•
•
•
•
•
11
August 20, 2007
Land Design Partnership
Attn: Mr. Ron Liston
918 Cooper Avenue
Glenwood Springs. CO 81 601
Re: Tri-State Noise Assessment
Dear Mr. Liston:
di, engineering
e I dynamics
incorporated
Page 1 of 3
(V) 970-945-2246
(Fax) 970-945-4056
ran�7a landdesignpartnership.carn
EDI Job No. C3610
On July 17, 2007 Noise measurements were conducted at the planned Tri-State Trucking site located near the
Ruliston Exit from 1-70 in Garfield County, Colorado_ Noise monitors were positioned at three locations along the
eastern boundary of the property as shown on the map prepared by the Land Design Partnership. The noise
monitors were Quest Electronics Model M-39 and each monitor was set to measure and store in the memory of the
monitor the dB(A) slow response for each and every one (1)minute interval for the entire measurement interval.
The monitors were started at 5:00pm on July 17 and shut off at 10:00am on July 18, for a total run time of 17
hours. This measurement interval did include the hours when the truck traffic to and from the site would be the
maximum.
Besides the measurements taken with the noise monitors at the three fixed locations, measurements were taken of
truck noise. Four (4) trucks were used during these tests. They were:
1. Flatbed Kenworth
2. Flatbed Kenworth
3. Flatbed Peterbuilt
4. 5th Wheel Peterbuilt
Attempts were made to measure the noise emissions of the trucks as they entered and left the site at the
measurement location closest to the access road, Site 1. It was not possible to obtain meaningful data because
of the traffic noise coming from 1-70 and adjusting the data as stipulated in CRS 25-12-103§(9) in order to obtain
that component of the noise attributable to truck noise. Because of this situation, static and drive-by tests were
conducted as follows
Static Tests
The four tucks were parked side-by-side and all facing the same direction. Noise measurements were then taken
ata distance of 50 ft. in front of the trucks. The truck engines were first running at normal idle and then sped up to
1200rpm. Measured values were:
• All four trucks idle — 68.5 dB(A)
• All four trucks at 1200 rpm — 71.3 d8(A)
Drive -By Tests
Noise measurements were taken at a distance of 50 ft. from the side of the trucks as the trucks drove by at about
10 mph. The maximum dB(A) values were as follows:
■ 72 dB(A), 68 dB(A), 70 dB(A) and 70.8 dB(A)
These measurements, the static and drive-by tests, were not affected by the traffic noise from 1-70 or any other
sources because the measured dB values were more than 10 dB(A) above the background at the time of the
measurements. Also, the terrain between the trucks and the 50 ft. measurement location was flat and there were
no nearby structures that would produce reflections of the truck noise and increase the measured values.
Using these data, the noise levels at any other distance from the trucks can be computed and are presented in
Tables 1 and 2. It should be pointed out that these dB values at various distances do not include or are adjusted
for the effects of terrain or wind. That is, the dB values are what the noise level would be in a direct line -of -sight
between the noise source and receptor.
3925 south kalamath street • enalewood. coloredo 80110 • 303.761.4367 • Fax 303.761.4379
•
■ engineering
e 1 dynamics
incorporated
Mr. Ron Liston
August 20, 2007
Page 2 of 3
Now, the data presented in Table 1 are for the situation when all of the trucks are pointed towards the east. A
reduction of 5 dB(A) can be easily achieved by having the parked trucks pointing towards the north or south.
Doing so would reduce the noise of eight trucks from 47.9 dB(A) to 42.9 dB(A). Also there is the interaction
between the trucks of blocking each others' noise. This blocking effect, especially when there are four to eight
trucks parked, would be at least a 2 or 3 dB reduction.
Similarly, Table 2 presents the maximum drive-by noise using the highest levels of 72 dB(A at 50 ft.
Table 2
Truck Drive -By Noise Level
Table 1
Noise Levels in Front of Trucks — Parked Overnight On -Site
Idle at 500 RPM and 1200 RPM
Distance
50
Number of Trucks and Engine Speed
4 Trucks
8 Trucks
1200 RPM
Idle — 500 RPM
50 ft.
54
71.3 dB(A)
71.5 dB(A)
100 ft.
48
65.3 dB(A)
65.5 dB(A)
200 ft_
52
59.3 dB(A)
59.5 dB(A)
400 ft.
Site 3
53.3 dB(A)
53.5 dB(A)
600 ft.
55
49.7 d0(A)
49.9 dB(A)
761 ft
47.7 dB(A)
47.9 dB(A)
Now, the data presented in Table 1 are for the situation when all of the trucks are pointed towards the east. A
reduction of 5 dB(A) can be easily achieved by having the parked trucks pointing towards the north or south.
Doing so would reduce the noise of eight trucks from 47.9 dB(A) to 42.9 dB(A). Also there is the interaction
between the trucks of blocking each others' noise. This blocking effect, especially when there are four to eight
trucks parked, would be at least a 2 or 3 dB reduction.
Similarly, Table 2 presents the maximum drive-by noise using the highest levels of 72 dB(A at 50 ft.
Table 2
Truck Drive -By Noise Level
Side Line Distance — Ft
dB(A) Level
50
72
100
66
200
60
400
54
600
50.5
800
48
The measured truck drive-by noise level, as presented in Table 2, show that the noise level at the residentially
zone property adjacent to the access road would be 62 to 65 dB(A), if the access road were at the same level.
The access road is lower by about sixteen ft. and the barrier effect of this topography will reduce the truck
noise by about 3 to 5 dB(A) when the trucks were at that location. Another method of reducing truck noise is
to limit truck speeds to less than 5 MPH and at the same time engine speed to less than 500 rpm.
The measurements at the three (3) fixed locations; Sites 1, 2 and 3 show the statistical distribution as
presented in Table III.
Table 3
Statistical Distribution of Noise at
Exceedance Level —
Tri-State Trucking
dB(A)
50%
75%
90%
5%
10%
20%
Site 1
58
56
54
51
46
41
Site 2
55
54
52
48
44
39
Site 3
63
61
59
55
48
41
3925 south kalamath street • enalewood. coloredo 80110 • 303.761.4367 • Fax 303.761.4379
if engineering
dynamics
edi incorporated
Mr. Ron Liston
August 20, 2007
Page 3 of 3
The data presented in Table 3 shows the dB(A) values that were exceeded 5, 10, 20, 50, 75 and 90 percent of
the time during the entire 17 hour long measurement interval. The measured noise levels at Site 2 were lower
than those at Sites 1 and 3 ;}ecause the traffic noise from 1-70 was partially shielded by storage trailers and
other structures located to the west of Site 2.
The reduction of noise at Siwe 2 shows how noise barriers can be used to reduce noise. The one -minute noise
level records, which are attached to this report and show the noise levels at the times the trucks would leave
and return to the site. Of particular interest is the existing noise level at Site 3, which is the closest to the
access road and where the truck noise would be greatest. The averages are as follows:
Trucks leaving Site, 7:00-8:OOam 59 dB(A)
Trucks returning to Site, 5:00-6:00pm 57 dB(A)
These data show that during the hours that the trucks would be leaving and returning to the site that the
average noise level at Site 3 is 57 to 59 dB(A). This means that the existing noise level at Site 3 anc: at other
equal distances from 1-70 are in excess of the 55 dB(A) daytime limit for residential zones as defined in CRS
25-12-103.
If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact me at our Englewood office.
Sincerely.
ENGINEERING DYNAMICS, INC.
Howard N. McGregor, P.E.
Senior Acoustical Engineer
3925 south kalamath street • enolewood. coloredo 80110 • 303.761.4367 ■ Fax 303.761.4379
•
Naugle Tri-State Trucking
Special Use Permit
Supplemental Submission
April 10, 2007
•
•
LAND DESIGN PARTNERSHIP
918 Cooper Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
970-945-2246 / Fax 970-945-4066
E-mail: rblist@quixnet.net
April 10, 2007
Craig Richardson
Building and Planning Department
Garfield County
109 Eighth Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: Naugle/Tri State Special Use Permit Application
Supplemental Submission
Dear Craig:
Attached herewith are a number of documents that address the information deficiencies
• you identified on page 12 of your Staff Report (PC 03/14/2007). Specifically, the items
you listed are addressed by these attachments or have already been addressed by the
information submitted as Exhibits at the March 14th Planning Commission Hearing.
Following is a summary of the submitted information:
1. Legal Water Supply: See letter from Zancanella and Associates attached herewith.
This letter documents the issuance of a West Divide Water District contract to
providing legal water rights and the application for the conversion of the existing
exempt domestic well permit to a well permit based on the West Divide contract. On
the adjacent Teter Special Use Permit process, it was my understanding that the BOCC
approved that application conditioned upon the delivery of the well permit from the
State.
2. Potable Water: The letter from Zancanella and Associates submitted as an exhibit at
the Panning Commission Hearing described two alternative methods by which water for
human consumption could be provided to the site. The cline has expressed an intent to
utilize the bottled water option such as can be provided by an independent contractor
like Mountain Clear Water Company.
3. Compliance with Colorado State Noise Statute: See the letter report from
Engineering Dynamics Incorporated attached herewith.
4. Truck Wash Wastewater disposal: This topic was addressed by the letter submitted
as an exhibit. at the Planning Commission meeting by Sopris Engineering.
5. Site Rehabilitation: Attached herewith is a Rehabilitation Plan prepared by Sopris
• Engineering.
6. Weed Management: See the attached report from Andrew Antipas, Ecological and
•
1
•
Environmental Consulting, LLC.
7. SWMP: The Sopris Engineering letter submitted as an exhibit at the March 14th
meeting addresses this subject. Typical, l believe, the BOCC includes provision of the
actual permit as a condition of the approval of the SUP.
B.Wildlife: At complete wildlife report was submitted as an exhibit at the March 14th
meeting clearly stating the wildlife impacts are minimal.
Regards,
Ronald B. Liston
pc Harry & Rhonda Naugle
Bill Critton
P.G. Box 1908
1011 Grand Avenue
Glenwood Springs,
CO 81602
•
•
ZANC4NELL4 4140 4550cI4 TEs. INC.
ENGINEERING CQNSULT4NTS
April 10, 2007
Mr. Fred Jarman
Garfield County Planning Department
108 Eighth Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: Tri-State Trucking
Dear Fred:
(970) 945-5700
(970) 945-1253 Fax
We have prepared and submitted the attached well permit application for Tri-State
Trucking special use permit. The well is located in Area A of the West Divide
Conservancy District (see attached contract). The well will be covered by the West
Divide Temporary Substitute Supply plan until the well is adjudicated in the District's
batch adjudication program. The well was drilled and has been in operation for four
years without any adverse impacts to surrounding well as an exempt domestic well.
The only well within 600 feet that was entitled to an impact review has agreed to waive
the right to the hearing (see attached waiver). We anticipate that the revised permit will
be issued in a timely manner by the Colorado Division of Water Resources.
If you have any questions, please contact our office at (970) 945-5700.
Very truly yours,
Zancanella & Associates, Inc.
ral titAAZ PI% Z CCit tAQ-Ack
Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E.
Attachments
/cc: Ron Liston
z:\26000\264 1 4 critton, bill (rulison)Viston-wel permitting.doc
, COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
1313 SHERMAN ST, RM 818, DENVER, CO 80203
phone - info: (303) 866-3587 main: (303) 866-3581 fax: (303) 866-3589
http://www.waterstate.co.us
GENERAL PURPOSE
"Plater Well Permit Application
Review instructions on reverse side prior to completing form,
The form must be completed in black or blue ink or typed.
Office Use Only
Form GWS -45 (06/2006)
1. Applicant Information
Name at applicant
Harry Naugle
c/o Zancanella &
Mailing address
P.O. Box 1908
City
Glenwood Springs
Telephone #
(970) 945-5700
Associates, Inc.
............ .
State Zip code
CO 81602
E-mail (Optional)
crobinson@za-engineering.com
6. Use Of Well (check applicable boxes)
Attach a detailed description of uses applied for.
® Industrial
0 Municipal
® Irrigation
® Commercial
0 Other (describe):
2. Type Of Application
(check applicable boxes)
❑ Construct new well
❑ Replace existing well
O Change source (aquifer)
❑ Other:
kTi
Use existing well
0 Change or increase use
0 Reapplication (expired permit)
7. Well Data (proposed)
Maximum pumping rale
15
Total depth
85
gpm
feet
Annual amount to be withdrawn
4.7 CU
Aquifer
Trib, to Colorado River
acre-feet
3. Refer To (if applicable)
Wet permit #
254155
Designaled Basin Determination #
Waley Court case #
WDWCD No. 061214TST(a)
Well name or #
4. Location Of Prosed Well
County
Garfield
actioni Township N or S
SE 1l4 of the
Range E or W
NW iii
Principal Meridian
6 El El 95 ❑® 6th
tante of well from section lines {section lines are typically not property lines)
2,850 Fi. from ❑ N Il S 2,750 Ft. from ®E ❑ W
For replacement wells only— distance and direction from old well to new well
feet direction
Well location address {Include City. State. Zip) Li Chedc if well address is same as in Item 1
16605 Highway 6 & 24, Parachute, CO 81635
Optional: GPS well location information in UTM format You must check GPS unit for
required settings as follows:
Format must be L/TM
❑ Zone -12or❑Zone 13
Units must be Meters
Datum must be NADU
Unit must be sel 10 true north
Was GPS unit checked for above? ❑ YES
Easting
Northing
Remember to set Datum to NAD83
8. Land On Which Ground Water Will Be Used
Legal Description (may be provided as an attachment). Same as in item 5.
(If used for crop irrigation. attach a scaled map that shows irrigated area.)
A. # Acres Owner
Irrigation of trees only. Same as in item 5.
C. List any other wells or water rights used on mss land
Same as in item 5.
9. Proposed Well Driller License #(optional):
10. Signature Of Applicant(s) Or Authorized Agent
The making of false statements herein constitutes perjury in the second
degree. which is punishable as a class 1 misdemeanor pursuant to C.R.S.
24-4-104 (13)(a). 1 have read the statements herein, know the contents
thereof and state that they.are true to my knowledge.
Sign here (Must be original signalure) i pate
Print name & title 1-1
Naugle, owner
/-1e.)—(:,7
5. Parcel On Which Well Will Be Located
(PLEASE ATTACH A CURRENT DEED FOR THE SUBJECT PARCEL)
A. Legal Description (may be provided as an attachment):
The western portion of Parcel 217325100022, shown as parcel 3 on
the attached survey map.
B. # of acres in parcel • C. Owner
54 Harry Naugle
Will this be Lie only well on this parcel? ❑YES I�yNO (if no - list other wells}
ocation of proposed alternate not yet decided.
E. Stale Parcel ID# (optional): —�-
217325100022
Office Use Only
USGS map name
DWR map no. Surface elegy.
Receipt area only
WE
WR
CWCB
ropo
MYLAR
SB5 DN WD BA MD
•
600 FOOT WELL SPACING STATEMENT
I (we) Douglas and Beverly Teter state as follows:
1. 1 (we) own real property described as: in Section 25 , Township 6 South,
Range 95 West of the 6th P.M., in Garfield County, Colorado. Located
on my (our) property is(are) the following well(s):
Permit No. 254154
Permit No. 61348-F
2. 1 (we) have been apprized that, Harry Naugle , a present owner of a parcel of
land in Section - 25 , Township 6 South, Range 95 West of the 6th P.M.,
in Garfield County, Colorado has applied for a well permit to ad uses to a
well already existing on his (her) property. 1 (we) also understand that the
purpose of such well is set forth in the well permit application, and that I (we)
have reviewed the well permit application attached.
3. The location of the subject well is less than 600 feet from one or more of my
(our) wells.
By this statement I (we) are specifically waiving any objection to the issuance of a well
permit for the subject well, as set forth in the attached application, and would request
that permit issuance not be postponed or denied because of any concerns by the
Division of Water Resources or others that the proposed well permit will materially
affect my (our) well(s) or water right(s). I (we) also specifically waive any right I (we)
may have to participate in a hearing before the State Engineer pursuant to Section 37-
90-137(2), C.R.S.
Dated this C day of '24i/ , 2007.
Doug lasTeter
e "7:2-tr;
Beverly -Deter
• Z:\25000t26414 Critton, Bill (Ruliso060OWaiver-Teter.doc
WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT
.109 WEST FOURTH STREET P. O. BOX 1478
RIFLE, COLORADO 81650-1478
alkater@wdwcd.org Tel: 970-625-5461
wdwcd.org Fax: 970-625-2796
March 21, 2007
Tri-State Trucking
P. O. Box 7S9
Vernal, UT 84078
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Enclosed is your approved contract # 061214TST(a). Please read the contract carefully if you have not already done so, but
please especially note paragraph 2 concerning availability of water.
West Divide obtains its augmentation water from a number of sources and operates its water supply program pursuant to a
Temporary Substitute Supply Plan ("TSSP") approved annually by the State Engineer's Office. TSSPs are common for water
conservancy districts and West Divide has operated pursuant to a TSSP for several years with no significant reliability issues.
Federal policy relating to endangered species, environmental concerns, and forces of nature are always such that no source of
water can be guaranteed during any season or from year to year. Further, the State Engineer's Office periodically reviews the
icrgraphic area served by West Divide and has recently made a decision to reduce West Divide's Area A Service Area. While
structure is currently located within the West Divide Area A Service Area, the Division Engineer's Office could make
another adjustment to the Service Area in the future and your structure could fall outside the Service Area and be subject to
curtailment by the State Engineer's Office.
West Divide continues to make good -faith efforts to obtain alternative long-term supplies in an effort to make reliable and
predictable the water supply anticipated by your contract with us_ West Divide also continues to make good -faith efforts to
maintain its existing TSSP and keep its Area A Service Area intact. For most years, we expect to be successful in these efforts.
This water allotment contract may require you to obtain a well permit from the State Engineer's office. Once your well is drilled
you are required to install a measuring device and submit a meter reading to West Divide, upon request.
Non-compliance with measuring and reporting requirements are grounds for cancellation of your water allotment contract with
West Divide. This could result in action by the State Engineer which could prevent your further use of your well.
Sincerely yours,
Janet Maddock
Enclosure
cc Division No. 5 Water Resources wlenclosure
Kerry D. Sundeen, Hydrologist wlenclosure
t7Zancanelia and Associates, Inc_
•
Samuel B. Potter, President Kelly Couey, Vice President Robert J. Zanella, Secretary
LaVerne Starbuck, Treasurer Bruce E.Warnpler, Director
APPLICATION TO LEASE WATER FROM
T DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT
"est Fourtlm Street, P. 0. Box 1478, Rine, Colorado 81650
Contract # 061214TST(a)
Map #555
Date Activated 1111107
Fax: (970) 625-2796
Telephone: (970) 625-5461
I. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name Tri-State Trucking
Mailing address: P.O. Box 789
Vernal, UT 84078
Telephone: {4351 828-.0533
Authorized agent: Thomas A. Zancanella. P.E.
2. COURT CASE #'s: Decree Case No.
Augmentation Plan Case Na.
3. USE OF WATER
0 RESIDENTIAL (check applicable boxes)
❑ Ordinary household use Number of dwellings
❑ Subdivision: No. constructed units: No. vacant lots
❑ Horne garden/lawn irrigation of sq. ft
Method of irrigation. ❑ flood ❑ sprinkler ❑ drip ❑ other
❑ Non-commercial animal watering of anEll als
❑Fire Protection
❑ Evaporation: Maximum water surface to be exposed.
Description of any use, other than evaporation, and method of
diversion, rate of diversion, and annual amount of diversion of arty
water withdrawn from the pond:
Well Sharing Agreement for multiple owner wells must be submitted. If
greater than two owners, application auks( be made under a homeowners
atiQlion.
❑ COMMERCIAL (check applicable boxes)
Number of units: Total sq. ft. of commercial units
Description of use:
❑� INDUSTRIAL
Description of use: Office and shop for trucking opperation.
Tree watering.
Evaporation: Maximum water surface to be exposed. 0.00
Description of any use, other than evaporation, and method of diversion, rate
of diversion, and annual amount of diversion of any water withdrawn from
the pond:
❑ MUNICIPAL
Description of use:
❑ DIRECT PUMPING
Tributary:
Location:
4. SOURCE OF WATER
Structure: Well Structure Name:
Source: []Surface ❑Storage °Ground water
Current Permit # 254155 (attach copy)
5. LOCATION OF STRUCTURE
Garfield SE
County Quarter/quarter
25
Section
6S
Township
Distance of well from section lines:
2,850 ft from South line
2,750 ft from East Iine
NW
Quarter
95W
Range
6th
P M
Elevation; 5,200 ft above MSL
Well location address: 16605 Highway 6 & 24
Parachute, CO8 1635
(Attach additional pages for multiple structures)
6. LAND ON WHICH WATER WILL BE USED
(Legal description may be provided as an attachment.)
See attached maps.
Number of acres in tract: 54
Inclusion into the District, a1 Applicant's expense, may be required
7. TYPE OF SEWAGE SYSTEM
0 Septic tank/absorption leach field DCentrai system °Other
District name:
8. VOLUME OF LEASED WATER NEEDED IN ACRE FEET:
4.7 see attached table (minimum of 1 acre foot except augmentation
from Alsbury Reservoir where a lesser amount is allowed)
Provide engineering data to support volume of water requested.
Commercial, municipal, and industrial users must provide diversion and
consumptive data an a monthly basis.
A totalizing flow meter with remote readout is required to be installed and
usage reported to West Divide.
Applicant expressly acknowledges it has had the opportunity w review the
District's form Water Allotment Contract and agrees this application is
made purant and subject to the terms and conditions contained therein.
, 4-Q .
Applicant Signature
Applicant Signature
Application Date: /Q — S — Q f ,
ISSUED AS AREA B CONTRACT
YES X NO
Th ed portions of this form, except differentiated additions or deletions, have been approved and adopted by the West Divide Water Conservancy Distrix.
Form # WDWCD 050901 APP
Summary of Anticipated Water !!sage
n
0
E
ui 6 0000000
'Tham.bG in d
4
0
O
C
0
M ti O N O W N O
RR 000 0 0 0 0 0 N M 0
E S O b G 0 O 6 0 6 6 0
Q
G µµ yy
y T q 4 0 6 O 0 g O 6 6 P 0
240666500600 0 0
E
0
SO
b• @ '- 9 P 6 n m 4Zm YS n V
g 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 6 4
2'2.606,00 �aV
�NGG0��..
J LL � � •' r
d oo0000000000
0�
a
0 r r N [n �• to N 6 r
0000.-Nui 0ui1 e00
ry 644'43 n�+�.n n4 v`'i
- ' 0 0 6
0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0
w Eo 4000(01100 G 0 G 600
6 6 p o 6 6 6
6 W 4 S o o O O o o p p g 0
V O N C] 6 6 6 6 0 p 6 6 6 6 6
2
N
2
0 N N N N NN N N N NN00400p0400p60 6
666666606666
0
0
6
Q n
E c
,lemeameocamelm
n n
t!! o 000 a 0o
� G O 6 G
0
m
E7-6 1 4 h 0 N O? O o0 N to
m ee .- 6 0 G v <D !A n rp wl epi
0
N S h N 65 O tNv ubj N
N N
0-
D N N N r M n n chi N
N
N
ry006 N Y] W 0 n v 0)j
A06606606,;6060
X 0 4 4 Q+ V 2 g m m 2
• ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m
S nat
�
. t
N
z
q006.00.6006.0.
.06060006666
000600000600
i 2 c 0 6[ i 6 0 6 6 6 6 6
go
▪ 6 4) ON o 0 0 N
_,6660606066666
0
N
4)84a
U U []
CP
c
off°
co v
o
141
.8
Q.)
y �
Q.) cucu
+45
z
ko
ok
Name of Applicant:
Contract # 061214TST(a)
Map #555
Date Activated 1/1/07
WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT
WATER ALLOTMENT CONTRACT
Tri—State Trucking
Quantity of Water in Acre Feet
4.7 acre feet
Applicant, hereby applies to the West Divide Water Conservancy District, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado,
organized pursuant to and existing by virtue of C.R.S. 1973, §37-45-I01, et seq.. (hereinafter referred to as the "District") for an allotment
contract to beneficially and perpetually use water or water rights owned, leased, or hereafter acquired by the District. By execution ofthisContract
and the attached Appl ication, Applicant hereby agrees to the following terms and conditions:
1. Water Rights: Applicant shall own water rights at the point of diversion herein lawfully entitling Applicant to divert
water, which will be supplemented and augmented by water leased herein. If Applicant intends to divert through a well, it must be understood by
Applicant that no right to divert exists until a valid well permit is obtained from the Colorado Division of Water Resources.
2. Quantity: Water applied for by the Applicant in the amount set forth above shall be diverted at Applicant's point of
diversion from the District's direct flow water rights, and when water is unavailable for diversion pursuant to administration by the Colorado State
IlIngineer during periods when said direct flow water right is not in priority, the District shall release for the use of Applicant up to said quantity in
acre feet per year of storage water owned or controlled by the District. It is understood that any quantity allotted from direct flow, storage or
otherwise, to the Applicant by the District will be limited by the priority of the District's decrees and by the physical and legal availability of water
from District's sources. Any quantity allotted will only be provided so long as water is available and the Applicant fully complies with all of the
terms and conditions of this Contract. The District and the Applicant recognize that some of the District's decrees may be in the name of the
Colorado River Water Conservation District, and the ability of the District to allot direct flow right to the Applicant may be dependent on the
consent of the Colorado River Water Conservation District. If at any time the Applicant determines it requires less water than the amount herein
provided, Applicant may so notify the District in writing, and the amount of water allotted under this Contract shall be reduced permanently in
accordance with such notice. Rates shall be adjusted accordingly in following water years only.
3. Beneficial Use and Location of Beneficial Use: Any and ail water allotted Applicant by the District shall be used for
the following beneficial use or uses: industrial, municipal, dornestic and related uses, or commercial (except for commercial use from Alsbury
Reservoir and except to the extent that Ruedi Reservoir water may not be available for commercial as that term is defined on Page 5 of Contract
No. 2-07-70-W0547 between the United States and the West Divide Water Conservancy District). Applicant's beneficial use of any and all water
allotted shall be within or through facilities or upon land owned, leased, operated, or under Applicant's control.
4, Decrees and Delivery: Exchange releases made by the District out of storage from Ruedi Reservoir, Green Mountain
Reservoir, Alsbury Reservoir, or other works or facilities of the District, or from other sources available to the District, shall be delivered to the
•pplicant at the outlet works of said storage facilities or at the decreed point of diversion for said other sources, and release or delivery of water at
1
such outlet or points shall constitute performance of the Districts total obligation. Delivery of water by the District from Ruedi Reservoiror Green
Mountain Reservoir shall be subject to the District's lease contracts with the United States Bureau of Reclamation. Releases from other facilities
available to District shall be subject to the contracts, laws, rules, and regulations governing releases therefrom. Furthermore, the District hereby
pressly reserves the right to store water and to make exchange releases from structures that may be built or controlled by the District in the
future, so long as the water service to the Applicant pursuant to this agreement. is not impaired by said action. Any quantity of the Applicants
allocation not delivered to or used by Applicant by the end of each water year (October 1), shall revert to the water supplies of the District. Such
reversion shall not entitle Applicant to any refund of payment made for such water.
Water service provided by the District shall be limited to the amount of water available in priority at the original point of
diversion of the District's applicable water right, and neither the District, nor those entitled to utilize the Districts decrees, may call on any greater
amount at new or alternate points of diversion. The District shall request the Colorado Division of Water Resources to estimate any conveyance
losses between the original point and any alternate point, and such estimate shall be deducted from this amount in each case.
Water service provided by the District for properties located within the Bluestone and Silt Water Conservancy Districts is
provided pursuant to Agreements with said Districts. The Intergovernmental Agreement between the District and the Silt Water Conservancy
District, dated January 25, 2001, is recorded as Reception No. 575691, Garfield County Clerk and Recorder's Office. The Intergovernmental
Memorandum of Understanding between the District and the Bluestone Water Conservancy District, dated April 26, 2001, is recorded as
Reception No. 584840, Garfield County Clerk and Recorder's Office.
5. Alternate Point of Diversion and Plan of Augmentation: Decrees for alternate points of diversion of the District's
water rights or storage water may be required in order for Applicant to use the water service contemplated hereunder. Obtaining such decree is the
elusive responsibility of Applicant. The District reserves the right to review and approve any conditions which may be attached to judiciar
pproval of said alternate point of diversion as contemplated or necessary to serve Applicants facilities or lands. Applicant acknowledges and
agrees that it shall be solely responsible for the procedures and legal engineering costs necessary for any changes in water rights contemplated
herein, and further agrees to indemnify the District from any costs or losses related thereto. Applicant is solely responsible for providing works
and facilities necessary to obtain/divert the waters at said alternate point of diversion and deliver them to Applicant's intended beneficial use.
Irrespective of the amount of water actually transferred to the Applicant's point of diversion, the Applicant shall make annual payments to the
District based upon the amount of water allotted under this Contract.
In the event the Applicant intends to apply for an alternate point of diversion and to develop an augmentation plan and institute
legal proceedings for the approval of such augmentation plan to allow the Applicant to utilize the water allotted to Applicant hereunder, the
Applicant shall give the District written notice of such intent. In the event the Applicant develops and adjudicates its own augmentation plan to
utilize the water allotted hereunder, Applicant shall not be obligated to pay any amount under Paragraph 19 below. In any event, the District shall
have the right to approve or disapprove the Applicant's augmentation plan and the Applicant shall provide the District copies of such plan and of
all pleadings and other papers filed with the water court in the adjudication thereof.
6. Contract Payment: Non-refundable, one time administrative charge, in the amount determined by the Board of
Directors of the District from time to time, shall be submitted with the application for consideration by the District.
•
2
Annual payment for the water service described herein shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the District. The initial
annual payment shall be made in full, within thirty (30) days after the date of notice to the Applicant that the initial payment is due. Said notice
will advise the Applicant, among other things, of the water delivery year to which the initial payment shall apply and the price which is applicable
that year.
Annual payments for each year thereafter shall be due and payable by the Applicant on or before each January 1. Ilan annual
payment is not made by the due date a flat $50 late fee will be assessed. Final written notice prior to cancellation will be sent certified mail, return
receipt requested, to the Applicant at such address as may be designated by the Applicant in writing or set forth in this Contract or Application.
Water use for any part of a water year shall require payment for the entire water year. Nothing herein shall be construed so as to prevent the
District from adjusting the annual rate in its sole discretion for future years only.
If payment is not made within fifteen (15) days after the date of said written notice, Applicant shall at District's sole option have
no further right, title or interest under this Contract without further notice, and delivery may be immediately curtailed. The allotment of water, as
herein made, may be transferred, leased, or otherwise disposed of at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the District.
Upon cancellation of this water allotment Contract with the District, the District shall notify the Division of Water Resources
offices in Denver and Glenwood Springs. The Division of Water Resources may then order cessation of all water use.
7. Additional Fees and Costs: Applicant agrees to defray any expenses incurred by the District in connection with the
allotment of water rights hereunder, including, but not limited to, reimbursement of legal and engineering costs incurred in connection with any
water rights and adjudication necessary to allow Applicants use of such allotted water rights.
• 8. Assignment: This Contract shall not inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors or assigns of Applicant, without the
prior written consent of the District's Board of Directors. Any assignment of Applicant's rights under this Contract shall be subject to, and must
comply with, such requirements as the District may hereafter adopt regarding assignment of Contract rights and the assumption of Contract
obligations by assignees and successors. Nothing herein shall prevent successors to a portion of Applicant's property from applying to the District
for individual and separate allotment Contracts. No assignment shall be recognized by the District except upon completion and Fling of proper
forms for assignment and change of ownership.
In the event the water allotted pursuant to this Contract is to be used for the benefit of land which is now or will subsequently
be subdivided or held in separate ownership, the Applicant may only assign the Applicant's rights hereunder to: 1) No more than three separate
owners all of whom shall be party to a well sharing agreement satisfactory to the District; or 2) A homeowners association, water district, water
and sanitation district or other special district properly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Colorado, and then, only if such
parties, association or special district establishes to the satisfaction of the District that it has the ability and authority to perform the Applicant's
obligations under this Contract. In no event shall the owner of a portion, but less than all, of the Applicants property to be served under this
Contract have any rights hereunder, except as such rights may exist pursuant to a well sharing agreement or through a homeowners association or
special district as provided above.
Upon the sale of the real property to which this Contract pertains, Applicant shat i make buyer aware of this Contract and proper
arms for assignment and change of ownership must be completed.
3
9. Other Rules: Applicant shall be bound by the provisions of the Water Conservancy Act of Colorado; by the rules and
regulations of the Board of Directors of the District; and all amendments thereof and supplements thereto and by all other applicable law.
10. Operation and Maintenance Agreement: Applicant shall enter into an "Operation and Maintenance Agreement" with
ipie District under terms and conditions determined by the board of Directors of the District, if and when. the Board of said District determines in
its sole discretion that such an agreement is required. Said agreement may contain. but shall not be limited to, provisions for additional annual
monetary consideration for extension of District delivery services and for additional administration, operation, and maintenance costs; or for other
costs to the District which may arise through services made available to the Applicant.
11. Change of Use: The District reserves the exclusive right to review, reapprove or disapprove any proposed change in
use of the water allotted hereunder. Any use other than that set forth herein or any lease or sale of the water or water rights allotted hereunder
without the prior written approval of the District shall be deemed to be a material breach of this Contract.
12. Use and Place of Use: Applicant agrees to use the water in the manner and on the property described in the documents
submitted to the District at the time this Contract is executed, or in any operation and maintenance agreement provided by Applicant. Any use
other than as set forth thereon or any lease or sale of the water or water rights herein, other than as permitted in paragraph 8 above, shall be
deemed to be a material breach of this agreement.
13. Title: It is understood and agreed that nothing herein shall be interpreted to give the Applicant any equitable or legal
fee title interest in or to any water or water rights referred to herein.
14. Conservation: Applicant shall use commonly accepted conservation practices with respect to the water and water
hts herein, and hereby agrees to be bound by any conservation plan adopted hereafter by the District for use of District owned or controlled
ater or water rights.
15. Restrictions: Applicant shall restrict actual diversions to not exceed the contract amount for ordinary household
purposes, the watering of domestic livestock, fire protection, and the irrigation of lawn and garden as specified in the Application.
Applicant shall also comply with all restrictions and limitations set forth in the well permit obtained from the Colorado Division
of Water Resources.
Watering of livestock shall be restricted to Applicant's domestic animals not to be used for commercial purposes unless
Applicant obtains approval from the Colorado Division of Water Resources for commercial use/livestock watering, provided that in no event shall
actual diversions exceed the amount of water provided by this Contract.
Violation of this paragraph 15 shall be deemed to be a material breach of this Contract.
16. Weil Permit: If Applicant intends to divert through a well, then Applicant must provide to District a copy of
Applicant's valid well permit before District is obligated to deliver any water hereunder.
0 17. Measuring Device or Meter: Applicant agrees to provide, at its own expense, a measuring device deemed acceptable
the District's Engineer after consultation, or a totalizing flow meter with remote readout to continuously and accurately measure at all times all
4
water diverted pursuant to the terms of Applicant's water right and the terms of this Contract Applicant agrees to provide accurate readings from
such device or meter to District upon Districts request. Applicant acknowledges that failure to comply with this paragraph could result in legal
action to terminate Applicants diversion of water by the State of Colorado Division of Water Resources. By signing this Contract, Applicant
•erebY specifically allows District, through its authorized agent, to enter upon Applicant's property during ordinary business hours for the
purposes of determining Applicants actual use of water.
18. Representations: By executing this Contract, Applicant agrees that it is not relying on any legal or engineering advice
that Applicant may believe has been received from the District. Applicant further acknowledges that it has obtained all necessary legal and
engineering advice from Applicant's own sources other than the District. Applicant further acknowledges that the District makes no guarantees,
warranties, or assurances whatsoever about the quantity or quality of water available pursuant to this Contract. Should the District be unable to
provide the water contracted for herein, no damages may be assessed against the District, nor may Applicant obtain a refund from the District.
19. Costs of Water Court Filing and Augmentation Plan: Should the District, in its own discretion, choose to include
Applicant's Contract herein in a water court filing for alternate point of diversion or plan of augmentation, then Applicant hereby agrees to pay to
the District, when assessed, an additional fee representing the Districts actual and reasonable costs and fees for Applicant's share of the
proceedings. Applicant shall be assessed a pro -rata share of the total cost incurred by the District in preparing, filing and pursuing to decree the
water court case. The pro -rata share shall be calculated by dividing such total cost by the number of contractees included in the Fling. To the
extent that the District is caused additional costs because of objection filed specifically due to the inclusion of Applicant's Contract in the filing,
such additional costs may be charged specifically to Applicant and not shared on a pro -rata basis by all contractees.
20. Binding Agreement: This agreement shall not be complete nor binding upon the District unless attached hereto is the
4111trrn entitled "Application to Lease Water From West Divide Water Conservancy District" fully completed by Applicant and approved by the
istrict's engineer. Said attachments shall by this reference thereto be incorporated into the terms of this agreement. All correspondence from the
District to Applicant referring to or relating to this agreement is by this reference incorporated into this agreement as further terms and conditions
of this agreement.
2I. Warning: 11' IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO OBTAIN A VALID WELL PERMIT OR
OTHER WATER RIGHT IN ORDER TO DIVERT WATER, INCLUDING THE WATER ACQUIRED UNDER THIS CONTRACT. IT IS THE
CONTINUING DUTY OF THE APPLICANT TO MAINTAIN THE VALIDITY OF THE WELL PERMIT OR WATER RIGHT INCLUDING
FILING FOR EXTENSIONS OF PERMITS, FILING WELL COMPLETION REPORTS, FILING STATEMENTS OF BENEFICIAL USE, OR
OTHERWISE LAWFULLY APPLYING THE WATER TO BENEFICIAL USE ON A REGULAR BASIS WITHOUT WASTE.
22. AREA B. CONTRACTS: IF APPLICANTS WELL OR OTHER WATER RIGHT THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF
THIS CONTRACT IS LOCATED OUTSIDE "AREA A" AS DESIGNATED BY THE DISTRICT, THEN THIS PARAGRAPH APPLIES: THE
AUGMENTATION WATER PROVIDED BY THE DISTRICT UNDER THIS CONTRACT MAY ONLY PROTECT APPLICANT'S WATER
RIGHT FROM A CALL ON THE COLORADO RIVER AND MAY NOT PROTECT APPLICANT FROM A CALL FROM ANY OTHER
SENIOR RIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION OTHERWISE 15 MADE 13Y THE DISTRICT. IF THIS ISA CONCERN TO APPLICANT, THIS
CONTRACT MAY BE RESCINDED UPON WRITTEN NOTICE DELIVERED TO THE DISTRICT BY THE APPLICANT WITHIN THE
NEXT 30 DAYS FOLLOWING THE AFFIXING OF SIGNATURES ON THIS CONTRACT IN WHICH EVENT ALL SUMS PAID BY
iiiPPLICANT FOR THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REFUNDED TO APPLICANT.
5
-fi
:�L�.
Applicant
*TATE OF c_,: f:/7 ( )
ss.
COUNTY OF 4—i i;4 :
Applicant
The fore o" instrument was acknowledged before me on this day7 of tt►tt'tt�Iif:q
gff�g g A ►► _ r �, by
��I- �r'i-' . Witness my hand and official seal..Mycommission expires: by;fJ. Y / `' ., l.1,.:
4'e x -y C 1 --tc.,.- eta0TARr
Notary Public a `j"j°"R'�{ -
u -V' P V B L 1 . Q
e.
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
)
) ss.
The foregoing instrument was acknow€edged before me on this day of , 20 , by
Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires:
Notary Public
ORDER
After a hearing by the Board of Directors of the West Divide Water Conservancy District on the Application, it is hereby ORDERED that said
Application be granted and this Contract shall be and is accepted by the District.
•
WEST DIVIDE WATER CONS DISTRICT
By
President
U
_)/
Date e 4 tz_o .t e. � ! + I t)
This Contract includes and is subject to the terms and conditions of the following documents which must accompany this Contract:
1. Map showing location of point of diversion (use map provided)
2. Application and Data Form fully completed and signed
The printed portions of Ibis form, except differentiated additions or deletions, have been approved and adopted by the West Divide Water Conservancy District.
Form #WDWCD 050901 CONTRACT.
•
6
April 10, 2007
Tri-State Trucking, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Ron Liston
918 Cooper Avenue
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Dear Mr. Liston:
engineering
e d dynamics
incorporated
Page 1 of 2
(V) 970.945-2246
(Fax) 970-945-4066
rblist@quixnet.net
EDI Job No. C3610
On Tuesday, April 3, 2007, noise measurements were taken at the Tri-State Trucking Facility in Rulison, Colorado.
The purpose of the work was to determine by actual measurements the noise level at the property line of the planned
facility when there were trucks on site. The applicable law in Garfield County regarding noise emissions is the State of
Colorado Noise Law CRS -25-12§103, which limits the noise level at a point 25 ft. beyond the property line of the
property upon which the noise source or sources are located to the values presented in Table 1.
Table 1
CRS 25-12-103, Maximum Permissible Noise Levels
Zone
7:OOam to next 7:00 pm
7:OOpm to next 7:00am
Residential
65 dB(A)
50 dB(A)
Commercial
60 dB(A)
55 dB(A)
Light Industrial
70 dB(A)
65 dB(A)
Industrial
80 dB(A)
75 dB(A)
The property is bounded from northeast around to the west by rapidly rising terrain and probably will remain
undeveloped. To the southwest the property abuts to a parcel of land that appears to be an industrial operation
having trucks, truck maintenance equipment and heavy equipment storage. To the southeast, the site abuts to a
parcel of land that is undeveloped and could be used as either commercial or industrial. This property is impacted by
noise from U. 5. High 1-70, which runs along the entire southeastern boundary of the property.
The Tri-State facility will be used for parking and servicing of heavy trucks and based upon this panned usage it can
be considered to be classified as an industrial zone as defined in CRS 25-12-102§(4).
It is expected that there will be about twenty-five to thirty trucks or tractor trailer combinations parked at the site with
that concentration occurring during overnight. During the overnight operations some of the trucks will be running at
idle rpms, which for most trucks is 500 rpm. It was not possible to obtain a large number of trucks to simulate the
condition when the facility was fully occupied with trucks_ Three (3) trucks were used to conduct baseline noise
measurements, which were:
1. Kenworth, 2007, with Caterpillar 615 diesel engine.
2. Peterbuilt, 1982, with Cummins 400 diesel engine.
3. Kenworth, 1980, with Cummins 350 diesel engine.
The three trucks were positioned at about 200 ft. from the southeasterly property line (the existing fence line). During
actual operations most of the trucks will be parked about 550 to 600 ft. from the southeastern property line where the
noise test trucks were positioned.
During the noise tests the three trucks were operating with the engines running at 1200 rpm, which is a higher engine
speed then the idle speed of 500 rpm. So, running three trucks at 1200 rpm and at a distance of 200 ft. from the
southeastern property line was a reasonable representation of the maximum noise emission situation. The maximum
noise levels at the three measurement sites are presented in Table 2.
3925 south kalamath street • eng;ewood, coloredo 80110 ■ 303.761.4367 • Fax 303.761.4379
■ engineering
dyna
ernrarporated
Mr. Ron Liston
April 10, 2007
Page 2 of 2
cs
Table 2
Maximum Measured Noise Level at 25 ft. beyond the Property Line
Three Trucks with Engines at 1200 rprn and 200 ft. from Property Line
Site Location
Maximum Measured Noise Level--dB(A)
Existing Entrance at 25 ft.
56.5 to 545
Midway along Fence Line at 25 ft.
56.6 to 56.4
Southern Corner at 25 ft.
51.7 to 52.9
it is expected that during the early morning hours that there will be about fifteen trucks idling in the parking area
prior
to hauling out. Adjusting the measured noise levels for an increase in distance from 200 ft. to just 500 ft. would lower
the measured decibel values by 7.9 dB(A). Then adjusting the noise level for an increase in the number of trucks from
three to fifteen would increase the noise level by 6.9 d6{A). This means that in the morning the noise level at the
three measurement points, when there were fifteen trucks idling at 500 rpm and getting ready to pull out, would be
very dose to the dB(A) va4ues obtained during the measurements conducted on April 3, 2007 with three trucks
running at an engine speed of 1200 rpm.
If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact me at our Englewood office.
Sincerely,
ENGINEERING DYNAMICS, INC
' 4/ .
Howard N. McGregor, P.E.
Senior Acoustical Engineer
3925 south kalamath street • englewood, cola redo 80110. 303.761.4367 • Fax 303.761.4379
April 7, 2007
• Bill C:ritton
Tri-State Trucking, Inc.
P.Q. Box 789
Vernal, UT 84078
•
Re: Parcel 3 - Special Use Permit - Site Rehabilitation Plan
SE Job #: 26166.01
Dear Bili:
This letter is in reply to the Garfield County Staff Report (dated 3114107) requesting a Site Rehabilitation Plan that
should be submitted to the Garfield County Vegetation Management Department in regards to the Special Use
Permit Application for Parcel 3 of the Naugle Boundary Survey (in Rulison, Colorado).
Existine, Conditions
The site is just north of the Rulison exit (#81) on Interstate 70 and has direct access from the highway with very
little impact to existing traffic. Ground cover is comprised mostly of sparse sage and dirt with dry channels that
convey historic flows across the site. The soil type within the development area is classified as "Nihill channery
loam" per the National Cooperative Soil Survey web site. The existing site topography slopes toward the existing
72" culvert in the south -cast corner of the property: and drops approximately 60 feet from north to south, with an
average slope of 5% toward Interstate 70. Currently the entire site drains toward the southeast corner and then
follows existing drainage channels under interstate 70 to the Colorado River.
Proposed Development
The site will consist of a 9.4 acre truck and trailer maintenance and storage area including a 1 story structure with a
gross building area of 6,800 S.F. Potential future expansion includes a 1,520 S.F. detached truck wash, a 3.600 S.F.
shop expansion, and two 4,000 S.F. storage buildings for a total potential build -out of approximately 20,000 S.F. of
enclosed buildings.
During construction the existing topsoil should be stripped approximately 12" and stockpiled in a berm along the
northern edge of the proposed parking area. (See Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan for location). This
stockpile of topsoil shall be used to reclaim the site per the following plan.
Reclamation
Post -construction, the site will be vegetated and reseeded per the proposed landscaping pian. Final site reclamation
will be performed within one year of the business closure or discontinued construction. The purpose of reclamation
is to stabilize disturbed areas and establish a self-sustaining vegetative rangeland for cattle operations. Tri-State
Trucking reserves the right to modify this plan based on Best Available Technology at the time of rehabilitation.
Structure Removal
Buildings would remain in place but would be abandon in accordance with the regulation in place at the time of
reclamation. No live services would remain.
502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax
(970) 704-0313
•
Sorais ENGINEERING • LLC
civil consultants
•
•
•
SE. JOB 26166.01
April 10, 2007
Page 2
ropsoil Replacement & Grading
Reclaimed areas should be graded to match existing conditions and nut exceed a 3:1 slope. All existing drainage
channels must be retained or diverted to provide continuous uninterrupted flow to the existing 72" culvert in the
southeastern portion of the property. Topsoil stockpiles created during construction shall be redistributed over the
surface after any subsoil has been replaced and all grading has been complete. Grading and soil replacement should
not he done in wet and frozen conditions to avoid unstable soils.
Seedbed Preparation
Once the topsoil has been redistributed over the disturbed areas, soil should be tilled to a minimum depth of 4" and
all rock material that exceeds 4" diameter or larger shall be removed. If the topsoil is occupied by 20% or more
rock, than the rock shall be reduced to less than 20% of the surface area.
Seeding Methods and Times
Spring reseeding shall be performed prior to May 15th and fall seeding shall be performed after August 30th but prior
to soil freezing. Seeding will consist of drill seeding with a rangeland drill to a planting depth of l/" to `/2" on
slopes less than 3:1. If any slopes exceed 3:1 or are not accessible for drill seeding, then broadcast seeding and
hand raking of cover soil will be acceptable.
A certified weed -free straw or grass type mulch shall be applied within 24 hours of reseeding to all reclaimed areas.
Mulch shall be applied at 2 tons per acre for straw mulch, and 1-1/2 tons per acre for grass hay. Mulch shall be
crimped into the soil surface using a commercial mulch crimper, a straight disc, or bulldozer tracks (in areas too
steep to crimp in place).
Seed Mixture
The seed mix shall be a dry land mixture approved by Garfield County. The seed mix should provide adequate
long-term reclamation.
YatfG}y�eii;E-�
Principal Engineer
cc: Ron Liston
.41.141 ANDREW ANTI PASrc:afi�ccat asud L multerttaJ Con,u4.1ut LLC
11111
April 3, 2007
Ron Liston Landscape Architect
918 Cooper Ave
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Reference: Weed Management Plan
Tri-State Trucking, LLC
Rulison I-70 Interchange
Dear Mr. Liston,
April 2, 2007, I visited the above referenced site and inspected the site for listed noxious weeds in
accordance with Colorado's Noxious Weed Act and Garfield County's land use code. Due to early
season growing conditions, a thorough inventory of noxious weeds could not be completed. Therefore, a
second site inspection will take place in June of 2007. The weed management plan will be updated to
address control measures for any additional noxious weeds species identified at that time.
IIProposed Project and Landscape Setting
•
The project area is located north and adjacent to the Rulison exit of Interstate 70, which is approximately
9 miles west of Rifle, CO. The proposed project is to construct a truck storage, cleaning, and
maintenance facility on 8 acres of the 53 -acre parcel. The land is currently being used for cattle grazing.
The terrain is gently sloping north to south with some natural and man made drainage channels running
through it. The existing plant community consists of sagebrush, rabbit bush, greasewood, and saltbrush
consistent with semi desert shrublands.
Results of Site Inspection
During the April site inspection, the only noxious weed identified was Tannarisk (Tamarix spp).
Tamarisk, also called saltcedar, was found in three locations within the project area. The locations are
identified on the attached site plan. Tamarisk was introduced as an ornamental, but has become a serious
problem along riparian corridors in the west. It out competes native vegetation, lowers water tables,
increases salt content of soils, and makes for poor wildlife habitat. In addition to the Tamarisk, Mr.
Steve Anthony (Garfield County Vegetation Management) has identified Chicory (Cichoriurn intybus)
along the entrance drive to the site during the growing season. I did not see any chicory remains, but will
look for it during the June inspection.
V: 970.963.8297 • M: 970.948.3446 • F: 970,704.0305
0285 Crystal Circle • Carbondale, CO 81623
•
•
Recommended Treatment
One of the most effective ways of controlling Tamarisk is cutting woody stems close to the ground and
painting the cut stems within 30 minutes of cutting using the herbicide Pathfinder 2 or comparable
product. Due to the complexity and inherent danger of improperly used or applied herbicide, a
commercial applicator should be retained. Two contractors capable of treating the tamarisk close to the
project site are Outdoor Services (970-625-1002) located in Rifle, and Native Habitat (970-876-2776)
located in Silt. Tamarisk leaves emerge in April, and flowering starts in May. Tamarisk can be treated
any time of the year. However, it would be best to organize the treatment as soon as possible before
flowering and possible seed set occurs.
Best Management Practices
Noxious weed control is best done before the plants establish themselves. Noxious weeds invade new
sites when native plants and soils have been disturbed, which can occur due to construction, excessive
grazing, or flooding. Therefore, the earth disturbance "footprint" during construction should be kept as
small as possible. Temporarily disturbed areas will be reseeded with a Garfield County recommended
seed mix to prevent colonization of undesirable plant species. Hand pulling of weeds and spot
application of herbicide will likely be necessary during this time period. Once weed control has been
accomplished with a ground cover of native grasses, containerized native woody species can be added to
restore the plant community.
Summary
• Tamarisk (Tamarix spp) was identified in three locations within the study area. Tamarisk will be
treated as soon as possible by a licensed applicator. The project area will be checked regularly
over the next several years to insure effective control of Tamarisk. Additional herbicide
treatments will take place as needed.
• Best management practices will be utilized to minimize the earth disturbance footprint during
construction. Temporarily disturbed areas will be stabilized with a County approved grass seed
mix for weed control, which will be followed by the planting of native woody species. Hand
pulling and spot treatment of noxious weeds will take place during the growing season for the
next several years.
• A second site inspection will take place in June in order to identify noxious weeds that were not
present in early April. The Weed Management Plan will be revised to identify noxious weed
species not identified during the initial inspection. The revised plan will outline species-specific
treatments for long-term control and eradication of noxious weeds.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide ecological consulting services for this project. If you have any
questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Ver) truly yours,
Andrew Antras
•
•
\
\
\
\
\
\
crJ
Z
E;7
LTJ
b
Com]
X
\
\
\
\
``
f
2 7
iffl9ICI)
,
r
fir
t(,
N
J
\[
\
1
it
411
3
n
V•
��
.
/
/
/
I
1
aR
k
+}
TRI-STATP: TRUCKING /,/
RULISON, COLORADO
GRAPHIC SCALE SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION - SITE PLAN ''�
.
FEEr
1 inch - 100 R NV= wx
•
I
/
I
I
-
s
V,r'
,,
r
~
,f1
►[
Il
.,=1
5g15
'ti
--5-------i
I J-
/
�/
1�./
_0-----
�\
/ ■
1
J
r1
./1,--;::::::::.--...---/
,
r!
1
.
_l
gr_r
•
•
�yF-'--
J
/
1
..!v
„J..,
."£
'MI
t'
, .:;
_
'jr
♦
FIs
T~�;
\.
\
'J,
ch
��Y #/ 1 1 1 r 1 11 �Y4rl
yl...i ,-
fi k -
•
>;
I A+ �'��\�
,
I I
rI
r I +
1
..� r
`'
^»�
T/
"_sl♦
r
r `1
\
L1 ti""-.
-_rL
',
+ s
:' _
. '
. �
,
& „5450000 S
__1
\
y 511
V I"f
r11I1r. .
01'-
1`
-
11
r+
1111;,
\ +�
\\\\
` 111
\11111\:
■
' \\\\,\._'��
\•t\�"F��_
\ 111
:;,::.•-`1.."-:,-,
1 1 ��\
..-,�.
\\\\,,. \•,. \
\1 1 1 \
�\1 \ 1
/- >' /
/
. /
i r./ r
/ r
r =�
r
-
F f/rte-j�1111
r/f /r/r-�
f+r//r /-f'+!iry
b�•1 r5rr�1;.
I//19+"x/ /
\/�r
,,,./d/I�/I
/1 1 1/7
1 1 /
r I d 1[ ,$61
r I lJ�rl1
" 1 +
I � II`r,,,,r
r Y/ 1 j
1 1 1 1 f!
I /1i/
I I+
I ih h 1 R
l ih y, 7 r
111111
111\•
1 1 1
r�./r1-i
�'� '
1
.\\\ r 1
?k ` X1;11
i
•
\•
�
,
11
.1
4 cq
a
-
_� �;=.
�-� 1,
.\'�\ 11
■111
�1 1,11
11 I t l 11
/ 1 I 1
I 1 1 Id
J
,/ r / r r
//!/ I I
/ / 1 I
! -! l
- s
I rr F�.
r I
C Jrl//
•
/I
/
/ r•i
�' 1 11 /,
r I X 1 1
, 7 w IoaJi
7 1 11t 1R1,
r h 1 I
7 11 r
! 7" 1 r7117�
1\ \1\[.'
\ ♦\♦'
,1 77\
1 1I 111
r} 1 I 1
I
/ I / r
f j
1 1
rf rY
�7 Via'
11 71,i<41,1 X41,
fi/ I r` I \+
%,. 1
v 1
1
,
r
r
'
r V f I I-
i
=1OB1y11L44'v�^� .r}/1 i 1 1 Irl
�y5^.. j r 1 /
-r �..' / 1 r 1144..
A4jr,•- ----' / l j I
. r q - J / / !
I' � ............_......,,,..../////,------/-7-4
i,,... ~ r r-^^-
-^ /' r
•/ ,/,,,i,5 -.,A__,_______, s1 �7
I 119 -", rk--^^�c�---�
2 .0
,1 I y5_ J 1 -- "'
•'..-
--^ II lit.- - r
•i° ..-`.
r;,��&\ L-`-".'�:=_=•-•/�
- y i-,54:.,0
~v r� /99 r�r/11 -�
r� -- BiS-�'��08tSM1-^-_.._-
/ y"I ' z '..-4-.1'
11i --VP ig_
.J•••� - l / r -----r-------
/�-�- �i /Ili lr� '1t�f
11A ; gad
11 / f\ .-`._-- Ify \
r f I\ -------' I✓`^-
j " /i'",.."-'--- •- I fl1+ ry
J1 IV Ire\
r
1 .'�^ .
\ --- i1 ,
/ 1 r _-^--!111}f•--5i6r.
I , , r---_._• ,,ja,i
// r r r_- l .-.
1 1 ! r _ . N�1--��-`^♦
_1 + f ! 1 \ 1 \^
'sa1s'?f
=� J / 1 I 1 1�1 •s'l%
/ / . I
��.1
, -• a11l�
1 Rr'- �
R R r I
E Rg _-s
i J.�
�'r�1 j : C.
1-. }; •����
-1----
-`,��^ ! LG":
y \* l
^~
+ 1 l\�n y`
Ie �_ �'"'y\
/ `-? .\/r/- 75/M1\
\ ,ire 11i.-_11"
.. `L`��^-.. rr� .•' Ilrr:
.7 1 tL �1�1iii:-.~.�^_-;}.•}�.k
V 1 1rylfi:
-� ) /� }/•iG 11;i ��
I / 1 i."j �i/,_,-.•..,--,.._•.....-_,,,,
7 f --r ;:-,-\:%11 �_-
/ f`\ 11 --,r
I i I \IIS
.5,_-1y IN \/IA
.' r 1 ^CJI I r.
i/Y. ~`f
,-------- +/ - '�T 1
. I T. /
yrs l�/ 1
'r i ,/ +1 N \ 1+11 `
1. ,r g 11 5VI1+1`,",
\ 1r\I 1, 11 1
S+1\or--' •, 1 1 1 1 51
1 I I[
1 L \ f I1 !171111
1 \• c I I
I'•. -e 1 17 I I
1- \ "
e�-• , 1111 51
.S• • 1 1 1 11
1 l 1 1 11
Os1S� -1 11 1 1 + 11
11
♦. 1 I I 1 1
' ! [ 1 ��
: \ 1 w 1
'V - 1 1 +�1�1
1 1 1 1 N1 ti,','l
. 1 1111 iIl
� L 111 ,
; } I \ \F
_ 1 ,
i i 1
f 1 1 1 1 Io
1 1 r f" 19
I 1 4
i 4511 \ \ \ \\
\\
L.al♦-S
f�.�.,r�!r_\\--.
^1
♦-r���
'•^
~� \.
\•"+
\\
'•-•1,-
1 1
11 I 1
r',///,1/
I j /7
1 r f
l 1},111
l 1
I 11l
r r r
r11+i
1 I V 1111
I1
1
1
\i",1 *
1 1
1 \\
Ill \\\1111111,,.\1\\Ill,y§
11111iIV+1
l \ 1
! 1 1
1 1
d l
','\,\':\4'.-=-=\....=--.,11',\.1.-----=-_:-.-_-----: 1
\\t'..j1
\ \•
.
1.1,41--,'�
L
rr'�j
' I
I'
' 1
r ,
i I
1
j 7
i
1 1 1
11
+
1
r
+1
q.,--...4.
"'...:
r
J o
! �,
fir'
LA
~ fit'
.'�
I
1 RI1,1
71 t1f I4
11,1
\�
` \
,%,'
r'�1h
'r��`;k
1
.'r 1
ti , 1//11
1` �\: _
-1 .
1\ y I r 1//
j1 •' I -/ //I I i
/rr//,/..----
I I /r/".,-;,..
f •,i/1/1--,
I !
11 1 iiiirii
I/j I1 . r1�111./7;
;�l,e,�r„
11 / r t r 11 Ir
, I r+1111 , ".,,..
I I 1 7
111181 1�11jj1
+11! I
I II WI frlr"r
I
7 !1114 111,(;.-,:\
11
11 11 l .1+
°\k•,"-`1':.11\1\11' 1141E\��
1 1
111 1\�. S] 1fi
1+ 11 11 \ Ii11111111f
1 \t \ \\\1,1` l
rl \ 1,4,:%,:`,:•-,•,', -1 Ilci\��
\ ml1Plill yi4l��
1 j111IS�11[.L•y\��1��
\
} 11 IL \\1,\
I 111 ♦ \ti
1 ; 1 1 1 1■ \\
1 1 1 1 1 \... \
t l 11 ♦, `ti:•�\•
1 \ \ ..�
:\� _-�
ten\ \
!ll _= _..\
1
-\.- ?
1
/ , rJ
r rr,
r I/ /f/r r
1 \A I / I /
ti� 1
/ 1 4, 1•,, r
/
9ti4�1rFr
, /Jry 'If
fI
! r rlf1�
I r/ Ii,
/ f r;r
1 j
1 } /rr/
I! 1 7r/1f
1 1 r 11I
! I/
r + 1 J I r 1
1"yy"+Ir
1 l 111 ' r 1 1
171 ,, 11i.,
r. / r- 1/
1, . 5 1 1 p
I I I 1
!1 1i,ISI1i�'/!l1rr+
I 1 " + I
C0
�'
a,m
PLANT LISP
QTY- BOTANICAL HAIIE COMMON NAVE SIZE
POPULUS DELTOID ES-SOW:LAND.
ROBINMA PSEUDOACACIA
ACER NEGUNDO
FRAXINUS AMERICANA
•/
i
..�1rei.
1:
'A
\ Y1
\\
S�
to e
n
F,
n
F:19
m_,/,,,,,,,,„_,__.______,N.�l
c
ro i7
g
7
y
N
N
"
\
\
\
\ \11[.'
\
cn �a [a ru I--.
I 1
t. a LTJ
~3 +y.
/T�+ i�-�
Cz] �
o
�'
C=i
CI)
a
L-.
/. 4r
- '.. 7
/%r-1 \ 1 �.+
rf" ' 1- , y
kl\ m-
j1] y ,.
\
r' _.y� 1/r -'.111 1 .
�+`1 ❑� 1 1 L�'.•
1 1.1 \ / �.='--;.-50./1 l Id �,
I1 r r.+i K=r
a'
/ - �. Il_; �� 1!
+j'elll r r • l 1, `t, � 1 g ,I Jg_
r. ► �,1`C1[[\\\ Ik
\\\ L\
'yr.f--
y
�
.."-
r .
y
g
ii 4. \1' \ L.
or r\ . •�
111111 L��•.• A,,,\
. I+II r �, _ \
I11� / „ I
,• llr1+ r, w I I,s
+' _I .yam,
'• f ..�:.
...^„ 1P.!
i
+• 1 i 1 �, 1 1
/
F4 ,;: r
, �, j //1
�` 1 1 ! r
+
/i,''/
07
1 \i V11� -/1`'is
t I I\ [ I !�' �`,
.1111\I\ + 7 r r
fj1h `Lll� y 1 7 !� 1/
:s ti 4 I I,
r r
,/1 \\\ 1 1 '��I
--, 111
1 �$Z- • ` ,
M1 `-
.-. --I,. --•"---
._ _ .- \\,,,
--,
� �.a \ 1, • '
�..t
L=1 G R �`•/rte':,.�_
� g
C
\
\ _
`\•
\ `
N •
.
�� S
gq) -4‘rr
�{ Y
�1
\-)C7
v l rri - r"-• r rJ If
i l V��jy61i�- ! // 1 1 i
, /'N I ./ ! 11
171+ r I it !
! 1}"
•fr""r 1
r I+r 1
1 711+1 '• 4A.
+ /11 4
,.±pf+ifi ., f 1 - _/ ��
1 11111 11 \ �•1
11117 ( i 1 1 7 I / r." -;
7 V , ir)rj all
r r I- r .G /
1] Im
. ':.v ,.. i�1�'•3 i Jy 1
` _ ♦
...._\.`. L �.
�.. -''- T .. 1
\\�'f ,,' J
!z :.as , r` ..r.
A r =� f
i I ,�/�
1 Y
• 1 1
li i ,
� 1 � _ 1.1rrl f**
-R\I 7
. ,,,_.,...s.,
1r •, i•�
:.�� k\•\ -fit+ _
•\ ti. �=: �L
•\ . aJ
\ \\� 1ti'\ r
1.11,17
'•T, } : rte.
ji..g. \1\\,\�1
•sf W
y( J�y Its
i11
t .6 I i
7 1 .11
lr ,p+ 1 \ 1
:; .;1 4.../1-41,,,,-44.°.'/;/
/ ..
I / F "'i \\\c
, ti'U
-\ I +,
a+ .4�
N\ •
'
\ \\
\
+,
.•',
A�111
Vii\\111
tii;', ,� 1
\ p
70PRIS ENCINEIIRINC. ALC.
302 1h101 STREET. SWTE A3
C.0100116ALE, CQ 81623
(970] 70. -on,
RULISON, COLORADO
TRI-STATE TRUCKING
SPECIAL USE PKRILIT
SITE PLAN
°y'
C-1'
iSm
L'
•
•
•
TABLE OF CONTENTS
October 27, 2006
Tri-State Trucking Special Use Permit Application
Vicinity Map
Application Form with Submittal Requirements Response
Comprehensive Plan Exhibit
Existing Zone Districts Exhibit
Mule Deer Winter Range Exhibit
Water Report — Zancanella & Associates
West Divide Water Contract Application
Engineering Report — Sopris Engineering
CDOT Access Permit
Agreement to Pay Form
Authorization Letter
Title Policy
Legal Description
Property Owners within 200 Feet w Map Exhibit
Mineral Rights Owners
Site Plan Drawings 11"x 17"
Site Plan
Existing Conditions
Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control
Utility Plan
Details
Site Plan Drawings 24"x 36" included under separate cover
•
•
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning Department
108 8th Street, Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile: 970.945.3470
www.garfield-county.com
Special Use Permit
GENERAL INFORMATION
(To be completed by the applicant.)
Street Address 1 General Location of Property: 16605 Hwy 6, Rifle, CO 81650
north side of Interstate 70 at the Rulison Exit
➢ Legal Description: SEE ATTACHED
➢ Existing Use & Size of Property in acres: Agriculture; 54.01 Acres
➢ Description of Special Use Requested: Industrial Support Facilities
including Warehouse and Storage Facilities. See Description Below
➢ Zone District: RL - Resource Land (Gentle Slopes
Lower Valley Floor)
Name of Property Owner: Harry & Rhonda Naugle (sellers)
➢ Address: P.D. Box 829 Telephone: 907-625-1139
➢ City: Rifle State: CO Zip Code: 81650 FAX: 625-8898
➢ Name of Owner's Representative (Applicant & prospective purchaser):
Bill Critton, Tri-State Trucking, LLC
➢ Address: P.Q. Box 789 Telephone: 435-789-2680
➢ City: Vernal State: UT Zip Code: 84078 FAX: 435-789-2681
STAFF USE ONLY
➢ Doc. No.: Date Submitted:
Planner: _ Hearing Date;
TC Date:
•
•
1. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
As a minimum, specifically respond to all the following items below and attach any additional information to be
submitted with this application:
1. Please submit, in narrative form, the nature and character of the Special Use requested. Submit plans and
supporting information (i.e. letters from responsible agencies). Include specifications for the proposed use
including, but not limited to, the hours of operation, the number and type of vehicles accessing the site on a
daily, weekly and/or monthly basis, and the size and location of any existing and/or proposed structures that
will be used in conjunction with the proposed use, and provisions for electric power service and any other
proposed utility improvements. Be specific.
The Applicant is the owner of Tri-State Trucking, Inc based in Vernal, Utah but operating
extensively in Western Garfield County serving the gas and oil exploration industry. Tri-
State is in intense need of a permanent site in the Rifle/Parachute area from which to
operate including truck and trailer maintenance and storage, short term storage of
materials and equipment, gas/oil drilling industry equipment staging, truck washing
facilities and administrative services.
Site: The site, located north of the Rulison 1-70 interchange, is 54.01 acres in size although
the requested use only occupies about 8 acres of the property. This parcel exhibits a
number of attributes which make it a logical choice for the proposed activities.
1. Convenient location to the oil and gas drilling activities.
2. The majority of the property has gently sloping terrain requiring only
moderate grading.
3. Direct vehicular access to 1-70 at the Rulison Interchange with minimal
impact on County Road 323 (Rulison Road).
4. Proven water supply from an existing well.
5. Adjacent uses are compatible. Another gas/oil industry contractor is located
adjacent to the south and to the southeast is a commercially zoned tract.
Both of these uses buffer the proposed Tri-State site from I-70.
6. Terrain and existing uses along I-70 reduce the visibility of the site to three
or four points along 1-70 where portions of the site become visible for short
periods of time to the 1-70 traveler.
7. The property backs up to Federal lands and severe terrain so there is no
impact on any rural residences or other existing or future uses except for the
home of the current owner of the property which is located a few hundred
feet to the east.
The site is accessed from the north side of the Rulison Interchange and via an access
easement across the previously mentioned commercial property. The property is in the
Resource Lands Zone District (Gentle Slopes anti Valley Flour) where the proposed uses
are accommodated as a Special Use under "Industrial support activities including material
handling, staging areas, storage areas". The dominating activity of Tri-State is the
movement of drilling rigs and miscellaneous equipment from drilling site to drilling site
with occasional short term storage of the rigs and equipment as a necessary element of the
relocation process. The truck maintenance and truck and equipment storage activities at
the site are directly supportive to the oil and gas exploration and production industry.
Proposed Uses: A proposed sixty foot by one hundred foot truck maintenance shop located
at the westerly end of the site will also house a small office area, employee restroorns and a
separate area for storage of petroleum and other supplies and materials supportive of the
maintenance operations. The attached Site Plan also identifies an area for potential future
expansion of the maintenance building and the approximate location for potential future
storage building for parts, equipment and trucks. Truck parking and open storage areas
for miscellaneous equipment are also shown on the Site Plan. Sewage discharge from the
restrooms will be handled by a septic tank and leachtield as discussed in the Sopris
Engineering Report.
The future truck washing facility will utilize water recapture and reuse equipment which
will eliminate the requirement for on-site discharge of wash wastewater. The mechanical
filtration and pumping equipment will be located within a building as will the truck
washing bay. Sediments and detergents filtered out of the waste wash water will be hauled
from the site for disposal at the County Landfill. Fueling of the truck fleet will occur off-
site.
The Applicant projects an average of 25 to 30 trucks or tractor trailer combinations may
be parked at the site at any one time with that concentration typically occurring overnight.
All vehicular circulation and parking areas will be graveled with a dust suppressant
(magnesium chloride) applied as necessary to control dust. Approximately eight acres of
the site are anticipated to be graveled. Main travel corridors within the site and the access
road may be asphalted in the future. The access drive across the adjacent property will be
a 24 foot wide graveled surface.
The facility will be operational twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. Traffic
• volumes at the site will tend to peak at the site from 6:00 --- 7:00 AM and again from 5:00 —
8:00 PM. Approximately fifty employees will park at the site each day with ten to fifteen of
these employees working at the maintenance shop.
•
Application has been made to the Colorado Department of Transportation for a new access
permit for the site (see attached). The attached Sopris Engineering report provides a more
detailed discussion of traffic projections that were prepared for use with the Access Permit
Application. Sopris Engineering dos not anticipate that any highway improvements will be
required by a new CDOT permit.
Site lighting located on the shop building and throughout the site as approximately shown
on the Site Plan. All lighting will be downward directed and oriented away from property
boundaries.
The Applicant proposes an right foot chain link security fence with slat inserts along the
east property line, adjacent to the commercially zoned property which will assist in the
screening of the site. The slatted screen will be effective for screening the site from
travelers passing on 1-70 through the Rulison Interchange area. Immediately southwest of
the east bound off -ramp, the east bound travelers have a brief but more open view into the
proposed site. Tree plantings are proposed to mitigate this view and to augment the
screening provided by the proposed slated chain-link fence. The trees will be maintained
with a drip irrigation system. The tree species were selected for their adaptability to the
site soil conditions and for their vigorous growth rate. The use of few different tree species
also creates a more interesting vegetation pattern while softening the "soldiers in a row"
appearance that a screen planting can sometimes have. The site grading plan minimizes
disturbance of areas outside of the proposed gravel surfaces. Those limited areas of
disturbance will be seeded with dryland grasses.
Storm water management and discharge is discussed in the Sopris Engineering Report but
in general includes collection and treatment of water on site storm water before being
discharged into the historic drainage channels.
Relationship to Comprehensive Plan
4.0 COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL USES
GOALS:
Industrial: Garfield County will encourage the development of a diversified industrial base for the
County which recognizes the human resources, natural resources and physical location -to -market
capabilities of the community, and which further recognizes and addresses the social and
environmental impacts of industrial uses.
Future, long-term commercial and industrial development in western Garfield County and at
interchanges along 1-70.
Being located at the Rulison 1-70 Interchange adjacent to other industrial and
commercial uses, the proposed industrial activity has almost no impact on
residential properties and adds diversity to the County's industrial economy.
Therefore, the proposed use is consistent with this Comp Plan Goal.
OBJECTIVES:
4.1 To ensure that commercial and industrial developmentare compatible with adjacent land uses
and mitigate impacts identified during the plan review process
The proposed use is compatible with the industrial uses located adjacent to the
south and east boundaries of the project. Federal lands adjacent to the west and
north boundary are characterized by such severe terrain that there are no human
activities to impact. The owner of a residence located a few hundred feet to the
east of the proposed use is a signatory on this application as the property owner.
4,2 Encourage the location of industrial development in areas where visual, noise, air quality and
infrastructure impacts are reduced.
As noted above, there are no neighbors that would be inappropriately impacted.
Other than the current owner, the closest residence is across the Interstate to the
southeast. Visually the site is seen from a few locations along Interstate 70 but
these views are interrupted by terrain and the other uses located between the
proposed site and the Interstate. The industrial use to the south which was
approved by Garfield County in 2004 under a special use permit is surrounded by
an eight foot slatted chain link fence which further serves to screen the proposed
site. A proposed eight foot slated chain link fence is proposed along the east
property line will help screen the low angle views of the site as viewed from 1-70
in the area of the interchange overpass. Additionally, extensive tree plantings are
proposed by the Applicant to mitigate the impact on views from 1-70. Within a
very few years these plantings will effectively interrupt the more distant views
from 1-70 just southwest of the east bound exit ramp. The site slopes to the west
so views toward the site are mostly blocked by natural terrain as viewed by west
bound 1-70 travelers from locations east of the interchange. The isolated location
and proposed visual mitigation efforts make this proposal compatible with the
intent of this objective.
4.4 Ensure that commercial development is conducive to safe and efficient traffic flow, reduces
vehicular movements and encourages alternate transportation rnodes and the use of mass
transit.
Vehicular access to the site is almost directly from an existing 1-70 interchange
crossing only a commercially zoned parcel by recorded easement. The proposed
use is not anticipated to have an impact on mass transit.
4.5 Ensure that the type, size and scope of industrial and commercial development are consistent
with the long-term land use objectives of the County.
The proposed use operates in direct support of the gas and oil exploration and
production industry in Garfield County and is centrally located relative to that
industry. The Comprehensive Plan recommends this area as Outlying Residential
but industrial activities are contemplated by the underlying Resource Lands
Zoning and the County has supported this zoning by a fairly recent approval of a
special use permit for an industrial activity on the adjacent property which is also
zoned Resource Lands. Also, the current County zoning map shows a
Commercial Limited Zone District tract adjacent to and between the proposed
Special Use site and the 1-70 interchange. Additionally, the location at an
• interstate interchange and the proposed visual mitigation efforts further supports
consistency with this objective.
4.6 Ensure that Zoning Regulations addressing Commercial and Industrial uses reflect the
changing land use patterns and demographics of the County and encourage the further
diversification of the County's economy.
As described earlier, this use offers diversification of the County's industrial
economy and is consistent with changing land use patterns in the area. Locating
this use at an Interstate interchange in the heart of the gas and oil industry
activity in Garfield County is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The
proposal's compliance with county industrial performance criteria is discussed
later in this application.
POLICIES:
4.3 Landscaping and screening will be required to address specific visual impacts of industrial
and commercial development.
As discussed above, this application proposes tree plantings and screen fencing
appropriate to the mitigation of potential visual impacts of the use.
4.4 The project review process will include the identification and mitigation of transportation
impacts related to commercial and industrial development.
•
This application includes a traffic impact analysis prepared by Sopris
Engineering. The location at an interstate interchange assures minimal direct
impact on the county road system.
(End of Comprehensive Plan discussion.)
2. If you will be using water or will be treating wastewater in conjunction with the proposed use, please detail
the amount of water that would be used and the type of wastewater treatment. if you will be utilizing well
water, please attach a copy of the appropriate well permit and any other legal water supply information,
including a water allotment contract or an approved water augmentation plan to demonstrate that you have
legal and adequate water for the proposed use.
Water will be supplied by an existing on-site well which will be protected by a
water allotment contract (application attached). See the attached Zancanella and
Associates report regarding the legal and physical water supply. This report
notes that the water quality at the site is not desirable for human consumption
and therefore the Applicant proposes to provide drinking water at the site from an
approved source such as one of the bulk bottled water delivery services.
Sewage disposal will be handled by septic tank and leachfield. See the report by
Sopris Engineering for a detailed discussion regarding of sewage treatment.
3. Submit a site plan /map drawn to scale that portrays the boundaries of the subject property, all existing and
proposed structures on the property, and the County or State roadways within one (3) mile of your property.
If you are proposing a new or expanded access onto a County or State roadway, submit a driveway or
highway access permit.
See the attached Site Plan. Access is directly from Interstate 70. See the Sopris
• Engineering report for a detailed discussion of traffic projections and access.
•
4 Submit a vicinity map showing slope / topography of your property, for which a U.S.G.S. 1:24,000 scale
quadrangle map will suffice.
Attached.
5. Submit a copy of the appropriate potion of a Garfield County Assessor's Map showing all mineral rights
owners of the subject property and public and private landowners adjacent to your property (which should be
delineated). In additional, submit a list of ail property owners and their addresses adjacent to or within 200
ft. of the site. This information can be obtained from the Assessor's Office.
Attached.
6. Submit a copy of the deed and a legal description of the subject property.
See attached title Commitment.
7. if you are acting as an agent for the property owner, you must attach an acknowledgement from the
property owner that you may act in his/her behalf.
See attached authorization.
8. Submit a statement that specifically responds to each of the following criteria from Section 5.03 of the
Zoning Regulations
(1) Utilities adequate to provide water and sanitation service based on accepted engineering standards
and approved by the Board of County Commissioners shall either be in place or shall be constructed in
conjunction with the proposed use.
•
Sewage disposal will be handled by septic tank and Ieachfield. See the report by
Sopris Engineering for a detailed discussion of this subject.
(2) Street improvements adequate to accommodate traffic volume generated by the proposed use and
to provide safe, convenient access to the use shall either be in place or shall be constructed in
conjunction with the proposed use:
Access to the site is directly from the Rulison 1-70 interchange and across an
adjacent property via a recorded access easement. See the Sopris Engineering
report for details.
(3) Design of the proposed use is organized to minimize impact on and from adjacent uses of land
through installation of screen fences or landscape materials on the periphery of the lot and by
location of intensively utilized areas, access points, lighting and signs in such a manner as to
protect established neighborhood character;
A slated, eight foot high chain link fence is proposed to be constructed along the
east property line adjacent to the commercially zoned property. To mitigate the
longer distance views of the site, plantings of a variety of tress are proposed
along the south and east boundaries of the site as noted on the Site Plan. These
plantings will be maintained by a drip irrigation system. Areas of the site
disturbed by the site construction but not graveled will be seeded with dryland
grasses and forbs. Site lighting will be downward directed and baffled to
minimize Tight trespass from the site and used only to the extent necessary to
provide safe utilization of the site. The general character of the proposed use is
compatible with the existing adjacent uses. Any future signage will comply with
Garfield County sign regulations.
• The neighborhood is currently characterized by the existing industrial use site
located adjacent to the south and the commercially zoned tract located
immediately east of the proposed use which will likely see an increase in
commercial activities in the future.
9. Depending on the type of Special Use Permit requested, you may need to respond to additional review
standards in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution Section 5.00 [Supplementary Regulations]. This may
include uses such industrial uses [section 5.03.07 & 5.03.081, Accessory Dwelling Units [section 5.03.21j,
Utility line/Utility Substations, etc. Specific sections of the Zoning Resolution which can be located on the
Garfield County web site at httb.//www.garfield-county.com/buildino and planning/index.htm. or information
can be obtained from this office
Following are specific responses to Sections 5.03.07 and 5.03.08 dealing with
industrial uses.
5.03.07 Industrial Operations- Industria! Operations, including extraction, processing, fabrication, industrial support
facilities, mineral waste disposal, storage, sanitary landfill, salvage yard, access routes and utility
lines, shall be permitted, provided:
(1) The applicant for a permit for industrial operations shall prepare and submit to the Planning
Director ten (10) copies of an impact statement on the proposed use describing its location, scope,
design and construction schedule, including an explanation of its operational characteristics. One
(1) copy of the impact statement shall be filed with the County Commissioners by the Planning
Director. The impact statement shall address the following:
Each of the topics listed are addressed in other areas of this Special Use Permit
• Application as noted or are addressed below.
•
•
(A) Existing lawful use of water through depletion or pollution of surface run-off, stream flow or
ground water;
See the engineering reports prepared by Zancanella and Associates and Sopris
Engineering. Surface water runoff is proposed to be collected from the graveled
surfaces of the site and channeled through sediment traps and oil skimmers
before being discharged into the natural drainages.
(B) Impacts on adjacent land from the generation of vapor, dust, smoke, noise, glare or vibration,
or other emanations;
Please refer to the response to the items of Section 5.03.08 below.
(0) Impacts on wildlife and domestic animals through the creation of hazardous attractions,
alteration of existing native vegetation, blockade of migration routes, use patterns or other
disruptions;
Wildlife mapping on the county's web site identifies this site along with the entire
Garfield County as Elk and Mule Deer Overall Range. Additionally, the site is
mapped as Mule Deer Winter Concentration Area and Mule Deer Severe Winter
Range. A review of the attached Mule Deer Winter Range Exhibit shows that
these Mule Deer ranges dominate the entire Colorado River Valley from Rifle to
Parachute.
(D) Affirmatively show the impacts of truck and automobile traffic to and from such uses and their
impacts to areas in the County;
All traffic accesses the site directly from Interstate 70 except for limited traffic
that may be generated from County Road 323 which intersects the south side of
the Rulison 1-70 interchange. Please refer to the Sopris Engineering report for a
detailed discussion of traffic.
(E) That sufficient distances shall separate such use from abutting property which might otherwise
be damaged by operations of the proposed use(s);
Other than one residence (the seller of the property) located about 800 feet
southeasterly of the site, the only adjacent uses are industrial or commercial in
nature and federal lands characterized by extreme topographic conditions.
(F) Mitigation measures proposed for all of the foregoing impacts identified and for the standards
identified in Section 5.03.08 of this Resolution
See responses to Section 5.03.08 listed below.
(2) Permits may be granted for those uses with provisions that provide adequate mitigation for the
following:
(A) A plan for site rehabilitation must be approved by the County Commissioners before a permit
for conditional or special use will be issued;
(8) The County Commissioners may require security before a permit for special or conditional use
is issued, if required. The applicant shall furnish evidence of a bank commitment of credit, bond,
certified check or other security deemed acceptable by the County Commissioners in the amount
calculated by the County Commissioners to secure the execution of the site rehabilitation plan in
•
workmanlike manner and in accordance with the specifications and construction schedule
established or approved by the County Commissioners. Such commitments, bonds or check shall
be payable to and held by the County Commissioners,
(0) Impacts set forth in the impact statement and compliance with the standards contained in
Section 5.03.08 of this Resolution. (A. 93-061)
The proposed use is not intended to be short term in nature nor to be abandoned.
5.03.08 Industrial Performance Standards- All industrial operations in the County shall comply with applicable County,
State, and Federal regulations regulating water, air and noise pollution and shall not be conducted
in a manner constituting a public nuisance or hazard. Operations shall be conducted in such a
manner as to minimize heat, dust, smoke, vibration, glare and odor and all other undesirable
environmental effects beyond the boundaries of the property in which such uses are located, in
accord with the following standards;
(1) Volume of sound generated shall comply with the standards set forth in the Colorado Revised
Statutes at the time any new application is made. (A. 93-061)
Uses proposed at the site do not generate unusual noise impacts. The only
anticipated sound generation would be from trucks licensed for use on the state
highway system. It does not seem pertinent to provide sound data for trucks
when there are no uses in the area that would be impacted by the truck engine
noise.
(2) Vibration generated: every use shall be so operated that the ground vibration inherently and
recurrently generated is not perceptible, without instruments, at any point of any boundary line of
the property on which the use is located;
Uses proposed at the site do not generate unusual vibrations. The only
• anticipated vibration generation would be from normal truck operations.
•
(3) Emissions of smoke and particulate matter: every use shall be operated so as to comply with
all Federal, State and County air quality laws, regulations and standards;
Uses proposed at the site do not generate unusual emission of smoke or
particulate mater except as generated by normal truck operations. Commonly
traveled gravels surfaces at the site will be chemically treated to control dust.
Additionally, consider that there are no uses in the area that would be unusually
Impacted by the truck exhausts.
(4) Emission of heat, glare, radiation and fumes: every use shall be so operated that it does not
emit heat, glare, radiation or fumes which substantially interfere with the existing use of adjoining
property or which constitutes a public nuisance or hazard_ Flaring of gases, aircraft warning
signals, reflective painting of storage tanks, or other such operations which may be required by
law as safety or air pollution r.:ontrol measures shall be exempted from this provision;
Uses proposed at the site do not generate unusual heat, glare, radiation or fumes
except for truck engine exhausts.
(5) Storage area, salvage yard, sanitary landfill and mineral waste disposal areas :(A97-112) (A)
Storage of flammable or explosive solids or gases shall be in accordance with accepted standards
and laws and shall comply with the national, state and local fire codes and written
recommendations/comments from the appropriate local protection district regarding compliance
with the appropriate codes; (A97-112)
Petroleum products such as greases, oils and cleaning solvents used in the truck
maintenance operation will be stored in the truck maintenance shop. This
• structure will comply with all required building codes, local fire codes and
regulations governing storage of such materials. Truck fueling will occur off-
site.
•
•
(B) At the discretion of the County Commissioners, all outdoor storage facilities may be required to
be enclosed by fence, landscaping or wall adequate to conceal such facilities from adjacent
property; (A97-112)
A slated, eight foot high chain link fence is proposed to be constructed along the
east property line adjacent to the commercially zoned property. To mitigate the
longer distance views of the site, plantings of a variety of tress are proposed
along the southerly and easterly boundaries of the site as noted on the Site Plan.
These plantings will be maintained by a drip irrigation system. Areas of the site
disturbed by the site construction but not graveled will be seeded with dryland
grasses and forbs. Site lighting will be downward directed and baffled to
minimize light trespass from the site. The general character of the proposed use
is compatible with the existing adjacent uses.
(C) No materials or wastes shall be deposited upon a property in such form or manner that they
may be transferred off the property by any reasonably foreseeable natural causes or forces; (A97-
112)
Drainage through the site will be designed to avoid any significant flooding of
storage areas. See the attached Sopris Engineering report.
(0) Storage of Heavy Equipment wilt only be allowed subject to (A) and (0) above and the
following standards: (A97-112)
Storage of heavy equipment and drill rigs will be generally temporary in nature to
allow for transferring of the heavy equipment to other trucks or brief periods
related to scheduling of deliveries. The site complies with the terms of this
section as described below.
1. The minimum lot size is five (5) acres and is not a platted subdivision.
The property is 54 acres in size with the actual developed site involving about 8
acres.
2. The equipment storage area is not placed any closer than 300 ft. from any existing
residential dwelling.
The closest dwelling is over twice that distance from the site.
3. All equipment storage will be enclosed in an area with screening at least eight (8) feet in
height and obscured from view at the same elevation or lower.
Screening may include berming, landscaping, sight obscuring fencing or a combination of any of these methods.
A slated, eight foot high chain link fence is proposed to be constructed along the
east property line adjacent to the commercially zoned property. To mitigate the
longer distance views of the site, plantings of a variety of tress are proposed
along the south and east boundaries of the site as noted on the Site Plan. These
plantings will be maintained by a drip irrigation system.
• 4. Any repair and maintenance activity requiring the use of equipment that will generate
noise, odors or glare beyond the property boundaries will be conducted within a building or outdoors during the hours
of 8 a.m. to S p.m., Mon. -Fn.
•
•
Repair of heavy equipment will be minimal in nature and a maintenance shop is
available for these repair activities.
5. Loading and unloading of vehicles shall be conducted on private property and may not
be conducted on any public right-of-way.
All loading and unloading will occur on the site.
(E) Any storage area for uses not associated with natural resources shall not exceed ten (10)
acres in size. (A97-112)
The entire developed site does not exceed 10 acres and only a portion of that
area would be used to store heavy equipment.
(F) Any lighting of storage area shall be pointed downward and inward to the property center and
shaded to prevent direct reflection on adjacent property (A97-112)
Site lighting will be downward directed and directed internally to avoid impacting
adjacent properties.
(6) Water pollution: in a case in which potential hazards exist, it shall be necessary to install
safeguards designed to comply with the Regulations of the Environmental Protection
Agency before operation of the facilities may begin.
See the attached report prepared by Sopris Engineering to review proposed
management of storm water runoff.
All percolation tests or ground water resource tests as may be required by local or State Health
Officers must be met before operation of the facilities may begin.
10. A $400.00 Base Fee: Applicant shall sign the "Agreement for Payment" form and provide the fee with the
application.
The Agreement form and check are attached.
OCT -16-2006 MON 06:08 AM BILL =TON
TTON
FAX .19702852042 P. 003
11. Submit 2 copies of this completed application form and all the required submittal materials to the Building
and Planning Department. Staff will request additional copies once the Special Use Permit application has
been deemed technically complete.
11. PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS
(The following steps outlina how the Special Use Permit Application review process works in Garfield County.)
Submit this completed application form, base fee. and ail supplemental information to the Garfield County
Planning 'Department It will be received and given to a Stan Planner who Wit review the application for technical
completeness.
2. Once the application is deemed tecttnicatiy complete, the Staff Planner will send you a fetter indicating the
application is complete, In addition. Staff wtll also send you a "Public NotlCe Form(s)' indicating the time and date
of your hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. Prior to the public hearing, Staff will provide you with
a Staff Memorandum regarding your roquested Special Usa. (If Staff determines you application to be deficient, a
fatter will be sent to you indicating that additional information is needed to deem your appfcation complete.)
3. It is solely the Applicant's responsibility to ensure proper noticing occurs regarding the requested Special Use
and the public hearing. if proper notice has not occurred, the public hearing will not occur_ Notice
requirements aro as follows:
a.
b.
c.
Notice by publication, including the name of the applicant. description of the subject lot, a
description of the proposed special use and nature of the hearing, and the date, time and place for the
hearing shall be given once in a newspaper of general arculation in that portion of the County In which
the subject property is located at least thirty (30) but not more than eixty (60) days prior to the date of
such hearing, and proof of publication shall be presented at hearing by the applicant.
Notice by mail, containing information as described under paragraph (1) above. shall be
mailed to all owners of revord as shown in the County Assessor's Office of lots within two hundred feet
(200') of the subject lot and to all owners of mineral interest in the subject property at feast thirty (30) but
not more than sixty (60) days prior to such hearing time by certified return receipt mall, and receipts
shall be presented et the hearing by the applicant.
The site shall be posted such that tee notice is clearly and conspicuously visible from a
public right-of-way, with notice signs provided by the Planning Department. The posting must take
place at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (80) days prior to tate hearing date and 4 the sole
responsibility of the applicant to post the notice, and ensure that it remains posted until and during the
date of the hearing,
4, The Applicant is required to appear before the Board of County Commissioners at the time and date of the
public hearing at which time the Board will consider the request. In addition, the Applicant shall provide proof, at
the hearing. that proper notice was provided.
5. Once the Board makes a decision regarding the Special Use request, Staff will provide the Applicant with a
signed resolution memorializing the action taken by the Board Following the Boards approval. this office will
issue the Special Use Permit to the applicant. If the Board's approval includes specific conditions of approval to
be met, this office will not issue the Official Special Use Permit certificate until the applicant has satisfied all
'conditions of approval. The Special Use Permit approval is not finalized until this office has issued the Oficial
Special Use Permit certificate signed by the Chairman Otte Board of County Commissioners.
I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information which is
correct and accurate the the beof my knowledge.
Signature of Applicant. Bili Critton
Signature of Own r. Harry Narfgle
honda Naugle
Last Revised: 11)0772002
•
Rulison
•
Legend
•
Outlying Resider fares per Dwelling unit
Residential, Varying Density
High Density Residential, 8-16 Units per Acre
Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial
Mixed Use Residential Commercial
Light Industrial
Public Lands
Open Space
Subdivision
Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Districts
•
•
36
Legend
Agricultural Industrial
Open Space
Agriculture Residential Rural Density
Commercial Limited
Commercial general
Resource Lands
Light Industrial
Planned Unit Development
Planned 'Development
Residential Nlehile Home General Urban Density
Resid&tial Limited Suburban Density
Residential Limited Urban Densty
Residential General Sulrur:,an Density
Residential General Jrban Density
Airport
Right-cf-way, Railroad or Highway
Existing Zone Districts
•
•
MULE DEER: Winter Rang
L.eger7d
.. ,.?'� �-ter:'. . �;;m:? ,;�!•3�:.''Yi'1'.i�i �i::i.�f :'- -
_.._.. EntargementrT-�7 ..rr-..-�.
t,i
ENLARGEMENT
:7"1
P.O. Box 1908
1011 Grand Avenue
Glenwood Springs,
CD 81602
•
Z4NC414ELL4 4f1D 4550Ct4 TES, NC.
EMGINEEl�ING CoNSULr>1rlr
October 25, 2006
Mr. Bill Critton
c/o Mr. Ron Liston
Land Design Partnership
918 Cooper Ave.
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: Rulison Water Supply for SUP
Dear Bill:
(970) 945-5700
(970) 945-1253 Fax
This letter summarizes results of our work to date on the development and
documentation of a suitable water supply for the office and shop facilities you propose
for a parcel of land located at Rulison, Colorado; legally described as lying in Section 25
of Township 6 South, Range 95 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, in Garfield County,
You may wish to submit this letter to Garfield County with your application for a Special
Use Permit (SUP).
Project Information
We based our approach to development of the water supply on the following information
communicated to us by Mr. Ron Liston of Land Design Partnership. The facility plan
calls for construction of an office / shop building with approximately 600 square feet of
industrial floor space. It is anticipated that about 15 employees will work in the new
building as support staff for approximately 35 truck drivers who will operate trucks
based on the property. In addition, trees will be planted to screen the operation from
the interstate to the south and east. The facility requires a reliable year-round potable
water supply.
Water Usage
As a first step, we prepared an engineering estimate of the proposed facility's
anticipated average water usage by month. It is attached as Table 1.
The table provides for in-house use of 15 gallons per building employee per day, and 5
gallons per truck driver per day, as well as 350 gallons per day allocated to the
industrial space. It assumes that the in-house wastewater will be disposed of by means
of an Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS - septic tank with leach field),
resulting in the consumptive use of about 15 percent of the total in-house usage. The
table also provides for a total of 4.30 acre-feet per year for water consumption by trees
and assumes an application efficiency of 80 percent.
• Our estimate for the total annual volume of water required by these demands came to
6.22 acre-feet or just over 2 million gallons, as shown in Column 6 of Table 1. This is
Zancanella & Associates, Inc. 212 60 0012641 4 Critton, Bill (Ruiison)lwaterSupplyReportGarCo.doc 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 5
the average annual amount of water which we anticipate the facility will divert. The
• proposed project could potentially be supplied by pumping from the existing well on the
property. As can be seen in Column 8, the highest corresponding monthly average
pumping rate is 7.5 gallons per minute (gprn) throughout the month of June. The
instantaneous rate of usage may be as high as 3 times that number, however, with an
appropriately sized water tank, the instantaneous diversion rate will not need to exceed
15 gpm for the uses enumerated above.
Table 1 also contains estimated monthly consumptive use figures. Based on the
parameters mentioned above, we estimate that the total annual consumptive use
associated with the diversions will be 4.43 acre-feet. The rate at which the consumptive
use of the water pumped from the aquifer presumably tributary to the Colorado River
impacts stream flow likely differs somewhat from the rate at which it is diverted. This is
commonly referred to as delayed impact or lagging. Delayed impacts to the nearby
river were accounted for using aquifer parameters derived from a pump test of the
existing well, A 5 percent transit loss contingency was added to the resulting
redistribution of monthly consumptive use to yield total monthly needs for replacement
water or augmentation. This resulted in an annual total of 4.65 acre-feet.
Physical Supply
Based on the need for a reliable year-round water supply, a groundwater source may be
best suited to meeting the facility's water requirements.
Pump Test
A pump test of the existing well was conducted in order to evaluate the aquifer and the
groundwater underlying the property. Since the well already has a pump installed,
Zancanelia & Associates conducted the pump test. Mr. Harry Naugle was also on hand
during the pump test.
Any eventual use of the well for the proposed industrial facility may require changes to
the permitting of the well. Conflicts with other wells, especially those within 600 feet of
the subject well, can potentially cause permitting problems, so during the pump test we
monitored the other wells within 600 feet of the pumping well. There were two such
wells, owned by the Teters, from whom we received permission for the monitoring,
Figure 1 shows the locations of the wells in the vicinity.
The pump test began at a rate of 2.00 gallons per minute (gpm). Fifteen minutes into
the test the rate was raised to 7.45 gpm, and 30 minutes into the test the rate was
raised to 7.70 gpm, which proved to be the maximum capacity of the existing pump and
plumbing. Pumping was continued at the rate of 7.70 gpm throughout the remainder of
the test, which had a total duration of 1,440 minutes or 24 hours.
Table 2 gives water levels in the wells throughout the duration of the pump test and
early recovery period. Figure 2 shows water levels in the pumping well, as well as the
static water level and the pump intake level for reference. The static water leve!,
measured before the pump test, was 58.05 feet and the pump intake was set at
approximately 90 feet according to Mr. Naugle. As can be seen, drawdown due to
pumping never exceeded 5.35 ft or 16.7% of the available drawdown (31.95 ft),
Zancanelia & Associates, Inc. Z:126000126414 Critton, Bill (Raison»WaterSupplyReportGarco.doc 10/25/2006 Page 2 of 5
although a constant 7.7 gpm was pumped from the well during all but the first 30
• minutes of the test.
•
The water level data was analyzed using the Rorabaugh Straight Line procedure in
order to determine well loss coefficients and well efficiency, the later of which was found
to be approximately 65% at 7.7 gpm. This means that 65% of the total hydraulic losses
or drawdown can be attributed to formation losses incurred in the aquifer, while the rest
are incurred as water passes through the perforated casing into the well.
In order to characterize the aquifer's reaction to pumping, formation losses were derived
using the well foss information. These formation losses were analyzed using a Theis
multiple rate superposition model that yielded values of storativity and transmissivity,
which are groundwater flow parameters for the aquifer. These parameters were used to
lag anticipated depletions associated with the proposed facility. They were also used to
project the well's steady-state capacity. Assuming a 12 -month recharge period and
accepting an operational drawdown equivalent to 50 percent of the available drawdown
yielded a projected capacity of 15 gpm. This pumping rate cannot be achieved with the
existing pump and plumbing, however, the well could supply this flow after being fitted
with a higher capacity pump and appropriately adapted plumbing. These modifications
would enable the well to produce an adequate quantity of water to serve the proposed
needs.
Additionally, a residual drawdown curve was plotted from the recovery data, and is
shown in Figure 3. The linear nature of the plot and the fact that the line may be
extended back through zero residual drawdown by extrapolation to unity indicate that
the well recovers normally.
During the pump test we also collected a water sample which we sent off for laboratory
analysis of 95 commonly considered water quality constituents. The sample was sent
to Evergreen Analytical for microbiology, organics, inorganics, and radionuclides.
Water Quality
The water quality test results are given in Table 3, attached. Completed state health
department reporting forms and other reporting documents from the lab are also
attached. Drinking water guidelines and regulations set by the Colorado Department of
Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) are based on U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) criteria and or standards. As can be seen in the table, all constituents
considered in the analysis meet their respective criteria, with the exceptions of iron,
chloride, sulfate, hardness, total dissolved solids (TDS), gross alpha particle activity,
and gross beta particle activity.
The iron, chloride, sulfate, hardness, and TDS standards are secondary, which means
that they are not enforceable guidelines but are suggested for aesthetic reasons.
Certain concentrations of these constituents may make the water less than ideal, but
they do not pose a major threat to public health.
• A threat is, however, posed by the alpha and beta radioactivity, the standards for which
are set by the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations based on scientific evidence
Zancanelta & Associates, Inc. 2:126000126414 Critton. Bill(Rulison]1WaterSupplyReportGarCa.doc 10/25/2006 Page 3 of 5
that long-term exposure to radioactive drinking water increases the risk of cancer. For
ID this reason we hereby recommend that all drinking water consumed at the facility be
hauled in from a safe source. You may want to consider providing bottled water for
drinking.
•
•
Hydrologic Budget
The capacity of the existing well is sufficient to meet the proposed facility's water
diversion requirements. This does not necessarily mean that the local hydrologic
budget will successfully bear the depletion over the long term. For this reason it is
important to monitor the aquifer in order to identify any trends, which may be seasonal,
periodic, or long-term in nature. We recommend keeping a log of well soundings on a
quarterly basis beginning as soon as possible and continuing as long as groundwater
supplies the facility.
Further Development of Supply
In order to provide the facility with a mechanically redundant water supply and the ability
to meet peak -hour demands, we recommend that an additional well be drilled in
conjunction with construction of the shop building, and that a water storage tank be
incorporated into the system, which may also include a booster pump. We are available
to aid in the construction of an additional well and help with tank sizing and pump
selection.
Legal Supply
As you are aware, in the state of Colorado, the legal right to apply water to beneficial
use must be obtained in addition to identifying the presence of a physical supply.
West Divide Contract
In many situations establishment of a water right requires filing a claim with the
appropriate water court, however, that should not be necessary for this facility, as it is
located within the Bluestone Water Conservancy District, and the Bluestone District has
an agreement with the West Divide Water Conservancy District (WDWCD) allowing
WDWCD to extend its water rights to provide augmentation water within the Bluestone
boundaries. Augmentation water is water diverted under a senior priority which may be
used to replace water diverted out of priority by junior users. WDWCD has designated
an area within which it can by contract legally provide replacement water under its
existing substitute supply plan. This is known as Area A. The subject property lies
entirely within Area A.
WDWCD augmentation has routinely been accepted by Garfield County in the past. We
therefore recommend that Tri-State Trucking obtain a West Divide Water Conservancy
District contract including the proposed facility in the West Divide augmentation plan.
Accordingly, we have filled out a WDWCD contract application for 4.7 acre-feet of water.
The application was mailed to you on October 111h, and we understand that you have
submitted it.
Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Z:126000126414 Critton, Bill(Ruiison»WaterSupplyReportGarCo.doc 10/25/2006 Page 4 of 5
Summary
We estimate the proposed facility will divert a total of 6.22 acre -ft annually, of which
4.43 acre -ft will be used consumptively, with a total annual need for replacement of 4.65
acre -ft.
We estimate the maximum monthly average diversion rate to be 7.5 gpm throughout the
month of June. Our evaluation of the existing well shows that the well's capacity should
be sufficient to meet the demand. We recommend that the aquifer be monitored for
trends in water level to allow for continual evaluation of the long-term viability of the
source. The well will need to be re -permitted for industrial use. A new well permit
application can be submitted upon receipt of confirmation that your WDWCD application
has been approved. An additional well should eventually be drilled and a water storage
tank needs to be installed to provide mechanical reliability.
Laboratory test results show that the quality of the groundwater on site is not acceptable
for drinking. For this reason we hereby recommend that all drinking water consumed at
the facility be hauled in from a safe source.
if you have any questions, please call aur office at (970) 945-5700.
Very truly yours,
• Zancanella & Associates, Inc.
•
a A -Zcco-/Q.14
Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E.
S. Collin Robinson, El
Attachments
Table 1
Figure 1
Table 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Table 3
Water quality results
Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Z:126000\26414 Critton, Bill(Rulison]1WaterSupplyReportGarco.doc 10/25/2006 Page 5 of 5
•
o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
000
rn UT a w ru -+
0
co,rn as vs II, ill ris
cc c
N N NN N N N N
0 0 0 D g.❑ W aC
3 3 z c m a 3
a 0 0 0 c o m m
co N .c .31 rn❑ o o 0 0
33 0 '. IT C 0
y 0. H C L-; n 2
x
i,,,,,„ [p tr N H 1 Q 7
` n, n m 2• n
P. w t- 3 a
TO 9. m ti o`c A ,i E
Ca. 1q U rDi 0 fTl
ZJ
a o 0 , ' ti •°
❑ N 0 L. �1 -c m
N 2 P. y W
N
N N 0 ,2 g.
ry
w C7 fl ro 0
C y N
C} w ry 5 O
t 4 `o- 7 ' N
--1 - O
0 fl 4 CC m
W so
' =1
N
m a 3 0
Cr
o w m
y g
A N m
n co w cg
921 0 b
m a b
n �• ro
m aW
r a
tr
N3.
co b
is L.m
Cin h
0
7
Q
S..
R
o Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C C' 0 C= 0 C C C
oo 33 o 3 00
(C 0, N 01 UT A W R1 -.
.a a a m 0-0 a a a q
oo.a Wo�; 0, mam w aa
W
nf N [ G
Wry N N NNN
O e m F0. ° 0cp00
DA
a Pag
Y, 4 3a
GS w w wo w
-is °i ro °m
CJ V H sa y N0
ri ?5
P.: W b C11 co N N
N W ❑
c 0.
O k 3- 14
'17
N a ti -° a
a ❑
m
N -I $ FO. rn d
O m a a n m
ri
C15
v O F 2 C7
O
,C a N
a
01
II
0
C]
0
0
0
'9d
C=
p
N
6
01
"co
co
0)
[7
N
CA
Cn
Cn
O
W
0)
d
w
p
FV
Css
C31
00
00 > --n , 0
cr7 =� ❑ •mro Ti ns 3 v 3 3
aC ° �- CrCI-
0
X
N
0
n
Cs p d O h o 0 0 o p d d n im
0 o O 6 0 C O O p o o o a
N N N N N N N N N N N N R
O 0 6 6 c c O d c 0 0 C
d d 0 p C7 6 06066't
N N h] N N N N N IN 0) 0) I.
CD a 0 0 0 d d C7 C7 0 CD C
06666666066'c
CO CO CO CO W CO CO CO CO CO W G
O Cr p p Cr C7 0 0 O O c C
W Cn 00 c0 tp q0 A •--L• d p 0
CO A 0) Co N 0) CT) C4 O C7 0 -P
000-.0000000C
A V 1
c
0 °p c)1 i\) p - p k:cn -� COW a Cp CO CO C)) C17 V V
" Cl) W W W CO NJ N N Cr
A W a N N 0
V N 0.) V N N 1V Ln W W 1
NCn N C7 Cn fV Cn N o N Ng
Cn 0 Cn (n C7 Cn 0 Cn a U1
a s CD C) p d 0 C] O O a C
Co C31 0) V -1 CD -ado a -s
W CO W 01 CC) 01 [0 01 (71 Cn 0)
0 C) d 0 d 0 0 0 o p d o
666[766,666666
o o 0 p 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0)
co co W co co CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
O 6 O O o 0 000000
0 0 4 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0
o 0) o o C7 0 O O a 0 p 0
N N N N N N N N N N !V N
O C) O O Ca 0 0 0 p o d 0
o a o o a o 0 0 0 0 o 0
C7 Ca 0 C7 0 0 CJ a Cr C] d 0)
Ur CJI 01 Cr! Cn Ln Ch Ln Ln On Cn Ln
000000600000,
[J1 - Ca) W C7
-+ 0 o s
0 N CoC0 0) CP CO V Us O O 0 s
290222202000
W if, V V V V (4 ' 0 b d -
N co 0 07 Ch C7 Co 0)
N A Cn Cn 01 Os ND - 0 C) p C7
CO O s [n 07 Cp N ••-• -s -s c9
220229220000
(.4 01 0 0
N W 0 0) Ln 0 00 0) A N
N GS) V [n ca W a a C3
0) LT)
0) N N W 00
CA W 00- CD W CA A A V 6 N
0 C] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W CJE CA d d 6
A (0 A CA W CO CD a - - IV
0 0 0 d 0 0 0 O O C7 0 0
6606 000001010000100
N W W A A W N d 0 0 --•
0 6 2 0 0 d d d C7 0 0 0
0) Cn V V CO V A- 0 0 a -+
W O) N CO C7 N 0 -I s CO
ti
m
3
a
0
co
co
CP
:P
W
0,
rn
00
0
W
m
0
co
0
Tr) CO
CL
N
c)
0)
c.s
0
0n
O)
m 0 0 _. to 3
co Q) m .� x. ,c 0 ,,<' n
7 0 0 3 ❑) '- N 7
7 to 7 CR 7 N co CO co
O* N@ N 0 O
m LI,m =•I Om
0 G 3
n 0 C w 11 n m-0
0' w m 0 0 0
rn -� 0 cl o w us
0
�. O 0) N N
= o m
-c• 3 3 -3
c.
-1 0
CSD co
CON
00 _ W CO
in
O W Cnd a Cn W (fl
60ooapcnocn
n& m w (7 m m
ry �
N, 4
0
m
3
z
Q
N
Summary of Anticipated Water Usage
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
SCALE:
1' = 750'
DATE:
October 5, 2006
SHEET:
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
SCR
CHKD BY:
APPD BY:
DRAWING:
VcinityMap.dwg
Tri—State Trucking
ZANCANELLA AND ASSOCIATES, INC
ENGINEERING CCNSLIL TANTS
POST OFnCE sox 19oe -- 1011 GRAND AVENUE
GLENWOOD SPRfNGS, COLORADO 91902 (970) 945-5700
FIGURE NO.
1
PROJECT: 26414
•
Pump Test Data
1 Observation Well 2 (61348 F)
Drawdown
mi
o0
0 1
o a r r-
CO
r
0
N
En
To
�
O
0 CO
CO to L) 1!)
1 Observation Well 1 {254154}
Level Drawdown
jft1 [ff1
00 0 0 0 00
O 0 O a
O0
't Cr 0 CO
1- n n n
in to U) to
N
6
(SD
1`
tO
Pumping Well (254155)
Drawdown
[h1
O to 0 LO LD LO LO LC) In LC) N kr, LO LC) Ln to in to
0 n 0 co co co Lv •ttt CD CO CO CO CD 0) c"7 c`7
66666 0`7'4 4C 444 V 4 tri tri
Ln a LO a a 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 O 0 0
a co co D] Cr) Cr) Cn LO LO LC) CO n t- 1- n 0 'cY
CO CO CO LO � LO CO CO CO CO CO CO (O CO CD CD Co cO
0 0 0 0 0 In LO LO Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 a 0 O O
00000*I' •rNn n nl-F-n n nnnl-i-nnn
N N N CV N1 -f -n nn n nnnT-n nnnnv-nnn
L
to in N to 0 In to 0
C)) CO 1- n 0 Ln L(]
r 00 66066
0 0 n C) 0 0 0 L+n
LC) 0 CO CO I- n CO LO
L[") LO U in in LD Ln L0
0 0 a o o o a 0 O 0
00a 0000000
066p666006
47
7
J
Pumping Rate
f rpm1
Time
Ln0 in 0
O N CD 0 in co 0 Ln O N CO C7 Ln Lo 0 O Ln 0 Ry co to
•,- r r N N M CO C•7 Cn c# CC) 1— N N N Cr] in r7
r.- Lr) na)MLncrs
ti ay] N -1 a V co N N
r N d. D 0 LO 0 Ln 0 tin
C� 7 � CO Cfl
N •d' Co 0 to 0 tO 0 10
v -to In 1- co 0 0
1- Ln in
From Start (t) From Shutoff (t')
[min] jminl
Zancanella and Associates
I
i
0 0<NI 0 0
C) Q ▪ 1.2 • 00o 8 0
[ail lana1
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
r
Static - - Observed
a
a
[j] LuMOpMMa IenX !se`u
a
a
0
O
ark
W tble 3
Raw Water Quality Analysis
Tri-State Trucking, Existing Well
w
Test No, Analyte
Category
C lass ificalla n
Regulation Units
Detectable Level Result
Standard
Status
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
9 Copper
10 Iron
11 Lead
12 Magnesium
13 Manganese
14 Mercury
15 Nickel
16 Silver
17 Sodium
18 Thallium
19 Zinc
20 Chloride
21 Cyanide
22 Fluoride
23 Selenium
24 Sulfate
25 Nitrate
26 Nitrite
27 Alkalinity, Bicarbonate
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
5E
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
r0
71
72
r3
r4
r5
rg
r7
ra
rg
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
Alkalinity, Total
Conductivity, 25 -C
Hardness
Langeiier Index
pH
Temperature, Test
Total Dissolved Solids
Coliforms, Total (MPN)
Escherichia Coli (MPN)
Gross Alpha Activity
Gross Beta Activity
Radium 226
Radium 228
Radon
Uranium
2,4,5 -TP (Siivex)
2,4-D
Alachlor
Aldicarb
Aldicarb suifone
Aldicarb sulfoxide
Atrazine
Benzo[alpyrene
Carbofuran
Chlordane
Dalapon
D i(2 -ethyl hexyl )adipate
Di (2 -ethyl hexyl )phthalate
D it:roiT octii or opropa n e
Dinoseb
Diquat
Endothall
Endrin
Ethylene dibromide
Glyphosate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Hexachlorobenzene
H exach lorocyclope ntadie ne
Lindane
Methoxychlor
Oxamyl (Vydate)
Pentachlorophenol
Picloram
Polychlorinated biphenyls
Simazine
Toxaphene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1.2 -Dig hi o roeth a ne
1,2-Dichloroprapane
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
cis -1,2 Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride)
Elhylbenzene
Monochlorobenzene
0 -Dichlorobenzene
Para-Dichiorobenzen e
Styrene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
Trans -1,2 Dichloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
x.i.nag Total
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Metal
Nonmetal
Nonmetal
Nonmetal
Nonmetal
Nonmetal
Oxidized Ammonia
Oxidized Ammonia
Wet Chemistry
Wet Chemistry
Wet Chemistry
Wet Chemistry
Wet Chemistry
Wet Chemistry
Wet Chemistry
Wet Chemistry
Bacterium
Bacterium
Particle
Particle
Radium
Radium
Radon
Uranium
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Synthetic
Volatite
Volatite
Volatile
Volatile
Volatile
Volatile
Volatile
Volatile
Volatile
Volatile
Volatile
Volatile
Volatile
Volatile
Volatite
Volatile
Volatile
Volatile
Volatile
Volatile
Volatile
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
Inorganic
inorganic
Inorganic
Microorganism
Microorganism
Radionuclide
Radionuclide
Radionuclide
Radionuclide
Radionuclide
Radionuclide
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Secondary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
None
Primary
Primary
Secondary
Primary
None
Secondary
Primary
Informal
Secondary
None
Primary
Secondary
Secondary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Seccndar
Primary
Primary
None
None
None
Informal
None
Secondary
None
Secondary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
None
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
mgJL
mgJL
mgJL
mgJL
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mgJL
mg/L
mgJL
mgJL
mgJL
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mgJL
mg/L
mg/L
mgJL
mg/L
mg/L as CN-
mglL
mg/L
mg.L
mgJL as N
mgJL as N
mg/L as CaCO3
mg/L as CaCO3
pS
mg/L as CaCO3
Standard Units
Standard Units
C
mg/L
MPN1100mL
MPN1100mL
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
mgJL
mgJL
mg/L
mg/L
mgJL
mgJL
mg/L
mgJL
mgJL
mg/L
mg/L
mgJL
mg/L
mgJL
mgJL
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mgJL
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mgJL
mgJL
mgJL
mgJL
mg/L
mgJL
mgJL
mgJL
mg/l.
mg/L
mgJL
mgJL
mgJL
mgJL
mgJL
mg/L
mg/L
mgJL
mgJL
mg/L
mg/L
mgJL
mgJL
0.025
0.0004
0.0014
0.002
0.0003
0.0005
0.012
0.006
0.01
0.2
0.002
0.05
0.05
0.0001
0.0005
0.002
2
0.0003
0.005
25
0.01
0.4
0.002
25
0.05
0.075
5
5
1.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
10
0
0
2.9
2.7
0.2
0.6
13
0.001
0.0002
0.0001
0.00025
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.00025
0.00002
0.0005
0.0002
0.001
0.0006
0.0006
0.30002
0.0002
0.0004
0.009
0.00001
0.00001
0.005
0.00001
0.00001
0.00002
0.00005
0.00001
0.00005
0.0005
0.00004
0.0001
0.0001
0.00025
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
0.011
Below DL
Below DL
350
0.0077
Below DL
2.2
Below DL
190
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
0.024
970
Below DL
0.013
274
Below DL
0.48
0.024
2,720
8.8
Below DL
436
436
5,330
1,700
0.61
7.0
20
5,060
0
0
42
59
0.5
0.6
440
0.018
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below OL
Below OL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below OL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
Below DL
0.20
0.0060
0.010
2.0
0.0040
0.0050
N/A
0.1000
1.3000
0.30
0.0150
N/A
0.050
0.0020
0.10
0.05
N/A
0.0020
5.0
250
0.20
4.0
0.050
250
10.0 (Category Total)
1.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
300
N/A
6.5<pH<8.5
N/A
500
0
0
15.0
50.0 (Trigger Level)
5.0 (Category Total)
5.0 (Category Total)
N/A
0.030
0.050
0.070
0.0020
0.0030
0.0020
0.0040
0.0030
0.00020
0.040
0.0020
0.20
0.40
0.0060
0.00020
0.0070
0.020
0.10
0.0020
0.000050
0.70
0.00040
0.00020
0.0010
0.050
0.00020
0.040
0.20
0.0010
0.50
0.00050
0.0040
0.0030
0.20
0.0050
0.0070
0.070
0.0050
0.0050
0.0050
0.0050
0.070
0.0050
0.70
0.10
0.60
0.0750
0.10
0.0050
1.0
0.10
0.0050
0.0020
10.0
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
N/A
Pass
Pass
Fair
"":++.
Pass
NIA
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
N/A
Pass
Pass
Fail "...Ir
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
N/A
N/A
N/A
Fail
N/A
Pass
N/A
Fail
Pass
Pass
Fail••'"*""
Fail
Pass
Pass
NIA
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Zancaneua and Associates
Z126000126414 Critton, Bili tRelisonjllWaterqualityTable.xls RawOrinkingLongAnalysis
10/6/2005
---- 5--°F
General Parcel ctinthiry
Delineates ac of Use
Weil
}•.
7
•
•ROJECT LOCATION MAP
CALE:
r " 75d'
RAW BY:
SCR
DATE:
October 5, 2006
CHID BY:
SHEET:
1 OF 1
APPA BY: DRAWING:
--- VcinityMap.dwg
Tri—State Trucking
ZANCANELLA AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
POST OFFICE BOx 1908 — 101} DRANO AVENUE
c4.ENw000 SPRUIOS. COF.ORAPO SI6OZ (970} 94,55-5700
FIGURE NO.
4
PROJECT: 26414
Cotvuudo brgarnx,+t
al PubtkH.�h
and f'r+imn mcnr
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Compliance Assurance & Data Management Unit
REPORTIN1G FORM FOR ORGANIC CONTAMINANT ANALYSES
SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM FOR EACH SAMPLE
Are these results to be used to fulfill compliance montioring requirements YESnor NOD
Is this a check or confirmation sample? YES❑ NOE]
PWSID: 06-5771-01 COUNTY: Garfield
SYSTEM NAME: Tri State Trucking C/O Zancanella & Associaties
DATE COLLECTED: 8/22/2006
SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS: 1011 Grand Ave. Glenwood CO 81601
Stites 2i3arcss/P0 Box city state Zip
CONTACT PERSON: Collin Robinson PHONE: (970) 945-5700
SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Collin Robinson TIME COLLECTED: 12:30 pm
ENTRY POINT (Finished Water) SAMPLED SOURCE WATER SAMPLE fl
FOR ENTRY POINT SAMPLE PLEASE INDICATE: Chlorinated D Other Treatment
Finished - Not Treated (No chlorine or other treatment) El
STATE ENTRY POINT CODE: EPNAUGLE W SOURCE(S) REPRESENTED: NAUGLE WELL
DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPORTED BI THE LABORATORY? YES❑ NOE
LUTE: CHECK OR CONFIRMATION SAMPLES CANNOT BE (OMPOSJUP
For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line
•LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 06-5771-01 CLIENT NAME or ID #; NAUGLE WELL
ABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021
DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 8123106 DATE ANALYZED: 8/24/2006 - 8/30/2006
COMMENTS:
•
of
•
J
LABORATORY NUMBER: 06-5771-01 PWSID 06-5771-01
REGULATED PHASE I, II, V ORGANIC CHEMICALS - VOCs
UNITS MUST BE REPORTED IN µg/L
CONTAMINANT
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropan e
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Benzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
CAS#
RESULT
ARIL
75-35-4 BDL
71-55-6 BDL
79-00-5 BDL
107-06-2 BDL
78-87-5 BDL
120-82-1 BDL
71-43-2 BDL
56-23-5 BDL
156-59-2 BDL
75-09-2 BDL
i'LCL
STANDARD
METHOD
7 1 E524.2
200
a
E524.2
5 1 E524.2
5 1 E524.2
5 1 E524.2
Lab Report Lab
Limit µg/L NIDLµg[L
0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5
-BLANK
RESULT
BDL
BDL
70 E524.2
5 1 E524.2
5 E524.2
70 1 E524.2
5
E524.2 r
0.5 0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
Ethylbenzene
Monochlorobenzene
'o -Dichlorobenzene
para-Dich1 orobenzene
Styrene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
cans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
''Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
;Xylenes (total)
100-41-4 BDL
108-90-7 BDL
95-50-1 BDL
700 1 E524.2
100 1 E524.2
600 1 E524.2
0.5 0.5
0.5 - 0.5
0.5 0.5
BDL
BDL
BDL
106-46-7 BDL
100-42-5 BDL
75 1 E524.2
T 100 T E524.2
0.5 0.5
0.5 - 0.5
BDL
BDL
127-18-4 BDL
108-88-3 j BDL
156-60-5 BDL
79-01-6 BDL
5 1 E524.2
1,000 i E524.2
100 1 E524.2
5 1 E524.2
0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5
0.5 _ 0.5
0.5
0.5
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
75-01-4 BDL
2 1 E524.2
0.5 0.5
BDL
1330-20-7 BDL
10,000 { E524.2
0.5
0.5
BDL
BDL - Indicates char the corms] was analyzed for, hai was below the lab MDL. B • The analyze is found in the associated Wank as well as in he sample.
NT • Not Tcxted for Compound. MCL • Maximum Contaminant Lcvci.
µ VI- - Micrograms per Liter Lab MDL Laboratory Method Detection Limit.
1 • Indicatc5 the presence of a compound that meas the identiS canon criteria but the result is less than the sample quantitation limn and greater Chao the Lab MDL.
(Above the Lab MDL but below the PQL)..
•
2 of 5
LABORATORY NUMBER: 06-5771-01 PWSID 06-5771-01
UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS - VOCs
UNITS MUST RE REPORTED IN µg/L
CONTAMINANT
1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane
Bromomethane
Bromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Bromobenzene
Chloroethane
p-Chlortoluene
o-Chlorotoluene
2,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dich loropropane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1, 3 , 5 -Tri methylbenzene
Chloromethane
1,2 , 4 -Tri m e t hylbenzen e
1, 2, 3 -Tri ch l orop rop ane
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,1-Dichloropropene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
rn-Dichlorobenzene
Isopropylbenzene
CAS#
630-20-6
RESULT
u g[L
BDL
74-83-9 BDL
74-97-5 BDL
74-95-3 BDL
108-86-1 BDL
MCL 'STANDARD Lab Report Lab
gIL METHOD Limit _IL MDL g/L
E524.2 0.5 0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
E524.2 } 0.5 0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
BLANK
RESULT
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
75-00-3 BDL
106-43-4 BDL
95-49-8 BDL
590-20-7 BDL
E524.2 0.5 0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
142-28-9 SOL
75-71-8 BDL
108-67-8 BDL
74-87-3 BDL
95-63-6 BDL
96-18-4 BDL
87-61-6 BDL
563-58-6 BOL
75-34-3 BDL
79-34-5 - BDL
541-73-1 - BDL -
98-82-8 BDL
E524.2
E524.2
E524.2
E524.2
E524.2
E524.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
E524.2 - 0.5 0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
HDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
p-Isopropyltoluene
P 1 uo rotri c h l oro methane
Naphthalene
n -Propyl benzene
99-87-6 BDL
75-69-4 BDL
91-20-3 BDL
103-65-1 BDL
n-Butylbenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
104-51-8 BDL
87-68-3 BDL
E524.2 0.5 0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
sec-Butylbenzene
tort-Butylbcnzene
135-98-8 BDL
98-06-6 BDL
THMs
Brom odichlo romethane
Bromoform
C h 1 orodi bromorn ethan e
Chloroform
75-27-4 BDL
75-25-2 BDL
124-48-1 BDL
E524.2 0.5 0.5
E524.2 0.5 0.5
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
E524.2
E524.2 r 0.5 0.5
BDL
67-66-3 BDL _ -
E524.2
0.5 0.5
BDL
E524.2 0.5 0.5
BDL
E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL
EDL - knlicaus that the coptrnd was analyzed for. but was below the Lars MDL. B - The analyte is found in :he associated blank as well as is be sample.
NT = Not Tested For Compound.
NCL- Maximum Canlaminant Level.
N gIL • Micrograms per Liter. Lab MDL - Laboratory Method Dei ction Limit
1 • trdicncs the pro:clue of a compound that meets the idcnti&cation criteria bur the result is teS. than the sample quenntarion limit and greater lhan the Lab MDL.
(Above the Lab MDL but below the PQLI.
•
3 of5
LABORATORY NUMBER: 06-5771-01 PWSID 06-5771-01
REGULATED PHASE I, II, V ORGANIC CHEMICALS - SOCs
• UNITS MUST RE REPORTED IN AWL
CONTAMINANT
Dioxin
CAS RESULT
j.t gIL
1746-01-6 NT
2,4-D
94-75-7
MCL
iz g/L
0.00003
STANDARD Lab Report Lab BLANK
METHOD Limit T, g/L MDL)�a1L RESULT
NT
BOL 70
2,4,5 -TP
93-72-1
BDL 50
Alachlor
15972-60-8 BDL
Atrazine
1912-24-9
2
E515.4 0,1 0.1 BDL
E515.4 0.2 0.2 BDL
E525.2 0.25 0.2 BDL
BDL 3
Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8
Carbofuran 1 563-66-2
Chlordane
Dalapon
57-74-9
75-99-0
Dibromochloropropane 96-12-8
BDL 0.2
E525.2 0.25 0.1 BDL
E525.2 0.02 0.02 BDL
BDL 40
E53I.1 0.5 0.5 BDL
BDL 2
BDL 200
E508 0.2 0.2 BDL
E515.4 1 1 BDL
BDL 0.2
E504.1 0.02 0.02 BDL
Dinoseb
85-85-7
BDL 7
E515.4 0.2 0.2 BDL
Diquat
85-00-7
BDL 20
E549.2 0.4 0.4 BDL
Di(2-ethylhexyl}adipate 103-23-1
BDL 400
Di(2-ethylhexyl)phtha[ate 117-87-7
Endothall
BDL 6
E525.2 0.6 0.6 BDL
E525.2 0.6 0.6 BDL
145-73-3
BDL 100
E548.1 9 9 BDL
Endrin
72-20-8
BDL 2
Ethylene Dibromide L 106-93-4
;lyphosate 1071-83-6
BDL 0.05
E508 0.01 0.01 BDL
E504.1 0.01 0.01 BDL
I3DL 700
E547 5 5 BDL
Heptachlor 76-44-8
BDL 0.4
E508 0.01 0.01 BDL
Heptachlor Epoxide 1024-57-3
BDL 0.2
E508 0.01 0.01 BDL
Hexachlorobenzene _ 118-74-1 BDL
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77-47-4 BDL
1
50
E508 0.02
E508 0.05
0.02 BDL
0.05 BDL
Lindane
58-89-9
BDL
0.2
E508 0.01
0.01 BDL
Methoxychlor 72-43-5 BDL
Oxamyl
40
E508 0.05
0.05 BDL
23135-22-0
BDL
200
E531.1 0.5
0.5 BDL
Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 BDL
Picloram
1
E515.4 0.04
0.04 BDL A
1918-02-1
BDL
500
E515.4 0.1
0.1 BDL
Po]ychlorinated Biphenyls 1336-36-3
BDL
0.5
E508 0.1
0.1 BDL
Simazine 122-34-9 BDL
Toxaphene 8001-35-2 BDL
4
E525.2 0.25
3
E508 0.5
0.07 BDL
0.5 BDL.
$ flL • Int/Waits that the opund was,tnalysed for. but was below the Leh MDL. B = The analyte is Found in the associated blank as well u [n he sample.
NT - Not Tested for Compound.
MCL Maximum Contaminant Level.
N g/L - yficrograma per Liter. Lab MIIL = Laboratory Method Detection Limn.
J • Indicates the presence or a compound that mats the identification criteria but the result is Less than the sample quantitation limit and (plows than the Lab MDL.
{Above the Lab MDL but below the PQLy.
•
4of5
•
LABORATORY NUMBER: 06-5771-01 PWSED 06-5771-01
UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS - SOCs
UNITS MUST tIE REPORTED IN µgIL
CONTAMINANT
Aldicarb sulfoxide
Propachior
Metribuzin
Metolachlor
Methomyl
3-Hydroxycarbofuran
Aldicarb sulfone
CAS#
1646-87-3
1918-16-7
21087-64-9
51218-45-2
16752-77-5
16655-82-6
1646-88-4
RESULT
g/L
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
MCL STANDARD
ggIL METHOD
E531.1
- E525.2
E525.2
E525,2
E531,1
E531.1
E531.1
Lab Report
Limit 'AWL
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.5
Lab BLAIN
!IDLe.fL RESULT
0.5
0.25
0.25
BDL
BOL
BDL
0.25 BDL
0.5 BDL
0.5
0.5
0.5 BDL
Dieldrin
Aldrin
Butachlor
Carbaryl
Dicamba
60-57-1
309-00-2
23184-66-9
Aldicarb
63-25-2
1918-00-9
116-06-3
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
E508
E508
E525.2
E531.1
E515.4
E531.1
0.01
0.01
0.25
0.5
0.3
0.5
0.5 BDL
0.01 BDL
0.01 BDL
0.25 BDL
0.5 BDL
0.3 BDL
0.5 BDL
BOL - indicates that the copund was analyzed for, but was below the Lab MOL B = The analyse 4 found in the associated blank as well as in the sample.
NT Not Tested for Compound. MCL - Maximum Contaminant Level.
µ &14 Micrograms pct Liter. Lab MDL - Laboratory Method Detection Limit.
1 • Indicates the presence of a compound that meets the identification criteria but the result is less than the sample quantitasieu limit and greater than the lab MDL.
{Above the Lab MDL but below the PQLj.
I/Laboratory Results Reviewed & Approved by
MAIL RESULTS TO: CDPHE, WQCD-CADM
4300 Cherry Creek Drive South
Denver, CO 80246-1530
•
Technical Director
Title
FAX: 303-758-1398
7/x-(0 U
Date
5 of 5
tom, 14
r`r
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Compliance Assurance & Data Management Unit
REPORTING FORM FOR NITRATE OR NITRITE AS NITROGEN ANALYSES
[ dN.miu tkpukn`enr
of 14A& Heald:
sndhovinrnmcnr SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM FOR EACH SAMPLE
Are these results to be used to fulfill compliance montioring requirements YES[ NOD
is this a check or confirmation sample? YES❑ NOO
PWSID: 06-5771-01 COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 8/22/2006
SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Tri State Trucki g C/O Zancanelia & Associaties
SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS: 1011 Grand Ave.
Glenwood CO 81601
Street addrtsr'Pa sox Cry Sale Zip
CONTACT PERSON: Collin Robinson PHONE: (970) 945-5700
SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Catlin Robinson
ENTRY POINT (Finished Water) SAMPLED
FOR ENTRY POINT SAMPLE PLEASE INDICATE:
OTHER DESCRIPTION:
TIME COLLECTED: 12:30 pm
SOURCE WATER SAMPLE n
Chlorinated El Other Treatment D
Finished - Not Treated (No chlorine or other treatment) pX
STATE ENTRY POINT CODE: EPAUGLE WEI
SOURCE(S) REPRESENTED: NAUGLE WELL
DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY THE LABORATORY? YES NOE
CHECK OR CONFIRMATION SAMPLES CANNOT BE COMPOSITED
For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line
LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 06-5771-01 CLIENT NAME or ID #: NAUGLE WELL
•ABORATORy NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory
DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 8/23/06
LATS PHONE: (303) 425-6021
DATE ANALYZED: 8/23/2006 01:30 PM
COMMENTS:
PARAMETER
RESULT
in (mg/L)
MCL
in (mg/L)
STANDARD
METHOD_
LAB MDL
in (mg/L)
•NITRATE -N _
8.8
r 10.0
E300
0.05
NITRITE -N
BDL
1.0
E300
0.075
NITRATE*NITRITE-N
_ NT
10.0L
E300
-
BDL - Indicates thin the copund was analyzed for. but wag below the Lib MDL.
N7 = Not Tested for Compound,
mg/L - Ml kligrarns per Liter.
• .viewed & Approved by
MCL — Maximum Contain inarn LeveE.
H - Holding time has been exceeded_
Lab MDL= Laboratory Method Detxliou Limn.
Technical Directora
Title ate
MAIL RESULTS TO: CDPHE, WQCD-CADM-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530
•
Colotele Deportment
of Pulr1c Hralsh
and l j, nmcnr
Colorado Department of Public Health and Eoviroument
Compliance Assurance & Data Management Unit
REPORTING FORM FOR COR tOSIVITY ANALYSES
SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SAMPLING POINT
Are these results to be used to fulfill compliance montioring requirements YES[X NOI 1
Is this a check or confirmation sample? YE Sn NO[]x
PWSID: 06-5771-01 COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 8/22/2006
SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Tri State Trucking C/O Zancanella & Associaties
SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS: 1011 Grand Ave..
Glenwood CO 81601
Siren address/PO$ox City Slate Zip
CONTACT PERSON: Collin Robinson PHONE: (970) 945-5700
SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Collin Robinson TIME COLLECTED: 12:30 pm
WATER TYPE: RAW (No chlorine or other treatment) ® CHLORINATED 0 OTHER TREATMENT
Ei
SAMPLE POINT:
NAUGLE WELL
LOCATION: Address SOURCE{S} REPRESENTED:
NAUGLE WELL
CORROSIVITY SAMPLES CANNOT BE COMPOSITED
Far Laboratory Use Only Below This Lure
LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 06-5771-01 CLIENT NAME or ID #: NAUGLE WELL
LABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021
SATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 8/23/06 DATE ANALYZED: 8/23/2006 - 9/05/2006
COMMENTS:
PARAMETER
RESULT
in (mg/L)
MCL
in (rng/L)
STANDARD
METHOD
LAB MDI,
in (mg/L)
LANGLIER INDEX
+ 0.61
***
SM2330 B
CALCIUM _
350
N/A
200.8
0.012
DISSOLVED SOLIDS
5060
N/A
SM2540 C
10
pH
7.00
N/A
E150.1
1
TOTAL ALKALINITY
, 436
_
N/A
SM2320 B
5
TEMPERATURE
20 C
N/A
..-
NT b Hol Tested for Compound. Iti1A — Not applicable
mg/L - Milligrams p r Liler. MCL Maximum Contaminant Levet.
Lab MDL - Labonmry Method Damenm Limit k - Hnldmg Time has been exceeded
*** IF LANGLIER INDEX IS A NEGATIVE DiUNIFIER, WATER IS CORROSIVE.
IF LANGLIER INDEX IS A ZERO, WATER IS BALANCED.
IF L.ANGLIER INDEX IS A POSITIVE NUMBER, WATER I5 SCALE FORMING.
•
Technical Director
.ceviewed & Approved by Title
MAIL RESULTS TO: CDPIIE, WQCD-CADM-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530
Date
[ Mara f. I lrpa+rntrnt
ui Pinta H61th
and b inrnnlerd
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Compliance Assurance & Data Management Unit
REPORTING FORM FOR INORGANIC ANALYSES
SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM FOR EACH SAMPLE
Are these results to be used to fulfill compliance montioring requirements YESLJ NOD
Is this a check or confirmation sample? YE Sr NOD
PWSID: 06-577I-01 COUNTY: Garfield
DATE COLLECTED: 8/22/2006
SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Tri State Trucking C/O Zancanella & Associaties
SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS; 1011 Grand Ave. Glenwood CO 81601
Street addeessTO Box City Slate Zip
CONTACT PERSON: Coffin Robinson PHONE: (970) 945-5700
SAMPLE COLLECTED I3Y: Collin Robinson TIME COLLECTED: 12:30 pm
ENTRY POINT (Finished Water) SAMPLED SOURCE WATER SAMPLE 0
FOR ENTRY POINT SAMPLE PLEASE INDICATE: Chlorinated ❑ Other Treatment
Finished - Not Treated (No chlorine or other treatment) [ }
OTHER DESCRIPTION:
STATE ENTRY POINT CODE: EPA,UGLE WEI SOURCE(S) REPRESENTED: NAUGLE WELL
DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY THE LABORATORY? YEC NOE
CHECK OR CONFIRMATION SAMPLES CANNOT BE COMPOSITED
For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line
•LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 06-5771-01 CLIENT NAME or ID #: NAUGLE WELL
AI3ORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory LAB PHONE: (3031 425-6021
DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 8/23/06 DATE ANALYZED; 8/24/2006 - 9/06/2006
COMMENTS:
PARAMETER
RESULT
i n (mgfL)
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BDL
BOL
MCL
in (mgfL)
0.006
STANDARD
METHOD
200.8
LAB MDL
in (mg/L)
0.0004
0.05/0.010*
200.8
0.0014
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
CYANIDE
-FLUORIDE
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SODIUM
0.01 I
BDL
BDL
0.0077
BDL
0.48
BDL
BOL
2.0
0.004
0.005
0.l
0.2
4.0
0.002
**
200.8
200.8
200.8
200.8
SM4500-CN E
SM4500-F C
245.1
200.8
THALLIUM
0.024
970
BDL
0.05
**
0.002
200.8
200.8
200.8
0.002
0.0003
0.0005
0.006
0.01
0.4
0.0001
0.0005
0.002
2
0.0003
BAL = Indkares that the copund was analysed for. but was below the Lab MOL.
NT • Not Tested for Compound.
mJL = Milligrams per Liter.
MCL - Maximum Con tarsi non Level.
H - Hiding time has been exceeded,
• • MCL.6010 mgrL is effective January 23, 2004.
•• . NOT an MCL, "Monitoring Requirement ONy'•.
Lab MAL - Laboratory Method Detection Limit.
'YL Technical Director
4110.:viewcd & Approved by Title
MAIL RESULTS TO: CDPHE, WQCD-CADM-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530
/ICS
Date
f;,doablu neparu-deny
uE 14aLf:. Hauld:
and FT,imnmcru
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Compliance Assurance & Data Management Unit
REPORTING FORM FOR RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM FOR EACH SAMPLE
Are these results to be used to fulfill compliance montiorinS requirements YESE NOD
is this a check or confirmation sample? YES[] NOD
PWSID: 06-5771-01 COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 8/22/2006
SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Tri State Trucking CIO Zancanella & Associaties
SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS: 1011 Grand Ave.
Glenwood CO 81601
Street eddressPO Box City State Zip
CONTACT PERSON: Collin Robinson PHONE: S970} 945-5700
SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Collin Robinson TIME COLLECTED: 12:30 pm
ENTRY POINT (Finished Water) SAMPLED SOURCE WATER SAMPLE
FOR ENTRY POINT SAMPLE PLEASE INDICATE: Chlorinated 0 Other Treatment 0
Finished - Not Treated (No chlorine or other treatment) 0
OTHER DESCRIPTION:
STATE ENTRY POINT CODE: EP NAUGLE
SOURCE(S) REPRESENTED: NAUGLE WELL
DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY THE LABORATORY? YES❑ NO0
CHECK OR CONFIRMATION SAMPLES CANNOT BE COMPOSITED
For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line
•inkLABORATORY SAMPLE #: 06-5771-01 CLIENT NAME or ID #: NAUGLE WELL
,ABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory
DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 8/23/06 DATE ANALYZED: 8/31/2006
COMMENTS:
LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021
PARAMETER
Gross Alpha
Screening Gross Beta
TOTAL SOLIDS
Radium 226
Radium 228
Uranium
RESULT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
18
UNITS
MCL
30 pg/L4
STANDARD
METHOD
200.8
LAB MDL
1 ig.+[L
REGULATORY
MDL
1 I.1gi1.
8DL — Indicates that the coneamina u was arralyaed for. Ind wap below the Loh MDI.
Lab MDL - Laboratory Method Detection Limit.
pCi1L • Picocurie€ per Liter.
g/L • Micragrema per Liter
m21L - bl to igrams per Liter
MCL - Maximum Contami num Level.
MAL • Method Detection Limit [the laboratory MDL mux(
• CL---(' ?yk.
NT • Not Testas Far Compound.
I = The MCL for beta particle and photon activity is 4 mi:ltrems per ynr.
2 - The Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level is a recommendation only maim enforceable.
3 - MCL of 5 pCifl_ is for COMBINED Fadi um 226 and 223
4 = 32 irgiL (equivalent m 20 pCsLI..
NIA - 2401 applicable,
bo equal mor fess than the regulalary minimum detection level).
Technical Director
,:viewed & Approved by Title
MAIL RESULTS TO: CDPHE, WQCD-CADM-82, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530
Colorado Deparvnent
or Public Health
and Environment
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Compliance Assurance & Data Management Unit
REPORTING FORM FOR RADIONUCLIDE ANALYSIS
Sampler; Please Complete a Separate Form for Each Sample
Are these results to be used to fulfill compliance monitoring requirements? YES Dor NO
Is this a check or confirmation sample? 0 YES ❑ NO
PWSID: CO COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 08 / 22 / 2006
SYSTEM NAME: Tri State Trucking
SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS: c/o Zancanella & Assts.. 1011 Grand Ave. Glenwood Sorinss CO 81601
Siren addresspP0 Box CITY STATE ZIP
CONTACT PERSON: Collin Robinson PHONE: ( 970) 945 5700
SAMPLE COLLECTED 13Y: Collin Robinson
SEP 2 2 2006
TIME COLLECTED: 1230 am/pm
ENTRY POINT (Finished Water) SAMPLE 0 SOURCE WATER (Raw Water) SAMPLE 0
FOR ENTRY POINT SAMPLE PLEASE INDICATE: Chlorinated 0 Other Treatment 0
Finished — Not Treated (No chlorine or other treatment)
STATE ENTRY POINT CODE: EP SOURCE(S) REPRESENTED: Naugle Well 1
DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY THE LABORATORY? YES 0 NO 0
For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line
LABORATORY SAMPLE # H370/06-1 CLIENT NAME or ID# Evergreen Analytical, Inc.
LABORATORY NAME: Hazen Research. Inc.
LAB PHONE # ( 303) 279 4501
COMMENTS:
DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 08 1 24 /2006
PARAMETER
Gross Alpha (4002)
Radium 226 (4020)
Radium 228 (4030)
Uranium (4006)
Screening Gross
_Beta (4100)
Total Solids ono)
Radon
42±4
pCi/L
MCL
15 pCi/L
0.5±0.3
pCt/L
Ra -226+228=
5 pCi/L
0.5±0.6
59±3
pC i/L
u�
pCi/L
mg1L
440#30 pCi/L
r Secondafy laimum Cgatninant L evc] - tion-enfu ceable Standard
Ra -226+228=
5 pCi/L
30 ig/L
Trigger level
50 nCi/L
SMCL' = 500
mgfL
Laboratory Results Reviewed & Approved by
STANDARD
METHOD
EPA 900.0
SM 7500 -Ra B
EPA Ra -05
EPA 900,0
EPA 160.3
SM 7500 -Rn 13
2.9 pCi/L
0.2 pCi/L
0.6 pCi/L
AWL
2.7 pCi/L
rngfL
13 pCi11.
REGULATORY
MDL
3 pCi/L
1 pCi/L
1 pCi/L
4 pCi/L
NIA
Robert Rostad Laboratary Manager
Title
MAIL RESULTS TO: CDPHE, WQCD-CADM
4300 Cherry Creek Drive South
Denver, CO 80246-1530
FAX: 303-782-0390
09 / 06 / 2006
09 /14 1 2006
09/07/2006
08 1 24 1 2006
09 1 21 / 2006
Date
For Stale Use ONLY
•4900 4010 4006
Compliance Alpha Combined Radium -226+228 Uranium
Evergreen Analytical, Inc.
4036 Youngfield Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-3862
(303) 425-6021
Client Sample ID: NAUGLE WELL — Lab Work Order: 06-5771
Client Project ID: Lab Sample ID: 06-5771-01
Date Collected: 8/22/06 1230 Sample Matrix: Drinking Water
Date Received: 8/23/06
Method: SM2330B Prep Method:
LANGELIER INDEX
Date Prepared; 9/5/06 Dilution Factor: 1
Date Analyzed: 9/5106 Lab Fraction ID: 06-5771-01N
Analytes CAS Number Result LQL Units
Langelier Index + 0.61
Method: E150.1 Prep Method:
PH
Date Prepared: 8/23/06 Dilution Factor: 1
Date Analyzed: 8/23/06 1155 Lab Fraction ID: 06-5771-01N
Analytes CAS Number Result LQL Units
pH 7.00 1.00 pH Units
Method: SM 2540C Prep Method:
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS (TDS)
'rate Prepared: 8/28/06
irate
Analyzed: 8/29/06 0000
Analytes
Lab File ID: 75 Dilution Factor: 1
Method Blank: MBLK Lab Fraction ID: 06-5771-01N
CAS Number Result LQL Units
Total Dissolved Solids 5060 10.0 mg/L
•
Analyst
Approved
Qualifiers: B - Analyte detected in the associated Method $lank, value not subtracted from result
E - Extrapolated value.Value exceeds calibration range
H - Sample analysis exceeded analytical holding time
1 - Indicates an estimated value when the compound is detected, but is below the LQL
S - Spike Recovery outside accepted limits
U - Compound analyzed for but not detected
X - See case narrative
* -Value exceeded the Maximum Contamination Level (MCL), TCU' limit, or if
compound is undetected, LQL exceeds MCL.
Definitions: NA - Not Applicable
LQL - Lower Quantitation Limit
Surr - Surrogate
Print Date. 9/5/06
• Client Sample ID:
Client Project ED:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Evergreen Analytical, Inc.
4036 Youngfieid Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-3862
(303)423-6021
NAUGLE WELL Lab Work Order: 06-5771
Lab Sample ID: 06-5771-01
8122106 Sample Matrix: Drinking Water
8123106
Method: E245.1
MERCURY, DRINKING WATER
Prep Method: E245.1
Date Prepared: 8/24/06 Lab File ID: 082406w
Date Analyzed: 8/25/06 Method Blank: M13-10717
Analytes CAS Number
Mercury 7439-97-6
Result
Dilution Factor: l
Lab Fraction ID: 06-5771-01M
LQL Units
U
0.00010 mg1L
Method: SM 234013
TOTAL HARDNESS (CALC)
Prep Method:
Date Prepared: 8/30/06
Date Analyzed: 8/31/06
Analytes CAS Number
•
•
Total Hardness as CaCO31L 471-34-1
1 eD
Result
1700
Dilution Factor: 1
Lab Fraction ID: 06-5771-01M
LQL Units
Analyst
1.2 mg/L CaCO3
Qualifiers: B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank, value not subtracted from result
E - Extrapolated value.Value exceeds calibration range
H - Sample analysis exceeded analytical holding time
1
- Indicates an estimated value when the compound is detected, but is below the LQL
5 - Spike Recovery outside accepted limits
U - Compound analyzed for but not detected
X - See case narrative
• -Value exceeded the Maximum Contamination Level (MCL), TCLP limit, or if
compound is undetected, LQL exceeds MCL.
Approved
Definitions: NA - Not Applicable
LQL - Lower Quantitation Limit
Surr - Surrogate
Print Date 9/7/06
industrial•
LABORATORIES
Industrial Laboratories is your independent,
third party analytical testing laboratory
To: Evergreen Analytical
4036 Youngfield
Wheat Ridge
Attn: Carl Smits
CO 80033-5862
TEST REPORT
EVI601
Date Received: 8/23/2006
Date Reported: S/28/2006
PD Number: 5437
Note: Sample test procedures conform to EPA 40CFR136 requirements.
Lab No. Sample Description
060823027-01A
060823027-01A
•
Test
Method
06-5771-010/P
06-5771-010/P
ff
Departmen 'Tanager
* Escherichia coli
9221 E
* Total Coliforms MPN
SM 9221 B
Analysis
Result Units MDL Date/By
<2 MPN/ t OOmL
<2 fecal; <2 MPN/ 1 DOmL
total
JJ
8/23/2006
GH
8/23/2006
' Scope Analysis
Subconhacted Analysis
MOL Method Detection Limit
ND= Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit
Page: 1 of 1
4046 Youngfield 5t. • Wheat Ridge,Colorado 80033 • (303) 287-9691 • (303) 287-0964 Fax • www,industriallabs.net
Receipt of analysis services acknowledges the terms and conditinns orr the ,-e ierse side and acknowledges that they a' .: part of this_ order.
This report is not to be reproduced in whole or in part for advertising purposes without obtaining prior written authorization.
Evergreen Analytical, Inc.
4036 Youngfield Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-3862
(303) 425-6021
Client Sample ID: NAUGLE WELL
Client Project ID:
Date Collected: 8/22/06 1230
Date Received: 8/23/06
Method: E300
ANIONS BY IC
Lab Work Order: 06-5771
Lab Sample ID: 06-5771-01
Sample Matrix: Drinking Water
Prep Method:
Date Prepared: 8/23/06
Date Analyzed: 8123106 1330 Method Blank: METHOD BLANK
Analytes CAS Number Result
Dilution Factor: 5
Lab Fraction ID: 06-577]-01J
LQL Units
Nitrite -N
Nitrate -N
U
8.8
0.38 mg/L
0.28 mg/L
Date Prepared: 8/23/06
Date Analyzed: 8/23/06 1523 Method Blank: METHOD BLANK
Analytes CAS Number Result
Chloride
Sulfate
Dilution Factor: 100
Lab Fraction ID: 06-5771-01J
LQL Units
764744-5
7778-80-2
274
2720
25 rrtgfL
25 rng/L
Qualifiers: B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank, value not subtracted from result
E - Extrapolated value.Value exceeds calibration range
H - Sample analysis exceeded analytical holding lime
S - Indicates an estimated value when the compound is detected, but is below the LQL
S - Spike Recovery outside accepted limits
13 - Compound analyzed for but not detected
X - See case narrative
• -Value exceeded the Maximum Contamination Level (MCL), TCLP limit, or if
compound is undetected. LQL exceeds MCL.
Approved
Definitions: NA - Not Applicable
LQL - Lower Quantitation Limit
Surr -Surrogate
Print Date: 8125108
Evergreen Analytical, Inc.
4036 Youngfield Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-3862
(303)425-6021
• Client Sample 1D: NAUGLE WELL
Client Project ID:
Date Collected: 8/22/06
Date Received: 8/23/06
•
Method: E200.8 Prep Method: E200.8
Lab Work Order: 06-5771
Lab Sample ID: 06-5771-01
Sample Matrix: Drinking Water
METALS, DRINKING WATER
Date Prepared: 8/30/06
Date Analyzed: 8/31/06
Analytes
Lab File ID: 06083IA.BIO33SMPL.D
Method Blank: MB -10776
Dilution Factor: 1
Lab Fraction ID: 06-5771-01M
CAS Number Result LQL Units
Aluminum 7429-90-5 U 0.025 mg/L
Antimony 7440-36-0 U 0.0020 mg/L
Arsenic 7440-38-2 U 0.0020 mg/L
Barium 7440-39-3 0.011 0.010 mg/L
Beryllium 7440-41-7 U 0.0010 mg/L
Cadmium 7440-43-9 U 0.00050 mg/L
Calcium 7440-70-2 350 0.40 mg/L
Chromium 7440-47-3 0.0077 0.0010 mg/L
Copper 7440-50-8 U 0.010 mg/L
Iron - 7439-89-6 2.2 0.20 mg/L
Lead 7439-92-1 U 0.0020 mg/L
Magnesium 7439-95-4 190 0.050 mg/L
Manganese 7439-96-5 U 0.0050 mg/L
Nickel 7440-02-0 U
0.010 mg/L
Selenium 7782-49-2 0.024 0.0020 mg/L
Silver 7440-22-4 U 0.00020 mg/L
Thallium 7440-28-0 U 0.0010 mg[L
Uranium 7440-61-1 0.018 0.0010 mg/L
Zinc 7440-66-6 0.013 0.0050 mgt,
Date Prepared: 8/30/06
Date Analyzed: 9/6/06
Lab File ID: 060906A.B1054SMPLD Dilution Factor: 20
Method Blank: MB -10776 Lab Fraction ID: 06-5771-OIM
Analytes CAS Number Result LQL Units
Sodium 7440-23-5 970 10 mg/L
•
IrD
Analyst Approved
Qualifiers: B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank, value not subtracted from result
E - Extrapolated value.Value exceeds calibration range
1-1- Sample analysis exceeded analytical holding time
i - Indicates an estimated value when the compound is detected, but is below the LQL
S - Spike Recovery outside accepted limits
U - Compound analyzed for but not detected
X - See case narrative
* -Value exceeded the Maximum Contamination Level (MCL), TCLP limit, or if
compound is undetected, LQL exceeds MCL.
Definitions: NA - Not Applicable
LQL - Lower Quantitation Limit
Surr - Surrogate
Print Date 98106
UPLICATION TO LEASE WATER FROM
.ST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT
09 West Fourth Street, P. O. Box 1478, Rifle, Colorado 81650
t‘ atercri tvilh..ed.org
Fax: (970) 625-2796
Telephone: (970) 625-5461
I. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name: Tri-State Trucking
Mailing address: P.O. Box 789
Vernal. UT 84078
Telephone: {435] 828-0533
Authorized agent: Thomas A. Zancanella. P.E.
2. COURT CASE #'s: Decree Case No.
Augmentation Plan Case No.
3. USE OF WATER
❑ RESIDENTIAL (check applicable boxes)
❑ Ordinary household use Number of dwellings:
❑ Subdivision: No. constructed units: No. vacant lots
❑ Home garden/lawn irrigation of sq_ ft.
Method of irrigation: 0 flood 0 sprinkler ❑ drip 0 other
❑ Non-commercial animal watering of animals
❑ Fire Protection
❑ Evaporation: Maximum water surface to be exposed:
Descnption of any use, other than evaporation, and method of
diversion, rate of diversion, and annual amount of diversion of any
water withdrawn from the pond:
Well Sharing Agreement for multiple owner wells must be submitted. If
ger than two owners, application toast be ntade under a homeowners
:anon.
❑ COMMERCIAL (check applicable boxes)
Number of units: Total sq. ft. of commercial units:
Description of use:
El INDUSTRIAL
Description of use: Office and shop for trucking opperation.
Tree watering.
Evaporation: Maximum water surface to be exposed: 0.00
Description of any use, other than evaporation, and method of diversion, rate
of diversion, and annual amount of diversion of any water withdrawn from
the pond:
0 MUNICIPAL
Description of use.
❑ DIRECT PUMPING
Tributary:
Location:
4. SOURCE OF WATER
Structure: Well Structure Name:
Source: ❑Surface ❑Storage °Ground water
Current Permit # 254155 (attach copy)
•
5. LOCATION OF STRUCTURE
Garfield SE
County Quarter/quarter
25
Section
65
Township
Distance of well from section lines:
2,850 ft from South line
2,750 ft from East line
NW
Quarter
95W
Range
6th
P. M.
Elevation: 5,200 ft above MSL
Well location address: 16605 Highway 6 & 24
Parachute, CO 8I635
(Attach additional pages for multiple structures)
6. LAND ON WHICH WATER WILL BE USED
(Legal description may be provided as an attachment)
See attached maps.
Number of acres in tract. 54
Inclusion into the District, at Applicant's expense, may be required.
7. TYPE OF SEWAGE SYSTEM
° Septic tank/absorption leach field ❑Central system ❑Other
District name:
8. VOLUME OF LEASED WATER NEEDED IN ACRE FEET:
4.7 see attached table (minimum of 1 acre foot except augmentation
from Alsbury Reservoir where a lesser amount is allowed)
Provide engineering data to support volume of water requested.
Commercial, municipal, and industrial risers must provide diversion and
consumptive data on a monthly basis.
A totalizing. flow meter with remote readout is required to be installed and
usage reported to West Divide.
Applicant expressly acknowledges ii has had the opportunity to review the
District's form Water Allotment Contract and agrees this application is
made pursuant and subject to tthhee terms and conditions contained therein.
I:, 3;sy [)
P
Applicant Signature
Applicant Signature
Application Date. /0 — 5 .- t
ISSUED AS AREA B CONTRACT
YES X NO
The printed portions of this form, except differentiated additions or deletions, have been approved and adopted by the West Divide Water Conservancy District.
Form # WDWCD 050901 APP
t Form No.
GWS -25
APPLICANT
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203
(303) 866-3581
HARRY L NAUGLE
PO BOX 829
RIFLE, CO 81650-
(970) 625-1139
PERMIT TO USE AN EXISTING WELL
EXST
WELL PERMIT NUMBER 254155
DIV, 5 WD39 DES. BASIN MD
APPROVED WELL LOCATION
GARFIELD COUNTY
SE 1/4 NW 114 Section 25
Township 6 S Range 95 W Sixth P,M.
DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES
2850 Ft. from South
2750 Ft. from East
t1TM COORDINATES
Northing:
Section Line
Section Line
Easting:
ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit
does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from
seeking relief In a civil court action.
2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval
of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Weti Construction and Pump Installation
Contractors in accordance with Rule 18.
3) Approved pursuant to CFS 37-92-602(3)(b)(II)(A) as the only well on a tract of land of 35.75 acres described as that portion
of the SE 114 of the NW 114, Sec. 25, Twp, 6 South, Rng. 95 West, 6th P.M„ Garfield County, more particularly described on
the attached exhibit A. Further identified as 16605 Highway 6 & 24, Parachute, CO 81635.
4) Approved for an amended legal description, well location correction, and use of an exisiting well, constructed April 24,
1999, to a depth of 85 feet, under permit no. 202849 (canceled). Issuance of this permit hereby cancels permit no. 202849.
5) The use of ground water from this well is limited to fire protection, ordinary household purposes inside not more than
three (3) single family dwellings, the watering of poultry, domestic animals and livestock on a farm or ranch and the
irrigation of not more than one (1) acre of home gardens and lawns.
6) The pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM.
7) The return flow from the use of this well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of the
non -evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located.
8) This well shall be located not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit.
NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2173.251-00-022
NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R260121 (totaling 147.38 acres)
APPROVED
DMW
`Receipt No. 9501706
State Engineer
DATE ISSUED 11-19-2003
/ •
8y
EXPIRATION DATE
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
w T`
g.
y
50
C x
tlOy
nAp;
t
attm
)MSA
9
�Q �W
1'321E4
�r�aa�zny
54.6
r
�myE`�ci
p Y
xa ;
'9 Cd
0 v4
w
A
ea
ua�
•
t r
♦
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
fi
•
•
••
•
♦
b m A
xa
o°x
wwNbhe
OA
A Y
, 2
•
•
•
•
•
[STS •
•
•
\ gp
•
•
•
CIS
alb
a
•
•
\
a •• 5
aa
•t 11
H
•
Y is
1
� n
\
• •
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
to co V 0 U A Co N
O
21,2.2".V2,1.11"2"21.2',5
0000000000-
N N Of 1.0 +q N Co �i y m
0 0 0 0 a a qdj C 2 a.
ro
0 2 2 o n m Le
w ovf V , 0 $ o a .�
3 S. 0 'e b fi 2 m
y y m ' m y x. i s
w
-0m 4"y '
N 0 °�
a Z" y JQ m Ii
2. C v '' D a
y `° b m 2
3
} c o c' a o• Q.1;2-
W W N al
6i W (=I`,3:
7 '
m0 d y m
mw C ❑
Q.
a
° g
-i d
k rti 5
•N
• C Oa y
❑ iI a D a
4 O 7' N 0
O a \ 0
C
a
a
0)
Fi
0
O
0
0
a
O
0
p
W
0
Liz
0
N
CP
0
CCJ
0 ❑ 2
O m co c K� v Q= m m
o 6 c m -w a - o
f0 `� 00 o
4 0 0 0 0 0 p O Cao 0 o
666666666666
N N N N 7V N N N N N 7V N
o p O o p O o 0 0 0 0 0
6666666601666
IV NNN N !V N N N NJ N N
p o o O Q O o 0 0 0 0
O p 6 a p p 0 p p p p
W S.J. W W W CO W W CO CO W
N Cn CA �7 0, co co 4 co p N
A 00 .P W A V 0 N
W Cb 67 W
O O P 0 6 0 0 4 0 0 O
Ga Cn 'Cn 0) is o c' O
A(D A❑7000oCil s N
p Ca 6 0 0 6 Ca 6 6 6 Ca O o
N O O p O 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0'
N N co co A A 0) N O 0 01
p O 0 0 0 0 O Q 0 b Q Q
UtV 01 V — P O 4 0)
co O N Co 0' O N O V --• -� W
sunup N°rlJI
11
u o a
c
O a (n
t,7 ti
"n
fl7
LI)
o 5
N (0
0
2
N �
❑
0
r0
0)
a
0
C A
0)
-iEl- D❑iEC7g❑�J
moim,7x,,�F�n
0= p= N❑ en m
Lp 0 Q_ (o C co Q
n.
7 v 7 fl] 7 (0 [D m 0)
Q N
N C5 a' y N co
(NF1 `d
CD CD a mp,'—I ❑m
m n C v ?1 x 0 0
• O N 0 ❑ 02
0, CO ❑-
❑ O N
f i l ❑-= N N
C7o� 0-
0 0 j v Com] -�
7 c-...: N m
[77 - 3 7
rei
1 C1 C7
(D `C
CO (C1
0 m
•
•
October 20, 2006
13111 Critton
Tri-State Trucking, Inc.
P.D. Box 789
Vernal, UT 84078
Re: Parcel 3 — Special Use Permit
SE Job #: 26166.01
Dear Bill:
This letter provides engineering information required for a Special Use Permit Application for Parcel 3 of the
Naugle Boundary Survey (in Rulison, Colorado) that are not already shown in the drawing set produced by Sopris
Engineering and dated 10/20/06.
Existing Conditions
The site is just north of the Rulison exit (#81) on Interstate 70 and has direct access from the highway with very
little impact to existing traffic. Ground cover is comprised mostly of sparse sage and dirt with dry channels that
convey historic flows across the site. The existing site topography slopes toward the existing 72" culvert in the
south-east corner of the property; and drops approximately 60 feet from north to south, with an average slope of 5%
toward Interstate 70. Currently the entire site drains toward the southeast corner and then follows existing drainage
channels under Interstate 70 to the Colorado River.
Proposed Development
The site will consist of a 9.4 acre truck and trailer maintenance and storage area including a 1 story structure with a
gross building area of 6,800 S.F. Potential future expansion includes a 1,520 S.F. detached truck wash, a 3,600 S.F.
shop expansion, and two 4,000 S.F. storage buildings for a total potential build -out of approximately 20,000 S.F. of
enclosed buildings.
Site Drainage
The "Tri-State Trucking — Special Use Permit Grading & Drainage Plan" prepared by Sopris Engineering dated 10-
20-06 indicates that Parcel 3 drainage should drain toward the existing 72" culvert on the south east side of the site.
All existing drainage channels will be maintained except for the ditch traversing the site from north to south and
crossing through the proposed parking area. There are two drainage basins that contribute flow to this ditch, and the
Rational Method was used to estimate the volume of water (see attached "Drainage Basin Delineation Map").
Basin "A" has a Q15=55 cfs and a Q10o=74 cfs, Basin "13" has a Q,5=25 cfs and a Q1oo=33 cfs. The resulting
502 Main Street ■ Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax
(970) 704-0313
Sorais ENGINEERING • LLC
civil consultants
•
•
•
SE. JOB 26166.01
October 20, 2006
Page 2
combine flow for the ditch is Q25=80 cfs and a Q1o0=167 cfs. This flow will be diverted around the proposed
parking area with a 3' deep ditch that will transfer the 25 year event and allow the 100 year event to overflow onto
the proposed parking area without flooding the proposed building.
On-site drainage within the area of the proposed parking lot will be collected with curb and gutter and treated using
an underground mechanical collection system. The expected quantity of water that will need to be treated is based
on a 2 year— 1 hour event at the time of full build -out with a gravel parking lot resulting in a flow of 15 cfs. The 15
cfs will be treated by baffled inlets located at low points that discharge the treated water into the existing drainage
channels.
Traffic Impacts
The site has direct access to Interstate 70 without using any county roads, therefore very little impact to the existing
traffic is anticipated. Due to the existing access, this site is a very good location for industrial type traffic without
affecting the existing local traffic or creating any additional maintenance of county infrastructure.
Trip Generation
Traffic generation estimates are based on information from Trip Generation, 6th Edition — Volume l of 3 by the
Institute of Transportation Ermineers (ITE), "Land Use 130 — industrial Park, Trip Ends per Employee on a
weekday" and information gathered from the owner regarding expected vehicular traffic based upon his existing
operation.
The operation anticipates a total of 50 employees with 15 being on-site full time employees working in the office
that have been applied to ITE code l30*; and 35 off-site employees that will park their personal vehicles on-site in
the morning, then leaving the site in a truck returning at the end of the day in their truck and leaving the site in their
personal vehicle.
Table 1. Estimated Trip Generation
Land Use
Size
Daily
Trips
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
In
Out
Total
In
Out
_
Total
On -Site Employees
15
50
5
1
6
2
5
7
Off -Site Employees
35
l40
35
35
70
17
18
35
TOTALS
50
190
40
36
76
19
23
42
*IT'E Code 130 values
3.34 trips/weekday/employee
0.43 trips/A.M. Peak Hour/employee
0.45 trips/P.M. Peak Hour/employee
The proposed development will generate approximately 190 trips per weekday with a peak A.M. value of 76 trips
and a peak P.M. value 01 42 trips.
•
•
•
SE. JOB 26166.01
October 20, 2006
Page 3
Sewer Service
Garfield County will permit a proposed Onsite Wastewater System(s) (OWS) at the above referenced Site per State
(ISDS) guidelines. The detailed design and permitting of an individual OWS system for the proposed facilities are
feasible pursuant to review and approval by Garfield County. A detailed OWS permit/construction drawing will be
created and submitted for the facility with the building permit application.
The average flow from the trucking/service facility is based on the maximum projected populations is estimated to
be less than 900 gallons per day with a peak design flow less than 1400 gallons per day. We assume that the office
and shop facility will have a daily employee population of up to 50 persons with up to 15 full office personnel at the
facility and approximately 35 transient employees coming in and out each day. The proposed OWS will be
designed for a maximum of 50 persons. The design flow will be calculated in accordance with minimum State
ISDS standards based on a peaking factor of 150% and may include increased values for typical water use above the
state guidelines. The design flows will be based on standard water usage for commercial uses per types of
facilities and employee populations. Typical average water uses include the following:
a. Office per employee = 15 gpd
b. Offsite worker for check in/out (assume % of total per day) = 5 gpd
c. Equivalent factory worker (with showers) = 35 gpd
Based on these projections the design flow is calculated to be 1305 gpd.
For preliminary design feasibility we are assuming soil loading rates will be between 0.4 and 0.6 gallons per square
foot per day. Additional site specific geotechnical evaluations, inspections, percolation test and/or infiltration test
by the engineers will be performed prior to final OWS designs and during initial stages of construction to verify
assumptions made for the OW'S designs.
The system will handle the domestic wastewater from the trucking facility. Based on preliminary calculations the
system will include a 2000 -gallon septic tank and a 500 -gallon pump basin with a duplex effluent pump assembly
that will discharge effluent to a pressure dosed trench treatment/absorption system. The treatment/absorption
system may be installed in natural soils with the possibility of imported sand for enhanced treatment. The
treatment/absorption envelope comprises approximately 5000 Square feet based on initial assumptions. The
system will be installed to meet all required setbacks and minimum horizontal separation distances associated with
this project's multiple OWS's within the general boundaries indicated on the attached plan. Geotechnical
subsurface evaluations need to be performed to provide additional design criteria for the proposed treatment and
dispersal systems.
Our initial analysis and recommendations are based upon preliminary information and data projected and supplied
to us by others.
Truck Wash Treatment
The proposed site improvements include the future construction of a truck wash facility. The facility will include a
high pressure washer, oil/sand separation tank (or equivalent system) and wastewater storage tank with a water
recycling system. The facility will not have any surface or underground discharge on or off the site. All wash
facility wastewater will have primary treatment through the oil/sand separation tank (or equivalent system) and will
be collected in the discharge storage tank for reuse and periodic collection by pumper truck for disposal at an offsite
receiving facility. The wash facility will have intermittent use with average daily flows estimated to be 100 to 300
gallons per day. Based on zero discharge no local or state permitting is required.
•
•
•
SE. JOB 26166.01
October 20, 2006
Page 4
Water Service
See report from Zancanella & Associates, Inc.
An on-site water storage tank with a minimum volume of 2,500 gallons is required by the Parachute Fire
Department for fire suppression and is shown on the Utility Plan.
If you have any questions or need any additional information please give us a call.
Sincerely,
SOPRIS NGINEERIN
Chris J. Busley4,E
Design'' ngine r
y
Cc;
pal
•
•
•
q
•li I!F+ ri)
W 'Nr- 1°4
r� 1Ai rw- L m � - ----' - J
`..�-{i� 1R • tea- +.r �_
0 if.'"--...) . I - i ' • 1."*.- ' 1
_ . ., 4 ''':.-- , . .,-. ,,
ifl i'
_.,.....; r• i i
L•-� // a
tzj H -- •r-:"---,--_,,) _+ �.L-/.11..-
$
1 r / /)"
\ f• '. (! r - •��--'-1,1 E �..' 1
!r
+. i
li) /1 I,
1%\\
VII 1
114
■
1
.� fes ../)
.`► ,k
'[
�•:
.L „. „ ..\\*:...\*.-"(N,,...•%N... k
% -N.'4:‘,.. , 0. _,-__.
,._ , -=
•q ` , •
_ i r•
•
�.�
f
ice~ •
�.—
141111‘ • fa
•
•
of—
4
..•)
•
, i1/('N
r
t M,I
-_ -s . ��t
1 �e
........0........)
J 1 �;i
f
"'Ir r� rf y•� �• ll 1
I • ► f f ; ..--- r
i i j ■ •#1y 1 1 JI
F
1`, f
I s ifi ' rr t -
ti
trr
o
°
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS CODE
NOTICE TO PROCEED
CDOT Permit No.
306236
SH/S/MP
070A1081.1901L
Local JurisdiCtG
Garfield Count
Permittee(s): Applicant;
Rhonda Naugle William Critton
PO Box 829 Sopris Engineering
Rifle, CO 81650 502 Main Street, Suite A3
970-625-1139 Carbondale, CO 81623
970-704-0311
The permittee is hereby authorized to proceed with access construction within state highway right-of-way in
accordance with the above referenced State Highway Access Permit and this Notice to Proceed.
This Notice to Proceed is valid only if the referenced Access Permit has not expired. Access Permits
expire one year from date of issue if not under construction, or completed. Access Permits may be extended in
accordance with Section 2.3(11)(d), of the Access Code.
Adequate advance warning is required at all times during access construction, in conformance with the
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways.
All construction shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finished within 45 days
from initiation. The permittee or applicant shall notify the Department prior to commencing construction as
indicated on the Access Permit.
Both the Access Permit and this Notice To Proceed shall be available for review at the construction site.
This Notice to Proceed is conditional. The following items shall be addressed prior to or during construction as
• propriate.
one
Teo
41.otCill.ir
Ite
'''‘p ill*64
44.
i41!
IS
itcr
Municipality or County Approval (When the appropriate local authority retains issuing authority)
By
Title
Date
(X)
This Notice is not valid until signed by a duly authorized representative of the Department
Colorado Department of Transportation
Title
Date
(X) j ; L
Access Manager
January 4, 2007
Copy Distribution: Required t Region Pe files -Staff Access Section. As needed: Local Authority, MICE Patrol, Inspector Form 1265 8198
[COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT
u q TS 0\-09-077
errnitfee
100.00
CDOT Permit No.
306236
Stale Highway No/MplSide
07OA/081.190/L
Date of transmittal
11/03/2006
Region/Section/Patrol
03/02/09
Local Jurisdiction
I
Garfield County
The Permittee(s);
Rhonda Naugle
PO Box 829
Rifle, CO 81650
970-625-1139
Applicant; Ref No. 06-242
William Critton
Sopris Engineering
502 Main Street, Suite A3
Carbondale, CO 81623
970-704-0311
is hereby granted permission to have an access to She state highway at the location noted below. The access shall be constructed, maintained and used in
accordance with this permit, including the State Highway Access Code and any attachments, terms. Conditions and exhibits. This permit may be revoked
by the issuing authority if at any time the permitted access and its use violate any parts of this permit. The issuing authority, the Department and their duly
appointed agents and employees shall be held harmless against any action for personal injury or property damage sustained by reason of the exercise of
the permit.
Location:
Located on I-70 Frontage, a distance of 1000 feet east of RP 81, also known as 16605 Hwy 6. This access is north of 1-70 and at the
very end of a frontage road.
Access to Provide Service to:
Industrial Park 50 DHV 100.00
Other terms and conditions:
See Attached Pages 2 and 3 and Other Enclosures for Additional Terms and Conditions.
MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY APPROVAL
Required only when the appropriate local authority retains issuing authority.
By
(x)
Date
Title
Upon the signing of this permit the perm.ttee agrees to the terms and conditions and referenced attachments contained
herein. All construction shall be cornpleted in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finished within 45 days from
Initiation. The permitted access shall be completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit prior to
being used.
The permittee shall notify Brad Brophy with the Colorado Department of Transportation in Grand Junction at 970-
248-7360 at (east 48 hours prior to commencing construction within the State Highway right-of-way.
The person signing as the permittee must be the owner or legal representative of the property served by the permitted access and have full authority to
accept the permit and its terms and conditions.
Date
This permit is not valid until signed by a duly authorized representative of the Department.
COLORApq DEPARTN�FxNT OF TRANSPORTATION
By
(x)
Date (of issue)
(i 0 7
Title
.. % ffrr nyif
Copy Distribution:
•
Requir
1.Region
2.Applicant
3.Staff Access Section
Make copies as necessary for:
Local Authorrly inspector
MICE Patrol Traffic Engineer
Previous editions are obsolete and may not be used
CBOT Forrn al 01 area
•
L
ti
O Fq yy
3 N O C J G
-2f5U U C mR
T <a U ° g '
cc `04)
E
vLr nm'
o a^c m o
O = O C _N
$ o 0 N
1152>:
o m c m c
mL 0o; E
u Y H L y Y
L O O t7 m 0, a
r To NL c u
.nv oL5
° Q o $ ° c
0
404,q�2 0 0) 0
4)i U L a c n
N
T N O L m y N
1;2..c58
!i�
3 tf
ma C EO O
°_� c c F u o
2L 0 u°i >3V
o^ o N 0 c 0
AomdOm>
L Oi Z. Y
t U s t Y N5
134a:'2:
5
_y 0!_^gmo
EcENmai9
0 1 m 3 o a A
44)o5=€a5i-mmE
Yg� r
m m a n_ N o
oym aY _.3 m c -
c
J5UANOuaY
L Fa`
0°32211
C W
m0 O E:C D.g52gga�,10
o g m t u o g 3 G
YJ N
L (5 0 0 3 4
r D m- N a n
C m -
228-'6“
Y m • -s0
o a- o o a
5c0 0.
O p p p m
O (Nmr.
0
c = g m c
Y E y ^
3
O my a O"m
o n m o U u o
= c 0 0 c o
0C(00U
05010n2v
r c
aYmis
Zi `o ao.c
E 'o60ca
,c, U o� u '9
n � o ° u 0.
Ut4g
o0ogm
Ta O. 0 uoa
Eo5N5.y.0
a = E € � p�p
L a U E D o 3
0a'c0(0
r° c y o 5
ami-cc25
o °n4) c o 0
. 6 C 6.E.0 c
m
n d o r F oF y°
m a0r CO C
61::!"4'2
n c D t TO q u
7 O m m C Y V
o n„mTA
2)0EaE=--a g
Wm ,327o5 O W C
a r c o ^ i,
aQO'C � O f O Y
m0E
C
„ 3 , 2
m = o
c
Y auiv� o` a
y u 99
L N N C r c
my c Q0.
i'`;')21:! »
L >
O- Tm-g
`Cf >
4Nt5v`5
-'-°0. n� E6.5
c o
_m22: ° 0 m = o m
o - u
0DL
-E v
s2d''2
53.9 umai
m uo 0 u u
ndu a.>E
a Eo
n p$ie
m 7 m 4) r
Li0 Y O U
r L N Y
o E• 5
m
.0 G ca c Y u
LuN U = u
m >
;E0-4am4
I1O C
8y .N E- c = 5
.2.0.!4) a c E m
a� Q _ U c `c o m
m
d
u - Y 3 mn Y
30u o'n2
>=Y
550; 0 N
4
V
L D y j V
O- ; - O m V
=-▪ .45a�o
5E0'Eo
mo s w=i.
N` LU
g416::
C N 0 Y g M E
Y C G =C
aL>'NmnECCp
f7 g> m m U
282
Oo
acoL
u o
4)450
n
012
p Y
0-=
0-1E
5 m 4
= 4)Y n
o n
m m _
0 ° L E
2 € c n
5.0.05
0 0'5 u
C G L C
c o m A
u c c 5
S 4 2 c
'171.
o E o
Aug
C . Y
S4Lv
'31215
d c 5
mgw
5ug
yt0-4i1-3
c o 5 E
o
t C
m
E o�
g32;
Y -a
c°o`o
y m S
Y �
N - N5 Y °
O.S H'N
8 2 1 N
Y m C
C
a m U O
E - U
Q ' m0. 5
•
•
STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT 306236
Located on 1-70 Frontage near RP 81.19 Left
Issued to Rhonda Naugle
November 3, 2006
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1 This access is approved as constructed in accordance with Section 2.6(3) of the Access Code.
2. This permitted access is only for the use and purpose stated in the Application and Permit.
This Permit is issued in accordance with the State Highway Access Code (2 CCR 601-1), and
is based in part upon the information submitted by the Permittee. Any subsequent relocation,
reconstruction, or modifications to the access or changes in the traffic volume or traffic nature
using the access shall be requested for by means of a new application. Any changes causing
non-compliance with the Access Code may render this permit void, requiring a new permit.
3. The traffic limitations listed on the face of this permit shall be adhered to. The traffic volumes
are listed in Design Hourly Volume (DHV) trips or Average Daily Trips (ADT) where entering
the site and returning counts as two trips.
4. Any mud or other material tracked or otherwise deposited on the roadway shall be removed
daily or as ordered by the Department inspector, If mud is an obvious condition during site
construction, it is recommended that the contractor build a Stabilized Construction Entrance or
Scrubber Pad at the intended construction access to aid in the removal of mud and debris from
vehicle tires. The details of the Stabilized Construction Entrance is found in the M & 5
Standards Plan No. M-208-1.
-2-
502 Main Street • Sui
•
1
•
October 20, 2006
Dan Roussin, CDOT
Region 3 - Traffic and Safety
222 South 6th St, Room 100
Grand Junction, CO 81501
Re: State Highway Access Permit — Tri-State Trucking, LLC
SE Job #: 26166,01
Dear Dan:
Tri-State Trucking, LLC is proposing to locate a truck maintenance facility on a Parcel of land just north of the
Rulison exit (EXIT 81) in Rulison, Colorado. The proposed use on the site would be truck and trailer maintenance
and storage, short term storage of materials and equipment, gas/oil drilling industry equipment staging, truck
washing facilities and administrative services. We are proposing a change in access use for the existing access
easement (see attached legal description) located approximately 450 feet northwest of the intersection for the
highway off -ramp and Rulison Road. We have included a preliminary site plan and anticipated traffic associated
with this access. Please review the access permit and additional information and provide us with an access permit
as soon as possible.
Existing Conditions
The existing access is provided by Rulison Road as it proceeds northwest from its intersection with the north I-70
on-ramp and off -ramp. This existing road is approximately 24' wide and transitions from asphalt to gravel just
north of the intersection prior to reaching the existing access easement approximately 450 feet northwest of the
intersection where it provides access to the existing adjacent businesses. Our proposed access would continue west
across the existing access easement and connect with an existing gravel road that accesses the proposed
development (see attached site plan).
Proposed Site Plan
The preliminary site plan for the facilities and the proposed access location are attached on an 11"x17" drawing.
Traffic Impacts
The site has direct access to Interstate 70 without using any county roads, therefore very little impact to the existing
traffic is anticipated. Due to the existing access, this site is a very good location for a trucking business without
affecting the existing local traffic.
Trip Generation
Traffic generation estimates are based on information from Trip Generation, 6th Edition -- Volume 1 of 3 by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), "Land Use 130 — Industrial Park, Trip Ends per Employee on a
weekday" and information gathered from the owner regarding expected vehicular traffic.
to A3 • Carbondale, CO 81523 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax
(970) 704-0313
SOPRIS ENGINEERING LLC
civil consultants
•
SE. JOB 26166.01
October 20, 2006
Page 2
The operation anticipates a total of 50 employees with 15 being on-site full time employees working in the office
that have been applied to ITE code 130*; and 35 off-site employees that will park their personal vehicles on-site in
the morning, then leaving the site in a truck returning at the end of the day in their truck and leaving the site in their
personal vehicle.
Table 1. Estimated Trip Generation
Land Use
Size
On -Site Employees 15
Off -Site Employees 35
TOTALS 50
Daily
Trips
In
AM Peak Hour
Out
Total
In
PM Peak Hour
*ITE Code 130 values
3.34 trips/weekday/employee
0.43 trips/A.M. Peak Hour/employee
0.45 trips/P.M. Peak Hour/employee
50
140
190
5
35
40
1
35
36
6
70
76
2
17
19
Out Total
5
18
23
7
35
42
The proposed development will generate approximately 190 trips per weekday with a peak A.M. value of 76 trips
and a peak P.M. value of 42 trips.
• If you have any questions or need any additional information please give us a call.
Sincerely,
SOPRIS ENGI ERING
•
Chris J. Bus ey,
Design Engineer
Yancy Nichol, P.E.
Principal
Cc;
A
ti
M,OG IW LON
M.,89,2 6 SS
:1.SZ,L P.09S
p
A
F
/
rrrn
1 „60,s0o00 s
0
7-1
0
a1
Al „OS,1917o 69 S
N
co
Po
0
t z -fk"
Co
—
— la 114, i4
•
\ /
.\ o� s. Cr752
IP, 1 [ c)No
0
\ \ „ r. r maT
\ ! m i
n
an•.A
I! 1 ` c,▪ 21.
��N1 22;n
i s1 1 IV
LJ i I I Q,
N. ♦ ( 0
i FN
4a
'■`
U!JVIPI
n 8,,,,G. "'xn
v P
ti
h
co
0
-
Nm
m -
J � )Pv'
a
is
0 \
.
,�.Lti2dOIa IOavx
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
igh PARCEL OF LAND SITUATE IN THE SE1/4NW1/4 AND THE SWI/4NE1/4 OF SECTION 25,
JWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 95 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF'
COLORADO. SAID PARCEL OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE CENTER NORTH 1/ 16 CORNER OF SECTION 25, A #5 REBAR IN PLACE;
THENCE N89°37'21 "E ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SW1 / 4NE I / 4 OF SAID SECTION 25,
A DISTANCE OF 701.02 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE 537°53'43"E 357.70
FEET TO THE NORTH WESTERLY CORNER OF THE NAUGLE EXEMPTION TRACT AS SHOWN
ON THE NAUGLE EXEMPTION PLAT FILED WITH THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND
RECORDER'S OFFICE AS RECEPTION NO. 535392; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY
BOUNDARY OF SAID NAUGLE EXEMPTION TRACT S33 °43'18 "W 1050.00 FEET; THENCE
CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE S40°16'42 "E 73.06 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING
SAID WESTERLY LINE S89 °44'35"W ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2, AS
DESCRIBED ON THE NAUGLE BOUNDARY SURVEY, DEPOSITED WITH THE GARFIELD
COUNTY SURVEYOR, NUMBER 611, A DISTANCE OF 380.35 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING
ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE S89°44'35"W 1290.89 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY
LINE OF THE SE 1 / 4NW 1 / 4 OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTHERLY
LINE N00 °05'09 "W ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE 1208.54 FEET TO THE NORTH WEST 1/16
1.' ORNER OF SECTION 25, (WHENCE A REBAR AND CAP LS NO. 12132 IN PLACE BEARS
8 °58'57"W 10.17 FEET FROM POINT FOR CORNER); THENCE DEPARTING SAID WESTERLY
LINE N89°44'50 "E ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 1288.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINING 54.011 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
TOGETHER WITH AN ACCESS EASEMENT
A PARCEL OF LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT, SITUATE IN THE
SWI/4NE1/4 OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 95 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO, SAID PARCEL OF LAND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTER NORTH 1/ 16 CORNER OF SECTION 25, A # 5 REBAR IN
PLACE; THENCE S56 °45316"E 919.97 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE
OF THE NAUGLE EXEMPTION TRACT AS SHOWN ON THE NAUGLE EXEMPTION PLAT FILED
WITH THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE AS RECEPTION NO.
535392, THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID NAUGLE EXEMPTION
TRACT THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES:
1.)N33°43 '18"E 272.56 FEET;
• S41 °31 '00 "E 191.00 FEET;
�.� S07°31 '00"E 108.42 FEET THENCE DEPARTING SAID NAUGLE EXEMPTION BOUNDARY
S59 °57'58"W 141.70 FEET; THENCE N60 °4 7'25 "W 194.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINING 1.206 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT FORM
(Shall be submitted with application)
GARFIELD COUNTY (hereinafter COUNTY) and Bill Critton (hereinafter APPLICANT) agree
as follows:
1. APPLICANT has submitted to COUNTY an application for a Special Use Permit for
an Industrial Support Facility (hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Garfield County Resolution No. 98-09, as
amended, establishes a fee schedule for each type of subdivision or land use review applications,
and the guidelines for the administration of the fee structure.
3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the
proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in
processing the application. APPLICANT agrees to make payment of the Base Fee, established for
the PROJECT, and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT. APPLICANT
agrees to make additional payments upon notification by the COUNTY when they are necessary as
costs are incurred.
4. The Base Fee shall be in addition to and exclusive of any cost for publication or cost of
consulting service determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners for the
•onsideration of an application or additional COUNTY staff time or expense not covered by the Base
Fee. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial Base Fee, APPLICANT shall pay additional billings to
COUNTY to reimburse the COUNTY for the processing of the PROJECT mentioned above.
APPLICANT acknowledges that all billing shall be paid prior to the final consideration by the
COUNTY of any land use permit, zoning amendment, or subdivision plan.
APPLICANT
c&F,,L/L.(i(AByL
Signature
Date:
Bill Critton
Print Name
L L C rt# -f -43 j1
Mailing Address: Tri-State Trucking, LLC
P.D. Box 789
Vernal, UT 84078
•
DEC -27-2000 WED 03:48 PM BILL CP, I TTCiI FAX. 107028520 42 F. 002
Dec 07 06 08:e5a Ronald Liston 87O-945-4056 p_
Garfield County Dept. Of Building & Planning
108 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
• Re: Special Use Permit Application for an Industrial Support Facility
Property Owned by Harry and Rhonda Naugle
To Whom It May Concern:
\Mth this letter 1 grant my consent for Bili Cr'itton and his representative, Ron
Liston, to pursue the above referenced Special Use Permit_
Sincerely,
Harry Naugle Rhonda Naugle ei"'
•
•
s
•
l-10-LUII0 INN UU:ub AM I1LL',:H1lI'ON
TRI-STATE Trucking LLG
P.O. Box 789
Vernal, UT 84078
October 10, 2006
Garfield County Dept. Of Building & Planning
108 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re. Special Use Permit Application for an Industrial Support Facility
Bill Critton
To Whom It May concern:
With this letter !authorize Ron Liston, of the planning firm Land Design
Partnership, to act as a representative of Bill Critton, Tri-State Trucking LLC in
regard to the above referenced land use process,
Sincerely,
`eta ,ee-17
Bill Grifton
Tri-State Trucking LLC
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
SCIIEDULE A
File No. 0608040
410
1. Effective Date: July 31, 2006 at 7:59 AM
•
•
2. Policy or Policies to be issued:
(a) ALTA OWNER POLICY (ALTA 10-17-92)
Proposed Insured:
Tri-State Investments, LLC
(b) ALTA LOAN POLICY (10-17-92)
Proposed lnsured:
Harry L. Naugle and Rhonda K. Naugle
$810,000.00
$405,000.00
3. The Estate or interest in the land described or referred to in the Commitment and covered herein is Fee Simple and
is at the effective date hereof vested in:
Harry L. Naugle and Rhonda K. Naugle
4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado and
described as follows:
Township 6 South Range 95 West of the 6th P.M.
Section 25: SE 1/4NW 114, SW 114NE1l4
Excepting therefrom any portion thereof lying southerly of the northerly right of way of Interstate 70 as described in
Book 602 at Page 597 and except that part conveyed in deed recorded April 16, 2004 in Book 1578 at Page 336 and
except that part shown on the Naugle Exemption Plat recorded November 13, 1998 as Reception No. 535392
together with an access easement as shown on the Naugle Exemption Plat recorded November 13, 1998 as
Reception No. 535392.
TITLE CHARGES
Owner's Policy Standard Coverage
Mortgagee's Policy
Tax Certificate
COUNTERSIGNED.ct\+
American Land Title Association
Schedule A
(Rev'd 6-86)
lk
0
$1,723.00
40.00
15.00
Authorized Officer or Agent
rl
Valid Only if Schedule B and Cover Are Attached
Issuing Agent:
Commonwealth TItIe Company of Garfield County, Inc.
327 East 5th Street Rifle, CO 81650
5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is 5l,000,000.00 or less shall be arbitrated a[ the option
of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http:llwww.atta.ore.
File No. 0608040
SCHEDULE S - SECTION 1.
The Following are the requirements to be complied with prior to the issuance of said policy or policies. Any other instrument
recorded subsequent to the date hereof may appear as an exception under Schedule B of the policy to be issued. Unless otherwise
noted, all documents must be recorded to the office of the Clerk and Recorder of the County in which said property is located.
1. Warranty deed frorn Harry L. Naugle and Rhonda K. Naugle vesting fee simple title in Tri-State Investments, LLC.
2. Deed of Trust from Tri-State Investments, LLC to the Public Trustee of Garfield County for the use of Harry L. Naugle and
Rhonda K. Naugle.
3. Recordation of a Statement of Authority for Tri-State investments, LLC, a , evidencing the existence of the entity and authority
of the person authorized to execute instruments conveying, encumbering or otherwise affecting title to real property on behalf of
the entity, and containing the other information required by CRS 38-30-172, evidencing the existence of said entity prior to its
acquisition of title to the land herein.
•
NM 6
American Land Title Association Commitment
Schedule B - Section 1 - Form 1004-5
•
•
•
•
File No. 0608040
SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2
Schedule B of the Policy or Policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same arc disposed of to the satisfaction
of the company:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the Public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in arca, encroachments, and any facts, which a correct survey and inspection of the
premises would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore ar hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public
records.
5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent
to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon
covered by this commitment.
6. Any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax sales.
7. Any lien or charge on account of the inclusion of subject property in an improvement district.
8. Any and all water rights, claims, or title to water, whether ar not the matters excepted are shown by the public record.
9, Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States, as reserved in United States Patent recorded July 8,
1911 in Book 73 at Page 44.
10. Right of way to Public Service Company of Colorado described in Rule and Judgement recorded July 2 1, 1930 in Book 161 at Page 488.
1 I . Reservation of a one . third interest in all oil, hydrocarbons and minerals as described in deed recorded July 15, 1929 in Book I59 at Page
97, and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof.
12. Reservation of a one - half interest in all oil, hydrocarbons and minerals as described in deed recorded September 3, 1929 in Book 155 at
Page 372, and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof.
13. Permanent easements described in Rule and Order recorded July G, 1982 in Book 602 at Page 597.
14. Terms and conditions of Oil and Gas Lease by and between Anvil Points Properties, Ltd., A Colorado Limited Partnership, as Lessor and
Barrett Resources Corporation, as Lessee, recorded December 7, 1992 in Book 849 at Page 154, and as amended by instrument recorded
May 14, 1993 in Book 862 at Page 530, and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof and any and all interests therein or
assignments thereof.
l5. Reservation of all oil, gas and mineral rights as described in deed recorded July 8, 1993 in Book 868 at Page 145 and any and all interests
therein or assignments thereof.
16, Terms and conditions of right of way agreement recorded December 29, 1994 in Book 926 at Page 800.
17. Terms and conditions of surface use agreement as evidenced by memorandum recorded June 15, 2006 in Book 1810 at Page 495.
NOTE: EXCEPTION(S) N/A WILL NOT APPEAR IN THE NIA TO BE ISSUED HEREUNDER.
The Owner's Policy of Title Insurance committed for in this Commitment, if any, shall contain, in addition to the Items set forth in Schedule 13 -
Section 2, the following items:
(1) The Deed o f Trust, if any, required under Schedule B - Section 1. (2) Unpatcntcd mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in
Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. (3) any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax sales.
American Land Title Association Commitment
Schedule 13 - Section 2
Form 1004-12
•
•
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATE IPI THE SE1/4NWI/4 AND THE SWI/4NE1/4 OF' SECTION 25,
TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 95 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE QF
COLORADO. SAID PARCEL OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE CENTER NORTH 1/16 CORNER OF SECTION 25, A tis REBAR IN PLACE;
THENCE N89'3 7'21 E ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SWI/ 4NEI / 4 OF SAID SECTION 25,
A DISTANCE OF 701.02 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE S37°53'43"E 357.70
FEET TO THE NORTH WESTERLY CORNER OF THE NAUGLE EXEMPTION TRACT AS SHOWN
ON THE NAUGLE EXEMPTION PLAT FILED WITH THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND
RECORDER'S OFFICE AS RECEPTION NO. 535392; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY
BOUNDARY OF SAID NAUGLE EXEMPTION TRACT S33°43'2 8"W 1050.00 FEET; THENCE
CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE 540°16'42"E 73.06 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING
SAID WESTERLY LINE S89'44'35"W ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2, AS
DESCRIBED ON THE NAUGLE BOUNDARY SURVEY, DEPOSITED WITH THE GARFIELD
COUNTY SURVEYOR, NUMBER 611, A DISTANCE OF 380.35 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING
ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE S89 °44 35"W 1290.89 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY
LINE OF THE SEI/ 4NW1/4 OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTHERLY
LINE N00°05'09"W ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE 1208.54 FEET TO THE NORTH WEST 1/16
CORNER OF SECTION 25, (WHENCE A REBAR AND CAP LS NO. 12132 IN PLACE BEARS
S88 58'57"W 10.17 FEET FROM POINT FOR CORNER); THENCE DEPARTING SAID
WESTERLY LINE N89 °44'50"E ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 1288.01 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINING 54.011 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
TOGETHER WITH AN ACCESS EASEMENT
A PARCEL OF LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT, SITUATE IN THE
SWI/4NEI/ 4 OF' SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP' 6 SOUTH, RANGE 95 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO. SAID PARCEL OF LAND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTER NORTH 1/ I6 CORNER OF SECTION 25, A #5 REBAR IN
PLACE; THENCE S56°45' 16"E 919.97 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY
LINE OF THE NAUGLE EXEMPTION TRACT AS SHOWN ON THE NAUGLE EXEMPTION PLAT
FILED WITH THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE AS RECEPTION NO.
535392, THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID NAUGLE EXEMPTION
TRACT THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES:
1.) N33°43'18"E 272.56 FEET;
2.) S41 '31'00'E I91.00 FEET;
3.) S0731'00"E 108.42 FEET THENCE DEPARTING SAID NAUGLE EXEMPTION BOUNDARY
S59°57'58"W 141.70 FEET; THENCE N60°47'25'W 194.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINING I.206 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
•
•
PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET
of Critton Special Use Permit Site.
2173-251-00-022
NAUGLE, HARRY L. & RHONDA K.
PG BOX 829
RIFLE, CO 81650-0829
2173-253-00-035
TETER, DOUGLAS A. & BEVERLY A.
4949 COUNTY ROAD 309
PARACHUTE, CO 81635-9109
2173-253-00-003
MAHAFFEY, GARY LEE 1/2 INT.
MAHAFFEY, LYLE LEON 1/2 INT.
4947 COUNTY ROAD 309
PARACHUTE, CO 81635-9109
2173-254-00-004
POTTER, SAMUEL B & TERESA A
P O BOX 148
RIFLE, CO 81650
2175-302-00-182
MOSBY, MICHAEL .1 & BETTY JO {JT)
0106 COUNTY ROAD 323
RIFLE, CO 81650
•
•
Harry & Rhonda -
Naugle
(C)74
Bureau of Land Management
Critton
Special Use
Permit Site
Duouglas &
Bever!
Teter
p
Garey Lee McHaffey
Lyle Leon McHaffey
Michael &
Betty Jo
Mosby
"8O)
Sam & Teresa Potter
el
Property Owners within 200 feet
Mineral Rights Owners
Mahaffey Minerals, LLC & Margaret & Merrill Mahaffey
21630 Road
Grand Junction. CO 81502
W.F. Clough
P.D. Box 686
Rifle, CO 81650-0686
Anvil Points Properties, LTD
C/O Joseph Scott
2801 Youngfield St., Ste. 310
Golden, CO 80401-0210
•
LLti3d0Ud
m
VI3Y3YOQ(i1Sd VINiHQN
QNY1XIf1O5. 574.1O17312 SfiTfldod
YeMlN3FfV Sf1NIXY7j3
A
z
x
�i
x
0
0
QOORN01.L0a Nd LSY3 QNY7XNHI3
01
5
N
N
m
0
x
9YlYIJ NOP OO
'X
a
n ..
•
•
•
Citi 4. CO
1 1 1 1 1
C7Cbtri
C/] Cx7
Z
ab
❑
z
0
CI]
b
z
d
z
z
11
9
2
a
0
co
co
0
A
z
6
N
owl! r18 -x3
roe
aA
3.5
EN
co • s
5
crt
9
6S'Sa� r g „60, Saa as s
OtiOd Lal¢ '%3
71 AM
Es
Y
•
21]
It
•
l' '/fn
II\ t+7 an -0 Z a �
\ 0 -3
a
Zvn ;,7,
\ zr 01 a
z
\ \ . o U
` W N; 'Ox
`� N R ▪ i :x
\ • i E N
\ ` -. n
\ \ N a r v {
a ` U 5 2 v
9 ]� wn
r IIgg
a}n"r
Awn
rr _
vn
0v
vA '
bx
M ti
4
il
\ ` ( i
0 \\
n
14,
oa 13RYa9 'X3
Nz
co
r.�
g
e
6
7
a
M „OS',trf7o68 S
M IZ,LE68S
•
\ 1
•
03
\ LrA
fffyf
'zm
ee t6
S� x
.a ' c
b yn
p N
9
.4
zw
n
u v
J 3dOId rrnnvN
c
'C3
t
n
b7 1-3
CI)
yp H
M
n
b
1 0
z
NV'Id 3115
•
•
•
1�-
'i
11 u `
I `1 1 \ 1 1
1 4 41 1 1 1 1
1 1
1 i 4 1 1 \ \ ♦~`
1 1. 1 11 11 1 11 "♦ ♦ ♦♦ \ -} \
1 1 1 \ ♦ ti ♦ --♦
1 1 1 ♦ •
1 1 + 1 ♦♦ ♦•
1 1 L, \\ \ti -rl
L \ \ \ ~tom..' 7/ 1
\
,
-r.
--/1 r^
.,
— r +S r
l J
1, r.7./ 1 "a 1 ^ ,
1 'y. 11 1 1 l 11-' ,_• �
` ,141-
♦• ' \1144 ♦\ ♦- , �1
•X1114 V♦`-- 1\_
1' \ -1 1
♦ !f r \ \ \
•
•
Ire' •
-• 4
•
4111
i r \ V r
'.12
11 . Ir
7 4.4
r'r1 t 1 rrv+x ✓
1fr ..1 ' 1V1 1 1 r^=441•-•4•,,-,-Trr 1 „..,
i•` �rr/rr1V, + i -/Nr 11/"
1. 11 �,1 ji i ,'p +ir��(lllr 711/
rf1 1 ! 11 1111 1 .iBm 'N1 1
fl, fr 111 11r1i _� '111 1 1,
I+1 44N, r- .h
{'I I 1 -
il+ 1 4 ii-.,-fr
I
+1+ i' 1 r -
hl 1 -
1.
---114
• ,
,
[IS
p t3
c
5z
H4 A
x
s
'J sr m
CS DI
W C9
O
0 x
0 w1
a1V3S JIHdV i0
Ex
S n
uv
33N33
1/
S;3#1
r
X FL
w
r
�1
b
� r
��--rte _ ,11
1 I
♦- 1
1 .l 1
I 1
4.4
•
•
LLIINH3d Sail rJVJ3 ds
t --
CD ❑
�r r�
I
CDvl
on
zo
nr
❑
1•V
o
rn
PoT
0
❑
z
0
0
r"
r
z
H
z
•
•
•
ONIO 1 n9 X
1
A
x
2
n
` \Y
r ` /
/ r
/ r
/
cor
0
o
\ o�
ria
n
wa
N;
w ,a
ONDIam 1, aLFIS-I I
A
2
LJ
11 RE
it m
m
0
0
AQ
z rn
0n
'IVDS DIHdVa0
V
VP
i rj
y A
PR
AP
Fg
FA
gq
4^5 Z0
241 R2
eN .4
g.
4�0 'g
51A 9i
,94
gip 4
f1 g
ig€ ij
ul
V
DI
C)
c
CQ
rl
it IJ►nf
y y�
"a Ly
2CD
n
b
O
z
NA
^fig l4'. ;8% n m
a
iF ;f:N !ori
51: gla
Ft .;6:0-
Jam R
two Rat KV
•
•
•
0
" 3 € 1 •� 'p
P 'p
c3'"o o r
i
1
—LENGTH OF HO%--
IZ.�= d2m d_.
�
AL SILT 1
�`� 1 `U1
1` 1 11
I1 1i+U�
j
't 4i
AM1
t
FRR11E
LEN:'.1k
S : .
=Z n�=
ZItri-y
11111111111
Cd
_
>
g* rtFrd•T OF WIRE
Ell 11
1
a°
1-11
RI
k
cn
r
—}f
~ITl�l1
o
Z
ayrCD
,'
i'l
_IIi
g { rl����
=
i
,i
S
17•
R
11
rn
ti
m
-3
-9e
$
�f
L-J
�x1
�
l
�(-)� ,�
1�'1 i
4
fn
4^J
tc-)
x
rri 4-3 -. t
r •P:I
,10.--
0 ■ 4 x
AY N
5,2
I
p
h
V
CTI
1-3 m x
4 8
ri
„,'�i'
PA
p 22
� m
22m
lig
2�$ !RCN 0Y Cr
Y Of mil' BIXi
1`•
OF
�Y
WI/.
1!I�j�
rrer BOW "
rip,
%'
yj TO ICC
aF MET Ip.
1�• Iw'w41u
If'—rk� 112. TOT OF
g -i, SUB %dl
SF
aO %
F
9
4
a ,
c4
��
n '
41 RIDIO
.
to
A
C
-‹
P
RM$
!I
.'' sR;. 411:1
p.
in
AI
P1 AF
!Lg.
OP
P
i45 '
VI
952k
rrPx
WWI CC VAIL(
RULISON, COLORADO
AL USE PERMIT APPLICATION -
}--i
,. j
.,{
C=]
CI A4dirfr
A
i ,, ,
.0$11111.1111
uS4
�o
cows a u
H
f{
t J
/
7)
.i;:
r)
p,
iii
1
gp�a•
aT
F#'2
/
6- r—
OPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC
502 MAN STREET. SLUE A]
CARBONOALC, CO 91673
{9101 7O4-0311
/--1
CO $
DE
El
iWUUSON. COLORADO
TRI-STATE TRUCKING
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
DETAILS
m
_
z
i
cn
g
'E
a
12
6
x
a!
Ge
Zi
o y
3
yM
m
Y