No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondenceDave Argo From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Dave Argo Wednesday, June2L,20t7 l0:2O AM 'trevorruonavaara@ hotmail.com' Jack Albright fi ack@albright-associates.com) Ruonavaara Springridge Reserve - Permit #BLRE-06-17 -4757 Trevor: Once we receive a copy of your soils report as described in my previous email to Jack Albright, we have one additional item that will need to be addressed before we can issue a building permit for your new residence at Springridge Reserve - phase 4 (Lot 76). According to one of the recorded plat notes for this subdivision, you are required to submit an Engineering report by a Geolog¡st supporting the placement of your house location on the síte, including any possible mitigation for potential rock fall (if applicable). More specifically, the language included on the subdivision plat reads as follows: o prior to buitding permit, owners of Lots 63-66 ond 70-87 sholl retain on engineering geologist to ossrst in the siting of units with the building envelopes of those tots in attempt to avoid potentiol for rock foll hazards on those lots. This shoutd be completed prior to construction because if unstable rock feotures ore locoted, they may be more eosily removed and at lesser cost. Although we have essentially completed our plan review of your project - pending submittal to our office of the soils report and geologist report described above - we will place your building plans "on hold" until we receive these outstanding items. Thank you for your attent¡on to this matter. Dave Argo Plans Examiner Garfield County Commun¡ty Development Department 708 gth Street, Suite 407 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ema il: d ø rg o@ gø rfield-cou nty.com Web : go rfield-cou nty. com CONFIDENTIALIT( NOTICE: This email commun¡cotion and any files tronsm¡tted olong with it ore intended only for the person or ent¡ty to which it ¡s oddressed. tf you hove received this emoil in error, please immediotely notify the sender by email and delete ít from your files. 1 Jim Wilson Sent: To: Cc: From:Jack Albright, Albright &. Associates <jack@albright-associates.com> Monday, July L0, 2OL7 4:LL PM Jim Wilson jparker@kumarusa.com RE: Excavation Obseruation, 76 Hidden Valley Drive, Garfield County, CO Jim, I had a discussion with James Parker this afternoon. We talked about the double normal reinforcing in the footing comment. Hesaidthathisintentwastoremindusoftheneedforadditional beamactionduethedifferenceinbearing material. What I understand is that the original 14 feet anomaly span requirement in the first report was the requirement that addressed that issue. Since we designed the foundation for that span as part of our design process, I don't believe a revision is required on our part. James is going to revise the letter to state the requirement more clearly for everyone's records. Regarding the moisture conditioning and compaction of the below footing soils, I suggested to James that he reach out to the owner/builder for clarification of what had been done and make the appropriate recommendations. I think he will likely communicate with you on what he discovers. Let me know if you need additional assistance from us Best, Jack \X/e hnue moued! Please note we dre now lncated ín Unit A. Subject: EI*F,ËIçFÃ Jack Al .PE Principal 97o.379-3244 cell 97o.927.q63 office | 97o.927.3o39 fax 4oz Park Ave., Unit A I Basalt, CO 8t6zt From: Jim Wilson Imailto:jwilson@garfield-county.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 3:t2 PM To: jack@al bright-assocíates.com Subject: FW: Excavation Observation, 76 Hidden Valley Drive, Garfield County, CO From: Kathy Crisler Imailto:kcrisler@kuma rusa.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2OI7 4:O7 PM To: Trevor Ruonavaara (trfinishes@email.com) Cc: Jim Wilson; Terry Heidi Ruonavaara (thruonavaara@msn'com) Subject: Excavation Observation, 76 Hidden Valley Drive, Garfield County, CO 1 Jim Wilson From: Sent: To: Subject: James Parker <jparker@kumarusa.com > Monday, July 1-0, 2OL7 4:29 PM Jack Albright, Albright &. Associates; Jim Wilson RE: Excavation Observation, 76 Hidden Valley Drive, Garfield County, CO Thanks Jack, We'll have a revised excavation observation letter out shortly. I will touch base with Trevor about compaction on the base ofthe footings. James A. Parker, P.E., P.G. Senior Engineer I Project Manager iparker@kumarusa.com H-P\KUMAR H-P/Kumar 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 P: (970) 945-7988 | F: (970) 945-8454 www.hpkumar.cenn Denver (HQ) I Colorado Springs I Fort Gollins I Glenwood Springs I Parker I Summit Gounty Geotechnical Engineering I Engineering Geology I Construction Observation & Materials Testing I Environmental Confidentialitv Notice: The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it ¡s addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged ¡aterial-Cnfevte*, copying, transmission, disclosure, distribution, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by personoreniiliesothertñániheintendedrecipientisprohibited. lfyoureceivedthisinerror,pleasecontactthesenderanddeletethematerial fromanycomputer From: Jack Albright, Albright & Associates Imailto:jack@albright-assoc¡ates.com] Sent: Monday, July tO,2OL7 4:10 PM To:'Jim Wilson' <jwilson@garfield-county.com> Cc: James Parker <jparker@kumarusa.com> Subject: RE: Excavation Observation,T6 Hidden Valley Drive, Garfield County, CO Jim, I had a discussion with James Parker this afternoon. We talked about the double normal reinforcing in the footing comment. He said that his intent was to remind us of the need for additional beam action due the difference in bearing material. What I understand is that the original l-4 feet anomaly span requirement in the first report was the requirement that addressed that issue. Since we designed the foundation for that span as part of our design process, I don't believe a revision is required on our part. James is going to revise the letter to state the requirement more clearly for everyone's records. Regarding the moisture conditioning and compaction of the below footing soils, I suggested to James that he reach out to the owner/builder for clarification of what had been done and make the appropriate recommendations. I think he will likely communicate with you on what he discovers. Let me know if you need additional assistance from us Best, Dave Argo From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Terry Heidi Ruonavaara <thruonavaara@msn.com> Tuesday, September 26,201-7 6:07 PM Dave Argo Re: Subsoil Study, 76 Hidden Valley Drive, GarCo Image.tif I have attached the clarification letter from our structural'eng¡neer per the request at our previous inspection. I will also have a copy on site for review at the time of our framing inspection. Thank you Heidi Ruonavaara 970-309-48LL From: Dave Argo <dargo@garfield-county.com> Sent: Thursday, June 22,2OI7 2:09 PM To: Terry Heidi Ruonavaara Subject: RE: SubsoilStudy, T6 Hidden Valley Drive, GarCo Thank you Heidi, I did receive a copy of this soils report from Jack Albright yesterday. The only outstanding item left is receipt of a letter from a Geologist verifying proper site location and/or rockfall mitigation (if applicable) per my email sent to Trevor yesterday. Dave Argo Plans Examiner Caant¡, Communíty Development Department L08 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 8L601 Tel: 970-945-8272 Emo il : d a rg o@ g o rfield-cou nty.com We b : ga rfi eld-co u nty. com CONFTDENTTALTTY NOTICE: This emoil communicotion and any files tronsmitted ølong with it are intended only for the person or entity to wh¡ch ¡t ¡s oddressed. lf you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by email and delete it from your files. From: Terry Heidi Ruonavaara Imailto:thruonavaara @msn.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 21,2OL7 6:22PM To: Dave Argo <dargo@garfield-county.com> Subject: Fwd: Subsoilstudy, 76 Hidden Valley Drive, GarCo Hi Dave- I have attached the soils report for lot 76. I wasn't sure if Albright Associates was sending to you or not. 1 Permit # BLRE-06 -17 -47 57 ,\LöruLrI1 t SLASSO'CIATES',! t:l'1 Memorandum To From Date Re : Trevor Ruonavaara, Terry Ruonavaara : Michael Petaisto, PE :. Septembet tL,2AL7 :'. Lot 7ó Springridge rü(/e have been asked to review rwo items on the Lat76 Springridge Resen¡e project to see if any structural revisions are necessary. The first item was a revision to part of the building's footing elevation. it is our understanding that a section of footing was lowered roughly 10" from what we had indicated in order to bear on suitalrle soils. The section begins roughly L2' kom the building's northwest corner and is along the remainder of the 'iyest 'ú/a11s to the southwest cotner. It continues the length of the building's south wall to the southeast corner and along the east wall to just south of the 7'4 7 /8" wall ¡og for the Entry. No structural changes are necessary as a result of the lowering of the footing. In order to prorect the wood columns, the crawlspace grade shall be below all top of footing elevations. The second irem was HP-Kurnar's repoft, dated June 29, ZOIT,regarding the obsen¿ation of the exposed soils to be used for the foundation support. The report indicated that the foundation should be designed ro span an unsupported length of 14'where the foundation transitions from being supported on native soils to fractured bedrock. The concrete foundation walls have been reinforced in such a manner as to span over this 14' length. After reviewing these two items, the buildiny's foundation can be constructed using the information shown on our 'Construction Set', dated A6/08/17. Please feel free to contact us if the¡e are any additional questions or concerns. JackAlbright Principal 17025ML Albrieht&Assoclates, INC: g7o.g27.436Soffice ) g7o.gz7.3a39fax - 4ozParkAve.,UnitA - Basatt,COBr6zr . www.albright'associates.com