Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 Staff Report BOCC 01.15.18Board of County Commissioners - Public Hearing Exhibits BJ Services LLC - Material Handling Limited lmpact Review (File LIPA-10-17-8584) January 15,2018 Exhibit #Exhibit Description 1 Public Hearing Notice Information Form 2 Proof of Publication 3 Receipts from Mailing Notice 4 Photo evidence of Public Notice Posting 5 Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, as amended o Garfield County Comprehensive Plan of 2030 7 Application I Staff Report I Staff Presentation 10 Referral Comment from Chris Hale, Mountain Cross Engineering, Dated December 27,2017 11 Referral Comment from Orrin Moon, Colorado River Fire Rescue, Dated December 27,2017 12 Referral Comment from Dan Roussin, Colorado Department of Transportation, Dated December 5, 2017 13 Referral Comment from Justina Mickelson, Colorado Division of Water Resources, Dated December 21 2017 14 Supplemental Referral Comment from Justina Mickelson, Colorado Division of Water Resources, Dated December 27 2017 15 Referral Comment from Kent Kuster, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Dated December 5,2017 16 Referral Comment from Morgan Hill, Garfield County Environmental Health, Dated December 22,2017 17 Applicant Email regarding wetlands on the property, dated November 30,2017 18 Supplemental Referral Comment from Chris Hale, Mountain Cross Engineering, Dated December 29, 2017 19 Comment from Grand Valley Ditch Company, dated December 29, 2017 20 Supplemental Email Comments from Applicant addressing Traffic and Fugitive Dust Control,Dated January 4,2018 21 Supplemental Email Comments from Applicant addressing location of qenerators and controls, Dated January 4,2018 22 Supplemental Comment from Grand Valley Ditch Company January 4,2018 dated 23 Supplemental Comment from Morgan Hill, Garfield County Environmental Health, Dated January 8,2018 f\ove tro a((tuve ?- o d çq*u"J t-5 t-\1- ,EXHIB¡T EØB r-' REQUEST APPLICANT/P PERTY OWNER REPRESENTATIVE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL # PROPERTY SIZE LOCATION ACCESS EXISTI ZONING BOCC-January 15,2018 LIPA-10-17-8584 Limited lmpact Review - Material Handling BJ Services LLC lvan Geer - River City Consultants, lnc. 2177-111-00-359 Approximately 1 3.69 Acres The property is located east of the City of Rifle at2873} Highway 6 &24, Rifle, CO, 81650. The facility will be accessed off of State Highway 6 & 24 Commercial/ General PROJECT ¡NFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS I. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The application proposes a Material Handling facility to be operated in conjunction with the existing oil field services facility. The existing use of the property is an oil field services facility. The property has accessory office, vehicle maintenance, and storage uses on the site. The applicant has indicated that the proposed application is to add storage containers containing generators and control equipment, as well as cement silos to the existing oil field services facility. Since the initial submittal, the applicant has indicated that the control equipment and generators shall be located inside the existing facility (Exhibit 21). The tanks will hold the dry components of concrete and will be positioned to combine the components in appropriate amounts into trucks for the intended use off-site. The applicant has indicated that nine employees are anticipated to operate the site with three haul trucks. 1 Highway 6&24 Citv of Rifle Subiect Propertv t-70 .J .¡a BOCC-January 15,2018 LtPA-10-17-8584 Vicinity Map II. LOCATION . SITE DESCRIPTION The site is currently improved with an existing structure. The structure ¡s used as an office, vehicle maintenance facility, and storage area. The remaining property is used for outside storage related to oil and gas services. The property accesses to Highway 6 & 24 wlth an improved access and a gate. The property is relatively level and graveled. There is some existing vegetation on the adjacent parcel that screens the facility from the single family residence on the adjacent parcel to the northeast. An irrigation ditch is located on the property, however, it has been piped and the applicant has indicated that the proposed infrastructure will be located to not affect the ditch. 2 BOCC - January 15,2018 LIPA-10-17-8584 Aerial lmage Fl ïÊ 17 ¡/ Fr III. PUBLIC COMMENTS AND REFFERAL AGENCY COMMENTS Public Notice was provided for the public hearing in accordance with the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code as amended. Notice included publication, mailing and posting. The Applicant has provided public notice documentation for review by the County. No public comments have been received on the application. Comments from referral agencies and County Departments are summarized below and attached as Exhibits. Garfield County Consulting Engineer, Chris Hale, Mountain Cross Engineering (Exhibit 10):- Requested that the applicant provide a 4-hour pump test for the well 3 ñ 4 :; Approximate Location of ProPosed Material Handline Use Existing Structure Existing Access BOCC-January 15,2018 LIPA-10-17-8584 lndicated that the applicant needed to provide additionalwater quality testing and address outstanding water quality issues. Commented that the applicant should clarify the uses of the existing well. Colorado River Fire and Rescue, Orin Moon, Fire Marshal (Exhibit 1 1) - lndicated no issues with the application CDOT, Dan Roussin, Access Coordinator (Exhibit 12): - lndicated no issues with the application The site has an existing access permit and the traffic study detailed that it would not go over that use. Colorado Division of Water Resources, Justina Mickelson (Exhibit 13): - lndicated no issues with the application provided that the applicant does not exceed the uses allowed under the permit. Supplemental Referral Comment, Colorado Division of Water Resources, Justina Mickelson (Exhibit 1 4): - Responded to Community Development statf question that restroom and drinking water uses are allowed under the existing well permit. Colorado Division of Public Health and Environment, Kent Kuster (Exhibit 15): - lndicated that the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment had no comment on the aPPlication. Garfield County Environmental Health, Morgan Hill (Exhibit 16): - lndicated that the applicant should take steps to prevent concrete and bentonite dust from escaping during the transfer of materials. - Recommended that the applicant provide a water quality test. Supplemental Referral Comment, Mountain Cross Engineering, Chris Hale, (Exhibit 18) - Specifically addressed the pump tests that the applicant had submitted. lndicated that the test was old and did not meet County standards. Supplemental Comment, Garfield County Environmental Health, Morgan Hill, (Exhibit 23)- Responded that the Applicant's proposal to control fugitive dust appeared to be adequate for the oPeration. Agencies that did not respond: Garfield County Road and Bridge, Garfield County Vegetation Management, Colorado Parks and Wildlife, and City of Rifle 4 BOCC - January 15, 2018 LIPA-10-17-8584 Site PIan Excerpt i! i' ll,ì ç I L I $i;i 4t ¿ 3f g ì ì \ :,i.ri:ji:rì.ij:.j.a,:;.)_ìi:::. r:.!:-lr¡'1,:1:il:r.;ijr:;i,r...:'lr;'.' t ú .,.:.:- ai..rr:ì :.:li\r i..:":--ir'. - ìi. cii ¿; ;li¿ ,". i '.t ,|: I I i. .-. I:r'¡:: t.,. ,, t- ¡ t I I, i í I .<l.:í"" g9'19$(} lql ,TL )/ ,1. ,t,..i In accordance w¡th the Land Use and Development Code, the Applicant has provided detailed responses to the Submittal Requirements and applicable sections of Article 7, Divisions 1,2,and 3, including Section 7-1001, Industrial Use Standards. 5 BQCC - January 15,2018 LIPA-10-17-8584 7-101 - 102.District Reoulations. Com rehensive Plan The proposed use demonstrates general conformance with the Commercial / General Zone district. The proposed structures are approximately 11 feet in height, significantly less than the 40 foot height limit in the zone district. A Material Handling facility is permitted in the Commercial/ GeneralZone District, provided it is approved by the Board of County Comm issioners. Surrounding land uses include light industrial activities to the east and west. South of the property is the right-of-way for Highway 6 & 24 and the railroad. The property to the north, on the other side of the County Road, is agricultural with a residence on the property. There is a single-family residence that is located to the northeast of the proposed use. lt is screened from the proposed use by existing vegetation. The existing use on the property as an Oil Field Services Facility appears to fall under the Large Contractor's Yard Use, a by-right use in the Commercial/General zone district. The property has an accessory otfice, vehicle maintenance, and storage uses on the site, all of which can be classified as accessory to the Contractor's Yard use. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area as Commercial, which is described in the Plan as commercial uses intended to serve a regional market. The applicant's proposal to provide concrete to oil facilities throughout the County is supported by this designation. Additionally, the use is supported by the Comprehensive Plan Goal 1 in the Economics, Employment, and Tourism section which states: Maintain a strong and diverse economic base (for both employment and income generation). The proposed use of delivering dry concrete mix to sites throughout the County is further supported by Policy 3 in the Economics, Employment, and Tourism section which states: Garfietd County will encourage the development of a diversified industrial base recognizing physicat tocation-to-market capabilities of the community and the social and environmental impacts of industrial uses. The City of Rifle received a referral request for the application and did not submit a comment. 7-103:oatibilitv The property has historically been used for light industrial purposes, including by the previous owner, Bayou Well Services. Both properties to the east and the west are light industrial. There is a single-family residence adjoining the property to the northeast that is screened by existing vegetation. The single-family residence shares the same zoning as the subject property. 6 BOCC -,lanuary 15,2018 LtPA-10-17-8584 7-104: Source of Water The application represents that the proposed facility will be waterless. Employees on the site will use already established facilities located in the accessory office structures. The property is supplied by an on-site well (permit No. 67588-F). The well permit was reviewed by the Division of Water Resources who indicated (Exhibit 13), "As long as the uses of the well do not exceed those allowed under the permit this office has no objection to the land use change request." The well permit was approved for commercial vehicle washing and the irrigation of not more than Tz acre of landscape. No office use was included in the well permit. County staff followed-up with the Division of Water Resources to address this inconsistency. The Division responded by stating (Exhibit 14): ln review of Court Case 94CW003, commercial drinking and sanitafion uses would be attowable, as long as discharge is to a septic and leach field system and the annual amount pumped does not exceed 11.05 acre-feet. Permit number 67588-F was rssued pursuant to case number 94CW0003 therefore restroom and drinking water uses are covered under this permit as long as the conditions of approval are met. Staff has included a suggested condition of approval that the applicant shall be required to adhere to any Division of Water Resources well permit requirements. The applicant did not provide an up-to-date well pump test that meets County standards. The applicant did submit a pump test from 2008, however it is almost 10 years old and the County designated engineer indicated that the pump test does not meet Land Use and Development Code standards (Exhibit 18). Staff has included a suggested condition of approval that the applicant provide a pump test that meets County standards. The application did provide a water quality test, however that test did not meet minimum Land Use and Development Code standards and was from 2008. The test was reviewed by the Garfield County designated engineer and Garfield County Environmental Health. Both referral agencies indicated that the applicant should supply a new water quality test that addresses all the contaminants identified in the Land Use and Development Code. Staff has included this as a suggested condition of approval. 7-1O5. Central Water Distribution and Svstems The applicant has represented that the existing facility is serviced by two Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS). The applicant submitted an as-built Enginèer's Report that was included as part of the submittal for Building Permit BLCO-1280. This report indicated that there are two OWTS' on site. The total capacity is for 50 employees. Although the engineer report was submitted as part of a Building Permit, it appears there is no siand-alone septic permit for the site. The application was reviewed by the Chief l BOCC-January 15,2018 LrPA-10-17-8584 Building Official who indicated that the applicant should obtain septic permits for the two systems on site. This has been included by staff as a suggested condition of approval. 7-106: Public Utilities The applicant has indicated that gas, electric, cable, and telephone services are extended to the existing facility and that the level of services currently provided to existing developments in the area will not change as a result of this project. The applicant has indicated that the proposed use will be operated by a self-contained generator located inside the main structure. 7-107 & Roadwavs The proposed use will be accessed directly off of State Highway 6 & 24. The applicant has indicated that the existing driveway is designed to accommodate large trucks and has been permitted by the Colorado Department of Transportation. CDOT reviewed the application and indicated (Exhibil 12): Thank you for the opportunity to review the BJ Services LLC for a Land Use Change Permitfor a Material Handling use on an approximately 13.69 acre parcel located at 28730 Highway 6 & 24, Ihis sife has an access permit #307107 and it is currently active. The permit is for 20 DHV and based upon the traffic study, the site wilt not be going over the 20 DHV. CDOT is in agreement with the study. Therefore, no updated access permit is required. The application indicated that, "Based on the basic traffic study, the access has adequate capacity, and no impacts will require mitigation. The access is 28 feet wide and 90 feet long to the security gate, with a 50 foot radius, and meets the secondary access and semi-primitive driveway standards in Tabe-107". The applicant's traffic study indicated that the road access would fall into the semi-primitive driveway category. ln follow-up correspondence, the applicant indicated that 2-3 maintenance workers access the site intermittently in addition to the nine employees on site (Exhibit 20). lt is County staff's opinion that these workers are incidental to the operation of the facility and as they are not on the premises regularly, it is appropriate that they are not included in the overall traffic study. The application was reviewed by both the County designated engineer and Colorado River Fire Rescue. Neither identified any issues with access. Once vehicles enter the site, it is flat and graveled. 7-108: N Hazards County records show that the only mapped geologichazard on the site is High Ground Water, which can have an impact on septic systems. The application included an engineer's report for the existing OWTS' on the site. That engineer's report stated that 8 BOCC-January 15,2018 LIPA-10-17-8584 the older 1,000 gallon concrete septic tank was adequate and that the new system had been installed in compliance with the permitted design recommendations and specifications. Staff has included a suggested condition of approval that the applicant obtain OWTS permits for the installed systems. 7-109: Fi Protection The application was reviewed by Colorado River Fire Rescue, who did not identify any issues with the proposal (Exhibit 11). lt is staff's opinion that based on the fire district's review, adequate fire protection will be provided. 7-201: Aqricultural Lands No impacts to agricultural land are anticipated from the proposal. Agricultural uses are located to the north of the subject property, however that property is located on the other side of the county Road and a significant distance from the proposal. With regards to irrigation ditches, the applicant has indicated: There are no existing ditches on the properfy, although a ditch along the west boundary of the property was previously piped. No permanent structures are proposed that woutd impede users of the ditch from maintaining the pipeline in the event of emergency or repair. No drainage from the proposed operation will affect this pipetine, or change the water quality from storm water as the ditch is piped and buried. Staff submitted the plans to the Grand Valley Ditch Company. They provided the following comments (Exhibit 19): The pipetine was originally an open ditch carrying water from the lower Cactus Vatley Ditch, owned by Grand River Ditch Company, to shareholders south of Highway 6 & 24. Not wanting an open ditch on their property, Bayou Well Seryices (not a shareholder nor owner of any of the irrigation water) piped it. lt is the position of the Ditch Company that the owner, Bayou Well Services, was and rs responsibte for continuation of the pipeline, and that obligation transfers to any subsequent owner. Additionally, the Grand Valley Ditch Company submitted another comment clarifying their position on maintenance of the ditch. They stated (Exhibit 22): Our only concern is the statement you made regarding ..."no permanent structures are proposed that would impede users of the ditch from maintaining the pipetine..." lt is the position of the ditch company that because the landowner chose to pipe the formerty open ditch, future responsibility for maintenance of the pipeline falls to the landowner and ifs successors' 9 BOCC - January 15,2018 LIPA-10-17-8584 The location of improvements does not appear to impact the piped irrigation ditch and the applicant has provided the location of the ditch on the site plan. Since the ditch is piped and buried staff does not anticipate any potential drainage issues affecting the ditch. 7-202: Wildlife Habitat Areas The application was referred to Colorado Parks and Wildlife who did not respond. The property has already been developed and is bordered by light industrial uses. Staff does not anticipate significant impacts on wildlife. 7-203: Protectio of Water Bodies The applicant indicated that no structures are or will be located within the vicinity of a waterbody that requires a 35 foot setback. Staff identified possible wetlands on the parcel as identified in an old survey. The applicant responded (Exhibit 17): Ih,s /s a picture of the area near the proposed tanks that was previously a ditch but is now piped. River City performs wetlands consulting on many proiects, and with the ditch now in pipe, our professional opinion is that this area does not have the 3 characteristics that define USACE Army Corp Wetlands/Jurisdiction. The three characteristics are wetlands vegetation, hydric soil, and hydrology. The site is graveled and not hydric soil, and there was no water present apparent during our May sife vrslf. We did not evaluate vegetation at that time as the site did not have obvious indicators of potential wetlands. Staff did not notice any obvious signs of wetlands on the property and it is staff's opinion that the applicant appears to be compliant with any required water body setbacks. 7-204: Drainaoe and Erosion The applicant included a Drainage and Erosion plan and description as part of the application. lt was reviewed by the County designated engineer and no issues were identified. As such it is staff's opinion that the applicant meets requirements. The applicant also indicated that during construction waddles will be placed around the construction site as a best management practice. This has been included as a suggested condition of approval. 7-205: Environmental Qualitv The applicant indicated that the addition of the tanks will not affect air or water quality. The application was reviewed by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, who indicated they did not have any comment on the application (Exhibit 1S). Comments were received from Garfield County Environmental Health. Those comments stated (Exhibit 16): 10 BOCC-January 15,2018 LIPA-10-17-8584 Air Quatity and Nuisance (Application Narrative: 4-203-G) -The application sfafes that nuisance impacts will not be created by the proposed operation; however, there are sometimes fugitive dusf emrssions that can result when dry concrete is transferred from one storage container to anather. The applicant should take sfeps to prevent concrete and bentonite dust from escaping during the transfer of these materials from the holding tanks to the trucks. The applicant has indicated that they will control fugitive dust by (Exhibit 20): Ptant Dust Controt-Plant loading uses a two pipe system that routes potential s/o overflows into the scale hopper. The s/os and scale hoppers are sealed. When toading from the plants to the trucks, the truck has a filter system to capture dust. tn this system, generation of fugitive emrssions would be highly unlikely and would only result from significant operator error. Gar¡eld County Environmental Health reviewed the applicant's response and indicated (Exhibit 23): The emissions controls BJ Seryices will use seetns to address the fugitive dust rssues that could be caused by this operation. Staff has included a suggested condition of approval that the applicant control any potential fugitive dust and that any dust created by the use shall not impact adjacent properties. 7-206: Wildfire Hazards The site is located in an area mapped as either not rated or low wildfire susceptibility. There is limited vegetation on site and the application was reviewed by Colorado River Fire Rescue without any comments on wildfire hazard. The site is relatively level. As such, it is staff's opinion that wildfire hazard issues are adequately addressed. 7-207: Natural and Geoloqic Hazards Other than high ground water (discussed in Section 7-108 of this staff report), no natural or geologic hazards have been identified on site. 7-208: Reclamation The applicant has indicated that any area temporarily disturbed as a result of the tank installation will be restored to its pre-construction condition as a road base/graveled yard. The applicant has indicated that storm water drainage functions on the property and that temporary storm water infrastructure will be in place during construction. TL BOCC - January 15,2018 LrPA-10-17-8584 7-301 : Compatible Desiqn To address this section, the applicant responded The proposed operation will not affect surrounding infrastructure and is a compatibte use within the subject property. Dust, odors, gas, fumes, and glare will not be emitted at obiectionable levels. Sfafe noise standards, according fo CRS, A¡ticle 12, Title 25, are 65 decibels for tight industriat and 75 decibels for industrial use at the property line of subiect property. Noise from generator operations will be contained in storage containers, and will not exceed these limits at any of the propeñy lines. Buffering will not be required to minimize impacts, and the proposed operation will not detract from adiacent buildings or uses. The applicant has provided a system for how they will control fugitive dust on the site That system is discussed further in this staff report under Section 7-205. The applicant has represented that the generators for the use will no longer be outside and will be stored in the main facility (Exhibit 21). As such it is anticipated that the applicant will be able to meet required noise standards. This has been included as a suggested condition of approval. 7-302: Off-Street Parkinq and Loadino Standards The applicant has indicated that parking for the existing building has already been established and that over 50 parking spaces were installed at that time. This exceeds the parking requirements for the site. The applicant has provided a turning radius design for tractor trailers to demonstrate that they will be able to access the site and use the existing facility. Additionally the applicant has represented that they will comply with Garfield County parking requirements, including handicapped accessible parking. 7-303: Landscapinq No landscaping is required because the proposed application is for an industrial use. 7-304: Liqhtinq No lighting is proposed for the facility 7-305 Snow Storaqe t2 BOCC - January 15,2018 LtPA-10-17-8584 The site plan demonstrates that there is adequate space to meet snow storage standards. 7-306 Trails Trails standards are generally not applicable based on the type of use 7-1001 INDUSTR USE STANDARDS The Schedule of Uses contained in Article 3 include compliance with the standards in Section 7-1001for storage uses. Waivers have been requested by the Applicant from several standards. A. Residentialsubdivisions: The proposed use is not in a platted residentialSubdivision B. Setbacks: The proposed use is at least 100 feet from the adjacent residential property line located to the northeast of the subject property and 100 feet from all property lines. C. Concealing and Screening: The applicant has requested a waiver from this standard. The standard states, "When an industrial use is not located on an industrial zoned property, all storage, Fabrication, service, and repair operations shall be conducted within an enclosed building or have adequate provisions, based on location and topography, to conceal and screen the facility and/or operations from adjacent property(s)". The applicant has indicated that they believe a waiver is appropriate, based on the following: lndustrial Use of Site and Adjacent Properties - Although the property and other properties along this corridor are not zoned industrial, the historic use of this property has been light industrial for providing services to the oil and gas industry. ln addition, this type of property use is compatible along the adjacent highway corridor, as oil and gas industries have historically and continue to operate along this corridor. Properties immediately adjacent, east, and west are both currently utilized as light industrial operating facilities. The south property line is bounded by a highway and railroad, with an industrial gravel pit located on the other side. These facilities will not be adversely impacted by the proposed use due to their compatibility. As shown in the image of the proposed location, industrial equipment is stored adjacent to the west fence. a 13 o a BOCC - January 15,2018 LIPA-10-17-8584 Existing Fencing-The site is bounded by an existing fence on all sides that provides a measure of screening. Refer to the previously referenced image for examples. Distance Buffer-The proposed operation is located 100 feet from the west fence line and 455 feet from the north fence line. The distance from the north fence line provides significant visual buffering from the residential/agricultural properties to the north. There is also a county road separating properties to the north from the project site . Self-Contained- The proposed use is also self-contained. Controls, generators, and equipment are installed in storage containers, and the cement silos are also self-contained. There will be no open assembly or storage of unsightly materials introduced by the proposed use that would require screening to buffer visual impacts. Staff is supportive of the Applicant's waiver request. The adjacent properties land-uses are mainly light industrial. The single-family residence to the northeast of the property is buffered from the activity by significant distance and existing vegetation on that property. The property to the north is buffered by significant distance and the property of the south side Highway is a gravel pit. No public comments were received on the application. Waiver Analysrs E €' Þt I _à ,¡*'l ,-. ''¡.i :j; Subject Parcel Existing Vegetation Single-Family Residence Approximate Location of Proposed Facility t4 BOCC - January 15,2018 LtPA-10-17-8584 D. Storing: The applicant has indicated that all storage of materials will be in metal silos and a minimum of 100' from the property line. Materials will be store in compliance with all regulatory standards. The applicant has represented hazardous materials will not be stored on site. E. lndustrialWastes: The site will not produce any industrialwaste F. Noise: The applicant has indicated that generators will be stored inside the main building. A suggested condition of approval shall be included that the applicant comply with applicable noise requirements. G. Hours of Operation: The applicant has proposed hours of operation from 7am to 7pm, Monday through SaturdaY. H. lnterference, Nuisance, or Hazard: No noise or other nuisance impacts are anticipated from the facility. No lighting is proposed. The applicant has provided a description of how they will handle any possible fugitive dust on the site (Exhibit 20). V. SUGGESTED FINDINGS 1. That proper public notice was provided as required for the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The hearing before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties were heard at that meeting. 3. That for the above stated and other reasons the proposed Land Use Change Permit application by BJ Services LLC, for a Material Handling Facility is in the best interest of the health, safety, convenience, order, prosperity and v'reifare of the citizens of Garfield County. 4. That with the adoption of conditions, the application is in general conformance with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, as amended. 5. That with the adoptions of conditions and granting of waivers from Section 7-1001 , lndustrial Use Standards related to Concealing and Screening the application has adequately met the requirements of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, as amended. VI. RECOMMENDATION The following recommended conditions of approval are provided for consideration by the Board of County Commissioners for approval of the BJ Services - Material Handling, Limited lmpact Review Land Use Change Permit. 15 BOCC-January 15,2018 LtPA-10-17-8584 Prior to lssuance of the Land Use Ghange Permit 1. Prior to the issuance of the Land Use Change Permit, the applicant shall submit a well pump test that meets the standards in Section 4-203(MXl XbXSXa). n statement from a qualified professional shall be submitted to Community Development that states the wellwill be adequate to supply water forthe proposed uses. The pump test shall be reviewed and accepted by the Community Development Department and the County designated engineer. 2. Prior to the issuance of the Land Use Change Permit, the applicant shall submit a water quality test that meets the standards in Section 4-203(MXlXbXSXc). lf any contaminant exceeds required standards the applicant shall provide a letter from a qualified professional that details how the well can be brought into compliance. Any recommended upgrades or system changes to the water distribution system from that letter shall be required to be installed prior to the issuance of the Land Use Change Permit. The water quality test shall be reviewed and accepted by the Community Development Department. 3. Prior to the issuance of the Land Use Change Permit, the applicant shall obtain an Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) Permit from Garfield County Community Development for any OWTS on the property. Operational Conditions 4. All representations made by the Applicant in the application shall be conditions of approval unless specifically altered by the conditions of approval of the Board. 5. The facility shall be operated in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and local regulations governing the operation of this type of facility. 6. The applicant shall comply with all Division of Water Resources well permit requirements. 7. During construction the applicant shall utilize temporary storm water infrastructure as indicated in the application to address potential runoff issues. L The use shall comply with applicable County and State noise requirements. 9. The height of the silos shall not exceed zone district height requirements 10.Hours of operation for the use shall be 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM Monday through Saturday. 11.The applicant shall obtain any required Garfield County Building Permits. 12. No fugitive dust from the use shall impact adjacent properties. t6 L EXHIB IT Garfield Coulnty PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE INFORMATION Please check the appropriate boxes below based upon the notice that was conducted for your public hearing. lnaddition,pleaseinitial ontheblanklinenexttothestatementsiftheyaccuratelyreflectthe described action. My application required written/mailed notice to adjacent property owners and mineral owners. L i(_ L Mailed notice was completed on the ll* aru * bpunb¿r 2011, All owners of record within a 200foot radius of the subject parcel were identified as shown in the Clerk and Recorder's office at least 15 calendar days prior to sending notice. All owners of mineral interest in the subject property were identified through records in the Clerk and Recorder or Assessor, or through other means [list] Please attach proof of certified, return receipt requested mailed notice. My application required Published notice. X- Notice was published on the lt* Please attach proof of publication in the Rifle day o¡ W,núer 2011. EÎ My application required Posting of Notice. X- Notice was posted on the l)r a"y ot bøumþs,20f* X- Notice was posted so that at least one sign faced each adjacent road right of way generally used by the public. Citizen Telegram I testify that the above information is true and accurate. 5 {4r ."{l*nß ,lneName: Signatu re Date nln l-l ,t Arl #: 0000161663-01 Customer: EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRIS Your account number is: 2927005 PROOF OF PUBL¡CATION RIFLE CITIZEN TELEGRAM STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF GARFIELD l, Samantha Johnston, do solemnly swear that I am Associate General Manager of the RIFLE CITIZEN TELEGRAM, that the same weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Garfield for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement; that said newspaper has been admitted to the United States mails as a periodical under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly newspaper for the period of 1 insertion; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 1211412017 and that the last publication of said notice was dated 1211412017 in the issue of said newspaper. ln witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day, 12t1412017. Samantha Johnston, Associate General Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Garfield, State of Colorado this day 1211412017. L_e_gel Qes-S_!p!!9¡;.., A tract of land, contained in the- Southeast la ol lþ'e Northeast 7¿ of Sect¡on 11, TownshiP 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th P.M., more Parl¡cularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the noñhwesÏerly right-of-way line of State Highway 6 & 2Awith the east line of sald Section 1 1, whence the East 7¿ Comer of said Section 11 bears South OO"16'58" East 51O.75 feet; Thence along said right-of-way line South 63"01 '54" West 721 .64 teel; Thence leaving sa¡d r¡ght-of-way line North 02'24' 4-5" East 1134. 73 feet to the northerly line of said SoutheastT¿ of the NortheastY4i Thence along said northerly line North 89"39'46' East 591 .41 feel to the Northeast comer of said SoutheastT+ of the NortheaalY4i Thence South OO"16'58" East 8O9.96 feet to the P()INT OF BEGINNING. Pf AçliSal pe_s,c !:j pt¡eli Th e p rope rty i s I o cated aDDrox¡matelv one mile nonh east of trré c¡V of Rífle along State Highway 6 and 24. The physical address is 2873C Highway 6 & 24, Rifle, co, 81650. Th€ Gãrf¡eld County Assessor's parcel number for the property is 21771 1 1 00359. 9eS-Sfip!i-o_¡ ol R,equ_es[: The Applicant is requesting a Land Use Change Permit for Materiãl Handling. The proposed development would add storage contairiers conta¡n¡ng generators and control equipment, as well as cement silos to an existing oil field services facil¡ty. The tanké would hold the dry compohents of concrete and would'be posit¡oned to combine the components in appropriate amounts for the intended off site use. The mater¡als are non-hazardous and non-combustible. The Property is zoned Commerc¡al/General. All persons affected by the proposed proiect are in- vited to appear and state their views, protests or support. lï you cannol appear personally at_ such heäiing, thên you are uiged to state your views by letter, ás the Board of Cóunty Commissioners will q¡ve consideration to the comments of surround¡ng ıroperty owners, and others affected, in deciding wnethe-r to grant or deny the request. The applica- tion mav be-reviewed aithe office of Garfield Coun- tv Comfriunitv Develooment located at '1 OB 8th étreet, Suite'4O1 , Garf¡eld County Plaza Building, Glenwood Springs, Colorado between the hours ot 8:3O a.m. and 4:3O p.m., Monday through Friday o-r through Garfield County Community Development's websi-te. Contact the Gârfield County Community Development Department at (97O) 945-a212 or pwal ler@qarfield-countv.com with any quest¡ons. A Boärd of County'Commissioners'Public Hearing on the application has been scheduled for Mon_day January'1.s, 2017 at 1:OO P.M. in the Board of Coun- ty Commissioners Meeting Room, 1OB 8th St, Glenwood Springs, Colorado, 81 601. Planning Department Gadield County Published in the Citizen Telegram December 14 2017 0000161663 PUBLIG NOTIGE that BJ éervices LLC Commissioners, Colo to request a a Mater¡alit to allow has applied to Garfield Coun- Land Use Handling use to be located on the Section 11, Township Garfield, State of e+q% Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public My Commission Expires: November 1, 2019 4þoo E U.S. Postal Service'* CERTIFIED MAIL, RECEIPT (Domestlc Mall Only; No lnsurance CoveÍage Provìded) U.S. PostalService*' CERTIFIED MA¡L" Provided)Mall(Domeslic RECEIPT No lnsurance $ü. rjll St¡.1:¡l:l Herê - Pogtmark 0 Y b.Cð or PA Box Nô. city, "èiaiei it pi ¿' "' Qvtnv . vlsit our websltêFor See Feverse lor lnstructionsPS Form 3600, August 2006 1 rOt- Eû LN rå --Erå.f råE EIt3 EI n-uj ri rjlE n- ¿T Posåda rn Ll-l rOr'l Ë JIÉ :f rq Ef c3rf trf r.. LN rl r:l.{ Ef n- rosiLEe ru J¡ Et¡ L.l JIr?5. rt EI T3 ff n- I.r¡rI r{ri c3tr [rrl4 r.rt 14 -.0 rjl:r råt:E E} E n-l4 rã rl r{ff, F" Relum Rece¡pt Fee {Ëndorsement Requ¡rsd} Feslricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Sil" Ttfâl Postagê & Fees t""l"in certifisd Foe Return Receipt Fee (Endolsemsnt Required) Rêstrrctêd Delrvery FPe (Endorserìent Roqurêol Total Postâge & Fees LziLL /2rrL7 po"ÈÞ certif¡ed Fec Return tìecerpt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restflct€d Ooi¡very Fêe (Ênd0rsement Fìequ¡rød) ttJ Tota¡ Poslage & Fees Cârtified Fee ntêtu¡n Recelot Fe¿ (Êndórsement Reduired) lìeotr¡cted Oelivery Fe€ {Endorsernent Fì6qu¡red) {ir Total Postâgê & F€es L2/tr /2úr7 Cêdifled Fee 1_r RIFI-EItü,.S14-5r: ., i ..'t $l:r . r'Jll $n. ilü ipl-r ¡ ¡_lr_r îYô Jat 0 5ô or PO gox No. City, State, ZIP+4 ç ,fu"plk ínlo¡mation vie¡t our webs¡ts at See Reverse lor lnstructionsPS Form 3800, August 2006 Postal Service" RECEIPTTIFIED MA]L'u.s. Mall CER No Insuranoë $fJ, ilfl sir, Ûrl iil' i. oo.,;¡* .' H€fe 0qe"r 4'iiaie, ziril 1ot PO Box No For websitelnformatlonvlsil our Sæ Flev9fse larr lnsìrüctions PS Form 3800,August 2006 U.S, PostalService" CERTIFI'ED MAIL. RECEIPT lüaíl lnsurance $lr " t:lu $11. r:rÚ Ðt-r r r_ru $ C¡ty, StaÍe, zlP+4 tfr_5""ot PA tsox No. 'ñô'.: co flb5b visil our website atFor See'Reverse lþr lnstruclionsFotm 3800, August 2006 FI:r,so s1 ri,F11'R1 liEr $ü. utl Postmark06, I ¡Hera 1t7l s *t\/.r 5bCo 'siàiáZi"+î'-PAor Box 1 Fo.websito atinformalionvisit our PS Forñ 3Boo, August 2006 See fìeverse lor lnstructions U.S. PostalService'" CERTIFIED MAIL- InsumnceIitail RECEIPT Coverage Provicled) U.S. Postal CERTIFIE Service" D MAIL'" RECEIPT (Domestic Mail OnlY;No lnsurance GRA}ID. JUNCÏ;Ï Gl $ü .l-ltt $u, ult Hêrg u or PO tûLn ZIP+4Srit;; ( tr,lhrf 3.b-93, . For infofmation v¡slt our wêbsite at www.usps.comtu See Reverse for lnstructions PS Form 3800' August 20oo U.S. Postal Service'" CERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT (Domestio Mall No lnsu¡ance Coverage 6LEflIdTOD SFRTINü$ i ' ll irl' 81 {l ., 40 $lJ. trrl 5Lì. iJr-l No.: 0ot PO Box No. 6AC¡ For inlormatíon visit our webÊite at -.8ú€rjt r{ -.[r{ ËlÉ E¡ Ef Er!Lfl f:l rå rãÐf- m[r EOttl rã .E r rã E [ftrf EI r!. LN rq rlrlE r\" o"$ån Certilled FêE Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Requlred) Rostr¡ct€d Dêl¡v€ry Fee (Êodorsemsnl Required) $ll , Tolal Fostage & Êses t'"1"îu Certifed Feê Return Receipt Fee (Endorsemont Requked) Rsstricted DellverY Fee (Endorsem€nt Requlred) $u. fotal Postagô & Fees 7 ,.r¡11¡tf-rT7 [r[ftr LN rjt.¡r{î r{ cf, EIE eoSe Ѐrtil¡ed Fsê Return ReceiPt Feè (Endorsement Bequired) Fìeslrictod Dêlivêry Feê (Endorsement Requ¡red) $Ll " Totål Poslågs & Feês E r.-Irl rl rir'lg r- i .*-^ --'r-'- --)¿- - ¡!Ê-*-.*. * Þ-*--+-- ìL- -* MOUNTAIN EROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Envirsnmental Çonsulting and De*ign December 27.2017 Mr. Patrick Waller Garfi eld County Planning 108 8th Stleet, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Revierv of the BJ Services * Material Handting Application: LIPA-I0-17-8584 Dear Patrick: This off,rce has performed a review of the documents provided for the BJ Selvices, Material Hanclling Applicàtion. The submittal was found to be thorough and well organized. The rcview generated the following comments: 1. The Applicant dicl not provide a 4-hour pump test for the wells. 2. The Applicant provided watel quality tests that were some years o1d; the analysis was not a flill analysis ancl that test revealed issues with water quality. The Applicant should hire a qualified professional to determine applicable methocls of water treatment. Water quality testing f-or the remaining contaminants is wan'anted. 3. The wells ar.e permitted for irrigation and vehicle washing. The Applicant shoulcl verify that the wells can be permittecl for the proposed use and provide documents that show the use and ownership of the well has been changed. Fcel lree to call if you have any questit;ns or cornnlents. Sincerely, Mountain Cross Inc U Hale, PE b 3g o 8267'Grand Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 P: 970.945.5 544 F: 97 0.945.5558 www.mountaincross-eng.com Colorado River Fire Rescue Patrick Waller 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 December 27,2017 RE: BJ Services Patrick: This letter is to aclvise you that I have reviewed File Number: LIPA-10-17- 8584, BJ Services located at28730 Hwy 6 in Rifle, CO. I have made a site visit to this location, reviewed the digital application, and I have no requirements or concerns with the land use change for proposed addition of tanks that will be added to hold the dry components of concrete along with the additional loading and unloading of trucks on site. Thank you for allowing me to review this referral and please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. . Thank You, Orrin D. Moon, Division Chief/Fire Marshal Patrick Waller From: Sent: To: Roussin - CDOT, Daniel <daniel.roussin@stäte.co.us> Tuesday, December 05,2017 9:45 AM Patrick Waller Re:Garfield County Referral Request - File No. LIPA-l0-17-8584Subject: Patrick - Thank you for the opportunity to review the Sf Services LLC for a Land Use Change Permit for a Material Handling use on an approximately 13.69 acreparcel located at28730 Highway 6 8 24, This site has an access permit #307107 andit is currently active. Thé permit is for 20 DHV and based upon the traffic study, the site will not be going over the 20 DHV. CDOT is in agreement with the study. Therefore, no updated access permit is required. Thanks Dan Roussin Permit Unit Manager Traffic and Safety Dan P 970.683.6284 | F 970.683.6290 222 South 6th Street, Room 100, Grand Junction, CO 81501 n .co.us I www.codot.gov/ | www.cotrip.ors x On Mon, Dec 4,2017 at4:32PM, Patrick Waller <pwaller@,garfield-county.com> wrote Good Afternoon, Garfield County Community Development is requesting referral comments for an application submitted by BJ Services LLC for aLandUse Change Permit for a Material Handling use on an approximately 13.69 acre parcel located at28730 Highway 6 &,24, Rifle, 81650. The proposed development would add storage containers containing generators and control equipment, as well as cement silos to an existing oil freld services facility. The tanks would hold the dry components of concrete and would be positioned to combine the components in appropriate amounts for the intended off site use. The materials are non-hazardous and non- combustible. The property is zoned Commercial/General. 1 COLORADO Division of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 821 Denver, CO 80203 Permit No. 67588-F Rec No. 3632094 M EMO RAN DIIIVL Date To: From: Re: December 21,2017 Patrick Waller, Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Department Justina P. Mickelson, Physical Science Researcher/Scientist BJ Services LLC; LIPA-10-17-8584 We have reviewed the land use change request for material handling on a parcel of approximately 14 acres in size, located in part of the E1l2 of the SEli4 of the NE1/4 of Section 11, Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th P.M., a|28730 6 &24 HWY, Rifle, CO, (parcel no.2177-111-00-359). The property currently consists of an oil field facility. The applicant does not propose to create a new lot or change the size of the existing lot. The applicant proposes to add storage containers containing generators and control equipment, as well as cement silos at an existing oil field services facility. The tanks would hold the dry components of concrete. According to the submitted Water Supply and Distribution Plan, the proposed cement facility will not require water as it is a dry operation. The existing oilfield facility is served by an on-site well, well permit no. 67588-F. According to our records, Well Permit No. 67588-F was issued on October 8, 2009, to construct a well in the SE1i4 of the NEli4 of Section 11, Twp. 6 South, Rng. 93 West of the 6th P.M. The use of groundwater from the well was approved for commercial vehicle washing and the irrigation of ñot more than Tz acre of landscape. The annual amount of ground water to be withdrawan shall not exceed 11.05 acre-foot. The rate of this well shall not exceed 20 gpm. As long as the uses of the well do not exceed those allowed under the permit, this office has no objection to the land use change request. Please feel free to contact me at 303-866-3581 if you or the applicant has any questions. EXHIBIT l7 Ir0ı0a 1313 Sherman Street, Room 821, Denver, CO 80203 P 303.8ó6.3581 www.water,state.co.us Patrick Waller From: Sent: To: Mickelson - DNR, Justina <justina.mickelson@state.co.us> Wednesday, December 27,2017 1:18 PM Patrick Waller Re: BJ Services LLC LIPA-'10-17-8584Subject: Patrick - Since permit number 67588-F does not specifically include commercial drinking and sanitary pu{poses, a copy of this correspondence will be added to the permit file. onWed,Dec27,20t7at1:l2PM,Mickelson-DNR,Justinawrote: Dear Patrick, In review of Court Case 94CV/003, commercial drinking and sanitation uses would be allowable, as long as discharge is to a septic and leachfield system and the annual amount pumpcd docs not exceed 1 1.05 acre-feet. permit number 67588-F was issued pursuant to case number 94CW0003 iherefore restroom and drinking water uses are covered under this permit as long as the conditions of approval are met. Please feel free to contact me with any further questions. on wed, Dec 27,2017 at 12:05 PM, Patrick Waller <pwaller@garfield-c wrote: HiJustina, I had a follow-up question on the DWR's comments on this application. While the application is for a use that does not require any water, there will be staff located on site that will need to use the restroom and drinking water' Does this well permit cover that use? Thanks for your help, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County 1 Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 8160L (970) 945-13 77 ext. 1580 pwa I ler@ga rfield-co untv.com http://www.ga rfield-co u ntv.com/com m u n itv-deve lopme nt/ From: Mickelson - DN R, Justina Imailto:iustina.mickelson@state.co.us] Sent: Thursday, December 2L,2OL7 1:36 PM To: Patrick Waller <pwa ller@ga rfield-countv.com> Subject: BJ Services LLC LIPA-1-0-17-8584 Patrick, Please find attached the SEO comments regarding BJ Services LLC LIPA-10-17-8584. Thanks, y'**- 2 %*/"4'- Physical Science Researcher/Scientist Division of Wrarcr Resources Department of Natural Resources 13I3 Sherman St, Room 821: Denver CO 80203 Office: 303-866-3581 x 8232 2 Thanks, y'*'*2" 2 %h/"á'- Physical Science Researcher/Scientist Division of Water Resources Department of Naturøl Resources I313 Sherman St, Room 821; Denver CO 80203 Offìce: 303-866-3581 x 8232 Thanks, y'-r**" 2 %2/.á'- Physical Science Researcher/Scientist Division of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources I313 Sherman St, Room 82I ; Denver,CO 80203 Office: 303-866-3581 x 8232 3 Patrick Waller From: Sent: To: Subject: Kuster - CDPHE, Kent <kent.kuster@state.co.us> Tuesday, December 05,2017 9:07 AM Patrick Waller LrPA-10-17-8584 December 5,2017 Patrick Watter, Senior Planner Garfietd County Community Devetopment Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Gtenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: File No. LIPA-10-17'8584 Dear Mr. Watter, The Cotorado Department of Pubtic Heatth and Environment has no comment on the BJ Services land use change permit LIPA-10-17-8584 Ptease contact Kent Kuster at 303'692-3662 with any questions. Sincerety, Kent Kuster EnvironmentaI Specialist Cotorado Department of Pubtic Health and Environment 1 EXHIBIT \, bÂ.oa Garfield County Public Heulth 195 W. 14th Street Rifle, CO 81650 (970) 625-5200 Garfield County Community Development 108 8rh Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Attn: Patrick Waller 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-6614 December 22,2017 Hello Patrick, l've reviewed the application for the BJ Services Material Handling Facility and have a few comments: 1. Air Quality and Nuisance (Application Narrative: 4-203-G) - The application states that nuisance impacts will not be created by the proposed operation; however, there are sometimes fugitive dust emissions that can result when dry concrete is transferred from one storage container to another. The applicant should take steps to prevent concrete and bentonite dust from escaping during the transfer of these materials from the holding tanks to the trucks. 2. Drinking water - I wasn't able to locate information in the application about a water quality test from the existing well. lf it has been more than 5 years since the well was tested or if it has never been tested, I recommend a water quality test be done according to Garfield County's code. Please feel free to contact me with questions. Thank you, /llwi'ro //4 ßtiL Morgan Hill Environmental Health Specialist I ll Garfield County Public Health 195 W. 14th Street Rifle, CO 81650 (970) 665-6383 Garfield County Public Health Deparlment - working to promote health and prevent disease Patrick Waller From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: lvan Geer < igeer@rccwest.com> Wednesday, December 13,2017 4:36 PM Patrick Waller; Tracy States Rob Montgomery; Cheyen.ne Scharf RE: BJ Services Additional lnformation I MG-a52s jpg; IMG-a523 jpg Hi Patrick, This is a picture of the area near the proposed tanks that was previously a ditch but is now piped. River City performs wetlands consulting on many projects, and with the d¡tch now in pipe, our professional opinion is that this area does not have the 3 characteristics that define USACE Army Corp Wetlandslurisdiction. The three characteristics are wetlands vegetation, hydric soil, and hydrology. The site is graveled and not hydric soil, and there was no water present apparent during our May site visit. We did not evaluate vegetation at that time as the site did not have obvious indicators of potential wetlands. Please let us know if you have any questions. Thanks! lvan Geer, PE Principal/Engineer River City Consultants www.rccwest.com 970-241,-47220 970-26L-4420 M From: Patrick Wa ller Imailto :pwaller@garfield-county'com] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 3:56 PM To: Tracy States <tstates@rccwest.com> Cc: lvan Geer <igeer@rccwest.com>; Rob Montgomery <Rob.Montgomery@BJSERVICES'COM>; Cheyenne Scharf <Cheyenne.Scha rf@ BJSERVICES.COM> Subject: RE: BJ Services Additional lnformation Thanks for sending this over. Only one last piece to button-up before Technical Completeness. The survey from June 10, 2005 identified wetlands on the site associated with the irrigation ditch. We have a 35 foot setback requirement from any wetlands. However, I know you have represented that the irrigation lateral has been piped. Can you confirm that the piping of the western irrigation ditch eliminated the wetlands on the property? Or alternatively that the proposed development is at least 35-feet away? Thanks, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Depa rtment i-08 8th Street, Suite 401- Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 94s-L377 ext. 1-580 1 pwalle r(@earfield-cou ntV.com http ://www.ga rfield-cou ntv.com/com m u n itv-deve lopment/ From : Tracy States Ima i lto :tstates@ rccwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, November28,2OL7 3:29 PM To: Patrick Waller <pwaller@ea rfield-countv.com> Cc: lvan Geer <igeer@rccwest.com>; Rob Montgomery <Rob.Montgomerv@BJSERVICES.COM>; Cheyenne Scharf <Chevenne.Scha rf@ BJSERVICES.COM> Subject: FW: BJ Services Additional lnformation Patrick, Attached is an updated Title Commitment with a link to the ALTA referenced in Exception No. 13 - Schedule B. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thank you, finc7 9tøtct ftycct Oøø{ínøtor River City Consultants, lnc 744 Horizon Court #110 Grand Junction, CO 81506 970-241-4722 Phone 970-241-8841Fax tstates@rccwest.com rivercitv@rccwest. com From: Stepha nie Bornholdt Ima ilto :stepha nie@cwtrifle.com] Sent: Tuesday, November28,2OL7 2:36 PM To: Tracy States <tstates@ rccwest.com> Subject: RE: BJ Services Additional lnformation As requested Stephanie Bornholdt Commonwealth Title CompanY I27 E.5th Street Rifle, CO 81650 970.625.3300 ha nie cwtrifle.co From: Tracy States Imailto:tstates@rccwest'com] Sent: Tuesday, November28,2OI7 11:03 AM To: Stephanie Bornholdt <stephanie@cwtrifle.com> Subject: FW: BJ Services Additional lnformation 2 Hi Stephanie, Can you please update the attached Title Commitment to reflect proper ownership. Also, can you provide the requested documentation for exception 13 on Schedule B? Please call me with any questions. Thank you, Trøc7 Støter frTect&øør{iøøtør River City Consultants, lnc. 744 Horizon Court #110 Grand Junction, CO 81506 970-241-4722 Phone 970-241-8841Fax tstates@rccwest.com rivercitv@rccwest. com From: Patrick waller [ma ilto: pwa ller@ga rfield-countv'com] Sent: Tuesday, November 28,2OL7 10:25 AM To: Tracy States <tstates@rccwest.com> Cc: lvan Geer <igeer@rccwest.com>; Rob Montgomery <Rob.MonteomerV@BiSERVICES.COM>; Cheyenne Scharf <Cheve n ne.Scha rf @ BJSE RVIC ES.CO M > Subject: RE: BJ Services Additional lnformation Good Morning, Thank you for the supplemental submittals. Further review of those documents leaves two outstanding issues from the County Attorney's Office: 7. The County Attorney's Office is requesting a copy of the surveys described in exception number 13 of Schedule B- Section 2 dated April 8, 2005 and June 10, 2005. There appear to be possible encroachments on the property. 2. The Title Commitment states that the property is owned by BJ Allied Newco LLC. This is different than the applicant and current owner per the assessor's records. Please explain this discrepancy. The supplied water quality test does not address all the contaminants required per the Land Use and Development Code and the Pump Test is not for the correct amount of time. While these can be accepted at the Technical Completeness phase and reviewed through referral agency comments, more than likely, if the application is approved, staff will include suggested conditions that these are updated. Additionally, as a heads-up the permit for the well is only for "commercial vehicle washing" pending DWR review, they could identify some possible changes that need to be made to the permit. Please let me know if there are any additional questions, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Department 1"08 8th Street, Suite 401 3 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-1377 ext. 1580 pwa ller@ga rfield-cou ntv.com http ://www.sa rfield-cou ntv.com/com m u nitv-develo pme nt/ From: Tracy States Imailto:tstates@rccwest.com] Sent: Monday, November L3,20t7 1:52 PM To: Patrick Waller <pwa ller@garfield-countv.com> Cc: lvan Geer <igeer@rccwest.com>; Rob Montgomery <Rob.Montgomerv@BJSERVICES.COM>; Cheyenne Scharf <Chevenne.Sc BISERVICES.COM> Subject: BJ Services Additional lnformation Patrick, Please find attached the requested additional information with regards to the BJ Services Limited lmpact submittal. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thank you, TrneTStøtcr fr7ætbr{ízøtor River City Consultants, lnc. 744 Horizon Court #1 10 Grand Junction, CO 81506 970-241-4722 Phone 970-241-8841Fax tstates@rccwest.com rivercity@ rccwest. com 4 {f': - -:-ÌII Patrick Waller From: Sent: To: Subject: Chris Hale < chris@ mountaincross-eng.com > Friday, December 29,2017 4:14 PM Patrick Waller RE:Garfield County Referral Request - File No. LIPA-10-17-8584 Patrick I agree, correct. The pump tests provided do not meet LUDC standards plus they are almost L0 years old Sincerely, Mountain Cross Engineering, Inc. Chris Hale, P.E. 826112 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Ph: 970.945.5544 Fx: 970.945.5558 From: Patrick Wa ller Imailto: pwaller@ga rfield-county.com] Sent: Friday, December 29,2OI7 2:49 PM To: Chris Hale <chris@mountaincross-eng.com> Subject: RE: Garfield County Referral Request - File No. LIPA-10-17-8584 Hi Chris, Following-up on your review, I have one question, the applicant did provide a pump test for the well. However, it was from 2008 and I don't think the test meets our standards. lt is located on Page 3 of the well permit document available here: http://records.earfield-countv.com/WebLink/O/edoc/3646913/L0.04%20Well%20Permit%2067588-F.pdf. Would you mind giving it a quick glance over to confirm? Thanks, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Com m unity Development Depa rtment 108 8th Street, Suite 40L Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (97O\t 945-1377 ext. 1580 pwa ller@garfield-countv.com htt p : //www. ea rf ie I d -co u ntv. co m/co m m u n itv-d eve I o p m e nt/ From: Chris Ha le Ima ilto:chris@ mounta incross-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 27,20L7 5:27 PM To: Patrick Waller <pwaller@garfield-countv.com> Subject: RE: Garfield County Referral Request - File No. LIPA-10-1-7-8584 I Patrick Here you are. The original is in the mail Sincerely, Mountain Cross Engineering, Inc. Chris Hale, P.E. 826112 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Ph: 970.945.5544 Fx: 970.945.5558 From: Patrick Wa ller Imailto: pwaller@earfield-countv.com] Sent: Monday, December O4,2O1-7 4:32 PM To: Kelly Cave <kcave@sarf¡eld-countv.com>; Morgan Hill <mhill@earfield-countv.com>; Wyatt Keesbery <wkeesberv(@ea eld-countv Steve Anthony <santhonv@garfield-countv.com>; insrid.hewitson@state.co.us; Roussin - CDOT, Daniel <daniel.roussin@state.co.us>; Sullivan - DNR, Megan <megan.sullivan@state.co.us>; lcenogle - CDPHE, Bret <bret.icenogle@state.co.us>; scott.hover@state.co.us; Taylor Elm - DNR <tavlor.elm@state.co'us>; nlindquist(Arifleco.org; Chris Hale <chris@mountaincross-eng.com>; Orrin Moon <Orrin.Moon@Crfr.us> Subject: Garfield County Referral Request - File No. LIPA-10-17-8584 Good Afternoon, Garfield County Community Development is requesting referral comments for an application submitted by BJ Services LLC for a Land Use Change permit for a Material Handling use on an approximately 13.69 acre parcel located at28730 Highway 6 &24, Rifle, 81650. The proposed development would add storage containers containing generators and control equipment, as well as cement silos to an existing oil field services facility. The tanks would hold the dry components of concrete and would be positioned to combine the components in appropriate amounts for the intended off site use. The materials are non-hazardous and non-combustible. The property is zoned Commercial/General' The link to the application is available here. Garfield County Community Development is requesting referral comments by Wednesday, December 27 ,20L7 Please let me know if you have any questions, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Department L08 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-1377 ext. 1580 pwa I ler(ô ga rfield-cou ntv.co m 2 rfield-cou m b¡3g q Patrick Waller From: Sent: To: Linda S. Hansen <lhansen@sopris.net> Friday, December 29,2017 9:48 PM Patrick Waller Re: ReferralSubject: The pipeline was originally an open ditch carrying water from the lower Cactus Valley Ditch, owned by Grand River Ditch Company, to shareholders south of Highway 6 &24. Not wanting an open ditch on their property, Bayou Well Services (not a shareholder nor owner of any of the irrigation water) piped it. lt is the position of the Ditch Company that the owner, Bayou Well Services, was and is responsible for continuation of the pipeline, and that obligation transfers to any subsequent owner. Linda S. Hansen --- pwaller@garfield-cou nty. com wrote: F rom : Patrick Wa I ler <pwa I ler@ga rfield-cou nty. com > To: "Linda S. Hansen" <lhansen@sopris.net> Subject: Referral Date: Fri,29 Dec2017 17:19:56 +0000 Hi Linda, I had a quick question for you. We have an application in for Material Handling on the BJ Services parcel (28730 Highway 6 &24). They have shown a piped irrigation ditch on the site plan. lwas wondering if the irrigation ditch was associated with you all? Or if you might know who is responsible for it. Thanks for all your help, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Commu nity Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-1377 ext 1580 pwa I ler@ ga rfield-co u ntv. com http ://www. sarfield-county. com/comm u n ity-developmenU 2 Patrick Waller From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: lvan Geer < igeer@rccwest.com> Thursday, January 04,2018 2:19 PM Patrick Waller Cheyenne Scharf RE: BJ Services Question Hi Patrick, We should add 2 to the application for the purposes of the facility. Due to the staggering effect of the staffing/schedule, it won't affect the traffic analYsis. Thanks! lvan Geer, PE Principa l/Engineer River City Consultants www.rccwest.com 970-24L-47220 970-261--4420 M From: Patrick Waller Imailto:pwaller@garfield-county.com] Sent: Thursday, January 4,2OL8tI:27 AM To: lvan Geer <igeer@rccwest.com> Cc: Cheyenne Scharf <Cheyenne.Scha rf@ BJSERVICES.COM> Subject: RE: BJ Services Question Thanks lvan So just to be clear there I would be correct in saying there are no additional staff that work for BJ Services on the site besides what you have mentioned in the traffic study? I just want to be sure the infrastructure accounts for total employees on the site and not just those who would serve the proposed Material Handling Facility. Thanks again for working through this with me, Patr¡ck waller Senior Planner Garfield County Comm unity Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 8L601 (970) 94s-L377 ext. L580 pwa ller@ga rfield-countv.com http://www.ga rfield-cou ntv.com/co m m u n itv-developme nt/ From: lvan Geer [mailto:igeer@rccwest.com] Sent: Thursday, January O4,2OI8 10:25 AM 1 7c> EXHIBIT To: Patrick Waller <pwaller@ga rfield-county'com> Cc: Cheyenne Scharf <Chevenne.Scha rf@ BJSERVICES.COM> Subject: RE: BJ Services Question Hi Patrick, The traffic study represents the potential peak, which would be the worst case of simultaneous truck and office traffic using the access. I talked to Cheyenne to clarify, and there also will be 2-3 maintenance and service people on site from time to time, but their arrivals are staggered and will not coincide with the peak. Thanks! lvan Geer, PE Principa l/Engineer River City Consultants www.rccwest.com 970-24L-47220 970-26L-4420 M From: Patr¡ck Wa ller Imailto:pwa I ler@sa rfield-countv.com] Sent: Thursday, January 4,2Ot8 9:06 AM To: lvan Geer <iReer@rccwest.com> Cc: Cheyenne Scha rf <Chevenne.Scharf@ BJSERVICES.COM> Subject: RE: BJ Services Question Thanks lvan, Thanks for clarifying. For the first question I am wondering about the total traffic generated by the whole site. The Traffic Study is only for 9 people total. Are there more people on site who weren't accounted for in the Traffic Study? Thanks, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Comm unity Development Depa rtment 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 94s-1377 ext. 1580 pwaller@garfield-countv.com http : //www.ga rfie ld-cou ntv.com/co m m u n itv-develo pme nt/ From: lvan Geer Imailto:igeer@rccwest.com] Sent: Thursday, January 04,2OL8 9:02 AM To: Patrick Waller <pwa ller@ga rfield-countv'com> Cc: Cheye n ne Scha rf <Cheve n ne.Scha rf @ BJSE RVICES.CO M > Subject: RE: BJ Services Question 2 Hi Patrick, Sorry we didn't get back to you quickly. Both Cheyenne and I had busy "Mondays". Below are the responses to your inquires in traffic and dust control: L. Traffic-The plant will be operated by 3 operators, with 3 office staff, for a total of 6. There will be 3 truck drivers that typically stagger their runs depending on demand for product in the field. 2. Plant Dust Control-Plant loading uses a two pipe system that routes potential silo overflows into the scale hopper. The silos and scale hoppers are sealed. When loading from the plants to the trucks, the truck has a filter system to capture dust. ln this system, generation of fugitive emissions would be highly unlikely and would only result from significant operator error. Cheyenne can take pictures of the truck system if you are interested in more information. lf you need more information let us know. Thanks! lvan Geer, PE Principa l/Engineer River City Consultants www.rccwest.com 970-24L-47220 970-261-4420M From: Patrick Waller Imailto: pwaller@garfield-countv.com] Sent: Thursday, January 4,2018 8:514M To: lvan Geer <iReer@rccwest.com> Subject: RE: BJ Services Question Hi lvan, Sorry to keep bothering you, but I was wondering if you had a chance to follow-up on my questions? Thanks, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Com m unity Development Depa rtment 108 8th Street, Suite 401. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-1377 ext. 1580 pwa I le r@ea rfie ld-co u ntv.com http : //www.ga rfield-cou ntv.com/co m m u n itv-develo pme nt/ From: Patrick Waller Sent: Tuesday, January 02,2Ot8 3:03 PM To:' lvan Geer' <!gger@rçSg$.co¡1> Subiect: RE: BJ Services Question No worries at all, thanks for the response. 3 Patrick waller Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Depa rtment 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 8L601 (970) 945-1377 ext. 1580 pwa I le r@ ga rfie ld-cou ntv.com htto://www.sa rfie ld-cou ntv.com/co m m u n itv-develo pme nt/ From: lvan Geer Imailto:igeer@rccwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 02,2OL8 2:59 PM To: Patrick Waller <pwaller@garf¡eld-countv.com> Subject: RE: BJ Services Question Hi Patrick...just been a long "Monday". Wanted to verify with air control system and answer all questions at once lvan Geer, PE Principal/Engineer River City Consultants www.rccwest.com 970-24L-47220 970-26L-4420 M From: Patrick Waller [mailto: pwaller@garfield-countv.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 2,207812:35 PM To: lvan Geer <igeer@rccwest.com> Subject: RE: BJ Services Question Hi lvan, I hope you had a great New Years. I am following-up to be sure that you received the below email Thanks, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Com munity Development Department LO8 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81.601 (970) 94s-1"377 ext. 1580 pwa ller@sa rfield-countv.com http ://www.ga rfie ld-co untv.com/com m u n itv-develo pme nt/ From: Patrick Waller Sent: Friday, December 29,20L7 11:20 AM 4 To:'lvan Geer' <igeer(@ rccwest.com> Subject: RE: BJ Services Question Hi lvan, One more question as I am preparing the staff report. lt looks like nine employees will be on site (6 staff and 3 truck drivers). My understanding is that this is the total amount of all employees that will be located on site and not just employees required to operate the material handling facility. Please confirm if this is correct. Thanks, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 94s-1377 ext. 1-580 pwa I le r(o ga rf ie ld-co u nty. co m http://www.ga rfie ld-co u ntv.com/co m m u n itv-developme nt/ From: Patrick Waller Sent: Friday, December 29,2017 9:37 AM To:' lvan Geer' <igeer@rccwest.com> Subject: BJ Services Question Hi lvan, I hope you are having a nice holiday week. I have a question about the BJ Services application. During our site visit either you or Cheyenne mentioned how the dry concrete would be transferred to the trucks. I remember you explaining that the transfer would use vacuum technology to make sure the material wasn't exposed. I was hoping you could explain to me a little more in depth the process for the transfer to the trucks? Thanks, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-1377 ext. 1580 pwaller@ga rfield-countv.com http ://www.ga rfie ld-co u ntv.com/co m m u nitv-developme nt/ 5 Patrick Waller From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: lvan Geer <igeer@rccwest.com> Thursday, January 04,2018 2:40 PM Patrick Waller Cheyenne Scharf bj services rifle containers Hi Patrick, Per our conversation, this email updates the narrative for consistency with the current site plan. The initial site plan and narrative submitted included both silos and containers for operating equipment located outside on pads. ln the updated and current site plan, the containers were eliminated as operating equipment was moved indoors to the space we visited on our site visit. This was not properly updated in the narrative. For clarification, there will be no outdoor containers on concrete pads for operating the proposed cement facility Thanks! lvan Geer, PE Principa l/Engineer River City Consultants www.rccwest.com 970-24L-47220 970-26t-4420M L\EXHIBIT 1 Patrick Waller From: Sent: To: Subject: Linda S. Hansen < lhansen@sopris,net> Thursday, January 04,2018 9:26 PM Patrick Waller; Brent Peterson; LeeRoy Chelewski; Scott Fields RE: Referral Our only concern is the statement you made regarding ..."1'ìo permanent structures are proposed that would impede users of the ditch from maintaining the pipeline..." lt is the position of the ditch company that because the landowner chose to pipe the formerly open ditch, future responsibility for maintenance of the pipeline falls to the landowner and its successors. Linda S. Hansen --- pwaller@garfield-cou nty. com wrote F rom : Patrick Wal le r <pwa I ler@garfield -cou nty. com > To: "Linda S. Hansen" <lhansen@sopris.net> Subject: RE: Referral Date: Fri,5 Jan201800:24:34 +0000 Hi Linda, I hope you are having a wonderful week. Just following-up on this email. My staff report on this issue is due tomorrow by the close of business and I just wanted to double check to make sure that you all didn't have any issues beyond what has already been mentioned. Thanks very much, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 1 EXHIBIT bôt 1-L Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-1377 ext. 1580 pwa I ler@sa rfie ld-cou ntv.com http://www.ga rfield-cou ntv.com/com m u nitv-developme nt/ From: Patrick Waller Sent: Tuesday, January 02,2OI810:02 AM To:'Linda S. Hansen' <lhansen@sopris.net> Subject: RE: Referral Thanks Linda. The proposal is for a dry concrete material handling facility. lt is available for review here. The applicant has indicated that no permanent structures are proposed that would impede users of the ditch from maintaining the pipeline and because the dltch is piped and buried there will be no water quality issues. Please let me know if you all have any further comments. Happy New Year, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 94s-1377 éxt. 1580 pwa I ler@ga rfie ld-cou ntv.com http://www.ga rfie ld-cou ntv.com/co m m u nitv-deve lo pment/ 2 From: Linda S. Hansen Imailto:lhansen@sopris.net] Sent: Friday, December 29,2OL7 9:48 PM To: Patrick Waller <pwa ller@garfield-countv.com> Subject: Re: Referral The pipeline was originally an open ditch carrying water from the lower Cactus Valley Ditch, owned by Grand River Ditch Company, to shareholders south of Highway 6 & 24. Not wanting an open ditch on their property, Bayou Well Services (not a shareholder nor owner of any of the irrigation water) piped it. lt is the position of the Ditch Company that the owner, Bayou Well Services, was and is responsible for continuation of the pipeline, and that obligation transfers to any subsequent owner. Linda S. Hansen --- pwaller@garfield-cou nty.com wrote: From : Patrick Wal ler <pwa I ler@qa rfield-cou nty. com > To: "Linda S. Hansen" <lhansen@sopris.net> Subject: Referral Date: Fri,29 Dec2017 17:19:56 +0000 Hi Linda, I had a quick question for you. We have an application in for Material Handling on the BJ Services parcel (28730 Highway 6 &24). They have shown a piped irrigation ditch on the site plan. I was wondering if the irrigation ditch was associated with you all? Or if you might know who is responsible for it. Thanks for all your help, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Commu n ity Development Department 3 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-1 377 ext. 1580 pwa I ler@ q a rfield-cou nty. com http ://www. qarfield-cou nty. com/comm un itv-developmenU 4 Patrick Waller From: Sent: To: Morgan Hill Monday, January 08, 2018 10:15 AM Patrick Waller RE: BJ Services QuestionSubject: Hi Patrick, My apologies for not responding sooner - I was out of the office Thursday afternoon and Friday for my avalanche safety class. The emissions controls BJ Services will use seems to address the fugitive dust issues that could be caused by this operation. Thank you for following up with them on my question! Morgan From: Patrick Waller Sent: Friday, January 05, 2018 2:20 PM To: Morgan Hill <mhill@garfield-county.com> Subject: RE: BJ Services Question Hi Morgan, Sorry to hassle you, just wanted to see if you had a chance to look at the email below. I am hoping to finish up my staff report today. Thanksl Patrick waller Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Depa rtment 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 94s-1377 ext. 1580 pwa ller(oga rfield-cou ntv.com http ://www.ga rfie ld-co u ntv.com/co m m u n itv-deve lopme nt/ From: Patrick Waller Sent: Thursday, January 04,2OL8 9:07 AM To: Morgan Hill <mhill@sarfield-countv.com> Subject: FW: BJ Services Question Hi Morgan, Please see Number 2 below as a discussion of how the applicant's will handle dust from the site 1 EXHIBIT !t! Let me know what you think, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-1377 ext. 1580 pwa I ler@ga rfield-cou ntv.com http://www.ga rfield-co u ntv.co m/com m u n itv-developme nt/ From: lvan Geer [mailto:igeer@rccwest.com] Sent: Thursday, January O4,2Ot8 9:02 AM To: Patrick Waller <pwaller@garfield-countv.com> Cc: Cheyenne Scha rf <Chevenne.Scharf@ BJSERVICES.COM> Subject: RE: BJ Services Question Hi Patrick, Sorry we didn't get back to you quickly. Both Cheyenne and I had busy "Mondays". Below are the responses to your inquires in traffic and dust control: 1. Traffic-The plant will be operated by 3 operators, with 3 office staff, for a total of 6. There will be 3 truck drivers that typically stagger their runs depending on demand for product in the field. 2. Plant Dust Control-Plant loading uses a two pipe system that routes potential silo overflows into the scale hopper. The silos and scale hoppers are sealed. When loading from the plants to the trucks, the truck has a filter system to capture dust. ln this system, generation of fugitive emissions would be highly unlikely and would only result from significant operator error. Cheyenne can take pictures of the truck system if you are interested in more information. lf you need more information let us know. Thanks! lvan Geer, PE Principa l/Engineer River City Consultants www.rccwest.com 970-247-47220 970-26r-4420 M From: Patrick Waller Imailto: pwa ller@sarfield-countv.com] Sent: Thursday, January 4,2Ot8 8:5L AM To: lvan Geer <igeer@rccwest.com> Subject: RE: BJ Services Question Hi lvan, Sorry to keep bothering you, but I was wondering if you had a chance to follow-up on my questions? 2 Thanks, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Comm unity Development Depärtment 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 8160L (970) 94s-1-377 ext. 1580 pwaller@ga rfield-countv.com htto : //www.ea rfie ld-co u ntv.m /co m m u n itv-deve lonment/ From: Patrick Waller Sent: Tuesday, January 02,2OL8 3:03 PM To:'lvan Geer' <igeer@ rccwest.com> Subject: RE: BJ Services Question No worries at all, thanks for the response Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 94s-1377 ext. 1580 pwa I ler@ga rfie ld-cou ntv.co m http://www.ga rfie ld-co u ntv.com/com m u n itv-deve lo pme nt/ From: lvan Geer Imailto:igeer@rccwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 02,2Ot8 2:59 PM To: Patrick Wa I ler <pwa I ler@ga rfie ld-co u ntv.com > Subject: RE: BJ Services Question Hi Patrick...just been a long "Monday". Wanted to verify with air control system and answer all questions at once lvan Geer, PE Principal/Engineer River City Consultants www.rccwest.com 970-24L-47220 970-26r-4420M From: Patrick Wa ller [mailto: pwa ller@sarfield-countv.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 2,2OI8 L2:35 PM To: lvan Geer <igeer@rccwest.com> Subject: RE: BJ Services Question 3 Hi lvan, I hope you had a great New Years. I am following-up to be sure that you received the below email. Thanks, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Spiings, CO 81601 (970) 945-1377 ext. 1580 pwa I ler@sa rfield-cou ntv.co m http: //www.ga rfield-cou ntv.com/co m m u nitv-deve lo pme nt/ From: Patrick Waller Sent: Friday, December 29,2OI7 11:20 AM To:'lvan Geer' <igeer@ rccwest.com> Subject: RE: BJ Services Question Hi lvan, One more question as I am preparing the staff report. lt looks like nine employees will be on site (6 staff and 3 truck drivers). My understanding is that this is the total amount of all employees that will be located on site and not just employees required to operate the material handling facility. Please confirm if this is correct. Thanks, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Com munity Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-1377 ext. l-580 pwa I le r@sa rfield-co u ntv.co m http://www.ea rfield-co u ntv.com/co m m u n itv-deve lo pme nt/ From: Patrick Waller Sent: Friday, December 29,2017 9:37 AM To:'lvan Geer' <igeertô Subject: BJ Services Question 4 Hi lvan, st.com> I hope you are having a nice holiday week. I have a question about the BJ Services application. During our site visit either you or Cheyenne mentioned how the dry concrete would be transferred to the trucks. I remember you explaining that the transfer would use vacuum technology to make sure the material wasn't exposed. I was hoping you could explain to me a little more in depth the process for the transfer to the trucks? Thanks, Patrick Waller Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Department L08 8th Street, Suite 40L Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-1377 ext. 1580 pwal ld-countv co m http ://www.ga rfield-cou ntv.com/co m m u nitv-deve lo pme nt/ 5