The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1.01 Application Materials4.4 Table of Contents: Quicksilver Court Subdivision Land Use Change Permit, Administrative Review Application for Accessory Dwelling Units Prepared by Jena Skinner, AICP Pursuant to the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code (LUDC), written commentary and exhibits are required for this request. They are arranged as follows: Section 1: Payment Form Letter of Authorization Pre -Application Materials Section 2: Written response to applicable Standards as found in the LUDC Section 3: Exhibits: A. Application Description B. Impact Analysis C. Vicinity Map D. Proof of Ownership E. Adjacent Property Owners F. Mineral Rights G. Plat/Engineering H. Property Map I. Soils Information J. Water Information K. Traffic Information Ga�fielc County I PAYMENT AGREEMENT FORM GARFIELD COUNTY ("COUNTY") and Property Owner ("APPLICANT") GEORGE DANIELS III agree as follows: 1. The Applicant has submitted to the Count an application for the following Project: DANIELS/QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION ADU APPLICATION 2. The Applicant understands and agrees that Garfield County Resolution No. 2014-60, as amended, establishes a fee schedule for each type application, and the guidelines for the administration of the fee structure. 3. The Applicant and the County agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. The Applicant agrees to make payment of the Base Fee, established for the Project, and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to the Applicant. The Applicant agrees to make additional payments upon notification by ell County, when they are necessary, as costs are incurred. 4. The Base Fee shall be in addition to and exclusive of any cost for publication or cost of consulting service determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners for the consideration of an application or additional County staff time or expense not covered by the Base Fee. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial Base Fee, the Applicant shall pay additional billings to the County to reimburse the County for the processing of the Project. The Applicant acknowledges that all billing shall be paid prior to the final consideration by the County of any Land Use Change or Division of Land. I hereby agree to pay all fees related to this application: Billing Contact Person: GEORGE DANIELS III (JODY) Phone: { 970) 471-0920 Billing Contact Address: 176 GH DANIELS BLVD. City: GYPSUM State: CO Zip Code: 81637 Billing Contact Email: ghdgrowit@aol.com Printed Nariie of Person Authorized to Sign: JENA SKINNER \ ) )11( 1 4/12/17 (Signature) (Date) April 18, 2017 To Whom It May Concern: I, GEORGE DANIELS 111, hereby authorize JENA SKINNER, to act as representative(s) on behalf for land use applications in Garfield County. If you have any comments on this document, please do not hesitate to contact me at (970) 471-0920 or via email at ghdRrowit@aol.com Sincerely, Geo r a Daniels 111 Owner, Lots 4-7 Quicksilver Court Subdivision Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8t" Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 www.garlield-county.com fl TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 217722301004, 217722301005, 217722301006, 217722301007 DATE: December 21, 2016 PROJECT: Accessory Dwelling Unit OWNERS/APPLICANT: DANIELS, GEORGE H III REPRESENTATIVE: N/A PRACTICAL LOCATION: Lot 4 (10.011 acres), 5 (10.004 acres), 6 (10.012 acres), 7 (10.021 acres) of QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION, RIFLE 81650 ZONING: Rural TYPE OF APPLICATION: Land Use Change Permit — Administrative Review I. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting a permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on Lots 4-7 of the Quicksilver Court Subdivision located within the Rural zone district. As each property is over 4 acres, the Land Use and Development Code (LUDC) limits the size of the ADU to 3000 square feet and requires that they meet all building code requirements. The Preliminary Plan and Protective Covenants limit the size of each ADU further to 1500 square foot each. Each lot is currently vacant. It is understood that Lots 4 and 5 will be served by Shared Well 2 (Permit No. 67565-F) while Lots 6 and 7 will be served by Shared Well 3 (Permit No. 67566-F). Through a review of the Preliminary Plan and Final Plat, it is understood that each of these wells have adequate legal water to serve an ADU on each of the parcels, however a Land Use Change Permit is necessary before ADU may be constructed on each Lot. For the purposes of the ADU applications, copies of the each of the well permits for the shared wells along with explanations as to the current utilization of the well will be necessary (e.g. how many dwelling units are currently being served by each well). In addition, it is understood that augmentation contacts are in place for each of the shared wells. Copies of these augmentation plans along with demonstration that the contracts are in good standing will need to be supplied with the application. Regarding septic, it is understood that each ADU will be served by an Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS). The systems are to be installed at the time of construction. The applicant will need to obtain necessary County permitting at that time. Soils information for the subject areas from the NRCS has been attached to be included with the application. Demonstration of conformance to Section 7-107 and specifically Table 7-107, Roadway Design Standards, needs to be provided. Please respond to each of the items in the Roadway Design Standards Table (7-107) to show compliance with these parameters (ROW width, Lane width, Shoulder width, etc.). Note: most driveways fall into the Primitive / Driveway category, please identify which Average Daily Trip (ADT) category this access road may fall within with each dwelling unit accessing this driveway counting as 9.57 ADT. It is understood that none of the access driveways are yet constructed. As a result, representation that the drivewayswill be built to the required standards is necessary. Please respond to the Standards as identified in Article 7: Standards, Division 1, 2 and 3 and for ADUs, Section 7-701. These are the standards by which the application will be determined to be approved, approved with conditions or denied. A short response to these items ensures that 1) the applicant has read and understands the standards upon which a determination will be based, and 2) allows the applicant and staff to work through any possible issues early on in the application process. Upon review of Garfield County GIS, no geologic hazards have been identified on the property. II. REGULATORY PROVISIONS APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO ADDRESS • Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030 • Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, effective July 15, 2013 • Accessory Dwelling Unit (7-701), following Administrative Review (Section 4-103) • Table 4-102, Common Review Procedures and Required Notice; • Table 4-201, Application Submittal Requirements III. REVIEW PROCESS • The review process shall follow the steps as contained in Table 4-102 and Section 4-103, Administrative Review. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Please refer directly to Table 4-201 and the list of General Application Materials in section 4-203. These application materials are generally summarized below: w Application Form • General project description • Ownership Documentation (deed) and title information indicating if there are any lien holders and/or encumbrances (a title commitment may be necessary) 2 • Statement of Authority (if property is owned by an LLC or other corporate entity) or Letter of Authorization (if the Applicant is not the owner of the property), if necessary • Fee Payment and Payment Agreement Form ■ Pre -Application Conference Summary • Names and addresses of all property owners within 200 feet of project site and all mineral owners of the subject parcels (demonstrated through a search of Clerk and Recorders database and/or Assessors database — Adjacent property owners can be conducted using the Garfield County Geographic Information System website at 1.-twagi_s_yarfield- countv.com/LandExplorer/index.html arfield- county.com/LandExplorer/index.html and use Buffer Tool to 200' from subject parcel). • Vicinity Map • Improvements Agreement / Development Agreement (may be waived upon request) ■ Site Plan • Grading and Drainage Plan demonstrating positive drainage off the site • Impact Analysis — Please respond to the identified impacts in Section 4-203(G) ■ Code, Covenants, Restrictions (if applicable) Respond to Standards fully described in Article 7, Divisions 1-3 and, for an ADU Article 7, Section 701 • Demonstration of Legal and Physical Water (Well permit, augmentation plan, 4 -hour pump test, and water quality test per Section 4-203(M)) • Description of septic system (OWTS). If OWTS is to be shared or is otherwise already installed, then a letter from a professional engineer is necessary stating that the system is adequate to handle the added load of the ADU. If a new, yet to be installed, OWTS is proposed, then a statement indicating this intent is necessary. w Soils information (Can be obtained from MRCS Soils website — see attached) • Statement and demonstration of conformance with Section 7-107, Access and Roadways (Specifically conformance with Table 7-107 for driveway from County roadway to proposed ADU) Submit three paper copies and one digital for applications. Additional copies will be requested upon determination of completeness. See the land use code for additional information on submittal requirements. IV. APPLICATION REVIEW a. Review by: Staff for completeness recommendation and referral agencies for additional technical review b. Public Hearing: X None (Director's Decision) _Planning Commission _ Board of County Commissioners _ Board of Adjustment 3 c. Referral Agencies: May include Garfield County Road and Bridge Department, Fire Protection District, Garfield County Designated Engineer, and State of Colorado. V. APPLICATION REVIEW FEES a. Planning Review Fees: $ 250.00 b. Referral Agency Fees: $ TBD — consulting engineer/civil engineer fees c. Total Deposit: $ 250.00 (additional hours are billed at $40.50 /hour) General Application Processing Planner reviews case for completeness and sends to referral agencies for comments. The case planner contacts applicant and sets up a site visit. Staff reviews application to determine if it meets standards of review and makes a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or denial to the Director of the Community Development Department. The Director's decision is subject to a 10 - day call-up period. The pre -application meeting summary is only valid for six (6) months from the date of the written summary. Application Submittal 3 Hard Copies 1 Digital PDF Copy (on CD or USB stick) - Both the paper and the digital copy should be split into individual sections. Please refer to the list included in your pre -application conference summary for the submittal requirements that are appropriate for your application: • General Application Materials • Vicinity Map • Site Plan • Grading and Drainage Plan • landscape Plan • Impact Analysis • 'Traffic Study • Water Supply/Distribution Plan • Wastewater Management Plan • Article 7 Standards Disclaimer The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the County. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. This summary does not create a legal or vested right. Pre -application Summary Prepared by: 7e December 21, 2016 David Pesnichak, AICP — Senior Planner Date 4 SECTION 11 SECTION 2: WRITTEN RESPONSE ARTICLE 4, DIVISION 1. REVIEW PROCESS FOR LAND USE CHANGE REQUESTS. 4-101. COMMON REVIEW PROCEDURES. A. Pre -Application Conference A Pre -Application conference was held December 21, 2016 between the applicant and Garfield County Planner, David Pesnichak, AICP (See attached Pre -Application Materials) 4-103.3 NOTICE A mailing list of neighboring property owners has been provided as Exhibit E ARTICLE 2, DIVISION 2. GENERAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. 4-201. APPLICATION MATERIALS. GENERAL APPLICATION MATERIALS. The following materials have been addressed and/or exhibits have been provided in this application: • Application form • Proof of ownership — Exhibit D • Adjacent property and Mineral Owners Information — Exhibits E and F • Project Description — Exhibit A • Vicinity Map — Exhibit C • Site Plan — Exhibit G • Associated Plans including engineering and Final Plat — Exhibit G • Impact Analysis — Exhibit B • Traffic — Exhibit K • Water Supply — Exhibit J ARTICLE 7: STANDARDS 7-101. ZONE DISTRICT USE REGULATIONS. The Land Use Change shall comply with Article 3, Zoning, including any applicable zone district use restrictions and regulations. Pursuant to Article 3, Zoning, an Accessory Dwelling Unit is permitted on properties with Rural Zoning. The Quicksilver Court Subdivision is platted, and is in conformance with the Rural Zoning standards as found in the LUDC. All residential uses, and construction of new buildings (including both primary residences and the ADUs), shall comply with all dimensional limitations and building standards as set forth for this zone district. One exception: ADUs proposed are limited to 1,500 sq. ft., as was accepted as a condition of previous approvals. 7-102. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS. The Land Use Change is in general conformance with the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan and complies with any applicable intergovernmental agreement. The Quicksilver Court Subdivision Land Use Change is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan for Garfield County. The current designation for this area is Residential Low Density, 10+ acres per dwelling; all lots in Quicksilver are 10+ acres. It has always been the intention to implement Accessory Dwelling Units (hereinafter, ADUs) as part of the Quicksilver Court Subdivision. As such, ADUs were incorporated as part of both the Preliminary Plan and Final Plat applications, which were approved by Garfield County. There are no Intergovernmental Agreements in existence for these lots, and/or subdivision. 7-103. COMPATIBILITY. The nature, scale, and intensity of the proposed use are compatible with adjacent land uses. As mentioned above, the use of ADUs in this development was contemplated during previous land use approvals, 8+ years ago. During those processes (Preliminary Plan and Final Plat), it was found that the proposed residential uses of the Quicksilver Court Subdivision, were compatible with the uses of neighboring properties. This remains consistent with the conditions as found today. Further, there was no opposition from neighbors regarding the use of ADUs, during either Preliminary Plan, or Final Plat applications. As such, the use of ADUs remains compatible with adjacent land uses. 7-104. SOURCE OF WATER. All applications for Land Use Change Permits shall have an adequate, reliable, physical, Tong -term, and legal water supply to serve the use, except for land uses that do not require water, or that contain Temporary Facilities served by a licensed water hauler. The potable water supply/system for the subject lots was determined adequate by Garfield County and the State of Colorado, during previous approvals. Nothing has changed that would alter this determination, or any approvals for wells, etc. Pursuant to the Declaration of Protective Covenants for the Quicksilver Court Subdivision, the water distribution system for the subject Tots is summarized below, and detailed information has been included as Exhibit J: Only the Lots, and the dwelling units located thereon, shall be permitted to receive water from the Water Distribution System, as was established during the approval of the Quicksilver Court Subdivision. Further, use of the water supply must be residential in nature. Agricultural uses, other than permitted domestic livestock watering, and commercial uses, other than home occupations, are prohibited. Lot 4 shall draw water Shared Well 2 (also known as Daniels Well No. 2), Declaration of Protective Covenants Quicksilver Court Subdivision Page 15 Permit No. 67565-F. Use shall be limited to ordinary household purposes inside one (1) single-family dwellings and one (1) ADU; the irrigation of lawn and gardens of not more than 7,000 square feet; and the watering of two (2) animals. The pumping rate shall not exceed 15 gallons per minute. The remainder of the water shall be used by the Association to fill and refill and replace evaporation of Quicksilver Pond each year. Lot 5 shall draw water Shared Well 2 (also known as Daniels Well No. 2), Permit No. 67565-F. Use shall be limited to ordinary household purposes inside one (1) single- family dwellings and one (1) ADU; the irrigation of lawn and gardens of not more than 7,000 square feet; and the watering of two (2) animals. The pumping rate shall not exceed 15 gallons per minute. The remainder of the water shall be used by the Association to fill and refill and replace evaporation of Quicksilver Pond each year. Lot 6 shall draw water from Shared Well No. 3 (also known as Daniels Well No. 1), Permit No. 67566-F. Use shall be limited to ordinary household purposes inside one (1) single-family dwellings and one (1) ADU; the irrigation of lawn and gardens of not more than 7,000 square feet; and the watering of two (2) animals per lot. The pumping rate shall not exceed 15 gallons per minute. The remainder of the water shall be used by the Association to fill and refill and replace evaporation of Quicksilver Pond each year. Lot 7 shall draw water from Shared Well No. 3 (also known as Daniels Well No. 1), Permit No. 67566-F. Use shall be limited to ordinary household purposes inside one (1) single-family dwellings and one (1) ADU; the irrigation of lawn and gardens of not more than 7,000 square feet; and the watering of two (2) animals per lot. The pumping rate shall not exceed 15 gallons per minute. The remainder of the water shall be used by the Association to fill and refill and replace evaporation of Quicksilver Pond each year. Important: Daniels Well 2 was only tested for three (3) hours previously, which, at the time of the last approval, was satisfactory to Garfield County under Code (Section 4- 203(M)(1)(b)(5)(a) and (c). Currently, this standard has been revised, and now requires four (4) hours of testing. As such, we hereby request that as a Condition of Approval: Prior to permitting any residence served by Daniels Well 2, the applicant shall provide Garfield County with a new test, which is in accordance to current standards. Please see Exhibits J (Water Info) and G (Site Plan/Plat/Engineering) 7-105. CENTRAL WATER DISTRIBUTION AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS. Waterlines for each residence will be constructed according to all applicable construction standards, as required by Garfield County. Lots 4-7 will use allocated wells as their source of potable water; well permits are approved to serve a primary residence and an ADU. Waterlines from the wells will be run once building sites are determined on each lot. All waterlines shall be permitted and constructed in accordance with all applicable County and/or State regulations. All lots currently exceed the minimum acreage required for individual wastewater systems; public wastewater systems do not exist for this area. Each lot owner will be required to obtain any necessary wastewater permits, prior to construction of any residential structure. 7-106. PUBLIC UTILITIES. All lots are currently served by Xcel Energy and Centurylink. 7-107. ACCESS AND ROADWAYS. All lots have legal and physical access to a public right-of-way, as is shown on map exhibits. Primitive driveways may exist for Lots 4 and 5; however, since building sites have not been determined, it is unclear if the existing, informal driveways will be improved for access. Regardless, all individual driveways for both the primary and/or ADU shall be constructed in conformance with applicable County driveway standards. The internal roadway for the Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Quicksilver Court (which connects to the public ROW- Quicksilver Way), has been completed, and approved by Garfield County. Driveway connections to Quicksilver Court, will be constructed according to applicable County road/access standards. 7-108. USE OF LAND SUBJECT TO NATURAL HAZARDS. No known natural hazards or geologic conditions exist for these properties. 7-109. FIRE PROTECTION. All lots are served by the Rifle Fire Protection District. ARTICLE 7, DIVISION 2. GENERAL RESOURCE PROTECTION STANDARDS. The following resource protection standards apply to all proposed Land Use Changes, including divisions of land unless elsewhere in this Code a use is explicitly exempt from 1 or more standards. 7-201. AGRICULTURAL LANDS. The proposed ADUS shall not interfere with any agricultural lands. Lots for the Quicksilver Subdivision are contemplated as residential lots, with minimal agricultural uses. 7-202. WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS. No significant wildlife habitat exists in the Quicksilver Court Subdivision. ADUs shall not negatively affect wildlife in this area. 7-203. PROTECTION OF WATERBODIES. No waterbodies exist in the Quicksilver Court Subdivision. 7-204 DRAINAGE AND EROSION. Residential construction in the Quicksilver Court Subdivision will adhere to all applicable development standards regarding drainage and erosion control. The subject properties have suitable areas for construction that are relatively flat, easy to develop, and disturbance will be minimal. Road construction of Quicksilver Court has already been completed, and all lots are contiguous to this roadway. 7-205. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. All ADUs shall incorporate applicable environmental controls, pursuant to current building standards and/or air quality control standards, that may exist at the time of permitting. No hazardous materials, outside of typical household use (i.e. paint or cleaning products), are anticipated for these properties. 7-206. WILDFIRE HAZARDS. Although these Tots are in a moderate wildfire hazard area, a pond dedicated for firefighting use has been established for Quicksilver, in anticipation of residential construction. Further, new homes and ADUs shall incorporate any noncombustible materials, as is required by code. 7-208. RECLAMATION. Residential construction shall adhere to all applicable mitigation controls, which minimize site disturbance, and any potential impacts. ARTICLE 7, DIVISION 3. SITE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. Unless a use is explicitly identified elsewhere in this Code as being exempt from 1 or more standards, the following standards shall apply to all uses, divisions of land and PUDs. Single family dwelling units, are specifically exempt from these Division 3 standards. 7-301. COMPATIBLE DESIGN. Proposed ADUs shall be limited to residential use, which is compatible to neighboring residential properties. 7-302. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS. Parking areas will be provided for all residential uses during, and post -primary and ADU construction. Further, the owners will provide the required amount of parking spaces per structure/as is required by the County. 7-303. LANDSCAPING STANDARDS. Single -Family Dwelling Units, Accessory Dwelling Units, Industrial Uses and all uses located fully within a parcel of land in an Industrial Zone District are exempt from this section. 7-304. LIGHTING STANDARDS ADUs shall incorporate any required/applicable lighting controls. 7-305. SNOW STORAGE STANDARDS. All residential uses except for multi family are exempt from this section, unless the residential use includes a common outdoor parking area. Not applicable 7-306. TRAIL AND WALKWAY STANDARDS. Not Applicable ARTICLE 7, DIVISION 4. SUBDIVISION STANDARDS AND DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS. The following standards apply to all divisions of land unless elsewhere in this Code a division of land is explicitly exempt from 1 or more standards. Not applicable DIVISION 6. ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR AGRICULTURAL AND ANIMAL RELATED USES. Not applicable DIVISION 7. ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES. 7-701. ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT. A. Maximum Floor Area. The Floor Area of an ADU shall not exceed 1,500 square feet for Lots 4-7. B. Ownership Restriction. An ADU is restricted to leasehold interest in the dwelling unit and is for residential or Home Office/Business use only. The primary purpose for the ADUs is residential, and as such, complies with this standard. C. Compliance with Building Code. Construction shall comply with the standards set forth in this Code and with Building Code requirements. All construction shall comply with applicable codes. D. Minimum Lot Area. The minimum Lot Size for an ADU is either: 1.) 2 acres; or, 2.) For lots in zone districts with a minimum Lot Size of less than 2 acres, the minimum Lot Size is twice the minimum required Lot Size. Each lot in the Quicksilver Court Subdivision is 10+ acres, and can easily accommodate a primary residence and ADU. E. Entrance to Dwelling Unit. A separate entrance to the Accessory Dwelling Unit is required. All construction/residential design shall comply with this, and any other applicable codes. F. One per Lot. One Accessory Dwelling unit which is subordinate to a Single -Unit (primary) dwelling unit is allowed per legal lot. Only one (1) primary and one (1) ADU will be constructed on each lot. 7-702. HOME OFFICE/BUSINESS. The use of the ADUs shall be limited to those allowed uses, as found in the Rural zone district. 7-703. MANUFACTURED HOME PARK. Not applicable 7-704. GROUP HOME FACILITIES. Not applicable 7-705. TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE HOUSING FACILITIES, MAJOR. Not applicable 7-706. TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE HOUSING FACILITIES, MINOR. Not applicable 7-707. TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE HOUSING FACILITIES, SMALL. Not applicable SECTION 111: EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: The owner of Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Lots 4-7, would like to obtain approvals for four (4), 1,500 - square foot Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) — one for each lot. ADUs have been contemplated consistently through each level of approval for the Subdivision, and the applicant can adequately demonstrate conformance with the standards herein. Legal and accessible access has been constructed for these Tots; and potable water is available for all properties and uses. Currently, all lots are vacant, except for a firefighting pond, located on Lots 5 and 6. It has been determined that the process to obtain ADU approval is administrative. EXHIBIT B 4-203.G.Impact Analysis. Where the proposed development will impact specific features of the site, the Applicant shall describe both the existing conditions and the potential changes created by the project. The Impact Analysis shall include a complete description of how the Applicant will ensure that impacts will be mitigated and standards will be satisfied. The following information shall be included in the Impact Analysis: 1. Adjacent Land Use. Existing use of adjacent property and neighboring properties within 1,500 -foot radius. The uses surrounding the Quicksilver Court Subdivision are residential, public lands, and those associated with the oil and gas industry. The majority of actual uses are residential. See Vicinity Map Exhibit C, and Mineral Rights map in Exhibit F. 2. Site Features. A description of site features such as streams, areas subject to flooding, lakes, high ground water areas, topography, vegetative cover, climatology, and other features that may aid in the evaluation of the proposed development. The 4 -lots have areas that are generally flat, apart from the western portion of Lot 4 and 5. While all lots contain typical hardscrabble elements: dry soils and vegetation like juniper and sage bushes, grasses, and rabbit bush, there are also areas of slopes in Quicksilver. This subdivision is typical of a mesa you would find at 6,000 ft+ in western Colorado. No live streams or water runs through this subdivision. See Exhibit H 3. Soil Characteristics. A description of soil characteristics of the site that have a significant influence on the proposed use of the land. The soils have been simplified into the following categories: • Morval-Tridell complex, 6 to 25 percent slopes • Torriorthents-Rock outcrop, complex, steep • Vale silt loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes See Exhibit I 4. Geology and Hazard. A description of the geologic characteristics of the area including any potential natural or manmade hazards, and a determination of what effect such factors would have on the proposed use of the land. No unusual or hazards known for these properties. 5. Groundwater and Aquifer Recharge Areas. Evaluation of the relationship of the subject parcel to Floodplains, the nature of soils and subsoils and their ability to adequately support waste disposal, the Slope of the land, the effect of sewage effluents, and the pollution of surface Runoff, stream flow, and groundwater. Neighboring properties with homes of over 25 years have not had issues with surface runoff or groundwater. Wastewater systems will require an ISDS permit. New systems will be EXHIBIT B designed according to all applicable standards. Any mitigation needed, will be incorporated into each design. Several ISDS are utilized in this area, and with over 10+ acres for each lot, there is adequate space to accommodate an ISDS. Further (per Restrictive Covenants): 5.5 Sewage Disposal. Each residence shall contain at least one (1) fully equipped bathroom, and all sewage shall be disposed of by means of an individual sewage disposal system ("ISDS"). Owners shall maintain such treatment facilities in good operating condition. Each ISDS shall be designed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Colorado, pursuant to C.R.S. § 12-25-111, and shall adequately address the soil percolation conditions present at the Lot site, which percolation rates shall be verified through appropriate on-site testing. Each Owner shall submit the ISDS design to Garfield County at the time of submission of his or her building permit application. 6. Environmental Impacts. Determination of the existing environmental conditions on the parcel to be developed and the effects of development on those conditions, including: a. Determination of the long-term and short-term effect on flora and fauna; ADUs should not affect local flora and fauna, outside of typical residential use. b. Determination of the effect on designated environmental resources, including critical wildlife habitat; ADUs should not affect local wildlife, outside of typical residential use. No areas of critical habitat have been identified on these Tots. c. Impacts on wildlife and domestic animals through creation of hazardous attractions, alteration of existing native vegetation, blockade of migration routes, use patterns, or other disruptions; and Animals are somewhat restricted on these lots, and should not have any impacts on wildlife when considering wildlife movement. With 10+ acres for each site, there is satisfactory room to locate residential uses without negatively affecting existing conditions. Per Restrictive Covenants: 5.6 Domestic Animals. One (1) dog shall be allowed for each residential unit and the dog shall be required to be confined within the owner's property boundaries. 5.7 Non -Domestic Animals. An Owner may own or keep non-domestic animals — including horses, sheep, and chickens — subject to the limits contained in this Subsection 5.7, within a one acre disturbance envelope located more than one hundred (100) feet from any dwelling unit, including ADUs, and all property lines. Pursuant to General Use Well Permits 67565-F and 67566-F, Lots 1, 2 and 3 may water up to three (3) non-domestic animals on each Lot; Lots 5, 6, and 7 may water up to two (2) non-domestic animals on each Lot. This restriction applies per Lot, regardless of the number of dwelling units built thereon. EXHIBIT B d. Evaluation of any potential radiation hazard that may have been identified by the State or County Health Departments. None. 7. Nuisance. Impacts on adjacent land from generation of vapor, dust, smoke, noise, glare or vibration, or other emanations. ADUs will not generate any nuisance impacts. Uses are anticipated to be typical/normal, residential uses. 8. Hours of Operation. The Applicant shall submit information on the hours of operation of the proposed use. Not applicable. _ - Garfield County EXHIBIT C VICINITY Garfield County, Colorado Garfield County Land Explorer Printed by Web User 1 inch = 3,009 feet 1 inch = 0.57 miles 0.4 00 16 Miles Garfield County Garfield County Colorado www.gerfield county.com Colorado Disclaimer Mir i.. „ oq. ealimi of i ernrds m thry np prnr in thr Garfield County Offices effcctine the area shown. This drawing is to be used only far reference purposes and the County is not responsible for any Inaccuracies herein conlained. 0 Copyright Garfield County, Colorado 1 All Rights Reserved Printed: 4/17/2017 at 8:51:43 PM ■iii IANIVACIIIMILliii 111111 Reception#: 817731 04/23/2012 03:57:37 PM Jean Rlberico 1 of 1 Rec Fee:$11.50 Doo Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO EXHIBIT D QUIT CLAIM DEED This QUIT CLAIM DEED, made this l`lday of April 2012, between G.H. Daniels IV, whose legal address is 390 High Ridge, Grand Junction, CO 81507 ("Grantor") and George H. Daniels Ili, whose legal address is 176 GH Daniels Blvd., Gypsum, CO 81637 ("Grantee"): WITHNESSETH, that the Grantor for and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has remised, sell, convey and QUIT CLAIMED, and by these present does remise, release, sell, convey and QUIT CLAIM unto the Grantee, his heirs, successors and assigns forever, all the real property together with improvements, if any, situate lying and being in the County of Garfield and State of Colorado described as follows: Lots, 4, 5, 6, and 7, Quicksilver Court Subdivision, according to the Final Plat thereof, as amended, recorded in the real property records of Garfield County, Colorado, a resubdivision of Lot 2 Grass Mesa Ranch. Subject to easements, covenants, reservations, rights-of-way, and restrictions, however evidenced. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same, together with all and singular the appurtenances and privileges thereunto belonging or in anywise thereunto appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, and claim whatsoever, of the Grantor, either in law or inequity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the Grantee, his heirs, successors, and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this deed on the .t• set forth above. STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss G.H. Daniels, IV COUNTY OF GtrRF+ELD ) tea 5 This foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this1.9 day of April 2012 by G.M. Daniels, IV as Grantor. Witness my hand and official seal. ("A t: ' Lsl--t j 2r0I S Notary Public BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 2300 RIVER FRONTAGE ROAD SILT, CO 81652 C&B JEWELL REVOCABLE FAMILY LIVING TRUST 124 E LEOTA STREET WASILLA, AK 99654 COKER, KENT L & MICHELLE S 1300 QUICK SILVER WAY RIFLE, CO 81650 DANIELS, GEORGE H III 176 GH DANIELS BLVD GYPSUM, CO 81637 Physical Address Not available RIFLE 1891 319 COUNTY RD RIFLE 1300 QUICK SILVER WAY RIFLE QUICKSILVER CT RIFLE 1155 QUICKSILVER WAY RIFLE 1000 CEDAR BREAKS RD RIFLE 1180 QUICK SILVER WAY RIFLE QUICKSILVER CT RIFLE QUICKSILVER CT RIFLE 900 CEDAR BREAKS RD RIFLE EXHIBIT E JEWELL, STEFANIE D 1155 QUICKSILVER WAY RIFLE, CO 81650 MACKLIN, JUSTIN L & NICOLE L 1000 CEDAR BREAKS ROAD RIFLE, CO 81650 MALDONADO, JOSE N REYES & SOTO, ISIDRA LANDEROS PO BOX 1992 EAGLE, CO 81631 MCMULLEN, JESSICA LEA 2460 PIONEER WAY RIFLE, CO 81650 Owner BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT C&B JEWELL REVOCABLE FAMILY LIVING TRUST COKER, KENT L & MICHELLE S DANIELS, GEORGE H 111 JEWELL, STEFANIE D MACKLIN, JUSTIN L & NICOLE L MALDONADO, JOSE N REYES & SOTO, ISIDRA MCMULLEN, JESSICA LEA QUICKSILVER COURT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION SCHULTZ, FREDERICK E JR SCHULTZ, FREDERICK E JR 900 CEDAR BREAKS ROAD RIFLE, CO 81650-8438 QUICKSILVER COURT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1155 QUICKSILVER WAY RIFLE, CO 81650 Mailing Address 2300 RIVER FRONTAGE ROAD SILT, CO 81652 124 E LEOTA STREET WASILLA, AK 99654 1300 QUICK SILVER WAY RIFLE, CO 81650 176 GH DANIELS BLVD GYPSUM, CO 81637 1155 QUICKSILVER WAY RIFLE, CO 81650 1000 CEDAR BREAKS ROAD RIFLE, CO 81650 PO BOX 1992 EAGLE, CO 81631 2460 PIONEER WAY RIFLE, CO 81650 1155 QUICKSILVER WAY RIFLE, CO 81650 900 CEDAR BREAKS ROAD RIFLE, C081650-8438 EXHIBIT F Mineral Interests According to information obtained from the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder, the following mineral interest is situated in the same Section, Township and Range as the Quicksilver Court Subdivision. (See Section Map aerial, which is page 2 of this exhibit). Assignment Of Oil & Gas Lease - 589581 Reception Number 589581 Recording Date 10/04/2001 12:45:00 PM Book 1292 Page 327 Doc. Date 07/01/1993 Signer assignor VAN HOOK, STEVEN G -AIF SNYDER OIL CORP Assignee BALLARD PETROLEUM LLC Return Address BALLARD PETROLEUM INC 950 17TH ST #2600 DENVER, CO 80202 Surface Use Agreement - 807174 Reception Number 807174 Recording Date 08/24/2011 03:36:45 PM Doc. Date 09/20/2001 All Parties BUSBY, MIKE LATIL, CRUZ BALLARD PETROLEUM LLC Return Address ENCANA OIL & GAS, INC LAND DEPARTMENT 2717 COUNTY RD 215, STE 100 PARACHUTE, CO 81635 - Garfield County OIL & GAS OVERLAY Quicksilver Court Subdivision Garfield County, Colorado 22-X to72)J 22-900 022MM Peine 21 (1224073%2 Garfield County Land Explorer Base map: Obtained from Online Mapping (GC) Oil & Gas Information obtained from Online Mapping (GC) o NOTE: Oil & Gas Overlay is approximate Printed by Web User 1 inch = 752 feet 1 inch = 0.14 miles 0.1 02 0.4 Miles 14arfiplri fnunty Garfield County Colorado www,earfield-cauntv.com Colorado Dlsclalmer This is a compilation of records es they appear in the narfield fnunty Offices affecting the area shown. This drawing Is to be used only for reference purposes and the County b not responsible for any Inaccuracies herein contained. © Copyright Garfleld County, Colorado 1 All Rights Reserved Printed: 5/2/2017 at 8:08:52 PM 447534PdIT. A Ot• w•carto am, a..5d. SeT3e5 me, P•54 5•Aunt37. SO sr, so Aur6�r.:WC THIsi 114.5 115 655101 451817 2,71 pans. II wi) dome, 5 5•35541P, 6 r'rY lnAcv lx 5517 Ole, AS ro..e.a 's a �mw .r.rrnue rr.SIVP 445 , 777t, .43 MC MM.., MC,. PPR 5•45.5,074S To PPE WO 1.107455007 COT14251. um :H+nr, wi�a` 0.000031. SPRA03, BP. =pip-reds.44'4g/Tal ms wer >o _q „ xr vay.r. a `� air MP= o ,..i oxo T, m xaoY i WE 204 5545.43x.r a.. 4.0040 tt�,�Amn. v w vxNv sfsmn 6e fs'ux¢ u'Yort= aus a x 1w.^C • s x scvwncd axon e.r co.Mmrm+.e0. szi.va w r:C v r,z wao�uwm. �. ara• M wacx .Potts w AW.z .a, m `rta"rYox 'b .., Ziersr iAsi1,rern Aacnlc =or; a',m."rw'w '+ ��e(�np�husw'xr uxAu'zl lnUtw 5tazr0'e rNACa o_ .Je, w mY WT, r=7, lirrealr a�Qyfeex5 rnW.x.s.ewi0 .c e.n•mw�iit)`Y 1�rv.d v:aarca zz5o. xci[e. "O 4:10"'"" ¢wva� .rri ui 5 5511 �x wsr A4.Nir¢w,m-o ur xi, :di [r n�nw nc -rzl.a luse.a rs ao. A ,40•. r'7r„va 1041 w. ,75511 w, mc, 5554755534 4' At,5f,Ci,455 5 `sar r,-ee•0707 .aa: 1.45 _ s5;A .�A.rwncx xe .re,a 7V72,r V.'.r=.x .,. Ni.". r:esli �m+a.=n'.ev"w`A rc.Acsttxe aAn' , .ns` vrni ceaAri. 704 c'r .'...` a .r x d ,e.""`""' .`Vr ..417x1..,==4.:4 wr'`"r<waau...ttz:m,. >' G•auR.±+ ca'a o l 'q[ . 3wM :va A;'c :4 ,t"" z>w :FA.'s.i Vic µas�mi's tro ¢u >.wt'< . :..3�.rrr�.Nn�i: ^ ;i+.�vesV r•n r1c .or-.�.V`',V we%" -x7444.:,•%. ` Ems."A E7 Mb, 07.704.7575.1' x.a x.x nu 7g.wntvns 4 enraP ;%.-.r -MML`1LY`arf .041.; =V11=1 n : vx l0.., rxs+..l 4 6xcuwcirrvi ni'su..'c A 1 ,. 14 61R..fad'o�i�p!wNa...Y..a. iekrx•i • • x 4� r ^0,75.4•7•74. Y . ,:'4.4.- �...r .S iP..NnE MAT. PLAT QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION A RRPLAT OF' LOT 5 AND TOT 6 OF THE FINAL PLAT OF QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 785073 BEING A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 22 AND THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 27. TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH„ RANCE 93 WEST OF THF 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIF.TAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO 'PURPOSE OF THIS AMENDED FINAL PLAT IS TO ADJUST THE LOT LINE BETWEEN LOT 5 AND LOT 8 SHEET 1 DF 2 PLAT NOW4 o/legmaire oms =ox NI wortw• sa PEA414 Cr u. 4455634,14P/0514 IS4 Axxa J., AedY.cv :SM nxr L[rtl 4bM �• ItZe.%; r.vg,,OMISA J004 17A44 A4511041 511764451 r471•15515 :or 5 • ."a.• -r..ne -. .dYw ri 9wk. .t wsrR e�• .a:. rorri •nenco er vmr ve:s.uk 1 cI°:zn sumcv a aa* • ac 01 name 1.7,75,1104,741:47- mn. e.i WO x VC PICexpe 1e Rzrzt 45747 AS Uett415Pnx..aQ,..a,CAP srassas, ..erm,,.n�"aYm=e asuumeas te. 'wF .w. "'"...44:57=174 ":""r..4..''.'.:a%'1444•=.1 3 .4774 Stl=Krfr 1: iir:�r{ �M •�wf 1.541M111:55`74 3 i- wLe ✓s. =471, "r:T' pie y •• iia., IiY Iwa- rM1" ws.� MPS s55 , eVe5 .r..va . 9 •.'•-al ..=..* r.:•tt•TI Y..1.•94 .14.1.45.5 4441 cv.wt vvo..a �CM.]FO ne. y c �.cvep[w w A aSf 4�u .145555 ,o.'s rr8racaR ViCINTTY MW LrmilaILLMSDalatallEaSEULte .P.C5A11547 5. RC •. pT•74 .RSa[•.I.snx rs 475. AsSA r5,5E1 S7 AiW CPs T[J 77• Y50nw reMde .leM yyryroq 'T5'n {N �.Y: n r .n.x *y,L:.S+yR 74 OM, , r., *4471 :X t•.* s .•. 9.113. - - _ _ i awc xaxwc[ r.e . c¢9Anr cxroA.srwr zinuaz-ise°i•�e *455.4 .da,a 1e-7.nos ._.....a •.x =:i. .__-.na,5. r _F.4 �-3 u•Avxin iWutt••`�I"J.r.N.. n.u.•r- x xiw!L �i111w,v k •KAAG W.• .- ....ea..... PC 41 74 wamra 5, n. .14 -nspaLtall =,551155r _ - •x.' _ swr. sr .4Y_._ae.Ya5547,84t1 w5 " ai"�' "r .57414 Y..5554, uA: 78555 jjfi' �. ivh.• 111(1H COl!h'rliY ENG1NF•FRING. INC. bOnErtLiPiC EPCQH.EM 104) 31.4."V10 ,5 151'; 9IA1(h: AVENUE. x1IMIL' 101 C1FNn000 SPP.LNGS, 1 00.W0 UI601 (970) 045-9676 riLLLE SLL31121ami aAgvx 145504.4113. 5, 51.LPER, CO BPS. Pr.,431 61110.1t SIC Aim.: 574140. 1�'iY12 21.1 xIRM 71.579 SASSES 1•3_ '9I 3=91 ""W es zmirg Voa -rent-. 4:ft er ~15w fpB Fly .4 M.i AEa ieZr a TrtO nzval(10ga, vm.'•••'.. ll4Re iz' aar.a a7.S. erG..m md,< asxAAAaarsx .w•ss .455 Mut obi mr..i es 5.44.1574 ..141 •47456 .fiem,Ce "" MOW 711 a` Or %.31( Y 7•552, .5111511.1. 71•55APPli .44•54 rCL144141,13571 lr�AAr�g5ftI G.a:.,3..<We8n.MerzIi 5vx.e.0 r�r AY „"-,ur�q,,m Yuh -'"YT w .:"d '.44144 . ti .4.1 •'b3'iirE . 1516 5543.4 *4 rnuf9l.Y *41'9909 .uxw s ..errE.e 714. nsSwA. 1 A e" v!M 99.99 r 979.4' .? i? './: r.' .-- s'•r d 9Al.5. man r;A.rW r w4_IOrIv Ferincnnex .._ .. . tt, . dI cA. puuu la ntt 454olm IS -1404 .4344 SANA SLE2(aLeS CEP]1F1•A'T Oe A • "p.1=?04..v. :ysrry 5404.0 `yIC5... V5f 5 �Yn�64��Yia*JRY rs vw,v^cy��gwr 45.52t7... ��: =welt? P-` ow"T..rEn9 K='I r«c fy'.•M_ •T Ya1Q/ R a�M�oec-ft,. +•• . r r5aa Y„'me r -sx m 4,44 ASP7- aft + ," ,bad,,,_ ter• -4A..74:19•=.116.,31 tr Xa Tom.. 16.,3 12.01.6-221)..8£0290f.0. ,7641199 *99 �Lp� lEp� AI�,t\o� �v'y4�'K =,- •dr MmE ]6'rO ••P21f,Q•1 �i^Itr. L.51 JOEL f&'?LCA&E FAMILY.81 15LW 19LnT r5L` IVOR PN; Ci A�pc A. E�IBI 7NT aA pnWN00 0OOR 0505 ALBENDED FINAL PLAT UICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION A REPLAT OF LOT 5 AND LOT 6 OF THE FINAL PLAT OF QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 785073 BEING A PARCEL OF LAND SIT'UA'TED 15 THE Sw1/4 05 SECTION 22 AND THE NWIj4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH.. RANGE 93 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO "PURPOSE OF THIS AMENDED FINAL PLAT L TO ADJUST THE LOT LINE BETWEEN LOT 5 AND 709` 6' SHEET 2 OF 2 n1E M��►r fl. 11101101157 1MuNu PM( MN no-mmrw1w.00rcwrca>> +GA.s Y �rK� ;G FLuded � �. mei[ .--' []D1340.6r.CUMILVER WAY 0TC 1,1G w a'd -.s w+SOTWO.: dam -G - l wTC1 . 1x102070 ,511.14" LYCR .155.7 .111.14 �� 1070 0 8 850. .1115 14=. rZ" W5. PR — T -- ; 1• Is.e 1 wi�u 7 1 LOT 7 jj}{�.° m� ,Lata fN'fy i'- :" .. <91'Se1 S.F. 1'.: 1111^�- 11.,N, Ac +,- �1 r�vn K a 1 _,,w,— _ ylr _ h is :tea rr. _1! 1 1 V. - .,.s w--- !'1 j..an.l_S'ti 1 iii _ wyY}AaaY� wa.wll_n_=__ • - J-- l'. , , wrrw+n�'1.Ti1. MAW P M ( L9T 55 IE15 0000. 4E1 011,14371. -ER NKr C17APHIC 0c.1LE 1*- 1a. 8450 •000 MJAF aREAPS ROAD P:0_5 M 131800 IRE (0:0.1. Pt W11 IWI.Nt MC MEND_ rr wec+., v.1re..s 71.1-a YNINN 0012,1 .M G. 50057057).. _n r,CoeoVT EASPRITT MOTTO, 110 750.5 IN Wm Nims er anwcs HIGH COUNTRY ENGTNEERING, INC. EPER I� Y.nbR W Aa�c7.4, COPIRM CONSULTING BRiCIiEER: AND SVRSEY2R> 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, SRNs 151 0.E1Rl00D 500100.3, COLORADO 01671 ;875) 905-11670 11 r a J 7 1 1_ f 11 . r/g�l� iII��t l 1!r,�/f� jIiiii I i !Ili II ) ltfl 1—I HASEN BERG / DANIELS GARFIELD COUNTY. CO QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION MASTER UTILITY PLAN H-HIGaH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. �e 14 IxvaAA�0eECw111.ArCi21Z 12O11-4 CO 80II2 11v1.idA W !AS moll uw¢n n¢I _. CA7L W ' lane v.124 07111 4—Als707YPNas 3[ ale° k 1tl1 MIa1OO NEYmau Ia:AC*kwffY C a aim 110 10 NRNYA /OA IINu. R1A6 :-0O.a H' .o IIMRRNIt.IISGUI/IYCa n.mIn l' A py F� A En !1 gFF� I4 4 11 41 %Ail Ai I lit kr gg ,P Igisr II /10 i lig nil tie 9gg J ppSIli p` 118P A�3 B„ ii 5 11 117 ill _ q�gliA X 4 Rp 7 �RR ep AF INsi � 4 1 �37V all VIP a < ��qf 14 p e igi 1101R1 4 pga 931 AR WI gV l ^59S 91 € € g R 9 4 s �4 91 14 4�R° �� SI A 4 r! I-IASENBERG / DANIELS GARFIELD COUNT', CO QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. rv22-gW22q Caeul 12 191 NESOal.n t.44 r#.Yat Rleavi level •1w.c 4t 222I eo ac 1.011 wrc I/O/as .11,140.1 NbIwaewre.nl.+..wse* 012,10 Orrail.r.rory FOAL RAH. AIDIGFPFe..ROMINTY caenrNre. o+ia 1900922-198] N 2,14110zareanc EXHIBIT H PROPERTY MAP t�R • • •f`�, w "2'772230400 r.- ¢. x44 T kythiv ;-(r. • 17� 217722301006 1110- r. 1: • Ail •. • • a to 217722301007 r.i .Ric• 1' • - j morn i Soil Map—Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties (Quicksilver Court Subdivision; 262000 262100 I6Z2 262300 252400 • 260500 :ti.0.? - 262500 39° M30" N 1 .. - - ..ti-r_•C�t �: ry Waming: Sal Map may not be valid at this scale. MalT Fragi 39' 30Nn.• "G+--,_ .J- I � I i 261800 261900 262000 252110 262200 762300 262,130 • 262500 Map SGa€e: 1:5,350 if printed on A landsope (11" x 8.5"J sheet. Meters 0 50 100 200 300 Fe -it 0 250 500 1000 1500 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGSS4 Edge S6: UN Zone 13N WGSS4 l7Si.)<\ Natural Resources Web Soil Survey ""Ila Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 39. 30 30"N 1 i v 39° 39 6 N 262600 262700 262600 262900 12/21/2016 Page 1 of 3 Soil Map—Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties (Quicksilver Court Subdivision) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons �..r Soil Map Unit Lines ▪ Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features w Blowout 14 Borrow Pit X Clay Spot Closed Depression • Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot • Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp • Mine or Quarry • Miscellaneous Water • Perennial Water Ra, Rock Outcrop -_ Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot • Sinkhole Slide or 51io • Sodic Spot 0 •• Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation t+4 Rails rftr Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background k& Aerial Photography MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Waming: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties Survey Area Data: Version 9, Sep 22, 2015 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 7, 2011—Sep 3, 2011 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/21/2016 Page2of3 Soil Map—Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties Quicksilver Court Subdivision Map Unit Legend Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties (CO683) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 45 Morval•Tridell cornplex, 6 to 25 37.0 25.6% percent slopes 67 Torriorthents-Rock outcrop 42.2 29.4% complex, steep 68 Vale silt loam, 3 to 6 percent 64.5 44.9% i i slopes Totals for Area of Interest 143.8 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/21/2016 Page 3 of 3 Daniels Contracts Tammy Keenan <water@wdwcd.org> Wed 5/3/2017 8:54 AM "o:jsdesigns@outlook:com <jsdesigns@outlook.com>; cc:ghdgrowit@aol.com <ghdgrowit@aol.com>; 4 attachments (4 MB) 9.17.09 to current amendment.pdf; 4.17.08 amendment.pdf; 5.17,07 amendment.pdf; Daniels Contract.pdf; Good morning Jena, Jody asked that I send you the original contract with West Divide. Please see the attached, original contract and subsequent amendments. This contract has been paid in full and is in good standing. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Thanks so much! Tammy Keenan West Divide Water Conservancy District P. O. Box 1478 818 Tau9henbaugh Blvd., #101 Rifle, CO 81650 970-625-5461 APPLICATION TO All END WATER LEASE if 070215GD(b) WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT 109 West Foutth Street, P. O. Box 1478, Rifle, Colorado 81650 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name: OuicksIlver Court Homeowners' Association Mailing address; 1155 Qulcks±iver Way Ride. CO 81650 Contract #070215GD(b) Map #556a,b,c,d,e Date Activated 2/15/07 Dates Amended 5/17/07, 4/17/08 9/17/09 Telephone: 470.309.3236 Email: le pb erg@Yehoo.com Authorized agent:GregorY Hasenberg 2. COURT CASE Ns: Decree Case No. N/A Augmentation Plan Case No. 3. USE OF WATER RESIDENTIAL Number amain residences: 7 No. ADU's 5 Subdivision: No. constructedNo. vacant o� l lame garden/lawn irrigation of 49,000 total sq. ft. Method of irrigation: flood_ sprinkler x other Non-commercial animal watering of / 7 animals Fire Protection X Evaporation: Maximum water surface to be exposed: 10,000 SF Description of any use, other than evaporation, and method of diversion, rate of diversion, and annual amount of diversion of any water withdrawn from the pond: Used for Gro protection. Filled by Daniels Wells 1, 2, 3, ora. Well Sharing Agreement for multiple owner wells must he ,submitted If realer Than two owners, application nest be nut* tinder a homeowners assuriatiCOL COMMERCIAL Number of units: 'Total sq. ft. of commercial units: Description of use: INDUSTRIAL Description of use: Evaporation: Maximum water surface to be exposed: Dcocription of any use, other than evaporation, and method of diversion, rule of diversion, and annual amount of diversion of any water withdrawn from the pond: DIRECT PUMPING Tributary: Location: 4. SOURCE OF WATER Structure: Wells Structure; Name: See attached. Source: surface storage ground water x Current Permit h `ee att8ched. (attach copy) S. LOCATION OF STRUCTURE See attached descriptions. County Quintet/quarter Quarter Section Township Distance of well from section litres: Runge P. M. Elevation: 5200 feel. - Well Location address: Original Lots 2 and 29, Grass Mesa Ranch. (Attach additional pages for multiple structures) 6. LAND ON WHICH WATERWILL BE USED (Legal description may be provided as an attachment) SE1l4SW114.522, T6S, R93W, 6th P.M. (Lot 2) NE1/41W-174 SL77Sff93W, 6th P.M. (Lot2a) Number of acres in tract: Approx. 19 acres. Inclusion into the District, at Applicant's expense, may be required 7. TYPE OF SEWAGE SYSTEM Septic tank/absorption 1 • field X District name: Central System Other 8. VOLUME OF LEr?rSF 'ATER NE Amended from of to IF except augmentation tknm Alshury allowed) CRE FEET: of 1 acre foot we a lesser wnnunt is Provide engineering ditto to support volume of water requested Commercial, nauaricipal, and industrial users must provide diversion and consumptive data on a monthly basis. A tatali;:iug flow meter with remote readout is required to be installed and usage reported to West Divide. Aiaialieant er-Presstv acknowledges it hos• bud the opportunity to review the District's forte Water Allotment Contract and agrees this application is made pursuant and subject to the terms and conditions contained therein. Appli a 41 11/A.IA Applicant Signature Application Late: r " C . 0 C\ i DATE APPROVED: - - 1 --c.2 WEST DIVIDE. By: [:y11tiGT AT1FS' Printed portion of this Amin. except differentiated additions ordeletiotu, have been unmoved and atIuyte.4L by the W DividoWator Vorm TVrlAt, `T'T'nlflea A%AT.Mei A ape Tr`A'T1r1R7 7 Deaner 2 .3"-t 6 5 4 3 9 10 11 4�-\17 17 16 15 93.01N y 5.05 92.01 19 21 22 23 2' 19 20 21 22 23 4 8 V 9 10 3� �b 31 2 1 6 11. 30 28 27 30 29 28 27 7 3i� 3Z 33 3' 35 36 , 313I. 34 35 3 2 10 11 °594: W .21 . 22 12 7 5 2 11 72 S 9-t AW 23 24 28 33 4 27 34 26 25 35 36 3 2 1 31 32 6 5 33 34 35 36 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 Well Permits — Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Grass Mesa Ranch Permit No. Name Lots Served Location Notes 67567-F Hasenberg Well No. 1 (aka Shared Well No. 1, Water Sharing Agreement) 2B, 2C, and 2D NE1/4NW 1/4, S27, T6S, R93W, 6 PM 600 Ft. from North Section Line; 2150 Ft. from West Section Line 67565-F Daniels Well No. 1 (aka Shared Well No. 2, Water Sharing Agreement) 2E (and 2F) SE1/4SW 1/4, S22, T6S, R93W 6 PM 214 Ft. from South Section Line; 1995 Ft from West Section Line Old Permit No. 276142 67566-F Daniels Well No. 2 (aka Shared Well No. 4, Water Sharing Agreement 2G (and 2H) SE1/4SW1/4, S22,T6S, R93W 6PM 125 Ft. from South Section Line; 3190 Ft. from East Section Line Old Permit No. 66062-F 277120 Daniels Well No. 3 (aka Shared Well No. 3, Water Sharing Agreement) 2F (and 2E) SE 1/4SW 1/4, S22, T6S, R93W 6 PM 875 Ft. from South Section Line; 3450 Ft. from East Section Line Monitoring Hole — need general :use permit 277121 Daniels Well No. 4 (aka Shared Well No. 5, Water Sharing Agreement) 2H (and 2G) _ SE1/4SW1/4, S22, T6S, R93W 6 PM 850 Ft. from South Section Line; 3100 Ft. from East Section Line Monitoring Hole — need general use permit JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TO -AL WATER USE ESTIMATES COLORADO RIVER SERVICE AREA WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT APPLICANT: Quicksilver Court Homeowners' Association DWELLING UNITS: IRRIGATED AREA (SQ FT): COMMERCIAL AREA (SQ FT): NO. OF LIVESTOCK: ELEVATION (MSL): EVAPORATION AREA (Acre): (4) 12 49000 0 17 6200 0.23 5 6 Contract Amount w/ 5% transit Loss = 4.00 acre feet 7 8 9 Transit Loss= 5.0% (10) 11) (12) {131 Unit Vaiue. Irrigation Diversion (ft) Unit Value: Irrigation C.U. (ft) In House Diversion (AF) In House C.U. (AF) Commercial Diversion (AF) Commercial C.U. (AF) Irrigation Diversion (AF) Irrigation C.U. (AF) Livestock. Diversion & C.U. (AF) Pond Evaporation (AF) Total Diversion (AF) Total C.U. (AF) Total Contract Amount (AF) 0.40 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.438 0.078 0.082 0,36 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0:00 0.02 0.01 0.404 0.078 0.082 0.40 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.488 0.125 0.131 0.049 0,039 0.39 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.08 0.562 0.196 0.206 0.364 0,291 0.40 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.33 0.02 0.10 0.975 0.507 0.533 0.526 0.421 0.39 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.47 0.02 0.12 1.176 0.672 0.706 0.568 0.454 0.40 0.06 0,00 0.00 0.64 0.51 0.02 0.13 1.243 0.716 0.752 0,445 0.356 0.40 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.40 0.02 0.12 1.085 0.593 0.623 0.316 0.253 0.39 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.28 0.02 0,09 0.887 0.445 0.467 0.081 0.065 0.40 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.07 0.02 0.06 0.597 0.211 0.221 0.39 0,06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.459 0.108 0.114 0.40 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.02 0.00 0.438 0.078 0.082 2.349 1.879 4.70 091 0.00 0.00 2.64 2.11 0.21 0.78 8.752 3.807 3.998 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 80% irrigation efficiency for sprinkler systems Blaney Criddle assessment with Pochop adjustments 350 gallons per day per residence 15% consumptive use for ISM systems 200 gallons per day per 1000 sq ft of commercial space 15% consumptive use for ISDS systems Column (1) * irrigated area in acres Column (2) " Irrigated area In acres Livestock use at 11 gallons per head per day Evaporation Calculations Column (3) + Column (5) + Column (7) + Column (9) + Column (10) plus 5% transit loss Column (4) + Column (6) + Column (8) + Column (9) + Column (10) Column (12) plus transit loss 91912009 Form No_ GWS -25 APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 8'8 Cenlenniol Bldg.. 1313 Sherman 41., Deriver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 GH DANIELS ill 176 GH DANIELS BLVD GYPSUM, CO 81637- EXST WELL PERMIT NUMBER 67565 -F DIV. 5 WO 45 DES, BASIN MD Lot: 2 Block: Filing: Subdiv: GRASS MESA RANCH APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY SE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 22 Township 6 5 Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES (970) 471-0920 CHANGE?EXPANSION OF USE OF AN EXISTING WELL ISSUANCE OF THiS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action, 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has boon granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Constnrction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) far the construction of a well. appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado River, on the condition that the well shall be operated only when the West Divide Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, Is in effect, and when a water allotment contract between tire well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir Is in effect. or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract #070215GD(b) (amended April 17, 2008). Approved for the use of, an existing well, constructed on January 16, 2008, to a depth of 195 feel, with a pump being installed July 18, 2008, under permit no. 276142 (canceled). Issuance of this permit hereby cancels permit no. 276142. 5) Approved as a well on a tract of land of 39.9 acres described as lot 2, Grass Mesa Ranch division of land, Garfield County. 6) The use of ground water from this well is limited to fire protection, ordinary household purposes inside two (2) single family dwellings, two (2) accessory dwellings units, the irrigation of not more than 14,000 square feet (0.32 den acre) of home gardens and lawns. the watering of four (4) head domestic animals, filling, refilling and storage of a pond and evaporation of a pond (surface area being 0.23 of an acre). Storage, filing and refiling of the pond may be from this well (Daniels Welt no. 1) or Daniels Well no. 2 or in combination with Daniels Well nos. 1 and 2. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. This well is known as Daniels Well no. 1. 7) The pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 8) The combined average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated by this well (Daniels Well no. 1) and Daniels Weil no. 2 (permit no. 67556-F) and Hasenberg Well no. 1 (permit no. 67567-F) shall not exceed 5.34 acre -feel. 9) The owner shell mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 10) This welt shall bo located not more than 200 feet from the Inr•.ation specified on this permit and at least 600 feet from ariy existing well, completed in the same aquifer, that is not owned by the applicant. 11) Totalizing flow meters must be installed an this well (Daniels Weil no. 1) and Daniels Well no. 2 (permit no. 67506-F) and Hasenberg Well no. 1 (permit no. 67567-F), and maintained in good working order. Permanent records ot all diversions must be msintatned by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request NOTE: Use of ground water from this wee (Daniels Well no. 1), Daniels Well no. 2 (permit no. 67556-F) and Hasenberg Well no. 1 (permit no. 67567-F) shall be operated pursuant to WDWCD contract no. 070215GD(B) (amended April 17, 2008). / J� NOTE: Canceled permit no. 276142 was previously issued for this well. NOTE: Parcel Identlffcatton Number (PIN): 23-2177-223.00.463 NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number. R247345 (totaling 39.67 acres) 214 Ft. from South 1995 Ft. from West Section Line Section Line UTM COORr 1NATESjMeters,Zone:13,NADB3) Easting: Northing: ci APPROVED DMW Receipt No. 9503036A 1 Stale Engineer By DATE ISSUED 09-30.2008 EXPIRATION DATE Form No, GWS -25 APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg-. 1313 Sherman Si., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 DANIELS GH (H 176 GH DANIELS BLVD GYPSUM, CO 81637- (970) 471-0920 PERMIT TO USE AN EXISTING WELL ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The Issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief In a civil ceud action. 2) The constriction of this well shall be in compliance 4rilh the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, untess approval of a valiance has been granted by the State Hoard of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado River, on the condition that tha well shall be operated only when the West Divide Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the Stale Engineer, is in effect, and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Waler Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruodi Reservoir is in affect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract #070215GD(b) (amended April 17, 2008). 4) Approved tar the use of, an existing welt. constructed on March 10, 1999, to a depth of 223 feet under monitoring hole notice MH -35741 and later permitted for use with a pump being installed on July 18, 2008, under permit no. 66062-F (canceled) . Issuance of the permit hereby cancels pemlii no. 66062-F. 5) Approved as a well on a tract of lend of 39.9 acres described es lot 2, Grass Mesa Ranch division of land, Garfield County. 6) The use of ground water from this well is limited to Ike prelectlon, ordinary household purposes inside two (2) single family dwellings, two (2) accessory dwellings units. the irrigation of not more than 14.000 seuare feet (0.32 of an acre) of home gardens and lawns, the watering of four (4) head domestic animals, filling. refilling and storage of a pond and evaporation of a pond (surface area being 0.23 of an acre). Storage. filling end refilling of the pond may bo from this well (Daniels Well no. 2) or Daniels Well no. 1 or in combination with Daniels Well nos. 1 and 2. All use of this wall will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract Or a plan for augmentation is In effect. This well is known as Daniels Well no. 2. 7) The pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 9) The combined average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated by this well (Daniels Well no. 2) and Daniels Well no. 1 (permIt no. 67565-F) and Hasenberg Well no. 1 (permit no. 67567-F shall not exceed 8.34 acre-feet. ) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary moans and precautions to preserve these markings. 10) This well shall be located not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit and at least 600 feet from any existing well. completed In the same aquifer, that is not owned by the applicant. 11) Totalizing flow meters must be inslalied on this well (Daniels Well no. 2) and Daniels Well no. 1 (permit no. 67565-F) and Hasenberg well no. 1 (permit no. 67567-F), and mainlained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded al least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. NOTE: Use of ground water Irom this well (Daniels Well no. 2), Daniels Well no. 1 (permit no. 67565-F) and Hasenberg Well no, 1 (permit no. 67567-F) shall be operated pursuant to WDWCD contract no. 070215GD(B) (amended April 17, 2008). NOTE: Canceled permit no. 66062-F was previously issued for this well, , C7 NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PMN): 23-2177-223-00-463 NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R247345 (totaling 39.67 acres) EXST WELL PERMIT NUMBER 67566 - F DIV. 5 WD 45 DES. BASIN MD Lot: 2 Block: Filing: Subdiv: GRASS MESA RANCH APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY SE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 22 Township 6 S Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 125 Ft. from South Section Line 3190 Ft. from East Section Line UTM COORDINATES (Meters,Zone:13,NAD83) Easting: Northing: APPROVED DMW e1 rr- 1 L.. State Engineer Receipt No. 9503156 DATE ISSUED 09-30-2008 Sy DATE Form No. GWS -25 APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St.. Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 8666-3581 GREGORY HASENBERG 1155 QUICKSILVER WAY RIFLE, CO 81650- EXST WELL PERMIT NUMBER 67567 -F DIV. 5 WD45 DES. BASIN MD Lot: 2A Block: Filing: Subdiv: GRASS MESA RANCH (970) 309-3236 CHANGEIEXPANSION OF USE OF AN EXISTING WELL r � ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing wafer rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no Injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the Slate Board or Examiners of Walnr Weil r.onslructidn and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 1 B. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado River, on the condition that the well shall be operated only when the West Divide Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect, and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Rued Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract 11070215GD(b) (amended April 17, 2008). 4) Approved for the installation of a pump in, and the use of, an existing well, constructed on January 26, 1999, to a depth of 194 feet, under monitoring hole notice MH -35447 and later permitted for use under permit no. 216160 (canceled). Issuance of this permit hereby cancels permit no. 216160. 5) Approved as a well on a tract of land of 39.9 acres described as lot 2A, Grass Mesa Ranch division of land, Garfield County. 6) The use of ground water from this wail is limited to tire protection, ordinary household purposes inside three (3) single family dwellings and one (1) accessory dwelling unit, the Irrigation of not more Than 21,000 square feet (0.48 of an acre) of home gardens and lawns, and the watering or nine (9) head domestic animals. Ail use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. This well is known as Hasenberg Well no. 1. 7) The pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 8) The combined average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated by this well (Hasenberg Well no. 1) and Daniels Well no. 1 (permit no. 67565-F) and Daniels Well no. 2 (permit no. 67566-F) shall not exceed 8.34 acre-feet. 9) The owner shall mark the welt in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 10) This well shall be located not more than 200 feel from the location specified on this permit and al least 600 feet from any existing well, completed in the same aquifer, that is not owned by the applicant. 11) Totalizing flow meters must be Installed on this well (Hamburg Well no. 1) and Daniels Well no. 1 (permit no. 67565-F) and Daniels Well no. 2 (permit no. 67566-F). and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request NOTE: Use of ground water from this well (Hasenberg Well no. 1). Daniels Welt no. 1 (permit no. 67555.F) and Daniels Well no. 2 (permit no. 67566-F) shall he operated pursuant to WDWCD contract no. 070215GD(B) (amended April 17, 2008). NOTE: Canceled permit no. 216160 was previously issued for this well. �' n/� ,et el NOTE: Parcel identiflcallon Number (PIN): 23-2177-272-00-464 NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R247346 (totaling 39.95 acres) APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NE 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 27 Township 6 S Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 600 Ft. from North 2150 Ft. from West Section Line Section Line UTM COORDINATES (Melers,Zone:13,NAD83) Easting: Northing: APPROVED DMW Receipt No. 95030388 f.. 1 State ,neer By DATE ISSUED 09-30-2008 XPIRATION DATE 09-30-2009 41. Form No. GWS -25 APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Conlennlal Bk g., 1313 Sf ormen St., Donvor, Colorado 80203 (303) 868-3581 GEORGE H DANIELS III 176 G:H. DANIELS BLVD GYPSUM, CO 81637- (970) 471-0920 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL 1095 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 277120 DIV. 5 WD45 DES. BASIN MD Lot 2 Block: FEng: Subdkr. GRASS MESA RANCH APPROVED WELL LOCATJON GARFIELD COUNTY SE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 22 Township 6 S Range 93 W Sbcth P.M. pISTAidCES FROM SECTION LINES 876 Ft. from South Section Line 3450 Ft. from East Section Line UTM COQRD1NATES (Meters.Zone;13,{4AO833 Easting: Northing: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDMON$ OF_APPROVAL 1) Thls wan shall be used In such a way as to cause no material Injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief In a civil court action. 2) The constnictlon of this well shall be M compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2. untaes approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Watet Well Construction and Pump installation Contractors Gr accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(I) for uses as described in CRS 37.92402(1)(q. Use of this well Is limited to monitoring water tevels and/or water quay sampling. This well is known as Daniels Well no. 3. 4) This well must be equipped with a torkint cap ar sear to prover! well cor amination or puss3>bto hazards as an open we& The well must be kept capped and locked at all times except during sampling or measurbtg. 5) Records of water level measurements and water quality analyses shall be maintained by the well owner and submitted to the Division of Water Resources upon roquest. . 6) Upon conclusion of the monitoring program the well owner shall plug this well in accordance with Rule 16 of the Water Wen Construction Rules. A Well Abandonment Report must be comps and submitted to the Division of Water Resources wUtdn 80 days of plugging.. 7) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with the weal permit member and name of aquifer as appropriate, end shall taks necesesry manna and prions to preserve these markings. 8) This wee must be constructed by or under the supervision of a ttcensed wan drr'Uer or other authorted Individual according to the Water WeU Construction Rules. H nonstandard construction is anlicipatad. s variorum request must be submitted in accordance with flute 18 and approved prior to well conslructlon. 9) A Well ConeIr utIon and Teat Report (Form GWS -31), Includinglithalo9ic tog must be submitted by the tndivlduai authorized to construct the well. For nonstandard construction. the report must Include an as -bulli drawing thawing 'Utah such as depth, casing, perforated zones, and a description of the grouting type and Interval. 10) This well shall be constructod not more than 200 feet from the tocallon specred on this panne. 11) Issuance of this permit does not guarantee that this well can be converted to a produdlon well under a future permit. The ability of thiswea to be converted to a production well Is limited by all governing statutes, rules, regulations, orders, andlor decres. NOTE: Permit nos. 277121, 278142 and 66082-F (MH.35741) %ere previously issued for this parcel. 2 ----- mare Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2177-223.00.483 NOTE Assossor Tax Schedule Number. R247345 (totaling 39.87 acres) i0 44/1o4 9 APPROVED DMVV Receipt No. 9503013A State Engineer DATE ISSUED 04-14-2008 BY DATE 04-10-2010 Form No. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER GWS -25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., 0erner, Colorado 8020.3 (303) 868-3581 A3LICANT GEORGE H DANIELS III • 176 G.H. DANIELS BLVD GYPSUM, CO 81637- (970) 471-0920 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL. 1095 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 277121 DN. 5 WD45 DES. BASIN MD Lot: 2 Block: Filing: Subdty: GRASS MESA RANCH APPRQVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY • SE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 22 Township 6 5 Range 93 W Sixth P.M. glawggummzsijoidm 850 Ft from South Section Line 3100 Ft. from East Section Line UTM COORDINATES (Meters Zone:13,NAD83) Easting; Northing: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used In such a way as to caule no material injury to existing water rights. The Issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury vnll occur to another vested water right or gide another owner of a vested water right from seeking regef in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be In compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been grunted by the State Board of Exaxminers of Water Wen Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-802(3Xb)W for uses as descrbued In CRS 37-92-e02(1)(f). Use of this web is limited to monitoring water levels and/or Water quality sampling. This wel is known es Daniels Well no. 4. 4) This well must be equipped with a locking cap or seal to prevent well co ntem Matson or possible hazards as an open wen. The well must be kept capped and locked at all times except during oumpfing or measuring. 6) Records olwater level measurements and water quality analyses shall be maintained by the well owner and submitted to the Division of Water Resources upon request. 8) Upon conclusion of the mongering program the well owner shalt plug this wall In accordance with Rule 18 of the Water Wet Construction Rules. A Well Abandonment Report must be completed and submitted to the Division of Water Resources within 80 days of plugging. 7) The owner shall mark the well In a conspicuous place with the well permit number and name of aquifer as appropriate, and shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 8) This well must be constructed by or under the supervision of a licensed wee driller or other authorized individual according to the Water Well Construction Rules. if non-atendrvd conntructrnn is anticipated. a variance request must be submitted in aaxitdsr xxi with Rule 18 and approved prior to well construction. 9) A Well Construction and Test Report (Form GWS -31), including t3hotogic log must be submitted by the individual authorized to construct the well. For non-standard construction. the report must include an as-buln drawing showing details such es depth, casing, perforated zones, and a description of the grouting type and interval. 10) This well shag be constructed not mare than 200 feet from the location specitied on this penult. 11) Issue of this permit does not guarrntee that this wall can be converted to a production well under a future permit. The ability of this wet to be converted to a production wen is limned by asgovem(ng statutes, rules, regulations, orders, andlor decrees. NOTE: Pemne nos. 277120.278142 and 136082-F (MH35741) were previously issued for Ws parcel. NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2177-223-00.463' � NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number. R247345 (totaling 39.87 acres) a4..,, 4,4,:,0pg APPROVED DMW State Engineer BY „Reoraipt No. 95030135 DATE ISSUED 04-10-2008 EXPIRATION DATE 04-10-2010 , APPLICATION TOAMEND WATER LEASE # 070215GD(b) WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT 109 West Fourth Street, P. O. Box 1478, Rifle, Colorado 81650 I. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name: Ouicksilver Court Homeowners' Association Mailing address: 1155 Quicksilver Way Rifle, CO 81650 Telephone: 970-309-3286 Authorized agent: Gregory F. Hasenberg U. 2. COURT CASE #s: Decree Case No. Augmentation Plan Case No. 3. USE OF WATER RESIDENTIAL Number of main residences: 7 No. ADU's 5 Subdivision: No. constructed units: No. vacant lots __ 1 fame garden/lawn irrigation of 49,000 total sq. 0. lvlethod of irrigation: flood sprinkler_ x_ other Non-commercial animal watering of i 1 animals Fire Protection X Evaporation: Maximum water surface to be exposed: 10,000 SF Description of any use, other than evaporation, and method of diversion, rate of diversion, and annual amount of diversion of an water withdrawn from the pond: Used for fire protection and irrigation. Filled from Daniels Wells 1 & 2, only. Jf`c/! Sharing ,lgreentetrtfor multiple owner wells nuts1 be.stelanined. tf greater ater than two owners, application must be made under a homeowners association. COMMERCIAL Number of units: Total sq. 11. of commercial units: Description ()fuse: IND[JS'IR1AL Description urn e: Evaporation: Maximum water surface to be exposed: Description of any use, other than evaporation, and method of diversion, rate of diversion, and annual amount of diversion of any water withdrawn from the pond: MUNICIPAL Description of use: DIRECT 1'UMI'INC Tributary: Location: 4. SOURCE OF WATER Structure: Welts Structure Name: See attached Source: surface___ storage_. ground water x_ Current Permit # See attached (attach copy) 5. LOCATION OF STRUCTURE Sao attached descriptions. Contract #070215GD(b) Map # 556a, b, c Date Activated 2/15/07 Date Amended 4/17/08 County Quarter/quarter Quarter Section Township Distance of well from section lines: Range P. M. Elevation: 6200 Well location address: Grass Mesa Ranch Lot 2 and 1155 ❑uicksifver Way, Rifle (Attach additional pages for ntulf iple structures) 6. LAND ON WHICH WATER WILL BE USED (Legal description may be provided as an attachment) SE1l4SW1/4 522, TOS, R93W 6th P.M. (Lot 2 Grass Mesa Ranch) NE1T4IifWIT4 527, T6S, R93W, 6Th P.M. Number ofacres in tract: 79 Inclusion into the District, at Applicant's cApense, may be required. 7. TYPE OF SEWAGE SYSTEM Septic tank/absorption leach field tt Central System Other District name: 8. VOLUME OF LEASED WATER NEEDED IN ACRE FEET: (minimum of t acre foot except augmentation from Alshury Reservoir where a lesscr amount is allowed) Provide engineering data Al support volume ajwater recta ested. Commercial, municipal, and industrial users nuns! protide diversion and cutrstnetprive data an a monthly basis. A totalizing flow nater with remote readout is required to he installed and u.sagr reported to !Vest Divide. Applicant expressly acknowledge% it has had the opportunity to rerietr the District's firm Water Allotment Contract and agree% this application is trade pursuant mid subject to the terms and cnttrlitiuns contained therein. Applicant Signature Application Date: / 8 DATE? APPROVED: WEST DIVIDE W . INNIS ERVA By: .A'LTESi': yet Printed portions atlas fill III, except differentiated addition.3 or deletions, have hew approved and arInptrd by the West Divide WaterConServancy Districl Foran : WDWCD 0I-034% AMEND APPL.ICATiON APPLICATION TO.: WATER LEASE # . ] 7 & 1 5 `b C�.) WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT 109 West Fourth Street, P. 0. Box 1478, Rifle, Colorado 81650 I. APPLICANT INFORMATION •-� }� Name: 6 (-o r9>� . i- L�C Yl t e t Fr Mailing uddress: l Lo ire g i t 15 1Q s L: vv.\ tta 31 Telephone: Ct l — 1 •- d ( O [• r �� Authorized agent: 2. COURT CASE H's: Decree Case No. Augmentation Plan Case No. ____.__� -• 3. USE OF WATER XI RESIDENTIAL (check applicable boxes) A Ordinary household use Number of dwellings: 47/ Subdivision: No. constructed units: _Ni. vacant lots fioanc garden/lawn irrigation of 6, 34 Q - sq, R- Metho 1 of irrigation: 0 flood g1 sprinkler 3:l drip 0 other 0 Non-commercial animal watering of •6) animals &Fire Protection 0 Evaporation: Maximum water surface to he exposed: /CO)0 Description of any use:, other than evaporation, and method of diversion, rate ofdiversion, and annual amount of diversion ufany water withdrawn from the pond: r, t 4 er — t.✓<. S L' F eAtO sti it cht S'Irar i n{..-ke r+-rt:rt: r fr • grtgder than lays rtit, 11e.1, •',: hrrn+et, iv/NM ens arrirrliern. 0 COMMERCIAL (check applicable boxes) Number of units: Total sq. It of commercial units: Description of use: — CI INDUSTRIAL Description of use: Evaporation: Maximum water surface to he exposed: Description of nny use, other than evaporation, and method of diversion, rate of diversion, and annual amount of diversion of any water withdrawn from the pond 0 MUNICIPAL Description of use: 0 DIRECT PUMPING Tributary; Location: 4. SOURCE OF WATER+ r'� I Structure: Lit.) e NA. Structure Name: �,�t f �.�ff l Source:: [Surface 0Storagc, OGround water Current Permit 4 '[Y\ \'1( 2514/1 Pilo. copy) Contract 4070215GD(a) Map # 556 Date Activated 2/15/07 Date Amended 5/17/07 5. LOCATION OF' STRUCTURE LcJ !, lo�rsyte►k Stray _ I County Quarter/quarter Qanner '- D— (¢ 5 cI 3 LU Section Township Range Distance of well from section Zinc:;: _5:03.2_4: r Q Y+ -t 1 t (-12._-.:_,,. l 5t Sro:-v-•• C-, \an s• c..`)_?. --- Elevation: Elevation: _ccs ja Weil location address: Ch j cks P. M. (Attach additional pages for nwIiple structures) 6. LAND ON WEIICH WATER WILL DE USED (Legal descrlplfotr may he provided as au alt' chnrent) -c P-ci3Gu •Ov-r.M. sea. Number ofttcrea in tract: It'3 •'S•i; . �..., :jra "rcrr:.;'. c :. frYr:,sd: r:r� t L•: r�•q::i'c:t_ 7. TYPE OF SEWAGE SYSTEM Septic tank/absorption leach field DCcntral system D0ther a [riot name: 9. VOLUME OF LEASED WATER NEEDED IN ACRE FEET: (minimum of 1 acre foot except augrncntatiu frorn Alsbury Reservoir where a lesser amount is allowed) .xlrrW;irrir. +.. ::ne(s i : e4r:, rift r. r: 11+nr6lt• hrr.Js. fz1.61117iti1c..1101r.mr41 VirfrlZ•Orsrdrtearlurr .•'=;+far. rr:r(J rrsagr r jrvr1ed W West' Divide. ifrf+lie aril e -5* -5* iteAruns. irartys it firm' bird tire• r,nfr'rt rir; - rher F)hrrirf'X friar f1 iticr'.1JJo neat t •rrfrrrr; l rapt, +:: r flax rt'. !r r.•:,;r;i p•::rsrrr:rt' r r?/ ft' iar the la•rrrrr nnr?i t+r: s - • r 4p1 IS gn are Applicant Signature Application Date: DATE APPROVED: WEST DIVIDE WA Ily: The printed portions of this form, except daticreettltued additions or deletions, lawn been approval and adopted by the West Divide Water Conservancy District, Form it WDWCD 050901 AMGND APP APPLICATION TO LEASE WATER FROM WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT 109 West Fourth Street, P. 0. Box 1478, Rifle, Colorado 81650 Contract # 070215GD(a) Map #556 Date Activated 2/15/07 I. APPLICANT INFORMATION Naive: Ge-p#I 6 IV • 144 - Mailing address: 1 7( 6-/-' /-7 Telephone: 9- 7 7/ -0 9'zo S 2\\ Authorized agent: 'i , /47 27.9- 2. COURT CASE #'s: Decree Case No. Augmentation Plan Case No. 3. USE OF WATER ❑ RESIDENTIAL (check applicable boxes) pOrdinary household use Number of dwellings: 1 • [(Subdivision: No. constructed units: No. vacant lots G-Iosne garden/lawn irrigation of 1 Q/ Oto sq. 11. Method of irrigation: LI flood Wprinkler adrip ❑ oiber D/Non-commercial animal watering of . animals 'Fire Protection Evaporation: Maximum water surface to be exposed: ; O d o SF Description of any use, other than evaporation, and method of diversion, rate of diversion, and annual amount of diversion of any water withdrawn from the nd: /VO' d .Tru; !jam Well Sharing Agreement for multiple owner wells must be submitted. If greater than two owners, application must be made under a homeowners association. O COMMERCIAL (check applicable boxes) Number of units: Total sq. ft of commercial units: Description of use: ❑ INDUSTRIAL Description of use: Evaporation: Maximum water surface to be exposed: Description of any use, other than evaporation, and method of diversion, rate of diversion, end annual amount of diversion of any water withdrawn from the pond: ❑ MUNICIPAL Description ofusc: [' DIRECT PUMPING Tnbutary: Location: 4. SOURCE OF WATER Structure: We-\\ Structure Name: (-1 (Z t e15 ).- Source: ['Surface ❑Storage ['Ground water Current Permit # (attach copy) 5. LOCA TION OF TRUCTl.1R County Quarter/quarter Section yyQuarier Saint 7 3 tJEsT S:K741 Township Range P. M. Distance of well from section lines: die) -Son' Elevation: 6. Zc7(p Well location address: (Attach additional pages for multiple structures) 6. LAND ON WHICH WATER WILL BE USED description may be provided as an attachment.) dw^' 4i tp Seri "-ff.,/ 93 444.S--7- a.�,c Pis'! -1 (4-11 54 ,Kf 5 w y,I Lc -r L. Number of acres in tract: 6-211-55 W luch►sion into the District, at Applicant's expense, may be required. iVG� 7. TYPE OF SEWAGE SYSTEM 3Veptic tank/absorption leach field ❑Central system DOther District name: 8. VOLUR OF LEASED WATER NEEDED IN ACRE FEET: r A -P (minimum of 1 acre foot except augmentation from Asbury Reservoir where a lesser amount is allowed) Provide engineering data to support volume of water requested. Commercial, municipal, and industrial users must pr=ovide diversion and consumptive data on a monthly basis. A totalizing flow meter with remote readout is required to be installed and usage reposed to West Divide. Applicata eapresslt• acknowledges it has had flee opportunity to review the District's form Water Allotment Co d agrees this application is made pursuant •.,nl u_ fact rn tconditions contained therein. Applicant Si attire Applicant Signature Application Date: ISSUED AS AREA B C N'fILACT YES NO The printed portions of this 1brm, except dlffbrendated additions or deletions, have been approved and adopted by the West Divide Water Conservancy District. Form # WDWCD 050901 APP JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT WATER USE ESTIMATES APPLICANT: George H. Daniels, III DWELLING UNITS: 1 IRRIGATED AREA (SO FT): 10000 NO. OF LIVESTOCK: 2 ELEVATION (MSL): 6200 EVAPORATION AREA (Acre): 0.23 Contract Amount w/ 5% transit Loss = 1.29 acre feet Transit Loss.. 6.0% (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) In House Total Diversion In House irrigation In House Irrigation Livestock Total Contract per Unit C.U. per Diversion Irrigation Diversion In House Diversion Irrigation Diversion & Pond Diversion Total C.U. Amount AF Unk R ft A AF C.U. AF C.U. Eva oratk n RF AF AF 0.029 0,004 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.031 0.008 0.007 0.026 0.004 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.028 0.006 0.006 0.029 0.004 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.079 0.055 0.058 0.028 0.004 0.049 0.039 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.08 0.120 0.094 0.099 0.029 0.004 0.364 D.291 0.03 0.00 0.08 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.123 0.082 0.086 0.028 0.004 0.526 0.421 0.03 0.00 0.12 0.10 0.00 0.11 0.256 0.208 0.219 0.029 0.004 0.568 0.454 0.03 0.00 0.13 0.10 0.00 0.13 0.289 0.238 0.250 0.029 0.004 0.446 0.356 0.03 0.00 0.10 0.08 0.00 0.13 0.285 0.220 0.231 0.028 0.004 0.316 0.253 0.03 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.00 0.12 0.221 0.183 0.192 0.029 0.004 0.081 0.065 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.09 0.137 0.109 0.115 0.028 0.004 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.042 0.018 0.019 0.029 0.004 Q.11 Q9Q Q,4Q QQQ Q=QQ Q,QQ 0.031 9.006 Q1QQZ 0.33E 0.050 2349 1.879 0.34 0.05 0.54 0.43 0.02 0,72 1,621 1.227 1.289 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 300 gallons per day per residence 16% consumptive use for ISDS systems 80% Irrigation efficiency for sprinkler systems Blaney Griddle assessment with Pochop adjustments Column (1) • number of dwelling units Column (2) • number of dwelling units Column (3) • Irrigated area In acres Column (4) • Irrigated area in acres livestock use at 11 gallons per head per day (99CW320) Evaporation Calculations Column (6) + Column (7) + Column (9) plus 6% transit loss Column (0) + Column (8) + Column (9) Column (11) plus transit loss Contract # 070215GD(a) Map #556 Date Activated 2/15/07 WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT WATER ALLOTMENT CONTRACT Name of Applicant:`/.¢,rv1c%s Quantity of Water in Acre Feet: Applicant, hereby applies to the West Divide Water Conservancy District, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, organized pursuant to and existing by virtue of C.R.S. 1973, §37-45-101, et seq., (hereinafter referred to as the "District") for an allotment contract to beneficially and perpetually use water or water rights owned, leased, or hereafter acquired by the District. By execution ofthis Contract and the attached Application, Applicant hereby agrees to the following terms and conditions: 1. Water Rights: Applicant shall own water rights at the point of diversion herein lawfully entitling Applicant to divert water, which will be supplemented and augmented by water leased herein. If Applicant intends to divert through a well, it must be understood by Applicant that no right to divert exists until a valid well permit is obtained from the Colorado Division of Water Resources. 2. Quantity: Water applied for by the Applicant in the amount set forth above shall be diverted at Applicant's point of diversion from the District's direct flow water rights, and when water is unavailable for diversion pursuant to administration by the Colorado State Engineer during periods when said direct flow water right is not in priority, the District shall release for the use of Applicant up to said quantity in acre feet per year of storage water owned or controlled by the District. It is understood that any quantity allotted from direct flow, storage or otherwise, to the Applicant by the District will be limited by the priority of the District's decrees and by the physical and legal availability of water from District's sources. Any quantity allotted will only be providedso_long as water is available and the Applicant fully complies with all of the terms and conditions of this Contract. The District and the Applicant recognize that some of the District's decrees may be in the name of the Colorado River Water Conservation District, and the ability of the District to allot direct flow right to the Applicant may be dependent on the consent of the Colorado River Water Conservation District. if at any time the Applicant determines it requires less water than the amount herein provided, Applicant may so notify the District in writing, and the amount of water allotted under this Contract shall be reduced permanently in accordance with such notice. Rates shall be adjusted accordingly in following water years only. 3. Beneficial Use and Location of Beneficial Use: Any and all water allotted Applicant by the District shall be used for the following beneficial use or uses: industrial, municipal, domestic and related uses, or commercial (except for commercial use from Alsbury Reservoir and except to the extent that Ruedi Reservoir water may not be available for commercial as that term is defined on Page 5 of Contract No. 2-07-70-W0547 between the United States and the West Divide Water Conservancy District). Applicant's beneficial use of any and all water allotted shall be within or through facilities or upon land owned, leased, operated, or under Applicant's control. 4. Decrees and Delivery: Exchange releases made by the District out of storage from Ruedi Reservoir, Green Mountain Reservoir, Alsbury Reservoir, or other works or facilities of the District, or from other sources available to the District, shall be delivered to the Applicant at the outlet works of said storage facilities or at the decreed point of diversion for said other sources, and release or delivery of water at 1 such outlet or points shall constitute performance of the District's total obligation. Delivery of water by the District from Ruedi Reservoir or Green Mountain Reservoir shall be subject to the District's lease contracts with the United States Bureau of Reclamation. Releases from other facilities available to District shall be subject to the contracts, laws, rules, and regulations governing releases therefrom. Furthermore, the District hereby expressly reserves the right to store water and to make exchange releases from structures that may be built or controlled by the District in the future, so long as the water service to the Applicant pursuant to this agreement, is not impaired by said action. Any quantity of the Applicant's allocation not delivered to or used by Applicant by the end of each water year (October 1), shall revert to the water supplies of the District. Such reversion shall not entitle Applicant to any refund of payment made for such water. Water service provided by the District shall be limited to the amount of water available in priority at the original point of diversion of the District's applicable water right, and neither the District, nor those entitled to utilize the District's decrees, may call on any greater amount at new or alternate points of diversion. The District shall request the Colorado Division of Water Resources to estimate any conveyance losses between the original point and any alternate point, and such estimate shall be deducted from this amount in each case. Water service provided by the District for properties located within the Bluestone and Silt Water Conservancy Districts is provided pursuant to Agreements with said Districts. The Intergovernmental Agreement between the District and the Silt Water Conservancy District, dated January 25, 2001, is recorded as Reception No. 575691, Garfield County Clerk and Recorder's Office. The Intergovernmental Memorandum of Understanding between the District and the Bluestone Water Conservancy District, dated April 26, 2001, is recorded as Reception No. 584840, Garfield County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 5. Alternate Point of Diversion and Plan of Augmentation: Decrees for alternate points of diversion of the District's water rights or storage water may be required in order for Applicant to use the water service contemplated hereunder. Obtaining such decree is the exclusive responsibility of Applicant. The District reserves the right to review and approve any conditions which may be attached to judicial approval of said alternate point of diversion as contemplated or necessary to serve Applicant's facilities or lands. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be solely responsible for the procedures and legal engineering costs necessary for any changes in water rights contemplated herein, and further agrees to indemnify the District from any costs or losses related thereto. Applicant is solely responsible for providing works and facilities necessary to obtain/divert the waters at said alternate point of diversion and deliver them to Applicant's intended beneficial use. Irrespective of the amount of water actually transferred to the Applicant's point of diversion, the Applicant shall make annual payments to the District based upon the amount of water allotted under this Contract. In the event the Applicant intends to apply for an alternate point of diversion and to develop an augmentation plan and institute legal proceedings for the approval of such augmentation plan to allow the Applicant to utilize the water allotted to Applicant hereunder, the Applicant shall give the District written notice of such intent. In the event the Applicant develops and adjudicates its own augmentation plan to utilize the water allotted hereunder, Applicant shall not be obligated to pay any amount under Paragraph 19 below. In any event, the District shall have the right to approve or disapprove the Applicant's augmentation plan and the Applicant shall provide the District copies of such plan and of all pleadings and other papers filed with the water court in the adjudication thereof. 6. Contract Payment: Non-refundable, one time administrative charge, in the amount determined by the Board of Directors of the District from time to time, shall be submitted with the application for consideration by the District. 2 Annual payment for the water service described herein shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the District. The initial annual payment shall be made in full, within thirty (30) days after the date of notice to the Applicant that the initial payment is due. Said notice will advise the Applicant, among other things, of the water delivery year to which the initial payment shall apply and the price which is applicable to that year. Annual payments for each year thereafter shall be due and payable by the Applicant on or before each January 1. If an annual payment is not made by the due date a flat $50 late fee will be assessed. Final written notice prior to cancellation will be sent certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Applicant at such address as may be designated by the Applicant in writing or set forth in this Contract or Application. Water use for any part of a water year shall require payment for the entire water year. Nothing herein shall be construed so as to prevent the District from adjusting the annual rate in its sole discretion for future years only. If payment is not made within fifteen (15) days after the date of said written notice, Applicant shall at District's sole option have no further right, title or interest under this Contract without further notice, and delivery may be immediately curtailed. The allotment of water, as herein made, may be transferred, leased, or otherwise disposed of at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the District. Upon cancellation of this water allotment Contract with the District, the District shall notify the Division of Water Resources offices in Denver and Glenwood Springs. The Division of Water Resources may then order cessation of all water use. 7. Additional Fees and Costs: Applicant agrees to defray any expenses incurred by the District in connection with the allotment of water rights hereunder, including, but not limited to, reimbursement of legal and engineering costs incurred in connection with any water rights and adjudication necessary to allow Applicant's use of such allotted water rights. 8. Assignment: This Contract shall not inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors or assigns of Applicant, without the prior written consent of the District's Board of Directors. Any assignment of Applicant's rights under this Contract shall be subject to, and must comply with, such requirements as the District may hereafter adopt regarding assignment of Contract rights and the assumption of Contract obligations by assignees and successors. Nothing herein shall prevent successors to a portion of Applicant's property from applying to the District for individual and separate allotment Contracts. No assignment shall be recognized by the District except upon completion and filing of proper forms for assignment and change of ownership. In the event the water allotted pursuant to this Contract is to be used for the benefit of land which is now or will subsequently be subdivided or held in separate ownership, the Applicant may only assign the Applicant's rights hereunder to: 1) No more than three separate owners all of whom shall be party to a well sharing agreement satisfactory to the District; or 2) A homeowners association, water district, water and sanitation district or other special district properly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Colorado, and then, only if such parties, association or special district establishes to the satisfaction of the District that it has the ability and authority to perform the Applicant's obligations under this Contract. In no event shall the owner of a portion, but Tess than all, of the Applicant's property to be served under this Contract have any rights hereunder, except as such rights may exist pursuant to a well sharing agreement or through a homeowners association or special district as provided above. Upon the sale of the real property to which this Contract pertains, Applicant shall make buyer aware of this Contract and proper forms for assignment and change of ownership must be completed, 3 9. Other Rules: Applicant shall be bound by the provisions of the Water Conservancy Act of Colorado; by the rules and regulations of the Board of Directors of the District; and all amendments thereof and supplements thereto and by all other applicable law. 10. Operation and Maintenance Agreement: Applicant shall enter into an "Operation and Maintenance Agreement" with the District under terms and conditions determined by the board of Directors of the District, if and when, the Board of said District determines in its sole discretion that such an agreement is required. Said agreement may contain, but shall not be limited to, provisions for additional annual monetary consideration for extension of District delivery services and for additional administration, operation, and maintenance costs; or for other costs to the District which may arise through services made available to the Applicant. 11. Chance of Use: The District reserves the exclusive right to review, reapprove or disapprove any proposed change in use of the water allotted hereunder. Any use other than that set forth herein or any lease or sale of the water or water rights allotted hereunder without the prior written approval of the District shall be deemed to be a material breach of this Contract. 12. Use and Place of Use: Applicant agrees to use the water in the manner and on the property described in the documents submitted to the District at the time this Contract is executed, or in any operation and maintenance agreement provided by Applicant. Any use other than as set forth thereon or any lease or sale of the water or water rights herein, other than as permitted in paragraph 8 above, shall be deemed to be a material breach of this agreement. 13. Title: It is understood and agreed that nothing herein shall be interpreted to give the Applicant any equitable or legal fee title interest in or to any water or water rights referred to herein. 14. Conservation: Applicant shall use commonly accepted conservation practices with respect to the water and water rights herein, and hereby agrees to be bound by any conservation plan adopted hereafter by the District for use of District owned or controlled water or water rights. 15. Restrictions: Applicant shall restrict actual diversions to not exceed the contract amount for ordinary household purposes, the watering of domestic livestock, fire protection, and the irrigation of lawn and garden as specified in the Application. Applicant shall also comply with all restrictions and limitations set forth in the well permit obtained from the Colorado Division of Water Resources. Watering of livestock shall be restricted to Applicant's domestic animals not to be used for commercial purposes unless Applicant obtains approval from the Colorado Division of Water Resources for commercial use/livestock watering, provided that in no event shall actual diversions exceed the amount of water provided by this Contract. Violation of this paragraph 15 shall be deemed to be a material breach of this Contract. 16. Well Permit: If Applicant intends to divert through a well, then Applicant must provide to District a copy of Applicant's valid well permit before District is obligated to deliver any water hereunder. 17. Measuring Devine or Meter; Applicant agrees to provide, at its own expense, a measuring device deemed acceptable by the District's Engineer after consultation. or a totalizing flow meter with remote readout to continuously and accurately measure at all times all 4 water diverted pursuant to the terns of Applicant's water right and the terms of this Contract. Applicant agrees to provide accurate readings from such device or meter to District upon District's request. Applicant acknowledges that failure to comply with this paragraph could result in legal action to terminate Applicant's diversion of water by the State of Colorado Division of Water Resources. By signing this Contract, Applicant hereby specifically allows District, through its authorized agent, to enter upon Applicant's property during ordinary business hours for the purposes of determining Applicant's actual use of water. 18. Representations: By executing this Contract, Applicant agrees that it is not relying on any legal or engineering advice that Applicant may believe has been received from the District. Applicant further acknowledges that it has obtained all necessary legal and engineering advice from Applicant's own sources other than the District. Applicant further acknowledges that the District makes no guarantees, warranties, or assurances whatsoever about the quantity or quality of water available pursuant to this Contract. Should the District be unable to provide the water contracted for herein, no damages may be assessed against the District, nor may Applicant obtain a refund from the District. 19. Costs of Water Court Filing and Augmentation Plan: Should the District, in its own discretion, choose to include Applicant's Contract herein in a water court filing for alternate point of diversion or plan of augmentation, then Applicant hereby agrees to pay to the District, when assessed, an additional fee representing the District's actual and reasonable costs and fees for Applicant's share of the proceedings. Applicant shall be assessed a pro -rata share of the total cost incurred by the District in preparing, filing and pursuing to decree the water court case. The pro -rata share shall be calculated by dividing such total cost by the number of contractees included in the filing. To the extent that the District is caused additional costs because of objection filed specifically due to the inclusion of Applicant's Contract in the filing, such additional costs may be charged specifically to Applicant and not shared on a pro -rata basis by all contractees. 20. Binding Agreement: This agreement shall not be complete nor binding upon the District unless attached hereto is the form entitled "Application to Lease Water From West Divide Water Conservancy District" fully completed by Applicant and approved by the District's engineer. Said attachments shall by this reference thereto be incorporated into the terms of this agreement. All correspondence from the District to Applicant referring to or relating to this agreement is by this reference incorporated into this agreement as further terms and conditions of this agreement. 21. Warning: IT I5 THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO OBTAIN A VALID WELL PERMIT OR OTHER WATER RIGHT M ORDER TO DIVERT WATER, INCLUDING THE WATER ACQUIRED UNDER THIS CONTRACT. IT IS THE CONTINUING DUTY OF THE APPLICANT TO MAINTAIN THE VALIDITY OF THE WELL PERMIT OR WATER RIGHT INCLUDING FILING FOR EXTENSIONS OF PERMITS, FILING WELL COMPLETION REPORTS, FILING STATEMENTS OF BENEFICIAL USE, OR OTHERWISE LAWFULLY APPLYING THE WATER TO BENEFICIAL USE ON A REGULAR BASIS WITHOUT WASTE. 22. AREA S. CONTRACTS: IF APPLICANTS WELL OR OTHER WATER RIGHT THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS CONTRACT IS LOCATED OUTSIDE "AREA A" AS DESIGNATED BY THE DISTRICT, THEN THIS PARAGRAPH APPLIES: THE AUGMENTATION WATER PROVIDED BY THE DISTRICT UNDER THIS CONTRACT MAY ONLY PROTECT APPLICANT'S WATER RIGHT FROM A CALL ON THE COLORADO RIVER AND MAY NOT PROTECT APPLICANT FROM A CALL FROM ANY OTI-EER SENIOR RIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION OTHERWISE IS MADE BY THE DISTRICT. IF THIS ISA CONCERN TO APPLICANT, THIS CONTRACT MAY BE RESCINDED UPON WRITTEN NOTICE DELIVERED TO THE DISTRICT BY THE APPLICANT WITHIN THE NEXT 30 DAYS FOLLOWING THE AFFIXING OF SIGNATURES ON THIS CONTRACT IN WHICH EVENT ALL SUMS PAID BY APPLICANT FOR THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REFUNDED TO APPLICANT. 5 s Applic: "' Applicant STATE OF apt/CAA COUNTY OF ) ss. ) pi e foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this LLie day of `f)<_ CDAS . Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expir Emboamd Kerma b I SW of Catwado N¢taTY ptibWe Sell *Comerdssion Expires Naar*/ 04, 2008 MOLE 6. MUNI' , 20 Notary Public STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF _ ) • by The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of 201 , by . Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public ORDER After a hearing by the Board of Directors of the West Divide Water Conservancy District on the Application, it is hereby ORDERED that said Application be granted and this Contract shall be and is accepted by the District. ATTEST: ey<Zie .� Secretary WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT By LG1 President Date This Contract includes and is subject to the terms and conditions of the following documents which must accompany this Contract: 1. Map showing location of point of diversion (use map provided) 2. Application and Data Form fully completed and signed The printed portions of this form, except differentiated additions or deletions, have been approved and adopted by the West Divide Water Conservancy District. Form I#WDWCD 050901 CONTRACT. 6 Prepared for: Prepared by: UPDATED WATER SUPPLY REPORT QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Jody Daniels 176 GH Daniels Blvd. Gypsum, Colorado 81637 Greg Hasenberg 1155 Quicksilver Way Rifle, Colorado 81650 Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. 1565 Gilpin St. Denver, Colorado 80218 (303) 321-8335 Job No. 720.1 Quicksilver Court Subdivision Water Supply Plan UPDATED WATER SUPPLY REPORT QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION GRAND COUNTY, COLORADO Original: April 16, 2008 Updated: October 2, 2008 ..{nes L. Jehn, C.P.G. President 1 Gina L. Burke, C.G.W.P. Senior Project Manager/Principal II Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. Quicksilver Court Subdivision Water Supply Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION 2 III. WATER DEMAND 3 IV. WATER SUPPLY 4 V. WATER QUALITY 7 VI. CONCLUSIONS 8 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Property Location Map LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Estimated Demands Table 2 Water Quality Summary APPENDICES Appendix A Existing Well Permits Appendix B Drawdown and Recovery Plots Appendix C West Divide Water Conservancy District Contract III Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. Quicksilver Court Subdivision Water Supply Plan I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Report sets forth the results of a water supply investigation and impact analysis that was conducted as part of the Subdivision Application for the Quicksilver Court Subdivision. The Application supports the development of up to 7 lots and 12 domestic units on approximately 80 acres in Garfield County, Colorado. The projected annual demands are approximately 8.22 acre-feet, which can be adequately met from the existing on-site water supply wells. Tests were conducted to determine aquifer parameters and analyses were completed to determine the existence of a reliable water supply. Water quality samples were collected from two of the proposed water supply wells to meet the County's requirements for the Subdivision. As a result of the analyses and testing, it was determined that the ground water from the existing wells on the property is more than adequate in quantity and quality to supply water for the planned Quicksilver Court Subdivision. 1 Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. Quicksilver Court Subdivision Water Supply Plan II. INTRODUCTION The Quicksilver Court Subdivision, located in Sections 22 and 27, Township 6 South, Range 93 West, 6th P.M. (Figure 1) is anticipated to be developed into 7 lots, each with one dwelling unit. Five of the lots will also have one accessory dwelling unit. This Report presents the studies and analyses to provide Garfield County with the necessary information regarding the quantity, quality, and dependability of the water supply for the proposed Quicksilver Court Subdivision in support of the Subdivision Application. Projected demands of the Subdivision are estimated, the source of the water supply to meet the proposed demands of the Project is presented, and results of pumping tests conducted on the Property are provided. Results of the water quality analyses of the proposed supply are also presented. 2 Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. Quicksilver Court Subdivision Water Supply Plan III. WATER DEMAND The demands for the Quicksilver Court Subdivision may consist of up to 12 dwelling units which include 5 accessory dwelling units, irrigation of approximately 7,000 square -feet of lawn and garden per lot and up to a total of 17 horses (7 total lots proposed). A pond is also planned for the Subdivision with a surface area of approximately 0.23 acres. Table 1 shows the estimated demands for the Subdivision which includes the calculated evaporation from the pond. The water demands for the Subdivision, as shown in Table 1, are based on Garfield County Regulations and standards utilized by West Divide Water Conservancy District. The overall usage is estimated to be 8.22 acre-feet per year (af/yr). The three existing ground water wells are planned to be utilized to meet the total demand. The maximum average daily demand per well is anticipated to be 2,448 gallons, or an average of 1.70 gallons per minute (gpm), based on the maximum annual demand of 2.74 af/yr per well. 3 Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. Quicksilver Court Subdivision Water Supply Plan IV. WATER SUPPLY The proposed Quicksilver Court Subdivision will be supplied by water from three existing wells located on the Property. The three existing wells are Daniels Well No. 1 (Permit No. 67565-F), Daniels Well No. 2 (Permit No. 67566-F) and the Hasenberg Well No. 1 (Permit No. 67567-F). It is proposed in the pending Subdivision Application that Daniels Well No. 1 will serve Lots 4 and 5 (a total of four units), Daniels Well No. 2 will serve Lots 6 and 7 (a total of four units) and Hasenberg Well No. 1 will serve Lots 1, 2 and 3 (a total of four units). The locations of the three existing wells are shown on Figure 1 and copies of the well permits and construction reports are included in Appendix A. Daniels Well No. 1 was drilled and completed on January 16, 2008 to a depth of 195 feet. Prior to the start of the pumping test, the static water level in the well was approximately 118 feet below top of well casing. Daniels Well No. 2 was drilled and completed on March 10, 1999 to a depth of 223 feet. The static water level in the well prior to the test was approximately 119 feet below top of well casing. The Hasenberg Well No. 1 was drilled and completed on January 26, 1999 to a depth of 194 feet. The static water level in the well prior to the test was approximately 113 feet below top of well casing. Pumping Tests Dynotek Slimline Submersible Pressure Transducers were installed for monitoring purposes in the existing wells, and were utilized to collect water levels during the pumping tests for the Quicksilver Court Subdivision. Beginning at 10:50 A.M. on February 12, 2008, a 17 -hour continuous rate pumping test was begun at a rate of 4.2 gpm at Daniels Well No. 1. During the test, the pumping rate was continuously adjusted to maintain as close to 4 gpm as possible. A totalizing flow meter was installed on the discharge. The transducer was set to record relatively continuous water level data. Water level data was recorded for an additional 31 hours following the pump test at Daniels Well No. 1. At the end of the 17 hours, the total drawdown in the pumped well was 73 feet. 4 Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. Quicksilver Court Subdivision Water Supply Plan The second test was conducted on Daniels Well No. 2 for approximately three hours. The test was started at 10:45 A.M. on February 13, 2008. The plan was to complete a 4 -hour test. During the first almost 2 hours of the test, the well was pumped at approximately 4 gpm. A very slight drawdown was detected in the down -hole transducer near the 2 -hour point in the test, so it was decided to increase the pumping rate of the test after allowing the water level to recover for about 2.5 hours. For approximately one hour, Daniels Well No. 2 was pumped at an average rate of almost 9 gpm. Due to the increase in pumping, the total drawdown in the pumped well was 78 feet at the end of the three hours. Water level data was recorded for an additional 18 hours following the second pump test at Daniels Well No. 2. The third test was conducted on the Hasenberg Well No. 1. Beginning at 3:15 P.M. on February 13, 2008, a 4 -hour continuous rate pumping test was conducted at a rate of approximately 3 gpm. Water level data was recorded for an additional 15 hours following the pump test at the Hasenberg Well No. 1. At the end of the 4 hours, the total drawdown in the pumped well was 54 feet. During all three pumping tests the other two non -pumping wells were also monitored for drawdown. There was no drawdown affects recorded at the non -pumping wells during any of the pumping tests. Pump Test Results and Aquifer Parameters The electronic drawdown, recovery and pumping data were downloaded from the transducer devices and reduced to a spreadsheet format for analysis. The Theis confined methodology was utilized to analyze drawdown and recovery data for interpretation of aquifer parameters. Results of those analyses indicate an average transmissivity value of 53 gallons per day per foot (gpd/ft) for the underlying aquifer. Graphs showing the pumping test drawdown and recovery plots are included in Appendix B. The pumping tests are a standardized method of determining aquifer parameters by measuring the drawdown and recovery capabilities of the wells over the pumping period. 5 Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. Quicksilver Court Subdivision Water Supply Plan As a result of the pumping tests analyses, each of the three wells are capable of producing the required average annual yield of 1.70 gpm (2.74 of/yr) needed for the water supply to meet the development's demands. G Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. Quicksilver Court Subdivision Water Supply Plan V. WATER QUALITY Water quality samples were collected from Hasenberg Well No. 1 and Daniels Well No. 2 on February 13, 2008. Due to holding time issues, a sample was not analyzed from Daniels Well No. 1. Per Garfield County Regulations, the samples were tested for Nitrate, Nitrite and Total Coliform. Field parameters: pH, conductivity and temperature, were also collected and these results are indicative of normal drinking water quality. The Nitrate and Nitrite analyses meet the State and Federal Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for Drinking Water. Total Coliform was detected from Daniels Well No. 2. Since this well is 223 feet in depth it is unlikely that coliform exists in the well, and it is the authors' belief that the Total Coliform was from sampling contamination. It was recommended that a second sample be taken prior to development to confirm this belief. On August 14, 2008, a second water quality sample was collected from Daniels Well No. 2. The sample was analyzed by Eagle River Water and Sanitation District. The sample was found to be absent for Total Coliform and E.coli. Table 2 is a summary of the water quality results. 7 John Water Consultants, Inc. Quicksilver Court Subdivision Water Supply Plan VI. CONCLUSIONS Currently, Daniels Well No. 1, Daniels Well No. 2 and Hasenberg Well No. 1 are all augmented by the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the demands discussed herein. The West Divide Water Conservancy District Contract No. 070215GD(b) is attached as Appendix C to this Report. Three well tests were completed on the existing wells within the proposed Subdivision. All tests show that the wells are capable of producing the required average annual yield of 1.70 gpm. During the pumping tests, no drawdown was observed at the other two wells in the proposed Subdivision, indicating no interference between wells during pumping. Water quality samples obtained from the wells indicated detections of Nitrate and Nitrite below MCLs and the absence of Total Coliform. As a result of our site-specific investigations, it is our professional opinion that the Quicksilver Court Subdivision has more than adequate ground water resources to support the proposed development. 0 Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. y _ _ VA8j •• R1f 6108 TSS R A S 5 M S A Daniels Well #1 (Permit No. 67565-F) `rte Daniels Well #2 (Permit No. 67566-F) Hasenberg Well #1 (Permit No. 67567-F) f 2 7 400 R93W/- Sources: USGS 7.5' Quadrangles Rifle, CO, Photorevised 1982, Contour Interval 40 ft. No. Mamm Peak, CO, Photorevised 1982, Contour Interval 40 ft. Parcel information courtesy Garfield Co., Colorado Projection: UTM NAD83 S Legend Quicksilver Court Subdivision Job No. 720.1 0 Prepared By: KCD 04/11/2008 Updated: KCD 10/02/2008 Checked By: GLB 04/11/2008 Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. 1565 Gilpin Street Denver, CO 80218 (303) 321-8335 (303) 321-8346 fax 1,000 1 inch equals 1,000 feet 2,000 Feet Quicksilver Court Subdivision P •I D.jth N n e ni b"ro develoomenlIGISIZQW2008 Uoda]edPicA[v LoSacion mxd Figure 1 TABLE 1 ESTIMATED WATER DEMANDS Quicksilver Court Subdivision gpd/pers People Use per per unit unit (gpd) No. Units Total Demand (aflyr) In-house Uses (1) 100 3.5 350 12 4.71 ft/yr Total Demand SgttiLot No. Lots (aflyr) Irrigation (2) 2.35 7,000 7 2.64 Total Demand gpd/horse No. of Horses (aflyr) Horse Watering (3) 11 17 0.21 Surface Area Total Demand ft/yr (acres) (ailyr) Pond Evaporation `.1 2.87 0.23 0.66 Total Demand (af/yr) 8.22 Met by three existing wells Total Demand per Well (af/yr) 2.74 Average Rate per Well (gpm) 1.70 Notes: (1) In-house uses include 7 dwelling units and 5 accessory dwelling units 100 gpd per person use value per Subdivision Regulations of Garfield County, CO of 1984 (2) Irrigation application rate from WDWCD worksheet (3) Assumed 2 horses per lot (7 Tots) and 11 gpd per horse per WDWCD worksheet (4) Pond surface area planned to be 10,000 sqft and for calculation purposes was assumed to always be full. Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. April 16, 2008 Job No. 720.1 TABLE 2 UPDATED WATER QUALITY SAMPLING SUMMARY Quicksilver Court Subdivision Samples Collected 2/13/2008 & 08/14/08 Parameter Measured Concentration Maximum Contaminant Units Daniels Well #1 Hasenberg Well #1 Daniels Well #2(1) Level (MCL))2 Nitrate (as N) mg/L N/A 0.25 0.41 10 Nitrite (as N; mg/L N/A ND ND 1 No more than one colifcrm- Total Coliform Absent/Presenl N/A Absent Absent positive sample per montt pH* pH units 7.78 8.06 8.13 6.5 to 8.5 Electrical Conductivity' pS/cm 665 600 610 NS Temperature' °F 53.0 51.6 54.0 NS NOTES: (1) Total Coliform sampled on 08/14/OE (2) MCL values obtained form the CDPHE, Laboratory Services Divisior N/A - Indicates that a sample was not submitted to Evergreen Analytical for analysis because of holding time constraints. ND - Parameter analyzed for but not detected. * Indicates that the parameter was measured in the field. NS - No standard. Bold and red indicates that the sample exceeded the MCL. September 15, 2008 Jehn Water Consultants, Inc Job No. 720 1 APPENDIX A Form No. GWS -25 APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial I3Idg.. 1313 She:rnan St Denver. ColoN.irio 80703 (303) 866-3581 GH DANIELS III 176 GH DANIELS BLVD GYPSUM, CO 81637- (970) 471-0920 Arot-- icVIDAMQInAi r1F I ICF nr AN FXigTINC; wNFI I Easting: Northing: EXST WELL PERMIT NUMBER 67565 -F DIV. 5 WD45 DES. BASIN MD Lot: 2 Block: Filing: Subdiv: GRASS MESA RANCH APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY SE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 22 Township 6 S Range 93 W Sixth P.M, DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 214 Ft. from South 1995 Ft. from West Section Line Section Line UTM COORDINATES (Meters,Zone:13,NAD83) ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado River, on the condition that the well shall be operated only when the West Divide Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect, and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract #070215GD(b) (amended April 17, 2008). 4) Approved for the use of, an existing well, constructed on January 16, 2008, to a depth of 195 feet, with a pump being installed July 18, 2008, under permit no. 276142 (canceled). Issuance of this permit hereby cancels permit no. 276142. 5) Approved as a well on a tract of land of 39,9 acres described as lot 2, Grass Mesa Ranch division of land, Garfield County. 6) The use of ground water from this well is limited to fire protection, ordinary household purposes inside two (2) single family dwellings, two (2) accessory dwellings units, the irrigation of not more than 14,000 square feet (0.32 of an acre) of home gardens and lawns, the watering of four (4) head domestic animals, filling, refilling and storage of a pond and evaporation of a pond (surface area being 0.23 of an acre). Storage, filling and refilling of the pond may be from this well (Daniels Well no. 1) or Daniels Well no. 2 or in combination with Daniels Well nos. 1 and 2. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. This well is known as Daniels Well no. 1. 7) The pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 8) The combined average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated by this well (Daniels Well no. 1) and Daniels Well no. 2 (permit no. 67566-F) and Hasenberg Well no. 1 (permit no. 67567-F) shall not exceed 8.34 acre-feet. 9) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 10) This well shall be located riot more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit and at least 600 feet from any existing well, completed in the same aquifer, that is not owned by the applicant. 11) Totalizing flow meters must be installed on this well (Daniels Well no, 1) and Daniels Well no. 2 (permit no. 67566-F) and Hasenberg Well no. 1 (permit no. 67567-F), and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request, NOTE: Use of ground water from this well (Daniels Well no. 1), Daniels Well no. 2 (permit no. 67566-F) and Hasenberg Well no. 1 (permit no. 67567-F) shall be operated pursuant lo WDWCD contract no. 070215GD(B) (amended April 17, 2008). NOTE: Canceled permit no. 276142 was previously issued for this well. 7v - NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2177-223-00-463 0 Q ? -' �, on<,g NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R247345 (totaling 39.87 acres) APPROVED i.. DMW.. r State Engineer By Receipt No. 9503038A DATE ISSUED 09-30-2008 EXPIRATION DATE Form No. GWS -25 APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial etdg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 GEORGE H DANIELS Ili 176 GH DANIELS BLVD GYPSUM, CO 81637- (970) 471-0920 PERMIT TO CONSTRICT A WELL 095 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 276142 DIV. 5 WD45 DES. BASIN MD Lot: 2 Block: Filing: Subdiv: GRASS MESA RANCH APPROVED WEL L LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY SE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 22 Township 6 S Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 214 Ft. from South Section Line 1995 Ft. from West Section Line UTM COORDINATES (Meters Zone:13,NAO83) Easting: Northing: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does hot ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right From seeking relief in a civil court action, 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(I) for uses as described in CRS 37-92-602(1)(1). Use of this well is limited to monitoring water levels and/or water quality sampling. This well is known as Daniels Monitoring/Observation Well no. 1. 4) Approved as a well on a Tract of land of 39.87 acres described as lot 2, Grass Mesa Ranch division of land, Garfield County. 5) This well must be equipped with a locking cap or seal to prevent well contamination or possible hazards as an open well. The well must be kept capped and locked al al limes except during sampling or measuring. 6) Records of water level measurements and water quality analyses shall be maintained by the well owner and submitted to the Division of Water Resources upon request. 7) Upon conclusion of the monitoring program the well owner shall plug this well In accordance with Rule 16 of the Water Well Construction Rules. A Well Abandonment Report must be completed end submitted to the Division of Water Resources within 60 days of plugging. 8) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with the well permit number and name of aquifer as appropriate, and shall take necessary means and precautions 10 preserve these markings. 9) This well must oe consliucled by or undor the supervision of a licensed well driller or other authorized individual according to the Water Well Censbuction Rules. If nen-standard construction is anticipated, a variance request must be submitted in accordance with Rule 18 and approved prior to well construction. 10) A Well Construction and Test Report (Form GWS -31), including lithologic log must be submitted by the individual authorized to construct the well. For non-standard construction, the report must include an as -buil drawing showing details such as depth, casing, perforated zones, and a description of the grouting type and interval. 11) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 12) Issuance of this permit does not guarantee that this well can be converted to a production well under a future permit. The ability of this well to be converted to a production well is limited by all governing statutes, rules, regulations, orders, and/or decrees. NOTE: Permit no. 66062-F was prevlously Issued for this lot NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2177.223-00-463 7 NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number. R247345 APPROVED DMW Stale Moineer ,.Receil)t No 9502958 DATE ISSUED 12-04-2007 B EXPIRATION DME 12-04-2009 Y Tuesday, March 11, 2008 max WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER FOR OFFICE. IISE ONLY APPROVAL t1 GWS31-91-03 I • i WELL PERMIT NUMBER 276142 2 I Owner Name(s): George Daniels Mailing Address: 176 GI -I Daniels Blvd City, State, Zip : Gypsum, CO 81637 Phone if WELL LOCATION AS DR[1,I ED SE 1/4 SW 1/4 Sec: 22 Twp: 6 S Range: 93 W DISTANCES FROM SEC. LINES 330 ft. from South Sec. line and 1835 ft. from West Sec. line OR Easting: Northing: SUBDIVISION: Grass Mesa Ranches LOT: 2 BLOCK: FILING (UNIT): STREET ADDRESS AT LOCATION 4 GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ft. DRILLING METHOD Air Rotary DATE COMPLETED: 1/16/2008 TOTAL DEPTH: 195 DEPTH COMPLETION: 195 5. GEOLOGIC LOG 6. HOI.P. DIAMETER (in) FROM (11) TO (11) Depth Type of Material (Size, Color. and Type) 9.0 0 40 000-180 Clays, Volcanic Rocks 6.5 40 195 180-195 Wasatch Formation 7. PLAIN CASING 0D (in) Kind Wall Siu Fmm (11) To (R) 7.0 Steel 0.240 1 40 5.5 PVC 0.250 35 135 5.5 PVC 0.250 180 195 PERF. CASING Screen Slot Size --1 5.5 PVC 0.250 135 180 I Water Located: 135, 180 Remarks : 8. Filter Pack Material : Size : Interval : 9. Packer Placement Type : Depth : 10. GROUTING RECORD Material Amount Density interval Placement Cement 5 sks 6 gal/sk I 0-40 poured 11. DISINFECTION : Type : HTH Amt. Used : 3 oz. 12. WELL TEST DATA : () Check Box IfTest Data Is Submitted On Supplemental TESTING METHOD : Air Compressor Static Level : 122 ft_ Date/Time Measured 1/16/2008 Production Kate 5 gpm Pumping Level : Total. ft, Date/Time Measured 1/16/2008 Tost Length : 2 hours Test Remarks : 13 ] hive foul the slatemctttl mark I1,Y�n tit ow Ctc ceaa tits tluroof, and tl��' itc} are true to my knowledge. (Pursuant to Section 24-4-1-4 (13xa) CRS. the making of false stltcmcrts cam•* riap a m the s coal daree puatth hir as a class 1 misde +:a7p ) CONTRAC`OR : Sheltnn Chilling Corp. Phone : (970) 927-4182 Mailing Address : P.O. Box 1059 Basalt,, o. 81621 Lic. No. 1095 Name / Title (Pease Type or Print) Wayne Shelton / President SignatureDate r1 /22/2008 yid r J Tuesday, March 11, 2008.max Form No. GWS -25 APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 81'3 c:entenn al FiEdg . 1313 Sherman Si.. Denver. Calnran❑ 30203 (303) 866-3581 DANIELS GH III 176 GH DANIELS BLVD GYPSUM, CO 81637- (970) 471-0920 PERMIT TO USE AN EXISTING WELI EXST WELL PERMIT NUMBER 67566 - F DIV. 5 WD45 DES. BASIN MD Lot: 2 Block: Filing: Subdiv: GRASS MESA RANCH APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY SE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 22 Township 6 S Range 93 W Sixth RM. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 125 Ft. from South Section Line 3190 Ft. from East Section Line UTM COORDINATES fMeters,Zone:13,NAD83) Easting: Northing: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CPNDITIIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be. in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado River, on the condition that the well shall be operated only when the West Divide Water Conservancy Districts substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect, and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract #070215GD(b) (amended April 17, 2008). 4) Approved for the use of, an existing well, constructed on March 10, 1999, to a depth of 223 feet under monitoring hole notice MH -35741 and later permitted for use with a pump being installed on July 18, 2008, under permit no. 66062-F (canceled) . Issuance of the permit hereby cancels permit no. 66062-F. 5) Approved as a well on a tract of land of 39.9 acres described as lot 2, Grass Mesa Ranch division of land, Garfield County. 6) The use of ground water from this well is limited to fire protection, ordinary household purposes inside two (2) single family dwellings, two (2) accessory dwellings units, the irrigation of not more than 14,000 square feet (0.32 of an acre) of home gardens and lawns, the watering of four (4) head domestic animals, filling, refilling and storage of a pond and evaporation of a pond (surface area being 0.23 of an acre). Storage, filling and refilling of the pond may be from this well (Daniels Well no. 2) or Daniels Well no. 1 or in combination with Daniels Well nos. 1 and 2. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. This well is known as Daniels Well no. 2. 7) The pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 8) The combined average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated by this well (Daniels Well no. 2) and Daniels Well no. 1 (permit no. 67505-F) and Hasenberg Well no. 1 (permit no. 67567-F shall not exceed 8.34 acre-feet. 9) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 10) This well shall be located not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit and at least 600 feet from any existing well, completed in the same aquifer, that is not owned by the applicant. 11) Totalizing flow meters must be installed on this well (Daniels Well no. 2) and Daniels Well no. 1 (permit no. 67565-F) and Hasenberg Well no. 1 (permit no. 67567-F), and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. NOTE: Use of ground water from this well (Daniels Well no. 2), Daniels Well no. 1 (permit no. 67565-F) and Hasenberg Well no. 1 (permit no. 67567-F) shall be operated pursuant to WDWCD contract no. 070215GD(B) (amended April 17, 2008).�.-- NOTE: Canceled permit no. 66062-F was previously issued for this well. NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2177-223-00-463 NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R247345 (totaling 39.87 acres) `7.f3,n1.-7 /ass APPROVED DMW Receipt No. 9503156 1.4j;State Engineer By DATE ISSUED 09-30-2008 EXPIRATION DATE 9�r ORDER OF THE STATE ENGINEER IN THE MATTER OF WELL PERMIT NO. 66062-F LOCATION: SE 1/4, SW 1/4, SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 93 WEST, 6th P.M. APPLICANT: GH DANIELS III THE STATE ENGINEER FINDS: The well pennit was issued on July 27, 2007, with an expiration date of July 27, 2008. A well construction report was submitted on April 14, 1999, indicating that the well was constructed on March 10, 1999, to a depth of 223 feet, under monitoring hole notice MH -35741 and later permitted for use of an existing well, under permit no. 66062-F with a pump being installed July 18, 2008. On September 30, 2008, the current well owner (GH Daniels III) submitted an application to change the use of the existing well permit no. 66062-F. The new permit (permit no. 67566-F) allows for the change of use of the well (Daniels Well no. 2) in accordance with the West Divide Water Conservancy District contract no. 070215GD(b), amended April 17, 2008. The well permit is hereby canceled and is of no further force or effect. September 30, 2008 Ore, Dick Wolfe State Engineer By: :•-;., ` jt.,., 4 Dwight M. Whitehead Engineering Tech (Ground Water) cc: Division Applicant :dmw/066062-F order to cancel, Daniels, GI -I III 09-30-08 Form No, GWS -25 APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St.. Denver. Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 GH DANIELS III 176 GH DANIELS BLVD GYPSUM, CO 81637- EXST WELL PERMIT NUMBER 66062 -F DIV. 5 WD45 DES. BASIN MD Lot: 2 Block: Filing: Subdiv: GRASS MESA RANCH APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY SE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 22 Township 6 S Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 125 Ft. from South Section Line 3190 Ft. from. East Section Line (970) 471-0920 UTM COORDINATES (Meters.Zone:13.NAD831 PERMIT TO USE AN EXISTING WELL Easting: Northing: r ISSUANCE OF THIS PERlvii T DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF. APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water.Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Constructic-. and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado River, on the condition that the well shall be operated only when the West Divide Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect, and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract #070215GD(a). 4) Approved as a well on a tract of land of 39.87 acres described as the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, Sec. 22, Two. 6 South R^n 93 West. further identified as lot 2, Grass Mesa Ranch division of land, Garfield County. 5) Approved for the installation of a pump in, and the use of, an existing well, constructed on March 10, 1999, to a depth of 223 feet, under monitoring hole notice MH -35741. 6) The use of ground water from this well is limited to fire protection (storage and filling of a pond with a surface area of 10,000 square feet and an annual evaporation amount of 0.72 acre-foot), ordinary household purposes inside four (4) single family dwellings, the irrigation of not more than 20,000 square feet (0.46 of an acre) of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of eight (8) domestic animals, All use of this we:l will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect, This well is known as Daniels Well no. 2. 7) The pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 8) The average annual amount of around water to be appropriated shall not exceed 3.242 acre-foot (1,056,406 gallons). 9) The owner shall mark the wall in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aou er, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings, 10) A totalizing fiow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. 7u.,.anent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. 11) This well shall be located aot more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2177-223-00-463 2- NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R247345 ' 7r 2..„-(.7 n 1 APPROVED DMW ,Re44i01 No. 9502022 State i _er g DATE ISSUED 07-27-2007 EXP IRATION DATE 07-27-2008 , Tuesday, March 11, 2008.max MIS "a- 10/91 I WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT . STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER For MO Use only RECEIVED RECEIVED CLIC 0 1 2007APR 1 1999 WATER RESOURCES In rEiiarso 7RCES 8TA COLOiNEER eYAt iEFn 1. WELL PERMIT NUMBER «11 F.;)L11 1 6 L2 C2. �,-- 2 OWNER NAME(S) ein y . A l t_ Malting Address P• 0. mi. ; City, St. 7-rp RI_ 0= (Q F3) 4,55 Phone (qr1d Cray . ��y g 3. WELL LOCATION AS DRILLED: S C. 1/4 SO 1/4, Sec. a.P Twp. (n S , Range Q 3 . DISTANCES FROM SEC. LINES: fL from Sec, line. and h. from Sec. line. OR grEf or tnso Nam or woo SUSDMVIS10N: F P S rnLcsIc ej J.( f-4_ LOT a BLOCK FILING(UNIT) STREET ADDRESS AT WELL LOCATION: 4. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION & I ft. DRILLING METHOD cb r Rip V DATE COMPLETED -) -10:99._. TOTAL DEPTH OcZES ft. DEPTH COMPLETED_ tQQt2K it. 5. GEOLOGIC LOG: Depth .ot Malarial (Type, Size. Color, Water Location) - ��r.� rl>l 6. HO CLAM. (in.) From (ft) To (R) 9� �e3 pp r !. /J.S O '7 5� 4 �t 7. PLAIN CASING OD (in) Kind •, Wall S a FrOm(ft) 'rept) - .. 6 ` )4,.. 4Cc, w¢d. �.-. Lar , -1 I' ? - d.,. S(..a.. 1107 "-!$ 5� ,�'s� rep we( q ai�„ • .4. ,.rRri. -.. —. 1RS— 23 S(.,a . ET ±,L 22_ S' _— .0 1‘24) _4_0_ PERF. CASING: Screen Slot S' e: , ` _ �JUL S�-c^,F6 /c7.z i. 3. FILTER PARC}){• ,�} Material ►" l�T 9. PACKER PLACEMENT: Type. Size II Interval Depth 10. GROUTING RECORD: Material AjnDunt Density Interval Placement #ar ( - 2s6 ' s5al.s.wc4 10-7cour- REMARKS: 11. DISINFECTION: Type i -i 77-7 ' 7 2 oI, Amt. Used [ is WELL TEST DATA: ❑ Check box it Test Data Is submitted on Form No. GWS 39 Supplemental Weil Test. TESTING METHOD Static Level ft. Date/me measured 3 - r 5 -, 9 . Production Rate _gpm. Pumping level R Date/Time measured , Test length (hrs.) . Remarks 13. !haws read the statements mode herein and know the (*Merits thereat, and that they ore cue to my knowledge. pursuant to Section 24-104 (13)(e) C.RS., the making of false wititicp.wrbeiiktury in the second degree and 7s punhahabls as a dace T misderneanvr.) c) CONTRACTOR 3850 a LINCOLNSTREEt Phone (3o3) QV�3.3 Lic. No./6)841�Iallinsa Address , NernefT1t1e (Please type or print) Ca Ece66 ST6...0117)e - i I -L" Signature 72, A 1 Data —, , ars Tuesday, March 11, 2008.max Form No. GWS -25 APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg. 1313 Sherman St., Denver. Colorado 80703 (303) 866-3581 GREGORY HASENBERG 1155 QUICKSILVER WAY RIFLE, CO 81650- EXST WELL PERMIT NUMBER 67567 DIV. 5 WD45 DES. BASIN MD Lot: 2A Block: Filing: Subdiv: GRASS MESA RANCH APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NE 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 27 Township 6 S Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 600 Ft. from North Section Line 2150 Ft. from West Section Line UTM COORDINATES (Meters,Zone:13,NAD83) Easting: Northing: (970) 309-3236 -;HANGE1EXPANSION OF USE OF AN EXISTING WELL 1) 2) 3) ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Const[uction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado River, an the condition that the well shall be operated only when the West Divide Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect, and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract #070215GD(b) (amended April 17, 2008). 4) Approved for the installation of a pump in, and the use of, an existing well, constructed on January 26, 1999, to a depth of 194 feet, under monitoring hole notice MH -35447 and later permitted for use under permit no. 216160 (canceled). Issuance of this permit hereby cancels permit no. 216160. 5) Approved as a well on a tract of land of 39.9 acres described as lot 2A, Grass Mesa Ranch division of land, Garfield County. 6) The use of ground water from this well is limited to fire protection, ordinary household purposes inside three (3) single family dwellings and one (1) accessory dwelling unit, the irrigation of not more than 21,000 square feet (0.48 of an acre) of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of nine (9) head domestic animals. Ali use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. This well is known as Hasenberg Welt no. 1. 7) The pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 8) The combined average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated by this well (Hasenberg Well no. 1) and Daniels Well no. 1 (permit no. 67565-F) and Daniels Well no. 2 (permit no. 67566-F) shall not exceed 8.34 acre-feet. 9) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 10) This well shall be located not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit and at least 600 feet from any existing well, completed in the same aquifer, that is not owned by the applicant. 11) Totalizing flowmeters muss be installed on this well (Hasenberg Well no. 1) and Daniels Well no. 1 (permit no. 67565-F) and Daniels Well no. 2 (permit no. 67566-F), and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. NOTE: Use of ground water from this well (Hasenberg Well no. 1), Daniels Well no. 1 (permit no. 67555-F) and Daniels Well no. 2 (permit no. 67566-F) shall be operated pursuant to WDWCD contract no. 070215GD(B) (amended April 17, 2008), ,5L- 1•,v •7r -- NOTE: Canceled permit no. 216160 was previously issued for this well. NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2177-272-00-464 NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R247346 (totaling 39.95 acres) APPROVED DMW JJ}f fb' State E`n"§ ni eer Rnceiot No. 9503036B DATE ISSUED 09-30-2008 By EXPIRATION DATE 09-30-2009 Form No. 'GWS -25 APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg„ 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 1095 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 21616 0 DIV. 5 CNTY. 23 WD 45 DES. BASIN MD Lot: 2A Block: Filing: Subdiv: GRASS MESA GREG & CHERI HASENBERG P.O. BOX 3144 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 (970)945-8363 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NE 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 27 Twp 6 S Rng 93 W 6th P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 600 Ft. from NORTH Section Line 2150 Ft. from WEST Section Line ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37.92-602(3)(b)(II)(A) as the only well on a tract of land of 40 acres described as the NE '4, NW %, Sec. 27, Twp. 6 S, Rng. 93 W, 6th P.M., Garfield County. 4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to fire protection, ordinary household purposes inside up to 3 single family dwellings, the irrigation of not more than one acre of home gardens and (awns, and the watering of domestic animals. 5) The maximum pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The return flow from the use of the well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of the non -evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 7) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 8) Monitoring hole notice MH -35477, was acknowledged for construction of a monitoring and observation hole for this applicant, in this '4, Y., on 1/19/99. APPROVED SAP SIM@ Engineer Receipt No. f 4 5ou,9 DATE ISSUED MAR 161999 Fir EXPIRATION DATE MAR 16 2001 Tuesday, March 11, 2008.max 1 I WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER FOR OFFICE USE ONLY t WELL PERMIT NUMBER X1216160 2. Owner Name(s) : Greg Hasenberg Mailing Address : P.O. Box 3144 City, St. Zip : Glenwood Springs, Co. 81602 Phone (970) 945-8363 APR ;( 2 199p sr..,.:. CdA APPROVAL #GWS31-91-03 3. WEI..L LOCATION AS DRILLED NE 1/4 NW 1/4 Sec. 27 Twp. 06S Range 93W DISTANCES FROM SEC. LINES: 600 ft. from North Sec. line. and 2150 ft. from West Sec. line. OR SUBDIVISION : Grass Mesa LOT 2A BLOCK FILING(UNIT) STREET ADDRESS AT WELL LOCATION : 4 GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ft. DRILLING METHOD Air Rotary DATE COMPLETED 01/26/99 TOTAL DEPTH 194 ft. DEPTH COMPLETED 194 ft. 5. GEOLOGIC LOG : 6. HOLE DIAM. (in) FROM (ft) TO On Depth Type of Material (Size, Color, and Type) 9.0 0 25 000-185 Volcanic Rocks, Clays 6.5 25 194 185-194 Wasatch Formation 7. PLAIN CASING OD (in) 7.0 Kind Steel 17.24 Well Size From (ft) -1 To (ft) 25 5.5 PVC 0.25 16 120 5,5 PVC 70.25 160 1 194 PERF. CASING : Screen Slot Size : 5.5 PVC .250 120 160 r WATER LOCATED 120 -160 REMARKS : 8. Filter Pack Material : Size : Interval : 9. Packer Placement Type Depth 10. GROUTING RECORD Materiel Amount Density Interval Placement cement 3 sks 16 gal 5-25 poured 11. DISINFECTION : Type : HTH Amt. Used : 2 oz. 12. WELL TEST DATA : () Check Box If Test Data is Submitted On Supplemental Form. TESTING METHOD : Air Compressor Static Level : 109 ft. Date/Time Measured : 01/26/1999 Production Rate . 8 gpm. Pumping Level : Total ft. Date/Time Measured : 01/26/1999 Test Length : 2 hrs. Remarks : n h►W sed Me stK.emerrts made no o o and na ow !tx aen`d n25 t,etevt, and than they ere rue m my knowwaee. (Pursuant to Season 24-4104 113)(a) CRS. me mewing of fano enesmena col Tu4es 13.pehufy n S 4 no 00d deprcq and 4 punlahe7le ae s flee 1 misdameenu7.j CONTRACTOR : Shelton Drilling Corp. Phone : (970) 927-4182 Mailing aagrees • P D. Box 1059 Basalt cam Lic. No 109 Name / Title (Please Type or Print) Wayne Shelton / President Signet e..• Date 03/12/99 i111.— ORIGINAL Tuesday, March 11, 2008.max APPENDIX B o1 10 20 30 o 40 p 50 60 70 80 0 Mean Pumping Rate = 4.44 gpm Daniels Well #1: 17 -hr Test Drawdown and Recovery • • • • Start Recovery 12 24 Elapsed time (hr.) Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. 36 45 March 11, 2008 Job No. 720.1 0 . 5 10 0 3 15 0 20 • • } Daniels Well #2: 2 -hr Test Drawdown and Recovery Mean Pumping Rate = 4.20 gpm Start Recovery 25 0 1 2 3 Elapsed time (hr.) Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. 1 4 5 March 1 1, 2008 Job No. 720.1 10 20 30 c 40 0 50 ca 0 60 70 80 90 • • • • • F • Start Recovery Daniels Well #2: 1 -hr Test Drawdown and Recovery Mean Pumping Rate = 9.0 gpm } 0 4 8 12 16 20 Elapsed time (hr.) Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. March 11, 2008 Job Nn. 720.1 0 - 10- o 30 v 40 50 60 i • • • • • • • • • • • • • Hasenberg Well #1: 4 -hr Test Drawdown and Recovery Start Recovery Mean Pumping Rate = 3.04 gpm 0 4 8 12 16 20 Elapsed time (hr.) Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. March 11, 2008 Job Na 720.1 APPENDIX C WEST D/VIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT 109 WEST FOURTH STREET P. O. BOX RIFLE, COLORADO 816 50-147 vsriter@wawcol.org Tel: 970-625-5451 v ;n wed . ore April 18, 2008 Quicksilver Court meowners' Association c/o Gregory J nberg 1155 Quicks- er Way Rifle, CO 1650 DearOreg: Fax: 970-625-2790 Enclosed is your approved assignment of ownership and amended application for contract #070215GD(b). Please read the contract carefully if you have not already done so, but please especially note paragraph 2 concerning availability of water. West Divide obtains its augmentation water from a number of sources andoperates its water supply program pursuantto a Temporary Substitute Supply Plan (TSSP) approved annually by the State Engineer's Office. TSSPs are common for water conservancy districts and West Divide has operated pursuant to a TSSP for several years with no significant reliability issues. Federal policy relating to endangered species, environmental concerns, and forces of nature are always such that no source of water can be guaranteed dining any season or from year to year. Further, the State Engineer's Office periodically reviews the geographic area sewed by West Divide and has recently made a decision to reduce West Divide's Area A Service Area. While your structure is currently located within the West Divide Area A Service Area, the Division Engineer's Office could make another adjustment to the Service Area in the future and your structure could fall outside the Service Area and be subject to curtailment by the State Engineer's Office. West Divide continues to make good -faith efforts to obtain alternative long-term supplies in an effort to make reliable and predictable the water supply anticipated by your contract with us. West Divide also continues to make good -faith efforts to maintain its existing TSSP and keep its Area A Service Area intact For most years, we expectto be successful in these efforts. This water allotment contract may require you to obtain a well permit from the State Engineer's office. Once your well is drilled you are required to instals a measuring device and submit a meter reading to West Divide, upon request. Non-compliance with measuring and reporting requirements are grounds for cancellation of your water allotment contract with West Divide. This could result in action by the State Engineer which could prevent your further use of your well. Sincerely yours, C J rN.3r `Ni tXcU O anet Maddock Enclosure cc Division No: 5 Water Resources w/enclosure Kerry D. Sundeen, Hydrologist w/enclosure Christina Sloan, w/enclosure Samuel B. Potter, President Kelly Couey, Vice President Robert J. Zenelle, Secretary Bruce E. Wampler, Treasurer Dan Harrison, Director Clerk and Recorder Recording Information WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT APPLICATION FOR ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP Water Allotment Contract #: 070215GD(b) Name of Contract Holder: George H. Daniels, III Print Form Contract # 070215GD b Map ID II 55 Date Activated 2/15/07 Date: April 7, 2008 Name and Address of Assignee: Quicksilver Court Homeowners' Association 1155 Quicksilver Way, Rifle, CO 81650 Telephone Number: 970-309-3236 Amount of Water Assigned in Acre Feet: 2 Legal description of parcel where well is located: SE1/4SW1/4 S22, T6S, R93W 6th P.M. (Lot 2 Grass Mesa Ranch) Recording Information of Memorandum of Water Allotment Contract: County _Garfield Book 1900 Reception No. 718602 Page 0513 The undersigned Contract Holder and Assignee do hereby give notice to and make application to West Divide Water Conservancy District for the assignment of the above described Water Allotment Contract. By signing this instrument, Assignee does hereby agree to assume and be bound by the terms and conditions of said Water Allotment Contract and all addenda and exhibits thereto. It is understood that Contract Holder is released from performance under said contract to the extent that such performance has been hereby assumed by Assignee. Signed the . .:e t appear!' above. (Assign VI' 01: ('.nInrarin (Contract Holder) (Assignee) APPLICATION TO AMEND WATER LEASE # 070215GD(b) WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT 109 West Fourth Street, P. O. Box 1478, Rifle, Colorado 81650 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name: Quicksilver Court Homeowners' Association Mailing address: 1155 Quicksilver Way . Rifle, CO 81650 Telephone: 970-309-3236 Authorized agent Gregory . Hasenberg 2. COURT CASE #s: Decree Case No. Augmentation Plan Case No. 3. USE OF WATER RESIDENTIAL Number of main residences: 7 No. ADU's 5 Subdivision: No. constructed units: No. vacant lots Home garden/lawn irrigation of 49,000 total sq. ft. Method of irrigation: flood sprinkler x other Non-commercial animal watering of r 7 "animals Fire Protection x Evaporation: Maximum water surface to be exposed: 10.000 SF Description of any use, other than evaporation, and method of diversion, rate of diversion, and annual amount of diversion of any water withdrawn from the pond: Used for fire protection and irrigation Filled from Daniels Wells 1 & Z only. fJ'eII Sharing Agreement for multiple owner wells must be submitted If greater than two owners, application Hurst be made under a homeowners association. COMMERCIAL Number of units: Total sq. ft. of commercial units: Description of use: INDUSTRIAL Description of use: Evaporation: Maximum water surface to be exposed: Description of any use, other than evaporation, and method of diversion, rate of diversion, and annual amount of diversion of any water withdrawn from the pond: MUNICIPAL Description of use: DIRECT PUMPING Tributary: Location: 4. SOURCE OF WATER Structure: Wells Structure Name: See attached Source: surface storage ground water x Current Permit # See attached (attach copy) Contract #070215GD(b) Map # 556a, b, c Date Activated 2/15/07 Date Amended 4/17/08 5. LOCATION OF STRUCTURE See attached descriptions. County Quarter/quarter Quarter Section Township Distance of well from section lines: Range P. M. Elevation: 6100 Well location address: Grass Mesa Ranch Lot 2 and 1155 Quicksilver Way, Rifle (Attach additional pages for multiple structures) 6. LAND ON WHICH WATER WILL BE USED (Legal description may be provided as an attachment.) SE114SW1/4 S22, T6S, R93W 6th P.M. (Lot 2 Grass Mesa Ranch) NE1/4NW1/4 527. T6S. ROW, 6th P.M. Number of acres in tract: 79 Inclusion into the District, at Applicant's expense, may he required. 7. TYPE OF SEWAGE SYSTEM Septic tank/absorption leach field x District name: Central System Other S. VOLITh OF LEASED WATER NEEDED IN ACRE FEET: (minimum of 1 acre feat except augmentation from Alsbury Reservoir where a lesser amount is allowed) Provide engineering data to support volume of water requested. Commercial, municipal, and industrial users must provide diversion and consumptive data on a monthly basis. A totalizing flow meter with remote readout is required to be installed and usage reported to lies/ Divide. Applicant expressly acknowledges it has had the opportunity to review the District's form Water Alla:anent Contract and agrees this application is made pursuant and subject to the terms and conditions contained therein. Applicant Signature Application i )ate: - - DATE APPROVED: WEST DIVIDE W ONSERV Printed portions of this form, except differentiated additions or deletions, have been approved and adopted by the West Div to Watei'.Conservaney Dis�ict. Fuirn . WDWCD 01-01-0HAMEND APPLICATION - - - QUICKSILVER COURT HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION WATER STRUCTURES Daniels Well #1 Permit #276142 SE1/4SW1/4, S22, T6S, R93W 6th P.M. 214 Ft. from South Section Line 1995 Ft from West Section Line Daniels Well #2 Permit #66062-F SE1/4SW1/4, S22, T6S, R93W 6th P.M. 125 Ft. from South Section Line 3190 Ft. from East Section Line Hasenberg Well #1 Permit #216160 NE1/4NW1/4, 527, T6S, R93W, 6th P.M. 600 Ft. from North Section Line 2150 Ft. from West Section Line Form No. GWS -25 APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman S1 . Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 GEORGE H DANIELS III 176 GH DANIELS BLVD GYPSUM, CO 81637- (970) 471-0920 aERMI ' TO CO�NSTRIA WELL ISSUANCE OF THS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Exani iners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 15. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602.(3)(b)(I) for uses as described in CRS 2!-92-602(1)(f). Use of this well is limited to monitoring water levels and/or water quality sampling. This well is known as Daniels Monitoring/Observation Well no. 1. 4) Approved as a well on a tract of land of 39.87 acres described as lot 2, Grass Mesa Ranch division of land, Garfield County. 5) This well must be equipped with a locking cap or seal to prevent well contamination or possible hazards as an open well. The well must be kept capped and locked at all times except during sampling or measuring. 6) Records of water level measurements and water quality analyses shall be maintained by the well owner and submitted to the Division of Water Resources upon request. 7) Upon conclusion of the monitoring program the well owner shall plug this well in accordance with Rule 16 of the Waler Wet Construction Rules. A Well Abandonment Report must be completed and submitted to the Division of Water Resources within 60 days of plugging. 8) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with the well permit number and name of aquifer as appropriate, and shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 9) This well must be constructed by or under the supervision of a licensed well driller or other authorized individual according to the Water Well Construction Rules. If non-standard construction is anticipated, a variance request must be submitted in accordance with Rule 18 and approved prior to well construction. 10) A Well Construction and Test Report (Form GWS -31), including lithologic log must be submitted by the individual authorized to construct the well. For non-standard construction, the report must include an as -built drawing showing details such as depth, casing, perforated zones, and a description of the grouting type and interval. 11) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 12) Issuance of this permit does not guarantee that this well can be converted to a production wet under a future permit. The ability of this well to be converted to a production well is limited by all goveming statutes, rules, regulations, orders, and/or decrees. �✓ NOTE: Permit no. 68082-F was previously issued for this lot. NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2177-223-00-463 %2.Vi4 / 47:7 - NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R247345 1 095 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 276142 DIV. 5 WD45 DES. BASIN MD L Lot: 2 Block: Filing: Subdiv: GRASS MESA RANCH APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY SE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 22 Township 6 S Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 214 Ft. from South 1995 Ft. from West Section Line Section Line UTM COORDINATES (Meters,Zcne:13,NAD83) Eastina Northing: r APPROVED DMW j eceipt No. 9502958 State Engineer DATE ISSUED 12-04-2007 By EXPIRATION DATE 12-04.20fl9 Form No. GWS -25 APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 GH DANIELS III 176 GH DANIELS BLVD GYPSUM, CO 81637- (970) 471-0920 PERMIT TO USE AN EXISTING WELL EX ST WELL PERMIT NUMBER 66062 -F DIV. 5 WD45 DES. BASIN MD Lot: 2 Block: Filing: Subdiv: GRASS MESA RANCH APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY SE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 22 Township 6 S Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 125 Ft. from South 3190 Ft. from East Section Line Section Line UTM COORDINATES (Meters,Zone:13,NAD83) Easting: Northing: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This wet shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado River, on the condition that the well shall be operated only when the West Divide Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect, and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract #070215GD(a). 4) Approved as a well on a tract of land of 39.87 acres described as the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, Sec. 22, Twp. 6 South, Rng. 93 West, 6th P.M., further identified as lot 2, Grass Mesa Ranch division of land, Garfield County. 5) Approved for the installatiori of a pump in, and the use of, an existing well, constructed on March 10, 1999, to a depth of 223 feet, under monitoring hole notice MH -35741. 6) The use of ground water from this well is limited to fire protection (storage and filling of a pond with a surface area of 10,000 square feet and an annual evaporation amount of 0.72 acre-foot), ordinary household purposes inside four (4) single family dwellings, the irrigation of not more than 20,000 square feet (0.46 of an acre) of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of eight (8) domestic animals. AN use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. This well is known as Daniels Well no. 2. 7) The pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 8) The average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated shall not exceed 3.242 acre-foot (1,056,406 gallons). 9) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 10) A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. 11) This well shall be lucaled riot more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2177-223-00-463 NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R247345 APPROVED DMW Receipt No. 9502822 State Enger DATE ISSUED 07-27-2007 By EXPIRATION DATE 07-27-2008 GWS -25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 APPLICANT r L KL - 5 Lit/ ,1 PERMIT NUMBER 216 16 0 DIV. 5 CNTY. 23 WD 45 DES. BASIN MD 1095 Lot: 2A Block: Filing: Subdiv: GRASS MESA APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY GREG & CHERI HASENBERG NE 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 27 P.O. BOX 3144 Twp 6 S Rng 93 W 6th P.M. GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 (970)945-8363 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 600 Ft. from NORTH Section line 2150 Ft. from WEST Section Line ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL_ 1) This well shall be used in such a v.tny as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall he in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(II)(A) as the only well on a tract of land of 40 acres described as the NE %, NW %, Sec. 27, Twp. 6 S, Rng. 93 W, 6th P.M., Garfield County, 4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to fire protection, ordinal household purposes inside up to 3 single family dwellings, the irrigation of not more than one acre of horne gardens and lawns, and the watering of domestic animals. 5) The maximum pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The return flow from the use of the well must be through an individual waste water disposal syRsterim.of the non -evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 7) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 8) Monitoring hole notice MH -35477, was acknowledged for construction of a monitoring and observation hole for this applicant, in this 1/4, 1/4, on 1/19/99. APPROVED SAP Rar•.eint Nn State Engineer 3 -g 1)A TF ISfiI IFn MAR 161999 GYPIRATIr1N fl TC MAR 1 c} 2Rfll JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL WATER USE ESTIMATES COLORADO RIVER SERVICE AREA WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT APPLICANT:WEEMMEREMMEM 1 DWELLING UNITS: IRRIGATED AREA (SQ FT): COMMERCIAL AREA (SQ FT): NO. OF LIVESTOCK: ELEVATION (MSL): EVAPORATION AREA (Acre): 2 3 4 (5 Contract Amount w/ 5% transit Loss = 3.99 acre feet (7) (8) 9) Transit Loss= 5.0% (10) (11 (12) (13) Unit Value: Irrigation Diversion (ft) Unit Value: Irrigation C.U. (ft) In House Diversion (AF) In House C.U. (AF) Commercial Diversion (AF) Commercial C.U. (AF) Irrigation Diversion (AF) Irrigation C.U. (AF) L.ivestoCk Diversion & C.U. (AF) Pond Evaporation (AF) Total Diversion (AF) Total C.U. (AF) Total Contract Amount (AF) 0.40 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.438 0.078 0.082 0.36 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.396 0.070 0.074 0.40 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.486 0.123 0.129 0.049 0.039 0.39 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.08 0.565 0.198 0.208 0.364 0.291 0.40 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.33 0.02 0.11 0.979 0.511 0.536 0.526 0.421 0.39 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.47 0.02 0.13 1.180 0.676 0.710 0.568 0.454 0.40 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.51 0.02 0.13 1.247 0.720 0.756 0.445 0 356 0.40 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.40 0.02 0.12 1.089 0.597 0.627 0.316 0.253 0.39 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.28 0.02 0.09 0.890 0.448 0.470 0.081 0 065 0.40 0 06 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.07 0.02 0.06 0.599 0.212 0.223 0.40 0.06 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.448 0.087 0.091 0.40 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.438 0.078 0.082 2.349 1.879 4.72 0.71 0.00 0.00 2.64 2.11 0.21 0.77 8.754 3.799 3.989 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (8) (7) 80% irrigation efficiency for sprinkler systems Blaney Criddle assessment with Pochop adjustments 350 gallons per day per residence 15% consumptive use for ISDS systems 200 gallons per day per 1000 sq ft of commercial space 15% consumptive use for ISDS systems Column (1) " irrigated area in acres Column (2) " irrigated area in acres Livestock use at 11 gallons per head per day Evaporation Calculations Column (3) + Column (5) + Column (7) + Column (9) + Column (10) plus 5% transit loss Column (4) + Column (6) + Column (8) + Column (9) + Column (10) Column (12) plus transit loss Quicksilver water use estimates 041508.xls 4/162008 DRAFT TABLE 1 ESTIMATED WATER DEMANDS Quicksilver Court Subdivision In-house Uses''r Irrigation 1'. People Use per Total Demand apd/pers per unrt unit Vel) Nlo. Units (af/yr) 100 3.5 350 12 4.71 Horse Watering (1 Total Demand ft/yr Soft/Lot No. Lots (af/yr) 2.35 7,000 7 2.64 Total Demand gpd/horse No. of Horses (af/yr) 11 17 0.21 Pond Evaporation Surface Area Total Demand ft/yr (acres) (af!!!yr) 2.87 0.23 0.66 Total Demand (af/yr) 8.22 Met by three existing wells Total Demand per Well (af/yr) 2.74 Average Rate per Well (gpm) 1.70 Notes: (1) In-house uses include 7 dwelling units and 5 accessory dwelling units 100 gpd per person use value per Subdivision Regulations of Garfield County, CO of 1984 (2) Irrigation application rate from WDWCD worksheet (3) Assumed 2 horses per lot (7 Tots) and 11 gpd per horse per WDWCD worksheet (4) Pond surface area planned to be 10,000 soft and for calculation purposes was assumed to always be full. Jehn Water Consultants, Inc. March 27, 2008 Job No. 720.1 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL APPLICANT: WATER USE ESTIMATES COLORADO RIVER SERVICE AREA WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT Quicksltver Court HOA DWELLING UNITS: IRRIGATED AREA (80 FT): COMMERCIAL AREA (SQ FT): NO. OF LIVESTOCK: ELEVATION (MSL): EVAPORATION AREA (Acre): (1) (2) (3) (4 Unit Value: Irrigation Diversion (ft) 0,049 0,364 0.529 0.568 0,445 0.316 0.081 Unit Value: Irrigation C.U. (ft) 0.039 0.291 0.421 0.454 0.356 0.253 0.065 2.349 1.679 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) In House Diversion (AF) 0.40 0.36 0.40 0.39 0.40 0,39 0.40 0.40 0.39 0.40 0.40 PAg 4.72 12 49000 0 17 5200 0.23 In House C,U, (An 0.06 0.05 0.08 0.06 0.06 0,06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.06 4n 0.71 (5) 6) Contract Amount wf 5% transit Loss = 3.99 acre feet ( 7) Transit Loss= 5.0% (8) (9) (10) 011) (12) (13) Commercial Diversion (AF) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.44 0.00 Commercial C.U. (AF) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Irrigation Diversion (AF) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.41 0.59 0.64 0.50 0.36 0.09 0.00 4.42 2.64 Irrigation C.U. (AF) 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.04 0.33 0.47 0.51 0.40 0.28 0.07 0.00 2,11 Livestock Diversion & C.U. (AF) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0,02 0 02 0.21 Pond Evaporation (AF) 0,00 0.00 0.05 0.08 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.12 0,09 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.77 Total Diversion (AF) 0.438 0.396 0.486 0.565 0.979 1.180 1.247 1.089 0.890 0,5. 0.448 1.421 8.754 Total C.U, (AF) 0.076 0,070 0.123 0.198 0.511 0,676 0.720 0.597 0.449 0.212 0.087 0.076 3.799 Total Contract Amount (AF) 0.082 0.074 0.129 0.208 0.536 0.710 0.756 0.627 0.470 0,223 0.091 3.989 80% irrIgetIon efficiency for sprinkler systems Blaney Criddle assessment with Pochop adjustments 350 gallons per day per residence 15% consumptive use for MOS systems 200 gallons per day per 1000 sq ft of commercial space 15% consumptive use for 1S0S systems Column (1) * irrigated area In acres Column (2)' irrigated alas in acres Livestock use at 11 gallons per heed per day Evaporation Calculations Column (3) *Column (5) + Column (7) + Column 9) + Column (10) plus 5% transit loss Column (4) + Column (8) + Column (8) + Column (9) + Column (10) Column (12) plus transit loss Quicksilver water use estimates 041508.xls 4/15/2008 Form No. GWS -11 1/2009 STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, CO 80203 Phone — Info: (303) 866-3587 Main: (303) 866-3581 Fax: (303) 866-3589 http:llwww.water.state.co.us CHANGE IN OWNER NAME/ADDRESS CORRECTION OF THE WELL LOCATION Review instructions on the reverse side prior to completing the form. Name, address and phone of person claiming ownership of the well permit: NAME(S): Quicksilver Court Homeowners' Associatio Mailing Address: 1155 Quicksilver Court City, St. Zip: Rifle, CO 8165[) Phone: (970) 309-3236 E-mail (optional): jeepberg@yahoo.com For Office Use Only This form is filed by the named individual/entity claiming that they are the owner of the well permit as referenced below. This filing is made pursuant to C.R.S. 37-90-143. WELL LOCATION: Well Permit Number: 67565-F Receipt Number:9503038A_ Case Number:N/A County Garfield Well Name or # (optional) Daniels Well I (Address) (City ) (State) (Zip) SE1/4 of theSW 1/4, Sec. 22, Twp. 6 0 N. or ® S., Range 93 0 E. or ® W., 6th P.M. Distance from Section Lines: 330 Ft. From 0 N. or ® S., 1835 Ft. From 0 E. or W. Line. Subdivision Name Grass Mesa Ranch Lot 2 , Block , Filing/Unit The above listed owner(s) say(s) that he, she (they) own the well permit described herein. The existing record is being amended for the following reasons: ® Change in name of owner 0 Change in mailing address 0 Correction of location for exempt wells permitted prior to May 8, 1972 and non-exempt wells permitted before May 17, 1965. Please see the reverse side for further information regarding correction of the well location. I (we) claim and say that I (we) (are) the owner(s) of the well permit described above, know the contents of the statements made herein, and state that they are true to my (our) knowledge. Please print the Signer's Name & TitleDate H .s.'' 1- 2-6/-16 7 n It dy the new owner` : this well permit tt<i complete and sign this form. Sig res of agents are acceptable if an original letter of agency signed by the owner is attached to the form upon its receipt. For Office Use Only Signature(s) of then owner 1 is res sibr ' of State Engineer By Date Form No. GWS -11 1/2009 STATE OF COLORADO) OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, CO 80203 Phone — Info: (303) 866-3587 Main: (303) 866-3581 Fax: (303) 866-3589 httpl/www.water.state.co.us CHANGE IN OWNER NAMEIADDRESS CORRECTION OF THE WELL LOCATION For Office Use Only Review instructions on the reverse side prior to completing the form. Name, address and phone of person claiming ownership of the well permit: NAME(S): Quicksilver Court Homeowners' Associatio Mailing Address: 1155 Quicksilver Court City, St. Zip: Rifle, CO 81650 Phone: (970) 309-3236 E-mail (optional): jeepberg@yahoo.com This form is filed by the named individual/entity claiming that they are the owner of the well permit as referenced below. This filing is made pursuant to C.R.S. 37-90-143. WELL LOCATION: Well Permit Number: 67566-F. Receipt Number:9503156_ Case Number:N/A County Garfield Well Name or # (optional) Daniels Well 2 (Address) (City (State) (Zip) SE114 of theSW 1/4, Sec. 22, Twp. 6 0 N. or ® S., Range 93 0 E. or ® W., 6th P.M. Distance from Section Lines: 125 Ft. From ❑ N. or ® S., 3190 Ft. From ® E. or ❑ W. Line. Subdivision Name Grass Mesa Ranch Lot 2 , Block , Filing/Unit The above listed owner(s) say(s) that he, she (they) own the well permit described herein. The existing record is being amended for the following reasons: Change in name of owner 0 Change in retailing address 0 Correction of location for exempt wells permitted prior to May 8, 1972 and non-exempt wells permitted before May 17, 1965. Please see the reverse side for further information regarding correction of the well location. I (we) claim and say that I (we) (are) the owner(s) of the well permit described above, know the contents of the statements made herein, and state that they are true to my (our) knowledge. Signature(s) of the new owner Please print the Signer's Name & Title �+ 170,1 Date Ciie 6 0�t� 1L41 r/��f�r,<e� It is tresnsibility of the new o - r of this well permFt'io complete and sign this form. Si fares of agents are acceptable if an original letter of agency signed by the owner is attached to the form upon its receipt. For Office Use Only / -zy-/o State Engineer By Date Form No. GWS -11 1/2009 STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, CO 80203 Phone — Info: (303) 866-3587 Main: (303) 866-3581 Fax: (303) 866-3589 http://www.water.state.co.us CHANGE IN OWNER NAME/ADDRESS CORRECTION OF THE WELL LOCATION Review instructions on the reverse side prior to completing the form. Name, address and phone of person claiming ownership of the well permit: NAME(S): Quicksilver Court Homeowners' Associatio Mailing Address: 1155 Quicksilver Court City, St. Zip: Rifle, CO iii 650 Phone: (970) 309-3236 E-mail (optional): jeepberg@yahoo.com For Office Use Only This form is filed by the named individual/entity claiming that they are the owner of the well permit as referenced below. This filing is made pursuant to C.R.S. 37-90-143. WELL LOCATION: Well Permit Number: 67567-F Receipt Number:9503038B_ Case Number:N/A County Garfield Well Name or # (optional) Hasenberg Weill 1155 Quicksilver CourtR iilz CO 8165(1' 16511 (Address) (City) (State) (Zip) NE1/4 of theNW 1/4, Sec. 27, Twp. 6 0 N. or ® S., Range 93 0 E. or ® W., 6th P.M. Distance from Section Lines: 600 Ft. From ® N. or 0 S., 2150 Ft. From 0 E. or (OW. Line. Subdivision Name Grass Mesa Ranch Lot 2A , Block , Filing/Unit The above listed owner(s) say(s) that he, she (they) own the well permit described herein. The existing record is being amended for the following reasons: ® Change in name of owner 0 Change in mailing address ❑ Correction of location for exempt wells permitted prior to May 8, 1972 and non-exempt wells permitted before May 17, 1965. Please see the reverse side for further information regarding correction of the well location. I (we) claim and say that I (we) (are) the owner(s) of the well permit described above, know the contents of the statements made herein, and state that they are true to my (our) knowledge. Signature(s) of the new owner Please print the Signer's Name, - �n�Date XN95 e4 / 2(7-1 It is thesporfbility of the new owner : this well permit to complete and sign this form. Sig if an original letter of agency signed by the owner is attached to the form upon its receipt. For Office Use Only Mures of agents are acceptable State Engineer By Date GWS -25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg-, 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 APPLICANT WELL PERMIT NUMBER 216160 DIV. 5 CNTY. 23 WD 45 DES. BASIN MD 1095 Lot: 2A Block: Filing: Subdiv: GRASS MESA APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NE 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 27 Twp 6 S Rng 93 W 6th P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 600 Ft. from NORTH Section Line 2150 Ft. from WEST Section Line GREG & CHERI HASENBERG P.O. BOX 3144 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 (970)945-8363 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil Cour L action. 2) The construction of this well shall he in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(11)(A) as the only well on a tract of land of 40 acres described as the NE A, NW 'A, Sec. 27, Twp. 6 S, Rng. 93 W, 6th P.M., Garfield County. 4) The use. of ground water from this well is limited to fire protection, ordinafy household purposes inside up to 3 single family dwellings, the irrigation of not more than one acre of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of domestic animals. 5) The maximum pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The return flow from the use of the well must be through an individual waste water disposal sytsterrl-of the non -evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 7) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 8) Monitoring hole notice MH -35477, was acknowledged for construction of a monitoring and observation hole for this applicant, in this '/a, A, on 1/19/99. 3-5-9'") APPROVED SAP Rereint No State Engineer nnTF MAR 161999 PXPIReTInN noTG MAR 1 c 7ffi EXHIBIT K Traffic The Quicksilver Court Subdivision consists of seven (7) Tots total, and was approved for seven (7) primary residences, and seven (7) ADUs. Quicksilver Court provides access to all lots, with the exception of Lot 2 (see Final Plat, Exhibit G). The applicant, G. Daniels III owns lots 4-7, and it is these lots, which are the subject of these ADU applications. Quicksilver Court Subdivision is accessed from Quicksilver Way, which is a 60' ROW. This ROW preexisted Quicksilver Court Subdivision, and is utilized by neighboring properties and oil and gas interests in the area. Quicksilver Court, a 40' ROW, internal to the Quicksilver Court Subdivision, has been recently completed, and properly connects to Quicksilver Way. This road is considered acceptable to the County, and no further construction is required. All new driveways for lots 4-7, servicing both the primary residence and ADU, will connect (to this internal road) in the future. Quicksilver Court features adequate turnaround for fire trucks, and lots 4-7 are contiguous to this ROW. Quicksilver Court was designed to accommodate access for six (6) primary residences, as well as six (6) Accessory Dwelling Units, for an average of 120 trips per day (average of 10 trips per unit). This was anticipated in the previously approved Preliminary Plan and Final Plat applications', and the amount of traffic that was considered remains consistent with these four (4) ADU applications (see attached Preliminary Plan Traffic Study). All future driveways/accesses for lots 4-7 will be constructed according to the applicable standards of Garfield County. Additionally, these driveways will adhere to any applicable standards, when connecting to Quicksilver Court. Please also see Exhibit G, Final Plat 1 The Declarations and Covenants proposed during Preliminary Plan may have restricted the number of ADUs permitted in Quicksilver; however, the final Declarations, accepted at Final Plat, did not restrict the number of ADUs. Each lot is permitted to have one (1) primary residence and one (1) ADU. That document is recorded at Reception # 785077. TR AFFIC LMPACT STUDY Quicksilver Court Subdivision Garfield County, Colorado Prepared for High Country Engineering 1517 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Prepared by Kimley-Hoar: and Associates, Inc. 950 Seventeenth Street Suite 1050 Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 228-2300 (303) 446-8678 FAX April 2008 1 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kiraley-Ham and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDICES LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES . 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 3 3.0 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS 5 3.1 Existing and Future Roadway Network 5 3.2 Existing Study Area 7 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes 7 3.4 Anticipated Developments' Contribution to Background Traffic 7 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 10 4.1 Trip Generation .. . . 10 4.2 Trip Distribution 11 4.3 Traffic Assignment and Total (Background Plus Project) Traffic 11 5.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS 15 5.1 Analysis Methodology 15 5.2 Key Intersection Operational Analysis 16 5.3 Design of Local Roads 18 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 20 APPEN DICES Appendix A - Conceptual Site Plan Appendix B - Intersection Count Sheets Appendix C - Trip Generation Worksheet Appendix D - HCS Analysis Worksheets Kindey-Horn and Associates, Inc. • 09607I001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO Page i LIST OF TABLES Table 1 - Quicksilver Court Subdivision Traffic Generation 10 15 Table 2 - Level of Service Definitions Table 3 - Mamm Creek Road (CR -319) & Grass Mesa Road LOS Results 17 LIST OF FIGURES 4 Figure 1- Vicinity Map 6 Figure 2 - Existing Laneage and Control Figure 3 - Weekday Existing Traffic Volumes Figure 4 - 2008 Background Traffic Volumes 9 12 Figure 5 - Trip Distribution 13 Figure 6 - Traffic Assignment Figure 7 - Existing 2008 Plus Project Traffic 14 I:haey-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page ii 096071001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Quicksilver Court Subdivision is proposed within the Grass Mesa Subdivision north of Grass Mesa Road along the west side of Quicksilver Way, southeast of the City of Rifle and southwest of the Garfield County Airport in Garfield County, Colorado. The residential development is anticipated to include seven lots. Development may include a primary and secondary residence on each lot. Therefore this study assumes develnt of fourteen (14) dwelling units to be conservative. As directed by Garfield County staff, analysis was completed for the existing plus project traffic condition. The purpose of this study is to identify traffic generation characteristics, to identify potential traffic related impacts on the County and local street system, and to develop mitigation measures required for identified impacts. Garfield County staff identified the key intersection of Mamnm Creek Road (CR -319) with Grass Mesa Road for evaluation in this study. Regional access to the site is provided by I-70, US -6, and SH -13. Primary access to the site is provided by Mamm Creek Road (CR -319). Direct access to the residential lots will be frorn Quicksilver Way. The Quicksilver Court Subdivision is expected to generate approximately 134 daily weekday driveway trips. Of these, 11 trips are expected to occur during the weekday morning peak hour, while 15 trips are expected during the weekday afternoon peak hour. Distribution of site traffic on the street system was based on the area street system characteristics, existing traffic patterns to and from the site, and the access system for the project. Assignment of the project traffic was based upon the trip generation described previously and the distributions developed. Based on the analysis presented in this report, Kimley-Horn believes the proposed Quicksilver Court Subdivision will be successfully incorporated into the existing roadway network. The Kiaaley-Nara and Associates, Inc.. Page 1 096077007_ (hricksilver Court Subdivision, Gay field County, CO proposed development and expected traffic volumes resulted in the following recommendations: • It is recommended that all local roadways providing access to and from the Quicksilver Court Subdivision be designed in accordance with Chapter 5 of AASHTO's Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. • Based on a 25 mile per hour design speed, it is recommended that 155 feet of stopping sight distance be provided along the local roadways within the Grass Mesa Subdivision with a maximum grade of 11 percent. Based on traffic volume projections, it is believed that all local roads in this vicinity will be able to adequately handle the anticipated traffic with a single through lane in each direction. It is also recommended that the minimum width of the traveled way be 18 feet with a 2 foot shoulder. Intersections should be carefully located to avoid steep profile grades and to ensure adequate approach sight distance. • All on-site and off-site signing and striping improvements should be incorporated into the Civil Drawings, and conform to Garfield County stand ards, as well as the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices - 2003 Edition (MUTCD). Kiniteij-Horn arid Associates, inc. Page 2 096071061- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) has prepared this report to document the results of a Traffic Impact Study of future traffic conditions associated with the propose d Quicksilver Court Subdivision to be located within the Grass Mesa Subdivision north of Grass Mesa Road along the west side of Quicksilver Way, in Garfield County, Colorado. The vicinity map illustrating the site location is shown in Figure 1. The residential development is anticipated to include seven lots. Development may include a primary and secondary residence on each lot. Therefore, this study was conducted assuming development of fourteen (14) dwelling units to be conservative. As directed by Garfield County staff, analysis was completed for the existing plus project traffic condition. The current site plan is included in Appendix A. The purpose of this study is to identify traffic generation characteristics, to identify potential traffic related impacts on the County and local street system, and to develop mitigation measures required for identified impacts. Garfield County staff identified the key intersection of Mamm Creek Road (CR -319) with Grass Mesa Road for evaluation in this study. Regional access to the site is provided by 1-70, US -6, and SH -13. Primary access to the site is provided by Mamm Creek Road (CR -319). Direct access to the residential lots will be from Quicksilver Way. Khnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096071001- Quicksilver .Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO Page 3 3.0 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS 3.1 Existing and Future Roadway Network Regional access to the proposed Quicksilver Court Subdivision is anticipated to be provided by Interstate 70, US Highway 6, and State Highway 13. Primary access to the project site is provided by Mamm Creek Road (CR -319). West Mamm Creek Road (CR -319) is a north -south roadway that provides a single lane of travel in each direction with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour. Direct access to the residential lots will be from Quicksilver Way. The T - intersection of West Mamrn Creek Road (CR -319) with Grass Mesa Road operates with stop control for the eastbound approach of Grass Mesa Road. Grass Mesa Road is a two lane private road with a posted speed limit of 15 miles per hour. The existing intersection lane configuration and control for the study area intersection are shown in Figure 2. Kil nley-Honz and Associates, Inc, 096071007- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Gni field County, CO Page 5 NaRTH NTS D96071001 GARFIELD COUNTY AIRPORT FIGURE 1 QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO VICINITY MAP Qoa ❑-.❑ end AssSSKii1Urr1 ,� - UCtUI L'S, Inc. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Kimley-Horn's analysis of traffic operations in the site vicinity was conducted to determine potential capacity deficiencies in the existing 2008 condition at the identified key intersection. The acknowledged source for determining overall capacity is the current edition of the Highway Capacity Miinual2. 5.1 Analysis Methodology Capacity analysis results are listed in terms of Level of Service (LOS). LOS is a qualitative term describing operating conditions a driver will experience while traveling on a particular street or highway during a specific time interval. It ranges from A (very little delay) to F (long delays and congestion). For intersections and roadways in this study area, Kimley-Horn recommends intersection LOS D as the minimum threshold for acceptable operations. Table 2 shows the definition of level of service for unsignalized intersections. Table 2 - Level of Service Definitions Definitions provided from the Highway Capacity Manna], Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2000 a Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Washington DC, 2000. Kiiiley-Hort andAssociates, Inc. 096071001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO Page 15 Level of Service Unsignalized Intersection Average Total Delay jsecJveh) - A <_10 B >10and s15 C _ >15 and 5 25 D >25 and < 35 ' E >35 and <_ 50 I F >50 Definitions provided from the Highway Capacity Manna], Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2000 a Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Washington DC, 2000. Kiiiley-Hort andAssociates, Inc. 096071001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO Page 15 91,84,14.4 IVC7F Th 4fS 096071601 MUSTANG MESA TRAIL CEDAR BREAKS ROAD CRASS MESA ROAD FIGURE 7 QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 2008 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC r--- aro' !-i LEGEND: it XX (XX) 1XX.xI Study Area Key Intersection AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volume Estimated Doily Traffic Volume 4 nun KVmley—Horn end AssaciDles, inc 1V c=:, FiTM NIS 096071001 MV51ANa Mf SA 1RML 0(5) — CRASS VESA ROAD FIGURE 6 QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT LEGEND: Study Areo Key Intersection AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volume r11 Kimley--Horn and Assoc;ales, inc, j 1 NTS 096071001 MUSTANG MESA TRAIL FIGURE 5 QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO TRIP DISTRIBUTION �n Kiriipk-:rOrn end 11.>!lGci01es, Inc. LEGEND: • 1 xx%(xx%) Study Area Key intersection Er lering(Exiling) Percentage of Vehicles 4.2 Trip Distribution Distribution of site traffic on the street system was based on the area street system characteristics, existing traffic patterns, and the proposed future access system for the site. The directional distribution of traffic is a means to quantify the percentage of site -generated traffic that approaches the site from a given direction and departs the site back to the original source. The project trip distribution is illustrated in Figure 5. 4.3 Traffic Assignment and Total (Background Plus Project) Traffic Traffic assignment was obtained by applying the project trip distribution to the estimated traffic generation of the development shown in Table 1. Project traffic assignment for the site is shown in Figure 6. Site traffic volumes were added to the 2008 bac kground volumes to represent current traffic conditions with the addition of the Suarez single-family residential development and the Quicksilver Court Subdivision. These total traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 7. Kinsey -Horn and Associates, Inc. 096071007- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield Comity, CO Page 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 4.1 Trip Generation Site -generated traffic estimates are determined through a process known as trip generation. Rates and equations are applied to the proposed land use to estimate traffic generated by the development during a specific time interval. The acknowledged source for trip generation rates is the Trip Generation Reports published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). ITE has established trip rates in nationwide studies of similar land uses. For this study, Kimley- Horn used the ITE Trip Generation Report average rate equations that apply to Single -Family Detached Housing (210) for traffic associated with the development. The Quicksilver Court Subdivision is expected to generate approximately 134 daily weekday driveway trips. Of these, 11 trips are expected to occur during the weekday morning peak hour, while 15 trips are expected during the weekday afternoon peak hour_ Table 1 summarizes the estimated traffic generation for the proposed development. The trip generation worksheet is included in Appendix C. These calculations illustrate the equations used, directional distribution of trips, and number of daily trips based on the published ITE rates. Table 1- Quicksilver Court Subdivision Traffic Generation Land Use Independent Variable Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enterj�Exit 3 8 Total Enter I Exit ]'Total Y 5 Tingle-Family ]Detached Housing 14 dwelling units 134 1 11 _....- 10 15 1 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation: An Information Report, Seventh Edition, Washington DC, 2003. Kintley-Horn and Associates, Inc_, 096071001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield Conn fl CO Page 10 N RTf--1 NTS 09E071001 MUSTANG MESA TRAIL 30(11) .-- 0(0) GRASS MESA ROAD FIGURE 4 QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 2008 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEGEND: if �— XX (XX) Study Area Key Intersection AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volume N G7 FST# --1 tos 09801001 USTANG MESA 1RArL Tuesday, January 8, 2008 7:00-8:00 A.M. , 4:30-5:30 P.M, 26(8) —A 0(0).-N T M V1 6 GRAS IAESA ROAO FIGURE 3 QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 2008 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEGEND: • 1 XX (XX) Study Area Key Intersection AM(PI,A) Peak Flour Traffic Volume Kirniey-Horn 1 C I—' and A5<_ncictes, Inc. } 3.2 Existing Study Area The existing project site is located within the Grass Mesa Subdivision and is comprised of vacant land. Various residential uses are located in the surrounding areas. The downtown commercial district of the City of Rifle is located approximately 3 miles northwest of the site. The Garfield County Airport is located northeast of the site. 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes Existing peak hour turning movement counts were conducted at the study intersection of West Mamm Creek Road (CR -319) with Grass Mesa Road on Tuesday, January 8, 2008. The counts were conducted during the AM and PM peak hours of adjacent street traffic in 15 --minute intervals from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM on this count date. Existing turning movement counts are shown in Figure 3 with count sheets provided in Appendix B. 3.4 Anticipated Developments' Contribution to Background Traffic The Suarez residential development is also proposed to be constructed within the Grass Mesa Subdivision on the southeast corner of Grass Mesa Road and Rodeo Drive in Garfield County, CO. Kimley-Horn and Associates performed the Traffic Impact Analysis for this development in January 2008. This residential development is anticipated to include eight (8) single-family dwelling units. Projected traffic volumes for this development have been incorporated into the existing turning movement counts at the key study intersection to accurately model traffic once this development is complete. The 2008 traffic volumes including the project traffic volumes from the Suarez development are shown in Figure 4. Kinmley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096071001- Quicksilucr Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO Page 7 N O NTS 0607 OD 11USTA+IG 1.15A TRAIL 1 GRASS MESA ROAD LEGEND: • 1 Study Area Key !ntersecl!on Stop Conirol!ed Approach Posted Speed Limit lana 25 FIGURE 2 QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO LANE CONFIGURATION AND CONTROL El—Il Kirnley—Morn and A55ocioles, Inc. J The study area intersection was analyzed based on average total delay analysis for unsignalized intersections. Under the unsignalized analysis, the level of service (LOS) for a two-way stop controlled intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is defined for each minor movement. Level of service for a two-way stop -controlled intersection is not defined for the intersection as a whole. 5.2 Key Intersection Operational Analysis Calculations for the level of service at the key intersection for the study are provided in Appendix D. All analyses are based on the lane geometry and intersection control shown in Figure 2. The HCS recommended peak hour factor of 0.88 for rural areas was used in the analyses. LOS for two-way stop controlled intersections was calculated using HCS analysis software. Kimley-lioru and Associates, Inc. 0960X001 • Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield Comity, CO Page 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mamm Creek Road (CR -319) & Grass Mesa Road The existing T -intersection of Mamm Creek Road (CR -319) with Grass Mesa Road operates with stop control along the eastbound approach of Grass Mesa Road. The results of this analysis indicate that all movements at this intersection currently operate acceptably (LOS A) during both the AM and PM peak hours. It is anticipated that all movements will continue to operate acceptably during both the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of project traffic. Table 3 provides the results of the level of service at this intersection. Table 3 — Mamm Creek Road (CR -319) & Grass Mesa Road LOS Results Scenario AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour DelayLOS (sec/veh) Delay (sec/veh) LOS 2008 Existing Northbound Approach Eastbound Approach 7.3 9.1 A A 7.3 9.2 A A 2008 Existing Plus Project Northbound Approach . Eastbound Approach 7.3 9.2 A A 7.4 __=-9.3 F A A Kinney -Horn and Associates, Inc 096071001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield County CO Page I7 5.3 Design of Local Roads The local roadways providing access to and from the Quicksilver Court Subdivision should be designed in accordance with AASHTO'S Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Chapter 5 provides guidance for the design of local rural roads with respect to design speeds, stopping sight distance, maximum grades, etc. A majority of these criteria are based on the design speed of the road. The posted speed limit along Grass Mesa Road is 15 miles per hour. Therefore, it is assumed that the design speed for this road and other local roads within the Grass Mesa Subdivision is 25 miles per hour based on the guideline that the design speed of a roadway is ten (10) miles per hour greater than the posted speed limit. Based on a 25 mile per hour design speed, 155 feet of stopping sight distance should be provided along these roads according to Exhibit 5-2. Design Controls for Stopping Sight Distance and for Crest and Sag Vertical Curves. The maximum grade for a design speed of 25 miles per hour with rolling terrain is 11 percent, based on Exhibit 5-4. Ma:din:U z Grades for Local Rural Roads. Two travel. lanes usually can accommodate the normal traffic volume on rural local roads. If exceptional traffic volumes occur in specific areas, additional lanes may be provided in accordance with design criteria in Chapter 2 of AASHTO's Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Based on traffic volume projections, it is believed that all local roads in this vicinity will be able to adequately handle the anticipated traffic with a single through lane in each direction. According to Exhibit 5-5. Minimum Width of Traveled Way and Shoulders, the minimum width of the traveled way for a design speed of 25 miles per hour and under 400 vehicles per day is 18 feet with a 2 foot shoulder. To estimate the average daily traffic volume within the Grass Mesa Subdivision, it was assumed that the AM and PM peak hour traffic volume along Grass Mesa Road each represent approximately ten percent of the average daily traffic volume. Therefore, with the addition of project traffic, the average daily traffic volume along Grass Mesa Road and the other local roadways in this subdivision is estimated to be less than 400 vehicles per day. Intersections should be carefully located to avoid steep profile grades and to ensure adequate approach sight distance. Kin! ley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 18 09637I001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield Country, CO All Traffic: Data File Name : GRASSMESA&CR319PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/8/2008 Page No : 2 GRASS MESA RD CR 319 GRASS MESA RD Westbound CR319 $out hbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left i Thad Right Peds [ Left i m Rfgln TPeds I ..... uI Leri Tw„ i a m pew I kr.r.r Lof j 7hni I Right i Peds f r.:. r Ivy ► ,te Peak Hour Anetysls From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak of 1 Peak Hour for [dire Intersection Begins al 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 0 7 6 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0' 29 04:45 PM 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 18 3 0 0 0 3 34 05:00 PM 0 8 6 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 1 30 05:15 PM 0 9 4 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 17 4 0 0 0 4 34 Total volume 0 37 16 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 66 8 0 e 0 8 127 %App.Totol 0 69.8 30.2 0 0 0 0 D 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 0 PE F .000 .712 .667 .009 .946 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 917 .000 .000 .o17 . • 0 .000 .000 .000 .500 .834 CR 3i Out In Total I 74I 1531 1x71 iEfir B Tr t t li t pedG } Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM llnphillad Len Thru Right Pada r Pi_ Lei a1 3TJ f 103 Out IT3 Total CR 319 4J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 G rou os Printed- tJ nshffted File Name : GRASSMESA&CR319PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date - 1/8/2008 Page No 1 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 0 8 6 0 0 9 4 0 0 3 7 0 O 11 4 0 Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 31 21 0 0 72 37 0 O 66.1 33.9 0 O 31.9 16.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ❑ 0 0 O 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 O 17 0 0 4 0 0 0 O 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 O 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 7 S} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 100 0 0. 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 0' 5.8 0 0 0 0 Out . In Total 71 I I 1 [.., IW 9L.. LAC Fi 7Th,u� L La • North 118/2008 04: 1!8/2006 0545 PM Unshifled 4_ T r' trill Thra Right Pads Di _104j_ Out In Total 30 34 23 24 111 226 CR 319 Southbound GRASS MESA RD Westbound CR 319 Northbound GRASS MESA RD Eastbound Start Time Left l Thru 1 Right] Peds 0 13 4 D 0 6 6 0 0 7 6 0 0 13 0 0 Left 1 Thru 1 Right 1 Peds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Left 1 Thru 1 Right 1 Peds Left i Thru L Right Pada Int, Total . 2 28 29 34 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 0 7 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Taut 0 41 16 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 ;>2 0 0 0 0 0 0 115 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 0 8 6 0 0 9 4 0 0 3 7 0 O 11 4 0 Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 31 21 0 0 72 37 0 O 66.1 33.9 0 O 31.9 16.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ❑ 0 0 O 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 O 17 0 0 4 0 0 0 O 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 O 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 7 S} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 100 0 0. 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 0' 5.8 0 0 0 0 Out . In Total 71 I I 1 [.., IW 9L.. LAC Fi 7Th,u� L La • North 118/2008 04: 1!8/2006 0545 PM Unshifled 4_ T r' trill Thra Right Pads Di _104j_ Out In Total 30 34 23 24 111 226 11— A.11 Traffic Data File Name : GRASSMESA&CR319AM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/8/2008 Page No : 2 II— CR 319 GRASS MESA RD Southbound Westbound Start lime Leri Tn}u I Rigrn Pads ._ r,,, Left -rum ETZI Peak Hour Analys s From 07:0 t AM to 0 :45 - Peak 10 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 0 6 1 0 7 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 13 2 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 16 2 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 10 0 0 0 0 Talal volume %App. Tail PI -1F 0 0 0 0 45 5 0 0 90 10 0 15 18 10 50 CR 319 Northbound ® 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 .000 .703 .625 .000 .694 .000 .000 .000 .000 000 R in1Pad irdel GRASS MESA RD Eastbound Left rlxu I Rl1 I Peds l N, , W , tail O 10 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 11 18 O 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 7 29 0 9 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 5r 32 0 13 0 0 13 13 0 0 0 13 30 O 39 0 0 39 26 0 0 0 26 115 O 100 0 D 100 0 0 0 000 .750 .000 .000 .750 .500 .000 _000 .000 .500 , .7a8" CR 314 Out i In Total g 1 S7§] I 651 Left j Peak Hour Data North peek}snirr5egi6nOC8 00A,M Unschiftet1 1 All Traffic Data File Name : GRASSMESA&CR319AM Site Code - 00000000 Start Date : 1/8/2008 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Urtahifted CR 319 GRASS MESA RD CR 319 1 GRASS MESA R0 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound _. Start Time Left 1 Thru l Right l Peds 1Left Thru Right j Peds Left I Thru 1 Right' Peds Left I Thru I Right I Peds Int. Total j 07100 AM 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 18 07:15 AM 0 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 29 O 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 5 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 0 38 O 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 26 0 0 0 115 07:30 AM 0 16 2 0 07:45 AM 0 10 0 0 'rota! 0 45 5 0 08:00 AM 0 7 0 9 08:15 AM 0 7 0 0 08:30 AM 0 5 1 0 08:45 AM 0 11 2 0 Total 0 .10 3 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 75 8 0 0 0 D 0 Apprch % 0 90.4 9.6 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 40.5 4.3 0 0 0 0 0 O 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 O 9 0 0 4 0 0 0 O 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 0 0 0 O 23 0 q 14 0 0 0 O 62 0 0 0 100 0 0 O 33.5 0 0 15 20 13 22 70 40 0 0 0 185 100 0 0 0 21.6 0 0 0 —LBB I flE00dIasn TO c11oY �'a V�iw�i �'o�ii WP"+YiiA�Y4 �+N.onw r� 'ONi '9N Fkia'13 N F9N3 AWLI.Nfno3 1491H NV -1.1341g -13AHO ON3ON.OS^WN ONY BT31NYO OJ X1,111OO Q131321VD 'LTHN.N • O,33614 w 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis presented in this report, Kimley-Horn believes the proposed Quicksilver Court Subdivision will be successfully incorporated into the existing roadway network. The proposed development and expected traffic volumes resulted in the following recommendations: • It is recommended that all local roadways providing access to and from the Quicksilver Court Subdivision be designed in accordance with Chapter 5 of AASHTO's Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. • Based on a 25 mile per hour design speed, it is recommended that 155 feet of stopping sight distance be provided along the local roadways within the Grass Mesa Subdivision with a maximum grade of 11 percent. Based on traffic volume projections, it is believed that all local roads in this vicinity will be able to adequately handle the anticipated traffic with a single through lane in each direction. It is also recommended that the minimum width of the traveled way be 18 feet with a 2 foot shoulder. Intersections should be carefully located to avoid steep profile grades and to ensure adequate approach sight distance. • All on-site and off-site signing and striping improvements should be incorporated into the Civil Drawings, and conform to Garfield County stand ards, as well as the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices - 2003 Edition (MUTCD). Kincley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096071001- Quicksilver Court',inbdivision, Garfield County, CO Page 20 ICCOR KknieyHom and As=es, Inc. Project Daniels!Hasenberg Subdivision Subject Trip Generation for Single -Family Detached Hausinn Designed by HvW Daf e January 14, 2008 Checked by Date Job No, 096112.001 Sheet No. of TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation Manual 7th Edition, Average Rate Equations Land Use Code - Single -Family Detached Housing (210) Independant Variable - Dwelling Units (X) 4 = 14 T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Adjacent Sit Traffic. One Hour Betweeni and 9 a.m. (page 270) Daily Weekday (T) = 0.75(X) (T) = 0.75 * (14.0) Directional Distribution: 25% entering, 75% exiting T = 11 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 3 entering 8 exiting 3 + 8 Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic. One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.rn. (nage 2711 Daily Weekday (T) = 1.01(X) (T)=1.01 a (14.0) Peak Hour of Generator. Saturdav (page 2751 Daily Weekday (T) = 0.94(X) (T)=0.94" (14.0) Weekday ioage 269] Daily Weekday (T) = 9.57(X) (T)=9.57" (14.0) Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting T = 15 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 10 entering 5 exiting 10 + 5 = 15 Directional Distribution: 54% entering, 46% exiting T = 14 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 8 entering 6 exiting 8 + 6 14 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting T = 134 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 67 entering 67 exiting 67 + 67 = 134 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information 'Site Information Intersection West Mamm Creek and Grass Mesa Analyst HvW Agency/Co.A Jurisdiction Garfield County Date Performed 1114/2008 Analysis Year 2008 Total Analysis Time Period AM Project Description Daniels/Hasenberg Subdivision EastNVest Street: Grass Mesa Road ;Vann/South Street: West Mamm Creek Road (CR 319) Intersection Orientation: North-South (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R ()fume (veh/h) 0 39 45 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 'veh/h) 0 44 0 0 51 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 i — -- 0 -- — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 3onfiguration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Westbound iMinor Street Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 38 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) 43 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 - 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 v 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound ' Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT— LR r (veh/h) 0 43 C (m) (veh/h) 1541w 899 r/c 0.00 0.05 .35% queue length 0.00 0.15 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 9.2 LOS A A Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 9.2 Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright a 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 1/16/2008 12:59 PM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection West Mamm Creek and Grass Mesa Analyst HvW Agency/Co. KNA Jurisdiction Garfield County Date Performed 111412008 Analysis Year 2008 Analysis Time Period PM Project Description East/West Street: Grass Mesa Road North/South Street: West Mamm Creek Road (CR 319) intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period Ors): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L_ T R L T R Jolume (veh/h) 0 66 37 16 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 75 0 0 42 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- edian Type Undivided 1RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Jolume (veh/h) 8 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 9 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N T Storage 0 0 iRT Channelized 0 y 0 Lanes o 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR , Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound IMovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 0 9 C (m) (veh/h) 1544 869 v/c 0.00 0.01 ` 95% queue length 0.00 0.03 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 9.2 LOS A _ A Approach Delay (s/veh) — -- 9.2 Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright 0 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS}TM Version 5,2 Generated: 1114/2008 3:04 PM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information West Mamm Creek and Grass Analyst HvW Intersection Mesa M Agency/Co. KHA Jurisdiction Garfield County Date Performed fI14I2008 Analysis Year 2008 LAnalysis Time Period AM Project Description East/West Street: Grass Mesa Road North/South Street: West Mamrn Creek Road (CR 319) Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound southbound (Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T - R Volume (veh/h) 0 39 45 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR1 (veh/h) 0 44 0 0 51 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 onfiguration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 26 0 eak-(Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 'veh/h) 29 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 IFlared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 onfiguration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LT A LR v (veh/h) 0 29 C (m) (veh/h) 1549 _ 901 v/c 0,00 0.03 95% queue length 0.00 0.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 9.1 LOS A A Approach Delay (s/veh) - — 9.1 approach LOS -- -- A Copyright 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 1/1412008 3:04 PM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection West Mamm Creek and Grass Mesa Analyst HvW Agency/Co. 1(t-{,4 Jurisdiction Garfield County Date Performed 1/14/2008 Year 2008 Total Analysis Time Period PMAnalysis `roject Description ❑anielslHasenberg Subdivision East/West Street: Grass Mesa Road North/South Street: West Mama? Creek Road (CR 319) intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0,25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments aior Street Northbound Southbound ovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T _ R L T R plume (veh/h) 0 66 37 32 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 75 0 0 42 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT 1 TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 78 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R ofume (veh/h) 16 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) 18 0 0 0 0 0 -ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 _ 0 2 0 _ 0 0 +Percent Grade (%) 0 0 IFlared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 onfiguration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT_ LR i (veh/h) 0 18 C (m) (veh/h) 1520 859 rlc 0.00 0.02 35% queue length 0.00 0.06 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 9.3 LOS A A Approach Delay (s/veh) - -- 9.3 Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 1/16/2008 12:59 PM Kimley>»Horn June 26, 2017 Ms. Jena Skinner, AICP JS Designs, LLC PO Box 116 Minturn, CO 81645-0116 Re: Quicksilver ADUs Traffic Compliance Letter Garfield County, Colorado Dear Ms. Skinner: This traffic compliance letter documents a trip generation comparison for the proposed Quicksilver ADUs residential development in Garfield County, Colorado. The proposed Quicksilver ADUs is located north of Grass Mesa Road along the west side of Quicksilver Way, southeast of the City of Rifle and southwest of the Garfield County Airport. The proposed residential development was previously studied with seven lots that may include primary and secondary residences on each lot; therefore, 14 total dwelling units for the overall development was analyzed to yield a conservative result. Kimley-Horn previously conducted a Traffic Impact Study for this project, "Quicksilver Court Subdivision Traffic Impact Study", dated April 2008. The current proposed development does not propose any land use changes from the study completed in April 2008. The purpose of this letter is to provide a trip generation comparison for the currently proposed Quicksilver Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) to the findings in the Quicksilver Court Subdivision Traffic Impact Study to determine the difference in site generated traffic. The current project is anticipated to develop ADUs on Lots 4 through 7, for a total of four (4) accessory dwelling units. As previously identified, the original traffic study included ADUs on each of the seven Tots, so these units have already been accounted for within the original traffic study. Site -generated traffic estimates are determined through a process known as trip generation. Rates and equations are applied to the proposed land use to estimate traffic generated by the development during a specific time interval. The acknowledged source for trip generation rates is the Trip Generation Report' published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). ITE has established trip rates in nationwide studies of similar land uses. Trip generation is based on the ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition (most current edition) fitted curve and average rate equations for single-family detached housing. The original traffic study calculated single-family detached housing with ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition due to this being the most current edition in 2008. The following table summarizes the anticipated trip generation for the proposed four dwelling units (trip generation calculations are attached) compared to the use previously studied with all seven lots including accessory dwelling units for a total of 14 units. As summarized in the table, the currently proposed four dwelling units of this Quicksilver ADUs project is anticipated to generate 38 daily trips with 3 trips occurring during the morning peak hour, and 4 trips occurring during the afternoon peak hour. Based on the previous traffic study, the previously proposed total Quicksilver Court Subdivision residential development was anticipated to generate 134 daily trips with 11 trips occurring during the morning peak hour, and 15 trips occurring during the afternoon peak hour. 1 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation: An Information Report, Ninth Edition, Washington DC, 2012. kimley-horn.com 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500, Denver, CO 80237 303 228 2300 Kimley>»Horn Trip Generation Comparison Quicksilver Court Subdivision vs. Quicksilver ADUs Ms. Skinner June 26, 2017 Page 2 USE AND SIZE Daily Trips WEEKDAY VEHICLE TRIPS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Previous Study — Quicksilver Court Subdivision (14 Units) Single -Family Detached Housing (14 Dwelling Units — 7th Edition) 134 3 8 11 10 5 15 Current Proposal — Quicksilver ADUs (4 Units) Single -Family Detached Housing (4 Dwelling Units — 9th Edition) 38 1 2 3 3 1 4 Net Difference in Trips -96 -2 -6 -8 -7 -4 -11 Based on these results, development of four (4) single-family accessory dwelling units within the proposed Quicksilver Court Subdivision residential development should not change the results of the original study. Therefore, the proposed Quicksilver ADUs project is believed to be in traffic compliance with the original "Quicksilver Court Subdivision Traffic Impact Study", completed by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. in April 2008, which included this development area. It is believed that all potential traffic impacts with the proposed project have been previously addressed within the original traffic impact study. As demonstrated within this original traffic study, the surrounding street network and proposed access will successfully accommodate this project traffic volume. We believe no further traffic analysis is needed due to this proposal. If you have any questions or require anything further, please feel free to call me at (303) 228-2304. Sincerely, KIML Y -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ./t< X."( Curtis D. Rowe, P.E., PTOE Vice President kimley-horn.com 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500, Denver, CO 80237 303 228 2300 Project Quicksilver ADUs (4 Units) Subject Trip Generation for Single -Family Detached Housing Designed by Curtis Rowe Date June 26, 2017 Job No. 96633000 Checked by Date Sheet No. of TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition, Average Rate Equations Land Use Code - Single -Family Detached Housing (210) Independent Variable - Dwelling Units (X) X = 4 T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (page 297) Average Weekday (T) = 0.75(X) (T) = 0.75 * (4.0) Directional Distribution: 25% entering, 75% exiting T = 3 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 1 entering 2 exiting 1 + 2 = 3 Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. (page 298) Average Weekday (T) = 1.00(X) (T) = 1.00 * (4.0) Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting T = 4 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 3 entering 1 exiting 3 + 1 = 4 Peak Hour of Generator, Saturday (page 302) Average Saturday Directional Distribution: 54% entering, 46% exiting (T) = 0.93(X) T = 4 Average Vehicle Trip Ends (T) = 0.93 * (4.0) 2 entering 2 exiting 2 + 2 m 4 Weekday (page 296) Average Weekday (T) = 9 52(X) (T) = 9.52 * (4.0) Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting T = 38 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 19 entering 19 exiting 19 + 19 38 Kimley>>>Horn T R A F F I C IMFACT STUDY L Quicksilver Court Subdivision Garfield County, Colorado Prepared for High Country Engineering 1517 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 950 Seventeenth Street Suite 1050 Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 228-2300 (303) 446-8678 FAX April 2008 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document zr'ithout written authorization and adaptation by Kinrley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall he without liability to Kinrley-Horn and Associates, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDICES LIST OF TABLES ii LIST OF FIGURES 11 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 3 3.0 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS 5 3.1 Existing and Future Roadway Network 5 3.2 Existing Study Area 7 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes 7 3.4 Anticipated Developments' Contribution to Background Traffic 7 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 10 4.1 Trip Generation 10 4.2 Trip Distribution 11 4.3 Traffic Assignment and Total (Background Plus Project) 'fraffic 11 5.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS 15 5.1 Analysis Methodology 15 5.2 Key Intersection Operational Analysis 16 5.3 Design of Local Roads 18 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 20 APPENDICES Appendix A - Conceptual Site Plan Appendix B - Intersection Count Sheets Appendix C - Trip Generation Worksheet Appendix D - HCS Analysis Worksheets Kin:ley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096071001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO Page i LIST OF TABLES --. — 10 Table 1- Quicksilver Court Subdivision Traffic Generation 15 Table 2 - Level of Service Definitions Table 3 - Mamm Creek Road (CR -319) & Grass Mesa Road LOS Results 17 LIST OF FIGURES 4 Figure 1- Vicinity Map 6 Figure 2 - Existing Laneage and Control Figure 3 - Weekday Existing Traffic Volumes 8 Figure 4 - 2008 Background Traffic Volumes 9 12 Figure 5 - Trip Distribution 13 Figure 6 - Traffic Assignment Figure 7 - Existing 2008 Plus Project Traffic 14 Kinney -Horn and Associates, tuc. Page ii 096071001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Quicksilver Court Subdivision is proposed within the Grass Mesa Subdivision north of Grass Mesa Road along the west side of Quicksilver Way, southeast of the City of Rifle and southwest of the Garfield County Airport in Garfield County, Colorado. The residential development is anticipated to include seven lots. Development may include a primary and secondary residence on each lot. Therefore this study assumes development of fourteen (14) dwelling units to be conservative. As directed by Garfield County staff, analysis was completed for the existing plus project traffic condition. The purpose of this study is to identify traffic generation characteristics, to identify potential traffic related impacts on the County and local street system, and to develop mitigation measures required for identified impacts. Garfield County staff identified the key intersection of Mamm Creek Road (CR -319) with Grass Mesa Road for evaluation in this study. Regional access to the site is provided by 1-70, US -6, and SH -13. Primary access to the site is provided by Mamm Creek Road (CR -319). Direct access to the residential lots will be from Quicksilver Way. The Quicksilver Court Subdivision is expected to generate approximately 134 daily weekday driveway trips. Of these, 11 trips are expected to occur during the weekday morning peak hour, while 15 trips are expected during the weekday afternoon peak hour. Distribution of site traffic on the street system was based on the area street system characteristics, existing traffic patterns to and from the site, and the access system for the project. Assignment of the project traffic was based upon the trip generation described previously and the distributions developed. Based on the analysis presented in this report, Kimley-Horn believes the proposed Quicksilver Court Subdivision will be successfully incorporated into the existing roadway network. The Kinmley-Hors and Associates, Inc. 096071001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Canfield Count, CO Page 1 proposed development and expected traffic volumes resulted in the following recommendations: • It is recommended that all local roadways providing access to and from the Quicksilver Court Subdivision be designed in accordance with Chapter 5 of AASHTO's Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. • Based on a 25 mile per hour design speed, it is recommended that 155 feet of stopping sight distance be provided along the Local roadways within the Grass Mesa Subdivision with a maximum grade of 11 percent. Based on traffic volume projections, it is believed that all local roads in this vicinity will be able to adequately handle the anticipated traffic with a single through lane in each direction. It is also recommended that the minimum width of the traveled way be 18 feet with a 2 foot shoulder. Intersections should be carefully located to avoid steep profile grades and to ensure adequate approach sight distance. • All on-site and off-site signing and striping improvements should be incorporated into the Civil Drawings, and conform to Garfield County stand ards, as well as the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices - 2003 Edition (MUTCD). !Gulley -Horn raid Associates, Inc, Page 2 096071001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield Comity, CO 1 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) has prepared this report to document the results of a Traffic Impact Study of future traffic conditions associated with the propose d Quicksilver Court Subdivision to be located within the Grass Mesa Subdivision north of Grass Mesa Road along the west side of Quicksilver Way, in Garfield County, Colorado. The vicinity map illustrating the site location is shown in Figure 1. The residential development is anticipated to include seven lots. Development may include a primary and secondary residence on each Iot. Therefore, this study was conducted assuming development of fourteen (14) dwelling units to be conservative. As directed by Garfield County staff, analysis was completed for the existing plus project traffic condition. The current site plan is included in Appendix A. The purpose of this study is to identify traffic generation characteristics, to identify potential traffic related impacts on the County and local street system, and to develop mitigation measures required for identified impacts. Garfield County staff identified the key intersection of Mamm Creek Road (CR -319) with Grass Mesa Road for evaluation in this study. Regional access to the site is provided by I-70, US -6, and SH -13. Primary access to the site is provided by Mamm Creek Road (CR -319). Direct access to the residential lots will be from Quicksilver Way. Kinrley-Horn and Associates, inc. 096071001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO Page 3 3.0 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS 3.1 Existing and Future Roadway Network Regional access to the proposed Quicksilver Court Subdivision is anticipated to be provided by Interstate 70, US Highway 6, and State Highway 13. Primary access to the project site is provided by Marren Creek Road (CR -319). West Mamm Creek Road (CR -319) is a north -south roadway that provides a single lane of travel in each direction with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour. Direct access to the residential lots will be from Quicksilver Way. The T - intersection of West Mamm Creek Road (CR -319) with Grass Mesa Road operates with stop control for the eastbound approach of Grass Mesa Road. Grass Mesa Road is a two lane private road with a posted speed limit of 15 miles per hour. The existing intersection lane configuration and control for the study area intersection are shown in Figure 2. Kinmley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 0960 71 001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO Page 5 Nic 1 1Th nrs 096071001 GARFIELD COUNTY AIRPORT MUSTANG MESA TRAIL yq 5S WV, ROAD 1IY •nr - 1 Y101( _ 1 FIGURE 1 QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO VICINITY MAP 4 ciari and AC anA f.S sHorn es, Inc. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Kimley-Horn's analysis of traffic operations in the site vicinity was conducted to determine potential capacity deficiencies in the existing 2008 condition at the identified key intersection. The acknowledged source for determining overall capacity is the current edition of the Highway Capacity Manunl2. 5.1 Analysis Methodology Capacity analysis results are listed in terms of Level of Service (LOS). LOS is a qualitative term describing operating conditions a driver will experience while traveling on a particular street or highway during a specific time interval. It ranges from A (very little delay) to F (long delays and congestion). For intersections and roadways in this study area, Kimley-Horn recommends intersection LOS D as the minimum threshold for acceptable operations. Table 2 shows the definition of level of service for unsignalized intersections. Table 2 - Level of Service Definitions Level of Service Unsignalized Intersection Average Total Delay (sec'veh) A 510 B >l0and 515 C >15and 525 D >25 and 5 35 E >35 ands 50 F >50 Definitions provided from the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2000. 22 Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Washington DC, 2000, Kiniley-Hoar and Associates, Inc. 096071001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield Count, CO Page 15 Study Arco Key Intersection AM(PI,t) Peak Hour Traffic Volume Estimated Doily Trolfic Volume J =nKimor d Associates, crn pn 5bCi0 tCS, I^C 4 LlilY: n MUSrANO MESA MALI. 1"..14=41=Er11--+ HIS O*O71QOI I.i AIL ,'4 A NA CRASS MESA ROAD r LEGEND: • F— XX (xx) FIGURE 7 2 QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION �GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 008 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC -Hc and A .n _ _ and Assoc ales, inc 1 NTS 096071001 FIGURE 6 QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT LEGEND: •1 Study Area Key Intersection E-- XX (XX) AM(PM) Peok hour Troflic Volume rminKimlr y'• I1Um and A: sncintes, Inc • NGIP F=t'T' 1 MS 096071001 MUSTANG MESA TRAIL 0 u ti ,PROJECT.9 Kr PA GRASS IKEA ROAD FIGURE 5 QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO TRIP DISTRIBUTION OMVL ti LEGEND: Study Area Key Intersection Entering(Exiting) Percentage of Vehicles J 4.2 Trip Distribution Distribution of site traffic on the street system was based on the area street system characteristics, existing traffic patterns, and the proposed future access system for the site. The directional distribution of traffic is a means to quantify the percentage of site -generated traffic that approaches the site from a given direction and departs the site back to the original source. The project trip distribution is illustrated in Figure 5. 4.3 Traffic Assignment and Total (Background Plus Project) Traffic Traffic assignment was obtained by applying the project trip distribution to the estimated traffic generation of the development shown in Table 1. Project traffic assignment for the site is shown in Figure 6. Site traffic volumes were added to the 2008 bac kground volumes to represent current traffic conditions with the addition of the Suarez single-family residential development and the Quicksilver Court Subdivision. These total traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 7. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096071001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO Page 11 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 4.1 Trip Generation Site -generated traffic estimates are determined through a process known as trip generation. Rates and equations are applied to the proposed land use to estimate traffic generated by the development during a specific time interval. The acknowledged source for trip generation rates is the Trip Generation Report) published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). ITE has established trip rates in nationwide studies of similar land uses. For this study, Kimley- Horn used the ITE Trip Generation Report average rate equations that apply to Single -Family Detached Housing (210) for traffic associated with the development. The Quicksilver Court Subdivision is expected to generate approximately 134 daily weekday driveway trips. Of these, 11 trips are expected to occur during the weekday morning peak hour, while 15 trips are expected during the weekday afternoon peak hour. Table 1 summarizes the estimated traffic generation for the proposed development. The trip generation worksheet is included in Appendix C. These calculations illustrate the equations used, directional distribution of trips, and number of daily trips based on the published ITE rates. Table 1 - Quicksilver Court Subdivision Traffic Generation I.und Use Single -Family Detached I lousing Independent Variable Daily AM Peak Hour Trips Inter 14 dwelling units L134 f 3 Exit Total 8 11 PM Peak Hour 1 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation: An Information Report, Seventh Edition, Washington DC, 2003. lemuiry. Horn and Associates, Inc. Pn c W 0960 71 001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO g' AIS OHmur1Oc] MV5IANG MESA 1RML 3o(1I) — 0(01—N GRASS MESA ROAD 1 LEGEND: • e - xx (xx) FIGURE 4 QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 2008 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES Study Areo Key Inlerseclion AM(PM) Peok Hour Troffic Volume r g37EZ9 IV c R h -f NTS 006071001 MuS71W0 UES• TRAM v Tuesday, January 8, 2008 7:00-8:00 A.M. , 4:30-5:30 P.M. T FIGURE 3 QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 2008 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEGEND: ■ 1 xx (xx) Study Areo Key Intersection AM(PM) Peak Hour Trollic Volume r;- Kimlky-florn onA Associates, Inc 3.2 Existing Study Area The existing project site is located within the Grass Mesa Subdivision and is comprised of vacant land. Various residential uses are located in the surrounding areas. The downtown commercial district of the City of Rifle is located approximately 3 miles northwest of the site. The Garfield County Airport is located northeast of the site. 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes Existing peak hour turning movement counts were conducted at the study intersection of West Mamm Creek Road (CR -319) with Grass Mesa Road on Tuesday, January 8, 2008. The counts were conducted during the AM and PM peak hours of adjacent street traffic in 15 -minute intervals from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM on this count date. Existing turning movement counts are shown in Figure 3 with count sheets provided in Appendix B. 3.4 Anticipated Developments' Contribution to Background Traffic The Suarez residential development is also proposed to be constructed within the Grass Mesa Subdivision on the southeast corner of Grass Mesa Road and Rodeo Drive in Garfield County, CO. Kimley-Horn and Associates performed the Traffic Impact Analysis for this development in January 2008. This residential development is anticipated to include eight (8) single-family dwelling units. Projected traffic volumes for this development have been incorporated into the existing turning movement counts at the key study intersection to accurately model traffic once this development is complete. The 2008 traffic volumes including the project traffic volumes from the Suarez development are shown in Figure 4. Kindely-Hoa n and Associntes, Inc. 096071001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO Page 7 NU tTH ITIS 095071001 FIGURE 2 QUICKSILVER COURT SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO LEGEND: 1 mnv 25 Study Area Key Intersection Stop Controlled Approach Posted Speed Limit LANE CONFIGURATION AND CONTROL rC�� Kimley-Horn I_ and A55o[.lole9, Ing The study area intersection was analyzed based on average total delay analysis for unsignalized intersections. Under the unsignalized analysis, the level of service (LOS) for a two-way stop controlled intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is defined for each minor movement. Level of service for a two-way stop -controlled intersection is not defined for the intersection as a whole. 5.2 Key Intersection Operational Analysis Calculations for the level of service at the key intersection for the study are provided in Appendix D. All analyses are based on the lane geometry and intersection control shown in Figure 2. The HCS recommended peak hour factor of 0.88 for rural areas was used in the analyses. LOS for two-way stop controlled intersections was calculated using HCS analysis software. Kineley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096071001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO Page 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mamm Creek Road (CR -319) & Grass Mesa Road The existing T -intersection of Manure Creek Road (CR -319) with Grass Mesa Road operates with stop control along the eastbound approach of Grass Mesa Road. The results of this analysis indicate that all movements at this intersection currently operate acceptably (LOS A) during both the AM and PM peak hours. It is anticipated that all movements will continue to operate acceptably during both the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of project traffic. Table 3 provides the results of the level of service at this intersection. Table 3 - Mamm Creek Road (CR -319) & Grass Mesa Road LOS Results Scenario AM Peak Delay (sec/veh) Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS 2008 Existing Northbound Approach Eastbound Approach 7.3 _ _ _ 9.1 _ 7.3 9.2 A A 7.3 9.2 _ A A 2008 Existing Plus Project Northbound Approach Eastbound Approach _ A _ A 7.4 9.3 A A Kinney -Horn and Associates, Inc. 096071007- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO Page 17 5.3 Design of Local Roads The local roadways providing access to and from the Quicksilver Court Subdivision should be designed in accordance with AASHTO's Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Chapter 5 provides guidance for the design of local rural roads with respect to design speeds, stopping sight distance, maximum grades, etc. A majority of these criteria are based on the design speed of the road. The posted speed limit along Grass Mesa Road is 15 miles per hour. Therefore, it is assumed that the design speed for this road and other local roads within the Grass Mesa Subdivision is 25 miles per hour based on the guideline that the design speed of a roadway is ten (10) miles per hour greater than the posted speed limit. Based on a 25 mile per hour design speed, 155 feet of stopping sight distance should be provided along these roads according to Exhibit 5-2. Design Controls for Stopping Sight Distance and for Crest and Sag Vertical Curves. The maximum grade for a design speed of 25 miles per hour with rolling terrain is 11 percent, based on Exhibit 5-4. Maximum Grades for Local Rural Roads. Two travel lanes usually can accommodate the normal traffic volume on rural local roads. If exceptional traffic volumes occur in specific areas, additional lanes may be provided in accordance with design criteria in Chapter 2 of AASHTO's Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Based on traffic volume projections, it is believed that all local roads in this vicinity will be able to adequately handle the anticipated traffic with a single through lane in each direction. According to Exhibit 5-5. Minimum Width of Traveled Way and Shoulders, the minimum width of the traveled way for a design speed of 25 miles per hour and under 400 vehicles per day is 18 feet with a 2 foot shoulder. To estimate the average daily traffic volume within the Grass Mesa Subdivision, it was assumed that the AM and PM peak hour traffic volume along Grass Mesa Road each represent approximately ten percent of the average daily traffic volume. Therefore, with the addition of project traffic, the average daily traffic volume along Grass Mesa Road and the other local roadways in this subdivision is estimated to be less than 400 vehicles per day. Intersections should be carefully located to avoid steep profile grades and to ensure adequate approach sight distance. Kinney -Horn and Asociates, Inc. Page 18 096071001- Qnicksiliwr Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO .AI1 ''Traffic .Dat.ri, r-1; 1Ir. File Name : GRASSMESA&CR319PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/8/2008 Page No : 2 CR 319 GRASS MESA RD CR 319 GRASS MESA RD Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound _ 1. Start Time Leff Trw , i pnas 1 R,, ,..,' Left rhr„ Rq r1i Paas Tao Lott 77 RIJN i.Peah [ ,,. f,t,!J LehJ lieu i Nei i ?!da L�.,,.r I, 11 Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 ai 1 Peak Hour for Entre Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 0 7 8 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 29 04:45 PM 0 13 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 18 3 0 0 3 34 05:00 PM 0 8 8 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 15 1 0 0 1 30 05:15 PM 0 9 4 13 0 0 0 0 00 17 0 0 17 4 0 0 41 34 Tour Vohr 0 37 18 53 0 0 0 0 0_ 6. 86 0 0 66 8 0 0 8[ 127 % pp. Toot! 0 89.8 30.2 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 AHF 000 .712 .687 .00 .948 000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .917 .000 .000 .917 .500 .000 .000 .000 .500 ' _.834 elf 310 OulTotal I® 74 1 127!-01et Peak Hour Data North I HcurBegat' at04.30PM LinahiRed T r tell Thal RI h Peds 1. -PI_ .1_ aJ.Ql CR 314 —la 4—VIQ 0 it 1/9/2008134:00 PM 1/9/200805:45 PM I Uneh1964 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 StartTi 04:00 PI 04:15 P 04:30 P 04:45 P Tot 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total All T>. c:fTic. Data r...r m m a3.,: ivs in .ern.:-+rr File Name GRASSMESA&CR319PM Site Code 00000000 Start Date : 1/8/2008 Page No 11 Printed- Unshlfted Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 8 6 0 O 9 4 0 O 3 7 0 O 11 4 0 0 31 21 0 O 72 37 0 O 66.1 33.9 0 O 31.9 16.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 O 17 0 0• 4 0 0 0 O 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 O 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 7 0 0 0 30 34 23 24 111 0 0 0 0 0 104 0 0 13 0 0 0 228 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 i 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46. 0 0; 5.8 0 0 0 &0310 i:7rel 1 2201 1_. 371 721 _ 4 R1. 4nig tat1 Pada 4 lj "i NorthT T i' leis T R t4 Pols L•1__104 .._r_ P1. nk da In tots OR 319 CR 319 Southbound GRASS MESA RD Westbound CR 319 Northbound — GRASS Eastbound MESA RD ThruRight 1 e Left . Thru Right l Peds Left 0 0 0 0 Thru 0 0 0 0 - r M i Peds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Left ® 0 7 0 11 0 16 0 18 RIphl Peds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r Left 1 Peds Int. Total M M M M sl 0 0 0 13 8 7 13 4 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 29 34 0 41 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 6 0 0 115 Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 8 6 0 O 9 4 0 O 3 7 0 O 11 4 0 0 31 21 0 O 72 37 0 O 66.1 33.9 0 O 31.9 16.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 O 17 0 0• 4 0 0 0 O 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 O 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 7 0 0 0 30 34 23 24 111 0 0 0 0 0 104 0 0 13 0 0 0 228 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 i 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46. 0 0; 5.8 0 0 0 &0310 i:7rel 1 2201 1_. 371 721 _ 4 R1. 4nig tat1 Pada 4 lj "i NorthT T i' leis T R t4 Pols L•1__104 .._r_ P1. nk da In tots OR 319 Peek War &skis at 07:00 AMI Unstinted 1 File Name GRASSMESA&CR319AM Site Code 00000000 Start Date : 1/8/2008 Page No . 2 GR 319 ; GRASS MESA Ra CR 318 GRASS MESA RD j ii JSDtllht7Cund WaBtbound T Northbound J Eeat6aured $tali i3R1e Le$ 3 T1>ru I R19FN P¢dS i .y, .... L9f1 I 'mu r Rlalk f Ped* I ... �. 1 -Thru [ ROI . prfds .v „r Left Tfw R Peds • T.." K ?Me freak Hour Analysts From 07:00 AM lo 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour far E life Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 6 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 1 0 0 0 1 18 07:15 AM 13 2 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 7 0 0 0 7 29 07:30 AM 16 2 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 5 0 0 0 5 32 07:46 AM 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 13 0 0 0 13 36 Total volume 45 5 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 39 26 0 0 0 28 115 et .;., Tela/ 90 10 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 __ .000 .703 .525 .000 .094 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 750 .000 .000 .750 .500 .000 .000 .000 .500 799 s V) CR 319 Out In Tow T f 1 % .1 1 1 Peak Hour Data Nath 4l Lnfl Thru ,r T! Pada al 451 E. .31 T"�1 Out In Total CR 512 r-- 4-3 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A17 :1Jat �ras'i lam+# s a aea2-+d n nfrr.:a* Groups Printed- U nshMed File Name : GRASSMESA&CR319AM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/8/2008 Page No : 1 08:00 AM 0 7 0 0 08:15 AM 0 7 0 0 08:30 AM 0 5 1 0 08.45 AM 0 11 2 0 Tota1 0 30 3 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 5 0 0 0 9 0 0 O 2 0 0 O 7 0 0 0 23 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 00 0 114 o_ 0 a rote 1 29 32 36 115 15 20 13 22 Grand Total 0 75 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 40 0 0 0 185 Apprch % 0 90.4 9.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 0 Total % 0 40.6 4.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.5 0 0 21.6 0 0 0 CR 319 Southbound GRASS MESA RD Westbound CR 319 Northbound GRASS MESA RD Eastbound Start Time Left ® Right 1 Peds Left ® Right Peds Left - e ht Peds Lel ' Thru i Right L Peds Int. 07:00 AM 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 r r 1 0 0 D 07:15 AM 0 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 5 0 0 0 07:45AM0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 45 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 �Trtal 08:00 AM 0 7 0 0 08:15 AM 0 7 0 0 08:30 AM 0 5 1 0 08.45 AM 0 11 2 0 Tota1 0 30 3 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 5 0 0 0 9 0 0 O 2 0 0 O 7 0 0 0 23 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 00 0 114 o_ 0 a rote 1 29 32 36 115 15 20 13 22 Grand Total 0 75 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 40 0 0 0 185 Apprch % 0 90.4 9.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 0 Total % 0 40.6 4.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.5 0 0 21.6 0 0 0 L/6t-zseoor I 0N F7TIIN33N{9N .ta wnQn HflJH NW -Wain NO 01101:01311YN ONV PI INV O AINw,a lavvv SOMVO / OtOSPOTM YgG tk 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis presented m this report, Kimley-Horn believes the proposed Quicksilver Court Subdivision will be successfully incorporated into the existing roadway network. The proposed development and expected traffic volumes resulted in the following recommendations: + It is recommended that all local roadways providing access to and from the Quicksilver Court Subdivision be designed in accordance with Chapter 5 of AASHTO's Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. • Based on a 25 mile per hour design speed, it is recommended that 155 feet of stopping sight distance be provided along the local roadways within the Grass Mesa Subdivision with a maximum grade of 11 percent. Based on traffic volume projections, it is believed that all local roads in this vicinity will be able to adequately handle the anticipated traffic with a single through lane in each direction. It is also recommended that the minimum width of the traveled way be 13 feet with a 2 foot shoulder. Intersections should be carefully located to avoid steep profile grades and to ensure adequate approach sight distance. • All on-site and off-site signing and striping improvements should be incorporated into the Civil Drawings, and conform to Garfield County stand ards, as well as the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices - 2003 Edition (MUTCD). Kineley-Horn and Associates, Inc, 096071001- Quicksilver Court Subdivision, Garfield County, CO Page 20 �I MIS, Kimley Morn and Assoctates, Inc. Project DanielsII-Iasenberg Subdivision Subject Trip Generation for Single -Family Detached Housing Design d by HvW Data January 14, 2008 Job No. 096112.001 Checked by Date Sheet No. of TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trio Generation Manual 7th Edition, Average Rate Equations Larid Use Code - Single -Family Detached Housing (210) Independent Variable - Dwelling Units (X) X = 14 T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Your of Adjacent Street Traffic. One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (page 270) Daily Weekday (T)= 0.75(X) (T)=0.75" (14.0) Directional Distribution: 25% entering, 75% exiting T = 11 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 3 entering 8 exiting 3 + 8 = 11 Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. (page 271) Daily Weekday (T) = 1.01(X) (T) = 1.01 • (14.0) Peak Hour of Generator. Saturday (page 275) Daily Weekday (T) = 0.94(X) (T) = 0.94 Weekday (page 269) (14.0) Daily Weekday (T)= 9.57(X) (T) = 9.57 " (14.0) Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting T = 15 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 10 entering 5 exiting 10 + 5 = 15 Directional Distribution: 54% entering, 46% exiting T = 14 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 8 entering 6 exiting 8 + 6 14 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting T = 134 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 67 entering 67 exiting 67 + 67 = 134 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information Project Description DanielsIHasenberg Subdivision East/West Street: Grass Masa Road ' Intersection Orientation: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 North/South Street: West Mamm Creek Road (CR 319) Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Major Street Movement Northbound Southbound 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type IRT Channelized Lanes Configuration pstream Signal Winer Street Movement 0 39 45 10 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 • 0 44 0 0 51 11 2 0 Undivided 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 LT TR 0 0 Eastbound Westbound 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R ✓olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor. PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (vehTh) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized Lanes Configuration 38 0 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 43 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Movement Northbound 1 Southbound Westbound Eastbound 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration v (veh/h) (m) (veh/h) LT LR 0 43 1541 899 Inc/ 0.00 0.05 95% queue length Control Delay (s/veh) LOS 0.00 0.15 7.3 • 9.2 A A Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Copyright ® 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved 9.2 A HCS+TM Version 5 2 Generated: 1/16/2008 12:58 PM West Mamm Creek and Grass Analyst HvW Intersection Agency/Co. KHA Jurisdiction .Mesa Garfield County Dale Performed 1/1412008 Analysis Year 2008 Total Analysis Time Period AM Project Description DanielsIHasenberg Subdivision East/West Street: Grass Masa Road ' Intersection Orientation: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 North/South Street: West Mamm Creek Road (CR 319) Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Major Street Movement Northbound Southbound 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type IRT Channelized Lanes Configuration pstream Signal Winer Street Movement 0 39 45 10 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 • 0 44 0 0 51 11 2 0 Undivided 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 LT TR 0 0 Eastbound Westbound 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R ✓olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor. PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (vehTh) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized Lanes Configuration 38 0 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 43 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Movement Northbound 1 Southbound Westbound Eastbound 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration v (veh/h) (m) (veh/h) LT LR 0 43 1541 899 Inc/ 0.00 0.05 95% queue length Control Delay (s/veh) LOS 0.00 0.15 7.3 • 9.2 A A Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Copyright ® 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved 9.2 A HCS+TM Version 5 2 Generated: 1/16/2008 12:58 PM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst West Mamm Creek and Grass Mesa 'HvW Agency/Co._KHA Analysis Year 2008 Date Perfored 1/14/2008 Analysis Time Period PM Intersection West Mamm Creek and Grass Mesa Jurisdiction Garfield County Analysis Year 2008 Project Description East/West Street: Grass Mesa Road Intersection Orientation: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments :Major Street Movement 1 North/South Street: West Mamm Creek Road (CR 319) Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Northbound Southbound 2 3 4 5 L T R L T CVolume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type RT Channelized 0 66 37 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 6 R 16 0.88 0 75 0 0 42 18 2 0 Undivided 0 0 i_anes lConfiguralion Upstream Signal 0 1 0 0 1 0 LT TR 0 0 J Minor Street Movement Eastbound Westbound 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) (Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized (Lanes Configuration 8 0 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 9 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LR IDelay, Queue Length and Level of Service Approach Movement Northbound 1 Southbound Westbound Eastbound 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration ,v (veh/h) C (m) (veh/h) v/c LT LR 0 9 1544 0.00 869 _ 0.01 95% queue length Control Delay (s/veh) LOS 0.00 0.03 7.3 9.2 A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 9.2 Approach LOS A Copyright 0 2005 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 1/14!2008 3:04 PM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Analyst 'HvW Agency/Co. 1CHA Date Performed 1114/2008 , Analysis Time Period AM Site Information intersection '/West Mamm Creek and Grass, Mesa Jurisdiction Garfield County Analysis Year 2008 Project Description EasVWest Street: Grass Mesa Road Intersection Orientation: North-South North/South Street: West Mamm Creek Road (CR 319) Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movement 1 Northbound Southbound 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (vehlh) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type iRT Channelized 0 39 45 5 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0 44 0 0 51 5 2 0 Undivided 0 0 (Lanes onflguration Upstream Signal Minor Street ovement 0 1 0 0 1 0 LT TR 0 0 Eastbound Westbound 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) eak-Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channellzed Lanes onfiguratlon 26 0 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 29 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Movement Lane Configuration (veh/h) (m) (veh/h) u/c Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 LT 0 1549 0.00 LR 29 901 0.03 D5% queue length Control Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.00 0.10 7.3 9.1 A A 9.1 Approach LOS A Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 1/14/2008 3:04 PM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information ilntersection West Mamm Creek and Grass Mesa Analyst HvW Agency/Co. KHA Jurisdiction Garfield County (]ate Performed 1/i412008 Analysis Year 2008 Total Analysis Time Period ,-M -roject Description Daniels/Hasenbarg Subdivision astfWest Street: Grass Mesa Road North/South Street: West Mamm Creek Road (CR 219) intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ajor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 0 66 37 32 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) 0 75 n 0 0 42 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- _ - 0 -- - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 ILanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 onfiguration LT TR Upstream Signal v 0 0 (nor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 16 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 t 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (vehlh) 18 0 0 0 0 0 '-ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 _ 2 0 0 0 percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 ILanes 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 ontiguretion LR I slay, Queue Length, and Level of Service • •proach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement Movement 1 4 .-,- 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT. LR v (vehlh) 0 18 C (m) (veh/h) 1520 ! vlc 0.00 ..859 _ 0.02 95% queue length 0.00 0.06 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 9.3 LOS A _ A Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- - 9.3 Approach LOS _ — -- -- A Copyright ® 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 1/16/2006 12:59 PM