Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubsoil Study for Foundation Design 06.29.17H-PVKUMAR Gleotsrünlcal Enghnãing I Englnee¡ing Geology Matsrlale Tesli¡rg I Ervironmsntal 5020ComgRoad 154 Glenu,ood Spdngs, 0O 81601 Phor¡e: {970} 94S7988 Far (970) 94s8454 Email hpkglenwood@kurnarusa.c,om Offce Locations: Parker, Glenwood Spdngs, and Silverhome, Colorado June29,2Al7 Hayes Construction Attn: Eric Lintjer 1002 Blake Avenue Glenrvood Springs, Colorado 81601 ericlintier@ smail.com RËCEIVED APR 2 7 ïr/IE GARFIELD COUNTY COMIII U N ITY D EVELOPMEII T Project No. 17-7488 Subject:Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Red Barn Remodel,345 Mid Valley Lane, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Eric, As requested, a reprcsentative of H-P/Kumar observed two pits at the subject site on June 19, 2Ol7 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design rire presented in this report. The services were performed in accordance with our agreement for professional engineering services to Hayes Construction, dated June 15, zOn. The proposed construction is the remodel of the Red Bam. We understand the proposed remodel will consist of a one to two story structure. Ground floor will be slnb-on-grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depth of about 3 feet. We assume relatively light foundalion loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. At the time of our visit to the site, two pits had been dug in the vicinity of the Red Barn. The soils exposed in the pits consisted of sandy to very sandy silt rvith scatt€red gravel. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on a sample taken from Pit 2, shown on Figure l, generally indicate the soils hove low compressibility under light loading and a low collapse potential under condilions of loading and wetting. No free water wäs encountered in the pits and the soils were moist. Considering the conditions exposed in the pit excnvations and the nature of the proposed construction, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed fo¡ an allowable Hayes Construction June29,2Ql7 Page 2 soil bearing pressure of 1,500 psf can be for support of the proposed remodel footings. The soils tend to compress when wetted and there could be posÞconstruction settlement of the foundation if the bearing soils become wet. The settlement could be I to 2 inches depending on the depth and extent of wetting. Footings should be a minimum width of l8 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose disturbed soils and any existing fill in footing areas should be removed and the bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. The exposed soils should then be compacted. Exterior footings should be provided with adeguate soil cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Continuous foundation walls shoulcl be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 14 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures (if any) should also be designed to resisr a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit wcight of at least 50 pcf for on-site soil as backfill. A perimeter foundation drain should be provided ro prevent temporary buildup of hydrostatíc pressure behind the retaining walls. Structural fill placed within floor slab areas can consist of the on-site soils compacted to at least 957a of standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum' Backfill placed around the structure should be compacted and the surfacc graded to prevent ponding within at least l0 feet of the building. l:ndscape that requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod, and sprinkler heads should not be located within t0 feet of the foundation. This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time, We make no w¡¡rrilnty either express or imptied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated in the vicinity of the Red Barn, the proposed type of construction, and our experience in the area, Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in thp future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identifìed at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. Vy'e are not responsible for technical interprelations by others of our information. As rhe project evolves, we H-P*¡¡¡¡¡y1¡¡¡Project No, 17-7-488 Hayes Construction lune29,2Ol7 Pagc 3 should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented hcrein. We recornmend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representåtive of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office, Sincerely, H-PSKUMAR 7-rø' * L. Robert L. Duran, E.I. Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, RLD/kac Attachments: Figure I *Test Result Table I * Surirmary of Laboratory Test Results L" Ë"il Ëe * {I (l nI Ì1 ftå¡"-É ir¿r1 frf;2, * H.P+KUMAR rrolsc¡ No, I /-/-4öÞ t I t l I t i!,- I SAMPLE OFr Sondy Slll FROM:Pif2G-4.3' WC = 12.5 %, ÐD = 98 pcf c h ! l i I : ii iì I 0 -l ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION UNDER CONSTANT PRESSURE DUE TO WETIING JJ t¡J =ln I o t- ã ovtz,o() -z l i 5 -4 ¡ ¡ "-t5 *6 ì ì I I !l ; ' 'I i ¡ : I -ô t i *9 -10 Ì ¡ 1 j : r.0 17-7*488 H-PVKUMAR 5WELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULT Fig. 1 H.PIKUMIARTABLE 1SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTSProject No. 17-7488SOILTYPEVery Sandy SiltSandy SiltUNCONFINEDCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTI{fPSRPråsTrclNoEl(r%tLIQUIDLiltilTf%tPERCENlPASSINGNO.20rSIEVEGRADATIONSAND(%lGRAVEL(%lNATURALDRYDENSITYfocfl9098NATURALMOISTURECONlENTt%ÌI 1.0r2.5.ocATloNOEPTHtflt64iÉSAI,IPLE IPITISE ofBarn2SW ofBam