Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application and Supplemental Information4r,--avA VAIA
�3/2 /rg
©e,
Atiad 11444K,
.ti. Me..P
4-• l f r ci c,.. I !?
vvi rr�.r�ulc f+,0. t�7Aive.4
Sti1� (JL
T
sl� ()i _J r1
�''�, l,/w' rp
(J' Ar { pat�ytd s � E is v
_ ,-' y W oat}i b o+y+awsc
I-Vv.-1►d /1 (t..A •�- - .�.tP re, p►- , . I 4
4 < I,a fA r
rf, ..
uccmss{ S1 OD.
41,0-ef iiiii;ettay:,,,, r�_ A• fr ._
l f' ,of..' �l s)
'- . 1/Ufi f l
(14-664-5
al/tesavep/
f
/41-/
/14-e,-;
*9-/
Ae-en"-=-->
1
(rte70)r�YJ
To
Date .3/" Time /// aI
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
Name
of
Phone,221/—,21-A4
r
Telephoned
y�
-
Please CaII
K
Returned Your Call
Will Call Again
Wants To See You
,
RUSH
Message Ai. yhey----
"yo?
O RATOR
398-51-05-0013
Printed By Division or Central Services
41011
11-6"
131-4"
u2" ouszAPl_r1 4E.
IC kJ Fc9R. ad,G4-1 Ll C.
11
NUJ . 811 47 7.TED
R7LdS
0
i 7-----------th-Jt'H gi,2•Ft= ''ccY4-1 e :ipll
1 1 1 ii - '-' 1 1 -1
I 1 1 1 1 1 =o
11 1 f 1 1 ;4
1 11 1 1 1I
1
pi
l�
N2 x (p 'IFfME:1, �5t3o1.
pz..114r.
oule. .pLy w/ C a.Qi-Ffc�
CP OR&u-16, AROur.Ir E1.JTI .
RKi
pcc�Ej H2.Tr i oIAT .
1317-6”...11S1 2-O 4.G, Ai.JO A.
•t-�CF RbPL(
al.lo Fa.+IJT
-a b s cva. spa.
415OITT i¢,oubtH cel
Rawl- usi wag Lam-
�I.. W� VV HEMS. COU L.I' -
iu ' 130 LT E+eisos • win".
41E40 1:1"&r
/4IIs i'-
•
REQUEST:
1/44.00
BOA 3/24/88
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
Request for Variance from Section
5.07.07(7) to Allow an Off -Site
Sign
APPLICANT: Town of Parachute
LOCATION:
A parcel of land situated in the NW
1/4, Section 5, T7S, R95W; located
approximately 1 mile east of
Parachute on the north side of Hwy
6.
SITE DATA: The site consists of 0.03 acres.
EXISTING ZONING: R/L (Resource Lands), gentle slopes
and lower valley floor
ADJACENT ZONING: A/R/RD and R/L, gentle slopes and
lower valley floor
I. RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The site is located in the Parachute Urban Area of Influence, as
designated on the Comprehensive Plan Management Districts Map.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL
A. Site Description: The site is generally level, with native
vegetation, and is located immediately adjacent to the
highway right-of-way. The 0.03 acre site is a portion of a
larger tract owned by Exxon and is not a separate parcel.
B. Project Description: The applicant proposes to locate a
"Welcome to Parachute" sign on the site. The sign would be
88 sq. ft. in size and would also identify some recreational
activities in the area (See Page ).
III. MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS
1. Section 5.07.07(7) states that "signs shall identify or
advertise only interests conducted on the lot of the sign
location, unless the Board of Adjustment, upon request,
determines that an off-site sign conforming to the district
regulation in which the sign is located is necessary to
promote the interests of the use to which it relates."
2. The proposed sign is less than the maximum 90 sq. ft.
allowed in the R/L, gentle slopes and lower valley floor
zone district.
3. The Zoning Resolution does allow for variances to the sign
code, provided that the variance would not allow any
business an unfair advertising advantage over any other
business (See Page /. ). A sign promoting the
Town of Parachute would benefit the business community as a
whole and would not create any unfair advantages. However,
no individual businesses or interests should be noted on the
sign.
4. The sign must receive approval as necessary from the State
Department of Highways, or the applicant demonstrate that it
is in compliance with the State regulations. The wThe
application has been referred to the State,
witcomments received at this time.
IV, SUGGESTED FINDINGS
1. That the applicationfor variance yrat` found to be consistent
with the requirements and standards of Section
of the
Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978,
as 2. That proper publication and public notice was provided
d of
required for the public hearing before the Zoning Board
Adjustment.
3. That the public hearing before the Zoning Board of
Adjustment was extensive and complete, that all facts,
matters and issues weehsubiitted and that all interested
( ) parties were heard at the
V. RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL of a variance from Section 5.07.07(7) the to allow an
off-site sign for the Town of Parachute, subject
conditions:
That the applicant receive approval from the State Highway
Department for the sign.
That the sign promoteworofinterestsebesident�fiedand
on
that no individual businesses
the sign.
r ll[' 701'i of Pavackutc
P. 0. Box 100
222 Grand Valley Way
Parachute, Colorado 81635
303/ 285-7630
ALOA0/).-A
MAR 11988
GARFIELD COUNTY
February 26, 1988
�;,ir1le)d County Planning Department
Mr. Mark Bean
109 8th Street Suite #303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Sign Variance Request
Dear Mark:
The Town of Parachute is requesting a variance per
Garfield County Sign Code requirements per Section 5.07.07
Subsection 7, to locate a "Welcome to Parachute"
of �.
on private property. approximately one
(I)s it location is.
the Parachute City Limits. The proposedat mile location
n6,
fn acing westhside of bound traffic n11-70. hway 6,
facing
With the interest shown in the Parachute aarea, itxea, is
felt the sign would not only. identify
the a whPar. The
but it would benefit the community
as proposed sign location would give at tiPatrrachute ample time
to slow down and exit l
The Town has entered into a License Agreement with
Exxon Corporation to place the sign on a small section
of the
of their property. Please find eloseaEcopyit A-1
executed License Agreement, SignLocation
(General Description), Exhibit A-2 (Specific Description)
plus topo map showing the approximate physical location
osed sign. The total
sitem and a Zerox copy of the proposed
area siqe of the sign will be 88 square feet.
Should you need additional information, please feel
free to contact me.
Thank you for your prompt attention to our request.
Sincerely,
enc
• i
,.tea
/. :,
'
/ 4
/ -•,. . 1
Dave Rousseau
Town Administrator
/ g-77PA/4
LICENSE AGREEMENT
This agreement
Januar f�made and effective as of
between and
municipal corpo at on of the State of the
TOWN
rado,
to as "Parachute," and EXXON CORPORATION
corporation, herein referred to as "Exxon."
Exxon is the owner of certain lands described in Exhibit A-1
attached hereto. Parachute desires to construct and maintain on
a portion of such lands a sign advertising Parachute and its
amenities.
the 28th day of
OF PA X EWTE, a
herein referred
a New Jersey
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual
herein contained and for one dollar paid by Parachute
the parties agree as follows:
1. Exxon grants to Parachute a license to occupy
subject to all of the terms and conditions hereof, the
described in Exhibit A-2 attached hereto.
promises
to Exxon,
and use,
premises
fo2. The premises may be occupied and used b
r the purposes of erecting thereon and maintai ningutae
solely
sign of approximate size of 8 feet high and 17 feet wig".
hrou3 . Th ense shall be from Ft' ���1 1 , 19b
ILA
g �p e 1b;h;')4� oc� �, ,1387.
shall be extended for consecutive o one-year oterms cif neitherparty
that the term
elects to terminate this license in accordance with the
provisions of paragraph four herein.
4. Subsequent to the third year of the term of the license,
either party may terminate this license at any time and for any
reason by giving written notice to the other, specifying the date
of termination, such notice to be
(15) days prior to the date therein given
less than fifteen
5. Exxon shall have the right to approve
design of the sign, which approval sllnoth be unreasonablye ording on y
withheld,
6. The sign shall be constructed, erected and maintained at
the sole cost of Parachute. If the sign is not properly
installed or is not properly maintained in the sole judgment of
Exxon, Exxon shall have the right, without incurring any
liability to Parachute, to remove it. Upon such occurrence the
license granted shall terminate and be of no effect.
7. Parachute shall be responsible for obtaining any and all
permits and approvals from governmental entities necessary to
locate a sign on the premises. The cost of such permits and
approvals shall be the responsibility of Parachute. Parachute
shall not seek any zoning change or change in county land use
plans, if such is required in order to locate a sign on the
premises, without the express prior written approval of Exxon.
Should Parachute seek such a change without Exxon's approval,
this license shall terminate and be of no effect.
8. Upon termination of the license granted herein,
Parachute agrees to promptly remove the sign and any supports
therefor and restore the premises to a condition comparable to
that existing prior to the location of the sign thereon. Should
Parachute default in the performance of its reponsibilities- under
this paragraph, Exxon shall have the right to remove the sign and
restore the premises. Parachute shall pay all reasonable costs
incurred by Exxon for removal of the sign and restoration of the
premises upon receipt of an invoice with sufficient support
documentation to explain the invoice charges.
9. Parachute shall comply with applicable worker's
compensation laws and shall require any contractors it engages to
perform work on the premises to do the same. Parachute further
agrees to indemnify and save Exxon harmless from and against all
claims, liability and causes of action for injury to, or death
of, any person or persons, including persons employed or engaged
by Parachute or Exxon, and for damage to or loss of property,
resulting from the locating of the sign on the premises or from
willful or negligent acts or omissions of Parachute or its
agents, employees, representatives or subcontractors relative to
the sign.
10. Access across Exxon lands to the sign location is hereby
granted; provided, however, that access shall be at a location
and along a route specified by Exxon, which location and route
may change from time to time.
11. All notices required to be given hereunder shall be
considered properly given upon delivering the notice in writing
-2-
co--"-
1._J _. It it s necessary or reasonahl Ptnerant vn T. nnr-n
to the party to be notified, or mailing by registered or
certified mail, or sending by electronic communication device
such as facsimile transmission, to the party to be notified at
such party's address set forth below or such other address as the
party may have designated by previous written notice to the
other.
Parachute
Mr. Dave Rousseau
Town of Parachute
P. co. Box 100
Parachute, Colorado 81635
Exxon
Exxon Company, U.S.A.
Colony Shale Oil Project
P. O. Box 308
Grand Junction, Colorado 81502
Attention Resident Manager
with copy to Synthetic Fuels Coordinator, Refining Department,
Exxon Company, U.S.A., P. O. Box 2180, Houston, Texas 77252-2180.
12. This agreement may be amended only by express written
agreement signed by both parties. The agreement shall be
governed by the laws of the State of Colorado.
EXECUTED and DELIVERED as of the date first written above.
A ST
t
Town Clerk
TOWN OF PARACHUTE
A
By 'I
Mayor �
EXXON CORPORATION
By
-3-
Agent and Attorney in Fact
(5) If it is necessary or reasonable to grant a variance
• GARFIELD COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Adjustment
FROM: Garfield county Planning Department
RE: gown of Parachute Variance, Continued Public Hearing
DATE: April 19, 1988
This note is to remind you that the continuation of the public hearing on
the Town of Parachute's request for a sign code variance is scheduled for
April 28, 1988, at 3:30 P.M., at the Garfield County Courthouse. Please
contact this office to indicate whether you will be able to attend this
hearing.
Attached is a copy of an amendment to the request, submitted by the Town
of Parachute.
Please bring your copy of the staff report from the last hearing, or
contact this office if you will need another copy.
Thank you.
109 8TH STREET, SUITE 303
945-8212 1625-5571 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601
The Touwn of Parachute
P. O. Box 100
222 Grand Valley Way
Parachute, Colorado 81635
303/ 285-7630
April 5, 1988
Mr. Mark Bean
Garfield County Planning Department
109 Eighth Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Sign Variance Request Amendment
Dear Mark:
P APR 071988
GARFIELD COUNTY
After the Variance Request Hearing on March 24, 1988, the
Town wishes to amend the original request due to some of the
concerns addressed during that hearing.
On the sign itself the word, "Golf", will be removed leaving
just the white golf ball with the golfer and fisherman as is. It
was felt during the sign design work that these two figures were
the most recognizable for people to identify.
In our license agreement with Exxon it states, "after three
years for any reason either Exxon or the Town of Parachute may
terminate the agreement." Ori Page 2, Paragraph 6 it also states,
"if the sign is not properly maintained Exxon will remove it."
The Town of Parachute is willing to also state, "if the sales
tax revenues do not show an increase of 7-10% after the sign
is erected, the Town will take it down after the three-year
period." The Town monitors its sales tax monthly now and, with
the addition of the traffic counter at our rest stop in Parachute,
the traffic counter can also be used to gauge percentages.
I would also like to mention that a year ago the Garfield
County Economic Development group hada professional economic
consultant address interest groups in Garfield County. When he
was in Parachute, the I-70 sign was one of the ideas presented to
help identify our area other than•just a place to stop to get
gas, food or use our rest area. The sign will be used to promote
our recreations that are available to the traveler on 1-70.
This sign will benefit no individual business or interest
group but the Town of Parachute as a whole.
Should you need additional information please feel free to
contact me.
DR:rsm
-2-
4
Serely ►
ti cq0A1/4-
Dave Rousseau
1
tiati
'400404
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MEETING
AGENDA
TIME: 3:30 P.M.
PLACE: Garfield County Courthouse, Suite 302
DATE: Thursday, April 28, 1988
(1) Call to Order
(2) Roll Call
(3) Election of Officers
(4) Approval of the minutes from March 24, 1988
(5) Continuation - Request for Variance from Section
5.07.07(7) to Allow an Off -Site Sign
Applicant: Town of Parachute
(6) Adjournment
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Meeting #154
March 24, 1988
MEMBERS PRESENT COUNTY STAFF PRESENT
Leo Jammaron Mark Bean, Director of
Richard Moolick Building, Sanitation &
Danny Gallacher Planning
Pete Cabrinha
3:35 P.M.
Mark Bean called the meeting to order in the absence of a Chairman. Roll
call was taken with Allan Bowles, Mary Odell, and Larry Hazelton absent.
It was established that Leo Jammaron was elected Vice -Chairman in 1987,
and would act as Chairman pro -tern. Mr. Jammaron formally appointed
Richard Moolick, Pete Cabrinha and Danny Gallacher as voting members since
there were no other regular members present.
Pete Cabrinha made a motion to accept the minutes of May 28, 1987, as
presented. The motion was seconded by Richard Moolick; motion carried
unanimously.
REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 5.07.07(7) TO ALLOW AN OFF-SITE SIGN -
TOWN OF PARACHUTE.
Mark Bean stated, for the record, that the public notice met the
requirements for this public hearing, and that they may proceed.
Mr. Bean presented the following exhibits:
Exhibit A - Application
Exhibit B - Proof of Publication
Exhibit C - Mail Return Receipts
Exhibit D - Letter from the Town of Parachute, 3/07/88
Letter from the St. Highway Dept., 3/17/88
Richard Moolick made a motion to accept the exhibits. Pete Cabrinha
seconded the motion; motion carried unanimously.
Chairman pro -tem, Leo Jammaron, swore in Dave Rousseau, Town
Administrator, 222 Grand Valley Way, Parachute.
Mark Bean briefly noted that the application was from the Town of
Parachute, for an off-site sign that requires a variance from Section
5.07.07(7) of the Garfield County Sign Code. He noted that the State
Highway Department, in Exhibit D, required that the County accept, through
resolution, all responsibility for the sign and declare it an official
county•sign. Mr. Bean noted that the Board of County Commissioners had
agreed to sign a resolution to that effect, if the Board of Adjustment
approves the variance.
Danny Gallacher asked if the sign was to be lighted. Mr. Rousseau said
that was not their intention.
Mr. Rousseau. explained that the purpose for the sign was to place a sign
one mile east of the. I-70 Interchange, in the hope that some travelers
might be more inclined to pull off and stay in Parachute. In response to
a question, Mr. Rousseau said the sign would be 88 sq. ft, in size.
Pete Cabrinha stated that he was puzzled about the need for more
identification of Parachute since there were two state highway signs
noting Parachute, in advance of the large exit sign noting Parachute. Mr.
Rousseau stated that those signs do not show any of the recreational
/
•
opportunities available in the area beyond the food, lodging, and rest
area. Mr. Gallacher had similar concerns.
Richard Moolick noted that this was a small community that was devastated
by the oil shale bust. He felt that the sign was a reasonable -request, to
try and get the community back on their feet.
Mark Bean noted that this application could be justified for virtually
every other community in the County; but, that only a municipality would
be able to qualify for this type of sign since the graphic benefitted the
whole community and not one particular business.
Pete Cabrinha pointed out that the proposed sign advertised "golf", and
that there was only one golf course in the area. Everyone agreed that
there may be an unfair advantage for a golf course, and Dave Rousseau said
that the word "golf" would be removed from the sign.
Pete Cabrinha noted that the town had made some dramatic improvements in
appearance; but in general, he did not care for off-site signs and the
proliferation of those signs. He did not really feel that they would
provide any tangible benefit to the town.
There was discussion of the pros and cons of highway signs and their
benefits. There was no concensus of opinion reached on the issue.
Richard Moolick made a motion to continue this meeting to another date,
when a larger quorum could be present. The motion was seconded by Leo
Jammaron.
After a further discussion, Mr. Cabrinha suggested that a variance be
approved for three years; after which, the town could show justification
for continued use of the sign. Mr. Bean stated that the county attorney
said that a variance cannot be conditional.
After being advised by the county attorney that the meeting could only be
continued to a date certain, Mr. Moolick amended his motion to continue
the meeting to April 28, 1988, at 3:30 P.M. The amended motion was
seconded by Leo Jammaron; motion carried unanimously.
Pete Cabrinha made a motion to adjourn; seconded by Danny Gallacher. The
motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Larry Hazelton
Secretary
LH/ljb
•
June 1, 1988
Town of Parachute
P.O. Box 100
Parachute, CO 81635
ATTN: Dave Rousseau
Dear Dave:
GARFIELD COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Enclosed is a copy of the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No.
88-041, designating your "Welcome to Parachute" sign an official County
sign. Please review the Resolution, to assure that it meets your needs
and that there is no problem with the conditions included by the Board.
Please contact this office if you have any further questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
13. //L. ?f, -4(z
Glenn Hartmann
Planner
GH/1jb
Enclosure
109 8TH STREET, SUITE 303
945-8212 / 625-5571 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601
GARFIELD COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
May 3, 1988
Town of Parachute
P.O. Box 100
Parachute, CO 81635
ATTN: Dave Rousseau
Dear Dave:
This letter shall serve as confirmation that on April 28, 1988, the zoning
Board of Adjustment did unanimously approve a variance request from
Section 5.07.07(7), to allow an off-site "Welcome to Parachute" sign. The
resolution by the Board of county Commissioners accepting the sign as an
official County sign is being drafted, and a copy will be forwarded to you
as soon as possible.
Please contact this office should you have any further questions or
concerns.
Sincerely,
1-- 941--
Glenn
4_
Glenn Hartmann
Planner
GH/ljb
109 8TH STREET, SUITE 303
945-8212 / 625-5571 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601
•
GARFIELD COUNTY •
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
T0: Board of Adjustment
FROM: Garfield County Planning Department
RE: Town of Parachute Variance, Continued Public Hearing
DATE: April 19, 1988
This note is to remind you that the continuation of the public hearing on
the Town of Parachute's request for a sign code variance is scheduled for
April 28, 1988, at 3:30 P.M., at the Garfield County Courthouse. Please
contact this office to indicate whether you will be able to attend this
hearing.
Attached is a copy of an amendment to the request, submitted by the Town
of Parachute.
Please bring your copy of the staff report from the last hearing, or
contact this office if you will need another copy.
Thank you.
109 8TH STREET, SUITE 303
945-8212 / 625-5571 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601
0
STATE OF COLORADO
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
222 South Sixth Street, P.O. Box 2107
Grand Junction, Colorado 8'1502-2107
(303) 248-7208
March 17, 1988
Mr. Glen Hartman
Garfield County Planning Department
109 8th Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Dear Mr. Hartman:
lif11.`ci.P
MAR 18 1988 1
cji' W w�
GMK*ILCOUNTY
Thank you for your memorandum concerning the "Welcome to
Parachute" sign proposed by the Town of Parachute.
Since this sign is located in Garfield County's jurisdiction but
is not on State Highway Right -of -Way, there are just a few
stipulations to be made by the State.
1) The county must accept, through resolution or ordinance,
all responsibility for the sign and declare it an
official county sign.
2) The sign cannot in any way encroach upon State Highway
Right -of -Way.
3) A copy of the resolution or ordinance must be forwarded
to the State Department of Highways, District III Right
of Way Section, P. 0. Box 2107, Grand Junction, CO
81502 for permanent filing.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter and if I can be of
any further assistance, please let me know.
EKD:rb
cc: Town of Parachute
Staff ROW
file
Yours truly,
R. P. MOSTON
DISTRICT ENGINEER
By eg‘
Edward K. 4ry
Roadside Advertising Inspector
aeon e..
Pueuc repro ivarke tha. Norma
, Stele of
1 whh se.aw.prama valartai in ottmin the
Caere), of Corfield, iror+etl eileotrd» tft.
Da 1.260 egl,nol
' ,a'e.d a ww eq al a feed (0
?a d her/
i ` ,et +s
-4:, �;_
►�.
rwrw izoee-�:
.'d� shsr t.w+.
. +N►illrot the west geey4i Section 5,
T.7 S., S4S W., bran whence th.ip corner el
Sedhea 6.;;T.i 14 R/s. W. been Sad+ Yy a distance
s 261SaSjeerl ',pf, an bearing. mttj+d.turatn
Poing neatly* them:
Thence N061651'E, a tiF tinny feet to 0
paint en the
r,p thetly bd.ne*utth.
riphhafeway
>:
dePartbeg eald`+ ,t -0f W, o
dibielwirof
'• . ?rwrroe
tlef's1a ttet
'Thome 330201M-4;klerail.pot*, the areeee�Mh�rt'jr . ^ ,?�Ao beet
PIP.itilbea odd iimjheriy-, r un
th
'►00,"00.ellifiell.. 34,9000* t1'e,.7>
>1161.1140/. (12PilfrP00.8114reffil
feel • - :bo +quer.
*Wiwi Thiscri0ORM. : , With raped to
t1 !idle east of
i�en•
L. lokhPart. fi.�or,bel6sSF ,6
.saltealrence 1: 1s alio« the Petition.. relief from
Setikna 07.01( )ietorwreroNaNr*nondeeabove
1.1/W hiedpra�erlb;
piece. emitted a.d b►- the proposed variance one
lamed to a pout. arrl_etele they viers, pretests or
ablecttarrs. *AA Canner appear personally at such
• ineeti 4• MM%yee ate urged to state your views by
letter' portfealatly-1F you lore chlird6Pris to sol,
Varlande-reheeet.ias'the Zoning Board of Adlushnent
to the cornments of surrounding
1. Prepettty 46stilbiabed others affected in deciding
wbiNnr pspEaeA 0 dsny.the request forrlleeoariana..
Thierptirtfidarerp,eit application may be reviewed at
the 011111,:Il1e Planning Department located of 109
Stft Serrsp, Salle 309. Garfield County. Courthouse,
Giertereed SPrbrge. Cola;odo between the haw, of
SAO a.m. end k06jv.et., fllatday through Friday.
;Thal rob* ha:wir :on the oppikation for the above
*admire hos Mite.,, far the 24th day of Mardv, 1985,
osthe haw ofY.,#bptoi., Gratihhd Co„r,ttOAw Hone•
Suns 902, 104Sth Sheet. Glenwood Springs, CO.
Pian ing Depart„1e11,
Publ.h.dhiorehl,19S8Inthe G Garast. euney
Glenwood Doer.
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
GLENWOOD POST
STATE OF COLORADO,
SS.
COUNTY OF GARFIELD.
N2 19740
ROBERT C. HELSLEY do solemnly
swear that I am PUBLISHER of the
GLENWOOD POST; that the same is a newspaper printed, in whole
or in part, and published in the County of Garfield, State of Colo-
rado and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has
been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of
Garfield for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next
prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertise-
ment; that said newspaper has been admitted to the United States
mails as second-class matter under the provisions of the Act of
March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof. and that said newspaper
is a newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and ad-
vertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of
Colorado.
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in
the regular and entire issue of every number of said newspaper for
the period of 1 consecutive insertions; and that the first pub_
lication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated
MAR. 4 A.D., 19 88 , and the last publication of said
notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated A.D.,
19
In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand this 4th
day of BARS
A.D., 19.......$
neral Manager / Publisher
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the
County of Garfield, State of Colorado. this 4th day
of
(SEAL)
MARCH
My Commission Expires
A.D., 1
Notary Public
My Comiaissioa faraksts..May.22,-199.1 .......
2014 Grand Ave., Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601
:SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 whin
and 4.
Put your addrea in the "RETURN TO"
you.
card from livered to and the data of donarv}
f4 r
for fees
eddit I services ora delimit], and complete Items 3
hie on0040; Ode, r Intra , " this will • revent this
. .' l .
� ` " a " e� •'Hilt
serrequested.'N' .'
vicelsl
address. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery
1(Extra charge) t
hd
postmaster and c sok box es for ad
( additional
1, $ Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's
1(Extra charge)t
3. Article Addressed to:
Me. AIA..) OJeRk I L{
1
fTX K ON 0- o - 5.-a•--'+- 1
`A x as v
0RANJ Wk.�0—A,No.
/ V(• . fl ,
�o
g)sa-L_lino
4. Article Number '
-P ..5.53 oS'( '7 30
Type of Service:
0 Registered 0 Insured
atertified 0 COD
0 Express Mail
Al II, tq) 'signature of addressee
i : ...
6. Signature -- Addressee
X
'
41t.•r , . • rens (ONLY It
{. req 4'. n• to paid)
Q C
\ i9
`w..„,.,-,0},
6. Signet t
X /, �/1/4-4,c—,
+
t
7. Date y/40#1
n....
* U.S.Q.P,O.1987.179-268
DETURN RECEIPT
P 553 081 730
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED
NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
(See Reverse)
Sent to I f
the_AlAvleakli -rxxax Vl
Street and No.
Vrz. 7)C 045'
P.O.,n7,Piij Step and ZiP ode
(S.ttiC i k41tiCo 7160
Postage
$
Certified Fee
7
5
Special Delivery Fee
r
Restricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt Showing
to whom and Date Delivered
��
Return receipt showing 10 whom,
Date, and Address of Delivery
TOTAL Postage
$//
cr
Postman.' - ti
a.
..)
•
The Town of Parachute
P. 0. Ilox 100
222 Grand Valley Way
Parachute, Colorado 81635
303/ 285-7630
Mr. Alan Weakly
Exxon Company U.S.A.
P. 0. Box 308
Grand Junction, CO 81502
March 14, 1988
Cert. P 553-081-730
RE: Public Notice - Sign Variance Request
The Town of Parachute has applied to the Zoning Board of '
Adjustment, Garfield County, State of Colorado, to grant a sign
variance request located on property in County of Garfield, State
of Colorado.
The variance request is to allow the Town of Parachute an
off-site "Welcome to Parachute" sign on private property located
approximately one (1) mile east of Parachute, on the north side
of Highway 6.
The variance request application public hearing is set for
March 24, 1988 at 3:30 P.M., Garfield County Court House, Suite
302, 109 8th Street, Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to
appear and state their views, protests, or objections. If you
cannot appear personally at the scheduled hearing,, then you are
urged to state your` views by letter, particularly if you have
objections to the proposed variance request. The Garfield County
Board of Adjustments will give consideration to the comments of
surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding
whether to grant or deny the request for a variance. This variance
request application may be viewed at the office of the Garfield
County Planning Depaftment located at 109 8th Street, Suite 303,
Garfield County Courthouse, Glenwood Springs, Colorado between
the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday.
Should you need additional information, please feel free to
contact me.
Si ely,
David Rolsseau
Town of Parachute
•ScsS Complete Items 1 and 2 when additt nal services are desired, and complete Items 3
and 4.
Put your address In the "RETURN TO" Space on verse side. Failure to do this will prevent this
card from being returned to you. The return race ee wIIJ ProvIde you the name of She oersort
gellvared to and the date of delivery. For edditiona
fees The following services ere aveliabie. Consult
servlce(s) requested.
address. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery
t (Extra charge)t
postmaster for fees and check boxes} for additional
1. ❑. Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's
't (Extra charge)t
3. Article Addressed to:
0 b, ,R 6 e f A C 0 tx.-- {� --1). — '4" r\
- ''. Q ''Q-\ ,
r O f lir 0,, S7. S'v. A e c.D3
C'eiU ++ {y 6O
D d P R ��{ 5 1 8
4. Article Number
ry v�( 7 s
Type of Service:
,O Roistered 0 Insured
L!TCertlfied 0 COD
❑ Express Mall
Always obtain signature of addressee
or agent and DATE DELIVERED.
5. Signature — Addressee
X
8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if
requested and fee paid)
B. Signature/gent z
XPPej
7. DatfyLive •
PS form 3811, Mar. 1987
* U.S.L3.F.O. 1987-178-268
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
P .553 081 731
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED
NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
(See Reverse)
Sent to
( w(if•1d C1.�-4IaY. \vN.c1 -i e'RI •
Street and No.
/a9 kt" St. Su lie 3O3
P.O., State and ZIP Code
afellak2,,d 5 fR+v. s
SIbof
tC�
Postage
$ a
Certified Fee
5
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt Showing
to whom and Date Delivered
7 0
Return receipt showing to whore,
Date, and Address of Delivery
TOTAL Post= . ^ =s
C�
$ /
6,7
Postmar Qr + - •
U „Z•
6;.
4g%)s
1
• •
The Town of Parachute
P. 0. Box 100
222 Grand Valley Way
Parachute, Colorado 81635
303/ 285-7630
Garfield County Planning Department
109 8th Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
March 14, 1988
Cert. P 553-081-731
RE: Public Notice -- Sign Variance Request
The Town of Parachute has applied to the Zoning Board of
Adjustment, Garfield County, State of Colorado, to grant a sign
variance request located on property in County of Garfield, State
of Colorado.
The variance request is to allow the Town of Parachute an
off-site "Welcome to Parachute" sign on private property located
approximately one (1) mile east of Parachute, on the north side
of Highway 6.
The variance request application public hearing is set for
March 24, 1988 at 3:30 P.M., Garfield County Court House, Suite
302, 109 8th Street, Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to
appear and state their views, protests, or objections. If yogi
cannot appear personally at the scheduled hearing, then you are
urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have
objections to the proposed variance request. The Garfield County
Board of Adjustments will give consideration to the comments of
surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding
whether to grant or deny the request for a variance. This variance
request application --may be viewed at the office of the Garfield
County Planning Department located at 109 8th Street, Suite 303,
Garfield County Courthouse, Glenwood Springs', Colorado between
the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday.
Should you need additional infcrmation, please feel free to
contact me.
rely,
David Rousseau
Town of Parachute
IFSEN4.I$ER: Complete Items 1 and 2 when addl I services are desired, and complete Items 3
and
Put your address In the "RETURN TO" Space on versa side. Failure to do this will prevent this
card from being returned to you. Th return receiplee will orovlde you the nminion
pf rson
delivered to and the data of delivery. For additional) fees the
the
following services ars evafle6 e. Consult
requested.
2. 0 Restricted Delivery
" t (Extra charge) t
postm8eter for fees and check box eaj for additional service{s)
1. G' how to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address,
t (Extra charge) t
3. Article Addressed to:
Co f t) .-3) 'C . O -r- a � w 4 5
�
O, 1J a K 7 0 7
,',,✓d t� cog/5.-
(> �~
"1307/0 010 R 1 Cf e,,,. !! -(-0 rbJx ys
/
4. Article Number
A) —3-(-7 %
Type of Service:
0 Registered 0 Insured
■ COD
0 Express
❑Express Mall
Always obtain signature of addressee
or agent ands ! ERED.
5. Sign re — Addressee
X 0 (-0
S. Addr oafs ' :dr 7 • 1 . If
req see and fer,�p�r d L J,
,�►'yl� /Q O
98� ��
B. Signature nt
Xc
7. Date of Delivery
PS Form 3811, Mar. 1987
* U.S.O.P.O. 1987-178.288
RN RECEIPT
P 553 081 729
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED
NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
(See Reverse)
S/,g�nt 1)o
U o /o . Oe? -1, r i lit LA) ai{
S eet a No. ll
V.(), c2/O7
P.O., State and ZIP Code',
6)R R � d. S.a ,A.C.1, 1 a �
S) (6 0
Postage
$
.:?a
Certified Fee
7.-
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt Showing
to whom and Date Delivered
D
Return receipt showing to whom,
Date, and Address of Delivery
TOTAL Post- • nd &= t
S
Postmark
.d
• •
The 701111 �,f Thct rrclttrtc
P. 0. Box 100
222 Grand Valley Way
Parachute, Colorado 81635
303/ 285.7630
Colorado Department of Highways
P. 0. Box 2107
Grand Junction, CO 81502
ATTN: District Right -of -Way
March 14, 1988
Cert. P 553-081-729
RE: Public Notice - Sign Variance Request
The Town of Parachute has applied to the Zoning Board of
Adjustment, Garfield County, State of Colorado, to grant a sign
variance request located on property in County of Garfield, State
of Colorado.
The variance request is to allow the Town of Parachute an
off-site "Welcome to Parachute" sign on private property located
approximately one (1) mile east of Parachute, on the north side
of Highway 6.
The variance request application public hearing is set for
March 24, 1988 at 3:30 P.M., Garfield County Court House, Suite
302, 109 8th Street, Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to
appear and state their views, protests, or objections. If you
cannot appear personally at the scheduled hearing, then you are
urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have
objections to the proposed variance request. The Garfield County
Board of Adjustments will give consideration to the comments of
surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding
whether to grant or deny the request for a variance. This variance
request application may be viewed at the office of the Garfield
County Planning Department` located at 109 8th Street, Suite 303,
Garfield County Courthouse, Glenwood Springs, Colorado between
the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday.
Should you need additional information, please feel free to
contact me.
Sincerely,
(L1:c149
David Rousseau
Town of Parachute
ocivi))
•
The Town of Dara c u e
P. 0. Box 100
222 Grand Valley Way
Parachute, Colorado 81635
303/ 285-7630
MAS PM
%ti�i�11"its
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
March 7, 1988
Mr. Robert Richardson, Chairman
Garfield County Commissioners
109 8th Street, Suite 300
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-3303
Dear Mr. Richardson:
ob
Larry
0/Marian
The Town of Parachute has applied to the Zoning Board of
Adjustment, Garfield County, for a variance to place an official
off-site "Welcome to Parachute" sign. The sign location is approx-
imately one (1) mile east of Parachute, on the north side of High-
way 6. Due to the increased interest in the Parachute area, the
sign is being placed to identify Parachute. This location will
give travelers on 1-70 ample time to exit at Parachute.
After reviewing and discussing with State Highway officials,
the variance request is only the first step the Town has to take.
The sign will not be in the city limits of Parachute, but in the
county. In order for the State to grant a permit to Parachute
to erect the sign, Garfield County would have to designate the
sign an official county sign.
At this time the Town of Parachute is requesting the County
to consider a resolution to designate the sign an official County
sign. The Town of Parachute would still be responsible and liable
for the sign. The county resolution is the only way the State
Highway Department will permit the Town of Parachute to erect a
sign out of the city limits.
Thank you for your consideration of our request. If you have
any questions or need additional information please feel free to
contact me.
Sincerely,
Dave RousseauTown Administrator
DR/jl
•
STATE Of COLORADO
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
222 South Sixth Street, P.O. Box 2107
Grand Junction, Colorado 81502-2107
(303} 248-7208
March 17, 1988
Mr. Glen Hartman
Garfield County Planning Department
109 8th Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Dear Mr. Hartman:
n. rr t.
. MAR 18 1988
Ght* ELL) COUNTY
Thank you for your memorandum concerning the "Welcome to
Parachute" sign proposed by the Town of Parachute.
Since this sign is located in Garfield County's jurisdiction but
is not on State Highway Right -of -Way, there are just a few
stipulations to be made by the State.
1) The county must accept, through resolution or ordinance,
all responsibility for the sign and declare it an
official county sign.
2) The sign cannot in any way encroach upon State Highway
Right -of -Way.
3) A copy of the resolution or ordinance must be forwarded
to the State Department of Highways, District III Right
of Way Section, P. O. Box 2107, Grand Junction, CO
81502 for permanent filing.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter and if I can be of
any further assistance, please let me know.
EKD:rb
cc: Town of Parachute
Staff ROW
f ile
Yours truly,
R. P. MOSTON
DISTRICT ENGINEER
BytcY.r✓,
Edward K. ry
Roadside Advertising Inspector
The Town of Parachute
P. 0. Box 100
222 Grand Valley Way
Parachute, Colorado 81635
303/ 285-7630
Garfield County Planning Department
109 8th Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
4 MAR 16 1988
GARFIELD COUNTY
March 14, 1988
Cert. P 553-081-731
RE: Public Notice Sign Variance Request
The Town of Parachute has applied to the Zoning Board of '
Adjustment, Garfield County, State of Colorado, to grant a sign
variance request located on property in County of Garfield, State
of Colorado.
The variance request is to allow the Town of Parachute an
off-site "Welcome to Parachute" sign on private property located
approximately one (1) mile east of Parachute, on the north side
of Highway 6.
The variance request application public hearing is set: for
March 24, 1988 at 3:30 P.M., Garfield County Court House, Suite
302, 109 9th Street, Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to
appear and state their views, protests, or objections. If yra�a
cannot appear personally at the scheduled hearing, the:n your are
urged t.:, state your view; by letter, particularly if you have
objections to the proposed variance request. The Garfield County
ECaLd of lidjust,rierits will give consideration to the comments of
surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding
whether to grant or deny the request for a variance. This vrariancr
request application may be viewed at the office of the Garfield
County Planning Department located at 109 8th Street, Suite 303,
Garfield County Courthouse, Glenwood Springs', Colorado between
the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday.
Should you need additional infcrmation, please ;eel free to
contact me.
=rely,
'cit24f2e0u__
David Rousseau
Town of Parachute
•
•
Town of Parachute
SIGN LOCATION
Exhibit A-1
(General Description)
Being a 1,250 square feet (0.03 acre) parcel of land situated in the
northwest one quarter of Section 5, Township 7 South, Range 95 West of the
6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado, said parcel being more
particularly described as follows (all bearings referenced to the Colorado
Coordinate System, Central Zone - Modified):
Exhibit A-2
(Specific Description)
BEGINNING at the west quarter corner of Section 5, T.7 S. R.95 W., from
whence the southwest corner of Section 5, T.7 S., R.95 W. bears S00.03'51"W
a distance of 2612.25 feet, with all bearings contained herein being•
relative thereto;
Thence N06'38152"E, a distance of 1111.35 feet to a point on the northerly
boundary of the right-of-way to the north frontage road of 1-70;
Thence departing said rightrof-way, N30'28'34"W, a distance of 25.00 feet;
Thence N59'31'26"E, a distance of 50.00 feet;
Thence S30'28'346E, a distance of 25.00 feet to a point on the
aforementioned right-of-way;
Thence along said northerly rightrof-way line, S59'31126"W, a distance of
50.00 feet to the TRUE POINTT CF BEGINNING and containing 1,250 square feet
(0.03 acres) of land.
• •
RECORD OF CONVERSATION
TIME, '7; 4 •
DATE, 3 /I
RE, G vevt,I
COMMENTS, 4 (Noun h( wtiz
INCOMINS/ 'UTOOINS
CONTACT, L OVx
S ow)) eo• 150K 0407L cLi, W
In 5Th.
64410 i°'fl O 11i,/'cs purse() Si N •
de G I1fmNc 5;uG a+• 1414 y, 1V- t, .a0Ce-hi jy �i t /1,4 imaJA
rydo.64-i
L4t_,xmui f srNa .vt L014407(
bift .,„,+R1 I J oU G[.,4 iN w), r,� ,� wiz.. �, G6�G. Ct IZA �V
�61f (Wei,
r ontV4A Lis 00.4k t rc- Q VW -rats 4101, (h.( ' u (.e
.osfeW, td ofir'Gr -keit. n -a' isein,6„ "W ci cArw,. du Pew, -01M,,,4 "
FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED, WA ti SL'OSGsii or IO, ja i&
SIGNED,_
12e a4.1
0 0
GARFIELD COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Colorado State Highway Dept.
FROM: Garfield County Planning Dept.
RE: Sign Code Variance
DATE: March 15, 1988
Garfield County has received an application from the Town of Parachute for
a sign code variance to allow an off-site "Welcome to Parachute" sign off
Highway 6. A copy of the application is enclosed for your review and
comment. Specifically, we would be interested if the State has
jurisdiction over the proposed sign and whether the State will issue
permits for the sign.
The request is scheduled for a public hearing on March 24, 1988, at 3:30
P.M., Suite 302, Garfield County Courthouse, 109 8th Street, Glenwood
Springs. Any comments should be received by the Planning Department prior
to the public hearing. Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated.
109 8TH STREET, SUITE 303
945-8212 / 625-5571 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601
• r
REQUEST:
•
•
BOA 3/24/88
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
Request for Variance from Section
5.07.07(7) to Allow an Off -Site
Sign
APPLICANT: Town of Parachute
LOCATION:
A parcel of land situated in the NW
1/4, Section 5, T7S, R95W; located
approximately 1 mile east of
Parachute on the north side of Hwy
6.
SITE DATA: The site consists of 0.03 acres.
EXISTING ZONING:
R/L (Resource Lands), gentle slopes
and lower valley floor
ADJACENT ZONING: A/R/RD and R/L, gentle slopes and
lower valley floor
I. RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The site is located in the Parachute Urban Area of Influence, as
designated on the Comprehensive Plan Management Districts Map.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL
A. Site Description: The site is generally level, with native
vegetation, and is located immediately adjacent to the
highway right-of-way. The 0.03 acre site is a portion of a
larger tract owned by Exxon and is not a separate parcel.
B. Project Description: The applicant proposes to locate a
"Welcome to Parachute" sign on the site. The sign would be
88 sq. ft. in size and would also identify some recreational
activities in the area (See Page ).
III. MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS
1. Section 5.07.07(7) states that "signs shall identify or
advertise only interests conducted on the lot of the sign
location, unless the Board of Adjustment, upon request,
determines that an off-site sign conforming to the district
regulation in which the sign is located is necessary to
promote the interests of the use to which it relates."
2. The proposed sign is less than the maximum 90 sq. ft.
allowed in the R/L, gentle slopes and lower valley floor
zone district.
3. The Zoning Resolution does allow for variances to the sign
code, provided that the variance would not allow any
business ari unfair advertising advantage over any other
business (See Page /.3 ) . A sign promoting the
Town of Parachute would benefit the business community as a
whole and would not create any unfair advantages. However,
no individual businesses or interests should be noted on the
sign.
i1
• •
4. The sign must receive approval as necessary from the State
Department of Highways, or the applicant demonstrate that it
is in compliance with the State regulations. The
application has been referred to the State, with no written
comments received at this time.
IV. SUGGESTED FINDINGS
/-0 sigpitu/{9
1. That the application Afor variance was found to be consistent
with the requirements and standards of Section 9.05 of the
Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended.
2. That proper publication and public notice was provided as
required for the public hearing before the Zoning Board of
Adjustment.
3. That the public hearing before the zoning Board of
Adjustment was extensive and complete, that all facts,
matters and issues were submitted and that all interested
///////10
parties were heard at the hearing.
V. RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL of a variance from Section 5.07.07(7) to allow an
off-site sign for the Town of Parachute, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That the applicant receive approval from the State Highway
Department for the sign.
2. That the sign promotes the Town of Parachute as a whole, and
that no individual businesses or interests be identified on
the sign.
lo
LICENSE AGREEMENT
( 0
This agreement/1 made and effective as of the 28th day of
January 19881,y and between the TOWN OF PARACHUTE, a
municipal corporation of the State of Colorado, herein referred
to as "Parachute," and EXXON CORPORATION, a New Jersey
corporation, herein referred to as "Exxon."
Exxon is the owner of certain lands described in Exhibit A-1
attached hereto. Parachute desires to construct and maintain on
a portion of such lands a sign advertising Parachute and its
amenities.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises
herein contained and for one dollar paid by Parachute to Exxon,
the parties agree as follows:
1. Exxon grants to Parachute a license to occupy and use,
subject to all of the terms and conditions hereof, the premises
described in Exhibit A-2 attached hereto.
2. The premises may be occupied and used by Parachute
solely for the purposes of erecting thereon and maintaining a
sign of approximate size of 8 feet high and 17 feet wile. 47
F,'f3 1,4,/,711s,
' jqa� /,
3. Thgr e of h' ense shall be from �er--IX987
Iiihrough-Sept�4, )provided, however, that the term U
shall be extended for consecutive one-year terms if neither party
elects to terminate this license in accordance with the
provisions of paragraph four herein.
4. Subsequent to the third year of the term of the license,
either party may terminate this license at any time and for any
reason by giving written notice to the other, specifying the date
of termination, such notice to be given not less than fifteen
(15) days prior to the date therein specified.
5. Exxon shall have the right to approve the wording on and
design of the sign, which approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
6. The sign shall be constructed, erected and maintained at
the sole cost of Parachute. If the sign is not properly
installed or is not properly maintained in the sole judgment of
Exxon, Exxon shall have the right, without incurring any
liability to Parachute, to remove it. Upon such occurrence the
license granted shall terminate and be of no effect.
7. Parachute shall be responsible for obtaining any and all
permits and approvals from governmental entities necessary to
locate a sign on the premises. The cost of such permits and
approvals shall be the responsibility of Parachute. Parachute
shall not seek any zoning change or change in county land use
plans, if such is required in order to locate a sign on the
premises, without the express prior written approval of Exxon.
Should Parachute seek such a change without Exxon's approval,
this license shall terminate and be of no effect.
8. Upon termination of the license granted herein,
Parachute agrees to promptly remove the sign and any supports
therefor and restore the premises to a condition comparable to
that existing prior to the location of the sign thereon. Should
Parachute default in the performance of its reponsibilities under
this paragraph, Exxon shall have the right to remove the sign and
restore the premises. Parachute shall pay all reasonable costs
incurred by Exxon for removal of the sign and restoration of the
premises upon receipt of an invoice with sufficient support
documentation to explain the invoice charges.
9. Parachute shall comply with applicable worker's
compensation laws and shall require any contractors it engages to
perform work on the premises to do the same. Parachute further
agrees to indemnify and save Exxon harmless from and against all
claims, liability and causes of action for injury to, or death
of, any person or persons, including persons employed or engaged
by Parachute or Exxon, and for damage to or loss of property,
resulting from the locating of the sign on the premises or from
willful or negligent acts or omissions of Parachute or its
agents, employees, representatives or subcontractors relative to
the sign.
10. Access across Exxon lands to the sign location is hereby
granted; provided, however, that access shall be at a location
and along a route specified by Exxon, which location and route
may change from time to time.
11. All notices required to be given hereunder shall be
considered properly given upon delivering the notice in writing
-2-
,
to the party to be notified, or mailing by registered or
certified mail, or sending by electronic communication device
such as facsimile transmission, to the party to be notified at
such party's address set forth below or such other address as the
party may have designated by previous written notice to the
other.
Parachute
Mr. Dave Rousseau
Town of Parachute
P. O. Box 100
Parachute, Colorado 81635
Exxon
Exxon Company, U.S.A.
Colony Shale Oil Project
P. O. Box 308
Grand Junction, Colorado 81502
Attention Resident Manager
with copy to Synthetic Fuels Coordinator, Refining Department,
Exxon Company, U.S.A., P. O. Box 2180, Houston, Texas 77252-2180.
12. This agreement may be amended only by express written
agreement signed by both parties. The agreement shall be
governed by the laws of the State of Colorado.
EXECUTED and DELIVERED as of the date first written above.
1TIEST TOWN OF PARACHUTE
BY Jj c.
c-'-�
Town Clerk Mayor
-3-
EXXON CORPORATION
By
Agent and Attorney in Fact
Tbwn of Parachute
SIGN LOCATION
Exhibit A-1
(General Description)
Being a 1,250 square feet (0.03 acre) parcel of land situated in the
northwest one quarter of Section 5, Township 7 South, Range 95 West of the
6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado, said parcel being more
particularly described as follows (all bearings referenced to the Colorado
Coordinate System, Central Zone - Modified):
Exhibit A-2
(Specific Description)
BEGINNIN;, at the west quarter corner of Section 5, T.7 S., R.95 W., from
whence the southwest corner of Section 5, T.7 S., R.95 W. bears 500`03'51"W
a distance of 2612.25 feet, with all bearings contained herein being
relative thereto;
Thence N06'38'52"E, a distance of 1111.35 feet to
boundary of the right-of-way to the north frontage
Thence departing said right-of-way, N30'28'34"W, a
Thence N59'31'26"E, a distance of 50.00 feet;
Thence S30'28'344E, a distance of 25.00 feet to a point on the
aforementioned right-of-way;
Thence along said northerly right-of-way line, S59'31'26"W, a distance of
50.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 1,250 square feet
(0.03 acres) of land.
a point on the northerly
road of 1-70;
distance of 25.00 feet;
• •
87
(1) Setbacks. All signs shall maintain a minimum
setback of 10 feet from the street right-of-way line.
5:07.10 Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) and/or Industrial or
Commercial Subdivision.
Existing platted commercial or industrial planned unit
developments (P.U.D.$) or subdivisions shall be allowed
one freestanding sign per development, with one
additional identification sign for each business within
the development. Sizes shall be compatible with those
specified for the underlying County Zone District. That
is, the P.U.D. signage limitation shall be compatible to
or more restrictive than the County Zone Districts, but
shall not be broader in scope than the county
requirements. All future developments of this type shall
develop a sign code for their proposed uses, which must
receive approval from the Garfield County Board of
Commissioners and which shall be recorded at the time of
P.U.D./Zone Change designation.
5.07.11 Existing or Non -Conforming Signs.
Signs existing at the time of the effective date of this
ordinance, and not in compliance herewith shall be
regarded as non -conforming signs which may continue for a
period of eight (8) years from the earliest effective
date of the substantive provisions or limitations with
which the signs do not comply, if the signs are properly
repaired and maintained and in conformance with the other
ordinances of the county. At the end of such eight year
period, the signs shall be removed. Non -conforming signs
which are structurally altered, relocated, or replaced
shall comply immediately with all provisions of this sign
code. (A. 82-90)
5.07.12 Variance.
A variance from the strict application of the provisions
of this code may be granted by the Garfield County Board
of Adjustment, in accordance with the following
guidelines:
(1) It is the policy of the county to encourage
aesthetically pleasing ,signs without substantial
interference with the business to which the sign relates.
(2) Projecting signs should not substantially obscure
any part of another sign relating to another use.
(3) Excessively large or tallsigns should be avoided to
prevent visual obstruction of the natural scenery within
the county. ,.
(4) Variances should not be granted which would allow
any business use an unfair advertising advantage over any
other business use.
(5) If it is necessary or reasonable to grant a variance
to the strict regulations of this chapter, the sign
should be limited in size, height, and location in
conformance with the purpose of the sign.
•
GARFIELD COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
March 2, 1988
Town of Parachute
P.O. Box 100
Parachute, CO 81635
ATTN: Dave Rousseau, Town Administrator
Dear Dave:
Your application for a variance to allow an off-site sign for the Town of
Parachute has been scheduled for a public hearing before the zoning Board
of Adjustment on March 24, 1988, at 3:30 P.M., in Suite 302, Garfield
County Courthouse, 109 8th Street, Glenwood Springs. It is suggested that
you be represented at the time of the meeting.
Copies of the enclosed notice form must be sent by certified
return -receipt mail to all owners of property within two hundred (200)
feet of the subject property at least five (5) days prior to the hearing.
The return receipts, showing receipt of notice, shall be presented at the
hearing by the applicant, unless the applicant is able to otherwise show
evidence of adequate notice to such owners.
As proof of receipt of the notice is required prior to hearing, it is
recommended that all mailings be completed well in advance of the required
five (5) days.
In addition, a copy of the enclosed public notice form has been submitted
to the Glenwood Post for publication one time, fifteen (15) days prior to
the date of the public hearing. The proof of publication must be
presented at the hearing by the applicant. You should contact the
Glenwood Post directly regarding billing and to obtain the proof of
publication. It is also requested that you display the enclosed poster on
the site, to assist the Zoning Board of Adjustment in locating and
reviewing the request.
Please contact this office should you have any further questions.
Sincerely,
Glenn Hartmann
Planner
GH/ljb
Enclosure
109 8TH STREET, SUITE 303
945-8212 / 625-5571 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601
• •
PUBLIC NOTICE
Take Notice that the Town of Parachute has applied to the Zoning Board of
Adjustment, Garfield County, State of Colorado, to grant a variance in
connection with the following described property situated in the County of
Garfield, State of Colorado; to wit:
Legal Description: See Exhibits A-1 and A-2 (attached)
Practical Description (location with respect to highway, County roads and
residences):
Located approximately 1 mile east of Parachute, on the north
side of Hwy 6.
Said variance is to allow the Petitioner relief from Section 5.07.07(7) to
allow an off-site sign
on the above described property.
All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and
state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear
personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by
letter, particularly if you have objections to such variance request, as
the Zoning Board of Adjustment will give consideration to the comments of
surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to
grant or deny the request for the variance. This variance request
application may be reviewed at the office of the Planning Department
located at 109 8th Street, Suite 303, Garfield County Courthouse, Glenwood
Springs, Colorado between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday
through Friday.
That public hearing on the application for the above variance has been set
for the 24th day of March, 1988, at the hour of 3:30 P.M., Garfield County
Court House, Suite 302, 109 8th Street, Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
Planning Department
Garfield County
• •
7bwn of Parachute
SIGN LOCATION
Exhibit A-1
(General Description)
Being a 1,250 square feet (0.03 acre) parcel of land situated in the
northwest one quarter of Section 5, 'ibwnship 7 South, Range 95 West of the
6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado, said parcel being more
particularly described as follows (all bearings referenced to the Colorado
Coordinate System, Central Zone -- Modified) :
Exhibit A-2
(Specific Description)
BEGINNING at the west quarter corner of Section 5, T.7 S., R.95 W., from
whence the southwest corner of Section 5, T.7 S., R.95 W. bears 500'03'51"W
a distance of 2612.25 feet, with all bearings contained herein being
relative thereto;
Thence N06'38'52"E, a distance of 1111.35 feet to a point on the northerly
boundary of the right-of-way to the north frontage road of I-70;
Thence departing said right-of-way, N30'28'34"W, a distance of 25.00 feet;
Thence N59°31'26"E, a distance of 50.00 feet;
Thence S30'28'34"E, a distance of 25.00 feet to a point on the
aforementioned right-of-way;
Thence along said northerly right-of-way line, 559'31'26"W, a distance of
50.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 1,250 square feet
(0.03 acres) of land.
Tr
.r�i.:..:r.;n',s':1�,..►.:.r,wds.`t �+wa;k.Jad74�'t.YShcrDt".4i�tiiJnr...r,.��.�.r."i1.Kerwa.J►.�JFnk.:,.iv.�r��.w.t ',?� �,., ! '� r '�.:
.rXn.. -M•.R �_.;-a.-. at.'u.wi,.r�a e..�L^�:.: Ax�..arS:rl. d.'
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MEETING
#154
AGENDA
7�
6444E
TIME: 3:30 P.M.
PLACE: Garfield County Courthouse, Suite 302
DATE: Thursday, March 24, 1988
(1) Call to Order
(2) Roll Call
(3) Election of Officers
(4) Approval of the minutes from May 28, 1987
(5) Request for Variance from Section 5.07.07(7) to Allow
an Off -Site Sign
Applicant: Town of Parachute
(6) Adjournment
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Meeting #153
May 28, 1987
MEMBERS PRESENT
John Tripp, Chairman
Mary Odell
Larry Hazelton
Leo Jammaron
Richard Moolick
Danny Gallacher
John Tripp called the meeting
following members absent: Allan
COUNTY STAFF PRESENT
Jim Leuthauser, Asst. Cty
Attorney
Glenn Hartmann, Planner
Eleanor Haring, Recording
Secretary
3:30 P.M.
to order. Roll call was taken with the
Bowles and Pete Cabrinha.
ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR 1987
John Tripp made a motion to elect Allan Bowles as Chairman. The motion
was seconded by Mary Odell and carried unanimously.
John Tripp then made a motion to elect Leo Jammaron as Vice -Chairman,
Danny Gallacher seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously.
Mary.Odell made a motion to elect Larry Hazelton as Secretary. Richard
Moolick seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.
The minutes of April 23, 1987 were approved as written by a motion from
Richard Moolick and a second by Leo Jammaron. The motion carried
unanimously.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 5.04.03, LOT AREA,
RESTRICTIONS BASED ON SEWAGE DISPOSAL METHOD - Doris M. and Daniel G.
Hunt.
John Tripp relinquished his vote in this matter because he was not present
at the previous meeting and also the fact that he knew Mrs. Hunt
personally. Mr. Tripp appointed Mr. Moolick and Mr. Gallacher as voting
members on this item.
Glenn Hartmann entered the Amended Project Information and Staff Comments
as Exhibit G. Larry Hazelton made a motion to accept the exhibit which
was seconded by Richard Moolick. The motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Hartmann summarized the staff report stating that the Hunt property
includes a single family home which is currently being used as a two
family dwelling. Subsequent to the previous continuation of this Public
Hearing, the Board of County Commissioners did hear Mrs. Hunt's request
for Subdivision Exemption on May 11, 1987. At that public meeting, they
failed to approve her request, siting the small lot sizes and individual
sewage disposal systems.
Under Major Issues and Concerns, Mr. Hartmann noted #5 & 116 which state:
"Due to the failure of the Board of County Commissioners to approve the
creation of the lots on which Mrs. Hunt is requesting'the variance, no
hardship presently exists." and "Mrs. Hunt has verbally requested an
additional continuance of this public hearing to allow her to further
investigate her subdivision options." Mr. Hartmann said Staff
Recommendation is continuance of the public hearing to a date certain.
Doris Hunt spoke of her intent to pursue all possibilities despite the
recent denial on the part of the County Commissioners. Mrs. Hunt said she
would appreciate a favorable approval on the part of the Zoning Board of
Adjustment of the individual sewage disposal system conditional on the
creation of the lot. Mrs. Hunt referred to the letter from the engineer
who advised that sewage disposal systems could be constructed on both lots
with the availability of central water.
Larry Hazelton said he had a problem discussing a variance
does not exist. Mr. Hazelton said if the lot was created,
more comfortable with the request for variance.
Leo Jammaron said the Zoning Board of Adjustment has never
before the lot was created.
Doris Hunt said she hoped that the Board of Adjustment would
or vote against but approve a continuance.
on a lot that
he would feel
done anything
not drop it,
Larry Hazelton stated that in regard to the continuance, the Board could
not go on forever. Would it just be continued until the next regular
meeting?
Mr. Hartmann thought it might be appropriate to continue the request until
the July meeting of the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
Mrs. Hunt said she felt this would give her the time to complete all the
details that she had to work out.
Mary Odell said that one of the guidelines that this Board had to follow
was hardship caused by zoning and she did not see that in this case.
Glenn Hartmann said that what Mrs. Hunt has represented in the past that
the basis for her variance request was the fact that the central sewer
system is distant from her lot and with the central sewage disposal system
on her lot she would be allowed in her zone district to have a 1/2 acre
lot size.
John Tripp asked if Mrs. Hunt.
Mrs. Hunt said that would be
mile away and the engineered
deal less.
could hook into the central sewer.
a hardship because the system is 3/10 of a
sewage disposal system would costa great
Mrs. Hunt gave Dean Gordon's estimated expense of a system as around $3000
and she said that since her husband could do the excavating, a good deal
would be saved right there.
Glenn Hartmann said a continuance until July 23, 1987 is what is being
requested.
Danny Gallacher made a motion to close the public part of the hearing with
a second from Leo Jammaron. The motion carried with all ayes.
Richard Moolick made a motion to continue the hearing until July 23, 1987
at 3:30 P.M., with a second from Leo Jammaron. The motion carried
unanimously.
REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 5.05.03 (8) ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN
REQUIRED YARDS —Joseph A. Scott and the Joseph A. Scott 1979 Trust #1.
Jim Leuthauser affirmed that the notices were properly given with the
exception of the notice to Steve and Theresa Seale which had been mailed
but no proof of receipt returned. Upon hearing the statement of Jim Ellis
of 718 Bennett, Glenwood Springs, CO, who was sworn in as a representative
of the Scotts, that Sharon Stevens of Vicki.Lee Green & Assoc., managers
of the Seale property, had also been personally notified, Mr. Leuthauser
indicated that it is up to the Zoning Board of Adjustment to determine if
this constitutes appropriate notice.
Larry Hazelton remarked that the forwarding and return -receipt process
sometimes takes three to four weeks and he made a motion to accept the
notices with a second from Mary Odell. The motion carried unanimously.
Glenn Hartmann entered the following exhibits:
A. Proof of publication
B. Mailings
C. Application
D. Staff Report
Larry Hazelton made a motion to accept the exhibits, with a second from
Richard Moolick. The motion carried with all ayes.
Glenn Hartmann gave the history of the application as follows:
The applicant did apply for and receive conditional approval of the
requested variance to construct a six foot high fence within their
required front yard setback, in September, 1986. Subsequent to that
approval, the County Attorney's office advised that the variance
application was not valid because the actual property owner, the
Joseph A. Scott 1979 Trust #1 had not made the variance request.
Proper application by the Trust has been received with the appropriate
signature.
One the concerns, Mr. Hartmann said, at the previous meeting was snow
removal and that has been addressed by widening of the road and
improvement of the road.
Mr. Gallacher asked if the fence was already up. Mr. Hartmann said yes.
Mr. Hartmann referred to the Findings in the Staff Report which are as
follows:
1. That the application for variance was found to be consistent with
the requirements and standards of Section 9.05 of the Garfield
County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended.
2. That proper publication and public notice was provided as
required for the public hearing before the Zoning Board of
Adjustment.
3. That the public hearing before the Zoning Board of Adjustment was
extensive and complete, that all facts, matters and issues were
submitted and that all interested parties were heard at the
hearing.
Staff ReCommendation, Mr. Hartmann, said was approval of a variance from
Section 5.05.03 (8) to allow a six foot fence within a required front
yard.
-Leo Jammaron made a motion to close the public hearing with a second from
Mary Odell. The motion carried unanimously.
Larry Hazelton made a motion to approve the request for variance with the
Suggested Findings. Richard Moolick seconded the motion. The motion
carried unanimously.
Danny Gallacher made a motion to adjourn the meeting with a second from
Leo Jammaron. The motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Larry Hazelton
Secretary
LH/emh
REQUEST:
BOA 3/24/88
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
Request for Variance from Section
5.07.07(7) to Allow an Off -Site
Sign
APPLICANT: Town of Parachute
LOCATION: A parcel of land situated in the NW
1/4, Section 5, T7S, R95W; located
approximately 1 mile east of
Parachute on the north side of Hwy
6.
SITE DATA: The site consists of 0.03 acres.
EXISTING ZONING: R/L (Resource Lands), gentle slopes
and lower valley floor
ADJACENT ZONING: A/R/RD and R/L, gentle slopes and
lower valley floor
I. RELATIONSHIIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The site is located in the Parachute Urban Area of Influence, as
designated on the Comprehensive Plan Management Districts Map.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL
A. Site Description: The site is generally level, with native
vegetation, and is located immediately adjacent to the
highway right-of-way. The 0.03 acre site is a portion of a
larger tract owned by Exxon and is not a separate parcel.
B. Project Descriytion: The applicant proposes to locate a
"Welcome to Parachute" sign on the site. The sign would be
88 sq. ft. in size and would also identify some recreational
activities in the area (See Page ),
111. MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS
1. Section 5.07.07(7) states that "signs shall identify or
advertise only interests conducted on the lot of the sign
location, unless the Board of Adjustment, upon request,
determines that an off-site sign conforming to the district
regulation in which the sign is located is necessary to
promote the interests of the use to which it relates."
2. The proposed sign is less than the maximum 90 sq. ft.
allowed in the R/L, gentle slopes and lower valley floor
zone district.
3. The Zoning Resolution does allow for variances to the sign
code,provided that •the variance would not allow any
business an unfair advertising advantage over any other
business (See Page /J ) . A sign promoting the -
Town of Parachute would benefit the business community as a
whole and would not create any unfair advantages. However,
no individual businesses or interests should be noted on the
sign.
4. The sign must receive approval as necessary from the State
Department of Highways, or the applicant demonstrate that it
is in compliance with the State regulations. The
application has been referred to the State, with no written
comments received at this time.
IV. SUGGESTED FINDINGS
I. That the application for variance was found to be consistent
with the requirements and standards of Section 9.05 of the
Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended.
2. That proper publication and public notice was provided as
required for the public hearing before the Zoning Board of
Adjustment.
3. That the public hearing before the Zoning Board of
Adjustment was extensive and complete, that all facts,
matters and issues were submitted and that all interested
parties were heard at the hearing.
/(//V. RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL of a variance from Section 5.07.07(7) to allow an
off-site sign for the Town of Parachute, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That the applicant receive approval from the State Highway
Department for the sign.
That the sign promotes the Town of Parachute as a whole, and
that no individual businesses or interests be identified on
the sign.
C
The (Town of Parachute
P. 0. Box 100
222 Grand Valley Way
Parachute, Colorado 81635
303/ 285-7630
NAft(-
MAR 11988
GARFiELD COUNTY
February 26, 1988
Garfield County Planning Department
Mr, Mark Bean
109 8th Street Suite #303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Sign Variance Request
Dear Mark:
The Town of Parachute
Garfield Count is requesting
Garfield
7, o Sign Code requirements per variance per
Su Private locate a "Welcome to Section 5.07.07
private
property approximately Parachute" Sign
theon the northuside Limits, one ( signe east of
facingState Highway° 6,sted location is
west bound traffic on 1-70.
Y at mile marker 76,
With the interest shown in
felt theh she wound the Parachute
butl it would not only identify area, it is
benefit the community Y the Parachute area,
Proposed sign location would Y as a whole,
to slow down g and a give travelers The
exit 1-70 at the Parachute ample
time
ExxonThe Corown has entered into a
Corporation to License Agreement with
their property. Place the sign on a small
of License A Please find enclosed a section
executed(GenDescription),
Sign Location ExhibitA-1e
plus tops a ption), Exhibit A-2
slue p showing the approximatep hyliccific l location
area sand a Zerox copy of the Physical location
q of the sign will be proposed sign. The total
Should
to contact me.
square feet.
free you need additional information
please feel
Thank you for your prompt attention to
our request.
Sincerely,
enc
Dave
Rousseau
Town Administrator
12' aw _, •.l, Il LL;.n , 62500,
)' 1 I�\JI
), rJ/ _ 1` ` i'--- 1 V'-
H %N. R d5n 2 J:r 'SS
'r
A
*l+7,
I i 6'' , 2i)\-��s'`
+� r _ ` r
.N
�", \\. :
/ .0,1. '• ,L\
4
p,o' +, '' .
•
�o.
oas. .�‘, . .,ao ••'? 1
12 »
rs
•
•a •
7cyiaiit"• ,
♦ 3• )�' hn
.rl,
reld
G/A go:CC A 7 C- �•1 • ,
V
I
r"
•
Mon
•
-
•
menl�
1 M.
-\ > • `• rt
•
'L • •
•
iN
.1
•
•
K
LICENSE AGREEMENT
This agreement,
Januar
munzci ", made and
l98t effective
to pal corporation of and between the as of the day
rred
cot as "Parachute," the State of TOWN of p of
potation, hereachuinfref referred to
"Exxon." here C r a
RATION refs
attached
Exxon
owner of as Exxon.► � a New Jersey
Portion ofParachute certaindesires lands describe
amenities. such lands to d in Exhibit
a sign advertising
and maintain A-1
ng Parachute and on
theein°W' THEREFORE, inconsiderationits
contains and
Parties of
agree as folloone dollar paid by the mutual Exxon,
1. Exxon Parachute Exxonpromises
- subject to n grants to to
described xol of the Parachute a license
in Exhibit A-2 eatta h d conditions to occupy,t
hereto °ns hereof, thand Use,
5�9n solely
2. The
hthe premises be premises
may
of approximate poses oof erecting the occupied andused
size by Parachute
3. Th e 8 feet high and and maintaining
through -der of h om
• feet wi�e. g a
shall be , 77 nse shall F �i3 f1?
elects tofor�consec provided, extended howevfer hat th 19b'�
provisions ofterminate this.utive one-year r, that 8
Para licenSe the term
paragraph four herein. in accordance
4. Subsequent with paths
either quant to the
Partthird
Y mayyear
o f reason her part giving written en no this licenseof the term m
(15) days ion, such entnotice to thtat
many time and for of the license,
Prior
to the date- to be given not specifying the datane
there' pacified. less. fifteen
withheld. gn • °f the shall have the right than
sign, which approvalshallto approve the wording on
not be unreasonably
pattvw
0114004.
6. The sign shall be constructed, erected and maintained at
the sole cost of Parachute. If the sign is not
installed or is notproperly
Exxon, Exxon shall properly
l the maintained ight,without in the so incle urring any
liability to Parachute, to remove it. Upon such occurrence the
license granted shall terminate and be of no effect.
7. Parachute shall be responsible for obtaining any and all
permits and approvals from governmental entities necessary to
locate a sign on the premises. The cost of such
permits
approvals shall be the responsibility of Parachute.Parachute
shall not seek any zoning change or change in county land use
plans, if such is required in order to locate a sign on the
premises, without the express prior written approval
Should Parachute seek such a change without Exxon's fapproval,rxon
this license shall terminate and be of no effect. t
8. Upon termination of the license granted herein,
Parachute agrees to promptly remove the sign and anysu
orts
therefor and restore the premises to a condition comarable rto
that existing prior to the location of the sign thereon. Should
Parachute default in the performance of its reponsibilities under
this paragraph, Exxon shall have the right to remove the sign and
restore the premises. Parachute shall pay all reasonable costs
incurred by Exxon for removal of the sign and restoration of the
premises upon receipt of an invoice with sufficient support
documentation to explain the invoice charges.
9. Parachute shall comply with applicable worker's
compensation laws and shall require any contractors it engages to
perform work on the premises to do the same. Parachute further
agrees to indemnify and save Exxon harmless from and against all
claims, liability and causes of action for injury to, or death
of, any person or persons, including
loe
by Parachute or Exxon, and for damage tos n ore o ss of op eengrgyd
resulting from the locating of the sign on the premises orfrom
willful or negligent acts or omissions of Parachute or its
agents, employees, representatives or subcontractors relative to
the sign.
10. Access across .Exxon lands to the sign location is hereby
granted; provided, however, that access shall •be at a location
and along a route specified by Exxon, which location and route
may change from time to time.
11. All notices required to be given hereunder shall be
considered properly given upon delivering the notice in writing
-2-
•�+..�j-�`y'y�CF�Wi <:/abLX�ca.. %� +�#-'j:?�°Ny Fief e..'w�i iS,:�i'� f E...r ..rf. , w
- "�,r":`1'�f!'4�tn *'' a=>�' '".1 i4 ,.Fey.. t.- .- S.'. r i S ti'�4. _.ae i y'. .•:.`i a.. .'.y, 6�j M_.*Mt�Li.r�a .- ;'%!!�s ?�.ti.+"i;r: x/. iw.Y iC-`�G4R'7
•
to the party to be notified, or mailing by registered or
certified mail, or sending by electronic communication device
such as facsimile transmission, to the party to be notified at
such party's address set forth below or such other address as the
party may have designated by previous written notice to the
other.
Parachute
Mr. Dave Rousseau
Town of Parachute
P. O. Box 100
Parachute, Colorado 81635
Exxon
Exxon Company, U.S.A.
Colony Shale oil Project
P. O. Box 308
Grand Junction, Colorado 81502
Attention Resident Manager
with copy to Synthetic Fuels Coordinator, Refining Department,
Exxon Company, U.S.A., P. O. Box 2180, Houston, Texas 77252-2180.
12. This agreement may be amended only by express written
agreement signed by both parties. The agreement shall be
governed by the laws of the State of Colorado.
EXECUTED and DELIVERED as of the date first written above.
ST
Town Clerk
-3-
TOWN OF PARACHUTE
By
Mayor
EXXON CORPORATION
By
Agent and Attorney in Fact
lbw of Parachute
SIGN LOCATION
Exhibit A-1
(General Description)
Being a 1,250 square feet (0.03 acre) parcel of land situated in the
northwest one quarter of Section 5, Township 7 South, Range 95 West of the
6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado, said parcel being more
particularly described as follows (all bearings referenced to the Colorado
Coordinate System, Central Zone - Modified):
Exhibit A-2
(Specific Description)
BEGINNING at the west quarter corner of Section 5, T.7 S., R.95 W., from
whence the southwest corner of Section 5, T.7 S., R.95 W. bears S00'03'51"w
a distance of 2612.25 feet, with all bearings contained herein being
relative thereto;
Thence N06'38'52"E, a distance of 1111.35 feet to a point on the northerly
boundary of the right-of-way to the north frontage road of 1-70;
Thence departing said right-of-way, N30'28'34"W, a distance of 25.00 feet;
Thence N59'31'26"E, a distance of 50.00 feet;
Thence S30'28'34"E, a distance of 25.00 feet to a point on the
aforementioned right-of-way;
Thence along said northerly right-of-way line, S59'31'26"W, a distance of
50.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 1,250 square feet
(0.03 acres) of land.
i•
. r .
87
(1) Setbacks. All signs shall maintain a minimum
setback of 10 feet from the street right-of-way line.
5:07.10 Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) and/or Industrial or
Commercial Subdivision.
Existing platted commercial or industrial planned unit
developments (P.U.D.$) or subdivisions shall be allowed
one freestanding sign per development, with one
additional identification sign for each business within
the development. Sizes shall be compatible with those
specified for the underlying County Zone District. That
is, the P.U.D. signage limitation shall be compatible to
or more restrictive than the County Zone Districts, but
shall not be broader in scope than the county
requirements. All future developments of this type shall
develop a sign code for their proposed uses, which must
receive approval from the Garfield County Board of
Commissioners and which shall be recorded at the time of
P.U.D./Zone Change designation.
5.07.11 Existing or Non -Conforming Signs.
Signs existing at the time of the effective date of this
ordinance, and not in compliance herewith shall be
regarded as non -conforming signs which may continue for a
period of eight (8) years from the earliest effective
date of the substantive provisions or limitations with
which the signs do not comply, if the signs are properly
repaired and maintained and in conformance with the other
ordinances of the county. At the end of such eight year
period, the signs shall be removed. Non -conforming signs
which are structurally altered, relocated, or replaced
shall comply immediately with all provisions of this sign
code. (A. 82-90)
5.07.12 Variance.
A variance from the strict application of the provisions
of this code may be granted by the Garfield County Board
of Adjustment, in accordance with the following
guidelines:
(1) It is the policy of the county to encourage
aesthetically pleasing signs without substantial
interference with the business to which the sign relates.
(2) Projecting signs should not substantially obscure
any part of another sign relating to another use.
(3) Excessively large or tallsigns should be avoided to
prevent visual obstruction of the natural scenery within
the county.
(4) Variances should not be granted which would allow
any business use an unfair advertising advantage over any
other business use.
(5) If it is necessary or reasonable to grant a variance
to the strict regulations of this chapter, the sign
should be limited in size, height, and location in
conformance with the purpose of the sign.
.}5
ixdrn�lii7i.1
7w4..ka::tiFY
• r c
wFan++fi�.i:twi. �.�.�:.�:4,r,�' r;.4�d'w e..11 � �.�.✓.I�.tiw &i��"at:Sril. V,�'4:i.`.'.
l/
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MEETING
#154
AGENDA
TIME: 3:30 P.M.
PLACE: Garfield County Courthouse, Suite 302
DATE: Thursday, March 24, 1988
(1) Call to Order
(2) Roll Call
(3) Election of Officers
(4) Approval of the minutes from May 28, 1987
(5) Request for Variance from Section 5.07.07(7) to Allow
an Off -Site Sign
Applicant: Town of Parachute
(6) Adjournment
MEMBERS PRESENT
John Tripp, Chairman
Mary Odell
Larry Hazelton
Leo Jammaron
Richard Moolick
Danny Gallacher
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Meeting #153
May 28, 1987
3:30 P.M.
COUNTY STAFF PRESENT
Jim Leuthauser, Asst. Cty
Attorney
Glenn Hartmann, Planner
Eleanor Haring, Recording
Secretary
John Tripp called the meeting to order. Roll call was taken with the
following members absent: Allan Bowles and Pete Cabrinha.
ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR 1987
John Tripp made a motion to elect Allan Bowles as Chairman. The motion
was seconded by Mary Odell and carried unanimously.
John Tripp then made a motion to elect Leo Jammaron as Vice -Chairman,
Danny Gallacher seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously.
Mary Odell made a motion to elect Larry Hazelton as Secretary. Richard
Moolick seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.
The minutes of April 23, 1987 were approved as written by a motion from
Richard Moolick and a second by Leo Jammaron. The motion carried
unanimously.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 5.04.03, LOT AREA
RESTRICTIONS BASED ON SEWAGE DISPOSAL METHOD - Doris M. and Daniel G.
Hunt.
John Tripp relinquished his vote in this matter because he was not present
at the previous meeting and also the fact that he knew Mrs. Hunt
personally. Mr. Tripp appointed Mr. Moolick and Mr. Gallacher as voting
members on this item.
Glenn Hartmann entered the Amended Project Information and Staff Comments
as Exhibit G. Larry Hazelton made a motion to accept the exhibit which
was seconded by Richard Moolick. The motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Hartmann summarized the staff report stating that the Hunt property
includes a single family home which is currently being used as a two
family dwelling. Subsequent to the previous continuation of this Public
Hearing, the Board of County Commissioners did hear Mrs. Hunt's request
for Subdivision Exemption on May 11, 1987. At that public meeting, they
failed to approve her request, siting the small lot sizes and individual
sewage disposal systems.
Under Major Issues and Concerns, Mr. Hartmann noted #5 & #6 which state:
"Due to the .failure of the Board of County Commissioners to approve the
creation of the lots on which Mrs. Hunt is requesting the variance, no
hardship presently exists." and *Mrs. Hunt has verbally requested an
additional continuance of this public hearing to allow her to further
investigate her subdivision options." Mr. Hartmann said Staff
Recommendation is continuance of the public hearing to a date certain.
Doris Hunt spoke of her intent to pursue all possibilities despite the
recent denial on the part of the County Commissioners. Mrs. Hunt said she
would appreciate a favorable approval on the part of the Zoning Board of
Adjustment of the individual sewage disposal system conditional on the
creation of the lot. Mrs. Hunt referred to the letter from the engineer
who advised that sewage disposal systems could be constructed on both lots
with the availability of central water.
Larry Hazelton said he had a problem discussing a variance on a lot that
does not exist. Mr. Hazelton said if the lot was created, he would feel
more comfortable with the request for variance.
Leo Jammaron said the Zoning Board of Adjustment has never done anything
before the lot was created.
Doris Hunt said she hoped that the Board of Adjustment would not drop it,
or vote against but approve a continuance.
Larry Hazelton stated that in regard to the continuance, the Board could
not go on forever. Would it just be continued until the next regular
meeting?
Mr. Hartmann thoughtit might be appropriate to continue the requestuntil
the July meeting of the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
Mrs. Hunt said she felt this would give her the time to complete all the
details that she had to work out.
Mary Odell said that one of the guidelines that this Board had to follow
was hardship caused by zoning and she did not see that in this case.
Glenn Hartmann said that what Mrs. Hunt has represented in the past that
the basis for her variance request was the fact that the central sewer
system is distant from her lot and with the central sewage disposal system
on her lot she would be allowed in her zone district to have a 1/2 acre
lot size.
John Tripp asked if Mrs. Hunt could hook into the central sewer.
Mrs. Hunt said that would be a hardship because the system is 3/10 of a
mile away and the engineered sewage disposal system would cost a great
deal less.
Mrs. Hunt gave Dean Gordon's estimated expense of a system as around $3000
and she said that since her husband could do the excavating, a good deal
would be saved right there.
Glenn Hartmann said a continuance until July 23, 1987 is what is being
requested.
Danny Gallacher made a motion to close the public part of the hearing with
a second from Leo Jammaron. The motion carried with all ayes.
Richard Moolick made a motion to continue the hearing until July 23, 1987
at 3:30 P.M., 'with a second from Leo Jammaron. The motion carried
unanimously.
REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 5.05.03 (8) ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN
REQUIRED YARDS - Joseph A. Scott and the Joseph A. Scott 1979 Trust #1.
Jim Leuthauser affirmed that the notices were properly given with the
exception of the notice to Steve and Theresa Seale which had been mailed
but no proof of receipt. returned. Upon hearing the statement of Jim Ellis
of 718 Bennett, Glenwood Springs, CO, who was sworn in as a representative
of the Scotts, that Sharon Stevens of Vicki Lee Green & Assoc.-, managers
Of the Seale property, had also been personally notified, Mr. Leuthauser
indicated that it is up to the Zoning Board of Adjustment to determine if
this constitutes appropriate notice.
Larry Hazelton remarked that the forwarding and return -receipt process
sometimes takes three to four weeks and he made a motion to accept the
notices with a second from Mary Odell. The motion carried unanimously.
Glenn Hartmann entered the following exhibits:
A. Proof of publication
B. Mailings
C. Application
D. Staff Report
Larry Hazelton made a motion to accept the exhibits, with a second from
Richard Moolick. The motion carried with all ayes.
Glenn Hartmann gave the history of the application as follows:
The applicant did apply for and receive conditional approval of the
requested variance to construct a six foot high fence within their
required front yard setback, in September, 1986. Subsequent to that
approval, the County Attorney's office advised that the variance
application was not valid because the actual property owner, the
Joseph A. Scott 1979 Trust #1 had not made the variance request.
Proper application by the Trust has been received with the appropriate
signature.
One the concerns, Mr. Hartmann said, at the previous meeting was snow
removal and that has been addressed by widening of the road and
improvement of the road.
Mr. Gallacher asked if the fence was already up. Mr. Hartmann said yes.
Mr. Hartmann referred to the Findings in the Staff Report which are as
follows:
1. That the application for variance was found to be consistent with
the requirements and standards of Section 9.05 of the Garfield
County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended.
2. That proper publication and public notice was provided as
required for the public hearing before the Zoning Board of
Adjustment.
3. That the public hearing before the Zoning Board of Adjustment was
extensive and complete, that all facts, matters and issues were
submitted and that all interested parties were heard at the
hearing.
Staff Recommendation, Mr. Hartmann, said was approval of a variance from
Section 5.05.03 (8) to allow a six foot fence within a required front
yard.
Leo Jammaron made a motion to close the public hearing with a second from
Mary Odell. The nation carried unanimously.
Larry Hazelton made a motion to approve the request for variance with the
Suggested Findings. Richard Moolick seconded the motion. The motion
carried unanimously.
Danny Gallacher made a motion to adjourn the meeting with a second from
Leo Jammaron. The motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Larry Hazelton
Secretary
UVeh
REQUEST:
BOA 3/24/88
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
Request for Variance from Section
5.07.07(7) to A11ow an Off -Site
Sign
APPLICANT: Town of Parachute
LOCATION: A parcel of land situated in the NW
1/4, Section 5, T7S, R95W; located
approximately 1 mile east of
Parachute on the north side of Hwy
6.
SITE DATA:
EXISTING ZONING:
ADJACENT ZONING:
The site consists of 0.03 acres.
R/L (Resource Lands), gentle slopes
and lower valley floor
A/R/RD and R/L, gentle slopes and
lower valley floor
I. RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The site is located in the Parachute Urban Area of Influence, as
designated on the Comprehensive Plan Management Districts Map.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL
A. Site Description: The site is generally level, with native
vegetation, and is located immediately adjacent to the
highway right-of-way. The 0.03 acre site is a portion of a
larger tract owned by Exxon and is not a separate parcel.
B. Project Description: The applicant proposes to locate a
"Welcome to Parachute" sign on the site. The sign would be
88 sq. ft. in size and would also identify some recreational
activities in the area (See Page )_
III. MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS
1. Section 5.07.07(7) states that "signs shall identify or
advertise only interests conducted on the lot of the sign
location, unless the Board of Adjustment, upon request,
determines that an off-site sign conforming to the district
regulation in which the sign is located is necessary to
promote the interests of the use to which it relates."
2. The proposed sign is less than the maximum 90 sq. ft.
allowed in the R/L, gentle slopes and lower valley floor
zone district.
3. The Zoning Resolution does allow for variances to the sign
code, provided that the variance would not allow any
business an unfair advertising advantage over any other
business (See Page /.3. ). A sign promoting the
.Town of Parachute would benefit the business community as a
whole and would not create any unfair advantages. However,
no individual businesses or interests should be noted on the
sign.
4. The sign must receive approval as necessary from the State
Department of Highways, or the applicant demonstrate that it
is in compliance with the State regulations. The
application has been referred to the State, with no written
comments received at this time.
IV. SUGGESTED FINDINGS
1. That the application for variance was found to be consistent
with the requirements and standards of Section 9.05 of the
Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended.
2. That proper publication and public notice was provided as
required for the public hearing before the Zoning Board of
Adjustment.
3. That the public hearing before the Zoning Board of
Adjustment was extensive and complete, that all facts,
matters and issues were submitted and that all interested
parties were heard at the hearing.
V. RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL of a variance from Section 5.07.07(7) to allow an
off-site sign for the Town of Parachute, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That the applicant receive approval from the State Highway
Department for the sign.
2. That the sign promotes the Town of Parachute as a whole, and
that no individual businesses or interests be identified on
the sign.