HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- PermitGarfield County
Building & Sanitation Department
108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003
Job Address
NO. 10275
c4
Nature of Work Building Permit (ri P
Use of Building /r
b Y1 �� L. �J' • os C�.�-�-� s
Owner
1er,L�v�c9�`Sa.'t
AmountContractor e_ CS).nr
of Permit $ l .8.3L/
Date
of t4 Date
Clerk
a393 -009
0t -f
-707 el'
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
108 8-' Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Spring'', CO 81601
Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fac 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 970-3845003
Permit No: l a
Job Address:
Parcel/Schedule No: 23Q12,0 3 'Q 2009
1 Lot No:Block No: Subd. / Exemption:
13-11 APis.0 fi[ i o. r
2
Owncr:Address
PAvia ci SAii-c Y $ue-i j
CARSD�)L i.
78 evF&c,.o uv
Ph:
70'1.1'2.4
Wk Ph:
9403. ?.4.
3
Contractor:
KEEL -TY c -k sTJec-Tri
Address:2.04 PARK, AVWL.
SIE. 9k c.c.
Ph:
927, (.0972
Lic. No.
4
Architect/Engineer:
Kou E-M*0 ,s
�r,
Address: hd1.4.
3a'-) 14-140 Sr 57A- 2s3
Ph:
/Col. 322-3
Lic. No.
27o 34.
5
Sq. Ft. of Building:
81161 SF,
Sq. Ft. of Lot:.
! 04,E 329.9
Height'
25' 0„e F1P-Pcar
No. of Floors:
3
6
Use of Building:
RESib lAL - 5l
I
_A L. Ai1 /. ! CA--€W3k 4
C
New 0 • Alteration o Remove
Addition 0 Move
7
Describe Work.
Nato Ga ,e'cxrio�
8
Class of Work:
0
9
10
Gare 0 Single
ii e� * CJ4? spAcs_. Double
Carport: A 0 Single
A 0 Double
•
oD_riveway Permit 0 On -Site Sewage
WA'1.` / Disposal
j . Site PI
11
VIation off Wor
(A5 ��',�` -".'-`
& C ' O' .7-5-P3,59,5”
Adjusted Valuations:
,' b
R
I J5 1,-) I ()
�� r
iP 4 .
ptiooi . 7rit 3.2-o7
12
Spec. Canditio s:
j� {,'c-ur-dP rAicie-&iti-u-,
A SEPARATE
ISSUED
THIS
AUTHORLZED
CONSTRUCTION
PERIOD
I HEREBY
APPLICATION
PROVISIONS
COMPLETED
GRANTING
TO VIOLATE
LOCAL
^T
vi CO'
NOTICE
ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE
BY THE STATE OF COLORADO-
PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION
IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR, IF
OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A.
OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED.
CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED TILES
AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL>
OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE
WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE
OF A PERMTT{BOL*S-N PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY
0' - CEL THE PR SIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR
LAW Gi e. NG CZJNS RUCTION O�Y/I IE PERFQRMANC,E
1 lY/ /
Plan Check Fee:
£
Permit ee:
V 39 7 4) 7
Total Fee:
/ ,,.„,./-:2.5-g se
Dated Permit Issued:
�CO . �1'
Const. Type:
.
�On n
fYIJ `
�{1 17i �4-'•- O-/
(1— , 1
Setbacks:
j •/ 1 [1 r {l (,
1
�J
r
'�f
Manu. Home:
(J6 Ce
ISDS No. EL Fee:
. �-a-Q A`.-
S o
SIG
, OWNER
ATE
hA
fiII
A>'PRO AL/DATE APPROVAL/DATE,�i�P
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT
THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND
USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED 13Y GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES
THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WTrH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE
ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME
NULL AND VOID. TILE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE I3UILDING OFFICIAL
FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING
BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF
THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUPTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE
Ar/ ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES 13Y GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSI
HELM FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DBUILDER,
AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND TN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST.
(-•L\c)c.‘
I IIEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INIAL):
6t
-51
I a-ag-cam
��9�I "-e._1rwL13-bee__
Dec. 26. 2006 1:04PM
12/26/2006 70:36 AM FROM: Fax TO: 704-0287 PAGE, 002 OF 002
No. 0248 P. 2
The following ilteme are required by Garfield County for a final lnepeotiont
1. A futnl 131eetrieal Tn pedhon it'oin the Cnlortldo Stato tilectrioal Trlsnootori
2, PeiThenenrAddress AcsIgned by Ghtrfdld County. RoilIctingDoportinontp rood will%ie irudlly
visible from access; d; .
3, A finishCtl roof, a tucknble house_ complcto exterior siding, exscriar doors Lind window
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with tot & cold running water, ttun absorbcrtl
kitchen, flnnr rnvaringi, vowit'r tope tont ii,ittsfird walk, reedy for .lt Yo anti tabIsOrnil)r, t I
necessary plumbing;
4. All bathrooms :S vet his t„,„ 1,I!1 . %wirtr tiVKyhbttWVt, LUIS= ants, lir, 14I101 AVIA, h and cold
running wetly', non-absorbent tin nr l and walls ravished and u privacy door;
S. All sicps outside or inside Over three (3) steps mat have handrails, guard rails an balconies or
ducks, twin 30" high t_c1nsfructzd t4 olt C and MC rc p1 zmen ;
6. Outside grading dune to Whole water will detour away !rout the building;
7, t3Xceptt ns to the outelde s:tcps, decks and grading may bet made upon the demonlltration of
ontommtif4 4rau113t4r1V94, i,v, 1rarillyar, tan. -11. ConlfctCe Or (JOeupeneyy wilt net he issurxi until
all that required horns an: completed and a final inapootian made;
8. A fitull inspection sign off by the Garfluid County 'toad & Bridge. I aparimcnt for driveway
in5tallation, where appllcoble; as well tis Any finial sign off by the Fire District, ainl/pr Sian
Agetiell:s where 4ipplicnbla.
9, Wyatt will connecting to a SIM* water tiudlor savior system, proof of the top tbcs hcnve beau
pald and the conrlectionS !impeded by d1F mvolrr. provider priorlo lanuanuo of a C',O,
A CERTIFICATE 'I E or OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UN'T'IL AL -L tiJ'ci F
ABOVE t'fEMS 13,4,VE BEEN (7O14A'T,E JI D.
"'AAA CERTIFICATE OF a(C.r;PAN ['ie M&Y TJlttlt,`. UP PO do Bugrrwr80 DAYS 1') Din
PROCESSED AND ISSUED.
aa4*+CANNOT OCCUPY OR lgiE DIN LX.,ING UNTIL A GFRTIFICA't'E op
(JCCUPANCY (C,O) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR VSE OF 1)WI♦ Ii JNG WITIIO11T A
C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN UJ. E(iAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY RR. GROUNDS
¥OR VACATING IntEMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
r urytltabo ►ul rued atinnt: rat arttu{t by tI10 atl1We conditions for ocottpuncy, Me and ILIO iRSusn v era
Certificate orO ctupancy for the dwelling undor building permit 11 / c
Sisnatsre
fpnppJic ntir+uu4tubet2006
Received Time Dec, 26. 2006 iH8AM No, 0247
Dalo
VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION
Applicant N Subdivision its { �` ta�5
Address a` m,,- cacrl Lot/Block le` 9
Date _ / i(f gi o to Contractor l,ee1
Finished (Livable Area):
Main 5 7g I
Upper / 1 03
Lower
Other
Poc 211
Total Square Feet '7095/ I- 74
Valuation
Basement:
Unfinished 41$ '1 1
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
�}t Plan Check Fee for Conversion
Q' { Valuation
Garage:
Valuation no ( 8
Crawl Space:
Valuation 'S" 3(03 Ni
Decks/Patios:
Covered
Valuation
Open
Valuation
17.3`0
Total Valuation
�tl
85') .rte
/7 /38
l7, qz8
48, 2'07
=
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan
and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result
in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or
contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other
plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed
after it has been provided to the Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your
project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plait review. Also, please consider
using a design professional for assistance is your [resign and a construction professionai for
construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the
plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building,
plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to
and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and `toi submit the
completed checklist at time of application for a permit.
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and
drawn to scale.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
1
decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line
and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof,
including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation,
sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered
foundations may be required.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be
designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind
speed, wind exposure 13 or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or
your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC.
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and
distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by
a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the
drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan.
(NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure
within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on
a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a Iicensed surveyor and have the surveyor's
signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a
building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of
the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located
within the envelope.
Yes
2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and
utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution
if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special
setbacks do apply.
Yes X
3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage
Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and
adjacent properties), streams or water courses?
Yes N/A
2
4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing
the property?
Yes
5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design?
Yes D(
6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes
7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist
spaces and doff ts?
Yes t(
8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow Toads, (a
minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor
Ioads and wind loads?
Yes 1)(
9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof
construction?
Yes
10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling
joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes
11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection
of all columns and beams?
V
Yes
12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed gddition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and cave of a gable or shed roof or the
top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet)
Yes
13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including
make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes No pc
Atuc.. 4,,ds APPUArVC1— CA -
1 -1A4 Cr .
3
14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to
comply with the IRC?
Yes No
15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC?
Yes p( No
16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural
light and ventilation for all habitable rooms?
Yes No
17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as
a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures
and spec' safety glazing for these areas?
Yes No
18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated on the plan?
Yes K No
19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption
process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes
and/or covenants?
Yes No
20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility
to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to
submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not
be accepted without it.
Yes
No
21. Will this be t - only residential tructure on the parcel? l fr Hoc'sli,
Yes No i,y If no -Explain: rM-
si
22. Have two(2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
Yes �(
23. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and
20fI. Iong?
Yes /X No
4
24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
construction code requirements?
Yes M No
25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your
properties zone district?
Yes No
26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final
inspection by the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes No
27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior
to the application of these changes?
Yes X No
28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you
at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as
well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your
building permit?
Yes No
29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before
the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections
will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to
be called in to 384-5003.
Yes No
30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will
result in a $50.00 re -inspection fee?
Yes ( No
31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC
including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and
occupancy of the building?
Yes No
32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written
authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply
with the IRC?
Yes No
5
33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to
show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road
& Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge
Department at 625-8601.
Yes 1.1/A No
34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed EIectrician
and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are
performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be
required at ti a of applicable inspection.
Yes No
35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in
the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal
of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes No
36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of
fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the
building department about this requirement)
37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the
property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading
permit?
Yes
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the
be f my altli .
0
Signaturi; of Owner Dat
Phone:
Project Name: i s 5IbZ X.L-
Project Address: 00L5 ThaW.Y1 Gl2GC. ,
Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this
information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process.
Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a
permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review
the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application
may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not
reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first
(days); (evenings)
6
position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction.
BpminregFeb2005
7
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
ApplicantT)c.)-44)f..44Date 2. 18
/Building
Engineered Foundation
%i Dr'veway Permit
Surveyed Site Plan
,KSe tic Permit and Setbacks
Grade/Topography 30%
AttachResidential Plan Review List
Minimum Application Questionnaire
Subdivision Plat Notes
/(%(44- Fire Department Review <
Valuation Determination/Fees
Re 1 Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
Attach Conditions
Application Signed
--lan Reviewer To Sign Application
Parcel/Schedule No.
) L4 40# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms.
Soils Report
GENERAL NOTES:
o s.
Planni : Zoning
Prop.. y Line Setbacks
30ft tream Setbacks
Flood Plain
Build ng Height
Zoni g Sign -off
Roati Impact Fees
H • A/DRC Approval
G adelTopography 40%
lanning Issues
Subdivision Plat Notes
No.
Assessor's Parcel No 2313 ----off
Date /a -
Lest »T 7
BUILDING PERMIT CAR
Contractor -e--Q-1 -k Lc*
Setbacks: Front Rear
� C. -3
Address
Address
RH
Soils Test
Footing
Foundation �.b ' •'-n./{.
Grout
Underground Plumbing
ough Plumbing
;7 Framing 9 t ill,,, ct .. r, vo'1 4b1
Insulation cf-0 7
Roofing
Drywall ?4'l.�rz q/,., ---r J� Arlt
Gas Piping 3' 2l'f7? 7
y 7-1s--o799&-A
PECTIONS
/o -07".70
NOTES
01ST F
hone #6,0
�
Phone #r,...-7.459.7.2
7sP�%
LH Zoning
04k/41
etTS.720�
Weathe roofing
' al in -67g2.) =`-,/,1 z i -
Electrical Rough (State) ✓
Electrical Final (State) r/
Final ?- K-08 /Checklist Com leted?
Certificate Occupancy # 1 Z
Date (5SU. o`I
Septic System #
Date
Final
Other
continue on back)
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date Issuedik.a °.Zoned Area Permit No 102773"
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
Use
G w Com. - - ._.
Address or Legal Description
e". sAYIALAPMOid S'SCAint
Own
Contract°
et.
Setbacks Font Side Sides Rear
This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection.
J
INSPECTION
RECORD
Footin • ; --). w, , _
Driveway
Foundation
Underground Plumbing),
Insulation 7_2,0_07
Rough Plumbing g
Drywall m, 7 07�%7�
i.".._,
Chimney & Vente_A
—/Gas Piping
Final 7-a3- e,,...,—
OK.— rf; Hods g git-- a
Septic Final
Framing p...l, l.- . 4-13o1,4.SL
(To include Roof innplace and Windows
and Doors installed). ,
)fir,
Notes: 12 i - ::C. ,, :/7
4', - /a -I -a7
i/ ;,1G�t_,.. f _f i _„ f
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING -
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
APPROVED
Data• I ':4 By FV
IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC
/-,2y-o7 /volt di;t0A7r4a4=0-4.
7-- /0 -07 ?a,e % 7- 3o -o7 G7zA,
11-°7 614'241 )11/§) //V A;0,-77972 /7&ee,d;.
( _97i,dee/� �z
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at 004"
Permit No. /Da75-
I
5-
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
4,,e ,4,ee,e,e<
grAZ-C
CaII for Re -Ins • ection
® $50.00 Re -Inspection Fee must be paid prior to Re -Inspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date 7-/e�pg 20
Building Inspector .---"OreeZid,fer../e"-Z".-----
Phone (970) 945-8212
COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION TI E
108 8th St, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at 004/5"—
Permit
C 4"5
Permit No.
1 have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
))/a/ ACE/17b---0/4/
rL 3 J7, 3 ,I ,..Z
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date 9'-/9-G7 20
Building Inspector
Phone (970) 945-8212
COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION TIE
108 8th St, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at o('s1,2c.�. -
Permit No.
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date a7 20
Building Inspector -257-4,:,,W--`7,-;"
Phone (970) 945-8212
J
MA
JOHN MUIR
ARCHITECTS, Inc.
TRANSMITTAL
TO: Andy Schwaller
CC:
FROM: Josh Smith
DATE: 12.14.06
RE: 0045 Pheasnat Circle, Lot B-9 at Aspen Glen
Burden Residence- 45 Pheasant Circle, Aspen Glen Lot 13-9
Code compliance, Section 323 of the International Residential Code- Flood Resistant Construction
R323.1.1- Addressed by structural engineer
R323.1.2- Pressure treated sill plates and inlet/ outlet provided at foundation.
R323.1.3- Flood height established at 6,021.0' per Beach and Associates study.
R323.1.4- Lowest floor elevation is located at 6,022.5', 1'-6" above flood level. Bottom
of floor joists are located at 6,021'-11 3/8". Basement is located outside of the
100 year flood boundary.
323.1.5- Note #13 added to General Notes, sheet A0.1 stating that the conditions of
section 323.1.5 must be followed. All mechanical and electrical systems will be
above flood level. Mechanical and electrical equipment will be located outside of the 100 year flood
boundary.
323.1.6- Note #11 added to the General Plan Notes sheet A0.1.
323.1.7- Addressed by the structural engineer. Note #12 added to the General Plan Notes
sheet A0.1.
323.1.8- N/A
R323.1.9- Addressed through study provided by Beach Resource Management. A copy of
this study is enclosed with this submittal package.
R323.2.1-
1. Lowest floor level is located at 6,022.5, 1'-6" above the design flood elevation.
2. Basement is located outside of the 100 year flood boundary.
3. Basement is located outside of the 100 year flood boundary.
201 Main Street Carbondale, Suite 304, Colorado 81623
Phone: (970) 704-9750 Fax: (970) 704-0287 E -Mail: jma@sopris.net
®!IIM1' its 4I1,rii1.1414.IriVinC IRV IhPHi 11A1
Reception#: 766435
04/17/2009 01:39:10 PM Jean Rlberico
1 of 3 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee.O 00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
DECLARATION OF DEED RESTRICTION
THIS DECLAMPION OF EED RESTRICTION (this "Declaration") is
made as of this 3OJ ay of A tz c L 2009, by SANDY T. BURDEN
(hereinafter referred to as "Owner"), whose address is 45 Pheasant Circle,
Carbondale, CO 81623, located in the County of Garfield.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Owner owns real property described on Exhibit A, attached
hereto (the "Real Property"), which Real Property contains, in addition to a main
residence (the "Main Residence"), a detached cottage containing approximately
1,434 net livable square feet unit (the "Cottage"). For purposes of this Declaration,
the Cottage, the Real. Property, and all appurtenances, improvements and fixtures
associated therewith shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Property"; and
WHEREAS, the County has imposed a covenant upon the Propertywhich
shall prohibit use of the Cottage as a dwelling unit separate from the Main
Residence.
NOW, THEREFORE, Owner hereby covenants and agrees as follows:
1. Owner hereby covenants that the Cottage shall not be used as a permanent
dwelling unit separate from the Main Residence. Nothing herein shall prohibit
Owner or Owner's guests and invitees from using or occupying the Cottage.
2. 111's Declaration may be modified or removed by the Owner, or successor
owners of the Property, upon approval by Garfield County.
6. Unless modified as stated above, this Declaration constitutes a covenant
running with the Real Property.
IN WITNESS HEREOF, Owner has executed this instrument on this day
and year above first written.
OWNER:
• ■1111'i • NEYJ I 1 V0L1-1INIC 15:l4I1pli"'i dill"
Recept i onk# : 766435
04!1712009 01:39:10 PM Jean Rlberico
2 of 3 Rec Fee:$0 00 Doc Fee 0.00 GPRFIELD COUNTY CO
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF GARFIELD )
. \
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I day of iNc 1 , 2009, by
Sandy T. Burden.
WITNESS MY hand and official seal.
My Commission expires: \--)e _ 2_2- 2,01b
2
Notary Public
111111PliFaifii`,141116.10.1161.14Vinr4igliiit Pi
Reception#: 766435
04/17/2009 01:39,10 PM Jean Rlbericc
3 of 3 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee_0,00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
Exhibit A
Legal Description of Property
Lot B9, Aspen Glen, Filing No. 1, according to the plat recorded as Reception No. 581065,
County of Garfield, State of Colorado.
3
JNA
JOHN MUIR
ARCHITECTS, Inc.
R323.2.2 -
I. Crawl space below the design flood elevation is solely for building maintenance access.
2. Flood openings provided, see sheet A2.1.
2.1. Openings provided on four sides of the building.
2.2. 2,183 sq. ft. of crawlspace is located in the flood boundary. 2,238 sq. inches of openings
have been provided to allow entry and receding points for flood waters.
2.3. All openings are located within 12" of adjacent grade,
2.4. Vents/ openings inside dimensions are 8"H x 42" W, and 4" or 10"
pipes,
see A2.I
2.5. Openings are permanently open with insect screen behind and no louvers.
2.6. No vents are located in doors or windows.
R323.2.3- Addressed by the structural engineer.
R323,3- N/A
201 Main Street Carbondale, Suite 304, Colorado 81623
Phone: (970) 704-9750 Fax: (970) 704-0287 E -Mail: jmanasopris.net
A Premier
Woodburning Fireplaces
Touching your
senses and
lighting your
passions, our
fireplaces are the
heart and soul
of your home
H EAT6 GLO.
Where everything comes together
Cur line of clean faced wood burning fireplaces will make
their mark in stone.
I lave the sound
and scent of a
real wood fire
burning.
The crackling fire in
my Exclaim strikes
just the right chord
for the evening.
Weve created an exclusive offering
of fireplaces designed to be finished
right up to the doors with your
favorite stone, marble, granite or tile.
The result is a classic masonry look
without all the fuss. And with
several styles and sizes to choose
from, you 11 never need to worry
about being stuck between a rock
and a hard place.
The new Exclaim series, shown at
right, offers viewing areas of
magnificent proportions. With a
choice of a traditional or
herringbone brick interior and an
elegant array of door options,
our clean -faced fireplaces can
turn any living area from casual
to spectacular.
Cover photo Exclaim -50 with optional pewter Craftsman doors
Exclaim -36
Just the right size for most applications, the Exclaim -36
makes any room stand out. The selection of glass or mesh
door options allows for that extra personal touch.
Exclaim -42
A bolder statement that transforms your family room.
Stack in the wood and sit back for a full fireplace
experience with your Exclaim -42.
Exclaim -50
The view doesnt get any bigger or more spectacular. The
Exclaim -50 offers a vision of epic proportions, something
any lodge would be envious of.
Exclaim -36 Shown with optional DM -60365 doors &
herringbone refractory
HaIA
Exclaim -42 Shown with optional DP -8042 Perception doors
and traditional refractory
Exclaim -50 (Below) Shown with standard parting mesh and traditional refer
/e lean and simple. The North Star makes a difference inside
your home and out.
Sometimes the answer is so
obvious, there really is no decision
to make. In the case of the North
Star, you neednt make a choice.
Approved to EPA -Phase II
standards, the North Star meets the
strictest environmental standards in
the country with low particulate
matter emissions of only 3.25 grams
per hour. This allows you to enjoy a
beautiful, roaring fire and be a friend
to the environment at the same
time. Just as importantly, weve
created a ruggedly traditional look
that is matched only by its heating
capacity.
My mementos
havefound their
natural place
Nothing makes you
appreciate a fire like
splitting your own
wood
Capable of producing up to 70,000
Btu/Hour and boasting a
77.8% efficiency rating,
the North Star will warm
you up on the coldest of
nights. And with two
standard fans and up to two
optional Heat -Zone kits, it can
heat up other areas of the home
as well.
I dont need to leave
home to get that
feeling of being in the
North Woods.
2
Premier Wood Line Drawings Refer to installation manual for detailed specifications on installing these products.
Model North Star
5-718"
Side View
Front View
A 111111 I,_43.18
4116
411388'
31 ,r80
11-1100
Exclaim Models 36 - 42 -50
Front View
[222mm]
Energy Master Model EM -415
Side View
Elstmr
05 KHOCI4out
Outside
-5180
40
37'
Top View
4151&—.
{ 1, 057mm]
Top View
40'-1
F
Front View
A A A A
�I1 l 1 I I.
1 1) 1
1 J 1 F] 1 1
I
20-3!4'
1527mm]
,.5)8'
[295mm]
23-118'
Exclaim Specifications
MODEL
DIMENSION
A
DIMENSION
8
DIMENSION
C
DIMENSION
11
DIMENSION
E
DIMENSION
F
DIMENSION
G
Exclaim
36
43-1/8
49-5/8
59114
28-12
441/2
27112
36
Ixctaint
42
43-118
49-5/8
59114
28-1/2
50112
27112
42
Exclaim
50
48-318
60-1/4
70-1/2
33
60-5/8
29-1/2
50
Reference dln4ensions only. We recommend measuring individual units at installation.
Side View
41'
(eliectve heigh
MSC
Gas Knocko.t
OunlcfionBox
11
{
41-80
13"
8-518" 8-118'
Energy Master Model EM -42
Front View
n I 17�i
3'
(83 mm]
fLED3203:12C0:0 0:1=a
I Erie
(4a7mml
1
Nf'J
7mm
tmm® 11170317171=3
caanolonm 011:011111=
Istsmm]
42Ve
[1o76mm]
0
Energy Master Model EM -485T
Side View
36"
4IM'
Damper
Handle
[709 mm]
v
7'
Side Yew
I °O h0 1
Ir
a67mmy
DI .
13-172°
4"
25'
1834m -al
g•
[229m m[
[27mm]
Front View
10-1/7
, da.;
3ra'
(90mm]
18'.6'
I477mrn]
Top View
Top View
42
21 h'
(537nun1
40. 12' M��
{1015nandhelp!)
[39lmml i ��I a[b55mm
IediaeGve
L.
Side View
Top View
48'
7
Models HST -42D and HST -48D
11
Top View
Front View
1l2J . A 7 -we
If 6
Models Bay -40 and Pier -40
End View - Bay 40
Side View
4' x 4'
nulNlde
Air
14•
9/s' Gas
1
Knockout
I1•
HST Specifications
MODEL DIM1 NNS61N
A
OEMENSION
B
47
DIMENSION
7/8'
23
DIMENSION DIMEESION DIMENSION
38-1/2
58-7/8
28
Reference dimensions only. We recommend measuring individual units at installation
Front View - Bay 40 Front View - Pier 40 Top View - Both Models
Specifications
22-1YY
36•��
�. 5-374'
AOA
El
/2'/2' `'-374•
40
I
22-tYP ..
24'
, tlr
MODEL FRONT HEIGHT REAR HEIGHT FRONT WIDTH BACK WIDTH DEPTH GLASS SIZE
EM -419
...................
P2442
EM 185T
North Star'
HST -42D
HST -48D
PIER -40
BAY -40
Exclaim -36
Exr1aim-42
Exclaim -50
413/8
413/8
4313/16
41.
391!4
471/8
4]`118
495/8
44:5/8
601/4
4112
41.1/1
417/8
4313/1
41 12
393/4
475/8
47.518.:
493/4
49374..
61...
413/8
41..
413/8
4313116
41
39 U4
47 1/8
:471/8
59 1/4
591/4
601/4
4112
41314
417/8
4313/16
4112
39314
47 5/8
47.5/8
64
61
42
'424/i
48
40
..............
40
47
40
40
...........
44 1/2
501/2',
60 5/8
43
43 I/f.
49
42
41
148
40
39
45 12
sr in
615/8
281/4
42178.
307/8
40
40
40
40 ,
28 5/8
Sari
415/8
43
4311$.
49
42
41
40
45 12
51112
615/8
22
25 ,
22 3/4
231/8
24
24
241/2
2712
27'1/2
2912
23
2512
23114
23
23
23112
28
303/8
36x231/2
361131/8
42a23 1/2
36 x 201/8
361207/8;;r
36X2812
4??[. 281P�
50X33
Refer re inaltation manual for dtuilyd spcci5ra/iars on insulting this product. HEAT R ILL) relents the right a update wits pcnodiulIF
l'ieituu in [his brochurcarc nor true tcprnmsarion of the colors of the arcplaoc andlar flans.
Tine produce as caaad by or.r m morn Rioted ic.bnalogics.
*Tested to EPA Phase II Standards, the North Star fireplace meets the strictest
environmental standards for woodburning fireplaces and can be used in areas
where conventional woodburning appliances are restricted or banned.
* Btu of Cord Wood Fuel are to be used as a guideline only and may differ due to
type of wood and moisture content.
-7(6)
SGS
'2005 B PREMIER WOOD REV C 10/05
HEAT & GLO
a brand of Hearth & Home Technologies Inc.
20802 Kensington Boulevard, Lakeville, MN 55044
(888) 427-3973 (952) 985-6000 Fax (952) 985-6001
Email us at: info@heamglo.com
End View - Pier 40
Bottom View - Bay 40
-.17581'
5-714
12'
T ELECTRICAL
KNOCKOUT
FOR ST36C
rr
For complete details on
Premier Woodburning Fireplaces, please contact us:
HEAT6GLO.
Where everything comes together
Visit out web site at: heatnglo.com
TOWN & COUNTRY FIREPLACES
TC36?
A Town & Country Fireplace
gives you the most -realistic
look of a wood burning •
hearth available today.
The Town & Country TC36
offers unprecedented
flexibility in installation and
design options. For the first
time we invite you to come
inside the fireplace to design
your hearth from the inside
out. You have complete
control over the look of your
fireplace, with a variety of
firebox liners and accessories
to choose from, a clean view
of the fire unobstructed by
louvers, a flush hearth
design, and "disappearing"
ceramic glass.
Town & Country Fireplaces
has redefined gas fireplace
design with its patented
Decorative Direct Vent
technology®, creating the
first gas fireplace with flames
so real you almost hear them
crackle.
FIREPLACE DIMENSIONS
CENTER OF FLUE OUTLET
11 9116•
12 11!16'
TOP VIEW
f4-24 3116"
SIDE VIEW
TOP STANDOFFS
47 13196'
A A_J\
t
>32 3116'
37112'
41 31a"
FRONT VIEW
POSSIBLE CONTROL BOX LOCATIONS
tff LIF T1ft
Town & Country's
comprehensive warranty
assures you of a lifetime of
warmth and pleasure.
I
TOWN & COUNTRY FIREPLACES
Toll Free: 1-888-223-0088
Fax: 1 (250) 748-0844
E-mail: sales@townandcountryfireplaces,net TOWN & COUNTRY
www.townandcountryfireplaces.net FIREPLACES"'
PRINTED IN CANADA
Specifications subject to change without notice
TOWN .36 B RC H. 11/04120M
Oct 18 2005 3:24PM HP LASERJET 3330
Technical Memorandum
EVALUATION OF FLOODING ON THE
ROARING FORK RIVER •
AT LOT B9. ASPEN GLEN
Southwest % Section 20, T 7 S, R 88 W
Garfield County, Colorado
Prepared for
David and Sandy Burden
78 Buffalo Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
by
William W. Hansen, PhD, PE
Beach Resource Management, LLC
Aspen, Colorado
17 October 2005
Proj. No. 0420
p.2
Oct 18 2005 3:24PM MP LASERJET 3330
Technical Memorandum
P.3
EVALUATION OF FLOODING ON THE
ROARING FORK MAR
AT LOT B9. ASPEN GLEN
17 October 2005
Proj, No. 0420
PURPOSE
A proposed building site described as Aspen Glen Lot B9 lies along the right bank of the
Roaring Fork River approximately three miles northwest of the City of Carbondale in Garfield
County, Colorado. The site is impacted by unusual flood events, e.g., the flood that has a
probability of 1% of being equaled or exceeded in any year (the "104 -year flood). This
document summarizes an analysis of the configuration of the Roaring Fork 100 -year flood at
Lot B9 of the Aspen Glen development,
BASIC DATA _
A detailed reconnaissance of the site was conducted on 08 August 2005. Beach Resource
Management, LLC of Aspen, Colorado, provided information concerning the site and the
project requirements. A detailed topographic survey was conducted by Tuttle Surveying of
Glenwood Springs, who has provided a computer-generated topographic map of the site.
Location of cross-sections and estimates of the channel roughness coefficients were obtained
from the Flood Insurance Study for Garfield County, Colorado Unincorporated Areas, Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), January 3,19 86 (FIS).
Since publication of the FIS, the U.S_ Geological Survey has published an updated and revised
methodology for estimating peak rates of flooding in the mountains of Colorado, Analysis of the
MAgnitud and Frequency of Floods in Colorado, (Water -Resources Investigations Report 99-
4190, Denver, Colorado, 2000). The revised method requires the parameters Drainage Basin
Area and Mean Basin Slope, which were determined at the confluence of Cattle Creek by
appropriate scaling from USGS topographic maps at a scale of 1:100,000.
METHODS OF ANALYSIS
The detailed studies conducted by FEMA in the preparation of the FIS utilized one cross-
section upstream (BH) and three cross-sections downstream (BE -- BG) for the reach under
study. New cross-section data was obtained at all four locations by Tuttle Surveying, as well
as one additional cross-section (BZ) that bisected the property (Lot B9) under study. In this
manner differences in flood elevation between this analysis and the 1986 FIS could be
evaluated at common points.
(1)
Oct 18 2005 3:24PM HP LASERJET 3330
p.4
Data for the five cross-sections was developed by scaling from the topographic maps provided
by Tuttle Surveying. The cross-section data and distances between stations were entered into
the software routine HEC -RAS River Analysis System (US Army Corps of Engineers, January
2001). From the. FIS, channel roughness parameters were determined to be 0.035 — 0,050 in
the main channel and 0.070 - 0.090 in the overbank areas. A flood discharge of 10,400 cubic
feet per second (cis) at the confluence of Cattle Creek with the Roaring Fork River was
obtained by the methods presented in the USGS reference_
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
The results of the HEC -RAS simulation may be summarized with reference to the
accompanying figures. Based upon the cross-section data scaled from the current topographic
maps, the area that would be inundated by the design flood is as shown by the heavy
boundary lines and the shaded area on Figure 1. The computed flood profile is illustrated on
Figure 2, with elevations above Mean Sea Level (MSL) plotted against distance upstream of
FEMA cross-section BE. The cross-section identifiers are shown in their appropriate locations.
The cross-section at Station BZ is reproduced on Figure 3 in order to verify the backwater that
occurs on the right bank. The HEC -RAS analysis allows for the definition of "ineffective flow
area" which is shown as the shaded portion of the figure. Over this width there is floodwater
present but it is simply ponded there due to topography and has zero velocity in the
downstream direction. The figures clearly show that the floodwaters do not encroach on the
building envelope.
Any disparity between these results and those illustrated in the FIS is largely due to some
significant differences in streambed elevation. Figure 4 provides a comparison between the
streambed profiles of the two studies, where differences in elevation of two to three feet may
be noted. The movement of streambed materials during periods of high water is well
documented, and the morphology of the Roaring Fork River has been captured by the modem
surveying instrumentation employed for this analysis_
(2)
Figure
BOUNDARY AND ELEVATIONS
OF 100 -YEAR FLOOD
Roaring Fork River at Burden Building Site
Aspen Glen Lot B9
Scale:1 inch A 30 feet 10 Oct '05
6019
1f
Beach Resource Management LLC
WdS2:6 SOO2
13CN3SU 1 dH
m
W
(y1
0
U1
Oct 18 2005 3:25PM HP LASERJET 3330 p'6
6028
6024
6020
0 6016
re
6012
ut
6008
6004
6000 BE
0
Figure 2: Water -Surface Elevation
1-4-2005 survey
-f-- FIS
r^+
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Distance, feet
Figure 3: Cross -Section at Project Site
Section BZ
.035
.07
1 i
110-0
50 100 150 200
Station (Ft)
Legend
EGFF1
WS PF 1
.1-
Crit PF 1
Ground
inef f
Bank Sta
350
6018
6014
c6010
0
6006
m
1L 6002
5998
5994
0
Figure 4: Minimum Channel Elevation
12005 survey
--MI-•FJS
1
E
BE
T
500
1000
1500 2000 2500 3000
Distance, feet
3500 4000
4500
5000
Beach Resource Management LLC
17 October 2005
Feb 27 2006 10:1SRM HP LRSERJET 3330
Beach
IFI
Envtroamen al, LLC
517 E. Hopkins A
Suite 100
Aspen. CO 8161!
Tel 1970} 925-3475
Fax 925-1754 I
Mr. Mark Bean
Garfield County Department of Planning & Zoning
108 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
p.2
16 February 2006
RE: Floodplain Evaluation, Lot B9, Aspen Glen,, SW % S20, T7S, R88W
Dear Mr, Bean:
This is in response to our telephone conversation on Friday 10 February 2006. In view of
the fact that adoption of our floodplain analysis of October 2005 will require a Letter of
• Map Revision from. FEMA, we will base. our evaluation c f:the.building site on the current
Flood Insurance Study for Garfield County, dated January 23"4, 1986.
With reference to Table 2•of the Floodway Data for the Roaring Fork River, we note that
the more stringent With Floodway BFEs are 6026.3 and 6015.8 at Cross Sections BH
and BG, respectively, which are the sections immediately above and below the subject
property. Linear interpolation between these points indicates that the BFEs are
approximately 6021.0 and 6019.5 at the upstream and downstream property lines,
respectively.
These values may be compared with the detailed site-specific topographic maps
produced from the survey data obtained last fall by Tuttle Surveying of Glenwood
Springs. The contours of 6019 and 6020 are well outside of the building envelope, and
the contour of 6021 encroaches only about 20 feet into the building envelope on the
riverward side.
ue
In summary, a lower floor elevation of 6022 may be considered safely above the Base
Flood Elevation. If any of the proposed structure is to be placed where the ground
elevation is between 6020 and 6022 we recommend either fill or piers to raise the
lowermost floor elevation to 6022.
Thank you for your attention and cooperation. Please feel free to call if you have any
questions regarding our analysis and conclusions.
Sincerely yours,
. Hansen, PhD, PE
No. 10275
420 been Itr.dac
CoPy
FI4 [0 vi,Kes ict'
Aspen Glen Homeowner's Association
Design Review Committee
RECEIVED
FEB 0 7 2007
GARFtLL
& BUIDING PLANNING
January 15, 2007 via email
Mr. John Muir
John Muir Architects
201 Main Street, Suite 304
Carbondale, CO 81623
Re: B-09 & B-1010045 Pheasant Circle
The Aspen Glen DRC reviewed an amendment to the approved plans at their January 10,
2007 meeting. Thank you for the DRC review fee of $1000. This fee was necessary due
to the continued review of the proposal and the substantial nature of the amendment.
The DRC approved the amendments with the following conditions:
1. The revised design of the "cottage" had a long unbroken roof line. The Guidelines
discourage this element of design. In particular the DRC was concerned of the
view of the roof from Diamond A Ranch Road as the home is situated well below
the road. The applicant's architect and the DRC discussed several solutions.
Subsequent to the meeting a revised plan was submitted for review. This revision
has been found by the DRC to comply with the Guidelines andaddresses initial
concern expressed by the DRC. The revision is therefore approved.
2. Although Lot B-09 is well over an acre the zone district is the 3/4 acre zone district
and the maximum amount of high intensity irrigated land is 12,000 square feet.
The landscape plan shall be revised to indicate the correct amount of irrigated
land area. The amount planned for Lot B-10 is correct. Please submit the revised
landscape plan prior to the dry -in inspection.
3. It was also discussed that the design of the entry monumentation is still under
consideration. Please submit the sketch for DRC review prior to the dry -in
inspection.
Please be reminded that two inspections need to occur during construction of the
residence. These are ultimately the responsibility of the owner and bear upon release of
the Builder's Completion Deposit. Please contact the DRC Administrator at (970) 963-
3362, upon completion of the dry -in phase of construction and for a final site inspection
by the DRC. Details of these procedures are contained in the Design Review application
11PO Box 900 Carbondale, CO 81623 Tel: (970) 963-3362
Ernail:llamont@sopris.net
packet. Failure to call for any of these inspections will result in $1000 per violation
held by the Homeowners Association from the return of your Builder's Completion
Deposit. It will be necessary for the builder to arrange reviews in accordance with
the DRC's scheduled sessions. Finally, prior to construction it is required that your
contractor meet with the DRC Administrator on site to review construction procedures,
access and site tidiness items.
Please keep in mind that a copy of your approved plans is kept on file for periodic review
by the Design Review Committee to assure compliance with your approved plans. Any
anticipated changes from your approved plans must be submitted to, reviewed by and
receive approval from the Design Review Committee prior to making any changes.
Sincerely,
Leslie Lamont
Aspen Glen DRC Administrator
cc: David & Sandy Burden
DRC files
22Po Box 400 Carbondale, CO 81623 Tel.• (970) 963-3362
Emaildlamont@sopris.net
Mar. 1. 2007 9: 53AM No. 0539 P. 1
FAX TRANSMITTAL
TO: Andy Schwaller
CC;
FROM: Josh Smith
DATE: 3.1.07
RE: Burden Residence
.IMA
JO11N MLi11&
AKc'11111,'c:Ts,
PAX F. 384.3470
PAG);S' 2
(incl. cover sheet)
Andy,
This is the revised wet bar to replace the kitchenette for the Burden Residence, 45 Pheasant Circle,
in the guest wing. Please let me know if you will need any further information to complete the amend-
ment to an approved plan.
Regards,
Josh Smith
RECEIVED
MAR 0 1 2007
GARFfELD COUNTY
BUILDING & PLANNING
201 Main Street, Ste. 504, Carbondale, Colorado 51623
Phone: (970) 7049750 Fax: (970) 704-0287 E -Mail: jma aQsopris.net
t. Y
49N,y/NG
ADMINIS'TRA TI VE PERMIT
for
Aspen Glen Subdivision, Lot B-9
In accordance with and pursuant to Section 6.00 of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution of
1978, as amended, and Resolution No. 2006 - 79 of the Board of County Commissioners of
Garfield County, State of Colorado, the Director of the Building and Planning Department
hereby authorizes, by Administrative Permit, the following activity:
The placement of fill and the construction of a
residential dwelling unit in a designated
floodplain.
The Administrative Permit is issued subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A (attached
hereto), and shall be valid only during compliance with such conditions and other applicable
provisions of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, Building
Code, and other regulations of the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County,
Colorado.
BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT,
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Director
ti /9 /c006
EXHIBIT A
FLOODPLAIN PERMIT — ASPEN GLEN SUBDIVISION, LOT B-9
1. All representations made in the application shall be considered conditions of
approval, unless modified by this Exhibit A.
2. No alterations of the floodplain may be made other than the specific
improvements noted in the application and shown on drawings by Jeffrey
Allen Tuttle, LS 33638, and stamped received September 15, 2006.
3. All new construction or substantial improvements shall be designed (or
modified) and adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral
movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads,
including the effects of buoyancy.
4. All new construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed with
materials resistant to flood damage.
5. All new construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed by
methods and practices that minimize flood damage.
6. All new construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed with
electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment and
other service facilities that are designed and/or located so as to prevent water
from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of
flooding.
7. All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize
or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system.
8. New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize
or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system and discharge from the
systems into flood waters.
9. On-site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them
or contamination from them during flooding.
10. No disturbance of a regulated wetland will be allowed.
Dec. 26. 2006 1:04PM No. 0248 P. 1
FAX TRANSMITTAL
TO: Kathy
CC:
FROM: Josh Smith
DATE: 12.26.06
RE: Burden Residence
JM�
JOHN MIIIR
ARCHITECTS, Inc.
FAX #: 384.3470
PAGES: 2
(inch cover sheet)
Kathy,
Following is the signed page for the Burden building application.
Regards,
Josh
RECEIVEL,
DEC 2 6 2006
BUILDING PL4NNiNG
201 Main Street, Ste. 804, Carbondale, Cplorado 81628
Phone: (970) 704-9760 Fax: (970) 704-0287 E -Mail: jma@sopris.net
STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD
INSPECTION REPORT CORRECTION NOTICE
Date Rec. 7-/ g -02 PERMIT # 16 2 LI 413 Co
. Contractor/florae Owner:
-.Address: q: P44' r..-c:c.,4 1,
1YPE OF INSPECTION:
Partial Rough in
Underground Final
ACTION:. Accepted , Rejected Remarks
REINSPECTION FEB
Comments or Corrections: /6K -f--.2:1-0
,r
ji
. r • .
1.2
•
/
Inspector's Name 1/
Phone # 6-'60-22 Date
Z'd 6L -179 -/Z6 -0L6
FORMS : EBINSP_NOTIC E. DOC
L:oao c inr
1
Parcel Detail Page 1 of 3
Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
Assessor/Treasurer Property Search Assessor SubsetQuery 1 Assessor Sales Search
Clerk& .Recorder Reception Search
Basic Building Characteristics 1 Tax Information
Parcel Detail Value Detail 1 Sales Detail 1 Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail
Land Detail 1 Photographs
Tax Area
083
Account Number
R830032
Parcel Number
239320302009
Mill Levy
67.214
Owner Name and Mailing Address
BURDEN, DAVID A., & SANDY T.
78 BUFFALO LANE
CARBONDALE, CO 81623
Legal Description
SECT,TWN,RNG:29-7-88 SUB:ASPEN GLEN
FLG 1 LOT:B-9 PRE:R111395 BK:0918
PG:0408 BK:0904 PG:0724 BK:0846
PG:0615 BK:0835 PG:0305 BK:0779
PG:0484 BK:0703 PG:0121 BK:1631
PG:147 RECPT:661731 BK:0976 PG:0684
BK:0921 PG:0661 BK:0921 PG:0661
Location
Physical Address:
45 PHEASANT CIR CARBONDALE
Subdivision:
ASPEN GLEN FLG 1
Land Acres:
2.441
Land Sq Ft:
0
Section
Township
Range
29
7
88
Parcel Detail Page 2 of 3
Property Tax Valuation Information
Sale Date:
Sale Price:
10/13/2004
824,500
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential
Buildings:
Number of Comm/Ind
Buildings:
0
0
No Building Records Found
Tax Information
Tax Year
Actual Value
Assessed Value
Land:
700,000
203,000
Improvements:
0
0
Total: 700,000
203,000
Sale Date:
Sale Price:
10/13/2004
824,500
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential
Buildings:
Number of Comm/Ind
Buildings:
0
0
No Building Records Found
Tax Information
Tax Year
Transaction Tyke
Amount
2005
Tax Payment: Whole
($13,700.06)
2005
Tax Amount
$13,700.06
2004
Tax Payment: Whole
($14,243.00)
2004
Tax Amount
$14,243.20
2003
Tax Payment: Whole
($12,104.54)
2003
Tax Amount
$12,104.54
2002
Tax Payment: Whole
($12,279.36)
2002
Tax Amount
$12,279.36
2001
Tax Payment: Whole
($12,342.92)
2001 l
Tax Amount
$12,342.92
2000
Tax Payment: Whole
($12,038.36)
2000
Tax Amount
$12,038.36
1999
Interest Payment
($121.78)
1999
Interest Charge
$121.78
1999
Tax Payment: Second Half
($6,089.04)
1999
Tax Payment: First Half ($6,089.04)
1999
Tax Amount
$12,178.08
17./9h/7.006