Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondenceDave Argo From: Dave Argo Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 2:46 PM To: 'Bill Gavette' Cc: Andy Schwaller Subject: RE: Rudd Industrial Building D Thanks for this update, Bill. 1 had asked Chris Jung to deliver plans for Rudd's 2 newest steel buildings (Buildings A and D as shown on the site plan). They won't be required to have sprinklers since they are employing a fire wall to separate the buildings into smaller fire areas than the overall building footprint area which exceeds the 9,000 SF maximum size for Type II -B construction. Let me know if you have any other specific concerns. Dave Argo Plans Examiner CGarfield County I Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com From: Bill Gavette[mailto:gavette@carbondalefire.org] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 4:40 PM To: Dave Argo Cc: Andy Schwaller Subject: Rudd Industrial Building D Dave, FYI, I received drawings for the proposed Building D at 0062 County Road 113. Thanks, Bill Gavette Deputy Chief Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District www.carbo nda1efire.o rg 970-963-2491 p[ofrn �• s FIRE • EM S = RESCU E 1 Dave Argo From: Dave Argo Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 3:55 PM To: 'Chris Jung' Cc: Glenn Hartmann Subject: Rudd Cattle Creek - Buildings A & D Chris: I was reviewing Rudd's Cattle Creek projects recently and I realized that we are missing the structural foundation drawings (Sheets S1 & S2) for one of the plan sets for Building D. Can you please provide us with one copy of each of these (2) sheets as stamped by the Engineer? As I understand it from Glenn Hartmann, there are still outstanding items to be resolved on the floodplain development permit, so these drawings will remain in our pending file until Glenn signs off on that permit. Thanks & have a great weekend — Dave Argo Plans Examiner . Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com 1 Tally Ho Construction Inc. From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Chris Jung <chris@ruddconstruction.com> Tuesday, November 06, 2018 4:32 PM John Parrington Fwd: Fire Wall for Rudd 1813 -Rudd Area Separation Wall Report11062018.pdf John, Are you going to drop this off at the Building Dept. or do you want me to do it? Thanks Chris Jung Rudd Construction 970-309-0123 Cell 970-927-4038 ext 4 Office Original message From: Harry Garner <garner harry@msn.com> Date: 11/6/18 3:28 PM (GMT -07:00) To: tallyhoconst@sopris.com, Chris Jung <chris@ ruddconstructioti.com> Subject: Fire Wall for Rudd Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Harry GA,1 GARNER ASSOCIATES, INC. Harry Garner, Architect 202 E. 3rd Street Rifle, Colorado 81650 970.665.9295 (Office) 970.379.8345 (Cell) e-mail: garner harrv@msn•com Web Site; gaiassociates.com Sent from Mail for Windows 10 1 RECEIVED NOV 0 7 2018 GARFIELD COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Dave Argo From: Bill Gavette <gavette@carbondalefire.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 11:06 AM To: Dave Argo Subject: RE: Fire Sprinkler Reqts. for Buildings A and D Dave, This is right in line with the brief discussion that I had with Chris about possible alternatives to the fire sprinklers. Thanks, Bill Gavette Deputy Chief Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District www.ca rbonda lefi re. o rg 970-963-2491 FIRE • EMS - RESCUE From: Dave Argo [mailto:dargo@garfield-county.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2018 4:15 PM To: Bill Gavette Cc: Andy Schwaller; Chris Jung Subject: FW: Fire Sprinkler Reqts. for Buildings A and D Bill: I had intended to copy you on this email to Rudd Construction regarding fire sprinkler options, but somehow I forgot to get you on the initial email ... sorry about that! Dave Argo Plans Examiner . Garfield County I Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com From: Dave Argo Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 3:17 PM To: 'Chris Jung'; Eric Rudd 1 Cc:'JeffJohnson'; Andy Schwaller (aschwaller@garfield-county.com) Subject: RE: Fire Sprinkler Reqts. for Buildings A and D Chris: Wanted to follow-up on a couple outstanding issues related to the (2) new steel warehouse buildings located at Cattle Creek Commercial Center: • Front Yard Setback — It was confirmed at our weekly staff meeting this morning that the appropriate front yard setback is 25 feet from Highway 82 frontage road, so this issue raised in my previous email isn't a problem. • Fire Sprinkler Requirements & Alternatives — Just a few items to follow-up and clarify based on your discussion with Bill Gavette .. . A. Fire Sprinklers may be required in certain buildings by either and/or both the Fire Code and the Building Code. As we previously discussed, fire sprinklers are required in this situation per I.F.C., Section 903, Table A as adopted in Garfield County's Building Resolution (see attachment). Since both Building A and Building D exceed the 9,000 SF maximum allowable size for Type II -B construction, fire sprinklers are required. B. Fire Area Separation Wall — If a "fire wall" conforming to I.B.C., Section 706 is installed with the purpose of reducing the effective overall square footage into two smaller separate buildings, then this may be an acceptable alternative to fire sprinklers in the building — and ultimately this is Bill's call. In the case of Type II -B construction, the fire wall is required to be a 3 -hour fire -rated assembly (see attached Section 706, Table 706.4). C. Type II -A Construction — Another option is to upgrade from construction Type II -B to Type II -A, which provides a maximum area of 12,000 SF before the fire sprinkler requirement kicks in, but this involves upgrading from nonrated to one-hour rated assemblies for all of the following items: structural frame, bearing walls, floor and roof construction and associated secondary members (see attached I.B.C., Table 601). This option is not simply spraying on fire -proofing to the steel structure. Due to the nature of this building serving as leasable tenant spaces, each of which can be expected to have multiple and varying tenant improvements through the years, the Building Dept. wants to insure that the required one-hour assemblies aren't compromised through various iterations of tenant finish. As a result, we will require that the one-hour assemblies as required by Table 602 are protected from damage over time. For example, rather than simply installing spray -on fireproofing onto columns or other structural elements, those fire -rated assemblies need to be wrapped with Type X drywall to better protect the steel structure while offering one-hour protection. In considering these alternatives listed above, we encourage you to engage your Architect in conversations as to which option is best for your situation. Depending upon which option is selected, we will require supplemental information to be submitted by the Architect—for example, details of fire -rated assemblies and/or fire walls. Hopefully this provides you with necessary information to move forward with this issue while other information related to updating the Cattle Creek floodplain and/or floodplain development permits for each of these new buildings as required by Glenn Hartmann and FEMA. Dave Argo Plans Examiner C. Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com 2 Dave Argo From: Dave Argo Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 4:15 PM To: Bill Gavette (gavette@carbondalefire.org) Cc: Andy Schwaller (aschwaller@garfield-county.com); 'Chris Jung' Subject: FW: Fire Sprinkler Reqts. for Buildings A and D Attachments: Rudd Fire Sprinkler Reqts.pdf Bill: I had intended to copy you on this email to Rudd Construction regarding fire sprinkler options, but somehow I forgot to get you on the initial email ... sorry about that! Dave Argo Plans Examiner Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com From: Dave Argo Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 3:17 PM To: 'Chris Jung'; Eric Rudd Cc: 'Jeff Johnson'; Andy Schwaller (aschwaller@garfield-county.com) Subject: RE: Fire Sprinkler Reqts. for Buildings A and D Chris: Wanted to follow-up on a couple outstanding issues related to the (2) new steel warehouse buildings located at Cattle Creek Commercial Center: ■ Front Yard Setback — It was confirmed at our weekly staff meeting this morning that the appropriate front yard setback is 25 feet from Highway 82 frontage road, so this issue raised in my previous email isn't a problem. • Fire Sprinkler Requirements & Alternatives —Just a few items to follow-up and clarify based on your discussion with Bill Gavette .. . A. Fire Sprinklers may be required in certain buildings by either and/or both the Fire Code and the Building Code. As we previously discussed, fire sprinklers are required in this situation per I.F.C., Section 903, Table A as adopted in Garfield County's Building Resolution (see attachment). Since both Building A and Building D exceed the 9,000 SF maximum allowable size for Type II -B construction, fire sprinklers are required. B. Fire Area Separation Wall — If a "fire wall" conforming to I.B.C., Section 706 is installed with the purpose of reducing the effective overall square footage into two smaller separate buildings, then this may be an acceptable alternative to fire sprinklers in the building — and ultimately this is Bill's call. In the case of Type II -B construction, the fire wall is required to be a 3 -hour fire -rated assembly (see attached Section 706, Table 706.4). 1 C. Type II -A Construction — Another option is to upgrade from construction Type II -B to Type II -A, which provides a maximum area of 12,000 SF before the fire sprinkler requirement kicks in, but this involves upgrading from nonrated to one-hour rated assemblies for all of the following items: structural frame, bearing walls, floor and roof construction and associated secondary members (see attached I.B.C., Table 601). This option is not simply spraying on fire -proofing to the steel structure. Due to the nature of this building serving as leasable tenant spaces, each of which can be expected to have multiple and varying tenant improvements through the years, the Building Dept. wants to insure that the required one-hour assemblies aren't compromised through various iterations of tenant finish. As a result, we will require that the one-hour assemblies as required by Table 602 are protected from damage over time. For example, rather than simply installing spray -on fireproofing onto columns or other structural elements, those fire -rated assemblies need to be wrapped with Type X drywall to better protect the steel structure while offering one-hour protection. In considering these alternatives listed above, we encourage you to engage your Architect in conversations as to which option is best for your situation. Depending upon which option is selected, we will require supplemental information to be submitted by the Architect — for example, details of fire -rated assemblies and/or fire walls. Hopefully this provides you with necessary information to move forward with this issue while other information related to updating the Cattle Creek floodplain and/or floodplain development permits for each of these new buildings as required by Glenn Hartmann and FEMA. Dave Argo Plans Examiner Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com From: Chris Jung [mailto:chrisc ruddconstruction.com] Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 2:06 PM To: Dave Argo; Glenn Hartmann Subject: RE: Local vs. Arterial Setbacks Dave, Thanks. Also, I met with Bill Gavette and we discussed the fire code. He said we had a couple of options to get away from fire sprinklers. One was a fire rated partition wall to keep the spaces under 9,000 sq. ft. and the other option was to change to a Type II A by spraying the steel columns and steel rafters with a one hour rating material. Bill said I would need to discuss the spray coating to get the one hour rating with you. Is this possible with you guys and what material would need to be applied? Thanks Chris Jung Property Manager Wayne Rudd, Rudd LLC., Aces & Eights LLC. and YDD LLC. 132 Park Ave Basalt, CO 81621 ch risCa, ru d d co n structi o n. co m 2 Dave Argo From: Dave Argo Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 3:17 PM To: 'Chris Jung'; Eric Rudd Cc: 'Jeff Johnson'; Andy Schwaller (aschwaller@garfield-county.com) Subject: RE: Fire Sprinkler Reqts. for Buildings A and D Attachments: Rudd Fire Sprinkler Reqts.pdf Chris: Wanted to follow-up on a couple outstanding issues related to the (2) new steel warehouse buildings located at Cattle Creek Commercial Center: • Front Yard Setback — It was confirmed at our weekly staff meeting this morning that the appropriate front yard setback is 25 feet from Highway 82 frontage road, so this issue raised in my previous email isn't a problem. • Fire Sprinkler Requirements & Alternatives -- Just a few items to follow-up and clarify based on your discussion with Bill Gavette ... A. Fire Sprinklers may be required in certain buildings by either and/or both the Fire Code and the Building Code. As we previously discussed, fire sprinklers are required in this situation per I.F.C., Section 903, Table A as adopted in Garfield County's Building Resolution (see attachment). Since both Building A and Building D exceed the 9,000 SF maximum allowable size for Type II -B construction, fire sprinklers are required. B. Fire Area Separation Wall — If a "fire wall" conforming to I.B.C., Section 706 is installed with the purpose of reducing the effective overall square footage into two smaller separate buildings, then this may be an acceptable alternative to fire sprinklers in the building — and ultimately this is Bill's call. In the case of Type II -B construction, the fire wall is required to be a 3 -hour fire -rated assembly (see attached Section 706, Table 706.4). C. Type II -A Construction — Another option is to upgrade from construction Type II -B to Type II -A, which provides a maximum area of 12,000 SF before the fire sprinkler requirement kicks in, but this involves upgrading from nonrated to one-hour rated assemblies for all of the following items: structural frame, bearing walls, floor and roof construction and associated secondary members (see attached I.B.C., Table 601). This option is not simply spraying on fire -proofing to the steel structure. Due to the nature of this building serving as leasable tenant spaces, each of which can be expected to have multiple and varying tenant improvements through the years, the Building Dept. wants to insure that the required one-hour assemblies aren't compromised through various iterations of tenant finish. As a result, we will require that the one-hour assemblies as required by Table 602 are protected from damage over time. For example, rather than simply installing spray -on fireproofing onto columns or other structural elements, those fire -rated assemblies need to be wrapped with Type X drywall to better protect the steel structure while offering one-hour protection. In considering these alternatives listed above, we encourage you to engage your Architect in conversations as to which option is best for your situation. Depending upon which option is selected, we will require supplemental information to be submitted by the Architect — for example, details of fire -rated assemblies and/or fire walls. Hopefully this provides you with necessary information to move forward with this issue while other information related to updating the Cattle Creek floodplain and/or floodplain development permits for each of these new buildings as required by Glenn Hartmann and FEMA. Dave Argo Plans Examiner 1 CGarfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com From: Chris Jung [mailto:chris@ruddconstruction.com] Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 2:06 PM To: Dave Argo; Glenn Hartmann Subject: RE: Local vs. Arterial Setbacks Dave, Thanks. Also, I met with Bill Gavette and we discussed the fire code. He said we had a couple of options to get away from fire sprinklers. One was a fire rated partition wall to keep the spaces under 9,000 sq. ft. and the other option was to change to a Type II A by spraying the steel columns and steel rafters with a one hour rating material. Bill said I would need to discuss the spray coating to get the one hour rating with you. Is this possible with you guys and what material would need to be applied? Thanks Chris Jung Property Manager Wayne Rudd, Rudd LLC., Aces & Eights LLC. and YDD LLC. 132 Park Ave Basalt, CO 81621 chris@ruddeonstruction.com (970) 309-0123 CeII (970) 927-4038 ext. 4 Office From: Dave Argo <darRo@Barfield-cotinty.rnm> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 1:46 PM To: Chris Jung <chris@ruddconstruction.com>; Glenn Hartman <ghartman@Barfield-conntv.com> Cc: Eric Rudd <eric@ruddconstruction.com> Subject: RE: Local vs. Arterial Setbacks Chris: Thanks for your follow-up on this issue. I will still bring up at tomorrow's staff mtg. as a point of clarification for all staff, but based on this email from Pesnichak the front yard setback shouldn't be an issue on your project. Dave Argo Plans Examiner C.• . Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 2 Dave Argo From: Andy Schwaller Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 3:58 PM To: Dave Argo Subject: RE: Fire Sprinkler Reqts. for Rudd It appears there are products that could be used on interior wood, steel and gypsum to obtain a 1 hour rating. It is up to the design professional to submit to us. The application does require special inspections per Chapter 17 for material prep and application. From: Dave Argo Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 2:19 PM To: Andy Schwaller <aschwaller@garfield-county.com> Subject: FW: Fire Sprinkler Reqts. for Rudd Andy: This attached email is from Rudd regarding the fire sprinkler reqts. for buildings larger than 9,000 SF maximum allowed by Section 903, Table A in fire code section of our building resolution. They talked to Bill Gavette about options for not utilizing fire sprinklers including: (a) fire wall to keep building size below 9,000 SF and (b) upgrading to Type II — ONE HOUR CONSTRUCTION. Isn't it their Architect's (Jeff Johnson) responsibility to clarify this issue instead of ours? Will we accept spray -on fireproofing to upgrade the Type II -B to a Type II -A? How well does that actually work when insulating the thermal envelope? Let me know your thoughts & I will get back to them_ Thanks, Dave Argo Plans Examiner _ Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com rillMon 10/8.f20181125 PM Chris Jung <ckris@ iticiciconstruction.com> FW: Local vs. Arterial Setbacks To Dave Argo; Glenn Hartman Cc Eric Rudd Q You replied to this message on 10/8/20181:46 PM, Click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of some pictures in this message. Glenn and Dave, Below is an email dated July 26, 2017 from David Pesnichak where he responds to the Highway 82 Frontage Road as "Highway 82 Frontage Roads are considered "Local' for the purposes of determining setbacks identified in Table 3-201 of the Land Use and Development Code (LUDC) of 2013. Thanks Chris Jung Rudd Construction 132 Park Ave Basalt, CO 81621 chIis@ruddconstruction. corn (970) 309-0123 Cell (970) 927-4038 ext. 4 Office From: David Pesnichak fmaiito:dpesnichak@garfield-countv.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 4:01 PM To: I oa r ka r res op rss. ne Subject Local vs. Arterial Setbacks Hi Roland, Sorry I missed your call earlier. 'r Next "* Last In response to your question, Highway 82 Frontage Roads are considered "Local" for the purposes of determining setbacks identified in Table 3-201 of the Land Use and Development Code (LUDC) of 2013. Thanks, Dave David Pesnichak, AICP Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Department Dave Argo From: Bill Gavette <gavette@carbondalefire.org> Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2018 5:01 PM To: Dave Argo Subject: RE: New Buildings at Cattle Creek Commercial Center Dave, I have received drawings for Building -D. Where will the second building be located? At the Building -A location? I agree that sprinklers are required unless they provide a fire wall as described in IFC Section 903.2, Item 3. I know that Item 3 of the amendment isn't very clear but in the past, we've applied the fire wall provision of Item 3 to new construction. The site plan show two new fire hydrants. I don't see any other issues except for installing Knox boxes for keys on each building per IFC Section 506. Thanks, Bill Gavette Deputy Chief Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District www.carbondalefire.org 970-963-2491 FIRE , EMS . RESCUE From: Dave Argo [mailto:dargo@garfield-county.com] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2018 11:41 AM To: Bill Gavette Cc: Andy Schwaller Subject: New Buildings at Cattle Creek Commercial Center Bill: We have received plans for (2) new manufactured steel buildings from Wayne Rudd to be located at Cattle Creek Commercial Center, 62 County Road 113. The site plan they submitted shows a total of 5 additional new buildings (including these 2 buildings) all of which will be'located between Highway 82 frontage road and the existing steel buildings already built. 1 Each of these (2) new buildings is 9,375 S.F. in size (one-story), Type II -B construction, with F-1 occupancy/use. Since both buildings exceed the 9,000 S.F. maximum size (per I.F.C. Section 903.2, Table A) it appears to me that they will need to include a fire sprinkler system. Do you agree with that assessment? Have you been contacted or received plans for these new buildings? Are there any other I.F.C. requirements or issues that we need to be aware of? Dave Argo Plans Examiner CGarfield County 1 Community Development Department 108 Stn Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com 2 Dave Argo From: Dave Argo Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2018 5:25 PM To: 'Jeff Johnson' Cc: 'chris@ruddconstruction.com'; 'Eric Rudd'; Glenn Hartmann Subject: Cattle Creek Commercial Center - Buildings A & D Jeff: We have reviewed plans for (2) new manufactured steel buildings to be built at Cattle Creek Commercial Center at 62 County Road 1134 (Cattle Creek) in Carbondale, but before we can finalize our review and issue building permits we have questions and/or comments regarding the following items: 1. Front Yard Setback Encroachment — As illustrated on site plan, Building A — as well as future Building AA — are located within the 50' front yard setback. The 50' setback is based on our interpretation of Highway 82 frontage road as an "arterial" street, but I want to confirm my assumption with our Director. I will advise you if my interpretation is not correct following our staff meeting on Tuesday morning — otherwise building placement for Building A and future Building AA will need to comply with the 50' setback. 2. Building "A" Dimensions & Footprint Location — Lengthwise dimension shown on Zancanella's drawings is 150 feet, but is shown elsewhere as 125 feet. Please clarify/verify the correct length of this building, and also provide minimum dimension between Building A and future Building B to be located immediately to the east. 3. Fire Sprinkler System — 9,375 S.F. area of each of these buildings exceeds maximum allowable size for Type II -B construction without fire sprinklers, and the issuance of a building permit will therefore include a condition for fire sprinklers. Have you contacted Bill Gavette at Carbondale Fire District? If not, please provide him with a set of plans — including a site plan. 4. Floodplain Development Permit — The site plan clearly illustrates both Building A and Building D within 100 -year floodplain adjacent to Cattle Creek. Garfield County's Land Use & Development Code requires a "Floodplain Development Permit" whenever proposed development encroaches into the floodplain — including related site grading, filling and/or creation of embankments — and this Floodplain Development Permit must be completed prior to issuance of building or grading permits for such work. Our records do not indicate that a floodplain development permit has been issued for construction of these buildings, but if you already have permit(s) in hand, please provide us with copies for our review. Please contact Glenn Hartmann, Planning Dept. Manager to discuss specific requirements. 5. OWTS Permits — It is our understanding that these new buildings will be utilizing an existing septic system already in place and serving the existing adjacent buildings. Each of these new buildings is required to complete a Septic System application for any alteration of the existing septic system. Please contact either Brooke or Lindsay at the front desk for requirements and fees for this application. Since the existing septic system is also apparently located in the floodplain, is there a floodplain development permit for that work too? 6. Driveway Permit — Please provide a copy of a driveway permit (or exemption letter) from Garfield County's Road & Bridge Dept. 7. Interior Partition Walls — As currently shown on plans, there is only one interior demising wall shown between (5) potential future tenant spaces. However, no details or specifications are provided in this set of plans indicating wall construction or fire -rating of this wall. In addition, details or specifications are not included for interior walls at the (5) bathrooms, which may eventually align with future fire -rated demising walls between tenant spaces. Please provide additional information about fire -ratings and intended wall specifications. If intended to serve as fire -rated partitions, please provide listing agency's reference numbers and cut sheets for our review and Building Inspector reference in the field. * NOTE: At some future date — when tenant spaces are leased, actual occupancy/use is better known, and tenant improvements are scheduled to be completed — interior partition walls separating individual tenants may be required to comply with "fire partition" requirements (I.B.C., Section 708). Please provide clarification and/or additional information as requested above at your earliest opportunity so that we can finalize our plan review of these buildings. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Dave Argo Plans Examiner Garfield County► Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com 2 Dave Argo From: Dave Argo Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2018 11:41 AM To: Bill Gavette (gavette@carbondalefire.org) Cc: Andy Schwaller (aschwaller@garfield-county.com) Subject: New Buildings at Cattle Creek Commercial Center Bill: We have received plans for (2) new manufactured steel buildings from Wayne Rudd to be located at Cattle Creek Commercial Center, 62 County Road 113. The site plan they submitted shows a total of 5 additional new buildings (including these 2 buildings) all of which will be located between Highway 82 frontage road and the existing steel buildings already built. Each of these (2) new buildings is 9,375 S.F. in size (one-story), Type II -B construction, with F-1 occupancy/use. Since both buildings exceed the 9,000 S.F. maximum size (per I.F.C. Section 903.2, Table A) it appears to me that they will need to include a fire sprinkler system. Do you agree with that assessment? Have you been contacted or received plans for these new buildings? Are there any other I.F.C. requirements or issues that we need to be aware of? Dave Argo Plans Examiner . Garfield Cow: Community Development Department 108 8th Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com 1