HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.0 Correspondencea
•
(o'
October 12, 1982
Mr. Larry Velasquez, Chairman
Garfield County Commissioners
Courthouse Annex
Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Dear Mr. Velasquez:
In December, 1981, we requested an exemption of two
parcels out of a forty acre parcel. In April we re-
quested an extension on this request, which was granted.
At this time, property descriptions are submitted re-
garding the parcels to be established out of the forty
acres. I believe providing these descriptions is the
final requirement for us to receive exemption approval.
Upon final approval, deeds will be prepared and filed
to correspond with the parcels described on the attached
page.
Parcel A will be under the ownership of Jack & Irene
Wigington. This parcel of approximately five acres,
totally includes an approximate 1.68 acre parcel they
now own. As was discussed in the original exemption
request, this parcel is an adjustment of property
lines only.
Parcel B, containing approximately ten acres, includes
lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 that were originally requested. This
parcel will be deeded in the names of Janice, Edward, Dennis
and Ronald Bell.
Parcel C is the balance of the forty acre plot and will
remain in the names of Jack & Irene Wigington and Jaedro,
Inc.
The attached descriptions are the survey results conducted
by Tim R. Callahan (T.S16397) during December, 1981. The
final results of the survey were not available at the time
of the initial exemption request. Some minor dimension
adjustments have been made to establish property lines
along existing fence lines.
Your consideration of this request for final approval by
the board will be appreciated.
Sin
er
.on 11
0662 county Rd 233
Rifle, Colo 625-4017
aZ 24 4
MEMO TO: GARFIELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT GARFIELD
CU. rLiiR
FROM: CITY OF RIFLE PLANNING DEPARTMENT0
DATE: December 11, 1981
RE: Subdivision Exemption; Ronald L. Bell, Petitioner
t77, -.7r
DEc 1
4 1981
The parent parcel (Tax Lot 022, 77f acres) is contiguous to the Rifle City
limits on its north and western most property lines. The application
however is confusing as to whether or not the total 77± acre parcel is
one unit. The smaller parcels'being requested are within the Secondary
Development zone designation of the Rifle Comprehensive Plan.
The Secondary Development zone indicates that there are some utility
constraints for City densities within this area. The provision of City
utility service to this area may become a solution for utility service
to the Good Family ownerships contiguous to the north and east of this
ownership.
The parcels being created by this request should not create an undue
hardship on future urbanization of Graham Mesa. However, the division
of the 10 acre parcel into 2.5 acre parcels at a later date as eluded to
in paragraph 'D' of the applicants request could hamper future urbanization
of this area. Divisions into parcels of less than 5 acres in size create
problems with designing City subdivisions as well as small lots tend to
become areas of polarization and resist City development of adjacent lands
and their ownerships. The Wiggington letter also eludes to this concern.
With the development of Graham Mesa, major road and utility line extensions
may become necessary to extend through these areas. Staff has some strong
reservations with development of smaller lots within this area as a result
and wishes to place both the County and the applicants on notice of this
concern. At a minimum, development at this time should formally agree to
participate in future street and utility improvements necessary to serve
this request and surrounding lands.
337 East Avenue P.O. Box 1908
Phone 625 - 2121 Rifle, Colorado 81650
ooi3oHOME OF "OIL SHALE
"USA -lc-.
• • .!oo�o�c �Q�