HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.0 Resolution 81-279STATE OF COLORADO
County of Garfield l"
et a...f.9.9}1.1.9.f...........,.. ......meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado,
.S.9919.m.b..e.r........................A. D. rs....8.1..... , there were present:
Commissioner Chairman
Commissioner
Commissioner
.E.e.r.]....9.t.....8.h.9d9s. , county Attorney
..Qh..g.fy.]....{.r.....K99S."....09p.U.!y. , clerk or the Board
ruhen the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to-wit:
RESOLUTTON NO. BL-279
RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE DENIAL OF SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION REQUEST BY
JAMES AND VEDA WATERS.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County hasreceived an application from James and Veda Waters for subdivision exemptionsrelating to tracts of land i-n Section 28; Township 6 South, Range 88 Westof the Sixth Principal Meridian; and
hIHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has carefully considered
the said application together with the reconrmendation of the Garfield County
Planning Department, and has considered the circumstances surrounding the
said subdivision exemption request and the subject property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has made the following
determinations of Fact:
1. That the applicants have owned the subject property, which con-
sists of ten acres, for approximately one year.
- 2. That the applicants are seeking a subdivision exemption so thatparcels of land ean be sold to third parties.
3. That in accordance with Resolution +80-65, which resolution set
forth the criteria for consideratiorr of applications for sub-
dj-vision exemptions, the applicants herein Co not qualify for
said exemption.
. 4. That previously the Board of County Commissioners, in Resolution
#81-175, has determined that the subdivision of lands in the
Spring VaIley area is premature because of the present ccnfigu-ration and availability of government services in that area.
. 5. That the proposed division of land falls within the purposes of
the Garfield County Subdivisj-on Regulations and the Statutes of
the State of Colorado relating to the subdivision of land within
this state
6. That the subject lands are not suitable for subdivision under
criteria established by the Garfield County Subdivision Regula-
tions because of the reasons set forth in Resolution #8f-I75 and
specifically the proximity of the subject l-ands to County Road 115
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, that the request for exemption
from the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations and the Subdivision laws
of the State of Colorado by James and Veda Waters be and hereby is denied.
THE BOARD
GARFIELD
OF COUNTY COMI,IISSIONERS
couNTY, coLoRADo
Chairman'
ATTEST:
{ )/,,,. t" >vl/I)Uoar-a c,t' County
Commissionetrs, carfield County, Colorado
\
nxq
Upoo motion duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the following vote:
....-rr.e.r.ry....Ye.1.e.s.g,t+9.?................. .....Aye
....8.s.g.e..+.e....ii.,I;.ttt 11.... P.r*.I].li.h9 s.s.e ........-........Aye
STATEOFCOLORADO IIss
County of Garfield I
Comrulssioners
......., County Clerk and exofficio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners
in and for the County and Statc aforesaid do hereby certify that the annexed and ioregoing Order is uuly copied from the Records of
thc hoeeedings of the Board of County Comnrlssioners fot said Garfield County, now in my office.
lN IIIITNESS WHEREOF, I have herreunto rot my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at Glcqwood Springs,
thts....................day of........ ...., A. D. 19..............
Courty Clerk and cx-officio Clerk of th6 Board of County Commisrioneru.