The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondenceDave Argo From: Dave Argo Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 3:55 PM To: 'Chris Jung' Cc: Glenn Hartmann Subject: Rudd Cattle Creek - Buildings A & D Chris: I was reviewing Rudd's Cattle Creek projects recently and I realized that we are missing the structural foundation drawings (Sheets S1 & S2) for one of the plan sets for Building D. Can you please provide us with one copy of each of these (2) sheets as stamped by the Engineer? As I understand it from Glenn Hartmann, there are still outstanding items to be resolved on the floodplain development permit, so these drawings will remain in our pending file until Glenn signs off on that permit. Thanks & have a great weekend — Dave Argo Plans Examiner CGarfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com 1 Mon 10/8/20181;25 PM Chris Jung <chris@ruddconstruction.com> PM Local vs. Arterial Setbacks To Dave Argo; Glenn Hartman Cc Eric Rudd Vou replied to this message on 10/8/20181:46 PM. Click hereto download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of some pictures in this message. Glenn and Dave, Below is an email dated July 26, 2017 from David Pesnichak where he responds to the Highway 82 Frontage Road as "Highway 82 Frontage Roads are considered "Locar for the purposes of determining setbacks identified in Table 3-201 of the Land Use and Development Code (LUDC) of 2013. Thanks Chris Jung Rudd Construction 132 Park Ave Basalt, CO 81621 chris@rudd constructlo n. co rf (970) 309-0123 Cell (970) 927-4038 ext. 4 Office From: David Pesnichak tmailto:doesnichakergarfieid-caunky.caml Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 4:01 PM To: rpark?rebsonris.net Subject Local vs. Arterial Setbacks Hi Roland, Sorry I missed your call earlier. T Next "* Last In response to your question, Highway 82 Frontage Roads are considered "Local" for the purposes of determining setbacks identified In Table 3-201 of the Land Use and Development Code (LUDC) of 2013. Thanks, Dave David Pesnichak, AICP Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Department Dave Argo From: Dave Argo Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2018 5:25 PM To: 'Jeff Johnson' Cc: 'chris@ruddconstruction.com'; 'Eric Rudd'; Glenn Hartmann Subject: Cattle Creek Commercial Center - Buildings A & D Jeff: We have reviewed plans for (2) new manufactured steel buildings to be built at Cattle Creek Commercial Center at 62 County Road 1134 (Cattle Creek) in Carbondale, but before we can finalize our review and issue building permits we have questions and/or comments regarding the following items: 1. Front Yard Setback Encroachment — As illustrated on site plan, Building A — as well as future Building AA — are located within the 50' front yard setback. The 50' setback is based on our interpretation of Highway 82 frontage road as an "arterial" street, but I want to confirm my assumption with our Director. I will advise you if my interpretation is not correct following our staff meeting on Tuesday morning — otherwise building placement for Building A and future Building AA will need to comply with the 50' setback. 2. Building "A" Dimensions & Footprint Location — Lengthwise dimension shown on Zancanella's drawings is 150 feet, but is shown elsewhere as 125 feet. Please clarify/verify the correct length of this building, and also provide minimum dimension between Building A and future Building B to be located immediately to the east. 3. Fire Sprinkler System — 9,375 S.F. area of each of these buildings exceeds maximum allowable size for Type II-B construction without fire sprinklers, and the issuance of a building permit will therefore include a condition for fire sprinklers. Have you contacted Bill Gavette at Carbondale Fire District? If not, please provide him with a set of plans — including a site plan. 4. Floodplain Development Permit —The site plan clearly illustrates both Building A and Building D within 100-year floodplain adjacent to Cattle Creek. Garfield County's Land Use & Development Code requires a "Floodplain Development Permit" whenever proposed development encroaches into the floodplain — including related site grading, filling and/or creation of embankments — and this Floodplain Development Permit must be completed prior to issuance of building or grading permits for such work. Our records do not indicate that a floodplain development permit has been issued for construction of these buildings, but if you already have permit(s) in hand, please provide us with copies for our review. Please contact Glenn Hartmann, Planning Dept. Manager to discuss specific requirements. 5. OWTS Permits — It is our understanding that these new buildings will be utilizing an existing septic system already in place and serving the existing adjacent buildings. Each of these new buildings is required to complete a Septic System application for any alteration of the existing septic system. Please contact either Brooke or Lindsay at the front desk for requirements and fees for this application. Since the existing septic system is also apparently located in the floodplain, is there a floodplain development permit for that work too? 6. Driveway Permit — Please provide a copy of a driveway permit (or exemption letter) from Garfield County's Road & Bridge Dept. 7. Interior Partition Walls — As currently shown on plans, there is only one interior demising wall shown between (5) potential future tenant spaces. However, no details or specifications are provided in this set of plans indicating wall construction or fire -rating of this wall. In addition, details or specifications are not included for interior walls at the (5) bathrooms, which may eventually align with future fire -rated demising walls between tenant spaces. Please provide additional information about fire -ratings and intended wall specifications. If intended to serve as fire -rated partitions, please provide listing agency's reference numbers and cut sheets for our review and Building Inspector reference in the field. 1 * NOTE: At some future date — when tenant spaces are leased, actual occupancy/use is better known, and tenant improvements are scheduled to be completed — interior partition walls separating individual tenants may be required to comply with "fire partition" requirements (I.B.C., Section 708). Please provide clarification and/or additional information as requested above at your earliest opportunity so that we can finalize our plan review of these buildings. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Dave Argo Plans Examiner CGarfwld County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com 2 Dave Arg o From: Dave Argo Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2018 11:41 AM To: Bill Gavette (gavette@carbondalefire.org) Cc: Andy Schwaller (aschwaller@garfield-county.com) Subject: New Buildings at Cattle Creek Commercial Center Bill: We have received plans for (2) new manufactured steel buildings from Wayne Rudd to be located at Cattle Creek Commercial Center, 62 County Road 113. The site plan they submitted shows a total of 5 additional new buildings (including these 2 buildings) all of which will be located between Highway 82 frontage road and the existing steel buildings already built. Each of these (2) new buildings is 9,375 S.F. in size (one-story), Type II-B construction, with F-1 occupancy/use. Since both buildings exceed the 9,000 S.F. maximum size (per I.F.C. Section 903.2, Table A) it appears to me that they will need to include a fire sprinkler system. Do you agree with that assessment? Have you been contacted or received plans for these new buildings? Are there any other I.F.C. requirements or issues that we need to be aware of? Dave Argo Plans Examiner C. Garfield County 1 Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: 970-945-8212 Ext. 1610 Email: dargo@garfield-county.com Web: garfield-county.com 1 Jim Wilson From: Tally Ho Construction Inc <tallyhoconst@sopris.net> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 9:20 AM To: Brooke Winschell; Jim Wilson Cc: jeffjparrington@aol.com; robert.parrington@yahoo.com Subject: [External] FW: Rudd Building D; Permit No. BLCO-09-18-5462 Good Morning, Brooke and Jim: Below is an email from the Engineer on the Rudd Building D project, I believe, per your request. Would you please make sure Jim sees this and then place in the captioned building permit file. Thank you, Nila Parrington Tally Ho Construction, Inc. From: Alex Smith [mailto:asmith@engtecsrv.com] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 2:57 PM To: Tally Ho Construction Inc. Subject: Rudd Building D John, It is acceptable to splice the hair pins as long as you lap the hairpins the required splice as noted on sheet S1 Thank you, Alex Smith, E.I. Engineering & Technical Services, Inc. 1101 North Heritage Parkway PO Box 308 Tea, SD 57064-8100 asmith@engtecsrv.com Phone Number: (605) 498-1290 Ext. 2 Toll Free Number: (888) 338-2441 Fax - (605) 498-1282 Office Hours: M-TH: 7:30 am — 5:30 pm CST Friday: 7:30 am — 11:30 am CST 1