HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence Regarding Site ElevationColleen W¡rth
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Subject:
Karen Barney <karen@freestylearchitects.com >
Wednesday, August 18,2021 9:35 AM
Colleen Wirth; Mike Arbaney
jd bcon @yahoo.com; Andy Schwaller
RE: lExternal] site elevation - Jandrall / Maftin
Follow up
Flagged
Keenedørye¿ha^
0ø e//U e/erâz+b??
',4.^r" ,4.jrk"-b
afre¿"ad
HiColleen,
The T.O. Slab should read 6085'-6" and the T.O. Plywood should be 6086'-0". Sorry for the confusion there.
I see Mike Arbaney is copíed here and I have asked hím to review the 4û PSF for roof question
Thank you,
Karen
From: Col I een Wírth <cwi rth @garf ield-cou nty. com >
Sent: Wednesday, August 1.8,2O2L 9:08 AM
To: Karen Barney <karen@freestylearchitects.com>; Míke Arbaney <mike@coloradostructural.com>
Cc: jdbcon@yahoo.com; Andy Schwal ler <aschwal ler@garfield-county.com>
Subject: site elevation - Jandrall / Martin
BLRE-O8 -ZL-7O20 - Jandrall - Martin new SF dwelling is under rev¡ew
Message for Karen and Mike:
Hello, I started reviewing Sally Jandrall - Anthony Martin building application at 94 Stonefly Dr, Coryell Ranch
What is the site elevation?
4100 SITE PLAN shows 99'6" t.o. slab = 9085.6 and 100' t,o. plywood = 9086' and the faint contours say 6088, 6087
6085, I believe, no?
Ithink it is probably a minortypo or errata on the Al-00 site plan, but ask to reconfirm so I have something to put Ín the
file.
Sheet S1.0 - Mike Arbaney lists ROOFS at 40 PSF, is that still correct?
Thanks for your help, hope you have a good day!
Take care,
Colleen Wirth
Plans Examiner
Garfield County Building Division
108 8th Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 8L601
cwi rth @earf iel d-cou nty. com
1