HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 Correspondence & SupplementsItem #1
Provide an application form which is filled out with the proper involved part¡es, including the correct
property owner, and signature by either the authorized representative for the application or the
property owner.
TYPE OF APPLICATION
T-lndministrative Review
l5¿1tinììled tmpact Revìew
i--lttn.Jo, lmpnct Rev¡cw
ndmÊnts to ân
lrR nMrR
Aooroveri LTJCP
Llsup
[-_lM'no¡Temporary Housing Facility
[Jvacation of a County Road/Public ROW l--l¡ppeat of Administrative lnterpretatìon
l--lLocation and €xtent Rev¡ew l--lAreas and Act¡vities of State lnterest
[-_lComprehensive Plðn Àmendment l-lAccommod¡tion Pußuant to Faìr tlous¡n Act
f]]Prpelrne Development l---lvanance
i-ll¡me Ixtensron {àlso clìecktype of orrgrnal appircation}
Gu(icld (itutrÍ.¡,
Community Development Dcpartment
108 8tÀ Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, C0 81601
{970) 94s-8212
ww w. ga rlì e I d -countv. c om
INVOLVED PARTIES
Owncr/Applicant lnl tLLtA$ {: D¿ıf¿Ë Je
l,¡ame; lv\AâîHA ÞÊâs6' Tfu;'6¿
MailingAddress: F.o . ßaX !sq-]
C¡ty: Cr¡r'Ißù¡.\? A L{I
E-m {¡¿rd phtla t-L O ¿-ol Ls1^Y)-
Representetlve (Authori:atìon Required!
l¡a.u'.\À
LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT
APPLICATION TORM
[--l Devlln¡ment in l00.Ypar flnrxlplatn
[* lDevelopment in 100 Year tloodplain Vanãnte
f-l Co,Je Terl Anlgrrclnìerlt
l-*l Rezoning
[-lzone oistrict i-lpuo [-IPUD Amendment
f--lAdministrative lnterpretðtion
I êr.¡31 { ,l,rrc-ftl }"\ ¡¡Jlnl }ÊAkä Jtdv'>-i
Phone: ?¡ Z _<d¿i3 3¿Çf -_
state: ¡1c> - Zip code:- g t {¿ L3-
Phone: (.-l üf l?ß\ -OqLl?
Zip code: t\5ãÀ\
Meil
City:l\,tf,r\C,l-
E-ma¡r:\bìVr.^? @ Àar',cO *gv
PßOJECT NAME AND LOCATION
Project Name:
ASSeSSOT S PArce¡ NUmDer
.,)
State:
LNÐ " f rfra
/¡r:L_ r_r l.ì '1 fr,r a\ l! l^ì n .l -_Ll_L2,-.rr_--1.-*Y/
Physical/Street Address:
Legel Dercription
ZÕnê District:fr:t¡x\Properrv size (acres|: 35, .?431
PROJECT OESCR|mO¡¡
Exlstlng use:
Proposed Use lFrom UsêlablB 3-{.q31:
De¡crlptlon of Prorect!
For Appeal of lnterpretatlon lnclude;l, th! Declslon you are sppeallng.
2, The d.te rhè Declslon was sent es rpecllled tn the notlce (date matlsdl.
3, The nâture of the decl¡lon ¡nd the speclfied Iround for appeal, please che spec¡f,c code sectlons
. ãnd/or. releuent documentstlon to support Vour request,
4. Thê approprlãte appêal tee of 92S0.0O.
S. Plear€ note a comÞlated Appeðl Appllrauon 6nd feas must be feßêlved w¡th¡n 30 (âlendar days
of tfte date of the flnat u,rltten Admtñlstraüvê lnrerpraràtlôn.
RCQU€Í F1ORWAN,ER¡
Submlsslon Rèqulrements
E 'the Applícant requestlng a wa¡ver ¡rf submisslon ñéqu¡Gmenb per sectlon d-202. ust:
Sectlon: _Sectlon: :Sectloni sectlon:
E lhe Applic¿nt is requestlng a Weiver of Stðndard! p€r Section 4-118. List:
Sectlon¡- . ',ar,Sectlon:
Sectlon:Sect¡on: _
I have resd the stalemsnts aboye and have provldad the.requ¡¡Êd att¡chedlnformatlon whlch¡ls
to the
t fzø]zozi
¡,r¡p¡llF ¡,r,¡Of¿ ¡4.Åq'e TûrsrP.opcrtY
N\rqßfH¡ lrltt
OFFICIAT USC ONLY
Flla Numben
t¡, t
OP
S¿. Ì9--5¡i:
Fee P¡ld!
Item #2
Provide a Statement of Authority for an agent(s) to act on behalf of the property owner, William F. and
Martha M. Drake Trust. The document must be recorded with the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder.
Please provide the recorded copy.
Item #3
Provide contact information for any ditch owners on the property, including name and mailing address.
Blue Turf Farm,393 County Road 102, Carbondale, CO 81623, (970) 963-3990
Mountain
Item #4
Certification of Mineral Owner Research form (attached) needs signature and information regarding
mineral owner research.
Gørfield County
( I I'l R'l' I Ì{'ICATION OF MINERAL OWNER RESEÄRCH
This form is to be contpleted and sub¡nil"led willt øny uppliculit-tn lur u Lu¡¡tl Use Chunge Per¡niL.
Mineral interests may be severed from surface right interests in real property, C.R.S. $ 24-65.5-101, et seq,
requires notification to mineral owners when a landowner applies for an application for development from a
local government, As such, the landowner must research the current owners of mineral interests for the
property.
The Garfield County Land Use and Development Code of 2013 ("LUDC") Section 4-101(EX1Xb)(4) requires
written notice to owners of mineral interests in the subject property in accordance with C.R.S. S 24-65.5-IOL
et seq, "as such owners can be identified through the records in the office of the Clerk and Recorder or
Assessor, or through other means." This form is proof of applicant's compliance with the Colorado Revised
Statutes and the LUDC.
The undersigned applicant cert¡f¡es that mineral owners have been researched for the subject property as
required pursuant to C.R.S. 5 24-65.5-101, et seq, and Section 4-101 (EX1)(b)(a) of the Garfield County Land
Use and Development Code, as amended. As a result of that research, the undersigned applicant cert¡f¡es
the following (Pleose init¡dl on the blank line next to the statement thot accurately reflects the result of
research):
-
I own the entire mineral estate relative to the subject property; or
Å Min"r.ls are owned by the parties listed below
The names and addresses of any and all mineral owners identified are provided below (attach additional pages
as necessary):
Name of Mineral Owner Mailing Address of Mineral Owner
Rimledee Uranium and Minine Corooration (Unknown) 275E.32nd Street, Duranso, CO 81301-
Aoolicant / Landowner
I acknowledge I reviewed C.R.S. S 24-65.5-10L, et seq, and I am in compliance with said statue and the
LUDC.
Garfield & Hecht., P.C.
l,-l,co/t_ &az^ k**o2lt8l202t
Attorney for Danco Group Date
2t18t2021
RIMLEDGE URANIUM AND MINING
CORPORATION
Entlty Number: 78037 6O-01 42
Company Type: Corporation - Domestic - Profit
Address: Unknown, NA 00000
State of Orlgin:
åf:i::i**!1i
Applicant Name
Corporation
Entity Details: RIMLEDGE URANIUM AND MINING CORPORATION - Utah Business Search - Utah.gov
Status: Expired
Status: Expired O asof06/16/1977
Status Descrlptlon; Voluntarily Dissolved
Employment Voriflcatlon: Not Registered with Veriff Utah
History
Registratlon Date: 08/01/1 955
Last Renewed: N/A
<< Back to Search Results
Business Name:
View Management Team
View Filed Documents
https://secure.utah. gov/bes/displayDetails. html 1t1
Item #5
Please provide specific responses and demonstration of compliance with the Standards
as identified in Article 7: Standards, Division 1 , 2 and 3, and Section 7-704 Group Home
Facilities. Additionally, please provide a traffic study to address all requirements for a
Basic Traffic Analysis as outlined in Section 4-2O3.L.2 of the LUDC, including
demonstration of compliance with Section 7-107 , and adequacy of the access drive. A
waiver which includes specific responses pursuant to section
4-202 may be requested from submittal of a full traffic analysis, with appropriate
supporting evidence such as a statement from a qualified professional.
See attached below
Transportation lmpact Analysis
for
Momenta Recovery
5325 CR100
Carbondale, Colorado
January L4,2O2L
Revised March 23,2021
PREPARED FOR:
Danco
525L Ericson Way
Arcata, CA 95521
Attention: Dan Johnson
PREPARED BY:
McDowell Engineering, LLC
PO Box 4259
Eagle, CO 81631
970.623.0788
Contact: KariJ. McDowell Schroeder, PE, PTOE
Project Number: M1500
Statement of Engineering Qualifications
Kari J. McDowell Schroeder, PE, PTOE is a Transportation and Traffic Engineer for McDowell
Engineering, LLC. Ms. McDowell Schroeder has over twenty-three years of extensive traffic and
transportation engineering experience. She has completed numerous transportation studies and
roadway design projects throughout the State of Colorado. Ms. McDowell Schroeder is a licensed
Professional Engineer in the State of Colorado and has her certification as a Professional Traffic
Operations Engineer from the lnstitute of Transportation Engineers.
s32s cR 700 Morch 23,2027 Poge 2
Transportation lmpact Analysis
Table of Contents
1.0
L.1
2.O
2.1
2.2
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
5.0
6.0
6.L
6.2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Pnoposeo Drvelopvrrur
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Rono NerwoRr
Tnnrnc Dnrn Cou-rcroN............
PROJECT TRAFFIC
Tnrp GerueRmoN..............
SrvrnR Fnctrw Coururs
Cusrovrzro Pnolecr Tnrp Grru¡Rmoru
TRnr¡rc AssrcrrrvrErur
Tor¡l Tnnrnc................
TRANSPORTATION I M PACT ANATYS¡S
PrRcerurncg op I rurrRsrcloN I rvlpncr.......
Prncrrurncr or Ronow¡y lvrpncr
Srnrr HrcHwAY AccEss PeRulrs
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RrrrRerucr Docuvrrurs.
lructuoeo Docuverrrrs
Figures and Tables
DrR¡clonnL DrstRlsuroN
4
5
6
6
6
7
7
7
8
9
APPENDIX
10
TL
t2
L2
L2
13
L4
15
15
15
F¡cuRr l-: Vrcrlr¡tty M¡p...........4
4
5
6
7
FrcuRr 2:An¡n Mnp
F¡e uRr 3:S¡r¡ Sunvrv :..................
FrGuRr 4: Exrslruc Cou¡rrs ron SH 82 / CR 100 lrur¡nsecnoN ......
FrcuRr 5: BecrcRourrro TRnrrc ron SH 82 / CR l-00 lIrlrrRseclo¡r
Fte un¡ 6: DrREcrorunl DrsrnrsuroN FoR SH 82 / CR 1-00 lrureRseclrolr¡ ............ L0
Frcunr 7: Tnnpnc Assrclr¡ve rur ron SH 82 I Cn L00 lrurrnsrcroN............ ........ 1-0
FrcuRe 8: TnRrnc Assrclrverur ron SH 82 / CR 100 lrurrns¡croN............ ..,...., 11
FrcuRe 9: Gnnrt¡lo Couruw Ronowny SrnrrronRos.. .................... L3
TesL¡ 1: SuvrvraRv o¡ ExtsrrruG Coururs nr 3302 SourH Gnnruo Avrruur.......
TneLe 2: TRrp G¡¡rrRnïoN pER Cusrov Tnrp GrrurRmoN .............
TRaLr 3: PERcENTAGE lvpncr or NoRrH Lee or SH 82 / CR 1-00 lrur¡Rsrclorr¡
o
........ 12
5325 CR 100 Morch 23,2027 Poge 3
1.0 Project Description
McDowell Engineering has prepared this Transportation lmpact Analysis for the
property located at 5325 County Road 100 in unincorporated Garfield County.
A vicinity map showing the property is shown in Figure 1.
Fiqure 7: Vicinitv MaP
An area map ís shown in Figure 2.
Fiaure 2: Area Map
s325 CR 100 Morch 23,2027 Poge 4
L.L ProposedDevelopment
The applicant is looking to develop a Women's Mental Health and Trauma Center at
the project site. The site consists of an existing residential structure and accessory
buildings on an approximate 35 Acre parcel. A site survey is shown in Figure 3.
Fiqure 3: Site Survev
;;ã;;;Í:çEL;
Håil^g.H-
¡
/Æ\W
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT
A PARCELO! TAÐSTÚATÛDIN SICrcN T9,rcWNSIM TSOUNÌNANGÉ87WÈçTO} TIIEóftI TM6UÑ OF &RTTETD SAM OF COLORAM
i' flßG¿ Á I
1¡i ,41¡q!!61
a
)
4l¡¡@
I
il!Ífffiñffifl@uñ¡tM,¡I
Ni
!@aq!l(ry
5325 CR 100 Morch 23, 2027 Poge 5
2.O ExistingConditions
2.1 Road Network
State Hiehwav 82 (SH 82)
SH 82 is a State Highway that connects lnterstate 70 at Glenwood Springs to US 24
south of Leadville. This major regional route is classified by the State as Access
Category E-X, Expressway, Major Bypass in the vicinity of the project according to the
State Highway Access Codel (SHAC).The posted speed limit is 55 miles per hour (mph)
in both directions. There is an existing traffic signal at the intersection of SH 82 and
cR 1_00.
Catherine Store Road (CR 100)
Catherine Store Road (CR 1-00) is a Garfield County Road that begins at the east
boundary of Carbondale and heads east, then north, crossing SH 82, and ends at the
intersection of Cattle Creek Road (CR 11"3) approximately 4.5 miles north of the SH 82
intersection. Cattle Creek Road is a two lane paved roadway classified by Garfield
County as a Minor Collector per Table 7-tO7: Roadway Standardss, based upon
existing roadway counts taken by Garfield County in 20L96.
2.2 Traffic Data Collection
Peak hour turning movement counts were collected on Tuesday, December 15,2020
from 7:00am to 9:00am and 4:00pm to 6:00pm at the SH 82 and CR 100 intersection.
Data was summarized into 15 minute bins. Figure 4 shows the existing traffic counts.
LEGEND:
Directional Distribution = lnbound% {Outbound %}
AM/PM Volumes = XX/XX VPH {in PCEs)
rurning Movements nr| 1 f
Fioure 4: Existino Counts for SH 82 'R 700 lntersection
A SeasonalAdjustment Factor of 1-.19 was applied to the through traffic volumes along
SH82. Seasonal Adjustment factor calculations are provided in the Appendix for
reference. The factors use CDOT's OT\S2 online portal for data acquisition. Figure 5
shows the background traffic volumes with the Seasonal Adjustment factor applied.
1
(.) (Ð
N€9
NÈO)N-óJtt
l_ otse
- 30't/1,579
I s+rzt+
Çorz
2t2jJ
pt2aJ
1,381t443-
1m/381
rlr
ú)6CÔsQql=
ÓN o
532s CR 100 March 23,2027 Page 6
1
óóôl cô -c! F- ct)(\¡ e (?,
JTL
l- olre
€ 358/1,879rC
54t214
0t2
2t2Ð
12t20J
1,U3t527*
1ffi/381
tlrb6æQs-
-f-\(?, l\o,
LEGEND:
Directional Distribution = lnbound% (Outbound %)
AM/PM Volumes = XX/XX VPH (in PCEs)
Turning Movements nl 1r
Fiaure 5: Backqround Troffic for SH 82 / CR 700 lntersection
Traffic count data is included in the Appendix of the report.
3.0 Project Traffic
3.1 Trip Generat¡on
Trip Generation is normally calculated by using the mêthods prêsented in the ITETrÍp
Generation Handbooks, with data provided from the lTETrip Generation Manua4.This
method is accepted by CDOT, Garfield County, and most other jurisdictions.
The Trip Generation Handbook does detail specific instances to use other methods,
especially when existing data is sparse, or when conditions are different than one of
the available land use categories in the Trip Generøtion Manual, Often this involves
counting a similar sized facility or creating a customized trip generation.
3.2 Similar Facility Counts
Momenta Recovery has a slmllar slzed faclllty located ln Glenwood Sprlngs at 3302
South Grand Avenue. Twenty four hour volume counts were conducted at this
location on Tuesday, December L5,2O2O.Table l summarizes these counts:
Toble 7: Summorv of Existina Counts at 3302 South Grand Avenue
vph: Vehicles per Hour, vþd: Vehicles per Day
During the counts, it was est¡mated that eight staff members were working that day,
in addition to the clients. The proposed facility will offer the approximate same
capacity as the existing Glenwood Springs facility.
AM Peak (8am-9am)9 vph 5 vph L4 vph
PM Peak (5pm-6pml 2 vph 4 vph 6 vph
Daily 27 vpd 27 vpd 54 vpd
Time lnbound Traffic Outbound Traffic TotalTraffic
5325 CR 700 Morch 23,2021 Poge 7
Traffic count data is included in the Appendix of the report.
3.3 Customized Project Trip Generat¡on
A customized trip generation can also be created by examining anticipated operations
and presenting a detailed analysis and accounting of these items. Customized trip
generations are acceptable provided that the methods and rationale are logical and
reasonable.
The trip generation analyses three different times as follows:
AM Peak Hour. Morning (AM) Peak Hour trip generation is measured in vehicle
trips per hour (vph) and consists of the highest 60 minute period that occurs
during the morning hours of operation.
PM Peak Hour. Afternoon (PM) Peak Hour trip generation is measured in
vehicle trips per hour (vph) and consists of the highest 60 minute period that
occurs during the afternoon/evening hours of operation.
Dailv. Daily trip generation is measured in vehicle trips per day (vpd) and
consists of the anticipated daily trips that will occur over a 24 hour period.
This method uses the operational assumptions to estimate the trip generation for the
project site. Detailed calculations are provided in the Appendix. Operations have been
supplied by the applicant as listed below:
a Clinicians: Four full time and two part time clinicians. Full time from 8am-5pm
5 days/week and part time from 10am-4pm 3 days/week, each drive
separately (no carpooling)
Nurse Practitioner: One nurse practitioner 3 days/week 8am-LOam
Admin tors:Four administrators, daytime shift only 8am-5pm, no
carpooling.
o Technicians: Four technicians, one during morning shift 6:45am-3pm, two
during swing shift 2pm-10pm, one during overnight shift 9:45pm-7:15pm, no
carpooling.
¡ Support Staff (Chef): One chef, 10am-6pm shift, 6 days/week.
¡ Support Staff (Trainer): One trainer, 7:15am-8:15am, 3 days/week
¡ Onsite Companv Vehicles: Two onsite vehicles, used for field trips, errands,
medical appointments and other activities. Three activities each vehicle each
day.
o Support Vehicles (Fedex, UPS, etc.): Two vehicles per day.
¡ Groundskeepers/Maintenance: One full time groundskeeper and one part
time maintenance worker. Full time from 8am-5pm 5 days/week and part time
from 10am-4pm 5 days/week
¡ Carpooling: No carpooling occurs except for the onsite company vehicles.
a
o
a
a
a
532s CR 100 March 2i,2027 Poge 8
The results of the customized trip generation are shown in Table 2. The full trip
generation table ls enclosed ln the Appendlx.
Table 2: Trìp Generation per Custom Trip Generation
vph; Vehicles per Hour, vpd: Vehicles per Day
The proposed project is anticipated to generate 58 trips per day with 12vph for the
AM peak hour occurring between 7:00 AM and 8:00 AM. The PM peak generates
l1vph and occurs between 5:00 PM and 6:00 PM. These volumes are very similar to
the existing facility that was counted and described in Section 3.2 above.
3.4 Directional Distribution
The distribution of project-generated traffic on the surrounding roadway network is
influenced by several factors including the following:
o The location of the site relative to other facilities and the roadway network
o The configuration of the existing and proposed adjacent roadway network
o Relative location of neighboring population centers
Based upon existing traffic counts and the location of the project in relation to nearby
population centers, the following project-generated directional distribution is as
follows:
Forty percent (4O%l of site-generated traffic will be to and from the west
utilizing SH 82 towards Carbondale and Glenwood Springs.
Forty percent (40%) of site-generated traffic will be to and from the east
utilizing SH 82 towards ElJebel and Basalt.
Twenty percent (2O%) of site-generated traffic will be to and from the south
utilizing Catherine Store Road towards Carbondale.
a
a
a
AM Peak Hour 11 vph 1 vph 12 vph
PM Peak Hour 2 vph 9 vph 11 vph
Daily 29 vpd 29 vpd 58 vpd
Time lnbound Traffic Outbound Traffic TotalTraffic
5325 CR 100 Morch 23,2027 Page 9
The anticipated directional distribution of project-generated traffic for the SH 82 /
Catherine Store Road (CR 100) intersection is depicted in Figure 6.
LEGEND;
Directional Distribution = lnbound% {Outbound %)
AM/PM Volumes = XX/XX VPH {in PCEs)
Turning Movements n+| 1f
Fiaure 6: Directional DisÛibution for SH 82 '.R 700 lntersection
3.5 Traffic Assignment
When the trip generation expected for this site is applied to the directional
distribution, the result is the anticipated assignment of trips on the roadway system.
Figure 7 depicts the new vehicle trips that are anticipated from the proposed
development.
TEGEND:
Directional Distribution = lnbound% {Outbound %}
AM/PM Volumes = XXIXX VPH (in PCEs)
Turning Movements n.| 1f
Fiaure 7: Troffic Assianment for SH 82 / CR 700 lntersection
1
èsàeèsoÕo-fC!V
èSàeàeÕ(>oJIL
L 40% (o%)
-rq
5
$o/olJ
--t
41o/o
rtr
Iso(\¡
1
rôOJTL
L
-r
ç
411
5J
--ì
5t1
t r1o
C\¡
s325 CR 100 Morch 23, 2027 Poge 70
3.6 TotalTraffic
When the Background Traffic (Figure 5) is added to the site-generated traffic
(Figure 7)to yield the TotalTraffic in Figure 8.
TEGEND:
Directional Distribution = lnbound% (Outbound %)
AM/PM VolurÌes - XXIXX VPH (in pCEs)
Turning Movements nt tr
Fioure 8: Troffic Assionmcnf SH 82 / CR 100 lntersection
1
l'- ¡'-ôl(J)-ıñòC{-(DJTL
l_ totrs
- 358t1,879
f satzu
Çorz
2t2Ð
17t21J
1,643t527-
103/3S-l
ì1rra) tô €9a-r6¡\(9 F-o)
5325 CR 100 Morch 23,2027 Poge 11
4.0 TransportationlmpactAnalysis
4.t Percentage of lntersection lmpact
Table 3 below summarizes the background and proposed site generated vehicle
volumes on the north leg of the SH 82 and CR 100 intersection, as well as the
percentage:
Table 3: Percentaoe Impact of North Lea of SH 82 / CR 700 lntersection
Therefore, the proposed project is anticipated to generate 70.4o/o and 8,0% of the
north leg access volumes for the AM and PM peaks respect¡vely. lt should also be
noted that if the directional distribution discussed in Section 3.4 were changed, this
intersection impact would yíeld the same results, or less (in the event that distribution
would head north from the driveway access on CR 100).
4.2 Percentage of Roadway lmpact
Garfield County conducts road traffic counts on the¡r county roads. Catherine Store
Road was counted on April 23,2OI9, and had a daily volume of I,24O vpd6. From
Table 2 above, the site generated traffic is 58 vpd.
LO.4%103AM Peak L2
8.O%L27PM Peak 7L
Site Generated
Volume (vph)
Background Traffic
Volume (vph)Time
Site Generated
of Traffic
Deslgn standards
21 - 100 0-20 No Access
to DU2501+401 - 2500 201 - 400 101-200Deslgn Capac¡ty (ADT)
40 15 to 301 30605050Minimum RoWWidth
{Feet)
80
8 Single Lâne
t2
Single Lane
1tL21111[ane Width (Feet)12
2 0 06
4 Min. Paved
6
4 M¡n. Pãved
4
2 Min. PavedShoulder Wldth {teet)
I
6 Min. Pav€d
6 4 3210106D¡tch W¡dth (Feet)
nla2%2Y' Chip/Sedl
3% Gråvel
29o ch¡p/seal
3% Grävel 2o/o2o/o 2voCross Slope
5%n/a n/a3Ya5o/o 5VoShoulder Slope 3Vo
nlanlan/a n/a n/a35 mph 35 mphDesign Speed
50 40 n/a18580Min¡mum Redius {Feet}425
72o/o10%!2o/o t2%l2VoMaxlmum % Grade 8o/o ÈVo
Native
Material ¡/aChip/5eat
Chip/Seal or
Gravel €ravel Gravelsurface
Asphalt or
Chio/5eal
ins dete.rmined adequåte ¡n ôn engineeiìiãffidmltive road shall be dedicated RoW, dr¡veway can be ded¡cated as either an
easement or ROW.
2 lf determined neccssary for adequate drainage,
3Accessory Dwell¡ng Un¡ts and Bullding Perm¡ts for Stngle Famlly Homes shall be exempt from these standards unless associated wlth
a new subdivision application.
Maior
Collector
Table 7-107: Roadway Standards
M¡nor secondarY Rurar AccessCollector Access
5em¡
Pr¡mit¡ve
Pr¡mitive/
Drivewayr
Pubt¡c l-and
Access
532s CR 100 Morch 23,2027 Poge 72
Fìaure 9: Garfield Countv Roadwav Standords
From Figure 9 above, Catherine Store Road is classified as a Minor Collector and with
the addition of the site generated traffic, will continue to function as a Minor
Collector.
4.3 State Highway Access Permits
Section 2.6(3)of the Stote Highwoy Access Codel (SHAC) requires a new access permit
when there is a land use change and/or the volume is anticipated to increase by more
than twenty percent (2Ùo/ol. Per Section 4.1 above, the site generated volumes are
less than twenty percent.
Therefore, a new State Highway Access Permit is not required for the SH 82 and CR
100 lntersection.
5325 CR 100 Morch 2j,2021 Poge 13
5.0 Summary and Recommendations
The applicant is looking to develop a Women's Mental Health and Trauma Center at
the project site.
Traffic Data: Peak hour turning movement counts were collected on Tuesday,
December L5,2O2O from 7:00am to 9:00am and 4:00pm to 6:00pm at the SH 82 and
CR i-OO intersection. Momenta Recovery has a similar sized facility located in
Glenwood Springs at 3302 South Grand Avenue. Twenty four hour volume counts
were conducted at this location on Tuesday, December 15,202O.
Trip Generation: A customized trip generation was performed for the proposed
project. lt ¡s ant¡cipated to generate 58 trips per day wíth 12vph for the AM peak hour
occurring between 7:00 AM and 8:00 AM. The PM peak generates llvph and occurs
between 5:00 PM and 6:00 PM.
lntersection lmpact: The proposed project is anticipated to generate L0.4% and 8.0%
of the north leg access volumes for the AM and PM peaks respectively.
Roadwav lmpact: Garfield County classifies Catherine Store Road (CR 100) as a Minor
Collector based upon daily counts taken in 20L9 of L,240 vpd. The proposed project
is anticipated to add 58 vpd to the roadway. This additional volume will not change
the road classification.
State Highwav Access Permit: The site generated access volumes are less than twenty
percent of the existing volumes. Therefore, a new State Highway Access Permit is not
required for the SH 82 and CR 100 lntersection.
Transportation Recommendations: Based upon the analysis presented in this report,
the proposed Momenta Recovery project is anticipated to be successfully
incorporated in the existing roadway network.
s325 CR 100 Morch 23, 2027 Poge 74
6.0 Appendix
6.1 Reference Documents
6.2 lncluded Documents
1.
2.
State Highway Access Code. State of Colorado ,2OO2.
CDOT Online Transportation lnformation System. (CDOT OTIS). State of
Colorado,2020.
lnstitute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd
Edition, September 20L7
lnstitute of Tronsportation Engineers, Trip Generation Monual, 70th
Edition, September 2017
Gorfield County Lond lJsed Development Code (LUDC), Article 7 Standards,
https: ' \uww.aorfield-countv.com/communitv-development/files lsites '12 /' rticle-7.pdf
Garfield County Road Traffic Counts, https://www.oorfietd-countv.com/rood-
b ri d o e /f i I e s /s ites /28/ 20 19/ 7 7 / 20 19-T roff i c-Co u nt-Stu dv. pdf
3
4.
5
6
L
2
3
Traffic Counts
Seasona I Adjustment Factor Matrix
Trip Generation Analysis Calculations
s325 CR 100 Morch 23, 2027 Poge 75
www.idaxdata.com
CATHERINE STORE RD
HWY 82 ida)'
^N Peak Hour
Date: Tue, Dec15,2020
Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM
Peak Hour: 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM
ulza
ÊÉ.
tJJ ulÍ.Ér-o< r--<) u)
-l
1-
(\ l-(\¡
l1 ,tiì
'i,, .,t ::.,
o)(Ðo o
i', ,1 1..I
t..
'a.. .,6
0
-Q rhIEV: 2,172
PHF: 0.97
t: ' '30'l
:: '-' 54tj
- 361
â- 'rsà rft
o
0 0-0103 'l:
HWY82 ttJ ozú.d.uuú.TOFF<Ø(J
1o
HV %: PHF
*l 1."È\, lR
EB
WB
NB
SB
TOTAL
3.8o/o
7.5o/o
1.3%
2.6%
4.1%
0.91
0.84
0.95
0.85
0.97
rb
Two-Hour Count Summaries
lnterval
Start
HWY 82 HWY 82 CATHERINE STORE RD CATHERINE STORE RD l5-min
Total
Rolling
One HourEastbound
LT THUT RT
Westbound
LT THUT RT
Northbound
LT TH RTUT
Southbound
UT LT TH RT
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:l5AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
U
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
1
2
3
3
4
o
a
2
341 19
381 29
365 16
319 24
316 34
307 14
240 14
270 23
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
1
752
558
10 69
21 85
18 89
16 71
23 84
24 100
2
1
3
2
0
0
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
7
3
9
't2
l3
6
I
1
0
2
2
3
3
5
I
43
55
57
44
41
54
57
38
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
12
I
9
10
6
7
I
2
4
I
7
5
7
7
3
7
5
6
4
3
4
c
485
561
542
531
538
459
451
491
0
0
0
2,119
2,172
2,110
2,019
1.979
Count Total 3 27 2,539 173 1 124 608 14 0 60 15 389 0743635 4,098 0
Peak Hour 2 12 1,381 103 0543016 0317197 0391722 2,172 0
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles ¡n overall count
lnterval
Start
Heaw Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossinq Leq)
EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:1 5 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
I
14
't1
16
't6
17
17
20
3
6
I
b
7
9
I
6
o
0
2
0
1
â
2
1
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
20
20
21
23
25
29
28
27
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
U
0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0
0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Count Total 120 53 '16 4 193 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t,0
Peak Hour s7273289 00000 0 0 0 00
TMC 1 CATHERINE HWY 82
Mark Skag gs: (425) 250-07 7 7 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com
www.idaxdata.com
CATHERINE STORE RD
HVVY 82 idar
^N Peak Hour
Date: Tue, Dec 15,2020
Count Period: 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Peak Hour: 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM
ulzo
eÉ.
llJ LrJTÉ.
KP() at)
-l
1-
ctô¡i cr)o êt¿LU t-z3
2sJ
443 ¡¡r+
38 0
â
0
l-669*:- 1,s7g < 1'833 -0
503 '
TEV: 2,588
PHF: 0.93 :'o - ,L dft
o ôl-
38
HWY 82 n.ì 1(troloa',N €oú.
t¡l
É.oF(t,
1
HV%: PHF.l 1-R'|l lR
EB
WB
NB
SB
TOTAL
2.8o/o
2.5o/o
1.Qo/o
O.Oo/o
2.4o/o
0.89
0.93
0.84
0.73
0.93
Two-Hour Count Summaries
HWY 82 HWY 82 CATHERINE STORE RD CATHERINE STORE RDlnterval
Start
UT RT
Eastbound
LT TH UT RT
Westbound
LT TH UT RT
Northbound
LT TH
Southbound
UT LT TH RT
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
I
5
I
'l
6
127
121
99
1,t9
105
94
15
10
I
7
12
7
0610710
0
0
1
0
0
59
52
67
5l
47
298
343
367
352
397
395
I
10
7
12
7
t0
o412926
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
19
12
12
20
22
2
6
7
2
5
7
42
43
35
23
37
25
0 13 3 17
3
4
6
3
4
5
5
4
6
I
4
2
10
5
I
7
7
3
0
0
0
0
0 0 3 5 503
573
632
613
6r4
650
625
5:45 PM
@
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
0
0
0
2,432
2,509
2,502
2,588
2,477
Count Total 2 43 897 81 2 410 2,879 70 o 123 43 255 o262652 4,909 0
Peak Hour 2204/.338 2 214 0 65 25 t,t8 013823 2,588 0
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.
Heaw Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossinq Leqllnterval
Start EB WB NB SB Tota|EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total
3
2
4
2
5
18
17
11
19
I
1
0
1
0
0
0
22
23
18
21
14
13 1740
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0 0 05:45 PM
4:OO PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0 0 0 0
Gount Total 3011072149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Peak Hour 14452061 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
iir ' l l ,1,j:ir, 1l I i:ì
TMC 1 _CATHERINE-HWY 82
Mark Skaggs: (425') 250-0777 mark. skaggs@idaxdata. com
Location:
Gount Date:
Note: Peak Hour Based on hourly time of day bins.
Traffic Counts
3302 S Grand Avenue
12t1512020
:üf,
F ,ü-il8ilü t t :ril* il*
aaaa<c) o o c) o o c) o I A e ô o o o o ct o o o cl o cloo o o o o o ı ı ı ı ë ë = = e ç ç C,e ç ? ç ç çñ 5 ñ ã + ü ö ñ ö ö ë J ñ J ñ ü € vr (o r. oo or o F{
H-dJF{dd
tb
e74
I
o, rz
CL
Ëto
.c,E8
q,E6
ı
I
ß¿
t-
0
Time EB
AM 0
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
9
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
5
4
1
1
00 AM
AM
00 AM
:00 AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
6
14
4
1
5
12:00 PM
'l:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
2
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
3
1
1
,|
0
4
0
2
0
0
1
0
5
2
1
'l
0
6
1
2
0
,|
1
0
27
Percent 50%50o/o
Peak AM - 9:00 AM)9
Percent 64o/o 360/o
14
PM Peak Hour (5:00 PM - 6:00 PM)
Percent
2 4
33o/o 67olo
6
i EB (lnbound) 8b WB (Outbound)
Monthly Summary Data
ON 9H 82 NWO SNOWM^g3 CillK RD, CRS 11 & 16, SNOWMASS (Srãtton td 000t361
Seasonal Adjustment Factors
ON SH 82 NWO SNOWMASS CREEK RD, CRS 11 & 16, SNOWMASS (sration td 0002361
Monthly Summary Data from CDOT OTIS:
https://dtdapps.coloradodot.info/otis/TrafficDatâ#ui/O/0lIlsTation/000236/rfiteúa/ /19lfaßeltrve/
2020 20,709 20,377 75,747 8,978 15,623 19,943 21,883 2r,926 2r.767 20.253 77,202 19,014
2019 20,116 19,966 19.984 18,414 17,804 22,IO9 23,rs2 22,780 2r,20r 19,369 t7,424 20,402
20LA 19,62t 19,180 19,580 1 8,304 17,76\21,602 22.5r2 2r.946 20.449 14.397 17,r99 19,720
20t7 18.550 r8,927 L9,443 16,987 16,943 21,253 22,324 21,086 19,821 18,048 76,873 19,575
2016 78,612 18,613 18,878 16,828 17,254 27.393 20.90222,397 20,479 18,774 16,340 18,813
20L5 17,908 77.747 18.317 16,451 15,838 20,486 zz,r4t 20,765 20,oa4 18.002 16,160 18.790
20t4 76,786 16,586 17,062 15,332 15.302 t9,o47 20.643 1.9.455 r8,461 16,665 14,287 17,40I
20Lt 16,47I 16.387 15,888 73,O74 14,574 77,789 L9,205 18,535 16,845 13,969 72,7L4 14,336
20L2 L6,266 15,875 16.306 14,715 !4,A32 17.835 T9,I74 19,048 77.724 15,655 74,824 15,915
20LL 16,703 15.716 16,399 13,695 73,876 17,634 18,818 18,620 77,543 75,235 74,378 16.553
2010 16,309 1s,908 16.508 14.295 74.115 17,727 1 8,C57 18,147 14,4R9 16,t66
2009 17.sAs 77.067 16,85s 15,o97 14,805 78,297 L9,416 18,236 17,74r 15,681 14.839 16.267
2008 18,043 17,945 18,408 16378 16.098 79,757 20,581 19,8s2 18,648 77,649 15,681 16,153
2007 18.475 77,927 18,854 16,740 16,936 79,847 20,828 27.227 18.998 18.296 t9.537 18.597
2006 76,925 77,577 17,585 20,900 76.223 !9,277 19,695 20,o76 18,422 76,744 16,081 17,722
200s 76.542 16,885 17,329 15,008 14,987 18,501 19,511 18,953 77,653 15.863 75.462 16,004
20flø.15,436 15,762 76,432 74.645 14,291 77,532 t8,662 18,313 17,747 15,253 74,902 17,026
2003 15323 75,742 15,o32 14,088 13,892 16,483 18,747 77,357 15.852 14.843 L3.749 15,086
2002 15,380 15,353 15,607 L5.067 14,72t 16,659 L8,206 17,493 15,925 14,900 t3,70\15,101
2001 15,577 15,884 16,343 14,956 !4,876 \7,790 78,174 78.752 15.902 15.552 74,42r 74,725
2000 75,727 14,405 14,985
1999 74.O77 14,653 15,639 74,726 73,567 15,945 18,030 17.850 16.675 15.075 13.560 14,860
1998 13,980 14,555 14,565 73.773 14.789 76,227 17,939 77,rt6 15,857 14,335 73,342 14,627
t997 12.66s 14,260 14,975 73,245 13,020 77,ttg t7,569 16,904 15.308 14.305 12.669 14,307
1996 12,552 73,446 74.r43 12.940 12,905 15,130 L6,994 16,940 14,983 13,652 72,674 13,187
1995 12.5s9 12,633 73,298 11,569 12,272 15,020 16,118 16.631 74.294 13.487 72.782 13,338
1994 72,4r7 72,542 L3,796 7L.727 TT,962 74,544 rs,342 15,753 74,325 72,897 71,852 12,973
1993 7r.220 11,305 12,595 70,877 70,720 13,181 14,669 14,557 13.431 1"2.r59 11.547 72,872
Averepe 16,180 L6,204 16,484 14,724 14,810 18.034 19.300 18.860 t7.sti¡15.933 L4,7tt t6,245
C.AIYR IAN I-FF MAR APR MAY JUN JUt AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
len Feb Mar APr Mav Jun Jul Aug sep Oct Nov Dec
16,180 16,204 76,484 14,724 14,810 18,034 19,300 18,860 17,5r3 15,933 14,777 1"6,245
Jan 16,180 1.00 1.00 t.o2 0.91 0.92 1.7r 1.19 1.77 1.08 0.98 0.91 1.00
Feb 76,204 1.00 1.00 r.o2 0.91 0.91 1.11 1.19 1.16 1.08 0.98 0.91 1.00
Mar 76,484 0.98 0.98 1.00 0.89 0.90 1.09 7.77 7.14 1.06 o.97 0.89 0.99
Apr 74,724 1.10 1.10 7.12 _ i.00
0.99
1.01
1.00
7.22
r.22
1.31 r.28 1.19 1.08 1.00 1.10
MaY 14,810 1.09 1.09 1.11 1.30 7.27 1.18 1.08 0.99 1.10
Jun 18.034 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.82 0.82 1.00 7.O7 1.05 o.97 0.88 o.82 0.90
Jul 19,300 0.84 0.84 0.85 o.76 o.77 0.93 1.00 0.98 0.91 0.83 o,76 0.84
AUE 18,860 0.86 0.86 0.87 0.78 o.79 0.96 7.O2 1.00 0.93 0.84 0.78 0.86
sep 17,573 0.92 0.93 0.94 0.84 0.85 1.03 1.10 1.08 1.00 0.91 0.84 0.93
Oct 15,933 r.o2 r.o2 1.03 0.92 0.93 1.13 7.2r 1.18 1.10 1.00 o.92 r.o2
Nov L4,777 1.10 1.10 I.I2 1.00 1.01 1.23 1.28 1.19 1.08 1.00 1.10
Dec 76,245 1.00 1.00 1.01 0.91 0.91 r.1I 1.19 1".16 1.08 0.98 0.91 1.00
Tr¡p Generotion Anolvs¡s
INC IN[,!IIINü..
5325 CR100
Carbondale, CO
Estimâtêd Trafflc
Iotll p.r
Tilpi
Toi.l
lilp!
lPcEsll
l@d)
V.hlcl.Trlp.p.r Horr lln Pctir)
Dtrætlo¡E E E E E E E E 6
E E E E E E E E Ë E E E
9
E
Fullnñ.
Cllnlcl¡ns 4 8 1 8
4 I cllniclans, each dilvê sep¿råtely, I
54
cl¡nlchnr 2 4 1 4
2 2 påd t¡me cllnlclåns. each drivê
séParåtêly, 10.4, 3x perwêek2
c 1 2 1 2
1 1 NußePrâdltioneron M,W F
iiom &101
D 6 12 1 12
4 2 4ådmlniskãtors, M-F 8'5, each
ddveseparately24
E ÁMShfr 1 2 I 2
1
1 Tèch duilnBAM sh¡it 6:45-3pm
1
F swtNGshlft 2 4 1 4
2
2 Techs dudng 5w¡n8sh¡ft 2-1opm
2
G OVERNIGHTShIfr 1 2 1 2
I lTech duringovernishtShift
9{5pm-7:154m1
H
SuppoÉStú
lch.rl 1 2 1 2
r I Cher1G6,5 days/weêk
1
SùppodS¡ff
(rr.ln!¡)1 2 I 2
1
1 tã¡¡er7:15'8:154m, 3x wëêk
1
I 6 72 I 3 1 2 2 vêh¡cles ons¡tè, used forlleld
ùlps, err.nds, ând âppointments (1
2 1 1 2
K
lF€d.x, Uml 2 4 1 4
1 I
1 7
t Full nñ.1 2 1 2
1 1 ¡rcundskeepe¡, M-F 8-5
1
1 2 2
1 1 p¡d tlñê maintenanæ, 1G4, 3x
perweek1m.1
Totâl peåk hou.r¡ps (ln
PROIIf NUMBER:
PREPARED BY:
DATE:
RWrS¡D:
M15æ
GWS
312312027
lotat dallytr¡ps (in PcEs)
29 vpd
29 vpd
58 vpd
Cu*oñ Tr¡p Gener¡tion cålculåtionsare based upon åntlc¡Pated Projedoperâtlons
I Pðssen8erc¿r Equ¡v.lents (PcEs) are basèd upon sêdlon 2.3{4)(e) ol the stãtè 01 coloßdo'sStote Hishwova..èss code
vpd =veh¡cles pèr day, vph = vehjclèr pêr hour
312
glo
.gB
o
l.
12am l¿m 2anì 3an 4¿m 5âñ 5am 7añ *ânì 9am 1o¿¡n 11im 12pm tpm 2pnr
i,
,,
:
, a:.
spnì 6pnr 7pm ap¡n 9pù lopm ltpnr
(vpd)(vpd)OLd¡on E E E Ê E E¡Ê E ı E E E E E E E
Tor¡l {ln PcE3l 29 58 58
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 0 4 1 3 2 1 0 0 2 o 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 I 2 2 1 7 3 9 1 0 0 0 2 0
4 4 5 4 2 1 tI 1 0 0 L 2 o000000L1216
Item #6
Provide a Landscaping Plan which meets criteria in Section 4-2O3.F. A waiver may be
requested pursuant to Section 4-202 with appropriate supporting evidence.
LANDSCAPE PLAN: A waiver is requested per LUDC 4-202.
There is no new landscaping proposed. Existing landscaping is appropriate for the proposed
use. No changes. See Photos Below
,?3
Item #7
Provide specific responses to lmpact Analysis items in Section 4-2O3.G of the LUDC.
LAND USED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVIEW:
Update: Feb.4,2021
PROJECT LOCATION:
5325 County Road 100, Carbondale, CO 81623
TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 2391 -193-00-046
PROJ ECT CONTACT I NFORMATION :
Laura Berreth, Director of Operations
Momenta Recovery
3302 S.GRAND AVE, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
P: 970-930-6355
Kirsten Thrap, Vice President
The Danco Group
5251 ERICSON WAY, ARCATA, CA 95521
P:707-331-0442
PROJECT RRATIVE:
The proposed project includes conversion of existing single-family home with guest suite into a
recovery center, a healing place for women. lt will be licensed for up to (12) residential clients.
The following analysis of the LUDC is provided in response to the pre-application conference
summary, dated Dec. 7, 2020. The project would be reviewed as a limited impact review. See
enclosed site plan.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN:
Waiver requested per LUDC. There is no change to any grading or drainage. A waiver is
requested per LUDC 4-202.
LAN PE PLAN:A waiver is requested per LUDC 4-202.
There is no new landscaping proposed. Existing landscaping is appropriate for the proposed
use. No changes.
IMPACT ANALYSIS PER LUDG 4.203.G:
The project does not include any land development or new construction. lt will create no impact
to the site.
1 . Adjacent land use: the existing use of the project site and adjacent properties is all
rural residentialwith large parcels with large pastures.
2. The site features include gently sloping grass pastures, landscaping areas with shrubs
and other plantings, good drainage and no creeks, streams, ponds, or other unique haþitat
areas.
3. Soil characteristics have no known slgnificant influence on the proposed use.
4. Geology and hazards have no known significant influence on the proposed use. The
existing facility is a permitted structure.
5. Groundwater and aquifer recharge is not an impact by the proposed project. An
inspection by Raun E Samuelson, Samuelson Pump Co. On 611912020, see letter. Existing well
is listed as 290 ft deep, 7x5" casing,250.77'standing water level, 4 hours test time, drawdown
to 252.80', production 5 gpm, recover back to 251.05' in 10 minutes. The proposed water use is
no greater than the existing dwelling unit at full capacity.
6. Environmental impacts to be evaluated:
a. Long term and short term effect of flora and fauna.
Response: none. The project does not change the existing types of uses
that may occur on a rural residential use vs. The proposed Group Home. This could be enjoying
the outdoor space, walking, gardening, tending to animals, and other typical activities. There is
no new development proposed.
b. Determination of the effect on designated environmental resources, including
critical wildlife habitat.
Response: no impact as there is no change in activities or any new
construction.
c. lmpacts on wildlife and domestic animals through creation of hazardous
attractions, alteration of existing native vegetation, blockade of migration routes,
use patterns, or other disruptions.
Response: no impact as there is no change in activities or any new
construction.
d. Evaluation of any potential radiation hazard that may have been identified by
the state or county health departments.
Response: there are no known radiation hazards.
7. There are no potential nuisances from the proposed use. There are not impacts on
adjacent land and there is no generation of any vapor, dust, smoke, noise, glare orvibration, or
other emanations.
8. Hours of operation. The proposed use includes a 2417 facility with up to (12) clients
staying as residents. There are always staff on-site. Additional support staff visit during regular
business hours most days.
STANDARDS PER LUDC ARTICLE 7. DIVISIONS 1.2. & 3 AS APPLIGABLE:
Thn n¡nnaan.l ^h^^^^ f.^* ^ l.,ni^^l .^^¡¡^^ri^l ,,a^ l^ ^^-+^, ..,i¿L:^ +L^ ^..:^+;^^rrre yrvPvèev vrrqrrvs rrvrrr s ryvruor rçor\rçrruol uÐE tL, a rt-uvvçry vçrrLçr vvtuilrr UtE; E'^tÐt¡ilv
structure and site development does not present any issues within Article 7 Standards of the
LUDC. Parking has been addressed, and an accessible parking space may be added. There is
sufficient water and wastewater capacity. The driveway is sufficient and well-constructed. There
is no negative impact on access to utilities, roadways, traffic, agricultural operations, fires,
habitat, or drainage. The types of activities are substantially similar to the rural residential uses.
Article 7. Division I - General Approval Standards:
7-101. Zone District Use Regulations: The project complies with zoning given
approval of the proposed use permit.
7 -1 02. Com prehens ive Plan & lntergovernmental Agreements : The project
complies with zoning given approval of the proposed use permit.
7-103. Compatibility: The proposed project is compatible in nature, scale, and
intensity as compared to adjacent land uses.
7-104. Source of Water: As demonstrated by the enclosed well evaluation
letters, the existing site has sufficient water supply for the intended use.
7-105. Central Water Distribution and Wastewater Systems: The project
includes existing on-site wellwater system with no external supply entity or central
system. The project includes existing on-site wastewater system that is adequate to
serve the proposed and use and density in accordance with the attached wastewater
system evaluation by a septic system professional and compliant with County OWTS
regulations.
7-106. Public Utilities: There are adequate public facilities including electric
power and all systems, connections, easements, locations, and dimensional
requirements are existing and in compliance.
7-107. Access and Roadways: The existing parcel includes an existing
driveway with compliant access to the public right-of-way. Access is safe, with adequate
capacity, and no additional roadways or access components are required.
7-108. Use of Land Subject to Natural Hazards: The site is not subject to any
known identified natural hazards as listed in this section.
7-109. Fire Protection: There is no change to the zoning and existing fÏre
protection district is just as adequate for the existing use as it would be for the proposed
use as a group home. The project does not include a subdivision.
Article 7. Division 2 - General Resource Protection Standards:
7-201. Agricultural Lands: The project does not limit agricultural operations,
and has no impact to animal controls, fences, roads, or ditches. The project does not
include any new construction.
7-202. Wildlife Habitat Areas: There are no proposed new structures or other
heavy construction which may cause any impact to wildlife habitat areas.
7-203. Protection of Waterbodies: There are no proposed new structures or
other heavy construction which may cause any impact to waterbodies. There are no on-
site or adjacent waterbodies associated with the project site. There are no issues with
setbacks related to waterbodies.
7-204. Drainage and Erosion: There are no proposed new structures, roads, or
other heavy construction which may cause any impact to drainage or erosion. There is
no subdivision of parcels which would require demonstration of positive drainage design
or compliance with CDPHE. There is no change to the stormwater run-off as there is no
new development.
7-205. Environmental Quality: There is no change to air or water quality by any
measure.
7-206. Wildfire Hazards: The existing structure and.parcel is not located in a
hazard area with slopes greater than 30% or within a fire chimney as identified by the
CSFS. There is no new development, and no new structures which would require
evaluation of roof materials and design.
7-207. Natural & Geologic Hazards: There are no changes to utilities,
avalanche hazard areas, landslide areas, rockfall hazards, alluvialfan hazards, slope
development, corrosive soils, mudflow areas, or faults.
7-208, Reclamation: The proposed pro¡ect does not include any development
that requires Land Use change.
Article 7. Division 3 - Site Planninq & Development Standards:
7-301. Compatible Design: There are no new structures proposed, and the
existing structures are compatible with the existing character of adjacent uses and the
proposed use. The existing site is organized in a way that provides privacy to adjacent
properties and creates no activities which may be of nuisance such as dust, odor, gas,
or fumes. There will be no new sources of noise. The proposed urse incluldes a 2417
facility with up to (12) clients staying as residents. There are always staff on-site.
Additional support staff visit during regular business hours most days. No new buffering
features are necessary.
7-302. Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards: Table 7-302.A Min. Off-
street parking standards by use does not include an exact match to the proposed Group
Home. ln accordance, any use not specifìcally listed shall be determined by the director
One similar use may be commercial lodging, which requires 1 space per room. The
existing facility has (7) bedrooms and therefore could be required to have (6) parking
spaces. However, clients to the group home will not bring their personal vehicles on site,
instead they will be shuttled with passenger vehicles to the property. Therefore, it is
reasonable to have not less parking spaces than the number of on-site staff members at
peak shift.
At peak shift, it is estimated that there will be as many as twelve (12) staff
members total at the eventual full-capacity. That would include approximately (3)
clinicians, (3) administrators, (4) behavioral health technicians, (1) chef, and (1)
maintenance / support staff. lf the director requires one parking space per staff member
at peak shift, then the property will require (12) parking spaces. This is represented on
the enclosed site plan.
7-303. Landscaping Standards: The proposed project does not include any
new required landscaping. The existing parcel includes existing established landscaping
and vegetation that is appropriate for the location and is compatible with the adjacent
area. The project does not include any new structures, subdivisions, other new
development which would require in depth analysis of Landscaping design per 7-303.F
and G. There is no impact to clear vision areas.
7-304. Lighting Standards: The proposed project does not include any new
exterior lighting. The existing exterior lighting is consistent of typical single-family
residences.
7-305. Snow Storage Standards: Residential uses except for multi-family are
exempt from this section, unless the residential use includes a common outdoor parking
area. The proposed group home use is a residential use, and is not classified as a multi-
family use. Even though this section is not applicable to the proposed project, the site
does include an unlimited access to snow storage without impacting public roadways or
drainage.
7-306. Trail and Walkway Standards: Single family dwellings are exempt from
this section. The proposed use as a group home is classified as residential use. There
-^... ¡--:r -- -!l^---^il- ^^----¡:---arc ilu ilcw uail ut ötuew¡rtK uuillteuuuiltt.
NOTE REGARDING OFFICE USE:
The use as a group home includes support staff who generally work with clients in various
settings including private and semi-private meeting rooms or cffices. These support staff
members include clinicians, administrators, technicians, and others. While the project does
include offlce-type areas within the existing facilities, those spaces are accessory to the overall
use as a group home (see following section) and are all dedicated to the activities taking place
at the given physical location and operation. On-site offices are not considered a separate use
to be applied to this project.
SECTION 7.704 GROUP HOME FACILITIES:
a. The proposed project shall be in compliance with and all applicable federal, state, and
local permits shall be obtained and maintained.
b. The project location does not create a concentration and is not located within 300 ft of
another known group home. The project does not constitute any threat to health, safety, or
welfare of the community.
c. The facility is appropriately staffed with on-site staff at all times. There is sufficient
area to not cause any queuing into or waiting in the public right of way.
d. Short term care facilities in a residential district are listed under d.1.a. As not to
exceed 6 persons for each dwelling unit. The existing facility includes a separate guest wing that
has its own full kitchen, bathroom, bedrooms and living space. Therefore, the LUDC would limit
the number of clients lo (12) maximum.
e. The proposed project is not a transitional housing facility.
Item #8
Provide information on the water supply plan including a 4-hour pump test which
demonstrates adequate water to serve the proposed use. Alternatively, you may submit
a request to fulfill this requirement as a condition of approval..
Samuelson Pump Company
P.O. Box 297
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
970-945-6309
970 947 92148 (Fax)
.¡EiW4W¡å,
WELL TEST CONTRACT
DATE | 4/8/2t
This Contract and Work Order requests that Samuelson Pump CO., lnc, undertake the testing of well or wells
Property legal description and street address:5325 Cou Road 1"00
rbondale. Co.81€,?-3
Buyer's name or agent, address and ph one number: Kjfsten Tharp
f)r nrn Groun
5ll5:1 Fricson Wav Ste A
Ar.ålâ Câ 95r;21
Fma il ktha rn anco-srouû_com
Phone -331-0442
Description of work or service to be performed at above address:Jlun a 4 hr test with recoverv using exsitne equipment
at 5325 CR 100.
Total price to be paid in advance: S 1500.00
It is agreed that the above amount is only an estimate made prior to full examination of the property and existing
conditions. The owner of the property and the person signing th¡s Contract and Work Order are responsible for the
actual and final costs of labor, work perfcrrmed, materials and equipment repaired or installed on the property. lf
completed within thirty (30) days, such bill shall be duer upon receiprt. lf the work requires more than thirty (30) days,
the responsible party shall be billed eve4r thirty (30) days for work in pro8ress for labor, work performed, equipment,
materialsfurnisheciancionthepropertypriortosuchbilling. lfanybill isnotpaidwithinthirty(30)daysuponreceipt,
the unpaid balance shall incur ínterest at 11"/2 % per morrth. ln the event Samuelson Pump Co., lnc. shall incur costs
and fees to collect any unpaid charges, sltch costs and fees, includirrg reasonable attorney fees (whether a suit was filed
or not) shall be due and owing to Samuelson Pump Co., lnc.
SAMUËISON PC0 rNc.
Dated /í Y .1-. ¡lly
PR()PERTY OWNER/UYER/AGENT:
atl)t)ñ),1 llyDated:
PC Box 2.97 t Glenv¡ood Sp,rings CO €ilr5[.]2 t (.rì7ût ç,15-6:i]g. f:o;r (Çll0) qü-ç)448
Item #9
Provide information on the wastewater treatment plan which demonstrates adequate capacity to
serve the proposed use. Alternatively, you may submit a request to fulfill this requirement as a
condition of approval.
d kffi,r 9399 West Higgins Rd Ste 1100
Rosemont, lL, 60018
877-889-8195
www.cutligan.com
Phone:
Web:
Page 1 of5
Report Date: 611712020
Anal,,';is Numben 2005418
Culligan Water Conditioning of Carbondale,
Colorado
1107 Hendrick Drive
C ERTIF ICATE OF ANALYSIS
r00
Ca¡bondale CO,81623
Control Number:90513
Account Number: 10005152
Collected By:
Misc:
SAMPLE INFORMATIONT
Analysis Type Requestëd: S¡lver/Realtor Well Test
Sampled: 6t1512020 at 9:22 AM Supply/Source: Pr¡vate Well Conrlírion:
Received: 611612020 at 10:48 AM Sampl¡ng po¡nl: Faucet Application:
Th¡s Cert¡fìcate óf Añalysis compãres the actual test result to national standardr\ ¡s defined ìn the EPA's Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulâtions.
Primary Standards: Are expressed as the maximum contaminant level (MCL) which is the h¡ghest level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking waler.
MCLs are enfotceâble stândards.
Secondãry Stândards: Are non-enlorceable gu¡delines regulat¡ng contaminants that may câuse cosmetic effects (such as Ekin or looth discolorat¡on) or
aeslhet¡c effects (such as tasle, odor, or color) in drinking watêr. Some states may choose to adôpt that as enforceable standards.
mg/L (ppm): Unless olherw¡se indicated, rêsults and stândards are expressed as an amount in milligrams per liter or parts per million.
ug/L (ppb): Unless olheruise indicated, results and stândards are expressed as an amount in m¡crograms per liter or parts per billion.
^El
lrml. ^^l^ñr¡ f^rili^^ ' '^¡r- ^^r ı¡ll¡l¡^'vrrrL¡v vrrrro Pù' rrI[rnrs¡
Reporting Detectlon Levèl (RDL): The lowest concentration level that the laboratory cân detect a contam¡nant.
ND; The ôontamin8nt was not detected above lhe m¡nimun detect¡on level.
NA: The contam¡nant was nol ana¡f¿ed.
. non-TNl accred¡ted paramelêr -- - lL-lDpH accredited parameter
Status
The oonttminant r,vas not detected ¡n the sample sbove the m¡nimum detection level.
The contam¡nant was detected below National Standard limit.
The contaminanl was detected above National Standard limit.
cc:
ffi
ffi
@
Gustomer: Ami Flynn
Status Contaminant Results RDL
Page 2 of 5
Un¡ts Method EPA Limit Analvsis Date/Time eual
ffi TotalArsenic 1 ,11 1.000 ug/L 200.8 R5.4 10.00 611712020 at 11:48
E Lêad (Pb)<1.000 1.000 ug/L 200.8 R5.4 15.00 611712020 at 11:37
ffieqsFw Nitrate as N 0.81 0.200 mg/L 300.0 R2.1 10.00 611712020 al 8;50
ffi Nitrite as N <0. 1 00 0.100 mq/L 300.0 R2.1 1.00 611712020 at 8:50
ffi E. Coli**Non-detecled sM9223B
Coli-18
611712020 at 8:05
H Total Coliform*'Nondetected sM9223B
Col¡-18
611712020 al 8:05
This report can only be reproduced ¡n its entirety. The resulls repoded here are represenlative of the sample as received in the laboratory. Unless noted
hold¡ng times and temperature requ¡rements for method 300 are not followed. pH results are out of hold time.
This analysis will not determine whether a waler is safe for human consumption,
ANATYTE QUALIFIERS
Hl An¿lysis conductied outis¡de tfhe EpA metihod hotding time
H2 Sample rece¡ved ôutisíde EpA metihod tiemperatjure requ¡rementis
P Sample received outiside tihe ÊpA metihod preseruative requirementi
C Sample received in an inãppropr¡atie sample contiainer
T lnsuficienti semple rece¡ved firom clientitio perfiorm tihe analys¡s per EPA metihod requ¡rementisg Analvtie was detiectied ¡n an assoc¡atied blank ati a concentiration Ereatier tihan tihe MOL
M M¡croblologi6lanâlyslsinftiatiedmoretihar8ohoursafier5amplecollection. Analysiswascompletieduponclientiapproval
SH The sãmpler's nâme and signatiure were nori listied on tjhe COC
SF Sample collection daties and rimes were noti listied on tihe COC
A The sâmple was analyzed by serral dilution
D The precision betiween tihe sample and sample dupllcatie exceeded laboratiory contirol l¡m¡tjs
I This analytìe exceeded secondâry soufce ver¡fication cr¡tiêria lovrhigh fior tihe initial ca¡¡bration This rèportied resultì should be côns¡dered an estimðtied
val ue.
ss This analytie did noti meeti tihe secondary source verification critier¡a tior tihe in¡tial cal¡bratidihe reportied resulti should be cons¡dered ¿n estimatied valæFS The sample was filti€Íed in ñhe laboratiory prror tlo analysrs
R Resultis confirmed by second analysis
SC This reporti contiðins datiã tihati we¡e produced by subcontiractied lãboratiorycertified fior tihe fields ofi tiesting perfiormedDM Non-metihod d¡gestion process ìs tìollowed
MM M€tihod mod¡ficahon- notj firom dhe acid¡fied well mlxêd sampte
NELAP Certif¡cations: tL-100213; pA-68-04623; Ny-1 1 756; TX-TX269-2007A
State Certi{ications: tL-tDPH-1 TS9B: CA-2958: MT-CERT0091 ; tA-369;
W{2199; Wl-l05-10119; COIL1002l3; Mt_9988; MO-1060
Maria Mozdzen
Analytical Lab lr,ianager
Page 3 of 5
pH - lhe acid strength of watêr on a scale of 0 lo 14 (neutral = pH 7.0). Values from 7*0 are increasingly more acidic; values from
7+14 are increasingly more alkaline, The recommended ranoe for dr¡nkino wale¡ [nder the l.l.S. re0ulat¡ons is 6 5 to I 5
Conductivlty - the relative ability of water to carry an electrical cunent, used to estimate the total concentration of dissolved ions.
Turbidity Un¡ts (NTUS). The mandalory max¡mum under U.S. regulations ¡s 0.5 NTU. Turbidity Filtered is measured after 11 micron filter paper.
Color - the amouill of lr¡ownish-yellow color from dlssÕlvêd lânnlns lrôm vê0êtallôn (llkê tea) and melals (like ntst) anrJ their comhinâtiûns,
measurêd on an arbitrary scale. The recommended maximum under U.S. regulations is 1S CU.
Silica, SlO, - a nalurally occurdng d¡ssolved mineral, which produces ä glassy scãle in high temperature equipment but is more ¡mpo¡tant in
predicting the life of certa¡n water treatment media,
Hydrogen Sullide, H¡S - a toxic, noxious, corroslve gas that smells llke [otten eggs. Bacteria âcting on sulfate or organic sulfurconta¡ning
materials in the absence of oxygen produce it. Only "special" water ãnalyses can determine hydrogên sulfide levels.
Total H¡rdnoss - thê sum of all mêtal ¡ons which rcâct with soap lo inhib¡t sudsing ånd form "ßcum' or "bathtub ring' - ¡¡qslly CelcÌum and
Magnesium. When healed or evaporated, herd wat€r can cause l¡me scåle that can dopos¡l on sink and shower lixtursg and walls and resull in
loss ¡n ðfficiëncy or fuel wâstè In waler heaters , bo¡lers, and cÕoling syslems.
Totâl Alkalln¡ty - thê sum of hydroxide (OHl, carbonate (CO;,), and bicarbonate (HCO;) ions, which can combine with both acids and bases,
which act lo buffer waler and prevent sudden uncontrolled changes in pH .
câtíons - ìons (atôms or molecules with an electr¡cal charge) with a positive (+) electrical charge, so named becâuse they go toward the cathode
in an electric field. Bes¡des the hardness ions, the ma¡n cations in wâÎer åre sodium, Na -, and potassium, K..
Anions - ions (aloms or molecules w¡th an electr¡cal charge) wilh a negat¡ve G) electr¡cal charge, so named because lhey go towârd the anode in
an electric field. The main an¡ons ¡n water are hydroxide (OH -), carbonate (CO;¡), bicarbonate (HCO;) (which together comprise "alkal¡n¡ty'),
sulfate (SOr¡), nitrate (NO3-) and chloride (Ct').
Nitrate/Nitrite, NOI-/NO¡- - ¡mportant because of toxicity to ¡nfants, nitrale comes from fertilizers and an¡mãl wasles. Water suppl¡es with high
nitrate ¡evels should also be screened for agr¡cultural pestic¡des and bacte¡¡al contrâmination. The mandatôry l¡mit under U.S. regulations is 10 mg/L-
Sulfâtè, soa-¡ ' a common mineral component, only rarely occurring at excessive levols, which can cause a temporary diarrhea in visitors who
hav€ not become accl¡maled to it. Recommended U.S. l¡mit, 250 mg/L.
Fluoride, F- - often added to water to ¡nhibit looth decay. Mandatory U.S. limits range from 4.0 mg/ L ¡n northern reg¡ons to 1 .4 mg/L in southern
regions (where more water ¡n consumed).
Chlorlde, Cf - a common mineral component, can be found in êlevated levels near seawaler and othe¡ salt supplies, which can cause taste
problems ând can conhibuts to corosion. Recommonded U.S. l¡mit, 250 mg/L.
lron, Fe - cause of metall¡c taste, rusl stains on laundry and porcelain f¡xtures, and clogging/fouling of equipment. The recommended U.S. ¡imit is 0.3
mg/l.
Manganese, Mn - cause of metallic taste and black sta¡ns on laundry and porcelain. Often occurs in combinat¡on wlth iron. The recommended U.S.
limit is 0.05 mg/L Mn or a total of 0.3 mgi L of Fe + Mn.
Coppet, Cu - cause of grêen stains on porcelain ãnd f¡ttings, sèldom naturally-occuning, usually due lo corosion. The mandatory U.S. 'acl¡ons
level" of ,|.3 mg/L is t¡ed to the regulat¡on for lead contamination due to corros¡on of plumbing mat€rials .
Z¡nc, Zn - cause of metall¡c taste and upset stomach. Due to coûosion of galvanized plumbing matêr¡als. Recommended U.S. limit, 5.0 mg/L.
DETERMINATION OF POTENTIAL NUISANCE BACTERIA POPULATION (cfu/mL - colony forming units pe¡ m¡llil¡ter)
Slime Form¡ng Bactêr¡â lron Rèlatêd Bactèria Sulfale Reducing Becter¡e
1,750,000-Aggressive 570,000-Aggress¡ve 2,200,000-Aggressive
440,000-Aggress¡ve 1 40,O00-Aggressive 500,000-Aggress¡ve
67,000-Aggressive 35,ooo-Aggressive I 1 S,o0o-Aggressive
1 3,o00-Moderate 9,o0o-Aggressive 27,ooo-Aggressive
2,Soo-Moderate 2,200-Moderatê 6000-Aggressive
5oo-Moderate soo-Moderats l4o$Modorate
100-NotAggressive 150-ModeÌate 325-Moderate
o-None Present Zs-Moderate 7s-Moderate
8-Not Aggressive 20-Not Aggress¡ve
0-None Present S-NotAggressive
0-None Present
Un¡ts of Concentratlon used in this Rêport
gpg-abbrev¡at¡on for "grains per gallon' calculated in le¡ms of calcium carbonate equivalents. Multiply by 17.12 to convert gpg into
e¡ther ppm or mg/L.
ppm-ebbr6viat¡on for "parts per million-" lnterchangeeble with mg/L.
mg/L-ebbreviation for "milllgrams per liter,' lnterchangeable with ppm. (There are one million mill¡grams ¡n a liter of pure watêr).
ppb-abbreviãlion for "parts per b¡llion." lnlerchangeable with pg/ L o¡ micrograms per liter.
¡.tg/L-abbreviation for "micrograms per liter." lnterchangêable wilh ppb. (There are a billion micrograms in a liter).
1000 ppb = I ppm; 1000 Ug/L = 1 mg/L
Page 5 of 5
iltíiltfillffilfflilffiÍiltffi flililt/
51¡
SAMPLE ñUBMITTAD BY
.{ccount Nurnber¡
Account Name:
Phone Numben
II.MAIL:
Person Ttking
I)ûfe Sâmpls Tfiken
C USTOMER INI'ORSI"ATICIN
Customcr NEme¡
City;
Customer reported coücern:
SÀÙIPLE I N Ë.Q fìIlI ATTÛNI
Rosenronf; IL 60û1S
Time Sample Taken:
Co'trol ¡r.¡*r.90513
rNc.
#rÊ
å1623
S-rr^. ** . --
Culligan In ternrtional Compauy Analytical L¡rboratory
9399 lV. Higgins Road Suite I t0t
\*
Stäte: (O ..-T,ip: *¡&l Z
Water Supply: Privatc t,.," MunicipalSource: Surface_ Well,f¿j]T'knowrCondition: 'lìealed *.*_ Untreâre
Sample Poinu .tlaucet *g-- Ëquipmcni-- OtherApplication: Household
uommellL\ì
ANALYSIS RtrQUISTED:
-Standa¡'d Ä,nalyr is: *__
Standard rvÆOC;
ÍIen:oclialysis Basi; :
Hemodíalysís Cornpl*ı _ßacreria: Ircn** .,Sullhte_Slimq_
For Questiorrs contacl Rick
Scale Analvsis:
Resir: Anah,sis:
Ðepth Þ'iltár nnãysF.-
Arscnic Filter
voc
Speciat r\,natysis: {Lisr Analysis **c¡u"ur"Or, ffi& ffi "p4*Cook at (84 7) 430-1284 or Maria Moz-dzen at (847)430-12t9
l.Åa ust oNLï:
.^ $Mrple rsc¿ircd ¡n accrplnblc ccnditior¡: ys __* No * -,lfnut rc¿vu:ßr*h'edby: _.Ijqrc; 'limr:
t)Lyroeiriïtr
Customer:
Litigation samples are
Please
Please print your nåtne:Its:
WATTRI AW
l'^l'RICK I lvtll.l.IR I Nö'l'O
June 19,2020
Arni & Patrick Flynn
scott c. Mitter' Via email
shãrsholdðr
mrller@rvaterlaw.com
rèply to Aspen of¡ce
'liænsed ¡n co
ASPEN:
'197 Prospector Dr.
Suite 2104 A
Aspen. CO 81611
T. 970.920.1030
F- 970.925.6847
BASALl
Waterlaw Riverwalk
229 Midland Avenue
Basalt, CO 8f 621
T.970.920.1030
F.970.927.1030
DENVER:
999 .18rh St.
30lh Floor
Denver, CO 60202
T- 303.893.9700
F.303.893.7900
I ULSA:
7633 E. 63rd Pl.
Suite 300- 18
Tulsa, OK 74133
r.800.282.5450
F.970,927.f030
SCOTTSDALE:
16427 N. Scottsdale Rd.
Suite 4f 0
Scottsdale, 4285254
T.8UU.282.b458
F- 970.927.1030
www.wäletlåw.cûrlì
Confidential, Attorney-Client Privileged Communication
RE: Water due diligence for Drake Property (ourfile # 1433A)
Dear Ami and Patrick:
Per your request, we undertook a due diligence review of the water rights and
resources associated with 5325 County Road 100 owned by William Drake Trust
& Martha Drake Trust (the "Property") located in Carbondale, Colorado. To
perform this investigation, we reviewed relevant portions of the purchase and sale
contract and title commitment, as well as information provided by the Sellers. We
also reviewed copies of the relevant water rights clecrees, cliversion and
administrative call records, and well permit hles, all on file with the Colorado
Division of Water Resources; as well as other various documents. Our review did
not uncover any issues that should necessarily prevent you from moving forward
with closing. However, we note a few issues in bold below that you should be
particularly aware of. We did not perform a water rights title review and this letter
is not a title opinion.
I. Introduction to Colorado water law.
A brief overview of Colorado water law should help you understand the water
rights and resources associated with the Property. Colorado water law is based on
the prior appropriation system. Under this system, the state administers water
rights according to their priority dates, which are a function of their adjudication
dates andtheir appropriation dates. The adjudication date is the date on which the
--,^+^- ^^--¿ l^^-^ ^^ +L^ -:^L+ ^-J +L^ ^.^--^.^-:^+i^- l^+^ :^ +L^ l^+^ ^- ..,L:^L +L^w(llçl vuurL uçurççù urç rrérllr 4lrLl [lrE 4PPruPrrdu\ru Lr4tç rù rrru \"r41ç rjrl wrlrurl Lllu
owner of the right first initiates the appropriation. The adjudication date generally
controls a water right's seniority and administration. However, if two water rights
are decreed in the same year, the one with the earlier appropriation date will have
the more senior priority.
Under the prior appropriation doctrine, whenever there is an insufficient amount
of water in a stream to meet the demands of a senior water right, the owner of that
right can place a call (i.e. inform the local water commissioner that he or she is
not receiving a full allocation of water). The water commissioner will then curtail
Protessional Corp.
Letter to Flynns
Iune 19,2020
Page2
WATERLAW PArRrcK 1 rvuu FR N{)rc)
junior water rights by shutting down headgates, wells and other diversions in reverse order of
priority, i.e.,2020 rights are curtailed first, then2019, then 2018, and so on until the senior
rights are satisfied. The owner of the senior right is entitled to divert his or her fulI decreed
amount of water before junior appropriators can divert. Thus, the seniority of a water right is
important.
If the owner of a junior water right wishes to prevent curtailment, he or she can apply to the
water court for a plan for augmentation.In simple terms, a plan for augmentation is alegal
water supply plan designed to replace water back into the stream to ofßet depletions from a
new junior water use. This allows a junior right to continue diverting during a call. Common
sources of augmentation water include consumptive use credits associated with the dry-up of
historically inigated lands and/or releases of water previously stored in priority.
Finally, it will be helpful for you to understand how water is typically measured. The
standard flow rate measurement is a c.f.s., or a cubic foot of water per second of time. 1 c.f.s.
equals approximately 450 gallons of water flowing by a particular point in one minute (a
g.p.m.), or an amount of water with the approximate diameter of a basketball flowing by each
second. The standard volumetric measure of water is an acre-foot. 1 acre-foot equals
approximately 326,000 gallons. A way to picture this amount is as an acre of land (a football
field minus the end zones) inundated with water to a depth of one foot.
il.Domestic and lawn and garden water supply.
A. Exempt \ilell - Permit 87371-Á,.
The Property is served by a wcll permitted under State Engineer well permit no. 8737I-4.
This well permit allows for up to three single family dwellings, I acre of lawn and garden
irrigation, "domestic animals" watering and fire protection. "Domestic animals" includes 3-4
horses or a few cows, llamas, etc., by definition, but would not include â horse boarding
operation with many horses.
In 2007, the Drakes received Garfield County special use approval for a "two-family
dwelling unit." This is in addition to the main single family residence which was built in
1990. The survey shows three small wood buildings by the bam to the west of the main
residence. \ile are not aware of how manl, if any, of the wood buildings are occupied as
"dwelling unitson or whether you intend to use these as dwelling units. The potential
water issue here is the 3 dwelling limit on the well permit and staying within that limit.
The main residence and the special use unit are covered, leaving one additional unit which
could be covered under the well permit.
The well was constructed on 1211211996 to a depth of 320 feet, under an emergency approval
to replace the prior well on the Property. We do not know the circumstances of what
happened to the prior well. The State well permit file indicates some open questions
Letter to Flynns
Junc 19,2020
Page 3
WATERLAW pArrìrcK r N4rrrER NOrc)
about whether the prior well was properly cäpped änd abàndoned. We are not äware of
thc whcthcr that itcm has been completed and you may wish to inquire with thc Seller
or investigate further. Schedule B-2 Title exception #20 also raises this same issue.
It's our understanding that Samuelson Pump Company will be performing a well pump test
on the well to assess its actual production capacity. We will await the result of that test
before opining further on that. I believe Patty has obtained an extension to your due
diligence inspection period for those results, but it not, this should be done.
In and around 2006-2007 a 10,000 gallon cistern with a dry hydrant connection was installed
on the Property for fire protection. This can be filled from the well and should remain topped
off under normal circumstances. however. this does provide some emergency back-up water
ifneeded.
Upon closing, you will need to fïle notices with the State Engineerns Office indicating
that you are the new owner of the above exempt well permit. Typically the title
company will have that document drafted for closing, however, we can draft and
submit this notice as well.
III. Irrigation water supply: Missouri Heights - Mountain Meadows Irrigation Co.
A. MMHIC shares.
The primary source of inigation water for the Property, aside from the one acre irrigation use
permitted under the above well permit, is shares of stock in MHMMIC. MHMMIC is a
Colorado non-profit corporation that owns, holds title to, operates, and maintains an
irrigation water system that serves the greater Missouri Heights area. Currently, corporate
records indicate Martha Drake and the William Drake estate own 190 Class B shares
associated with the Property.
The shares of stock a-re held in the individual Drake names a¡d thr-rs" if yor-r close on the
Property, you will need to receive an appropriate deed and assignment for the stock
shares from Martha Ann Drake and the William F. Drake Jr Trust, even though the
general warranty deed for the Property wilt be from the Martha Minohr Drake Trust
and William F. Drake Jr. Trust. This is partially because the ditch company books record a
different 190 shares of stock once held by the Martha Minohr Drake Trust and sold to
Lassiter in July, 2015, associated with the two 35 acres parcels to the south of the Property.
Your purchase contract does not speci$ the exact type of deed to use for the water rights
transfer, but generally, water rights are transfened by bargain and sale deed or quit claim
deed. Those type of deeds do not come with any warranty of title. If negotiable, I would
prefer to see a special warranty deed in this situation, which comes with a warranty
that the seller has not done anything to adversely affect title during their ownership. In
Letter to Flynns
June 19,2020
Page 4
WATERLAW pArRlcK ì N4u r,FR r-w(-)ro
any event, I am happy to prepare andlor review whatever instrument is ultimately used for
transfer.
MHMMIC has its own forms and process for assignment of corporate shares. We would be
happy to fill out the forms on your behalf, and note that MHMMIC assesses a transfer fee of
$1b0 per stock certificate to be paid by the transferee. MHMMIC also requires payment
for all the Company's attorney fees for making the transfer on the books or other time
related to the transaction. This would be a negotiable item between Buyer and Seller as
to who pays this. This item should be worked out as part of the inspection deadline.
MHMMIC has a relatively new "Agreement for Assignment" which must be signed by
Buyer and Seller. This Agreement for Assignment must be signed in advance of closing as
the Board will review and approve; then the actual assignment will be done at closing. Of
particular note in this Agreement is a paragraph dealing with whether the share of
stock witl be encumbered as part of your loan collateral, or not. Ideally, you would not
want to pledge the stock as collaterat. If that is your intention (and the Bank will allow)'
then this will need to be made clear in the Deed of Trust. We can work with title
company on these issues, if you need.
MHMMIC's Class B shares are sourced from the Spring Park Reservoir storage water right,
decreed in 1918 in Civil Action 1997, Garfteld County District Court, for 2843 acre-feet fill
and re-fill for irrigation and livestock uses, with an appropriation date of December 28,1911.
MHMMIC can also source its Class B shares with 47 c.f.s. decreed to the Landis Canal
surface water right in 1958 in Civil Action 4613, Garfield County District Court, for power
generation, irrigation, domestic, municipal, livestock water, piscatorial, and industrial uses,
with an appropriation date of July 29,1957. The Landis Canal is owned by BWCD and made
available to MHMMIC through a 1979 agreement. The 47 c.f.s. can legally be diverted at the
headgate of the Mountain Meadow Ditch per the decree issued in Case No. 79CW333,
Division 5 Water Court. The Property's 190 Class B shares equal 1.0 c.f.s. of flow rate.
The 1.0 c.f.s. is more than sufficient flow rate to irrigate the Property, when the water is
available.
B. MHMMIC operations.
MHMMIC's operations are governed by the Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws
dated September 8,2011 ("Bylaws") and enclosed for your review. MHMMIC begins each
irrigation season by delivering to stockholders water under Class I shares. However, these
shares of stock run out because of water calls on Cattle Creek, shortly after spring run-off or
early ir'rigation season. Once the ditch right is shut off, MHMMIC begins delivering to
stockholders the water to which they are entitled under their Class B shares. The Property has
Class B shares. These are generally considered better than Class A shares because they allow
for irrigation water to be delivered later throughout the season.
Letter to Flynns
Jule 19" 2020
Page 5
WATERLAW pArRrcK . r4n r,ER NOro
MHMMIC sets the number of draw days out of Spring Park Reservoir at the beginning of
each irrigation season in accordance with the relative success of the winter/spring reservoir
fill out of Cattle Creek ancl the anticipated dates of the Clattle Creek call. A 16-day draw
represents an average water year. A 23 day draw represents a good water year and a full
Reservoir.
A shareholder can designate when they want to use theirs draw days. However, as the case
with the Drake Property, usually this is coordinatecl with your neighbors to receive your
shares during similar time periods in order to take advantage of efficiencies in delivery.
Thus, there is a collective effort to decide when the best time for irrigation will be from year
to year. Having said that, late June through mid-August tends to be the best time period for
utilizing the Class B shares, assuming an average to good water year and Reservoir
availability. Class B shares can be available into September in good water years.
MHMMIC is governed by a five-member Board of Directors. The Board elected each year at
the annual meeting of the MHMMIC stockholders, with each share in the corporation entitled
to one vote. Amongst other duties, the Board makes annual assessments, due by April I of
each year, for purposes operating, repairing, and maintaining the MHMMIC system; enforces
any failures to pay the annual assessment through the remedies set forth in Article VII.G of
the Bylaws; and sets various rules and regulations relating to general management of the
affairs, property, and business of MHMMIC. For purposes of future development of the
Property, we highlight the following rules:
A property owner must secure written permission from the Board prior to
constructing a flume, pedestrian bridge, utility crossing, driveway, culvert, pump,
lateral, or any other structure, across, over, or under the ditch, or placing a permanent
or temporary check, wheel, clam, or other obstruction into the ditch. The process for
securing such permission is outlined in Article VI.I of the Bylaws and includes
reimhrlrsing MHMMIC for reasonable related legal ancl engineering fees up to a
maximum total of $5,000.
a
o
a
In the event that a shareholder subdivides or conveys to a third party less than all of
his or her real propcrty inigatcd under MHMMIC, the associated shares must be
conveyed to a homeowners' association rather than split or divided amongst the
resulting parcels or lots.
Shareholders may lease their MHMMIC water to third parties for use on lands
historically inigated under MHMMIC's system in accordance with the process set
forth in Article XVI.F of the Bylaws.
a No shareholder may change the type or place of use of any portion of MHMMIC's
water rights.
Letter to Flynns
June 79,2020
Page 6
WATERLAW pArRrcK r r\4rr-t-tR r.\,oro
Assessments for any capital improvements to the MHMMIC system must be made
upon an affirmative vote of 75Yo of a quorum of MHMMIC's total shares.
a
MHMMIC's current assessment is $5 per share for general operations, maintenance'
and repairs, and 52 per share for capital improvements. It is our understanding the
assessments for 2020 have been paid by Seller but this should be confirmed. There may
be a pro rated adjustment at closing for this item.
Delivery of water to the Properly is accomplished via releases out of Spring Park Reservoir,
into a main lateral known as the "Highline Lateral." The water then runs along the north side
of Hunt Ranch, and across the north side of Strang Ranch. It then splits into two main
branches - the branch serving the McElnea, Drake and Lassiter properties runs south along
County Rd 100 before spitting off into smaller laterals. MHMMIC is responsible for
operation and maintenance of the main Highline Lateral. There was a major recent upgrade
to the sub-lateral system serving the McElnea, Drake and Lassiter properties, including 4.5
miles of new piping. According to Ted Potter, ranch manager for the McElnea property to
the north of the Property, this has greatly increased the carriage capacity to the properties on
the southeast end of the system.
Although the MHMMIC is responsible for operation and maintenance of the primary
ditch/pipeline laterals, you and your neighbors will be responsible for the smaller sub-
laterals. You may want to investigate further as to where the cut-off is in this regard.
Interview with Ted Potter
I interviewed Ted Potter who has great familiarity with the water delivery to this area of
Missouri Heights, including the Drake Property. His company, Potter Fatms, has run cattle
on the Drake Property and he has helped Ms. Drake with inigation of the Property, in the
past; thus, he has first-hand knowledge of, the Property. The following are some highlights
from that interview:
. Usually in average to good water years, in April and May, the Property will receive
"free" water for about 10 days to 2 weeks, through the subJateral ditch system, i.e.,
you will not need to use your Class B draw days for this water.
o However, in very dry years like this year, this free water is limited or not available
o In good years, the draw can be up to 23 days
o In average years, the draw will be 16 days
o In bad years, like this year, the draw can be less than 16 days, and the Reservoir may
run out by mid-June. This year, which is one of the worst Mr. Potter has ever seen,
the Class B water is done and there will be no more MHMMIC water available to the
Property this year
o The Drake Property needs to receive its fuIl 1 c.f.s. because of the sizing of its pump
and irrigation system. It does not run well on less of a flow rate
Letter to Flynns
June 19,2020
PageT
WATERLAW pArRrcK rN,uLr-rR NOro
o 'l'he Drake Property neecls several improvements to make the irrigation more effic,ient
and to "stretch the water." There a few sink hole spots on the Property where water is
being trapped. There is a lot of sage brush and yellow clover which sucks up the
available water
With some system improvements, there is no reason the Property could not grow
healtþ pasture grass or hay for grazing. Property probably cannot support a lot of
grazing but a few horses would be fine.
IIc rc-built thc Drake irrigation pump last ycar so it should bc in good shapc,
currently.
There is another ditch piping project coming up soon. $35,000 upgrade to system
from Panorama to the fire station on County Rd. 100. 24" pipe. This will be a capital
improvement split among approximately 1200 shares. The Property's 190 shares
represents approx. 160lo, thus, $5540 as a potential future expense to you.
IV. Conclusion.
In sum, we did not uncover any issues in our investigation that should prevent you from
moving forward under the purchase contract. However, we highlighted a few issues that you
should consider during your investigation phase, and some items that should be clarified or
negotiated before closing. Thank you for your business, and please feel free to contact me
with any questions or to discuss any of this.
Very truly yours,
Patrick I Miller lNoto
A Professional Corporation
Scott C. Miller
millerC@waterlaw.com
a
a
o
By
Item #10
Please provide information for all required sections identified in Section 4-203(E) for a Grading
and Drainage Plan or provide a waiver request which includes specific responses in accordance
with section 4-202 Waiver of Submission Requirements. A waiver request should include
specific responses to the criteria in Section 4-202 and appropriate supporting evidence such as
a statement from a qualified professional indicating positive drainage off the site, and whether
changes to grading and drainage are proposed.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN:
Waiver requested per LUDC. There is no change to any grading or drainage. A waiver is
requested per LUDC 4-202
Ñ rprt r v*{æ.*rd{" '&
çç¿, rr*f #r$&jå";ó
Item #11
The application should include information on the status of any permits for the proposed
use including but not limited to those with GDPHE and the State
Súafe of Colorado
Department of Human Senzices
Office of Behavioral Health
Approves
Momenta
3302 S. Grand Avenue
Glenwood Spnngs Colorado 81601
License Number: 1985-02
for the detivery of Substance Use Disorder Treatment Seryices in accordance with
Secfion 2 CCR 502-1 Vol 21, Colorado Code of Regulations, and is licensed for the
following services;
Gender Responsive Treatment for Women
General Treatment
Effective Date: 08/05/2020
Expiration Date: 08/05/2022
License Status: Full
ASAM Level 1;ASAM Level2.1;ASAM Level2.5;ASAM Level3.5
ASAM Level 1;ASAM Level2.1;ASAM Level2.5;ASAM Level3.5
Barbara Johnson, Manager, Licensing & Designation
Office of Behavioral Health
Colorado Department of Human Servrbes
Gøffield Coúlnty
January 20,2020
Kirsten Thrap
Danco Group
525L Ericson Way
Arcata, CA.95521
Reference Limited Impact Review Group Home Facility - Garfield County File Number
LIPA-o1-21-8822
Dear Kirsten,
This letter is in regard to our completeness review of the application Momenta Recovery has
submitted for a Limited Impact Review application for a group home facility, The parcel is
located northeast of the Town of Carbondale, at 5325 County Road 100, Carbondale, CO
8L623, and identified by County Assessor parcel number 2391- 193-00-046.
Our completeness review included input from the County Attorney's Office and has noted
several items that need to be addressed prior to a determination of technical completeness.
In accordance with the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code (LUDC), please
respond to the following items:
\. Provide an application form which is filled out with the proper involved parties,
including the correct property owner, and signature by either the authorized
representative for the application or the property owner.
2. Provide a Statement of Authority for an agent(s) to act on behalf of the property
owner, William F. and Martha M. Drake Trust. The document must be recorded
with the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. Please provide the recorded copy.
3. Provide contact information for any ditch owners on the property, including name
and mailing address.
4. Certification of Mineral Owner Research form [attached) needs signature and
information regarding mineral owner research.
5. Please provide specific responses and demonstration of compliance with the
Standards as identified in Article 7: Standards, Division 1,2 and 3, and Section 7-
704 Group Home Facilities. Additionally, please provide a traffic study to address
all requirements for a Basic Traffic Analysis as outlined in Section 4-203.L.2 of the
LUDC, including demonstration of compliance with SectionT-'J.07, and adequacy
of the access drive, A waiver which includes specific responses pursuant to section
4-202 may be requested from submittal of a full traffic analysis, with appropriate
supporting evidence such as a statement from a qualified professional.
1
6. Provide a Landscaping Plan which nleets criteria in Section 4-203.F.4 waiver may
he requested pursnant to Section 4-2AZ with appropriate supporting eviclence.
7. Provide specific responses to Impact Analysis items in Section 4-203.G of the
LUDC.
B. Provide information on the water supply plan including a 4-hour pump test which
demonstrates adequate water to serve the proposed use. Alternatively, you may
submit a request to fulfill this requircment as a condition of approval,
9. Provide information on the wastewater treatment plan which demonstrates
adequate capacity to serve the proposed use, Alternatively, you may submit a
request to fulfill this requirement as a condition of approval,
10. Please provide information for all required sections identified in Section 4-203(E)
for a Grading and Drainage Plan or provirle a waiver request which incìr¡des
specific responses in accordance with section 4-202 Waiver of Submission
Requirements. A waiver request should include specific responses to the criteria
in Section 4-202 and appropriate supporting evidence such as a statement from a
qualified professional indicating positive drainage off the site, and whether
changes to grading and drainage are proposed.
11. The application should include information on the status of any permits for the
proposed use including but not limited to those with CDPHE and the State.
We look forward to receiving the revisions and supplemental information listed above. Once
the above information is provided, we can finalize our completeness review and proceed
through the review process. Section 4-L01- (n)(Z)(a) stipulâtes that the applicant shall
correct the deficiencies within 60 calendar days or the application will be deemed
withdrawn.
We recognize that there is a lot of information here, so please feel free to contact Glenn
Hartmann at ghartmann@Garfield-County.com with any questions or schedule a follow-up
meeting for clarifications regarding any of the above items.
Sincerely,
Angie Martell
Planner
Garfield County - Community Development Department
108 Bth Street. Suite 401
Glenwood Springs. CO 8L601
(e70)945-1377
http://www.garfield-counfy.com/community-development/
2
Cotorado Department of Pubtic Heatth and Environment
Laboratory Sorvlco¡ DMslon
8100 Lowry Blvd. Denver, CO 80230
Phone: 303-692-3090 Fu: 303-344-9989
Analysls Rcport
<<< PRELIMINARY REPORT.BAGTERIAL RESULTS COMPLETE; GHEMISTRY PENDING >>>
Work Order #:1274669 (Well Water Chemical Testing) Chain of Gustody #:
Description:
Glient: PINNACLE WATER Report To: ROBERT DONNELLY
Profile: Well Water Chemical Testing PINNACLE WATER
1107 HENDRICK DRIVE
UNITA
Carbondale, CO 81623
Sampled By: ROBERT DONNELLY rdonnelly@pinnaclewater.com
Sample Summary
Lab tD Sample lD Sample rype rest Method c"|::i"d *"?åÍi"o
Analytes
Reported
2100429158 048-07 Water
E Trava D
Scientific Director
Note: The samples were tested as rece¡ved from the customer and
the results in this report relate only to the samples tested.
Total Coliform and E. coli
P/A
02116121 10:15 02117121 09:59 2
Thursday, February 18,2021 5:56:09 PM Page 1 oÍ 2
MRL = Minimum Reporting Limit; BDL = Below Detection Limit; * = Comment applied
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Limit per EPA regulations;
mg/L - milligrams per liter (ppm); uglL micrograms per liter (ppb); pci - picoCuries
Report lD: 1274669
HORIZON'
3004.7.0.0
Cotorado Department of Pubtic Heatth and Environment
Laboretory Sorvlcc¡ DM¡lon
8100 Lowry Blvd. Denve¡, CO 80230
Phonc: 303-692-3Q9Q Fax: 303-344-9989
Analtrcls Rcport
<<< PRELIMINARY REPORT-BAGTERIAL RESULTS GOMPLETE¡ GllEltlllSTRY PENDING >>>
Work Order #: 1274669 (Well Water Chemical Testing) Chain of Custody #:
Sample Results
Lab lD: 2100429158 Sample lD:048-07
DateCollscted:21161202'110:15 GollectionSite:
DateReceived:21'171202109:59 SiteDescription:
Description: DANCO GROUP 5325 CR 100 CARBONDALE CO 81623 KITCHEN WELL
Sample Type: Water
EPA92238 (Total Coliîorm and E. coli P/A)
Parameter
COLIFORM P/A
E, COLI P/A
Add itio n al I nf orm atio n
Temperature at Receipt:
Water Type:
Results
ABSENT
ABSENT
Units MRL MCL Prepared Analyzed
211812O21 14:44
211812021 14:44
DF
1
1
Qual
16.6
WELL
Analysis Result Comments
Analyte: COLIFORM P/A
. A COLIFORM P/A result of "ABSENT" ¡nd¡cates a m¡crobiologically safe sample
less than one (<1) Coliform per l00mL
Analyte: E. COLI P/A
. An E.COLI P/A result of "ABSENT" ¡ndicate6 that E.col¡ was NOT DETECTED.
, Coliform was absent or
Thursday, February 18,2021 5:56:10 PM Page 2 oÍ 2
MRL = Minimum Reporting Limit; BDL = Below Detection Limit; * = Comment applied
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Limit per EPA regulations;
mglL - milligrams per liter (ppm); uglL microgtams per liter (ppb); pCi - picoCuries
Report lD: 1274669
rcWEREOBY
HORIZON'
3004.7.0.0
January 27,202I
Ann & Patrick Flynn
5325 County Road 100
Carbondale, Co. 81623
ATTN: Ann & Patrick
On 6119120, a well test was conducted on a well at 5325 County Road 100. The
following information was obtained;
Well Depth
Casing Size------- - (7 x 5)"
Standing water level------- ------ 250.77'
Total test time-------- 4 Hours
Drawdown to
Production is
252.80'
5 GPM
This test was conducted with the existing pump. The well water level recovered back to
25I.05'in 10 Minutes. If you have any questions please call me, Raun Samuelson at
970-945-6309.
Sincerely;
Raun E Samuelson
Samuelson Pump Co
GIenn Hartmann
Sent:
To:
Cc:
From:Laura Berreth < lberreth@momentarecovery.com>
Monday, November 23,2020 12:11 PM
Angela Martell; Glenn Hartmann
Dan Johnson
lExternall Application
HiGlenn & Angie,
Following up with the two of you in regards to the application. lf you need anything else from us please let me know
Sincerely,
Laura Berreth
Director of Operations
MÕIV{ENTAÑECTVËÑY
ê a{E&L:t'¡{: FLi{{::: F*¡ì *'$È'tC¡¡
3302 S. Grand Ave. I Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
p. 970-930-63ss I r. 7O7-82s-19O3
I berreth@momenta recovery.com
Get mv Vcard here
www. momenta recoverv.com
Notice of Confidentiality: This email, and any attachments, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) and may contain privileged, private or
confidential ¡nformation. Any distribution, reading, or use of this, communication and any attachments, by anyone other than the addressee, is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful.
Subiect:
IIAHIfI
1
Member of The Danco Group of Companies
Glenn Hartmann
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subiect:
Attachments:
Lau ra Berreth < I berreth @ momentarecovery.com >
Thursday, November 19,2020 1:34 PM
Angela Martell; Glenn Hartmann
Dan Johnson
lExternal] ltems requested
OBH Zoning Use Confirmation (lD 2499842).pdf; OBH State License expires 08.05.22 (lD
756).pdf; FW: Retail Food Licensing
HiAngie & Glenn,
The items requested are attached and a definition of the ASAM levelof care we operate at is below. Please let me know
if I can be of further assistance.
1.210.57 ASAM Level lll.5 (Clinically Managed High-lntensity Residential Services SOA-R Level
4d) [Eff. 1111113]A. lndividuals who are appropriately placed in this level of care typically have
multiple deficits, which may include substance-related disorders and criminal activity.B. Such
individuals generally can be characterized as having chaotic, non-supportive and often abusive
interpersonal relationships; extensive treatment or criminaljustice histories; chronic substance
use disorders; limited work histories and educational experiences; and antisocial value
systems.C. Standard rehabilitation methods are inadequate to treat these individuals etfectively.
Effective treatment approaches are primarily habilitative in focus, addressing the individual's
educational and vocational deficits, as well as his or her socially dysfunctional behavior.D. This
level of care may represent a step-down from Level lll.7 and the therapeutic community is also
identified as an example of this level of care.E. Clinically Managed High-lntensity Residential
Services shall be a minimum frequency of five (5) hours of planned clinical treatment activities per
week.F. Resident to staff ratios shall not exceed twenty to one (20.1) during nighttime hours, per
agency site.G. Residential facilities delivering ASAM Level lll services shall construct and
maintain sound and sight barriers between male and female individuals, and between adult and
adolescents in bathrooms and sleeping quarters.
Sincerely,
Laura Berreth
Director of Operations
r-Iü14ENTAÑãC*VËRY
¡r l¡È&.L:a¡{: p:l:{ili l-{:}Ê ltiû44äal
3302 S. Grand Ave. I Glenwood Springs,'CO 81601
p. 970-930-63ss I r. 7o7-82s-1903
lberreth@ momentarecove¡v.com
1
Get mv Vcard here
wurw.mom@ntarecovery.com
Notlce of Confidentlallty: This email, and any attachments, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) and may contain privileged, private or
confidentlal information. Any distrlbution, reading, or use of this, communication and any atþchments, by anyone other than the addressee, is strictly
prohibited and mEy be unlawful.
Dåil[0
Member of The dánm Grouo of Cornoanies
2
Code Review
Contact: Community Development Director
Jurisdiction: City of Glenwood Springs Planning DepartmentPhone: WO-94f8212ProJect: The Mother's ProgramAddress: 3302 & 3204 South Grand Avenue, GWS CO
Parcel: , 2'18F214-0A-OA2
Permit No.: lfr&17; Planning ltem #34-17Date: Thursday, January04,2018
This review is being provided to the City of Glenwood Springs on behalf of Mandy Owensby,
Director of Rehabilitation Planning, The Danco Group of Companies, in response to Permit
Conditions listed under approved Special Use permit ffi6-17.
I have established the classification of these building occupancies per 2015 lBC.
The proposed primary use is consistent with a 'Boarding House" and/or a "Congregate Living
Facility" as defined by IBC Chapter 2.
The reviewed site includes two separate bulldings, and between them, use will consist of a
Womên's boarding house along with some associated soclal support services.
The exlstlng single-family home nearest the front of the property has always been an R-3
occupancy, and will continue to be an R-3 as a dwelling with not mole than two dwelling units
and use as a Boardlng House or Congregate Living Facility (non-transient) with 16 or fewer
occupants, in accordance with IBC Section 310.5.
The exlstlng rental apartments have alwa¡c been an R-2 occupancy, and will continue to be
an R-2 as a building with more than two dwelling units and use as a Boarding House or
Congregate Living Facilig (non-transient) with 16 out fewer occupants, also in accordance with
IBC Section 310.4.
The closest altemative occupancy group classification for these buildings would be R4 per IBC
Section 310.6, however, ít ís clear that would not be the appropriate classllication.
The unique aspect of the R-4 occupancy, as opposed to the R-2 and R-3 classÍfications, is that
R4 occupancies include Custodial Care. Per IBC Chapter 2 Definitions, Custodial Gare
describes facillties that include "assistance with day-to-day living tasks;such as assistance
with cooking, taking medication, bathing, using toilet facilities and other tasks ol dally living."
The proposed facilities do not include custodial care, therefore the R4 classification does not
applv.
The proposed use should not be considered "lnstitutional" for the followlng reasons:r There will be no medical care or medicalservices provided at either building.e Members of the public partlcipating in the boarding house will not be supsMsed of
watched over in a clinicaU medical sense ât the facility. (see clarlflcation of use)r There will be no custodial care provided to boarders. (as mentioned above). All boarders will capable of responding in an emergency situation wlthout assist¡ance.r ln respecf to the duration of occupancy, boarders shall be consldered "non-transienf',
Glarlflcation of use:
The proposed use as a Boarding House or Congregate Livlng Faciltty (non-transient) under the
R-2 and R-3 occupancy classifications is consistent with the seMces offered to residents.
Residents are offered ln-home consultatlons rrfth sociâl workers and similar trained
professionals who visit and work with residents on a frequent and intermlttent basis. The social
workers and similar professionals prwide assistanca to residents in coplng with and resolving
challenges ln their lives. They dealwith a wide range of perconaland family issues that do not
constitute medlcal or custodial care.
Jeff Johnson
ArchitecturalPC
l.3i i:¡ci I'hìrJ Siri;ti
,..:u:ie ii
l:rrfl¡: ili,r {i.l iìllii
PHCINE t,'li i:il;. l":it5i j
JEËF .lt:=i\jilìa'l
ç*çç¡1J,.¡ i¡ j: : l:::i:r
¡i;:.a:'r'.'.''': r:i r rci
" JeffJohnson
ArchitecturalPC
ì.-li: ir:.':.r¡ l, i-;iiij 3i¡:.::i
t1¡iii: il
i:ìii¡;r i]í,ì íìi iì.1-a¡
PHON Ë !r;'¡,i:r!. ta,a;!
JËFF,ll-i¡ Iit:-i{,}ll
{Jw¡ler,rA¡-::ir i t¡,;r :i
Jiilt i.:lCìi¡i:i ! :irÌ
Gode Review
There is a supervisory component to the facility staff duties. Staff, however, are not medically
bained nor are úey mental health prufesslonals, Supcrvision ís as ruquired by statc license-
(someone to be present b make a call b enìergency serviæs if needed, keep the premises
clean and ready for programming, and to report b support stafr if there is a violatjon of house
rules.)
Planned fi¡ture on-oite usee:
There has been some early planning for possibly converting the existlng Group U garage in the
R-2 aparünent building into a B Office Occupancythat would serve as permanent ofüces for
program staff. However, that project ¡s not part of the cunent proposâ|, and if pursued in the
future that project would require additional design and code comptiance analysis.
Determlnatlon:
The proposed use of thess buildings does not carry with it additional classifications of
performed work beyond Alteration-Level 1, as defined in IEBC Section 503.
The proposed use of these buildings doss not include any change in occupancy classification,
and as defined under Chapter2015 of the lntematbnal Existing Building Code, in my opinion,
the proposed use does not require the addition of a fire sprinkler system.
The faclllties wlll requlre an lnspection by the City of Glenwood Sprlngs to vêrify thât the
existing residential smoke and carbon monoxlde alarm s¡ætem ls functional and any performed
alterations are done in a matter that maintains the level of existing fire protection and means of
egress.
Thank you,
Jeffrey Scott Johnson
Jeff Johnson Architectural PC
i_ "
t,\ ,
c_e
01-04-18
ærco
Gørfteld Cowru,ty
195 w. l.4th street
Rifle, CO 81650
(e70l, 62s-s2oa
2014 Blake Avenue
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
(970) 94s-6614
February 22nd, 2018
Mandy Owensby
3302 S. Grand Avenue
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: Retail Food Licensing for Momenta
A site visit of the rehabilitation center Momenta, located at 3302 S. Grand Avënue in Glenwood Spríngs,
was conducted on February L6th, 201.8. The followin6 information was learned:
o The facilíty ls licensed by the Colorado Department of Human Services Offíce of Behavioral Health.
r lt is a substance use treatment center for mothers. No one under the age of 18 resides at the center,
however residents' families, lncluding their children, can occasionally visit them.
o The kitchen appeared to be newly constructed and clean. The floors, walls, and ceilings were
constructed of smooth, non-absorbent materials. All equipment was domestic. Adjacent to the kitchen,
there was a lighted dry storage area, laundry facilities, and a utility sink, Additional freezer and
refrigeration storage may be added in the future, which will be located in the secure garage,
o A chef will be hired to provide meals for the residents. Upon visits from residents'famÍlies, food may be
served to non-rês¡dents.
Based on this information, the facility does not meet the definitlon of a child cäre center or retãil food
establishment (RFË) and therefore Garfield County Public Health (CCPH) will not íssue a RFE lícense at thís time.
Thls facÍlity is the fírst of its kind in Colorado and there was no precedent for the licensing requlrements, The
operation most closely resembles an assisted fiving center or nursing home, which historically have not been
licensed or inspected by GCPH. lf in the future there is a rule change or the fac¡lity changes their food service
operation type, GCPH will re-evaluate whether or not to issue a license. Please contact me for any additional
guestions.
Sincerely,
Natalie Tsevdos, MPH
Environmental Health Specialist ll
Garflefd County Public Health
2014 Blake Avenue
Glenwood Springs, CO 8L601
ntsevdos@garf iel d-cou nty.com
970-665-6375
Garfíeld Co¡rnty Pubtic Health Department * working to promote health and prevent clisease
Sfate of Colorado
Department of Human Senzices
Office of Behavioral Health
Approves
Momenta
3302 S. Grand Avenue
Glenwood Spnngs Colorado 81601
License Number: 1985-02
for the delivery of Subsfance Use Disorder Treatment Services in accordance with
Section 2 CCR 502-1 Vol 21, Colorado Code of Regulations, and is licensed for the
following services;
Gender Responsive Treatment for Women
General Treatment
ASAM Level 1; ASAM Level 2.1; ASAM Level 2.5; ASAM Level 3.5
ASAM Level 1; ASAM Level 2.1; ASAM Level 2.5; ASAM Level 3.5
rq fr, rþrPl{LtrL
Effective Date: 08/05/2020
Expiration Date: 08/05/2022
License Status: Full
Barbara Johnson, Manager, Licensing & Designation
Office of Behavioral Health
Colorado Department of Human Seryices