HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubsoil StudyRECEIVED
FEB 2 5 2û2?
GARFIELD COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Huddleston-Berry
Engi*eering & 'lesting, LLC
December 22,2021
Project#02388-0001
Shane Wade
PO Box 425
Silt, Colorado 81652
Subject: Geotechnical Investigation
1650 County Road 237
Silt, Colorado
Dear Mr. Wade,
This letter presents the results of a geotechnical investigation conducted by Huddleston-Berry
Engineering & Testing, LLC (HBET) at 1650 County Ptoad 237 in Silt, Colorado. The site
location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed construction is anticipated to consist of a new
single-family residence. The scope of our investigation included evaluating the subsurface
conditions at the site to aid in developing foundation recommendations for the proposed
construction and to evaluate the site soils for onsite wastewater treatment.
Site Conditions
At the time of the investigation, the site was open and gradually sloping down towards the east.
Vegetation consisted of weeds, grasses, and small to large bushes and trees. The site was
bordered to the north and east by residential/agricultural properties, to the south by 250 Road,
and to the west by Harvey Gap Road.
Subsurface Investigation
The subsurface investigation included ten test pits as shown on Figure 2. The test pits were
excavated to depths ranging from 3.0 to 8.0 feet below the existing ground surface. Typed test
pit logs are included in Appendix A.
As indicated on the logs, the subsurface conditions at the site were variable. Most of the test pits
encountered L0 foot of topsoil above tan, moist, dense poorly graded gravel and cobble with
sand soils to the bottoms of the excavations. Groundwater was encountered in some of the test
pits at depths of 5.5 and 6.0 feet at the time of the investigation.
Test Pits TP-l, TP-7, and TP-10 encountered 1.0 foot of topsoil above brown, moist, medium
stiff sandy lean clay soils to the bottoms of the excavations. Groundwater was not encountered in
TP-1, TP-7, or TP-10 at the time of the investigation.
2789 Riverside Parkway
Grand Junction, Colorado 81501
Phone: 970-255-8005
Info @huddlestonberry. com
r 6s0 cR 237
#02388-000r
t2t22t2r ffi****rt*
Tcst Pit TP-6, conducted in the northern portion of thc southern investigated area, encountered
1.0 foot of topsoil above tan, moist, dense poorly graded gravel and cobble with sand soils to a
depth of 3.0 feet. The gravels were underlain by brown, most, medium stiff sandy lean clay soils
to the bottom of the excavation. Groundwater was encountered in 'I'P-6 at a depth of 6.0 feet at
the time of the investigation.
Laboratorv Testing
Laboratory testing was conducted on samples of the native soils encountered in the test pits. The
testing included grain size analysis, Atterberg limits determination, natural moisture content
determination, and maximum dry density and optimum moisture content (Proctor) determination.
The laboratory testing results are included in Appendix B.
The laboratory testing results indicate that the native soils range from non-plastic to slightly
plastic. In general, based upon the Atterberg limits and upon our experience with similar soils in
the vicinity of the subject site, the native clay soils are anticipated to be slightly collapsible. The
native gravel and cobble soils are anticipated to be fairly stable under loading.
Foundation Recommendations
Based upon the results of the subsurface investigation and nature of the proposed construction,
shallow foundations are recommended. Spread footings and monolithic (turndown) structural
slabs are both appropriate foundation alternatives. However, in order to provide a stable bearing
stratum and limit the potential for excessive differential movements, it is recommended that the
foundations be constructed above a minimum of 24-inches of structural fill.
The native clay soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable for reuse as structural fill. The native
gravel and cobble soils are also suitable for reuse as structural fill; provided particles in excess of
3-inches in diameter are removed. Imported structural fill should consist of a granular, non-
expansive, non-.free drainins material approved by HBET.
For spread footing foundations, the footing areas may be trenched. However, for monolithic slab
foundations, the structural fill should extend across the entire building pad area to a depth of 24-
inches below the lowest portion of the foundation. Structural fill should extend laterally beyond
the edges of the foundation a distance equal to the thickness of structural fill for both foundation
types.
Prior to placement of structural fill, it is recommended that the bottom of the foundation
excavation be scarif,red to a depth of 6 to 9 inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted to a
minimum of 95o/o of the standard Proctor maximum dry density, within + 2o/o of the optimum
moisture content as determined in accordance with ASTM D698. Structural fill should be
moisture conditioned, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts, and compacted to a minimum of
95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density for fine grainecl soils ancl 90%o of the modified
Proctor maximum dry density for coarse grained soils, within r 2o/o of the optimum moistr¡re
content as determined in accordance with ASTM D698 and DI557, respectively.
Structural fill should be extended to within O.l-feet of the bottom of the foundation. No rnore
than 0.l-feet of gravel should be placed below the footings or turndown edge as a leveling
collfse.
22:9008 ALL PROJECTS\02388 - Shane Wade\02388-0001 t650 County Road 237900 - Geo\02388-0001 LP'l2222l.doc
1650 CR237
#02388-0001
12/22/21
H¡di[cnon-Berry
ksffi¡a T({i4 Llr
For structural fill consisting of the native soils or imported granular materials and foundation
building pad preparation as recommended, a maximum allowable bearing capacity of 1,500 psf
may be used. In addition, a modulus of subgrade reaction of 150 pci may be used for structural
fill consisting of the native soils and a modulus of 200 pci may be used for approved imported
structural fill. Foundations subject to frost should be at least 36-inches below the finished grade.
Any stemwalls or retaining walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures. For backfill
consisting of the native soils or imported granular, non-free draining, non-expansive material, we
recommend that the walls be designed for an active equivalent fluid unit weight of 45 pcf in
areas where no surcharge loads are present. An at-rest equivalent fluid unit weight of 65 pcf is
recommended for braced walls. Lateral earth pressures should be increased as necessary to
reflect any surcharge loading behind the walls.
Water soluble sulfates are common to the soils in Western Colorado. Therefore, at a minimum,
Type I-II sulfate resistant cement is recommended for construction at this site.
Non-Structural Floor Slab and Exterior Flatwork Recommendations
In order to reduce the potential for excessive differential movements, it is recommended that
non-structural floating floor slabs be constructed above a minimum of l8-inches of structural fill
with subgrade preparation, structural fill materials, and fill placement be in accordance with the
Foundøtion Recommendations section of this report. It is recommended that exterior flatwork be
constructed above a minimum of l2-inches of structural fill.
Drainage Recommendations
Gradíns snd draínøse øre criticøl for the lons-term nerformønce of the structure and grading
around the structure should be designed to carry precipitation and runoff away from the
structure. It is recommended that the finished ground surface drop at least twelve inches within
the first ten feet away from the structures. It is also recommended that landscaping within five
feet of the structures include primarily desert plants with low water requirements. In addition, it
is recommended that irrigation, including drip lines, within ten feet of foundations be minimized.
HBET recommends that surface downspout extensions be used which discharge a minimum of
15 feet from the structures or beyond the backfill zones, whichever is greater. However, if
subsurface downspout drains are utilized, they should be carefully constructed of solid-wall PVC
and should daylight a minimum of 15 feet from the structures. In addition, an impermeable
membrane is recommended below subsurface downspout drain lines. Dry wells should not be
used.
As discussed previously, shallow groundwater was encountered at the time of the investigation.
Therefore, a perimeter foundation drain is recommended if a footing and stemwall foundation
with crawlspace is utilized. In general, the perimeter foundation drain should consist of
prefabricated drain materials or perforated pipe and gravel with the flowline of the drain at the
bottom of the foundation (at the highest point). The perimeter drain should slope at a minimum
of lo/o to daylight or to a sump with pump.
3Z:t2008 ALL PROJECTS\O2388 - Shane Wade\02388-0001 1650 County Road 237V00 - Ceo\02388-0001 LRl2222l.doc
1650 cR 237
#02388-0001
l2l22l2t
Hl¡d¡llcãtor'3eûy
&¡hd¡*ñ Td¡S. LLç
Onsitc W¡stcwater Treatment Svstem Fensibilitv
In order to evaluate the site soils for onsite wastewater treatment, percolation testing was
conducted at the site. The percolation rate in the native soils ranged from 3 to I minutes-per-
inch. The percolation testing data are included in Appendix C.
In accordance with Garfield County regulations, a percolation rate of between 5 to 60 minutes-
per-inch is required for soils to be deemed suitable for onsite wastewater treatment. Although
somc of thc pcrcolation rates were fairly fast, the native soils contain an appreciable quantity of
fines and will provide excellent filtration of effluent. Therefore, based upon the results of the
percolation testing, HBET believes that the native soils are suitable for onsite wastewater
treatment.
In addition to the percolation rate of the subsurface materials, the seasonal high groundwater
elevation is an important factor in detennining the suitability of the site for Onsite Wastewater
Treatment Systems. For OWTS suitability, the seasonal high groundwater elevation should be at
least four feet below the bottom of the proposed absorption bed. As discussed previously,
groundwater was encountered at the time of the investigation. In general, based upon the time of
year and the results of the subsurface investigations, HBET believes that the seasonal high
groundwater level is between 5.5 and 8.0 depending upon where the Soil Treatment Area (STA)
is proposed to be placed.
General Notes
The recommendations included above are based upon the results of the subsurface investigation
and on our local experience. These conclusions and recommendations are valid only for the
proposed consffuction.
As discussed previously, the subsurface conditions encountered in the test" pits were variable.
However, the precise nature and extent of any subsurface variability may not become evident
until construction. As discussed previously, it is recommended that HBET provide construction
materials testing and engineering oversight during the entire construction process. In addition,
the builder and any subcontractors working on the project should be provided a copy of this
report and informed of the issues associated with the presence of moisture sensitive subgrade
materials at this site.
It is importønt to note thst the recommendations herein are intended to reduce the risk of
structurøl movement snd/or dømaee, to varvíng desrees. øssocìated with volume chanse oÍ the
nøtive soìls, However, HBET cannot nredíct lons-term chanees in subsurface moisture
conditions ønd./or the precíse mqsnitude or erteú of volume chønse ín the nøtíve soÍls. ll/here
signifrcant increases in subsurføce moísture occur due to Door gradine, imnrooer stormwøter
manøgement, utilìtv lìne faílure. excess ìwísatíon. or other cøuse, either duríne constructíon
or the result of øctions of the nronertv owner. several inches of movement øre nossible. I&
add.ítíon. øn,v fq.ilure 1o comtr l!, wíth the recommendqtions ín thís repor-t releases Huddleston-
Berrv Eneineerins & Testíns, LLC of ønv lisbílìtv with reeørd to the structure nerformance.
4Z:U008 ALL PROJECTS\O2388 - Shane Wade\02388-0001 1650 County Road237V00 - Geo\02388-0001 LR122221.rloc
t6s0cR237 Æ\#02388-ooor (,{tü$ffint2/22t2t vu
We are pleased to be of service to your project. Please cont¿ct us if you have any questions or
comments regarding the contents of this report.
Respectfu lly Submitted:
Huddleston-Berry Engineering and Testing, LLC
Michael A. Berry, P.E.
Vice President of Engineering
5Z:V008 ALL PROJECTS\02388 - Shme Wade\02388-0001 ló50 County Road237U00 - Ceo\02388-0001 LRl2222l.doc
FIGURES
Location
Location Map
APPEI{DIX A
Typed Test Pit Logs
toLmo-lzc3@mvC)trmz|¡f)0)5oã0)o-oN(J€ ^ l.J r.1æ5.i oe?ã?ho ow5ôOô l"'¿)=æ<æ;E i'o¡ðt0a-loa.Isç-a!7Pm('){t-oc){ızqC)o!nemo{z=mo¡(Ìrooc5Ão0)o-N](r\¡{mU,{!-{zc=Emn{!IIÌ,omo-nzo-.tmg,rooomoEC)+ml)xmI@TDmxoÞ{ız3m++otrtmxoÞ-.1ızc)oz-{FC)-{ovao'atrtÞmU,{A{mIoN-tl)o-f@¡)oFJo()o3!m{moorso7oìtt=És=ãmXmfãYçS38xuËËiäroo-taZovoczqmt-mIızCL¿èa{maÃI!-{r4,NmcDEPTH(ft)GRAPHICLOGØfl)fo-()d=.fo(og)fo'Ø-{o1tØo|---lmÐromCNon!cozSAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(ROD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)POCKET PEN.(tsf)DRY UNITWT(pcr)MOISTURECoNTENT (%)-lr -"1=ï-l tDøJmnoFINES CONTENT("/"')LIQUIDLIMITPLASTICLIMITPLASTICITYINDËX. rÌ. i/, li:. . tr> r-1 ..É- . r\-.. ¡/,. t- . t. . t- .t-(,l^,U'Â)fo-roÂ)=ora.gıÉ3ı'5+3oCLc3a¿TDoo3ooø=o)f¡)oôor+
Huddleston-Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC
2789 Riverside Parkway
Cnand Junction, CO 81501
970-255-8005
TEST PIT NUMBER TP.z
PAGE 1 OF 1
PROJECT NAME 1650 Countv Road 237
PROJECT NUMBER 02388-OOO1 PRq'ECT LOCATION
CLIENT Shane Wade
EXCAVATION GONTRACTOR Client
CHECKEDBY MAB
EXCAVATION METHOD Trackh/Backhoe
AFTER EXCAVATION --
LOGGEDBY SD
NOTES
GROUND WATER LEVELS:
VrrnueoF ExcAvATroN s.5n
lnr e¡¡o oF ÊxcAVATroN s.5 n
ATTERBERG
LIMITStufL>ÍFur
-.rtgfL->=
U)
s
E8
8s
H
øî
=FlE==¿ıo>()a
zufL
ixg
OofL
F
ts
3E
É.o
l"U o\É.-
-F
i¡l Ur
-FOz>oo
Ou
a=
J-
otrh
3=
F0ı
ã9f=fL
t-z
uJt'-zOGo9)
U'ulztr
T
t--fL
l¡Jo
0-0
IT¡n
3e(,
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
{'/."!
/ù2
{1. !
.',..i,,
I'.r:-.
Sandy Clay with Organics (TOPSOIL)
g GB
1
4 NP NP NP 4
Graded GRAVELS and COBBLES with SAND (GP), tan,
dense
".Lab Classified GB-1
Poorly
moist,
f
Bottom of test pit at 6.0 feet.
Éoo
Øz
lJ
o
fE
I
Ut-ouo
GEOTÊCH BHæ3884001237tellozC3trmvN(Jccæat-EIz(t=N=o€0CLocÐ æx_r ! €=q:-r!ã'q=E'øac5 ô c=qã?rÀo Qw500- H¡vFljræ-<0a;<ioö=.ûe¡eIôsetr{-o!vo(-mo-t6c¡Iozq.i-)o!Fem(l{z=lnc,(¡(-ìocfToLFi.(j.\{mØ{!{zc=@m7{!I(.t!omo'Ttzomrt,t-ooomE'@ØomxoIız=m¿otr'+ıox@o)c)xomxC)ÞIızç)oz{1Þc){ovao=-ontai-{7mqol\)()¿lfloÃntqø@oo='ommE,oN)-ñn1nmx()ìızr(ìmzC'o.rtmxctIızIôC).ark1 ô;ErO#ÉçsËfrãþızgoãoCztr'mmIız{mU'!.!!Nñ?DEPTH(ft)GRAPHICLOGct,Â)=CLo0)É.5oo0)ı'ø-.1oItU'of--lm7rImØo¿1lJozSAMPLE ryPENUMBERRECOVERY %(ROD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)POCKET PEN.(tsf)DRY UNITWT(pcr)MOISTURECoNTENT (%)i--{=mS¡-{ tDutmnoFINES CONTENT("/")LIQUIDLIMITPLASTICLIMITPLASTICITYINDEXl:: lìt r¡ lì,.'[:t!o3oooE.0)IooÕl-oãoı'9*crY-ø^oı:oonmr-a)o)=o-oo@@rmØ=.JU)zg(oYÂ)-5
!7Pmo{zC=EmvON(,@@oÕo()trmzU'f0)oã0)o.oI ^ ¡.) rî{oÞ æxù:-túã-Ø5 (i o83.ø.iøo o-w500O o"{ô+r*3Ë;q i'ùeÊ"Êo0aFoltnemo-.15oo-zØiro!1Pmo-{z=mC,looocnoo¡o-N)(,_.1{mCN{!{zc=Emn{Ita5!omo-Tt=o{mq,5oonoEU'gmxoÞ+ız=m{oo{o)o(E9)o-5oomxC)Iızc)oz{utÞc'{o7aı'=E'nÌct{7-tfÍ,oo.Ì\):l)o=!lm{tnoNlo¿moxmotrt!ìrmFmxoÞızIImzoo.tImxC'Iızoeo7o>2ro*ñotrËËÉh{ızo.?ovclczofllñJ,oz+mID{!{.¿NmIoDEPTH(ft)GRAPHICLOG-{mvt-omØc)4.1lIozSAMPLE ryPENUMBERRECOVERY %(ROD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)POCKET PEN(tsÐDRY UNIT WT(pcr)MOISTUREcoNTENr (%)-{r-l=i+(DørmvoFINES CONTENT(%)LIOUIDLIMIÏPLASTICLIMITPLASTICITYINDEXt/r. t\.ì..¿. {\--. tvr{--'.l, ls ,;. 1*-'--.t4 .. tT._.,t¿,..\ tt,- l\ -tt'a,0¡o"a6)É.o(oIDı'Ø-lotl(torlTtãoã'9ô-ad*oöo"o7mf-U'0)o.oo@@t-mU){==Øzg(oEv0)5@oo3oooı=glIooo
GEOTECH BH æLUMNS OA38&OOO1 1650 CR 237.GPJ GINT US LA3.GDT 1215121zo-{mg,t-o6)omg@@omxo{ız=m-.1¿oo-l0)oxJ@0)o=oomxoiı2c)o2-{1Þc)ovE'm@u{rnIoN!7emo{zc=Etrlvotrmz-{(tf0¡aoãq)o.ooı-=ol\¡(¡)æÞc)c)cO^tJT¡-p æxI.J €*U=-'AÞ3 (ô 33 3.2. ião Ê-*5ôOô e'{" 1J'æ<oaüE *'of.caþIıEqt-t-oo¿moxmI@@oo3!mm0oN'll{mnmxoIızImzE,omxoÞIızCL¿ovo>=rOi<ñãotral /ã)Ëfifþ-{ız?6)7oCzImt-mÞ{ız!7elrlo|.oo-{ızq.Foo!Fem(ì-{z=mol(¡cof7o0¡clNCi{mCN{!{zc=tpm7{!I(rrm.D-{!gNm!omo'ÎtDEPTH(ft)GRAPHICLOGa)Â)o.oÂ)É.o(c)0)='Ø-to1'aor3-lm7tr-oma,on-0IozSAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(ROD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)POCKET PEN.(tsf)DRY UNIT WT(pcr)MOISTURECoNTENT (%)-l--l<il@Øm7oFINES CONTENT("/ùLIQUIDLIMITPLASTICLIMITPLASTICITYINDEX.r:. t4.l\ j.t/, s-;..r-. r\-.tvr. ¡-. J-. . t-. .t-.1,.. ...t.-..-..11...- t:.- .l: f/- L\. ,tt_.1\ . 12,. t\ .t,)(,l^,?-tãoã's*oYrdPoöo-onmr-(r,¡)fo.oo(DTDrmØt.5U'zo(c¡!vq)_5TDoo3ooø=Àts,ooo
PAGE 1 OF 1
TEST PIT NUMBER TP-6
PROTECTNAME 1650 Countv Road 237
PRG'ECT LOCATION SiIt. COPRO,'ECT NUMBER 02388-000r
CLIENT Shane Wade
Huddleston-Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC
Riverside Parkway
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-255-8005
DATE STARTED ,I1I1OI21 COMPLETED 11110121 TEST PIT SIZE
EXCAVATION GONTRACTOR C|ient
CHECKEDBY MAB
EXCAVATION METHOD Trackh/Backhoe
GROUND ELEVANON
LOGGEDBY SD
NOTES AFTEREXCAVATION _
GROUND WATER LEVELS:
Varnme oF ExcAvATroN 6.0n
Ynr erooF ExcAVATIoN 6.0 ft
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
IFo-tuo
0.o
I
*sú.'(,
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
ufL>tl-- uJ!gfL =|>z
(/)
s
g8
8s
H
øû
=FfE=¿ıo>oz
z
t¡JfL
ir l¿
oofL
F3
2a)5s
to
tll o\t:'
-F
i¡l Pro2>oo
o-
e=
J_
C)trF
3=
F-
0ı
42
FzulFzOG()Ð
U)
UJzil
!,'r.' .s
'i'!:t
'!!.'l
?i¿
Sandy Clay with Organics (TOPSOIL)
Poorly Graded GRAVELS and COBBLES with SAND (gp), tan,
moist, dense
Sandy Lean CLAY (cl), brown, moist, medium stiff
f
Bottom of test pit at 6.0 feet.
N
ñ
Fô
Éif
s)f,
Fzı
Lq
F
Núoo
@
oo?@
No
U)z
3Joox6
oUFouo
BH COLUMNS1650 CR 237,GPJ GINT US LAB.GDT 1215121!nemozC=¡D¡n7otrftzU,f¡J(Dãoo"oo19l¡)6æocogANJTicÞ æ=.¡ 5 eX'u:-tËã'æ5 ı o=Yø54boow5ı@Õ;".¿v ,ç lllæñrs.G<lo¡íoeR"FIı'g-qF-o!7emC)t-ooIızq.-oo!vPmÕz=mo(!ooc=7o0¡ctN)C,)._¡{fnU,-{!{zc=Emn{!I{!omo.Ttzo-{mv,t-oo6)moEU)amxo+o-z=m-{Totr,1ıc,=ttrÀ)ÕFoomxC)-lızooz-.1nÞl)o7oo'E'mgt{vmqor\)()¿moxmçt@@oo=!rm{mEoÌ\)o7otlt=*Ë#iãHçiËËËselfh| 29o7oczomt-til{ozCLaa-{mU,-{!-{altNmIoDEPTH(ft)GRAPHICLOG-lmÐtrUmØc)4.!IozSAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(ROD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)POCKET PEN,(ts0DRY UNIT WÏ(pcf)MOISÏUREcoNTENT (%)-l¡ -'l=msn-l @ØmnoFINES CONTENT(%)LIQUIDLIMITPLASTICLIMITPLASÏCIryINDEXN'1ì'..r-. i\. 1'rt-.' .lr.\ . t/-- t\ . -14rA'crıtØa=oo.o@U,0)o.-o0)fot-ot-YıÉ-f3o.øf+3oË'3(t4a)0)f,o"o0)É.o(c¡ß)ı'o-.1o1'ct)or(É-oqlof\)@(ì(¡)o)NTDoo3ooø-oqJ9oooo
Huddleston-Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC
2789 Riverside Parkway
Crrand Junction, CO 81501
970-255-8005
TEST PIT NUMBER TP.8
PAGE 1 OF 1
PROJECTNAME 1650Countv Road 237
PROJECT LOCATIONPRG'ECT NUMBER
CLIENT Shane Wade
DATE STARTEÍ' 11110121 TEST PIT SIZE
EXCAVATION GONTRACTOR Client
CHECKEDBY MAB
COMPLETED 11110121
EXCAVATION METHOD Trackh/Backhoe
GROUND ELEVATION
LOGGEDBY SD
NOTES AFTER EXCAVAÏION ---
Ynr eno oF EXcAVAnoN 5.5ft
GROUND WATER LEVELS:
Vrr nue oF ExcAVATToN s.5 ft
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
oô
Tt-0-tuo
O
+sÉ.-o
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
IUIL>ül- ur
5gfL =l>z
U)
s
q8
gs
H
øî
=l--l^Zrãasoz
zulfL
t-lu
)¿oofL
I
F
=F-^
=Eto
Lil o\ú.-
-F
fr ll
Oz>o()
Ou
a=
J_
otrb
3=
t-
0ñ
42
ô-
FzljlFzoG'o9)
U'
uJz
tl-
I]1..1
? itt
.!1.. !
ii.',¡ i:..r:-:
Sandy Clay with Organics (TOPSOIL)
Poorly Graded GRAVELS and COBBLES with SAND (gp), tan,
moist, dense
Bottom of test pit at 6.0 feet.
N
ñ
Fflqof
U)f
Fzo
È
ñ
N
ú.
Ooo@
ooo€
No
az
lJ
oIE
=Uts
U
GEOTECH 3H COLUMNS T'2388-OOO1 1650 CR 237.GPJ GINT US LAB.GDT 12.f5/21!vPmo{zC=EmvoN(¡)@@Õooot-fitzØ:t0¡foã0¡o-(ûg^Nì1c,Þ æ=e-rúä¿.5 (ì o!-øtÍu3 ãW5ôO- H=O o-kvFllæ-<OQrqãF-.to';rItvo(-mo5oa-zqhc!7em(ìz=mo¡otoooc7oq)o-NC!\¡{ntU,{!{zc=Emv{TI(o!omo-Ttzo{m(t,t-ooomo@U)Emxo{o-z=m¿o(t-lq)ôFJTDÀ¡ô-JoomxoÞ-{ızooz{ÃÞ(){ovQı'E'mlt{Þ1mqoN)o+moÃmc,EIDoo=Em-{mtr,oaottt=ilËgñËËHfi, oãI z>.onoczomm-.1ızCL?aIm(tt-{EIg,NmoDEPTH(ft)GRAPHICLOG3-lmnt-amØc)4-oIozSAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(ROD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)POCKET PEN(tsf)DRY UNIT WT(pcr)MOISTURECoNTENT (%)-lr-{:m<n-{@Øm7oFINES CONTENT("/")LIQUIDLIMITPLASTICLIMITPLASTICITYINDEXU'0)fooÂ)É.o(cIq,ı'Ø-Jo.It(nor-(¡)l-tltão@X*6)Y-Ë8.(eoovmrØ0)ooEOcormtJ)E.fa,z0(oE::-0,@o3ooa=q)f,¡ooot+
Huddleston-Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC
2789 Riverside Parkway
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-255-8005
PROJECT NAME 1650 Countv Road 237
PROJECT NUMBER PRq.|ECT LOCATION
CUENT Shane Wade
TEST PIT NUMBER TP.IO
PAGE 1 OF 1
GROUND WATER LEVELS:
AT TIME OF EXCAVATION
AT END OF EXCAVATION
AFTER EXCAVATION ---
TEST PIT SIZE
CHECKEDBY MAB
Trackh/Backhoe drv
drv
COMPLETED 11110121 GROUND ELEVATION
NOTES
DATE STARTED 11110121
EXCAVATION GONTRAGTOR Client
EXCAVATION METHOD
LOGGEDBY SD
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
IFùutcl
o
O
äsd'(,
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
tuÀ>t
F- ]U
5go-
=t>z
U)
s
t-
EE
8s
tÉ
øîÞFl
E==¿ıo>oz
z
lrJ
fLr-C
ilJ J4
ooo-
F
B
2Ö5s
É.o
:ãLrl o\ú.-
-F¿zf, Fro2>oo
Ou
:f=
l-
otrF
3=
È0ñ
42
ô-
t-z
l¡JFzoG'oÐ
U'
IJJz
tL
1
!f. .!
? r.t
f-q.. !
ti.'\t t)
!: $r¿"
!a.. j
2. .it ,¿
Sandy Clay with Organics (TOPSOIL)
2
3
Sandy Lean CLAY (cl), brown, moist, medium stiff
Bottom of test pit at 3.0 feet.
È(¿
ú
C)
o
@
ooo
No
Øz
fJo
ro-oUh
uo
APPEI\DIX B
Laboratory Testing Results
r!
N
Fôqof
Øl
tsz
fL
ñ
N
ú.oo
@
oôo
ç!
uN
ØzaÍ
Huddleston-Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC
2789 Riverside Parkway
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-255-8005
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
CLIENT Shane Wade PRO.TECT NAME 1650 Countv Road 237
PROJECT NUMBER 02388-0001 PROJECT LOCATION sitt. co
U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER64
FI(t
d
=
fD
ú.
UJztr
¡-z
uJO
É.ulÀ
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
100 l0 1
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
0. 1 0.01 0.001
COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAYcoarselinecoarsemediumfine
f\
\
\
ì tt
:I \t
\
\
(
\
\
ì{\
\
Specimen ldentification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu
o TP-2, GB-t 11110 POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND(GP)NP NP NP 5.22 51.18
a TP-7, GB-t 11110 SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL)28 15 t3
Specimen ldentification D100 D60 D30 D10 %Gravel %Sand %silt o/oClay
o TP-2, GB-1 11110 37.5 11.779 3.763 0.23 66.0 29.6 4.4
tr TP-7, GB-1 1',|.110 4.75 0.0 38.s 61.5
Ø:f
Fz
(?
È
ñ
too
@
oe
ó
@
No
ØF
EJo
É.Um
&.UFk
Huddleston-Be,rry Engineering & Testing, LLC
2789 Riverside Parkway
ATTERBERG LIMITS' RESULTS
Jrmcf,ion, CO 81501
970-255-ttO05
CUENT Sharre Wade PRCilECT NAME 1650 Courrtv Road 237
PRc|.'ECT NUMBER 02388-OOO1 PROJEGT LOCATION SIIt, CO
(Ð €D
P
L
A
S
T
I
c
I
T
I
N
D
E
X
30
20
10
CL-ML @ @
40 60
LIOUID LIMIT
80 100
Specimen ldentification LL PL PI #200 Classification
O TP.2, GB.I 111'10 NP NP NP 4 POORLY GRADED GRAVEL w¡th SAND(GP)
E TP-7, GB-l 11t10 28 t5 t3 62 SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL)
Huddleston-Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC
2789 Riverside Parkway
C¡rand Junction, CO 81501
970-2s5-8005
MOISTU RE.DENSITY RELATIONSHI P
PRO.JECT NAME '1650 County Road 237
PRqJECT LOCATION S¡It. COPRqJECT NUMBER 02388-OOO1
CLIENT Shane Wade
rul
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
,/\
7
\
/
\
Sample Date:
Sample No.:
Source of Material:
Description of Material
11t10t2021
21-0870
145 TP-7 GB.1
SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL)
Test Method ASTM D6984
140
135 TEST RESULTS
Maximum Dry Density 111.5 PGF
Optimum Water Content 15'0 o/o
r30
125
GRADAïON RESULTS (% PASSING)
#200 #4 314"
62 100 r00
()
o"tl-
<Dz
l¡Jo
É.o
ATTERBERG LIMITS
1 20
LL PL PI
28 15 l3
115 Curves of 100o/o Saturation
for Specific Gravity Equal to
110
2.80
2.70
2.60
105
100
95
5 15
WATER CONTENT, %
90
0 l0 20 25 30
APPENDIX C
Percolation Tcsting Rcsults
PERCOLATION TESTING
sTP322Ifuddleston-Berry
tDglr¡Mlsg & T*st¡ng' Ll"C
Project Name:
' . , irij:rrr irn::¡lh:l
1650 Road 237 Location:co
Testing Conducted By:
Supervising Engineer:
TEST PIT DIMENSIONS
SOIL PROFILE
Test Number'. 1
Top of Hole Depth: ¡ (ttl
Diameter of Hole: 4 (in)
Depth of Hole: Tlin¡
Rate (min/in):
S. Dinterman
M. Berry
Test Number:
Top of Hole Depth
Diameter of Hole:
Depth of Hole:
Test Number:
Top of Hole Depth
Diameter of Hole:
Depth of Hole:
(ft)
(¡n)
(in)
(ft)
(in)
(in)
TP-1
1
Test Pit No.
Date:
:'.:: . .i. i '..; ' .. ',".:,:".:l--:". .....",: ;:- ..¡. dli:"j
.t¡-&'- :1 ¡ .;t ;É é, J*È"¿
.i ',1- -"J ,. "t,', ,.:it:
0-1 Sandv Clavwith Orqanics ffOPSOIL)
1-3 Sandv Lean CLAY (cl). brown. moist. medium stiff
.,':.':¡¡r',t5
..1::. tt,1,:.!. :|.1 t.
'':.:::..:.: ::ttrIII
II
0 1.125
5 7.375 6.25
6.12s1013.5
15 14 0.5
20 14.625 0.625
25 15.125 0.5
30 Drv
35 1.25
40 4.375 3.125
45 7.5 3.125
B:ã,d-"È-{ ï¿"égl;. +: : :' l e: :'':Á})
i"'&B:..r ðS* :v".,' . l;ù , tu!:
*J.¡'r"i"i i"¡¿,. 'l4e.: -1 'l¡
äi.,"* i,
T5}.Í.i]iì.+*'.:i1,,,1 r,l L;¡
Average Percolation Rate (min/in):
Rate (min/in):Rate (min/in):
PERCOLATION TESTING
STP322Iluddlcston-Eerry
Ingiloud[g & T..t¡lrc, L¡-C
Project Nanre: 1650 County Road 237 Locatiorr: S¡lt, CO
Testing Conducted By:
Supervising Engineer:
S. Dinterman
M. Berry
TEST PIT D¡MENSIONS
width
üeÞth {t}
3 X
SOIL PROFILE
Ðepth
{ft}Rsmarl€
0-1 Sandv Clav with Orqanics ffOPSOIL)
1-3
Poorly Graded GRAVELS and COBBLES with SAND (gp), tan, moist,
loose
Test Number: 1
Top of Hole Depth: ¡ titl
Diameter of Hole: 4 _(in)
Depth of Hole: t A 1in¡
Rate (rnin/irr):
Test Number:
Top of Hole Depth: (ft)
Diameter of Hole: (¡n)
Depth of Hole: (in)
Test Number'. _
Top of Hole Depth: (ft)
Diameter of Hole: _(in)
Depth of Hole:
-(in)
11t10t2021
Project No.
Test Pit No.
Date:
02388-0001
TP.9
0 0.75
5 2.25 1.5
10 3.75 1.5
15 4.75 1
20 5.75 1
25 6.625 0.875
30 7.5 0.875
35 8.25 0.75
40 I 0.75
45 9.625 0.625
50 10.125 0.5
1O,75 0i:êâ$ I
11.5 0.76
7
mffim (in.l mffim
Average Percolation Rate (min/in):
Rate (min/in)Rate (min/in)
PERCOLATION TESTING
STP322fruddleston-Berry
l;ngincrriÈg & T(stiûg, L-.,{:
Project Name: 1650 County Road 237 Location: Silt, CO
Testing Conducted B!,:
Supervising Engineer:
TEST PIT DIMENSIONS
SOIL PROFILE
Test Number: 1
Top of Hole Depth: ¡ tttl
Diameter of Hole: a_ (in)
Depth of Hole: te 1in¡
lmfn.)
watgr
Ðapth
{in.}
0 0.25
5 2 1.75
10 3.75 1.75
15 4.625 0.875
20 5.5 0.875
25 6.375 0.875
30 7.125 0.75
35 7.75 0.625
40 8.5 0.75
45 9.25 0.75
50 10 0.75
1û.625 û.Ê25
6û 11.25 û.625
IRate (min/in):
' '-'S. Dihtérman' ' .'
M. Berry
Ðepth
fft)
0-1 ct with PSOIL
1-3 Sandv Lean CLAY (cl), brown, moist, medium stiff
Test Number: _
Top of Hole Depth: (ft)
Diameter of Hole: _ (in)
Depth of Hole: _ (in)
Test Number: _
Top of Hole Depth:
-
(ft)
Diameter of Hole: _ (in)
Depth of Hole: (in)
ïme
(min.)
Water
Depth
{in.}
Çhange
{in.)
02388-0001
TP-10
11t10t2021
Project No.
Test Pit No.
Date:
Le¡eth
(fr)
Depth
{fr}
Water Lerrel$epth {fi}
Ðepth {ff)Not Ërçountered
3 X
mffim
Average Percolation Rate (min/in)
Rate (min/in):Rate (min/in):