Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutObservation of Excavation 08.17.22l$rtflå#l[*iffßHi,r'3ü*.*5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 phone: (970) 945-7988 fax: (970) 945-8454 email: kaglenwood@kumanrsa.com www.kumantsa.comAn Employsc Owncd Compony Office Locations: Denver (HQ), Parkeq Colorado Splings, Fort Clollins, Glenrvood Springs, and Sumnrit County, Cololado September 16,2022 Surprise Valley l,LLC Attn: Jimmy Terui 5444 Cot:nty Road226 New Castle, Colorado 81647 it@)tebuilders.net Project No. 21-7-925.4 Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Residence, Lot2l-A, Grand Hogback Exemption, 2452 County Pioad 237, Gar{ield County, Colorado Jimmy: As requested, a representative of Kumar & Associates, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on September 13,2022 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated February 1,2022, Project No.2l-7-925. The proposed residence is essentially the same as described in our previous report and will be slab-on-grade floor with spread footings sized for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation trench excavations had been cut in one level from 3 to 4 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of sandy clay and clayey sand with gravel. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on a sample taken from the site, shown on Figure l, indicate the soils have low compressibility under light loading and moderate compressibility under additional loading after wetting. The laboratory test results are suilrmarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are similar to those previously encountered on the site but appear more variable with less clay and expansion potential than expected. We recommend that spread footings be placed on at least lt/z feet of road base structural fill and designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf to lessen the variability and movement potential. The structural fill should extend at least one foot beyond the footing edges and be compacted to at least 98% of standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. The exterior deck piers should not need structural fill for bearing unless they carry roof loading. Loose disturbed soils in the footing areas should be moistened and compacted prior to placing structural fill or concrete. Other recommendations presented in our previous repoft which are applicable should also be observed. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous subsurface exploration at the site. Variations Surprise Valley I,LLC September 16,2022 Page2 in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, Kumar & Associates, Steven L. Pawlak, P SLP/kac Attachments: Figure 1-Test Results Table 1 - Summary of Laboratory Test Results cc: JimRomeo0in@iirctgzu'al,cqpl) 6n2IØ I Kumar & Associates, lnc. o Project No.21-7-925.4 SAMPLE OF: Sondy Cloy FROMr Norlheosl Corner WC = 't 2.7 %, DD = 93 pcf ln fr. rôproducad, ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION UNDER CONSTANT PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING 2 ñ JJ t¡J> tt1 I o l-- o Jovtz() (-) 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 t.0 Fig. 1Kumar & Associates SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TESÏ RESULTS21 -7 -925A lC irffi?:ffifffinr'ifú-*TABLE 1SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTSNo.2l-7sotloRBEDROCKTYPESandy ClayCþey SandIPSRUNCOT{FINEDcorPREssrvESTRENGTHPLASNCINDEXfY"ìATTERBERG LIMffSl'/"1LK¡Uþ I.IMIÍPERCENÍPASSING NO.2m sEvE35l%'tSA}¡DGRAOATION(%)GRAìÆL939412.720.tBOTTOT OF EXCAVATIONLOCANONNATURALDRYDENSFYNATURALMOFTURECONTENTNortheast CornerSouthwest Corner