HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.00 Staff Report BOA 03.27.2017Exhibits - Gonzalez Variance
Board of Adjustment, March 27,2017, continued from February 27,2017
I
Exh¡b¡t
Letbr
Proof of Notice with attachmentsA
2013 Land Use and Code as amendedB
icationc
D Staff Memo
Staff PresentationE
F Email dated Jan 23 2O17 from Keesb Road &
Resolution of DenialG
Draft Resolution of rovalH
I dated Fe 27 20'17 Luke Watkins
of Pe issued GarfieldJ
ILC subm nt with setback identifiedK
L Site submitted the licant
ication and site n
Staff sketches on ILC ind location of nt with setbacksN
S of su for vananceo
Ph otos to ind icate sufficie nt iteon-sP
Revised Staffo
Revised Resolution ofR
s Revised Staff Presentation
T
U
V
w
x
Y
z
EXHIBIT
&
Gurfteld County
PUBTIC HEARING NOTICE INFORMATION
Please check the appropriate boxes below based upon the notice that was conducted for your public
hearing. ln addition, please initial on the blank line next to the statements if they accurately reflect the
described action-
- ..\\ lt--
lJ N
I tUy application required written/mailed notice to adjacent property owners and mineral
owners.
/ Mailed notice was completed on ,n 2! day of
[/' All owners of record within a 200 foot radius of the subject parcel were identified as
shown in the Clerk and Recorder's office at least 15 calendar days prior to sending
notice.
All owners of mineral interest in the subject property were identified through records in
the rk and ror r, or through other means flistl
2016.
. Please attach proof of return receipt requested mailed notice
E My application required Published notice.
Notice was published on the a 6 day of '1 u rtv r. rlz ,2o!6.
Please attach proof of publication in the Rifle C¡tizen TelegramI
EI My application required Posting of Notice.
-rt Notice was posted on the Ì â dav oiTu rtcor¿,.ru 20L6.
Notice was posted so that at leâst one sígn faced each adjacent road right of way
generally used by the public.
I test¡fy that the above information is true and accurate.
Name:
Signature:
Date:
U.S. Postal Service'"
CERTIFIED MAI]L@ RECEIPT
Domestic Mait Only
FJNEtd,,t åSTI"Er
È3.3ü
ER"tum
ll Return
R€ceipt (hardcopy)
R€celpt (olectronic)
f] C€dmêd Måll Re6ldgted Dêllvery
E Adult Slgnature Requked
E Adult Stgnature Fêstricted Dêllvsry
*f-r.47
$d.47
U.S. Postal Service'"
CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT
Domestio Maíl
For visit our website at www,usps,com@,
CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT
Domestic Mail
ry
rfl
m
if
ru
-J0lf
f
ru
tf,
EI
Ef,
EI
trlrl
EI
ru
JT
E]rr
e
ruff
rLÍ'
TTÐm
ru
f3
E¡t¡E
U
R.
c3
ru
JTf:ltrl
n-
f
FtÍ
ru
JI
E¡f
ru
E3E
EI
EIrr
E¡ru
-¡r{
c¡
r\-
r!r:l
.f
ru
JT
Ef,:f
ru
E3E
E¡
cf,
tf
rL[3
ru
.Jf
E¡t\
Here
.i : ¿
Postmark
tt/tr/2fr11
72",¿).1r
ta'
-t.
.,, - r.,
trm
ru
JI
EIt
ru
r:l
T3r:l
EI
ÊtÞ
E]
ru
,.urjl
13
tr-
-¡lr
-l¡if,
rr
cO
m
ru
t
EI
trl
EI
trlrrE
ru
-ErqE
rL
I'lEtl CASTIET CS 81d'47
û538 ..
fi9
Poslmark' Hàre '
'?frtlV
frq
Postmark
Hefg
/Lql2ttt7
ü9
'!Po.gtmark
Here
ül "i: ,
I
tr9
Postmark .. .
r, fl9t",'. :1 '; t'! i ; !.ìjr:--
;j2. ,,¡ i
''.trl /1 9/:t'1 7.
ú
'å'å"i,:iå"$,i ä:;"J"J;*
oo' "lo o" ' 1
ERetumnecolpt(electrcnic) O 3F$8['
ECertifisdMallRestdctsdDellvoi $ ft.Ûü
flAdutt stsnaturs R€qutred $
-+{}¡sÉ-..j-EAdult slgnature Restrlcted Del¡very $ --_q---
$ü,17Postage
ß \
"':j
informatiorì, vis¡t our webs¡te at
PS Form 3800, April 201 5 PsN 7530-02-000-9047 See Rêverse for
For
U.S. Postal Service"
CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT
Ðomestic Mail Only
$3.3t1
t] Return Recelpl (el€clron¡c)
flCerlíied Matt næUcted Del¡very
Ü Adult Signaturs R€quìred
$
$
$
$
sfl Adu[ Signature Rstr¡ctsd
t Rêturn Recelpt (hardcopy)
st:r.47
$d.4?
("
PS Form 3800,5 PsN Tsso-02-ooo-s047 ,See Reverse for lnstruct¡ons
v¡s¡t our atFor del
$3.3¡l
f]Êeturn Recelpt (hardcopy) S
E Return Recelpt (eleclronlc) I
EóedmedMallRostrictedDEl¡v€ry $
flAdult Signatur€ Required $
flAdult Slgnature Restrictsd Dsliv€ry $
sfi.47
66.47
information, visÍt our website at
2015 psN 7530-02.0û0.9042 See Reve¡se for lnstructionForm
U,S, Postal Service'.
öËäñFaÈP untu'REcElPr
DomestÍc Maíl
i3. ãü
ff:]:)=-lll-i-
dL-L
I
$
$
$
(oleotrcnic)Rec€¡Ptfl Beturn
D€llvoryR6trlclodMailC€rlilledE
Adult slgnature Requlredtr
DellveryRestrictedS¡gnature
Return R€ce¡Pt (hardcopy)
tü.47
U.S. Postal Service'"
CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT
Domestic Mail Anly
S3. Tü
E Retum Beceipt (hardcopy) $
E Raturo R€c€ipt (electron¡c) $
E C€rtifled Mall Restrirted Dslirery $
l]Adult Signalure Requ¡red $
nAdult Signãture Restrlcted Dellvery $
$Lr. {7 \
47
ôr
t
informalion, vis¡t our'For at
PS Form See Revefse for lnstructionr201,5
CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT
Domestic Mail
CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT
Domestic Mail Only
Postal
*3.3fr
*å'åf""#å:::,1
ñ:å: f:;*'-' "oi':wffw
E Roturn Recê¡pt (etætrcn¡o) s --$û-i#t-+f CortÌlÌed Mall Restrlot€d D€llvory $ -JËå-{ru-
EAdutt slsnatuE Reqúlred t -+ff-;{A--EAdult stgnatur€ Restricted oellvory $ ._
tll.47
U.S. Postal Service'"
CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT
Domestic Mail Only
Reverse for lnstructions2015 PSNPS Form 3800,
our www,usps.
HEI'I,rcQ $r"r+!
{Ê
,l
0
ilEU, eASTtEr¡ '{g 916{?
rrl./19 :¿Ltt / .
r
EO
.!
J
r
Êt¡
m
ru
'J
U
J
J
Lt
-8-q
J
r
¡jtrr
f
E.
co
m
ru
clt3
E3
EI
E¡
rLt3
ru
JIrl
EIrr
l',lEl^l
JI
n-
if,
ru
JIE:¡.
ru
c3Eclt3
IJ
rt-El
ru
JI
r.?
LJr!
J¡
rurr
^f,
tr
E0
m
ru
[f
EI
E¡
EI
tr]rr
tr¡
ru
JI
r-l
trlrr
ru
-i'ru
.lú
E]t
ru
EI[3
LJE
Et
rLE
ru
.¡
t3rl
Postmârk
tr-
JTf
ru
..n
EI
ru
g
EIE
E3
Ff'-E
ru
JT
EIrr
{.
"!':'
Postmark
.: . I",j :,::'i
"lÅL/19/2ttl7
f":l:
¡.-:
.'¡Postmark Postrhârk
Here. . ' r',
Itw.l9l?rj17
"?*,
r¡h/Jç/?trl7
.!nül/19/?ü1?'
è.l:,"
_ "
t:1 ,cq
la:
Postmark
." ,i ': 'rp¿..,','
?ü1?
t3.3rr
EIRstum Recelpt(hardcop9 $
E Return Rsæipl (€lectrcnlc) I
ECedf¡ed Mall Restdcted D€llv€ry $
EAdult Slgnarure Requlrsd $
rI Adult Slgnature Restricted Dellvory $
I+tü.47
*6.47
'-', "i
or
visit our webs¡te at
PS Form 3800, Apr¡l 2015 PsN7530'02-000-9047 See Rererse for lnstruct¡on
U.S. Postal Service'"
CERT¡FIED MAIL@ RECEIPT
Ðomestíc Mail Only
$3.3t1
l] R€turn Rgoolpt (hardcopy) $
ERdurn Receipt (€lectrcnic) $
L]Cêrtilied Mall Rêstr¡cted Delivôry $
EAdult Signature Rsquired $
Adult Slgnature Rêsk¡otêd Delívery $
sü,47
s¿.47
vis¡t our website at wwwusps,com@,
PS Form 38oo, April 2015 psN 7530.02'ooo-s047 See Reverse fof lnstruct¡ons
For del
93.3t1
ERetunRecelpl(hardcopy) S
E Return Rse¡pt (€tectrenlc) $
ECertfiod Mall Reeiriot€d De¡lvsry $
nAdult Slgnaturo Rôqulßd $
E Adult Slgnature Fìesl¡lcted Del¡very $
)pnaBl
lU-1"¡*rE}-
srl. 47 i
,47
6
For delivery intormation,al .www.usps,comþouf
PS Form 38OO, April 2015 pSN z5go.o2-000,9047 See Beverse for lnstruction{
U.S. Postal Service'"
CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT
Domestic Mail Only
U.S. Postal Service"
CERTIFIED MAIL@ REGEIPT
Domestic Mail Only
*3.31J
E Return Recelpt (hardcopy) $
E Return Recetpt (electronic) $
nCertlfled Mall Relr¡cted Del¡very
EAdult Signaturé R€quired $
E Adult Signature Restr¡cted D€livery $
fü.4?
rö.+t
or
lro
5ctû u/ar
visit our website at com6
PS Form 2015 PsN 7s30-02-oo0-9047 See Beverse for
f3.3ü
E Return Rece¡pt (eleadrcnlc)
n C€rtified Mall Restds{ed Dellvery
n Adu¡t SignatuÊ Requ¡red
l] Adutt Slgnature Rætricied Del¡v€ry
$
$
$
I
Roturff F€celpl (hardcopy)
gÈ1-
F*---úfl-
$'J.4?
$d.47
visít our webs¡te at
2015 PsN 7s3o.o2-oo0-s047 See Reverse for lnstruct¡on08o0,
lfl.
"f,if
ru
J¡
Ef
J
ru
EI
E¡cfE
EIr!
E]
ru
JT
E},r!
rn
EO
ru
,n
t3!
ru
ÉlE
EIt:
ru
fi,-¡f,
r
EO
m
ru
É
trtÉ
trl
CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT
Domestic Mail Only
CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT
Domestic Mail
ttr.4?
$
$
$
$
Del¡very
D€livery
R6tr¡çted
R€qu¡red
RestrictedMail
Receipt (eleclonlc)
slonature
Adult Signaturc
Retum
n ÀdrrB
EC€rtifisd
(hardcoPY)
$
$
Delv€ry
DeliverY
Ê€quiÉd
Reslricted
(elêcùñic)
R6trictedMail
Ræelpt (hardÉPy)
RæelPt
SignatuF
Adút SignatlG
Ceft:ftêd
Ret¡m
flAdult
ún*um
tr
8ÍrCfl
U.S. Postal Service
-'
öËFiilÊEó uRtt-u REcElPr
o
websiteour
forsee Reverse
at
OnlYMa,Domestic
PSN2015AÞril3aoo,FoimPS
f3.31'
nRdumRæe¡pt(ha¡d@p9 $
E Retum Ræipt (elæùonic) $
E C€¡tfed Mai¡ Rstnded Delivery
Ú Adult SignatuÞ Rêquired
EAdult s¡gmruÞ R6tricted Del¡v€ry $
*ü. {7
For delivery informat¡on, visit our webs¡te al www,usps,com@
PsN 753ô-02-000-904? See Reverse for lnstruct¡onsPS form 3800,201
ll
!)ü[.]r
PGgtmark
ü1/t?/?t¡t?
Here
NEII
rurn
J
ru
-¡EIjf
ru
EI
trl
IJ
Tf,
Ef,Il
trtru
.¡
11
E¡r!
cltr
J
ru
-¡tfs
ru
E
trt
EI
EI
EIrr
trI
ru
.¡rl
E]
rL
.¡E
lfl
ru
JI[f
J
ru
Tft3
EfE
.L \-
fl
Ç:
(
l
Postmark
Hgre
; : ?::;7
+t
Postrnark
. Hore: : - ^.^'' :..,,1ít
{¡1/19/3rr1?.'
\r
r:jPostmark
.Hårê
.,t ':' ,,-
/lgt1ttt7
Postmârk
Flero
i"r
cl
r.,B
ru
-¡rq
trlrt
. ¡1
,-\l-,'l. " Postmart
,,r :HîlP j,'rj
uY-i-#
¡ruår-
et--
Êü--
i3.3tl
Return Ræelpt (had@pt4 I
E Retum Rælpt (eledpnlc) $
ICertiñea Uatnestrtcted Del¡very $
EAdults¡gnaiureRequh€d $
E Adult S¡gnat@ Restricted Delþery I
sü,4?
sti.47
2015 PSN 7s30,02-000.9047 See Reverse for lnstructions
U.S. Postal Service'"
CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT
Domestic Mail
combvisit our website at www.information
PS Form 38OO,
ERêtum R€ceiÞt (hadcopt ) $
ERetumReæiÞt(elect¡oniq) S
DCêrtified Ma¡lRætict€d Dê|tuery I
EAdult Signature RequiÞd $
f] Adult Slgnatre Restr¡cted Del¡vqy $
*3.3ü
flRetum Rstpt(hârd@pg
I Retm næa¡ ¡eteetronic¡
$
I
$
$
$
E Csrtifi€d Mail R€striEt6d Doltuery
E Adult Slgnaturc Requ¡Gd
Û Adult SignatuÞ Resticted Del¡wry
*11. {7
information. visit our website at
PS Form 38OOr Apr¡l 2015 PSN 7530^02-000-s047 See Reversefor
U.S. Postal Service'"
CERTIFIEI MAIL@ RECEIPT
Domestic Mail Omt
our webs¡tê atínformation,
'; : .r^,^
' l, . 'r!l
I
*
*
h t.
U.S. Postal Service'-
CERTIFIED MAIL@ R ECEIPT
Dontestic Mail Only
CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT
Dontestic Mail Only
Ð
JI
EIlft
ru
.¡tff
ru
EIEcf
Êr
t3
f!
trt
ru
*¡
r.:lEr\.
ei
ru
rL.T
.f
TT
cB
mru
E
EI
EI
c3
EI
rL
tr¡ru
JIrttf,
rL
L
!
PoÊtrnerk
tt|/t9/2ttt7
L]Hêr€
g . ^ Po.stmad<
.:,i itler.e "-,,-,n-"" "J ....,í,''l'! t:,.,¡ í lj ?
lÊt$ft_) ij ,:"i, ì,,RI
tS.3tl
E Retum F€ælpt (hardæpy)
ÚRetum Recelpt (olectrcnlo)
E Cortlísd Mall nsdrlct€d Dellvdy
EAdult slgnatuÞ Requlri¡d $
sSfgnatuÞ Rðstrlcted
tü.47
$3. rtr
D Ê€'tuÌn Êecolpt (hardæp9
El R€tum Rædpt (olætþnlc)
Ecgltmsd Mall Rssùlctêd Deliwry
EI Adult SignatuE Roqulr€d
$
s
s
t
$Adult 6lgnatuÞ
sû,{?
"-{::":
information. vis¡t our website at
PS Form 38OO, April 2015 PsN 7540-02-000-9047 See Reverse fol
cotnr'For
U.S. Postal Service"
CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT
Domestic Mail
NEUåtlsuËE
t3.3fi
ERêtumRselpt(hardcopy) $
ElRdurn Rædpt (slectrþrb) S
Ecolüf,ed MallRq*rlc,ted fÞllvqy $
llAdult Slgnatuß R€qulßd S
Adult SlgnatuÞ R€str¡cled D€llwry $
Sr'.47
$6.4'7
.,;a9 L
See Fleverse for lnstructionsPSN201.5 7530-02-000.9047FormPSApr¡l38OO,
For visit our website atdelivery information'
ùtt
/ê
(/
mr{tfl
ru
-!EI¿
ru
tf
Êl
EI
E¡
f:l
rL
E¡
ru
.¡r:l
EI
rL
fr
ti
'!
.¡
fUt3tt,
.!trlÍru
trlc¡
EI
EI
trlrr
EIru
J¡
r.:l
trlr!
"r,ti ", .'li"
Postúalk
Hgrg
Itv/2fr17
Postmark
Hore
,' J :¡ iì]i"¡..,.)!:
/t9/2ltl7
r
r{
E¡lr¡
J¡
EI
' I ;, ,. .'.:,
Postmark
H6r€
/tq/2út7
ru
ct
E¡trtrI
t3
rL
EI
ru
JIr{Er!
U.S. Postal Service'"
CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT
Domestic Mail
*3,3(r
IflReù¡m RælPt (oloclþnlc) $
Ecerttfod MallR6tdcted Dsllv€ry S
EAdult signaturg R€qulÞd $
signature Reslricted Dellwry 0
tF€turn R&tPt fiad@Py)
lr_
t'1.17
Seê Reverse forPS Form Apr¡l 201 5 PsN 7530-02'000-9047
colttn'website at w!vw.For delivery information, visit our
U.S. Postalservice'"
CERTIFIED MAIL@ REC
Only EIPTDomestic Mail
13.3tr
Rofurnfl Rocelpt (h{dcopy)
ÐREtum Fæelpt (electontc)
Ecertlffod Mâfl Rsstdsted Dellrery s
EAduft stgnatuË R€gulrcd
Ðstivsry gSlsnat¡Þ Rostdctod
iú,47
*å.47 \.
April 201PS Forrn s800,
lnstructions
lt PSN 7s30.J2,000,9047 See Reverse fot
visit ourFordelivery
at wwwusps.com@
Receipl of Payment
olt20t17
Swift Communications
City Glenwood Springs
State CO
Credit Gard
Type M
NUm *********:É*********
Auth 091428
Expir &&/a/
Zip 81602 Country Code US
Start 01126117 Paytype CC lssues f
Stop o1t26t17 Rate Code vCT Glass 0990
Copy ct Heidi Schultz BOA 5 Ute Ave.
æbfu:Al0'tubtur¿d¡d2s ûñ sdbk tu kfthfo fddtz @rffirhér@dãiMs
'b4l)ffidffi(Ð
Púlshdhl& tllæ¡ l¿¡oyåñ &1Ert 26.ærz{f¿61@1i
Ad shown is not actual print size
283 Words
1 cols x 4.28 inches
1:17 PM
Account 8627595
Name RMS Concrete
Phone (970)945-0887
Address POB 670
rykdÞ: bts1Ád2.@k3.Ëlxçdæwd.hh
MD..qFcr su.Ávæ
Amount
Tax
37.80
0,00
Rep 8P175
Ad # 126',5521
Paytype Credit Card
Balance 0
Receipt No
Amount Paid
Payment Due
Received by
01/2A/17
Original
Receipt of Payment
Swift Communications
Account 8627595
Name RMS Concrete
Phone (970)945-0887
Address POB 670
Credit Card
Type M
Num
Gity Glenwood Springs
State CO
Auth 091428
Expir &&lal
Zip 81602 Gountry Code US
Start 01126|,7 Paytype CC lssues 1
$top o1tz6tlz Rare Gode VCT Class 0990
Copy ct Heidi Schultz BOA 5 Ute Ave.
A pud¡é ldñg6 th dldb tulã
'fr&ldffi,F@flmtø7,A6SÂñ-lnrh(Mhftra3jffiÊtu-e¡3.d'dl:dffiñtuffi.Ml@.1M*d,dMSFrc.(É
tu@k@dH*rtury
PùbisM iñ rÈClrl¿e¡ relègrs¡ h@ry 2û
2ù17. \12G1æ1t
Ad shown is not actual print size
283 Words
1 cols x 4.28 inches
37.80
0.00 Ad Size
Date
1 ;17 PM
L@l kldd: !6 J d2. gek 3, €rkâéelD6@t md,Wtu
æedrFh:5u.Ayfu
Iì#Mih Ate'vffiêÍdhÈrÞqú.åd25 trfi! sdkkdáabeÞrc trârd 12'Vdbmàtdr û!¿ ¡rydã lM É!
Amount Paid
Payment Due
ReP 8P175
Ad # 12615521
Paytype Credit Card
Balance 0
Receipt No
Amount
Tax
37.80
0.00
37.80
0.00
Received by
Customer Gopy
Ad Size
Date
Outlook.com Print Message Page I of3
Print Close
RE: Public Notice (5 Ute Avenue)
From: Pam Schultz (PSchultz @eaglevalleyenterprise.com)
Sent: Fn l/20/17 2:18 PM
To: RMS CONCRETE INC. (rmsconc@msn.com)
l attachment
ct l?615521 rms concrete At-26-2t17,pdf {85i.9 KB)
Attached is your paid ad receipt and a copy of your notice for
the Citizen Te1egram.
ACCO UNT NUMBER: 8627595
ÄD II¡ NUMBERT 12615521
n'tell p¿ff&ffNt$ fO: Make Fayable to: Eagle Valley Enterprise
Colorado Mcuntain News Media
FO Box 15t0
Gypsurn, CÛ 81637
Pamela J. Schultz
97û328.{,656 x 128t2
970-777-3172 (direct) Fax: 970- 328-6409
Legals
mailto: psehultz@eaglevalleyenterprise.com or @
Legals Ctenk for: Eagle Valley Enterprise; Vai! Ðaily and Midråle Fark Times,
https://blu I 80.mail. live.com/ol/mail.mvclPrintMessages?mkFen-us 1120/2017
Outlook.com Print Message Page2 of 3
Çlenwood Pcst Independemt, Rifle Citizen Telegram, Aspen Times Weekly, Snowrn*ss Sun *nd the
Susr¡nit Co*nty Journal
Beginning soon after January LZAIT w€ a!"e going to a ncw prog!'åm" You will need to include your
Account nurnher when making a req¡rest for any publieatioxr"
If you *lcn'f have you!" âeeß¿lnt q:¡lmbcr úhen I wilå let yau lenow what it is"
If you have questions ûn an ad please incle¡de yaur ad nnrnber whÊch is at the top of yoarr ad fieket"
Flease review y*ur procf tå¡at is aftaeË¡ed rvhe¡'¡ I retaarB it rvítfu the sd tåekeË"
If there are corrections piease res¡¡oFd f¡ra¡E.rptly. Errors f,oupd more Éhan 24 hoËrs af,ter $¡¡bliesÉion
wiil not be done for frçe.
Aàso please have yarur eopv ç"e*dv far p¿rbåic*tåon rvhen sent ts rne" R.edoing tl¡em ås time ecnsr¡ming and
*rav res¿¡lt !n your notice noÉ making *he deadåi¡¡e reguÊr"ed.
DeadEine for all weeklv Ë¡âÊetrs are due I week of the date vour ree¡nest n¡¡hlücsÉia¡r.
ÐeadËines for Ðailv papers are f*vo davs prior to requested publieation.
From¡ RMS CONCRETE INC. [mailto: rmsconc@msn.com]
Sent: Thursday, January L9,2Ol7 10:344M
To: Pam SchulE
Subjecü FW: Public Notice (5 Ute Avenue)
Thankvou
Rulsen L'cu'gas
Esfimator/Owner
(e70)-37e-664e
RMS COI{CRETE TI{C"
(970)-94s-0887 ffice
https ://blu I 80.mail.live.com/oVmail.mvc/PrintMessages?mkFen-us r/2012017
Outlook.com Print Message
(970)-94s-9412 fax
PO BOX 670
Glenwoad Springs, Co. 81602
Page 3 of3
From: rmsconc@msn.com
To: rmsconc@msn.com
Subject:
Date: Thu, 19 lan 2Ot7 09:55:23 -07æ
>
htþs :/iblu 1 8O.mail. live. cor¡/oVmail.mvc/PrintMessages?mkt:en-us 1/20/2017
REQUEST
APPLICANT / OWNER
REPRESENTATIVE
LOCêT|ON
SITE DATA
ACCESS
EXISTING ZONING
Gonzalez Variance
Board of Adjustment - F 27,2017
PROJECT INFORMATION
Gonzalez Variance
Petronello Gonzalez
Ruben Vargas
5 Ute Avenue, Elk Creek DeveloPment
Approximately Tz miles northwest of the Town of New
Castle
.203-acres ez - ool
Parcel No. 2125-251-W
Ute Avenue
Residential Mobile Home Park (RMHP)
t.PROPOSAL
The Applicant owns a .203-acre
parcel in the Elk Creek
Development northwest of the
Town of New Castle, Figure 1.
The lot is located at the corner of
Ute Avenue and Comanchero
Trail. The Garfield CountY Land
Use and Development Code, as
amended (LUDC), Section 3-202
C., states that corner lots shall
observe the 25' front Yard
setbacks along both streets.
A shed/garage currently exists on
the site and the Applicant recently
had a modular home set on the
site without benefit of a building
permit. The location of the
modular unit encroaches on the
two required 25 foot front
setbacks along Ute Avenue and
Comanchero Trail. The
encroachment along Ute Avenue is 9.6 feet and the encroachment along Comanchero Trail is 11.7
feet as shown in the lmprovement Location Certificate, Figure 2.
'1 l[:'a;ge
Figurel-SiteLocation
z
T
ú
LOT 1
I ¡.5'
LOT 2
r5,4'
6
t
Ëå
f J.t'
ơvrs&r Creek \#-il
¡MFRC'ìr'EME¡IT TOCATION CFRNRC¡:.Is
FOFTNON OF LdTS '
ANO 2. BLTCJ< 5
ELK CFIËEK ÞEVELC'PE{I,iEIìIÍ. UNÍT ONÊ
5 UTE AVENUE
NEWCÅSTLE. COLORAÐA
NO\EMEEFI 28. ãOS PFOJ. ì6t73 Ll 2EeDtrCÛ'dÖ
lffi cfff,KguRltfoñú ltË.
mwc.ffiffiffildffi
L8ffi
wwtub*f;*ffistl tÊsrr Fr4€tæ
IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE
s
/ Ètltflb ÉÊ¡âÊ
øf &{D eâP
l,trr{Ess c$t{Ê
N
{
q
Þz
C)
Erïñð'rl
,ÐÕ
-ln
1-ê
a
PROPÉFÌY t€S{8rs¡roru
t¡srERh Pû{11ø{ OF LOtÊ r rn0 2,
8LÓEK ¡,€ìÍ üEf¡( ü€vÊLoÞr¡Éxl uNfr or*
rÉw crsnr. colcRÀm
¡ lôrt{o Rf,!áRr A{t} cåPtr
UTE AVE eû'a0'ü'
I HEREey CEFÎíT fl{^f ÌHls ll.PRWÊUEr{l tôC^ìlor¡ CËÊlf,leAfÊ Tl 5
FñÉFIRÍÛ U,¡O€F YY Dl߀Ct SUPfñilS¡Ol{ FOR PETEOIÈO C¡årol't4 'lr{ÀÍ tHr9 s r¡01 å l¡¡Ê s(.ñ|tr Ft¡^l 0ñ ¡¡aFFentuEt*t slJ8lvEY FtÀr.
Íraf fr l5 t{or ro gE nEufo oFotr FoR l¡il €sr¡ålls}q{Hf É rEtc€.
óe ôTHEÊ fvlUF€ ruFÈtvÉt¡Ër{f uNÉÊ.
r,{o
¡ur[00rc,
p¡ÊcËL
elrnÊfLY
^sNO
¡¡{l}
Ólr
rXAY ÈÄsñirfiror sÀq Plf,qfL
Gonzalez Variance
Board of Adjustment - February 27,2017
Figure 2 - lmprovement Location Certificate
,il. HlsroRY AND DESGRIPTION
fhe County euitOingjivision discovered the modular home being set on the site in early
November. No building permit was issued to permit this activity. The Applicant then submitted the
November 2gth lmprovement Location Certificate (lLC) which clearly indicates that the unit was not
set in compliance with the required 25 foot front yard setbacks. A photograph of the modular
2lPage
Gonzalez Variance
Board of Adjustment - February 27,2017
home is shown, right, in Figure 3.
On December 9, 2016 the APPlicant
requested a pre-aPPlication
conference to discuss the Variance
process to correct the setback
issues.
The Applicant has stated that the
location of the shed/garage and the
existing septic system do not allow
them to located the modular home in
conformance with the setbacks.
:lll. REFERRAL COMMENTS
Staff referred the application to the following agencies/County Departments for their review and
comment. Comments received are attached as exhibits and incorporated into the memorandum
where applicable.
1. Road & Bridse,ExhibÉE Wyatt Keesbery has no issues with the application
Agencies who did not respond to the request for comments include the following:
Còlorado River Fire Rescue, Town of New Castle, Book Cliff, Mount Sopris & South Side Soil
Conservation Districts
.lV. REVIEW CRITERIA
Variances require that all of the standards be met for a finding of approval.
Section 4-115 C., Review Criteria.
The following standards shall be satisfied for approval of a request for variance from
specific regulatory provisions of this Code:
1. Special Circumstances or Conditions Exist. One or more of the following
circumstances or conditions exist with respect to the specific property:
a. Exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of the property at the
time of the enactment of the regulation in question;
Staff Comment: The site is a corner lot that is neither narrow,
shallow nor irregularly shaped. The dimensions of the lot are 87.31
feet by 120feet.
b. Exceptional topographic conditions of the property; and
Staff Comment: There are no exceptional topographic conditions on
3lFage
Figure3-ModularUnit
the property
c
Gonzalez Variance
Board of Adjustment - February 27,2017
Other extraordinary and exceptional situations or conditions of the
property.
Staff Comment: No extraordinary and exceptional situations or
conditions exist on the property.
Not a Result of the Actions of Applicant. The special circumstances and
conditions have not resulted from any act of the Applicant.
Staff Comment: There are no special circumstances or conditions that exist
on the site. lt is Staff opinion that the 27 foú by 60 foot modular unit cannot
be placed on the site compliant with the setbacks due to existing
improvements on the site. Those improvements include a garage/shed and
a septic system. The placement of the unit on the site is the cause of the
proposed setback encroachment and therefore would be a direct result of an
act of this applicant.
Strict Application Consequence. Because of the special circumstances and
conditions found pursuant to section 4-115.C.1., the strict application of the
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional, practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardship on, the owner of the property.
Staff Comment: Strict application of the regulation could result in peculiar
and exceptional practical difficulties for the Applicant as the modular unit has
been installed on the site and it does not appear that the unit can be located
elsewhere to allow conformity with the setbacks.
Variance is Necessary for Relief. The granting of the variance from the strict
application of the provisions set forth in this Code is necessary to relieve the
owner of the peculiar and exceptional, practical difficulties or exceptional
and undue hardship.
Staff Comment: The variance is necessary for relief to allow the modular
home to remain on the site.
Not Detrimental to the Public Good. Granting the variance will not cause
substantial detriment to the public good.
Staff Comment: The variance would not cause detriment to the public good
Variance Will Not lmpair the County's Zoning. Granting the variance will not
substantially impair the intent and purpose of this Code.
Staff Comment: Granting the variance would be contrary to the code
purpose; that provides clearly for a required front setbacks of 25 feet.
4lPage
2.
3.
4.
5
6
Gonzalez Variance
Board of Adjustment - February 27,2017
.V. DISCUSSION
The burden of demonstrating a hardship is a difficult threshold to meet, given the 'exceptional' and
'extraordinary' language in the LUDC and that it is not a result of the applicant's actions. A
hardship is solely related to the physical conditions of the site and the potential limitations that
result from those conditions.
The task of demonstrating a hardship lies with the Applicant, and a determination of whether a
hardship exists is to be determined by the Board of Adjustment.
The Applicant installed the modular unit on the site without first obtaining required building permits
which would have identified an issue with the setbacks. However it does not appear that the size
of the modular home, along with existing site improvements, would allow the unit to conform with
the two front yard setþacks. Staff is of the opinion that the Applicant has created the hardship and
therefore the variance should be denied.
vt.RECOMMEN D FINDINGS
1. That proper notice was provided as required by the Garfield County 2013 Land Use and
Development Code;
2. That the review before the Board of Adjustment was extensive and complete, that all
pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that adjacent property owners had
the ability to be heard regarding this request;
3. That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed Gonzalez Variance lS/lS NOT
in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County if
recommended conditions of approval are satisfied;
4. That, upon satisfaction of conditions of approval, the application HASiHAS NOT met the
requirements of the Garfield County 2013 Land Use and Development Code, as amended.
VII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff finds the variance criteria has not been met as there are no extraordinary or exceptional
conditions that exist on the site that result in a hardship, therefore the request for a variance does
not meet the LUDC requirements and should be denied.
VI¡I. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DELIBERATION AND DECISION
SlFlaage
Gonzatez Variance
Board of Adjustment
February 27,2017
Project Summary
Owner/Applicant
Representative
Location
Legal Description
Site Data
Access
Zoning
Variance Request
Petronito Carmona Gonzatez
Ruben Vargas
Northwest of the Town of New Castle
Elk Creek Development, Unit 1, Block 3, Porti
.203-acres (approximatety 8,843 square feet)
Parcel No. 21 25-251-02-001
5 UteAvenue
Ute Avenue
Residentiat Mobite Home Park (RMHP)
Front Setback along Comanchero Trail
Front Setback along Ute Avenue
ons of Lots 1 and 2
-ÏH
...{l o'
ll¡.¡Ê.J
uîd
ant A,tlul)l
Request
Applicant has placed a modular home on the site that encroaches the required 25
foot front setback along Comanchero Trail and the required 25 foot front setback
along Ute Avenue.
The lot has an existing shed/garage and a septic system that the Appticant states
does not a[[ow for ptacement of the modular home in compliance with the
required 25 foot setbacks
Site Detaits
The site is approximately
87' x 120' and requires
minimum 25' setbacks on
the 2 fronts.
Gonzalez Variance
5 UteAvenue
Elk Creek Development
Ì
Modular Home Ptacement
IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE
3 ;z Fùl¡g ÊÉlrny- a¡ Crtcl?r{ls gßcn
2
I
N
ÞffiÌ Delcærû.
fll'fiÌ FÇrEt f tor's r nD 2.È¡tx 3.a* citû( ol\,BOFl{tF. tlÍr O.Éx€r cfüifi.E- coL&ron
(^)o
z(-)ü:Eæ frtn
It0
Þr
t
rûll¡ Ëxn.üD Cp
0' ¿0' {0" 6ryffi
I
(,
LOT 1
LOr 2
r¡-J
r5.a',
6
trl
r1.6'
UTE AYE
Code Review Criteria Section 4-11 5
The fottowing standards shall be satisfied for approval of a request for variance from specific regulatory
provisions of this Code:
1. Special Circumstances or Conditions Exist. One or more of the foltowing circumstances or conditions
with respect to the specific property:
Exceptional
question;
narrowness, shallowness, or shape of the property at the time of the enactment of the regutation ina.
2
b. Exceptional topographic conditions of the property; and
c. Other extraordinary and exceptional situations or conditions of the property.
Not a Result of the Actions of Applicant. The special circumstances and conditions have not resutted f
any act of the Appticant.
3
4.
Strict Apptication Consequence. Because of the speciaI circumstances and conditions found pursuant
section 4-115.C.1., the strict application of the regutation would resutt in peculiar and exceptionat,
practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undue hardship on, the owner of the property.
Variance is Necessary for Relief. The granting of the variance from the strict application of the p
set forth in this Code is necessary to relieve the owner of the peculiar and exceptional, practical
difficutties or exceptionat and undue hardship.
5.
6.
Not Detrimenta
pubtic good.
I to the Public Good. Granting the variance wi[[ not cause substantial detriment to
Variance Witt Not lmpai
and purpose of this Cod
r the County's Zoning. Granting the variance will not substantiatty impair
e
Staff Recommendation
The request for the variance does not meet the criteria, particularty that the
request is not a result of actions by the Appticant.
Findings
Proper posting and pubtic notice were provided as required for the meeting
before the Board of Adjustment.
2
3
1
4
The meeting before the Board of Adjustment was extensive and comptete, that
alt pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that att interested
parties were heard at that meeting.
For the above stated and other reasons,
determined to be in the best interest of
citizens of Garfietd County.
the proposed Variance has not been
the heatth, safety and welfare of the
The application has not met the standards and requirements for Variance
pursuant to the 2013 Land Use and Devetopment Code, ai amended.
Board of Adjustment
Deti beration / Decision
The Board has the foltowing options regarding the Gonzalez Variance request:
1. Deny the requested Variance and adopt the recommended findings.
Authorize the Chairman to sign the resolution of denial;
z. Approve the requested Variance and amend the recommended findings in
support of the action. Authorize the Chairman to sign the resotution of
approvat;
3. Continue the request to a specific date, citing the information or reason for
the continuance.
EXHItsIT
t-
Kat A.
From:
Sent:
To:
Subiect:
Wyatt Keesbery
Monday, January 23,2017 11:44 AM
Kathy A. Eastley
RE: Referral Request - Variance in Elk Creek at 5 Ute Avenue
No issues from Road and Bridge.
Wyatt
From: Kathy A. Eastley
Sent: Thursday, January 19,2OL7 11:06 AM
To: Wyatt Keesbery; Kelly Cave; Tim Cain; Orrin Moon; Prow, Sharie - NRCS, Glenwood Springs, CO
Cc: Tamra Allen
Subject: Referral Request - Variance in Elk Creek at 5 Ute Avenue
Good day,
The Garfield County Community Development Department has received a land use application for a Variance on a lot in
Elk Creek Development, located northwest of the Town of New Castle. The Applicant seeks relief of the requirement to
provide a 25' front yard setback along Ute Avenue and Comanchero Trail in order to allow a modular home to be placed
on the site.
You are receiving this email because you are a referral agency or a party that may have an interest in reviewing and
commenting on the application. The County is requesting your comments no later than February 10th so that those
comments can be considered by the Garfield County Board of Adjustment at the public hearing on the application.
Attached is a referral form which lists the timeframe for the review and provides the file number of the application
(vARA-1_2-L6-8s06).
A link providing direct access to the application materials is provided for your ease of review https://records.garfield-
countv.com/We bLin k/Browse.aspx?sta rtid=3589392
lf this link does not work you may access these application materials through our online File Cabinet found at
https://www.garfield-countv.com/public-records/countv-documents.aspx by searching with the File Number VARA-12-
L6-8506.
Please feel free to call me at 970-9 45-1377 extension 1580 ¡f you have any questions about the requested review or
difficulty in locating the application on the County system. Thank you for your time.
Kothy Eostley, ATCP
Senior Plonner
GarÍield County Community Development
108 8th Street, #4Ot
Glenwood Springs, CO 8t6OL
Phone: 97O-945-L377 ext. t58O
Fox: 970-384-3470
keost ley@gorf i eld-county.com
RESOLUTION NO.
Series of20l7
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF GARFIELD COUNTY
DENYING A VARIANCE FOR MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACKS ALONG UTE
AVENUE AND COMANCHERO TRAIL FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5 UTE
AVENUE IN ELK CREEK DEVELOPMENT, NORTHWEST OF THE TOWN OF NEW
CASTLE, GARFIELD COUNTY
PARCEL NO# 2 I 25-2 5 I -02-0 I
Recitals
A. Petronilo Carmona Gonzalezmade an application to the Board of Adjustment of Garfield
County, Colorado, (the "Board") requesting the Board grant variances from the20l3 Land Use and
Development Code, as amended (LUDC), Table 3-201, Zone District Dimensions.
B. Petronilo Carmona Gonzalez is the owner of real property as identified in a Warranty
Deed recorded at Reception No. 866820 in the Office of the Garfield County Clerk & Recorder,
more practically described as 5 Ute Avenue, Portions of Lot I and2, Block 3, Unit One of the Elk
Creek Development.
C. The subject property is contained within the Residential Mobile Home ParkZone District
and issuance of the requested variance will not effect the requirement for the parcel to comply with
the remainingzone district standards contained within the LUDC.
D. Petronilo Carmona Gonzalez specifically requests the Board grant variances from the
required 25 foot front yard setback along Ute Avenue to allow for an encroachment of 9.6 feet and
along Comanchero Trail to allow for an ll.7 feet encroachment into the setback as indicated on
attached Exhibit A.
E. Garfîeld County is a legal and political subdivision of the State of Colorado, for which the
Board of County Commissioners is authorized to act.
F. The Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County has appointed the Garfield
County Board of Adjustment.
H. The Board of Adjustment conducted a public hearing on February 27 , 2017, upon the
question of whether the requested variance should be approved, denied, or whether any action should
be taken on this matter.
1. Proper posting and public notice were provided as required for the meeting before the
Board of Adjustment.
1
2. The meeting before the Board of Adjustment was extensive and complete, that all
pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties were
heard atthatmeeting.
3. For the above stated and other reasons, the proposed Variance has been determined to be
in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County.
4. The application has met the standards and requirements for Variance pursuant to the
2013 Land Use and Development Code, as amended.
RESOLUTION
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment, Garfield County,
Colorado, that:
A. The forgoing Recitals are incorporated by this reference as part of the resolution.
1. The Variance from Table 3-201, Zone District Dimensions,25 foot front setback from
Ute Avenue permitting a 9.6 foot encroachment and an 11.7 foot encroachment on
Comanchero Trail is hereby approved subject to the compliance with Exhibit A.
Dated this _ day of A.D. 20_.
ATTEST:GARFIELD COLTNTY BOARD OF
ADJUSTMENT, GARFIELD COLTNTY,
COLORADO
Secretary to the Board Chairman
Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the
following vote:
BRAD JORDAN. CHAIRMAN .Aye ORNay
STEPHEN DAMM" VICE-CHAIRMAN Aye OR Nay
DWIGHT JUHL. SECRETARY , Aye OR Nay
JOCK JACOBER , Aye OR Nay
JARMAN SMITH , Aye OR Nay
MATT LANGHORST , Aye OR Nay
RICK ULLOM , Aye OR Nay
RUSSEL TALBOT Aye OR Nay
SEAN MELLO , Aye OR Nay
STEVEN BOAT , Aye OR Nay
DANIEL ADAMS , Aye OR Nay
2
:++
EXHIBIT
booa
RESOLUTION NO.
Series of2017
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF GARFIELD COUNTY
DENYING A VARIANCE FOR MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACKS ALONG UTE
AVENUE AND COMANCHERO TRAIL FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5 UTE
AVENUE IN ELK CREEK DEVELOPMENT, NORTH\üEST OF THE TOWN OF NE\il
CASTLE, GARFIELD COUNTY
PARCEL NO# 2 I 2 5-25 I -02-0 I
Recitals
A. Petronilo Carmona Gonzalezmade an application to the Board of Adjustment of Garfield
County, Colorado, (the "Board") requesting the Board grant variances from the 2013 Land Use and
Development Code, as amended (LUDC), Table 3-201, Zone District Dimensions.
B. Petronilo Carmona Gonzalez is the owner of real property as identified in a Warranty
Deed recorded at Reception No. 866820 in the Office of the Garfield County Clerk & Recorder,
more practically described as 5 Ute Avenue, Portions of Lot I and2, Block 3, Unit One of the Elk
Creek Development.
C. The subject property is contained within the Residential Mobile Home ParkZoneDistrict
and issuance of the requested variance will not effect the requirement for the parcel to comply with
the remaining zone district standards contained within the LUDC.
D. Petronilo Carmona Gonzalez specifically requests the Board grant variances from the
required 25 footfront yard setback along Ute Avenue to allow for an encroachment of 9.6 feet and
along Comanchero Trail to allow for an 1 1.7 feet encroachment into the setback as indicated on
attached Exhibit A.
E. Garfield County is a legal and political subdivision of the State of Colorado, for which the
Board of County Commissioners is authorized to act.
F. The Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County has appointed the Garfield
County Board of Adjustment.
H. The Board of Adjustment conducted a public hearing on February 27,2017, upon the
question of whether the requested variance should be approved, denied, or whether any action should
be taken on this matter.
1. Proper posting and public notice were provided as required for the meeting before the
Board of Adjustment.
I
2. The meeting before the Board of Adjustment was extensive and complete, that all
pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties were
heard atthatmeeting.
3. For the above stated and other reasons, the proposed Variance has been determined to be
in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County.
4. The application has met the standards and requirements for Variance pursuant to the
2013 LandUse and Development Code, as amended'
RESOLUTION
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment, Garfield County,
Colorado, that:
A. The forgoing Recitals are incorporated by this reference as part of the resolution.
1. The Variance from Table 3-20l,Zone District Dimensions, 25 foot front setback from
Ute Avenue permittingag.6 foot encroachment and an 11.7 foot encroachment on
Comanchero Trail is hereby approved subject to the compliance with Exhibit A.
Dated this
-
day of A.D. 20
ATTEST:GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF
ADJUSTMENT, GARFIELD COUNTY,
COLORADO
Secretary to the Board Chairman
Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the
following vote:
Frp ÂT)JORD A'NI ôf,TATPI\fAN Aye OR Nay
Aye OR Nay
Aye OR Nay
Aye OR Nay
Aye OR Nay
Aye OR Nay
Aye OR Nay
Aye OR Nay
Aye OR Nay
Aye OR Nay
Aye OR Nay
ETtrDIJFNT TìA \/TñE ñIJATPI\/ÍA]\T
DWIGHT JUHL.ARY
JOCK JACOBER
IAT)'t\/f^-l'{ Sl\/fTTI{
GHO
pTf-ra ULLOM
ISSF,T,T T ROT
SEAN MELLO
STEVEN BOAT
TìA'NTTFT ANÂNíS
2
Page I ofl
4ütb\T T
Deb Sanderson
From: "LukeWatkins"<lukewatkins@gmail.com>Date: Monday, February 27,2017 12:39 PM
To: <debsanderson@,sopris.neÞ
Subject: variance meeting for 05 Ute Ave
Greetings Deborah Sanderson,
I am the owner of 44 Navajo Street., New Castle Colorado property in the Elk Creek Subdivision. I wish
to provide you with a record of my wishes regarding the variance request by the owner/representative of
the 05 Ute Avenue property. The set backs that are in place provide for a better look-and-feel for the
neighborhood, giving a more natural living space with trees, shrubs, decorative plants,grasses and lawns
and such to line the roadways instead of buildings and walls up against the roadways. So I am against
granting any variance from the current set back requirements. To be sure, a foot or so variance would be
no problem.
Thank you for conveying my statement to the appropriate parties,
Luke Watkins (aka Lawrence G V/atkins owner of 44 Navajo St)
720 530-8830 [text or voice]
11169 Dexter Dr, Thornton CO 80233
212712017
PERMIT CARD
Community Development Department
108 8th Street, Suite 401
Gfenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone (970)945-8212
POST THIS IN A CONSPICIOUS PTACE WHEN
CONSTRUCTION IS STARTED
Garfield County
Project Address 5 Ute Ave parcef No. 212525102001
Owner Name Petronilo Carmona Owner phone 970-366-7322
Contractor(s)Gontractor Phone
Work Description Replace existing septic tank
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning,
location, construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted. The applicant further agrees that if the above
said regulations are not fully complied with ín the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit
may then be revoked by notice from the County Building division and immediately become null and void.
ìPâil5'i;jþ¿iiil1'¡, r'
PercTest
Final
PLEASE SEE BACK OF PERMIT FOR OTHER COMMENTS
ADDITIONAL TNSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED
For Inspections Call (970) 945-1377 xl62l
For Driveway Inspections Call (970) 625-8601
ozo
ô-f
ãCo
&{
Èc
AU
ÊzLd
29o?E
-"t
Õ 2^
É; äË
äÉ äsct o ,4
a ä:Ësùt(J
F 3ãã*
'aiU?.d ..94úE.ðUc¡r.a
ei) lJz=fF¡l-gã;COMANCHERO TRAIT
N oO'
- . ¿A
t.4()Ur.l¡ '
e\
@
,ll ,
!+-'(
ilg,
ru
.)
ø
¡
(
)
).J
,i;
I
!
,
t
)
+
\ll:,/ . i.- -'
t.Oú'É
L!]'/
!-l
"-)
?
.-).ì
;..
iljl4i
I
'o
Þâ
t /¡-Êbg.g .f 1'
o(l 0
ù * .;...,,
o-ì"rr' ;i:.-- ,- -
¿::.
lð
.. '';;r--:>'
a
I
i
lZr¿.Çr¡(ít':'t ¡Xi
L
e
I
t
I
l
.t
14 -LF'++Y=
L
e
,-._-,_)_1
.)
I
I
,l
,l
'ì
rì
Ìl
"'.i
14 Lletw=
T t ot ldat, _1 - ,rî
¡',4\
¡;É.;
a
ç*
I
t'
I
t j'
I'1.¡..
-'.-- \
--1. t.*',t..?.
--:-"
#""¿-.-
Garfield County
(t
Communily DeveloPment fÞpartmcnt
1oE tü sÙect, Sulte 4ol
Glc¡rwood SPrft¡r, CO 81601
(970194s€212
wnnr.qarfi eld-countv,+m
TYPE OFCOI{STßUCNON
E New lnstallation :E Alterathn E Repair
WASTETYPE
Dwelling . E Transier¡t Use t Comm./lnductr¡al tr Non-I)'omestk
El Other Desc¡ibe
INVOLVED PARTIES
j
pr'o*tt-gü-Iea TãZfPrsperty Owncr:
MailingAddress:
Contractor: -Phone:
Mailing Addrcss:
'Engfuieer;Phone:
¡ Mailing Address:
'1
t
I
¡
ONSITE WASTEWATER
TREATMENT SYSTËM
(owrs)
PERMIT APPLICATION
A¡sesso¡'s Parccl N
Building or Servicc
Dísþnce to Ncarãt Commun¡ty Sewer Syslemf
W¡s an cffort m¡de to conncct to the Comnrunlty Satlar Systcm:ño
FlnalOlspoeal bY AùEorptioll lratch, trd or Plt tr undg¡rcqdO¡t¡rr¡t Aboræ Gtpr¡r¡d Þlspc¡¡d
PROJESf NAME AI{D TOCATION
Job Address:4
W¡tcr Source & TYPe W.t tr Sprlnt
umber: Sr¡b- : ?¡+ tot I -2 tsock ?
Type: rn6\q ùq\,o^ :¿tÀ1c tribidroomd
-
Gerb¡æ 6rindcr-
Enpot'.arprrdoo tr tt.ttrxrrtÊf Pmd S¡d Fltcr
O¡fi.r
tr Sr:rnrqG¡cct E Grtcm
--'-!
Cglltnut¡¡ìY W.tar Smr tlilna
lype of OWTS E v¡utt i tr Y¡utPrfut tr CqnpçlhtToilttS:ptkTent El ArÊt¡ü Plñt
tr Chctnk lloiþt
llcycÍn¡, Potúl¡Usr lnúr.ret¡oí lqtctRrcrdhrFlr
Othcr
Pcrcrnt Grurnd 9opCrOUn¿ Con¿¡t¡onS Dçtt to ln 6romd w¡þr t¡Þlc
-
Eff,ucnt ff! Eñlrpnt bc dltó.ftd t|FtcrÙbbw.tcr¡of ttcStltt?[3 Y¡¡ t] llo
c TflRCANON.
I hereby rclno¡rledtc
have providcd
rc¡d ¡nd unde¡st¡nd ths Notite rnd Ccrtifk¡t¡on aboyÊ a¡ well e¡
information whkh is corrcct and accur¡te to the best qf my knotvledg¡.
DatCÈlnt ard Sign
Êùd Q.tk.¡¿e
î',!Ñ*ea$å
-$z.-tæ
l_____,
oFRGTAIUStOrútY
Pcín'¡t fcg;#?s.oô Perl Ëca: -û.VH ':$åä.*'l'it *
to¡ldln¡ PcrmittùlA ¡
seft¡cfcrmìEgFeçìft3\lsrr¡e D¡ta! I4ltrltþ "w;.''*
a
STOG DIV:1-'îA
DATE
IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTI FICATE
s 895ô'00' W 87-40'
w 87.31'
FÍT.T.II} REEAR
A}¡D CAP
UITÌGSS CÍnl€R
PROPERTY TESCRIPIìON
E S'IERN PORflON 0F LOTS 1 Af,lD 2,
BLOCK 3,
ELK CÎEE1( DEVELOPMENT, UNIT ONE
NEW CAS.TLE, COLORAOO
F͡UND REBAR
AND CAP
40'60'
N
z
f
o
Noôô
oo
=z
C)
fËrÉ IPÍþ rrl;uo
-tn
t'-
'2b' ôg.re,lctr-* uTE AVE
Ì.t{Ðúø'[dDM-d\¡:tOr'$'t"øP
=auP{E +ffi
t,(9a sq.t,&æ<
I HERESY CERTIFY TIIAT THIS ILPRO\'€UENT -Lq)AIION
CERnflC^TE WAS
paiËìñro -uHoen w DlREcr suP€Fr4goN-FoR-PÉrRoNlLo c¡Rl'ou'-
;liñ'iH'S rs iór ¡ r¡xò-snvw-purr_oR IMPRo/E¡IENT SUfn4Ylt T, Al,¡o
ä.üir ri'rS ñOf ro er Èl¡ED iJPoN FoR THE EsT¡EuSHuENT Of FEt-tcE' BulLflNG'
on orxrn FLIruRE lrrPBov€t Er{Î LINES.
0'?0'
KJ
'ooo
+ Éd
fúî?ß,1trfrÍo
rrl
1 2.ı'
Gts
I
LOT 1
1J.3'
15.,r'
LOT 2
z('qoN
Nobo-
*
IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CEtrN FrcATE
POFTION OF LOTS 1 At\¡D 2' BLOCKS
ELK CREEK DEVELOPEMENT, UN]T ONE
5 UTEAVENUE
NEWCASTLE, COLORADO
L1 2 ECD ILC.DIIVGPFOJ.16073NCA/EMBER 28. æ09
olVÞE CFEEK SlrRl/Ë¡r13RS ÌNC.
F¡Ehrt off,l lJrd grYlypr
Ls.84505
æ¡¡cdûdoFtGFoß
NdcdqCoaqÈ
(970187'6-5632 tytq8ã5æ6
DA\m C. NlcHot sol.l
{* g.vl {df
o{
rrl
T
I
T
I
qi'-¡
-g*-fil
-l-*
C
-{r-l
F1
Z.t'-tao
o{
(-).1
Corrnrforo Trt/
Frt lg
5 ulE -Lv ;uL Сt¡s;n¡n Ñ'"-l
'Ni ,i'i";;;i"",;úi; /" 4'¿l*sl/.cô 8/ ø î',V
/o ¿tc/tbn o
i
L.it it .
c>, f)ú/ ØLf thÆr"Q^?5 C o ,^o nchn,, -t n¡t N¿*Ces¡ k .
t r¿ u { C" r. a(l-,,-¿ Tr'.ìl tU ú tl{,,-c i L;
I or^u]
i.
t;LL'
. 'C- icb,*¡
t),Àüç {-o'rn¿u^,'L,*.n-, -fî, ¡\f ø ,'1tL..-
-4't -trpi-..) tiiq
g )2ö' ú
9 Í'l¿ú¿-
y' t{J
rÍiL.\-. g rT\ ¿ira(
-¿"¿4:t ¿1,,r'/4
tî ,/o.Y.otre
tl:-(
2 ¿-! nll
+ lo'*t
,- ¡
eu, t\
tj StLÉ t ¿' .-
he¡-.t-i? f ¿r.^i L. s tl¿
1& (ir t'L
.è
J {¿ì
I
¡le¡J
.-I^*215 C o'* o*YtcV'c 1s T¡ \
{-i
tüo
5*7 ILTE,
l'-YÉ ßç *,n, t'l¡'L 4(Con*I E.L
s8m17 ¿{17û904-1547321Jpc
tüþe/mai l.geogle.csn/mdl/u/Off rÈodlSaaac06cbe$-/8c?prciecW= 1 lt1
REQUEST
APPLICANT I OWNER
REPRESENTATIVE
LOCATION
Gonzalez Variance
Board of Adjustment - March 27 , 2017 , continued from Febru ary 27 ,2017
PROJECT INFORMATION
Gonzalez Variance
Petronello Gonzalez
Ruben Vargas
5 Ute Avenue, Elk Creek Development
Approximalely % miles northwest of the Town of New
Castle
SITF DATA .203-acres
Parcel No. 2125-251 -02-001
ACCESS
EXIST¡NG ZONING
Ute Avenue
Residential Mobile Home Park (RMHP)
Staff has revised this report based upon a site visit conducted on March 7, 2017, review of
supplemental information submitted by the applicant, neighbor signatures of support, and
further review of Section 3-202 E. Partially Developed Frontages, of the 2013 Land Use and
Development Gode, as amended (LUDC). Answers to the Board of Adjustment questions
are located in Section lV. Of this report. All of the additional infomation has resulted in a
revised Staff Recommendation to approve the requested front yard variances.
I
I. PROPOSAL
The Applicant owns a .203-acre parcel
in the Elk Greek Development
northwest of the Town of New Castle,
Figure 1. The lot is located at the
corner of Ute Avenue and
Comanchero Trail. The Garfield
Coun$ Land Use and Development
Code, as amended (LUDC), Section 3-
2O2 C., states that comer lots shall
observe the 25' front yard setbacks
along both streets.
A garage currently exists on the site
and the Applicant recently had e
modular home set on the site. The
location of the modular unit
encroaches on the two required 25
foot front setbacks along Ute Avenue
and Comanchero Trail. The encroachment along Ute Avenue is 9.6 feet (property line to edge of
llPage
EXHIBIT
Figure I -Site Location
Gonzalez Variance
Board of Adjustment - March 27 ,2017 , continued from February 27 , 2017
structure) and the encroachment along Comanchero Trail is 11.7 feet (property line to edge of
structure) as shown in the lmprovement Location Certificate, Figure 2. A site visit indicates that
the unit is essentially 21' from the edge of Ute Avenue and 19'from the edge of Comanchero Trail
as shown in Figure 2, below.
IMPROVEM ENT LOCATI ON CE RTIFICATE
t Qf
Ff¡lfâ ¡úl¡¡
¡a4 Êü,'¡ç¡3 66rEt
I N
ì
I
t
*
LO'I I t
f
¡
i
ãl
3l
¡låt â
LÞ¿('i
g;æ r-"1E
ã'
I ,t
:
Ii-
I
I
!
I
I
I
'I
!
--*
1r?.6'¡g
E
¡t
Ð
3
ci?
,l
Èå
t
¡
lg
I
I
!
I
i
i-,
EfFPd fÆis
t{f't{ Cf Ltrt r ¡r* ¡,
!
I
Ltf; 0F{
LI]T ?r¡xl
t&¡.ú +lþ1{! .-rþ
t:,¡'
- lif
I IE:'drriÈN:lÊs
: - ¡¡3rrr-få -7: ¿,:-ð1É
fr-:'lr¿.r,:,
iliE rif:aÐ
ffi cÓiir\ '{r w1 r.r'tEl.J:{r t{tlr4ñ Snrráll-t^:
tfriTÍå,¿..ßi îÆi,ffiffi,à'l¿ffiif sffi?i;!. .p
iüi ;.'* iá-ra fí Ç¡þ r¡t3¡ tttr-tt€ tjirÊ{{rtfl{t 'r '!xl-r' &rt¡rç'
m íF{it rJ-Jl¿ r2folrIlf,f lrçÍ
1
E¡¡l tdt.
r i,!49-êllFËåFrærq l'rPñtllF}rlE¡rT lllC nOh CEFF'FIG¡:IE
tstitìrtç¡t ôF'-aT8' A¡r¡ ¿ BLÞEI(8
ã-X I;il[fx fIF"ELOFEìI€'{T. UM.T çô¡E
E LITE A'JE¡IJE
^rÊ,¿r
cAsllå C{tLOR¡\[ro
I
i
ilfiC Eãr-
-¡3ãJr=!æ!-
-lÆ
Í{ahkHbSûô,¡. â!t?.f ñlE ir 3û.!pãJ I t.iclt r-î D¡'3
Figure 2 - lmprovement Location Ceftificete
2lPage
Gonzalez Variance
Board of Adjustment - March 27,2017, continued from February 27,2017
The site visit was conducted to determine the distance of the modular unit from the edge of the
roadway as well as to determine if the location was consistent with the neighborhood. As the
photos
-below
show, the adjacent structures are located close to the edge of the roadway, similarly
to the subject site.
House A House A
House B House B
House B
House A
House B
i
sr
!Lt
Photos of the Gonzalez home are shown below:
3lPage
Gonzelez Variance
Board of Adjustment - March 27,2017 , continued from February 27,2017
II. REFERRAL GOMMENTS
Staff referred the application to the following ageneies/County Departments for their review and
comment. Comments received are attached as exhibits and incorporated into the memorandum
where applicable.
4lPage
1. Road & Bridqe. Exhibit F: Wyatt Keesbery has no issues with the application.
Gonzalez Variance
Board of Adjustment - March 27,2017, continued from February 27,20'17
Agencies who did not respond to the request for comments include the following:
Cãbrado River Fire Rescue, Town of New Caotle, Book Cliff, Mount Sopris & South Side Soil
Conservation Distric'te
I
Variances require that all of the standards be met for a finding of approval
Section 4-115 G., Rcvlow Gritcria.
The following standards shall be satisfied for approval of a request for variance from
specific regulatory provisions of this Code:
1. Special Circumstances or Conditions Exist. One or more of the following
circumstanoes or conditions exist with respect to the specific property:
a. Exceptional nanowness, shallowness, or shape of the property at the
time of the enactment of the regulation in question;
Staff Comment The site is a corner lot, 87.31 feet by 120 feet,
subject to providlng two 25 foot front setbacks as it fronts on both Ute
Avenue and Comanchero Trail. The lot is neither narow, shallow
nor inegularly shaped.
b. Exceptional topographic conditions of the property; and
Staff Comment There are no exceptional topographic conditions on
the property.
c.Other extraordinary and exceptional situations or conditions of the
property.
Staff Comment: Several exceptional situations that exist relative to
this application.
1) The Elk Greek Development is an older subdivision zoned as
Residential Mobile Home Park. As it has built'out it has become
apparent that many of the units are not compliant with setbacks
and that the roads do not appear to be consistently located in the
described ROW.
2) Section 3-202 E. of the LUDC contemplates this exact situation
where the 'neighborhood' or'adjacent' units are similarly non-
compliant. This code section permits previously constructed
buildings not meeting the required front yard setback for the
district to average the front yard setback of the adjacent
buildings. Staff review of the area setbacks show that the
placement of the modular home on the Gonzalez parcel is
consistent with the neighborhood.
Not a Result of the Actions of Applicant. The special circumstances and
conditions have not resulted from any act of the Applicant.
2.
SlPage
Gonzalez Variance
Board of Adjustment - March 27 ,2017 , continued from February 27 ,2017
Staff Commcnt: Thcrc arc epccial circum¡tanccc and conditions that exist
within the Elk Creek Development. lt is Staff opinion that the 27 tool by 60
foot modular unit cannot be placed on the site compliant with the setbacks
due to existing improvements on the site, Those improvements include a
garage/shed and a septic system.
3.Strict Application Consequence. Because of the special circumstances and
conditions found pursuant to eection 4-115.C.1., the etrict application of the
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional, practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardship on, the owner of the property.
Staff Comment: Strict application of the regulation could result in peculiar
and exceptional practical difficulties for the Applicant. The modular unit
cannot be moved within the site to allow conformity with the setbacks and
not permitting the variance would result in exceptional, practical difficulties
as well as exceptional and undue hardship on the owner.
4.Variance is Necessary for Relief. The granting of the variance from the strict
application of the provisions set forth in this Code is necessary to relieve the
owner of the peculiar and exceptional, practical difficulties or exceptional
and undue hardship.
Staff Comment: The variance is necessary for relief to allow the modular
home to remain on the site.
5.Not Detrimental to the Public Good. Granting the variance will not cause
substantial detriment to the public good.
Staff Comment: The variance would not cause detriment to the public good
6.Variance Will Not lmpair the County's Zoning. Granting the variance will not
substantially impair the intent and purpose of this Code.
Staff Comment: Granting the variance would not substantially impair the
intent and purpose of the code purpose.
tv. ifsêusslorr
At the public hearing on February 27, 20'17 the Board of Adjustment continued the public hearing
to March 27,2017 so that the Applicant could provide the following information (with staff response
in italics):
'l. Determine the septic tank and leachfield location in relation to the modular unit;
Staff Comment: The septic tank is læated approximately 5 feet from the home, compliant
with separation distance. The leachfreld is located as shown in photos below:
6lPage
Gonzalez Variance
Board of Adjustment- March 27,2017, continued from February27,2017
2. Determine if the existing septic tank in adequate to serve the 3-bedroom modular unit;
Statr Comment: The tank is sufficiently sized to serue a &bedroom home.
3. Determine if the prior home on the lot was non-conforming as far as setbacks;
StafÍ Comment: The prior home a 6û square foot structurc that was compliant with the 25'
frant setbacks. Photos from the,Assessor's weösrfe are shown below to indicate the size
and location of the former strudure.
Rear Yard from Comanchero Trail
Rear Yard lookinq at Comanchero Trail
TlPage
-rF
f
t{
rl r,!\
--
4t.
Gonzalez Variancc
Board of AdJustment-March 27,2017, contlnued from February27,2017
ñouse from Ute Avenue
t
Ë
, r't
.-rtÉ t#t.
Ð..,.
Garage from Ute Avenue
House frcm Comanchero Trail
I
'- I.t
SlPage
?ç
a
¿
I
I
a ¿>.ö'
-¡t
'l¡ '-
f,
t..
à
ef,L
Gonzalez Variance
Board of Adjustment - March 27 , 2017 , continued from February 27 ,2017
4. Discuss the proposal with neighbors and HOA to get local support for the variance;
Staff Comment: The Applicant has submitted twenty-two signafures from the neighbors in
support of granting the variance, Exhibit O.
5. Determine if the setbacks of the modular unit are consistent with the neighborhood;
Staff Comment: Based upon the photos of the neighborhood taken at the staff sife visit, it
does appear that the subject sife sefbacks are consisfent with some of the neighboring
properties.
6. Determine the size of unit that could fit on the site compliant with the setbacks;
Staff Comment: Staff completed an analysis that appears to indicate that a 1,000 square
foot envelope would allconstruction of a home compliantwith the seföacks.
7. Any other information that could be used in support of the request'
Staff Comment: The Appticant has indicated to staff that they had planned to purchase a
smaller unit when their son was diagnosed with autism. The additional space was deemed
necessary to accommodate fhe issues with their son. They purchased the unit from a
friend.
v. RECOüMENDED FINDINGS
1. That proper notice was provided as required by the Garfield County 2013 Land Use and
Development Code;
2. That the review before the Board of Adjustment was extensive and complete, that all
pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that adjacent property owners had
the ability to be heard regarding this request;
3. That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed Gonzalez Variance is in the
best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County if
recommended conditions of approval are satisfied;
4. That, upon satisfaction of conditions of approval, the application has met the requirements
of the Garfield County 2013 Land Use and Development Code, as amended.
VI. STAFF RECOi'IIIIENDATION
Staff finds the variance criteria has been met and therefore recommends that the Board of
Adjustment grant the requested front yard variances from Ute Avenue and Comanchero as shown
on the lmpiovement Location Certificate. Staff also recommends that the motion include
authorization for the Chair to sign the resolution.
VII. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DELIBERATION AND DECISION
9lPage
Exhibits - Gonzalez Variance
Board of Adjustment, March 27 , 2017 , continued from February 27 ,2017
ExhibitExhib¡t
Letûer
fA to Zl
A Proof of Notice with attachments
B Garfield Countv 2013 Land Use and Development Code, as amended
G Application
D Staff Memo
E Staff Presentation
F Email dated January 23,2017 from Wyatt Keesbery, Road & Bridge
G Draft Resolution of Denial
H Draft Resolution of Approval
I Email dated February 27,2017 from Luke Watkins
J Copy of Septic Permit issued Garfield Cou
ILC submitted bv Applicant with setback identifiedK
L Site photos submitted by the Applicant
M Septic Application and site plan
N Staff sketches on ILC indicatinq location of footprint compliant with setbacks
o Siqned petition of support for granting variance
P Photos to indicate sufficient on-site parking
o Revised Staff Report
R Revised Resolution of approval
s Revised Staff Presentation
T
U
V
w
x
Y
z
R
RESOLUTION NO. 02
Series of20l7
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF GARFIELD COUNTY
APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR MI¡IIMTJM X'RONT YARD SETBACKS ALONG UTE
AVEI\ruE A¡ID COMANCHERO TRAIL FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5 UTE
AYENUE IN ELK CREEK DEVELOPMENT, NORTr{VyEST OF THE TOWIï OF NE}Y
CASTLE, GARFIELD COI]NTY
PARCEL NO# 2 I 2 5-25 I -02-0 I
Recitals
A. Petronilo Carmona Gonzalezmade an application to the Board ofAdjushnent of Garfield
County, Colorado, (the "Board") requesting the Board graut variances ûom the 2013 Land Use and
Development Code, as amended (LUDC), Table 3-207, Zone District Dimensions.
B. Petronilo Carmona Gonz.alez is the owner of real property as identified in a Warranty
Deed recorded at Reception No. 866820 in the Offrce of the Garfield County Clerk & Recorder,
more practically described as 5 Ute Avenue, Portions of Lot I andZ, Block 3, Unit One ofthe Elk
Creek Development.
C. The subject property is contained within the Residential Mobile Home Park Zone District
and issuance of the requested variance will not effect the requirement for the parcel to comply with
the remaining zone district standards contained within the LUDC.
D. Petronilo Carmona Gorø.alez specifically requests the Board gant variances from the
required 25 foot front yard setback along Ute Avenue to allow for an encroachment of 9.6 feet and
along Comanchero Trail to allow for art ll .7 feet encroachment into the setback as indicated on the
site plan attached as Exhibit A.
E. Garfield County is alegal andpolitical subdivision ofthe State of Colorado, forwhichthe
Board of County Commissioners is authorized to act.
F. The Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County has appointed the Garfield
County Board of Adjusünent.
H. The Board of Adjustnent conducted a public hearing on February 27,2017, upon the
question of whether the requested variance should be approved denie{ or whether any action should
be taken on this matter. This public hearing was continued to March 27,2017 so that the Applicant
could address issues raised by the Board of Adjustnent.
I. The Board of Adjustment conducted a continued public hearing on March 27,2Al7,upon
the question of whether the requested variance should be approved, denied, or whether any action
I
should be taken on this matter.
l. Proper posting and public notice were provided as required for the meeting before the
Board of Adjustment.
2. The meeting before the Board of Adjustment was extensive and complete, that all
pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties were
heard at that meeting.
3. For the above stated and other reasons, the proposed Variance has been determined to be
in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County.
4. The application has met the standards and requirements for Variance pursuant to the
2013LandUse and Development Code, as amended.
RESOLUTION
NOW THEREFORE' BE IT RESOLYED by the Board of Adjusünent, Gmfield County,
Colorado, that:
A. The forgoing Recitals are incorporated by this reference as part of the resolution.
1. The Variance from Table 3A01,Zone District Dimensions, 25 foot front setback from
Ute Avenue permitting a 9.6 foot encroachment and an 11.7 foot encroachment on
Comanchero Trail is hereby approved subject to the compliance with Exhibit A.
Dated this
-
day of A.D.20_
ATTEST:GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF
ADruSTMENT, GARFIELD COTINTY,
COLORADO
Secretary to the Board Chairman
Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the
following vote:
ÞD ATì ITìPÏ'ìAN ATDI\/f A'NT Aye ORNay
Aye ORNay
Aye ORNay
Aye ORNay
Aye ORNay
s'TFPT¡trN A'IUÍI\Í VITTF-T'IJ ÀTIIM ^\f
rrìñra r^rtÕËlLip
2
STEVSNpOAT " - ,
DAT{ML AÞATVÍS
Aye ORNay
Aye ORNay
Aye ORNay
Aye ORNay
Aye ORNay
Aye ORNay
3
IMFROVEMENT LOCAT¡ON CERTIFICATE
@--/
M'{II RÊDAß
ânlt cAP
I'ITIGSS CMTER
PIOPERÍY DEgCRIPTION
E STEnn P(nnON (F tOlS t áilO 2,
ELOCK 3.-
EtI( CREEI( DEI'ELOPUEilT. UNTT OilE
NEt cASfLE O(}-ORTOO
s 8956'00' w 87-{O'
w 87Jr'
UTE AVE
N
z
E('eltaC'
f
oo
z
c)Tmno
-l7
t-
tËr¿o FED
No
b.
I HEREFT CERÍ|FY 1l{Àr r{ls nFROYEllEtfT ,tq:^!q¡¡ -cElßnncAÏE sAs
inlËiñËo-ti¡ËËi rr onecr s,pgnrrlsþN FoR-I'ryìlll¡ c¡Rr{lu. -ï¡äi'iñ5 rs'l¡sr
^
urp-snøv njr,oq $.P-!qEIE{r sLRlEr PuT, qro - -üüi ä'É'Nor TO E ntuËO upo¡ Ffr fHE Esr^EuSxuofi oF ÍEr{cE, ilJll¡|î{G.
OR OÎTER FUTI.IRE IIPßO'EIIEilT LII{ES-
olr TllE
TMUTY
0'
sHoril,
EXCEFî
Z- FfItJl{D REBER./- AIID CAP
e0'40 60'
PTRCEL
Û{NRELY
AREåsIHAT
Äs
EVIDS|CE ffi SlCt{ OF Ailr ilSAlEilt
PARCET- ÐrcEpr
^s
NofiÐ.
9.I
ff¡o
=ooc
E
Lo
ffi
LOT I
r2.G'
r3.5
LOT 2
t5-¿t'
t
Gß
,
äl
z
c'c!o
f
Creek
IMPROVEMENT LOCANON CERNHGATE
POFmOh¡ OF LOTS I Al.lD 2, BLOCKS
ELK CREEK DEVELOPEMENT, UNIT ONE
5 UTEAVENUE
NEWCASTLE, COLORADO
L1 2ECDLC.üftGPFqt. 1æ73NC'VEMBER29. æ09
DII'I'E CfiCEKSJñìIEIOFS ¡IC.' -=
-
DAVDc' I.!CTK'I.æN
ffiÈrdL-úùtrrrû
t¡,,.ttË
Hüc-.,Cffi
mx
.¡.
E
-{
\A
Gonzatez Vari ance
Board of Adjustment
March 77 , 2017, continued from February 27 , 2017
Project Summary
Owner/Applicant
Representative
Location
Legal Description
Site Data
Access
Zoning
Variance Request
Petronilo Carmona Gonzalez
Ruben Vargas
Northwest of the Town of New Castte
Etk Creek Development, Unit 1, Block 3, Portions of Lots I and 2
.203-acres (approximatety 8,843 square feet)
Parcel No. 21 25-251-02-001
Ute Avenue
Residentiat Mobite Home Park (R^IlHP)
Front Setback atong Comanchero Trail
Front Setback along Ute Avenue
/\
l¡au
i
I
I
,unI A,tlulll
Request
Applicant has p[aced a modular home on the site that encroaches the required 25
foot front setback along Comanchero Trail and the required 25 foot front setback
atong Ute Avenue.
The lot has an existing shed/garage and a septic system that the Appticant states
does not allow' for placement of the modutar home in compliance with the
required 25 foot setbacks.
i
I
BOA February 27,2017
hearing to March 27 , 2017 .
1. Determine the septic tank and leachfietd location in retation to the modutar unit;
The tank is located approximately 5 feet from the home.
BOA February 27,2017
z. Determine if the existing septic tank in adequate to serye the 3-bedroom
modular unit;
Based upon the septic permit issued by Garfietd County the system is sufficient for a
3-bedroom unit.
3. Determine if the prior home on the lot was non-conforming as far as
setbacks;
The prior home was approximatety 650 square feet and it wâs compliant with the front
setbacks. lt appears from photographs that the home was involved in a fire.
BOA February 27,2017
4. Discuss the proposal with neighbors and HOA to get [oca[ support for the
variance;
The Appticant has submitted a petition of adjacent owner signatures who are in favor
of granting the variance.
s. Determine if the setbacks of the modutar unit are consistent with the
neighborhood;
The Etk Creek Development contains a variety of actual structure setbacks. Some
appear to meet the setback from the road, however the location of the road may or
may not be located within the prescribed right-of-way. Other homes are tocated very
close to the right-of-way.
House A
Houee B
House A
te
Subject
House A
House B
Hou¡c B
I
I
BOA February 27,2017
6. Determine the size of unit that coutd fit on
the site comptiant with the setbacks;
There appears to be an approximately 1,000
square foot, irregutarty shaped area in which a
structure coutd fit that would be compliant with
the setbacks.
LOr ?
12.6
r ati!
6fy
N
r0'
tüiÉr
tÊt ¡ n[l.¡*¡ CAP
ao'
a
rco'
I5
t
Lb'cpe*cus uît Avt
Fina1Y üsc*1¡ft6ar
Ë^sfE¡i{ FfffÞt f tots ! åo 2,ã"0ı( J.{u( cEû( otullfrãn" u|fr cc{€ç Crglr.å" COL*|ûo
c)
ËÞzn
&f@ f?tn
C)
-1
Þr
r- ):
BOA February 27,2017
7. Any other information that could be used in support of the request.
The Applicant has made staff aware that they had ptanned to purchase a
smatler modutar home but that their autistic son needed space. A friend was
selling the modular unit and they purchased it because it was Larger and
would be a better fit for their famity, in particular their son.
LUDC Section 3-202 E.
Partially Developed Frontages.
On a vacant lot bordered on 2 sides by previousty constructed buitdings
that do not meet the required front yard setback for the district, the
required front yard setback for the vacant lot sha[[ be established as
the averaged front yard setback of the 2 adjacent buitdings; where a
vacant lot is bordered on onty I side by a previousty constructed
buitding that does not meet the required front yard setback for the
district, the required front yard setback for the vacant lot shall be
estabtished as the averaged front yard setback of the adjacent
buitding and the minimum front yard setback for the zone district.
Code Review Criteria Section 4-11 5
1. Special Circumstances or Conditions Exist. One or more of the following
circumstances or conditions exist with respect to the spec¡f¡c property:
a. Exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of the property at the
time of the enactment of the regulation in question;
Staff Comment: The site is a corner lot, 87.31 feet by 120 feet, subject
to providing two 25 foot front setbacks as it fronts on both Ute Avenue
and Comanchero Trail. The lot is neither narrow, shallow nor
irregularly shaped.
b. Exceptional topographic conditions of the property; and
Staff Comment: There are no exceptional topographic conditions on
the property.
c.Other efraordinary and exceptional situations or conditions of the
property.
Staff Comment: Several exceptional situations that exist relative to th¡s
application.
1) The Elk Creek Development is an older subdivision zoned as
Residential Mobile Home Park. As it has built-out it has become
apparent that many of the units are not compliant with setbacks
and that the roads do not appear to be consistently located in the
described ROW.
2) Section 3-202 E. of the LUDC contemplates this exact situation
where the 'neighborhood' or 'adjacent' units are similarly non-
compliant. This code section permits previously constructed
buildings not meeting the required front yard setback for the district
to average the front yard setback of the adjacent buildings. Staff
review of the area setbacks show that the placement of the
modular home on the Gonzalez parcel is consistent with the
neighborhood.
Code Review Criteria Section 4-11 5
2.Nol a Result of the Ac{þns of Apdicant. The specbl circr¡mstances and
conditions have not resulted ftom eny act ol the Apdicârìt.
Staff Gornment ThEre arc special circunrstances ard cortdilbns that exist
within the Elk Creek Development. lt b Statr o¡rinion th6t the 27 bot by 60
foot modr.dar unil cannoû be placad on the site compliant with üe setbecks
due to exiding irnproæments on ttre site. Thæe inprovenænts Ûndufe a
garæe/Ehed and a sa$ic system,
Sfict Appl¡cati<¡n Cons€quence. Becar.se d the special circr¡lretancee and
condilions found pursuant to sedion 4-i15.C"1., the stfid apPücaliôrl of the
regulatbn umuH result in peanliar sd Exceptþnal. pncticaldifficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hadship on, tlìe ou,nd of the propeny"
Sffi Commenl: Sfirbt applicatim of ttre ngulatirn could result in peculiar
and exæptlmal practical difnulties for üe Applicent. The moú¡lar mit
cenncil be moved within the dþ to alþrr conhrmi$ wtlh fie s€ûbed€ and
not permi[ing the varbnæ r¡puþ resuft in excedi¡nal, praclical diffict¡ltþs
as urell æ exceptional and undæ hardship on the ovúner.
Vrrirno! þ i'lcccæ¡ry þr Rrllrf. Tþ gnnling of thr vrfirncc frül üa lbtd
æpllc¡t¡on of üre provi¡ionr æt fuüì in thh Codc h ncoet¡rry to ¡dlcw the
orxrer of tfia peanliar and except'nn¡|, ptncticel dlÍllctllüæ or excaptlonal
rnd undue h¡nlahip.
St¡fi-Commrft Tlr vsirnca ir nrcarrery br nllaf to ¡ll¡r üp modul¡r
honc to rum¡in on thc slta.
3.
4.
Code Review Criteria Section 4-11 5
t.
8.
Ì.lot D*iment¡al to the Public fud" Grantlng tlrs veri¡noa will not cau¡a
gubatantial dstriment to he rublic good.
Shfr.Qommant: Tlp varianca upuld not cau¡e ddrimcnt to tlp puilb good.
Vaiance W¡ll Not lmpair the Corng'e Zoning. Granting üte varianoe will not
g¡bstantialfi impair the intent and purpoeo of this Codo"
StEff Cornmarrt Granüng ths verianot wgr¡ld not cubsntially impair he
intent and purpose dttþ æde purfs.
Staff Recommendation
Based upon additional review the request for the variance does appear to meet
the required criteria. Staff recommends that the BOA approve the variance,
incorporating the required findings and authorizing the Chairman to sign the
Resotution of approvat.
Findings
Proper posting and public notice were provided as required for the meeting
before the Board of Adjustment.
The meeting before the Board of Adjustment was extensive and comptete, that
a[[ pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that att interested
parties were heard at that meeting.
7
3
4
For the above stated and other reasons, the
determined to be in the best interest of the heal
citizens of Garfield County.
proposed Variance has been
th, safety and wetfare of the
The apptication has met the standards and requirements for a Variance pursuant
to the 2013 Land Use and Devetopment Code, as amended.
Board of Adjustment
Deti beration / Decision
The Board has the following options regarding the Gonzatez Variance request:
1. Approve the requested Variance and adopt the recommended findings.
Authorize the Chairman to sign the resolution of approvat;
z. Deny the requested Variance and amend the recommended findings in
opposition of the action;
3. Continue the request to a specific date, citing the information or reason for
the continuance.