HomeMy WebLinkAboutOwner Correspondencedu¿r
Colleen W¡rth
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
John Reed <john@cottonwoodholdings.com >
Thursday, September 21, 2023 3:52 PM
Colleen Wirth
John Plano
RE: BLRE-g8 -23-8279 - Reed and Gibson storage building at 7550 CR 312 is now UNDER
REVIEW
Follow up
Flagged
Colleen,
Thank you for your clear and detailed request for information. My responses are below highlighted in green. lf you
prefer, I can put these responses into a letter format and email to you.
Please let me know if you need any additional information
John Reed
From: Col leen Wirth <cwirth @garfield-cou nty.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20,2023 8:00 AM
To: John Reed <john@cottonwoodholdings.com>
Cc: John Plano <jplano@garfield-county.com>
Subject: BLRE-08-23 -8279 - Reed and Gibson storage building at 7550 CR 312 is now UNDER REVIEW
BLRE-g8-23-8279 Reed Gibson building at 7550 CR 312 is now UNDER REVIEW
>
ó
OJ
.t
Courtesy Update for John Reed and Mary Gibson:
Hello, I have commenced the formal review of submitted building plans for 7550 CR 312.
To be clear I am applying the correct code and regulations to your issued FIELD COPY, I would like to obtain
from you as lot owner(s) on a few items.
Receiving your response will enable me to move ahead with the remainder of the review and prepare "redl
FIELD COPY.
l'll need more information before I can release this plan for building permit issuance.
lc
c
contirmation ,!
ines" for ror:g.--t
ÞESTIONENTS:
1. COMM ENT: Viewing the "Proposed Building Location Certificate" prepared by SurvCo circa June 20,2023, I
believe the surveyor is showing a 25 ft access & utility easement with "proposed barn location" measuring 43
feet and 3 inches from said easement'
eUESTIONS: Would I be correct in understanding the proposed building will be accessed via an existing
driveway contained within this easement area? lf not, can you illustrate or otherwise confirm how the
building will be accessed? yes, access will be on the existing gravel driveway that is within the platted 25'
access and utilitY easement.
Z. COMMENT: The SurvCo Location Certificate illustrates no other existing building structures on the property,
while the Garfield County Assessor's Property Record Card for parcel 218332200082 currently shows an existing
3 bedroom log home built circa 1950'
1
QUESTIONS 2.4: May I reconfirm, subject Lot t has arr exislirrg est¿hlisherl residerrtial horne orr it? Anrl the
circa 1950 home has not been demolished or otherwise removed from premises? Yes, there is an existing
home on the property as shown on the Garfield County Asscssor's Propcrty Record Card for parcel
218332200082.
3. COMMENT: I am viewing varied labels and uses for a proposed building structure on this property. The Land
Surveyor references a 28 ft by aB ft "barn". The Class of work in the application form lists: NEW DETACHED
GARAGE USE. CTL Thompson Geotechnical engineering investigation report lists the "REED STORAGE
BUILDING". Architectural Sheets prepared by Gary Jorgensen dated on August L9,2023 reference a "proposed
storage building" with floor plan and concrete slab utilized for "storage" with an 18 x I overhead garage door.
QUESTION: May I please obtain a written statement directly from the property owner(s), expressing the
intended building use or uses. I request something in writing from conveying the following:
3.a. That this is detached garage structure intended for private use and accessory to the main residence on
the property? Yes, this is a detached storage building/garage that is intended for the private use of the
owners of lot 1 and accessory to the main residence on the property.
t L ?L-¡ ¡L;- :- J^À--L-J --:..-r^ ..-- --tl --^l-- 1^-- rL^ -^--!---r^ --^^ ---l r^ rt^-3.Ãi. ! ir(fL L¡¡¡5 ¡5 uÈt¡tcr¡Eü, Pt¡vıIe i¡se CüaU slüi¿¡Be rträ¡y Tùl f¡ie i¡ilivAIe U5€ ãÍli¡ ãCCessOry Ilf, EÍ]€ iliãii-¡
residence on the property? Yes, this is a detached cold storage only for the private use and accessory to the
main residence on the property.
3.c. That this 1,433 sq ft cold storage building is for non-residential use / commercial business / place of
employment or other etc? lf so, please expound. This cold storage building is for non-residential use and is
not intended for commercial use or as a place of employment.
3.d. That this 1,433 sq ft structure is intended for use as an agricultural barn by the property owners? The
proposed structure is intended for use as a cold storage building for agricultural equipment, implements and
tools.
With this written clarification received by email to Colleen Wirth, Plans Examiner, email cwirth@garfield-
countv.com, I would then with your blessing "strike out" any erroneous or inaccurate buílding uses shown on
affected pages of the plan set. You have my blessing to "strike out" any erroneous or inaccurate building uses
sown on the plan set,
, Thanks for your efforts putting this application packet together, I look forward to hearing a reply and seeing your
building project move forward.
Best,
ì
Colleen W¡rth
. , Building Plans Examiner
, Garfield County Community Development
108 8th Street, Suite 401
, (970) 94s-1377 ext 1610
cwirth @ga rfield-cou ntv.com
2