The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1.00 General Application MaterialsCommunity Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 www.garfield-county.com LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM TYPE OF APPLICATION Administrative Review Development in 100-Year Floodplain Limited Impact Review Development in 100-Year Floodplain Variance Major Impact Review Code Text Amendment Amendments to an Approved LUCP LIR MIR SUP Rezoning Zone District PUD PUD Amendment Minor Temporary Housing Facility Administrative Interpretation Vacation of a County Road/Public ROW Appeal of Administrative Interpretation Location and Extent Review Areas and Activities of State Interest Comprehensive Plan Amendment Accommodation Pursuant to Fair Housing Act Pipeline Development Variance Time Extension (also check type of original application) INVOLVED PARTIES Owner/Applicant Name: ________________________________________________ Phone: (______)_________________ Mailing Address: ______________________________________________________________________ City: _______________________________________ State: _______ Zip Code: ____________________ E-mail:_______________________________________________________________________________ Representative (Authorization Required) Name: ________________________________________________ Phone: (______)_________________ Mailing Address: ______________________________________________________________________ City: _______________________________________ State: _______ Zip Code: ____________________ E-mail:_______________________________________________________________________________ PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION Project Name: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Assessor’s Parcel Number: ___ ___ ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ - ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ Physical/Street Address: ________________________________________________________________ Legal Description: ______________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Zone District: ___________________________________ Property Size (acres): __________________ PROJECT DESCRIPTION REQUEST FOR WAIVERS Submission Requirements The Applicant requesting a Waiver of Submission Requirements per Section 4-202. List: Section: ______________________________ Section: _________________________________ Section: ______________________________ Section: _________________________________ Waiver of Standards The Applicant is requesting a Waiver of Standards per Section 4-118. List: Section: ______________________________ Section: _________________________________ Section: ______________________________ Section: _________________________________ I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information which is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. ______________________________________________________ __________________________ Signature of Property Owner or Authorized Representative, Title Date OFFICIAL USE ONLY File Number: __ __ __ __ - __ __ __ __ Fee Paid: $_____________________________ Existing Use: ____________________________________________________________________________________ Proposed Use (From Use Table 3-403): ____________________________________________________ Description of Project: __________________________________________________________________ 1.The Decision you are appealing. 2.The date the Decision was sent as specified in the notice (date mailed). 3.The nature of the decision and the specified ground for appeal. Please cite specific code sections and/or relevant documentation to support your request. 4.The appropriate appeal fee of $250.00. 5.Please note a completed Appeal Application and fees must be received within 30 calendar days of the date of the final written Administrative Interpretation. For Appeal of Administrative Interpretation please include: 1 Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 www.garfield-county.com PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 218106200283 DATE: 10/05/2023 PROJECT: Wagenman Secondary Dwelling Unit OWNERS: Benjamin and Theresa Wagenman CONTACT/REPRESENTATIVE: Benjamin Wagenman PRACTICAL LOCATION: County Road 238 (Slaughter Gulch Road) Approximately 3.3 miles west of New Castle and 2.5 miles east of Silt. TYPE OF APPLICATION: Administrative Review ZONING: Rural COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential Medium High, Area of Influence Silt I. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicants envision constructing two units on site. The first will be approximately 1,700 sq ft and the second larger. Since the small unit exceeds the ADU’s maximum size of 1,200 sq ft, a permit for a Secondary Dwelling Unit will be required. The application will need to show legal and physical access, water supply, and wastewater management. Detailed OWTS engineering may be able to be done as a condition of approval, but enough information to determine the feasibility of the system is required. Water management plans typically require a well permit, 4-hour pump test, and water quality test. Physical access should shown with appropriate easements or driveway permits and driveways that meet the Article 7 standards. Grading and Drainage plans are required for administrative review permits as well. Residential uses are typically exempt from landscaping requirements. Waiver of submittal requirements may be submitted for the above items, but should include a letter from a certified professional attesting to the adequacy of the site, system, ect. The application should address the impact analysis (4-203.G) and Article 7, Divisions 1-3 Standards. It should also address Section 7-701 for specific SDU requirements. 2 The mailing addresses for public notice should include any properties in neighboring counties within the 200-foot buffer. Garfield County’s Land Explorer can produce a list of addresses for properties within Garfield County. The current policy is for SDU permits to only be issued when a primary unit exists on the site. Typically, the proposed garage with dwelling unit on top would be done as the by-right primary unit and the applicant would submit an application when ready to begin work on the second, larger unit. The SDU permit could consider the existing unit as the SDU to maintain compliance with dwelling unit sizes. A full copy of the land use and development code can be found here: https://www.garfield- county.com/community-development/land-use-code/ II. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The area is considered Residential Medium High and within the area of influence of the Town of Silt. III. REGULATORY PROVISIONS APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO ADDRESS The following Sections of the Garfield Land Use and Development Code as amended apply to the Application: • Section 4-103 Administrative Review and Section 4-101 Common Review Procedures • Table 4-201 Submission Requirements and Section 4-203 Description of Submittal Requirements. • Section 4-118 and Section 4-202, as applicable. • Article 7 Standards , as applicable IV. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS As a convenience outlined below is a list of information typically required for this type of application. Table 4-201 outlines the specific application submittal criteria. The following list can function as a checklist for your submittal. General Application Materials including the Application Form (signed), payment of Fees and signed Payment Agreement Form (see attached). o A narrative describing the request and related information. o Proof of ownership. o A recorded Statement of Authority is required for any property owned by an LLC or other entity. o A Letter of Authorization is required if an owner intends to have a representative complete the Application and processing. o Names and mailing addresses of property owners within 200 ft. of the subject property from Assessor’s Office Records. o Mineral rights ownership for the subject property including mailing address and/or statement on mineral rights research (see attached). o Copy of the Preapplication Summary needs to be submitted with the Application. Vicinity Map. 3 Site Plan. Grading and Drainage Plan. Landscape Plan. Impact Analysis. Development agreement, if applicable. Improvement agreement, if applicable. Traffic Study. Water Supply/Distribution Plan. Wastewater Management/Treatment Plan. Affordable Housing Plan, if applicable. The Application should demonstrate compliance with Article 7 Standards, as applicable. he Application should include a waiver request from submittal requirements according to 4- 202, specifically addressing the review criteria for each waiver request. The Application should include any waivers from Article 7 Standards that the applicant wishes to pursue, in accordance with 4-118. Three hard copies and one digital copy (on a USB drive, for example) of the application are required. Both versions should be split into individual sections. Community Development Staff is available to meet with the Applicant to provide additional information and clarification on any of the submittal requirements and waiver requests. 4 V. REVIEW PROCESS Call-Up for review by the Board in accordance with the procedures and review process contained in Section 4-112. Staff will review the application for completeness, and when complete, refer it to appropriate agencies for technical review. Staff will create a report to be submitted to the Director for their decision. Public Hearing(s): X No Public Hearing, Directors Decision (with notice per code) Planning Commission Board of County Commissioners Board of Adjustment 5 Referral Agencies: May include but is not limited to: Garfield County Surveyor, Garfield County Attorney, Garfield County Building Department, Garfield Road and Bridge, Garfield County Consulting Engineer, Homeowners Association, Fire District . VI. APPLICATION REVIEW FEES Planning Review Fees: $250 Referral Agency Fees: $na Total Deposit: $250(additional hours are billed at hourly rate of $40.50) VII. GENERAL APPLICATION PROCESSING The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the County. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. This summary does not create a legal or vested right. The summary is valid for a six-month period, after which an update should be requested. The Applicant is advised that the Application submittal once accepted by the County becomes public information and will be available (including electronically) for review by the public. Proprietary information can be redacted from documents prior to submittal. Pre-application Summary Prepared by: 11/16/2023 Philip Berry, Planner III Date 6 7 8 Garfield County Land Use and Development Code Article 7: Standards TEMPLATE Applicants may use this template for organizational purposes when responding to Article 7 Standards for Land Use Change Permit applications. Applicants should reference the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code for detailed descriptions of standards relating to their particular proposals when responding. DIVISION 1: GENERAL APPROVAL STANDARDS 7-101. ZONE DISTRICT USE REGULATIONS Maves Lot 1 & 2 Reception No. 645280 attached. 7-102. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS N/A 7-103. COMPATIBILITY Proposed project consistent with neighboring properties. 7-104. SOURCE OF WATER West Divide Water contract # 030520DM(c); DWR well permit #88761-F; and well pump test and water quality test attached. 7-105. CENTRAL WATER DISTRIBUTION AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS Septic design packet attached. 7-106. PUBLIC UTILITIES Road easement and access attached. Electrical currently installed from existing power pole and run underground to box on property. 7-107. ACCESS AND ROADWAYS Road easement and access attached. 7-108. USE OF LAND SUBJECT TO NATURAL HAZARDS N/A 7-109. FIRE PROTECTION Colorado River Fire hazard mitigation plan attached. DIVISION 2: GENERAL RESOURCE PROTECTION STANDARDS 7-201. AGRICULTURAL LANDS Maves Lot 1 & 2 Reception No. 645280 attached. 7-202. WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS N/A 7-203. PROTECTION OF WATERBODIES N/A 7-204. DRAINAGE AND EROSION Bookcliff existing conditions survey attached. 7-205. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY N/A 7-206. WILDFIRE HAZARDS N/A 7-207. NATURAL AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS N/A 7-208. RECLAMATION N/A DIVISION 3. SITE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7-301. COMPATIBLE DESIGN 7-302. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS Adequate parking. See property boundary survey and road easement attached. 7-303. LANDSCAPING STANDARDS Revegetation planned with mix of native, adaptive and drought tolerant grasses, ground covers, trees and shrubs. 7-304. LIGHTING STANDARDS N/A 7-305. SNOW STORAGE STANDARDS N/A 7-306. TRAIL AND WALKWAY STANDARDS N/A OTHER PERTIENT STANDARDS Garfield County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan ♦ 2022 1 Colorado River Fire Rescue Profile Planning Team Name Title Orrin Moon Preventative Division Chief – Colorado River Fire Rescue Zach Pigati Division Chief – Colorado River Fire Rescue Leif Sackett Fire Chief – Colorado River Fire Rescue Location and Geography While they are formally called Colorado River Fire Protection District by state agencies, the District is commonly known as Colorado River Fire Rescue and will be addressed as such for the rest of this report. Colorado River Fire Rescue was established as a fire authority in 2012 as a joint effort between Burning Mountains Fire Protection District and Rifle Protection District. The fire districts merged in 2012. The Colorado River Fire Rescue covers a territory of approximately 851 square miles. The coverage area includes public land (Bureau of Land Management, United States Forest Service, Garfield County, etc.) as well as private land. Three urban areas lay within the District’s boundaries: the city of Rifle, the Town of Silt, and the City of New Castle. The District maintains six facilities: • Station #41 at 1850 Railroad Avenue, Rifle Co 81650 • Station #42 at 220 County Rd. 352A, Rifle Co 81650 • Station #43 at 419 Last Chance Dr., Rifle Co 81650 • Station #61 at 611 Main Street, Silt Co 81652 • Station #63 at 5255 County Rd. 335, New Castle Co 81647 • Station #64 at 775 Castle Valley Blvd, New Castle Co 81647 The stations listed above are also identified as the district’s critical facilities. Rifle: • Rifle is a Home Rule Municipality located in Garfield County. The land area covers about 5.7 square miles. • Rifle’s population grew from 9,451 people in 2015 to 9,650 in 2019, an increase of more than 279 people at an average annual growth rate of 0.5 percent. • The City of Rifle serves as the gateway to Northwest Colorado. Rifle is served by Interstate 70 (east/west) and Highway 13 (north/south). Highway 13 is one of the most heavily used hazardous material shipping routes in the State of Colorado. Silt: • The Town of Silt is a Home Rule Municipality located in Garfield County. The land area covers 2.8 square miles. • Silt’s population grew from about 2,976 in 2015 to 3,115 in 2019, an increase of 139 people at an average annual growth rate of 1.2 percent. • Residential development within the Silt Mesa area has increased significantly over the last 20 years, and presents an interface with the more urbanized and the more rural area of that part of the County. • The Union Pacific Rail line and Interstate 70 both bisect the town and are critical transportation arteries for the town and region. Section Seven: Colorado River Fire District Profile 2 Garfield County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan ♦ 2022 New Castle • New Castle lies along the Fire District’s eastern boundary and encompasses 2.53 square miles. • New Castle’s population grew from about 4,569 in 2015 to 4,875 in 2019, an increase of 309 people at an average annual growth rate of 1.6 percent. • Since 1990, the vast majority of the new single-family dwelling units were located in two major subdivisions, Castle Valley Ranch Planning Unit Development (PUD) and Lakota Canyon Ranch PUD. Both subdivisions lie north of the original New Castle town site and are separated from the original town site by Mt. Medaris. • New Castle can be accessed using 5 different routes and these transportation routes are key for daily commerce and public safety during evacuations. Transportation The District is bisected by I-70, a major transportation route that serves the entire region and is critical to ongoing functioning of the economy and Highway 13 which runs northward towards Meeker in Rio Blanco County. Development Trends The Colorado River Fire Rescue District was formed in 2012 when Burning Mountain FPD and Rifle RFP merged. All equipment, personnel, and resources available to each district was then available to CRFR. All communities within the district, Silt, Rifle, and New Castle, have experienced population growth over the past decade. The majority of this development has occurred in the fringes of each community or areas adjacent to the WUI. The fire district is looking to make sure all areas in the county are covered by a fire protection district and continues to strive to provide necessary services to properties and areas not currently protected. There is an automatic mutual aid agreement in place for Glenwood Springs FPD to the east of the district and with Grand Valley FPD to the west. As development and growth continues to occur in the district, CRFR will look to expand local staff and resources capabilities. Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Each participating jurisdiction identified critical facilities vital for disaster response, providing shelter to the public, and essential for returning the jurisdiction’s functions to normal during and after a disaster. Critical facilities were identified during the original planning process and updated by the local planning team as a part of this plan update. The following table and figure provide a summary of the critical facilities for Colorado River Fire Rescue and whether they are in known hazard areas. Table CRFR.1: Colorado River Fire Rescue Critical Facilities Number Name Generator (Y/N) Floodplain Dam Inundation Wildfire Hazards Geologic Hazards 1 Station 41 Y No Yes Low Soils 2 Station 42 N No No Low Soils 3 Station 43 Y No No Low Soils 4 Station 61 N No Yes Moderate Soils 5 Station 63 N No No Moderate Landslide 6 Station 64 Y No No Moderate None 7 Communication Tower (at Rifle Gap Reservoir) N Yes Yes Low None Section Seven: Colorado River Fire District Profile Garfield County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan ♦ 2022 3 Figure CRFR.1: Colorado River Fire Rescue Critical Facilities Section Seven: Colorado River Fire District Profile 4 Garfield County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan ♦ 2022 Hazard Prioritization The Garfield County Hazard Mitigation Plan evaluates a range of natural and man-made hazards which pose a risk to the county and communities. However, during the planning process, the local planning team identified specific hazards of top concern for Colorado River Fire District which required a more nuanced and in-depth discussion of local events, vulnerabilities, and mitigation actions the community wishes to pursue. The following section expands on the hazards of top concern identified by CRFR’s local planning team, including: • Wildfire • Flood • Landslide, Mud/Debris Flow, and Rockfall • Severe Wind • Severe Winter Weather • Drought • Hazardous Materials For a review and analysis of other natural hazards, please see the county-wide summary in Section Four: Risk Assessment. Wildfire The primary concern of the CRFR is wildfire. There are numerous homes or properties located within the wildland urban interface in each of the communities the district serves (Rifle, Silt, and New Castle). These properties have an increased risk of damages due to wildfire and may require rescues with the assistance of the district during severe events. There are also several homes located in remote areas of the district which are a concern due to a lack of adequate transportation corridors. Local concerns focus on the difficulty of reaching these homes in time to save them from fire. Specifically, the district identified Odien Drive as a new WUI area of concern due to recent development. The district regularly works with local homeowners to install defensible space. Recent mitigation work has occurred near Elk Creek Road north of New Castle and new fuel breaks have been installed along B Avenue and 7th Street in New Castle. However, additional work is still needed to reduce hazardous fuel loads. The list below includes areas of concern and areas the district is working on to either reduce fuel loads or install fire breaks as well as their priority level. • Fuelbreak Lakota areas, east side of Faas Ranch Road (high) • Fuelbreak at tow slope east of schools and water tank on USFS land near Castle Valley Ranch Road (high) • Fuelbreaks Hidden Valley and Elk Run area (high) • Fuelbreak and tree thinning Elk Creek Campground (high) • Tree thinning on Elk Creek Road near 1700 area (high) • Tree thinning and fuelbreaks near 3724-3768 on Harvey Gap Road (high) • Firewise developing for subdivision off of Harvey Gap Road (moderate) • Tree thinning along Odien Drive (high) • Tree thinning and fuelbreaks in Ram Lane area (moderate) • Defensible space around water tanks north of Silt (moderate) • Fuelbreaks in Mineota estates area (high) • Fuelbreaks along Divide Creek Road (high) • Fuelbreaks along Middle Elk Creek Road (high) • Fuelbreak for Porcupine Creek Subdivision (high) • Fuelbreak for Beaver Creek Manor (high) Section Seven: Colorado River Fire District Profile Garfield County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan ♦ 2022 5 • Fuelbreak for Red Apple area (low) • Fuelbreak for Rifle Village South (moderate) • Fuel management Grass Mesa area (high) • Fuelbreak for Cedar Springs (high) • Fuelbreak for Teepee Bible Camp (moderate) • Fuel reduction along Rifle Creek in Rifle (moderate) • Fuelbreaks around multiple subdivision north, west, and east of Rifle (moderate) • Fuel treatments around Rifle Estates and Upper Rifle Creek drainage (high) • Fuelbreak for Jewell Lane (high) • Fuelbreak for C Avenue (low) • Fuelbreak for Rollie Gordon Park (high) • Fuel reduction at Morning Star Drive (med-high) • K&K Lumberyard and Harness Lane (low/med area of concern) • Fuel reduction at Morrow Drive (high) • Areas of concern around Apple Tree Park (low) • Fuelbreaks along Moki Road (moderate) • Fuel reduction at Puma Paw Rd (low) • Fuel reduction at Stony Ridge Rd (moderate) • Fuelbreaks at Scutter Lane (moderate) • Areas of concern around 17764 Co Rd 252 (low) • Defensible space around homes and outbuildings (high) • Mowing vegetation along roads (moderate) The district would like to a see a WUI code integrated into the local building codes which require fire resistant building materials. As of fall 2021 there is a state sub-committee currently discussing a WUI code for Colorado. While a WUI building code is not currently required, CRFR highly emphasizes the use of the code for all new development. The district also noted a vulnerability regarding mutual aid resources when major transportation corridors and the Glenwood Canyon pass is closed during severe events. Flood Local concerns relate to flood waters disrupting transportation routes and rescuing rafters and boaters on high waters. The local planning team indicated that areas around both Silt and Rifle are prone to flash flooding. The convergence of Rifle Creek and Government Creek was identified as a location prone to high water following heavy rainfall. An additional concern regarding flooding in the district is the increased prevalence of burn scars throughout the county. Past major fires in Glenwood Canyon have left behind significant burn scars with dead vegetation. These areas are more prone to have unstable soils, landslides, debris flows, mudflows, and flash flooding. Difficulty receiving mutual aid or rescue resources is a concern when the canyon is closed. Past flooding events in the county have closed access to Eagle and Gypsum areas due to mudslides which have blocked the highways. The Colorado River Fire Protection District is not an eligible participant for the National Flood Insurance Program and thus does not participate. Landslide, Mud/Debris Flow, Rockfall Debris flows regularly occur near Newcastle and Silt after large rain events (approximately six times in ten years according to the local planning team). Past events have closed the interstate Section Seven: Colorado River Fire District Profile 6 Garfield County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan ♦ 2022 and blocked access to Eagle and Gypsum. Local concerns focus on the potential to cut off transportation routes, block rescue attempts, and required resources to clear debris. The local planning team indicated that landslides result in a roadway closure every couple of years. Severe Winds Past severe wind events have led to roofs flying off homes, trampolines blowing away, and trees falling on power lines. The damage to power lines can lead to an increased fire risk as well as power outages. Severe Winter Weather The main concern is the impact on transportation routes and the district’s ability to respond to emergencies. The local planning team noted recent winters have been warmer than average; however, this has produced an increased risk of ice on roads and utilities due to the thawing and freezing cycle. Hazardous Materials The presence of the oil and gas industry in the CRFR district increases the risk of hazardous materials spills. Areas of principal concern are Highway 13, Beaver Creek, and the gas lines south of the Colorado River. However, the local planning team noted the total number of exploratory drill rigs in the district have declined in recent years. There is currently only one rig actively drilling for gas. This, in turn, has impacted the local economy and available funding for the district. There is not a HAZMAT team located in the district. The nearest full team is located either in Grand Junction or on the front range. CRFR and other local FPDs have trained technicians and some equipment; however it is not adequate for a large scale event and additional staffing would be required to maintain all safety precautions. Maintaining HAZMAT equipment, staffing, and training is currently cost-prohibitive to the district and other districts in the county. Drought Drought is a concern for the district not only because the increased risk of wildfire, but also because of water quantity concerns. Rural areas of the district were identified as having insufficient water supplies and thus are vulnerable during drought periods. The district typically brings water with them when responding to fire calls. As of fall 2021 due to drought conditions across the State of Colorado the district has lost some available water resources previously used to combat fire events. Currently the district has agreements with and has been pulling water from municipal resources to fill rigs when responding to fire calls. Other Concerns Another concern of the district is the reliance on the oil and gas industry. The local planning team indicated that nearly 90 percent of the budget is from the oil and gas industry. When the oil and gas industry fluctuates, there is a significant impact on the district’s budget. However, as of fall 2021, a new mill levy was passed in the district to help supplement funding. Voters approved a phased-in levy to assist the fire department in covering expenses. This change has reduced reliance on the fluctuating oil and gas industry and instead places emphasis on the local residents the fire protection district actually serves. Lastly, evacuation planning is an ongoing concern for the local communities. Due to the fluctuating circumstances around significant fire events or other hazard types, no formal evacuation map has been developed in the county. A local subcommittee in New Castle is currently working to address evacuation concerns in town. Section Seven: Colorado River Fire District Profile Garfield County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan ♦ 2022 7 Capability Assessment Due to the unique structure of fire protection districts, the typical capability assessment table was not used. The following table summarizes the district’s overall capabilities. The Colorado River Fire Rescue will continue to utilize existing relationships with local, county, state, and federal agencies to aid in the implementation of mitigation projects. Table CRFR.2: Capability Assessment Overall Capability 2017 Plan 2022 Plan Does the jurisdiction have the financial resources needed to implement mitigation projects? Limited Moderate (new mill levy passed Nov. 2021) Does the jurisdiction have the staff/expertise to implement projects? High High Does the jurisdiction have the community support to implement projects High Moderate Does the jurisdiction have the time to devote to hazard mitigation? Moderate Moderate Plan Integration Plans listed in below were reviewed by the local planning team to identify opportunities to integrate the HMP with current planning mechanisms. These documents were also used by the local planning team to assist in identifying risks, vulnerabilities, and potential mitigation actions. The documents directly contributed to the hazard prioritization and mitigation action items sections of this district profile. When these plans and other relevant district planning mechanisms are updated, the local planning team will review the HMP for opportunities to incorporate the goals, risk and vulnerability data, and mitigation actions into the plan update as appropriate. Colorado River Fire Rescue participated in the 2021 Garfield County CWPP update. This plan identified areas within the district with an increased risk of wildfire and identifies strategies to mitigate wildfire impacts. Risk data and mitigation actions in the CWPP were integrated into the HMP. The district will continue to participate in future updates to this plan. Additionally, CRFR noted they would like to develop a district specific CWPP for a more nuanced view of needed mitigation work in the district. Section Seven: Colorado River Fire District Profile 8 Garfield County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan ♦ 2022 Mitigation Action Items Short and long-term action items identified through the planning process are an important part of the mitigation plan. Action items are detailed recommendations for activities that local departments, citizens and others could engage in to reduce risk. Although not all the actions below fit the definition of mitigation, they add to the overall resilience of the community and are thus included within the hazard mitigation plan. New and Ongoing Actions: Action and Description Hazards Addressed Goals Estimated Cost Potential Funding Timeline Priority Lead Agency Status Community Wildfire Protection Plan: Participate in the ongoing development of an updated Community Wildfire Protection plan to ensure that future updates to the CWPP and the Garfield County Natural Hazard mitigation plan are coordinated to reflect the best available data and comprehensive set of risk reduction actions. Wildfire 1,2,3,4,5 Unknown Fire Districts’ Budget, Garfield County General Fund, Title III Fund 2-5 year High Operations Division Chief This is a continued mitigation action. CRFR participates in the Garfield County CWPP last updated in 2021. The district would like to develop a CRFR- specific CWPP. Implement CWPP Projects Implement fuel management projects in vulnerable areas and projects identified in the Garfield County CWPP. Wildfire 1,5 Varies by project Fire District’s Budget Ongoing High Fire Chief This is a new specific mitigation action which includes the 2017 action “Fuel Management”.. The fire district implements fuel management projects as funds or resources are available. See the Garfield County CWPP for a list of specific fuel management projects identified for the district. Section Seven: Colorado River Fire District Profile Garfield County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan ♦ 2022 9 Action and Description Hazards Addressed Goals Estimated Cost Potential Funding Timeline Priority Lead Agency Status Develop Resource List for Predicting Damaging Events: Develop a resource list for predicting damaging events subsequent to a disaster All Hazards 1,2 Unknown Fire District’s Budget 2-5 years High Prevention Division Chief, Operations Chief This is a continued mitigation action. The CRFR is in the process of identifying all resources in the district on GIS. There are currently several standalone maps with relevant information which should be combined for easier use. Firewise: Develop Firewise (Ready, Set, Go!) program for vulnerable communities Wildfire 1,5 Staff Time Fire District’s Budget 5+ years High Prevention Division Chief This is a continued mitigation action. The CRFR currently works with interested communities to help them meet the requirements of the Firewise program. The Cedars subdivision and Elk Run subdivision in New Castle have recently joined the Firewise program. Elk Creek subdivision is currently evaluating the process to join. Rural Water Supply Plan: Develop a rural water supply system and/or plan All Hazards 3,5 $25,000 Fire District’s Budget 5+ years Low Fire Chief This is a continued mitigation action. Not yet started. Additional resources are needed due to drought conditions in the state. Section Seven: Colorado River Fire District Profile 10 Garfield County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan ♦ 2022 Action and Description Hazards Addressed Goals Estimated Cost Potential Funding Timeline Priority Lead Agency Status Conduct Hazmat Training Conduct hazmat training and exercises to build relationships among (private/public) members of the response community Hazardous Materials 1,5 $10,000, Staff Time Fire District’s Budget 1-2 years Medium Fire Chief This is a continued mitigation action. This action has not yet been started. Develop Regional Response Plan: Develop regional response plan for pipeline releases. This would include mapping vulnerable areas and critical management sites. Hazardous Materials 1,2,3,4,5 $30,000 Fire District’s Budget, Garfield County General Fund 1-2 years High Fire Chief This is a continued mitigation action. This action has not yet been started. Public Education and Risk Communication: Develop and implement outreach and education efforts for a range of natural hazard types which impact the county including wildfire, landslides, evacuation procedures, etc. Purchase necessary resources as needed for programs. All Hazards 1,3,5 $15,000, Staff Time Fire Districts’ Budget 5+ years High Prevention Division Chief This is a continued mitigation action combining two actions from the 2017 plan – “Risk Communication” and “Education and Outreach”. Fire District utilizes several public education strategies including an annual meeting, publications, etc. The Rifle Rendezvous & County Fair were identified as potential engagement locations. A sign board has been purchased to aid in public notification. Purchase Necessary Equipment: Purchase equipment to aid in fuel loads projects. Wildfire 1,5 $10,000 Fire District’s Budget 2-4 years Medium Fire Chief This is a continued mitigation action. A small chipper was identified as needed. Section Seven: Colorado River Fire District Profile Garfield County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan ♦ 2022 11 Action and Description Hazards Addressed Goals Estimated Cost Potential Funding Timeline Priority Lead Agency Status Improve Communication Capabilities: Improve communication capabilities & radio interoperability. All Hazards 1,5 $250,000 Garfield County General Fund, DOLA 5+ years Medium Fire Chief This is a continued mitigation action. A new tower is planned to be constructed at Rifle Gap Reservoir. Additional communication towers are needed in the southern portion of the district. 200ft Buffer_List of Neighbors Parcel Physical Address Owner Account Num Mailing Address 212529400960 3630 237 COUNTY RD SILT BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT R200730 2300 RIVER FRONTAGE ROAD SILT, CO 81652 212534400961 Not available SILT BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT R150245 2300 RIVER FRONTAGE ROAD SILT, CO 81652 218106100183 Not available NEW CASTLE MURR FAMILY TRUST R015168 37659 HIGHWAY 6 NEW CASTLE, CO 81647 218106100272 4789 214 COUNTY RD SILT SWARTWOUT, SHANE TIMOTHY R006628 4789 COUNTY ROAD 217 SILT, CO 81652-9513 218106200264 214 COUNTY RD NEW CASTLE GILL, ROBERT BRUCE R150264 6630 COUNTY ROAD 346 SILT, CO 81652 218106200282 Not available NEW CASTLE GILL, ROBERT BRUCE R040999 6630 COUNTY ROAD 346 SILT, CO 81652 218106200283 Not available NEW CASTLE WAGENMAN, THERESA & BENJAMIN R041000 1226 COUNTY ROAD 238 SILT, CO 81652 CBO Inc. 129 Cains Lane Carbondale, CO 81623 970.309.5259 carla.ostberg@gmail.com July 12, 2021 Project No. C1614 Ben Wagenman oleoconstruction@gmail.com Subsurface Investigation and Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Design 3-Bedroom Residence + 2-Bedroom ADU TBD CR 238 Garfield County, Colorado Ben, CBO Inc. performed a subsurface investigation and completed an onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS) design for the subject residences. The 5.543-acre property is located outside of New Castle, in an area where OWTSs and wells are necessary. We have made some clarifications from the design dated June 29, 2021, which should be discarded and replaced with these dated July 12, 2021. Legal Description: Section: 6 Township: 6 Range: 91 A TR IN SEC 6 CONT 6.35 AC AKA LOT 2 MAVES SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION. EXCEPT A TR OF LAND CONT .807 AC +/- AS DESC IN BNDY LINE ADJ BK 1636/937 AND QCD BK 1636/940 5.543 ACRES Parcel ID: 2181-062-00-283 SITE CONDITIONS The property is currently undeveloped. A 3-bedroom, single-family residence and detached 2-bedroom accessory dwelling unit (ADU) are proposed. The property will be served potable water from a private well. The well is located to the west of the proposed ADU. The well will be located greater than 50-feet from the proposed septic tank and greater than 100- feet from the proposed soil treatment area (STA). The water line will enter each residence from the east and will not come within 25-feet of any OWTS component. The proposed STA location has an approximate 5-10% slope to the southwest. The proposed area vegetated with native grasses. There should be no traffic or staging of material over the future STA site to avoid compaction of soils prior to construction of the STA. SUBSURFACE The subsurface was investigated on May 4, 2021 by digging two soil profile test pit excavations (Test Pits). A visual and tactile soil analysis was completed by Carla Ostberg at the time of excavation.1 1 Carla Ostberg holds a Certificate of Attendance and Examination from the CPOW Visual and Tactile Evaluation of Soils Training. Page 2 The materials encountered in Test Pit #1 consisted of dark brown topsoil to 0.5-feet, underlain by light brown, dense sandy loam to a maximum depth explored of 8.0-feet. No bedrock or groundwater was encountered. The materials encountered in Test Pit #2 were consistent with those encountered in Test Pit #1. Test Pit #2 was explored to a maximum depth of 8.0-feet. No bedrock or groundwater was encountered. A sample of the soils was taken from Test Pit #1 at 3-feet below grade. Soil structure grade was weak. The soil formed a ball and a ribbon less than 1-inch in length before breaking. Soil structure shape was blocky and consistence was friable. Soil texture was more gritty than smooth. STA sizing is based on Soil Type 2A, Sandy Loam with weak structure grade. A long term acceptance rate (LTAR) of 0.5 gallons per square foot will be used to design the OWTS. Test Pit #1 Page 3 Test Pit #1 Looking toward Test Pit #2 Sieved sample Page 4 Backfill Test Pit #2 Sidewall of Test Pit #2 Page 5 View of site DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS Design Calculations: Average Design Flow = 75 GPD x 2 people/bedroom x 3 Bedrooms = 450 GPD + 2-Bedroom ADU (300 GPD) = 750 GPD LTAR = 0.5 GPD/SF 750 GPD / 0.5 GPD/SF x 1.0 (gravity trenches) x 0.7 (chambers) = 1050 SF The OWTS design is based on 3-bedrooms in the main house and 2-bedrooms in the ADU. An average daily wastewater flow of 750 GPD will be used. For the purposes of this OWTS design, Benchmark Elevation 100’ has been identified Finished Floor of the Main House. CBO Inc. should be notified of any discrepancies or problems with grade elevations of proposed components during installation of the OWTS. OWTS Component Minimum Elevation Primary Tank Inlet Invert Approximate horizontal distance 143’ / min. 2% fall to septic tank / min. 35.75” fall Distribution Box Approximate horizontal distance 37’ / min. 1% fall to d-box / min. 4.625” fall Infiltrative Surface Approximate horizontal distance 10’ / min. 1% fall to infiltrative surface / min. 1.25” to upper-most trench *Elevations are based upon standard OWTS installation practices. Component elevations may change during installation due to site conditions. The 4-inch diameter SDR-35 sewer line exiting the residence must have a double-sweep clean out and a minimum 2% grade to the septic tank. The system installation must include a 1500-gallon, two-compartment poly Infiltrator® septic tank with an effluent filter on the outlet tee. A concrete septic tank may be substituted, if desired. Risers must bring the manhole lids to grade for access. If more than one riser is added to the septic tank, an extension handle must be installed on the effluent filter. Page 6 Effluent will gravity flow to a distribution box, and then to five gravelless chamber trenches. The distribution box must be accessible from grade and must have flow equalizers, or similar product, installed on each outlet pipe in the distribution box to assure equal flow to each trench. Each trench will consist of 18 ‘Quick 4’ Standard Plus Infiltrator® chambers for a total of 90 chambers and 1080 square feet of infiltrative area. There must be at least 4-feet of undisturbed soil between each trench. Inspection ports must be installed at the beginning and end of each trench. Ports may be cut to grade and placed in sprinkler boxes for access. COMPONENT SPECIFICATIONS The component manufacturers are typical of applications used by contractors and engineers in this area. CBO Inc. must approve alternative components prior to installation of the OWTS. Requests must be submitted, in writing, to our office for approval prior to installation. Component technical data sheets are available upon request. COMPONENT MANUFACTURER MODEL NO. COMMENTS Septic Tank Infiltrator® IM-1530-2CP 1500-gallon, 2-compartment poly septic tank Biotube Effluent Filter Orenco® Full Size Effluent Filter and housing Tank Risers and Lids Orenco® Double-walled PVC Risers and Lids (24” diameter) Distribution Box PolyLok Distribution box, flow equalizers, risers, lid Chambers Infiltrator® Standard Plus 90 ‘Quick 4’ Standard Plus Chambers Construction must be according to Garfield County On-Site Wastewater Treatment System Regulations, the OWTS Permit provided by Garfield County Building Department, and this design. INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR CBO Inc. expects that the installer be experienced and qualified to perform the scope of work outlined in this design. The installer must review this design thoroughly and coordinate with our office in advance of installation. Any additional conditions in this design or county permit must be completed and documented prior to final approval of the OWTS installation. Communication between the installer and this office is expected throughout the installation. INSTALLATION OBSERVATIONS CBO Inc. must view the OWTS during construction. The OWTS observation should be performed before backfill, after placement of OWTS components. Septic tanks, distribution devices, pumps, dosing siphons, and other plumbing, as applicable, must also be observed. CBO Inc. should be notified 48 hours in advance to observe the installation. In an effort to improve the accuracy of the record drawing, we request that the installer provide a sketch of the installation, including path of the sewer lines, water line installation (if applicable), septic tank location, STA location, and measurements from building corners or another fixed objects on the property. This sketch is most easily provided on Sheet W2.0 of the OWTS Design Packet. Photographs of the installation and final cover are also requested to supplement our installation documentation. Page 7 REVEGETATION REQUIREMENTS An adequate layer of good quality topsoil capable of supporting revegetation shall be placed over the entire disturbed area of the OWTS installation. A mixture of native grass seed that has good soil stabilizing characteristics (but without taproots), provides a maximum transpiration rate, and competes well with successional species. No trees or shrubs, or any vegetation requiring regular irrigation shall be placed over the STA. Until vegetation is reestablished, erosion and sediment control measures shall be implemented and maintained on site. The owner of the OWTS shall be responsible for maintaining proper vegetation cover. OPERATION INFORMATION AND MAINTENANCE The property owner shall be responsible for the operation and maintenance of each OWTS servicing the property. The property owner is responsible for maintaining service contracts for manufactured units, alternating STAs, and any other components needing maintenance. Geo-fabrics or plastics should not be used over the STA. No heavy equipment, machinery, or materials should be placed on the backfilled STA. Machines with tracks (not wheels) should be used during construction of the STA for better weight distribution. Livestock should not graze on the STA. Plumbing fixtures should be checked to ensure that no additional water is being discharged to OWTS. For example, a running toilet or leaky faucet can discharge hundreds of gallons of water a day and harm a STA. If an effluent filter or screen has been installed in the OWTS, we recommend this filter or screen be cleaned annually, or as needed. If the OWTS consists of a pressurized pump system, we recommend the laterals be flushed annually, or as needed. The homeowner should pump the septic tank every two years, or as needed gauged by measurement of solids in the tank. Garbage disposal use should be minimized, and non-biodegradable materials should not be placed into the OWTS. Grease should not be placed in household drains. Loading from a water softener should not be discharged into the OWTS. No hazardous wastes should be directed into the OWTS. Mechanical room drains should not discharge into the OWTS. The OWTS is engineered for domestic waste only. ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES If design includes a pump, weep holes must be installed to allow pump lines to drain to minimize risk of freezing. The pump shall have an audible and visual alarm notification in the event of excessively high water conditions and shall be connected to a control breaker separate from the high water alarm breaker and from any other control system circuits. The pump system shall have a switch so the pump can be manually operated. Excavation equipment must not drive in excavation of the STA due to the potential to compact soil. Extensions should be placed on all septic tank components to allow access to them from existing grade. Backfill over the STA must be uniform and granular with no material greater than minus 3-inch. LIMITS: The design is based on information submitted. If soil conditions encountered are different from conditions described in report, CBO Inc. should be notified. All OWTS construction must be according to the county regulations. Requirements not specified in this report must follow applicable county regulations. The contractor should have documented and demonstrated knowledge of the requirements and regulations of the county in which they are working. Licensing of Systems Contractors may be required by county regulation. Page 8 Please call with questions. Sincerely, CBO Inc. Carla Ostberg, MPH, REHS Garfield County, CO Developed by Account Number R041000 Parcel Number 218106200283 Acres 6 Land SqFt 0 Tax Area 152 2019 Mill Levy 67.0920 Physical Address 0 NEW CASTLE 81647 Owner Address WAGENMAN, THERESA & BENJAMIN PO BOX 1954 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81602 2019 Total Actual Value $160,000 Last 2 Sales Date Price 5/14/2021 $0 4/16/2021 $200,000 Date created: 7/2/2021 Last Data Uploaded: 7/2/2021 11:37:23 AM 460 ft Overview Legend Parcels Roads Parcel/Account Numbers Highways Limited Access Highway Major Road Local Road Minor Road Other Road Ramp Ferry Pedestrian Way Owner Name Lakes & Rivers County Boundary Line 7/2/2021 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R041000 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerID=22381&PageTypeID=4&PageID=9447&Q=1526834&KeyValue=R041000 1/2 Gareld County, CO View Map WAGENMAN, THERESA & BENJAMIN PO BOX 1954 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81602 Assessed Year 2021 2020 2019 Land Actual $160,000.00 $160,000.00 $160,000.00 Improvement Actual $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Actual $160,000.00 $160,000.00 $160,000.00 Assessed Year 2021 2020 2019 Land Assessed $46,400.00 $46,400.00 $46,400.00 Improvement Assessed $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Assessed $46,400.00 $46,400.00 $46,400.00 Tax Year 2020 2019 2018 2017 Taxes Billed $3,113.08 $2,930.96 $2,441.12 $2,183.88 Click here to view the tax information for this parcel on the Gareld County Treasurer's website. Sale Date Deed Type Reception Number Book - Page Sale Price Grantor Grantee 5/14/2021 Easement 957704 $0 WAGENMAN, BENJAMIN; WAGENMAN, THERESA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 4/16/2021 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED 954622 $200,000 TITUS, DALE R WAGENMAN, THERESA; WAGENMAN, BENJAMIN 3/10/2021 STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY 952146 $0 TITUS, SUZANNE-DEC TITUS, SUZANNE-DEC; TITUS, DALE R 1/25/2021 DEATH CERTIFICATE 952144 $0 TITUS, SUZANNE TITUS, DALE R 11/3/2004 QUIT CLAIM DEED 662891 1636- 940 $0 TITUS, SUZANNE & DALE GUCCINI, TOBY & DEBRA 11/3/2004 AFFIDAVIT 662890 1636- 937 $0 3/29/2004 INCLUSION 654545 1598- 320 $0 Summary Account R041000 Parcel 218106200283 Property Address , NEW CASTLE, CO 81647 Legal Description Section: 6 Township: 6 Range: 91 A TR IN SEC 6 CONT 6.35 AC AKA LOT 2 MAVES SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION. EXCEPT A TR OF LAND CONT .807 AC +/- AS DESC IN BNDY LINE ADJ BK 1636/937 AND QCD BK 1636/940 5.543 ACRES Acres 5.543 Land SqFt 0 Tax Area 152 Mill Levy 67.0920 Subdivision Owner Land Unit Type 5 AC TO L/T 10 AC - 0530 (VACANT LAND) Square Feet 0 Actual Values Assessed Values Tax History Transfers 7/2/2021 qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R041000 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerID=22381&PageTypeID=4&PageID=9447&Q=1526834&KeyValue=R041000 2/2 1/21/2004 WARRANTY DEED 647041 1563- 225 $0 1/21/2004 WARRANTY DEED 645446 1556- 929 $147,000 MAVES, DAVID W TITUS, SUZANNE & DALE R 1/20/2004 RESOLUTION 645280 1556- 494 $0 11/20/2003 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT 641452 1540- 917 $0 11/20/2003 QUIT CLAIM DEED 641451 1540- 915 $0 11/20/2003 EASEMENT 641450 1540- 912 $0 11/14/2003 POWER OF ATTORNEY 645447 1556- 931 $0 3/27/2001 QUIT CLAIM DEED 582549 1260- 669 $0 MAVES, DAVID W & MAXINE J MAVES, DAVID W 6/3/1992 Deeds 0833- 0386 $0 1/1/1900 Deeds 0458- 0128 $0 1/1/1900 Deeds 0393- 0510 $0 1/1/1900 Deeds 0369- 0463 $0 1/1/1900 Deeds 0362- 0582 $0 1/1/1900 Deeds 0357- 0591 $0 1/1/1900 Deeds 0205- 0004 $0 No data available for the following modules: Buildings, Sketches. Photos Version 2.3.128 The Gareld County Assessor's Ofce makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation. Data is subject to constant change and its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. User Privacy Policy GDPR Privacy Notice Last Data Upload: 7/2/2021, 9:37:23 AM Developed by 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 phone: (970) 945-7988 fax: (970) 945-8454 email: kaglenwood@kumarusa.com www.kumarusa.com Office Locations: Denver (HQ), Parker, Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, Glenwood Springs, and Summit County, Colorado SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE AND BARN/ADU 999 COUNTY ROAD 238 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO PROJECT NO. 22-7-719 JANUARY 11, 2023 PREPARED FOR: BEN WAGENMAN 126 COUNTY ROAD 238 SILT, COLORADO 81652 oleoconstruction@gmail.com Kumar & Associates, Inc. ® Project No. 22-7-719 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ........................................................................... - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION .................................................................................... - 1 - SITE CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................... - 1 - FIELD EXPLORATION ................................................................................................ - 1 - SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ..................................................................................... - 2 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................ - 2 - FOUNDATIONS ........................................................................................................ - 2 - FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS ........................................................... - 3 - FLOOR SLABS .......................................................................................................... - 4 - UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM ......................................................................................... - 4 - SURFACE DRAINAGE ............................................................................................. - 5 - LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................... - 5 - FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURES 4 through 7 - SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Kumar & Associates, Inc. ® Project No. 22-7-719 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence and barn/ADU to be located at 999 County Road 238, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Ben Wagenman dated November 7, 2022. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils and bedrock obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a 2-story structure with a walkout lower level and the barn/ADU will be a pole structure located as shown on Figure 1. Ground floors will be slab-on-grade. Grading for the structures is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths of about 2 to 8 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. If building loadings, locations or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The property was vacant and covered with about 4 inches of snow at the time of our field exploration. The ground surface has a strong slope down to the south with around 3 feet of elevation difference across each building footprint. Vegetation consists of mostly grass and weeds with pinon and juniper trees along the building area perimeter. Large remnant sandstone blocks were observed near the residence site. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on December 28, 2022. Three exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. - 2 - Kumar & Associates, Inc. ® Project No. 22-7-719 The borings were advanced with 4-inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck- mounted CME-45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Kumar & Associates. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 2-inch I.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsurface materials at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils and hardness of the bedrock. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered, below about ½ foot of topsoil, consist of medium dense, silty sand overlying medium hard and weathered to very hard sandstone below depths of about 4 feet at Boring 1 and 12 feet at Boring 2 in the residence site. In the barn site, medium dense silty sand was encountered down to about 12 feet and underlain by clayey sand down to the boring depth of 21 feet. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and density and finer than sand size gradation analyses. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples of the sand soils and weathered sandstone, presented on Figures 4 through 7, indicate low to moderate compressibility under loading and minor collapse potential (settlement under constant load) when wetted. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling and the subsurface materials were moist to slightly moist with depth. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the buildings be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural granular soils or bedrock. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. - 3 - Kumar & Associates, Inc. ® Project No. 22-7-719 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) The topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the natural granular soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened and compacted. If water seepage is encountered, the footing areas should be dewatered before concrete placement. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the structure and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 40 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. - 4 - Kumar & Associates, Inc. ® Project No. 22-7-719 Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. Backfill placed in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. Backfill should not contain organics, debris or rock larger than about 6 inches. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.40. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 375 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be a granular material compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils or bedrock, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab-on-grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4-inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2-inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the onsite granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area and where bedrock is shallow that local perched groundwater can develop during times - 5 - Kumar & Associates, Inc. ® Project No. 22-7-719 of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1½ feet deep. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after each structure has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be covered with filter fabric and capped with about 2 feet of the on-site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 5 feet from foundation walls. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the Kumar & Associates Kumar & Associates Kumar & Associates Kumar & Associates Kumar & Associates Kumar & Associates Kumar & Associates TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Project No. 22-7-719 SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT NATURAL DRY DENSITY GRADATION PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SOIL TYPE BORING DEPTH GRAVEL SAND LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC INDEX (%) (%) (ft) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (psf) 1 2½ 17.5 100 Silty Sand 5 5.1 128 Weathered Sandstone 2 5 4.2 100 Silty Sand 10 4.9 115 35 Silty Sand 3 2½ 4.1 109 35 Silty Sand 5 4.6 108 Silty Sand C O L O R A D O WELL PERMIT NUMBER 88761-F Division of Water Resources DNR RECEIPT NUMBER 10032503 Department of Natural Resources ORIGINAL PERMIT APPLICANT(S) APPROVED WELL LOCATION BENJAMIN WAGENMAN Water Division: 5 Water District: 39 THERESA WAGENMAN Designated Basin: N/A Management District: N/A County: GARFIELD Parcel Name: MAVES SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION Lot: 2 Block: Filing: Physical Address: N/A NE 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 6 Township 6. 0 S Range 91. 0 W Sixth P.M. UTM COORDINATES (Meters. Zone:13. NAD83) Easting: 276790.4 Northing: 4382544.9 PERMIT TO USE AN EXISTING WELL ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2), for the change/expansion of use of a well constructed under permit no. 34092-MH, re- permitted under permit no. 211947 and then re-permitted under permit no. 59989-F, on the condition that this well is operated in accordance with the West Divide Water Conservancy District Augmentation Nan approved by the Division 5 Water Court in case no. 02CW0123. If this well is not operated in accordance with the terms of said decree, it will be subject to administration including orders to cease diverting water. WDWCD contract#030520DM(c). Permit no. 34092-MH has expired. Permit no. 211947 has been canceled. Permit no. 59989-F has been canceled by order of the State Engineer. 4) Approved as a well on a residential site of 5.54 acre(s) described as Lot 2, Maves Subdivision Exemption, Garfield County. 5) The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside two (2) single family dwellings, the irrigation of not more than 12,000 square feet (0. 28 of an acre) of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of five (5) head domestic animals. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. This well is known as Maves Well. 6) The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 7) The average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated shall not exceed 1.63 acre-feet (531,137 gallons). 8) The return flow from the use of this well must be through an individual wastewater disposal system of the non-evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 9) A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. 10) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 11) This well shall be located not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 218106200283 Printed 12-05-2023 For questions about this permit call 303.866.3581 or go to https://dwr.colorado.gov Page 1 of 2 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 88761-F RECEIPT NUMBER 10032503 1 Date Issued:12/5/2023 it Issued By GEOFFREY DAVIS Expiration Date: N/A Printed 12-05-2023 For questions about this permit call 303.866.3581 or go to https://dwr.colorado.gov Page 2 of 2 WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT 818 Taiighenbnugh Bivd., Suite 101 P.O. Box 1478 Rifle, Colorado 81650-1478 Tel: (970) 625-5461 Web: www.wdwcd.org Email; watcr@wdwcd.org October 19, 2023 Theresa and Benjamin Wagenman 1266 County Road 238 Silt, CO 81652 Dear Theresa and Benjamin: Enclosed is approved amended contract # 030520DM(c) amending the contract from one home to two. Please make sure you re-permit your existing permit to reflect these changes. Sincerely yours, WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT y S. Keenan Enclosure Division No. 5 Water Resources w/amendment Colorado River Engineering w/amendment cc Samuel B. Potter Kelly Coucy Richard L. McNeill JankovskyDirectors:Dan R. Harrisonom CONTRACT#: 030520DM(c) MAP ID#: 466 DATE ACTIVATED: 5/20/03 DATE AMENDED; 10/19/23 APPLICATION TO AMEND WATER LEASE# WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT 818 Taugheiibaugh Blvd. #10!. P. 0. Box 1478, Rifle, Colorado 81650 water@wdwcd.org Fax;(970)625-2796 Telephone: (970)625-5461 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION ■Name: Theresa and Beniamin Wneenman Mailing address: ^^3?, 5: If. ^ 5. LOCATION OF STRUCTURE Counly Assessor’s Parcel Number 2181-062-00-283GrtrfielJMEl/4CX)mui Email: olcoconslruction@gmail.com Counly Quartcr/quartcr Quarter66S91W 6thTelephone; 970-309-6686 Authorized agent:Section TotvnshjpDistance of well from section lines:Range P. M. 2. COURT CASE #s: Decree Case No. Augmentation Plan Case No.Elevatioft; 3500. Well location address: TBD County Rond 23R Sill. CO RIA^?X USE OF WATER RESIDENTIAL Number of main residences; 2 (Attach additional pages for nutllipie siractio'es) 6, land on which water WILL BE USED (Legal desci lptlon may be provided as an allachmeni.) _L0\ 0 AAQtfgK. ^Sukdtui&i.i?n Py f No. ADU’s Subdivision: No. constructed units: Momegarden/lawti inrigatibn of 12.000 of ItTigalion: fl ood sprinkler X other Noh-commcrclal animal watering of 5. animals Fire Protection. Evaporationt. Maximum water surface to be c.’cposed: Description of any use, other tHim evaporation, and method of diversion, rale of diversion, and annual amount of diversion of anywater withdrawn from the pond; No. vacant lots total sq. ft . Method Number of acres in tract: 5.543 Inclusion Into the District, at Applicant's expense, may be required. 7. TYPE OF SEWAGE SYSTEM Septic tank/absorplion leach fleld X District name:Central System Other Well Sharing Agreement for multiple owner wells nmst be submitted. If greater than two owners, application nmst be made under a homeownersassociation. 8. A'OLUME OF LEASED WATER NEEDED IN ACRE FEET: Amended from ! Dwelling to 2dwcHlngs (minimum of 1 acre foplexcept augmentation from Alsbuiy' Reservoir where a lesser amount isallowed) Provide engineering data to support volume of water requested. Commercial, municipal, and Industrial users must provide diversion andconsumptive data on a monthly basis. A totalizing/low meter with remote readout Is required to be Installedand usage reported to West Divide, COMMERCIAL Number of units:_ Description of use:Total sq. ft. of commercial units: INDUSTRIAL Description of use: Applicant ^pressly acknowledges it has had the opportunity fa reviewthe District's form Water Allotment Contract and agrees this applicationIs made pursuant and subject to the terms and conditions containedtherein.^Evaporation: Maximum water surface to be exposed: Description of any use, other than evaporation, and method of diversion,rate of diversion, and annual amount of diversion of any water withdrawnfrom the pond: ' QLlyAjf^a_0Applicant Signature Vv Applicant SignatureDIRECT PUMPING Tributary: Location:JO-& <^0^3Application Date:, DATE APPROVED: WEST DIVIDE WAie :ONSER>\NCY DlSTfaCT4. SOURCE OF WATER Structure: Well X Source; surfaceCuiTcnt Permit #59989-F _S lructurc Name: Maves Well storage ground water X (attach copy) By: [residi ATTEST: SccreioV Form f WDWCD20 IT^Sn^APpS 'West'^'ide Water Conservancy District. WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT COLORADO, SILT, RIFLE. ALSBURY WATER USE ESTIMATES Theresa & Beniamin Waflentnan Contract Amount w/ 5% transit Loss =0.78 acre feetAPPLICANT: DWELLING UNITS IRRIGATED AREA (SQ FT) COMMERCIAL AREA (SQ FT) NO. OF LIVESTOCK ELEVATION (MSL) EVAPORATION AREA (ACRE) 2 12,000 0 5 Transit Loss=5.0% Contract Location Colorado/Silt/Alsbury 5500 Off-Channel (6)(7)(1)(2)(3)ill (5)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) Unit Value:In House Diversion Livestock Diversion & C.U. (AF) Pond Evaporation (AF) Unit Value: Irrigation Diversion (AF) Total Diversion (AF) Imgation C.U.In House C.U. (AF) Commercial Diversion (AF) Commercial C.U. (AF) Irrigation Diversion (AF) Irrigation C.U.Total C.U.Total Contract Amount (AF)(AF) (AF)(AF)(AF) 0.00JAN0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00FEB0.06 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.01 0.01 MAR 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0,00 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.087 0.301 0.444 0.490 0.385 0.272 0.068 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.01APR0.109 0.376 0.555 0.613 0.481 0.340 0.085 0.00 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.10MAY0.07 0.01 0.00 0.08 0.01 0.00 0,18 0.10 0.10 JUN 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.23 0.14 0.14 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.13 0,01JUL 0.00 0.25 0.15 0.16 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.11 0.21AUG0.07 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.13 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.07 0.01SEP0.06 0.00 0.17 0.09 0.09 0.00OCT0.07 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.00 0,10 0.03 0.04 NOV 0,06 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01DEC 0.00 0.08 0.02 0.02 2.047 0.78 0.12 0.00 0.00 0,70 0.56 0.06TOTAL2.559 0.00 1.63 0.74 0.78 80% irrigation efficiency for sprinkler systems Blaney Criddle assessment with Pochop adjustments 350 gallons per day per residence 15% consumptive use for ISDS systems 200 gallons per day per 1000 sq ft of commercial space 15% consumptive use for iSDS systems (7)Column (1) l irrigated area in acres Column (2)' Irrigated area in acres Livestock use at 11 gallons per head per day (99CW320) Net Pond Evaporatlon(ft. calcs in 'Assumptions') *evaporation area in acres Column (5) + Column (7) + Column (9) + Column (10) plus 5% transit loss Column (6) + Column (8) + Column (9)+ Column (10) Column (12) plus 5% transit loss (1) (8)(2) (3)(9) (10)(4) (11)(5) (B)(12) (13) Confidentiality Notice: This spreadsheet, including all attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken in reliance on the contents of the information contained in this spreadsheet is strictly prohibited. Colorado_SiltMesa_Rifle_Alsbury_2017 10/10/2023 jCOLORADO WELL PERMfT NUMBER 59989-F RECEIPT NUMBER 9501529 ! Division of Water Resources ! Department of Natural Resources ORIGINAL PERMIT APPLICANTfSI TITUS DALE 6 SUZANNE APPROVED WELL LOCATION Water Division: 5 Designated Basin: Management District: County: Parcel Name: Lot: 2 Physicai Address: NE 1/4 NW1/4 Section 6 Township 6.0 S Range 91.0 W Sixth P.M. Water District: 39 N/A N/A GARFIELD MAVES SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION Block:Filing: COUNTY ROAD 238 SILT, CO 81652 UTM COORDINATES fAAeters. Zone: 13. NAD83) Easting:276790.4 Northing:4382544.4 ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure tlie applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. The construction of this \well shall be incompliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the Slate Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction aixJ Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. Approved pursuant toCRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to tlie Colorado River, as an alternate point of diversion to the Avalanche Canal and Siphon, on the condition that the well shall be operated only when the West Divide Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect, and when a water allotrrient contract between tlie well owner and tfie West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract #030520DM(a). Approved as a well on a residential site of 7.44 acre(s) described as lot 2, Maves Subdivision Exemption, Garfield County. Approved for the use of an existing well constructed on August 4, 1998, to a depth of 240 feet, under monitoring/observation hole acknowledgement file no. MH-34092and later permitted for use under permit no. 211947 (canceled). The Issuance of this permit hereby cancels permitno. 211947. The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside one (1) single family dwelling, the irrigation of not more than 12,000 square feet (0.28 of an acre) of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of five (5) head domestic animals. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. Tills well is known as Maves Well. The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. The average annual anxiunt of groundwater to be appropriated shall not exceed 1.141 acre-feet (371,795 gallons). Tlie owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit numberfs), name of the aquifer, and court case number (s) as appropriate. Ttie owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. This well shall be located not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2181-062-00-264 NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R150264 (totaling 81.53 acres) 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) Printed 04-29-2021 For questions about this permit call 303.866.3561 or go to www.water.state.co.us Page 1 of 2 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 59989-F RECEIPT NUMBER 9501529 Date Issued:8/7/2003 Expiration Date: 8/7/2004 S«e Ongmai Peimit Issued By PERMrr HISTORY 04-29-2021 04-29-2021 09-02-2004 CHANGE IN OWNER NAME/MAILING ADDRESS. CHANGED TO BENJAMIN WAGENMAN CHANGE IN OWNER NAME/MAILING ADDRESS. CHANGED TO THERESA WAGENMAN CHANGE IN OWNER NAME/MAILING ADDRESS Printed 04-29-2021 For questions about this permit call 303.866.35S1 or go to vAvw.water.state.co.us Page 2 of 2 r l f telllte i ■( I m 9i WE\inel s LCRF J I, 9 'ounty;Canyon Rim Outfittersairport' K .> Keyboard shortcuts , Map data €2023 Google 2kmL J ' Tei January 16, 2024 Philip Berry Garfield County – Community Development RE: Wagenman Secondary Dwelling Unit (GAPA 01-24-8994) Attached are the requested documents. 1. The property was created by the Maves Subdivision Exemption in 2003/2004 by the plat at Reception # 645003. It appears to have been inappropriately altered by a Boundary Line Adjustment at Reception # 662890. Based on the current information, an Amended Final Plat will be necessary to correct the plat prior to any permit being finalized. Please reach out to staff to schedule a Preapplication Conference to discuss. Meeting scheduled for Friday January 19th to discuss. Agreed and understood this would need to be completed prior to any permit being finalized. 2. A narrative description of the request is required. The narrative should include all waiver of submittal requirements requests and address Section 4-202’s review criteria for those requests. The proposed project is to build a barn with living quarters on the second level totaling 1,708 sq ft, which is over the maximum ADU sq footage allowed. The project is to be built by owners of the property as time permits with no outside contract labor planned. The current easement provides access to the property. Once the project is complete, owners plan to occupy the barn living quarters during the future construction of a home on the property. The property is currently approved for 1 dwelling unit. Due to the size of the proposed project, we are requesting approval for a 2nd dwelling unit on the property. The project size is small; not complex; does not have any anticipated impacts; and the information requested is not material. Thus, we are requesting a waiver of the following submittal requirements as they are not applicable: 4-203 Section A, E, F, H, I, J, K, L, M (aside from well permit information already provided), N (aside from septic information already provided), and O. 3. A Waiver of Submittal Requirements for a Grading and Drainage Plan should be provided. A surveyed site review of existing conditions was provided in the application packet. This included an existing topographic survey. We are requesting a waiver of submittal requirements for grading and drainage. Property does not currently have any existing structures, waterbodies, hydrologic features, intermittent water features, wetlands or 100-year floodplain boundaries. Property does not contain any steep slopes. There will not be any temporary roads during construction and erosion is not expected to be an issue. No soil or snow stockpile/storage areas are necessary or applicable. The property is relatively flat and the building site does not anticipate any grading, topographic or drainage issues. Storm drainage structures and runoff issues are not applicable. Hydraulic calculations, maintenance requirements and spill preventions are not deemed applicable to this project. Surrounding area consists of vacant ranch land; public lands; another vacant lot in the Maves Subdivision; and a private residence on acreage. Upon project completion, wild grass seed mix will be spread to match existing native species. Weed spray will be spread on areas where noxious weeds are present. 4. An impact analysis, Section 4-203.G, is required. Each item in this section should be responded to. 1. Adjacent land use consists of vacant ranch land; public lands; a vacant lot in the Maves Subdivision; and private residences. 2. Site features include pinyon trees and native grass. There are no bodies of water or streams. Property is slightly slopped to the south west. 3. A soils report has been provided in the application packet. 4. No known or expected geological or other hazards. The project is within the Colorado River Fire District jurisdiction and a copy of their hazard mitigation plan is included in the application packet. 5. No known or expected groundwater or aquifer recharge area issues. 6. No known or expected environmental impacts on flora/fauna; wildlife; or domestic animals. 7. No known or expected nuisance impacts. 8. Project would be completed during daylight hours on weekdays with work on weekends as time permits. Please contact me if you have any questions. I look forward to working with you on the project. Benjamin Wagenman 970-309-6686 oleoconstruction@gmail.com