HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence - Clarification on Scope of WorkC/anfiahazt aA ?
7/a-rD*arColleen Wirth
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Wayland Weatherred <wayland@ka-designworks.com>
Tuesday, May 28,2024 2:22 PM
Colleen Wirth
Subject: BLRE-04-24-8632 - Westerfield Residence is now UNDER REVIEW
23-7-522 (10-04-23) Lot H17 Subsoil Study signed.pdf
You don't often get email from wayland@ka-designworks.com. Learn why this is important
HiCotteen,
Betow are the architectural responses in btue. Attached is the soits report for the project.
We are submitting the 2 futt size paper sheets of S0.00 for the correct snow toad design criteria and the
Buitding Ptans Submittal, sheet tomorrow. The structuratengineer said the project was designed to the
correct snow Load of 40 psf, they just had a typo on the GSN sheet 50.00.
Let me know if you need anything etse from us
Thank you,
Waytand
Courtesy Message for Westerfietd Project Team:
I am compteting the code review for Lot H17 in Aspen Gten and have some corrections to
address before we issue this buitding permit:
ARCHITECTURAL PLAN CORREGTIONS:
1. Which ENERGY COMPLIANCE PATH is chosen forthis home design? Forfuture,
ptease ctearty state your chosen ENERGY COMPLIANCE PATH on architecturaI
sheet(s). Prescriptive Energy Comptiance Path.
2. Sheet A7O1, window/door schedute item #2reterences an optionat HERS ENERGY
REPORT. No HERS RATER report found in the apptication materiats. We do not
have a HERS rating report.
3. Wil.l, one or more ERV's be instatted in this home? lf so, identify proposed
equipment tocation(s) and nearest access point. There witt be no ERV's in this
home.
$
.-Q\I
.$\
-\i
1
4. What method of wHoLE-HousE vENTILATION is proposed? Exhaust onty,
combination exhaust / suppty i.e. ERV HRV etc or other? Exhaust only whote-
house ventitation is proposed.
5. Witt the hot tub be instatted with this new residential. construction phase? Or witt it
be roughed-in for future instal,tation after the Certificate of Occupancy BuiLding
Final inspections? The hot tub witt be instatted as part of the new residential
construction.
STRUCTURAL PLAN GORREGTIONS:
6, Sheet S0,00 references Kumar & Associates geotechnical reporl ?3-7-522 dated
October 4,2023. Said geotechnicaI report was not found in appl,ication materiats
To ensure zoning comptiance with subdivision plat notes, the Ptans Examiner need to
receive and assess information from the geotechnicatengineer.
7. Sheet S0.00 Design Criteria, lists a Pf roof snowtoad at 35 PSF. For awareness,
Garfietd Courrty Cotorado has adopLed locaI buitdirrg arrtertdrttertts requiring holne
sites up to 7,000 ft in el.evation be designed to a minimum 40 PSF measured at roof,
not ground. Ptease view attached PDF Buitding Code Requirements for further
guidance. Ptease AMEND any affected structurat sheets and accompanying
detaits.
REQUESTED ACTION STEPS:
Ptease answer question items 1 ,2,3,4, 5 via narrative response by emait to: Cotteen Wirth,
Pta ns Exa m i ner, cwi rth@ga rfietd-cou nty.com.
Ptease submit Kumar & Associates geotechnicaI report to me by emait: Cotl,een Wirth,
Pta ns Exam i ne r, cwi rth@garf ietd-cou nty.com.
Please resubmit AMENDED STRUCTURAL PLAN PAGES. 2 sets, Hard copy, fut[ size paper
sheets to our Garfieici County Community Development Dept front cjesk, waik-in
customers wetcome between 8:30 am - 4:00 pm weekdays.
Atso enctosed is the "BUILDING PLANS SUBMITTAL" cover sheet to remit with AMENDED
PLANS.
2
Thanks,
wffi;.atherred
KA DesignWorks
cell:97O.274.2239
wayland@ka-designworks. com
www.ka-designworks.com
3