Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutObservation of excavation ReportI(tA Im&lssoclailes,hG." Geotechnical and Materials Engineen ard Environrenlal Scientists An Emdoycc Outncd Conpony 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 phone: (970) 945-7988 fax (970) 94s-8454 email: kaglenwood@kumarusa.com www.kumarusa.com Office l-ocatiom: Denver (HQ), Parker, Colorado Springs, Fort Colinq Glenwood Springs, and Summit County, Colorado May 20,2024 Linda Hansen 3290 County Road 210 Rifle, Colorado 81650 lhansen@sopris.net Project No.23-7-675 Subject:Observation of Excavation, Proposed Garage and Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU), 3290 County Road 210, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Linda: As requested, a representative of Kumar & Associates, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on May 9, 2024 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. These services were perfbrmed as supplemental to our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated November 30,2023. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated January 15,2024, Project No.23-7-675. The proposed garage and ADU will be a two-story structure with the garage on the ground floor and the ADU on the second level. The building has been designed to be supported on spread footings sized for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf with a risk of settlement primarily if the bearing soils become wetted. At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation had been cut in one levelfrom2t/z to 3 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom ofthe excavation consisted of silty sand. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on a sample taken from the site, shown on Figure 1, indicate the soils are compressible under conditions of loading and wetting. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. CIP0"t trMt e LlnrdaHansen May 19,2024 Page2 The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those encountened on the site and suitable for sup'port of spread footinp designed for the recommeirded allowable bearing pressure of 1,5@ psf with a risk of settleme,nt. l,oose distrnbed soils should be moistened to near optimrm and compacted. Other recommendations presented in our pnevious report which are applicablq especially those to keep thebearing soils dry, should also be observod. The recommendations submittd in this letter are based on our obserrration of the soils exposed within the foundation excavalion and the previous subsurface exploration at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations encounterod in the excavation onditions for possible change to recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the prese,nce, prwention or possibility of mold or otherbiological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then aprofessional in this special field ofpractice shouldbe consulted. If you have any questions or nd further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, Kumar & Associates, lnc. James H. Parsonso P.E. Rw. by: SLP JrrPnjf attachments Figure I - Swell-Consolidation Test Results J-Caliber Construction - Jose Gonzalez- jose@icaliberconstruction.comeci Kumar & Associates, lnc. @ Project No.23-7-675 ! I SAMPLE OF: Silty Sond FROM: Northwest Corner ol Footing Grode WC = 9.0 X, DD = ,l10 pcf \ \ ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION UNDER CONSTANT PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING :l i i I l I L I I t_ j i l l I tr ofcpg@l 1 0x J1J l4l =an t-z zo F 6 Jooz.oo-4 -5 l0 100 23-7-67s Kumar & Associates SWELL_CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 1