Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutObservation of Excavation 08.12.24I (J-rt Hiffifi'ffi:ffinlriri*'" An EmployeE Owned ComPonY 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 phone: (970) 945-7988 fax: (970) 945-8454 email : kaglenwood@kumarusa.com www.kumarusa.com Office Locations: Denver (HQ), Parker, Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, Glenwood Springs, and Summit County, Colorado August 12,2024 Justin Mahaffey 2865 County Road 309 Parachute, Colorado 8 1635 imahaff ev (d,terrae D. co m Project No.24-7 -297 Subject Observation of Excavation, Proposed Shop Building, 2865 County Road 309, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Justin: As requested, a representative of Kumar & Associates, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on August 8,2024,to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. These services were performed as supplemental to our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated May 10,2024. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated May 3I,2024, Project No. 24-7 -297 . The proposed shop building will be a single-story, steel frame and metal skin structure. The building has been designed to be supported on a monolithic slab-on-grade with thickened edges sized for an allolvable bearing pressllre of 1,500 psf. At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation had been cut in 1 level from I to 2 feet belor,v the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of stiff, sandy silt. No free r,vater \,vas encountered in the excavation and the soils r,vere slightly moist to moist. The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent r,vith those previously enconntered on the site and suitable for support of spread footings (or monolithic slab) designed for the recommended alloi,vable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. Loose disturbed soils should be removed Justin Mahaffey August 12,2024 Page2 in the foundation areas and the exposed soils moistened and compacted. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should also be observed. The recommendations submitted in this letter arebased on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous subsurface exploration at the site. Vmiations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommsndations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concarled about MOBC, the,lr a professional in this special field of prac'tice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please cali our office. Sincerelyo Kumar & Associates, lnc. James H. Parsons, P.E. Reviewedby: SLP rHP/ljf Kumar & Associates, lnc. 6 Project No. 24-7-297