The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondence-Owners ResponseColleen Wirth From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Eric Bontrager < eric@bontragerbuilding.com > Tuesday, December 3,2024 6:40 PM Colleen Wirth tim@ krmconsultants.com; lmayer@lksmdesign.com Re: BLRE-1 1-24-8981- Turrets End Stann Ranch residential alteration UNDER REVIEW Hi Colleen, Please see my notes below in red. Thank you! 1. Whitebtueprintsshowareaofworkat'deckforthemainresidence'PLUSa2ndareaofworkfor'detached barn and bunkhouse' ........ 1 .a. The currentty requested work scope is ONLY to instatt new exterior deck and stair at main residence, correct? Yes, that's correct. 1.b. No construction workto the barn or bunkhouse is expected to be examined now, nor anticipated to be ADDED onto the f orthcoming issued buil.ding permit duringthe course of future inspections at the residence, correc{? Correct. When speaking with the buitding officiat in person, he advised that the barn woutd be considered agricutturat and woutd not require a permit. So atthough shown on the set of ptans, it witt not be a part of this or any permit. There are 2 separate permits for roofing. 1 on the bunkhouse and 1 on the otd cabin. This cabin is not habitabte but we got a permit regardtess. 2. lnasmuch as the buitding apptication form tists type of construction as "residentiat" -- am I correct the home is currentty (and in future) occupied as a private residence? This is a private residence, yes' 2.a. Not utitized (or ptanned at project comptetion for use) as a non-residentiat, commerciaI business operation with members of generaI publ.ic and emptoyee business use(s)? (plans examiner nofices Leah"s note:' re-installing existing guards' -- request to re-confirm private residential use and no change in occupancy to an 2018 IBC commercial building use with other d i m en sio n al requ i re ments) 3. Reviewing KRM Tim Hennum's stamped 51 (Job 2408-13)......... l'm noticing at deck "contact Engineer, if new pier and/or pier extension required, various locations. 3.a. Has there been any exploration to examine existing piers? There has not been exploration bel'ow grade. 3.b. ls the pretiminary design ptan to attach new deck f raming to existing poured piers? Yes, that is the ptan. 3.c. Do you anticipate "deferred structurat submittat detaits by KRM for new foundation pier work? There witL not be newfoundation work at the deck. Onty at the barn which won't be permitted. 3.d. Am I correct, in presuming the "foundation plans" on 52 and retated detaits on that page WILL NOT pertain to the forthcoming deck reptacement scope (but rather relate to separate barn / bunkhouse NOT reftected in this current buitding apptication)? Correct. 3.e. Simitarly, roof framing plan on 53 is NOT appticabte to this current buitding apptication? Correct. 3.f. 51 Deckframing ptan "generaI notes" Foundation Design a. lists a maximum atlowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf and c. further references geotechnical report by Kumar & Associates 24-7-567 .... 3.f.1Are these'generaI notes'intended to be attached to the residentiat deckAND the bunkhouse / barn tocations? No report by Kumar & Associates found in the apptication fotder. 3.t.21betieve an emait confirmation on deck foundation design by Tim witt be sufficient. Where you are using existing piers, I woutd presume there be no geotechnicat engineers field observation and no related N -$N s 1 "open hole report" attached to the deck reptacement project? Ctarification from Tim requested, thank you! I hope you are correct and witt tet Tim answer this one. Ptease let me know if you need anything etse. Thank you. Eric Bontrager Bontrager Building and Design, LLC eric@bontragerbuilding. com 0 471-90t0 On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 al3:12 PM Cot[een Wirth <cwirth@garfietd-county.com> wrote RE: BLRE-11 -24-8981 Turrets End Stann Ranch Courtesy Message for 5097 Sweetwater Rd (CR 150) Project Team Hetto, this is Garfiel,d County Ptans Examiner, Cotteen Wirth, touching base regarding the recent buitding apptication for Stann Ranch on Sweetwater Rd. l'm reviewing the apptication form and bl,ueprints and have some ctarifying questions to ensure I understand the requested construction scope, and ptace correct stamps on the finished FIELD COPY: QUESTTONS AS FOLLOWS: 1. White btueprints showarea of workat'deckforthe main residence'PLUS a2nd area of workfor 'detached barn and bunkhouse' ........ 2 x 1 .a. The currentty requested work scope is ONLY to instatl new exterior deck and stair at main residence, correct? 1.b. No construction work to the barn or bunkhouse is expected to be examined now, nor anticipated to be ADDED onto the forthcoming issued buitding permit duringthe course of future inspections at the residence, correct? 2. lnasmuch as the buitding apptication form lists type of construction as "residentiat" -- am I correct the home is currentty (and in future) occupied as a private residence? 2.a. Not util.ized (or ptanned at project comp[etion for use)as a non-residentiat, commerciaI business operation with members of generat publ.ic and emptoyee business use(s)? (plans examiner notices Leah"s note:' re-installing existing guards' -- request to re-confirm private residential use and no change in occupancy to an 2018 IBC commercial building use with other d i m e n s i o n a I re q u i re ments,) 3. Reviewing KRM Tim Hennum's stamped 51 Qob 24O8-13)......... l'm noticing at deck "contact Engineer, if new pier and/or pier extension required, various locations. 3.a. Has there been any expl,oration to examine existing piers? 3.b. ls the pretiminary design ptan to attach new deck f raming to existing poured piers? 3.c. Do you anticipate "deferred structural, submittal, detaits by KRM for new foundation pier work? 3.d. Am I correct, in presuming the "foundation ptans" on 52 and retated detaits on that page WILL NOT pertain to the forthcoming deck reptacement scope (but rather retate to separate barn / bunkhouse NOT refl,ected in this current buitding apptication)? 3.e. Simitarty, roof framing ptan on 53 is NOT appticabte to this current buitding apptication? 3.f. S1 Deck framing ptan "generaI notes" Foundation Design a. Lists a maximum attowabte bearing pressure of 2,000 psf and c. further references geotechnical report by Kumar & Associates 24-7-567 .... 3.f.1Are these 'general notes' intended to be attached to the residentiat deck AND the bunkhouse / barn Locations? No report by Kumar & Associates found in the appl'ication fotder. 3.t.21bel,ieve an emaiI confirmation on deck foundation design by Tim witt be sufficient. Where you are using existing piers, I woul,d presume there be no geotechnicaI engineers fietd observation and no retated "open hote report" attached to the deck reptacement project? Ctarification from Tim requested, thank you! 3 t. Ptease repty by email as best abte, I look foruvard to seeing this project move fonruard, Att best from, Co[teen Wirth Building Ptans Examiner Garfield County Gommunity Development 108 8th Street, Suite 401 (970) 945-1 377 ext 1 61 0 cwi rth@ga rf ield-cou nty. co m 4