Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGeotechnical Investigation 06.07.2024Huddleston-Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC Jvne7,2024 Project#02850-0001 Joe Reider 1620 County Road 2l Brighton, Colorado 80603 Subject: Geotechnical Investigation Parcel 24072300004 Parachute, Colorado Dear Mr. Reider, This letter presents the results of a geotechnical investigation conducted by lluddleston-Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC (IIBET) at Parcel 24A7n00004 in Parachute, Colorado. The site location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed construction is anticipated to consist of a new single-family residence. The scope of our investigation included evaluating the subsurface conditions at the site to aid in developing foundation recommendations for the proposed construetion. Site Conditions At the time of the investigation, tlre investigated area was open. The northwest portion of the site was fairly flat, and vegetation primarily consisted of grasses and weeds. The center and southeast portions of the site contained moderate to steep slopes down to the adjacent canyon, and vegetation consisted of grasseg weeds, and trees. The site was bordered to the north by a vacant lot and a rural residential property, to the west and south by rural residential properties, and to the east by Federal Land. Subsurface Investieation The subsurface investigation included trvo borings and two test pits as shown on Figure 2 - Site Plan. The borings were drilled to a depth of 20.0, and the test pits were excavated to a depth of 6.0 feet below the existing ground surface. Typed boring and test pit logs are included in Appendix A. As indicated on the logs, the subsurface conditions encountered at the site were fairly consistent. The borings and test pits encountered 1.0 foot of topsoil above reddish-tan to brown, moist, soft to very stiff lean clay with sand soils that extended to a depth of 12.0 feet in the borings and to the bottoms of the test pit excavations. The clay soils in the borings were underlain by brown to gray and tan, moist, dense silty sand with gravel soils that extended to the bottoms of the borings. Groundwater was not encountered in the subsurface at the time of the investigation. 2789 RiversidePa*way Grand Jrmction, Colorado 81501 Phone: 970-255-8005 Info@ltuddlestonberry. com N N \. . ' \q Pacel24M02300004 #028504001 06107D4 A@ H[d.lleston-Bsrry EnCae.inr& Tdin!, l.LC Laboratorv Testine Laboratory testing was conducted on samples of the native soils encountered in the borings. The testing included grain size analysis, Atterberg limits determination, natural moisture content determination, and maximum dry density and optimum moisture content (Proctor) determination. The laboratory testing results are included in Appendix B. The laboratory testing results indicated that the native clay and sand soils are moderately plastic. In general, based upon the Atterberg limits and our experience with similar soils in the vicinity of the subject site, the native clay soils are anticipated to be slightly expansive. Foundation Recommendations Based upon the results of the subsurface investigation and nature of the proposed construction, shallow foundations are recommended. Spread footings and monolithic (turndown) structural slabs are both appropriate foundation alternatives. However, as discussed previously, the native soils are anticipated to be slightly expansive. Therefore, in order to provide a stable bearing stratum and limit the potential for excessive differential movements, it is recommended that the f,oundationsbe construeted above a minimum of 24-inehesof structural fill. Due to their plasticity, the native soils are not suitable for reuse as structural fiIl. Imported structural fill should consist of a granular, non-expansive, non-free drainins material with greater than l0o/o passing the #20A sieve and Liquid Limit of less than 30. However, all proposed imported structural fill materials should be approved by FIBET. For spread footing foundations, the footing areas may be trenched. However, for monolithic slab foundations, the structural fill should extend across the entire building pad area to a depth of 24- inches below the turndown edges. Structural fill should extend laterally beyond the edges of the foundation a distance equal to the thickness of structural fill. Prior to placement of structural fill, it is recommended that the bottoms of the foundation excavations be scarified to a depth of 6 to 8-inches, moisture conditioned, and re-compacted to a minimum of 95o/o of the standard Proctor ma:<imum dry density, within *ZYo of the optimum moisture content as determined in accordance with ASTM D698. However, as discussed previously, soft soils were encountered in portions of the subsurface and this may make iompaction of the subgrade difficulf It may be necessary to utilize geotextile andlot geogrid in conjunction with up to 30-inches of additional granular fill to stabilize the subgrade. I{BET should be contacted to provide specific recommendations for subgrade stabilization depending upon the actual conditions encountered during construction. Structural fill should be moisture conditioned, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts, and compacted to a minimum of 95o/o of the standard Proctor maximum dry density for fine grained soils or modified Proctor maximum dry density for coarse grained soils, within *ZYo of the optimum moisture content as determined in accordance with ASTM D698 or D1557C, respectively. Structural fill should be extended to within 0.l-feet of the bottom of the foundation. No more than 0.I-feet of gravel should be placed below the footings or turndown edge as a leveling co'urse. 22:\2008-ALL PROJECTS\02850 - Joe Reider\02850'0001 Parcel 24O?02300004\200 - Geo\02&50'0001 LR060724:doc Pwcel 240702300004 #028504001 06107D4 HuddlestorlBerty For structural fill consisting of approved imported granular materials and foundation building a maximum allowable beari pcl may used for imported structural fill materials. Foundations subject to frost should be at least 36-inches below the finished grade. Any stemwalls or retaining walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures. For backfill consisting of the native soils or imported granular, non-free draining, non-expansive material, we recommend that the walls be designed for an active equivalent fluid unit weight of 55 pcf in areas where no surcharge loads are present. An at-rest equivalent fluid unit weight of 75 pcf is recommended for braced walls. Lateral earth pressures should be increased as necessary to reflect any surcharge loading behind the walls. Water soluble sulfates are common to the soils in Western Colorado. Therefore, at a minimum, cement adequate for Sulfate Exposure Class S1 is recommended for construction at this site. Non-structural Floor Slab and Exterior Flatwork Recommendations In order to reduce the potential for excessive differential movements, it is recommended that non-structural floating floor slabs be constructed above a minimum of 24-inches of structural fill with subgrade preparation, structural fill materials, and fill placement be in accordance with the Foundation Recommendations section of this report. It is recommended that exterior flatwork be constructed above a minimum of l2-inches of structural fill. I)rainase Recommendations Grudins and drainase are uitical for the lons-term oetformnnce of the structure and grading around the structure should be designed to carry precipitation and runoff away from the structure. It is recommended that the finished ground surface drop at least twelve inches within the first ten feet away from the structure. It is also recommended that landscaping within five feet of the structure include primarily desert plants with low water requirements. In addition, it is recommended that irrigation, including drip lines, within ten feet of foundations be minimized. I{BET recommends that downspout extensions be used which discharge a minimum of 15 feet from the structure or beyond the backfill zone, whichever is greater. However, if subsurface downspout drains are utilized, they should be carefully constructed of solid-wall PVC and should daylight a minimum of 15 feet from the structure. In addition, an impermeable membrane is recommended below subsurface downspout drain lines. Dry wells should not be used. In order to limit the potential for surface moisture to adversely impact the structure, a perimeter foundation drain is recommended. In general, the perimeter foundation drain should consist of prefabricated drain materials or a perforated pipe and gravel system with the flowline of the drain at the bottom of the foundation (at the highest point). The prefabricated drain materials or gravel should extend along basement walls to within 36-inches of the finished grade. The perimeter drain should slope at a minimum of 1.0% to daylight or to a sump with pump. The drain should also include an impermeable membrane at the base to limit the potential for moisture to infiltrate vertically down below the foundations. EnsharhS& T6lhB, t.LC pad preparation as recommended, used. In addition, a modulus of JZ:\2008 A.LL PROJECTSI'02850 - Joe Reider\O2850.0001 Parcel240702300004\200 - Geo\02850.0001 LR06072^1:doc Paur'el24O7O2300004 #028504001 06107D4 @ Huddleston.Berry Fn lnarini & IesinS, I.LC General Notes The recommendations included above are based upon the results of the subsurface investigation and on our local experience. These conclusions and recommendations are valid only for the proposed construction. As discussed previously, the subsurface conditions encountered at the site were fairly consistent. Ilowever, the precise nature and extent of any subsurface variability may not become evident until construction. As a result, it is recommended that IIBET provide construction materials testing and engineering oversight during the entire construction process. In addition, the builder and any subcontractors working on the project should be provided a copy of this report and informed of the issues associated with the presence of moisture sensitive subgrade materials at this site. It is imaortant to note thal the recommendations herein are intended to reduce the risk of structural movement and/or dnmage, to varving desrees. associatedu,ith volutrc change of the native soils. However. HBET cannot oredict long-term chanses in subsulface ,noisture conditions and/or the precise mngnitude or utent of volurne chanse in the native soils. Whg'e significant increases in subsurface moisture occur due to poor gradins. imoroper stormwater mnntagernent, utilitv line fflilure, ucess irrigation, or other cause, either during construction or the result of actions of the pronertv owner. several inches,of movement arelossible, In addition. anv failure to comnlv with the recommendations in this reoort releases Had.d,leston- Berry Engineerins & Testine, LLC of an! liabilitr with regard ta the structure performnnce. We are pleased to be of service to your project. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments regarding the contents of this report. Respectfully Submitted: Huddleston-Berry Engineering and Testing LLC Michael A. Berry, P.E. Vice President of Engineering 4 3 010 /24 2:\200&ALt PROJECTS\O2850 - JoeReider\O2850-000I Parcel2407O2300004\200 - Geo\02850-0001 LR060?24;doc ryped """,s#;fnril$ PR(UECT LOCANONPRCUECT NUMBER PRG,ECT TIIAME Parel24O7O23fiXlf)4CUENTJoe Reider Rirrcrside Engineering & Testing LI.C 97G255-8005 Junctisr, CO 81501 BORING NUMBER B-{ PAGE 1 OF 1 @Mft.ETED 5TNE4 CflECKEDBY MAB tpLEstzE 4-lnchMTESTARTED5mm4 TnlIlJ]'IG@NTRACTOR S. McKracken InILUIIIG METHOD Simco ZXX)Tnrc* Rio LOGGEDBY TC IlRtlltrlc - AT ilMEOFDRLU},IG Drv GROUND ELET'ATION GROUNDWATERLEVELS: AFIER ATENDOFDRLUI,IG Drv IOTES a. f=G= =r otrF 3=c Fqil 6e5- FzrrlFzoG'o3la lrJztr a g8 3s UJt ofr>Fl<z.Jiasoz 2ulLFGirl l4 oo(L 5 F^ =._EE(f, r.ueeu- -FL1'toltt -Foz. =oo ruo->trFUJ 3go-f>.2. a i/IATERIAL DESCRIPTIONg-F(L ulo o oi.^ *EE-(, SS 1 89 7+9(n SS 2 100 G11-15 (26) 30 27 3 40SS 3 100 1UI6-n (38)21 SS 4 13 30 Gff reO?stt-tan, mo-lst very g-m -- tan, moist, derse CLAY with with Gratrel,(SM) Sand wilh Organics SS€: Lab Classified Boftom of hole at feet. ooo oDoNo az :)Jo() Im GEOTECH BH ! amI2C =trmn o mz t-oo no o-o \o{ $ I00o NII 6c. e oo & 6 (D 0a Er. oa F I' sa Fo ! ano HDIoz .It oilo:rc o ;,o ! amq z =n to ao tro4zozc =@m7 trtt .It o m o'n 6 8 I I I Fomoo E E 6 =m oI E E 6Iz g o ov 3-{ nro;n mo-{o g. 3oo H{ e* ao (,ls s5 o Bxm tr, IE @ th 3ox ooxo =83! fi mo (,r N ss oI+rr= Eg*EEqq* FEEEt Aen o 8czc, m m > oz 0 e o 6 fi ut H iI c DEPTH (fi) GRAPHIC LOG -{m4r Imaon T' -.16z SAMPLEWPE NUMBER RECOVERY % (ROD) BLOW COUNTS (N VALUE) POCKET PEN. (ts0 DRY UNITWT (pcf) MOISTURE coNTENT e6) I e-.{ =$'{ (p(/)mno FINES CONTENT (%) LIOUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX l\-.. 'l? 'rJ;.'.|'j t4 . $Fitl L aol 3. €. 5od o,:. 8 +ol, @og o! 1Joo a c) q, o: an 3vI oLa o(o il oa CL oF 3 9.s CLot E o ct aL5 3Lo? oo:$ o oeX ^E (t){ o) G)J N X ru$ ol(o so)o 6 X <'l$ (Jlo (r) PI X sS so N)II I o 3 o eo o Nob o-o GEOTECH BH ! amo 2c3trn7 o mz L.oo nq. o-o ct BII \onNt"4{ il'{ =?E 99E.19E.*g &E 6 6ega?UA'Etr.:-*,x O o-Y r€Eoil (F F o' sq b aIllq 5 oz to do c .ooo ! amo 2 m !o ao -{nra{T -{ze =-'EI llt H{ iu-dqP rr- 6:{ a Fomg E -{o g B s oz =m 6c, gIt ozooz nD 3F 9-{ ryl CI' DE mI otilo tuA{ dor =@ 0to-Io ExlrlI E @ g L 0t e 83! H m0 (t N SA o E+rr= Es#;Hss* EHHHr9E o E z E, m m F oz I ?o ? mo I U' H Po DEPTH (fr) GRAPHIC LOG -{mz t-0mao41'-{oz SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER RECOVERY % (ROD) BLOW COUNTS (N VALUE) POCKET PEN (ts0 DRY UNITWT (pcO MOISTURE coNTENT (06) -{ =d{@amvo FINES CONTENT LIQUID LIMIT P|-ASTIC LIMIT PTASTICITY INDEX N)(,l ,lr,, tY .,r,! r\-.. l'. .'1.:' .ir;. .1.c,'1;.'. l.q .i';. It-.'r j-' l.', .r',, g ao e €.uo GI!t -8' -{o-ItaIr 5'o o F ao a o =6 CLsg o? 3Lo 3og =o + oa =ii .-. -5 { @ @o o 3 o o att E. 0, 9'o (D-o TEST PIT NUMBER TP-z PAGE 1 OF 1 PRI'ECT LOCANONPROJEGT NUMBER PRCUECT l.lAME ParcelCIIENT Joe Ihrddleson-Berry &rgin€ering & Testing LI-C q70-255-8005 GROUND ELB'AflON - TEST PITSIZE GK'UNDWATER LEI'ELS: CI{ECKEDBY MAB @MPTETED 5fnf24 EXCAVATION@NTRAGTOR \Mseland MTESTARTED 5mn4 EXCAVATION METFIOD LOGGEDBY TC ATENDOF EXCAVATION Drv ATTIMEOF EI(CAVANON Drv AFIERE'GAVAIIONtiflTEs ol_ e=fJ FF 3=(L F xlrl Fztut-.z 88aulztr orff>Fl 43r.do>oz z tUo FGug ooI 5 F^ =EEo ailE o o() ul TL>TtsFut 5g(L=l ez(t, a E8 8sul E. o l.n 3q(, IvIATERIAL DESCRIPTIONIE IF(L ulo Silty Sand with Organics (TOPSOIL) to stiffmoist, mediumLean(cl) Bottom of te$ pit at feet. s! N Juto Its {L APPENDIX B Laboratory Testing Results Huddleston-Berry Engin€cring & Testing; LIC 2789 Ri!€rside Parkway GrmdJunctim,CO 81501 97G25t8005 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CUENT Joe Reider Prc.'EGT II|ATI,IE Paresl2AOT(W3fr)00/ PRO'ECT NUMBER (}2850{too1 PRCUECT LOGAilON Parac u.s. srEvE opENlrlc lN lt{ctlEs I U.S, SIEI'E NUI'BERS I.IYDROIIIETER 21.5 1V4 6 14 20 1m1{)200 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65FI(, tr3 dluru.zii t--zuo E.ulG 40 35 30 F 20 15 10 5 o 00 1 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS 0.1 0.001 {I I I I 'tTI I t\ \q I ! :l il Il lll lil lilll COBBLES GFTAVEL SAND SILTOR CLAY @aIse line @arse medium fine Specimen ldentification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu a B-1, SS-3 5120 STLTYSAND(SM)30 27 3 E coMPoslTE 5120 LEAN cl-AY with sAND(cL)32 18 14 Specimen ldentification D100 D60 D30 D10 ToGravel 06Sand ToSilt o/oClay o B-1, ss-3 6120 9.5 0.30{6.0 54.0 to.0 coMPostTE 5/20 2.35 0.0 28.8 71.2E oIo @No ulN6z to fluddleston-Berry Engin€ering & T€sting; LIC ATTERBERG LIMITS' RESTJLTS Rirrcrside Parkway Junctim, CO 81501 c7G255-8005 Cl.IENT Joe Reider PRo',ECT ITIAME Parcel PROIECT NUMBER 028504001 PRO.IECT l.(lq-nON Paraqhde. CO @ @ P L A s T I c I T Y I N D E X 50 4A E 10 CL-ML @ @ 0 0 20 80 LIOUID LIMIT Specimen ldentification LL PL PI 1200 Classification B-1, SS-3 5t20 30 27 3 {o STLTYSAND(SM) COMPOSITE 5t20 32 18 14 71 LEAN ClAYwith SAND(GL) J1Iot (L (r, E d PRO.TECf LGTION Parachute. CO MO}STURE-DENSIW RELATIONSHI P PRo.IECT]tlAME Parcel PR(}'ECTNT'MBER suscmol n89 I CLIENT Joe 970-255-8005 Ituddl€ston-B€rry Engine€ring & T€sting, LIrC tl \\ \ 'I \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ I \\ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ 't \ \ \ \ \ \ -\\/\\\ \\ Sample Date: Sample No.: Source of Material: Description of Material: 5t20t202A' COMPOSITE 145 ClAYwith SAND{CL}LEAN Test Method (manual):ASTM D698A 140 135 TEST RESULTS Maximum Dry DensitY llXl:5 FGF Optimum Water Content 20'O olo 130 GRADATON RESULTS (% PASSING) #2OA # w 71 100 100 125 oc ATIERBERG LIMITS 120 LL PL PI 32 t8 14 115 Curves of 100o/o Saturation for Specific Gravity Equal to 110 2.80 2.74 2.60 105 100 95 90 5 15 WATERCONTENT, % 0 10 2A 25 30