The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1.00 General Application Materials MOUNTAIN VIEW PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION OWNER: RED DOG, LLC GARFIELD COUNTY – January 2025 FORMERLY CALLED: NORTH 27 OWNER/APPLICANT/CONSULTANT LIST OWNER/APPLICANT RED DOG LLC 1011 MAIN ST. CARBONDALE, CO 81623 KIRKENTERPRISES@COX.NET 480.216.2067 PLANNER/COORDINATION: MARK CHAIN CONSULTING LLC 811 GARFIELD AVE CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 (970) 309.3655 MCHAIN@SOPRIS.NET SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER: BOUNDARIES UNLIMITED 923 COOPER AVE., STE 201 Glenwood Springs, Co 81621 970.945.5252 ATTORNEY CHAD LEE, ESQ. JVAM PO BOX 878 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 970.893.8242 WATER ATTORNEY SARA DUNN, ESQ. BALCOMB GREEN PO BOX 790 818 COLORADO AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background/intent ………………………………………………………………………… p.2 Entitlement History ………………………………………………………………………. p.2 Project Site ………………………………………………………….……………………….. p.4 Development Plan Summary Information ………………………………… .. p.4 Improvement Survey, site plan and Draft Plat……………………………… p. 6 Compliance with Comprehensive Plan ………………………………………… p.10 Water Rights and Supply …………………………………………………………….. p.11 Visual Analysis ………………………………………..…………………………………… p.14 Article 7 Standards ……………………………………………………………………… p.19 Impact Analysis …………………………………………………………………………… p. 31 Mineral Rights …………………………………………………………………………….. p.35 Affordable Housing …………………………………………………………………….. p.37 Miscellaneous Planning Items……………………………………………………… p.37 Exhibits Exhibit A Application and Related Forms Exhibit B Relevant Deeds (Property Ownership) Exhibit C Engineering Reports Exhibit D Water Documents Exhibit E CCR Outline Exhibit F Improvements Agreement Exhibit G Geotech Information Exhibit H Mineral Rights Documents Exhibit I Miscellaneous Correspondence Exhibit J Past Approvals/Title Work/Property Information Exhibit K Grant of easements and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for a portion of Peach Valley Orchard and the Simon Subdivision Exemption Mountain View Preliminary Plan 1 MOUNTAIN VIEW MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAN 1. Background and Intent of Application Red Dog LLC (owner and applicant) is submitting a Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application for property that is 27.52 acres in size and has been known for the last 24 years as Lot 4 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption. This is the second step in the major subdivision process; the Sketch Plan Application was submitted in August 2023 with an update submitted in December 2023. . The proposal remains the same; to develop 5 lots ranging in size from 3.9acres to 6.8 acres. Access for 4 these lots is to be from County Road 261 with the fifth lot having access from Columbine Lane. The property is located on Silt Mesa approximately 1.5 miles north of the Town of Silt and it is almost directly south of the Harvey Gap reservoir. Two location maps are included in the following page. Applicant intends to install an interior private road serving 4 of the lots and domestic water and irrigation infrastructure. The plan is that that individual property owners will build on each of the lots. They will be providing their own OWTS as part of a building permit application. Each lot is being designed to have 1 single-family house with the ability to have an accessory dwelling unit. Owner will pay School District Fees, transportation fees and any other fees as required by code. The distance of the subject property from the Town of Silt infrastructure prevents connection to any municipal water or wastewater facilities. The subdivision as proposed is in compliance with the Town of Silt’s Comprehensive Plan, the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030 - 2020 Update. Developer will ensure that each lot is able to meet all County standards for the Rural “R” Zone District and will be compliant with Article 7 Development Standards as applicable. 2. Entitlement History What is now Lot 4 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption (SSE) received approval in its present configuration and legal description with the approval of the Simon Subdivision Exemption by virtue of the adoption of Resolution 99 – 044 and the associated Exemption Plat. Copies of these recorded documents are included as Exhibit J. That exemption created 4 lots and what is Lot 4 was sold to Paul and John Currier, who applied for a Sketch Plan and Preliminary Plan under the name of North 27 Subdivision. They submitted an application for a Preliminary Plan in 2000. From a review of the staff report and application, most of the issues were worked out with the exception of water supply. Lot 4 was sold to Terry, Julie and Gary Kirk in 2007. An application for Preliminary Plan was made once again. That plan was recommended for denial because proof of a legal water supply and augmentation plan had not been completed. The water analysis and augmentation plan and court cases continued to follow their way through the system. The application was tabled while the application went through Water Court, which took over 2 years. It was eventually dropped from the County’s agenda because of the length of time; and therefore never received formal approval. The water court case was resolved Mountain View Preliminary Plan 2 Garfield County, CO Red Dog LLC Location Map Created by: Chain Developed by Account Number R005297 Parcel Number 212736100052 Acres 28 Land SqFt 0 Tax Area 020 2019 Mill Levy 74.6820 Physical Address 0 SILT 81652 Owner Address RED DOG LLC 1011 MAIN STREET CARBONDALE CO 81623 2019 Total Actual Value $12,680 Last 2 Sales Date Price 11/4/2019 $0 10/22/2019 $0 Date created: 7/29/2022 Last Data Uploaded: 7/29/2022 4:53:27 AM 5,998 ft Overview Legend Parcels Roads Highways Limited Access Highway Major Road Local Road Minor Road Other Road Ramp Ferry Pedestrian Way Lakes & Rivers County Boundary Line /RXQWDLQrWLHZrmUHOLPLQDU\rmODQ c during the Kirks ownership but because of the Great Recession the application was not pursued for approval. A public hearing on the Sketch Plan was held in front of the Garfield County Planning Commission on April 10, 2024. Comments on the application centered around the provision of domestic and irrigation water supply and a concern related to the amount of traffic that would be generated from the project. 3.Project Site The site is 27.52 acres in size and is rectangular in shape. The property is generally flat with no hills, ridgelines or other such features. It has a gentle slope from north to south at 3 to 4%. The property has legal access from 2 sides. On the eastern boundary is County Road 261 which is an improved County Road. The property’s west boundary is adjacent to Columbine Lane, a private road associated with the Peach Valley Orchard subdivision. H P Geotech ( Now HP-Kumar) did a preliminary geologic assessment in November 1999. The report is included as Exhibit C. The report notes the property is on a pediment alluvial surface. The report indicates that the property is suitable to development and….” Not exposed to debris flow, landslides, rock fall or general subsidence hazards”. There was some shallow groundwater found with the investigation. Basement level construction may need to be limited but this will be determined in more detail as we move forward through the Final Plan Stage. Kumar also produced an updated letter on the application dated December 21, 2023. 4. Development Plan Summary Information The chart below shows relevant summary information for the sketch plan as presently laid out: Mountain View Sketch Plan Summary Information Lot # Size Access 4A 6.787 Private Road from CR 261 4B 6.467 Private Road from CR 261 4C 5.642 Private Road from CR 261 4D 3.882 Private Road from CR 261 4E `4.0 Columbine Road (private) Zoning: Rural Water: 2 enlargements to the Simon Well approved per Augmentation Plan Septic: OWTS for each lot Irrigation: provided by Mountain View Infrastructure 0RXQWDLQ 9LHZ 3UHOLPLQDU\ 3ODQ Access: previously noted Total Acreage: 27.52 Ave. Lot Size: 5.504 Ac. All associated infrastructure with the project including private road and all necessary utility work will the undertaken by the developer, Red Dog LLC. The developer has entered into discussions with the PVO/SSE HOA regarding timing of any well enlargements/new well for the Simon Well No. 1 and will update staff during the Preliminary Plan Review process. At this point in time it is foreseen that residential construction on any of the lots in Lot 4 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption will be the responsibility of a private lot owner or developer. An individual OWTS for any of the lots will occur concurrently with application or Building permit. Any impact fees or School Dedication fees will be undertaken according to the Garfield County LUDC procedures. The Applicant has coordinated with the Colorado River Fire & Rescue during the Sketch Plan process to meet all concerns related to fire protection and mitigation as well as emergency access. (See comments in Section 8 of this application narrative (Compliance with Article 7 standards (7-206) An Improvement Survey Plat, site plan and draft preliminary plat sheet are included on the following pages. Engineering Reports are included in Exhibit C. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 5 OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X E EM LOT 4 27.52 AC. (VACANT) Lot 1 Simon Subd. Exemption Robert & Sylvia Maclaughlin PO BOX 493 Silt, CO 81652 Lot 2 Simon Subd. Exemption Kristin & William Howard 830 County Road 250 Silt, CO 81652Lot 12 Peach Valley Orchard Subd. Martin Munoz & Maria Toole 1 Columbine Lane Silt, CO 81652 Lot 14 Peach Valley Orchard Subd. Loreto Ayala Villaman & Ayala Moroyoqui 68 Larkspur Court Silt, CO 81652 Lot 19 Peach Valley Orchard Subd. Nathan & Kelsey Miller 383 Columbine Lane Silt, CO 81652 Lot 20 Peach Valley Orchard Subd. Primitivo & Elsa Ochoa 256 Columbine Lane Silt, CO 81652 Lot 21 Peach Valley Orchard Subd. Kelly Mckee 755 County Road 261 Silt, CO 81652 Fr a n k & S h e i l a D a l e y 46 7 0 C o u n t y R o a d 3 1 1 Ne w C a s t l e , C O 8 1 6 4 7 T W SO S1 ° 0 7 ' 2 5 " W 8 8 7 . 7 5 ' S89° 21' 27"W 1350.12' N1 ° 0 0 ' 4 6 " E 8 8 7 . 7 8 ' N89° 21' 39"E 1351.83' 472.77'500.00'379.06' S1 ° 0 7 ' 2 5 " W 4 5 4 . 4 0 ' 5 7 9 0 5795 5800 5805 581 0 5 8 1 5 5820 5825 5795 5800 580 5 581 0 5 8 1 5 5 8 2 0 582 5 5830 583 5 58 4 0 58 4 5 5850 5855 58 6 0 5830 5835 5840 Lot 3 Simon Subd. Exemption Tommy and Susan Junge POB 827 Silt, CO 81652 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 75' > > > > > > > > > > 30 ' ' Ø 75' ROAD EASEMENT FOR ACCESS TO LOT 4, SIMON SUBD. EXEMPTION PER DECLARATIONS IN DOC. 546583, JUNE 3, 1999.IRRIGATION POND GREENHOUSE 15' WIDE GRAVEL DRIVE FENCE ELECTRIC METER RECOVERED 3' WITNESS CORNER NO. 4 REBAR W/ YELLOW PLASTIC CAP "WC 13501" CO U N T Y R O A D 2 6 1 (A S P H A L T R O A D ) CO L U M B I N E L A N E RECOVERED NO. 4 REBAR W/ YELLOW PLASTIC CAP "13501" FENCE PUMPHOUSE RECOVERED NO. 4 REBAR W/ YELLOW PLASTIC CAP "13501" RECOVERED NO. 4 REBAR W/ YELLOW PLASTIC CAP "13501" TELEPHONE PAD WATER SERVICE FENCE RECOVERED NO. 4 REBAR W/ YELLOW PLASTIC CAP "13501" RECOVERED NO. 4 REBAR W/ YELLOW PLASTIC CAP "13501" RECOVERED NO. 4 REBAR W/ YELLOW PLASTIC CAP "13501" RECOVERED WITNESS CORNER SGM ALUM. CAP "WC 13501" FENCE MEANDERS OFF AND ON THE PROPERTY LINE FENCE MEANDERS OFF AND ON THE PROPERTY LINE FENCE FENCE MEANDERS OFF AND ON THE PROPERTY LINE DITCH (SEE NOTE 12) DITCH (SEE NOTE 12) DITCH (SEE NOTE 12) DITCH (SEE NOTE 12) DITCH (SEE NOTE 12) GRAVEL DRIVESHARED DRIVEWAY 655.78' 22.5'ELECTRIC PAD 63 9 . 2 2 ' 20' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND DITCH PURPOSES (SEE NOTE 15) 20' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND DITCH PURPOSES (SEE NOTE 15) DITCH (SEE NOTE 12) 15' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND DITCH PURPOSES (SEE NOTE 15) C/L 15' EASEMENT TO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO (SEE NOTE 18) 17.6' 25.2' 31.0' 9. 2 ' 10 . 5 ' FENCEFENCE 30"Ø CMP OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE ACCESS ACCESS NORTH By Re v i s i o n No . D a t e 923 Cooper Avenue Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 tele: 970.945.5252 fax: 970.384.2833 Engineer or Surveyor Seal Sheet Client Information: PROJECT NO. FILE NAME: Designer: Drafter: Date: N: \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 9 \ 0 9 0 1 6 - N o r t h 2 7 \ d w g \ 0 9 0 1 6 - V - T o p o . d w g 5 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 2 4 : 1 2 P M 98765432 5/18/22 APL BUI 09016-v-topo.dwg 09016 xxx.xxx.xxxx Carbondale, CO 81623 1011 Main St. Red Dog LLC. Ga r f i e l d C o u n t y , C o l o r a d o 1. Lo t 4 , S i m o n s S u b d i v i s i o n E x e m p t i o n P l a t Im p r o v e m e n t S u r v e y P l a t V.1 00 100'200' Scale: 1" = 100' NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. Improvement Survey Plat Lots 4, Simon Subdivision Exemption County of Garfield, State of Colorado X X X X X EXISTING FENCE PROPERTY/RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE EXISTING BUILDING LINE LEGEND 7890 EXISTING 1' CONTOUR EXISTING 5' CONTOUR EXISTING WATER SERVICE/SHUTOFFWSO E FOUND #4 REBAR WITH ALUMINUM CAP SURVEY NOTES 1. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITH THE USE OF A CURRENT TITLE COMMITMENT PROVIDED BY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY (ORDER NO. GW63018795, DATED MAY 06, 2022) AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY BOUNDARIES UNLIMITED INC. TO DETERMINE TITLE OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. 2. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF RED DOG LLC NAMED IN THE STATEMENT HEREON. SAID STATEMENT DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED PERSON WITHOUT AN EXPRESS STATEMENT BY THE SURVEYOR NAMING SAID PERSON. 3. THIS SURVEY IS VALID ONLY IF PRINT HAS THE SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE OF SURVEYOR. 4.BASIS OF BEARINGS: N1°07'25"E BETWEEN THE ALUMINUM CAP FOUND AT THE E1/4 CORNER (L.S. 13501) AND THE SGM ALUMINUM CAP FOUND AT THE NE CORNER OF SECTION 36. 5. DATE OF FIELDWORK: APRIL 5, 2022. 6. UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET. 7. SITE BENCHMARK: TOP OF ALUMINUM CAP (3' WITNESS CORNER) AT NORTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER, ELEVATION 5841.86 (NAVD 88 DATUM). CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1 FOOT. CONTOURS SHOWN ARE FROM 2016. 8. SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED RURAL WITH THE FOLLOWING SETBACKS: 8.1. FRONT YARD: 25-FEET; 8.2. REAR YARD: 25-FEET; 8.3. SIDE YARD: 10-FEET. 9. NO EXCAVATIONS WERE MADE DURING THE PROCESS OF THIS SURVEY TO LOCATE BURIED UTILITIES AND/OR STRUCTURES. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOULD BE FIELD LOCATED BY THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVATION ON OR ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 10. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT AND/OR BOUNDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY, COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE C.R.S. SEC. 18-4-508. 11. THE WORD "CERTIFY" AS SHOWN AND USED HEREON MEANS AN EXPRESSION OF PROFESSIONAL OPINION REGARDING THE FACTS OF THIS SURVEY AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. 12. RESERVATION OF DITCH RIGHTS AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED , FEBRUARY 25, 1910 IN BOOK 79 AT PAGE 407 AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE DEED COVERS 240 ACRES APPROXIMATELY UPHILL OF PROPERTIES TO SOUTH RECEIVING IRRIGATION WATERS BY THIS DEED. 13. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF OIL AND GAS LEASE RECORDED MARCH 17, 2006 IN BOOK 1780 AT PAGE 766 EXPIRED IN FIVE (5) YEARS, 2011. ASSIGNMENT OF OIL AND GAS LEASES RECORDED JULY 6, 2007 IN BOOK 390 AT PAGES 390 AND 392 MAY AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY. 14. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF QUIT CLAIM RECORDED OCTOBER 4, 1999 IN BOOK 1153 AT PAGE 743 AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY. 15. EASEMENTS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF SIMON SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT (GARFIELD COUNTY RESOLUTION RECORDED APRIL 20, 1999 IN BOOK 1125 AT PAGE 434) RECORDED APRIL 21, 1999 UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 544219. 16. TERMS, CONDITIONS PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF GRANT OF EASEMENTS AND DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS RECORDED JUNE 3, 1999 IN BOOK 1133 AT PAGE 54 AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY. 17. TERMS, CONDITIONS PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF PAID UP OIL AND GAS LEASE RECORDED JUNE 24, 2011 UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 804309 AFFECTED SUBJECT PROPERTY MAY 02, 2011, IT EXPIRED IN FIVE (5) YEARS, 2016. 18. EASEMENT TO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO RECORDED OCTOBER 10,2018 UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 912741 IS SHOWN ON SURVEY. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, STEVEN L. SMITH, BEING A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, ON THE BASIS OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, DO HEREBY CERTIFY TO RED DOG LLC THAT THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT AS DEFINED BY C.R.S. 38-51-102(9), AND THAT IT IS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY SHOWING THE CURRENT LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES, VISIBLE UTILITIES, FENCES, HEDGES, OR WALLS SITUATED ON THE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND WITHIN FIVE FEET OF ALL BOUNDARIES OF SUCH PARCEL, ANY CONFLICTING BOUNDARY EVIDENCE OR VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, AND ALL EASEMENTS, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, AND TUNNELS FOR WHICH PROPERLY RECORDED EVIDENCE IS PROVIDED LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE (ORDER NO. GB63000653, DATED JULY 18, 2007), OR OTHER SOURCES AS SPECIFIED ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. BY: STEVEN L. SMITH, REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR COLORADO. NO. 25642 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF BOUNDARIES UNLIMITED INC. COUNTY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE DEPOSITED THIS DAY OF , 2022, AT O'CLOCK M., IN BOOK OF THE COUNTY SURVEYORS LAND SURVEY PLATS/RIGHT-OF-WAY SURVEYS AT PAGE , RECEPTION NO. . THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT APPROVED FOR CONTENT AND FORM ONLY AND NOT THE ACCURACY OF SURVEYS, CALCULATIONS OR DRAFTING. COMPILES WITH SECTION 38-51-101 AND 102 COLORADO REVISED STATUTES. GARFIELD COUNTY SURVEYOR DATE EXISTING ELECTRIC PAD 25642 ST E V E N L. SM I T HCOLORADO LICE N S E D P R O F E S SIONAL L A N D S U RVEY O R 18 MAY 2022 7889 Vicinity Map 1" = 4,000' LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 4, SIMON SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, R. N. 544219 TBD County Road 261 Lot 4 - Simon Subdivision Exemption County of Garfield, State of Colorado Parcel No: 2127-361-00-052 EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE NO R T H SITE I-70 Silt Mountain View Preliminary Plan 6 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE X X X X X X T > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > EX. GREENHOUSE Parcel No. 2127-361-00-049 Parcel No. 2127-361-00-050 Parcel No. 212736101009 Parcel No. 2127-361-01-010 Parcel No. 2127-361-01-005 Parcel No. 2127-361-01-003 Parcel No. 2127-361-01-001 Parcel No. 2125-311-00-046 Parcel No. 2127-361-00-051 (A S P H A L T R O A D ) Co u n t y R o a d # 2 6 1 Co l u m b i n e L a n e (G R A V E L R O A D ) W SO WSO EP EP kWhkWhkWh EP EP EP Lot 4-E 174246 sf 4.000 Ac± Lot 4-A 295648 sf 6.787 Ac± Lot 4-C 246406 sf 5.657 Ac± WSO HWL HW L HWL HW L 20' POTABLE UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATED WITH THIS PLAT FOUND WITNESS CORNER NO.4 REBAR W/ PC "WC 13501" (3.2' E) FOUND NO. 4 REBAR & PC "13501" (0.3' N) FOUND NO. 4 REBAR & PC "13501" (0.5' E) FOUND NO. 4 REBAR & PC "13501" (0.6' E) FOUND NO. 4 REBAR & PC "13501" FOUND NO. 4 REBAR & PC "13501" FOUND WITNESS CORNER: SGM ALUM. CAP "WC 13501" BEARS N 01°O7'25 E, 20.00' FROM THE NE1/4NE1/4 SECTION 36 AND N 01°0725" E, 454.40' FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING EX. FENCE EX. FENCE EX. LINED IRRIGATION POND EX. FENCE EX. IRRIGATION PUMPHOUSE EX. FENCE EX. DRAINAGE EX. DRAINAGE EX. DRAINAGE EX.DITCH SHARED DRIVEWAY EX. FENCE EX. ACCESS EX. ACCESS W/ CONCRETE APRON & 15"Ø CMP IRRIGATION EASEMENT DEDICATED WITH THIS PLAT EX. DITCH CENTERLINE PSCOC EASEMENT N89° 21' 27"E 655.78' (RN 912741) CENTERLINE PSCOC EASEMENT N0° 38' 33"W 639.22' (RN 912741) CENTERLINE PSCOC EASEMENT S89° 21' 27"W 22.50' (RN 912741) S75° 39' 34"E 31.16' S75° 39' 34"E 62.35' N89° 21' 27"E 98.44' 40 . 0 0 ' 44 0 . 7 4 ' 686.98' 704.33' 40 7 . 0 1 ' N89° 21' 39"E 1351.83' S0 1 ° 0 7 ' 2 4 " W 88 7 . 7 5 ' S89° 21' 27"W1350.12' N0 1 ° 0 0 ' 4 6 " E 88 7 . 7 8 ' 28 5 . 3 8 ' 60 2 . 4 0 ' 549.21'98.29' N55° 3 5 ' 2 8 " E 173.8 0 ' S47 ° 4 7 ' 3 6 " W 116 . 4 6 ' N52° 3 8 ' 0 2 " E 148. 3 2 ' N42 ° 4 3 ' 2 0 " E 61.9 3 ' N29 ° 5 2 ' 1 3 " E 341 . 8 9 ' 663.14' S90° 00' 00"W570.45' S88° 52' 36"E 76.74'C 1 N0 0 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " W 32 4 . 9 0 ' N80° 51' 37"E 248.82' S0 0 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 37 3 . 1 6 ' C 8 S89° 21' 27"W 110.00' 40' RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED WITH THIS PLAT 75' ROAD EASEMENT FOR ACCESS TO LOT 4, SIMON SUBD. EXEMPTION PER DECLARATIONS (RN 546583) 15' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND DITCH (RN 544219) 20' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND DITCH (RN 544219)20' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND DITCH (RN 544219) 20' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND DITCH (RN 544219) 20' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND DITCH DEDICATED WITH THIS PLAT 10' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATED WITH THIS PLAT 50' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATED WITH THIS PLAT 10' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATED WITH THIS PLAT 10' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATED WITH THIS PLAT Lot 4-B 281631 sf 6.465 Ac± Lot 4-D 170073 sf 3.904 Ac± ROW 30812 sf 0.707 Ac± N88° 52' 36"W 76.74' C 2 S80° 51' 37"W 175.99' C 3 C 4 C 5 C6 C7 N61° 32' 26"E 23.62' E S1 4 ° 2 0 ' 2 6 " W 20 0 . 8 6 ' E FOUND NO. 4 REBAR & PC "13501" (0.8' NE) EX. ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER CENTERLINE PSCOC EASEMENT N1° 40' 30"W 7.50' (RN 912741) 131.24' N0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 24 1 . 2 2 ' CENTERLINE 10' IRRIGATION EASEMENT DEDICATED WITH THIS PLAT NE1/4NE1/4 SECTION 36 (NOT FOUND) POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL CURVE DATA SEGMENT C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 LENGTH 272.27' 265.10' 41.47' 76.52' 79.10' 53.70' 209.33' 146.12' RADIUS 1520.00' 1480.00' 30.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 85.00' DELTA 10°15'47" 10°15'47" 79°11'35" 87°41'25" 90°38'33" 61°32'26" 239°52'25" 98°29'50" TANGENT 136.50' 132.91' 24.82' 48.02' 50.56' 29.77' -86.82' 98.64' CHORD DIR. S85° 59' 30"W' S85° 59' 30"W' S41° 15' 49"W' S45° 30' 44"W' N45° 19' 16"W' N30° 46' 13"E' N58° 23' 46"W' S49° 53' 28"E' CHORD LEN. 271.90' 264.75' 38.24' 69.27' 71.11' 51.16' 86.66' 128.78' PRELIMINARY PLAT Mountain View Subdivision A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NE 1/4 NE 1/4 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 92 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO NOTES 1.THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SUBDIVIDE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY INTO FIVE (5) PARCELS. 2.BASIS OF BEARING: ALL BEARINGS BASED ON THE LINE BETWEEN A WITNESS CORNER FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 36, REBAR WITH ALUMINUM CAP#WC 13501 , AND A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 36 HAVING A BEARING OF S01°07'25"W AS SHOWN HEREON. 3.DATE OF SURVEY: MAY 2022. 4.UNITS OF LINEAR MEASUREMENT ARE DISPLACED IN U.S. SURVEY FEET. 5.THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY BOUNDARIES UNLIMITED INC. TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. BOUNDARIES UNLIMITED INC. RELIED UPON LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NUMBER GWS63018795, DATED MAY 6, 2022. 6.THE PARCEL IS SUBJECT TO: a.RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1894, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 299. b.RESERVATION OF DITCH RIGHTS AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 25, 1910 IN BOOK 79 AT PAGE 407. c.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GARFIELD COUNTY RESOLUTION RECORDED APRIL 20, 1999 IN BOOK 1125 AT PAGE 434. d.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF OIL AND GAS LEASE RECORDED MARCH 17, 2006 IN BOOK 1780 AT PAGE 766, ASSIGNMENT OF OIL AND GAS LEASE RECORDED JULY 6, 2007 IN BOOK 1947 AT PAGE 390 AND RECORDED JULY 6, 2007 IN BOOK 1947 AT PAGE 392 AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN. e.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF QUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 04, 1999 IN BOOK 1153 AT PAGE 743. f.EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF SIMON SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT RECORDED APRIL 21, 1999, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 544219. g.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF GRANT OF EASEMENTS AND DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS RECORDED JUNE 3, 1999 IN BOOK 1133 AT PAGE 54. h.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF PAID UP OIL AND GAS LEASE RECORDED JUNE 24, 2011 AS RECEPTION NO. 804309. i.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF EASEMENT TO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO RECORDED OCTOBER 10, 2018 AS RECEPTION NO. 912741. 7.ALL NOT-FOUND EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR LOT CORNERS, SHALL BE MONUMENTED BY A NO. 5 REBAR WITH A 1 1/2" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED "BU-INC LS 25642". 8.FENCES SHOWN HEREON, IF ANY ARE SHOWN FOR GENERAL REFERENCE AND DO NOT NECESSARILY DEPICT LIMITS OF OWNERSHIP. 9.CONTROL OF NOXIOUS WEEDS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. 10.NO OPEN HEARTH SOLID-FUEL FIREPLACES WILL BE ALLOWED ANYWHERE WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. ONE NEW SOLID-FUEL BURNING STOVE AS DEFINED BY C.R.S. 25-7-401, ET.SEQ., AND THE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED THEREUNDER, WILL BE ALLOWED IN ANY DWELLING UNIT. ALL DWELLING UNITS WILL BE ALLOWED AN UNRESTRICTED NUMBER OF NATURAL GAS STOVES AND APPLIANCES. 11.ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT NECESSARY AND THAT ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE DIRECTED INWARD AND DOWNWARD, TOWARDS THE INTERIOR OF THE SUBDIVISION, EXCEPT THAT PROVISIONS MAY BE MADE TO ALLOW FOR SAFETY LIGHTING THAT GOES BEYOND THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. 12.COLORADO IS A "RIGHT-TO-FARM" STATE PURSUANT TO C.R.S.35-3-11, ET. SEQ. LANDOWNERS, RESIDENTS AND VISITORS MUST BE PREPARED TO ACCEPT THE ACTIVITIES, SIGHTS, SOUNDS AND SMELLS OF GARFIELD COUNTY'S AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS AS A NORMAL AND NECESSARY ASPECT OF LIVING IN A COUNTY WITH A STRONG RURAL CHARACTER AND A HEALTHY RANCHING SECTOR. THOSE WITH AN URBAN SENSITIVITY MAY PERCEIVE SUCH ACTIVITIES, SIGHTS, SOUND, AND SMELLS ONLY AS INCONVENIENCE, EYESORE, NOISE AND ODOR. HOWEVER, STATE LAW AND COUNTY POLICY PROVIDE THAT RANCHING, FARMING AND OTHER AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES AND OPERATIONS WITHIN GARFIELD COUNTY SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE NUISANCES SO LONG AS OPERATED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LAW AND IN A NON-NEGLIGENT MANNER. THEREFORE, ALL MUST BE PREPARED TO ENCOUNTER NOISES, ODOR, LIGHTS, MUD, DUST, SMOKE, CHEMICALS, MACHINERY ON PUBLIC ROADS, LIVESTOCK ON PUBLIC ROADS, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF MANURE, AND THE APPLICATION BY SPRAYING OR OTHERWISE OF CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS, SOIL AMENDMENT, HERBICIDE, AND PESTICIDES, ANY ONE OR MORE OF WHICH MAY NATURALLY OCCUR AS PART OF LEGAL AND NON-NEGLIGENT AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS. 13.ALL OWNERS OF LAND, WHETHER RANCH OR RESIDENCE, HAVE OBLIGATIONS UNDER STATE LAND AND COUNTY REGULATIONS WITH REGARD TO THE MAINTENANCE OF FENCES AND IRRIGATION DITCHES, CONTROLLING WEEDS, KEEPING LIVESTOCK AND PETS UNDER CONTROL, USING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZONING, AND OTHER ASPECTS OF USING AND MAINTAINING PROPERTY. RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO LEARN ABOUT THESE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES AND ACT AS GOOD NEIGHBORS AND CITIZENS OF THE COUNTY. A GOOD INTRODUCTORY SOURCE OF SUCH INFORMATION IS "A GUIDE TO RURAL LIVING & SMALL SCALE AGRICULTURE" PUT OUT BY THE COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION OFFICE IN GARFIELD COUNTY. 14.THE MINERAL RIGHTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPERTY MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED WITH THE SURFACE ESTATE, THEREFORE ALLOWING THE POTENTIAL FOR NATURAL RESOURCE EXTRACTION ON THE PROPERTY BY THE MINERAL ESTATE OWNER(S) OR LESSEE(S). 15.DOMESTIC DOGS KEPT ON THE PROPERTY SHALL BE IN A FENCED YARD OR ON A LEASH TO PREVENT HARASSMENT OF WILDLIFE, EXCEPT AS USED FOR LIVESTOCK CONTROL. 16.FENCING ON THE PROPERTY SHALL COMPLY WITH THE COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE SPECIFICATIONS FOR WILDLIFE FRIENDLY FENCING. 17.ENGINEER DESIGNED ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ARE REQUIRED WITH THIS SUBDIVISION. 18.ENGINEER DESIGNED FOUNDATIONS ARE REQUIRED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION. 19.DITCH OWNER(S) RIGHTS: COLORADO STATE STATUTES 37-86-102 PROVIDES THAT ANY PERSON OWNING A WATER RIGHT OR CONDITIONAL WATER RIGHT SHALL BE ENTITLED TO A RIGHT-OF-WAY THROUGH THE LANDS WHICH LIE BETWEEN THE POINT OF DIVERSION AND POINT OF USE OR PROPOSED USE FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRANSPORTING WATER FOR BENEFICIAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID WATER RIGHT OR CONDITIONAL WATER RIGHT. ANY IMPACT, CHANGE OR CROSSING OF A DITCH SHALL REQUIRE APPROVAL FROM THE DITCH OWNER. 20.WILDFIRE PREVENTION GUIDELINES OF THE U.S.F.S. AND COLORADO STATE FORESTER SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN HOME CONSTRUCTION AND SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN. 21.A GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRING A BUILDING PERMIT OR FURTHER SUBDIVISION. SUCH INVESTIGATION SHALL ADDRESS AT A MINIMUM THE POTENTIAL FOR HYDROCOMPACTIVE SOILS (SOILS EXHIBITING COMPRESSION OR COLLAPSE UNDER LOADING AND/OR WETTING), SEASONALLY SHALLOW GROUNDWATER AND PERCHED WATER, AND FLASH FLOODING AND EROSION ALONG HELMER GULCH. 19)ANY FUTURE GRADING OR BUILDING PERMITS REQUIRE A SITE-SPECIFIC SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION, CONSISTING OF BORINGS OR TEST PITS, LABORATORY TESTING AND ANALYSIS, AND SITE-SPECIFIC GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS (FOUNDATION, FLOOR SYSTEM, SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE, PAVEMENT, ETC.) TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT APPLICATION. 20)ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION AND OWNERSHIP (DEEDED) THE UNDERSIGNED RED DOG LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, BEING SOLE OWNER(S) IN FEE SIMPLE OF ALL THAT REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN GARFIELD COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 4 A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 92 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 WHENCE A WITNESS CORNER FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36 BEARING N 01°07'25" E, 20.00-FEET FROM SAID NORTHEAST CORNER BEARS N 01° 07'25" E, 454.40-FEET; THENCE S 01°07'25" W, 887.75-FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE S 89°21'27" W, 1350.12-FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, N 01°00'46", E 887.78-FEET; THENCE N 89°21'39" E, 1351.83 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 4 SIMON SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED APRIL 21, 1999 AS RECEPTION NO. 544219. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO CONTAINING 27.521 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, HAVE CAUSED THE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY TO BE SURVEYED, LAID OUT, PLATTED AND SUBDIVIDED INTO LOTS AND BLOCKS AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF Mountain View SUBDIVISION, A SUBDIVISION IN THE COUNTY OF GARFIELD. THE OWNERS DO HEREBY DEDICATE AND SET APART ALL OF THE STREETS AND ROADS AS SHOWN ON THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT TO THE USE OF THE PUBLIC FOREVER, AND HEREBY DEDICATES TO THE PUBLIC UTILITIES THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID REAL PROPERTY WHICH ARE LABELED AS UTILITY EASEMENTS ON THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT AS PERPETUAL EASEMENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UTILITIES, IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ELECTRIC LINES, GAS LINES AND TELEPHONE LINES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO TRIM INTERFERING TREES AND BRUSH, WITH PERPETUAL RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF SUCH LINES. SUCH EASEMENT AND RIGHTS SHALL BE UTILIZED IN A REASONABLE AND PRUDENT MANNER. ALL EXPENSE FOR STREET PAVING OR IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE SELLER OR PURCHASER, NOT BY THE COUNTY OF GARFIELD. EXECUTED THIS DAY OF , A.D., 20 . OWNER: RED DOG LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MANAGER: TERRY KIRK STATE OF COLORADO ) : SS COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION AND OWNERSHIP WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ____ DAY OF __________________, A.D., 20____, BY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC (SEAL) SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, STEVEN L. SMITH, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, THAT THIS PLAT IS A TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE PLAT OF Mountain View SUBDIVISION, AS LAID OUT, PLATTED, DEDICATED AND SHOWN HEREON, THAT SUCH PLAT WAS MADE FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF SAID PROPERTY BY ME, OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION, AND CORRECTLY SHOWS THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE LOTS, EASEMENTS AND STREETS OF SAID SUBDIVISION AS THE SAME ARE STAKED UPON THE GROUND IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE SUBDIVISION OF LAND. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE SET MY HAND AND SEAL THIS DAY OF , 20 . PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR STEVEN L. SMITH , PLS 25642 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF BOUNDARIES UNLIMITED INC. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' CERTIFICATE THIS PLAT IS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF , A.D., 20 , FOR FILING WITH THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF GARFIELD COUNTY AND FOR CONVEYANCE TO THE COUNTY OF THE PUBLIC DEDICATIONS SHOWN HEREON, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISION THAT APPROVAL IN NO WAY OBLIGATES GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE FINANCING OR CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ON LANDS, PUBLIC ROADS, HIGHWAYS OR EASEMENTS DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC, EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY AGREED TO BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY SUBSEQUENT RESOLUTION. THIS APPROVAL SHALL IN NO WAY OBLIGATE GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC ROADS, HIGHWAYS OR ANY OTHER PUBLIC DEDICATIONS SHOWN HEREON. CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL OF THE COUNTY OF GARFIELD. ATTEST: COUNTY CLERK CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE THIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, AT ____ O'CLOCK _____, ON THIS _____ DAY OF , 20___, AND IS DULY RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. _____________________. CLERK AND RECORDER BY DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE APPROVED FOR CONTENT AND FORM ONLY AND NOT THE ACCURACY OF SURVEYS, CALCULATIONS OR DRAFTING, PURSUANT TO C.R.S. § 38-51-101 AND 102, ET SEQ. DATED THIS _____ DAY OF , A.D., 20____. GARFIELD COUNTY SURVEYOR TITLE CERTIFICATE I, , AN ATTORNEY LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, OR AGENT AUTHORIZED BY A TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE TITLE TO ALL LANDS SHOWN UPON THIS PLAT AND THAT TITLE TO SUCH LANDS IS VESTED IN RED DOG LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS AND ENCUMBRANCES (INCLUDING MORTGAGES, DEEDS OF TRUST, JUDGMENTS, EASEMENTS, CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS OF RECORD AFFECTING THE REAL PROPERTY IN THIS PLAT), EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS: DATED THIS _____ DAY OF , A.D., 20_____. TITLE COMPANY: AGENT OR ATTORNEY COLORADO ATTORNEY REGISTRATION NO. CERTIFICATE OF TAXES PAID I, THE UNDERSIGNED, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS DUE AND PAYABLE AS OF , UPON ALL PARCELS OF REAL ESTATE DESCRIBED ON THIS PLAT ARE PAID IN FULL. DATED THIS _____ DAY OF , A.D., 20____. TREASURER OF GARFIELD COUNTY Vicinity Map NO R T H Site Interstate 7 0 Town of Silt 00 100'200' Scale: 1" = 100' Review C TCURTS N O NOI FTON R O NORTH By Re v i s i o n No . Da t e 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (T) 970.945.5252 www.bu-inc.com Engineer or Surveyor Seal Sheet Client Information: PROJECT NO. File Name: Designer: Drafter: Date: N: \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 9 \ 0 9 0 1 6 - N o r t h 2 7 \ d w g \ 0 9 0 1 6 - V - P l a t . d w g 12 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 2 9 P M Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) Required Project: If "Yes", SUE Certification by: Firm: Job #: Date: 9.8.7.6.5.4.3.2. 12/18/24 DJW DJW 09016-v-plat.dwg 09016.03 480.216.2067 SCHOTTSDALE, AZ 85259 12144 E. WELSH TRAIL RED DOG, LLC GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O 1. Pr e l i m i n a r y P l a n Pl a t - P r e l i m i n a r y Mo u n t a i n V i e w S u b d i v i s i o n V.1 No N/A N/A N/A LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EXISTING EASEMENT CENTERLINE EXISTING FENCE EX. DITCH OR SWALE T EX. TELECOMMUNICATIONS PEDESTAL EX./PR. ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER EX. UTILITY POLE MONUMENT FOUND MONUMENT TO BE SET WITH THIS PLAT EXISTING CULVERT/SIZE36''Ø >> X 10' CONTOUR 1' CONTOUR5402 5400 PROPOSED EASEMENT WSO EXISTING POTABLE WATER SERVICE/SHUTOFF/SPIGOT EXISTING ELECTRIC-OVERHEADOEOE EX. ELECTRIC PANELEP EX. ELECTRIC METERkWh E E Mountain View Preliminary Plan 7 2''W 2''W E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E 1.5''W 1.5''W 1.5''W 1.5''W 1.5''W 1.5''W 1.5''W 1.5''W RW RW RW RW RW RW RW 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2''W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2''W 2''RW 2''RW 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W 2' ' W RW E E E E E E E E E E E E 1. 5 ' ' W RW RW RW RW RW RW E E E E EX. SEPTIC SYSTEM 10 0 ' S E T B A C K > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE X X X X X X X X X X T > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 30 ' ' Ø W SO W SO W SO R45' R30' Profile: Centerline Road, Sta:1+00 to Sta:7+00 Scale: Vert.=20', Horiz.=60' 5795 5800 5805 5810 5815 5820 5825 5830 5795 5800 5805 5810 5815 5820 5825 5830 Pr : Ex : 5 8 2 5 . 4 1+00 Pr : 5 8 2 4 . 6 0 Ex : 5 8 2 5 . 3 Pr : 5 8 2 3 . 8 5 Ex : 5 8 2 3 . 4 2+00 Pr : 5 8 2 3 . 0 3 Ex : 5 8 2 2 . 3 Pr : 5 8 2 1 . 7 3 Ex : 5 8 2 1 . 2 3+00 Pr : 5 8 2 0 . 4 3 Ex : 5 8 2 0 . 0 Pr : 5 8 1 9 . 1 3 Ex : 5 8 1 8 . 6 4+00 Pr : 5 8 1 7 . 7 8 Ex : 5 8 1 7 . 6 Pr : 5 8 1 6 . 4 3 Ex : 5 8 1 6 . 4 5+00 Pr : 5 8 1 5 . 0 8 Ex : 5 8 1 4 . 7 Pr : 5 8 1 3 . 7 1 Ex : 5 8 1 3 . 3 6+00 Pr : 5 8 1 2 . 2 1 Ex : 5 8 1 1 . 2 Pr : 5 8 1 0 . 7 1 Ex : 5 8 1 0 . 4 7+00 -2.00%-1.50% -2.60% -3.00% -2.70% -2.70% PV I S : 1 + 0 3 . 4 5 PV I E : 5 8 2 5 . 4 4 PV I S : 1 + 3 3 . 4 5 PV I E : 5 8 2 4 . 8 4 PV I S : 2 + 4 4 . 1 6 PV I E : 5 8 2 3 . 1 8 PV I S : 3 + 9 4 . 1 6 PV I E : 5 8 1 9 . 2 8 PV I S : 7 + 0 0 . 0 0 PV I E : 5 8 1 0 . 7 1 PV I S : 4 + 9 4 . 1 6 PV I E : 5 8 1 6 . 5 8 PV I S : 5 + 9 4 . 1 6 PV I E : 5 8 1 3 . 8 8 W SO W SO EP EP kWhkWhkWh >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > EP EP EP 5800 5810 5820 58 3 0 5 8 4 0 5830 5820 5810 5800 5790 5800 5810 5820 Lot 4-E 174246 sf 4.000 Ac± SCF SC F SCF SC F SCF SCF SCF SCF SCF SCF SCF SCF SCF Lot 4-A 295648 sf 6.787 Ac± Lot 4-C 246406 sf 5.657 Ac± 2'' W BOV > 58 5 0 2' ' R W 2' ' R W 2' ' R W 2' ' R W 2' ' R W 2' ' R W 2' ' R W 2' ' R W 2'' R W 2'' R W IR IR IR IR W SO IR Parcel No. 2127-361-00-049 Parcel No. 2127-361-00-050 Parcel No. 2127-361-01-003 Parcel No. 2127-361-01-001 (A S P H A L T R O A D ) Co u n t y R o a d # 2 6 1 Co l u m b i n e L a n e (G R A V E L R O A D ) Parcel No. 2127-361-00-051 EX. GREENHOUSE 75' ROAD EASEMENT FOR ACCESS TO LOT 4, SIMON SUBD. EXEMPTION PER DECLARATIONS (RN 546583) 15' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND DITCH (RN 544219) 20' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND DITCH (RN 544219)20' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND DITCH (RN 544219) 20' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND DITCH (RN 544219) 20' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND DITCH DEDICATED WITH THIS PLAT 40' RIGHT-OF-WAY EX. VALVE EX. PVO HOA WATERLINE EX. PVO HOA WATERLINE FOUND 3.2' WITNESS CORNER NO. 4 REBAR W/ PC "WC 13501" FOUND NO. 4 REBAR & PC "13501" FOUND NO. 4 REBAR & PC "13501" FOUND NO. 4 REBAR & PC "13501" FOUND NO. 4 REBAR & PC "13501" FOUND NO. 4 REBAR & PC "13501" FOUND NO. 4 REBAR & PC "13501" EX. FENCE EX. FENCE EX. LINED IRRIGATION POND (EDGE OF LINER) TO REMAIN SALVAGE EX. GRAVELS EX. FENCE TO BE REMOVED EX. ELECTRIC METERS EX. FENCE EX. IRRIGATION PUMPHOUSE TO BE SALVAGED EX. TELEPHONE PED. EX. FENCE EX. DITCH EX. DITCH EX. DITCH DITCH EX.DITCH EX. GRAVEL DRIVE SHARED DRIVEWAY EX. ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER EX. FENCE EX. 30"Ø CMP EX. OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE EX. ACCESS TO REMAIN FOR LOT 4-E EX. ACCESS W/ CONCRETE APRON & 15"Ø CMP EX. ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER EX. FENCE UTILITY & IRRIGATION EASEMENT (INSTALL FENCE) INSTALL 2"Ø TEE & VALVES INSTALL 1"Ø SERVICE W/ SHUTOFF VALVE INSTALL 570 LF 2"Ø HDPE POTABLE WATER LATERAL APPROX. LOCATION OF PEACH VALLEY ORCHARD (PVO) HOA WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM (WELL, 10000-GAL. TANK, AND PRESSURE VAULT) PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVE (SEE DETAIL) EX. WATER SERVICE (SHUTOFF VALVE & SPIGOT) TO REMAIN EX. ELECTRIC PANEL TO REMAIN RETIRE EX. WATER SERVICE (SHUTOFF VALVE & SPIGOT) EXISTING SURFACE PROPOSED SURFACE 10' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 50' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 10' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT BIORETENTION FACILITY BASE AREA: 300 SF SIDE SLOPES: 3:1 BASE ELEV: 5804.0' TOP ELEV: 5806.0' WEIR/OVERFLOW WIDTH: 12" WEIR/OVERFLOW ELEV: 5803.5' 10' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT INSTALL SPLICE VAULT & TRANSFORMER. INSTALL 1"Ø POTABLE WATER SERVICE W/ SHUTOFF VALVE INSTALL SECONDARY ELECTRIC PEDESTAL INSTALL 2"Ø IRRIGATION SERVICES W/ SHUTOFF VALVE INSTALL 1"Ø POTABLE WATER SERVICE W/ SHUTOFF VALVE INSTALL 2"Ø IRRIGATION SERVICES W/ SHUTOFF VALVE INSTALL 1"Ø POTABLE WATER SERVICE W/ SHUTOFF VALVE INSTALL 2"Ø IRRIGATION SERVICES W/ SHUTOFF VALVE INSTALL 2"Ø IRRIGATION SERVICES W/ SHUTOFF VALVE RETIRE EX. WATER SERVICE (SPIGOT) RETIRE EX. ELECTRIC PANEL EXTEND EX. ELECTRIC TO LOT 4-E EX. ELECTRIC PANEL TO REMAIN INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCING ALONG THE LOWER LIMITS OF ALL DISTURBANCES CONSTRUCT 18" DEEP OVERFLOW SWALE WITH 3:1 SIDE SLOPE. INSTALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL LOGS EVERY 50 LF ACROSS THE SWALE. CAP THE EX. WESTERLY WATERLINE EXTENSION EXTEND 602 LF 2"Ø SCH.40 PVC IRRIGATION MAIN TO LOTS 4-B, 4-C AND 4-D. MAINTAIN 10' MIN. SEPARATION BETWEEN THE IRRIGATION AND THE EX/PR. POTABLE WATER. HWL HW L HW L H W L HWL HW L HW L 58 1 0 58 1 2 58 1 4 58 0 8 IR IR IR E W DECREED LOCATION OF PVO/SSE Well No. 1 W DECREED LOCATION OF PVO/SSE 2ND ENLARGEMENT EX. SEPTIC SYSTEM EX. SEPTIC SYSTEM 10 0 ' S E T B A C K 10 0 ' S E T B A C K Lot 4-B 281631 sf 6.465 Ac± Lot 4-D 170073 sf 3.904 Ac± 5804 5806 5806 5804 5 8 1 0 58 1 2 581 4 581 6 581 8 582 0 582 2 5824 58 0 8 8' ' R W 8' ' R W INSTALL DRY HYDRANT FIRE ASSEMBLY AND VALVE (SEE DETAIL) EX. POND DRAW TO REMAIN. INSTALL 90° BEND/RESTRAINTS & 122 LF 8"Ø C900 PVC HYDRANT LATERAL HY D E E INSTALL 140 LF OF 2"Ø SCH.40 PVC IRRIGATION MAIN TO LOT 4-E. MAINTAIN 10' OF SEPARATION BETWEEN THE IRRIGATION AND THE EX. POTABLE WATER. E N0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 24 1 . 2 2 ' EX. IRRIGATION PIPELINE TO REMAIN EX. IRRIGATION MAIN TO REMAIN E INSTALL POTABLE WATER BLOWOFF (SEE DETAIL) W SO NOTES: THIS PLAN SET IS INTENDED TO BE PLOTTED IN COLOR. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN MISSING DATA & INFORMATION CRITICAL TO THE PROJECT. SITE PLAN Mountain View Subdivision A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NE 1/4 NE 1/4 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 92 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO 00 60'120' Scale: 1" = 60' NORTH By Re v i s i o n No . Da t e 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (T) 970.945.5252 www.bu-inc.com Engineer or Surveyor Seal Sheet Client Information: PROJECT NO. File Name: Designer: Drafter: Date: N: \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 9 \ 0 9 0 1 6 - N o r t h 2 7 \ d w g \ 0 9 0 1 6 - V - P l a t . d w g 12 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 2 9 P M Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) Required Project: If "Yes", SUE Certification by: Firm: Job #: Date: 9.8.7.6.5.4.3.2. 12/18/24 DJW DJW 09016-v-plat.dwg 09016.03 480.216.2067 SCHOTTSDALE, AZ 85259 12144 E. WELSH TRAIL RED DOG LLC GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O 1. Pr e l i m i n a r y P l a n Si t e P l a n - P r e l i m i n a r y Mo u n t a i n V i e w S u b d i v i s i o n C.1 No N/A N/A N/A Scale: N.T.S. Gravel Road Section 1.5' MIN. 6" COMPACTED CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE 20' MIN. ( 8' LANES WITH 2' SHOULDERS) 3:1 M A X . SCARIFY THE SUBGRADE AND RECOMPACT TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR 3:1 M A X . CL 3% 4'.5 4.5 1.5' MIN. 4'.54.5' 3:1 M A X . 3:1 MA X . 3' 6:1 MAX. 3% NOTES: 1.ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE SEEDED WITH A GARFIELD COUNTY APPROVED NATIVE GRASS SEED MIXTURE USING COUNTY APPROVE APPLICATION GUIDELINES. CDOT REGION 3 NATIVER SEED MIX FOR ELEVATIONS BELOW 6500-FEET COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME LBS. PLS/ACRE AMERICAN SLOUGHGRASS BECKMANNIA SYZIGACHNE 1.5* (WET AREAS) SAND DROPSEED SPOROBOLUS CRYPTANDRUS 0.25 ALKALI SACATON SPOROBOLUS AIROIDES 0.5 INDIAN RICEGRASS ACHNATHERUM HYMENOIDES “RIMROCK” OR “PALOMA” 3.0 SIDEOATS GRAMA BOUTELOUA CURTIPENDULA “VAUGHN” 3.0 LITTLE BLUESTEM SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM “CIMARRON” 3.0 GALLETA GRASS P LEURAPHIS JAMESII “VIVA” 3.0 TOTAL 14.25 2.PROPOSED UTILITIES ARE SHOW FOR GENERAL REFERENCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE DIRECTLY WITH UTILITY PROVIDERS AND INSTALL ALL SYSTEM PER PROVIDER GUIDANCE, STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. Review C TCURTS N O NOI FTON R O LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EXISTING EASEMENT CENTERLINE EXISTING FENCE EX./PR FLOWLINE (DITCH OR GULCH) T EX. TELECOMMUNICATIONS PEDESTAL EX./PR. ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER OR PEDESTAL EX. UTILITY POLE MONUMENT FOUND MONUMENT TO BE SET WITH THIS PLAT PROPOSED ELECTRIC EXISTING POTABLE WATER LINE/SIZE EXISTING CULVERT/SIZE36''Ø 2''W 2''W E E >> X 10' CONTOUR 1' CONTOUR5402 5400 RW RW EXISTING IRRIGATION MAIN/LATERAL 2''W PROPOSED 2"Ø POTABLE WATER LATERAL/VALVE E PROPOSED EASEMENT WS WS WS PROPOSED 1"Ø POTABLE WATER SERVICEWSO W SO EXISTING POTABLE WATER SERVICE/SHUTOFF/SPIGOTWSWS EXISTING ELECTRIC-BURIEDEE EXISTING ELECTRIC-OVERHEADOEOE EX. ELECTRIC PANELEP EX. ELECTRIC METERkWh IR 2''RW PROPOSED 2"Ø IRRIGATION MAIN/LATERALIR E TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCESCF EXISTING TELECOMMUNICATIONTT 8''RW PROPOSED DRY HYDRANT FIRE ASSEMBLY AND VALVE H Y D E E Mountain View Preliminary Plan 8 FL O W FL O W POINTS A MUST BE HIGHER THAN POINT B D D POINT A ENTRENCH 3" POINT A POINT B POINT A EROSION LOG POINT B FLOW POINT A PLAN VIEW PLAN VIEW A A EROSION LOG SEDIMENT REMOVAL SHALL BE PERFORMED CONTINUOUSLY FOR PROPER FUNCTION.Ø ENTRENCH 3" Ø FLO W TO E A C H O T H E R AP P R O X . 9 0 ° SECTION A-A AREA DRAIN SECTION D-D Scale: N.T.S. Temporary Erosion Control Logs Scale: N.T.S. Temporary Sediment Control Fence EROSION LOG 10' MAX.24" MIN. 42" MIN. 18" MIN. 24" MIN.FLOW FLO W ANCHORED IN TRENCH AND FIRMLY ATTACHED SILT FENCE FABRIC TO POST POST (2" X 2" NOMINAL) 6" x 6" TRENCH SILT FENCE FABRIC ANCHORED IN 6"x6" TRENCH AND ATTACHED FIRMLY TO POST SILT FABRIC STAPLED TO POSTS COMPACTED BACKFILL FEATURE THAT NEEDS PROTECTION USE 2 PINE STAKES 1 1/2" x 1 1/2" x 12" AT ALL EROSION LOG ENDS OR JOINTS, OTHERWISE USE A STAKE EVERY 24 IN. AND CONTINUE TO ALTERNATE ORIENTATION THROUGHOUT THE LENGTH OF THE EROSION LOG. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1.IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL PRECEDE STRIPPING OF NATIVE VEGETATIVE COVER AND AS GRADING PROGRESSES. 2.ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND REPAIRED AS NEEDED TO ASSURE CONTINUED PERFORMANCE OF THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION. STRAW BALE DIKES OR SILT FENCING MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC REPLACEMENT. SEDIMENT TRAPS WILL REQUIRE PERIODIC SEDIMENT REMOVAL. 6" M I N . BIORETENTION, SEE PLAN FOR AREA DIMENSIONS & DEPTH, VEGETATE WITH A DROUGHT TOLERANT GRASS MIXTURE OR SAND GROWN SOD SUITABLE SANDY SOILS NO UNDERDRAIN NOTES: PROVIDE, AS A MINIMUM, AN 6-INCH LAYER OF WELL MIXED SAND AND SOIL (70% SAND AND 30% COMBINATION OF TOPSOIL AND LARGE ORGANIC MATTER BY VOLUME. LESS THAN 5% OF THE MEDIA CAN PASS THE 200 SIEVE AND THE MEDIA MUST INFILTRATE AT LEAST 2 INCHES/HOUR. MAINTAIN TOP SURFACE FLAT. MEDIA SHALL BE DELIVERED FULLY MIXED IN A DRUM MIXER. ON-SITE MIXING OF PILES SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. SAND/PEAT MEDIA FINISH GRADE Scale: N.T.S. Bioretention Facility MIRAFI 140N FILTER FABRIC UNDER SAND/PEAT MEDIA INSTALL TEMPORARY EROSION LOGS AROUND THE PERIMETER UNTIL LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETE SCARIFY THE SUBGRADE OVERFLOW 6"Ø NOMINAL ANGULAR RIPRAP 5' MIN. 6" MIN. 7' MIN. UNDISTURBED SOIL 3:1 OR FLATTER 3'3' MIN. SECURE WIRE TO GROUND WITH WIRE STAPLES #5 REBAR TO SECURE TIMBER 16 LF 8"x8" TREATED TIMBER SECURE WIRE MESH TO TIMBER FILTER CLOTH UNDER MESH BASKET COURSE AGGREGATE IN GALVANIZED WIRE MESH BASKET NOTES 1.LEVEL SPREADER CONSTRUCTED ON UNDISTURBED SOIL (NOT FILL MATERIAL). 2.CONSTRUCT A TRANSITION SECTION FROM THE DITCH TO SPREADER, BLEND TO MATCH GRADE. 3.CONSTRUCT THE LIP AT A 0 % GRADE TO INSURE UNIFORM SPREADING. 4.EROSION CONTROL NETTING SHOULD EXTEND 6 INCHES OVER THE LIP AND BURIED 6 INCHES. 5.SECURELY ENTRENCH THE RIGID LIP AT LEAST 2 INCHES BELOW GRADE AND ANCHOR. COARSE AGGREGATE SHOULD BE PLACED AT THE TOP, BEHIND THE LIP AND EXTEND AT LEAST 3 FEET. 6.LEVEL SPREADER POOL AND LIP SHOULD BE 10 TO 20 FEET LONG DEPENDING ON EXPECTED FLOWS. 7.SEED AND STABILIZE UPON COMPLETION. Scale: N.T.S. Level Spreader with Rigid Lip 00 1'2' Scale: 1" = 1' Review C TCURTS N O NOI FTON R O NORTH By Re v i s i o n No . Da t e 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (T) 970.945.5252 www.bu-inc.com Engineer or Surveyor Seal Sheet Client Information: PROJECT NO. File Name: Designer: Drafter: Date: N: \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 9 \ 0 9 0 1 6 - N o r t h 2 7 \ d w g \ 0 9 0 1 6 - V - P l a t . d w g 12 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 2 9 P M Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) Required Project: If "Yes", SUE Certification by: Firm: Job #: Date: 9.8.7.6.5.4.3.2. 12/18/24 DJW DJW 09016-v-plat.dwg 09016.03 480.216.2067 SCHOTTSDALE, AZ 85259 12144 E. WELSH TRAIL RED DOG LLC GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O 1. Pr e l i m i n a r y P l a n Ci v i l D e t a i l s - P r e l i m i n a r y Mo u n t a i n V i e w S u b d i v i s i o n C.2 No N/A N/A N/A Scale: N.T.S. Gate Valve 5'-5" FT. MIN. CONCRETE RING (OPTIONAL) 2" 36 " M I N . 48 " M A X . 4" CONCRETE RING NOTE: 1.PROVIDED A 6" THICK x 12" WIDE CONCRETE RING PLACED AFTER PAVING. SURFACE AREA SHALL BE PREPARED BY SAW CUTTING ASPHALT AND ADJUSTING VALVE BOX TO FINISH GRADE. 2.FINISH GRADE OF BOX TO BE NO MORE THAN 1/4" BELOW FINISH SURFACE AND 0" ABOVE FINISH SURFACE. 3.CONCRETE RING TO BE PROVIDED IN ALL AREAS. 4.IN UNPAVED AREAS, PROVIDE A SLIGHT GRADE FOR FINISH GRADE AWAY FROM THE CONCRETE RING VALVE EXTENSION VALVE NOTES: 1.ALL VALVES ADJACENT TO FITTING SHALL BE FLANGE x MJ. FITTING SHALL BE FLANGED NEXT TO VALVE. LINE VALVES TO BE MJ x MJ. 2.DESIGN LOCATIONS OF VALVES ARE OUTSIDE OF CONCRETE CURB/GUTTER AND VALLEY PANS. INSTALLED VALVES WHICH CONFLICT WITH CONCRETE AREAS SHALL BE RELOCATED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 3.ALL NUTS AND BOLTS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. 4.INSTALL OTHER TYPES OF VALVES IN A SIMILAR MANNER AS SHOWN FOR THE GATE VALVE INSTALLATION. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT ALL MATERIALS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. Scale: N.T.S. Thrust Blocks POLYETHYLENE BOND BREAKER 3"MIN. UNDISTURBED SOIL BEARING SURFACE PLUGGED TEE FOR FUTURE CONNECTION AREA POLYETHYLENE BOND BREAKER 3"MIN. UNDISTURBED SOIL BEARING SURFACE TEE AREA 2/ 3 D I A . POLYETHYLENE BOND BREAKER TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION AREA AREA POLYETHYLENE BOND BREAKER BEARING SURFACE UNDISTURBED SOIL DEAD END AREAAR E A REDUCER TYPICAL BEND 111 4°, 221 2°, 45°, 90° UNDISTURBED SOIL AREA 3" MIN. NOTES: 1.ALL NUTS AND BOLTS SHALL BE COR-BLUE OR STAINLESS STEEL. 2.KEEP CONCRETE OFF ALL BOLTS. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT ALL MATERIALS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE TOWN. NOTES: 1.LEAVE CORPORATION STOP AT MAIN IN THE 'ON' POSITION. 2.LOCATE THE CURB STOP AND SERVICE BOX AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 3.SERVICE SADDLE STRAPS AND ALL NUTS AND BOLTS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. THE TOWN MAY PERMIT THE USE OF 200 PSI HDPE POTABLE WATER LINE WITH WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. Scale: N.T.S. Water Service ASPHALT/ FINISH GRADE BASE COURSETRACER WIRE 2" SQUARE NUT SMALL BONNET BRICK WATER MAIN GATE VALVE, CL250 MAIN LINE GATE VALVES TO HAVE JOINTS SAME AS WATER MAIN OR AS SPECIFIED FOR MAIN LINE FITTINGS. POLYETHYLENE WRAP REQUIRED ON ALL METAL COMPONENTS. THREE PIECE ADJUSTABLE VALVE BOX, WORD "WATER" ON COVER. TOP OF VALVE BOX COVER 2" SQUARE OPER. NUT TO BE HELD DOWN WITH THREADED SHAFT, AS STANDARD VALVE STEM NUT ATTACHMENT. THIS PART OF STEM SQUARE WITH 4 SIDES TAPERED. 1/16" MIN.CLEARANCE 3/16" STL. PLATE 3/8"x3" DIA. PLATE MIN. ROD SIZE 1 1/4" DIA. STEEL DESIGN. A-15 TOP OF VALVE BOX COVER BEDDING MATERIAL BEARING SURFACE UNDISTURBED SOIL POLYETHYLENE BOND BREAKER FOR FUTURE CONNECTION, ROD PLUG TO FITTING WHERE REDUCER IS USED, ROD BACK TO TEE. MECHANICAL JOINT RESTRAINTS MAY BE USED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS IN PLACE OF TIE RODS UPON APPROVAL OF ENGINEER. TRACER WIRE (REQUIRED) Bc EXISTING ASPHALT & BASE COURSE CLASS 6 ABC OR SQUEEGEE BEDDING MATERIAL WITH COMPACTION DENSITY OF 95% AS PER ASTM D698. FILTER FABRIC IS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED AROUND OF THE BEDDING IF SQUEEGEE IS USED. 1/2"-3/4" SCREENED ROCK IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. PIPE TRACER WIRE (ALL POTABLE WATER, RAW WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER) CONDITION #1a: FLOWFILL (FLOWABLE CONCRETE) MATERIAL IN TOP 36" OF THE TRENCH UNDER A CDOT ROADWAY OVER CLASS 6 ABC WITH A COMPACTION DENSITY OF 95% AS PER ASTM D698. CONDITION #1b: SUITABLE ONSITE SELECT STRUCTURAL MATERIAL UNDER TOWN ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS WITH A COMPACTION DENSITY OF 95% AS PER ASTM D698. SLOPE TRENCH WALLS OR SHORE FOR SAFETY PER CURRENT OSHA & COSH REQUIREMENTS 5'-6" MIN. 12" VARIES 36" 12" 4" MIN. Bc + 18" SEE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT DETAIL 12" MIN. 24" MIN. EXISTING ASPHALT TO BE SAWCUT (TYP.) CONDITIONS: 1.PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT SHALL MEET EXISTING THICKNESS AND KIND WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUMS: 1.a.ASPHALT ROADWAY (HIGHWAY 006D) = 5" MIN. ASPHALT WITH 18" MIN. CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE. 1.b.ASPHALT ROADWAY (TOWN ROAD) OR PARKING AREA = 4" MIN. ASPHALT WITH 10" MIN. CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE. 2.IF UTILITY MAIN OR SERVICE IS NOT UNDER ROAD OR PARKING SURFACE, BACKFILL THE TRENCH WITH SUITABLE ONSITE SELECT MATERIAL COMPACTED TO 95% IN 12" LIFTS AS PER ASTM D698. TOP 12" TO BE TOPSOIL, AND REVEGETATE. NOTES: 1.THE SAWCUT AND ASPHALT/CONCRETE REPLACEMENT AREA REQUIRED TO BE REMOVED FOR A UTILITY MAIN OR SERVICE LINE SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE A 10' WIDE SECTION CENTERED ON THE UTILITY UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 2.PAVING JOINTS SHALL BE INFRARED BONDED. 3.SELECT MATERIAL SHALL BE 3"Ø MAXIMUM. 4.PROVIDE TRACER WIRE TAPED TO THE TOP OF THE PIPE FOR SEWER MAIN. POTABLE WATER MAIN, IRRIGATION WATER MAIN AND ALL SERVICE INSTALLATIONS. 5.DETAIL IS FOR 'DRY TRENCH' CONDITIONS. FOR UNSTABLE OR 'WET' CONDITIONS, PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 4" OF 1-1/2" SCREENED ROCK UNDER BEDDING MATERIAL WITH FILTER FABRIC PLACED BELOW AND ABOVE THE SCREENED ROCK. 6.Bc = OUTSIDE PIPE DIAMETER. 7.FILTER FABRIC SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: 7.a.GRAB TENSILE STRENGTH, ASTM D4632: 120 LBS 7.b.GRAB TENSILE ELONGATION, ASTM D4632: 50% 7.c.TRAPEZOID TEAR STRENGTH, ASTM 4533: 50 LBS 7.d.CBR PUNCTURE STRENGTH, ASTM 6241: 310 LBS 7.e.PERMITTIVITY, ASTM D4491: 1.7 sec-¹ 7.f.UV RESISTANCE (AT 500 HRS), ASTM D4355: 70% STRENGTH RETAINED 8.INSTALL AN 18" LONG CLAY/SILT CUTOFF DAM ACROSS THE BEDDING EVERY 100 LF, MIN. TOPSOIL SUITABLE ONSITE SELECT STRUCTURAL MATERIAL CONDITION #2 CONDITION #1a OR #1b Scale: N.T.S. Trench Cross Section 12" 36" MIN., 48" MAX. 6" MIN. 4"Ø SCH.80 PVC ELECTRIC CONDUIT 6" CLASS 6 ABC 6" WIDE MARKER TAPE TRACER WIRE Scale: N.T.S. Electric Trench NOTES: 1.ELECTRIC SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH AT LEAST 4' OF SEPARATION BETWEEN OTHER UTILITIES. 2.BACKFILL THE TRENCH WITH 4" MINUS ONSITE SELECT MATERIAL COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. CONCRETE PIER: 12"Ø IN HARDSCAPE 24"Ø IN SOFTSCAPE 6" 2'-6" 3'-6" 3/8"CONCRETE DOME CONCRETE FILLED 6" STEEL TUBE, GALVANIZED, PRIME AND PAINT WITH A YELLOW EXTERIOR PAINT AND WRAP WITH 2 ROWS OF YELLOW REFLECTIVE TAPE FINISH GRADE COMPACTED EARTH Scale: N.T.S. Stationary Bollard 3'-0" MIN. Scale: N.T.S. Dry Hydrant Fire System 5' M I N ICE STORAGE (1' MIN.) FIRE PROTECTION STORAGE 2' M I N . MARK TABLE MARK DESCRIPTION N GALVANIZED VERTICAL PIPE SUPPORT EMBEDDED IN 2'x2'x4" CONCRETE S TRACER WIRE FROM POND TO HYDRANT BASE: 10 GAUGE SOLID THHN INSULATED DETECTION WIRE. ALL SPLICES SHALL BE MADE WITH WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS. U 8"Øx6"Ø REDUCER V 8"Ø CLASS 150 C900 PVC WITH DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS AND MECHANICAL JOINT RESTRAINTS AT ALL FITTINGS AND JOINTS WITHIN 30 FEET OF FITTING. POLYWRAP ALL FITTINGS AND RESTRAINTS., COAT EXPOSED W/ UV INHIBITOR PAINT AC DRY BARREL HYDRANT: MUELLER SUPER CENTURION 250 (A-423) OR KENNEDY (K81D), OR AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDITION APPROVED EQUAL. OPEN COUNTER-CLOCKWISE, STAINLESS STEEL BURIED NUTS AND BOLTS. AE 8"Ø PVC HORIZONTAL STRAINER WITH BACK FLUSH CAP, 4:1 MINIMUM INTAKE RATIO (120 SQ. IN.) AF 8"Ø STRAINER SUPPORT CLAMP (MANUFACTURER SUPPLIED) AG A DISTINCT RED LINE PAINTED AT THE MINIMUM WATER SURFACE ELEVATION. AE AF N2' AG SLOPE @ 1% MIN. S V 4' TO 6'ROAD 5' M I N 24 " U 4"Ø PIPE BOLLARDS AC V -+ 2" RESILIENT SEAT GATE VALVE, 2" SQUARE OPERATING NUT & NPT THREADED ENDS Scale: N.T.S. Blowoff Valve Assembly 2" MALE I.P. THREAD 2" THREADED BRASS 6" FULL VALVE BOX (2 SECTIONS, TOP & CENTER FOR ADJUSTMENTS). 2" 90° BRASS ELL WITH WEEP HOLE THREADED CONNECTIONS 6" VALVE BOX (3 SECTIONS, TOP, CENTER & BASE). GROUND LINE 2" POTABLE WATER LATERAL 1 C.U. FT. GRAVEL 1 CU. FT. GRAVEL 16 ' ' 12 ' ' Mountain View Preliminary Plan 9 5. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan Documentation related to the Comprehensive Plan was provided as part of the Mountain View Sketch Plan Application. In summary, the development proposal is in compliance with the Garfield County Comprehensive plan 2030. The plan designates this area as Residential Medium High (RMH). _____________________________________________________________________________________ Future Land Use Designation Residential Medium High (RMH) Description Small farms, estates, residences and clustered residential subdivisions. Compatible Zoning District(s) Rural (R); Planned Unit Development (PUD) Density of Residential Uses 1 dwelling unit per 2 to 6-acres. Within this range, density is determined by the degree of clustering and the amount and quality of land preserved in open condition. Illustrative Example _____________________________________________________________________________________ We could provide further analysis upon request related to the County Comprehensive Plan 2030 various goals and objectives. We will do so upon request but our analysis at this time indicates that the proposal meets the Silt Comprehensive Plan and the County Comprehensive Plan. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 10 6. Water Rights and Supply The Simon Well No.1 provides domestic water for Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, and 25 of the Peach Valley Orchard subdivision as well as the Lot 4 Simon Subdivision Exemption (SSE). Lot 4 of the SSE is entitled to 8/25 share in the well. The well is located at the northern, common boundary of Lots 1 and 2 of the SSE. During previous applications for Lot 4 of the SSE the County Engineer and the State Water Engineer expressed concerns about there being an adequate legal and physical water supply for Lot 4. Therefore, an augmentation plan was submitted. The water augmentation plan has been approved, and the case was bifurcated into 2 court cases. The application was to adjudicate 2 enlargements to the Simon Well No.1. The 2 Water Court decrees are included in Exhibit D. An updated letter from Sara Dunn of Balcomb Green dated January 16, 2025 regarding the water rights associated with Lot 4 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption is attached. This letter is an update of her previous letter dated May 29, 2007. The 2007 letter, the most recent court decree and most recent water quality report are included in Exhibit D. Other documents related to water rates are also included in Exhibit D. Finally, please see the engineers report on Water Supply and Distribution from Boundaries Unlimited in Exhibit C for more technical information on the water development and distribution plan. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 11 Sara M. Dunn Direct Dial (970) 928-3467 sarad@balcombgreen.com SERVING COLORADO SINCE 1953 818 Colorado Avenue | Post Office Box 790 | Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 | 970.945.6546 | BalcombGreen.com January 16, 2025 Via Electronic Mail Red Dog, LLC c/o Mr. Terry A. Kirk kirkenterprises@cox.net Re: Mountain View Application – Legal Water Supply Dear Terry: This letter is to provide an update to our letter dated May 29, 2007 (“2007 B&G Letter”), regarding the water rights associated with Lot 4 Simon Subdivision Exemption near Silt, Colorado (“Subject Property”). We continue to opine that the Subject Property has an adequate legal water supply to subdivide the parcel into five residential lots with a main residence and an accessory dwelling unit on each lot and to continue irrigating the historical irrigated areas, less the dry-up associated with roads and building envelopes. Domestic Water Supply The Simon Well operating pursuant to Well Permit No. 68614-F will serve the Subject Property.1 The Water Court in Case No. 00CW36 approved the PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargement and PVO/SSE Second Enlargement conditional water rights to serve a total of 5 single family homes, 5 accessory dwelling units, 500 square feet of irrigation per lot and fire protection within the Subject Property. The Water Court also approved an alternate point of diversion for the PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargements at the PVO/SSE Well No. 1. The 2007 B&G Letter discusses the conditional water rights approved in Case No. 00CW36 in detail. The owner of a conditional water right must file an application with the Water Court every six years to demonstrate to the court that the water rights are still needed and 1 The Simon Well originally operated pursuant to Well Permit No. 049153-F. This well permit was cancelled September 10, 2009, and a new permit issued (Well Permit No. 68614-F) for the Simon Well to reflect the ownership of the well by the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association and to include the additional uses approved in Case No. 00CW36 for the PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargement and PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of the Simon Well. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 12 Red Dog, LLC Water Supply January 16, 2025 Page 2 of 2 SERVING COLORADO SINCE 1953 818 Colorado Avenue | Post Office Box 790 | Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 | 970.945.6546 | BalcombGreen.com that the owner is exercising reasonable diligence in the development of the water rights. The PVO/SSE Homeowners Association filed timely applications, and the Water Court found the Association has been reasonably diligent in the development of these conditional water rights in Cases No. 08CW41, 09CW98, 16CW3023, and 23CW3157 thus continued the conditional water rights in full force and effect. The decree in Case No. 23CW3157 is attached hereto. In addition, the PVO/SSE Homeowners Association has paid all assessments and fees associated with the West Divide Water Conservancy District contract and the Farmers Irrigation Company shares that are necessary to augment the out of priority depletions associated with the Simon Well and PVO/SSE Well No. 1. The plan for augmentation is described in detail in the 2007 B&G Letter. The PVO/SSE Homeowners Association operates the Simon Well which is a public water system (PWSID: CO0123605, Peach Valley Orchard). The 2024 Drinking Water Quality Report for this system is attached hereto. When the PVO/SSE Well No. 1 is constructed, it will be connected to the Peach Valley Orchard public water system. Applicant is in discussions with the PVO/SSE Homeowners Association regarding the future construction of the PVO/SSE Well No. 1 to provide a redundant and/or supplemental supply for the existing development served by the Peach Valley Orchard public water system as well as future development within Lot 4 approved pursuant to the pending application before Garfield County. Irrigation Water Supply The Subject Property has historically been irrigated with water associated with Farmers Irrigation Company shares owned by the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association and Silt Water Conservancy District project water that is appurtenant to the Subject Property. These water rights are in good standing and available to continue to provide irrigation supplies for the Subject Property. The 2007 B&G Letter contains a detailed description of the irrigation water supplies for the Subject Property. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, BALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. By: Sara M. Dunn Encl: Decree Case No. 23CW3157 Peach Valley Orchard 2024 Drinking Water Quality Report Mountain View Preliminary Plan 13 7. Visual Analysis Section 5-402.H requires a visual analysis to be submitted with each Sketch Plan application. As noted, the site is relatively flat and drops off gently from north to south. The subject property does not have any ridges, hills, slopes etc. The ridges in the adjacent surrounding area are to east related to the Grand Hogback formation and also to the north in the direction of Harvey Gap. But the subject property is at a considerable distance from these formations. In order to show this, we’re providing 4 Arial views from each direction. As readily apparent there will not be any structures that create an impact or have the ability to impact any ridgelines because of residential development. The only neighbors that would appear to be impacted are the 3 lots of the Simon Subdivision Exemption which lied to the north. Lots 4A and 4E are closest to these lots but these sit slightly lower in elevation so that potential impact would be minimal or limited. We will provide additional information as required with the Preliminary Plat. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 14 Mountain View Preliminary Plan 15 Mountain View Preliminary Plan 16 Mountain View Preliminary Plan 17 Mountain View Preliminary Plan 18 8. Article 7 Standards This section below will address compliance with Article 7 standards on a point by point basis. Please note that the engineering reports contained in Exhibit C from Boundaries Unlimited (BUI) also address some of these sections from a more technical, engineering viewpoint. COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 7, DIVISIONS 1 - 4 The following section of this application addresses compliance with the criteria and standards of Article 7, Divisions 1-4 of the Garfield County Land Use Development Code (LUDC). Responses to each criterion are in “italics”. Where standards don’t apply, N/A or reason for non- applicability will be stated. DIVISION 1 GENERAL APPROVAL STANDARDS FOR LAND USE CHANGE PERMITS Section 7-101 Compliance with Zone District Use Restrictions. Response: The site is located in the County’s Rural "R" Zone District. The development is in compliance with the zone district lot and building requirements and the Intent statement, use restrictions and regulations for the underlying zone district. All development will comply with dimensional criteria/requirements per Table 3-201 and general standards in Section 3- Zoning of the LUDC. Lots were laid out after taking into account the surrounding development/ construction pattern, logical access points, existing drainage and drainage ditches, views, relationship to location of existing Simon Well and easements and future well locations and infrastructure etc. Each building site will be developed in accordance with the maximum lot coverage requirement (15%) and maximum height (25 ft. for residential structures). Section 7-102 Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Intergovernmental Agreements Response: we will quickly address compliance with the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan as well as the Silt Comprehensive Plan. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 19 Garfield County. The proposed Mountain View Subdivision is designated as Residential Medium High (RMH) according to the Current Comprehensive Plan – Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030 - update 2020. Description of uses in this designation include: “Small farms, estates, residences and clustered residential subdivisions”. This designation is compatible with the Rural ( R ) District as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Density of residential uses is preferred to the 1 dwelling unit per 2 to 6 – acres. Lot sizes range from 3.9 acres to 6.8 acres with an average lot size of 5.5 acres. Lot summary information below: Mountain View Sketch Plan Summary Information Lot # Size Access 4A 6.787 Private Road from CR 261 4B 6.467 Private Road from CR 261 4C 5.642 Private Road from CR 261 4D 3.882 Private Road from CR 261 4E 4.0 Columbine Road (private) Silt Comprehensive Plan Silts present Comprehensive Plan is fairly unique. Land outside the town limits is grouped into 3 tiers. Tier 1 is a priority growth area for properties within ½ mile of existing Town Services. Tier II is called the Silt Secondary Growth Boundary – which indicates a sufficient land to serve what is estimated to be 25 years of growth and existing infrastructure within 1 mile of municipal boundaries. The Mountain View Subdivision falls within Tier III. That plan notes the Town should enter into IGA’s with Garfield County to help ensure the Town has input regarding potential development applications. Please note that the Mountain View Subdivision Sketch Plan was referred to the Town for review and no response was provided. We are unaware of any official IGA which comes into play between the Town and Garfield County for this area. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 20 This quick review indicates that the Application is in Compliance with both the Silt and the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan. At this point we do not think that it is necessary to review selected Goals And Objectives from the County Comp Plan and provide individual responses showing compliance. We will be happy to provide additional information as requested by the County. Note: Description of Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan was also submitted as part of the at Mountain View Subdivision Sketch Plan. Section 7-103 Compatibility Response: The nature, scale and intensity of the Mountain View Subdivision are compatible with adjacent land uses and do not have an adverse impact to adjacent land. Surrounding uses include residential subdivisions consistent with the Rural ( R ) Zone District and some nearby small agricultural properties. Densities proposed by Mountain View are consistent with the greater area as well as the Peach Valley Orchard Subdivision in which this lot (Lot 4 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption) is located. Nearby development/land-use within 1500 feet of the subject property includes the following: • 43 Residential Lots. These range in size from 2.5 acres to about 20 acres in size, with the great majority being between eight and 10 acres. These generally border the subject property to the north, west and south. 7 of these properties have some type of agricultural designation, but nearly all have residential units associated with the individual sites. • 1 relatively large agricultural property which lives directly to the east of the subject. This parcel is 287 acres in size. There are also 2 “farm” related residential units on this property. Section 7-104 Sufficient Legal and Physical Source of Water Response: There is a sufficient legal and physical source of water. A letter from Sara Dunn of Balcomb Green addressing water and irrigation supply is included in the project narrative. An engineering report from Mountain View Preliminary Plan 21 Boundaries Unlimited provides engineering information related to the water supply and distribution network can be found in Exhibit C. Legal documents related to water supply including 2 decrees from water court are included in Exhibit D. Section 7-105 A. Central Water Distribution System Supply Response: Tis project is too far away from having service provided through a Water Supply Entity. However, service with the subject property will be through Simon Well No. 1 or through it’s approved enlargements. Water will be provided and this property will be served through the PVO/SSE HOA. See letter from Attorney Sara Dunn and/or the water supply and distribution plan in Exhibit C. by Project Engineer Boundaries Unlimited Section 7-105 B. Wastewater System Response: Wastewater Systems. The development is not capable of being served by a public, existing wastewater system. Each lot will be served by an individual On-site Waste Treatment System (OWTS). Each system will be permitted under the County OWTS Regulations and this information will be provided with each individual building permit. Each onsite system will meet the minimum lot requirements set forth in Table 7-105. Percolation tests have been previously done for the property onto the proposed lots by HP-Kumar. The results are contained in a letter dated November 16, 1999 and contained in Exhibit G. The findings are that lots are capable of being served by an OWTS that meets County requirements. Section 7-106 Adequate Public Utilities Response: Adequate public facilities are being provided. Electric and telephone, in addition to the Central /Water System and the onsite waste disposal systems, are proposed. Natural gas service will not be extended to the site. Individual propane tanks will be used. Easements. Easements that meet standards of Article 7-106 are being followed. Easements from the existing Lot 4 SSE plat are included on the proposed plat. Dedication. Utility easements will be dedicated to the public. Drainage easements will be dedicated to the PVO/SSE HOA. Construction. Applicant has and will coordinate with appropriate utility companies. Trees or excessive excavations will be avoided. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 22 Conflicting Encumbrances. We are not aware of any conflicting legal encumbrances. Applicant will take care of conflicts as necessary. Section 7-107 Access and Roadways Response: 4 of the 5 proposed lots are proposed to access off of a private road. This private road has access off of County Road 261. This proposed private road does not have a name at this time. It is designed to be 20 foot in width, with lanes being 8 foot wide and with two – 2 foot shoulders. This private road ends in a cul-de-sac. Access and drainage easements are provided on both sides of the road and details are included in the Engineering Report. 1 lot, Lot 4 – E is proposed to have access off of Columbine Lane. Columbine Lane is a private road maintained by the PVO/SSE HOA. Applicant has discussed this access location with the HOA President and this primitive driveway access is already in existence. Adequate Capacity. The interior private road has capacity to serve the proposed lots and any ADU’s which would be constructed. Columbine Lane also has adequate capacity. A minor traffic study is included in the Engineering Report (see Exhibit C). Road Dedications. The private road will be dedicated to the public and so designated on the Final Plat. Applicant understands that the private road will not be accepted by the County related to maintenance needs. Lot 4-E will pay required fees to the HOA for the use of Columbine Lane. Impacts Mitigated. Applicant proposes to pay required impact fees. It is our understanding that county roads will not be impacted either via construction or impose construction where additional facilities must be built or upgraded. Design Standards. The internal private road is classified as a semi - primitive road and is meeting all required specifications. Driving surface is gravel. Dead-end Roads. The private Street ends in a cul-de-sac that meets County design specifications. Erosion and Drainage. Project engineer is designing adequate drainage that may occur due to the proposed road system. Commercial and Industrial. There are no proposed Commercial or Industrial uses. Emergency Access and Egress. Private road and access meets International Fire Code requirements. Conceptual plan plans were reviewed with the Colorado River Fire Department as part of the Sketch Plan review. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 23 Traffic control and Street Lighting. No traffic control devices or streetlights are proposed. Drainage Structures. Bioretention Facility. This structure is being built and will be located directly south of the proposed cul-de-sac. Drainage will be released to its historic location south of this bioretention facility and drainage will be released at historic rates. Individual Lots. Each individual lot should be examined at time of building permit for such drainage needs as culverts to pass water under driveways etc. This review should also confirm that Individual lots will not contain more than 10,000 ft.² of impervious surface area. If so, standards contained in Section 7 – 204 C would apply. Borrow Ditch. Borrow Ditches meet County standards. Variances. No design variances are being requested. Section 7-108 No Significant Risk from Natural Hazards Response: No natural hazards are associated with the site including landslide areas, snow slide or mud flow areas flooding etc. A preliminary geologic study was performed in 1999 for a previous application for the subdivision and a Letter of Update was included with the Sketch Plan application. All homes will have an engineered foundation. A soils study will be performed as part of each Building Permit an engineered foundations will be provided for each residential structure. The property is in an area identified as a Low Fire Hazard Section 7 – 109 Fire Protection. Response: Applicant reviewed plans with Colorado River Fire Department as part of the Sketch Plan review and an on-site visit was part of the meeting. The Fire District will be able to hook onto a dry hydrant situated at the Irrigation Pond. All homes built on the Subdivision will contain fire sprinklers and will be reviewed at time of Building Permit. The Fire Department will be able to hook on to this dry hydrant in order to fight any structure or wildfire in the immediate area. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 24 DIVISION 2 GENERAL RESOURCE PROTECTION STANDARDS FOR LAND USE CHANGE PERMITS Section 7-201 Protection of Agricultural Lands Response: This development will not adversely affect any existing agricultural operations. Lot 4 of the SSE is surrounded by County and private roads and there are 3 lots to the north which are already developed as residential properties. Please note that the subject property had some interim and limited agricultural operations on-site during some of the past 20 years while waiting for conditions to be right to proceed with an updated land-use application. Domestic Animals. Domestic animals are already subject to protective covenants as being part of the PVO/SSE HOA and this property will continue to have these or other appropriate controls. Fences. Any new fencing will be built by private property owners and be maintained by the owner or HOA. Perimeter fencing already exists. The new fencing will be CPW standards as necessary Roads. Existing County private roads are already well-established in this area. There will be a new private road accessing off of CR 261; this has adequate sight distance and a driveway access permit was obtained and access constructed (See permit # GRB16-D-18 contained in Engineer’s Basic Traffic Analysis). Ditches. There are no longer any ditches on the site that are used exclusively for agricultural operations. There is a tail water ditch in the northwest quadrant of the site in this will be maintained. Lots in this portion of the PVO/SSE already have a private irrigation system and the subdivision will be hooking onto and then extending the piped irrigation facility. Section 7-202 Protection of Wildlife Habitat Areas Response: This subdivision received comments from the Colorado Division of Wildlife (now Colorado Parks and Wildlife) into separate letters in 2000. This correspondence is included in Exhibit I. Comments included keeping any ditches in their present condition and consider them wetlands. Also noted was the presence of mule deer moving through the property. Areas of critical habitat were not mentioned. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 25 Types of fencing were addressed and they included wildlife friendly fencing or wildlife exclusion fencing which should be a minimum of 7 feet tall. The property has been fenced for many years and no fencing along the exterior of the subdivision as planned. Any future fencing would follow these guidelines. Section 7-203 Protection of Wetlands and Waterbodies Response: There are no perennial streams or water bodies on the subject property. The Division of Wildlife letter (now CPW) did state that existing ditches with cattails should be considered wetlands and not be disturbed. There is a tail water ditch in the northwest quadrant of the property which was mentioned previously. This is being maintained. Section 7-204 Drainage and Erosion Response: The Engineering Report for the property considers drainage and erosion. Drainage from the interior Road will be captured in a bio retention facility located to the southwest of that private road. Drainage will be released at historic rates and funneled to appropriate areas and there are drainage easements provided where necessary throughout the project. Positive drainage away from buildings will be provided and analyzed at time of building permit. There are no water bodies where drainage will be directed. Impervious surface areas are minimal and do not need special consideration. There are no stormwater detention ponds that are required for drainage for the project. Present development concept should not result in more than 1 acre being disturbed (per Article 7-204 A). If this should change, a CDPHE discharge permit will be obtained). Section 7-205 Environmental Quality Response: There are no proposed land uses in the subdivision which would compromise air or water quality. Uses are simply single-family detached structures in compliance with zoning densities as well as allowed accessory uses including ADU’s. Section 7-206 Wildfire Hazards Response: As noted previously, this area is in a low wildfire hazard area. The applicants are making available for fire protection purposes access to Mountain View Preliminary Plan 26 the irrigation pond and the irrigation pond is outfitted with a properly designed dry hydrant access. Applicant has met with the Fire Marshall of the Colorado River Fire Protection District. Through these discussions each residential unit will be sprinkled. Systems will be reviewed at time of Building Permit. Section 7-207 Areas Subject to Natural hazards and Geologic Hazards Utilities. There are no aboveground utility facilities being located within the subdivision and no aboveground utilities located in hazard areas. Hazards. A Geologic Hazard Assessment was made in November 1999 and written recommendations provided on November 16 of that year. An updated letter related to the geological assessment was written on December 21, 2023 and is provided in Exhibit G. There were no hazards related to avalanche, landslides, rock fall/debris, alluvial fans. The property is also subject to a gentle slope proceeding from northeast of Southwest averaging about 3 to 4%. Soils in the surrounding area can be subject to collapse or settlement, and every building permit should be accompanied by a soils analysis and recommendations on foundation and drainage. The property is also subject to earthquake related ground shaking. The area is in UBC – Seismic Risk Zone 1 should be designed to withstand moderate ground shaking. Section 7-208 Reclamation Response: Any area disturbed as part of construction activities related to infrastructure improvements, OWTS on any lots or any driveway permits will comply with the standards contained in Section 208 B as necessary. This reclamation will probably be limited to contouring and revegetation. Disturbed areas will also be treated so that noxious weeds are controlled. DIVISION 3 SITE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Section 7-301 Compatible Design Response: A. Site Organization. The site planning done for the project is logical given its location and surrounding land uses which are mostly residential lots of similar size lots. Access for the property via the proposed private Mountain View Preliminary Plan 27 road meets County specifications. Applicant has previously obtained a permit for access onto CR 261. B. Operational Characteristics. No objectionable emissions expected. Generally, noise and hours of operation will not be an issue with residential development. Infrastructure installation will generally be limited to normal business hours. No unusual times will be necessary for eventual construction of residential units. C .Buffering. N/A. There are no adjacent uses that are located in a different zone district. E. Materials. N/A. All structures will be residential, single-family at rural residential densities. The CCR’s will include a design review process and all proposed construction will be reviewed as is typical in such residential developments. Section 7-302 Off- Street Parking and Loading Standards Response: Generally not applicable, as this is not a multifamily, commercial or industrial development. All required parking will occur on the same lot as the uses they are intended to serve. Clear vision areas will be maintained as necessary. Most standards such as Loading and unloading areas, minimum dimensions of loading births, handicap parking will not be necessary. Section 7-303 Landscaping Standards Response: Landscaping: General Standards. Development will comply with the standards as applicable. In recent times, the site was used agriculturally for the growing of hemp. Much the original vegetation had been removed and remnants of the hemp are gone. There are there are no special areas of mature trees that are valuable The CCR’s and design review will refer to the standards contained in 7- 303 F. There are no specific areas targeted for landscaping where parking should be prohibited. A clear vision area according to Article 7-303 I will be maintained at the intersection of the private road and CR 261. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 28 Section 7-304 Lighting Lighting Standards. Any outdoor lighting will comply with the standards of this section of the Garfield County LUDC (7-304 A). All lighting will be downcast and shielded - and light will not shine directly on to other properties. References and standards will be made a part of the covenants. Outdoor lighting will be reviewed by the Architectural Review Committee at time of submission of building plans. No flashing lights are expected since this is not a commercial or industrial area. There will be no commercial greenhouses. Section 7-305 Snow Storage Standards Response: N/A. Snow plowing on the subdivision road will be done by the HOA. And snow will not be permitted to be stored on the private road. Section 7-306 Trail and Walkway Standards Response: A. Recreational and community facility access. N/A. There are no appropriate schools, shopping areas or other similar community types of land uses close to the subject property where a link would be practical and appropriate. Therefore, no trails rights-of-way or have been set aside for the project. This neighborhood is quiet and no issues with pedestrian circulation on the private road are anticipated. DIVISION 4 SUBDIVISION STANDARDS AND DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS Section 7-401 General subdivision Standards A. Maintenance for Common Facilities. Response: Common facilities are the connections to the domestic water system, irrigation system and subdivision road. Common maintenance and repair will be provided for as part of the CCR’s. Lot 4E will have access from Columbine Lane. The access will be directly opposite another access point on to Columbine Lane in the subdivision. This has been reviewed with the HOA president. Lot 4 E will pay related fees to Columbine Lane. This will be noted in the CCRs. B. Domestic Animal Control Response: Provided for in covenants. There are also Domestic Animal Control mechanisms in the CCRs for the entire subdivision (PVO/SSE). These will also be reviewed for consistency. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 29 C. Fireplaces Response: All fireplaces will conform to the County standards and will be noted in the covenants. A solid fuel stoves, as defined by CRS § 25-7-401 shall be limited to 1 device in the subdivision. Open hearth, solid fuel fireplaces shall be prohibited. The subdivision is not adjacent to any floodplain. Section 7-402 Subdivision Standards A. Lots to Conform to Code. Response: All lots conform to code Lot characteristics are appropriate for this location. And there are no lots less than 1 acre in size. There are no issues with side lot lines in relation to the private subdivision road easement. All lots fronting on the cul-de-sac have more than the required 25 feet frontage in the area and there will be no access problems. No lots are being divided by municipal boundaries, county roads or public rights-of-way. Section 7-403 Survey Monuments Response: Survey monument procedures will comply with state law (CRS § 38-51-104 and 38-51-105 as amended), and where appropriate, Garfield County standards. Section 7-404 School Land Dedication Response: The property is not located within the RE-1 School District. The subdivision is relatively small and there are no lands appropriate for or needed for dedication the school district. Applicant proposes to pay $200 per dwelling unit per Section 7-404 C.1 Section 7 – 405 Road Impact Fees The Mountain View Subdivision is located within the District 2 North Benefit Area. These fees will be paid per section 7 – 405 A.1 and according to the fee schedule and Table 7 – 405 in effect at that time. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 30 9. Impact Analysis The following section of this application addresses the criteria outlined in Article 4-203 G E of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution. Responses to each criterion are in “italics”. IMPACT ANALYSIS The following section of this application addresses the criteria outlined in Article 4-203 G E of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution. Responses to each criterion are in “italics”. G. Impact Analysis. The Impact Analysis shall provide a description of the impacts that the proposed land use change may cause, based upon County regulations and standards. The Impact Analysis shall include a complete description of how the applicant will ensure that impacts will be mitigated and standards will be satisfied. The following information shall be included in the Impact Analysis: 1. Adjacent Land Use. Existing use of adjacent property and neighboring properties within 1500’ radius. Response: Described in detail and responses to Compliance with Article 7 standards. See response to Section 7-103. 2. Site Features. A description of site features such as streams, areas subject to flooding, lakes, high ground water areas, topography, vegetative cover, climatology, and other features that may aid in the evaluation of the proposed development. Response: A description of the site features for the subject property includes: Streams, lakes and other water related features. The subject property lies on open areas of Silt Mesa south of the hills and incline going up to Harvey Gap. There is some relatively high groundwater in the area, probably due to the extensive irrigation in Silt Mesa. The geologic report indicates that there was groundwater encountered on lots 4 and 4C at depths of 2 to 5 feet in the test pits. The subject property is not located in a floodplain, nor is it subject to flooding, debris flows, etc. Vegetative cover. Original groundcover was removed over the years as the property was used for agricultural uses - originally irrigated fields and part dryland forage. In recent years, the property was subject to hemp farming. There is a tail water ditch in the northwest quadrant of the site which has some Mountain View Preliminary Plan 31 characteristics of riparian vegetation including cattail style vegetation. The tail ditch will be maintained in its present location and an easement for the ditch will be included on the final plat. Topography. Topography is relatively flat with gentle slopes running from northeast to southwest which reach a maximum of 2 to 5%. Climatology. As characteristic of most of the lower elevations of the Colorado River Valley, the subject property is characterized by cold winters and warm summers, with significant diurnal swings. Amount of snow depends on the particular winter. Wildfire. The area is noted as low fire risk. Regardless, individual residential structures will be sprinkled and the irrigation pond and the subdivision will have a dry hydrant for access by the Colorado River Fire Department. 3. Soil Characteristics. A description of soil characteristics of the site which have a significant influence on the proposed use of the land. Response: The site is composed of eolian and alluvial deposits which feature sandy silt and clay soils such as were found in the test pits on the property. Groundwater is relatively close to the surface, and it is assumed that this is because of the irrigation that occurs on Silt Mesa. Professional soils investigations and engineered foundations to be included with the building permit applications should mitigate any potential for settlement or other such characteristics that may occur with low-density, rural residential development. Please see the attached geologic reports (Exhibit G and the Engineering and Drainage Report from Boundaries Unlimited For some more information on the soils- Exhibit C). 4. Geology and Hazard. A description of the geologic characteristics of the area including any potential natural or man-made hazards, and a determination of what effect such factors would have on the proposed use of the land. Response: Previous geologic analysis and report from H P Geotech in November 1999 and a Letter of Update in December, 2024 indicate that there are no severe geologic hazards on the property. There is some potential for settlement due to the groundwater and types of soils but these can be mitigated by direction of post-development drainage and irrigation away from the buildings and reinforced foundation walls and low footing bearing pressures after a soils assessment for a specific building location. The Geo Hazard study also notes the possibility of moderately strong earthquake related ground shaking but this can be mitigated easily by following recommendations will was originally called uniform Building Code, Seismic Zone 1 recommendations. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 32 5. Effect on Groundwater and Aquifer Recharge Areas. Evaluation of the relationship of the subject parcel to floodplains, the nature of soils and subsoils and their ability to adequately support waste disposal, the slope of the land, the effect of sewage effluents, and the pollution of surface runoff, stream flow and groundwater. Response: Waste water disposal. All lots will be served by OWTS. Lots are sufficiently large that there will be adequate separation from other systems and from other well sites. There are no floodplains, streams or other surface water features in the area that may be impacted. Slope of the property does not present any development or geologic hazard constraints and does not place the area in a position where scenic views of the surrounding homes would be blocked. Surface runoff. Development potential is relatively light in scope, and there will not be a significant increase in the level of impervious surface. Existing drainage patterns will be maintained. The Engineering and Drainage Study indicates that there should be no problems caused by the proposed development. Aquifer Recharge. There will be a minimal increase in the impervious surface on this 27.5 acre property from development. The interior road surface is not being paved, and is approximately 600 lineal feet in distance.. Aquifer recharge should not be affected. 6. Environmental Effects. Determination of the existing environmental conditions on the parcel to be developed and the effects of development on those conditions, including: a. Determination of the long term and short term effect on flora and fauna. Response: There should be no long-term or short-term effect on flora and fauna. While the owner has previously leased the site for the agricultural use of hemp, that use was terminated 2 years ago. Existing flora are short grasses and brush with the exception of existing drainage ditch in the northwest quadrant which shows some riparian characteristics. Related to fauna, the property is not in its original in pristine condition and while mule deer have visited the property in the past, it is not noted as critical habitat. b. Determination of the effect on designated environmental resources, including critical wildlife habitat significant archaeological, cultural, paleontological, historic resources. Response: Discussion on critical wildlife habitat was noted above. There are no special environmental resources that presently exist on the site. c Impacts on wildlife and domestic animals to creation of hazardous attractions, alteration of the existing native vegetation, blockage of mitigation routes, use patterns, or other disruptions Mountain View Preliminary Plan 33 Response: There are no hazardous attractions nor will there be attractive nuisances related with this project. What was formally agricultural land has been in a holding pattern for a number of years and the first development application occurred more than 20 years ago. Alteration of the existing vegetation and migration routes for wildlife have been noted in other parts of the application. The proposed residential use pattern, (rural residential use) is the predominant use in the area. d. Evaluation of any potential radiation hazard that may have been identified by the State or County Health Departments. Response: The applicant and Development Team are not aware of any potential radiation hazards that have been 7. Nuisance. Impacts on adjacent land from generation of vapor, dust, smoke, noise, glare or vibration, or other emanations. Response: There should be no impact on adjacent properties from additional generation of vapor, dust, etc. With the exception of installation of infrastructure and the construction of single-family residences and related accessory structures, which are all short-term in nature, impacts should be minimal. County guidelines for lighting will be followed, so there should be no excess glare or light pollution from the subject property. No other nuisances are expected. 8. Hours of Operation. The Applicant shall submit information on the hours of operation of the proposed use Response: There are no set hours of operation as this is a rural, residential use compatible with other properties in the nearby area. It is not commercial, industrial or institutional in nature. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 34 10. Mineral Rights Our research indicates that the mineral rights have not been severed with the property. We first examined all documentation in the B-2 exceptions of the current title commitment. There were two leases related to mineral rights: 1. Apollo energy entered into a lease with the previous owners of the property, North 27 (Curriers), for a five-year time period which ended January 9, 2009. The terms of the lease were than taken over by the new owners (Kirks). The following documents are in Exhibit H. • Rec # 694178 - lease with North 27 – Apollo • Rec # 727431 and 727432- Transfer of lease to new owners (Kirks 2. Red Dog LLC entered into a 5-year lease with Antero on May 2, 2011. This lease can be found as Reception 804309. This lease is also found in Exhibit H. The time frames for each of these leases expired without any action taken by the lessees. The second thing we have done is contact the Assessor’s office. They are not actively valuing/tracking ownership of any severed mineral interest in that particular Section/Township/Range. Finally, it appears no mineral owner for the subject property has filed a request for notification to be provided in the case of relevant land-use applications. On the following page you will find attached the Certification of Mineral Owner Research Mountain View Preliminary Plan 35 Mountain View Preliminary Plan 36 11. Affordable Housing Provision of Affordable Housing is not required for this project. Section 8 – 102 A contains threshold requirements for affordable housing once a subdivision or development consists of 15 or more lots or residential units 12. Miscellaneous Planning Items. a. Open Space Plan. There is no separate open space plan for development of Lot 4 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption. This is similar to the greater Peach Valley Orchard Subdivision as well as other developments in this area of Silt Mesa b. Landscape Plan. There is no overarching Landscape Plan for the development. There will be revegetation of the areas that will be disturbed by installation of any infrastructure. There are also be revegetation requirements per tap County Standards related to individual building permits on each lot including OWTS facilities. Plantings and Revegetation will be by LU D the standards in Article 7 – 303, with any significant vegetation plantings conforming with 7 – 303 F. The standards will also be noted in the Covenants or the project. c. Roads/trails/bikeways. No specific trails, bike paths or pedestrian paths are proposed. This is similar to other areas in this portion of Silt Mesa. There is 1 Private Rd. provided for access. This meets all standards in Article 7. That road will not be accepted by the County nor is it expected to be maintained by the County. Arrow will be dedicated to the sub HOA for the development. Mountain View Preliminary Plan 37 EXHIBIT A Application and Related Forms EXHIBIT B Property Ownership Deeds EXHIBIT C Engineering Reports • Grading and Drainage • Traffic and Road Design • Water Supply and Distribution • Wastewater Management Page 1 Mountain View Subdivision BUI#09016.02 Major Subdivision Application December 18, 2024. Grading & Drainage Plan This Drainage Plan is provided in accordance with Article IV Section 4-203.E of the Garfield County Unified Land Use and Development Code and follows the outline provided therein. E1. Site Map: A Site Map has been attached which depicts the existing conditions and proposed improvements for the proposed Mountain View Subdivision in Garfield County, Colorado. The 27.52 Ac. property is owned currently by Red Dog, LLC and was previously developed with an irrigation pond and gravel drive. The property is currently accessed from County Road #261 and from Columbine Lane along the west boundary. The Applicant proposes to subdivide the property into five (5) residential lots. The property is not located within a delineated floodplain. E2. Drainage Structures: Existing drainage features include roadside ditches and drainages which traverse the property. The existing gravel drive extending from County Road #261 will be replaced with new 600 LF gravel subdivision road containing rural grass lined roadside ditches. None of the individual lots are anticipated to exceed 10,000 SF of impervious surface per Article VII Section 7-204.C but stormwater will be mitigated for the subdivision road using a bioretention facility below the cul-de-sac. Each individual property should be reviewed at the time of individual building permit to specifically locate drainage culverts under private driveways and to determine if the 10,000 SF of impervious surface has been exceeded. The bioretention facility shall be constructed with a 300 SF base area, 2-feet deep, 3:1 side slope and with a 12” wide overflow weir/channel placed 1.5-feet above the base finish grade. The base area should be overexcavated 12-inches deep and filled with 8-inches of sand/peat media and indicated on the Site Map and Details. E3. Topography: In general, The site slopes gently from north to south. Two (2) foot contours are represented on the attached Site Map. E4. Grading Plan: Only minor grading is required for the subdivision road, bioretention facility and utility installations. No major clearings should be necessary. Please see the attached Site Map and Details. E5. Soil Stockpile and Snow Storage Area: The proposed division of land does not require any major clearings or disturbances which would require soil stockpiles. All lots will contain sufficient area for snow storage. E6. Drainage Plan: As mentioned, the site slopes gently from north to south. An existing drainage is located along the common lot line of Lot 4-D and Lot 4-E which captures runoff from Lot 4-D and portions of Lot 4-E and conveys it to an existing roadside drainage/irrigation ditch along the east side of Columbine Lane. This drainage pattern will be maintained. The remainder of the subdivision sheet and shallow flows south Page 2 onto adjacent irrigated fields. This general drainage pattern will also be maintained, but with the addition of a bioretention facility at the end of the cul-de-sac to mitigate the subdivision road. E7. Equipment Storage: No equipment storage is proposed with this division of land. E8. Temporary Roads: No temporary roads are proposed with this division of land. E9. Areas of Steep Slope: No steep slopes exist on the property that would preclude a division of land. E10. Construction Schedule: Construction will be limited to the subdivision road, the bioretention facility, utility extensions, and the installation of a dry hydrant/lateral in the existing lined pond. This should take 90-120 days to complete. E11. Permanent Stabilization: The minimal disturbance required for construction should not require permanent stabilization beyond the basic broadcasting of native seed with straw mulch cover. E12. Erosion Control Measures: Erosion control measures are provided on the Site Map and Details. E13. Estimated Cost: The estimated cost of the required temporary soil erosion and sediment control measures less is as follows: • Sediment control fencing: 800 LF @ $3.75/LF $3,000 • Erosion control logs: 40 LF @ $8.00/LF $ 320 • Seed & Straw Mulch: 0.10 Ac @ $7000/Ac $ 700 Total: $4,020 E14. Calculations: Stormwater runoff and mitigation was estimate using Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis, 2022 for the basin affecting the subdivision road under the 2-yr, 25-yr and 100-year 24 hours storm events (based on the SCS TR-20 Method). Please see the attached data sheets. E15. Neighboring Areas: The neighboring properties to the north, west and south are small acre rural single-family residential and the land to the east is large acreage agricultural pasture. County Road #261 and an irrigation lateral run along the east boundary and Columbine Lane and an irrigation lateral run along the west boundary. E16. Stormwater Management: As discussed, temporary erosion control measures are included on the Site Map and Details and stormwater mitigation is being provide for the subdivision road. E17. Stormwater Management Plan: The proposed division of land is anticipated to disturb less than 1.0 acre and therefore does not require an application with the CDPHE. Page 3 E18. Reclamation, Revegetation and Soil Plan: a. Reclamation of disturbed areas adjacent to the subdivision road, within the bioretention facility and atop the utility installations should be limited to broadcasting native seed and straw mulch cover. These locations shall be seeded with a CDOT Region 3 Seed mix appropriate for elevations below 6500-feet as indicated on the Site Map. b. Disturbances are very limited for the proposed improvements and do not anticipate the need for overlot topsoil stripping and stockpiling. Topsoil from the roadway construction will be distributed evenly across the adjacent areas and revegetated. c. The proposed division of land is anticipated to disturb less than 1.0 acre and therefore does not require a Weed Management Plan. d. The proposed division of land does not meet any of the five (5) listed criteria requiring revegetation security. e. Not applicable. E19. Hydraulic Calculation: Please see the attached hydraulic calculation for the roadside ditches and swale. E20. Maintenance Requirements: The Mile High Flood District recommends the following for maintenance of swales and bioretention (infiltration) BMPs: • Grass Swales Swales require maintenance of the turf cover and repair of rill or gully development. Healthy vegetation can often be maintained without using fertilizers because runoff from lawns and other areas contains the needed nutrients. Periodically inspecting the vegetation over the first few years will help to identify emerging problems and help to plan for long-term restorative maintenance needs. This section presents a summary of specific maintenance requirements and a suggested frequency of action. 1. Inspection. Inspect vegetation at least twice annually for uniform cover and traffic impacts. Check for sediment accumulation and rill and gully development. 2. Debris and Litter Removal. Remove litter and debris to prevent rill and gully development from preferential flow paths around accumulated debris, enhance aesthetics, and prevent floatables from being washed offsite. This should be done as needed based on inspection, but no less than two times per year. 3. Aeration. Aerating manicured grass will supply the soil and roots with air. It reduces soil compaction and helps control thatch while helping water move into the root zone. Aeration is done by punching holes in the ground using an aerator with hollow punches that pull the soil cores or "plugs" from the ground. Holes should be at least 2 inches deep and no more than 4 inches apart. Aeration should be performed at least once per year when the ground is not frozen. Water the turf thoroughly prior to aeration. Mark sprinkler heads and shallow utilities such as irrigation lines and cable TV lines to ensure those lines will not be damaged. Avoid aerating in extremely hot and dry conditions. Heavy traffic areas may require aeration more frequently. 4. Mowing. When starting from seed, mow native/drought-tolerant grasses only when required to deter weeds during the first three years. Following this period, mowing of native/drought tolerant grass may stop or be reduced to maintain a length of no less than six inches. Mowing of manicured grasses may vary from as frequently as weekly during the summer, to no mowing during the winter. See the inset for additional recommendations from the CSU Extension. Page 4 5. Irrigation Scheduling and Maintenance. Adjust irrigation schedules throughout the growing season to provide the proper irrigation application rate to maintain healthy vegetation. Less irrigation is typically needed in early summer and fall, with more irrigation needed during July and August. Native grass should not require irrigation after establishment, except during prolonged dry periods when supplemental, temporary irrigation may aid in maintaining healthy vegetation cover. Check for broken sprinkler heads and repair them, as needed. Do not overwater. Signs of overwatering and/or broken sprinkler heads may include soggy areas and unevenly distributed areas of lush growth. Completely drain and blowout the irrigation system before the first winter freeze each year. Upon reactivation of the irrigation system in the spring, inspect all components and replace damaged parts, as needed 6. Fertilizer, Herbicide, and Pesticide Application. Use the minimum amount of biodegradable nontoxic fertilizers and herbicides needed to establish and maintain dense vegetation cover that is reasonably free of weeds. Fertilizer application may be significantly reduced or eliminated by the use of mulch-mowers, as opposed to bagging and removing clippings. To keep clippings out of receiving waters, maintain a 25-foot buffer adjacent to open water areas where clippings are bagged. Hand-pull the weeds in areas with limited weed problems. Frequency of fertilizer, herbicide, and pesticide application should be on an as-needed basis only and should decrease following establishment of vegetation. For additional information on managing vegetation in a manner that conserves water and protects water quality, see the 2008 GreenCO Best Management Practices Manual (www.greenco.org) for a series of Colorado-based BMP fact sheets on topics such as irrigation, plant care, and soil amendments. 7. Sediment Removal. Remove sediment as needed based on inspection. Frequency depends on site-specific conditions. For planning purposes, it can be estimated that 3 to 10% of the swale length will require sediment removal on an annual basis. Remove accumulated sediment near culverts and in channels to maintain flow capacity. Spot replace the grass areas as necessary. Reseed and/or patch damaged areas in side slopes, and/or channel to maintain healthy vegetative cover. This should be conducted as needed based on inspection. Over time, and depending on pollutant loads, a portion of the buffer or swale may need to be rehabilitated due to sediment deposition. Periodic sediment removal will reduce the frequency of revegetation required. • Bioretention (Rain Garden or Porous Landscape Detention) The primary maintenance objective for bioretention, also known as porous landscape detention, is to keep vegetation healthy, remove sediment and trash, and ensure that the facility is draining properly. The growing medium may need to be replaced eventually to maintain performance. This section summarizes key maintenance considerations for bioretention. 1. Inspection. Inspect the infiltrating surface at least twice annually following precipitation events to determine if the bioretention area is providing acceptable infiltration. Bioretention facilities are designed with a maximum depth for the WQCV of one foot and soils that will typically drain the WQCV over approximately 12 hours. If standing water Page 5 persists for more than 24 hours after runoff has ceased, clogging should be further investigated and remedied. Additionally, check for erosion and repair as necessary. 2. Debris and Litter Removal. Remove debris and litter from the infiltrating surface to minimize clogging of the media. Remove debris and litter from the overflow structure. 3. Mowing and Plant Care. • All vegetation: Maintain healthy, weed-free vegetation. Weeds should be removed before they flower. The frequency of weeding will depend on the planting scheme and cover. When the growing media is covered with mulch or densely vegetated, less frequent weeding will be required. • Grasses: When started from seed, allow time for germination and establishment of grass prior to mowing. If mowing is required during this period for weed control, it should be accomplished with hand-held string trimmers to minimize disturbance to the seedbed. After established, mow as desired or as needed for weed control. Following this period, mowing of native/drought tolerant grasses may stop or be reduced to maintain a length of no less than 6 inches. Mowing of manicured grasses may vary from as frequently as weekly during the summer, to no mowing during the winter. 4. Irrigation Scheduling and Maintenance. Adjust irrigation throughout the growing season to provide the proper irrigation application rate to maintain healthy vegetation. Less irrigation is typically needed in early summer and fall, while more irrigation is needed during the peak summer months. Native grasses and other drought tolerant plantings should not typically require routine irrigation after establishment, except during prolonged dry periods. Check for broken sprinkler heads and repair them, as needed. Completely drain the irrigation system before the first winter freeze each year. Upon reactivation of the irrigation system in the spring, inspect all components and replace damaged parts, as needed. 5. Replacement of Wood Mulch. Replace wood mulch only when needed to maintain a mulch depth of up to approximately 3 inches. Excess mulch will reduce the volume available for storage. 6. Sediment Removal and Growing Media Replacement. If ponded water is observed in a bioretention cell more than 24 hours after the end of a runoff event, check underdrain outfall locations and clean-outs for blockages. Maintenance activities to restore infiltration capacity of bioretention facilities will vary with the degree and nature of the clogging. If clogging is primarily related to sediment accumulation on the filter surface, infiltration may be improved by removing excess accumulated sediment and scarifying the surface of the filter with a rake. If the clogging is due to migration of sediments deeper into the pore spaces of the media, removal and replacement of all or a portion of the media may be required. The frequency of media replacement will depend on site- specific pollutant loading characteristics. Although surface clogging of the media is expected over time, established root systems promote infiltration. This means that mature vegetation that covers the filter surface should increase the life span of the growing media, serving to promote infiltration even as the media surface clogs Page 6 E21. Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures Plan: No fuel and/or hazardous liquid storages are proposed for this division of land. E22. Additional Information or Detail: None. E22. Signatures: Prepared by: Deric J. Walter, PE Boundaries Unlimited Inc. Acknowledged by: Red Dog LLC - Terry Kirk Owner/Manager Attachments • Drainage/Hydrologic Data Sheets • Hydraulic Data Sheet • NRCS Websoil Survey • Site Map & Details Autodesk Storm and Sanitary AnalysisAutodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis Area (sf)%Area (sf)%Area (sf)% Pre ROW 263680 0 0.0%--256327 97.2% Dev ROW 263680 0 0.0%13003 4.9%243325 92.3% Area (sf)%Area (sf)% Pre ROW --7353 2.8%61.4 Dev ROW 5012 1.9%2340 0.9%62.8 L (ft) HO1 (ft) HO2 (ft) Slope (%) Pre ROW 100 5852 5846 6.0% Dev ROW 100 5852 5846 6.0% L (ft) Hf1 (ft) Hf2 (ft) Slope (%) Pre ROW 930 5846 5806 4.3% Dev ROW 750 5846 5814 4.3% 200 5814 5808 3.0% Basin TcSSA (min.) Q2 (cfs) Q25 (cfs) Q100 (cfs) Pre ROW 19.1 0.00 0.02 0.24 Dev ROW 19.9 0.00 0.04 0.39 0.00 0.02 0.14 Basin Shallow Flow Controlled Rate (cfs): Basin Drainage Basin Summary Red Dog Major Subdivision Sheet Flow Soil Type BImpervious Curve NumberPasture Basin Area (sf) Soil Type C Gravels Basin Gravels Pasture 2-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Project Description 09016-SSA.SPF Project Options CFS Elevation SCS TR-20 SCS TR-55 Hydrodynamic YES YES Rainfall Details SN Rain Gage Data Data Source Rainfall Rain State County Return Rainfall Rainfall ID Source ID Type Units Period Depth Distribution (years) (inches) 49 Time Series Silt-2yr Intensity inches Colorado Garfield 2.00 1.05 SCS Type II 24-hr Enable Overflow Ponding at Nodes .......... Skip Steady State Analysis Time Periods ... File Name ................................................ Flow Units ............................................... Elevation Type ......................................... Hydrology Method .................................. Time of Concentration (TOC) Method ...... Link Routing Method ............................... 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 2-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Subbasin Summary SN Subbasin Area Peak Rate Weighted Total Total Total Peak Time of ID Factor Curve Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Concentration Number Volume (ft²)(in) (in) (ft³) (cfs) (days hh:mm:ss) 1 Dev_ROW 48 484.00 62.83 1.05 0.00 0.0 0.00 0 00:19:06 2 Pre_ROW 48 484.00 61.36 1.05 0.00 0.0 0.00 0 00:19:52 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 2-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Node Summary SN Element Element Invert Ground/Rim Initial Surcharge Ponded Peak Max HGL Max Min Time of Total Total Time ID Type Elevation (Max) Water Elevation Area Inflow Elevation Surcharge Freeboard Peak Flooded Flooded Elevation Elevation Attained Depth Attained Flooding Volume Attained Occurrence (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft²) (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (days hh:mm) (ac-in) (min) 1 Out_Dev_ROW Outfall 5808.00 0.00 5808.00 2 Out-Pre_ROW Outfall 5808.00 0.00 5808.00 3 Bio-ROW Storage Node 5808.00 5810.00 5808.00 0.00 0.00 5808.00 0.00 0.00 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 2-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Link Summary SN Element Element From To (Outlet) Length Inlet Outlet Average Diameter or Manning's Peak Design Flow Peak Flow/ Peak Flow Peak Flow Peak Flow Total Time ID Type (Inlet) Node Invert Invert Slope Height Roughness Flow Capacity Design Flow Velocity Depth Depth/ Surcharged Node Elevation Elevation Ratio Total Depth Ratio (ft) (ft) (ft) (%) (in)(cfs) (cfs)(ft/sec) (ft)(min) 1 Overflow_ROW Weir Bio-ROW Out_Dev_ROW 5808.00 5808.00 0.00 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 2-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Subbasin Hydrology Subbasin : Dev_ROW Input Data Area (ft²) ............................................................................. 263680 Peak Rate Factor ................................................................. 484 Weighted Curve Number ..................................................... 62.83 Rain Gage ID .......................................................................Rain Gage-01 Composite Curve Number 32 Area Soil Curve Soil/Surface Description (ft²)Group Number Paved parking & roofs 0 C 98 Gravel roads 12920.33 B 85 Gravel roads 5009.92 C 89 Pasture, grassland, or range, Good 243376.65 B 61 Pasture, grassland, or range, Good 2373.11 C 74 Composite Area & Weighted CN 263680.01 62.83 Time of Concentration TOC Method : SCS TR-55 Sheet Flow Equation : Tc = (0.007 * ((n * Lf)^0.8)) / ((P^0.5) * (Sf^0.4)) Where : Tc = Time of Concentration (hr) n = Manning's roughness Lf = Flow Length (ft) P = 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (inches) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Shallow Concentrated Flow Equation : V = 16.1345 * (Sf^0.5) (unpaved surface) V = 20.3282 * (Sf^0.5) (paved surface) V = 15.0 * (Sf^0.5) (grassed waterway surface) V = 10.0 * (Sf^0.5) (nearly bare & untilled surface) V = 9.0 * (Sf^0.5) (cultivated straight rows surface) V = 7.0 * (Sf^0.5) (short grass pasture surface) V = 5.0 * (Sf^0.5) (woodland surface) V = 2.5 * (Sf^0.5) (forest w/heavy litter surface) Tc = (Lf / V) / (3600 sec/hr) Where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hr) Lf = Flow Length (ft) V = Velocity (ft/sec) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Channel Flow Equation : V = (1.49 * (R^(2/3)) * (Sf^0.5)) / n R = Aq / Wp Tc = (Lf / V) / (3600 sec/hr) Where : Tc = Time of Concentration (hr) Lf = Flow Length (ft) R = Hydraulic Radius (ft) Aq = Flow Area (ft²) Wp = Wetted Perimeter (ft) V = Velocity (ft/sec) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) n = Manning's roughness 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 2-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Subarea Subarea Subarea Sheet Flow Computations A B C Manning's Roughness :0.13 0 0 Flow Length (ft) :100 0 0 Slope (%) :6 0 0 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in) :1.2 0 0 Velocity (ft/sec) :0.18 0 0 Computed Flow Time (min) :9.2 0 0 Subarea Subarea Subarea Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations A B C Flow Length (ft) :750 200 0 Slope (%) :4.3 3 0 Surface Type :Grass pasture Grassed waterway Grassed waterway Velocity (ft/sec) :1.45 2.6 0 Computed Flow Time (min) :8.62 1.28 0 Total TOC (min) ..................19.10 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in) ................................................................. 1.05 Total Runoff (in) .................................................................. 0 Peak Runoff (cfs) ................................................................. 0 Weighted Curve Number ..................................................... 62.83 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) .............................. 0 00:19:06 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 2-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Subbasin : Pre_ROW Input Data Area (ft²) ............................................................................. 263680 Peak Rate Factor ................................................................. 484 Weighted Curve Number ..................................................... 61.36 Rain Gage ID .......................................................................Rain Gage-01 Composite Curve Number 32 Area Soil Curve Soil/Surface Description (ft²)Group Number Pasture, grassland, or range, Good 256296.98 B 61 Pasture, grassland, or range, Good 7383.03 C 74 Composite Area & Weighted CN 263680.01 61.36 Time of Concentration Subarea Subarea Subarea Sheet Flow Computations A B C Manning's Roughness :0.13 0 0 Flow Length (ft) :100 0 0 Slope (%) :6 0 0 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in) :1.2 0 0 Velocity (ft/sec) :0.18 0 0 Computed Flow Time (min) :9.2 0 0 Subarea Subarea Subarea Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations A B C Flow Length (ft) :930 0 0 Slope (%) :4.3 0 0 Surface Type :Grass pasture Grass pasture Grassed waterway Velocity (ft/sec) :1.45 0 0 Computed Flow Time (min) :10.69 0 0 Total TOC (min) ..................19.88 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in) ................................................................. 1.05 Total Runoff (in) .................................................................. 0 Peak Runoff (cfs) ................................................................. 0 Weighted Curve Number ..................................................... 61.36 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) .............................. 0 00:19:53 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 2-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Storage Nodes Storage Node : Bio-ROW Input Data 5808.00 5810.00 2.00 5808.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Infiltration/Exfiltration 0.17 Storage Area Volume Curves Storage Curve : Retention-300sf x 2' Stage Storage Storage Area Volume (ft)(ft²) (ft³) 0 300 0 1 538 419 2 833 1104.5 Invert Elevation (ft) .......................................................... Max (Rim) Elevation (ft) ................................................... Max (Rim) Offset (ft) ........................................................ Initial Water Elevation (ft) ................................................ Initial Water Depth (ft) .................................................... Ponded Area (ft²) ............................................................. Evaporation Loss .............................................................. Exfiltration Rate (in/hr) .................................................... 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 2-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Storage Area Volume Curves Storage Area Storage Volume Storage Area (ft²) 800750700650600550500450400350300 Storage Volume (ft³) 1,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 S t a g e ( f t ) 2 1.95 1.9 1.85 1.8 1.75 1.7 1.65 1.6 1.55 1.5 1.45 1.4 1.35 1.3 1.25 1.2 1.15 1.1 1.05 1 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 S t a g e ( f t ) 2 1.95 1.9 1.85 1.8 1.75 1.7 1.65 1.6 1.55 1.5 1.45 1.4 1.35 1.3 1.25 1.2 1.15 1.1 1.05 1 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 2-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Storage Node : Bio-ROW (continued) Outflow Weirs SN Element Weir Flap Crest Crest Length Weir Total Discharge ID Type Gate Elevation Offset Height Coefficient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 Overflow_ROW Rectangular No 5809.50 1.50 1.00 1.00 3.33 Output Summary Results 0 0 0 0.07 5808 0 5808 0 0 00:00 0 0 0 0 Peak Exfiltration Flow Rate (cfm) ..................................... Peak Inflow (cfs) .............................................................. Peak Lateral Inflow (cfs) ................................................... Peak Outflow (cfs) ............................................................ Total Flooded Volume (ac-in) ........................................... Total Time Flooded (min) ................................................. Total Retention Time (sec) ............................................... Max HGL Elevation Attained (ft) ....................................... Max HGL Depth Attained (ft) ............................................ Average HGL Elevation Attained (ft) ................................. Average HGL Depth Attained (ft) ...................................... Time of Max HGL Occurrence (days hh:mm) .................... Total Exfiltration Volume (1000-ft³) ................................. 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 25-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Project Description 09016-SSA.SPF Project Options CFS Elevation SCS TR-20 SCS TR-55 Hydrodynamic YES YES Rainfall Details SN Rain Gage Data Data Source Rainfall Rain State County Return Rainfall Rainfall ID Source ID Type Units Period Depth Distribution (years) (inches) 49 Time Series Silt-25yr Intensity inches Colorado Garfield 25.00 1.77 SCS Type II 24-hr Enable Overflow Ponding at Nodes .......... Skip Steady State Analysis Time Periods ... File Name ................................................ Flow Units ............................................... Elevation Type ......................................... Hydrology Method .................................. Time of Concentration (TOC) Method ...... Link Routing Method ............................... 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 25-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Subbasin Summary SN Subbasin Area Peak Rate Weighted Total Total Total Peak Time of ID Factor Curve Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Concentration Number Volume (ft²)(in) (in) (ft³) (cfs) (days hh:mm:ss) 1 Dev_ROW 48 484.00 62.83 1.77 0.05 1164.6 0.04 0 00:19:06 2 Pre_ROW 48 484.00 61.36 1.77 0.04 835.0 0.02 0 00:19:52 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 25-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Node Summary SN Element Element Invert Ground/Rim Initial Surcharge Ponded Peak Max HGL Max Min Time of Total Total Time ID Type Elevation (Max) Water Elevation Area Inflow Elevation Surcharge Freeboard Peak Flooded Flooded Elevation Elevation Attained Depth Attained Flooding Volume Attained Occurrence (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft²) (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (days hh:mm) (ac-in) (min) 1 Out_Dev_ROW Outfall 5808.00 0.02 5808.00 2 Out-Pre_ROW Outfall 5808.00 0.02 5808.00 3 Bio-ROW Storage Node 5808.00 5810.00 5808.00 0.00 0.04 5809.53 0.00 0.00 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 25-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Link Summary SN Element Element From To (Outlet) Length Inlet Outlet Average Diameter or Manning's Peak Design Flow Peak Flow/ Peak Flow Peak Flow Peak Flow Total Time ID Type (Inlet) Node Invert Invert Slope Height Roughness Flow Capacity Design Flow Velocity Depth Depth/ Surcharged Node Elevation Elevation Ratio Total Depth Ratio (ft) (ft) (ft) (%) (in)(cfs) (cfs)(ft/sec) (ft)(min) 1 Overflow_ROW Weir Bio-ROW Out_Dev_ROW 5808.00 5808.00 0.02 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 25-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Subbasin Hydrology Subbasin : Dev_ROW Input Data Area (ft²) ............................................................................. 263680 Peak Rate Factor ................................................................. 484 Weighted Curve Number ..................................................... 62.83 Rain Gage ID .......................................................................Rain Gage-01 Composite Curve Number 32 Area Soil Curve Soil/Surface Description (ft²)Group Number Paved parking & roofs 0 C 98 Gravel roads 12920.33 B 85 Gravel roads 5009.92 C 89 Pasture, grassland, or range, Good 243376.65 B 61 Pasture, grassland, or range, Good 2373.11 C 74 Composite Area & Weighted CN 263680.01 62.83 Time of Concentration TOC Method : SCS TR-55 Sheet Flow Equation : Tc = (0.007 * ((n * Lf)^0.8)) / ((P^0.5) * (Sf^0.4)) Where : Tc = Time of Concentration (hr) n = Manning's roughness Lf = Flow Length (ft) P = 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (inches) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Shallow Concentrated Flow Equation : V = 16.1345 * (Sf^0.5) (unpaved surface) V = 20.3282 * (Sf^0.5) (paved surface) V = 15.0 * (Sf^0.5) (grassed waterway surface) V = 10.0 * (Sf^0.5) (nearly bare & untilled surface) V = 9.0 * (Sf^0.5) (cultivated straight rows surface) V = 7.0 * (Sf^0.5) (short grass pasture surface) V = 5.0 * (Sf^0.5) (woodland surface) V = 2.5 * (Sf^0.5) (forest w/heavy litter surface) Tc = (Lf / V) / (3600 sec/hr) Where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hr) Lf = Flow Length (ft) V = Velocity (ft/sec) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Channel Flow Equation : V = (1.49 * (R^(2/3)) * (Sf^0.5)) / n R = Aq / Wp Tc = (Lf / V) / (3600 sec/hr) Where : Tc = Time of Concentration (hr) Lf = Flow Length (ft) R = Hydraulic Radius (ft) Aq = Flow Area (ft²) Wp = Wetted Perimeter (ft) V = Velocity (ft/sec) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) n = Manning's roughness 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 25-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Subarea Subarea Subarea Sheet Flow Computations A B C Manning's Roughness :0.13 0 0 Flow Length (ft) :100 0 0 Slope (%) :6 0 0 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in) :1.2 0 0 Velocity (ft/sec) :0.18 0 0 Computed Flow Time (min) :9.2 0 0 Subarea Subarea Subarea Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations A B C Flow Length (ft) :750 200 0 Slope (%) :4.3 3 0 Surface Type :Grass pasture Grassed waterway Grassed waterway Velocity (ft/sec) :1.45 2.6 0 Computed Flow Time (min) :8.62 1.28 0 Total TOC (min) ..................19.10 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in) ................................................................. 1.77 Total Runoff (in) .................................................................. 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs) ................................................................. 0.04 Weighted Curve Number ..................................................... 62.83 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) .............................. 0 00:19:06 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 25-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Subbasin : Pre_ROW Input Data Area (ft²) ............................................................................. 263680 Peak Rate Factor ................................................................. 484 Weighted Curve Number ..................................................... 61.36 Rain Gage ID .......................................................................Rain Gage-01 Composite Curve Number 32 Area Soil Curve Soil/Surface Description (ft²)Group Number Pasture, grassland, or range, Good 256296.98 B 61 Pasture, grassland, or range, Good 7383.03 C 74 Composite Area & Weighted CN 263680.01 61.36 Time of Concentration Subarea Subarea Subarea Sheet Flow Computations A B C Manning's Roughness :0.13 0 0 Flow Length (ft) :100 0 0 Slope (%) :6 0 0 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in) :1.2 0 0 Velocity (ft/sec) :0.18 0 0 Computed Flow Time (min) :9.2 0 0 Subarea Subarea Subarea Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations A B C Flow Length (ft) :930 0 0 Slope (%) :4.3 0 0 Surface Type :Grass pasture Grass pasture Grassed waterway Velocity (ft/sec) :1.45 0 0 Computed Flow Time (min) :10.69 0 0 Total TOC (min) ..................19.88 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in) ................................................................. 1.77 Total Runoff (in) .................................................................. 0.04 Peak Runoff (cfs) ................................................................. 0.02 Weighted Curve Number ..................................................... 61.36 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) .............................. 0 00:19:53 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 25-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Storage Nodes Storage Node : Bio-ROW Input Data 5808.00 5810.00 2.00 5808.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Infiltration/Exfiltration 0.17 Storage Area Volume Curves Storage Curve : Retention-300sf x 2' Stage Storage Storage Area Volume (ft)(ft²) (ft³) 0 300 0 1 538 419 2 833 1104.5 Invert Elevation (ft) .......................................................... Max (Rim) Elevation (ft) ................................................... Max (Rim) Offset (ft) ........................................................ Initial Water Elevation (ft) ................................................ Initial Water Depth (ft) .................................................... Ponded Area (ft²) ............................................................. Evaporation Loss .............................................................. Exfiltration Rate (in/hr) .................................................... 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 25-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Storage Area Volume Curves Storage Area Storage Volume Storage Area (ft²) 800750700650600550500450400350300 Storage Volume (ft³) 1,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 S t a g e ( f t ) 2 1.95 1.9 1.85 1.8 1.75 1.7 1.65 1.6 1.55 1.5 1.45 1.4 1.35 1.3 1.25 1.2 1.15 1.1 1.05 1 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 S t a g e ( f t ) 2 1.95 1.9 1.85 1.8 1.75 1.7 1.65 1.6 1.55 1.5 1.45 1.4 1.35 1.3 1.25 1.2 1.15 1.1 1.05 1 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 25-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Storage Node : Bio-ROW (continued) Outflow Weirs SN Element Weir Flap Crest Crest Length Weir Total Discharge ID Type Gate Elevation Offset Height Coefficient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 Overflow_ROW Rectangular No 5809.50 1.50 1.00 1.00 3.33 Output Summary Results 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.16 5809.53 1.53 5808.56 0.56 0 20:11 0.099 0 0 21460.23 Peak Exfiltration Flow Rate (cfm) ..................................... Peak Inflow (cfs) .............................................................. Peak Lateral Inflow (cfs) ................................................... Peak Outflow (cfs) ............................................................ Total Flooded Volume (ac-in) ........................................... Total Time Flooded (min) ................................................. Total Retention Time (sec) ............................................... Max HGL Elevation Attained (ft) ....................................... Max HGL Depth Attained (ft) ............................................ Average HGL Elevation Attained (ft) ................................. Average HGL Depth Attained (ft) ...................................... Time of Max HGL Occurrence (days hh:mm) .................... Total Exfiltration Volume (1000-ft³) ................................. 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 100-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Project Description 09016-SSA.SPF Project Options CFS Elevation SCS TR-20 SCS TR-55 Hydrodynamic YES YES Rainfall Details SN Rain Gage Data Data Source Rainfall Rain State County Return Rainfall Rainfall ID Source ID Type Units Period Depth Distribution (years) (inches) 49 Time Series Silt-100yr Intensity inches Colorado Garfield 100.00 2.24 SCS Type II 24-hr Enable Overflow Ponding at Nodes .......... Skip Steady State Analysis Time Periods ... File Name ................................................ Flow Units ............................................... Elevation Type ......................................... Hydrology Method .................................. Time of Concentration (TOC) Method ...... Link Routing Method ............................... 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 100-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Subbasin Summary SN Subbasin Area Peak Rate Weighted Total Total Total Peak Time of ID Factor Curve Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Concentration Number Volume (ft²)(in) (in) (ft³) (cfs) (days hh:mm:ss) 1 Dev_ROW 48 484.00 62.83 2.24 0.16 3515.7 0.39 0 00:19:06 2 Pre_ROW 48 484.00 61.36 2.24 0.13 2900.5 0.24 0 00:19:52 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 100-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Node Summary SN Element Element Invert Ground/Rim Initial Surcharge Ponded Peak Max HGL Max Min Time of Total Total Time ID Type Elevation (Max) Water Elevation Area Inflow Elevation Surcharge Freeboard Peak Flooded Flooded Elevation Elevation Attained Depth Attained Flooding Volume Attained Occurrence (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft²) (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (days hh:mm) (ac-in) (min) 1 Out_Dev_ROW Outfall 5808.00 0.14 5808.00 2 Out-Pre_ROW Outfall 5808.00 0.23 5808.00 3 Bio-ROW Storage Node 5808.00 5810.00 5808.00 0.00 0.39 5809.62 0.00 0.00 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 100-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Link Summary SN Element Element From To (Outlet) Length Inlet Outlet Average Diameter or Manning's Peak Design Flow Peak Flow/ Peak Flow Peak Flow Peak Flow Total Time ID Type (Inlet) Node Invert Invert Slope Height Roughness Flow Capacity Design Flow Velocity Depth Depth/ Surcharged Node Elevation Elevation Ratio Total Depth Ratio (ft) (ft) (ft) (%) (in)(cfs) (cfs)(ft/sec) (ft)(min) 1 Overflow_ROW Weir Bio-ROW Out_Dev_ROW 5808.00 5808.00 0.14 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 100-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Subbasin Hydrology Subbasin : Dev_ROW Input Data Area (ft²) ............................................................................. 263680 Peak Rate Factor ................................................................. 484 Weighted Curve Number ..................................................... 62.83 Rain Gage ID .......................................................................Rain Gage-01 Composite Curve Number 32 Area Soil Curve Soil/Surface Description (ft²)Group Number Paved parking & roofs 0 C 98 Gravel roads 12920.33 B 85 Gravel roads 5009.92 C 89 Pasture, grassland, or range, Good 243376.65 B 61 Pasture, grassland, or range, Good 2373.11 C 74 Composite Area & Weighted CN 263680.01 62.83 Time of Concentration TOC Method : SCS TR-55 Sheet Flow Equation : Tc = (0.007 * ((n * Lf)^0.8)) / ((P^0.5) * (Sf^0.4)) Where : Tc = Time of Concentration (hr) n = Manning's roughness Lf = Flow Length (ft) P = 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (inches) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Shallow Concentrated Flow Equation : V = 16.1345 * (Sf^0.5) (unpaved surface) V = 20.3282 * (Sf^0.5) (paved surface) V = 15.0 * (Sf^0.5) (grassed waterway surface) V = 10.0 * (Sf^0.5) (nearly bare & untilled surface) V = 9.0 * (Sf^0.5) (cultivated straight rows surface) V = 7.0 * (Sf^0.5) (short grass pasture surface) V = 5.0 * (Sf^0.5) (woodland surface) V = 2.5 * (Sf^0.5) (forest w/heavy litter surface) Tc = (Lf / V) / (3600 sec/hr) Where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hr) Lf = Flow Length (ft) V = Velocity (ft/sec) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Channel Flow Equation : V = (1.49 * (R^(2/3)) * (Sf^0.5)) / n R = Aq / Wp Tc = (Lf / V) / (3600 sec/hr) Where : Tc = Time of Concentration (hr) Lf = Flow Length (ft) R = Hydraulic Radius (ft) Aq = Flow Area (ft²) Wp = Wetted Perimeter (ft) V = Velocity (ft/sec) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) n = Manning's roughness 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 100-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Subarea Subarea Subarea Sheet Flow Computations A B C Manning's Roughness :0.13 0 0 Flow Length (ft) :100 0 0 Slope (%) :6 0 0 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in) :1.2 0 0 Velocity (ft/sec) :0.18 0 0 Computed Flow Time (min) :9.2 0 0 Subarea Subarea Subarea Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations A B C Flow Length (ft) :750 200 0 Slope (%) :4.3 3 0 Surface Type :Grass pasture Grassed waterway Grassed waterway Velocity (ft/sec) :1.45 2.6 0 Computed Flow Time (min) :8.62 1.28 0 Total TOC (min) ..................19.10 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in) ................................................................. 2.24 Total Runoff (in) .................................................................. 0.16 Peak Runoff (cfs) ................................................................. 0.39 Weighted Curve Number ..................................................... 62.83 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) .............................. 0 00:19:06 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 100-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Subbasin : Pre_ROW Input Data Area (ft²) ............................................................................. 263680 Peak Rate Factor ................................................................. 484 Weighted Curve Number ..................................................... 61.36 Rain Gage ID .......................................................................Rain Gage-01 Composite Curve Number 32 Area Soil Curve Soil/Surface Description (ft²)Group Number Pasture, grassland, or range, Good 256296.98 B 61 Pasture, grassland, or range, Good 7383.03 C 74 Composite Area & Weighted CN 263680.01 61.36 Time of Concentration Subarea Subarea Subarea Sheet Flow Computations A B C Manning's Roughness :0.13 0 0 Flow Length (ft) :100 0 0 Slope (%) :6 0 0 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in) :1.2 0 0 Velocity (ft/sec) :0.18 0 0 Computed Flow Time (min) :9.2 0 0 Subarea Subarea Subarea Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations A B C Flow Length (ft) :930 0 0 Slope (%) :4.3 0 0 Surface Type :Grass pasture Grass pasture Grassed waterway Velocity (ft/sec) :1.45 0 0 Computed Flow Time (min) :10.69 0 0 Total TOC (min) ..................19.88 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in) ................................................................. 2.24 Total Runoff (in) .................................................................. 0.13 Peak Runoff (cfs) ................................................................. 0.24 Weighted Curve Number ..................................................... 61.36 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) .............................. 0 00:19:53 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 100-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Storage Nodes Storage Node : Bio-ROW Input Data 5808.00 5810.00 2.00 5808.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Infiltration/Exfiltration 0.17 Storage Area Volume Curves Storage Curve : Retention-300sf x 2' Stage Storage Storage Area Volume (ft)(ft²) (ft³) 0 300 0 1 538 419 2 833 1104.5 Invert Elevation (ft) .......................................................... Max (Rim) Elevation (ft) ................................................... Max (Rim) Offset (ft) ........................................................ Initial Water Elevation (ft) ................................................ Initial Water Depth (ft) .................................................... Ponded Area (ft²) ............................................................. Evaporation Loss .............................................................. Exfiltration Rate (in/hr) .................................................... 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 100-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Storage Area Volume Curves Storage Area Storage Volume Storage Area (ft²) 800750700650600550500450400350300 Storage Volume (ft³) 1,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 S t a g e ( f t ) 2 1.95 1.9 1.85 1.8 1.75 1.7 1.65 1.6 1.55 1.5 1.45 1.4 1.35 1.3 1.25 1.2 1.15 1.1 1.05 1 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 S t a g e ( f t ) 2 1.95 1.9 1.85 1.8 1.75 1.7 1.65 1.6 1.55 1.5 1.45 1.4 1.35 1.3 1.25 1.2 1.15 1.1 1.05 1 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== 100-year 24-hour Storm Event BUI#09016.03 Storage Node : Bio-ROW (continued) Outflow Weirs SN Element Weir Flap Crest Crest Length Weir Total Discharge ID Type Gate Elevation Offset Height Coefficient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 Overflow_ROW Rectangular No 5809.50 1.50 1.00 1.00 3.33 Output Summary Results 0.39 0.39 0.14 0.17 5809.62 1.62 5808.76 0.76 0 13:13 0.121 0 0 14557.57 Peak Exfiltration Flow Rate (cfm) ..................................... Peak Inflow (cfs) .............................................................. Peak Lateral Inflow (cfs) ................................................... Peak Outflow (cfs) ............................................................ Total Flooded Volume (ac-in) ........................................... Total Time Flooded (min) ................................................. Total Retention Time (sec) ............................................... Max HGL Elevation Attained (ft) ....................................... Max HGL Depth Attained (ft) ............................................ Average HGL Elevation Attained (ft) ................................. Average HGL Depth Attained (ft) ...................................... Time of Max HGL Occurrence (days hh:mm) .................... Total Exfiltration Volume (1000-ft³) ................................. 923 Cooper Ave., Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Boundaries Unlimited Inc. www.bu-inc.com Deric Walter, PE 970.945.5252 ====== ====== Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Thursday, Apr 20 2023 09016.03 1.5' Deep Roadside Ditch/Swale Capacity Triangular Side Slopes (z:1) = 3.00, 3.00 Total Depth (ft) = 1.50 Invert Elev (ft) = 100.00 Slope (%)= 3.00 N-Value = 0.030 Calculations Compute by:Known Depth Known Depth (ft) = 1.00 Highlighted Depth (ft)= 1.00 Q (cfs)= 15.65 Area (sqft)= 3.00 Velocity (ft/s)= 5.22 Wetted Perim (ft) = 6.32 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 1.12 Top Width (ft)= 6.00 EGL (ft)= 1.42 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Elev (ft)Depth (ft)Section 99.50 -0.50 100.00 0.00 100.50 0.50 101.00 1.00 101.50 1.50 102.00 2.00 Reach (ft) Hydrologic Soil Group—Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties (09016.03-Red Dog Major Sub.) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 4/19/2023 Page 1 of 4 43 8 3 9 5 0 43 8 4 0 0 0 43 8 4 0 5 0 43 8 4 1 0 0 43 8 4 1 5 0 43 8 4 2 0 0 43 8 4 2 5 0 43 8 3 9 5 0 43 8 4 0 0 0 43 8 4 0 5 0 43 8 4 1 0 0 43 8 4 1 5 0 43 8 4 2 0 0 43 8 4 2 5 0 271360 271410 271460 271510 271560 271610 271660 271710 271760 271810 271860 271360 271410 271460 271510 271560 271610 271660 271710 271760 271810 271860 39° 34' 40'' N 10 7 ° 3 9 ' 4 3 ' ' W 39° 34' 40'' N 10 7 ° 3 9 ' 2 1 ' ' W 39° 34' 28'' N 10 7 ° 3 9 ' 4 3 ' ' W 39° 34' 28'' N 10 7 ° 3 9 ' 2 1 ' ' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 0 100 200 400 600Feet 0 35 70 140 210Meters Map Scale: 1:2,430 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 6, 2022 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 25, 2021—Sep 5, 2021 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Hydrologic Soil Group—Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties (09016.03-Red Dog Major Sub.) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 4/19/2023 Page 2 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 50 Olney loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes B 16.6 55.5% 55 Potts loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes C 13.3 44.5% Totals for Area of Interest 30.0 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Hydrologic Soil Group—Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties 09016.03-Red Dog Major Sub. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 4/19/2023 Page 3 of 4 Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher Hydrologic Soil Group—Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties 09016.03-Red Dog Major Sub. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 4/19/2023 Page 4 of 4 Page 1 of 3 Mountain View Subdivision BUI#09016.02 Major Subdivision Application December 18, 2024 Basic Traffic Analysis The purpose of this document is to provide a basic engineered analysis for traffic generated from the proposed Mountain View Subdivision in Garfield County, Colorado (aka Lot 4 Simon Subdivision Exemption Plat, RN 544219). The property is owned by Red Dog, LLC and was previously developed with an irrigation pond, a gravel drive and a dirt drive. The property is currently accessed from the east by a permitted gravel drive off County Road #261 (aka Groff Lane) (Garfield County Driveway Permit No. GRB16-D-18) and from the west by a dirt drive off Columbine Lane. Columbine Lane is within the Peach Valley Orchard Subdivision and affords access to the subject property under the recorded Grant of Easements and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for apportion of Peach Valley Orchard and Simon Subdivision Exemption (RN54658). The Applicant proposes to subdivide the property into five (5) lots. Lots 4-A thru 4-D will be accessed from CR #261 at the existing driveway point. Lot 4-E will be accessed from Columbine Lane the existing access point located at the intersection of Columbine Lane and Larkspur Court. The following Exhibit-1 provides an aerial view of the proposed subdivision. Exhibit 1 (Site, Roadways and Accesses) Page 2 of 3 Based on field measurements, County Road #261 has a paved width of approximately 23.5’ with 6” gravel shoulders and the posted speed limit is 25 mph. Columbine Lane has a gravel width of approximately 16’. There are no existing sidewalks or public trails on either roadways. The proposed traffic trip generation has been estimated as follows: Proposed Conditions Description/ITE Code *ITE Vehicle Trip Generation Rates # Units Total Generated Trips Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Single Family Homes (210) 9.44 0.76 0.99 5 47.20 3.80 4.95 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise (220) 7.32 0.46 0.56 5 36.60 2.30 2.80 Total: 83.80 6.10 7.75 *Based on Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th ed. Table 1, Trip Generation Estimates Based on information provided by Garfield County Road & Bridge the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) in was recorded at 446 trips in 2014 and 514 trips in 2019. Based on this growth rate, the estimated current (2023) ADT can be estimated at approximately 568 trips. Given that the proposed traffic from the proposed subdivision is less than 20% (14.8%) of this estimate, no improvements appear to be warranted to CR#261. While County traffic data is not available for Columbine Lane, an observation of County GIS mapping indicates that the roadway provides access to ten (10) properties, including the subject property. As stated previously, only the proposed Lot 5 will be accessed from this roadway. Therefore, using the same ITE Single Family Homes (210) values stated above, the estimated ADT for Columbine Lane should remain at approximately 95 trips per day. This value resides within the Semi Primitive category of Table 7-107 which requires a lane width of 8’ (16’ total width) and a gravel surface, which is what currently exists. Therefore, the proposed subdivision should not warranty any improvements to Columbine Lane. According to LUDC Table 7-107 “Roadway Standards”, the access to Lots 4-A thru 4-D will be Semi Primitive (21-100 ADT; 40’ ROW; 8’ lane width; 2’ shoulder width’ 4’ ditch width; 3% gravel cross slope; 5% shoulder slope; 50’ min. radius; 12% max. grade; gravel surface, existing concrete apron, existing culvert at the ditch crossing, roadway runoff will not reach the accessed road). The private driveway for Lot 4-E will be constructed according to County driveway standards for access off a gravel road (90° intersection; 3% max. grade for first 30’; 300’ visibility in both directions; existing culvert at the ditch crossing; driveway runoff will not reach the accessed road). The following directly addresses LUDC Section 7-107 A-E: • 7-107-A: The proposed Lots 4-A thru 4-D already have legal and existing physical access to a public right-of-way under Permit # GRB16-D-18 (attached) and Lot 4-E has a legal access to Columbine Lane under the recorded Grant of Easements and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for apportion of Peach Valley Orchard and Simon Subdivision Exemption (RN54658). Page 3 of 3 • 7-017-B: The accesses and road/drive will be reconstructed to provide safe access in conformance with County regulations. • 7-107-C: The access and road/drive will be constructed in accordance with LUDC Table 7-107 and Road and Bridge driveway requirements and roadway impact fees shall be paid as necessary for the additional four (4) lots. • 7-107-D: The subdivision road off CR#261 will be dedicated to the public and so designated on the Final Plat and is not anticipated to be accepted as County roads. • 7-107-E: The proposed subdivision will produce minor traffic trip increases on Columbine Lane, CR#250 (Bendetti Road) and CR#261. The proposed residential subdivision will not produce any hauling, truck traffic or equipment use that would warrant offsite roadway improvements. • 7-107-F: All accesses will be constructed in accordance with LUDC Table 7-107 and Road and Bridge driveway requirements. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at 970.945.5252. Sincerely, BOUNDARIES UNLIMITED INC. Deric J. Walter, PE Enc. Mountain View Subdivision BUI#09016.02 Major Subdivision Application December 18, 2024 Water Supply & Distribution Plan This Water Supply & Distribution Plan is provided in accordance with Article 4 Section 4-203.M of the Garfield County Unified Land Use and Development Code and follows the outline provided therein. M1. Water Supply: The proposed Mountain View Subdivision (aka Lot 4 Simonson Subdivision Exemption) is included in the Peach Valley Orchard Subdivision Public Water System (CDPHE ID#CO0123605). The five (5) proposed single-family lots will be connected to the existing distribution system as indicated on the Site Plan. a. The subject property was researched by Balcomb & Green, P.C. (B&G) and documented in the attached Due Diligence Review letter dated May 29, 2007 (with exhibits). In the letter, B&G concluded, “that Lot 4 of the Simons Subdivision Exemptions has an adequate legal water supply to subdivide this parcel into five residential lots with a main residence and an accessory dwelling unit on each and to continue the historical irrigation of approximately 12 acres, less the dry-up associates with roads and building envelopes.” b. Not Applicable. c. Please see the B&G Due Diligence Review letter. d. Not Applicable. The Applicant proposes to extend the existing irrigation pipeline along the north boundary with lateral services to each lot. The existing 7-foot deep lined irrigation pond will also be maintained and equipped with a dry hydrant for fire protection. M.2. Water Distribution: The existing potable water system is managed by the PVO/SSE HOA and maintained by Treatment Operator Mark Hayes. A 2” distribution lateral will be extended into the subdivision from the existing 2” distribution main to service Lots 4-B thru 4-D. The lateral will be equipped with a blowoff at the end. An individual service will be installed on the existing 2” distribution main to service Lot 4-E and an existing 1-1/2” service will be maintained for Lot 4-A. Attachments • Due Diligence Review, Balcomb & Green, P.C., dated May 29, 2007; • Grant of Easements and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for apportion of Peach Valley Orchard and Simon Subdivision Exemption (RN54658); • Change Notice: CDPHE PWSIDE CO0123605, dated April 7, 2022; • Email: CDPHE to Mark Hayes, dated June 8, 2022; • 2022 Drinking Water Quality Report. Prepared by: Acknowledged by: Deric J. Walter, PE Red Dog LLC - Terry Kirk Boundaries Unlimited Inc. Owner/Manager B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Edward Mulhall, Jr. Scott Balcomb Lawrence R. Green Timothy A. Thulson David C. Hallford Christopher L. Coyle Thomas J. Hartert Christopher L. Geiger Sara M. Dunn Daniel C. Wennogle Scott Grosscup P.O. DRAWER 790 818 COLORADO AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 ____________________________________ TELEPHONE: 970.945.6546 FACSIMILE: 970.945.8902 www.balcombgreen.com May 29, 2007 KENNETH BALCOMB 1920-2005 Of Counsel: John A. Thulson VIA email: kirkenterprises@cox.net Mr. Terry A. Kirk 12144 East Welsh Trail Scottsdale, AZ 85258 Re: Due Diligence Review for Lot 4 Simon Subdivision Exemption near Silt, Colorado. Dear Mr. Kirk: We have completed a reconnaissance level review of the water rights and associated water issues which arise out of your proposed purchase of approximately 27.52 acres also known as Lot 4 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption located north of Silt, Colorado, owned by North 27, LLC (“Seller”). Based upon our examination of the materials described below and our interviews with: John Currier, a partner in the North 27, LLC; Pearl Knight, secretary of the Silt Water Conservancy District; and Janet Maddock, manager of the West Divide Water Conservancy District, and subject to the limitations and exceptions set forth below, we have concluded that Lot 4 of the Simons Subdivision Exemption has an adequate legal water supply to subdivide this parcel into five residential lots with a main residence and an accessory dwelling unit on each and to continue the historical irrigation of approximately 12 acres, less the dry-up associated with roads and building envelopes. In performing our investigation, we reviewed the following documents: Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate dated April 1, 2007; the Counterproposal dated April 5, 2007; the Title Commitment issued by Land Title Guarantee Company dated April 12, 2007; a revised Title Commitment issued by Land Title Guarantee Company dated May 22, 2007; the Seller’s Property Disclosures dated January 27, 2007; the Bylaws of the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association Inc.; Project Information and Staff Comments from Garfield County regarding a Preliminary Plan submittal by North 27, LLC for the North 27 Subdivision dated May 8, 2000; the PVO-SSE HOA Proposed 2007 Annual Budget; a letter from John M. Currier, P.E., of Resource Engineering Inc., to Sherry Caloia dated November 23, 2002; a color aerial photograph of Lot 4 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption purportedly taken in 1999; an unsigned Final Plat of the Simon Subdivision Exemption prepared by Richard L. Holsan, Professional Land B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Terry A. Kirk May 30, 2007 Page 2 Surveyor, on February 11, 1999; the Articles of Incorporation of PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association, Inc.; an engineered drawing entitled “Relationship of North 27 Subdivision to PVO/SSE HOA dated December 20, 1999 prepared by Water Resource Consultants, LLC; the Decree (Part 1 of 2) and (Part 2 of 2) entered by the Division 5 Water Court in Case No. 00CW36, Application for Water Rights of the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association; a water allotment table entitled “PVO/SSE Water Rights Associated With Each Lot Acre-Feet Available in a “100%” Year” dated April 15, 2000; the Decree entered by the Division 5 Water Court in Case No. W-1452, Application for Water Rights of Fred I. Simon; the Final Plat of the Simon Subdivision Exemption recorded as Reception No. 544219 in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder on April 21, 1999; a Grant of Easement and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for a Portion of Peach Valley Orchard and Simon Subdivision Exemption recorded as Reception No. 546583 in Book 1133 at Page 54 in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder on June 3, 1999; a Quit Claim Deed recorded as Reception No. 553203 at Book 1153 at Page 743 in the Records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder; and Garfield County Commissioners Resolution No. 99-044 approving the Simon Subdivision Exemption. The Contract identifies the water rights to be transferred in Paragraph 6 as follows: “All water and water rights, ditches and ditch rights, well and well rights pertenant [sic] to the property including but not limited to the following described; domestic, irrigation and available community.” The Seller’s Disclosures indicate that the water rights associated with the property include both Silt Project water, referring to the Bureau of Reclamation’s Silt Project operated by the Silt Water Conservancy District, Farmers Irrigation Company water, and domestic water from a community system, subject to an augmentation plan which is consistent with our findings. Lot 4 of the Simons Subdivision Exemption Sonia Simon petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, for an exemption from the definition of “subdivision” for the division of a 165 acre tract into four tracts, referred to as the Simon Subdivision Exemption Lots 1 through 4. The Simon Subdivision Exemption was approved by Garfield County by Resolution No. 99-044 recorded as Reception No. 544154 in Book 1125 at Page 434 in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. A copy Resolution No. 99-044 is attached hereto as Exhibit A. A copy of the Final Plat for the Simon Subdivision Exemption was recorded on April 21, 1999 as Reception Number 544219 in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. Due to the size of the recorded Final Plat, we have attached as Exhibit B an unsigned copy of the plat that is identical to the recorded copy but could be scanned and saved electronically. Lot 4 is the southern-most parcel and is comprised of 27. 52 acres. B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Terry A. Kirk May 30, 2007 Page 3 All of the lots within the Simon Subdivision exemption were acquired by S.M.I., L.L.L.P., a Colorado Limited Liability Limited Partnership formed by David and Connie Hick. S.M.I., L.L.L.P. also acquired Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24 and 25 of Peach Valley Orchard. The Simon well is the domestic water source for the Peach Valley Orchard Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24 and 25, and the Simon Subdivision Exemption Lots 1 through 4, according to the Grant of Easement and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for a Portion of Peach Valley Orchard and Simon Subdivision Exemption (the “Covenants”) recorded as Reception Number 546583 at Book 1133, Page 54 in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder and attached hereto as Exhibit C. The Simon Well is located on the lot line between Lots 1 and 2 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption as indicated on the Final Plat. The Simon Well is a shallow well constructed in 1910 to an approximate depth of 20.5 feet according to the Registration of Decreed Existing Well form filed by the Simon Estate in 1997, approved and permitted as State Engineer Well Permit No. 049153-F. A copy of the Registration is attached hereto as Exhibit D. This well was decreed by the Division 5 Water Court in Case No. W-1452 for 0.11 c.f.s (50 gallons per minute) from Cozza Gulch, tributary to the Colorado River for domestic and irrigation use with a date of appropriation of May 31, 1910. A copy of the decree in Case No. W-1452 is attached hereto as Exhibit E. However, according to John Currier a 72-hour well production test was performed in 1999, and the well only produced 33 gallons per minutes (“g.p.m.”) continuously and was not capable of sustaining a 50 g.p.m. continuous production rate. According to the Covenants, the Simon Well and the water rights decreed in Case No. W-1452 were to be conveyed by Quit Claim Deed to the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association as “common facilities.” The PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association operates and maintains the Simon Well and related facilities as well as pays the annual fees for contract water purchased from the West Divide Water Conservancy District. Apparently the PVO/SSE Homeowners Association has outlined how the operation and maintenance of the well and domestic water system will occur in a document entitled “Management and Operations Plan, Potable Water Supply System, Peach Valley Orchard Subdivision and Simon Subdivision Exemption, Silt, Colorado, October 27, 1999.” However, we have been unable to acquire a copy of this document. The monthly dues to the PVO/SSE Homeowners Association are $110 per lot according to the 2007 proposed budget, a copy of which is attached hereto with the Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation for the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association as Exhibit F. Each lot, with the exception of Lot 4 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption, was entitled to a proportionate 1/25th share in the production of the Simon Well. Lot 4 was entitled to 8/25th share in the well (which equates to approximately 10.56 g.p.m. for Lot 4), as well as the right to use an additional 3/25th interest in the production of the Simon Well in the event that Lots 1 through 3 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption were ever to connect to a central water system as B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Terry A. Kirk May 30, 2007 Page 4 required by Garfield County and memorialized as Note 5 on the Final Plat.1 According to John Currier, the PVO/SSE central water system does not have any central storage for fire protection or to meet peak demands and it is apparently the responsibility of individual lot owners to provide in-house pressure storage tanks. This requirement was discussed by the County during the Lot 27 Subdivision application process, but does not appear in the Covenants. Seller acquired Lot 4 from S.M.I., L.L.L.P. As indicated in Note 7 on the Final Plat, the County approved the Simon Subdivision Exemption on the condition that no further divisions by exemption would be allowed. Therefore, when the Seller decided to seek to subdivide Lot 4 into five residential parcels, Seller filed an application with Garfield County for approval of the “North 27 Subdivision.” The lots ranged in size from 3.22 acres to 12.49 acres with an average lot size of 5.50 acres. During the referral process, both the County Engineer and the State Engineer voiced concern that the water source identified for the development, the Simon Well could not legally serve the proposed development without a court-approved plan for augmentation. Thus, the Staff recommended denial of the proposed North 27 Subdivision for failure to comply with the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations requiring “evidence that a water supply, sufficient in terms of quality, quantity and dependability, shall be available….” According to John Currier, Seller requested Garfield County table the application until such time as it could satisfy the Garfield County water supply requirements, but after spending more than two years in Water Court adjudicating the water supply and associated plan for augmentation for the North 27 Subdivision, the Seller’s Application was dropped from the County’s agenda and never received a formal approval or denial. Domestic Water Supply To rectify the apparent lack of legal water supply for the existing PVO/SSE development and the proposed North 27 Subdivision, the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association filed an application with the Division 5 Water Court to adjudicate two enlargements of the Simon Well and a plan for augmentation to replace out-of-priority depletions associated with the domestic and limited irrigation uses of the Simon Well. The Water Court bifurcated Case No. 00CW36 into two parts. The first part of the decree referred to as Part 1 of 2 adjudicated the PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargement and a plan for augmentation for the existing development, including 1 According to the Covenants and Note 5 of the Final Plat, if any of Lots 1, 2 and/or 3 have the reasonable ability to connect with any municipal or centralized water and/or sewer system, such lot will be required to connect to said service within one year of the effective date of service availability and disconnect from the Simon Well. The proportionate interest in the Simon Well associated with the Lot(s) which connected to the municipal system shall revert to the owner of Lot 4. B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Terry A. Kirk May 30, 2007 Page 5 one residential unit to be located on Lot 4 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption. The second part of the decree (Part 2 of 2) approved a legal water supply for the proposed North 27 Subdivision. In Case No. 00CW36 (Part 1 of 2), the Division 5 Water Court granted a new junior water right to the Simon Well (“PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargement”) in the amount of 4.06 acre feet absolute for domestic use in the existing 9 residential units and 4.06 acre feet, conditional, for domestic use in 9 residential units that were not built at the time the Water Court entered the decree (total of 14 lots in PVO and 4 lots in SSE), irrigation in the amount of 9,000 square feet (500 square feet for each of 18 residential lots), fire protection, and livestock watering. A copy of the Decree is attached hereto as Exhibit G. An application for finding of reasonable diligence for the conditional portion of the PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargement is due on or before May 31, 2008 to prevent the cancellation of the 4.06 acre feet conditional portion of the water right. The PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargement is a very junior water right with a date of appropriation of February 9, 2000. Therefore, the PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargement will be out- of-priority during much of the year and must operate pursuant to a plan for augmentation which can replace all out-of-priority depletions to prevent injury to senior water rights both on Cozza Gulch and the Colorado River mainstem. The Water Court approved a plan for augmentation in Case No. 00CW36 (Part 1of 2) for the PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargement which includes two sources of replacement water: senior irrigation water which was historically used to irrigate 2.3 acres within the PVO/SSE property which will be dried-up due to construction of roads and the designation of building envelopes; and water from Green Mountain Reservoir and/or Ruedi Reservoir pursuant to a Water Allotment Contract with the West Divide Water Conservancy District. As indicated on Figure 1, attached hereto as Exhibit H, the PVO/SSE properties are partially located in the Harvey Gap drainage and partially located within the Cozza Gulch Drainage. As such the Court required that 1.15 acres in the Cozza Gulch drainage be dried up and 1.15 acres in the Harvey Gap drainage be dried-up to provide sufficient replacement water to augment local calls on Cozza Gulch including the Coleman Ditch, the Cozza No. 2 Ditch, the John Bruess Ditch and the Cozza Spring Ditch which are senior irrigation water rights. The dry-up area was associated with 3 shares of Applicant’s Farmers Irrigation Company (“FICo”) water rights. The FICo shares entitled Applicant to 0.07 c.f.s. from the Grass Valley Canal and 3.30 acre feet from the Grass Valley Reservoir a/k/a Harvey Gap Reservoir, both sources tributary to the East Fork of Rifle Creek. The plan for augmentation requires the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association to continue to divert this water through its irrigation system and by-pass this water into Cozza Gulch to satisfy any calls with Cozza Gulch which could occur between April 15th and October 15th, the normal irrigation season. To satisfy calls on the Colorado River mainstem that come from a block of irrigation rights under the Cameo call B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Terry A. Kirk May 30, 2007 Page 6 which normally is in place from early July through late October, the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association also obtained a contract with West Divide Water Conservancy District for 2.0 acre feet to be released from Green Mountain Reservoir located on the Blue River, a tributary of the Colorado River or Ruedi Reservoir, located on the Fryingpan River, a tributary of the Roaring Fork River, tributary of the Colorado River. In Case No. 00CW36 (Part 2 of 2), the Water Court approved the PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of the Simon Well for 3.8 acre feet conditional for domestic uses in 9 residential units (4 primary units and 5 accessory dwelling units) with a total of 2,000 square feet of irrigation (500 square feet per residential lot) with a date of appropriation of February 9, 2000. A copy of the decree is attached hereto as Exhibit I. The Water Court in Case No. 00CW36 maintained the original diversion rate for the Simon Well at 0.11 c.f.s. and simply raised the annual volumetric limit based on the additional proposed uses. The Water Court also approved the PVO/SSE Well No. 1 as an alternate point of diversion for the PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargements 1 and 2, for 0.11 c.f.s., conditional, with an annual volumetric limit of 12 acre feet for domestic use in 27 residential units, irrigation of up to 11,000 square feet (500 square feet on 22 lots), fire protection and livestock watering with a date of appropriation of February 9, 2000. However, it is worth noting that although the Simon Well is decreed for a 50 g.p.m. diversion rate, the well can only physically produce on a sustainable basis 33 g.p.m. according to the pump test. Therefore, the sustained combined pumping rate at the two points of diversion (the original Simon Well and the PVO/SSE Well No. 1) can only be 33 g.p.m. The second well cannot be used to bring the sustained combined diversion rate up to the decreed 50 g.p.m. An application for finding of reasonable diligence for the PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of the Simon Well and the PVO/SSE Well No. 1 must be filed with the Water Court on or before August 31, 2009. The Water Court also approved a plan for augmentation to replace out-of-priority depletions from the PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of the Simon. The plan for augmentation requires the dry-up of 0.44 acres associated with 0.5 FICo shares (.01 c.f.s. of the Grass Valley Canal and 0.55 acre feet of the Grass Valley Reservoir). As with the plan for augmentation for the PVO/SSE Simon Well First Enlargement, the water associated with the FICo shares will continue to be diverted through the Applicant’s irrigation system and released to Cozza Gulch to address any calls on Cozza Gulch. To address calls on the Colorado River mainstem, the Applicant increased the existing West Divide Water Conservancy District by 2.34 acre feet for a total contract amount of 4.34 acre feet according to Janet Maddock, manager of the West Divide Water Conservancy District. B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Terry A. Kirk May 30, 2007 Page 7 Irrigation Water Supply Pursuant to a Stipulation with the Objectors in Case No. 00CW36, the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association agreed to continue to irrigate as much of the remaining historically irrigated lands as possible each and every year in recognition that much of the water available to local wells is dependent upon localized irrigation. The PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association lands have historically been irrigated with 80 shares of FICo and 175 acre feet of Silt Project water. The FICo shares are owned by the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association and the only information we have received regarding how the water is allocated and distributed is a Table entitled “PVO/SSE Water Rights Associated with Each Lot” attached hereto as Exhibit J. Based on this Table, it appears that in a good water year Lot 4 is associated with 24.4 acre feet of FICo water. There are a total of 4,126 FICo shares associated with the 100 c.f.s. Grass Valley Canal water right which was decreed in Civil Action 279 in the District Court for Garfield County with an appropriation date of July 20, 1887 and an adjudication date of April 30, 1892 for irrigation uses. Therefore, the 80 shares equates to 1.94 c.f.s. ownership of the 100 c.f.s. Grass Valley Canal water right. Each year the FICo Board determines the number of “share days” that will be available to each shareholder based on the water available that year. According to our interview with John Currier and his report entitled “Water Rights Plan for Augmentation PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association” dated March 14, 2000, there are normally 100 share days available per share in normal years. In dry years there may be only 80 share days available. A share day equals 0.01 c.f.s. delivered for 24 hours. Fifty share days equals one acre foot of water. The Silt Project is a Bureau of Reclamation project which stores water from Rifle Creek and pumps water from the Colorado River to supply irrigation water for approximately 7,000 acres of irrigated land between Silt and Rifle. Project water is stored in Rifle Gap Reservoir, and is released directly into the Davie Ditch or by exchange to various ditches diverting from Rifle Creek such as the Grass Valley Canal. Beneficiaries of Silt Project water are subject to an ad valorem tax or special assessment paid with the Garfield County property tax. Based on the terms of the authorization for the Silt Project, project water is allocated by the Bureau of Reclamation to particular properties. Lot 4 is associated with 33.0 acre feet of water from the Silt Project as evidenced by the Quit Claim Deed recorded as Reception No. 553203 at Book 1153 at Page 743 in the Records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder and attached hereto as Exhibit K. This amount should be sufficient to irrigate the historically irrigated area on Lot 4. John Currier indicated that approximately 12 acres of alfalfa were irrigated on the property and the rest is dry-land pasture. This is consistent with the B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Terry A. Kirk May 30, 2007 Page 8 information in the Garfield County Project Information and Staff Comments for the North 27 Subdivision issued in 2000. We have relied extensively on the representation of the Silt Water Conservancy District for estimates regarding the availability of irrigation water on Lot 4 and the physical water requirements for irrigation uses. We are not engineers licensed in the State of Colorado and have no independent engineering experience with which to evaluate the accuracy, soundness or reliability of any of the contents of these statements recited herein. We have not visited the property. Further, we not engaged in a review of title to the water rights, nor engaged in an environmental, wetlands or water quality audit for the property and offer no opinion as to these matters. Our opinion in this matter is limited to our review of the information contained within the documents discussed. It is possible that information exists which we have not reviewed that might alter our opinions. In addition, our review of the documents was for the limited purpose of determining the legal status of the subject water rights. Specifically excluded from our opinion, and outside the scope of our research are claims of adverse possession related to the water rights, title matters relating to the land underlying the subject water rights, opinions regarding rights of way and easements for the water rights, adequacy of the physical water supply for the intended purpose, ditch company assessments, diversion records, matters that may be disclosed by an accurate survey of the real property, statutory liens, easements, or claims not shown by the public record. Conclusions and Recommendations We have concluded that the legal water supply for Lot 4 was properly adjudicated and can supply sufficient water to supply domestic water for 10 residential units (5 primary residences and 5 accessory dwelling units), irrigation of 500 square feet per lot (for 5 lots), and fire protection so long as the property to be dried-up according to the Decree in Case No. 00CW36 is dried up and the contract with West Divide Water Conservancy District is maintained. We also have concluded that the irrigation water associated with the property which includes a proportionate amount of FICo water and 33 acre feet of Silt Project water is sufficient to continue to irrigate the 12 acres historically irrigated. We recommend that the Sellers have the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association submit a change of ownership and address form to the State Engineer for Well Permit No. 049153-F to reflect the current ownership of the Simon Well and obtain a new well permit for the Simon Well First and Second Enlargements to reflect the uses decreed by the Division 5 Water Court in Case No. 00CW36. We also recommend that Seller transfer all rights and interest to the FICo water rights, the Simon Well, and the PVO/SSE Well No. 1 including the rights decreed in Case B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Terry A. Kirk May 30, 2007 Page 9 No. 00CW36 to you at closing. We also recommend that the Seller assign the Silt Water shares and convey by deed the 33 acre feet associated with the Silt Project shares to you at closing. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, BALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. By: Sara M. Dunn Sara M. Dunn SMD/bjz Encl. Ex. A – Resolution 99-044 Ex. B – Final Plat Ex. C – Covenants Ex. D – Well Permit No. 049153-F Ex. E – Decree, Case No. W-1452 Ex. F – Budget, Articles and Bylaws Ex. G – Decree, Case No. 00CW36, Part 1 of 2 Ex. H – Figure 1, Location Map Ex. I – Decree, Case No. 00CW36, Part 2 of 2 Ex. J – Table, Associated Water Rights Ex. K – Quit Claim Deed Deadlines: Application for Diligence, PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargement due on or before May 31, 2008 (to prevent the cancellation of the 4.06 acre feet conditional portion). Application for Diligence, PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of the Simon Well and the PVO/SSE Well No. 1 due to the Water Court on or before August 31, 2009 4300 Cherry Creek Drive S., Denver, CO 80246-1530 P 303-692-3500 www.colorado.gov/cdphe/wqcd Jared S. Polis, Governor | Jill Hunsaker Ryan, MPH, Executive Director April 7, 2022 DAVE HILLBRAND PEACH VALLEY ORCHARD SUBD - PWSID CO0123605 PO BOX 1061 SILT CO 81652 Requirements Change Notice Decreased Monitoring for LEAD AND COPPER The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environme nt (“Department”) has identified the following monitoring change per Section 11.26(2)(d) of the Colorado Primary Drinking Water Regulations (“Regulation 11”), 5 CCR 1002 -11 for PEACH VALLEY ORCHARD SUBD(“Supplier”): Analyte Name: LEAD AND COPPER Facility ID: DS001 Sample Point ID: Approved Lead and Copper Sample Pool Sites Previous Sample Schedule New Sample Schedule Schedule Begin Date 5 Sample(s) per Year 5 Sample(s) every 3 Years between June 1 and September 30 1/1/2022 (Next samples required by 2024)  Why did the sample schedule change? The Supplier has demonstrated low lead and copper concentrations at Department-approved sample sites in three annual monitoring periods. The Supplier's monitoring schedule, posted at wqcdcompliance.com/schedules, contains detailed monitoring requirements and has been updated to reflect the changes. Additional Information: EPA recently published the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions that include many changes to the current rule. Suppliers will need to devote substantial resources to complete a lead service line inventory of every service connection to classify the material as lead, galvanized requiring replacement, non-lead, or unknown by the compliance date of October 16, 2024. For suppliers that identify lead, galvanized requiring replacement, or unknown service line materials, a lead service line replacement plan must also be developed and submitted by the compliance date. The Department will soon be providing additional communication to suppliers about the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions and posting forms and guidance at https://cdphe.colorado.gov/dwforms. If there are any questions regarding the contents of this letter and/or requirements for t he Supplier, please contact Bryan Pilson by phone at 303-692-3318 or email at bryan.pilson@state.co.us. File: CO0123605, GARFIELD COUNTY, Community - Groundwater COLORADO Department of Public Health & Environment Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado I -- 6/8/22, 12:29 PM State.co.us Executive Branch Mail - Total Coliform Positive requirements - PEACH VALLEY ORCHARD SUBD https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=3c4f31a539&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar-68643090807605265&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-193273369…1/1 Fettig - CDPHE, Lindsey <lindsey.fettig@state.co.us> Total Coliform Positive requirements - PEACH VALLEY ORCHARD SUBD 1 message Fettig - CDPHE, Lindsey <lindsey.fettig@state.co.us>Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 12:27 PM To: Mark Hayes <MARK.AES@outlook.com> Hello, A water sample collected from PEACH VALLEY ORCHARD SUBD (CO0123605) ("System") on 06/06/2022 has results showing total coliform bacteria. The System is now required to collect 3 total coliform repeat samples in the distribution system on or before 06/09/2022. For every routine positive, 1 repeat must be collected at the original positive tap, 1 upstream within 5 service connections, and 1 downstream within 5 service connections. The System must also collect 1 raw water source sample on or before 06/09/2022. On the Chain of Custodies from the lab, please code the samples so I know which one is which. 1. Routine Original: RPOR 2. Repeat Upstream: RPUP 3. Repeat Downstream: RPDN 4. RAW - 001 When collecting samples the Department recommends that you evaluate and ensure that best practices are used when collecting these repeat samples. Please see the additional sample collection procedure guidance below: Remove any attachments (aerator) on the faucet Sterilize tap with rubbing alcohol Allow water to flow for 5 minutes before sampling Reduce flow to about the thickness of a pencil Do not rinse or overfill the container Always collect cold water; never sample hot water. Dedicated cold water lines are best Do not touch the inside of the sample bottle or its cap. It is best to wear gloves and try not to set the cap down if possible For upstream and downstream sites, avoid collecting from outdoor taps if possible. Bathroom or kitchen faucets with dedicated cold water lines are ideal. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you. Lindsey Fettig Senior Compliance Specialist Drinking Water Compliance Assurance Section Unit South P 720.507.7095 or 303.691.4025 | F 303.758.1398 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246 lindsey.fettig@state.co.us | www.colorado.gov/cdphe/wqcd 24-hr Environmental Release/Incident Report Line: 1.877.518.5608 Total Coliform Positive or Nitrate Above 10 mg/L Reporting Line: 303.692.3308 PEACH VALLEY ORCHARD SUBD, PWS ID: CO0123605 2022 CCR Page 1 of 5 PEACH VALLEY ORCHARD SUBD 2022 Drinking Water Quality Report Covering Data For Calendar Year 2021 Public Water System ID: CO0123605 Esta es información importante. Si no la pueden leer, necesitan que alguien se la traduzca. We are pleased to present to you this year’s water quality report. Our constant goal is to provide you with a safe and dependable supply of drinking water. Please contact DAVE HILLBRAND at 970-876-0825 with any questions or for public participation opportunities that may affect water quality. General Information All drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that the water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the Environmental Protection Agency’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline (1-800-426-4791) or by visiting epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water. Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Immunocompromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV-AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be particularly at risk of infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. For more information about contaminants and potential health effects, or to receive a copy of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and microbiological contaminants call the EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline at (1-800-426-4791). The sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material, and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity. Contaminants that may be present in source water include: •Microbial contaminants: viruses and bacteria that may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife. •Inorganic contaminants: salts and metals, which can be naturally- occurring or result from urban storm water runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining, or farming. •Pesticides and herbicides: may come from a variety of sources, such as agriculture, urban storm water runoff, and residential uses. •Radioactive contaminants: can be naturally occurring or be the result of oil and gas production and mining activities. •Organic chemical contaminants: including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, which are byproducts of industrial processes and petroleum production, and also may come from gas stations, urban storm water runoff, and septic systems. In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment prescribes regulations limiting the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. The Food and Drug Administration regulations establish limits for contaminants in bottled water that must provide the same protection for public health. Lead in Drinking Water If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems (especially for pregnant women and young children). It is possible that lead levels at your home may be higher than other homes in the community as a result of materials used in your home’s plumbing. If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using water for drinking or cooking. Additional information on lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline (1-800-426-4791) or at epa.gov/safewater/lead. Source Water Assessment and Protection (SWAP) The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment may have provided us with a Source Water Assessment Report for our water supply. For general information or to obtain a copy of the report please visit wqcdcompliance.com/ccr. The report is located under “Guidance: Source Water Assessment Reports”. Search the table using 123605, PEACH VALLEY ORCHARD SUBD, or by contacting DAVE HILLBRAND at 970-876-0825. The Source Water Assessment Report provides a screening-level evaluation of potential contamination that could occur. It does not mean that the contamination has or will occur. We can use this information to evaluate the need to improve our current water treatment capabilities and prepare for future contamination threats. This can help us ensure that quality finished water is delivered to your homes. In addition, the source water assessment results provide a starting point for developing a source water protection plan. Potential sources of contamination in our source water area are listed on the next page. Please contact us to learn more about what you can do to help protect your drinking water sources, any questions about the Drinking Water Quality Report, to learn more about our system, or to attend scheduled public meetings. We want you, our valued customers, to be informed about the services we provide and the quality water we deliver to you every day. PEACH VALLEY ORCHARD SUBD, PWS ID: CO0123605 2022 CCR Page 2 of 5 Our Water Sources Sources (Water Type - Source Type) Potential Source(s) of Contamination WELL 1 – SIMON WELL (Groundwater-Well)  As of June 2022, there was not a Source Water Assessment Report posted for our water supply. Please contact DAVE HILLBRAND at 970-876-0825 with questions regarding potential sources of contamination.  Potential sources of contamination in our source water area typically come from: dissolved naturally occurring minerals, septic systems, agricultural runoff, careless application, storage, and disposal of household chemicals and petroleum products. Terms and Abbreviations  Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) − The highest level of a contaminant allowed in drinking water.  Treatment Technique (TT) − A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water.  Health-Based − A violation of either a MCL or TT.  Non-Health-Based − A violation that is not a MCL or TT.  Action Level (AL) − The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment and other regulatory requirements.  Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL) − The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants.  Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) − The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety.  Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal (MRDLG) − The level of a drinking water disinfectant, below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants.  Violation (No Abbreviation) − Failure to meet a Colorado Primary Drinking Water Regulation.  Formal Enforcement Action (No Abbreviation) − Escalated action taken by the State (due to the risk to public health, or number or severity of violations) to bring a non-compliant water system back into compliance.  Variance and Exemptions (V/E) − Department permission not to meet a MCL or treatment technique under certain conditions.  Gross Alpha (No Abbreviation) − Gross alpha particle activity compliance value. It includes radium-226, but excludes radon 222, and uranium.  Picocuries per liter (pCi/L) − Measure of the radioactivity in water.  Nephelometric Turbidity Unit (NTU) − Measure of the clarity or cloudiness of water. Turbidity in excess of 5 NTU is just noticeable to the typical person.  Compliance Value (No Abbreviation) – Single or calculated value used to determine if regulatory contaminant level (e.g. MCL) is met. Examples of calculated values are the 90th Percentile, Running Annual Average (RAA) and Locational Running Annual Average (LRAA).  Average (x-bar) − Typical value.  Range (R) − Lowest value to the highest value.  Sample Size (n) − Number or count of values (i.e. number of water samples collected).  Parts per million = Milligrams per liter (ppm = mg/L) − One part per million corresponds to one minute in two years or a single penny in $10,000.  Parts per billion = Micrograms per liter (ppb = ug/L) − One part per billion corresponds to one minute in 2,000 years, or a single penny in $10,000,000.  Not Applicable (N/A) – Does not apply or not available.  Level 1 Assessment – A study of the water system to identify potential problems and determine (if possible) why total coliform bacteria have been found in our water system.  Level 2 Assessment – A very detailed study of the water system to identify potential problems and determine (if possible) why an E. coli MCL violation has occurred and/or why total coliform bacteria have been found in our water system on multiple occasions. PEACH VALLEY ORCHARD SUBD, PWS ID: CO0123605 2022 CCR Page 3 of 5 Detected Contaminants PEACH VALLEY ORCHARD SUBD routinely monitors for contaminants in your drinking water according to Federal and State laws. The following table(s) show all detections found in the period of January 1 to December 31, 2021 unless otherwise noted. The State of Colorado requires us to monitor for certain contaminants less than once per year because the concentrations of these contaminants are not expected to vary significantly from year to year, or the system is not considered vulnerable to this type of contamination. Therefore, some of our data, though representative, may be more than one year old. Violations and Formal Enforcement Actions, if any, are reported in the next section of this report. Note: Only detected contaminants sampled within the last 5 years appear in this report. If no tables appear in this section then no contaminants were detected in the last round of monitoring. Disinfectants Sampled in the Distribution System TT Requirement: At least 95% of samples per period (month or quarter) must be at least 0.2 ppm OR If sample size is less than 40 no more than 1 sample is below 0.2 ppm Typical Sources: Water additive used to control microbes Disinfectant Name Time Period Results Number of Samples Below Level Sample Size TT Violation MRDL Chlorine December, 2021 Lowest period percentage of samples meeting TT requirement: 100% 0 1 No 4.0 ppm Lead and Copper Sampled in the Distribution System Contaminant Name Time Period 90th Percentile Sample Size Unit of Measure 90th Percentile AL Sample Sites Above AL 90th Percentile AL Exceedance Typical Sources Copper 09/11/2021 to 09/13/2021 0.19 5 ppm 1.3 0 No Corrosion of household plumbing systems; Erosion of natural deposits Lead 09/11/2021 to 09/13/2021 2 5 ppb 15 0 No Corrosion of household plumbing systems; Erosion of natural deposits Disinfection Byproducts Sampled in the Distribution System Name Year Average Range Low – High Sample Size Unit of Measure MCL MCLG MCL Violation Typical Sources Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) 2020 5.3 5.3 to 5.3 1 ppb 60 N/A No Byproduct of drinking water disinfection Total Trihalome thanes (TTHM) 2020 12.7 12.7 to 12.7 1 ppb 80 N/A No Byproduct of drinking water disinfection PEACH VALLEY ORCHARD SUBD, PWS ID: CO0123605 2022 CCR Page 4 of 5 Radionuclides Sampled at the Entry Point to the Distribution System Contaminant Name Year Average Range Low – High Sample Size Unit of Measure MCL MCLG MCL Violation Typical Sources Gross Alpha 2019 0.58 0.58 to 0.58 1 pCi/L 15 0 No Erosion of natural deposits Combined Uranium 2019 26 26 to 26 1 ppb 30 0 No Erosion of natural deposits Inorganic Contaminants Sampled at the Entry Point to the Distribution System Contaminant Name Year Average Range Low – High Sample Size Unit of Measure MCL MCLG MCL Violation Typical Sources Barium 2019 0.03 0.03 to 0.03 1 ppm 2 2 No Discharge of drilling wastes; discharge from metal refineries; erosion of natural deposits Fluoride 2019 0.87 0.87 to 0.87 1 ppm 4 4 No Erosion of natural deposits; water additive which promotes strong teeth; discharge from fertilizer and aluminum factories Nitrate 2021 0.28 0.28 to 0.28 1 ppm 10 10 No Runoff from fertilizer use; leaching from septic tanks, sewage; erosion of natural deposits Selenium 2019 2 2 to 2 1 ppb 50 50 No Discharge from petroleum and metal refineries; erosion of natural deposits; discharge from mines Secondary Contaminants** **Secondary standards are non-enforceable guidelines for contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as skin, or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor, or color) in drinking water. Contaminant Name Year Average Range Low – High Sample Size Unit of Measure Secondary Standard Sodium 2019 93.3 93.3 to 93.3 1 ppm N/A Total Dissolved 2019 804 804 to 804 1 ppm 500 PEACH VALLEY ORCHARD SUBD, PWS ID: CO0123605 2022 CCR Page 5 of 5 Violations, Significant Deficiencies, and Formal Enforcement Actions No Violations or Formal Enforcement Actions TP 0 0 2 EP 0 0 2 Page | 1 of 2 Mountain View Subdivision BUI#09016.02 Major Subdivision Application December 18, 2024 Wastewater Management & Systems Plan This Wastewater Management & Systems Plan discussion is provided in accordance with Article 4 Section 4-203.N of the Garfield County Unified Land Use and Development Code and follows the outline provided therein. N1. Wastewater Management: a. N/A b. OWTS 1) Each lot within the subdivision shall be required to obtain a site specific OWTS soils analysis and engineered design performed by a qualified professional engineer in the State of Colorado and permit directly with Garfield County for compliance with the County’s OWTS requirements and requirements of the CDPHE, Water Quality Control Commission. 2) Garfield County public records for adjacent properties indicate that the regional soils (Soil Type 2A to Type 4, Sandy Loam to Clay) are acceptable for OWTS systems with no shallow bedrock and seasonal high groundwater levels from 4-feet to 8-feet below the surface (SEPT-10-18-5541, #3051, #03205, #03900, and #03770). 3) The lots are not limited by building envelopes which might require OWTS systems to be constructed at specific locations and as previously indicated, the regional soils are acceptable for OWTS systems. Therefore, it is proposed that each lot within the subdivision be required to obtain a site specific OWTS soils analysis at the time of building permit application. 4) Each lot within the subdivision shall be required to obtain a site specific OWTS soils analysis and engineered design performed by a qualified professional engineer in the State of Colorado and permit directly with Garfield County for compliance with the County’s OWTS requirements and requirements of the CDPHE, Water Quality Control Commission. 5) A proposed management plan for operation and maintenance of OWTS systems has been attached. c. N/A d. OWTS systems will be individually constructed, managed, maintained and repaired at the sole cost of the individual lot owner. e. All OWTS systems shall be designed by a qualified professional engineer licensed by the State of Colorado and permitted with Garfield County. f. N/A g. OWTS systems will be individually constructed, managed, maintained and repaired at the sole cost of the individual lot owner. h. N/A. i. Each lot within the subdivision shall be required to obtain a site specific OWTS soils analysis and engineered design performed by a qualified professional engineer in the State of Colorado and permit directly with Garfield County for compliance with the County’s OWTS requirements and requirements of the CDPHE, Water Quality Control Commission. j. All lots are greater than 1.0 acres in size as required by Table 7-105. Page | 2 of 2 Prepared by: Deric J. Walter, PE Boundaries Unlimited Inc. Acknowledged by: Red Dog LLC - Terry Kirk Owner/Manager Attachments • OWTS Maintenance and Management Plan • Adjacent Permits: o SEPT-10-18-5541 o #03051 o #03205 o #03770 o #03900 Page | 1 of 2 MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Mountain View Subdivision Garfield County, Colorado December 2024 Prior to requesting a Building Permit and/or Onsite Wastewater System (OWTS) Permit, each Lot Owner within Mountain View Subdivision is required to obtain a site specific OWTS soils analysis and engineered design performed by a qualified professional engineer and permit directly with Garfield County for compliance with the County’s OWTS requirements and requirements of the CDPHE, Water Quality Control Commission. Any new Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) installed within the Subdivision shall comply with current Garfield County OWTS Regulations and the following additional requirements: A. each system shall be designed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Colorado pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. §12-25-111 (1999); B. each system design shall adequately address the soil conditions present at the Lot site, which shall be verified through appropriate on-site testing by a professional engineer; C. each system shall be designed to adequately service the anticipated wastewater demand; D. the tops of all tanks or risers extending there-from shall be surface accessible to facilitate system maintenance, monitoring and inspections; E. absorption fields or trenches shall adhere to minimum setbacks as regulated by the Colorado Department of Health, Regulation No. 43 On-Site Wastewater Treatment System Regulation, most recent edition and Colorado Department of Health Site Application Policy WQSA-6; F. proper mitigation (diversion) of drainage and flood irrigation for the absorption field or trench areas shall be included in the design and construction; G. each system shall be designed with sufficient area specifically allocated for a reserve leach field to ensure that a future replacement is possible. The reserve leach field shall meet the same design criteria as the primary field and shall not be constructed over with driveways, buildings or other permanent structures; and H. septic tanks shall be fitted with an effluent filter. Following OWTS installation, the Lot Owner shall provide the Association (if one exists) and the Garfield County Community Development Department with as-built drawings in relation to the other improvements on the Lot, to scale, depicting the location and dimensions of the OWTS facilities including the absorption field and monitoring pipes, all applicable design, operation and Page | 2 of 3 maintenance specifications of the system's manufacturer and written certification from the design engineer that the OWTS was installed in conformance with the requirements above stated and all applicable design specifications of the manufacturer. In the event no Association exists or that the Association fails to properly implement and enforce the design and performance standards set forth in this paragraph, the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado and its duly authorized representatives and agents, shall have all the right to enter upon the property and implement and enforce such standards at the expense of the affected Lot Owner or exercise any other right or power afforded under this Restatement including, but not limited to, the initiation of appropriate proceedings in the District Court for Garfield County, Colorado, to compel enforcement of the same. The provisions of this paragraph shall not be amended or repealed by the Homeowners Association or Lot Owners without the written consent of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado. In order to ensure that each OWTS installed within the Subdivision is inspected on a regular basis and properly maintained, the responsibility and authority for such inspection and maintenance shall be vested exclusively within the Association. This management plan is not intended to provide for common ownership of the OWTS(s) or to provide common funding for the construction, repair or replacement thereof. Such ownership and responsibility for construction, repair and maintenance shall remain with the Lot Owner. A. In accordance with the above, the Association and Lot Owner shall: 1. retain at all times, the services of qualified personnel to inspect the OWTS(s) and to perform all maintenance and repairs necessary to ensure that same are installed properly, remain in good operating condition and comply with the performance requirements set forth within; 2. inspect the operating components of each OWTS within (30) days of being placed into operation; thereafter, each OWTS shall be inspected every year and the septic tank pumped at the time that the solids (settled and floating) accumulate to a level of 20 percent of the effective capacity of the tank; and 3. maintain at all times written or other permanent records documenting the date each OWTS was inspected or tested, the results of such inspections or tests and the extent of all maintenance and/or repairs performed. All documents maintained by the Association and Lot Owner pursuant to this provision shall at all times be available for inspection by other lot owners and/or authorized representatives of Garfield County. B. The following provisions shall apply in the event the estimated maintenance or repair costs required of any OWTS exceed $2000.00 in total during any one calendar year: 1. the Association shall give the Lot Owner and the Garfield County Community Development Department written notice of the nature and extent of the work necessary, to return the OWTS to good operating condition and/or bring the OWTS System within the performance requirements set forth within; Page | 3 of 3 2. within (10) days of receipt of such notice, the Lot Owner shall at his or her own expense submit an application for an OWTS Permit to Garfield County to repair or replace the OWTS; 3. within (30) days of receipt of such Permit, the Lot Owner shall at his or her own expense, cause to be completed, the repairs set forth within the notice. In the event the Lot Owner fails to complete such repairs within this the period to the satisfaction of the Association, the Association shall have the authority, in addition to any other remedy provided within this Restatement, to take any of the following actions: a. to impose against the Lot Owner, a fine not to exceed $200.00 for each day in which the OWTS System remains unrepaired; b. to complete on behalf of the Lot Owner the required repairs to the OWTS. All costs included by the Association in connection with the restoration shall be reimbursed to the Association by the Lot Owner of the Lot, upon demand. All un- reimbursed costs shall be a lien upon the Lot until reimbursement is made which may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of this Restatement; and/or C. In the event the Association fails to properly implement and enforce the provisions of this management plan set forth in this Article, the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado and its duly authorized representatives and agents, shall have the right to enter the Subdivision and implement and enforce such provisions at the expense of the Lot Owner or exercise any other right or power afforded under this Restatement including, but not limited to, the initiation of appropriate proceedings in the District Court for Garfield County, Colorado, to compel enforcement of the provisions of this management plan. D. To encourage the health and longevity of the OWTS system, the Lot Owner shall consider the following; 1. Minimize the amount of water that goes down the drain, the better the system will work. 2. Minimize solids going down the drain. 3. Eliminate garbage disposals or keep the use of garbage disposals to a minimum. 4. Minimize grease and oils that go down the drain. 5. Use lint filters on laundry machine drains. 6. Keep sand and dirt out of the building drain. 7. Avoid flushing sanitary napkins or paper products other than toilet paper. 8. Do not use lye-based drain unclogging chemicals such as Draino, Oven-Off, or other strong cleaning agents 9. Do not put any “root deterrents” down the drain. 10. Do not pour paint thinner, pesticides, paints or photo lab chemicals down the drain 11. Minimize use of chlorine bleach and toilet additives. (adapted from The Septic System Owner’s Manual, 2000, Shelter Publications, Inc., Bolinas, CA 92924) E. The provisions of this OWTS MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT PLAN shall not be amended or repealed by the Homeowners, Association or Lot Owners without the written consent of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado. PERMIT KEEP AVAILABLE AT PROJECT SITE Project Address ____________________________________________ Parcel No. ________________________ Subdivision _________________________________ Lot _______ Section-Township-Range ____________ Owner Name ______________________________________________ Owner Phone _____________________ Owner Mailing Address _______________________________________________________________________ Contractor(s) ______________________________________________ Contractor Phone _________________ Work Description: Valuation _________________________________ Square Feet _______________________________ IMPORTANT: APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR A PERMIT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS SET FORTH ON THIS APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE: Final inspection of the work authorized by this permit is required. A Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained prior to use and occupancy of new buildings and structures. A Building Permit becomes null and void if the authorized work is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after commencement. Permit Type ____________________________________ Work Classification _____________________________ Issue Date ___________ Expiration Date ___________ PERMIT # Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone (970) 945-8212 5/18/2019 36-05-92 Septic - New 970-948-8735 OWNER Simon Exemption PO Box 493, Silt, CO 81652 new OWTS installation for single family residence - 3 BR BY ENGINEER 1 SEPT-10-18-5541 212736100049 New 11/19/2018 Robert & Sylvia MacLaughlin TBD Sec36, T05S, R92W WELL COUNTY ROAD NO. 250 ASPHALT LTJ DRAINAGE, UTILITY AND DITCH EASEMENT PER PLAT REC. NO. 544219 LOT 1 3.71AC.f 50 100 LOT 2 188.7' • 126.7'—• 12 ABSORPTION TRENCHES INFILTRATRORS UAL 19.2' TO IRRIGATION DIT N \ INAGE, UTILITYAIvDITCH EASEMENT PER PLAT ILRC. NO. 544219 S 89°21'39" W 379.06' m LOT 4 Waste Water Flow Reference: 5 CCR 1002-43 Section 43.6 Design Flow. 75 gpd/person No. Bedrooms: 3 No. people/bedroom 2 Total Daily Flow 450 gallons Table 6-1) Percolation Data Percolation tests performed Oct. 13, 2018 No ground water within 8' of the 9round surface Average percolation rate = I 26.8 min/inch IMPORTANT NOTE: On site water was used in the percolation tests. Use of imported water (e.g, City of Glenwood Springs) for tests is invalid , produces erroneous results that do not represent actual percolation rates. Table 10-1 Soil Structure and LTAR LTAR = 0.5 Gal/Day/Square Foot I I I Table 10- 2 - Size adjustment for Application Method No reduction; gravity flow for a trench (chanter) I I Table 10-3 - Size ad ustment for distribution media Trench: reduce to 70% of calculated area REQUIRED TRENCH AREA 450 gpd / 0.5 gaVday/SF = 900 Table 10.3 reduction = 0. 7 Net Required Trench Area: 630 S.F. Design Recommend Infiltrator brand or equal, low profile 34" wide 48" effective length S.F./Infiltrator 11.33 No. required: 55.6 Use 3 trenches 18. 5 Round to units each trench 19 Total # chambers: 57 I Total length of each trench: 76 Feet Note: Clear distance between trenches 6 feet measured adjacent sidewall to adjacent sidewall) DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION NOTES: Septic tank: 1,250 gallon. Install an effluent filter on the distribution end. Infiltrator brand low profile chambers or equal. Adjust the following calculations if a different brand or size is used. Net absorption trench area = 630 s.f Designed for 3 bedroom home + auxiliary buildings (e.g„ shop) Design flow = 450 gpd Average percolation rate = 26.8 min/inch Soils are deep sandy silty loam, continuous. No water table within 8' of the ground surface. LTAR = 0.5 gal/day/SF. Each trench: 76 feet long x 34" wide (dig 36" wide). 19 chambers/trench are required. Trenches shall be as level as possible. Plans show the trenches parallel with the contours. This is optional. Install 6" diameter PVC inspection ports at each end of each trench. Cover with an irrigation box at grade. Min. of 18" soil over top of chambers. Lightly compact fill over top of chambers. Mound topsoil 6"-12" to allow settlement. Field fit elevations to septic tank / house elevations. Distribution lines: min. 4" diameter PVC Use 1x3 distribution / splitter box (gravity) Place splash blocks under inlets to minimize erosion COMPLIANCE NOTES Offset to well = 207 feet Offset to nearest open ditch = 119 feet 24753 et \\ • 41 ON o N ci L- 10 R co U Y U OWTS-ISDSSYSTEM DESIGNAND CONSTRUCTIONNOTESROB & SYLVIAMCLAUGHLIN LOT 1, SIMONSUBD. EXEMPTION GARFIELDCOUNTY, COLORADOWATERRESOURCECONSULTANTS, LLC 244HuttonAve., Rifle, CO81650 I 970) 625-5433 4 6ARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT Permit N°3 0 1 ie nS G1 ' 9 Bth Stre Suite 303 Assessor's Parcel No.r 1s I / L 9 Ienviood Springs, Colorado 81801 T. i 1k Phohg,(303) 945.8212 4 This does not constitute 1 r PP 41 NDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT a building or use permit. 4 t ' ' t : PROPERTY II/I 111 1l ?4 t o D?1 Present Addressl IW C 1 t2 I . 2 - I e ) 00,r L . t •d . !Owner's Nam= Phone System Location L S L egal Description of Assessor's Parcel No.a Ir'1 1 SYSTEM DESIGN Septic Tank Cap (gallon)Other le .‘ 1 r Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other)e. '. e Y h Required Absorption Area - See Attached 9 r i t 0. Special Setback Requirements:1 " yl u1 %1 Date Inspector i, 1 I FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as Installed) 9 k Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Installation t ,4 a'Is t tr System Installer i 1 • p Septic Tank Capacity r j ;Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name c t :Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface is Absorption Area t . i t Absorption Area Type and /or Manufacturer or Trade Name 1 ', r Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements 4± x Other VC. ri 4 S\,.//9.-0/ .1 + , r c p Date Inspector tn r i E-! f t Sig `" r- '-,4-/'! // G)GF O ^' l 444 ' t RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE `. ` q j - j 0- 3,c r CONDITIONS:S' eTl1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter Y3 25, Article 10 C.R.S. 1913, Revised 1984. i 2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con- I nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a i Y requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. i s .3. Any person who constructs, alters, or installs an individual aeWegediapos elsystemine mannerwhlohinvolvesaknowingendmatedal d i variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine —13 r 11fmonthsin )ail or both).f A t i `White - APPLICANT Yellow - DEPARTM M 0/190 C 130715 5 01'70 W d67. )d 1 r9.J7' LA 1 7.... Ss-4N T O IN It 1 y bAlrrl191 Z iI Tu Ot611 17.9f.00 N J 1I C. i y 2 ti e n ti a e H e Izi rn 1 A U NR R u I. 1 i 0 r.,,a N tl° 0 In b La 0 07611 j O L z y., Y 4b 21 g I1 t b a Ro° p NT 5 0119715' W 88775•5 01'07'" • •19 40 T N 01'0'IS' C OUNTY 2 rROA N A YNEto1 o INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM APPLICATION OWI4ER. Kt' 0 : h l n q 2- Ca "` ADDRESS 70 C 1/4.1-7 (2A M e & [ c at PHONE g70 - 9 84 - 9173 CONTRACTOR 0 W h -CAL ADDRESS CA 1/4 t PHONE PERMIT REQUEST FOR QQ NEW INSTALLATION ALTERATION REPAIR Attach separate sheets or report showing entire area with respect to surrounding areas, topography of area, habitable building, location of potable water wells, soil percolation test holes, soil profiles in test holes (See page 4). J.00ATION OF PROPOSED FAC.II Near what City of Town_ S i iT l Size of Lot ac e Leg esci%%on or Address 2[i • a50 _ J(1 I Sa I-o a S nwK Su Q WASTES TYPE:Q DWELLING TRANSIENT USE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL NON - DOMESTIC WASTES OTHER - DESCRIBE BUILDING OR SERVICE TYPE: 12 -fl ;'6 e/rc. e- Number of Bedrooms 2 Number of Persons Li IQ Garbage Grinder IQ Automatic Washer CI Dishwasher SOIJRCF ANJ) TYPE. OF WATER SUPPLY X() WELL SPRING STREAM OR CREEK If supplied by Community Water, give name of supplier: DISTANCE TO NEAREST COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEM: Ai/ft Was an effort made to connect to the Community System? A site plan is required to be submitted that indicates the following MINIMUM distances: Leach Field to Well:100 feet Septic Tank to Well:50 feet Leach Field to Irrigation Ditches, Stream or Water Course:50 feet Septic System to Property Lines:10 feet YOUR INDIVIDUAL, SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT Wii,i, NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT A SITE PLAN, C;ROL ND CONDITIONS: Depth to first Ground Water Table an Kr 0 m Percent Ground Slope 1 eta- 2 1 TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: p<) SEPTIC TANK AERATION PLANT VAULT VAULT PRIVY COMPOSTING TOILET RECYCLING, POTABLE USE PIT PRIVY INCINERATION TOILET RECYCLING, OTHER USE CHEMICAL TOILET OTHER - DESCRIBE FINAL DISPOSAL BY: ABSORPTION TRENCH, BED OR PIT EVAPOTRANSPIRATION X') UNDERGROUND DISPERSAL SAND FILTER ABOVE GROUND DISPERSAL WASTEWATER POND OTHER - DESCRIBE WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE? i o pERCOLATION TEST REST II.TS: (To be completed by Registered Professional Engineer, if the Engineer does the Percolation Test) Minutes per inch in hole No. 1 Minutes per inch in hole NO. 3 Minutes per inch in hole No. 2 Minutes per inch in hole NO. _ Name, address and telephone of RPE who made soil absorption tests: Name, address and telephone of RPE responsible for design of the system: HP Q.ety+c c t SOan C IQ 15(1 lerazb4 6 (Ali 9 Co 1601 Applicant acknowledges that the completeness of the application is conditional upon such further mandatory and additional tests and reports as may be required by the local health department to be made and furnished by the applicant or by the local health department for purposed of the evaluation of the application; and the issuance of the permit is subject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and regulations made, information and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are or will be represented to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and are designed to be relied on by the local department of health in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I further understand that any falsification or misrepresentation may result in the denial of the application or revocation of any permit granted based upon said application and in legal action for perjury as provided by law. Signed Date 9/a V Pi" PLEASE DRAW AN ACCURATE MAP TO YOUR PROPERTY!! 3 Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 yA ^h Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601techPhone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo @hpgeotech.com July 20, 1999 Kevin Long Country Road 312 New Castle, Colorado 81647 Job No. 199 518 Subject:Percolation Testing, Proposed Residence, Lot 2, Simon Exemption, County Road 250, North of' Silt, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Long: As requested by you, Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc., performed percolation testing at the subject site. The work was done in accordance with our agreement for professional services to you, dated June 28, 1999. Three percolation test holes were excavated prior to our site visit on June 28, 1999. The soils exposed in the pits below about 1 foot of topsoil consisted of sandy clay to the maximum depth of 4 feet. Free water was observed in the pits at a depth of 4 feet. The shallow groundwater may be related to irrigation of nearby fields. Three additional test holes were hand excavated to about 1 to 2 feet in depth alongside the existing pits. The test holes were soaked on June 28, 1999. The percolation test locations are shown on Fig. 1. Percolation testing was performed on June 29, 1999. The percolation test results are sununarized on Table I. Based on the groundwater encountered in the pits, the septic disposal system should be designed by a civil engineer. The percolation rates indicate a mounded infiltration system may be feasible. A perimeter trench may be needed around the uphill side to lower the groundwater level within the disposal area. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC, 7s PO- Jerk Steven L. Pawlak, PF gu, w REGij, 9 ,111 t Rev. By: DE 24443 y •i 7 A (71A SLP/ksm S mtortnuntoto Z S LOT 3 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1 ^ago' LOT -----) BOUNDARIES LOT 2 1 1 1 u 1 N 0 CZ00 z P 2 A 3 U A P 1 WELL ACCESS 1 AND EASEMENT 1 1 1 1 1 a LOT 1 f I 199 518 I GEOTECHNICAL, INC. I LOCATION OF PERCOLATION TEST HOLES I Fig. 1 1 HEPWORTH- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE I PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 199 518 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH LENGTH OF WATER DEPTH WATER DEPTH DROP IN AVERAGE INCHES)INTERVAL AT START OF AT END OF WATER PERCOLATION MIN)INTERVAL INTERVAL LEVEL RATE INCHES)INCHES)INCHES)MIN. /INCH) P -1 22 15 10 8 3/4 1 1/4 8 3/4 8 3/4 8 7 1/2 1/2 7 1/2 7 1/2 7 6 3/4 1/4 6 3/4 6 1/2 1/4 6 1/2 6 1/4 1/4 60 P -2 21 15 11 9 2 9 7 3/4 1 1/4 7 3/4 7 3/4 7 6 1/4 3/4 6 1/4 5 3/4 1/2 5 3/4 5 1/4 1/2 5 1/4 4 3/4 1/2 30 P.3 17 15 9 61/4 23/4 6 1/4 5 1/4 1 5 1/4 4 1/2 3/4 4 1/2 4 1/2 4 3 1/2 1/2 3 1/2 3 1/4 1/4 31/4 3 1/4 45 NOTE: Percolation test holes were soaked on June 28, 1999. Percolation testing was conducted on June 29, 1999. The average percolation rates are based on the last three readings of each test. WATER RESOURCE CONSULTANTS, LLC February 23, 2000 Kevin Long and Gina Reece 7700 County Road 312 New Castle, CO 81647 RE: ISDS Design Lot 2, Simon Subdivision Exemption Dear Kevin and Gina, Enclosed is a completed ISDS design for your home on Lot 2 of Simon Subdivision Exemption. The system is designed as a "mound system," meaning, partially above grade. This is because of the potential for a seasonally high groundwater table that may be within four (4) feet of the ground surface. Also, because of moderate percolation rates, I have included a one foot layer of sand in the absorption field. This will help improve percolation, as well as help reduce nitrate levels in effluent that returns to groundwater. 1 sPloVued on the vicinity drawing that the absorption field should be placed at least 100 feet away from the existing trees and seeps that are immediately south of your house. I felt this would be prudent, just in case the PVO/SSE homeowners ever need to drill another well to supplement the Simon Well. My current thought is that the seep area near the trees may produce another good, shallow well. Thus the rationale for staying at least 100 feet away from the existing seeps. Copeland Concrete should have all the parts you need in stock. If the elevations do not work for gravity flow, Dodson Engineering Supply has small pumps that will work. For your information, I included a copy of a pump Dodson carries. Any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, WATER RESOURCE CONSULTANTS, LLC BAG Paul C. Currier, P.E. PCC /pcc Attachments ISDS Application ISDS App Cry Ltr 2- 2300.doc / 2241.0 244 Hutton Ave., Rifle, CO 81650 PH / Fax (970) 625-5433 pcurrier@bwn.net INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM APPLICATION OWNER Kevin Long and Gina Reece ADDRESS 7700 County Road 312, New Castle, CO 81647 PHONE (970) 984 -9883 CONTRACTOR Kevin Long Construction ADDRESS 7700 Country Road 312, New Castle, CO 81647 PHONE (97n) 984- 9rl113 PERMIT REQUEST FOR X) NEW INSTALLATION ALTERATION REPAIR Attach separate sheets or report showing entire area with respect to surrounding areas, topography of area, habitable building, location of potable water wells, soil percolation test holes. soil profiles in test holes (See page 4). LOCATION OF PROPOSED FACILITY: Near what City of Town Silt, CO Size of Lot > 2 acres Legal Description or Address Lot 2, Simon Subdivision Exemption WASTES TYPE:X) DWELLING TRANSIENT USE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL NON - DOMESTIC WASTES OTHER - DESCRIBE BUILDING OR SERVICE TYPE: ResldeMial home Number of Bedrooms Five (5)Number of Persons Five (5) t3C Garbage Grinder X) Automatic Washer X) Dishwasher SOURCE AND TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: X) WELL SPRING STREAM OR CREEK If supplied by Community Water, give naive of supplier PVO/SSE Public Water System, PWID # 123605 DISTANCE TO NEAREST COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEM: 1.5 miles Was an effort made to connect to the Community System? > 1.5 miles; not within sewer district 4 site plan b ranted to be submitted that indicates the following MINIMUM distances: Leach Field to Well: > 100 ft 100 feet Septic Tank to Well: > 100 ft 50 feet Leach Fldd to Irrigadon Ditches, Stream or Water Course: > 100 50 feet Septic Systems to Property Lines: > 100 ft I feet y iI y_. , ty r tie Y)_u as L WILL NeTBE1.fY1. 1 Li It _1 Jam !!_ 1 AMMAN GROUND CONDITIONS: Depth to first Ground Water Table Approx. 4 feet Percent Ground Slope Varies, 2 - 5 % 2 TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: X) SEPTIC TANK AERATION PLANT VAULT VAULT PRIVY COMPOSTING TOILET RECYCLING, POTABLE USE PIT PRIVY INCINERATION TOILET RECYCLING, OTHER USE 1 CHEMICAL TOILET OTHER - DESCRIBE FINN, DISPOSAL BY: ABSORPTION TRENCH, BED OR PIT EVAPOTRANSPIRATION UNDERGROUND DISPERSAL SAND FILTER. ABOVE GROUND DISPERSAL WASTEWATER POND X) OTHER - DESCRIBE Mound System WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE? No pERCOLA77ON TPST RESULTS: (To be completed by Registered Professional Engineer, if the Engineer does the Percolation Test) Minutes 60 oer inch in hole No. 1 Minutes 45 per mob in hole NO.3 Minutes 30Mi per inch in hole No. 2 It/mutes per inch in hole NO. _ Name, address and telephone of RPE who made sod absorption tests: HP Geotech, Inc., 5020 CR 154, Glenwood Springs, CO 81801 Name, address and telephone of RPE reaponsrbie for design of the system: Paul C. Currier, P.E. Water Resource Consultants, LLC 244 Hutton Ave., Rifle, CO 81650 Applicant acknowledges that the completeness of the application is conditional upon such further mandatory and additional tests and reports as may be required by the local health department to be made and flrrnisbed by the applicant or by the local health department for purposed of the evaluation of the application; and the issuance of the permit issubjecttosuchtermsandconditionsasdeemednecessarytoinsurecompliancewithrulesandregulationsmade,information and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are or will be represented to be tore and correct to the best of my knowledge lad belief and are designed to be relied on by the local department of health in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I father understand that any falsification or misrepresentation may result in the denial of the application or revocation of any permit granted based upon said application and in legal action for perjury as provided by law. Signed G Date Feb 23, 2000 PLEASE DRAW AN ACCURATE MAP TO YOUR PROPERTYII Pao R£ciS•fFt 1oc':•..cuq•• 100 yards west of intersection of County Road 250 and County Road 281 o:a4/5 a iii z3 0U=W' ' 3 COUNTY RD.250 x y •—. — x — — ._. - - — 4_ Lot Z Simon Subd. Exemption 4.81+/— ACRES Pvo /SSE PWSID if 123605 WELL AND PUMP HOUSE t 1500 GAL. DOSWO SEPTIC TANK.11W17713SEPARATE500GALCOMPARTMENTS PLACE ETFWEMT FLTEF ON DISCHARGE FROM ENO TO 3R0 TANIC. IMIS 3.7147 SLOPE SIDES OF r 7MOUND5H: IV s 1 41 PLACE'FB10' FROM FIETD O7REES/SEEPS / /MW. OF 100' fROV TREES AND SEEPS I( POTABLE WATER LINE L1 rttp ^ PEORSj`1I I e UG. C.cU, i 1 A VV itg r` U 4 ' 61475 i2 100 50 0 a . . -.. I---I I---1 1' - 100' DATE : 234(9 -2000 AIL LONG / REECE RESIDENCE TILE : 224 -1.0 I vault CECONSAe.TAN111,11c GARFIELD COUNTY, CO.NO : 224-1.0 I 0MO OF 2441400w. • 11:01400. 81050 J BY PCC 2ISDSLOCATIONMAP DAm : PHIFat ' • @5 - 5433 T 20' SLOPE r .1 TO MIN CONDON N S PROCTOR DENSITY. REYWAW WITH ONASSIS SLOP We uYER, tlkN ri . SS Q.r. INWER TATTLE ABSORPTION FIELD ITYPICALCROSS— SFCTION Po p REG/s 11 Pi ES 0%,••6 Cb c^ 1 2475 n O,t• . ........•G s II fSS/GNP`E.` 1) 1500 GAL. DOSING SEPTIC TANK, 3 EQUAL CHAMBERS 2) SAND ISNMIN/MUM ONE4 ( rFEET ABOVERSEASONALLY IGHEXISTING WATER /TABLEINSURE TOP 3) LEVEL SAND AND PLACE 7 PARALLEL ROWS OF 5 INFILTRATOR CHAMBERS (35 CHAMBERS q TOTAL). TAKE NNCARLREDURING PLACEMENT OF CHAMBERS TO NOT COMPACT THE SAND SUBGRADE. MAX /MUM OF / r T PROCTOR D / ASTM DE / TOPSOIL. COMPACT SOIL TO A 5) GRADE TOP OF MOUND TO DRAIN, APPROX. 1" / 3' . 6) GRADE SIDE SLOPES OF MOUND 3H: N. 7) REVEGETATE WITH INDIGINEOUS PASTURE GRASSES 8 PIPING: INSTALL 4" CLEANOUTS AT ALL BENDS. SLOPE 13" TO 1/4" PER FOOT MIN. USE PERFORATED PIPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS FOR INFILTRATOR 9) INP ER.TION VENT /PORT: INSTALL 4" INSPECT /ON VENT AT BOTH ENDS OF INFILTRATORIN 10) BURY DELIVERY PIPE MIN. OF 3' BELOW GRADE TO MINIMIM/ZE FREEZING POTENT /AL. MiW : 23-EW -2000 LONG / REECE RESIDENCE FILE : 224 -1.0 WATER RESOURCE CONSULTANTS, LLC GARFIELD COUNTY, CO.IMO : Y24-1.0 I SJ*U OF 244 Hlim 'we .. RNA CO. 81650 J ISDS — DETAILS BY Poo 2 PH /Fax (970) 825 -5013 Ulm : FCC Kevin Long and Gina Reece Residence Lot 2, Simon Subd. Exemption ISDS Calculations Physical Data No. of Bedrooms 55 No. of people /bedroom 1 Total no. of people 7557Gallonsofeffluent / person / day 7 5 Total gal/day 375Peakdailyflow = 1.5 *Total gal / day percolation Data gp min/inch Test Hole 1 Test Hole 2 30 min/inch Test Hole 3 45 min/inch Ave. 45 min/inch Soil Profile at Location of Absorption Field 0-1 feet Topsoil 1-4 feet Sandy Clay 4 feet Bottom of hole; free water observed gbprotion Field Utilize gravelless trench with Infiltrators; reduce total area required by 20% Area = Q/5 `(q ^0.5 = 450 / 5* (8.4 min / in)A0.5 755 SF less 20% reduction TOTAL REQ'D AREA OF ABSORPTION FIELD:804 Use infiltrator chambers, 6.25' x 2.83' = 17.7 sf each O µEClg Fit t No. required: 35 4 - cut; to tl Use 7 rows of 5, i.e., 31' long x 20' wide aif e 2A • Han Soil G Z. ..............................Haulul In min. 1 feet in depth of river sand and / least crusher fines. Test to make sure percolation rate Is at least 10 min/inch. fl essi . P` = cr Backflll with native topsoil. Remove all rocks larger than 3" prior to placing material. Lightly tamp, but do not compacttomorethan85% standard density. Place a minimum of 24" depth of topsoil over top of Infiltrator chambers. Grade side slopes at 3H:1V or flatter. Revegetate with pasture grasses indiglneous to existing pasture. Water Resource Consultants, LLC 224 -1.0 2/23/00 / Page 1 of 1 4" Biotube® Effluent Filter & Biotube Jr. Applications Standard Features & Benefits 5 -10 times more flow area than other Our patented` 4" Biotube Effluent Filter and Biotube Jr. are ideal smanymatimes lasso , sds laststs angerbranrand,for residential septic tanks. They prevent large solids from leaving b the tank, dramatically improving wastewater quality and extending homeowner cleanings, ma nings, iy time cr the life of residential drainfields.Installs in minutes inside new or existing tanks; extendible tee handle for easy removal Easy to clean by simply hosing off whenever the tank needs pumping Removes about two-thirds of suspended t solids, on average, extending drainfield life Corrosion -proof construction, to ensure long life II let Optional Features & Benefits Alarm available, to signal the need for cleaning we Flow modulating plate available to M limit flow rate leaving tank t'a.Custom and commercial sizes available E `Biotube Filtering Process l •° 9 "Jr hunt lifter Effluent from the relatively clear zone of1 .the septic tank, between the scum and r„ r sludge layers, horizontally enters the Biotube Effluent Filter through inlet holes 4 " Biotube Jr.in the housing. Effluent then enters the n annular space between the housing and the Biotubes, utilizing the Biotubes' entire surface for filtering. Particles larger than 9' Biotube Effluent Filar the Biotube's mesh are prevented from leaving the tank. Orenco's superior effluent filters resin clogging better than 41 other brands. Our r standard, full -sized 4' Biotube Effluent Fiber provides maximum long -tens protection o• rd in a complete package, with housing. Our 9 "Blombe Jr.. at half the size ofour d tam standard model has more filtering rapacity than the full -sized filter told by other era ufacturers. For tanks with existing outlet tees, the Jr. insert filter is ideal OrMtou>oys[sms• Incorporated APa 220411 she rrx Rev. 220 NAt Changing Ike a3rld Doer tvnnexmel C rend by cam(5.492.635 and 4.439323 Model Codes for Ordering 4" Biotube 4" Biotube 4" Biotube Jr. Effluent Filter 7 Yfnr nutomixed options (c g -• N indi- rata mess Nord Carolina ra Extendible PVC handle - - -- x Indiata Boat bracket auacbod arts. _ Stainless steel set screws - caw- Indiata Box• modulation plate imalbd TOP seal plate Cartrid height- 28" and 36" arc mndard Air vents Housing height. 36" and 44" are standard a ° - Indicates filter diameter (in) W- Indiata fits 3034 outlet pipe S- lydirara Sekeduk 40 omelet pipe P- Indiaata 1116" filtration P indimra 1/8 filtration Biotube effluent fiber series Biotube filter cartridge - - - I ,4 " iBiotube Jr. (includes cartridgealdhousing) EFJJ 0 0418MA -yFor °atomncd options (rag.. NC indicatesTTmeetsNordCarolinater.) I I IlndiBata flint bulnrkationet aradcd Solid base Riser Indianw place irualltd it well dia Cartridge height (in) Indicates filter mdiaeter (in)i;,irW,en e W- Indiata fiu 3034 outlet pipe S/xdiara Schedule 40 order pipe 0» P- lndiara 1116" filtration Nn P indicate 1/8" frlmrnon IPJr. Series Biotube effluent filter series 4" Jr. Filter Insert (cartridge only) 71314 7 Aac customised options (e.g.. NC Indiata meets a „ - ( i North Carolina refit. H indicates fits into Hancor tec)t W-Indiata cartridge fits into 30 housing. i S- Indicates cartridge fits into Schedulee 440 housing t1Cartridgeheightfin)Filter housing Indicates filter diameter (in) P- Indiata 1116" filtration 1.' ``. No P indirnra l/8" Portion N'' I Insert Series 000 i Biowbe effluent filter wrier nn , 4 t'' To Order Tenkwel Call your nearest Orenco Systems, Inc. distributor. For nearest distributor, tall Orenco at 1 -800- 348 -9843. Orcnco Systems Inc 1999 Distributed By: Installation of an Automatic Siphon in a Pwtest t'nncrete manhole Iloml.. .,b I /1_ I It lc°t sewerl._. ,1 Isettlingkink Ikl ___ ..._ _____ u (. 1 _3 i , i Installation of an Automatic Siphon in a 3 Compartment Septic M manhole MANHOLE manhole Inlet sewer SIS OVERFLOW EFFLUENT., 1 __ Ii 1 1FILTERll uI y discharcw SETTLING CLEARWATER DOSING TANK TANK TANK Installation of an Automatic Siphon in a Concrete Dosing lane rllatl"ole manhole C . get sewer '.L1 i settling tank l 1 i li . r i , Fluid Dynamic Siphons, Inc. P.O. Box 882019 1 Steamboat Springs, CO 80488 -2019 1-800 -818-5653 303) 879 -2494 FAX ?h3- 879 -4948 MODEL 423 DIRECTIONS FOR SETTING 1) Read the entire instruction book before installing. 2) Set siphon trap plumb and level The long leg of the siphon should extend 16" above the floor line. 3) Use a gesketed fitting to connect the outlet of the siphon to the overflow pipe and discharge line. 4) Fin the siphon trap with water before Initial operation. 5) Make sure all Joints of the vent piping are airtight High Water Une µA.A. AAA.Vent Pipe MP la I 23 ,.2 6"Overflow Pipe 16 1 1 r 1 Olh Low Water ES dw.. n Floor Una 4;t IIIINIIIIII 1' S f. • 5" i ,1oY<fi j^' ke 4" PVC. CI or Tile pll Vgre, i f %P " rS .„1 not furnished by Flak 1,. a4 1 c s At A• Inc.t a.Afi.. tit kt te Discharge eonnectb I,i . Y'r 4 1 , , r 15" siphon 4215D. D.Y k icy 4i e 7 SK'I 1 s •t StI K K f F 9 r l i l t.' r h Sv't Cy t s,.: 4 e ytK,. 'i{_Lx f ! „'` ` ` r 3- r to }u ' 4 ' ( . 1'x v " 1 g Fl 1 f {' K. J F Rr .:YY ? Y 12Ys" V Installing the Siphon the bell will have risen to a level lust short of the top of the g p trap, end also at this point a quantity of air is forced around , Please read the entire instruction booklet before the invert of the trap and escapes through the discharge installing.leg of the siphon. The escaping air relieves the back The slphon trap should be water tested before setting pressure within the slphon and the water Inside of the bell In concrete to make sure that it has not sustained any will rush up and fill the siphon trap thereby starting the damage In shipping.siphon action. The liquid is drawn out of the tank until air reaches the bottom of the bell. At this point the siphon Set the siphon trap In concrete, being sure that it is action is stopped. plumb and level and that the long leg of the Trap extendsabovethefloorthecorrectdistance (please note the drawing on page 1). Do not change any dimension or Testing elevation without first contacting the factory. The FIIl thetankunUlllquldcoversthebellandven (piping.discharge line from the siphon should be vented back into if bubbles rise to the surface there is an Indication of an air overflow pip e and outlet pipepe must be connected t to the lethetank. overflow pipe will accomplish t The leak. An air leak in the bell or In the vent piping will prevent pipe osiphondischargeusingagasketedfittingbecauseitisproperoperation. Impossible to solvent bond the fitting to the high density As the liquid level In the tank approaches the high t polyethylene with which the siphon is constructed. This water line listen for a biooping noise which indicates air is may be accomplished by using a gasketed T' fitting or by escaping through the siphon discharge. When the siphon using a short length of sewer pipe that has a gasketed belied reaches the high water line the siphon will lire. If It does not. end and then connecting it to a solvent weld 'T fitting. The refer to the trouble shooting guide. discharge line leading from the siphon must have a slight pitch away from the siphon to prevent it from backing up.Operation Of Dual AlternatingFillthesiphontrapwithwatertillItflowsoutthedischarge line.Automatic Siphons in dual alternating Installations care must be taken to When liquid rises In the tank for the first time, both el both traps at the same elevation. They must both be siphons will operate as Indicated for the single siphon. Ifplumbandlevel. They may discharge In any direction but both siphons were constructed exactly the same and set they must NOT discharge into the same line or an perfectly they would both go into operation at the same Interconnecting line.time. Slight variations, however, are inevitable and will Next, screw the inner vent pipe into the siphon bell.bring one siphon Into operation before the other. Then screw the outer vent pipe Into the Inner vent pipe The first siphon to operate will empty the tank and will which is now in the bell. Use pipe compound on the result in all but about half of the liquid being forced out of threaded points to insure an air tight seal.the trap that did not operate. This will result in a greater With the 1 /4 -20 bolts started into the trap, place the quantity of air being trapped In the long leg of the siphon hell over the trap and rotate it 1111 the sloes In the bell line up that did not discharge. The extra alr in this siphon will with the bolts in the trap. Push the bell down and rotate it.cause It to operation. Into operation next. This results in the Tighten the bolts. Make sure that the siphon trap Is full of water up to the level of the discharge line. You are now ready to teat the Testing Dual Alternating Siphons siphon.Make sure that both siphon traps have been tilled with water. As the dosing tank Is filled and when the liquid Operation of Single Automatic covers ron siphon oeltsend ventnt p Accheck for bubbles bs Siphons an air leak which will prevent the siphons from operating As liquid rises In the dosing tank it also rises inside the properly. siphon bell at the same rate till the liquid reaches the levelof the outer vent pipe. At this point an air seal Is effected. As As the liquid in the tank reaches the high water line the liquid leveicontinuesto rise In the tank it also continues one of the siphons should go into operaton.Itisnecessary to rise in the bell but much more slowly. Concurrently, the to fill the tank at least one more time to make sure that the air that Is trapped in the bell and the long leg of the siphon other siphon goes into operation and the siphons are is forced towards the Invert of the siphon trap. When the alternating properly. If there is any problem refer to the quid In the tank reaches the high water line the liquid in trouble shooting section. MODEL 413 AUTOMATIC SIPHON Trouble Shootin g Is entering the dosing chamber then the vent pipe Is too ..., short, which Is delaying the pressurization of the siphon. If the Siphons are not operating properly follow these Water In the bell has risen to the level of the long leg of the steps:trap and is spilling over the trap but the air In the trap hasnotbeenforcedaroundtheInvertLengthentheventpipe 1) Make sure that the vent pipes are not clogged.by about 14" by gtueing a PVC coupling onto the end of it. 2) Make sure that there are no air leaks In the vent piping c) Retest the siphon, listening for the " Bloop" and or the bell.repeat step 4 if necessary. 3) Make sure the siphon trap(s) has been filled with water initial step).5) Dual Alternating Siphon 4) Refer to the section on the "Operation of SingleAutomaticSiphons ". A "Bloop" sound is audible as the air If one siphon always triggers, the vent pipes must be in the long leg of the siphon trap escapes around the invert adjusted. Lengthening the outer vent pipe has a tendencyUm of the trap. It Is important in diagnosing the trouble of a to bring vent siphon Into theoperations o r ortening ti emalfusiphontodetermineifthisairIsescaping from the siphon by listening for the " Bloop" as water fills vent iipe of the passivesishon.n and tor a torte and emit 1 the dosing tank.process of balancing the two siphons. Retest the system a) If the " Bloop' sound Is heard but the siphon does after each change. Caution: the vent pipes can be adjusted not come Into operation, the outer vent pipe Is too long. too much. They can be shortened to the point where no which is causing the siphon to be pressurized to soon.The water air will escape the siphon trap and the effluent will air in the long leg of the trap has escaped around the invert trickle through the siphon. The vent pipes can be of the trap but the water In the bell had not risen high lengthened to the point where air escapes through the enough to iiow lnto the trsp. Cut about ½" oltthe end o%the siphon but the liquid In the bell Is not high enough to tiow vent pipe.into the trap. It will "Bloop" and malfunction. If the siphons b) If no "bloop" is heard by the time the siphon are Installed property there Ise point in which both siphons r reaches the high water line and the siphon appears to be will operate alternately. Adjustments to dual alternating trickling effluent through the siphon as fast as the effluent siphons should be gradual (/. to Si"). FLUID DYNAMICS INC. 1025 Delaware Avenue Longmont, Colorado 0501 g19_ c... Y um The Eliniinators from Little Giant* b ••\ -4 .3 _ 94-^.\- ieXI e= 1610 — -• NA Ts yr 8E- Series Zi& ,The Eliminator submersible pumps from Little Giant are specifically y engineered to handle the tough demand- ing tasks for effluent and sewage waste r k. 7 ,, i- t.: '' #I• 'transfer with high efficiency and long s t/- -, ,- z + f ,, ;;term dependability. 5 ' ; ° i° -.' " ''it The Eliminators — USA Se- t 7 rc ries — includes pumps for use in Resi- t d.denial, Commercial, Industrial and tL tw }Agricultural applications with Tight to p J. ' medium transfer demands. For dewatcr- t ing, effluent waste, wastewater and sew- 14, - 1 . age handling where such materials must be moved upward from a collection area k`to sewer or septic lines, or drainage areas, the Eliminators are an ideal solution. Series Features Handles liquids and solid waste ma- terials up to 3/4" diameter. Cast iron pump housing with protec- tive epoxy coating for corrosion and rust resistance. Oil filled motor housing for lifetime g/ii lubrication and rapid heat dissipa- lion. I Stainless steel screws, bolts. handle, and seat assembly. 111)Mechanical seals (stainless steel spring, nitrite pans, carbon and co- E Series 4 . ' M t ramie faces). 8E Series t Thermal overload protection. E Manual and Automatic modes in For residential and light commer-I each size. coal use. the Model HE Series De-Automatic operation has 9" -14' watering end Effluent pumps handle a ' /On" level and, and 2" -6" "Ott" liquids and solid waste materials up II i_11,level range with adjustable Float to 'ii" diameter. Pumps feature a U/ 1.-Switch. 1l discharge. with a lift of 21'.r 2 Class- filled nylon cover and ABS rr ellS11 All 113 volt models are UUCSA base. Listed. iModel8E -CIM (Manual)i t u ci I,,fiOOakland able PumpsferEliminaDemaoughSebaModel8E- CIA -RFS (Auto) r Little Giant "'tsa Submersible Dewatering & Effluent Pumps a' 4 0 6 1180' -- tal Z041#111 : 4 ‘7 11111111: 4111) k \ sillik N II 1 4.65' — K'DIS USA iCHAROE I an^ Nie iiTTIiISMI 1 SCREEN TO PASS W' SOLIDS POWER CORD I BE SERIES MOOR CATALOG SOLIDS SIZE IUMNINI STANT PEAFOIMACEIBPN QNFAM SMUTOFF PWR CIS WOOD SINENSNMS NO.110. LISTING NP VOLTS IRM1.4 AMPS/WATTS AMPS W 10' 15' Sr IN PAL IFLI IUR.I PIA IBIUJ 11E -CIM 509000 ULICSA 113 115 314 111900 14 52 45 33 21 9.1 10 27 825x9.64.9 8E- CIHFS 509050 ULICSA t1/33 115 3/4 11190061900 147 8E-CIM 509000 52 45 33 21 9.1 12 27 825x8254.66.9 81-CIM 5091105 UL CSA 1/3 115 3/4 11/900 14 52 45 33 21 9.1 15 30 825x9.6 8E- CIA -RFS 509105 UL/CSA 1a 115 3/4 111900 14 52 45 33 21 9.1 15 32 8.25x9.6x6.9 BE-CIA-RFS 5091 ULIC 1/3 115 3/4 1119110 25524533219.1 20 34 826x69 All Models are 60 Hz. BE SERIES PUMP PERFORMANCE CURVE 115VAC 60Hz CAPACITY LITERS /MINUTE 1 d 25 I I 0 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 120 100 240 r(111!' 1 1 - 7.5 11::::*.--------Ve1 te 20 _6. 3 m .- 5 a 1W15 =d l q w 10 _A 2S y 5 _ INDIVIDUAL ACCESSORIES AND PRE- ENGINEERED SYSTEMS ARE AVAILABLE. 0 I'll 1111 1111 1114 1111 Ills 1111 Ins nfl 1111 0 0 15 30 45 60 75 CAPACITY- GALLONS /MINUTE e P.O. BOX 12010. 3810 N. TULSA 1 `_ I OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 73112a4 . I. DD wHV SUBSIDIA 405) 947 -2511t"RY xlCVMfiM C :9yd*1995 Chile (kill Pump Company —Form 0994340 -11/95 a NicRols lssoclates, Inc. 1 751 Horizon Court. Suite 102, Grand Junction, CO 81506 970·245-7101 ~ 970·245·3251 email • nai@acsol.net Date: rs'?" f" Total # of pages Including coveraheet: E To: To'\M 1;l.i..v..9e Recipient FAX: cf70-7'1'--S -~';;?<f5 From: I e v v J' fl/ c.. k <: \.s Nichols i«:ssoclates , Inc. Memo: sender FAX: t::f 7 o -:R ct-s;--3 ~ f;; / Check Cash Assessor's Parcel No. CHARGES Percolation Test $100.00 Includes final Inspection) Permit Processing Fee $50.00 1 .. J v Permit N: J .- Owner's Name ' l .\ ~' ('1 e Ir:.: I\''\ . J Address at System Location Ld 3 Amount P;;id /S 'L crt. Date Pai:! ·7/.J.7/~/ 3205 1t J..Si:..· c:-; I I~ (I..' tt; S..J- Money Order Cashier _CJ_~_.\._· _ ... _,.~-)'"'-~--~----------- ALL CHECKS ARE TO BE MADE PAYABLE TO GARFIELD COUNTY TREASURER While. APrltCANT Yellow. DEPARTMENT '(' 1 .,:.l.-C)~ s .£ _;, • ~ ' ·--· t• !:">-&\ INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM APPLICATION -- OWNER~~__.L_,;;OJ?z~~,j~~~r?~er~..&:>~·~~~------------~------------~~ ADDRESS __._P..;;;;;..o_.....;... a__;:CJ=-X..=------'-X"-r~ j"--'· 7'---..;;;....5__.-' 6-'-1 ........ 6=-o--= 6.~:li-=~s2 PHONE _S_79---'-: _____ !J-_;;?_;:_L-:f__;;8'::____ r CONTRACTOR __ _..,~~P--.------------------------ ADDRESS _~---------------- PHONE _________ _ PEIDvflT REQUEST FOR MNEW INST ALLATI ON ( ) AL TERA TION ( ) REPAJR Attach separate sheets or report showing entire area with respect to surrounding areas, topography of area, habitable building, location of potable water wells, soil percolation test holes, soil profiles in test holes (See page 4) LOCATION OF PROPOSED FACILITY : Near what City of Town ____ ----'S._..:/_./ _________ ----"'-S=ize"'-"'-'of'"""L...,.o_._t _/9_ ....... ~<-·r"J_~_tJ __ ~_F_-_ Legal Description or Address C ~ ./"1.!;;t t/?oc.-d .:JS-0 l WASTES TYPE . SXf DWELLING ( ) TR.t\NSIENT USE COM!vlERCIAL OR Il'l"DUSTRJAL ( ) NON-DO.rvfESTIC WASTES OTHER-DESCRIBE _~~~~---------------------- BUil..DING OR SERVICE TYPE ·------------------------ Number of Bedrooms 3 ----=-------------Number of Persons _._..J....__ __ _ 0 Garbage Grinder 00 Automatic Washer }\') Dishwasher SPRING ( ) STREA...~ OR CREEKSOlJRCEA ... ND TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: -)>{WELL If supplied by Commurury Water, give name of supplier: ________________ _ DISTA...NCE TO NEAREST COMMUNITY SE\iVER SYSTEM: ____ ;2 __ r-_""1-_~_~_r _____ _ Was an effort made to connect to the Community System? _____ /l._c.> _________ _ A site plan is required to be submitted that indicates the following MINIMUM distances: Leach Field to Well: 100 feet Septic Tank to Well: 50 feet Leach Field to Irrigation Ditches, Stream or Water Course: 50 feet Septic System to Property Lines: 10 feet YOUR JJ'UlIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT WILL NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT A SITE PLAN. GROUND CONDITIONS: fi v I D~ili~fu~Gro~dW~rT~~---~~~~·~~'~'-c~Y~ ___ o ____________ ~ I Percent Ground Slope ________ _..:;"'?=-~.-.......::P' ________________ _ t/t/S--fQ/ 2 q;J-rl Jf' INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: SEPTIC TANK ( ) AERATION PLANf ( ) VAULT VAULT PRIVY ( ) COr...n>OSTING TOILET ( ) RECYCLING. POT ABLE USE PIT PRIVY ( ) INCINERATION TOILET ( ) RECYCLING, OTIIER USE CHEMICAL TOILET ( ) OTIIER -DESCRIBE FINAL DISPOSAL BY: ABSORPTION TRENCH, BED OR PIT ( ) EV APO~~SPIR..l\TION c>6 UNDERGROUN'"D DISPERSAL ( ) SAND FILTER ABOVE GROUN-0 DISPERSAL ( ) WASTEWATER POND OTHER -DESCRIBE WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE? /70 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS : (To be completed by Registered Professional Engineer, ifthe Engineer does the Percolation Test) Minutes _____ per inch in hole No. 1 Minutes ______ per inch in hole NO. 3 Minutes per inch in hole No. 2 l\ifinutes per inch in hole NO._ Name , address and telephone of RPE who made soil absorption tests ·---------------- Name. address and telephone of RPE responsible for design of the system: _____________ _ A pplicant acknowledges that the completeness of the application is conditional upon such further mandatory and additional tests and reports as may be required by the local health department to be made and furnished by the applicant or by the local health depanment for purposed of the evaluation of the application~ and the issuance of the permit is ubject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and regulations made, information and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are or will be represented to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and are designed to be relied on by the local department of health in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein I further understand that any falsification or misrepresentation may result in the denial of the application or revocation of any permit granted based upon said application and in legal action for perjury as provided by law. Signed---.....~c.......r-.tP.~--'J~~---,7 rV....._ ___ _ r~, Date __ 6-_2._'fs_-9 _____ y __ _ PLEASE DRAW AN ACCURATE MAP TO YOUR PROPERTY!! 3 10c;!ll 999 03: 13 978245'.;:251 I I! u. I Cl) ' - 1 ~, i I I I 1 I I 1 i I L_ 1 j I I I 1 I i I 0688 COUNTY ROAD 250 ---- 460 Feet _______ ......... ____ . --·-·---................... ------ i . I 1 I Shop j I I \"" '-......, ' "--------. 3 BR House 0 Peri< te&t holes 0 Iii tit 1111111111110~ I i"'-..' T !--6~--~; ·,, 'Septic Tank 1,000Gal minimum concrete distribution box Repair area Pt-t.. - 472 Feet I ' \ I ~ I I i r; 1~ ~ lf ~ ~i i I~ 11! 1 419 Feet en 4!1 Cl) "/)' .--1-f.-. ·~:-:•· ~ ,, 4 .. L ~ 1---·-u IU en :::> Q ISOS SILT, CO Prepared for: Tom Junge. P .O. Box 827, Sitt, CO 81652 CJ) z 6~ t en wO < en az DATF. REMARKS I I --·· BVI ldn CRl\YIN er - trln rop;,oo iiy: Nich~ A$$0daces~T~.~ 1s1 Horizon A6-:;Grand Jundion, cf~ _1~ .•. _ . Phone 970- 245-7101 FAX 24S.32!i1 emai nalGru.net JRVEYDA" . . L~ ,, Ci r. u: u. u: J 0 1 l.l UI ltl r-J 01 ..... 7 J> 81 g ..... i,.. Ill U t- tTJ w J9/09/19''B 03:13 '371?2452251 PAGE 04 ISDS DESIGN FOR 0688 CR250 ROAD, S'LT, COLORADO NOTES: 1. Construction must be done according to current Garfield County individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations. Ar:y changes rnu~t be approved by the engineer and Garfield County Health Department. 2. The lnstallaticn will be inspected by the engineer and Gar11eld County Health Oel)&rtment before backfilling. 3. A 1.000 gallon minimum capacity septic tank is required. The tank mu~t meet the septlo design criteria specified by the Garfield County Health Department. The tank shall be Installed on a solid base and shall be level. Tank access and Inspection port shall be no more than S" below finished grada 4. Use 4~ diameter ASTM D 3034 plastic pipe from the building to the septic tank. A clasnout shall be Installed outside the bulldfng. Pipe from !he septic tank to the distribution box and infiltrators shall be 4' diameter ASTM 0 3034 . 5. As-built drawings shall be made after construction One copy ol the as·built drawing shall be delivered to the Garfl!ld County Health Department 6. The system must be Installed by a licensed septic tank Installer. 7. Plot plan must adhere to all hcri~ontal distance requirements as de&ignated by ttie Garfield County Health Department. 25' minimum distance to foundation 4 • diameter ASTM D 3034 plastic pipe Bencn pipe \.!• area to same f'\ elevatlon as fJ\' ;Jrflltrator I~~ I I I 1&----'--P~ ~0-----;d '. •J _-.~:~,:~, >~lllll\\\11111\ll~l\liii~il~ii I 1000 oaf. &~tic tank / t 1 I -.--··--·---- Concrete distributiot1 bolC IJI /\~(A~ e c.___ __ 1 • F Sc.lo GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT 109 8th Street Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone (303) 945 -8212 INDIVIDUA L SEWAGE DISPO SA L PERMIT PROPERTY BP-obL6 Permit N ~ J 7 7 0 Assessor 's Parcel No. CX,/d.7-3t,JMo/-oc > This does not consti tute a bu i ldin g or use permit. Owner's Name _,,[Jc __ __,_h_....Q.,,__,._,G\YJ-Pi~f~)_M_'_,_.di~'~l/~o -Present Address ~-FJCf~lf~J __ c_~_r_~_W"'l_bSfi=t /\:,.__,1 11.,,1~~L_r1_. Phone m6 -5 / J5' System Location _____ ____,O=--=-'JS=---{p,___C~6 ..:....;{ IA,'"-"-b1L..:..Ll:lo/o_,_,1c..:...J' Af'-"-----_))-=---{'_\ _J __,,,,-L"'----_._5 _,_,_j 4 (_,_ f __ Co __ · _:_¥_/_6__:o:~:___ __ galDncri~ionofA~uor~~~No. __ ~l_o_-~f-~~---~-~-c_h_~~£~f~~~-=0~C~~~~~,~~=-~-~d~/~~~7_-_3_~_/~- 0 I -l>6_3 SYSTEM DESIGN Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) ______ Other Perco lation Rate (minutes/inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other) ____ _ Required Absorption Area -See Attached Special Setback Requirements; Date _____________ Inspector---------------------------- FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed) Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Install ation System Insta ller _________________________________________ _ Septic Ta nk Capacity _______________________________________ _ Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name -------------------------------- Septi c Tank Access within 8" of surface --------------------------------- Absorption Area----------------------------------------- Absorption Area Type and/o r Manufacturer or Trade Name -------------------------- Adequate comp liance with County and State regulations/requirements. _____________________ _ Other __ -+--+--~'---------------1-----~-------~-~~--------~ b/t'f(o(,, ""'•"°'~~~~~~~~~ Date RETA IN WITH RECEIPT RECORD AT CONSTRUCTION S IT E CONDITIONS: 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter 25, Article 10 C.R.S . 1973, Revised 1984. 2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fu lly complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con- nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a requirement of the permit and ca u se for both legal action and re vocation of the permit. 3. Any person w ho constructs , alters, or installs an indi vid u al sewage d isposal system in a manner which involves a knowing and material variation from the terms or specifications contained in the appli cation of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine -6 months in jai l or both). White -APPLICANT Yellow -DEPARTMENT INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM APPLICATION OWNER £~','Mo OcZoc:.... ADDRESS O'tl(r CoLu.vib ,A,~ }ANL' · CONTRACTOR ~ t'-C (' 13 ;)I 1' le ) PHONE t/8 -'-It/ .J 7 PHONE 5re A}ft. L'( PERMIT REQUEST FOR (~EW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR Attach separate sheets or report showing entire area with respect to surrounding areas, topography of area, habitable building, location of potable water wells, soil percolation test holes, soil profiles in test holes (See page 4). LOCATION OF PROPOSED FACILITY: Near what City ofTown. __ 5~J~'tj-____________ Size ofLot@ c.,.Cl't""/ /&?, Legal Description or Address ~/-2c) /?ec.,_c £ {), //tCv Orch4f'C / WASTES TYPE: (::n;WELLING QJ_c, IP Co(v-~,J'D ~'") TRANSIENT USE NON-DOMESTIC WASTES ( ) COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL OTHER-DESCRIBE~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- BIBWINGORSE~~E~E:_~B_f~~u_·_~_l_r __ £_c~~-·-,b_/e_~_c_e ____________ _ Number of Bedrooms Number of Persons -------.,-----------------~ Garbage Grinder ( ) Automatic Washer SOURCE AND TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (~LL Ifsupplied by Community Water, give name of supplier: Y}-Dishwasher SPRING ( ) STREAM OR CREEK DISTANCE TO NEAREST COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEM :~2~'~"'=-,"~/<~s __ 5_.-·_/f_. __ Was an effort made to connect to the Community System? ----r-.A ..... J__.o-=----------- A site plan is required to be submitted that indicates the followint: MINIMUM distances: Leach Field to Well: 100 feet Septic Tank to Well: 50 feet Leach Field to Irrigation Ditches, Stream or Water Course: 50 feet Septic System (septic tank & disposal field) to Property Lines: 10 feet YOUR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT WILL NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT A SITE PLAN. GROUND CONDITIONS: I Depth to fir st Ground Water Table ___ ~......,,.._ ___________________ _ P G d SI /-....... c. t'/oercentrounope ____ ---=-...1_/_t:. _____________________ _ 2 TYPE OF INDIVIDUA,L SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: CY? SEPTIC TANK ( ) AERATION PLANT ( ) VAULT VAULT PRIVY ( ) COMPOSTING TOILET ( ) RECYCLING, POTABLE USE PIT PRIVY ( ) INCINERATION TOILET ( ) RECYCLING, OTHER USE CHEMICAL TOILET( ) OTHER-DESCRIBE FINAL DISPOSAL BY: ABSORPTION TRENCH, BED OR PIT ( ) EVAPOTRANSPIRA TION vf" UNDERGROUND DISPERSAL ( ) SAND FILTER ABOVE GROUND DISPERSAL ( ) WASTEWATER POND OTHER-DESCRIBE WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE? )Jo PERCOLATION TEST RES ULTS: (To be completed by Registered Professional Engineer, ifthe Engineer does the Percolation Test) Minutes @ Minutes W per inch in hole No. 1 per inch in hole No. 2 Minutes Minutes 8'0 per inch in?e No. J _,,..;;-- tie/l ~ fa b · 1 S .per inch ~le Httia; Name, address and telephone of RPE who made soil absorption tests:----~--------- Name, address and telephone ofRPE responsible for design of the system: Applicant acknowledges that the completeness of the application is conditional upon such further mandatory and additional tests and reports as may be required by the local health department to be made and furnished by the applicant or by the local health department for purposed of the evaluation of the application; and the issuance of the permit is subject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and regulations made, information and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are or will be represented to be true and correct to the best ofmy knowledge and belief and are designed to be relied on by the local department of health in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I further understand that any falsification or misrepresentation may result in the denial ofthe application or revocation of any permit granted based upon said application and in legal action for perjury as provided by law. OURPROP~~.tv-~~LJ~~_._.,_~~3-'--~~~~ 3 Designate North Arrow "' "-S-- Your Neighbor's Name & Address Your Plot -Shape to Fit No Scale) c J Locate well, all streams, irrigation ditchs, and any water courses. Draw in your house, septic tank & system, detached garages, and driveway. If a change of location is necessary, you must submit a corrected drawing, before a Certificate of Occupation will be issued. County Road (Note the Road Number and Name) eric c:\wpwin60\wpdocslplotloc ~ A) l Your Neighbor's Name & Address t ~.gg~ I , ?-' is' A)~ GARRELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT 109 8th Street Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81801 Phone (303) 945-8212 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT PROPERTY ~ Permit N~ 3900 Assessor's Parcel No. This does not constitute a building or use permit. I . f\I\ ~· ~\-:\~IL) \ 'i_~ Owner's NameVfn/~\YlQi tl 11. r Present AddressDl"J \ \14.. ~ l?-0 C'..ao ~ Phone5\c.~ -I1 <63 System Location loU A JJA.f"u "---S\ o.1 Legal Description of Assessor's Parcel No. a/c'3J-~J-0/-fY'>9 SYSTEM DESIGN Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) ______ .Other Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other) ____ _ Required Absorption Area -See Attached Special Setback Requirements: Date _____________ Inspector ___________________________ _ FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed) Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Installation System Installer ________________________________________ _ Septic Tank Capacity ______________________________________ _ Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name -------------------------------- Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface -------------------------------- Absorption Area---------------------------------------- Absorption Area Type and/or Manufacturer or Trade Name -------------------------- Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements _____________________ _ Other ___________________________________________ _ Date 1 -;q -0 £/ Inspector ~~ (fmt.;u:/,_/ RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE CONDITIONS: 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter 25, Article 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revised 1984. 2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con- nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. 3. Any person who constructs, alters, or installs an individual sewage disposal system in a manner which involves a knowing and material variation from the terms or spec1fications contained 1n the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine -6 months in jail or both). White -APPLICANT Yellow -DEPARTMENT INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM APPLICATION PERMIT REQUEST FOR tj..> NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR Attach separate sheets or report showing entire area with respect to surrounding areas, topography of area, habitable building, location of potable water wells, soil percolation test holes, soil profiles in test holes (See page 4). LOCATION OF PROPOSED FACILITY: NearwhatCityofTown Sbt 1Cdofada SizeofLot 1D ~5> Legal Description or Address 00 l (l rY6P1J r ,~1 bk 1 ffi 6Pwch \~ llo1i i>ah.Ob WASTES TYPE: C'/J DWELLING ( ) TRANSIENT USE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ( ) NON-DOMESTIC WASTES OTHER-DESCRIBE _______________ _ BUILDINGORSERVIcETE: F2'1cql11 ·&Y" Y\·,I~ c-hayrl.« Number of Bedrooms 4-Number of Persons_5 ____ _ Garbage Grinder <j) Automatic Washer ~ Dishwasher SOURCE AND TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: <:/J WELL ( ) SPRING ( ) STREAM OR CREEK Ifsupplied by Community Water, give name of supplier: ~i rrDn t,lkl.L DISTANCE TO NEAREST COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEM: _ __._tJ_.)_,_ft~,'-------- Was an effort made to connect to the Community System? -~ .......... ~----------- A site plan is required to be submitted that indicates the followine MINIMUM distances: Leach Field to Well: ND will 0 n...fl~ 100 feet Septic Tank to Well: 11 • • • • 50 feet Leach Field to Irrigation Ditches, Stream or Water Course: 50 feet Septic System (septic tank & disposal field) to Property Lines: 10 feet YOUR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT WILL NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT A SITE PLAN. GROUND CONDITIONS: Depth to first Ground Water Table __ _,,,Le.._-£-"'":s.a:J:::..__ ________________ _ Percent Ground Slope_-+......,.__ ______________________ _ TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: ef SEPTIC TANK ( ) AERATION PLANT ( ) VAULT VAULT PRIVY ( ) COMPOSTING TOILET ( ) RECYCLING, POTABLE USE PITPRIVY ( ) INCINERATION TOILET ( ) RECYCLING, OTHER USE CHEMICAL TOILET( ) OTHER-DESCRIBE FINAL DISPOSAL BY: fJ) ABSORPTION TRENCH, BED OR PIT ( ) EVAPOTRANSPIRATION eef UNDERGROUND DISPERSAL ( ) SAND FILTER ABOVE GROUND DISPERSAL ( ) WASTEWATER POND OTHER-DESCRIBE WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE? _ _,fJ'--D- PERCOLATION TEST RES ULTS: (To be completed by Registered Professional Engineer, ifthe Engineer does the Percolation Test) Minutes 51 O per inch in hole No. 1 Minutes / og per inch in hole No. 3 Minutes 3;:;? per inch in hole No. 2 Minutes er inch in hole No. Name, address and tel!oneofRPE who made soil absorption tests: bcfiC. lw Her 9R:J~c Hv:.e. ~;iJQ lJ\2 6l€n11~t· CD -~ llaDl D.t10;> UJ,)imi-\ac) :r:71c. ~ ~t.t <tM.llf\.UF~ [lfi)")qt15-'5252 Name, address and telephone ofRPE responsible for design of the syst~: ~ o Q,[) abtJ1.c O Applicant acknowledges that the completeness of the application is conditional upon such further mandatory and additional tests and reports as may be required by the local health department to be made and furnished by the applicant or by the local health department for purposed of the evaluation of the application; and the issuance of the permit is subject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and regulations made, information and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are or will be represented to be true and correct to the best ofmy knowledge and belief and are designed to be relied on by the local department of health in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I further understand that any falsification or misrepresentation may result in the denial ofthe application or revocation ofany permit granted based upon said application and in legal action for perjury as provided by law. Signed~':;;--==wLlk-,-) (} Date . .=l:l~-:t'-"--2'- 0_3-<=----- PLEASE DRAW AN AcclJRM< MAP ~OPERTY!! I Il, ~ • ~ I • I~ • ~ I j • I • s I ~ l • I I I 1 • I I I • II I • I I II • I I • I • l OKlllG~Ut.!!1-- s-: l· b•""' II TUI TO FIELD) 1 '. L· .. , • FINISH ~ADE 11_:11 n-r --I-,_ - 1 1--1 1--I I ii'I <o 11 1 '~' ,-·. _. l~~~~R~~A~PTIC Tri.ET ANO OUTLET POINTS IM'I' BE ~ r ~~~~i0 ~HAi'f!~z~[!;AS • J· I. .. AFFLE ~ENI~ Iii . • ' . _ J~ • E, " --•• PLAN VIEW ~ 6"TOl'SOIL CONCRHE LID I (lollN) 0 BA.rfLr OPENING i. Y/ '<, 5 PROFILE VIEW SEPTIC TANK DETAIL 1 1 d COMCRETE LIO 1 1' -_-_I -, = =1! -- 1 I - 7,<"".·(( .;;_:' Y' ', 0:~ ;;.;::: ~ vx (./,• ~'); ..!' ·;"-,:<,....: 1.<' 7'\.'' /'./ ·~\' v_'i-' /•' v/:-~ v i.llACtt flt_v:NMll..E CM' OR THREADED CLEANOUT "SSEMBL T INSTALL -ER I( CAP IS JO BE BURIED y /,'( 4" PVC WYE NISH GRACIE 4"• PVC RISER 45'BEHD 4"f S£W[R LINE,_ ~ CLEAN OUT CLEAN OUT DETAIL"''""" t<l,T.SJ Sl.t!»ITl.V_l'tllll_ D11A1-#11Juua1., W:aitTATIK ~ 0· ·~= f----··--- STANDARD INFILTRATOR TRENCH DETAIL J!ill,l ATTACH R'(t.l:IVABLE CAP OR n~EA0£0 ClEN«lUT ASS£r.et. Y INSTALL MARKCR ff C1>P IS TO 8( l!UIHEO 4"• F'VC SOLIO PIPE CUT TO FIT '/' 4"• COUPLtNC (UNION)-·'°" USE 140LE SAW TO CUT OUT PRE~D CIRCLE AT TI-IE CENTER IS Tl£ UN I T 4'• PERFORATED PVC PIPE EXTEND PIPE TO REST ON 8DTTCM OF ED/TRENCH y::: INSPECTION PORT DETAIL HTS.) SIJRfJiCE y I'\> '\Thi CRCJUll)llATER OBSERVED SOIL PROFILE N.T.L) I! g ' 1 ie ii1,ir., @ al!; I i!l1 111 I Jl1 ! ii~ I lg l,_j '·- POWER POLE\ W/GUY WIRE oiITl::i OE LOT 11 v 0 ..... D D w N 0 . 0 REBAR AND CAP LS #1 J501 POWER POLE W/GUY WIRE N 89'59'54" 676.22' UTIL. PED. DITCH GRAVEL RD DITCH OVERHEAD ELECT. DITCH 75' ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT LOT 12 Z ·_,,,-OVERHEAD ELECT. AT POWER POLE GRAVEL ROAD 1RR. VALVES 18"~ CMP 30' ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT IL--_,..-~---'.,__-~X----"'.___ ---------- co 0 ..... D D O> r1 ..... 0 f) REBAR AND LS #13501 l<-~~<-'--T,E~ ..... --::~~~~'ll""i~""'l':"~~~r=,,.:,,,,,""i'T':t:I'~ s 89'59 9 w 200' REBAR AND CAP LS #13501 LOT 14 PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMEI\ RD OR IN PLACE. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LOT 12, PEACH VALLEY ORCHARD IG TO THE PLAT RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1909 AS RECEPTION NO. COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE T'llAT" llllt"'"" ILJl"'"'ll"'"'ln\J~LJr-.. 1T lr'\r'\ATll""\ .. I l""rnTlllr'\ATI \AIAr nnrn BOUNDARIES UNLIMITED INC. Consulting Engineers February 23, 2004 Garfield County Building & Planning 108 S'h Street, Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: ISDS for Verveja Residence: Columbine Lane, Silt, CO BUI Project: Verveja Residence To Whom It May Concern: On February 19, 2004, Boundaries Unlimited Inc. personnel observed the construction of the ISDS for the Verveja Residence located off Columbine Lane, Silt, Colorado. One 1500- gallon septic tank and 42 standard Infiltrator units had been installed in a trench configuration. No backfilling had taken place. The owner was advised to install the inspection ports as specified in BUI' s design. Other than that, the installation of the system was in conformance with the intent of the design. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at 945-5252. Sincerely, BOUNDARIES UNLIMITED INC. Deric J. Walter, P.E. Project Manager Cc: Martin Verveja 923 Cooper Avenue I Suite 102 I Glenwood Springs I Colorado 81601 I Ph 970.945.5252 Fax 970.384.2833 EXHIBIT D Water Documents • Letter – Water Rights Opinion -Sara Dunn, Balcomb Green – May 29, 2007 • Decree – Case No. 23CW3157 • Water Quality Report – June 11, 2024 • Findings of Fact – Decree 1 of 2 • Findings of Fact - Decree 2 of 2 • Water Court stipulation • Case No. 00CW36 • Case No. 16CW3023 B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Edward Mulhall, Jr. Scott Balcomb Lawrence R. Green Timothy A. Thulson David C. Hallford Christopher L. Coyle Thomas J. Hartert Christopher L. Geiger Sara M. Dunn Daniel C. Wennogle Scott Grosscup P.O. DRAWER 790 818 COLORADO AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 ____________________________________ TELEPHONE: 970.945.6546 FACSIMILE: 970.945.8902 www.balcombgreen.com May 29, 2007 KENNETH BALCOMB 1920-2005 Of Counsel: John A. Thulson VIA email: kirkenterprises@cox.net Mr. Terry A. Kirk 12144 East Welsh Trail Scottsdale, AZ 85258 Re: Due Diligence Review for Lot 4 Simon Subdivision Exemption near Silt, Colorado. Dear Mr. Kirk: We have completed a reconnaissance level review of the water rights and associated water issues which arise out of your proposed purchase of approximately 27.52 acres also known as Lot 4 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption located north of Silt, Colorado, owned by North 27, LLC (“Seller”). Based upon our examination of the materials described below and our interviews with: John Currier, a partner in the North 27, LLC; Pearl Knight, secretary of the Silt Water Conservancy District; and Janet Maddock, manager of the West Divide Water Conservancy District, and subject to the limitations and exceptions set forth below, we have concluded that Lot 4 of the Simons Subdivision Exemption has an adequate legal water supply to subdivide this parcel into five residential lots with a main residence and an accessory dwelling unit on each and to continue the historical irrigation of approximately 12 acres, less the dry-up associated with roads and building envelopes. In performing our investigation, we reviewed the following documents: Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate dated April 1, 2007; the Counterproposal dated April 5, 2007; the Title Commitment issued by Land Title Guarantee Company dated April 12, 2007; a revised Title Commitment issued by Land Title Guarantee Company dated May 22, 2007; the Seller’s Property Disclosures dated January 27, 2007; the Bylaws of the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association Inc.; Project Information and Staff Comments from Garfield County regarding a Preliminary Plan submittal by North 27, LLC for the North 27 Subdivision dated May 8, 2000; the PVO-SSE HOA Proposed 2007 Annual Budget; a letter from John M. Currier, P.E., of Resource Engineering Inc., to Sherry Caloia dated November 23, 2002; a color aerial photograph of Lot 4 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption purportedly taken in 1999; an unsigned Final Plat of the Simon Subdivision Exemption prepared by Richard L. Holsan, Professional Land B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Terry A. Kirk May 30, 2007 Page 2 Surveyor, on February 11, 1999; the Articles of Incorporation of PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association, Inc.; an engineered drawing entitled “Relationship of North 27 Subdivision to PVO/SSE HOA dated December 20, 1999 prepared by Water Resource Consultants, LLC; the Decree (Part 1 of 2) and (Part 2 of 2) entered by the Division 5 Water Court in Case No. 00CW36, Application for Water Rights of the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association; a water allotment table entitled “PVO/SSE Water Rights Associated With Each Lot Acre-Feet Available in a “100%” Year” dated April 15, 2000; the Decree entered by the Division 5 Water Court in Case No. W-1452, Application for Water Rights of Fred I. Simon; the Final Plat of the Simon Subdivision Exemption recorded as Reception No. 544219 in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder on April 21, 1999; a Grant of Easement and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for a Portion of Peach Valley Orchard and Simon Subdivision Exemption recorded as Reception No. 546583 in Book 1133 at Page 54 in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder on June 3, 1999; a Quit Claim Deed recorded as Reception No. 553203 at Book 1153 at Page 743 in the Records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder; and Garfield County Commissioners Resolution No. 99-044 approving the Simon Subdivision Exemption. The Contract identifies the water rights to be transferred in Paragraph 6 as follows: “All water and water rights, ditches and ditch rights, well and well rights pertenant [sic] to the property including but not limited to the following described; domestic, irrigation and available community.” The Seller’s Disclosures indicate that the water rights associated with the property include both Silt Project water, referring to the Bureau of Reclamation’s Silt Project operated by the Silt Water Conservancy District, Farmers Irrigation Company water, and domestic water from a community system, subject to an augmentation plan which is consistent with our findings. Lot 4 of the Simons Subdivision Exemption Sonia Simon petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, for an exemption from the definition of “subdivision” for the division of a 165 acre tract into four tracts, referred to as the Simon Subdivision Exemption Lots 1 through 4. The Simon Subdivision Exemption was approved by Garfield County by Resolution No. 99-044 recorded as Reception No. 544154 in Book 1125 at Page 434 in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. A copy Resolution No. 99-044 is attached hereto as Exhibit A. A copy of the Final Plat for the Simon Subdivision Exemption was recorded on April 21, 1999 as Reception Number 544219 in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. Due to the size of the recorded Final Plat, we have attached as Exhibit B an unsigned copy of the plat that is identical to the recorded copy but could be scanned and saved electronically. Lot 4 is the southern-most parcel and is comprised of 27. 52 acres. B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Terry A. Kirk May 30, 2007 Page 3 All of the lots within the Simon Subdivision exemption were acquired by S.M.I., L.L.L.P., a Colorado Limited Liability Limited Partnership formed by David and Connie Hick. S.M.I., L.L.L.P. also acquired Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24 and 25 of Peach Valley Orchard. The Simon well is the domestic water source for the Peach Valley Orchard Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24 and 25, and the Simon Subdivision Exemption Lots 1 through 4, according to the Grant of Easement and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for a Portion of Peach Valley Orchard and Simon Subdivision Exemption (the “Covenants”) recorded as Reception Number 546583 at Book 1133, Page 54 in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder and attached hereto as Exhibit C. The Simon Well is located on the lot line between Lots 1 and 2 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption as indicated on the Final Plat. The Simon Well is a shallow well constructed in 1910 to an approximate depth of 20.5 feet according to the Registration of Decreed Existing Well form filed by the Simon Estate in 1997, approved and permitted as State Engineer Well Permit No. 049153-F. A copy of the Registration is attached hereto as Exhibit D. This well was decreed by the Division 5 Water Court in Case No. W-1452 for 0.11 c.f.s (50 gallons per minute) from Cozza Gulch, tributary to the Colorado River for domestic and irrigation use with a date of appropriation of May 31, 1910. A copy of the decree in Case No. W-1452 is attached hereto as Exhibit E. However, according to John Currier a 72-hour well production test was performed in 1999, and the well only produced 33 gallons per minutes (“g.p.m.”) continuously and was not capable of sustaining a 50 g.p.m. continuous production rate. According to the Covenants, the Simon Well and the water rights decreed in Case No. W-1452 were to be conveyed by Quit Claim Deed to the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association as “common facilities.” The PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association operates and maintains the Simon Well and related facilities as well as pays the annual fees for contract water purchased from the West Divide Water Conservancy District. Apparently the PVO/SSE Homeowners Association has outlined how the operation and maintenance of the well and domestic water system will occur in a document entitled “Management and Operations Plan, Potable Water Supply System, Peach Valley Orchard Subdivision and Simon Subdivision Exemption, Silt, Colorado, October 27, 1999.” However, we have been unable to acquire a copy of this document. The monthly dues to the PVO/SSE Homeowners Association are $110 per lot according to the 2007 proposed budget, a copy of which is attached hereto with the Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation for the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association as Exhibit F. Each lot, with the exception of Lot 4 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption, was entitled to a proportionate 1/25th share in the production of the Simon Well. Lot 4 was entitled to 8/25th share in the well (which equates to approximately 10.56 g.p.m. for Lot 4), as well as the right to use an additional 3/25th interest in the production of the Simon Well in the event that Lots 1 through 3 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption were ever to connect to a central water system as B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Terry A. Kirk May 30, 2007 Page 4 required by Garfield County and memorialized as Note 5 on the Final Plat.1 According to John Currier, the PVO/SSE central water system does not have any central storage for fire protection or to meet peak demands and it is apparently the responsibility of individual lot owners to provide in-house pressure storage tanks. This requirement was discussed by the County during the Lot 27 Subdivision application process, but does not appear in the Covenants. Seller acquired Lot 4 from S.M.I., L.L.L.P. As indicated in Note 7 on the Final Plat, the County approved the Simon Subdivision Exemption on the condition that no further divisions by exemption would be allowed. Therefore, when the Seller decided to seek to subdivide Lot 4 into five residential parcels, Seller filed an application with Garfield County for approval of the “North 27 Subdivision.” The lots ranged in size from 3.22 acres to 12.49 acres with an average lot size of 5.50 acres. During the referral process, both the County Engineer and the State Engineer voiced concern that the water source identified for the development, the Simon Well could not legally serve the proposed development without a court-approved plan for augmentation. Thus, the Staff recommended denial of the proposed North 27 Subdivision for failure to comply with the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations requiring “evidence that a water supply, sufficient in terms of quality, quantity and dependability, shall be available….” According to John Currier, Seller requested Garfield County table the application until such time as it could satisfy the Garfield County water supply requirements, but after spending more than two years in Water Court adjudicating the water supply and associated plan for augmentation for the North 27 Subdivision, the Seller’s Application was dropped from the County’s agenda and never received a formal approval or denial. Domestic Water Supply To rectify the apparent lack of legal water supply for the existing PVO/SSE development and the proposed North 27 Subdivision, the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association filed an application with the Division 5 Water Court to adjudicate two enlargements of the Simon Well and a plan for augmentation to replace out-of-priority depletions associated with the domestic and limited irrigation uses of the Simon Well. The Water Court bifurcated Case No. 00CW36 into two parts. The first part of the decree referred to as Part 1 of 2 adjudicated the PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargement and a plan for augmentation for the existing development, including 1 According to the Covenants and Note 5 of the Final Plat, if any of Lots 1, 2 and/or 3 have the reasonable ability to connect with any municipal or centralized water and/or sewer system, such lot will be required to connect to said service within one year of the effective date of service availability and disconnect from the Simon Well. The proportionate interest in the Simon Well associated with the Lot(s) which connected to the municipal system shall revert to the owner of Lot 4. B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Terry A. Kirk May 30, 2007 Page 5 one residential unit to be located on Lot 4 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption. The second part of the decree (Part 2 of 2) approved a legal water supply for the proposed North 27 Subdivision. In Case No. 00CW36 (Part 1 of 2), the Division 5 Water Court granted a new junior water right to the Simon Well (“PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargement”) in the amount of 4.06 acre feet absolute for domestic use in the existing 9 residential units and 4.06 acre feet, conditional, for domestic use in 9 residential units that were not built at the time the Water Court entered the decree (total of 14 lots in PVO and 4 lots in SSE), irrigation in the amount of 9,000 square feet (500 square feet for each of 18 residential lots), fire protection, and livestock watering. A copy of the Decree is attached hereto as Exhibit G. An application for finding of reasonable diligence for the conditional portion of the PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargement is due on or before May 31, 2008 to prevent the cancellation of the 4.06 acre feet conditional portion of the water right. The PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargement is a very junior water right with a date of appropriation of February 9, 2000. Therefore, the PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargement will be out- of-priority during much of the year and must operate pursuant to a plan for augmentation which can replace all out-of-priority depletions to prevent injury to senior water rights both on Cozza Gulch and the Colorado River mainstem. The Water Court approved a plan for augmentation in Case No. 00CW36 (Part 1of 2) for the PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargement which includes two sources of replacement water: senior irrigation water which was historically used to irrigate 2.3 acres within the PVO/SSE property which will be dried-up due to construction of roads and the designation of building envelopes; and water from Green Mountain Reservoir and/or Ruedi Reservoir pursuant to a Water Allotment Contract with the West Divide Water Conservancy District. As indicated on Figure 1, attached hereto as Exhibit H, the PVO/SSE properties are partially located in the Harvey Gap drainage and partially located within the Cozza Gulch Drainage. As such the Court required that 1.15 acres in the Cozza Gulch drainage be dried up and 1.15 acres in the Harvey Gap drainage be dried-up to provide sufficient replacement water to augment local calls on Cozza Gulch including the Coleman Ditch, the Cozza No. 2 Ditch, the John Bruess Ditch and the Cozza Spring Ditch which are senior irrigation water rights. The dry-up area was associated with 3 shares of Applicant’s Farmers Irrigation Company (“FICo”) water rights. The FICo shares entitled Applicant to 0.07 c.f.s. from the Grass Valley Canal and 3.30 acre feet from the Grass Valley Reservoir a/k/a Harvey Gap Reservoir, both sources tributary to the East Fork of Rifle Creek. The plan for augmentation requires the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association to continue to divert this water through its irrigation system and by-pass this water into Cozza Gulch to satisfy any calls with Cozza Gulch which could occur between April 15th and October 15th, the normal irrigation season. To satisfy calls on the Colorado River mainstem that come from a block of irrigation rights under the Cameo call B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Terry A. Kirk May 30, 2007 Page 6 which normally is in place from early July through late October, the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association also obtained a contract with West Divide Water Conservancy District for 2.0 acre feet to be released from Green Mountain Reservoir located on the Blue River, a tributary of the Colorado River or Ruedi Reservoir, located on the Fryingpan River, a tributary of the Roaring Fork River, tributary of the Colorado River. In Case No. 00CW36 (Part 2 of 2), the Water Court approved the PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of the Simon Well for 3.8 acre feet conditional for domestic uses in 9 residential units (4 primary units and 5 accessory dwelling units) with a total of 2,000 square feet of irrigation (500 square feet per residential lot) with a date of appropriation of February 9, 2000. A copy of the decree is attached hereto as Exhibit I. The Water Court in Case No. 00CW36 maintained the original diversion rate for the Simon Well at 0.11 c.f.s. and simply raised the annual volumetric limit based on the additional proposed uses. The Water Court also approved the PVO/SSE Well No. 1 as an alternate point of diversion for the PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargements 1 and 2, for 0.11 c.f.s., conditional, with an annual volumetric limit of 12 acre feet for domestic use in 27 residential units, irrigation of up to 11,000 square feet (500 square feet on 22 lots), fire protection and livestock watering with a date of appropriation of February 9, 2000. However, it is worth noting that although the Simon Well is decreed for a 50 g.p.m. diversion rate, the well can only physically produce on a sustainable basis 33 g.p.m. according to the pump test. Therefore, the sustained combined pumping rate at the two points of diversion (the original Simon Well and the PVO/SSE Well No. 1) can only be 33 g.p.m. The second well cannot be used to bring the sustained combined diversion rate up to the decreed 50 g.p.m. An application for finding of reasonable diligence for the PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of the Simon Well and the PVO/SSE Well No. 1 must be filed with the Water Court on or before August 31, 2009. The Water Court also approved a plan for augmentation to replace out-of-priority depletions from the PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of the Simon. The plan for augmentation requires the dry-up of 0.44 acres associated with 0.5 FICo shares (.01 c.f.s. of the Grass Valley Canal and 0.55 acre feet of the Grass Valley Reservoir). As with the plan for augmentation for the PVO/SSE Simon Well First Enlargement, the water associated with the FICo shares will continue to be diverted through the Applicant’s irrigation system and released to Cozza Gulch to address any calls on Cozza Gulch. To address calls on the Colorado River mainstem, the Applicant increased the existing West Divide Water Conservancy District by 2.34 acre feet for a total contract amount of 4.34 acre feet according to Janet Maddock, manager of the West Divide Water Conservancy District. B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Terry A. Kirk May 30, 2007 Page 7 Irrigation Water Supply Pursuant to a Stipulation with the Objectors in Case No. 00CW36, the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association agreed to continue to irrigate as much of the remaining historically irrigated lands as possible each and every year in recognition that much of the water available to local wells is dependent upon localized irrigation. The PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association lands have historically been irrigated with 80 shares of FICo and 175 acre feet of Silt Project water. The FICo shares are owned by the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association and the only information we have received regarding how the water is allocated and distributed is a Table entitled “PVO/SSE Water Rights Associated with Each Lot” attached hereto as Exhibit J. Based on this Table, it appears that in a good water year Lot 4 is associated with 24.4 acre feet of FICo water. There are a total of 4,126 FICo shares associated with the 100 c.f.s. Grass Valley Canal water right which was decreed in Civil Action 279 in the District Court for Garfield County with an appropriation date of July 20, 1887 and an adjudication date of April 30, 1892 for irrigation uses. Therefore, the 80 shares equates to 1.94 c.f.s. ownership of the 100 c.f.s. Grass Valley Canal water right. Each year the FICo Board determines the number of “share days” that will be available to each shareholder based on the water available that year. According to our interview with John Currier and his report entitled “Water Rights Plan for Augmentation PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association” dated March 14, 2000, there are normally 100 share days available per share in normal years. In dry years there may be only 80 share days available. A share day equals 0.01 c.f.s. delivered for 24 hours. Fifty share days equals one acre foot of water. The Silt Project is a Bureau of Reclamation project which stores water from Rifle Creek and pumps water from the Colorado River to supply irrigation water for approximately 7,000 acres of irrigated land between Silt and Rifle. Project water is stored in Rifle Gap Reservoir, and is released directly into the Davie Ditch or by exchange to various ditches diverting from Rifle Creek such as the Grass Valley Canal. Beneficiaries of Silt Project water are subject to an ad valorem tax or special assessment paid with the Garfield County property tax. Based on the terms of the authorization for the Silt Project, project water is allocated by the Bureau of Reclamation to particular properties. Lot 4 is associated with 33.0 acre feet of water from the Silt Project as evidenced by the Quit Claim Deed recorded as Reception No. 553203 at Book 1153 at Page 743 in the Records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder and attached hereto as Exhibit K. This amount should be sufficient to irrigate the historically irrigated area on Lot 4. John Currier indicated that approximately 12 acres of alfalfa were irrigated on the property and the rest is dry-land pasture. This is consistent with the B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Terry A. Kirk May 30, 2007 Page 8 information in the Garfield County Project Information and Staff Comments for the North 27 Subdivision issued in 2000. We have relied extensively on the representation of the Silt Water Conservancy District for estimates regarding the availability of irrigation water on Lot 4 and the physical water requirements for irrigation uses. We are not engineers licensed in the State of Colorado and have no independent engineering experience with which to evaluate the accuracy, soundness or reliability of any of the contents of these statements recited herein. We have not visited the property. Further, we not engaged in a review of title to the water rights, nor engaged in an environmental, wetlands or water quality audit for the property and offer no opinion as to these matters. Our opinion in this matter is limited to our review of the information contained within the documents discussed. It is possible that information exists which we have not reviewed that might alter our opinions. In addition, our review of the documents was for the limited purpose of determining the legal status of the subject water rights. Specifically excluded from our opinion, and outside the scope of our research are claims of adverse possession related to the water rights, title matters relating to the land underlying the subject water rights, opinions regarding rights of way and easements for the water rights, adequacy of the physical water supply for the intended purpose, ditch company assessments, diversion records, matters that may be disclosed by an accurate survey of the real property, statutory liens, easements, or claims not shown by the public record. Conclusions and Recommendations We have concluded that the legal water supply for Lot 4 was properly adjudicated and can supply sufficient water to supply domestic water for 10 residential units (5 primary residences and 5 accessory dwelling units), irrigation of 500 square feet per lot (for 5 lots), and fire protection so long as the property to be dried-up according to the Decree in Case No. 00CW36 is dried up and the contract with West Divide Water Conservancy District is maintained. We also have concluded that the irrigation water associated with the property which includes a proportionate amount of FICo water and 33 acre feet of Silt Project water is sufficient to continue to irrigate the 12 acres historically irrigated. We recommend that the Sellers have the PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association submit a change of ownership and address form to the State Engineer for Well Permit No. 049153-F to reflect the current ownership of the Simon Well and obtain a new well permit for the Simon Well First and Second Enlargements to reflect the uses decreed by the Division 5 Water Court in Case No. 00CW36. We also recommend that Seller transfer all rights and interest to the FICo water rights, the Simon Well, and the PVO/SSE Well No. 1 including the rights decreed in Case B ALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Terry A. Kirk May 30, 2007 Page 9 No. 00CW36 to you at closing. We also recommend that the Seller assign the Silt Water shares and convey by deed the 33 acre feet associated with the Silt Project shares to you at closing. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, BALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. By: Sara M. Dunn Sara M. Dunn SMD/bjz Encl. Ex. A – Resolution 99-044 Ex. B – Final Plat Ex. C – Covenants Ex. D – Well Permit No. 049153-F Ex. E – Decree, Case No. W-1452 Ex. F – Budget, Articles and Bylaws Ex. G – Decree, Case No. 00CW36, Part 1 of 2 Ex. H – Figure 1, Location Map Ex. I – Decree, Case No. 00CW36, Part 2 of 2 Ex. J – Table, Associated Water Rights Ex. K – Quit Claim Deed Deadlines: Application for Diligence, PVO/SSE Simon Well Enlargement due on or before May 31, 2008 (to prevent the cancellation of the 4.06 acre feet conditional portion). Application for Diligence, PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of the Simon Well and the PVO/SSE Well No. 1 due to the Water Court on or before August 31, 2009 DISTRICT COURT,WATER DIVISION NO.5, STATE OF COLORADO 109 Eighth Street, Suite 104 Glenwood.Springs,CO 81601 DATE FILED 970) 928-3065 November 11, 2024 CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR CASE NUMBER: 2023CW3157 WATER RIGHTS OF: PVO/SSE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, in GARFIELD COUNTY,COLORADO A COURT USE ONLY A Case No. 23CW3157 16CW3023; Consolidated Case Nos. 09CW98 and 08CW41; 00CW036—Parts 1 and 2) FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,RULING OF THE REFEREE, JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF THE WATER COURT The above-entitled Application was filed on November 14, 2023 ("Application"). The Application was referred to the Water Referee for Water Division No. 5, State of Colorado, by the Water Judge of said Court in accordance with Article 92, Chapter 37, C.R.S., known as the Water Rights Determination and.Administration Act of 1969, as amended. The undersigned Referee, having made such investigations as are necessary to determine whether or not the statements in the Application are true, and having become fully advised with respect to the subject matter in the Application, does hereby make the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law,Judgment and Decree in this matter: FINDINGS OF FACT l.Name and address of Applicant: PVO/SSE Homeowners Association c/o David Hillbrand, President P.O.Box 1061 Silt, CO 81652 3034462.1 District Court,Water Division No.5,Colorado Case No.23CW3157;Application ofPVO/SSE Homeowners Association Findings of Fact. Conclusions ofLaiv,Ruling of the Referee,Judgment and Decree Page 2 of 6 With a copy to: Mary Elizabeth Geiger Garfield &Hecht,P.C. 910 Grand Ave., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 2.Timely and adequate notice of filing of this Application was given as required by law. The statements in the Application are true except to the extent they have been modified herein. 3.No Statements of Opposition were filed in this case. The time for Statements of Opposition has expired. The Division Engineer issues a Summary of Consultation in this matter on March 11, 2024. Applicant filed its Response on June 20, 2024. The Court has given due consideration to these documents. 4.Applicant requests findings of reasonable diligence with regard to the water rights decreed to the PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of Simon Well. A. Information from prior decrees: Case No. 00CW36, Part 2 of 2, entered by the District Court, Water Division No. 5 on July 22, 2008; Subsequent diligence decree: Case No. 09CW98, 16CW3023, District Court in and for Water Division No. 5. B. Source: Groundwater tributary to Cozza Gulch,tributary to the Colorado River. C. Legal description of the Simon Well: The well is located in the NE1/4 NE'/4 NE1/4 of Section 36, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the 6th P.M. at a point 397 feet West and 147.5 feet south of the Northeast Corner of said Section 36. i. Alternate Point of Diversion PVO/SSE Well No.l (as decreed in Case No. 00CW36 Decree 2 of 2)Legal Description.: located in the NE'/4 NE'/4 NE'/4 of Section 36, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the 6th P.M. at a point 397 feet West and 425 feet south of the Northeast Corner of said Section 36. a. Source: Groundwater tributary to Cozza Gulch, tributary to the Colorado River. D. Date of appropriation: February 9, 2000 E. Amount: 0.11 c.f.s., 3.8 acre feet annually, conditional, 3034462.1 District Court,Water Division No.5,Colorado Case No.23CW3157;Application ofPVO/SSE Homeowners Association Findings of Fact. Conclusions ofLaw,Ruling of the Re_feree.Judgment and Decree Page 3 of 6 F.Uses: Domestic in 9 residential units (4 primary and 5 secondary units), irrigation, fire protection, and livestock watering. Irrigation for 2,000 square feet 500 square feet for each of 4 residential lots). G. Legal description of acreage to be irrigated: a total of 4 lots on Lot 4 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption. The lands are located in the NE'/4 NE'/4 of Section 36, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the 6th P.M. H. Remarks: In the Decree entered in Case No. 16CW3023, the Court confirmed that there is not a separate water right decreed to the PVO/SSE Well No.1, but rather this structure was decreed as an alternate point of diversion for the water rights decreed as the PVO/SSE First Enlargement of Simon Well (Decree 1 of 2 in Case No. 00CW36) and the PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of Simon Well Decree 2 of 2 in Case No. 00CW36). This Court reiterates that PVO/SSE Well No.1 is merely an alternate point of diversion for PVO/SSE First and Second Enlargements of Simon Well and as a result does not require additional diligence findings. In the event the Applicant desires to make the PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of Simon Well by virtue of diversions from its alternate point of diversion PVO/SSE Well No.1, it must provide to the Court appropriate evidence to support such claim. The PVO/SSE Well No. 1 is located on property owned by Red Dog LLC, 12144 E. Welsh Trail, Scottsdale,AZ 85259. I.Owner of land upon which well will he located: Kristin Goodwin and William Howard, 0830 CR 250, Silt, CO 81652. 5.The information provided in the Application and Response to the Summary of Consultation is sufficient to show that Applicant has demonstrated reasonable diligence in the development of the water rights decreed to the PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of Simon Well for all amounts and purposes. C.R.S. § 37-92-301( 4). 6.As stated above,there are no independent water rights associated with the PVO/SSE Well No 1;therefore,there is no need to find diligence or continue to request such finding for this structure. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 7.To the extent they constitute legal conclusions; the foregoing Findings of Fact are incorporated herein. 8.The Application was timely and properly filed in accordance with the statutory requirements. All notices required by law have been properly made, including as required under C.R.S. § 37-92-302(3). 3034462.1 District Court,Water Division No.5,Colorado Case No.23CW3157;Application ofPVO/SSE Homeowners Association Findings of Fact. Conclusions ofLaw,Ruling of the Re_feree.Judgment and Decree Page 4 of 6 9.The Application is complete, covering all applicable matters required pursuant to the Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969. C.R.S. §§ 37- 92-101-602. 10. The request for a decree granting a finding of reasonable diligence in the development of the subject conditional water rights as a matter of law permissible and comes within the definitions authorized by statute. 11. Applicant has fulfilled all legal requirements for entry of a decree granting a finding of reasonable and continuing the subject water rights in full force and effect. RULING OF THE REFEREE 12. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law shall be and hereby are made a part of this Ruling of the Referee. 13. The Court hereby finds that the Simon Well, PVO/SSE Enlargement of Simon Well, PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of Simon Well and PVO/SSE. Well No. 1 comprise an integrated water supply system for the PVO/SSE Subdivision, as decreed in Case No. 00CW36 and operated pursuant to the plan for augmentation approved in Case No. 00CW36. Therefore, due diligence on any one component of this integrated water supply system counts as due diligence on all. 14. The Court hereby finds that reasonable diligence has been exercised toward the continued development PVO/SSE Simon Well Second. Enlargement water right for all decreed. amounts and purposes. 15. Pursuant to Rule 9 of the Uniform Local Rules for All State Water Court Divisions, upon the sale or other transfer of the condition water right decreed herein, the transferee shall file with the Division 5 Water Court a notice of transfer which shall state: a. The title and case number of this Case No. 23CW3157; b. The description of the conditional water rights transferred; c. The name of the transferor; d. The name and mailing address of the transferee; and e. A copy of the recorded deed. The owner of said conditional water right shall also notify the Clerk of the Division 5 Water Court of any change in mailing address. The Clerk shall place any notice of transfer or 3034462.1 District Court,Water Division No.5,Colorado Case No.23CW3157;Application ofPYO/SSE Homeowners Association Findings of Fact. Conclusions ofLaw,Ruling of the Re_free.Judgment and Decree Page 5 of 6 change of address in the case file of this Case No. 23CW3157 and in the case file in which the Court first made a finding of reasonable diligence. A copy of this Ruling shall be filed with the Division Engineer for Water Division No. 5 and with the State Engineer. It is further ORDERED that this Ruling shall be filed with the Water Clerk, subject to judicial review. Dated this 8th Day of October, 2024. BY THE REFEREE i/fC64(1 Holly K. Strablizky, Water Referee Water Division No. 5, State of Colorado 3034462.1 District Court,Water Division No.5,Colorado Case No.23CW3157;Application ofPVO/SSE Homeowners Association Findings of Fact. Conclusions ofLaiv,Ruling of the Referee,Judgment and Decree Page 6 of 6 JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF THE WATER COURT As no protest was filed in this matter and the protest period has passed, the foregoing Ruling of the Referee is hereby entered as a final Judgment and Decree of this Court, Should the Applicant desire to maintain the subject conditional water rights, an application for finding of reasonable diligence shall be filed in the same month of the sixth calendar year following the entry of this decree, unless a determination has been made prior to that date that such conditional right has been made absolute by reason of completion of the appropriations or is otherwise disposed of. Any request for a future finding of reasonable diligence shall be filed in November 2030. Done this l l tltlay of Novemill3E.4. BY THE COURT AlternateWater Judge, Water Divis. 3034462.1 1~ aTA iter.3CL/N__,C- I I I DATDA7 IIae31lart ' 41'` 0 F1L11L1H 3F 7_44fi 1,.............CAnJ- Ii i eonaren u0 me Kristin Goodwin and William imay. 4.54-)1 J` Howard Parcel#212736100050i. fr 1. ij^ fo et/70); .. %_•/---4..—= -----. 5111,1.- , :-.. s.....%''.-..\-.—'-- \ 6 CNIII‘ e '' PVO/SSEWellNo. 11 JI: i'-' C NN 6. t i _.,,,i \ 1 Ji( 0) 46 ''. ' 1 a r f rI Red Dog LLC ti f1' f Parcel#212736100052 r...) \ , i j ir-:, ' 1 l, Service Area, PVO/SSE -- HOA y N I S r'': V r. 3:0 92 91 f- r s1/4"—:,i. N. w ) kfHAniSource:USGS 241c Silt QuadrangleI Case Nos. 08CW41 and 000CW36 Water Rights Location Map 1 in= 1.000 ft EBE R E SOU R C E FeetDate:2016-3- C8 File:1323-30.1 BBENGINEERING:ING.I i i i 1 i i i I 999 r,._bratlo r.xnue'Glan:rootl Sprin9`.pQ ruai Drawn:DNR 1 volt¢1570)945-6777-Vkil:annr000ur.c,ng4crr 0 500 1,000 2,600Approved:MJE PEACH VALLEY OR C HARD SU BD 2024 Drinking Wate r Quality Report Cove ring Data For Cal e ndar Y e ar 2023 =--------~--= .... -~ -=-·-===-_-_---_-~...::::::.--_---____._ __ -_ - Public Water Syst em ID : CO0 123605 Esta e s informaci ó n importa nte. S i no la pu e den le er, nec e s itan que a lg uien s e la tra du z ca . We are p leased t o prese nt to you th is year"s water q u ality repon . Our con stant goal is to prov ide you wit h a safe and depe nda.b le s u pply of drinki ng water . P lease co ntact DAVE H ILLBRA N D at 970-876 -0825 with any questions or fo r p u blic part ic ip ation op port uni t ies that rnay affect wa ter q ua li ty. General Information All drinkin g "·atcr. in c ludi ng bottled "·atcr. may re aso na bl y be ex pec ted to contain al lea st small amounts or so mc contaminant s. The pre sence of co nt a minant s do es not ne cessa ril) indicate that th e "ater pose s a hea lth ri sk. More information about contaminanl s and potellli a l hea lth effec ts ca n be ob1ained b) ca ll in g. th e En\'ironment al Prot ec tion Age nC) ·, Safe Drinking Water Hotlin e ( l-800-4 26-4 79 1) orb) vi sit ing ..:11 ,1.un\ urPunJ -11 atn-and -Jnnkin!.'-11 ~11..:r . Some peo ple ma) be mo re vulnerablc to contaminants in drinking \\ a ter than the ge nera! populat ion . lmmun oco mpromi sed perso ns s uch as pe rso ns wi1h cancer undergo in g chemotherap). person s who ha \·e undergo ne o rgan transpla nts . peopk with H IV-A ID S or other immun e system di sorders. so me eider!). and infant s ca n he panicularl) at ri sk of infec t ion s. These people should seek ad vic e about drinking water from th e ir health can:: providers. For mo re inform ation a hout contam ina nts and pote nti ä l hea lth effect s. or to rece i\'e a cop) or 1h e U.S. En\'ironment al Protecti on Ag.enc) ( EPA) and th e U.S. Ce mer s for Di sease Co ntrol (COC) guideline s on Administration re g ulation s estahli sh limit s for contam inant s in hott led water th at mu st provid e th e samc pro tection for publi c he a lth . Le ad in Drinking Water Lead can ca ust: serio us hea lth prohkm s. es pec ia ll) for pregn a nt women and young. children. Lead in drink in g. water is primaril y fro m material s and co mpo nents associated with service line s and ho me plumbin g . Wr.: are re s po ns ibl e lor prov idin g high qualit) drinking \•I ater a nd rcmoving lead pipc s. but cannot control th e Yariet) of material s used in plumbing components in yo ur ho me. You shar e the rc s ponsihilit ) for prot ect in g yo ur se lfa nd your fami l) from th e le ad in yo ur home plumbin g. You can take re s pon s ihilit) b) id entify in g a nd rcm ov in g lead mate rial s w ithin yo ur home plumbing and taking step s to r.::ducc) OLir family's ri sk. Beforc drinking tap water. flu sh yo ur pipes lor several m inute s by runnin g \·o ur tap . takin g a show e r. doin g la undr) or a loa d of dishe s . You ca n a lso usc: a filt er ce rtifi ed b) an American Nat iona l Standards ln s1i1ut e acc red it cd ce rtifi er to red uce lea d in drinkin g water. lr )ou a ppropri ate mcan s to lessen the ri sk o r in reet io n h) Cryp tos por idium are co ncerned about lead in your water and \\·ish to hav e yo ur \I ater and microbiol og ica l contaminam s ca ll the EPA Safe Drinkin g Water te sted. cont ac t D AVE HILLBRAND at 970 -876 -0825. Hotline at ( 1-800 -426-479 1 ). Information on lead in dr ink ing water. tc stin g method s. and step s The so ur c.::s o r drinki ng water (ho1h tap \\'ater and honle d water ) include river s. lakc s. str ea ms. pond s. rese n oirs. spring s. a nd we ll s. As \1 ·ater tra \ e ls over 1h e s urfa ce of the land or throu gh 1h e gro un d. it dissolves naturall ) occ urrin g mineral s and. in some ca ses. rad ioactive material. and can pick up suh sta nc es resulting from th e presenc c: of anim a ls or from human acti,·it ). Co ntamin ant s that ma) he pre se nt in so ur ce water includc : •M ic robi a l co nta min a nts: v iru ses and ba cteri a 1h at ma) com..: from se\\·age treatm en t plant s. septic S) stern s. agricu ltural li\ estock o pcrati ons. and" ildlife. •ln o rgani c co nta min a nts : sa lt s and metal s. which can he natural l)- occurring or rc sult from urhan s101111 water run off. indu strial or domest ic \\a ste \\atcr di sc harge s. oil and ga s pro d uction. minin g. or làrmin g . ·Pes ti c id es and he rbicide s: ma) come fr om n variet) of so urc es. suc h as ag riculturc . urban sto rm \\ ater run off. and res ide nt ia l use s. •Ra di oac ti ve co nt a min a nt s: ca n be na turall) occ urrin g or be th e n:s ult ofoil and ga s production and minin g acti\·itie s. •Organi c c hemi ca ! conta minants : inc ludin g sy nth etic a nd , olatile organic chemic a Is. \\ hich a re by product s or indu strial pro cc ss cs and petroleum produ ct ion . and a lso ma) co mc from ga s stati on s. urh an sto rm water runotT. and se ptic system s. In order to en surc that tap \1 ·atc:r is sa k to d r ink . the Co lorad o Dep a nment of Public Hcalth and Environment pr cscribe s rcgulati ons limitin g the am o unt o r cenain co ntaminam s in\\ atcr prov ided by public \\ntcr system s. The Food and Drug PEAC H VALLEY ORC H A RD SLIBD . PW S ID COO i ~3605 ) o u can take to m inim ize exposure is a va ilahl e at l:p~t. e< n s;.ill·" atL'r k~11. ... Source Water Assessment and Protection (SWAP) The Co lora do D<.:partment of Public Health and Environment ma) have provided us w i1h a Source Wat er Ass essment Re pon for our water s uppl). 1-or ge nera ! informat ion or to oht a in a cop) o f the repo rt please vis it II qc,kompl1anc"..:.,·om n:1. The re port is lo ca tcd und er ··Guidance : So ur ce: Wakr Ass ess ment Rep orts··. S<.:arch the ta b le us in g o ur sys te m name or ID. or h) contac1ing DAVE H I LLBRAND at 9 70-876 -0825 . The: Source \~.:ater Ass cs sm<.:nt Report prov id es a screening-le\'el eva lua1ion or potential co ntamin ati on that could occur. lt does not me an 1hat th e contamination has or wil/ occur. Wc can LJSC 1hi s informat ion to evaluate the need to improve our cum.:nt water treatment capabilities and pr.::par.:: for fut ure co ntamin at ion thn.:at s. Thi s ca n he lp us e ns ur e th al quality fini shcd \1 a1e r is deliv ercd to) our home s . In additi on. 1h c so urc e water asse ssment res ul1 s pro, ide a s1artin g poim lor de\ e lopin g a sour ce \\ ater prot ec ti o n plan . Pote mi a l so u ree s of" contamination in our so urce \l ater area are listt:d on 1he next page. Pkase contact us to learn mo re about what ) ou can do to he lp proleet) our drinking \l ater sourcc s. a n) q uestion s about the Drinking Wat er Qualit) Re pon. to le a rn mo re about our S) stem . o r to attend schedu lcd pub lic meetin gs . Wc wa nt) ou. o ur va lucd cu stomer s. to h..: informed a bout the se n ·ice s \1 e prm ·id e and the qu a lity water \1·e dcliver to you cvcry da) 2024 CC R Pag e I of 4 Our Water Sources Sources (Water Tï~e -Source Tï~e} Potential Source{s) of Contamination • As o l'Jun e 2024. th ere was nota So ur ce Water Ass ess ment Report pos ted for our wat er suppl ). Pl casc co nt ac t DAVE HILLBR AN D at 970 -87 6-0825 with qu es ti ons WELL 1 -SIM ON WELL (Gro un dwatcr -W el l) rega rd in g potcnti a l so ur cc s o f co nt amin ation . • Potcnti a l sour ces of co ntamin ation in our so urce water area typ ic all ) comc fr om: di sso lved nalllrall y occu rrin g mincr als. se pti c sys t.:m s. ag.ri cultur al run o lT. carclcss appl ication . storagc. and dispo sa l o f housd1 old chem ica ls and petroleum produ cts. Terms and Abbreviations • Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) -The hi g hes t leve l ofa co ntaminant a ll owe d in drinkin g water. • Treatment Technique (TT) -A required proc ess int end e d to redu ce th e lev e l of a contaminant in drinking water. • Health-Based -A violati o n of e ith er a MCL or TT. • Non-Health-Based -A v io lat io n th at is nota MCL or TT. • Action Level (AL) -T he co nce nt rat ion of a co nt am inant wh ic h. if exc ee ded . tri ggers tr ea tm e nt and other regu lat ory requirement s. • Maximum Residual Di s infectant Level (M RDL) -T he hi ghest level of a disinfectant all owed in drinking wa ter. There is co nvin c in g ev id ence th at addi ti on of a di s infec tant is necessary for co nt ro l o f microbial co nt aminants. • Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) -T he level of a co nt aminant in drinkin g water below whi ch th ere is no kn ow n or ex pec ted ri sk to hea lth . MCLGs all ow fo r a marg in of safety. • Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal (M RDLG) -T he level of a drinkin g water disinfectant , be low wh,ch th ere is no kn own or expected ri sk to hea lth . MRDL Gs do not re fi ec t th e benefits of th e use of di s infec tant s to co nt ro l mi cro bi a l co ntaminant s. • Yiolation (No Abbreviation) -Fa ilure to meet a Co lo rad o Primary Drinking Water Re g ulati o n. • Forma l Enforcement Action (No Abbreviation) -Esca lat ed actio n taken by th e State (du e to the ri sk to publi c hea lth . o r numbe r or seve rity ofv io lati o ns) to bring a non-co mpli a nt water sys te m back int o compliance. • Variance a nd Exemption s (V/E) -Department permi ss ion not to mee t a MCL o r tr eatm ent tec hniqu e under certa in conditions . • Gross Alpha (No Abbreviation) -G ross al ph a part ic le activity co mpli ance va lu e. lt in c lud es radium-22 6. but excl ud es rad o n 222 . and uranium . • Picocuries per liter (pCi/L) -Measure of th e radi oacti v ity in water. • Nephelometric Turbidity Unit (NTLI) -Meas ur e of the c larity or clo udin ess of water. T ur bid ity in excess of 5 NT U is j ust noticeable to th e typ ica l person. • Compliance Value (No Abbreviation ) -Single or ca lc ulated va lu e use d to determin e if reg ul atory co ntamin ant level ( e.g . MCL) is met. Examp les o f ca lc ulated va lu es a re th e 90 th Perce ntil e. Running A nnual A verage ( RAA) a nd Locatio nal Runnin g Annu a l Averag e ( LRAA ). • Average (x-bar) -Typica l va lu e. • Range (R) -Lowest va lu e to th e high es t va lu e. • Sample S ize (n) -N umb er o r co unt ofva lu es (i.e. numb er o f water sa mpl es co ll ecte d ). • Parts per million = Milligrams per liter (ppm = m g /L) -O ne part per mi Il io n co rr es pond s to one minute in tw o years o r a s ingl e pe nny in $10 .000 . • Parts per b illi on = Micrograms per liter (ppb = ug /L) -One part per billi o n co rr es pond s to one minut e in 2 .000 yea rs. o r a s in g le pe nn y in $10.000.000 . • Not App li cable (N /A)-Does not a ppl y o r not ava il ab le. • Level 1 Assessment -A sllld y o f th e water sys tem to id e nti fy pote nti a l problem s and dete rmin e ( if poss ibl e) wh y total co li fo rm bac teri a hav e been fo und in o ur wa ter sys tem . • Level 2 Assessment -A vel") detai led st ud y o f th e water sys te m to id e nti fy potenti a l prob le ms and determin e (if poss ibl e) why an E. co li MCL vio lat io n has occ urred a nd /o r wh y tota l co li form ba cte ri a have bee n found in o ur water sys tem o n mu ltipl e occas ion s. PEAC I I VALLEY ORC I I ARD SLIBD. PW S ID . CO0 12 360 ~ 2024 CC R Pag e'. 2 or 4 ====----= -~-----:--~ ---=---=---=--.=.. ---~ -=------- Detected Contaminants PEAC H VALLEY O RC HA RD SU BD ro utin e ly mo nit ors fo r co nt amin ant s in yo ur drinkin g wa ter acco rdin g to Fe deral and State laws. T he fo ll ow in g ta bl e(s) show a ll detect ions fo und in th e peri od o f Janu a ry I to Dece m be r 3 1. 2023 unl ess oth erwise noted . T he State of Co lorad o requires us to mo nit or fo r ce rt a in co ntaminant s less th an once per yea r bec au se th e co nce ntrati ons of th ese co nt amin ant s ar e no t exp ec ted to va ry s ig nifi ca ntl y fr om yea r to yea r. or th e sys tem is not co ns id ered v uln erabl e to thi s typ e of co nt amin ati o n . Th erefo re. so me of o ur data. th o ugh represe nt ati ve. may be more than one-yea r-o ld . V io lati ons and Fo rm a ) Enfo rce me nt Ac ti ons. ifa ny . are re po rt ed in th e nex t sec ti on of thi s re port . Note: O nl y detected co nta min a nt s sa mpl ed w ithin th e las t 5 yea rs a ppea r in thi s re po rt . lf no ta bl es ap pea r in thi s sec ti on. th en no co nt amin a nt s we re detec ted in th e las t ro und of monit o rin g . Disinfectants Sampled in the Distribution ystem TT Requirement : At leas t 95% of sampl es per peri od (month or quarter) mu st be at leas t 0.2 ppm OR lf sampl e size is less th an 40 no mor e th an 1 sampl e is be low 0.2 ppm Typical Sources: Water additi ve use d to co ntr ol mi crob es Disinfectant Time Period Results Number of Samples Sample TT MRDL Name Below Level Size Violation Ch lor ine Dece mb er. 2023 Lo 11 est pe ri od percentage of sa mple s 0 1 No 4 .0 ppm meeting TT requirc mcnt : 100° o Lead and Copper Sampled in the Distribution System Contaminant Time 90'h Sample Unit of 90'h Sample 90 1h Typical Sources Name Period Percentile Size Mea s ure Percentile Sites Percentile AL Above AL AL Exceedance Co ppe r 09 /1 1/202 1 0.19 5 ppm 1.3 0 No Corrosion of to house hold plu mb ing 09/13 /202 1 sys tems: Ero sion of natu ra ! dcpo sits Lead 09 /11 /202 1 2 5 pph 15 0 No Co rr os ion of to hou se ho ld plumbin g 09 /13 /202 1 sys tems: Erosion of natura! dcposit s Disinfection Byproducts Sampled in the Distribution System Name Year Average Range Sample Unit of MCL MCLG MCL Typical Sources Low-High Size Mea s ure Violation To tal 2023 6 .6 6.6 to 6.6 1 pph 60 N/A No Byproduc t of drin kin g 1-l a loac.:tic wa ter disin fr:c ti on Acids (II AA5) Total 2023 13.5 13.5 to 13.5 1 ppb 80 N/A No By prod uct of drinkin g Tri halome wa ter disin li:ctio n th anes (TT II M) PEAC H V A LLEY O RC H A RD SLIBD . PWS I D : CO0 123605 2024 CC R Pag .: 3 of 4 Granted The moving party is hereby ORDERED to provide a copy of this Order to any pro se parties who have entered an appearance in this action within 10 days from the date of this order. ___________________________ James B. Boyd District Court Judge Date of Order attached EFILED Document CO Garfield County District Court 9th JD Filing Date: Feb 24 2010 12:09PM MST Filing ID: 29731903 Review Clerk: Kathy Hall Any request for a further finding of reasonable diligence shall be filed in February 2016. /s/ Judge James B Boyd Court: CO Garfield County District Court 9th JD Judge: ANGELA LAIN STRAWN Current Date: Feb 24, 2010 Case Number: 2009CW98 Court Authorizer Comments: Page1 of1 COURT,DISTRICT COUNTY, COLORADOGARFIELD (GLENWOOD SPRINGS) Court Address: 109 8th Street, Ste. 104, Glenwood Springs, CO, 81601 In the Interest of:PVO SSE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION COURT USE ONLY Case Number: 2016CW3023 Division: E Courtroom: Decree: Decree of the Water Court The motion/proposed order attached hereto: GRANTED. Any request for a future finding of reasonable diligence shall be filed in November 2023. Issue Date: 11/12/2017 JAMES BERKLEY BOYD District Court Judge DATE FILED: November 12, 2017 CASE NUMBER: 2016CW3023 DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION NO. 5, STATE OF COLORADO 109 Eighth Street, Suite 104 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 928-3065 CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF: PVO/SSE HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, in GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO S COURT USE ONLY S Case No. 16CW3023 (Consolidated Case Nos. 09CW98 and 08CW41; (00CW036 – Parts 1 and 2) FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, RULING OF THE REFEREE, JUDGMENT AND DECREE The Applicant, PVO/SSE Homeowners’ Association (“Association” or the “Applicant”) filed this Application on March 10, 2016 (“Application”) and the Water Judge referred it to the Water Referee for Water Division 5, State of Colorado, in accordance with C.R.S. § 37-92-101, et seq., known as the Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969. The undersigned Referee having made such investigations as are necessary to determine whether or not the statements in the application are true, and having been fully advised of the subject matter of the application, does hereby make the following determination and Ruling as the Referee in this matter: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The statements in the Application are true, except as may be otherwise modified herein. 2. Name and address of Applicant: PVO/SSE Homeowners Association c/o David Hillbrand, President P.O. Box 1061 Silt, CO 81652 With a copy to: At t a c h m e n t t o O r d e r - 2 0 1 6 C W 3 0 2 3 District Court, Water Division 5 Application of PVO/SSE Homeowners Association; Case No. 16CW3023 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Ruling of the Referee, Judgment and Decree Page 2 of 6 Mary Elizabeth Geiger Garfield & Hecht, P.C. 420 Seventh Street, Suite 100 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 947-1936 3. Notice. Timely and adequate notice of the pendency of these proceedings has been given in the manner required by C.R.S. § 37-92-302, including landowner notification to the Red Dog, LLC pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-92-302(2)(b)(II). 4. Opposer. Red Dog, LLC filed a timely statement of opposition in this case. By Motion and Order of the Court, Red Dog, LLC withdrew its opposition on September 5, 2017. 5. Report of the Division Engineer. This Court has given due consideration to the Division Engineer’s Summary of Consultation dated June 22, 2016, and the response thereto, filed with the Court on July 21, 2016. 6. The Application requested findings of reasonable diligence with regard to the PVO/SSE Well No.1. In paragraph 23 of the decree entered in Decree 2 of 2 in Case No. 00CW36, this structure was decreed as an alternate point of diversion for the water rights decreed as the PVO/SSE First Enlargement of Simon Well (Decree 1 of 2 in Case No. 00CW36) and the PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of Simon Well (Decree 2 of 2 in Case No. 00CW36, and described herein below). Therefore, there is not a separate water right decreed to this structure; however, to the extent it is an alternate point of diversion for decreed water rights, such is continued in full force and effect. A. Prior decrees: Case No. 00CW36, Part 1 of 2, entered May 21, 2002, District Court in and for Water Division No. 5; Subsequent decrees: Case Nos. 08CW41 and 09CW98, District Court in and for Water Division No. 5. B. Source: Groundwater tributary to Cozza Gulch, tributary to the Colorado River. C. Legal description: located in the NE¼ NE¼ NE¼ of Section 36, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the 6th P.M. at a point 397 feet West and 425 feet south of the Northeast Corner of said Section 36. D. Date of appropriation: February 9, 2000 E. Amount: 0.11 c.f.s., 12 acre feet annually (this is an alternate point of diversion for the PVO/SSE Enlargement of the Simon Well, decreed in Case No. 00CW36, which is located in the NE¼ NE¼ NE¼ of Section 36, Township 5 South, Range At t a c h m e n t t o O r d e r - 2 0 1 6 C W 3 0 2 3 District Court, Water Division 5 Application of PVO/SSE Homeowners Association; Case No. 16CW3023 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Ruling of the Referee, Judgment and Decree Page 3 of 6 92 West of the 6th P.M. at a point 397 feet West and 147.5 feet south of the Northeast Corner of said Section 36, which well is the subject of Well Permit No. 68614-F and PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of Simon Well which is described herein below). F. Decreed uses: domestic (27 residential units), irrigation, fire protection and livestock watering. G. Total number of acres to be irrigated: 11,000 square feet (500 square feet for each of 22 residential lots). Legal description of acreage to be irrigated: a total of 14 lots in the Peach Valley Orchard Subdivision, 3 lots in the Simon Subdivision Exemption and 5 lots in the North 27 Subdivision. The lands are located in the NE ¼ and the NE ¼ NW ¼ of Section 36, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the 6th P.M. H. Owner of land upon which well will be located: Red Dog LLC, 1011 Main Street, Carbondale, CO 81623. 7. Applicant requested findings of reasonable diligence with regard to the water rights decreed to the PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of Simon Well. A. Information from prior decrees: Case No. 00CW36, Part 2 of 2, entered by the District Court, Water Division No. 5 on July 22, 2008; Subsequent diligence decree: Case No. 09CW98, District Court in and for Water Division No. 5. B. Source: Groundwater tributary to Cozza Gulch, tributary to the Colorado River. C. Legal description: The well is located in the NE¼ NE¼ NE¼ of Section 36, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the 6th P.M. at a point 397 feet West and 147.5 feet south of the Northeast Corner of said Section 36. D. Date of appropriation: February 9, 2000 E. Amount: 0.11 c.f.s., 3.8 acre feet annually, conditional, F. Uses: Domestic in 9 residential units (4 primary and 5 secondary units), irrigation, fire protection, and livestock watering. Irrigation for 2,000 square feet (500 square feet for each of 4 residential lots). At t a c h m e n t t o O r d e r - 2 0 1 6 C W 3 0 2 3 District Court, Water Division 5 Application of PVO/SSE Homeowners Association; Case No. 16CW3023 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Ruling of the Referee, Judgment and Decree Page 4 of 6 G. Legal description of acreage to be irrigated: a total of 4 lots on Lot 4 of the Simon Subdivision Exemption. The lands are located in the NE¼ NE¼ of Section 36, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the 6th P.M. H. Remarks: The PVO/SSE Well No. 1, described herein above, is an alternate point of diversion for this water right. I. Owner of land upon which well will be located: Jon P. and Ladonna J. Smith, 0830 CR 250 aka 830 Bendetti Road, Silt, CO 81652. 8. The Court finds that the information provided in the Application demonstrates that Applicant has been reasonably diligent in the development of the subject conditional water rights decreed to the PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of Simon Well, including any and all alternate points of diversion decreed thereto, including but not limited to the PVO/SSE Well No. 1, and that such water rights should be continued in full force and effect. C.R.S. § 37- 92-301(4). CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 9. To the extent they constitute legal conclusions; the foregoing Findings of Fact are incorporated herein. 10. All notices required by law have been properly made, including as required under C.R.S. § 37-92-302(3). The Court has jurisdiction over the Application and over all entities or persons who had standing to appear, even though they did not do so. 11. The Application is complete, covering all applicable matters required pursuant to the Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969. C.R.S. §§ 37-92-101–602. 12. Applicant has fulfilled all legal requirements for a decree continuing the subject conditional water rights. RULING OF THE REFEREE 13. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as set forth above are incorporated herein by reference and are hereby modified as necessary to constitute part of the Ruling and Final Judgment and Decree. 14. The application of the Association for finding of reasonable diligence with respect to the PVO/SSE Second Enlargement of Simon Well, including all alternate points of diversion, including but not limited the alternate point of diversion described as the PVO/SSE Well At t a c h m e n t t o O r d e r - 2 0 1 6 C W 3 0 2 3 District Court, Water Division 5 Application of PVO/SSE Homeowners Association; Case No. 16CW3023 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Ruling of the Referee, Judgment and Decree Page 5 of 6 No. 1, is granted and those conditional water rights are continued in full force and effect in the amount of 0.11 c.f.s. (3.8 acre-feet annually) for the uses described herein. 15. Should the Applicant desire to maintain the conditional water rights continued herein, an Application for Finding of Reasonable Diligence shall be filed in the same month six years from the date of the water judge’s order, unless a determination has been made prior to that date that such conditional rights have been made absolute by reason of the completion of the appropriation or are otherwise so disposed. 16. Pursuant to Rule 9 of the Uniform Local Rules for All State Water Court Divisions, upon the sale or other transfer of the conditional water rights decreed herein, the transferee shall file with the Division 5 Water Court a notice of transfer which shall state: A. The title and case number of this Case No. 16CW3023; B. The description of the conditional water right transferred; C. The name of the transferor; D. The name and mailing address of the transferee; and E. A copy of the recorded deed. The owner of said conditional water rights shall also notify the Clerk of the Division 5 Water Court of any change in mailing address. The Clerk shall place any notice of transfer or change of address in the case file of this Case No. 16CW3023 and in the case file (if any) in which the Court first made a finding of reasonable diligence. A copy of the Ruling shall be filed with the Division Engineer for Water Division No. 5 and with the State Engineer. It is further ORDERED that this Ruling shall be filed with the Water Clerk, subject to judicial review. At t a c h m e n t t o O r d e r - 2 0 1 6 C W 3 0 2 3 District Court, Water Division 5 Application of PVO/SSE Homeowners Association; Case No. 16CW3023 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Ruling of the Referee, Judgment and Decree Page 6 of 6 Dated: September 19, 2017. BY THE REFEREE Susan M. Ryan, Water Referee Division 5, Water Court DECREE OF THE WATER COURT No protest was filed in this matter. The foregoing Ruling is confirmed and approved, and is hereby made a Decree of this Court. Dated:______________________. ______________________________ Water Judge At t a c h m e n t t o O r d e r - 2 0 1 6 C W 3 0 2 3 !(!( Si m o n W e l l - S e c o n d E n l a r g e m e n t PV O / S S E W e l l N o . 1 Re d D o g L L C Pa r c e l # 2 1 2 7 3 6 1 0 0 0 5 2 Sm i t h , J o n P a n d L a d o n n a J Pa r c e l # 2 1 2 7 3 6 1 0 0 0 5 0 Se r v i c e A r e a , P V O / S S E HO A Ca s e N o s . 0 8 C W 4 1 a n d 0 0 0 C W 3 6 Wa t e r R i g h t s L o c a t i o n M a p ® Da t e : 2 0 1 6 - 0 3 - 0 8 Fi l e : 1 3 2 5 - 3 0 . 1 Dr a w n : D N R Ap p r o v e d : M J E So u r c e : U S G S 2 4 k S i l t Q u a d r a n g l e R E S O U R C E 90 9 C o l o r a d o A v e n u e / G l e n w o o d S p r i n g s , C O 8 1 6 0 1 Vo i c e : ( 9 7 0 ) 9 4 5 - 6 7 7 7 - W e b : w w w . r e s o u r c e - e n g . c o m E N G I N E E R I N G , I N C . 1 i n = 1 , 0 0 0 f t 0 1, 0 0 0 2, 0 0 0 50 0 Fe e t R R 92 9 1 W W DA T E F I L E D : M a r c h 1 0 , 2 0 1 6 3 : 0 2 P M Attachment to Order - 2016CW3023 EXHIBIT E Outline of CCR’s 1 DECLARATION FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 4 OF THE SIMON SUBDIVISION Article I. Declaration. This article will declare the property subject to covenants, conditions, restrictions, assessments, charges, servitudes, liens, reservations, exceptions, easements, privileges, rights and other provisions set forth in the declaration. The approach to this development will be, through this declaration, to establish a “Sub Association” that is responsible for managing and maintaining the affairs of the owners of the subdivide lots and in harmony with the declaration for Peach Valley Orchard and Simon Subdivision Exemption (Reception No. 546583). Article II. Definitions. This article will define words and phrases for general use within the declaration. Article III. General Restrictions Applicable to Community. This article will establish and impose a general plan for the improvement, development, use and occupancy of the development, all in order to enhance the value, desirability, and attractiveness of the development. This article will therefore declare that the development will be owned, held, used, occupied, improved, altered, maintained, conveyed, leased, encumbered, and enjoyed subject to the following covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements, and rights. Section 3.01 Design Control. No improvements shall be made, done, permitted, located, altered, or removed within the development without the prior written approval of the Design Review Committee. All construction and landscaping activities within the development shall be strictly governed by the Design Guidelines. Section 3.02 Violation of Law, Insurance, Etc. No Owner, Occupant, or Person shall do any act or cause or permit anything to be done or kept in or upon a Lot, Unit, or Common Area which would result in the increase, of cancellation of, insurance, maintained by the Master Association or the Sub Association or would be in violation of any federal, state, or town or other law, ordinance, regulation or code of any governmental body. Section 3.03 General Maintenance of the Community. All property within the development shall be kept and maintained in a clean and attractive condition and in good order, condition, and repair. Section 3.04 New Construction Required; No Temporary Building or Occupancy. All improvements constructed shall be new. No used or temporary house, structure, or non- permanent out-building shall be placed, erected, or allowed to remain, except temporary structures used for construction purposes during construction. Section 3.05 Noxious or Offensive Activities; Nuisances, Construction Activities, Pesticides. No noxious or offensive activity shall occur or be allowed at any time within the community, nor shall anything be done or placed therein, which is or may become a nuisance or cause an unreasonable embarrassment, disturbance, or annoyance to Owners. Section 3.06 No Hazardous or Unsafe Activities. No activity shall be conduct on, and no improvement shall be constructed which is or might be unsafe or hazardous to any person or property. 2 Section 3.07 No Firearms or Hunting. The discharge of firearms on any part of the community is prohibited, as is hunting. Section 3.08 No Obstruction. There shall be no obstruction of any easements or drainage, irrigation, water feature, public parks, of any interference with the free use thereof. Section 3.09 Animals. Each Lot or Unit will be limited to a maximum number of pets, but otherwise animals are prohibited from the community. Section 3.10 No Mining or Drilling. No mining or drilling is permitted within the community. Section 3.11 Easements; Utility Companies; Underground Utility Lines. No Lot or Unit Owner may erect any structure in or otherwise interfere with any of the easements shown on the Plat. Section 3.12 Landscaping. No landscaping shall be performed on any Lot or Unit unless a landscaping plan has received the prior written approval of the Design Review Committee. Section 3.13 Camping. No camping shall be permitted within the property. Section 3.14 No Individual Water Wells or Individual Sewage Disposal Systems. No individual water wells, and no cesspools, septic tanks or other individual sewage disposal systems shall be constructed, except those as may be installed by the Declarant. Section 3.15 Right of Entry. During reasonable hours and upon reasonable notice to an Owner, any member of the Design Review Committee or Executive Board may inspect a Lot or Unit. Section 3.16 Restrictions on Resubdivision, Property Restrictions, and Rezoning. No Lot or Unit may be further subdivided, rezoned, or further encumbered, except as expressly provided in the Declaration. Section 3.17 Implementation and Variances. The Executive Board may grant variances from the foregoing restrictions in certain defined circumstances. Article IV. Design Review Committee. This article will establish a Design Review Committee, the procedures followed by the Design Review Committee, and the Design Guidelines consistent with the application to govern design within the development. Article V. Easements. This article will reserve certain easements for the community. Section 5.01 Easements for Incidental Encroachments. Section 5.02 Blanket Sub Association Utility and Drainage Easement over Common Areas Section 5.03 Ditch Easements. Section 5.04 Utility, Drainage, and/or Irrigation Easements. Section 5.05 Blanket Emergency Services Easement Section 5.06 Recorded Easements and Licenses. 3 Article VI. Sub Association. This article will establish the Sub Association and procedures to be followed in administering the same. Section 6.01 Sub Association Section 6.02 Sub Association Executive Board Section 6.03 Membership in Sub Association. Section 6.04 Voting Rights of Members. Each Lot or Unit will have one vote in the Master Association. Section 6.05 Period of Declarant Control of Sub Association Section 6.06 Sub Association’s Relationship to Master Association Section 6.07 General Powers and Duties of Sub Association. Section 6.08 Power to Grant Easements. Section 6.09 Power to Convey or Encumber Common Areas. Section 6.10 General Power to Provide Services and Facilities to Owners. Section 6.11 Power to Provide Special Services to Owners. Section 6.12 Power to Acquire Property and Construct Improvements. Section 6.13 Power to Adopt Sub Association Rules and Regulations. Section 6.14 Duty to Accept Property and Facilities Transferred by Declarant. Section 6.15 Duties Regarding Common Areas Section 6.16 Duty to Pay Taxes. Section 6.17 Duty to Keep Sub Association Records. Section 6.18 Duty to Support Design Review Committee. Section 6.19 Insurance Requirements. Section 6.20 Repair and Replacement of Community. Section 6.21 Limited Liability. Article VII. Water Well and Related Facilities and Irrigation Water System. This article will create the framework for ownership, maintenance, repair, and operation of the well and related facilities within Lot 4 and with the PVO/SSE Association. Article VIII. Assessments. This article will create the framework for assessments on owners to maintain the community. Article IX. Special Provisions. This article will establish any special restrictions, rights, or obligations negotiated with approving governmental entities. Article X. General Provisions. This article will set forth the general provisions typical of all covenants in common interest communities. Section 10.01 Duration of Declaration. Section 10.02 Termination of Common Interest Community. Section 10.03 Amendment of Declaration and Plat. Section 10.04 Compliance and Enforcement. 4 Section 10.05 Rights of First Mortgagees. Section 10.06 Notice. Section 10.07 No Dedication to Public Use Unless Stated. Section 10.08 Interpretation of Declaration. Section 10.09 Conflict with Plats. Section 10.10 No Express or Implied Covenants on Lands Not Annexed. Section 10.11 Violations Constitute a Nuisance. Section 10.12 Declarant’s Disclaimer of Representations and Warranties. Section 10.13 Captions. Section 10.14 Singular Includes Plural. Section 10.15 Remedies Cumulative. EXHIBIT F IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT As there are still issues to be resolved, we request that the Draft Improvements Agreement the submitted at time of Final Plan EXHIBIT G Geotechnical Information EXHIBIT H Mineral Rights Documents HIllR Nf lW W,Nat,M',lf ulf lA'M IN N II Ill Reception#:727431 07/061200701:59:07PM B:1947P:0390JeanAlberico1of2 Rec Fee:$11.00Doc Fee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO ASSIGNMENT OF OIL AND GAS LEASE For good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged,North 27, LLC,("Grantor")hereby assigns,without recourse to the Grantor,allof the Grantor's right,titleand interestas the same may exist as of the date hereof inand to that certain Oil and Gas Lease with Apollo Energy,LLC,dated January 19, 2006,a memorandum of which isrecorded as Reception No.694178 of the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County,to the Grantees as follows: An undivided 55% of the Grantor's interestin and to said Lease to Terry Kirk and Julie Kirk as jointtenants,and An undivided 45% of the Grantor's interestin and to said Lease to Gary A. Kirk. The Grantees hereby acknowledge and agree that they accept this assignment and further,that they are not entitledto any payments made to the Lessor under said Lease prior to the date hereof. The address of the Grantees is clo Terry Kirk,12144 East Welsh Trail,Scottsdale,AZ 85259. Dated thistk day of June,2007. GRANTOR:NORTH 27,LLC By:/ Paul C.Currier,Member GRANTEES: Terr rk J e Kirk,also kn ad &Rirk, y Terry Kirk,a rney-in fact Ga Kirk)b ferry Kir ,a 'or y-i t WIRNfMHli,M',NI'I*W'lRIA'MMh HIll Reception#:727431 07/06/200701:59:07PM8:1947P:0391JeanAlberico2of2 Ree Fee:$11.00Doc Fee.0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) Subscribed,sworn to,and acknowledged before me this day of June, 2007,by Paul C.Currier,Member,of North 27,LLC.. Witness my hand and officialseal, tary Public 4.*O 4 * My commission expires: STATE OF 0 Oradd ) ss..* COUNTY OF vt 91 )CO Subscribed,sworn to,and acknowledged before me this day ofJune, 2007,by Terry Kirk for himself and as attorney-in-factforJulie Kirk,also known as Julie A.Kirk,and Gary A. Kirk. Witness my hand and officialseal. Not Public~ My commission expires: 6/23/07-C:\DocumentsandSettings\Defaultuser.server01\MyDocumenis\Assistantl\wpdata\Rbedoc-J\kirk-north27assignmentofoilandgas lease.wpd HIll14 W'MNIONIT,NT'HIV'lWIM'NIM H Al ill Reception#:727432 07/06/200701:59:07PM 8:1947P:0392JeanAlberico 1 of 2 Rec Fee.511.00Doc Fee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO ASSIGNMENT OF OIL AND GAS LEASE For good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged,North 27, LLC,("Grantor") hereby assigns,without recourse to the Grantor,allof the Grantor's right,titleand interestas the same may existas of the date hereof in and to that certain Oil and Gas Lease with Apollo Energy,LLC,dated January 19, 2006,a memorandum of which isrecorded as Reception No. 694178 of the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County,to the Grantees as follows: An undivided 55% of the Grantor's interest in and to said Lease to Terry Kirk and JulieKirkas jointtenants,and An undivided 45% of the Grantor's interestinand to said Lease to Gary A. Kirk. The Grantees hereby acknowledge and agree that they accept this assignment and further,that they are not entitledto any payments made to the Lessor under said Lease prior to the date hereof. The address of the Grantees is clo Terry Kirk,12144 East Welsh Trail,Scottsdale,AZ 85259. Dated this 17 da of June,2007. GRANTOR:NORTH 27,L By: Jo . rrier GRANTEES: Terry Irk ie Kirk,also kn ACKi by Terry Kirk,a ney-in-fact G ,Terry tt e ' fact HIllW1.NEMMI(.NI',NthlflWWh'Milkh H ill Reception#:727432 07/06/200701:59:07PM B: 1947P:0393JeanAlberico 2 of 2 Rec Fee:$11.00Doc Fee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) Subscribed,sworn to,and acknowledged before me t ES day of June, 2007,by John M. Currier. Witness my hand and officialseal..... e ublic m My commission expires:06 /28 /2008 Oj .*% STATE OF O.) )ss. COUNTY OF yor 2 ) Subscribed,sworn to,and acknowledged before me this day of 2007,by Terry Kirkforhimself and as attorney-in-factforJulie Kirk,also known as Julie A.Kirk,and Gary A. Kirk. Witness my hand and officialseal. No ry Public My commission expires:/ 6/27/07-C:\DocumentsandSettings\Defaultuser.Server01\MyDocuments\Assistantl\wpdatalRbedoc-J\kirk-north27assignmentofoilandgas lease-wpd HIllI'lliaM,WWIR.ld@*"14%@*,141%ll111Reception#:80430908/24/201103:08:42PM JeanAlberico1of5ReoFee:$31.00Doc Fee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO Producers88-PAIDUP Revised PAID-UP OIL AND GAS LEASE AGREEMENT,Madeandenteredintothe 2nd dayof May ,20 11 ,byandbetween Red DogLLC,a Coloradolimitedliabilitycompany whoseaddressis 1011Main Street Carbondale,CO 81623 ,hereinaftercalledLessor(whetheroneormore)and AnteroResourcesPiceanceCorporation whoseaddressis _162517t"Street,Suite300,Denver,CO 80202 hereinaftercalledLessee: WITNESSETH,ThattheLessor,forandinconsiderationofTENAND MORE DOLLARS ($10.00+)cashinhandpaid,thereceiptofwhichisherebyacknowledged,andthecovenantsandagreementshereinaftercontained,hasgranted,demised,leasedandlet,andbythesepresentsdoesgrant,demise,leaseandlet exclusivelyuntothesaidLessee,thelandhereinafterdescribed,withtheexclusiverightforthepurposeofdrilling,mining,exploringbygeophysicalandother methods,andoperatingforandproducingtherefromoilandallgasofwhatsoevernatureorkind,specificallyincludingcoalbedmethaneandanyandallsubstances producedinassociationtherewithfromcoal-bearingformations,withrightsofwayandeasementsforroads,layingpipelines,anderectionofstructuresthereonto produce,saveandtakecareofsaidproducts,allthatcertaintractoflandsituatedintheCountyofGarfieldStateofColorado,describedasfollows,to-wit: SeeExhibit"A"Attachedheretoandmadea parthereofforLegalDescription Addendum attachedheretoandmade parthereof togetherwithanyreversionaryrightstherein,andtogetherwithallstripsorparcelsofland,(not,however,tobeconstruedtoincludeparcelscomprisingaregular40-acrelegalsubdivisionorlotofapproximatelycorrespondingsize)adjoiningorcontiguoustotheabovedescribedlandandownedorclaimedbyLessor,and containing27.521acres,moreorless. 1. Itisagreedthatthisleaseshallremaininforceforatermoffive(5)yearsandaslongthereafterasoilorgasofwhatsoevernatureorkindisproducedfromsaidleasedpremisesoronacreagepooledtherewith,ordrillingoperationsarecontinuedashereinafterprovided.If,attheexpirationoftheprimarytermofthislease,oilorgasisnotbeingproducedontheleasedpremisesoronacreagepooledtherewithbutLesseeisthenengagedindrillingorre-workingoperationsthereon,thenthisleaseshallcontinueinforcesolongasoperationsarebeingcontinuouslyprosecutedontheleasedpremisesoron acreagepooledtherewith;andoperationsshallbeconsideredtobecontinuouslyprosecutedifnotmorethanninety(90)daysshallelapsebetweenthecompletionorabandonmentofonewellandthebeginningofoperationsforthedrillingofasubsequentwell.Ifafterdiscoveryofoilorgasonsaidlandoron acreagepooledtherewith,theproductionthereofshouldceasefromanycauseaftertheprimaryterm,thisleaseshallnottenninateifLesseecommencesadditionaldrillingorre-workingoperationswithinninety(90)daysfromdateofcessationofproductionorfromdateofcompletionofdryhole.Ifoilorgasshallbediscoveredandproducedasaresultofsuchoperationsatoraftertheexpirationoftheprimarytermofthislease,thisleaseshallcontinueinforcesolongasoilorgasisproducedfromtheleasedpremisesoronacreagepooledtherewith. Intheeventawellorwellsisdrilledandcompletedonthelands,oronthelandspooledtherewith,forthepurposeofdevelopingcoalbedgas,theword"operations"shallmean,inadditiontothosematterscoveredintheprecedingparagraph.(1)operationsofsaidwellstoremovewaterorothersubstancesfromthecoalbed,ortodisposeofsuchwaterorothersubstances,eventhoughsuchoperationsdonotresultintheproductionofhydrocarbonsinpayingquantities,or(2)shutting-inorotherwisediscontinuingproductionfromsaidwellstoallowforsurfaceorundergroundminingaffectingthedrillsiteorwellbore.2. ThisisaPAID-UPLEASE,Inconsiderationofthedowncashpayment,LessoragreesthatLesseeshallnotbeobligated,exceptasotherwiseprovidedherein,tocommenceorcontinueanyoperationsduringtheprimaryterm.LesseemayatanytimeortimesduringoraftertheprimarytermsurrenderthisleaseastoalloranyportionofsaidlandandastoanystrataorstratumbydeliveringtoLessororbyfilingforrecordareleaseorreleases,andberelievedofallobligationthereafteraccruingastotheacreagesurrendered. 3. InconsiderationofthepremisesthesaidLesseecovenantsandagrees:1st To delivertothecreditofLessor,freeofcost,inthepipelinetowhichLesseemay connectwellsonsaidland,theequaleighteenpercent(18%)partofalloilproducedandsavedfromtheleasedpremises.2nd To payLessorongasandcasingheadgasproducedfromsaidland(1)whensoldbyLessee,eighteenpercent(18%)ofthenetproceedsderivedfromsuchsaleor(2)whenusedbyLesseeoffsaidlandorinthemanufactureofgasolmeorotherproducts,themarketvalue,atthemouthofthewell,ofeighteenpercent(18%)ofsuchgasandcasingheadgas,Lessor'sinterest,ineithercase,tobeareighteenpercent(18%)ofthecostofcompressing,dehydratingandotherwisetreatingsuchgasorcasingheadgastorenderitmarketableorusableandeIghteenpercent(18%)ofthecostofgatheringandtransportingsuchgasandcasingheadgasfromthemouthofthewelltothepointofsaleoruse.3rd To payLessorforg producedfromanyoilwellandusedoffthepremisesorinthemanufactureofgasolineoranyotherproduct,a royaltyof eighteenpercent 8%)oftheproceeds,atthemouthofthewell,payablemonthlyattheprevailingmarketrate.4.Wheregasfromawellcap leofproducinggasisnotsoldorused,LesseemaypayortenderasroyaltytotheroyaltyownersOneDollarperyearpernetacreretainedhereunder,suchpaymentortendertobemadeonorbeforetheanniversarydateofthisleasenextensuingaftertheexpirationof90daysfromthedatesuchwellisshutinandthereafteronorbeforetheanniversarydateofthisleaseduringtheperiodsuchwellisshutin.Ifsuchpaymentortenderismade,itwillbeconsideredthatgasisbeingproducedwithinthemeaningofthislease. 5. IfsaidLessorownsalessinterestintheabovedescribedlandthantheentireandundividedfeesimpleestatetherein,thentheroyalties(includinganyshut-ingasroyalty)hereinprovidedforshallbepaidtheLessoronlyintheproportionwhichLessor'sinterestbearstothewholeandundividedfee.6.Lesseeshallhavetherighttouse,freeofcost,gas,oilandwaterproducedonsaidlandforLessee'soperationthereon.7.WhenrequestedbyLessor,LesseeshallburyLessee'spipelinebelowplowdepth.8.Nowellshallbedrillednearerthan200feettothehouseorbarnnowonsaidpremiseswithoutwrittenconsentofLessor.9. LesseeshallpayfordamagescausedbyLessee'soperationstogrowingcropsonsaidland.10.Lesseeshallhavetherightatanytimetoremoveallmachineryandfixturesplacedonsaidpremises,includingtherighttodrawandremovecasing.11.TherightsofLessorandLesseehereunderroaybe assignedinwholeorpart.No changeinownershipofLessor'sinterest(byassignmentorotherwise)shallbebindingonLesseeuntilLesseehasbeenfurnishedwithnotice,consistingofcertifledcopiesofallrecordedinstrumentsordocumentsandotherinformationnecessarytoestablishacompletechainofrecordtitlefromLessor,andthenonlywithrespecttopaymentsthereaftermade.No otherkindofnotice,whetheractualorconstructive,shallbebindingonLessee.No presentorfuturedivisionofLessor'sownershipastodifferentportionsorparcelsofsaidlandshalloperatetoenlargetheobligationsordiminishtherightsofLessee,andallLessee'soperationsmaybeconductedwithoutregardtoanysuchdivision.Ifalloranypartofthisleaseisassigned,noleaseholdownershallbeliableforanyactoromissionofanyotherleaseholdowner.12.Lessee,atitsoption,isherebygiventherightandpoweratanytimeandfromtimetotimeasarecurringright,eitherbeforeorafterproduction,astoalloranypartofthelanddescribedhereinandastoanyoneormoreoftheformationshereunder,topoolorunitizetheleaseholdestateandthemineralestatecoveredbythisleasewithotherland,leaseorleasesintheimmediatevicinityfortheproductionofoilandgas,orseparatelyfortheproductionofeither,wheninLessee'sjudgmentitisnecessaryoradvisabletodoso,andirrespectiveofwhetherauthoritysimilartothisexistswithrespecttosuchotherland,leaseorleases.Likewise,unitspreviouslyformedtoincludeformationsnotproducingoilorgas,may bereformedtoexcludesuchnon-producingformations.TheformingorreformingofanyunitshallbeaccomplishedbyLesseeexecutingandfilingofrecordadeclarationofsuchunitizationorreformation,whichdeclarationshalldescribetheunit.Any unitmay includelanduponwhicha wellhastheretoforebeencompletedoruponwhichoperationsfordrillinghavetheretoforebeencommenced.Production,drillingorreworkingoperationsorawellshutinforwantofamarketanywhereonaunitwhichincludesallorapartofthisleaseshallbetreatedasifitwereproduction,drillingorreworkingoperationsorawellshutinforwantofa marketunderthislease.Inlieuoftheroyaltieselsewherehereinspecilled,includingshut-ingasroyalties,Lessorshallreceiveonproductionfromtheunitsopooledroyaltiesonlyontheportionofsuchproductionallocatedtothislease;suchallocationshallbethatproportionoftheunitproductionthatthetotalnumberofsurfaceacrescoveredbythisleaseandincludedintheunitbearstothetotalnumberofsurfaceacresinsuchunit.Inadditiontotheforegoing,Lesseeshallhavetherighttounitize,pool,orcombinealloranypartoftheabovedescribedlandsastooneormoreoftheformationsthereunderwithotherlandsinthesamegeneralareabyenteringintoacooperativeorunitplanofdevelopmentoroperationapprovedbyanygovernmentalauthorityand,fromtimetotime,withlikeapproval,tomodify,changeorterminateanysuchplanoragreementand,insuchevent,theterms,conditionsandprovisionsofthisleaseshallbedeemedmodifiedtoconformtotheterms,conditions,andprovisionsofsuchapprovedcooperativeorunitplanofdevelopmentoroperationand,particularly,alldrillinganddevelopmentrequirementsofthislease,expressorimplied,shallbesatisfiedbycompliancewiththedrillinganddevelopmentrequirementsofsuchplanoragreement,andthisleaseshallnotterminateorexpireduringthelifeofsuchplanoragreement.Intheeventthatsaidabovedescribedlandsoranypartthereof,shallhereafterbeoperatedunderanysuchcooperativeorunitplanofdevelopmentoroperationwherebytheproductiontherefromisallocatedtodifferentportionsofthelandcoveredbysaidplan,thentheproductionallocatedtoanyparticulartractoflandshall,forthe RetumTo: AnteroResourcesCorporatzon P.O.Box1214 HillIF'd5hM M WEt.ld'MER.1M M 5 III Reception#:894309 06/241201183:09:42PM JeanAlberico 2 of 5 Rec Fee:$31.00DocFee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO purposeofcomputingtheroyaltiestobepaidhereundertoLessor,beregardedashavingbeenproducedfromtheparticulartractoflandtowhichitisallocatedandnottoanyothertractofland;andtheroyaltypaymentstobemadehereundertoLessorshallbebaseduponproductiononlyassoallocated.LessorshallformallyexpressLessor'sconsenttoanycooperativeorunitplanofdevelopmentoroperationadoptedbyLesseeandapprovedbyanygovernmentalagencybyexecutingthesameuponrequestofLessee. 13. Whenoperationsorproductionaredelayedorinterruptedbylackofwater,laborormaterial,orbyfire,storm,flood,warrebellion,insurrection,riot,strike,differenceswithworkmen,orfailureofcarrierstofurnishtransportorfurnishfacilitiesfortransportationorlackofmarketinthefieldfortheminerals.produced,orasaresultofanycausewhatsoeverbeyondthecontrolofLessee,thetimeofsuchdelayorinterruptionshallnotbecountedagainstLesseeandthisleaseshallremaininforceduringsuchdelayorinterruptionandninety(90)daysthereafter,anythinginthisleasetothecontrarynotwithstanding.14. Lessorherebywarrantsandagreestodefendthetitletothelandshereindescribed,andagreesthattheLesseeshallhavetherightatanytimetoredeemforLessor,bypayment,anymortgages,taxesorotherliensontheabovedescribedlands,intheeventofdefaultofpaymentbyLessorandbesubrogatedtotherightsoftheholderthereof,andtheundersignedLessors,forthemselvesandtheirheirs,successorsandassigns,herebysurrenderandreleaseallrightofdowerandhomesteadinthepremisesdescribedherein,insofarassaidrightofdowerandhomesteadmayinanywayaffectthepurposesforwhichthisleaseismade,asrecitedherein. 15.Lessorshereinintendtoleaseanyright,titleandinterestLessorsmayhaveinandtoanyandallmineralrightsinandunderallstripsorparcelsoflandincluding,butnotlimitedtostreets,countyroads,highways,railroadstripsand/oranyandallothereasementsandrightsofwaywhatsoever,canals,ditchesandotherwaterwayslyingacrossand/oradjacentand/orinanywayappertainingtothelandshereinabovedescribed,includingwithoutlimitationanylandsacquiredbyaccretionthroughmeanderofwaterways.16.ShouldanyoneormoreofthepartieshereinabovenamedasLessorfailtoexecutethislease,itshallneverthelessbebindinguponallsuchpartieswhodoexecuteitasLessor.Theword"Lessor,"asusedinthisleaseshallmeananyoneormoreorallofthepartieswhoexecutethisleaseasLessor.Alltheprovisionsofthisleaseshallbebindingontheheirs,successorsandassignsofLessorandLessee.17.LessoragreesthatLesseemay locateawellorwellsonanydrillingsitelocatedonanypartofthelanddescribedherein,includingtherighttoasubsurfaceeasementthroughanypartofthelanddescribedherein,whichwellswillbeusedtoaccessthesubsurfaceofadjacentmineralowners.18.Notwithstandinganythingtothecontraryacontainedherein,Lesseehastheoptiontoextendtheprimarytermanadditionalone(1)yearwiththepaymentofanamountequalto$4(10pernetacre,suchainoimtbeingpaidtoLessoronorbeforetheexpirationoftheprimarytermsetforthaboveinparagraph1.SuchpaymentshallbeconsideredtenderedbyLesseeandreceivedbyLessorwhendeposited,postage-paid,intheUnitedStatesmail,orwitha nationallyrecognizedcarrierservice. 19.ShouldLesseebepreventedfromcomplyingwithorfkilfillinganyexpressorimpliedcovenantorotherprovisionofthislease,byreasonofscarcityofofinabilitytoobtainortouseequipmentormaterial,oranyFederalorStateLaw,oranyorder,ruleorregulationofgovernmentalauthority,orduetotheinabilitytoobtainnecessaryadministrativeactionofagovernmentalauthority,.orbyeventsofforcemajeureand/orbysucheventsasarebeyondthereasonablecontrolofLessee,thenwhilesoprevented,thetimewithinwhichLesseemay complywithorfulfillsuchcovenantorotherprovisionshallbesuspended;andthisleaseshallbeextendedwhileandsolongasLesseeispreventedbyanysuchcausefromconductingoperationsonorfromproducingoilorgasfromsaidLand,andforanadditionalninety(90)daysthereafter;andthetimewhileLesseeissopreventedshallnotbecountedagainstLesseeincomputingthetimewithinwhichcomplianceorperformanceoccurred,anythinginthisleasetothecontrarynotwithstairding.20.PreferentialRight.Fortheconsiderationhereinrecited,ifduringthetermofthislease(butnotmorethan20yearsafterthedatehereof)Lessorreceivesabonafideofferfromanypartytopurchaseanewleagecoveringalloranypartofthelandsorsubstancescoveredhereby,andifLessoriswillingtoacceptsuchoffer,thenLessorshallpromptlynotifyLesseeinwritingofthenameandaddressoftheofferor,andofallpertinenttermsandconditionsoftheoffer,includinganyleasebonusoffered.Lesseeshallhavea periodof30daysafter;/receiptofsuchnoticetoexerciseapreferentialrighttopurchaseanewleasefromLessorinaccordancewiththetermsandconditionsoftheoffer,bygivingLessorwrittennoticeofsuchexercise.Promptlythereafter,LesseeshallfurnishtoLessorthenewleaseforexecution,alongwithatimedraftfortheleasebonuscohditioneduponexecutionanddeliveryoftheleasebyLessorandapprovaloftitlebyLessee,allinaccordancewiththetermsofsaiddraft.WhetherornotLekeeexercisesitspreferentialrighthereunder,thenaslongasthisleaseremainsineffectanynewleasefromtheLessorshallbesubordinatetothisleaseandshallnotbeconstruedasreplacingoraddingtoLessee'sobligationshereunder, INWITNESSWHEREOF,thisinstrme sexecutedasofthedatefirstabovewritten. TerryA."a ager,Red Dog LLC ACKNOWLEDGEMENT-INDIVIDUAL STATEof COUNTY of / BEFOREME,theundersignedNotaryPubh,inandforsaidCountyandState,onthis dayof ,20 personallyappeared ff;///,.y {, &VI&ge?,A str-,/.C. ,tome knowntobetheidenticalpersondescribedinandwhoexecutedthewithinandforegoinginstrumentofwritingandacknowledgedtomethathedulyexecutedsameashis freeand voluntaryactanddeedfortheusesandpurposesthereinsetforthandinthecapacitystatedtherein. INWITNESSWHEREOF,Ihavehereuntosetmy handandafflxedmynotarialsealthedayandyearlastabovewritten. My CommissionExpires: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT-INDIVIDUAL STATEof COUNTY of . BEFOREME,theundersi Public,aidCountyandState,onthis dayof ,200 personallyappeared ,tome knowntobetheidenticalperson describedinandwhoexecutedthewithinan strumentofwritingandacknowledgedtomethat he_dulyexecutedsameas freeand voluntaryactanddeedfortheusesandpurposesthereinsetforthandinthecapacitystatedtherein. INWITNESSWHEREOF,Ihavehereuntosetmy handandaffixedmynotarialsealthedayandyearlastabovewritten. My CommissionExpires: NotaryPublic: Address: Afterrecordinareturnto: TexhomaLandConsultants,Inc. 770W.RockCreekRd.#117 Norman,OK 73069 HillihdWAltWMLIN IM'WIM'S IM IM M ill Reception#:804309 06/241201103:08.42PM JeanAlberico 3 of 5 ReoFee:$31.00Doc Fee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO EXHIBIT "A" Attachedtoand made a partforallpurposestothatcertainoiland gasleasedatedMay 2,2011,by and between Red Dog LLC,aColoradoLimitedLiabilityCompany,as Lessor,and AnteroResourcesPiceanceCorporation,as Lessee,coveringlandinGarfieldCounty,Colorado. DESCRIPTIONOF LANDS A tractoflandsituatedinthe Northeast% oftheNortheast% ofsection36,Township5 South,Range92West of the6thPrincipalMeridian,beingmore particularlydescribedasfollows: Beginningata pointonthe EastlineofsaidNortheast%oftheNortheast%whenceawitnesscornerforthe NortheastCornerofsaidsection36 bearingNorth01"07'25"East20.00feetfromsaidNortheastCornerbears North01"07'25"East454.40feet;thenceSouth01"O7'25"West 887.75feettotheSoutheastCornerofsaid Northeast% oftheNortheast%;thenceSouth89'21'27"West 1350.12feettotheSouthwestCornerofsaid Northeast%oftheNortheast%;thencealongtheWest lineofsaidNortheast%oftheNortheast%North 01*00'46"East887.78feet;thenceNorth89"21'39"East1351.83feettothepointofbeginning. AlsoKnown As Lot4 Simon SubdivisionExemptionPlat Accordingtothe platrecordedApril21,1999 as ReceptionNo.544219 AllE,FSM,F,%RMIFRIM'M,1MIN HillReception#:80430906/24/201103:08:42PM JeanAlberico4of5ReoFee:531.00Doo Fee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO ADDENDUM THIS ADDENDUM constitutesan integralpart ofthatcertainPaid-Up Oiland Gas Lease dated May 2,2011,by and between,Red Dog LLC,a Colorado Limited Liability Company,Lessor,and ANTERO RESOURCES PICEANCE CORPORATION,as Lessee: Conflicts In the eventof a conflictbetween the terms ofthisLease Addendum and the terms of the printedform lease,the terms ofthisLease Addendum shallcontrol. Surface Use Restrictions: No well,well pad,road,pipeline,compressor unitsor stations,tanks,structuresor other surfacefacilityof any kind shallbe placed upon the Leased Premises.No entryon the surfaceof the leased Premises shallbe permitted and only pooling and directionaldrilling from neighboring lands shallbe utilizedby Lessee to develop the leasedmineral rights. Lessor acknowledges thislimitedsurfaceaccess willinhibitLessee's abilityto protectthe correlativerightsof Lessor and hereby expresslywaives any and allexpress or implied dutiesof Lessee regarding same. Deductions: Lessee shallbear Lessor'sportion ofthecostto gather,dehydrate,process and compress naturalgas from the wellhead to thefirstinterconnectwith eitheran interstateor intrastatepipeline. Protection of Water Wells: Lessee agrees,to assume liabilityfor any damage caused by Lessee's operations to Lessor's water well(s)or other water sources servingthe Leased Premises,and shalltake allnecessary steps to prevent itsoperationsfrom pollutingany water well,water spring or other water source locatedon the Leased Premises.Lessee shallhire an independent third-partyexpert(unlesssuch expert is objected to by Lessor,in which case the parties shallmutually agree upon a differentexpert)to testthe qualityof (a)each ground water well or spring locatedon the Leased Premises within a one-half (%)mile radiusof any surface-holelocationof an oiland gas well or other relevantoperationof Lessee,and (b) any surface water source on the Leased Premises located up to one-half (%)mile downstream of the historicdrainageroute(s)of a well pad or other relevantoperationof Lessee.Testing of a water well,water spring or other water source shalloccur (a)prior to Lessee conducting drillingoperations,(b)upon completion of allwells drilledfrom a well pad,and (c)any time thereafterwhen Lessee receiveswrittenrequestfrom Lessor to conduct such testing,but not to exceed once every two (2)years unless otherwise warranted (by way of example but not limitation,as a resultof a spillor leak of a size reportableto the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission).Inthe event such test resultsconfirm (inthe sole opinion of the third-partyexpert),that any water source was contaminated or damaged as a resultof Lessee's operations,Lessee agrees to either(a) drilla new water well on the Leased Premises at Lessee's expense of at leastthe same qualityand volume as the damaged well priorto Lessee's operations,(b)provide Lessor a replacement water source ina likevolume tothe damaged water source,atitssource or ata locationon the Leased Premises requestedby Lessor,or (c)treatthe water from the contaminated water source to bring itup to the standardsexistingpriorto contamination. Lessee shallbegin constructionon any new water well or source,as the case may be, within sixty(60) days afterreceiptof the third-partyexpert'sreport of contamination or damage,and shallcomplete such constructionwithin six (6)months thereafter.Lessee shallprovide potable water by truck or other means to Lessor in an amount sufficientto replacethe damaged water untilsuch remediationiscompleted. HillIF'dZMEMh,M IBM'l*WSJ*@M Il illReception#:80430906/24/201103:08.42PM JeanAlberico5of5RecFee:$31.00Doo Fee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO No Objection to Subdivision: Lessee agrees thatitshallnot objectin any way orto any person,entityor agency,to any applicationfor subdivisionor other land use or development plan thatLessor may submit or propose for development of or upon the Leased Premises. The subdivisionor other development of the Leased Premises shallnot modify any of Lessee's obligationsunder the Lease,asmodified by thisLease Addendum. RED DO LLC Antero Resources Piceance Corporation .By: Ter A. i k,ana er EXHIBIT I Miscellaneous Correspondence • Letter from Colorado Division of Wildlife • Letter from Garfield County Vegetation Officer STATE OF COLORADO Bill Otvehs, Governor ;;'PAiiiMENr oF NATURAL FEsouRcEs ^IVISION OF-WILDLIFE . ]buuopPonruNlrY EMPLoYEB John W. Mumma, Director 6060 BroadwaY Denver, Colorado 80216 Telephone: (303) 297'1 1 92 JanuarY 4,2OOO Don Crane Pistrict Wildlife Manager co: Stwe Yamashita ffi#ffiiru81601 RECEIVEDJAN062000 For Wildlife - For People' Mr. JeffLaurien Senior Planner Garfiekl County Building 6fl planning Deparrnent 1o9 86 Street, Suite 3O3 Glenwood SPrings' CO 8f60f RE: North 27 Subdivision Dear Ieff I reoeived a reque$ for comments on theNorth 27 subdivision preliminoy!lr- Ivisited the ;;rj* rit" *a ,*it*"a the plan and I am q,ite fa4ti=.with the area andthe associated wildlife ryeoies anil habitat. rnr following_are E Py:i*ofwildtife concerns and ;;;;dations for dwelopment of the North 27 Subdivision: l. The diainege ditches with their o(ryer of cattails should be consiilered wetlands and be maintained at crurelrt oonditions 2. Because ora year rormd population of mule deer that fieglent the areq dl perimaer fe'ncing - of lots soua not exceed fortytu,o (42) inches in height. 3. hoperty o*o, should be reArired to kennel or fenoe in theh dogs at all times 4. Property owners should be reqponsible topr-otect-their haystackg gardeng and orname'lrtal - --'*ia.tion fiomwildlife di-"g", in-ctu$S damage by mule-deer. 5, Rubbislq log anil lumber orjunk plles should not be allowed on lotsto minirniz€ pmential skunk infestation- 6. kt;;ers Sould be e,ncograged to plant trees mil wind breaks to provide o(ryer anil feed for song birds and sxnall mamtt'als' Ttank you for the opportrmiry to comment 6lr ttis proiect' RespeotfutlY, A- 0*''- ,l t-7 DEPABTMENToFNATURALRESoUBCES,GregWalcher,ExecutiveDirector wILDLIFE COMMlssloN, Chuck Lewis, cnairman. Mark LeValley' vice chairman ' Bernard L' Black' Jr''Secretary Members, Rick Enstrom . Marianna naftofoutos . Arnold Salazar. Robert Shoemaker ' Philip James rA:,I L' I L'L' L'J: .?OP ,.,un urane ;;"'-^-F!G,|E6lE-rff cnrrtlrEluncB rfviSlon oFIUILDLIFE 11l rilrr.cmnrrrv #ola -HrrW.Ia.fanBlfrtLr.o&*El!----CGz',Lt'iE. ItlhY 1.2@ iJh-Jdtta.[Ln SgfrrPErs Gafield Cqr[yBdfte and PEriU Oeptrem lG SP srDc' Sft 3fil Glsrrrcod sFiul co 8id'4 RE rlorttZ$Dtfufim ru/urbcf-luut P. r ForWihfifi-FrP@ DocJCt Thir lsoerit h8t'fiinbrru Prcl,iLE lelEro,Jzrrary +Nn tGeara3 oo'tt Enrr qr tlr prprONqlr27 $Hvbiqu Resd,s tEr a Erineu, Fq,tfl|g pefirff tlct,t ilg cE3 rd mad 1? h t-ttil,rrest tbndlg b rbsifred e a niilffe driqr benitr. AulnG edfin L;iler,pdd b used b t(q deor a,d @l aends qf d sr tE, qrdr E e srrrgdd t€o tat D a dnr agrionrd ztr p,.1oirn,rp3 !tt61.5 3p a niifnrn d l H,]f,X rd ol wrr uE lth f2 tud r"d"d p6 dcd ffiy 3 b 4 lbct h tE gtult4 l4! r e q bGtrun tl ;il;f,_ad ite fsn rrilt-dm *arr a taltro *u an hc htrin d tl wvtrt slt, ;;i99 .illE, 2 *.IdB d ffi uia qr llp tp d trc wrut *.. Ufitn n6d.4 ;;$"! Ue ronptcO arry liun hfrnas io Urn dscatnd udt aw lh htpl. Atrtrrry, prosPecli1p !t'orers stEUts be gge ffi] [E!l' rilEr!1m tF DilV, i"f 53;;fisfrllfurp.mfxq 1,136xg1tnanrl rffirp dfnftrtcs(r)- Thr* you fu fre ryonni$ b cqilp7t ot tic Pteiea ReEpecmry, c* Dqr Crdl DtstttU,U[D ]rrqer Cc SbtgYrtestfir ' ft7'2 Dgtrxf,g,rrort.Anm,FEcuJRcE\o,tu*l-.brrtt* lrA EXHIBIT J Miscellaneous Documents and Past Approvals • Title Commitment (Current) • Resolution 99-044 (Approving the Simon Subdivision Exemption) • Lot 4 Simon Subdivision Exemption Plat • Property Record Card • List of property owners within 200 feet Customer Distribution Prevent fraud - Please call a member of our closing team for wire transfer instructions or to initiate a wire transfer. Note that our wiring instructions will never change. Order Number: GW63018795-3 Date: 11/15/2024 Property Address: TBD COUNTY ROAD 261, SILT, CO 81652 For Closing Assistance For Title Assistance Land Title Garfield County Title Team 901 GRAND AVENUE #202 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 (970) 945-2610 (Work) (970) 945-4784 (Work Fax) glenwoodresponse@ltgc.com Seller/Owner RED DOG LLC Attention: TERRY KIRK Delivered via: Electronic Mail Attorney for Seller BALCOMB GREEN Attention: BRITT CHOATE brittc@balcombgreen.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Estimate of Title Fees Order Number: GW63018795-3 Date: 11/15/2024 Property Address: TBD COUNTY ROAD 261, SILT, CO 81652 Seller(s): RED DOG LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Buyer(s): TO BE DETERMINED Thank you for putting your trust in Land Title. Below is the estimate of title fees for the transaction. The final fees will be collected at closing. Visit ltgc.com to learn more about Land Title. Estimate of Title Insurance Fees "TBD" Commitment $265.00 TBD - TBD Income $-265.00 TOTAL $0.00 Note: The documents linked in this commitment should be reviewed carefully. These documents, such as covenants conditions and restrictions, may affect the title, ownership and use of the property. You may wish to engage legal assistance in order to fully understand and be aware of the implications of the documents on your property. Chain of Title Documents: Garfield county recorded 06/26/2007 under reception no. 726333 at book 1941 page 972 Garfield county recorded 06/26/2007 under reception no. 726336 at book 1941 page 979 Garfield county recorded 06/22/2008 under reception no. 751281 Garfield county recorded 10/23/2019 under reception no. 927184 Garfield county recorded 11/08/2019 under reception no. 927932 Plat Map(s): Garfield county recorded 04/21/1999 under reception no. 544219 Property Address: TBD COUNTY ROAD 261, SILT, CO 81652 1. Effective Date: 10/25/2024 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured: "TBD" Commitment Proposed Insured: TO BE DETERMINED $0.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A FEE SIMPLE 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: RED DOG LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 5. The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: LOT 4 A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 92 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 WHENCE A WITNESS CORNER FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36 BEARING NORTH 01 DEGREE 07 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST, 20.00 FEET FROM SAID NORTHEAST CORNER BEARS NORTH 01 DEGREE 07 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST, 454.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 07 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST, 887.75 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST, 1350.12 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, NORTH 01 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST, 887.78 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST, 1351.83 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 4 SIMON SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED APRIL 21, 1999 AS RECEPTION NO. 544219. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number:GW63018795-3 Copyright 2006-2024 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number:GW63018795-3 ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part I (Requirements) Order Number: GW63018795-3 All of the following Requirements must be met: This proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO. This commitment does not republish any covenants, condition, restriction, or limitation contained in any document referred to in this commitment to the extent that the specific covenant, conditions, restriction, or limitation violates state or federal law based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, handicap, familial status, or national origin. 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 7. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 8. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1894, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 299. 9. RESERVATION OF DITCH RIGHTS AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 25, 1910 IN BOOK 79 AT PAGE 407. 10. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GARFIELD COUNTY RESOLUTION RECORDED APRIL 20, 1999 IN BOOK 1125 AT PAGE 434. 11. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF OIL AND GAS LEASE RECORDED MARCH 17, 2006 IN BOOK 1780 AT PAGE 766, ASSIGNMENT OF OIL AND GAS LEASE RECORDED JULY 6, 2007 IN BOOK 1947 AT PAGE 390 AND RECORDED JULY 6, 2007 IN BOOK 1947 AT PAGE 392 AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN. 12. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF QUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 04, 1999 IN BOOK 1153 AT PAGE 743. 13. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF SIMON SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT RECORDED APRIL 21, 1999, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 544219. 14. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF GRANT OF EASEMENTS AND DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS RECORDED JUNE 3, 1999 IN BOOK 1133 AT PAGE 54. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: GW63018795-3 15. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF PAID UP OIL AND GAS LEASE RECORDED JUNE 24, 2011 AS RECEPTION NO. 804309. 16. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF EASEMENT TO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO RECORDED OCTOBER 10, 2018 AS RECEPTION NO. 912741. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: GW63018795-3 Land Title Guarantee Company Disclosure Statements Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.(A) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real property). (B) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. (C) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. (A) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. (B) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and material-men's liens. (C) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.(D) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. (E) This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface estate, in Schedule B-2. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of Regulatory Agencies. Note: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of a closing protection letter for the lender, purchaser, lessee or seller in connection with this transaction. Note: Pursuant to CRS 24-21-514.5, Colorado notaries may remotely notarize real estate deeds and other documents using real-time audio-video communication technology. You may choose not to use remote notarization for any document. That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and (A) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. (B) Joint Notice of Privacy Policy of Land Title Guarantee Company Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurancy Company This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company as agent for Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized access to your non-public personal information ("Personal Information"). In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from: applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web-based transaction management system; your transactions with, or from the services being performed by us, our affiliates, or others; a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction; and The public records maintained by governmental entities that we obtain either directly from those entities, or from our affiliates and non-affiliates. Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows: We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products and services to you. We may share your Personal Information with affiliated contractors or service providers who provide services in the course of our business, but only to the extent necessary for these providers to perform their services and to provide these services to you as may be required by your transaction. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action. We regularly assess security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal Information. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT STATED ABOVE OR PERMITTED BY LAW. Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows: Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Commitment For Title Insurance Issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company NOTICE IMPORTANT—READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED. THE COMPANY’S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. . COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within 6 months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. COMMITMENT CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS 2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. 3. The Company’s liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without: 4. COMPANY’S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment. 5. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY i. comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; ii. eliminate, with the Company’s written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or iii. acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment. 6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT “Knowledge” or “Known”: Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records.(a) “Land”: The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term “Land” does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy. (b) “Mortgage”: A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law.(c) “Policy”: Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment. (d) “Proposed Insured”: Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment.(e) “Proposed Policy Amount”: Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (f) “Public Records”: Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. (g) “Title”: The estate or interest described in Schedule A.(h) the Notice;(a) the Commitment to Issue Policy;(b) the Commitment Conditions;(c) Schedule A;(d) Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and(e) Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and(f) a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.(g) The Company’s liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company’s delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured’s good faith reliance to: (a) The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing. (b) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured. (c) The Company’s liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount. (d) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any.(e) In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. (f) In any event, the Company’s liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy.(g) Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment.(a) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment.(b) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment. (c) 7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT The issuing agent is the Company’s agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the Company’s agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services. 8. PRO-FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro-forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro-forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro-forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure. 9. ARBITRATION The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org/arbitration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Land Title Insurance Corporation has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A to be valid when countersigned by a validating officer or other authorized signatory. Issued by: Land Title Guarantee Company 3033 East First Avenue Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80206 303-321-1880 Craig B. Rants, Senior Vice President This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II —Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. (d) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company.(e) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company’s only liability will be under the Policy.(f) View Map RED DOG LLC 12144 E WELSH TRAIL SCOTTSDALE AZ 852595118 Tax Year 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 Actual Value $16,880.00 $16,880.00 $12,680.00 $12,680.00 $14,270.00 Summary Account R005297 Parcel 212736100052 Property Address , SILT, CO 81652 Legal Description Section: 36 Township: 5 Range: 92 A TR IN NENE OF SEC 36 AKA LOT 4 SIMON EXEMPTION. 27.52 AC Acres 27.52 Land SqFt 0 Tax Area 20 Mill Levy 70.9860 Subdivision Map Owner Land Unit Type IRRIGATED LAND-AGRICLTRL. - 4117 (AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY) Square Feet 0 Actual Values Gareld County, CO 1/15/25, 3:52 PM qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R005297 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerID=22381&PageTypeID=4&PageID=9447&Q=66090043&KeyValue=R005297 1/3 Tax Year 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 Assessed Value $4,460.00 $4,460.00 $3,350.00 $3,680.00 $4,140.00 Tax Year 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 Taxes Billed $316.60 $274.36 $222.24 $274.84 $281.04 Click here to view the tax information for this parcel on the Gareld County Treasurer's website. Sale Date Deed Type Reception Number Book - Page Sale Price 11/4/2019 QUIT CLAIM DEED 927932 $0 10/22/2019 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED 927184 $0 10/22/2019 STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY 927182 $0 10/10/2018 EASEMENT 912741 $0 6/24/2008 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED 751281 $0 6/20/2007 QUIT CLAIM DEED 726336 1941-979 $0 6/20/2007 POWER OF ATTORNEY 726334 1941-975 $0 6/20/2007 WARRANTY DEED 726333 1941-972 $525,000 6/20/2007 QUIT CLAIM DEED 726332 1941-970 $0 6/20/2007 STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY 726331 1941-969 $0 6/19/2007 POWER OF ATTORNEY 726335 1941-977 $0 4/20/2000 QUIT CLAIM DEED 562632 1184-366 $0 9/30/1999 QUIT CLAIM DEED 553203 1153-743 $0 9/30/1999 WARRANTY DEED 553202 1153-741 $0 4/21/1999 Plat 544219 $0 4/12/1999 PERSONAL REP DEED 544034 1125-65 $835,000 6/26/1976 QUIT CLAIM DEED 506097 1013-0018 $0 6/14/1976 QUIT CLAIM DEED 307924 0556-0873 $0 11/16/1962 WARRANTY DEED 221477 0349-0244 $0 11/15/1962 AGREEMENT 221478 0349-0245 $0 10/7/1949 WARRANTY DEED 169994 0245-0336 $0 9/12/1949 DEED 169991 0245-0333 $0 2/23/1949 QUIT CLAIM DEED 167498 0240-0556 $0 Click here to view Property Related Public Documents No data available for the following modules: Buildings, Sketches. Assessed Values Tax History Transfers Property Related Public Documents Photos 1/15/25, 3:52 PM qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R005297 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerID=22381&PageTypeID=4&PageID=9447&Q=66090043&KeyValue=R005297 2/3 The Gareld County Assessor's Ofce makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation. Data is subject to constant change and its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. | User Privacy Policy | GDPR Privacy Notice Last Data Upload: 1/15/2025, 12:09:17 AM Contact Us Developed by 1/15/25, 3:52 PM qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Property Record Card: R005297 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerID=22381&PageTypeID=4&PageID=9447&Q=66090043&KeyValue=R005297 3/3 AYALA VILLAMAN, LORETO & AYALA MO 68 LARKSPUR COURT SILT CO 81652 DALEY, FRANK G & SHEILA M 4670 COUNTY ROAD 311 NEW CASTLE CO 81647-9621 GOODWIN, KRISTIN MARIE & WILLIAM H 830 COUNTY ROAD 250 SILT CO 81652 JUNGE, TOMMY ALAN & SUSAN K 0688 COUNTY ROAD 250 SILT CO 81652 KESTI, LOREN & KESTI, JESSICA 892 COUNTY ROAD 250 SILT CO 81652 MCKEE, KELLY RAE 0755 COUNTY ROAD 261 SILT CO 81652 MILLER, NATHAN & KELSEY 383 COLUMBINE LANE SILT CO 81652 MUNOZ, MARTIN VERVEJA & TOOLE, MA 1 COLUMBINE LANE SILT CO 81652 OCHOA, PRIMITIVO & ELSA 256 COLUMBINE LANE SILT CO 81652 RED DOG LLC 12144 E WELSH TRAIL SCOTTSDALE AZ 852595118 EXHIBIT K Grant of Easements and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for a portion of Peach Valley Orchard and the Simon Subdivision Exemption MOUNTAIN VIEW SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION ADDENDUM OWNER: RED DOG, LLC GARFIELD COUNTY – MARCH, 2025 File # SPPA 01-25-9053 Mark Chain Consulting, LLC 811 Garfield Avenue Carbondale, CO 81623 1 March 23, 2025 Philip Berry, AICP Planner III – Garfield County -Community Development 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: NTC Letter Mountain View Preliminary Plan – SSPA 01-25-9053 Dear Philip: In this letter and the attached addendum we will address the 5 items that were outlined in the NTC letter noted above. 1. All owners need to be included on the mailing labels for notice to owners of property within 200 feet. Specifically, parcel # 212736101010 Response: The owners of the above-noted parcel were included in the mailing labels included in the Preliminary Plan application. Please see the annotated list in Tab 1. 2. A recorded copy of the Statement of Authority Is required: Response: A copy of the recorded SOA is contained in Tab 2. Reception # 100- 5067 3. The County Attorney’s Office has requested additional clarification on how mineral research was done, such as deeds reviewed: Response: The Development Team started this element of the review by obtaining a new TBD Title Commitment. We reviewed that title commitment whose order # is GW63018795-3. We reviewed all the listed chain of title documents and all relevant Schedule B-2 exceptions. The second part of our analysis was to find any past or current mineral lease documents that showed up in the records. These were specifically called out in section 10 of the Preliminary Plan Application and were printed in their entirety as exhibit H in that document. These include: Rec # - 694178 - lease with North 27 with Apollo Energy Rec # - 727431 - transfer of lease from Paul Courier to Kirks Rec # 727432 - transfer of lease from John Courier to Kirks Mark Chain Consulting, LLC 811 Garfield Avenue Carbondale, CO 81623 2 Rec # 804309 - Paid up oil and gas lease with Antero Energy entered into on May 2, 201. This lease was for a five-year term. Section 18 of that lease had a provision which allowed the lease to be extended for an additional one year with payment of $400 per acre which needed to be made effective before expiration of the primary term. Those terms were never activated. Moreover, an addendum which is part of the original lease and is also included at Reception # 804309 included the days specific statement which is included: No Objection to Subdivision: Lessee agrees that it shall not object in any way or to any person, entity or agency, to any application for subdivision or other land use or development plan that Lessor may submit or propose for development of or upon the Leased Premises. The subdivision or other development of the Leased Premises shall not modify any of Lessee's obligations under the Lease, as modified by this Lease Addendum. The third task undertaken was coordination with the County Assessor’s Office. We contacted them to see if they are actively valuing or tracking any severed mineral interests in the Section/Township’s/Range in which the subject property is located. And we also inquired from the Assessor’s office whether any mineral owner for the subject property had filed a request for notification which was to be provided in the case of any relevant land-use application. No notifications have been made and the Assessor’s office was not actively tracking any severed mineral interests in the vicinity of the subject property. Some relevant deeds that were examined in addition to the documents included in the Preliminary Plan application and repeated in Tab 3 attached were: Rec # 726333. Warranty deed - John and Paul Courier to Kirks Rec # 726336 _ QCD. Couriers to Kirks regarding water rights Rec # 751281 – SWD - Kirks to Red Dog LLC Rec # 927184- SWD - Kirks to Kirk Family Trust Rec # -927932 – QCD - Kirk Family Trust to Red Dog LLC Please see Tab 3 for some recorded documents and application text that were included in the Preliminary Plan application and related to Mineral Rights 4. Additional information on the Improvements Agreement is required. Response: we have put together a draft Development Agreement. It follows the layout of an earlier Development Agreement between the Froning Family Subdivision owners and the Garfield County BOCC. That layout seemed more up-to-date and appropriate than the draft template SIA provided to the Development Team. See Tab 4 5. The Preliminary Plan must be referred to the Colorado Geologic Survey. Please complete referral application form for that agency Mark Chain Consulting, LLC 811 Garfield Avenue Carbondale, CO 81623 3 Response: in reviewing past staff reports and previous application submittals for the subject property, we found that the Colorado Geologic Survey had previously reviewed a similar application for this property and provided comments to the County Staff. This letter dated January 10, 2000 is included in Tab 5. As that application was for the property in question in a very similar layout and the same density we hope that you will consider that CGS response sufficient. Health information in this letter and the other documents included in the addendum are sufficient for us to move forward to Public Hearing. Please contact me if you have any questions or wish to discuss any related matters. Sincerely, Mark Chain, planner February 24, 2025 Red Dog LLC 1011 Main Street Carbondale, CO 81623 Mark Chain Consulting LLC 811 Garfield Ave Carbondale, CO 81623 RE: NTC Letter Mountain View Preliminary Plan – SPPA 01-25-9053 Dear Applicant: Garfield County is in receipt of the Mountain View Preliminary Plan Application for a Major Subdivision in the Rural zone district. The following revisions/additional materials are requested: 1. All owners need to be included on the mailing labels for notice to owners of property within 200 feet. Specifically, parcel No. 212736101010. 2. A recorded copy of the Statement of Authority is required. 3. The County Attorney’s Office has requested additional clarification on how mineral research was done, such as deeds reviewed. 4. Additional information on the Improvement’s Agreement is required. At least a complete, draft agreement with updated information shall be provided. A description of what improvements will be installed and how they will be phased should also be provided. If that is not currently possible, please provide more specific information. 5. The Preliminary Plan must be referred to the Colorado Geologic Survey, please complete the referral application form for that agency and see the attached payment directions. We look forward to receiving the revisions and supplemental information and proceeding through the Limited Impact Review Amendment process. Section 4-101 (B)(2)(a) stipulates that the applicant shall correct the deficiencies within 60 calendar days or the application will be deemed withdrawn. If you have any questions or want to request clarification on the above items, , please feel free to contact me directly. Thanks again for your work on getting the application submittals complete. Sincerely, Philip Berry, ACIP Planner III Garfield County – Community Development Pberry@garfield-county.com 970-945-1377 ext 1580 Community Development Department TAB 1 List of Property Owners within 200 ft. Annotated AYALA VILLAMAN, LORETO & AYALA MO 68 LARKSPUR COURT SILT CO 81652 DALEY, FRANK G & SHEILA M 4670 COUNTY ROAD 311 NEW CASTLE CO 81647-9621 GOODWIN, KRISTIN MARIE & WILLIAM H 830 COUNTY ROAD 250 SILT CO 81652 JUNGE, TOMMY ALAN & SUSAN K 0688 COUNTY ROAD 250 SILT CO 81652 KESTI, LOREN & KESTI, JESSICA 892 COUNTY ROAD 250 SILT CO 81652 MCKEE, KELLY RAE 0755 COUNTY ROAD 261 SILT CO 81652 MILLER, NATHAN & KELSEY 383 COLUMBINE LANE SILT CO 81652 MUNOZ, MARTIN VERVEJA & TOOLE, MA 1 COLUMBINE LANE SILT CO 81652 OCHOA, PRIMITIVO & ELSA 256 COLUMBINE LANE SILT CO 81652 RED DOG LLC 12144 E WELSH TRAIL SCOTTSDALE AZ 852595118 TAB 2 Recorded Statement of Authority – Rec # 1005067 TAB 3 Mineral Rights Background • Section 10 – Mineral Rights Section in Preliminary Plan Application • Exhibit H – From Preliminary Plan Application which includes 4 recorded documents 10. Mineral Rights Our research indicates that the mineral rights have not been severed with the property. We first examined all documentation in the B-2 exceptions of the current title commitment. There were two leases related to mineral rights: 1. Apollo energy entered into a lease with the previous owners of the property, North 27 (Curriers), for a five-year time period which ended January 9, 2009. The terms of the lease were than taken over by the new owners (Kirks). The following documents are in Exhibit H. • Rec # 694178 - lease with North 27 – Apollo • Rec # 727431 and 727432- Transfer of lease to new owners (Kirks 2. Red Dog LLC entered into a 5-year lease with Antero on May 2, 2011. This lease can be found as Reception 804309. This lease is also found in Exhibit H. The time frames for each of these leases expired without any action taken by the lessees. The second thing we have done is contact the Assessor’s office. They are not actively valuing/tracking ownership of any severed mineral interest in that particular Section/Township/Range. Finally, it appears no mineral owner for the subject property has filed a request for notification to be provided in the case of relevant land-use applications. On the following page you will find attached the Certification of Mineral Owner Research Mountain View Preliminary Plan 35 Mountain View Preliminary Plan 36 EXHIBIT H Mineral Rights Documents HIllR Nf lW W,Nat,M',lf ulf lA'M IN N II Ill Reception#:727431 07/061200701:59:07PM B:1947P:0390JeanAlberico1of2 Rec Fee:$11.00Doc Fee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO ASSIGNMENT OF OIL AND GAS LEASE For good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged,North 27, LLC,("Grantor")hereby assigns,without recourse to the Grantor,allof the Grantor's right,titleand interestas the same may exist as of the date hereof inand to that certain Oil and Gas Lease with Apollo Energy,LLC,dated January 19, 2006,a memorandum of which isrecorded as Reception No.694178 of the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County,to the Grantees as follows: An undivided 55% of the Grantor's interestin and to said Lease to Terry Kirk and Julie Kirk as jointtenants,and An undivided 45% of the Grantor's interestin and to said Lease to Gary A. Kirk. The Grantees hereby acknowledge and agree that they accept this assignment and further,that they are not entitledto any payments made to the Lessor under said Lease prior to the date hereof. The address of the Grantees is clo Terry Kirk,12144 East Welsh Trail,Scottsdale,AZ 85259. Dated thistk day of June,2007. GRANTOR:NORTH 27,LLC By:/ Paul C.Currier,Member GRANTEES: Terr rk J e Kirk,also kn ad &Rirk, y Terry Kirk,a rney-in fact Ga Kirk)b ferry Kir ,a 'or y-i t WIRNfMHli,M',NI'I*W'lRIA'MMh HIll Reception#:727431 07/06/200701:59:07PM8:1947P:0391JeanAlberico2of2 Ree Fee:$11.00Doc Fee.0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) Subscribed,sworn to,and acknowledged before me this day of June, 2007,by Paul C.Currier,Member,of North 27,LLC.. Witness my hand and officialseal, tary Public 4.*O 4 * My commission expires: STATE OF 0 Oradd ) ss..* COUNTY OF vt 91 )CO Subscribed,sworn to,and acknowledged before me this day ofJune, 2007,by Terry Kirk for himself and as attorney-in-factforJulie Kirk,also known as Julie A.Kirk,and Gary A. Kirk. Witness my hand and officialseal. Not Public~ My commission expires: 6/23/07-C:\DocumentsandSettings\Defaultuser.server01\MyDocumenis\Assistantl\wpdata\Rbedoc-J\kirk-north27assignmentofoilandgas lease.wpd HIll14 W'MNIONIT,NT'HIV'lWIM'NIM H Al ill Reception#:727432 07/06/200701:59:07PM 8:1947P:0392JeanAlberico 1 of 2 Rec Fee.511.00Doc Fee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO ASSIGNMENT OF OIL AND GAS LEASE For good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged,North 27, LLC,("Grantor") hereby assigns,without recourse to the Grantor,allof the Grantor's right,titleand interestas the same may existas of the date hereof in and to that certain Oil and Gas Lease with Apollo Energy,LLC,dated January 19, 2006,a memorandum of which isrecorded as Reception No. 694178 of the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County,to the Grantees as follows: An undivided 55% of the Grantor's interest in and to said Lease to Terry Kirk and JulieKirkas jointtenants,and An undivided 45% of the Grantor's interestinand to said Lease to Gary A. Kirk. The Grantees hereby acknowledge and agree that they accept this assignment and further,that they are not entitledto any payments made to the Lessor under said Lease prior to the date hereof. The address of the Grantees is clo Terry Kirk,12144 East Welsh Trail,Scottsdale,AZ 85259. Dated this 17 da of June,2007. GRANTOR:NORTH 27,L By: Jo . rrier GRANTEES: Terry Irk ie Kirk,also kn ACKi by Terry Kirk,a ney-in-fact G ,Terry tt e ' fact HIllW1.NEMMI(.NI',NthlflWWh'Milkh H ill Reception#:727432 07/06/200701:59:07PM B: 1947P:0393JeanAlberico 2 of 2 Rec Fee:$11.00Doc Fee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) Subscribed,sworn to,and acknowledged before me t ES day of June, 2007,by John M. Currier. Witness my hand and officialseal..... e ublic m My commission expires:06 /28 /2008 Oj .*% STATE OF O.) )ss. COUNTY OF yor 2 ) Subscribed,sworn to,and acknowledged before me this day of 2007,by Terry Kirkforhimself and as attorney-in-factforJulie Kirk,also known as Julie A.Kirk,and Gary A. Kirk. Witness my hand and officialseal. No ry Public My commission expires:/ 6/27/07-C:\DocumentsandSettings\Defaultuser.Server01\MyDocuments\Assistantl\wpdatalRbedoc-J\kirk-north27assignmentofoilandgas lease-wpd HIllI'lliaM,WWIR.ld@*"14%@*,141%ll111Reception#:80430908/24/201103:08:42PM JeanAlberico1of5ReoFee:$31.00Doc Fee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO Producers88-PAIDUP Revised PAID-UP OIL AND GAS LEASE AGREEMENT,Madeandenteredintothe 2nd dayof May ,20 11 ,byandbetween Red DogLLC,a Coloradolimitedliabilitycompany whoseaddressis 1011Main Street Carbondale,CO 81623 ,hereinaftercalledLessor(whetheroneormore)and AnteroResourcesPiceanceCorporation whoseaddressis _162517t"Street,Suite300,Denver,CO 80202 hereinaftercalledLessee: WITNESSETH,ThattheLessor,forandinconsiderationofTENAND MORE DOLLARS ($10.00+)cashinhandpaid,thereceiptofwhichisherebyacknowledged,andthecovenantsandagreementshereinaftercontained,hasgranted,demised,leasedandlet,andbythesepresentsdoesgrant,demise,leaseandlet exclusivelyuntothesaidLessee,thelandhereinafterdescribed,withtheexclusiverightforthepurposeofdrilling,mining,exploringbygeophysicalandother methods,andoperatingforandproducingtherefromoilandallgasofwhatsoevernatureorkind,specificallyincludingcoalbedmethaneandanyandallsubstances producedinassociationtherewithfromcoal-bearingformations,withrightsofwayandeasementsforroads,layingpipelines,anderectionofstructuresthereonto produce,saveandtakecareofsaidproducts,allthatcertaintractoflandsituatedintheCountyofGarfieldStateofColorado,describedasfollows,to-wit: SeeExhibit"A"Attachedheretoandmadea parthereofforLegalDescription Addendum attachedheretoandmade parthereof togetherwithanyreversionaryrightstherein,andtogetherwithallstripsorparcelsofland,(not,however,tobeconstruedtoincludeparcelscomprisingaregular40-acrelegalsubdivisionorlotofapproximatelycorrespondingsize)adjoiningorcontiguoustotheabovedescribedlandandownedorclaimedbyLessor,and containing27.521acres,moreorless. 1. Itisagreedthatthisleaseshallremaininforceforatermoffive(5)yearsandaslongthereafterasoilorgasofwhatsoevernatureorkindisproducedfromsaidleasedpremisesoronacreagepooledtherewith,ordrillingoperationsarecontinuedashereinafterprovided.If,attheexpirationoftheprimarytermofthislease,oilorgasisnotbeingproducedontheleasedpremisesoronacreagepooledtherewithbutLesseeisthenengagedindrillingorre-workingoperationsthereon,thenthisleaseshallcontinueinforcesolongasoperationsarebeingcontinuouslyprosecutedontheleasedpremisesoron acreagepooledtherewith;andoperationsshallbeconsideredtobecontinuouslyprosecutedifnotmorethanninety(90)daysshallelapsebetweenthecompletionorabandonmentofonewellandthebeginningofoperationsforthedrillingofasubsequentwell.Ifafterdiscoveryofoilorgasonsaidlandoron acreagepooledtherewith,theproductionthereofshouldceasefromanycauseaftertheprimaryterm,thisleaseshallnottenninateifLesseecommencesadditionaldrillingorre-workingoperationswithinninety(90)daysfromdateofcessationofproductionorfromdateofcompletionofdryhole.Ifoilorgasshallbediscoveredandproducedasaresultofsuchoperationsatoraftertheexpirationoftheprimarytermofthislease,thisleaseshallcontinueinforcesolongasoilorgasisproducedfromtheleasedpremisesoronacreagepooledtherewith. Intheeventawellorwellsisdrilledandcompletedonthelands,oronthelandspooledtherewith,forthepurposeofdevelopingcoalbedgas,theword"operations"shallmean,inadditiontothosematterscoveredintheprecedingparagraph.(1)operationsofsaidwellstoremovewaterorothersubstancesfromthecoalbed,ortodisposeofsuchwaterorothersubstances,eventhoughsuchoperationsdonotresultintheproductionofhydrocarbonsinpayingquantities,or(2)shutting-inorotherwisediscontinuingproductionfromsaidwellstoallowforsurfaceorundergroundminingaffectingthedrillsiteorwellbore.2. ThisisaPAID-UPLEASE,Inconsiderationofthedowncashpayment,LessoragreesthatLesseeshallnotbeobligated,exceptasotherwiseprovidedherein,tocommenceorcontinueanyoperationsduringtheprimaryterm.LesseemayatanytimeortimesduringoraftertheprimarytermsurrenderthisleaseastoalloranyportionofsaidlandandastoanystrataorstratumbydeliveringtoLessororbyfilingforrecordareleaseorreleases,andberelievedofallobligationthereafteraccruingastotheacreagesurrendered. 3. InconsiderationofthepremisesthesaidLesseecovenantsandagrees:1st To delivertothecreditofLessor,freeofcost,inthepipelinetowhichLesseemay connectwellsonsaidland,theequaleighteenpercent(18%)partofalloilproducedandsavedfromtheleasedpremises.2nd To payLessorongasandcasingheadgasproducedfromsaidland(1)whensoldbyLessee,eighteenpercent(18%)ofthenetproceedsderivedfromsuchsaleor(2)whenusedbyLesseeoffsaidlandorinthemanufactureofgasolmeorotherproducts,themarketvalue,atthemouthofthewell,ofeighteenpercent(18%)ofsuchgasandcasingheadgas,Lessor'sinterest,ineithercase,tobeareighteenpercent(18%)ofthecostofcompressing,dehydratingandotherwisetreatingsuchgasorcasingheadgastorenderitmarketableorusableandeIghteenpercent(18%)ofthecostofgatheringandtransportingsuchgasandcasingheadgasfromthemouthofthewelltothepointofsaleoruse.3rd To payLessorforg producedfromanyoilwellandusedoffthepremisesorinthemanufactureofgasolineoranyotherproduct,a royaltyof eighteenpercent 8%)oftheproceeds,atthemouthofthewell,payablemonthlyattheprevailingmarketrate.4.Wheregasfromawellcap leofproducinggasisnotsoldorused,LesseemaypayortenderasroyaltytotheroyaltyownersOneDollarperyearpernetacreretainedhereunder,suchpaymentortendertobemadeonorbeforetheanniversarydateofthisleasenextensuingaftertheexpirationof90daysfromthedatesuchwellisshutinandthereafteronorbeforetheanniversarydateofthisleaseduringtheperiodsuchwellisshutin.Ifsuchpaymentortenderismade,itwillbeconsideredthatgasisbeingproducedwithinthemeaningofthislease. 5. IfsaidLessorownsalessinterestintheabovedescribedlandthantheentireandundividedfeesimpleestatetherein,thentheroyalties(includinganyshut-ingasroyalty)hereinprovidedforshallbepaidtheLessoronlyintheproportionwhichLessor'sinterestbearstothewholeandundividedfee.6.Lesseeshallhavetherighttouse,freeofcost,gas,oilandwaterproducedonsaidlandforLessee'soperationthereon.7.WhenrequestedbyLessor,LesseeshallburyLessee'spipelinebelowplowdepth.8.Nowellshallbedrillednearerthan200feettothehouseorbarnnowonsaidpremiseswithoutwrittenconsentofLessor.9. LesseeshallpayfordamagescausedbyLessee'soperationstogrowingcropsonsaidland.10.Lesseeshallhavetherightatanytimetoremoveallmachineryandfixturesplacedonsaidpremises,includingtherighttodrawandremovecasing.11.TherightsofLessorandLesseehereunderroaybe assignedinwholeorpart.No changeinownershipofLessor'sinterest(byassignmentorotherwise)shallbebindingonLesseeuntilLesseehasbeenfurnishedwithnotice,consistingofcertifledcopiesofallrecordedinstrumentsordocumentsandotherinformationnecessarytoestablishacompletechainofrecordtitlefromLessor,andthenonlywithrespecttopaymentsthereaftermade.No otherkindofnotice,whetheractualorconstructive,shallbebindingonLessee.No presentorfuturedivisionofLessor'sownershipastodifferentportionsorparcelsofsaidlandshalloperatetoenlargetheobligationsordiminishtherightsofLessee,andallLessee'soperationsmaybeconductedwithoutregardtoanysuchdivision.Ifalloranypartofthisleaseisassigned,noleaseholdownershallbeliableforanyactoromissionofanyotherleaseholdowner.12.Lessee,atitsoption,isherebygiventherightandpoweratanytimeandfromtimetotimeasarecurringright,eitherbeforeorafterproduction,astoalloranypartofthelanddescribedhereinandastoanyoneormoreoftheformationshereunder,topoolorunitizetheleaseholdestateandthemineralestatecoveredbythisleasewithotherland,leaseorleasesintheimmediatevicinityfortheproductionofoilandgas,orseparatelyfortheproductionofeither,wheninLessee'sjudgmentitisnecessaryoradvisabletodoso,andirrespectiveofwhetherauthoritysimilartothisexistswithrespecttosuchotherland,leaseorleases.Likewise,unitspreviouslyformedtoincludeformationsnotproducingoilorgas,may bereformedtoexcludesuchnon-producingformations.TheformingorreformingofanyunitshallbeaccomplishedbyLesseeexecutingandfilingofrecordadeclarationofsuchunitizationorreformation,whichdeclarationshalldescribetheunit.Any unitmay includelanduponwhicha wellhastheretoforebeencompletedoruponwhichoperationsfordrillinghavetheretoforebeencommenced.Production,drillingorreworkingoperationsorawellshutinforwantofamarketanywhereonaunitwhichincludesallorapartofthisleaseshallbetreatedasifitwereproduction,drillingorreworkingoperationsorawellshutinforwantofa marketunderthislease.Inlieuoftheroyaltieselsewherehereinspecilled,includingshut-ingasroyalties,Lessorshallreceiveonproductionfromtheunitsopooledroyaltiesonlyontheportionofsuchproductionallocatedtothislease;suchallocationshallbethatproportionoftheunitproductionthatthetotalnumberofsurfaceacrescoveredbythisleaseandincludedintheunitbearstothetotalnumberofsurfaceacresinsuchunit.Inadditiontotheforegoing,Lesseeshallhavetherighttounitize,pool,orcombinealloranypartoftheabovedescribedlandsastooneormoreoftheformationsthereunderwithotherlandsinthesamegeneralareabyenteringintoacooperativeorunitplanofdevelopmentoroperationapprovedbyanygovernmentalauthorityand,fromtimetotime,withlikeapproval,tomodify,changeorterminateanysuchplanoragreementand,insuchevent,theterms,conditionsandprovisionsofthisleaseshallbedeemedmodifiedtoconformtotheterms,conditions,andprovisionsofsuchapprovedcooperativeorunitplanofdevelopmentoroperationand,particularly,alldrillinganddevelopmentrequirementsofthislease,expressorimplied,shallbesatisfiedbycompliancewiththedrillinganddevelopmentrequirementsofsuchplanoragreement,andthisleaseshallnotterminateorexpireduringthelifeofsuchplanoragreement.Intheeventthatsaidabovedescribedlandsoranypartthereof,shallhereafterbeoperatedunderanysuchcooperativeorunitplanofdevelopmentoroperationwherebytheproductiontherefromisallocatedtodifferentportionsofthelandcoveredbysaidplan,thentheproductionallocatedtoanyparticulartractoflandshall,forthe RetumTo: AnteroResourcesCorporatzon P.O.Box1214 HillIF'd5hM M WEt.ld'MER.1M M 5 III Reception#:894309 06/241201183:09:42PM JeanAlberico 2 of 5 Rec Fee:$31.00DocFee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO purposeofcomputingtheroyaltiestobepaidhereundertoLessor,beregardedashavingbeenproducedfromtheparticulartractoflandtowhichitisallocatedandnottoanyothertractofland;andtheroyaltypaymentstobemadehereundertoLessorshallbebaseduponproductiononlyassoallocated.LessorshallformallyexpressLessor'sconsenttoanycooperativeorunitplanofdevelopmentoroperationadoptedbyLesseeandapprovedbyanygovernmentalagencybyexecutingthesameuponrequestofLessee. 13. Whenoperationsorproductionaredelayedorinterruptedbylackofwater,laborormaterial,orbyfire,storm,flood,warrebellion,insurrection,riot,strike,differenceswithworkmen,orfailureofcarrierstofurnishtransportorfurnishfacilitiesfortransportationorlackofmarketinthefieldfortheminerals.produced,orasaresultofanycausewhatsoeverbeyondthecontrolofLessee,thetimeofsuchdelayorinterruptionshallnotbecountedagainstLesseeandthisleaseshallremaininforceduringsuchdelayorinterruptionandninety(90)daysthereafter,anythinginthisleasetothecontrarynotwithstanding.14. Lessorherebywarrantsandagreestodefendthetitletothelandshereindescribed,andagreesthattheLesseeshallhavetherightatanytimetoredeemforLessor,bypayment,anymortgages,taxesorotherliensontheabovedescribedlands,intheeventofdefaultofpaymentbyLessorandbesubrogatedtotherightsoftheholderthereof,andtheundersignedLessors,forthemselvesandtheirheirs,successorsandassigns,herebysurrenderandreleaseallrightofdowerandhomesteadinthepremisesdescribedherein,insofarassaidrightofdowerandhomesteadmayinanywayaffectthepurposesforwhichthisleaseismade,asrecitedherein. 15.Lessorshereinintendtoleaseanyright,titleandinterestLessorsmayhaveinandtoanyandallmineralrightsinandunderallstripsorparcelsoflandincluding,butnotlimitedtostreets,countyroads,highways,railroadstripsand/oranyandallothereasementsandrightsofwaywhatsoever,canals,ditchesandotherwaterwayslyingacrossand/oradjacentand/orinanywayappertainingtothelandshereinabovedescribed,includingwithoutlimitationanylandsacquiredbyaccretionthroughmeanderofwaterways.16.ShouldanyoneormoreofthepartieshereinabovenamedasLessorfailtoexecutethislease,itshallneverthelessbebindinguponallsuchpartieswhodoexecuteitasLessor.Theword"Lessor,"asusedinthisleaseshallmeananyoneormoreorallofthepartieswhoexecutethisleaseasLessor.Alltheprovisionsofthisleaseshallbebindingontheheirs,successorsandassignsofLessorandLessee.17.LessoragreesthatLesseemay locateawellorwellsonanydrillingsitelocatedonanypartofthelanddescribedherein,includingtherighttoasubsurfaceeasementthroughanypartofthelanddescribedherein,whichwellswillbeusedtoaccessthesubsurfaceofadjacentmineralowners.18.Notwithstandinganythingtothecontraryacontainedherein,Lesseehastheoptiontoextendtheprimarytermanadditionalone(1)yearwiththepaymentofanamountequalto$4(10pernetacre,suchainoimtbeingpaidtoLessoronorbeforetheexpirationoftheprimarytermsetforthaboveinparagraph1.SuchpaymentshallbeconsideredtenderedbyLesseeandreceivedbyLessorwhendeposited,postage-paid,intheUnitedStatesmail,orwitha nationallyrecognizedcarrierservice. 19.ShouldLesseebepreventedfromcomplyingwithorfkilfillinganyexpressorimpliedcovenantorotherprovisionofthislease,byreasonofscarcityofofinabilitytoobtainortouseequipmentormaterial,oranyFederalorStateLaw,oranyorder,ruleorregulationofgovernmentalauthority,orduetotheinabilitytoobtainnecessaryadministrativeactionofagovernmentalauthority,.orbyeventsofforcemajeureand/orbysucheventsasarebeyondthereasonablecontrolofLessee,thenwhilesoprevented,thetimewithinwhichLesseemay complywithorfulfillsuchcovenantorotherprovisionshallbesuspended;andthisleaseshallbeextendedwhileandsolongasLesseeispreventedbyanysuchcausefromconductingoperationsonorfromproducingoilorgasfromsaidLand,andforanadditionalninety(90)daysthereafter;andthetimewhileLesseeissopreventedshallnotbecountedagainstLesseeincomputingthetimewithinwhichcomplianceorperformanceoccurred,anythinginthisleasetothecontrarynotwithstairding.20.PreferentialRight.Fortheconsiderationhereinrecited,ifduringthetermofthislease(butnotmorethan20yearsafterthedatehereof)Lessorreceivesabonafideofferfromanypartytopurchaseanewleagecoveringalloranypartofthelandsorsubstancescoveredhereby,andifLessoriswillingtoacceptsuchoffer,thenLessorshallpromptlynotifyLesseeinwritingofthenameandaddressoftheofferor,andofallpertinenttermsandconditionsoftheoffer,includinganyleasebonusoffered.Lesseeshallhavea periodof30daysafter;/receiptofsuchnoticetoexerciseapreferentialrighttopurchaseanewleasefromLessorinaccordancewiththetermsandconditionsoftheoffer,bygivingLessorwrittennoticeofsuchexercise.Promptlythereafter,LesseeshallfurnishtoLessorthenewleaseforexecution,alongwithatimedraftfortheleasebonuscohditioneduponexecutionanddeliveryoftheleasebyLessorandapprovaloftitlebyLessee,allinaccordancewiththetermsofsaiddraft.WhetherornotLekeeexercisesitspreferentialrighthereunder,thenaslongasthisleaseremainsineffectanynewleasefromtheLessorshallbesubordinatetothisleaseandshallnotbeconstruedasreplacingoraddingtoLessee'sobligationshereunder, INWITNESSWHEREOF,thisinstrme sexecutedasofthedatefirstabovewritten. TerryA."a ager,Red Dog LLC ACKNOWLEDGEMENT-INDIVIDUAL STATEof COUNTY of / BEFOREME,theundersignedNotaryPubh,inandforsaidCountyandState,onthis dayof ,20 personallyappeared ff;///,.y {, &VI&ge?,A str-,/.C. ,tome knowntobetheidenticalpersondescribedinandwhoexecutedthewithinandforegoinginstrumentofwritingandacknowledgedtomethathedulyexecutedsameashis freeand voluntaryactanddeedfortheusesandpurposesthereinsetforthandinthecapacitystatedtherein. INWITNESSWHEREOF,Ihavehereuntosetmy handandafflxedmynotarialsealthedayandyearlastabovewritten. My CommissionExpires: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT-INDIVIDUAL STATEof COUNTY of . BEFOREME,theundersi Public,aidCountyandState,onthis dayof ,200 personallyappeared ,tome knowntobetheidenticalperson describedinandwhoexecutedthewithinan strumentofwritingandacknowledgedtomethat he_dulyexecutedsameas freeand voluntaryactanddeedfortheusesandpurposesthereinsetforthandinthecapacitystatedtherein. INWITNESSWHEREOF,Ihavehereuntosetmy handandaffixedmynotarialsealthedayandyearlastabovewritten. My CommissionExpires: NotaryPublic: Address: Afterrecordinareturnto: TexhomaLandConsultants,Inc. 770W.RockCreekRd.#117 Norman,OK 73069 HillihdWAltWMLIN IM'WIM'S IM IM M ill Reception#:804309 06/241201103:08.42PM JeanAlberico 3 of 5 ReoFee:$31.00Doc Fee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO EXHIBIT "A" Attachedtoand made a partforallpurposestothatcertainoiland gasleasedatedMay 2,2011,by and between Red Dog LLC,aColoradoLimitedLiabilityCompany,as Lessor,and AnteroResourcesPiceanceCorporation,as Lessee,coveringlandinGarfieldCounty,Colorado. DESCRIPTIONOF LANDS A tractoflandsituatedinthe Northeast% oftheNortheast% ofsection36,Township5 South,Range92West of the6thPrincipalMeridian,beingmore particularlydescribedasfollows: Beginningata pointonthe EastlineofsaidNortheast%oftheNortheast%whenceawitnesscornerforthe NortheastCornerofsaidsection36 bearingNorth01"07'25"East20.00feetfromsaidNortheastCornerbears North01"07'25"East454.40feet;thenceSouth01"O7'25"West 887.75feettotheSoutheastCornerofsaid Northeast% oftheNortheast%;thenceSouth89'21'27"West 1350.12feettotheSouthwestCornerofsaid Northeast%oftheNortheast%;thencealongtheWest lineofsaidNortheast%oftheNortheast%North 01*00'46"East887.78feet;thenceNorth89"21'39"East1351.83feettothepointofbeginning. AlsoKnown As Lot4 Simon SubdivisionExemptionPlat Accordingtothe platrecordedApril21,1999 as ReceptionNo.544219 AllE,FSM,F,%RMIFRIM'M,1MIN HillReception#:80430906/24/201103:08:42PM JeanAlberico4of5ReoFee:531.00Doo Fee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO ADDENDUM THIS ADDENDUM constitutesan integralpart ofthatcertainPaid-Up Oiland Gas Lease dated May 2,2011,by and between,Red Dog LLC,a Colorado Limited Liability Company,Lessor,and ANTERO RESOURCES PICEANCE CORPORATION,as Lessee: Conflicts In the eventof a conflictbetween the terms ofthisLease Addendum and the terms of the printedform lease,the terms ofthisLease Addendum shallcontrol. Surface Use Restrictions: No well,well pad,road,pipeline,compressor unitsor stations,tanks,structuresor other surfacefacilityof any kind shallbe placed upon the Leased Premises.No entryon the surfaceof the leased Premises shallbe permitted and only pooling and directionaldrilling from neighboring lands shallbe utilizedby Lessee to develop the leasedmineral rights. Lessor acknowledges thislimitedsurfaceaccess willinhibitLessee's abilityto protectthe correlativerightsof Lessor and hereby expresslywaives any and allexpress or implied dutiesof Lessee regarding same. Deductions: Lessee shallbear Lessor'sportion ofthecostto gather,dehydrate,process and compress naturalgas from the wellhead to thefirstinterconnectwith eitheran interstateor intrastatepipeline. Protection of Water Wells: Lessee agrees,to assume liabilityfor any damage caused by Lessee's operations to Lessor's water well(s)or other water sources servingthe Leased Premises,and shalltake allnecessary steps to prevent itsoperationsfrom pollutingany water well,water spring or other water source locatedon the Leased Premises.Lessee shallhire an independent third-partyexpert(unlesssuch expert is objected to by Lessor,in which case the parties shallmutually agree upon a differentexpert)to testthe qualityof (a)each ground water well or spring locatedon the Leased Premises within a one-half (%)mile radiusof any surface-holelocationof an oiland gas well or other relevantoperationof Lessee,and (b) any surface water source on the Leased Premises located up to one-half (%)mile downstream of the historicdrainageroute(s)of a well pad or other relevantoperationof Lessee.Testing of a water well,water spring or other water source shalloccur (a)prior to Lessee conducting drillingoperations,(b)upon completion of allwells drilledfrom a well pad,and (c)any time thereafterwhen Lessee receiveswrittenrequestfrom Lessor to conduct such testing,but not to exceed once every two (2)years unless otherwise warranted (by way of example but not limitation,as a resultof a spillor leak of a size reportableto the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission).Inthe event such test resultsconfirm (inthe sole opinion of the third-partyexpert),that any water source was contaminated or damaged as a resultof Lessee's operations,Lessee agrees to either(a) drilla new water well on the Leased Premises at Lessee's expense of at leastthe same qualityand volume as the damaged well priorto Lessee's operations,(b)provide Lessor a replacement water source ina likevolume tothe damaged water source,atitssource or ata locationon the Leased Premises requestedby Lessor,or (c)treatthe water from the contaminated water source to bring itup to the standardsexistingpriorto contamination. Lessee shallbegin constructionon any new water well or source,as the case may be, within sixty(60) days afterreceiptof the third-partyexpert'sreport of contamination or damage,and shallcomplete such constructionwithin six (6)months thereafter.Lessee shallprovide potable water by truck or other means to Lessor in an amount sufficientto replacethe damaged water untilsuch remediationiscompleted. HillIF'dZMEMh,M IBM'l*WSJ*@M Il illReception#:80430906/24/201103:08.42PM JeanAlberico5of5RecFee:$31.00Doo Fee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO No Objection to Subdivision: Lessee agrees thatitshallnot objectin any way orto any person,entityor agency,to any applicationfor subdivisionor other land use or development plan thatLessor may submit or propose for development of or upon the Leased Premises. The subdivisionor other development of the Leased Premises shallnot modify any of Lessee's obligationsunder the Lease,asmodified by thisLease Addendum. RED DO LLC Antero Resources Piceance Corporation .By: Ter A. i k,ana er TAB 4 DRAFT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Between Red Dog LLC and Garfield County BOCC) 1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This MOUNTAIN VIEW SUBDIVISION (“Mountain View Subdivision”) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this ____ day of _________ 2025, by and between RED DOG LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“Owner” or “Developer”) and the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado (referred to in this Agreement as the “Board” or “County”). For purposes of this Agreement, the Owner and the Board are individually a “Party” and collectively the “Parties”). RECITALS WHEREAS the Developer is the record owner of real property located within Garfield County, Colorado, as more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Developer is proposing to split the Property into five (5) single-family residential lots through a major subdivision process with the County (the “Development”); and WHEREAS, on _________________________, the Board approved a Preliminary Plan for the Mountain View Subdivision (Resolution No. _____) which, inter alia, would create 5 single-family residential lots; and WHEREAS, on _________________________, the Board approved a Final Plat for the subdivision; and WHEREAS, as a condition of approval of the Final Plat to be submitted to the County for its approval as required by the laws of the State of Colorado, Developer wishes to enter into this Development Agreement with the County; and WHEREAS, Developer has agreed to certain restrictions and conditions regarding the issuance of building permits, certificates of occupancy and sale of properties, all as more fully set forth below in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. DEFINITIONS A. “Final Plat” means the document consisting of five (5) sheets to be recorded with the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder entitled Final Plat, Mountain View Subdivision. 2 B. “Plat Documents” mean the Construction Documents for prepared by ____________________ under project number _________, consisting of X pages, dated _______________, together with the Final Plat. 2. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. The County hereby accepts and approves the Final Plat for Mountain View Subdivision, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Preliminary Plan Approval (Resolution No. ________), and the requirements of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code. 3. DEVELOPER'S PERFORMANCE. Developer shall cause to be constructed and installed, at its own expense, those improvements (“Improvements”) related to the Final Plat for Mountain View Subdivision which are required to be constructed under the Preliminary Plan Approval, this Agreement, the Final Plat, and all Garfield County Land Use and Development Code. Developer shall comply with the following: A. All Plat documents submitted prior to or at the time of Final Plat approval, as well as all terms and conditions set forth on the Final Plat, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference; B. All requirements of the Preliminary Plat Approval and all Garfield County Land Use and Development Code applicable to this project; C. All laws, regulations, orders and resolutions of the State of Colorado, and the County of Garfield; D. All designs, specifications, drawings, maps, sketches, and other materials submitted by Developer and its engineers in furtherance of the application for the approval of Mountain View Subdivision, as heretofore approved by the County, including all improvements shown on the Plat Documents. E. Payment of all fees required by the County and/or such other government authority or special district with jurisdiction, as may be required for installation of the improvements. F. All such improvements shall be completed no later than one (1) year after the date of recording of this Agreement in the Office of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder, which period may be extended by the Board for good cause shown. The County agrees that if all required Improvements are installed in accordance with this Agreement, the requirements of the Preliminary Plan approval, the Plat Documents, the as-built drawings to be submitted upon completion of the improvements and the requirements of the Garfield County regulations, then the Owner shall be deemed to have satisfied all terms and conditions of the Zoning and Subdivision Regulations of Garfield County, Colorado with respect to the Improvements relating to the Development. 3 4. COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LETTER OF CREDIT The estimated cost of completing the Development, as set forth and certified by a licensed engineer on Exhibit B attached hereto, is $ XXXXX (such estimate includes typical construction costs, construction inspection, engineering fees and a 10% contingency fund). Letter of Credit. Since the County may in its discretion permit the Developer to substitute an acceptable alternative for collateral or a Letter of Credit (“LOC”), and since there is no infrastructure being dedicated to the County and the Developer is making improvements to land that it owns, the Parties agree that the only security necessary for the Project is an LOC to secure the amount estimated in the Engineer's Opinion of Probable Reclamation Costs attached as Exhibit C. Reclamation LOC. The purpose of the LOC is to ensure that, if the project infrastructure cannot be completed on or before one year from the date of the recording of this Agreement, the LOC funds will be available for returning the site to reasonable and acceptable conditions. The face amount of the LOC, $ XXXXX, shall be allocated to the extent necessary for reclamation of disturbed areas within the Subdivision, the costs for which are detailed in Exhibit C and shall be secured by delivery of a LOC from the Owner to the Board in the form agreed to be acceptable to the Board, attached to and incorporated in this Agreement by reference as Exhibit D (“Reclamation LOC”). The Reclamation LOC shall be valid for one year after the recording of this Agreement or until the recording of the Final Plat, whichever shall occur first. Single Request for Release of Reclamation LOC. Following receipt of written approval of the Community Development Department, the Owner may request release of the Reclamation LOC and shall do so by means of submission to the Board, through the Community Development Department, of a Written Request for Release of Reclamation LOC, in the form attached to and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit E, along with certification of completion by the Owner, or Owner's agent with knowledge, and a copy of the written approval of the Community Development Department. It is understood by the parties that the Reclamation LOC is not subject to successive partial releases, Further, the Reclamation LOC and the Board’s associated rights to withdraw funds and bring a court action may survive final release of the LOC. Restriction on Final Plat. The Parties understand as part of this approval that the Final Plat shall not be executed by the County or recorded until the Improvements are in place and the County accepts the Certificate of Completion from the Project Engineer which shall be transmitted to the Community Development Department as part of the process of completion of the subdivision improvements. The County should also have the ability if they so choose to inspect the site and improvements as part of this completion process. Final Improvements shall be completed and the Final Plat Filed and Recorded 4 within (1) one year of the execution of this Agreement unless an extension is approved by the Board. BOCC's Completion of Reclamation and Other Remedies. If Owner's reclamation efforts are deemed by the Board to be unsuccessful, in the sole opinion of the Board upon the recommendation of the Community Development Department, or if the Board determines that the Owner will not or cannot complete reclamation, the Board, in its discretion, may withdraw and employ from the Reclamation LOC such funds as may be necessary to carry out the reclamation work, up to the face amount of the Reclamation LOC. In lieu of or in addition to drawing on the Reclamation LOC, the Board may bring an action for injunctive relief or damages for the Owner's failure to adhere to the provisions of this Agreement related to reclamation. The Board shall provide the Owner a reasonable time to cure any identified deficiency prior to requesting payment from the Reclamation LOC or filing a civil action. Upon completion of all Improvements, Developer shall submit to the Board as-built drawings bearing the stamp of Developer’s professional engineer certifying that all improvements have been constructed in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement, including all Final Plat plans. The Board may inspect and review the improvements. 5. UTILITIES AND WATER SUPPLY. Prior to issuance of any certificates of occupancy by the County for any homes to be located upon Mountainview Subdivision, Developer shall install all specified utilities and a water distribution system for potable water and fire protection in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the County. All easements and rights of way necessary for installation, operation, service and maintenance of such water supply and distribution system shall be established as shown on the Final Plat. There is a water augmentation plan for the subdivision. This was approved by Case No. 00CWW36 in the state of Colorado District Court Water Division 5. Information and requirements are included in the Covenants. 6. ROADS. All roads within Mountainview Subdivision shall be dedicated to the Mountainview Subdivision Homeowners Association, Inc (the “HOA”) for the use and benefit of the public. The HOA shall be solely responsible for the maintenance, repair and upkeep of said roads. The County shall not be obligated to maintain any roads within the subdivision. 7. INDEMNITY. To the extent allowed by law, the Developer agrees to indemnify and hold the County and defend the County from all claims which may arise as a result of the Developer's installation of the improvements required pursuant to this Agreement. However, the Developer does not indemnify the County for claims made asserting that the standards imposed by the County are improper or the cause of the injury asserted. The 5 County shall be required to notify the Developer of receipt of a notice of claim, or a notice of intent to sue, and shall afford the Developer the option of defending any such claim or action. Failure to notify and provide such written option to the Developer shall extinguish the County's rights under this paragraph. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to require the Developer to indemnify the County from claims which may arise from the negligent acts or omissions of the County or its employees. 8. SCHOOL IMPACT FEES. The Developer shall meet the requirements of the RE-2 School District in a manner as set forth in the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code. Applicant shall pay $200 per dwelling unit at the time of Building Permit in accordance with the Garfield County Land Use Development Code, Article 7-404. 9. ROAD IMPACT FEES. The Property is located within the District 2 N Benefit Area. As such, Road Impact Fees will be paid in accordance with Article 7-401(C)(1) and accordance to the fee schedule in effect at the time of Building Permit. 10. COMPLIANCE WITH FIRE DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS. The Colorado River Fire Protection District (“District”) has approved inclusion of the Mountainview Subdivision in the District. The Developer shall comply with all provisions of the District’s approval, including, without limitation, that the Developer shall pay any impact fees to the District in effect at the time of Final Plat approval and all residences within the Subdivision will be required to install fire sprinklers. 11. SALE OF LOTS. Except for the entirety of the Property, no lots, tracts, or parcels within Mountainview Subdivision may be separately conveyed prior to recording of the Final Plat for Mountain View Subdivision with the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder’s Office. 12. BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. As one remedy for breach of this Agreement, the County may withhold issuance of building permits for any residence or other habitable structure requiring a permit to be constructed upon Lots 1 through 5, and/or any other structures requiring building permits within Mountainview Subdivision. Further, the parties agree that no certificates of occupancy shall issue for any buildings or structures, including residences, within Mountainview Subdivision until all on-site improvements have been completed and are operational as required by this Agreement. Developer shall provide the purchaser of a lot, prior to conveyance of the lot, a signed copy of a form in substantially the same form as that attached to and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit F concerning the restrictions upon issuance of building permits and certificates of occupancy detailed in this Agreement, Final Plat Approval and Preliminary Plan Approval. 13. ENFORCEMENT. In addition to any rights which may be provided by statute, the withholding of building permits and certificates of occupancy provided for in paragraph 12 above, and the provisions for release of security, detailed in paragraph 4 above, it is mutually agreed by the County and the Developer that the County, without making an 6 election of remedies, or any purchaser of any lot within the Subdivision shall have the authority to bring an action in the Garfield County District Court to compel enforcement of this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement, however, shall be interpreted to require the County to bring an action for enforcement or to withhold permits or certificates or to withdraw and use security. Nor shall this paragraph or any other provision of this Agreement be interpreted to permit the purchaser of a lot to file an action against the County. 14. CONSENT TO VACATE PLAT. In the event the Developer fails to comply with the terms of this Agreement, the County shall have the ability to vacate the Final Plat for Mountainview Subdivision as it pertains to any lots for which building permits have not been issued. As to lots for which building permits have been issued, the Final Plat shall not be vacated and shall remain valid. In such event, the Developer shall provide the County a survey, legal description and a plat showing the location of any portion of the Final Plat so vacated and shall record the plat in the Office of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. If such plat is not recorded by the Developer, the County may vacate the plat, or portions thereof, by Resolution. 15. NOTICE OF RECORDATION. This Agreement shall be recorded in the Office of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder and shall be a covenant running with title to all lots, tracts, and parcels within Mountainview Subdivision. Such recording shall constitute notice to prospective purchasers or other interested parties as to the terms and provisions thereof. 16. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. The obligations and rights contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the Developer and the County. 17. NOTICES. All notices required or permitted by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed effective when received by the recipient party via personal delivery, facsimile transmission, United States certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, by messenger or by overnight delivery service, in all cases addressed to the person for who it is intended at their address and facsimile numbers(s) set forth below or to such other address as a party shall have designated by notice in writing to the other party in the manner provided by this paragraph: If to Developer: Red Dog, LLC C/O Mark Chain Consulting, LLC 811 Garfield Avenue Carbondale, CO 81623 If to the County: Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County c/o Community Development Director 7 108 Eighth Street, Room 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 17. AMENDMENT. This Agreement may be amended or modified from time to time, but only in writing signed by the Parties hereto. 18. VENUE. The Parties hereby agree that venue for any cause of action arising out of, or related in any way to, this Agreement shall lie exclusively with the District Court for Garfield County, Colorado. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Agreement to be effective upon the date first set forth above. [signature page to follow] TAB 5 LETTER FROM COLORADO GEOLOGIC SURVEY – DATED 1/10/2000 ...4 STATE OFCOLOTUDO iOTORADO GEOLOG ICAL SURVEY iirition of Minerals and GeologY Department of Natural Resources Iiii sh.t-"n street, Room 715 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone: (3O3) 866'2611 FAX: (303) 866'2461 JanuarY 10,2000 JeffLaurien Garfield County Planning Deparhnent 109 86 Stree! Suite 303 Glenwood SPrings, Colorado 81601 DEPARTI\4ENT OF NATLTRAL RESOIJRCES Bill Owens Governor Greg E. Walcher Execullve Dircctor Michael B. Long Division Dire(tol Vicki Covvarr State Gcolotist and Director 1Re: North 27 Subdivision.'Southwest of intersection of c',R' 250 and c'R- 261' Garfield 'CountY. DearMr. Laurien: GA-00-0007 GABFIEI.D COUNTY FLANTJING DEPARTMENT 109 8TH ST.. SI.ETE 303 GLENI'UOOD SPRINGS, CO 81EOI At your request and in accordance with Senate Bill 35 (1972) we have reviewed the materials submitted for and made a field inspection on January 5,2OOO'of the proposed subdivision' The following materials were reviiwed: The Preliminary Plan Submittal (12120199)' The following comments summarize our findings' Overview The generalized surficial deposits at the approximately 2g-acre site consist of sandy silts *ittr occasionar angurar and rounded graversizea materiar. The surficial soils consist of eolian (wind_deposited) sandy-sitts anllebris fan materials. Field observation indicated the s,rface materials would probably exhibit low to moderate expansive characteristics. The site is currently covered with native grasses. The area dips io the south and has multiple unlined il;;r# cu*r, that cross the-site. Two main ""n"lr trend northeast-southwest and were approximatety..par'Atet to each. Both of the canals (ditches) had water flow at the time of the fierd visit. cattails and other water dependant r"g"tution indicated the two canals were small wetland areas. The western most cani *u, uppto*im3tely 20 feetdeePlnd the eastern canal was approxi-ut tf S feet deep. The area **'"ou.r"d with six inches of snow at the time of , the field visit. RECEIVIDJAI'| 182000 *a_l .<L The Geologic Report (HP Geote cb,llll6l99) approprytely recognizes that the soils at the site have the potJntial for collapse *alot t"tit"-"'n Ttreieport rgco-1nme;nds that if settlement pror," ,oir' are presenl, P;t;"1;;-1i1g-11by Control of landscape irrigation near buildirgr. Th;;"p"riAso indcates that compressibll soils may have to be excavated and replac"a *itu "o*p""t"d structural fill. The riport also discourages basement level constnrctioo O.r"io tU" ttigh gr- oundwater level' The CGS concurs with the recornmenaationsJn trr"iF 6r"orogi, n"p"rt. However, it is a CGS recornrnendation that a qualified g"ot""hrilal and/or toiltir6iJ"irecorrmend an appropriate building fo,ndation desieur based "" ;;;;;h"iot irr.rtEutionsincelhe sub-surface materials at the site may ;;il;;ll"# and/or settlement when loaded' Surface and Ground Water Considerations The Drainage plan @esource Engineering Inc., 11/13199) apptopriately makes a recommendation foi an intercepG ,*r"-uorojs the norttr end of Lots A, c and E to mitigate 1 against oFsite drainage imaacts.-edditionally, the report r@otnmends that constnrcting . , drainage swales;.*?tuiiding f;ilti;* (i.e. m"irtai"i"g positive drainage) helps to mitigate against fil;trg;ithe-residential struct,res' Additionally' it is a CGS recommenaation oat su6-surface p"ri*"* drains shourd be installed around building struct,res to r"ar* tr* wetting ofrrurrrr""" soils to minimize the risk of settlement and/or expansion orrc suustrface *ilr. aJ[tionally, it is a cGS recommendation that roof downspouts ana arains be located ; i;iio f# to' building foundations and flatwork areas, which mirrimires the wetting oi.,rUr".f"ce soils. Vegetation and subsequent irrigation should also be discouraged within 10 feet of building structures' At this time if the recorrmendations made above and those stated in the Preliminary Plan Submittal *" uadrlrred and made "onditio^ of approval for this subdivision, then we have no geology-rrfuira Gections. pf*"e ao not hesiiate to contact this office if you have any questions slogmments tum.ld County Pl anning Departrnent January 10,2000 Page2 Foundation Considerations SincerelY, Ben Arndt Geological Engineer a1\ ParcelId OwnerName OwnerAddress1 OwnerAddress2 OwnerAddress3 OwnerCityStZip Country R005294 KESTI, LOREN & KESTI, JESSICA 892 COUNTY ROAD 250 SILT CO 81652 R005295 GOODWIN, KRISTIN MARIE & WILLIAM HOWARD 830 COUNTY ROAD 250 SILT CO 81652 R005301 MUNOZ, MARTIN VERVEJA & TOOLE, MARIA ELE 1 COLUMBINE LANE SILT CO 81652 R005296 JUNGE, TOMMY ALAN & SUSAN K 0688 COUNTY ROAD 250 SILT CO 81652 R200792 MCKEE, KELLY RAE 0755 COUNTY ROAD 261 SILT CO 81652 R005308 OCHOA, PRIMITIVO & ELSA 256 COLUMBINE LANE SILT CO 81652 R005307 MILLER, NATHAN & KELSEY 383 COLUMBINE LANE SILT CO 81652 R005302 AYALA VILLAMAN, LORETO & AYALA MOROYOQUI 68 LARKSPUR COURT SILT CO 81652 R005297 RED DOG LLC 12144 E WELSH TRAIL SCOTTSDALE AZ 852595118 R200379 DALEY, FRANK G & SHEILA M 4670 COUNTY ROAD 311 NEW CASTLE CO 81647-9621 Click to Show Photos Account Number Owner Property Address City Map R005294 KESTI, LOREN & KESTI, JESSICA 892 250 COUNTY RD SILT Map R005295 GOODWIN, KRISTIN MARIE & WILLIAM HOWARD 830 250 COUNTY RD SILT Map R005296 JUNGE, TOMMY ALAN & SUSAN K 688 250 COUNTY RD SILT Map R005297 RED DOG LLC 0 SILT Map R005301 MUNOZ, MARTIN VERVEJA & TOOLE, MARIA ELE 1 COLUMBINE LN SILT Map R005302 AYALA VILLAMAN, LORETO & AYALA MOROYOQUI 68 LARKSPUR CT SILT Map R005307 MILLER, NATHAN & KELSEY 383 COLUMBINE LN SILT Map R005308 OCHOA, PRIMITIVO & ELSA 256 COLUMBINE LN SILT Map R200379 DALEY, FRANK G & SHEILA M 632 228 COUNTY RD SILT Map R200792 MCKEE, KELLY RAE 755 261 COUNTY RD SILT Map 10 ResultsProperty Results The Gareld County Assessor's Ofce makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation. Data is subject to constant change and its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. | User Privacy Policy | GDPR Privacy Notice Last Data Upload: 4/11/2025, 12:14:07 AM Contact Us Developed by Gareld County, CO 4/11/25, 10:24 AM qPublic.net - Garfield County, CO - Results https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1038&LayerID=22381&PageTypeID=3&PageID=9446 1/1