The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutField Observation 2Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 1 Street Subgrade: Chapparl Drive. STA 0+50. Centerline of street.1.0 Below subgrade.TROXLER / 3411 / 13040 / 05/10/2021 Peskuski, Ryan 2 Street Subgrade: Chapparl Drive. STA 1+50. Centerline of street.1.0 Below subgrade.TROXLER / 3411 / 13040 / 05/10/2021 Peskuski, Ryan 3 Street Subgrade: Chapparl Drive. STA 2+00. Centerline of street.1.0 Below subgrade.TROXLER / 3411 / 13040 / 05/10/2021 Peskuski, Ryan 4 Parking Lot Subgrade: West side of future building C. Centered north to south.4.0 Below subgrade.TROXLER / 3411 / 13040 / 05/10/2021 Peskuski, Ryan 5 Footing Subgrade: West footing line Building A. Center of excavation. Centered north to south 1.5 Below subgrade.TROXLER / 3411 / 13040 / 05/10/2021 Peskuski, Ryan 6 Footing Subgrade: West footing line Building A. Center of excavation. 25' north of the south west corner building A. 1.5 Below subgrade.TROXLER / 3411 / 13040 / 05/10/2021 Peskuski, Ryan Remarks B: Test results do not comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 6: As requested, we made a site visit to observe and test the placement of native fill at various locations around the project. We observed crews placing material in approximately 8-10" lifts with a dozer for the Chapparal Drive street subgrade. No compactive effort was observed at this location during our visit. Compactive effort was being applied to the west footing line of Building A with a Bomag single smooth drum roller. Our understanding was that the areas tested were placed and compacted the previous Friday. We observed lower than optimum moisture content at the locations tested. Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Oversize (%) Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 1 06/10/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 15 13.0 117.5 9.5 120.7 132.2 8 103 95 -2 / 2 B 2 06/10/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 15 13.0 117.5 10.3 118.9 131.2 8 101 95 -2 / 2 B 3 06/10/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 15 13.0 117.5 10.3 119.8 132.1 8 102 95 -2 / 2 B 4 06/10/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 10 14.0 115.5 7.3 111.6 119.7 8 97 95 -2 / 2 B 5 06/10/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 10 14.0 115.5 10.8 105.8 117.2 8 92 95 -2 / 2 B 6 06/10/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 10 14.0 115.5 9.8 106.1 116.5 8 92 95 -2 / 2 B This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 06/10/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000001 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 7 Road Embankment: Station 4+00 chaparral drive 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Schulz, Cayden 8 Road Embankment: Station 7+50 Center drive 3.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Schulz, Cayden 9 Road Embankment: Station 2+50 road way between Building A and Building B 3.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Schulz, Cayden Remarks B: Test results do not comply with specifications. A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 9: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test fill placement. The contractor was informed of the density test results. It was suggested to the contractor to rework, moisture condition the areas of density test #7 and #8. It was also suggested to the contractor to process the moisture into the lift and not just moisture condition the surface. Two top soil sample were obtained to determine the percent organic matter. Another on-site sample of fill material was obtained and a proctor density test will be performed. A return visit was requested for June 13, 2024, tomorrow. Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Oversize (%) Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 7 06/12/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 5 14.5 114.0 9.6 106.0 116.2 8 93 95 -2 / 2 B 8 06/12/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 10 14.0 115.5 12.0 120.3 134.7 8 104 95 -2 / 2 A 9 06/12/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 10 14.0 115.5 12.8 115.0 129.7 8 100 95 -2 / 2 A This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 06/12/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000002 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 10 Road Embankment: Station 4+00 Chaparral Drive 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 11 Road Embankment: Building 3 Access road, 40' southwest of southeast corner of building 3 envelope 4.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 12 Road Embankment: Building 3 Access road, 50' east and 20' south of southwest corner of building 3 envelope 4.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 13 Road Embankment: Building 3 Access road, 20' southwest of southwest corner of building 3 envelope 4.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 14 Road Embankment: Building A access road, 185' south of south edge of Donegan Road 1.5 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 14: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test roadway embankment being placed to achieve roadway and parking lot subgrade around the perimeter of building "C" and on the east side of building "A". The earthwork contractor is reusing the on-site material being excavated from the building "A" foundation as roadway embankment. The material is being placed in 10" lifts and compactive effort applied with a large smooth steel-drum roller. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. A return visit was requested tomorrow, Friday June 14, 2024. Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Oversize (%) Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 10 7 06/13/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 10 14.0 115.5 12.2 110.3 123.8 6 95 95 -2 / 2 A 11 06/13/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 10 14.0 115.5 12.1 111.2 124.6 6 96 95 -2 / 2 A 12 06/13/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 5 14.5 114.0 12.9 114.1 128.8 6 100 95 -2 / 2 A 13 06/13/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 5 14.5 114.0 12.5 112.3 126.3 6 99 95 -2 / 2 A 14 06/13/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 10 14.0 115.5 12.0 109.6 122.8 6 95 95 -2 / 2 A This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 06/13/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000003 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 15 Road Embankment: Center Drive, station 7+30 3.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 16 Road Embankment: Center Drive, station 6+10 3.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 17 Road Embankment: Chaparral Drive, station 4+25 3.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 18 Road Embankment: Building 3, south Access road, station 2+50 3.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 18: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test roadway embankment being placed to achieve roadway and parking lot subgrade around the perimeter of building "C" and on the east side of building "A". The earthwork contractor is reusing the on-site material being excavated from the building "A" foundation as roadway embankment. We observed the contractor place 10" lifts and apply compactive effort with a large smooth steel-drum roller. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. A return visit was requested on Monday June 17, 2024 for additional observations and density testing. Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Oversize (%) Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 15 06/14/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 10 14.0 115.5 12.1 114.6 128.5 6 99 95 -2 / 2 A 16 06/14/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 10 14.0 115.5 15.0 113.0 130.0 6 98 95 -2 / 2 A 17 06/14/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 15 13.0 117.5 11.7 117.6 131.4 6 100 95 -2 / 2 A 18 06/14/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 13 13.5 117.0 13.1 117.2 132.5 6 100 95 -2 / 2 A This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 06/14/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000004 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 26 Structural Fill: Building C, 25' south and 100' east of excavation northwest corner 2.0 Below rough grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 27 Structural Fill: Building C, 30' north and 70' west of excavation southeast corner 2.0 Below rough grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 27: As requested, a site visit was made for density testing of the on- site soils being placed to achieve proposed slab subgrade for building C. We observed the earthwork contractor moisture condition the on- site soils in loose 10" to 12" lifts and apply compactive effort to each lift with a large steel smooth-drum vibratory roller. Results of density testing performed in locations indicated met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Our office will be contacted when additional testing is requested. Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Oversize (%) Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 26 06/24/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 10 14.0 115.5 14.8 113.0 129.7 6 98 98 -2 / 2 A 27 06/24/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 15 13.0 117.5 11.3 118.8 132.2 6 101 98 -2 / 2 A This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 06/24/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000005 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 28 Structural Fill: Building C slab subgrade, 50' east and 20' north of excavation southwest corner. 1.0 Below rough grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 29 Structural Fill: Building C slab subgrade, 90' east and 30' north of excavation southwest corner. 1.0 Below rough grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 30 Structural Fill: Building C slab subgrade, 50' east and 20' north of excavation southwest corner. 1.0 Below rough grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks B: Test results do not comply with specifications. A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 30: As requested, a site visit was made for density testing of the on- site soils being placed to achieve proposed slab subgrade for building C. We observed the earthwork contractor moisture condition the on- site soils being excavated from building A in loose 10" to 12" lifts and apply compactive effort with a large steel smooth-drum vibratory roller. Results of density testing performed in locations indicated met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Our office will be contacted when additional testing is requested. Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Oversize (%) Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 28 06/26/24 Curve No. 1 698C Cohesive 17.0 107.2 14.5 109.3 125.2 6 102 95 -2 / 2 B 29 06/26/24 Curve No. 1 698C Cohesive 12 15.0 111.5 15.8 110.2 127.6 6 99 95 -2 / 2 A 30 28 06/26/24 Curve No. 1 698C Cohesive 12 15.0 111.5 14.8 109.2 125.4 6 98 98 -2 / 2 A This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 06/26/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000006 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 31 Structural Fill: Building C, 20' west and 36' south of building northeast corner 1.0 Below finish floor elevation XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 32 Structural Fill: Building C, approximate center of building 1.0 Below finish floor elevation XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 32: As requested, a site visit was made for density testing of the on- site soils being placed to achieve proposed slab subgrade for building C. We observed the earthwork contractor moisture condition the on- site soils being excavated from building A in loose 10" to 12" lifts and apply compactive effort with a large steel smooth-drum vibratory roller. Results of density testing performed in locations indicated met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Our office will be contacted when additional testing is requested. Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Oversize (%) Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 31 06/27/24 Curve No. 1 698C Cohesive 15 14.5 112.5 12.9 114.8 129.6 6 102 98 -2 / 2 A 32 06/27/24 Curve No. 1 698C Cohesive 15 14.5 112.5 14.6 113.4 130.0 6 101 98 -2 / 2 A This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 06/27/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000007 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 33 07/03/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 5.7 133.6 141.2 6 96 95 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 33 Sanitary Trench Backfill: Sanitary trench backfill, 40' north of existing manhole in mall parking lot 6.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 33: As requested, a site visit was made for density testing of sanitary sewer trench backfill in the Chapparal Circle. The earthwork contractor is installing a sanitary line heading north from the existing sanitary manhole structure located in the mall parking lot. We observed the contractor place CDOT Class 6 aggregate base course to 12" over the pipe and apply compaction effort with a jumping jack. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Our office will be contacted when additional testing is requested. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 07/03/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000008 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 34 07/08/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 5.9 133.4 141.3 6 95 95 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 34 Sanitary Trench Backfill: Sanitary trench backfill, Chapparal Circle. Station 1+39 5.5 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 34: As requested, a site visit was made for density testing of sanitary sewer trench backfill in the Chapparal Circle. The earthwork contractor is installing sanitary line heading north from the existing sanitary manhole structure located in the mall parking lot. We observed the contractor place CDOT Class 6 aggregate base course to 12" over pipe and apply compactive effort with a jumping jack. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Our office will be contacted when additional testing is requested. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 07/08/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000009 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 35 Sanitary Trench Backfill: Chappral Circle, 12' south of manhole M-604-20 2.0 Below rough grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 36 Sanitary Trench Backfill: Chappral Circle, 90' south of manhole M-604-20 0.0 Below rough grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 36: As requested, a site visit was made for density testing of sanitary sewer trench backfill in Chapparal Circle. The earthwork contractor is installing sanitary line heading north from the existing sanitary manhole structure located in the mall parking lot. We observed the contractor backfill the upper portion of the sanitary trench with the processed on-site soils previously excavated from the sanitary trench and apply compactive effort with a static wheel attached to a hoe and a vibratory sheeps-foot trench compactor. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Our office will be contacted when additional testing is requested. Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Oversize (%) Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 35 07/15/24 Curve No. 1 698C Cohesive 12 15.0 111.5 13.5 107.6 122.1 8 97 95 -2 / 2 A 36 07/15/24 Curve No. 1 698C Cohesive 12 15.0 111.5 13.5 111.0 126.0 8 100 95 -2 / 2 A This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 07/15/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000010 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 37 Electrical Trench Backfill: Building C, grid lines D/4 0.0 Below rough slab subgrade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 38 Electrical Trench Backfill: Building C, grid lines G.5/4 0.0 Below rough slab subgrade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 39 Waterline Trench Backfill: Building C, grid lines F.5/2 0.0 Below rough slab subgrade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 39: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test utility trench backfill for building "C". The earthwork contractor is reusing the on-site material excavated from the utility trenches to backfill the trenches. We observed the contractor place backfill in 8" lifts and apply compactive effort with a jumping jack and a vibratory sheepsfoot trench roller. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Our office will be contacted when additional testing is requested. Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Oversize (%) Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 37 07/24/24 Curve No. 3 698C Cohesive 15.3 113.5 13.6 110.8 125.9 6 98 98 -2 / 2 A 38 07/24/24 Curve No. 3 698C Cohesive 5 14.5 115.0 13.0 112.5 127.1 8 98 98 -2 / 2 A 39 07/24/24 Curve No. 3 698C Cohesive 5 14.5 115.0 12.6 113.3 127.6 6 99 98 -2 / 2 A This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 07/24/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000011 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 40 07/26/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 6.2 124.7 132.4 6 89 95 -2 / 2 B 41 07/26/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 6.4 136.8 145.6 6 98 98 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 40 Grade Beam Subgrade: Building C, along 1 line, 9' east of F line 0.0 Below bottom of planned grade beam XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 41 Grade Beam Subgrade: Building C, along 1 line, along B line 0.0 Below bottom of planned grade beam XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks B: Test results do not comply with specifications. A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 41: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test grade beam subgrade for building "C". We observed the contractor place the material in 8" lifts and apply compactive effort with a jumping jack and a vibratory sheepsfoot trench roller. Results of density testing performed today did not meet project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. The contractor indicated the area which failed on test #40 would be reworked. A return visit was requested for Monday, July 29, 2024 for retesting of this area and testing of additional grade beam compaction. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 07/26/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000012 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 42 40 07/29/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 5.2 136.5 143.6 6 98 95 -2 / 2 A 43 07/29/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 5.3 136.7 143.9 6 98 98 -2 / 2 A 44 07/29/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 5.5 137.1 144.6 6 98 98 -2 / 2 A 45 07/29/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 5.3 137.3 144.6 6 98 98 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 42 Grade Beam Subgrade: Building C, along 1 line, 9' east of F line 0.0 Below bottom of planned grade beam XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 43 Grade Beam Subgrade: Building C, along 4 line, 8' east of I line 0.0 Below bottom of planned grade beam XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 44 Grade Beam Subgrade: Building C, along 4 line and E line 0.0 Below bottom of planned grade beam XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 45 Grade Beam Subgrade: Building C, along 3 line and A line 0.0 Below bottom of planned grade beam XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 45: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test grade beam subgrade for building "C". The earthwork contractor is placing and compacting class 6 aggregate base course in the grade beam excavations to achieve proposed bottom of grade beam subgrade. We observed the contractor place the material in 8" lifts and apply compactive effort with a jumping jack and a vibratory sheepsfoot trench roller. A retest was performed today on the reworked area that previously failed (test#40). The retest in the area indicated met project specifications. Results of additional density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Our office will be contacted when additional testing is requested. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 07/29/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000013 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 46 07/30/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 5.2 136.5 143.6 6 98 98 -2 / 2 A 47 07/30/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 5.3 136.9 144.2 6 98 98 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 46 Footing Subgrade: Building C. Pad footing, 3/C line 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 47 Footing Subgrade: Building C. Pad footing, along 3 line, at G.2 line 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 47: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test pad footing subgrade for building "C". The earthwork contractor is placing and compacting class 6 aggregate base course in the pad footing excavations to achieve proposed bottom of pad footing subgrade. We observed the contractor place the material in 8" lifts and apply compactive effort with a jumping jack and a vibratory sheepsfoot trench roller. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Our office will be contacted when additional testing is requested. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 07/30/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000014 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 48 08/06/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 5.2 136.5 143.6 6 98 98 -2 / 2 A 49 08/06/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 5.4 136.4 143.7 6 98 98 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 48 Footing Subgrade: Building C, exterior grade beam. 12' south of intersection of K and 1 lines 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 49 Footing Subgrade: Building C, exterior grade beam. Intersection of K and 3 lines 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 49: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test grade beam subgrade for building "C". The earthwork contractor is placing and compacting class 6 aggregate base course in the grade beam excavations to achieve proposed bottom of grade beam subgrade. We observed the contractor place the material in 8" lifts and apply compactive effort with a jumping jack and a vibratory sheepsfoot trench roller. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Our office will be contacted when additional testing is requested. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 08/06/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000015 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 51 09/19/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 4.4 133.6 139.5 4 96 95 NA D Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 51 Waterline Trench Backfill: Center drive, water line trench. station 3+95 5.5 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks D: Test result is considered acceptable with no moisture requirement. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 51: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test waterline trench backfill along Center Drive. The earthwork contractor is placing and compacting class 6 aggregate base course in the utility trench. We observed the contractor place the material in 8" lifts and apply compactive effort with a jumping jack and a vibratory sheepsfoot trench roller. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Our office will be contacted when additional testing is requested. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 09/19/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000016 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 52 09/20/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 6.7 132.1 140.9 6 95 95 -2 / 2 A 53 09/20/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 5.4 132.4 139.6 4 95 95 -2 / 2 A 54 09/20/24 Curve No. 1 698C Cohesive 17.0 107.2 15.4 103.0 118.9 6 96 95 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 52 Waterline Trench Backfill: Center Drive, water line trench at station 3+45 5.5 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 53 Waterline Trench Backfill: Center Drive, water line trench at station 3+00 5.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 54 Waterline Trench Backfill: Waterline trench Center Drive 3+70 4.0 Below finish grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 54: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test waterline trench backfill along Center Drive. The earthwork contractor is placing and compacting class 6 aggregate base course around the waterline to 12" above top of pipe and the rest of the trench is being backfilled with the previously excavated on-site soils. We observed the contractor place the material in 8" lifts and apply compactive effort with a jumping jack and a vibratory sheepsfoot trench roller. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Our office will be contacted when additional testing is requested. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 09/20/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000017 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 55 Waterline Trench Backfill: Waterline trench, Center Drive, west end of building C 4.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 56 Waterline Trench Backfill: Waterline trench, Center Drive, west end of Building C 4.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 56: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test waterline trench backfill along Center Drive. The earthwork contractor is placing and compacting class 6 aggregate base course around the waterline to 12" above top of pipe and the rest of the trench is being backfilled with the previously excavated on-site soils. We observed the contractor place the material in 8" lifts and apply compactive effort with a jumping jack and a vibratory sheepsfoot trench roller. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Our office will be contacted when additional testing is requested. Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Oversize (%) Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 55 09/25/24 Curve No. 1 698C Cohesive 5 16.0 109.0 16.1 109.0 126.5 6 100 95 -2 / 2 A 56 09/25/24 Curve No. 1 698C Cohesive 5 16.0 109.0 15.5 109.5 126.5 6 100 95 -2 / 2 A This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 09/25/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000018 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 57 Storm Inlet Backfill: Chaparral Circle, west side of inlet C1.3.0 Below top of inlet box XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 57: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test storm trench backfill along Chapparal Circle. The earthwork contractor is placing and compacting the previously excavated on-site soils in the upper portion of the storm trench. We observed the contractor place the material in 8" lifts and apply compactive effort with a jumping jack and a vibratory sheepsfoot trench roller. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Our office will be contacted when additional testing is requested. Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Oversize (%) Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 57 10/04/24 Curve No. 1 698C Cohesive 30 12.0 119.0 10.2 119.5 131.7 6 100 95 -2 / 2 A This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 10/04/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000019 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 58 Electrical Trench Backfill: Chappral Circle, station 1+15 0.0 Below rough grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 59 Electrical Trench Backfill: Chapparal Circle, station 0+00 0.0 Below rough grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 60 Electrical Trench Backfill: Center Drive, station 4+50 1.5 Below rough grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 60: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test utility trench backfill along Chapparal Circle and Center Drive. The earthwork contractor is placing and compacting the previously excavated on-site soils in the upper portion of the utility trench. We observed the contractor placing the material in 8" lifts and apply compactive effort with a jumping jack and a vibratory sheepsfoot trench roller. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Our office will be contacted when additional testing is requested. Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Oversize (%) Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 58 10/17/24 Curve No. 1 698C Cohesive 15 14.5 112.5 12.8 107.8 121.6 6 96 95 -2 / 2 A 59 10/17/24 Curve No. 1 698C Cohesive 15 14.5 112.5 12.7 109.9 123.9 6 98 95 -2 / 2 A 60 10/17/24 Curve No. 1 698C Cohesive 15 14.5 112.5 12.6 108.9 122.6 6 97 95 -2 / 2 A This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 10/17/2024 Report Date: 11/13/2024 Report #: SNG-000020 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 19 Road Embankment: Building C access drive, west side of building. 30' west and 40' north of building envelope southwest corner. 0.0 Below rough grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 20 Road Embankment: Building C access drive, west side of building. 30' east and 36' south of building envelope southwest corner. 0.0 Below rough grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 21 Road Embankment: Building C access drive, south side of building. 40' west and 26' south of building envelope southwest corner. 0.0 Below rough grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 21: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test roadway embankment being placed to achieve roadway and parking lot subgrade around the perimeter of Building "C". The earthwork contractor is reusing the on-site material being excavated from the Building "A" foundation as roadway embankment. We observed the contractor place 10" lifts and apply compactive effort with a large smooth steel-drum roller. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Future site visits will be scheduled with our office when required Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Oversize (%) Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 19 06/18/24 Curve No. 3 698C Cohesive 15 13.0 119.0 13.6 118.0 134.0 6 99 95 -2 / 2 A 20 06/18/24 Curve No. 3 698C Cohesive 15 13.0 119.0 11.4 113.4 126.3 6 95 95 -2 / 2 A 21 06/18/24 Curve No. 3 698C Cohesive 15 13.0 119.0 13.4 114.5 129.8 6 96 95 -2 / 2 A This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 06/18/2024 Report Date: 12/10/2024 Report #: SNG-000021 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 22 Road Embankment: Access road, building C, south side. 45' south and 85' west of building C southeast corner 0.0 Below rough subgrade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 23 Road Embankment: Access road, building C, south side. 35' south and 70' east of building C southwest corner 0.0 Below rough subgrade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 24 Structural Fill: Building C, center of building footprint XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 25 Structural Fill: Building C, H line and 3.5 line XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 25: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test roadway embankment being placed to achieve roadway and parking lot subgrade around the perimeter of Building "C" as well as placing additional material to achieve rough subgrade for the Building "C" foundation. The earthwork contractor is reusing the on-site material being excavated from the Building "A" foundation as roadway embankment. We observed the contractor place 10" lifts and apply compactive effort with a large smooth steel-drum roller. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Additional site visits will be scheduled with our office when required. Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Oversize (%) Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 22 06/20/24 Curve No. 3 698C Cohesive 15 13.0 119.0 11.2 113.0 125.7 8 95 95 -2 / 2 A 23 06/20/24 Curve No. 3 698C Cohesive 13 13.5 118.0 13.3 116.2 131.7 6 98 95 -2 / 2 A 24 06/20/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 15.2 112.3 13.3 110.9 125.7 6 99 98 -2 / 2 A 25 06/20/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 15.2 112.3 15.4 112.0 129.2 6 100 98 -2 / 2 A This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 06/20/2024 Report Date: 12/10/2024 Report #: SNG-000022 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 50 Waterline Trench Backfill: Chappral Circle, station 1+75 0.0 Below rough grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 50: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test a waterline trench backfill along Chaparral Circle. The earthwork contractor is placing and compacting the previously excavated on-site material in the utility trench. We observed the contractor place the material in 8" lifts and apply compactive effort with a jumping jack and a vibratoy sheeps-foot trench roller. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Additional site visits will be scheduled with our office when required. Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Oversize (%) Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 50 09/05/24 Curve No. 1 698C Cohesive 5 16.0 109.0 14.7 107.1 122.8 6 98 95 -2 / 2 A This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 09/05/2024 Report Date: 12/10/2024 Report #: SNG-000023 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 61 Storm Sewer Trench Backfill: 60' north of storm inlet southeast side of building A 0.5 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 62 Storm Sewer Trench Backfill: 160' north of storm inlet at southeast side of building A 0.5 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 63 Sidewalk Subgrade: Building C, concrete apron on south side of building. At G line, south of 4 line. 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 64 Sidewalk Subgrade: Building C, south side. Concrete apron. At I 7 line, south of 4 line 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 65 Sidewalk Subgrade: Building C, south side. Concrete apron. At B.5 line, south of 4 line 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 66 Sidewalk Subgrade: Building C, south side. Concrete apron. At I 7 line, south of 4 line 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 67 Sidewalk Subgrade: Building C, west side. 10' north of building southwest corner 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas 68 Sidewalk Subgrade: Building C, west side. 38: south of building northwest corner 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Oversize (%) Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 61 12/04/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 5 14.5 114.0 12.6 111.0 125.0 6 97 95 -2 / 2 A 62 12/04/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 5 14.5 114.0 13.2 112.0 126.8 6 98 95 -2 / 2 A 63 12/04/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 5.4 134.3 141.6 6 96 95 -2 / 2 A 64 12/04/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 6.0 133.4 141.4 6 95 95 -2 / 2 A 65 12/04/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 5.8 134.8 142.6 6 96 95 -2 / 2 A 66 12/04/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 5.9 133.5 141.4 6 96 95 -2 / 2 A 67 12/04/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 6.1 132.7 140.8 4 95 95 -2 / 2 A 68 12/04/24 Curve No. 8 698C Granular 7.2 139.7 5.5 133.8 141.2 4 96 95 -2 / 2 A This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 2 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 12/04/2024 Report Date: 12/10/2024 Report #: SNG-000024 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 68: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test storm sewer trench backfill and sidewalk subgrade preparation. The earthwork contractor is placing and compacting the previously excavated on-site soils in the storm trench adjacent to the east side of Building A. Results of density testing performed in locations indicated met project specifications. The earthwork contractor is also placing and compacting CDOT Class 6 aggregate base course on the west and south sides of Building C to achieve sidewalk subgrade in these locations. Results of density testing for sidewalk subgrade met project specs. The contractor was notified of our observations and test results. Additional site visits will be scheduled with our office when necessary. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 2 of 2 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 12/04/2024 Report Date: 12/10/2024 Report #: SNG-000024 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 69 12/06/24 Curve No. 2 698A Cohesive 15.2 112.3 14.0 109.9 125.3 8 98 98 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Field Technician 69 Waterline Trench Backfill: Building A water service, 25' south of building.3.5 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 69: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test waterline trench backfill being placed in the water service trench for Building A. The earthwork contractor is placing the previously excavated material back in the trench in 10" loose lifts and is compacting the trench with a static wheel on a backhoe. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our test results. Additional site visits will be scheduled with our office when necessary. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 12/06/2024 Report Date: 12/10/2024 Report #: SNG-000025 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 70 02/03/25 Curve No. 5 698C Granular 7.7 134.3 5.0 117.9 123.8 6 88 95 -2 / 2 B 71 70 02/03/25 Curve No. 5 698C Granular 7.7 134.3 5.7 129.2 136.6 6 96 95 -2 / 2 A 72 02/03/25 Curve No. 5 698C Granular 7.7 134.3 5.7 129.8 137.2 6 97 95 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Specs Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Gauge Standardization Density Standard/Moisture Standard Field Technician 70 Sidewalk Subgrade: Sidewalk along Donegan Rd. ¶west of the electrical transformer. 0.0 Below grade TROXLER / 3411 / 13040 / 05/10/2021 1378 / 582 Peskuski, Ryan 71 Sidewalk Subgrade: Sidewalk along Donegan Rd. ¶west of the electrical transformer. 0.0 Below grade TROXLER / 3411 / 13040 / 05/10/2021 1378 / 582 Downing, Thomas 72 Sidewalk Subgrade: Sidewalk along Donegan Rd. ¶west of the electrical transformer adjacent to Chaparral Circle 0.0 Below grade TROXLER / 3411 / 13040 / 05/10/2021 1378 / 582 Downing, Thomas Remarks B: Test results do not comply with specifications. A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 72: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test sidewalk subgrade along Donnegan Road. At the time of our arrival the prepared sidewalk subgrade felt soft and some deflection of the surface was noted. Density testing results indicated the subgrade did not meet project specifications. We recommended additional compactive effort be applied to the sidewalk subgrade. We returned later in the afternoon and noted that the subgrade felt firmer, and no deflection underfoot was observed. Additional density testing in the area that failed earlier in the day indicated the subgrade was properly compacted and met the project specifications. Additional testing was performed along the prepared surface. Our observations and density test results indicate the sidewalk subgrade was prepared in general conformance with the project specifications. The general contractor was notified of our results and observations. Our office will be contacted when a return visit is required. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 2 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 02/03/2025 Report Date: 02/24/2025 Report #: SNG-000026 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 2 of 2 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 02/03/2025 Report Date: 02/24/2025 Report #: SNG-000026 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 73 02/04/25 Curve No. 5 698C Granular 7.7 134.3 5.8 133.1 140.8 6 99 95 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Specs Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Gauge Standardization Density Standard/Moisture Standard Field Technician 73 Sidewalk Subgrade: Sidewalk adjacent to Donnegan Road. 60" west of intersection of Chaparral Circle and Donnegan Road 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2871 / 463 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 73: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test sidewalk subgrade adjacent to Donnegan Road. The subgrade soils were prepared prior to our arrival. Our observations and density test results indicate the subgrade soils are in general conformance with the project specifications. The contractor was notified of our test results. Our office will be contacted when a return visit is required. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 02/04/2025 Report Date: 02/24/2025 Report #: SNG-000027 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 74 02/06/25 Curve No. 5 698C Granular 7.7 134.3 5.8 132.1 139.7 6 98 95 -2 / 2 A 75 02/06/25 Curve No. 5 698C Granular 7.7 134.3 5.9 134.1 142.0 6 100 95 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Specs Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Gauge Standardization Density Standard/Moisture Standard Field Technician 74 Electrical Trench Backfill: Donnegan road tie -in. 14' west of existing electrical vault. 1.5 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2850 / 459 Downing, Thomas 75 Electrical Trench Backfill: Donnegan road tie -in. 25' west of existing electrical vault. 2.5 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2850 / 459 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 75: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test aggregate base course being placed and compacted at the electrical utility trench tie-in to the existing electrical vault on Donnegan Road, adjacent to the northeast corner of the project. We observed the earthwork contractor placing and compacting moisture-conditioned CDOT class 6 aggregate base course in 10" lifts in the trench. Results of density testing performed today met project specifications. The contractor was notified of our density test results and observations. Additional site visits will be scheduled with our office when required. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 02/06/2025 Report Date: 02/24/2025 Report #: SNG-000028 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 76 02/24/25 Curve No. 5 698C Granular 7.7 134.3 3.4 123.6 127.8 4 92 95 -2 / 2 B 77 02/24/25 Curve No. 5 698C Granular 7.7 134.3 5.8 131.1 138.7 4 98 95 -2 / 2 A 78 02/24/25 Curve No. 5 698C Granular 7.7 134.3 5.7 128.7 136.1 4 96 95 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Specs Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Gauge Standardization Density Standard/Moisture Standard Field Technician 76 Sidewalk Subgrade: Sidewalk subgrade, south side of Donegan Road. stm station 3+45 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2809 / 456 Downing, Thomas 77 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: Chaparral Circle, east curb. Station 1+10 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2809 / 456 Downing, Thomas 78 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: Chaparral Circle, east curb. Station 2+00 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2809 / 456 Downing, Thomas Remarks B: Test results do not comply with specifications. A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 78: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test sidewalk subgrade along Donegan Road and curb and gutter subgrade on the east side of Chaparral Circle, from Donegan Road, heading south. The subgrade was prepared prior to our arrival. Results of density testing of the sidewalk subgrade in area indicated did not meet project specifications. Multiple soft areas of the sidewalk subgrade were noted during our time on-site. We recommended that the sidewalk subgrade be scarified and allowed to air dry before recompaction. Results of density testing performed on the curb and gutter subgrade on the east side of Chaparral Circle met project specifications. The general contractor was notified of our test results and observations in these areas. Our office will be notified when sidewalk subgrade has been addressed and is ready for retesting. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 02/24/2025 Report Date: 03/21/2025 Report #: SNG-000029 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 79 03/25/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 4.1 123.2 128.2 6 94 95 -2 / 2 B 80 03/25/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 3.3 121.8 125.8 6 93 95 -2 / 2 B 81 79 03/25/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 7.3 129.0 138.4 6 99 95 -2 / 2 A 82 80 03/25/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 7.1 127.5 136.6 6 98 95 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Specs Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Gauge Standardization Density Standard/Moisture Standard Field Technician 79 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: 50ft north of southwest corner of Building A, west curb line Grade TROXLER / 3411 / 12576 / 05/10/2021 1160 / 597 Cozza, Seth 80 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: 50ft north of southwest corner of Building A, east curb line Grade TROXLER / 3411 / 12576 / 05/10/2021 1160 / 597 Cozza, Seth 81 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: 50ft north of southwest corner of Building A, west curb line Grade TROXLER / 3411 / 12576 / 05/10/2021 1160 / 597 Cozza, Seth 82 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: 50ft north of southwest corner of Building A, east curb line Grade TROXLER / 3411 / 12576 / 05/10/2021 1160 / 597 Cozza, Seth This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 2 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 03/25/2025 Report Date: 04/21/2025 Report #: SNG-000030 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Remarks B: Test results do not comply with specifications. A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 80: As requested, a site visit was made for observation and density testing of aggregate base course being placed to achieve curb and gutter subgrade on the west side of Building A. The earthwork contractor had placed and compacted the required thickness of aggregate base course in this area prior to our arrival on-site. Results of density testing performed in locations indicated did not meet project specifications for density or moisture content. The contractor was notified of the failing test results. Area to be reworked and additional moisture added. Retesting in this area will be scheduled with our office when area is ready. 82: As requested, a site visit was made for retesting of curb and gutter subgrade on the west side of Building A. The earthwork contractor scarified the curb and gutter subgrade and additional moisture was incorporated into material prior to recompaction of the aggregate base course. Results of retests performed in previously tested areas met project specifications. As requested, we also observed a proof-roll at red top elevation on the south side of Building A parking lot. Proof roll completed with loaded tandem-axle water truck with unsatisfactory results. Contractor chose to subexcavate 12 inches and replace with suitable material. Contractor to contact our office when ready for additional inspections. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 2 of 2 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 03/25/2025 Report Date: 04/21/2025 Report #: SNG-000030 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 83 03/27/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 7.1 128.4 137.5 6 98 95 -2 / 2 A 84 03/27/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 7.0 127.4 136.3 6 98 95 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Specs Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Gauge Standardization Density Standard/Moisture Standard Field Technician 83 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: Curb and gutter on the south side of Building A, south side curb of road 45ft west of south east corner of Building A. 0.0 grade TROXLER / 3411 / 12576 / 05/10/2021 1163 / 600 Cozza, Seth 84 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: Curb and gutter on the south side of Building A, south side curb of road 55ft east of southwest corner of Building A. 0.0 grade TROXLER / 3411 / 12576 / 05/10/2021 1163 / 600 Cozza, Seth Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 83: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test aggregate base course being placed and compacted to achieve curb and gutter subgrade on the south side of Building A. We observed earthwork contractor moisture condition the aggregate base course prior to compacting with a large steel smooth drum compactor. Results of density testing performed in locations indicated met project specifications. The general contractor was notified of our observations and test results. Additional site visits will be scheduled with our office when required. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 03/27/2025 Report Date: 04/21/2025 Report #: SNG-000031 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 85 04/03/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 6.9 127.1 135.9 4 97 95 -2 / 2 A 86 04/03/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 6.8 127.0 135.6 4 97 95 -2 / 2 A 87 04/03/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 6.8 127.6 136.3 6 98 95 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Specs Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Gauge Standardization Density Standard/Moisture Standard Field Technician 85 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: East side of Building A, inner curb. 45' north of southeast corner of Building A 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2794 / 461 Downing, Thomas 86 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: East side of Building A, inner curb. 30' south of northeast corner of Building A 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2794 / 461 Downing, Thomas 87 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: East side of Building A, outer curb. 50' south of northeast corner of Building A 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2794 / 461 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 87: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test curb and gutter subgrade on the east side of Building A. The subgrade was prepared prior to our arrival. Results of density testing performed in locations indicated met project specifications. The general contractor was notified of the results of density testing performed today. Additional site visits will be scheduled with our office when required. Attachments Test #Name Description 87 17436998809431811353052611404253.jpg This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 04/03/2025 Report Date: 04/21/2025 Report #: SNG-000032 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Page 1 of 2 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 0 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 04/03/2025 Report Date: 04/21/2025 Report #: SNG-000032 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Page 2 of 2 Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 88 04/04/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 7.0 129.3 138.3 6 99 95 -2 / 2 A 89 04/04/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 6.9 125.6 134.3 6 96 95 -2 / 2 A 90 04/04/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 6.9 129.8 138.7 6 99 95 -2 / 2 A 91 04/04/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 7.1 129.4 138.6 6 99 95 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Specs Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Gauge Standardization Density Standard/Moisture Standard Field Technician 88 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: south of building C curb and gutter line 30ft east of southwest corner 0.0 Below grade TROXLER / 3411 / 12576 / 05/10/2021 1150 / 599 Cozza, Seth 89 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: south of Building C curb and gutter line 70ft east of southwest corner 0.0 Below grade TROXLER / 3411 / 12576 / 05/10/2021 1150 / 599 Cozza, Seth 90 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: west of Building C curb and gutter line 25ft north of southwest corner, east side of the road 0.0 Below grade TROXLER / 3411 / 12576 / 05/10/2021 1150 / 599 Cozza, Seth 91 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: west of Building C curb and gutter line 25ft north of southwest corner, west side of the road 0.0 Below grade TROXLER / 3411 / 12576 / 05/10/2021 1150 / 599 Cozza, Seth Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 91: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test aggregate base course being placed to achieve curb and gutter subgrade on the west side of Building C. The subgrade was prepared prior to our arrival. Results of density tests performed met project specifications. The general contractor was notified of our test results. Additional site visits will be scheduled with our office when required. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 04/04/2025 Report Date: 04/21/2025 Report #: SNG-000033 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 92 04/09/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 6.9 127.3 136.1 4 97 95 -2 / 2 A 93 04/09/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 6.9 126.9 135.6 4 97 95 -2 / 2 A 94 04/09/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 6.8 128.9 137.7 4 99 95 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Specs Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Gauge Standardization Density Standard/Moisture Standard Field Technician 92 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: Building A north side curb and gutter. 40' west of northeast corner of Building A 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2797 / 463 Downing, Thomas 93 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: Building A north side curb and gutter. 130' west of northeast corner of Building A 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2797 / 463 Downing, Thomas 94 Curb and Gutter Subgrade: Building A north side curb and gutter. 60' east of northwrst corner of Building A 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2797 / 463 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 94: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test aggregate base course being placed and compacted to achieve curb and gutter subgrade on the north side of Building A. The aggregate base course was placed and compacted prior to our arrival on-site. Results of density testing performed on locations indicated met project specifications. The general contractor was notified of our observations and density test results. Additional site visits will be scheduled with our office when required. Attachments Test #Name Description 94 17442102364635847209295442298870.jpg This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 04/09/2025 Report Date: 04/21/2025 Report #: SNG-000034 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Page 1 of 2 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 0 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 04/09/2025 Report Date: 04/21/2025 Report #: SNG-000034 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Page 2 of 2 Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 95 04/11/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 7.2 127.1 136.3 6 97 95 -2 / 2 A 96 04/11/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 7.0 125.7 134.5 6 96 95 -2 / 2 A 97 04/11/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 6.9 126.2 134.9 6 97 95 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Specs Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Gauge Standardization Density Standard/Moisture Standard Field Technician 95 Pad Subgrade: Condenser pad, east side of Building A, north pad 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2852 / 459 Downing, Thomas 96 Pad Subgrade: Condenser pad, east side of Building A, south pad 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2852 / 459 Downing, Thomas 97 Pad Subgrade: Condenser pad, west side of Building A, north pad 0.0 Below grade XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2852 / 459 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 97: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test aggregate base course being placed and compacted to achieve condenser pad subgrade on the east and west sides of Building A. The earthwork contractor has placed and compacted a ´lift of aggregate base course to achieve proposed condenser pad elevation. Our observations and density test results indicate the aggregate base course was placed and compacted in general conformance with the project specifications. The earthwork contractor was notified of our test results. Additional site visits will be scheduled with our office when required. Attachments Test #Name Description 96 17443868727714158011197248073860.jpg Southeast pad This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 04/11/2025 Report Date: 04/21/2025 Report #: SNG-000035 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Page 1 of 2 Description: Southeast pad This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 0 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 04/11/2025 Report Date: 04/21/2025 Report #: SNG-000035 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs Page 2 of 2 Test Results Test # Retest Of Test Date Proctor ID Method Soil Classification Optimum Moisture (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) In Place Moisture (%) In Place Dry Density (pcf) In Place Wet Density (pcf) Probe Depth (in) Percent Compaction Min Comp. (%) Optimum Moisture Tolerance (%)Remark 98 04/15/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 7.6 128.4 138.1 6 98 95 -2 / 2 A 99 04/15/25 Curve No. 9 698C Granular 8.8 130.6 7.0 126.0 134.8 6 96 95 -2 / 2 A Test Information Test #Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge Specs Make / Model / SN / Calibrated Gauge Standardization Density Standard/Moisture Standard Field Technician 98 Sidewalk Subgrade: Building A, north sidewalk, adjacent to building. 115' west of building northeast corner XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2808 / 459 Downing, Thomas 99 Sidewalk Subgrade: Building A, north sidewalk, adjacent to building. 50' east of building northwest corner XPLORER / 3500 / 1995 / 04/16/2020 2808 / 459 Downing, Thomas Remarks A: Test results comply with specifications. Comments Tests are "Direct Transmission" (Method A) unless probe depth is noted as "Backscatter". Gauge calibration data on file with the testing agency. 99: As requested, a site visit was made to observe and test aggregate base course being placed adjacent to the north side of building A to achieve sidewalk subgrade. The earthwork contractor was fine grading and compacting the sidewalk subgrade during our time on- site. Our observations and density test results indicate the aggregate base course was placed and compacted in general conformance with the project specifications. The earthwork contractor was notified of our test results. Additional site visits will be scheduled with our office when required. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of fill placement and the test results shown above. Test data are not the sole basis for opinions whether the fill meets project specifications. The contractor is responsible to apply necessary compaction effort and moisture to comply with project specifications. Our test results, observations and opinions do not constitute acceptance of the work. Page 1 of 1 Compaction Testing Test Method: ASTM D 6938 04/15/2025 Report Date: 04/21/2025 Report #: SNG-000036 Client: Andover Management Group Louisville, KY 40202 333 East main Street Suite 300 Project: 214 Center Drive GS06693.001F-345 Garfield County, CO 214 Center Drive 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2809 Glenwood Springs