HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.00 General Application Materials
Bauldridge Barn | Variance Application
Submitted: December 9, 2025
prepared by
(970) 379-1669 | matt@coloradoplanning.com
0165 Basalt Mountain Drive | Carbondale, CO 81623
on behalf of
Diane Bauldridge
0101 Fox Prowl Lane | Carbondale, CO 81623
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1. Application Cover Letter…………………………………………………………………………………… 3
2. Project Description……………………………………………………………………………………………. 4
3. General Application Materials (pursuant to Subsection 4-203(B))…………………….
• Applicant and Consultant Information
• Application Form
• Payment Agreement Form
• Proof of Ownership
• Names and Addresses of Adjacent Property Owners
• Mineral Rights Ownership for the Subject Property
• Letter of Authorization
5
4. Pre-Application Conference Summary………………………………………………………………. 19
5. Statement of Request & Compliance with Standards………………………………………… 25
6. Site Plan (pursuant to Subsection 4-203(D))…………………..…………………………………. 30
7. Compliance with Article 7: Divisions 1, 2, and 3.………………………………….……………. 32
Appendix A | Title Commitment
Appendix B | Attachments to Mineral Rights Research
Appendix C | Other Supplemental Materials
3
1. Application Cover Letter
December 9, 2025
Garfield County Community Development Department
c/o Philip Berry
108 8th Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Philip:
I am pleased to submit this variance application on behalf of Diane Bauldridge.
The property for this application is located in the eastern portion of Garfield County between Highway 82
and the Highway 82 Access Road, about 1.9-miles west of El Jebel and 5.4-miles east of the Town of
Carbondale. It is situated in Section 33, Township 7 South, Range 87 West, of the 6th Principal Meridian,
County of Garfield, State of Colorado. The property is zoned Rural (R) and is in a rural part of Garfield
County. The western portion of the property is developed with a single-family home, a garage, and a barn
and the eastern portion of the property is vacant. The property is neighbored primarily by residential
uses.
The property is considered a “Through Lot,” pursuant to Subsection 3-202(B) of Garfield County’s Land
Use and Development Code (LUDC). As a “Through Lot,” the property must observe a 50 foot setback
along the northern and southern property boundaries. The existing barn on the property, constructed in
1994, encroaches +/- 20.1 feet into the 50 foot setback required from the northern property boundary.
Therefore, a variance is being requested to authorize the barn’s encroachment into the required setback.
Further evidence to support the requested variance is provided in this application.
Approval of this application will authorize the existing barn on the property to encroach 21.1 feet into the
50 foot setback required from the northern property boundary.
This application conforms to the requirements for a variance (Section 4-115) set forth in the Garfield
County Land Use and Development Code (LUDC).
Our team looks forward to reviewing these materials with the county at the earliest convenience. After
the submittal has been deemed complete, please schedule the application for public hearing with the
Board of Adjustments (BoA). If you have any questions, you may contact me at (970) 379-1669 or
matt@coloradoplanning.com.
Sincerely,
Principal | Western Slope Consulting, LLC
4
2. Project Description
Diane Bauldridge is the owner of the ± 7.79 acre property (parcel no. 239133300001). Diane’s late
husband permitted and constructed the existing barn (i.e., “Warehouse”) on the property in 1994. The
county-approved building permit application, building permit, and plan set for the barn are included in
this application.
The subject property is considered a “Through Lot,” pursuant to Subsection 3-202(B) of Garfield County’s
LUDC. As a “Through Lot,” the property must observe the required front yard setback for the Rural (R)
zone district along the northern and southern boundaries of the property.
The northern boundary of the property fronts along State Highway 82 (SH-82), which is an Arterial road.
Therefore, pursuant to Table 3-201, the required setback along the northern boundary of the property is
50 feet.
Based on the survey of the property completed by Sopris Engineering in 2023, the existing barn
encroaches up to +/- 20.1 feet into the setback required from the northern property boundary. The
barn’s encroachment into the required setback is noncompliant with Garfield County’s LUDC. Therefore, a
variance is being requested to bring the encroachment into compliance with the LUDC.
5
3. General Application Materials (pursuant to Subsection 4-203(B))
Applicant and Consultant Information
Property Owner/Applicant
Diane Bauldridge
0101 Fox Prowl Lane
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
(970) 618-5127 | noahbauldridge@gmail.com
Planner/Authorized
Representative
Matt Farrar | Western Slope Consulting, LLC
0165 Basalt Mountain Drive
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
(970) 379-1669 | matt@coloradplanning.com
Project Land Surveyor
& Engineer
Sopris Engineering LLC
502 Main Street, Suite A3
Carbondale CO 81623
(970) 704-0311 | sopriseng@sopriseng.com
Note
The use of the term “Section” or “Subsection” in this application is in reference to applicable Section or
Subsection of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code (LUDC).
6
Application Form
7
8
Payment Agreement Form
9
Proof of Ownership
The property is owned by Diane Bauldridge. Proof of ownership is evidenced by a Warranty Deed
recorded with the office of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder on April 8, 1994 (reception no.
461526). A copy of the Warranty Deed is found on the following pages.
The property was co-owned by Bruce and Diane Bauldridge up until Bruce’s passing in 2012. Diane then
became the sole owner of the property.
10
11
12
List of Adjacent Property Owners
The records of the Garfield County Assessor identify the following owners of record for properties within
200 feet of the subject property. This information is current as of December 7, 2025.
Table 1. Owners of Record within 200 feet of the Subject Property
Parcel
Number
Account
Number
Owner
of Record
Mailing
Address
Physical
Address
1 239132100044 R111611 John Richards III 45 Eagles Nest Court
Carbondale, CO 81623
17408 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
2 239132400021 R011299 Collin Arnold &
Jeffrey McCollum
17377 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
17377 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
3 239132400022 R011505 Wesley & Ashley
Worthington
17395 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
17395 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
4 239133204014 R008048 Alexander Kallas
PO Box 5364
Snowmass Village, CO
81615
371 Larkspur Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
5 239133204015 R008049 SES Management, INC 9885 Tanner Road
Houston, TX 77041
389 Larkspur Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
6 239133204016 R008050 Jireh Holdings LLC 6661 South Evanston Circle
Tulsa, OK 74136
401 Larkspur Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
7 239133204017 R008051 Stephen Connor &
Joy Katzmark
449 Larkspur Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
449 Larkspur Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
8 239133204026 R008060 Diane Alonso 259 Blue Stem Court
Carbondale, CO 81623
259 Blue Stem Court
Carbondale, CO 81623
9 239133300002 R011451 Old Yard LLC PO Box 1799
Carbondale, CO 81623
17694 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
10 239133300006 R011067 Spencer & Stephanie
Eiseman
17411 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
17411 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
11 239133300007 R011327 Christine Lester 65 Favre Lane
El Jebel, CO 81623
17451 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
12 239133300008 R011191 Joseph & Gerry Zamora PO Box 754
Carbondale, CO 81623
17453 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
13 239133300009 R011461 Christina Davis
601 E Hopkins
3rd Floor
Aspen, CO 81611
17499 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
14 239133300011 R110242 Janice Gesselle Trust 17607 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
17607 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
15 239133300012 R011482
Michael Rosenberg -
Trustee Omni Universal
Trust 12/21/94
17665 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
17665 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
16 239133300016 R110243 Anna Edgerly 17527 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
17527 HIGHWAY 82
CARBONDALE, CO
17 239133300031 R111613 Cheryl Howard &
Robert Rust
17696 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
17696 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
18 239133300034 R112067 Kathleen & James
Clausen
17603 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
17603 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
13
14
Mineral Rights Ownership for the Subject Property
Noah Bauldridge performed a review of Garfield County’s records to determine ownership of the mineral
estate underlying the subject property (parcel no. 239133300001) pursuant to Subsection 4-
101(E)(1)(b)(4) of the LUDC and the Colorado Revised Statutes, specifically C.R.S. 24-65.5-103. Below is a
summary of the findings from Mr. Bauldridge’s research into mineral estate ownership for the subject
property:
May 1895 | John Cummings purchased the land from US General Land Office.
• Purchase includes mineral and water rights.
• Document #18378 (refer to Appendix C).
1895 to 1950 | Information missing from Garfield County’s records.
November 1950 | Vera and Rudolph Herin sold property to Agnes and Charles Farris.
• Documents state that the property was transferred to Agnes and Charles Farris, but ½ of the mineral
rights were retained by Vera and Rudolph Herin.
• It’s unclear as to what happened with the other ½ of the mineral rights between 1895 and 1950.
• Book 255 Page 148, Deed: Includes property description and mineral right exemption from sale (refer
to Appendix C).
• Book 255 Page 154, 155, 156, Indenture: Includes property description and mineral right exemption
from sale (refer to Appendix C).
• The property is transferred several more times without mentioning mineral rights.
• Agnes and Charles Farris 1950 -> Briece Arlian 1963 -> Margaret Smith 1970-> Martha Moffett 1972
August 1972 | Martha E Moffett sold property to Freda and Harold Sayre.
• Records state ½ of mineral rights were transferred to Sayre during the sale of the property.
• Book 434 page 132 and 133 (refer to Appendix C).
April 1994 | Freda and Harold Sayre sold property to Diane and Bruce Bauldridge.
• Records state property was transferred to Diane and Bruce Bauldridge without mineral rights.
• Bauldridge current deed, Book 898 Page 319, 320, unknown page (refer to Appendix C).
• Transfer Declaration, not on public record (refer to Appendix C).
In an effort to identify current ownership information for the mineral estate underlying the subject
property Mr. Bauldridge performed a further review of Garfield County’s records. The following narrative
explains the additional research carried out by Mr. Bauldridge:
I was unable to find any further information from the county offices when I visited Monday, June 10,
2024. I worked with an employee of the Clerk and Recorder’s Office to double check their records and we
concluded that there was no other information available for the subject property.
15
I reviewed the mineral rights ownership information I identified during my preliminary research and
determined that information remains the same. The only addition I can make is I confirmed the death of
Freda and Harold Sayre.
After the Sayre's sold the subject property to my parents, they moved to Texas and lived out the
remainder of their lives. The forwarding address I found for the Sayre’s is: 302 N Robinson Rd, Ft. Davis,
TX 79734. I also tracked down a phone number (432-426-3578) but found that it had been disconnected
when I tried calling. I discovered that Freda Sayre lived her remaining years in Focused Care Nursing
Home at 501 N Sycamore St, Fort Stockton, TX 79735. When I called the nursing home, the receptionist
informed me that Freda had passed on November 26, 2023, and that Harold had passed a few years prior.
The receptionist couldn’t provide me with an exact date for Harold’s passing. Further, the receptionist
informed me that she didn’t think that the Sayre’s had any children.
I did find that Freda Sayre had a sister named Joan Randal. I was given a phone number for Joan but
found that it had also been disconnected when I tried calling. I was unable to find any additional contact
information for Joan.
The State of Texas will only issue an official death certificate to an immediate family member. The State
does offer something called a "Death Verification" that we can apply for, if necessary.
To recap, below is a list of the steps that I have taken to research the mineral estate ownership, for the
subject property, to the best of my ability.
1. Early in 2024, I searched the public records available via the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder’s
Office. The findings of this research are provided this application. A summary of my findings is
provided below.
• Vera and Rudolph Herin retained 50% ownership of mineral rights from the sale of the property
to Charles and Agnes Farris in 1950 (Book 255, Page 148, 149, 154, 155, 156).
• Freda and Harold Sayre acquired 50% ownership of mineral rights when they purchased the
property from Martha Moffett in 1972 (Book 434, Page 132, 133).
• There’s no record of mineral rights being transferred with the sale of the property from Freda
and Harold Sayre to Diane and Bruce Bauldridge in 1994 (Book 898, Page 319, 320, Real Property
Transfer Declaration).
• There are no death certificates available to the public for any of the people listed above.
• The public record has no wills, trusts, or inheritance documents for any of the people listed
above.
2. I searched the records of the Garfield County Assessor's Office for any active claims on subject
property and adjacent properties. The findings of this research are provided below:
• There is no record of there ever being an active claim or other mineral activity on the subject
property.
• There is only one (1) lease on record in the surrounding area for the last 20 years (Lease no.
R111375). The lease was for a property (parcel no. 801101607000) a few miles north. The lease
16
became inactive in 2010 with no further payments or activity since. Since 2010, there have been
no active claims or mineral activity on any of the surrounding properties.
• There are no active leases, in the area surrounding the subject property, currently on file with the
county.
3. I worked with Holland & Hart LLP to research mineral rights ownership information for the subject
property. After several hours of research, Holland & Hart LLP determined that they were unable to
assist with identifying mineral rights ownership information.
4. I contacted Land Development Company (i.e., Landman) in Grand Junction. They declined to assist
with researching mineral rights ownership because the project is too small. Their focus is on assisting
large companies with mineral rights research for oil and gas development.
5. I returned to the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder’s Office, on June 10, 2024, to walk through the
steps outlined in the county’s Mineral Interest Research memo and to double check my initial
research. I worked with a county employee to double-check my initial findings and we concluded that
no further information was available, to the public, for the subject property.
Based on my research, it is my belief that 50% of the mineral rights for the subject property are owned by
Vera and Rudolph Herin (both of whom I suspect are deceased) and 50% are owned by Freda and Harold
Sayre (both of whom are deceased). I have been unable to find current contact information for the
Herin’s or the Sayre’s. I believe that I have exhausted all my options, including those listed in the Mineral
Interest Research memo provided by the county.
Table 2. Mineral Estate Ownership for the Subject Property
Owner Mailing Address
1 Vera and Rudolph Herin No contact information
in county records.
2 Freda and Harold Sayre No contact information
in county records.
17
18
Letter of Authorization
19
4. Pre-Application Conference Summary
20
21
22
23
24
25
5. Statement of Request & Compliance with Standards
Request
The subject property is currently zoned Rural (R) and is considered a “Through Lot,” pursuant to
Subsection 3-202(B) of Garfield County’s LUDC. As a “Through Lot,” the property must observe the
required front yard setback for the Rural (R) zone district along the northern and southern boundaries of
the property.
The northern boundary of the property fronts along State Highway 82 (SH-82), which is an Arterial road.
Therefore, pursuant to Table 3-201, the required setback along the northern boundary of the property is
50 feet.
Based on the survey of the property completed by Sopris Engineering in 2023, the existing barn on the
property encroaches up to +/- 20.1 feet into the setback required from the northern property boundary.
Refer to the Site Plan included in this application for further detail.
The request is to authorize a variance to allow the existing barn to encroach 21.1 feet into the 50 foot
setback required along the northern boundary of the property. While Sopris Engineering’s Site Plan
indicates that the existing barn encroaches up to +/- 20.1 feet into the required setback, an additional
foot is being requested to accommodate the barn’s roof overhangs (not included in Sopris Engineering’s
survey work) and potential, minor errors in the accuracy of the surveyed location of the barn.
Compliance with Standards
Pursuant to Subsection 4-115(C), a variance must satisfy the following standards for an approval to be
granted. An explanation for how the requested variance complies with each of standard is provided on
the following pages.
Standard 1: Special Circumstances or Conditions Exist. One or more of the following circumstances or
conditions exist with respect to the specific property:
a. Exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of the property at the time of the enactment of the
regulation in question;
b. Exceptional topographic conditions of the property; and
c. Other extraordinary and exceptional situations or conditions of the property.
Response to Standard 1: The subject property contains an existing barn that was constructed in 1994. As
evidenced by a county-approved building permit application, building permit, and Bauldridge Barn plan
set (refer to Appendix C), Garfield County reviewed the proposed location of the barn and inspected the
barn, during construction, on multiple occasions (e.g., footing inspection and plumbing inspections).
Based on an analysis of the county-approved Bauldridge Barn plan set (refer to Appendix C), it appears
that the northwest corner of the barn is depicted as roughly 25 feet from the northern property
boundary. Per the Site Plan, prepared by Sopris Engineering, the actual location of the northwest corner
of the barn is +/- 29.9 feet from the northern property line.
26
Further, there is language on the Building Permit that states:
“In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and
regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which
this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in
the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be
revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID,”
There is no record of the County Building Inspector issuing a violation notice and/or revoking the Building
Permit for the barn due to failure to comply with required setbacks.
The barn has existed in this location for over 30 years. As evidenced by the actual location of the barn on
the property, the Bauldridge’s constructed the barn in accordance with the county-approved plans.
Further, there is no record that Garfield County identified concerns with the location of the barn during
the review of the approved plans or during any of the inspections conducted during construction. The
location of the barn is a long-established, county-approved condition that constitutes an “extraordinary
and exceptional condition” on the property.
Standard 2: Not a Result of the Actions of Applicant. The special circumstances and conditions have not
resulted from any act of the Applicant.
Response to Standard 2: Diane Bauldridge is the current owner of the subject property and the applicant
for the requested variance. Based on testimony from Diane Bauldridge, her late husband, Bruce
Bauldridge, was responsible for the permitting and construction of the barn.
Based on the county-approved building permit application, building permit, and Bauldridge Barn plan set
(refer to Appendix C) it appears that any issues with the location of the barn were not addressed by
Garfield County during the application review process, nor were they addressed during the building
inspection process.
The Bauldridge’s constructed the barn in good-faith reliance on the county-approved building permit and
plan set, as well as on the inspections conducted by Garfield County. There is no evidence to indicate that
the encroachment of the barn into the required setback resulted from any intentional act by the
Bauldridge’s, specifically Diane Bauldridge, in an attempt to circumvent Garfield County’s zoning
regulations. Therefore, the special circumstances and conditions on the property did not result from any
act of the applicant and arises from Garfield County’s approval of the barn’s location.
Standard 3: Strict Application Consequence. Because of the special circumstances and conditions found
pursuant to section 4-115.C.1., the strict application of the regulation would result in peculiar and
exceptional, practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undu e hardship on, the owner of the property.
Response to Standard 3: Based on a review of Garfield County’s zoning regulations in effect at the time of
the permitting and construction of the barn, the barn should have adhered to the 50 foot setback
required under the county’s current regulations. Therefore, pursuant to the definitions set forth in Article
15 of the LUDC, the barn is not considered a “Nonconforming Structure.”
27
“Nonconforming Structure. A building or structure legally existing at the time of enactment of this Code or
lawful amendments to this Code that does not conform to the regulations of the zone district in which it is
situated.”
Consequently, the location of the barn is noncompliant with Garfield County’s required setbacks and
constitutes a violation on the property. Until this violation is resolved, the Bauldridge’s, or future property
owner(s), are inhibited from further improving and/or developing the property in accordance with the
property rights afforded by the Rural (R) zone district.
Options for resolving the barn’s encroachment into the required setback are as follows:
▪ Option 1: Moving the barn to a location that complies with the required 50 foot setback. This requires
modifying the barn’s existing foundation or constructing a new foundation, as well as hiring a
company to relocate barn. This option will result in a significant financial burden on the Bauldridge’s.
Further, the barn could be damaged during the relocation process, potentially rendering it unusable.
▪ Option 2: Modifying the barn to comply with the required 50 foot setback. This will necessitate
demolishing and/or relocating a significant portion of the barn (approximately 874 square feet).
o Simply demolishing the portion of the barn that encroaches into the required setback will render
the barn unusable.
o Renovating the barn to relocate the portion of the building that encroaches into the required
setback will require modifying the existing foundation and likely require altering the layout of the
property due to the configuration of exiting development, utilities, access, and other
improvements on the property (refer to the Site Plan included in this application). Renovating the
barn to comply with the required setback will result in a significant financial burden on the
Bauldridge’s.
Ultimately, modifying the barn to comply with the required setback will result in an unusable
structure or a significant financial burden on the Bauldridge’s.
▪ Option 3: Demolishing the barn.
Given the options for resolving the encroachment of the barn into the required setback (i.e., the special
circumstance and condition on the property), the strict application of the 50 foot setback requirement
will result in peculiar and exceptional, practical difficulties to, as well as exceptional and undue hardship
on, the Bauldridge’s because it requires relocating, reconstructing, or demolishing a fully functioning,
permitted, and county-inspected barn.
Standard 4: Variance is Necessary for Relief. The granting of the variance from the strict application of the
provisions set forth in this Code is necessary to relieve the owner of the peculiar and exceptional, practical
difficulties or exceptional and undue hardship.
Response to Standard 4: The requested variance is the minimum necessary to relieve the Bauldridge’s of
the peculiar and exceptional, practical difficulties and the exceptional and undue hardship resulting from
the strict application of the 50 foot setback requirement.
28
It is not possible to move or renovate the barn without placing a substantial financial burden on the
Bauldridge’s. Further, relocating the barn puts the structure at risk for damage. Granting the variance is
the only practical means to legalize the barn’s location while preserving its functionality and structural
integrity.
Standard 5: Not Detrimental to the Public Good. Granting the variance will not cause substantial
detriment to the public good.
Response to Standard 5: The barn has existed in its current location for over 30 years. There is no
evidence that the location of the barn has resulted in any adverse effects on:
▪ The health, safety, and/or welfare of the public;
▪ Neighboring properties;
▪ Public infrastructure (e.g. State Highway 82); and/or
▪ The character of this part of Garfield County.
The continued existence of the barn within the required 50 foot setback maintains the existing conditions
on the property and will not result in any new impacts.
It is understood that one of the reasons Garfield County requires a 50 foot front yard setback along
arterial roads is to provide space for potential, future expansions of such roads. Measurements taken via
Garfield County’s online mapping system (i.e., Land Explorer) indicate that there is r oughly 60 feet
between the nearest edge of State Highway 82 (SH-82) and the northern boundary of the Bauldridge’s
property. Therefore, in this location, there appears to be ample space within the existing SH-82 right-of-
way for future expansion of the highway.
Given the duration of the barn’s existence and lack of adverse effects, granting the variance to allow the
barn to remain in its existing location will not cause substantial detriment to the public good.
Standard 6: Variance Will Not Impair the County’s Zoning. Granting the variance will not substantially
impair the intent and purpose of this Code.
Response to Standard 6: The subject property is within Garfield County’s Rural (R) zone district. The LUDC
describes the Rural (R) zone district as follows:
The Rural Zone District is comprised of the County’s rural residential areas, agricultural resource lands,
agricultural production areas, and natural resource areas. Uses, densities, and standards established for
this zone district are intended to protect the existing character of the area from uncontrolled and
unmitigated residential, commercial, and industrial use. The zone district provides for the use of natural
resources, recreational development, rural residential, and other uses.
Granting the variance to allow the barn to remain in its long-standing, county-approved location does not
undermine, nor will it substantially impair, the intent and purpose of Garfield County’s LUDC, specifically
29
the intent and purpose of the county’s Rural (R) zone district. The requested variance pertains to an
existing, permitted structure, and will not change the character of, nor will it result in an increase or
intensification of development on, the property. Approving the variance upholds regulatory fairness while
maintaining the overall integrity of zoning standards.
It is worth noting that if the subject property were not considered a “Through Lot,” a 25 foot rear yard
setback would be required from the northern property boundary. The actual location of the northwest
corner of the barn is +/- 29.9 feet from the northern property line. Therefore, the barn complies with 25
foot rear yard setback required for typical lots in the Rural (R) zone district.
30
6. Site Plan (pursuant to Subsection 4-203(D))
A Site Plan, prepared by Sopris Engineering LLC, is included on the following page. This Site Plan depicts a
Minor Subdivision that is proposed for the subject property and a storage use that was approved by the
Board of County Commissioners in August 2025. The intent is to depict the comprehensive vision for the
property and to demonstrate that the requested variance will have no adverse impact on existing and
proposed development.
The Site Plan has been prepared in accordance with Subsection 4-203(D) and depicts all required items
relevant to the requested variance, the proposed Minor Subdivision, and the approved storage use. The
other Site Plan elements, required by Subsection 4-203(D), are not applicable to the proposed variance
and are not included on the Site Plan. A list of those elements and explanations for why they are not
included is offered below:
1. Proposed site topography. No changes to the site’s topography are proposed.
2. Proposed emergency turnouts, and emergency turnarounds, sidewalks, and paths, shown by location
and dimension. None of these improvements are proposed.
3. Proposed railroad tracks and irrigation ditches shown by location and dimension. None of these
improvements are proposed on, or adjacent to, the property.
4. Elevation drawings showing existing grade, finished grade, and height of the proposed structures
above existing grade. No new structures are proposed.
5. Location and size of leach field, sewer service lines, and treatment facilities to serve the proposed use.
No leach field, sewer service lines, or treatment facilities are being proposed. The approximate
location of the existing leach field for the barn is shown on Bauldridge Barn plan set included in
Appendix C.
6. Source and capacity of the water supply, including location and size of well(s) and/or water lines to
serve the proposed use. No potable water supply or water distribution system are proposed.
7. Location and size of signs for the purpose of identification, advertising, and traffic control. No signage
is proposed.
xxxx
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
x
x
x
x
OE
L
OE
L
X
E
L
XEL
X
E
L
X
E
L
X
E
L
X
E
L
X
E
L
X
E
L
X
E
L
X
E
L
X
E
L
X
E
L
X
E
L
X
U
T
XU
T
XU
T
X
U
T
X
U
T
X
U
T
X
U
T
X
U
T
X
U
T
X
U
T
X
U
T
X
U
T
XUT
XU
T
XU
T
x
x
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>
>
>
>>>
>
>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
210.87'
16.0
4.0
56.0
6360
6360
6360
6360
6360
6360
6365 6365
6365
6361
6361
6361
6361
6361
6361
6362
6
3
6
2
6362
6362
6362
6362
6362
6362
6363
6363
6363
6
3
6
3
6363
6363
6363
6363
6364
6364
6364
6366
6370
6370
6370
6366 6366
6367
6367
6367
6367
6367
6367
6368
6368
6368
6368
6368
63
6
8
6368
6369
6369
6369
6371
6371
6371
6372
6372
6372
6373
R20.0
CDOT ACCESS PERMIT #323154 (MM 17.23):PROPOSED SHARED ACCESS
16.0'
APPROXIMATELY 125.6'' TO HIGHWAY CENTER
10.0'' SETBACK
50.0'' SETBACK
10.0'' SETBACK
10.0'' SETBACK
50.0'' SETBACK
10.0'' SETBACK
10.0'' SETBACK
10.0'' SETBACK
50.0'' SETBACK
14.0'
4.0'
EXISTING WELL SERVES EXISTING RESIDENCE
PERMIT NUMBER# 106071
26.0'
PROPOSED SHARED ACCESS
PROPOSED 4' ASPHALT SHOULDER
PROPOSED 26' WIDE ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT
EXISTING SWALES
RICHARDS, JOHN
239132100044
2.01 ACRES
OLD YARD LLC
239133300002
2.10 ACRES
JANICE GESSELE TRUST
239133300011
4.18 ACRESCLAUSEN, KATHLEEN & JAMES
23913330034
2.00 ACRES
ANNA EDGERLY
239133300016
4.75 ACRESCHRISTINA, DAVIS
239133300009
4.68 ACRES
GERRY & JOSEPH, ZAMORA
239133300008
10 ACRESLESTER, CHRISTINE
23913330007
1.28 ACRESEISEMAN, SPENCER &
STEPHANIE
239133300006
0.36 ACRES
INSTALL 20 L.F. 12" CULVERT FOR THE PATTERSONAND CUMMINS DITCH UNDER THE 16' SHAREDACCESS
UTILITY POLE (TYP)
W/ELEC. METERS (2)
TELEPHONE
PEDESTAL
TELEPEDESTAL
FOUND NO.5 REBAR AND
1.25" RED PLASTIC CAP LS
33638 (TSS)0.2' ABOVE GROUND
FOUND 1.25" RED PLASTIC CAP LS
33638 (TSS)
IN TOP OF 6" FENCE POST
FOUND CDOT REFERENCEMARKER 1.25" SHINER INFENCE POST
FOUND NO.5 REBAR AND1.25" ALUMINUM CAP LS107322" ABOVE GROUND
PROPANE TANK
SEPTIC LIDSCLEANOUT
ELECTRIC SERVICE
LIMIT OF DENSE
VEGETATION (TYP.)
MAILBOX17450 COLORADO STATE HWY. 82
HIGHWAY 82 ACCESS ROAD (FRONTAGE ROAD)
HIGHWAY 82
EXISTING RESIDENCE1125 S.F.
EXISTING GARAGE757 S.F.
EXISTING GARAGE/BARN4614 S.F.
EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY
& STORAGE PARKING26049 S.F.
PROPOSED LOT
1
LOT AREA =
3.18 ACRES
PROPOSED LOT
2
LOT AREA =
2.32 ACRES
PROPERTY/ROW
L
I
N
E
PROPERTY/ROW LINE
PROPOSED LOT 3LOT AREA = 2.32 ACRES
EXISTING GARFIELD COUNTY PARCEL NUMBER
239133300001
7.79 ACRES
25.0'' SETBACK
STBK STBK STBK STBK STBK STBK STBK STBK STBK STBK STBK STBK STBK STBK STBK
S
T
B
K
S
T
B
K
S
T
B
K
S
T
B
K
S
T
B
K
S
T
B
K
S
T
B
K
STBK
STBK
STBK
STBK
STBK
STBK
STBK
STBK
STBK
STBK
STBK
STBK
STBK
STBK
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
25.0'' SETBACK
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
ST
B
K
25.0'' SETBACK
CDOT ACCESS PERMIT #323154 (MM 17.13):AS AMENDED, INCLUDES EXISTING
COMMERCIAL USE.
EXISTING ACCESS FOR 17450 HIGHWAY 82 ACCESS ROAD
CENTERLINE OF EXISTING 16.0' ROW
EASEMENT GRANTED TO MOUNTAIN STATES
T&T PER REC #266309 (BK469 PG140)
14.0'
14.3'
14.0'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 2 3 4 5 6
2.8'
4.4'
2.4'
EXISTING DOMESTIC WELL
EXISTING CATV PEDESTAL
33134.01JOB NO.
DATE:11-04-2025
DESIGNED BY
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
WJB
WJB
DATE REVISION
C-1.0
DRAWING NO.
TITLE
G:
\
2
0
2
3
\
3
3
1
3
4
B
A
U
L
D
R
I
D
G
E
\
C
I
V
I
L
\
C
I
V
I
L
D
W
G
S
\
D
E
\
3
3
1
3
4
-
S
I
T
E
.
D
W
G
-
N
o
v
0
4
,
2
0
2
5
-
3
:
2
8
p
m
SITE PLAN
BA
U
L
D
R
I
D
G
E
M
I
N
O
R
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
17
4
5
0
H
W
Y
8
2
CA
R
B
O
N
D
A
L
E
,
C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
SU
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
1 inch = ft.
( IN FEET )
GRAPHIC SCALE
040 40 80
40
16020
MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE
Know what's
EXISTING GUY WIRE
EXISTING POWER POLE
EXISTING ELECTRIC METER
EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL7900
EXISTING WIRE FENCEx
EXISTING TELEPHONE
EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
XUT XUT
XEL XEL
EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICOELOEL
EXISTING SWALE OR DITCH>>>>
EXISTING LEGEND
EXISTING GRAVEL PAVEMENT
PROPOSED SETBACKSSTBK
PROPOSED LEGEND
PROPOSED GRAVEL
PROPOSED LOT LINES
SHEET INDEX:
C1. - SITE COVER PLAN
C2. - UTILITY PLAN
ASPHALT PAVEMENT
ASPHALT PAVEMENT
1. THE EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE FROM AN UPDATED FIELD SURVEY OF TOPOGRAPHY AND
SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS PERFORMED BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC (SE). THE EXISTING UTILITY
LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE FROM UTILITY MAPPING, AND FROM THE SE FIELD SURVEY OF
SURFACE UTILITIES.
2. ALL GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS SHALL BE ADHERED TO.
3. SUBJECT PARCEL MUST ADHERE TO GARFIELD COUNTY RURAL (R) ZONING REQUIREMENTS
SITE NOTES:
N
O
R
T
H
SO
P
R
I
S
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
L
L
C
50
2
M
A
I
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
U
I
T
E
A
3
C
A
R
B
O
N
D
A
L
E
C
O
8
1
6
2
3
(9
7
0
)
7
0
4
0
3
1
1
s
o
p
r
i
s
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
.
c
o
m
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
A TRACT IN LOT 7 AND LOT 13, SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE SIXTH
PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EXISTING NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY
OF THE STATE HIGHWAY 82 ACCESS ROAD, WHENCE THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP
7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. BEARS S. 62° 35'47" E. A DISTANCE OF 4,949.44 FEET (WITH
ALL BEARINGS HEREIN BEING RELATIVE TO A BEARING OF N.72°10'02"W. BETWEEN COLORADO
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MONUMENTS ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE);
THENCE N.72°10'02"W. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 946.67 FEET TO THE
INTERSECTION OF A CROSS FENCE AS CONSTRUCTED AND IN PLACE, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THESOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PROPERTY RECORDED IN THAT DEED RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO.
465930 OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY RECORDS;
THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE N.17°49'00"E. ALONG SAID FENCE AND EASTERLY BOUNDARYLINE OF SAID RECEPTION NO. 465930 A DISTANCE OF 285.22 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF AN EXISTING
FENCE LINE, SAID POINT ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COLORADO
STATE HIGHWAY NO. 82;
THENCE LEAVE SAID CROSS FENCE S.82°42'54"E. ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE AND SAID RIGHT OF
WAY OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY NO. 82 A DISTANCE OF 907.26 FEET TO A POINT IN AN EXISTING
FENCE LINE, SAID POINT ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THAT PROPERTY
DESCRIBED IN THAT DEED RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 446891;THENCE LEAVING SAID FENCE LINE AND RIGHT OF WAY LINE S.10°54'25"W. A DISTANCE OF 454.62 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 340,819 SQUARE FEET OR 7.824 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
STATE OF COLORADO
WIDEN ROAD TO 14' MINIMUM (TYP.)
JPP
N.T.S.
GRAVEL SECTION DETAIL
VARIABLE %
4" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR.
8' MIN SUITABLE SITE SOILS OR CLASS2 PIT RUN COMPACTED TO 95%STANDARD PROCTOR
NOTES:1. CONTRACTOR TO STRIP ALL TOPSOIL, SCARIFY SUBGRADE TO A DEPTH OF 8", MOISTURE TREATED TO WITHIN 2 PERCENT
OF OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT, AND RE-COMPACT TO AT LEAST 95% OF MAXIMUM STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY.
2. AGGREGATE BASE COURSE SHALL BE LAID IN THIN LIFTS NOT TO EXCEED 6-INCHES, MOISTURE TREATED TO WITHIN 2PERCENT OF OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT, AND COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% OF MAXIMUM STANDARD PROCTOR
DENSITY.
3. THE ROAD SHALL BE PROOF ROLLED AFTER THE REQUIRED COMPACTION HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND THE SUBGRADE HASBEEN SHAPED TO THE REQUIRED CROSS SECTION. PROOF ROLLING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CDOT
SPECIFICATIONS WITH A VEHICLE WITH A MINIMUM AXLE LOAD OF 18 kips PER AXLE (SUFFICIENT FOR FIRE TRUCK
LOADING) AND OBSERVED BY PROJECT ENGINEER AND/OR PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.
4. EMBANKMENT FILL SHALL CONSIST OF GRANULAR NATIVE AND/OR PITRUN CLASS 2 COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD
PROCTOR DENSITY.
BA
U
L
D
R
I
D
G
E
B
A
R
N
V
A
R
I
A
N
C
E
32
7. Compliance with Article 7: Divisions 1, 2, and 3
Division 1. General Approval Standards
Zone District Use Regulations (Section 7-101)
Table 1 demonstrates that the subject property conforms with the county’s standards for the Rural (R)
zone district, pursuant to Section 3-201. The only exception is the existing barn encroaching into the 50
foot setback required from the northern property boundary.
Table 1. Conformance with Rural (R) Zone District Standards
Rural (R) Zone District Standards Conformance with Rural (R) Zone District Standards
Minimum Lot Size 2-acres The property is ± 7.79 acres.
Maximum Lot
Coverage 15%
The subject property is ± 7.79 acres (± 339,332 square feet). The maximum
lot coverage permitted is approximately 50,900 square feet.
As shown on the Site Plan, the existing lot coverage is ± 6,500 square feet.
Front Setback 50 feet (arterial)
25 feet (local)
The property is considered a “Through Lot” in accordance with Section 3-
202(B). Therefore, front yard setbacks are required along the sides of the
property adjacent to State Highway 82 (SH-82) and the SH-82 Access Road.
As evidenced by the Site Plan, all existing development on the property
complies with the front, rear, and side yard setbacks required in the Rural
(R) zone district, with the exception of the existing barn encroaching into the
50 foot setback required from SH-82.
Rear Setback 25 feet
Side Setback 10 feet
Height R: 25 feet
NR: 40 feet
No new structures are proposed with this application.
The existing residential and non-residential structures on the property
comply with the county’s height regulations.
Pursuant to Subsection 3-202(A), the property has a minimum of 25 lineal feet of frontage on the
Highway 82 Access Road right-of-way that provides access to/from the lots.
Pursuant to Subsection 3-202(B), the subject property is considered a “Through Lot.” Therefore, front
yard setbacks are required along the sides of the property adjacent to Highway 82 and the Highway 82
Access Road. The required setbacks are shown on the Site Plan included in this application.
Subsections 3-202(C), 3-202(D), 3-202(E), and 3-202(F) are not applicable to this application.
Comprehensive Plan and Intergovernmental Agreements (Section 7-102)
The subject property is designated as “Residential Low (RL)” on Garfield County’s Future Land Use Map
(refer to the map on page 33). In accordance with the county’s Comprehensive Plan, the intended
character of the RL designation can be described as follows:
“Agricultural and related uses, ranching, low density residential and related uses as well as home
occupation uses that can be adequately buffered from adjacent incompatible uses. Other uses may be
considered where residential character is maintained and/or special conditions warrant, such as
underlying zoning, proximity to transportation routes and 3-Mile Areas of Influence.”
The scale, nature, and intensity of existing development on the subject property have established a
residential character that is compatible with land uses in the surrounding area and intended character of
33
the RL designation. The proposed variance applies to the existing barn and will not alter the residential
character of the property in any way.
Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030 Future Land Use Map
The applicant is not aware of any Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs) that would be applicable to the
proposed storage use.
Compatibility (Section 7-103)
The nature, scale, and intensity of the existing barn is compatible with adjacent land uses. This is
evidenced by the scale of buildings in the surrounding area. Most notably, the property immediately to
the east of the subject property has a garage/storage building that is 5,000 square feet. Further, there is a
commercial building located on a property (parcel no. 239133300005) that is roughly 0.3-miles to the
east of the subject property. The commercial building is roughly 10,000 square feet.
The subject property has a rural residential character. The Bauldridge’s use the barn for storage purposes,
which has no impact on the character of the subject property. The function of the barn is also compatible
with the primarily residential land uses in the surrounding area.
Source of Water (Section 7-104)
The barn has a bathroom with a sink, toilet, and shower. There is an existing well (permit no. 106071) on
the property that provides an adequate, reliable, physical, long-term, and legal water supply for the barn
and the single-family home on the property.
On January 23, 2024, Samuelson Pump CO., Inc. performed a 4-hour pump test on the existing well
(permit no. 106071) in accordance with Subsection 4-203(M)(1)(b.)(a). The pump test found that the well
production is greater than sixteen (16) gallons per minute and the well water recovered to its standing
depth in four (4) minutes. It was also found that the existing well has capacity to serve three (3) homes.
The full results of the pump test can be found in Appendix C.
Site
34
In early 2024, a water quality test was performed on the existing well in accordance with Subsection 4 -
203(M)(1)(b.)(c). The findings of the water quality test did not identify any contaminants that exceeded
the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulations. The full
results of the water quality test can be found in Appendix C.
Central Water Distribution and Wastewater Systems (Section 7-105)
A. Water Distribution Systems.
Water service for the barn is, and will continue to be, provided by the existing well on the subject
property.
It is not physically or economically feasible for the barn to be served by the Mid-Valley Metropolitan
District (MVMD), which is the nearest water supply entity. The property is not located within the
MVMD’s boundaries. Further, the MVMD does not have water infrastructure on the south side of
Highway 82 within 400 feet of the property.
B. Wastewater Systems.
The barn is served by an on-site wastewater treatment system (OWTS). This OWTS is located to the
east of the barn. The approximate location of the OWTS that serves the barn is depicted on the
Bauldridge Barn plan set included in Appendix C.
The subject property is greater than 1-acre in size and therefore complies with the requirements of
Table 7-105.
The barn is not located near any public sewer system and a central wastewater system is not
necessary or required pursuant to Section 7-105(B).
Public Utilities (Section 7-106)
A. Adequate Public Utilities.
The barn is served by underground water, sewer, electric, and wired telephone utilities. Refer to the
Site Plan included in this application for further information. These existing utilities have been
adequate to serve the barn for over 30 years. No changes to these existing utilities are proposed
with this application.
B. Approval of Utility Easement by Utility Company.
No new utility easements are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-106(B) is not applicable to this
application.
All existing utility easements and utility easements proposed for the Bauldridge Minor Subdivision
are shown on the Site Plan. These are shown to demonstrate that the requested variance will not
interfere with any existing and/or proposed easements.
C. Utility Location.
No new utilities are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-106(C) is not applicable to this application.
As evidenced by the Site Plan all existing utilities that serve the barn are located underground in
accordance with Subsection 7-106(C)(1). Further, all utility lines, including appurtenances, are
located within roads, public rights-of-way, or appropriate easements as necessary.
35
D. Dedication of Easements.
No new easements are required or proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-106(D) is not applicable to
this application.
E. Construction and Installation of Utilities.
No new utilities are required or proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-106(E) is not applicable to this
application.
F. Conflicting Encumbrances.
The existing easements on the property appear to be free from any conflicting legal encumbrances.
Refer to the Site Plan for further information regarding existing easements on the property.
Access and Roadways (Section 7-107)
A. Access to Public Rights-of-Way.
The property has legal and physical access to/from the Highway 82 Access Road, a public right-of-
way.
B. Safe Access.
Access to/from the subject property via the Highway 82 Access Road is safe and in conformance with
the applicable county, state, and federal access regulations. Further, the traffic generated by the
existing barn does not necessitate improvements to county roads or state or federal highways.
C. Adequate Capacity.
The roads that provide access to/from the subject property have the capacity to efficiently and safely
service the traffic generated by the existing barn. No additional traffic will be generated by the
existing barn and therefore, proposed storage use will result in traffic congestion or unsafe traffic
conditions, impacts to county, state, and federal roadways.
D. Road Dedications.
No new roads or rights-of-way are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-107(D) is not applicable to this
application.
E. Impacts Mitigated.
No impacts to county roads associated with hauling, truck traffic, and equipment use are anticipated
with this application.
F. Design Standards.
As evidenced by the Site Plan, the existing access on the property complies with the design standards
set forth in Subsection 7-107(F).
1. Circulation and Alignment.
The existing access offers adequate and efficient internal circulation, and reasonable access to
the nearest public highways (i.e., State Highway 82). The existing access has been constructed so
that alignments join in a logical manner and combine with adjacent road systems to form a
continuous route from one area to another.
36
2. Intersections.
The intersection of the existing access with the Highway 82 Access Road conform to Subsection 7 -
107(F)(2) as demonstrated by the Site Plan included in this application.
3. Street Names.
No street names are being proposed or are required. Therefore, Subsection 7-107(F)(3) is not
applicable.
4. Congestion and Safety.
The existing access has been designed to minimize road congestion and unsafe conditions.
5. Continuation of Roads and Dead-End Roads.
No public roads are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-107(F)(5) is not applicable to this
application.
6. Relationship to Topography.
The existing access has been located and constructed to be compatible with the topography,
wooded areas, and other natural features on, and adjacent to, the subject property.
7. Erosion and Drainage.
The existing access on the property has been designed to minimize erosion and provide for
efficient and maintainable drainage structures.
8. Commercial and Industrial.
No commercial or industrial development is proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-107(F)(8) is not
applicable.
9. Emergency Access and Egress.
It is believed that the existing access for the barn provides sufficient emergency access and
egress for residents and emergency equipment. Limited improvements will be made to the
existing access to bring the access into compliance with requirements of the Carbondale & Rural
Fire Protection District (CRFPD). These improvements are required as a condition of approval for
the storage use that was approved by the Board of County Commissioners for the subject
property in August 2025. Refer to the Site Plan included in this application for further information
regarding the access improvements to be made.
10. Traffic Control and Street Lighting.
No changes to the existing development on the property are proposed. Therefore, no traffic
control devices, street signs, street lighting, striping, and pedestrian crosswalks are expected to
be required.
11. Drainage Structures.
No roadway drainage structures are required for the existing barn. Therefore, Subsection 7-
107(F)(11) is not applicable.
12. Roadside Ditches.
No roads or roadside ditches are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-107(F)(12) is not applicable.
37
Use of Land Subject to Natural Hazards (Section 7-108)
No evidence has been found to indicate that the location of the barn is subject to the following natural
and/or geologic hazards: avalanches, landslides, falling rock, alluvial fan hazards, slopes that exceed 20%,
corrosive or expansive soils and rock, mud flows, faults, flooding, or high-water tables.
All of Garfield County is identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as being located in
Radon Zone 1. Radon Zone 1 is the designation used by the EPA for counties with predicted average
indoor radon screening levels greater than 4 pCi/L. The existing barn is not used for residential purposes.
Therefore, radon remediation is not expected to be necessary. Further, radon mitigation will likely require
modifications to barn. No other potential radiation hazards have been identified by state or county Health
Departments on the property.
Fire Protection (Section 7-109)
A. Adequate Fire Protection.
The subject property is located within the service area for the CRFPD. The applicant understands that
this application may be referred to the CRFPD for review and comment. The applicant will address
recommendations of the CRFPD, to the best of their ability, once they have been received.
B. Subdivisions.
This is not an application for a division of land. Therefore, Subsection 7-109(B) is not applicable to this
application.
Division 2. General Resource Protection Standards
Agricultural Lands (Section 7-201)
A. No Adverse Effect to Agricultural Operations.
The existing barn is not located on, or adjacent to, any lands currently used for agricultural
operations. The approval of the requested variance will have no adverse impacts on existing
agricultural operations in this part of Garfield County.
B. Domestic Animal Controls.
There are no agricultural lands adjacent to the property. Therefore, Subsection 7-201(B) is not
applicable to this application.
C. Fences.
There are no agricultural lands adjacent to the property. Therefore, Subsection 7-201(C) is not
applicable to this application.
D. Roads.
As evidenced by the Site Plan, the existing access for the property is located a sufficient distance back
from the lot boundaries so that normal maintenance of these roads, including snow removal, will not
damage any fences existing or constructed along the perimeter of the lots.
There are no agricultural lands adjacent to the property and no construction activities will be
necessary for the requested variance. Therefore, dust control measures will not be necessary.
38
E. Ditches.
1. Required Site Plan Note.
No Final Plat is required for this application and this is not an application for a land use change
permit. Therefore, Subsection 7-201(E)(1) is not applicable to this application.
2. Colorado Constitution Provisions.
The applicant acknowledges the rights provided to all persons and corporations under Colorado
Constitution Article XVI, Section 7.
3. Rights-of-Way.
In accordance with Subsection 7-201(E)(3), the existing barn does not interfere with the right-of-
way for the Patterson and Cummins ditch.
4. Maintenance.
The irrigation ditches on the property are gravity laterals from the Patterson and Cummins ditch,
which solely benefit the subject property. Therefore, the applicant has a vested interest in
ensuring that these ditches remain functional, are maintained, and continue to deliver water to
the property. The existing barn does not have any impact on the function and/or maintenance of
the ditches on the property.
5. Maintenance Easement.
Given that the onsite ditches are gravity laterals from the Patterson and Cummins Ditch that only
serve the subject property, it is believed that Subsection 7-201(E)(5) is not applicable to this
application.
6. Ditch Crossings.
No ditch crossings are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-201(E)(6) is not applicable to this
application.
7. Referral to Ditch Owner.
The existing barn does not affect or impact any ditch right-of-way. Therefore, Subsection 7-
201(E)(7) is not applicable to this application.
8. Drainage.
The existing barn does not impact or impair the operation of the lateral ditches on the property.
9. Water Quality and Stormwater Management.
No new development or changes in land use are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-201(E)(9) is
not applicable to this application. There is no evidence that the existing barn results in surface
waters being channeled into any irrigation ditch on the subject property.
Wildlife Habitat Areas (Section 7-202)
A. Buffers.
Based on a review of CPW’s GIS data, there are no areas of critical wildlife habitat on, or adjacent to,
the property. Therefore, the existing barn is not expected to impact critical wildlife habitat.
39
B. Locational Controls of Land Disturbance.
The requested variance applies to the existing barn and therefore, there will be no new areas of
disturbance on the property. There is no evidence that the existing barn impacts existing wildlife
migration patterns nor does it significantly increase predation, interaction with vehicles, intense
human activity, or more severe topography or climate.
Based on a review of CPW’s GIS data, there are no migration routes identified on, or near, the
property.
C. Preservation of Native Vegetation.
No changes to the existing barn are proposed. Therefore, there will be no impacts to existing areas of
native grasses, existing trees, and/or existing shrubs on the property. Subsection 7-202(C) is not
applicable to this application.
D. Habitat Compensation.
There is no evidence that areas of critical wildlife habitat exist on, or adjacent to, the property.
Therefore, Subsection 7-202(D) is not applicable to this application.
E. Domestic Animal Controls.
The applicant acknowledges that pursuant to Subsection 7-202(E), the county may require protective
covenants or deed restrictions to control domestic animals by fencing or kenneling.
Protection of Waterbodies (Section 7-203)
There are no waterbodies within or adjacent to the property. Therefore, Section 7-203 is not applicable to
this application.
Drainage and Erosion (Section 7-204)
A. Erosion and Sedimentation.
No grading activities are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-204(A) is not applicable to this
application.
B. Drainage.
No changes to existing drainage patterns are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-204(B) is not
applicable to this application.
C. Stormwater Run-Off.
The property is not within 100 feet of a waterbody, and no impervious surface is proposed.
Therefore, Subsection 7-204(C) is not applicable to this application.
Environmental Quality (Section 7-205)
A. Air Quality.
The existing barn has not and is not expected to have any significant temporary or long-term adverse
effects on air quality or water quality and will not result in air quality being reduced below the levels
established by the Colorado Air Pollution Control Division.
40
B. Water Quality.
The applicant acknowledges that pursuant to Subsection 7-205(B), all hazardous materials shall be
stored and used in compliance with applicable State and Federal hazardous materials regulations. The
applicant is not aware of any hazardous materials being stored on the property.
Wildfire Hazards (Section 7-206)
According to the 2022 Garfield County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (GCCWPP), Colorado State
Forest Services’ Wildfire Risk Viewer, and Garfield County’s Wildfire Risk Map the subject property is
identified as being in an area with a “Low” to “Moderate” wildfire risk. Refer to the following map.
Colorado State Forest Service Wildlife Risk Map
A. Location Restrictions.
The property does not contain slopes that are greater than 30% as evidenced by the Site Plan. The
property is not located within a fire chimney as identified by the Colorado State Forest Service.
B. Development Does Not Increase Potential Hazard.
The requested variance is not expected to increase the potential intensity or duration of a wildfire,
adversely affect wildfire behavior, or fuel composition.
C. Roof Materials and Design.
No new structures are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-206(C) is not applicable to this application.
Natural and Geologic Hazards (Section 7-207)
A review of data made available by the Colorado Geological Survey (CGS), the United States Geologic
Survey (USGS), the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) indicate that the property is not subject to: avalanche hazard areas; landslide
hazard areas; rockfall hazard areas; alluvial fan hazard areas; slopes that exceed 20%; corrosive or
expansive soils and rock; mudflow areas; or faults.
Site
41
Reclamation (Section 7-208)
The applicant is not proposing any improvements that require reclamation pursuant to Section 7-208.
Therefore, Section 7-208 is not applicable to this application.
Division 3. Site Planning and Development Standards
Compatible Design (Section 7-301)
A. Site Organization.
In accordance with Subsection 7-301(A), the existing development and access on the property are
organized in a manner that consider adjacent streets and properties, solar access, and parking.
Pedestrian access and access to common areas are not appropriate or required.
B. Operational Characteristics.
The existing barn and its use have little to no impact on adjacent uses. There is no evidence to
indicate that the barn has resulted in any nuisance on adjacent uses over the past 30 years.
C. Buffering.
All properties adjacent to the subject property are zoned Rural (R), therefore Subsection 7-301(C) is
not applicable.
D. Materials.
No new structures are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-301(D) is not applicable to this application.
Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Section 7-302)
A. Off-Street Parking Required.
The barn is an accessory structure to the single-family residence (i.e., principal use) on the property.
Table 7-302.A does not specifically list minimum off-street parking standards for accessory uses or
structures. Therefore, it is understood that the off-street parking requirements for the existing barn,
if any, are to be determined by the Community Development Director.
The existing barn does not generate any demand for off-street parking beyond that generated by the
single-family residence. As evidenced by the Site Plan there is ample space on the property to address
the off-street parking needs of the existing development.
B. Off-Street Loading Required.
The existing barn does not, and is not intended to, receive and distribute materials and merchandise
by truck, nor is intended to be served by tractor-trailer delivery vehicles. Therefore, the off-street
loading standards set forth in Subsection 7-302(B) are not applicable to this application.
C. Continuing Obligation.
The applicant acknowledges that the provision and maintenance of off-street parking spaces is a
continuing obligation of the property owner pursuant to Subsection 7-302(C).
D. Location of Required Parking Spaces.
Off-street parking areas for the existing development are located on the subject property in
accordance with Subsection 7-302(D).
42
E. Loading and Unloading.
The barn is not a commercial or industrial use. Therefore, Subsection 7-302(E) is not applicable to this
application.
F. Parking and Loading Area Surface.
1. Surface Materials.
The existing off-street parking areas and access drives on the property are surfaced with gravel.
2. Grading and Drainage.
No new parking or loading areas are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-302(F)(2) is not
applicable to this application.
3. Striping.
Subsection 7-302(F)(3) is not applicable to the requested variance.
G. Minimum Dimensions of Parking Areas.
No new parking areas are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-302(G) is not applicable to this
application.
H. Compact Car Spaces.
No compact car parking spaces are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-302(H) is not applicable to this
application.
I. Minimum Dimensions of Loading Berths.
No loading berths are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-302(I) is not applicable to this application.
J. Handicapped or Accessible Parking.
No accessible parking spaces are proposed nor are they expected to be required for the existing barn.
K. Unobstructed Access.
As evidenced by the Site Plan, the existing off-street parking areas on the property have unobstructed
access to/from the access drive that connects to the State Highway 82 Access Road.
L. Tandem Parking.
No tandem parking spaces are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-302(L) is not applicable to this
application.
M. Backing Onto Public Streets Prohibited.
The existing off-street parking on the property has been located and designed to ensure that vehicles
exiting this parking are not required to back onto any public road.
N. Access Driveways.
As evidenced by the Site Plan, the existing access drive on the property complies with the applicable
requirements set forth in Subsection 7-302(N).
O. Parking and Loading Area Landscaping and Illumination.
No off-street parking and/or loading areas are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-302(O) is not
applicable to this application.
43
Landscaping Standards (Section 7-303)
A. General Standards.
No changes to existing vegetation on the property are proposed, nor is any new landscaping
proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-303(A) is not applicable to this application.
B. Multi-Family Development.
No multi-family dwellings are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-303(B) is not applicable to this
application.
C. Subdivision, PUD, and Rural Land Development Exemption.
This is not an application for a residential Subdivision, Planned Unit Development (PUD), or Rural
Land Development Exemption. Therefore, Subsection 7-303(C) is not applicable to this application.
D. Plants Compatible with Local Conditions.
No new landscaping is proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-303(D) is not applicable to this application.
E. Existing Vegetation.
All existing trees, shrubs, and other valuable features on the property will be preserved. No changes
to the subject property are proposed. The property does not contain any natural or significant rock
outcroppings. Therefore, Subsection 7-303(E) is not applicable to this application
F. Minimum Size.
No new trees or shrubs are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-303(F) is not applicable to this
application.
G. Minimum Number of Trees and Shrubs.
No new trees or shrubs are proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-303(G) is not applicable to this
application.
H. Parking and Storage Prohibited.
No areas required as landscaping are proposed to be used for parking, outdoor storage, or similar
uses.
I. Clear Vision Area.
No new landscaping is proposed. Therefore, Subsection 7-303(I) is not applicable to this application.
J. Landscaping Within Off-Street Parking Areas.
Subsection 7-303(J)(1) is not applicable to this application.
Lighting Standards (Section 7-304)
No exterior lighting is proposed. Therefore, Section 7-304 is not applicable to this application.
Snow Storage Standards (Section 7-305)
The existing barn is an accessory structure to the single-family residence on the property. Residential
uses, except for multi-family, are exempt from the standards set forth in Section 7-305. Therefore, it is
believed that Section 7-305 is not applicable to this application.
44
Trail and Walkway Standards (Section 7-306)
There are no feasible links to schools, shopping areas, parks, trails, greenbelts, and other public facilities
from the proposed storage use. Therefore, Section 7-306 is not applicable to this application.
45
Appendix A | Title Commitment
Customer Distribution
Prevent fraud - Please call a member of our closing team for wire transfer
instructions or to initiate a wire transfer. Note that our wiring instructions will
never change.
Order Number: BAR64006642-3 Date: 06/23/2025
Property Address: 17450 HIGHWAY 82, CARBONDALE, CO 81623
For Closing Assistance For Title Assistance
Land Title Roaring Fork Valley
Title Team
200 BASALT CENTER CIRCLE
BASALT, CO 81621
PO BOX 3440
(970) 927-0405 (Work)
(970) 925-0610 (Work Fax)
valleyresponse@ltgc.com
Seller/Owner
DIANE E. BAULDRIDGE
Delivered via: Electronic Mail
Attorney for Seller
HOLLAND & HART LLP
Attention: KEVIN GILES
600 E MAIN
SUITE 104
ASPEN, CO 81611
(970) 429-6881 (Work)
(970) 925-3476 (Work)
(303) 957-2305 (Work Fax)
kpgiles@hollandandhart.com
Delivered via: Electronic Mail
Seller/Owner
NOAH BAULDRIDGE
Delivered via: Electronic Mail
CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANT
WESTERN SLOPE CONSULTING LLC
Attention: MATT FARRAR
(970) 379-1669 (Cell)
matt@coloradoplanning.com
Delivered via: Electronic Mail
Attorney for Seller
HOLLAND & HART LLP
Attention: Meghan McGregor
600 E MAIN ST
Aspen, CO 81611
(720) 653-4013 (Cell)
(303) 295-8533 (Work)
mdmcgregor@hollandhart.com
Delivered via: Electronic Mail
Surveyor
SOPRIS ENGINEERING
Attention: CATE LOVE
502 MAIN
CARBONDALE, CO 81623
(970) 704-0311 (Work)
clove@sopriseng.com
Delivered via: Electronic Mail
Estimate of Title Fees
Order Number: BAR64006642-3 Date: 06/23/2025
Property Address: 17450 HIGHWAY 82, CARBONDALE, CO 81623
Seller(s): DIANE E. BAULDRIDGE
Buyer(s): A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED
Thank you for putting your trust in Land Title. Below is the estimate of title fees for the
transaction. The final fees will be collected at closing. Visit ltgc.com to learn more about
Land Title.
Estimate of Title Insurance Fees
"TBD" Commitment $265.00
TBD - TBD Income $-265.00
TOTAL $0.00
Note: The documents linked in this commitment should be reviewed carefully. These
documents, such as covenants conditions and restrictions, may affect the title, ownership and
use of the property. You may wish to engage legal assistance in order to fully understand and
be aware of the implications of the documents on your property.
Chain of Title Documents:
Garfield county recorded 04/08/1994 under reception no. 461526
Garfield county recorded 03/21/2018 under reception no. 904653
Copyright 2006-2025 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing
as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the
American Land Title Association.
Property Address:
17450 HIGHWAY 82, CARBONDALE, CO 81623
1.Effective Date:
08/11/2023 at 5:00 P.M.
2.Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured:
"TBD" Commitment
Proposed Insured:
A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED
$0.00
3.The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is:
FEE SIMPLE
4.Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in:
DIANE E. BAULDRIDGE
5.The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
A TRACT IN LOT 7 AND LOT 13, SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE SIXTH
PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EXISTING NORTHERLY RIGHT OF
WAY FENCE LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 82 WHENCE THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 33,
TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. BEARS S. 62° 35'16" E. A DISTANCE OF 4,948.19
FEET;
THENCE N. 72° 10'02" W. A DISTANCE OF 944.115 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY
FENCE LINE;
THENCE N. 17° 49' E. A DISTANCE OF 285.22 FEET TO THE EXISTING FENCE LINE;
THENCE S. 82° 37'15" E. A DISTANCE OF 904.63 FEET ALONG THE EXISTING FENCE LINE;
THENCE S. 10° 54'25" W. A DISTANCE OF 452.66 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
STATE OF COLORADO
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule A
Order Number:BAR64006642-3
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule B, Part I
(Requirements)
Order Number: BAR64006642-3
All of the following Requirements must be met:
This proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this
Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may
then make additional Requirements or Exceptions.
Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured.
Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company.
Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both,
must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records.
THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO.
This commitment does not republish any covenants, condition, restriction, or limitation contained in any
document referred to in this commitment to the extent that the specific covenant, conditions, restriction,
or limitation violates state or federal law based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender
identity, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
1.Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be
ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
2.Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records.
3.Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that
would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public
Records.
4.Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by
law and not shown by the Public Records.
5.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the
public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed
insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this
Commitment.
6.(a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that
levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public
agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown
by the records of such agency or by the Public Records.
7.(a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the
issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water.
8.RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED
STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MAY 08, 1895, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE
363.
9.RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM
SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN
UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MAY 08, 1895, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 363.
10.RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE BASIN DITCH OVER AND ACROSS SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON MAP
AND STATEMENT RECORDED JUNE 7, 1887 IN BOOK 9 AT PAGE 512.
11.RIGHT OF WAY FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY OVER SAID LOTS 7 AND 13 AS DISCLOSED BY RIGHT OF WAY
MAP FILED SEPTEMBER 5, 1936 AS RECEPTION NO. 125078, INSOFAR AS THE SAME MAY AFFECT
SUBJECT PROPERTY.
12.ONE-HALF OF ALL OIL, GAS, COAL AND MINERALS UNDERLYING AND WITHIN SUBJECT PROPERTY
TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF PROSPECT FOR, MINE AND REMOVE THE SAME AND TO
CONSTRUCT FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FOR SUCH PURPOSES, AS RESERVED TO VERA S. HERIN
AND RODOLPH HERIN BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 15, 1970 IN BOOK 255 AT PAGE 148.
13.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RIGHT OF WAY RECORDED OCTOBER 09, 1961 IN BOOK
337 AT PAGE 241.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule B, Part II
(Exceptions)
Order Number: BAR64006642-3
14.RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT
OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX,
SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL
ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL
LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY
APPLICABLE LAW, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 30, 1970, IN BOOK 414 AT
PAGE 365.
15.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RIGHT OF WAY RECORDED JUNE 08, 1971 IN BOOK 419 AT
PAGE 527.
16.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN DECLARATION OF
COVENANTS RECORDED AUGUST 10, 1972 IN BOOK 434 AT PAGE 130.
17.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED
TO MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1975 IN
BOOK 468 AT PAGE 537.
18.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT
RECORDED FEBRUARY 13, 1975 IN BOOK 469 AT PAGE 140.
19.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT
TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY RECORDED SEPTEMBER 2, 1975
IN BOOK 478 AT PAGE 223.
20.(THIS ITEM WAS INTENTIONALLY DELETED)
21.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT TO THE
MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1983 IN
BOOK 636 AT PAGE 263.
22.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION NO. 94-093 OF
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY RECORDED AUGUST 9, 1994 IN
BOOK 911 AT PAGE 825.
23.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN SPECIAL USE PERMIT OF
ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATURAL GAS RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 2014 AS RECEPTION NO. 856504 AND
RE-RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 2014 AS RECEPTION NO. 856505.
24.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN SPECIAL DISTRICT PUBLIC
DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT OF MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 2014
AS RECEPTION NO. 857790.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule B, Part II
(Exceptions)
Order Number: BAR64006642-3
Land Title Guarantee Company
Disclosure Statements
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that:
Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the
clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least
one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that,
the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or
filing information at the top margin of the document.
Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters
which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for
recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title
Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents
from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued.
Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of
Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following
conditions:
No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or
agreed to pay.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given:
The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.(A)
A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in
which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides
written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real
property).
(B)
The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of
County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor.
(C)
The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a
condominium or townhouse unit.
(A)
No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land
described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months.
(B)
The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and
material-men's liens.
(C)
The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.(D)
If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within
six months prior to the Date of Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include:
disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor;
payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any
additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company.
(E)
This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface
estate, in Schedule B-2.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or
information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may
include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance
company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for
the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award
payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of
Regulatory Agencies.
Note: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of a closing
protection letter for the lender, purchaser, lessee or seller in connection with this transaction.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 24-21-514.5, Colorado notaries may remotely notarize real estate deeds and other documents
using real-time audio-video communication technology. You may choose not to use remote notarization for any
document.
That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the
surface estate and that there is substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other
minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and
(A)
That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's
permission.
(B)
Joint Notice of Privacy Policy of
Land Title Guarantee Company
Land Title Insurance Corporation and
Old Republic National Title Insurancy Company
This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company as agent for Land Title Insurance
Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company.
We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state
privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence
is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized
access to your non-public personal information ("Personal Information").
In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from:
applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web-based
transaction management system;
your transactions with, or from the services being performed by us, our affiliates, or others;
a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction;
and
The public records maintained by governmental entities that we obtain either directly from those entities, or from
our affiliates and non-affiliates.
Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows:
We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in
order to provide products and services to you.
We may share your Personal Information with affiliated contractors or service providers who provide services in the
course of our business, but only to the extent necessary for these providers to perform their services and to
provide these services to you as may be required by your transaction.
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your
Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion.
Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action.
We regularly assess security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal
Information.
WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT
IS NOT STATED ABOVE OR PERMITTED BY LAW.
Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We
may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for
example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your
Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is
needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you.
Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows: Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy
policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration
Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction
thereof.
Commitment For Title Insurance
Issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
NOTICE
IMPORTANT—READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE
POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS
COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT.
THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION
OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF
THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF
THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED.
THE COMPANY’S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE
CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. .
COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY
Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Old Republic National Title Insurance
Company, a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is
effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the
specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met
within 6 months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end.
COMMITMENT CONDITIONS
1. DEFINITIONS
2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, Commitment terminates
and the Company’s liability and obligation end.
3. The Company’s liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without:
4. COMPANY’S RIGHT TO AMEND
The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or
other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The
Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment.
5. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY
i. comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements;
ii. eliminate, with the Company’s written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or
iii. acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment.
6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT
“Knowledge” or “Known”: Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records.(a)
“Land”: The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term “Land” does not include any
property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues,
alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy.
(b)
“Mortgage”: A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law.(c)
“Policy”: Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company
pursuant to this Commitment.
(d)
“Proposed Insured”: Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment.(e)
“Proposed Policy Amount”: Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this
Commitment.
(f)
“Public Records”: Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters
relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge.
(g)
“Title”: The estate or interest described in Schedule A.(h)
the Notice;(a)
the Commitment to Issue Policy;(b)
the Commitment Conditions;(c)
Schedule A;(d)
Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and(e)
Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and(f)
a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.(g)
The Company’s liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in the interval between the
Company’s delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed
Insured’s good faith reliance to:
(a)
The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the
matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing.
(b)
The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the
Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured.
(c)
The Company’s liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment
Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount.
(d)
The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any.(e)
In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements
have been met to the satisfaction of the Company.
(f)
In any event, the Company’s liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy.(g)
Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment.(a)
Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment.(b)
Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject
matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral,
express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment.
(c)
7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT
The issuing agent is the Company’s agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the
Company’s agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services.
8. PRO-FORMA POLICY
The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro-forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro-forma
policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro-forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure.
9. ARBITRATION
The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of
either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at
http://www.alta.org/arbitration.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Land Title Insurance Corporation has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown
in Schedule A to be valid when countersigned by a validating officer or other authorized signatory.
Issued by:
Land Title Guarantee Company
3033 East First Avenue Suite 600
Denver, Colorado 80206
303-321-1880
Craig B. Rants, Senior Vice President
This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not
valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II
—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.
Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are
prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the
terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy.
(d)
Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company.(e)
When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company’s only liability will be under the Policy.(f)
46
Appendix B | Attachments to Mineral Rights Research
47
Appendix C | Other Supplemental Materials
1,
No. 5289
GARb7RLl7 COUNTY
BUILDING, SANITATTONand PLANNING DEPARTMENT
109 1011 Street Suite 303
Glcawood Springs. Colorado 81601
303) 945-8212
Job Address 17450 Highway 82, Carbondale
Nature of Work Building Permit
USG of Building Warehouse
Ow Bruce & Diane Bauldridge
Contractor
Owner
Amount of l'crmilS 928 Date September 9, 1994
Permit: 563.00
Plan 365.95
Paid $365.95
S. Archuleta
Clerk
GARFIELD COUNTY
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING' PERMIT
PERMIT Q NUMBER d { 0pQ
please print or type DATE 7- ?-9,1AssessorsParcel (r
TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICA PLOT PLAN
ADDRESS 7 450 1 W f a d' /NOTE: Show easements, property line dimensions
a
SUBDIVISION all other structures, specify north, and street
o
FILING #LOT # 7 ,4. BLOCK #name. For odd shaped lots, or if space is
a TAX SCHEDULE #too small, provide separate plot plan.
LEGAL (SEC /TWN /RNG)OF BUILDINGS NOW ON PARCEL
c4 NAME ZUCI_ t I Ilrll Ll r- IIZI1GG USE OF BUILDINGS NOW ON PARCEL Rs In EAp I((
a MAILING ADDRESS 135',4 4P -I N-or S ,
J Q pv y (j ( gy p'o CITY C ' , Q itaj p J l7R - l[ I Co, PHONE c!(o i_(2s5 n/ D N/ O/J , 0
s NAME MICIC o-U EIN
Y Oy a
2 w ADDRESS Box 105"I CITY l FACT. h
xa NAME Owivt=R / Rut ILp -(?
ADDRESS
CITY
o PHONE LICENSE #
0
CLASS OF WORK
NEW _ ALTERATION ADDITION _
DEMOLISH REPAIR MOVE
VOBILE HOME (make /model)
S .F. OF BUILDING 1L S.F. OF LOT 77R q c rs
H OF FLOORS 1 HEIGHT o2 3 ' -t -
OF FAMILY UNITS 0 OF BEDROOMS 0
INTENDED USE OF BUILDING 5 Gr
GARAGE: SINGLE_ DBL CARPORT: SINGLE DBL
r'IREPLACE FRONT PROPERTY LINE
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED STREET NAME /ROAD NUMBER 1745 Hutt d 2-
R7A TER SUPPLY _ T(L hvlo Es(' ST(NG COE CHECK IF CORNER LOT _
DRIVEWAY PERMIT C- (S Q 121 'i E (Amor-,DESCRIPTION OF WORK PLANNED
SITE PLAN CON si tUN ler STD IZAq R -i2)-13UILDINGPLANSEnI -CJ l)10Q/S e)i3ANITARY SEWER CLEARANCE I hereby acknowledge that I have read this
3N SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT 7H04 c s(application and the above is correct and I
ETHER DOCUMENTS (specify)agree to comply with all county ordinances
e g r fft.wf : g fi , /
and state -.aws regulating construction
P a[iece wS 7C SIGNATURE
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
VALUATION co FLOOD HAZARD
PERMIT FEE $5(7 LAN CHECK FEE $3 CERTIFIED BLDG ELEVATION
TOTAL FEE SCHOOL IMPACT FEE $ N 1 SPECIAL CONDITIONS
DATE PERMIT I D T
ZONING DISTRICT PROBLEMS WITH PERMIT
TYPE OF OCCUPANCY _a— Y
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION N ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED
3.F. OF BUILDING y eo c S.F. OF LOT
MAX. HEIGHT J'ROAD CLASS.CERTIFIED BY COLORADO REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINE: FRONT OR ENGINEER
REAR RIGHT LEFT
JET STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRED
micas
APPROVED:Pars"
AD APPROVED:I 7 7 ¢BUILDING DErMENT DA E LANNIN. D 'ARTMENT DATE
NOTE
This is a photograph of the county-approved Bauldridge
Barn Plan Set. As a result, the scale shown is not accurate.
February 11,2024
Noah Bauldridge
0101 Fox Prowl Lane
Carbondale, Co.81623
ATTN: Noah
On 1123124, a well test was r;onducted on a well at 17450
information was obtained;
Well Depth I6'
Casing Size--------n))
Standing water level------- ------ 9.3"
Total test time-------- 4 Hours
Drawdown to ---------- ---.-------- 11.0'
Production is greater than-------- 16 GPM
This test was conducted with the existing pump. The well
9.4' in 4 Minutes. This well has enoush water to serve 3
questions please call me, Raun Samuelson art 970-945-6
Sincerely;
HQ-'
Raun E Samuelson
Samuelson Pump Co.
PO, Box 297 . Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 . (970)
Woter Sysfems . So/es, Serv,ice &
. Fox (970) 947-944E
lYy 82. The following
level recovered baok to
Ifyou have any
These results may be invalid.
This informational water quality report compares the actual test result to national standards as defined in the EPA's Primary and
Secondary Drinking Water Regulations.
Definition and Legend
The contaminant was not detected in the sample above the minimum detection level.
The contaminant was detected at or above the minimum detection level, but not above the referenced standard.
The contaminant was detected above the standard, which is not an EPA enforceable MCL.
The contaminant was detected above the EPA enforceable MCL.
mg/L (ppm):
The lowest level that the laboratory can detect a contaminant.
ND:The contaminant was not detected above the minimum detection level.
Minimum Detection
Level (MDL):
Unless otherwise indicated, results and standards are expressed as an amount in milligrams per liter or
parts per million.
Primary Standards:Are expressed as the maximum contaminant level (MCL) which is the highest level of contaminant that
is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are enforceable standards.
Secondary standards:Are non-enforceable guidelines regulating contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as skin
or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor,or color) in drinking water. Individual
states may choose to adopt them as enforceable standards.
Action levels:Are defined in treatment techniques which are required processes intended to reduce the level of a
contaminant in drinking water.
NA:The contaminant was not analyzed.
Ordered By:
Aspen Waterwise
50 North 4th Street
Carbondale, CO 81623
ATTN: Kellen Whitworth
Client:
Noah Bauldridge
17450 Hwy. 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
Informational Water Quality Report
Sample Number:
Collection Date and Time:
Received Date and Time:
Date Completed:
956837
1/17/2024 11:00 AM
1/22/2024 2:04 PM
2/13/2024
Straight From WellLocation:
Type of Water:
Watercheck
Time Sampled has been changed to EST.
6571 Wilson Mills Rd
Cleveland, Ohio 44143
1-800-458-3330
Microbiologicals
Total Coliform and E.coli were ABSENT, however bacteria results may be
invalid due to lack of collection information or because sample has exceeded
30 hour holding time.
Total Coliform by P/A
Inorganic Analytes - Metals
NDAluminum mg/L 0.2 EPA Secondary 0.1
NDArsenic mg/L 0.010 EPA Primary 0.005
NDBarium mg/L 2 EPA Primary 0.30
NDCadmium mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.002
92.9Calcium mg/L --2.0
NDChromium mg/L 0.1 EPA Primary 0.010
0.026Copper mg/L 1.3 EPA Action Level 0.004
0.074Iron mg/L 0.3 EPA Secondary 0.020
NDLead mg/L 0.015 EPA Action Level 0.002
0.002Lithium mg/L --0.002
13.97Magnesium mg/L --0.10
NDManganese mg/L 0.05 EPA Secondary 0.004
NDMercury mg/L 0.002 EPA Primary 0.001
NDNickel mg/L --0.020
1.8Potassium mg/L --1.0
NDSelenium mg/L 0.05 EPA Primary 0.020
12.4Silica mg/L --0.1
NDSilver mg/L 0.100 EPA Secondary 0.002
7Sodium mg/L --1
0.570Strontium mg/L --0.001
0.002Uranium mg/L 0.030 EPA Primary 0.001
0.004Zinc mg/L 5 EPA Secondary 0.004
Physical Factors
170Alkalinity (Total as CaCO3)mg/L --20
Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level
Page 2 of 5 Sample: 956837Product: Watercheck2/13/2024 9:50:20 AM
290Hardness mg/L 100 NTL Internal 10
7.6pH pH Units 6.5 to 8.5 EPA Secondary
350Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 500 EPA Secondary 20
0.4Turbidity NTU 1.0 EPA Action Level 0.1
Inorganic Analytes - Other
NDBromide mg/L --0.5
5.8Chloride mg/L 250 EPA Secondary 5.0
NDFluoride mg/L 4.0 EPA Primary 0.5
0.5Nitrate as N mg/L 10 EPA Primary 0.5
NDNitrite as N mg/L 1 EPA Primary 0.5
NDOrtho Phosphate mg/L --2.0
110.0Sulfate mg/L 250 EPA Secondary 5.0
Organic Analytes - Trihalomethanes
NDBromodichloromethane mg/L --0.002
NDBromoform mg/L --0.004
NDChloroform mg/L --0.002
NDDibromochloromethane mg/L --0.004
NDTotal THMs mg/L 0.080 EPA Primary 0.002
Organic Analytes - Volatiles
ND1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/L --0.002
ND1,1,1-Trichloroethane mg/L 0.2 EPA Primary 0.001
ND1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/L --0.002
ND1,1,2-Trichloroethane mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.002
ND1,1-Dichloroethane mg/L --0.002
ND1,1-Dichloroethene mg/L 0.007 EPA Primary 0.001
ND1,1-Dichloropropene mg/L --0.002
ND1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/L --0.002
ND1,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/L --0.002
Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level
Page 3 of 5 Sample: 956837Product: Watercheck2/13/2024 9:50:20 AM
ND1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.07 EPA Primary 0.002
ND1,2-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.6 EPA Primary 0.001
ND1,2-Dichloroethane mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.001
ND1,2-Dichloropropane mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.002
ND1,3-Dichlorobenzene mg/L --0.001
ND1,3-Dichloropropane mg/L --0.002
ND1,4-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.075 EPA Primary 0.001
ND2,2-Dichloropropane mg/L --0.002
ND2-Chlorotoluene mg/L --0.001
ND4-Chlorotoluene mg/L --0.001
NDAcetone mg/L --0.01
NDBenzene mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.001
NDBromobenzene mg/L --0.002
NDBromomethane mg/L --0.002
NDCarbon Tetrachloride mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.001
NDChlorobenzene mg/L 0.1 EPA Primary 0.001
NDChloroethane mg/L --0.002
NDChloromethane mg/L --0.002
NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene mg/L 0.07 EPA Primary 0.002
NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/L --0.002
NDDBCP mg/L --0.001
NDDibromomethane mg/L --0.002
NDDichlorodifluoromethane mg/L --0.002
NDDichloromethane mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.002
NDEDB mg/L --0.001
NDEthylbenzene mg/L 0.7 EPA Primary 0.001
NDMethyl Tert Butyl Ether mg/L --0.004
NDMethyl-Ethyl Ketone mg/L --0.01
Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level
Page 4 of 5 Sample: 956837Product: Watercheck2/13/2024 9:50:20 AM
NDStyrene mg/L 0.1 EPA Primary 0.001
NDTetrachloroethene mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.002
NDTetrahydrofuran mg/L --0.01
NDToluene mg/L 1 EPA Primary 0.001
NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene mg/L 0.1 EPA Primary 0.002
NDtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/L --0.002
NDTrichloroethene mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.001
NDTrichlorofluoromethane mg/L --0.002
NDVinyl Chloride mg/L 0.002 EPA Primary 0.001
NDXylenes (Total)mg/L 10 EPA Primary 0.001
We certify that the analyses performed for this report are accurate, and that the laboratory tests were conducted by methods
approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or variations of these EPA methods.
These test results are intended to be used for informational purposes only and may not be used for regulatory compliance.
National Testing Laboratories, Ltd.
556 South Mansfield Street • Ypsilanti • Michigan •
Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level
Page 5 of 5 Sample: 956837Product: Watercheck2/13/2024 9:50:20 AM