Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1.00 General Application Materials
Hogback View Estates Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Garfield County, Colorado Parcel #212335200186 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application Submitted November 20, 2025 by The Land Studio, Inc. for: Canyon Creek Partners, LLC 901 Cottonwood Circle Golden, Colorado 80401 canyoncreekpartners@gmail.com N➤➤N Image © 2025 Airbus Image © 2025 Airbus Image © 2025 Airbus Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 2 Table of Contents Application Team ....................................................................................................................................... 4 4-203. General Submittal Requirements ................................................................................................. 5 Pre-Application Conference Summary ..................................................................................................... 5 Application Form ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Fee Agreement ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Letters of Authorization ........................................................................................................................... 13 4-203.B.2 - Ownership Information ......................................................................................................... 14 4-203.B.3 - Adjacent Property Owners Within 200 Feet ........................................................................ 14 4-203.B - Project Description .................................................................................................................. 15 4-203.C - Vicinity Map .............................................................................................................................. 17 4-203.D – Site Plan ................................................................................................................................... 18 4-203.E – Grading and Drainage Plan ..................................................................................................... 18 4-203.F – Landscape Plan ........................................................................................................................ 18 4-203.G – Impact Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 18 4-203.L – Traffic Study ............................................................................................................................. 19 4-203.M – Water Supply and Distribution Plan ...................................................................................... 19 4-203.N – Wastewater Management and System Plan .......................................................................... 19 5-402.D – Preliminary Plan Map .............................................................................................................. 19 5-402.H – Visual Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 19 5-402.I – Codes, Covenants and Restrictions ........................................................................................ 21 Article 7, Divisions Standards ................................................................................................................. 21 Division 1. General Approval Standards ................................................................................................ 21 7-101. Zone District Use Regulations .................................................................................................... 21 7-102. Comprehensive Plan & Intergovernmental Agreements ............................................................. 22 7-103. Compatibility ............................................................................................................................... 22 7-104. Source of Water ......................................................................................................................... 23 7-105. Central Water Distribution and Wastewater Systems ................................................................ 23 7-106. Public Utilities ............................................................................................................................. 23 7-107. Access and Roadways ............................................................................................................... 23 7-108. Use of Land Subject to Natural Hazards .................................................................................... 23 7-109. Fire Protection ............................................................................................................................ 23 Division 2 General Resource Protection Standards ............................................................................. 24 Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 3 7-201. Agricultural Lands ...................................................................................................................... 24 7-202. Wildlife Habitat Areas ................................................................................................................. 24 7-204. Drainage and Erosion ................................................................................................................ 25 7-205. Environmental Quality ................................................................................................................ 25 7-206. Wildfire Hazards ......................................................................................................................... 25 7-207. Natural and Geologic Hazards ................................................................................................... 25 7-208. Reclamation ............................................................................................................................... 25 Division 3 Site Planning and Development Standards ......................................................................... 25 7-301. Compatible Design ..................................................................................................................... 25 7-302. Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards ................................................................................ 25 7-303. Landscape Standards ................................................................................................................ 26 7-304. Lighting Standards ..................................................................................................................... 26 7-305. Snow Storage Standards ........................................................................................................... 27 7-306. Trail and Walkway Standards .................................................................................................... 27 Division 4. Subdivision Standards and Design Standards ................................................................. 27 Section 7-401. General Subdivision Standards ..................................................................................... 27 Section 7-402. Subdivision Lots ............................................................................................................. 27 Section 7-403. Survey Monuments ........................................................................................................ 27 Section 7-404. School Land Dedication ................................................................................................. 28 Section 7-405. Road Impact Fees .......................................................................................................... 28 Exhibits ..................................................................................................................................................... 28 Exhibit A - Title Commitment Exhibit B - Engineering Report Exhibit C - Engineering Plan Set Exhibit D - CTL Thompson Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Exhibit E - Mineral Owner Research Exhibit F - Wildlife Habitat Report Exhibit G - Wildfire Hazard Report Exhibit H - Noxious Weed Report Exhibit I – Declaration of Covenants, Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 4 Application Team Landowners: Charles Hoge & Michael and Laura Resch 901 Cottonwood Circle Golden, Colorado 80401 canyoncreekpartners@gmail.com Applicant: Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Contact: Michael Resch 901 Cottonwood Circle Golden, Colorado 80401 canyoncreekpartners@gmail.com Civil Engineering/Survey: Sopris Engineering Contact: Kyle Sanderson, PE 502 Main Street, Suite A-3 Carbondale, CO 81623 970.704.0311 ksanderson@sopriseng.com Land Planning: The Land Studio, Inc. Contact: Doug Pratte 365 River Bend Way Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 970.927.3690 dougpratte@thelandstudio.com Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 5 4-203. General Submittal Requirements Pre-Application Conference Summary 1 Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 www.garfield-county.com PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 212335200186 DATE: April 1, 2024 PROJECT: Canyon Creek Partners/Hogback View Estates. OWNERS/APPLICANT: Hodge, Charles and Resh, Michael and Laura REPRESENTATIVE: The Land Studio Inc., Doug Pratte PRACTICAL LOCATION: Lot 2, Gabossi Subdivision Exemption According to the Plat Recorded February 11,2003 at Reception #620584 ZONING: Rural TYPE OF APPLICATION: Major Subdivision – Preliminary Plan COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Res MH (2 to 6 Ac/Du), New Castle Area of Influence I. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting to create a Major Subdivision of 7 lots from Lot 2 of the Gabossi Subdivision Exemption. The applicant has received comments from the PZ and the BOCC through the Sketch Plan process and would now like to proceed to Preliminary Plan. Access to the subdivision is proposed to be off County Road 138 and Highway 6 and 24 to the west of New Creation Church. The development is anticipated to be served by the Bowles Well No. 6 and each of the 7 lots will have individual OWTS. While the exact development to take place within the subdivision has not yet been finalized, from representations made in the pre-application meeting the range of development consists of 7 lots with lots 2- 6 ranging from 2 acres to 3.1 acres in size. Lot 1 is proposed to be 15.2 acres in size and lot 7 to be 8.1 acres in size. Lot 7 currently has a shop structure currently located on it. The proposeal is for the shop to exist as a home occupation on the lot. There are two ditches located on the site as well as a electric easment. Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 6 2 For the Preliminary Plan, the subdivision will need to be analyzed to their most impactful extent for traffic, water, and wastewater, as well as the review standards identified in Division 7, Sections 1-4. Subject Parcel II. REGULATORY PROVISIONS APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO ADDRESS • Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030 • Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, as amended • Section 4-101 – Common Review Procedures • Section 5-302(C) - Major Subdivision, Preliminary Plan • Table 5-501 and Section 5-402 – Submittal Requirements • Applicable provisions from Article 7, Standards (Article 7, Divisions 1-4) III. PROCESS The process is outlined in the table below and in the flow chart excerpt included at the end of the meeting summary. Public hearings before both the Planning Commission and Board of County Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 7 3 Commissioners are required. Noticing includes publication, posting and mailings 30 days prior to the public hearings. VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Application Type Section 4-203 Section 5-402 Section 8-201 B C D E F G H J K L M N B C D E F G H I Written Narrative/Additional Submissions Ge n e r a l A p p l i c a t i o n M a t e r i a l s Vi c i n i t y M a p Si t e P l a n Gr a d i n g a n d D r a i n a g e P l a n La n d s c a p e P l a n Im p a c t A n a l y s i s Re z o n i n g J u s t i f i c a t i o n R e p or t De v e l o p m e n t A g r e e m e n t Im p r o v e m e n t s A g r e e m e n t Tr a f f i c S t u d y Wa t e r Su p p l y /D i s t r i b u t i o n Pl a n Wa s t e w a t e r M a n a g e m e n t Pl a n Yi e l d P l a n Si t e M a p Sk et c h P l a n Ma p Pr e l i m i n a r y P l a n Ma p Fi n a l P l a n Ma p Fi n a l P l a t Op e n S p a c e P l a n Ma p Vi s u a l A n a l y s i s Co d e s , C o v e n a n t s , Re s t r i c t i o n s Af f o r d a b l e H o u s i n g P l a n Major Subdivisions 5- 302.B Sketch Plan 5- 302.C Preliminary Plan Preliminary engineering reports and plans: A, B, C. 5- 302.D Final Plan/Plat Engineering reports/ plans: A, B, C, D, E, F, G. Engineering Reports and Plans A. Roads Trails, Walkways, and Bikeways. B. Mitigation of Geological Hazard. C. Sewage Collection and Water Supply and Distribution System. D. Soil Suitability Information. E. Groundwater Drainage. F. Engineering design and construction features for any bridge, culverts, or other drainage features to be constructed. Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 8 4 G. Final cost estimates for public improvements. H. Preliminary cost estimates for improvements. Please note that the General Application Materials include all letters of authorization, statements of authority, proof of ownership, property owners with 200 ft. and mineral rights owner lists and research documentation, Agreement to Pay form, and Signed Application Form. Key studies and/or plans noted in the above table include: • Grading and Drainage Plans • Landscape Plan • Impact Analysis • A draft improvements agreement • Water Supply/Distribution Plan • Wastewater Management Plan • The Preliminary Plan Map • Visual Analysis • Covenants • Affordable Housing Plan is not required as you are less than 15 lots. • Engineering Plans for roads, water, wastewater In addition to the above table the following clarification and additional details are provided regarding submittal requirements: • Address the Preliminary Plan Review Criteria in Section 5-302(C) • Address Standards in Article 7 Divisions 1, 2, 3 and 4, in particular the Subdivision Standards in Division 4. Application formatting that address each specific code section is recommended. Submit three paper copies and one digital copy of the application. Additional copies will be requested upon determination of completeness, if necessary. See the land use code for additional information on submittal requirements. IV. APPLICATION REVIEW a. Review by: Staff for completeness recommendation and referral agencies for additional technical review b. Public Hearing: ___None (Director’s Decision) _X_Planning Commission _X_ Board of County Commissioners __ Board of Adjustment c. Referral Agencies: May include Garfield County Road and Bridge, Fire Protection District, Town of New Castle, Colorado Department of Transportation, Garfield Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 9 5 County Vegetation Management, and Garfield County Designated Engineer. V. APPLICATION REVIEW FEES a. Planning Review Fees: $ 675.00 Preliminary Plan ($325 Sketch Plan) b. Referral Agency Fees: $ N/A c. Total Deposit: $ 675.00 (additional hours are billed at $40.50 /hour) Disclaimer The pre-application meeting summary is only valid for six (6) months from the date of the written summary. The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the County. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. This summary does not create a legal or vested right. Pre-application Summary Prepared by: April 1, 2024 ___________________________________________ _____________ John Leybourne, Planner III Date Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 10 Application Form Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 www.garfield-county.com DIVISIONS OF LAND APPLICATION FORM TYPE OF SUBDIVISION/EXEMPTION Minor Subdivision Preliminary Plan Amendment Major Subdivision Final Plat Amendment Sketch Preliminary Final Common Interest Community Subdivision Conservation Subdivision Public/County Road Split Exemption Yield Sketch Preliminary Final Rural Land Development Exemption Time Extension Basic Correction Exemption INVOLVED PARTIES Owner/Applicant Name: ________________________________________________ Phone: (______)_________________ Mailing Address: ______________________________________________________________________ City: _______________________________________ State: _______ Zip Code: ____________________ E- Representative (Authorization Required) Name: ________________________________________________ Phone: (______)_________________ Mailing Address: ______________________________________________________________________ City: _______________________________________ State: _______ Zip Code: ____________________ E-mail:_______________________________________________________________________________ PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION Project Name: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Assessor’s Parcel Number: ___ ___ ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ - ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ Physical/Street Address: ________________________________________________________________ Legal Description: ______________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Zone District: ___________________________________ Property Size (acres): __________________ Charles Hoge & Michael and Laura Resch 901 Cottonwood Circle Golden CO 80401 mail:______________________________________________________________________________ 365 River Bend Way 970 927-3690 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 landstudio2@comcast.net Lot 2, Gabossi Subdivision Exemption Rural 34.7 Acres ✔ ✔ The Land Studio, Inc. Douglas Pratte canyoncreekpartners@gmail.com 2123-335-200-186 Hogback View Estates Subdivision x 212335200186 Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 11 Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 12 Fee Agreement Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 13 Letters of Authorization Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 14 4-203.B.2 - Ownership Information A Title Commitment is provided as an Exhibit to this Application 4-203.B.3 - Adjacent Property Owners Within 200 Feet Garfield County Land Explorer 212326200955 Not available NEW CASTLE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT R040354 2300 RIVER FRONTAGE ROAD SILT, CO 81652 212335100118 Not available NEW CASTLE MACY, JACQUELINE S REVOCABLE TRUST R040326 PO BOX 886 SILVERTHORNE, CO 80498 212335100120 319 138 COUNTY RD NEW CASTLE GLASSIER, TEMPLE & PALARDY, DYLAN & MORGAN PALARDY, ANNA R040328 319 COUNTY ROAD 138 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 212335100127 406-000408 138 COUNTY RD GLENWOOD SPRINGS HANSEN, NORMAN RAY R040338 PO BOX 435 NEW CASTLE, CO 81647 212335200059 Not available NEW CASTLE TIBBETTS HPW LLC R040237 225 N 5TH STREET GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 212335200186 24 138 COUNTY RD NEW CASTLE HOGE, CHARLES & RESCH, MICHAEL & LAURA R040429 901 COTTONWOOD CIR GOLDEN, CO 80401 212335200187 18 138 COUNTY RD GLENWOOD SPRINGS CANYON CREEK SELF STORAGE LLC R040430 PO BOX 2518 MEEKER, CO 81641 212335200188 22 138 COUNTY RD NEW CASTLE CANYON CREEK SELF STORAGE LLC R040431 PO BOX 2518 MEEKER, CO 81641 212335201001 44523 6 & 24 HWY GLENWOOD SPRINGS GABOSSI, ROCKY A & MARY A R082828 44523 HIGHWAY 6 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 ROW Not available null 10/21/25, 9:19 AM Garfield County Land Explorer about:blank 1/1 Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 15 4-203.B - Project Description The proposal is to subdivide the 34.7-acre Lot 2 of the Gabossi Subdivision Exemption into seven rural residential lots. The subject property is zoned Rural, which requires a minimum lot area of 2 acres. The Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Sketch Plan Application was submitted to Garfield County Community Development in March 2023 and was reviewed by the Planning Commission on November 8, 2023, and by the Board of County Commissioners on January 2, 2024. The Applicant has incorporated the staff, Planning Commission, and BOCC recommendations heard at Sketch Plan review into this Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application. This Application proposes to subdivide the property into seven lots, each of which will be 2 acres or greater in size, while maintaining an overall rural character and low-density development pattern. This Application is intended to address the Major Subdivision criteria contained in the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, including provisions related to lot design, access, utilities, drainage, wildfire mitigation, and protection of surrounding properties. Lot 1, which is just over 17 acres in size, will contain the existing single-family residence located on the upper portion of the property. This larger lot is intended to retain the established homesite and associated yard, driveway, and accessory improvements, while also preserving a substantial area of existing vegetation and open space on the steeper slopes above the lower bench. No significant changes are proposed to the existing residence at this time, other than typical maintenance and potential improvements that are permitted within the Rural Zone District. Lots 2 through 6, which are currently undeveloped, will be located generally within the lower, relatively flat area in the southwest corner of the property. These lots are planned to range from approximately 2 to 2.5 acres in size. The lot layout is designed to provide logical, buildable homesites with adequate building envelopes, yard areas, and space for shared wells and onsite wastewater treatment systems, consistent with Garfield County and CDPHE requirements. The lower bench location allows future homes to be sited in a way that minimizes grading, avoids steeper slopes, and fits with the existing topography. Access to these lots will be provided from an internal subdivision road that will connect to the existing access serving the property and will be designed to meet Garfield County roadway standards for width, grades, and emergency vehicle access. Driveways to each lot will extend from this internal road in a manner that minimizes disturbance. Lot 7 will be approximately 6.8 acres in size and will include the existing residential garage and surrounding area on the southeast corner of the property. This portion of the property is generally characterized by gently sloping terrain that is suitable for redevelopment as a rural homesite. Lot 7 is proposed to be redeveloped with a single-family residence and a residential garage, or with a single-family residence and the existing residential garage repurposed as a home occupation shop, once the structure has been brought into Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 16 compliance and restored to its original condition as a residential garage. Any home occupation use will be required to comply with the applicable standards of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, including limitations on traffic, noise, outdoor storage, and signage, to ensure that the use remains clearly subordinate to the residential use of the property and compatible with neighboring residences. All seven lots are intended to be served by a combination of individual and shared domestic wells and individual onsite wastewater treatment systems, subject to approval by the appropriate agencies. Utility extensions for electric, communications, and, if desired, natural gas will be extended to the subdivision and routed within designated utility easements as needed. Drainage from new impervious areas (roofs, driveways, and paved surfaces) will be directed to onsite swales or small detention and infiltration facilities sized in accordance with Garfield County stormwater standards, with the goal of maintaining historic drainage patterns and avoiding adverse impacts to adjoining properties. The proposed roads and improvements to existing roads have been designed to account for proper grading and drainage. When each of the individual lots is developed, grading and drainage design will be provided as part of the building permit drawings. Sopris Engineering, the project civil engineer, does not anticipate issues with meeting the Garfield County detention requirements (2-year and 25-year, 24-hour precipitation events) or safely passing the 100-year storm event through the site. The subdivision has been designed to maintain the existing rural character of the surrounding area by limiting density, providing large lot sizes, and encouraging building sites, access roads, and utilities that follow the existing landform to the extent practicable. Building envelopes and no-build areas are established on all lots to avoid steeper slopes, sensitive areas, and existing drainage ways, and to help maintain view corridors and open space between homes. Wildfire defensible space, fire apparatus access, and water supply for firefighting have been coordinated with the local fire protection district and will also be incorporated into future building permit reviews. In summary, the proposed seven-lot subdivision of Lot 2 of the Gabossi Subdivision Exemption is consistent with the Rural Zone District standards, meets or exceeds the minimum lot area requirement of 2 acres, and is designed to address the Major Subdivision criteria in the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code while preserving the rural character and livability of the property and surrounding neighborhood. Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 17 4-203.C - Vicinity Map &RS\ULJKW 1D WLRQ DO*HRJ UDS KLF 6R FLHW\LFXEHG N EW CAST LE 0.7 MIL ES GL ENW O O D SPRING S - 5 M ILE S APPRO XIM ATE SU BJ EC T B O U N D A R Y §¨¦70 9 LFLQL W\ £¤6 §¨¦70 &$1<21&5((.5' 6&$1<21 & 5 ( (.5' T H R E E M IL E R A D I U S &$1< 21 &5( (.3$ 571(56 //& 7+5((0,/(5$',869,&,1,7<0$3 )H HW $ 3$ 5&(/,1)250$7,2 1 *$5),( /'&2817<*,6 %$6(0$3 86 $72320$ 36( 65, 7+,6 0$ 3,6 ,17(1'(' )25*(1( 5$/3 /$11,1*3 85326(621/< VFD OH # [ PDS MEO 62 35,6( 1 *, 1(( 5,1*±// & & ,9 , /&2 168 /7$ 176 0$ ,16 75(( 7 68,7( $ &$ 5%2 1 '$ /( &2 /2 5$' 2 68 %- (&7 3$5 & (/ '(7$ ,/ 6 & 5 1 (: & $ 67/ (&2 3$5 &(/ 1 R /2 7 * $%2 66 ,6 8%' ,9,6,2 1 (;( 03 7,2 1 6(352 -(&7 1 R ' $7( Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 18 4-203.D – Site Plan See Proposed Site Plan, Sheets C-3.0 and C-3.1 provided by Sopris Engineering included as an Exhibit to this Application. 4-203.E – Grading and Drainage Plan See Proposed Grading Plans, Sheets C-5.0 and C-5.1 provided by Sopris Engineering included as an Exhibit to this Application. 4-203.F – Landscape Plan See the Landscape Plan included as an Exhibit to this Application. 4-203.G – Impact Analysis 1. Adjacent Land use The proposed Rural Low Density subdivision of 7 lots will be a compatible use with the adjacent rural residential land uses and fits within the Rural zoning allowance of one unit per 2 acres. The adjacent land uses consist of the following: - 12-acre Rural residential parcel with a single family home to the west - 59-acre Rural agricultural parcel with a single family home to the northwest - Two parcels with warehouse / self-storage / RV storage to the south - 28-acre Rural vacant land parcel to the northeast - 14-acre Rural residential parcel with a single family home to the east - BLM land to the north 2. Site Features – The property is generally wooded with shorter scrub oak and cedar trees throughout. There is a large 6 acre field that has been used for crop production in the past on the lower, southwest quarter of the property. There is an existing gravel driveway to the home and garage with other two track gravel drives around the site for ditch access and general property access. 3. Soil Characteristics - See the CTL Thompson Report included as an Exhibit to this Application. 4. Geology and Hazard – This development is not anticipated to be within any natural or geologic hazard areas. See the CTL Thompson Report included as an Exhibit to this Application. Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 19 5. Groundwater and Aquifer Recharge Areas – The entire property is outside of the 500-year floodplain. See Sopris Engineering’s report included as an Exhibit to this Application. 6. Environmental Impacts – See the attached reports addressing Wildlife, Wildfire, and Noxious Weeds included as Exhibits to this Application. 7. Nuisance – Not Applicable to this project 8. Hours of Operation – Not Applicable to this project 4-203.L – Traffic Study See page 8 of the Engineering Report provided by Sopris Engineering included as an Exhibit to this Application. 4-203.M – Water Supply and Distribution Plan See Subdivision Utility Plan, Sheet C-4.0 provided by Sopris Engineering included as an Exhibit to this Application. 4-203.N – Wastewater Management and System Plan There is not a public wastewater/sanitary sewer service to this property. The proposed Lots are to be served by individual Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS). The OWTS will be designed as needed in the design phases of the development. 5-402.D – Preliminary Plan Map See Proposed Site Plan, Sheets C-3.0 and C-3.1 provided by Sopris Engineering included as an Exhibit to this Application. 5-402.H – Visual Analysis The following images show Hogback View Estates located on the hillside about the highway corridor. View 1 shows an overview of context and building envelope locations. Directly below and to the south of the proposed subdivision is warehouse / self-storage / RV storage. View 2 is from east of the property looking west. View 3 gives an idea of visibility from the valley floor, showing only the edges of lots up above and only a glimpse of one building envelope corner. Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 20 N➤➤NImage © 2025 Airbus Image © 2025 Airbus Image © 2025 Airbus Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus N ➤➤N Image © 2025 Airbus Image © 2025 Airbus Image © 2025 Airbus Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus View 1 View 2 Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 21 5-402.I – Codes, Covenants and Restrictions See Declaration of Covenants, Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws included as an Exhibit to this Application. Article 7, Divisions Standards Division 1. General Approval Standards 7-101. Zone District Use Regulations Zoning for this parcel is Rural and the minimum lot area for the Rural Zone District is 2-acres. This Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application proposes to subdivide the property into 7 lots that are all 2 acres or greater in size. Single-Unit Dwellings (per legal lot) are a use by right in the Rural Zone District, so no rezoning is required for this Application. All proposed development will comply with any restrictions and regulations of the Rural Zone District in the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code and will comply with the following Zone District Dimensional Standards: N ➤➤ N Image © 2025 Airbus Image © 2025 Airbus Image © 2025 Airbus Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus View 3 Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 22 7-102. Comprehensive Plan & Intergovernmental Agreements The Garfield County Comprehensive Plan shows the Canyon Creek Partners parcel in the Res MH (2-6 Ac/Du) future land use designation. Residential Medium High is defined as small farms, estates, residences, and clustered residential subdivisions. The proposed density of seven residential lots per the 34.7 acre parcel = one residential lot per five acres, which is within the 2-6 Ac/Du range. This parcel also resides within the New Castle Area of Influence and at the edge of the New Castle Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. The Future Land Use designated for this parcel is Rural Low Density. The type of use for this designation is large lot single-family, working ranches/farms, ranchettes, and open pastures with rural qualities. While the density recommendation is 10 or more acres per dwelling unit (3.5 dwelling units) it should be noted that Garfield County allows ADUs, which will allow up to 7 dwelling units. This Application proposes 7 lots ranging in size from 2-17 acres each with a single-family dwelling unit in this rural neighborhood setting. The proposed Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Subdivision will be compatible with the Garfield County and New Castle Comprehensive Plans. 7-103. Compatibility The proposed Rural Low Density subdivision of 7 lots will be a compatible use with the adjacent rural residential land uses and fits within the Rural zoning allowance of one unit per 2 acres. The adjacent land uses consist of the following: - 12-acre Rural residential parcel with a single family home to the west - 59-acre Rural agricultural parcel with a single family home to the northwest - Two parcels with warehouse / self-storage / RV storage to the south - 28-acre Rural vacant land parcel to the northeast - 14-acre Rural residential parcel with a single family home to the east - BLM land to the north Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 23 7-104. Source of Water See page 3 of Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report, which is attached as an Exhibit for additional information. 7-105. Central Water Distribution and Wastewater Systems Water Distribution Systems – See Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report and Subdivision Utility Plan, Sheet C-4.0 provided by Sopris Engineering included as an Exhibit to this Application. Wastewater Systems – There is not a public wastewater/sanitary sewer service to this property. The proposed Lots are to be served by individual Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS). See Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report, which is attached as an Exhibit for additional information. 7-106. Public Utilities SE coordinated with Xcel on providing service to the site and received a “Will Serve” letter that states Xcel will provide natural gas (if desired) and electric service. See Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report, which is attached as an Exhibit for additional information. 7-107. Access and Roadways See page 6 of Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report, which is attached as an Exhibit. 7-108. Use of Land Subject to Natural Hazards This Application does not anticipate development within any natural or geologic hazard areas. See the CTL Thompson Report included as an Exhibit to this Application. 7-109. Fire Protection See Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report, which is attached as an Exhibit, for information related to their coordination with the Glenwood Springs Fire Department regarding access and fire suppression. Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 24 Division 2 General Resource Protection Standards 7-201. Agricultural Lands The project will have no negative effect on adjacent agricultural operations with only 7 residences proposed. The applicant will require the control of dogs through protective covenants. Irrigation ditches run through the property but will be protected and accounted for early in the design phases of individual lots. Culverts have been added where necessary at ditch crossings as shown in the Engineering drawings. 7-202. Wildlife Habitat Areas A Wildlife Habitat Study has been prepared and is included as an Exhibit to this Application. Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 25 7-204. Drainage and Erosion See Proposed Grading Plans, Sheets C-5.0 and C-5.1 provided by Sopris Engineering included as an Exhibit to this Application. 7-205. Environmental Quality See page 9 of Sopris Engineering’s Report included as an Exhibit to this Application. 7-206. Wildfire Hazards A Wildfire Hazard Study has been prepared and is included as an Exhibit to this Application. 7-207. Natural and Geologic Hazards See the CTL Thompson Report included as an Exhibit to this Application. 7-208. Reclamation See the Landscape Plan included as an Exhibit to this Application and page 10 of Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report. A Weed Management Plan has been provided and is included as an Exhibit to this Application. Division 3 Site Planning and Development Standards 7-301. Compatible Design The nature, scale, and intensity of the prospective residential homes on Lots that range in size from 2 acres to 17 acres are intended to compliment the adjacent rural residential land uses. Care will be taken to encourage structures that are designed to appear as a contemporary interpretation of the traditional neighborhoods of rural Garfield County and other western communities. The residences shall utilize materials and colors of that are in harmony with the natural landscape of the surrounding hillsides. 7-302. Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards Each residence within the 7 Lot subdivision will provide two off-street parking spaces per Table 7-302.A. Minimum Off-Street Parking Standards By Use. Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 26 7-303. Landscape Standards - All areas disturbed during construction will be revegetated according to the following criteria. - During construction, erosion which may pose a threat to surrounding properties or waterways will be contained through the use of temporary erosion control measures as deemed necessary. - Revegetation of disturbed areas shall commence in the fall, prior to the first major snowfall, or early spring if site conditions allow. - Exposure of soil to erosion by removal or disturbance of vegetation shall be limited to the area required for immediate construction operations and for the shortest practical period of time. - All disturbed areas shall be seeded, mulched, or sodded with a native grass seed mix. - All topsoil shall be salvaged from disturbed areas, stockpiled and re-spread prior to revegetation. Topsoil should not be re-spread on areas of the site proposed for future building. A weed Management Plan has been provided and is included as an Exhibit to this Application. 7-304. Lighting Standards All lighting will comply with Garfield County Lighting Standards and address the following outdoor lighting basics from the International Dark Sky Association: Modern society requires outdoor lighting for a variety of needs, including safety and commerce. IDA recognizes this but advocates that any required lighting be used wisely. To minimize the harmful effects of light pollution, lighting should: - Only be on when needed. - Only light the area that needs it. - Be no brighter than necessary. - Minimize blue light emissions. - Be fully shielded (pointing downward). Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 27 7-305. Snow Storage Standards Per Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report attached as an Exhibit, The proposed development is made up of 7 proposed Lots. The Lots will be developed with single- family dwelling units and do not include a common outdoor parking area. All residential uses except for multi-family are exempt from the Snow Storage Standards. 7-306. Trail and Walkway Standards Per Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report attached as an Exhibit, the proposed development is made up of 7 proposed Lots. The Lots will be developed with single- family dwelling units which are exempt from the Trail and Walkway Standards. Division 4. Subdivision Standards and Design Standards Section 7-401. General Subdivision Standards Subsections A. Maintenance of Common Facilities, B. Domestic Animal Control, and C. Fireplaces will be vetted in the design phases of the project. Subsection D. Development in the Floodplain does not apply to this site as the entire property is outside of the 500-year floodplain as shown on FEMA Floodplain Panel 1130 of 2075, Map Number 08045C1130E (Preliminary Oct 26, 2011. See attached for floodplain map. Section 7-402. Subdivision Lots Per Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report attached as an Exhibit, the preliminary Lot configurations generally conform to the lot size standards. All Lots are larger than 2-acres which is minimum for Rural Zone. Section 7-403. Survey Monuments Per Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report attached as an Exhibit, permanent survey monuments are required for subdivisions. These markers will be placed as the development moves forward through planning, design, and into construction. Hogback View Estates Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application 28 Section 7-404. School Land Dedication The BOCC shall require reservation, dedication, or payment in lieu of school land. Land Dedication Standards state that 870-SF of land (0.020-acre) per Single Family unit shall be dedicated or pay fee in lieu based on Section 7-404.C. The subject property will most likely require fee in lieu payment for the school land dedication requirement. The subject property is within the RE-1 School District boundary which will require payment based on Section 7-404.C.2 which is based on the unimproved fair market value of the land that would have been dedicated. The Applicant agrees to this standard. Section 7-405. Road Impact Fees Per Sopris Engineering’s Engineering Report attached as an Exhibit, Road Impact Fees shall be implemented and administered consistent with the Road Impact Fee Update study dated July 1, 2015. Road impact fees for new development are collected prior to issuance of a building permit. The subject property is located in the East Benefit District. Table 7-405 defines the Impact fee for Residential Dwelling per Square feet of Finished Floor Areas. The fees have specific ranges based on the size of the dwelling unit ranging from $726/unit for 900-SF or less up to $2,703/unit for 2,401-SF and greater. Exhibits Exhibit A - Title Commitment Exhibit B - Engineering Report Exhibit C - Engineering Plan Set Exhibit D - CTL Thompson Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Exhibit E - Mineral Owner Research Exhibit F - Wildlife Habitat Report Exhibit G - Wildfire Hazard Report Exhibit H - Noxious Weed Report Exhibit I – Declaration of Covenants, Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws Exhibit J – Landscape Plan Exhibit K – Plat Map Customer Distribution Prevent fraud - Please call a member of our closing team for wire transfer instructions or to initiate a wire transfer. Note that our wiring instructions will never change. Order Number: GW63019439-5 Date: 10/21/2025 Property Address: 24 COUNTY ROAD 138, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 For Closing Assistance For Title Assistance Land Title Garfield County Title Team 901 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 202 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 (970) 945- 2610 (Work) (970) 945-4784 (Work Fax) glenwoodresponse@ltgc.com Company License: CO44565 Seller/Owner CHARLES HOGE AND MICHAEL RESCH AND LAURA RESCH 901 COTTONWOOD CIR GOLDEN, CO 80401 fresch99@yahoo.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Estimate of Title Fees Order Number: GW63019439-5 Date: 10/21/2025 Property Address: 24 COUNTY ROAD 138, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 Seller(s): CHARLES HOGE AND MICHAEL RESCH AND LAURA RESCH Buyer(s): A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED Thank you for putting your trust in Land Title. Below is the estimate of title fees for the transaction. The final fees will be collected at closing. Visit ltgc.com to learn more about Land Title. Estimate of Title Insurance Fees "TBD" Commitment $265.00 TBD - TBD Income $-265.00 TOTAL $0.00 Note: The documents linked in this commitment should be reviewed carefully. These documents, such as covenants conditions and restrictions, may affect the title, ownership and use of the property. You may wish to engage legal assistance in order to fully understand and be aware of the implications of the documents on your property. Chain of Title Documents: Garfield county recorded 02/14/2022 under reception no. 970898 Garfield county recorded 03/05/2003 under reception no. 622235 Plat Map(s): Garfield county recorded 02/11/2003 under reception no. 620584 Property Address: 24 COUNTY ROAD 138, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 1. Effective Date: 10/01/2025 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured: "TBD" Commitment Proposed Insured: A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED $0.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A FEE SIMPLE 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: CHARLES HOGE AND MICHAEL RESCH AND LAURA RESCH 5. The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 90 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO, SAID TRACT OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE N1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35, SAID POINT BEING AN IRON PIPE WITH AN ALUMINUM CAP, PLS NO. 15710; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NW1/4 S 07°03'10" E 1870.02 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE N 90°00'00" W 84.81 FEET; THENCE S 00°40'50" W 80.42 FEET; THENCE S 10°10'24" E 123.46 FEET; THENCE S 79°49'36" W 85.70 FEET; THENCE N 58°20'18" W 80.34 FEET; THENCE 19.34 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°39'42" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 74°10'09" W 19.10 FEET; THENCE N 90°00'00" W 38.18 FEET; THENCE 88.08 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 515.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°47'59" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 85°06'01" W 87.98 FEET; THENCE N 80°12'01" W 56.76 FEET; THENCE 110.42 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 65.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 97°20'08" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 31°31'57" W 97.62 FEET; THENCE N 84°8' 51" W 119.80 FEET; THENCE S 84°18'28" W 105.41 FEET; THENCE N 74°56'17" W 210.39 FEET; THENCE N 68°43'16" W 110.56 FEET; THENCE S 72°59'26" W 101.15 FEET; THENCE N 80°11'51" W 128.20 FEET; THENCE N 02°38'42" E 142.25 FEET; THENCE N 28°03'51" W 69.80 FEET; THENCE N 34°01'36" E 250.32 FEET; THENCE N 23°42'17" E 160.96 FEET; THENCE N 40°24'52" E 63.16 FEET; THENCE N 04°15' 08" W 209.64 FEET; THENCE N 22°37'14" E 167.65 FEET; THENCE N 49°48'42" E 68.45 FEET; THENCE N 37°28'23" E 80.15 FEET; THENCE N 11°39'34" E 51.69 FEET; THENCE N 26°11'52" E 62.99 FEET; THENCE N 26°31'06" W 55.72 FEET; THENCE N 45°21'31" E 855.56 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO ALSO KNOWN AS: LOT 2 GABOSSI EXEMPTION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED FEBRUARY 11, 2003 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 620584. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number:GW63019439-5 Copyright 2006-2025 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number:GW63019439-5 ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part I (Requirements) Order Number: GW63019439-5 All of the following Requirements must be met: This proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO. This commitment does not republish any covenants, condition, restriction, or limitation contained in any document referred to in this commitment to the extent that the specific covenant, conditions, restriction, or limitation violates state or federal law based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, handicap, familial status, or national origin. 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 7. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 8. DEED OF TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 11, 2022, FROM CHARLES HOGE AND MICHAEL RESCH AND LAURA RESCH TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO FOR THE USE OF BAY EQUITY LLC TO SECURE THE SUM OF $856,000.00 RECORDED FEBRUARY 14, 2022, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 970901. 9. DEED OF TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 11, 2022, FROM CHARLES HOGE AND MICHAEL RESCH AND LAURA RESCH TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO FOR THE USE OF ALPINE BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF $288,000.00 RECORDED FEBRUARY 14, 2022, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 970902. NOTE: THE ABOVE DEED OF TRUST SECURES A LINE OF CREDIT. 10. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED OCTOBER 06, 1967, IN BOOK 388 AT PAGE 311. 11. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED OCTOBER 06, 1967, IN BOOK 388 AT PAGE 311. 12. ENCROACHMENT OF ROADWAY ONTO SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON FIRST AMENDED SENOR MESA PLAT RECORDED OCTOBER 13, 1998 AS RECEPTION NO. 533649 PURPORTEDLY GRANTED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 13, 1943 IN BOOK 201 AT PAGE 502. 13. UTILITY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 12, 1999, IN BOOK 1154 AT PAGE 989. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: GW63019439-5 14. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO 2002-84 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 IN BOOK 1387 AT PAGE 114. 15. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS GRANTED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 7, 2002 IN BOOK 1376 AT PAGE 135. 16. EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND ALL MATTERS SHOWN ON THE PLAT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 610839 AND AMENDED PLAT RECORDED FEBRUARY 11, 2003 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 620584. 17. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF WATER ALLOTMENT CONTRACT RECORDED OCTOBER 24, 2003 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 639228, AND APPLICATION RECORDED FEBRUARY 25, 2013 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 831818. 18. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 2010 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 791617. 19. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF WATER AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 2010 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 791618 AND AMENDMENT RECORDED MARCH 28, 2011 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 800548 20. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF QUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 14, 2022 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 970897. 21. MATTERS DISCLOSED ON IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT PREPARED BY BOOKCLIFF SURVEY SERVICES INC., CERTIFIED NOVEMBER 29, 2021, JOB NO. 21161-01, OUR ESI 40147305. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: GW63019439-5 Land Title Guarantee Company Disclosure Statements Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.(A) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real property). (B) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. (C) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. (A) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. (B) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and material-men's liens. (C) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.(D) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. (E) This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface estate, in Schedule B-2. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of Regulatory Agencies. Note: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of a closing protection letter for the lender, purchaser, lessee or seller in connection with this transaction. Note: Pursuant to CRS 24-21-514.5, Colorado notaries may remotely notarize real estate deeds and other documents using real-time audio-video communication technology. You may choose not to use remote notarization for any document. That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and (A) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. (B) Joint Notice of Privacy Policy of Land Title Guarantee Company Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurancy Company This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company as agent for Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized access to your non-public personal information ("Personal Information"). In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from: applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web-based transaction management system; your transactions with, or from the services being performed by us, our affiliates, or others; a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction; and The public records maintained by governmental entities that we obtain either directly from those entities, or from our affiliates and non-affiliates. Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows: We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products and services to you. We may share your Personal Information with affiliated contractors or service providers who provide services in the course of our business, but only to the extent necessary for these providers to perform their services and to provide these services to you as may be required by your transaction. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action. We regularly assess security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal Information. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT STATED ABOVE OR PERMITTED BY LAW. Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows: Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Commitment For Title Insurance Issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company NOTICE IMPORTANT—READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED. THE COMPANY’S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. . COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within 6 months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. COMMITMENT CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS 2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. 3. The Company’s liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without: 4. COMPANY’S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment. 5. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY i. comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; ii. eliminate, with the Company’s written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or iii. acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment. 6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT “Knowledge” or “Known”: Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records.(a) “Land”: The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term “Land” does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy. (b) “Mortgage”: A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law.(c) “Policy”: Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment. (d) “Proposed Insured”: Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment.(e) “Proposed Policy Amount”: Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (f) “Public Records”: Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. (g) “Title”: The estate or interest described in Schedule A.(h) the Notice;(a) the Commitment to Issue Policy;(b) the Commitment Conditions;(c) Schedule A;(d) Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and(e) Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and(f) a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.(g) The Company’s liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company’s delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured’s good faith reliance to: (a) The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing. (b) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured. (c) The Company’s liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount. (d) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any.(e) In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. (f) In any event, the Company’s liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy.(g) Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment.(a) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment.(b) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment. (c) 7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT The issuing agent is the Company’s agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the Company’s agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services. 8. PRO-FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro-forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro-forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro-forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure. 9. ARBITRATION The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org/arbitration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Land Title Insurance Corporation has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A to be valid when countersigned by a validating officer or other authorized signatory. Issued by: Land Title Guarantee Company 3033 East First Avenue Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80206 303-321-1880 Craig B. Rants, Senior Vice President This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II —Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. (d) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company.(e) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company’s only liability will be under the Policy.(f) Canyon Creek Partners – Major Subdivision Engineering Report November 13, 2025 Job #: 32000.01 Page 1 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 Canyon Creek Partners LLC c/o Julie and Doug Pratte – The Land Studio, Inc. 365 River Bend Way Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Email: juliepratte@thelandstudio.com, dougpratte@thelandstudio.com RE: Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan Engineering Report – Canyon Creek Partners LLC (SE Job #32000.01) Dear Julie and Doug, Sopris Engineering, LLC (SE) has prepared the following report in support of a Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan review in Garfield County for the proposed site planning and subdivision design at Lot 2 of the Gabossi Exemption. The site is generally located between Canyon Creek and New Castle off Highway 6 and County Road 138. This report generally outlines the civil design scope, civil related deliverables, and civil related responses to the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, Article 7 Standards for the proposed development. SE assumes the text in this report and the associated attachments will be combined into a single application by The Land Studio that encompasses all design criteria necessary for the Garfield County submission documents and requirements. Executive Summary Existing Improvement Survey Plat (Bookcliff Survey, 11/29/21) and Gabossi Exemption Plat are attached Vicinity Map is attached as Figure 1 (Section 4-203.C) General Site Map is attached as Figure 2 Civil Design Drawing set is attached (Section 4-203.D,E) Bookcliff Survey Preliminary Plat is attached. The subject property falls within the Rural Zone District. The minimum lot area for the Rural District is 2-acres. The site is to be subdivided into 7 total lots which triggers the Major Subdivision criteria within the Land Use Code. Lot 1 will include the existing residence on the upper portion of the property. Lots 2 through 6 will be located generally in the lower flat on the southwest quarter of the property. Lot 7 will include the existing residential garage and the surrounding area generally on the southeast quarter of the property. See below for a summary of the proposed Lots and corresponding areas: Lot 1 – ±17.09-acres Lot 5 – ±2.43-acres Lot 2 – ±2.13-acres Lot 6 – ±2.03-acres Lot 3 – ±2.01-acres Lot 7 – ±6.81-acres Lot 4 – ±2.17-acres Canyon Creek Partners – Major Subdivision Engineering Report November 13, 2025 Job #: 32000.01 Page 2 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 The residential garage on Proposed Lot 7 is not in compliance with County Code. The garage was being utilized as a metal shop but the owners have notified the business that all operations must stop. To bring the structure into compliance, the owner is to apply for a Demolition Permit to restore the building back to the original condition of a residential garage as described in a letter from Garfield County Chief Building Official, John Plano, dated March 3, 2025 (attached). The drainage issues at the County Road 138 and Highway 6 intersection noted in the Sketch Plan phase of this project have mostly been alleviated due to the County paving the County Road at the intersection. A storm drainage culvert is to be located and restored or replaced as shown on the Civil Design Drawings. The existing access road through offsite Lot 4 south of the subject property is to be re-graded to bring the road up to current standards for longitudinal slope and cross slope. The borrow ditch on the inside of the road is to be improved as well. These improvements and other road improvements onsite have been shown on the Civil Design Drawings. SE reviewed the CDOT State Highway Access Permit for the existing access at County Road 138. A new access permit will not be required if development includes no more than 7 additional dwellings. The development proposes 7 additional dwellings including a new residence on Lots 2 through 7 and an ADU allowed on Lot 4. There is a legal and adequate source of water as described in the water rights decree for the property, the existing wells that serve proposed Lots 1 and 7, and well testing that was performed on the existing wells in June of 2024. The decree, well permits, and testing reports are all attached and described further below. Access, utility, and irrigation easements to serve each of the proposed lots have been proposed as shown on the attached drawings. General Existing Site Conditions & Structures The subject property is approximately 34.685-acres. The property is generally wooded with shorter scrub oak and cedar trees throughout. There is a large ±6.0-acre field that has been used for crop production in the past on the lower, southwest quarter of the property. There is one single-family home located on the north side of the property with a circle gravel driveway, small outbuildings, and sheds. There is one shop building located on the southeast quarter of the property with a large parking and storage area outside of the building. There are generally single lane gravel driveways to the home and the shop with other two track gravel drives around the site for ditch access and general property access. The east 2/3 of the property generally slopes from north to south and the west 1/3 of the property generally slopes steeply from east to west. See attached Figure 1 for a Vicinity Map and Figure 2 for a General Site Map. Division 1. General Approval Standards The following section of this report includes general responses for Civil Engineering related scope found in the Land Use Code, Article 7, Division 1 Standards. Canyon Creek Partners – Major Subdivision Engineering Report November 13, 2025 Job #: 32000.01 Page 3 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 Section 7-104. Source of Water – The Gabossi Exemption (Existing Lots 1 through 4), has 6 wells known as Bowles Well Nos. 1 through 6 that may be used for in-house, domestic water use (no irrigation or outdoor use). The 6 wells may be used for up to 22 single- family dwellings. Bowles Well No. 2 is to be used for 7 of the dwellings where the remaining Bowles Well Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 may serve a combined total of up to 15 singe-family dwellings. See attached copies of the well permits for Bowles Well Nos. 2, 3, 4, and the decree for case No. 2019CW3096. Further details of the wells are as follows: - Bowles Well No. 1 has not been developed but is to be located somewhere on the Gabossi Exemption subdivision. Currently this well has a conditional water right for 25-gpm. - Bowles Well No. 2 has been developed (Permit No. 68856-F) and is located on Existing Lot 1 (Decreed location is 1,250-ft from the north section line and 960-ft from the west section line). Currently the well has an absolute water right for 15-gpm for use in 1 single-family dwelling and the remaining 10-gpm is a conditional water right for use in an additional 6 single-family dwelling units. - Bowles Well No. 3 has been developed (Permit No. 56102-F) and is located on Existing Lot 2 (Decreed location is 1,500-ft from the north section line and 2,200-ft from the west section line). Currently the well has a conditional water right for 25-gpm. This well appears to be the well serving the shop building on the southeast quarter of the property within Proposed Lot 7. - Bowles Well No. 4 has been developed (Permit No. 56103-F) and is located on Existing Lot 2 (Decreed location is 650-ft from the north section line and 2,200-ft from the west section line). Currently the well has an absolute water right of 13-gpm for 1 single-family dwelling with an additional 12-gpm conditional water right. This well appears to be the well serving the single-family home on the north end of Proposed Lot 1. - Bowles Well No. 5 has not been developed but is to be located somewhere on the Gabossi Exemption. Currently this well has a conditional water right for 25 gpm. - Bowles Well No. 6 has not been developed but is to be located somewhere on the Gabossi Exemption. Currently this well has a conditional water right for 25 gpm. The maximum total diversions from Bowles Well Nos. 1 through 6 combined is limited to 8.65 ac-ft per year for in- house domestic use only. No irrigation or outdoor use is allowed. Water from the wells may serve a combined maximum of 22 single-family dwellings located on the Gabossi Subdivision Exemption and Old Orchard Subdivision. The Bowles Pond, First Enlargement and the Bowles Diversion which fills the pond are located on existing Lot 1. 2.4 ac-ft is absolute for augmentation for Bowles Well No. 2. 0.1 ac-ft is conditional for augmentation for Bowels Well No. 2. 2.5 ac-ft is conditional for augmentation of the remaining Bowles Wells Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Note that the conditional water rights are subject to an Application for Finding of Reasonable Diligence in the same month six years from the date of the water judge’s order (November 25, 2020) in Case No. 2019CW3096. Canyon Creek Partners – Major Subdivision Engineering Report November 13, 2025 Job #: 32000.01 Page 4 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 Proposed Lots 1 and 7 are served by existing domestic wells (Bowles Well No. 4 – Permit No. 56103-F on Lot 1 and Bowles Well No. 3 – Permit No. 56102-F on Lot 7). Proposed Lots 2 through 6 are to share 2 new wells to be drilled. Per this section and Section 4-203.M, there are specific criteria to be met for developments with 14 or less SFE’s (Single-family Equivalent) and that are served by wells. The criteria (Section 4-203.M.1.b) is summarized below: a) A minimum 4-hour pump test shall be performed on the well(s) to be used. The results shall be analyzed and summarized in a report... b) If a well is to be shared, an Applicant shall submit a legal well-sharing declaration addressing all easements and costs associated with operation and maintenance of the system and identifying the person responsible for paying costs and how assessment will be made for those costs. c) Water quality shall be tested by an independent testing laboratory… Pump and water quality testing was performed in June of 2024 on the existing wells (Bowles Well No. 4 – Permit No. 56103-F on Lot 1 and Bowles Well No. 3 – Permit No. 56102-F on Lot 7). The testing was performed with help from Aspen Waterwise and High Country Pump. Wright Water Engineers prepared a summary report describing the suitability of the existing wells onsite which has been attached for reference. The state issued a new commercial exempt well permit for the current shop building which legalizes the water supply for Proposed Lot 7 (see attached). The two proposed wells, as shown on the Civil Design Drawings, will be developed in accordance with standard permitting and well completion protocols along with meeting Garfield County Land Use Development Code. The well performance and testing results would be expected to be similar to the existing wells that were tested. Last, all well-sharing agreements will be handled once HOA covenants and declarations are prepared in the subdivision process. Section 7-105. Central Water Distribution and Wastewater Systems – A. Water Distribution Systems – See above for the description of wells to serve the proposed lots. (Proposed Lots 1 and 7 are served by existing wells and Proposed Lots 2 through 6 are to be served by a combination of 2 new domestic wells.) B. Wastewater Systems – There is not a public wastewater/sanitary sewer service to this property. Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS) exist on Proposed Lots 1 and 7 as further described below. The proposed Lots 2 through 7 are to be served by individual OWTS’s which are to be designed as needed in the design phases of the development. SE investigated the existing OWTS at the shop building (Proposed Lot 7) and found the system to be functional for the limited use (½ bath). However, the system was never permitted, and the shop building must be brought back to its original condition as a residential garage which does not include an OWTS. When this lot is redeveloped, a new OWTS will need to be designed and permitted. Canyon Creek Partners – Major Subdivision Engineering Report November 13, 2025 Job #: 32000.01 Page 5 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 In SE’s investigation of the OWTS for the shop building, a search of County data revealed documentation of a 2011 Garfield County Building Permit and a 2002 Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) Permit associated with the property for a garage and single-family home. It appears that a single-family home’s OWTS was permitted and finalized, in 2002, under County ISDS Permit No. 3759 to serve a 1-bedroom residential unit plus “GHR” design capacity reported, calling for a 750-gallon septic tank. However, the application dated 11-01-02, indicates a 2-bedroom, single-family dwelling. The permit indicates the design called for 414-sf of leaching chambers (24 units) assumed to be old model standard Infiltrator chambers configured in a trench(s). The permit “final system inspection and approval as installed section” indicates a 1,250-gal concrete septic tank, manufactured by Copeland, was installed with Infiltrator trench. This permit was finalized 12-27-02. An application for “Gabossi Subdivision Exemption” document was submitted in 2002 and indicates the existing residence on Proposed Lot 1 has an ISDS in place. SE prepared a summary letter for the investigation described above which has been attached for reference. Note this report was prepared before receipt of John Plano’s letter stating the existing shop building must be brought back to the condition of a residential garage which includes removing the OWTS system. Section 7-106. Public Utilities – Xcel Energy (Public Service Co) – There is an overhead electric line that runs through the southern portion of the property and includes a 20-ft utility easement that was granted in 1999 for access for operation, repair, and maintenance. Structures are not permitted within this easement (Book 1154 at Page 989, See Exception 11 of Title Commitment). Gas lines exist within the Highway 6 right of way but are not currently extended to the property. SE coordinated with Xcel on providing service to the site and received a “Will Serve” letter that states Xcel will provide natural gas (if desired) and electric service. The letter is attached. Transformers will be required for new single- family residences with maximum 250-ft distance from the home. The existing lines would act as the “backbone” lines that new service lines would be pulled from. Gas service to the lots is not currently proposed. If gas service is desired to be extended, a CDOT utility permit would be required. An overhead service line extends to the home on Proposed Lot 1 from the main overhead line. It does not appear that there is a formal easement for this line. However, it is assumed to have prescriptive rights as the lines were installed in 2003. There is a proposed easement around this line shown on the civil design drawings and plat on the neighbor lots that the line crosses (Proposed Lots 5 and 6). There is a proposed easement shown on the civil design drawings and plat for future Xcel service to be extended to Lots 2 through 6. Service is planned to be extended from the main line on the south side of the project to two new transformers. One is proposed to serve Lots 4 and 5. The other is proposed to serves Lots 2, 3, and 6. Design of the Xcel infrastructure will need to be coordinated with Xcel. Service will be extended to Proposed Lot 7 from the existing overhead line that runs through the lot. The service will be fully designed at the building permit design phase. Canyon Creek Partners – Major Subdivision Engineering Report November 13, 2025 Job #: 32000.01 Page 6 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 Section 7-107. Access and Roadways – Existing Roads and Vehicle Access As stated above, the project site has multiple gravel drives that provide general access throughout the site and drive access to the single-family residence on the northern portion of the site and to the shop building. The main access is a gravel road that crosses through the existing Lot 4 property south of the site within an easement. This main drive runs through the lower portion of the property before turning up the hill and ending at the single-family residence on the north portion of the property. A driveway also wyes off the main access that provides access to the shop building. A detailed description of some of the existing roads for this project are further described below. Neighbor Driveway Encroachment – There is a portion of the neighbor’s driveway that encroaches on the property east of the existing shop building. This encroachment was granted based on an instrument recorded in 1943 (Book 201 at Page 502, Exception 10 of Title Commitment). This road encroachment shall remain in its existing condition with any development on the property. See attached drawings for location of road encroachment on the property. Access Easement through existing Lot 4 Property – There is a 30-ft wide ingress, egress, and utility easement (Reception No. 620584, Exception 14 of Title Commitment) into the property from County Road No. 138 from the south. This easement crosses existing Lot 4 of the Gabossi Subdivision. The existing gravel drive within the easement has some portions that will need to be re-graded for longitudinal slope, the cross slope will need to be improved, and the borrow ditch on the inside of the road will need to be improved as shown on the attached drawings. Road Design Standards Glenwood Springs Fire Department Standards – SE reached out to the Glenwood Springs Fire Department to confirm minimum road width and grade that they will accept for their fire apparatus. They stated they use the 2015 International Fire Code (IFC) for fire apparatus access roads. The 2015 IFC, Appendix D states fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10% grade unless approved by the fire chief and dead-end roads shall be minimum 20-ft wide. SE met with the fire chief onsite to discuss alternative approval for max grade as further described below. Garfield County Road Standards – For any development with multiple lots on the property, the County requires a Semi Primitive Access. The Roadway Standards for a Semi Primitive Access off a public right of way in the Garfield County Land Use Code, Article 7, Section 7-107.F, Table 7-107 states the following: Design Standards Semi Primitive Design Capacity (ADT) 21 to 100 Min ROW Width (ft) 40 Lane Width (ft) Two Lane – 8 each, 16 total Shoulder Width (ft) 2 Ditch Width (ft) 4 Cross Slope 2% Chip/Seal, 3% gravel Min Radius (ft) 50 Max % Grade 12% Canyon Creek Partners – Major Subdivision Engineering Report November 13, 2025 Job #: 32000.01 Page 7 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 Required Road Improvements for Proposed Development SE reviewed the existing road widths and grades and compared them against proposed site development, County road standards, and Fire Department road standards. SE met onsite with Robin Pitt, City of Glenwood Springs Fire Marshal, on July 14, 2025. The proposed road design, general site access, and other fire department criteria were reviewed. Robin verbally agreed that the proposed design of the roads, given the multiple pullout locations and proposed road improvements, would allow the fire department to accept a maximum grade of 12%. Below is a bullet point summary of the proposed road improvements for this project. Note that stationing has been applied to the main road access on the attached drawings. The road providing access through the easement on existing Lot 2 is shown at approximately STA: 0+00 to 4+55. This section of road is to be regraded to a max 12%, 16-ft width at 3% cross slope into the hillside, and 2-ft shoulders. The ditch on the uphill side of the road is to be cleaned and dug out with a min width of 4-ft and 1.5- ft deep. There is a culvert at the lower end of the road that crosses the drive to the storage facility. This culvert is to be located and either cleaned out or it is to be removed and replaced. Further details of the design are shown on the attached drawings. As the road continues into the project site, approximately STA: 4+55 to 13+00, portions of the upper hillside are to be cut and widened to allow for a wider and deeper borrow ditch. The Semi-Primitive road profile is to be maintained. A 40-ft access easement is proposed around this road. At approximately STA: 13+00, the existing drive will continue in its original alignment. This road will remain as the existing driveway to the single-family residence. A 30-ft access easement is proposed around this driveway through Lots 2, 5, and 6 for the benefit of Lot 1 access. Further details of the design are shown on the attached drawings. Note the existing drive to the shop building wyes off the main access at approximately STA: 8+50. The existing driveway is to remain in its original alignment. A new main drive is proposed from STA: 13+00 to 17+41. The Semi-Primitive road profile is to be maintained. A 40-ft access easement is proposed around this road. Individual driveways to Lots 2 through 6 will be designed off the main road when each of the respective Lots are developed. A driveway stub to Lot 4 is proposed at the northeast corner of the lot. The Glenwood Springs Fire Department requested clear signage to be added at the County Road intersection and at any other internal road intersections if applicable. This signage will be designed and added once addressing and road names are established in the development process. Canyon Creek Partners – Major Subdivision Engineering Report November 13, 2025 Job #: 32000.01 Page 8 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 Highway 6 & County Road 138 CDOT State Highway Access Permit, Traffic Generation If a development is accessed from a state highway, the access permit at the intersection is to be studied for increased traffic due to the development. If a development increases the permitted traffic at a highway access by 20% or more, a new access permit is required. The access to the subject lot is at the intersection of Highway 6 and County Road 138. CDOT Permit No. 303120 (attached) exists for this intersection and was permitted in 2003. The access provides vehicles access to County Road 138 and is permitted for 40 DHV (Peak Hour Trips). The 40 trips were calculated based on traffic generated from the New Creation Church and Daycare in the short term (2002) and long term (2022) scenarios. It is assumed the existing single-family residence on the site was included in the trips because the house received a certificate of occupancy on June 12, 2003 and the access permit is dated June 20, 2003. Using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual, Land Use 210 for Single-Family Detached Housing, 0.99 trip is generated for each single-family residence in a new development (attached). This number is rounded up to 1 trip. To determine what the 20% increase in traffic threshold is, there are two options. One is to use the 40 trips from the existing permit which means up to 7 additional residences can be added before a traffic permit revision is triggered (20% of 40 is 8). The other option is to perform a traffic study, physically count cars at this intersection, and use the physical counts as the baseline number. 20% of this counted baseline traffic would be the number of trips that would trigger the need for a new access permit. A new access permit would require a new traffic study to determine if highway improvements are necessary to support the increase in vehicle trips that are generated from the development. Development of the subject site proposes a maximum of 7 additional residences including a new single-family home on Lots 2 through 7 and an ADU allowed on Lot 4. SE reached out to Brian Killian, CDOT Region 3 Access Program Manager, to confirm the threshold that would trigger a new access permit. Brian confirmed in an email on September 20, 2022 that if the development adds 8 or more trips in the peak hour, a CDOT Access Permit is required. The email chain is attached. Section 7-108. Use of Land Subject to Natural Hazards – This development is not anticipated to be within any natural or geologic hazard areas. Section 7-109. Fire Protection – SE reached out to the Glenwood Springs Fire Department to confirm minimum road width and grade that they will accept for their fire apparatus. They stated they use the 2015 International Fire Code (IFC) for fire apparatus access roads. The 2015 IFC, Appendix D states that fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10% grade unless approved by the fire chief and dead-end roads shall be minimum 20-ft wide. SE met onsite with Robin Pitt, City of Glenwood Springs Fire Marshal, on July 14, 2025. The proposed road design, general site access, and other fire department criteria were reviewed. Robin verbally agreed the proposed design of the roads, given the multiple pullout locations and proposed road improvements meeting Garfield County standards, would allow the fire department to accept a maximum grade of 12% for all proposed roads. Canyon Creek Partners – Major Subdivision Engineering Report November 13, 2025 Job #: 32000.01 Page 9 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 Robin Pitt suggested the developer should clear trees on the sides of the roads including the main access roads and the driveways to the shop building and to the single-family residence. He specifically mentioned canopies should be pulled back and trees cleared so emergency vehicles do not have any issues using the roads to access the site and dwellings. The developer is to clear trees following mitigation recommendations from the fire department. Please also see the wildfire hazard study prepared by Michael Resch for additional details on fire protection. Division 2. General Resource Protection Standards The following section of this report describes general responses for Civil Engineering related scope found in the Land Use Code, Article 7, Division 2 Standards. Section 7-203. Protection of Waterbodies – There are no waterbodies located on the subject property. Irrigation ditches run through the property but will be protected and accounted for early in the design phases of the project. Culverts have been added where necessary at ditch crossings as shown on the attached drawings. Section 7-204. Drainage and Erosion – The proposed roads and improvements to existing roads have been designed to account for proper grading and drainage. When each of the individual lots is developed, grading and drainage design will be provided as part of the building permit drawings. SE does not anticipate issues with meeting the Garfield County detention requirements (2-year and 25-year, 24-hour precipitation events) or safely passing the 100-year storm event through the site. Section 7-205. Environmental Quality – Current construction standards provide parameters for mitigation of drainage and soil erosion activities relative to site development. Recommendations for appropriate best management practices (BMP’s) will be made throughout the design phases of this project. These BMP’s are primarily grouped for the construction phase and the post development phase of the project, with the main emphasis on soil erosion and sediment transport controls. Section 7-206. Wildfire Hazards – The County restricts development in areas designated as severe wildfire hazard areas (Slopes greater than 30% or within a fire chimney as identified by the Colorado State Forest Service). The subject property will be reviewed for wildfire hazard restrictions at the design phase of the project but does not appear to be in a severe wildfire area. In addition, see the wildfire hazard study prepared by Michael Resch for additional details on fire protection. Canyon Creek Partners – Major Subdivision Engineering Report November 13, 2025 Job #: 32000.01 Page 10 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 Section 7-207. Natural and Geologic Hazards F. Slope Analysis The County allows development of property on slopes up to 30%. Development on slopes from 20% to 30% requires special engineering study to “establish the feasibility of development for the site” as stated in the land use code, Article 7. Section 7-207.F. SE has prepared a slope analysis as shown on the design drawings which displays all slopes over 20%. The setbacks delineated within the lots account for slopes over 20%. Section 7-208. Reclamation – Recommendations for reclamation of disturbed areas will be made throughout the design phases of this project. In general, any disturbed areas are to be re-seeded with County approved seed mixes. Reclamation of disturbed areas will be outlined in more detail within sediment, erosion control, and stormwater management design. Permanent Erosion Control BMPs shall consist of a complete landscaping and ground covering task to permanently re-vegetate and cover bear grounds that will remain open space to avoid long-term soil erosion. This effort will reduce the risk of unnecessary degradation and failure of the drainage system. Temporary erosion control structures installed during construction shall be left in place as necessary and maintained until new vegetation has been reestablished at a 70% level. Upon reaching a satisfactory level of soil stabilization from the new vegetation, all erosion control structures shall be removed; with the exception of any proposed sediment/retention basins. These should remain in place until they become a conflict with future improvements. Division 3. Site Planning and Development Standards The following section of this report shows general responses for Civil Engineering related scope found in the Land Use Code, Article 7, Division 3 Standards. Section 7-302. Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards – The proposed development is made up of 7 proposed Lots. The Lots will be developed with single-family dwelling units which are exempt from the Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. Section 7-305. Snow Storage Standards – The proposed development is made up of 7 proposed Lots. The Lots will be developed with single-family dwelling units and do not include a common outdoor parking area. All residential uses except for multi-family are exempt from the Snow Storage Standards. Canyon Creek Partners – Major Subdivision Engineering Report November 13, 2025 Job #: 32000.01 Page 11 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 Section 7-306. Trail and Walkway Standards – The proposed development is made up of 7 proposed Lots. The Lots will be developed with single-family dwelling units which are exempt from the Trail and Walkway Standards. Division 4. Subdivision Standards and Design Specifications The following section of this report shows general responses for Civil Engineering related scope found in the Land Use Code, Article 7, Division 4 Standards. Section 7-401. General Subdivision Standards – Subsections A. Maintenance of Common Facilities, B. Domestic Animal Control, and C. Fireplaces will be vetted in the design phases of the project. Subsection D. Development in the Floodplain does not apply to this site as the entire property is outside of the 500-year floodplain as shown on FEMA Floodplain Panel 1130 of 2075, Map Number 08045C1130E (Preliminary Oct 26, 2011). See attached for floodplain map. Section 7-402. Subdivision Lots – The proposed Lot configurations conform to the lot size standards. All Lots are larger than 2-acres which is minimum for Rural Zone. The Lot configurations were strategically delineated to balance buildable area on Lots 2 – 6 with applicable setbacks and easements delineated as well. Lots 1 and 7 are the largest lots with the existing single-family residence on Lot 1 and the existing shop building on Lot 7. Section 7-403. Survey Monuments – Permanent survey monuments are required for subdivisions. These markers will be placed once platting is complete. Section 7-404. School Land Dedication – The BOCC shall require reservation, dedication, or payment in lieu for school land. Land Dedication Standards state that 870-SF of land (0.020-acre) per Single-family unit shall be dedicated or pay fee in lieu based on Section 7-404.C. The subject property will most likely require fee in lieu payment for the school land dedication requirement. The subject property is within the RE-1 School District boundary which will require payment based on Section 7-404.C.2 which is based on the unimproved fair market value of the land that would have been dedicated. Applicable payments will be made once the fee is calculated and established in the development process. Canyon Creek Partners – Major Subdivision Engineering Report November 13, 2025 Job #: 32000.01 Page 12 502 Main Street, Suite A3, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 Section 7-405. Road Impact Fees – Road Impact Fees shall be implemented and administered consistent with the Road Impact Fee Update study dated July 1, 2015. Road impact fees for new development are collected prior to issuance of a building permit. The subject property is located in the East Benefit District. Table 7-405 defines the Impact fee for Residential Dwelling per Square feet of Finished Floor Areas. The fees have specific ranges based on the size of the dwelling unit ranging from $726/unit for 900-SF or less up to $2,703/unit for 2,401-SF and greater. Conclusions: Sopris Engineering has studied the subject property and believes all criteria have been reviewed and met in the package provided to the County for Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan review. The project team looks forward to hearing from the County for feedback to move forward to the final plat phase of the project. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please call (970) 704-0311. Sincerely, Kyle Sanderson, PE Partner/Project Manager Attachments: 1 – Existing ISP – Lot 2 Gabossi Exemption 2 – Gabossi Exemption Plat 3 – Figure 1 – Vicinity Map 4 – Figure 2 – General Site Map 5 – Civil Design Drawings 6 – Hogback View Estates Preliminary Plat, Bookcliff Survey 7 – John Plano Letter – Shop Building 8 – Bowles Well Nos. 2, 3, and 4 Well Permits 9 – Water Rights Decree 2019CW3096 10 – Suitability Report – Bowles Well Nos. 3 and 4 11 – Commercial Exempt Well Permit No. 335230 12 – OWTS Report – Shop Building 13 – Xcel Energy Will Serve Letter 14 – CDOT Access Permit No 303120 15 – ITE Manual, Use 210, Single Family Detached Housing 16 – Email with Brian Killian, CDOT 17 – FEMA Floodplain Map SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 (970) 704-0311 G:\2022\32000\CIVIL\CIVIL DWGS\DE\32000-SITE.DWG - Oct 24, 2024 - 11:58am NO R T H FIGURE 1 GENERAL VICINITY MAP CANYON CREEK PARTNERS, LLC (BACKGROUND: GOOGLE EARTH AERIAL) CANYON CREEKPARTNERS LLC PROPERTY BOUNDARY (LOT 2 - GABOSSI EXEMPTION) SCALE: 1" = 1 mile COLORADORIVER ±3-MILE RADIUS AROUND PROPERTYBOUNDARY LAKOTALINKS GOLFCOURSE CHACRA/ CANYON CREEK EXIT 109 CANYONCREEK NEW CASTLEEXIT 105 ALKALICREEK TO GLENWOODSPRINGS SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 (970) 704-0311 G:\2022\32000\CIVIL\CIVIL DWGS\DE\32000-SITE.DWG - Oct 24, 2024 - 11:59am NO R T H FIGURE 2 GENERAL SITE MAP CANYON CREEK PARTNERS, LLC (BACKGROUND: GOOGLE EARTH AERIAL) CANYON CREEK PARTNERS LLCPROPERTY BOUNDARY (LOT 2 - GABOSSI EXEMPTION) HIGHW AY 6 C O U N T Y R O A D 1 3 8 NEW CREATION CHURCH EXISTINGSINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE EXISTING METAL SHOPBUILDING 30FT INGRESS, EGRESS,& UTILITY EASEMENT 20FT PUBLIC SERVICE CO EASEMENT LOT 4 LOT 3 LOT 1 SCALE: 1" = 250' EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO SHOP BUILDING OFF MAINDRIVE, MAX 14% GRADE HIGHW AY 6 TO NEW CASTLE TO GLENWOOD SPRINGS SUBJECT PROPERTY CANYON CREEK PARTNERS LLC, LOT 2 GABOSSI EXEMPTION INTE R S T A T E 7 0 COLORADO R I V E R NEW CREATIONCHURCH US HIGHWAY 6 EXISTING SHOP BUILDING EXISTINGSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE PROPOSED LOT 2 ±2.13 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 7±6.81 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3 ±2.01 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5±2.43 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 1±17.09 ACRES EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAYS US HI G H W A Y 6 COUNTY R O A D 1 3 8 DATE REVISION C-1.0 DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 1 - C O V E R . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 5 0 a m NO R T H COVER SHEET MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R 32000.01JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m GENERAL SITE NOTES: 1.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL HAVE A SET OF APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE BASED ON SURVEYS PERFORMED BY BOOKCLIFF SURVEY SERVICES, INC. THE UTILITIES, AS SHOWN, MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN LOCATES OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE AND POTHOLE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES TO VERIFY DEPTH PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 4. EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE AT 2.0 FT INTERVALS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATIONS AND PROTECTION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THESE UTILITIES EITHER UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN CONTINUOUS SERVICE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO, OR INTERRUPTION OF SERVICES CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING EXISTING CONDITIONS OUTSIDE THE DESIGNATED IMPROVEMENT AREA FROM DAMAGE. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING AREAS OUTSIDE THE DESIGNATED IMPROVEMENT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL, AT A MINIMUM, BE RESTORED TO A STATE EQUAL TO ITS PRE-CONSTRUCTION STATE. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THE WORK ACCORDING TO ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENT, COUNTY, STATE, AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS. IN PARTICULAR, THE "TRENCHING" AND "OPEN EXCAVATION" OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CURRENT O.S.H.A. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL PUBLIC OR PRIVATE UTILITY OWNERS FORTY-EIGHT HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK ADJACENT TO THE UTILITY. 9. ALL GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS TO BE ADHERED TO. EARTHWORK, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: 1. EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE AT 2.0 FT INTERVALS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN SEDIMENT AND EROSION PROTECTION THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION OPERATION. 3. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION DISTURBANCE ZONE SHALL BE REVEGETATED PER LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER GRADING IS COMPLETE. SEEDING TO BE APPLIED BY HYDROMULCH TECHNIQUES BY A QUALIFIED CONTRACTOR AND/OR OTHER TECHNIQUES PURSUANT TO RECOMMENDATION BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OTHER CONSULTANTS. 4. SILT FENCE ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF ANY DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. 5. TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL ON SITE FOR USE ON AREAS TO BE REVEGETATED. ANY AND ALL STOCKPILES SHALL BE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND PROTECTED FROM EROSIVE ELEMENTS. 6. VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL DEVICES (MUD RACKS) SHALL BE PROVIDED AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF THESE DEVICES, AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY TRACKING OF SEDIMENT ONTO THE ROADWAYS. ROADWAYS ARE TO BE KEPT CLEAN THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAIN CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO THE SITE BOUNDARIES AND SPECIFIED RIGHT OF WAY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE OUTSIDE THIS AREA WITHOUT THE PRIOR EXPRESSED CONSENT OF THE OWNERS. 8. DUST CAUSED BY EXCAVATION, TOPSOIL REMOVAL OPERATIONS, OR ROAD BASE PLACEMENT SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE. THE ENGINEER OR TOWN MAY REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR AT ANY TIME TO DISCONTINUE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL DUST EMISSIONS ARE MITIGATED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH AND APPLY A DUST PALLIATIVE ON THE SITE AS DIRECTED BY THE COUNTY. DUST PALLIATIVE MAY CONSIST OF WATER OR A NON-POLLUTING SOLUTION. SPREADING OF WATER OR WATER MIXTURE SHALL BE DONE WITH ACCEPTABLE SPRINKLING EQUIPMENT. ALL DUST CONTROL SHALL EXTEND BEYOND THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PROPER TO THE SIDE STREETS ENTERING AND EXISTING THE PROJECT, WHERE MUD AND DIRT FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, AS WELL AS LOCAL TRAFFIC, MAY GET ONTO THE SIDE STREETS. CLEANUP OF THESE AREAS WILL BE REQUIRED AS NECESSARY OR AS DIRECTED BY THE TOWN. 10. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE "BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES" TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION. NO SEDIMENT SHALL LEAVE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 11. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, INSPECTION, REPAIR AND REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROLS. 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WITH UNSTABILIZED DISTURBANCE AREAS OVER 1 ACRE, SUBJECT TO EROSION, REQUIRE A CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT FROM THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT (CDPHE), WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION (WQCD). 2. THE PERMIT APPLICANT(S) IS THE OWNER AND THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE(S). THE CERTIFICATION UNDER THE PERMIT REQUIRES THAT SPECIFIC ACTIONS BE PERFORMED AT DESIGNATED TIMES. THE OWNER AND/OR THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE(S) ARE LEGALLY OBLIGATED TO COMPLY WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATION. 3. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS (SWMPs) ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL PROJECTS REQUIRING A CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND UPDATED ON SITE. THE PERMIT HOLDER MUST IMPLEMENT, MAINTAIN AND INSPECT STORMWATER AND EROSION CONTROLS DELINEATED ON THE SWMPs UNTIL THE SITE IS PERMANENTLY STABILIZED AND THE PERMIT IS INACTIVATED. THE PERMIT COVERS ALL WORK ON THE PROJECT INCLUDING WORK PERFORMED BY SUB-CONTRACTORS AND OTHER ENTITIES. IT IS RECOMMENDED BY THE WQCD THAT A SWMP ADMINISTRATOR BE DESIGNATED FOR THE PROJECT. THE SWMP MUST BE KEPT ON SITE FOR USE BY THE ADMINISTRATOR AND REVIEW BY WQCD PERSONEL OR CITY. 4. THE SWMP SHALL BE PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES, HYDROLOGIC AND POLLUTION CONTROL PRACTICES. THE SWMP NEED NOT BE PREPARED BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER. THE OBJECTIVE OF THE PLAN SHALL BE TO IDENTIFY BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) WHICH WHEN IMPLEMENTED WILL MEET THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. THE SWMP SHOULD BE AMENDED AS NEEDED TO REFLECT THE CHANGES/IMPROVEMENTS MADE. 5. THE PERMIT REQUIRES THAT INSPECTION OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BE PERFORMED AT LEAST EVERY 14 DAYS AND AFTER ANY PRECIPITATION OR SNOWMELT EVENT OCCURS. INSPECTION REPORTS MUST BE MAINTAINED ON SITE AND MADE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY WQCD PERSONEL ALL REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE COMPLETED AND MADE IN A TIMELY MANNER, NO LESS THAN 7 DAYS AFTER ANY PRECIPITATION/RUNOFF EVENT. ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ANY SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE OR AT ANY TIME THAT THE SEDIMENT OR DEBRIS ADVERSELY IMPACTS THE FUNCTIONING OF THE SEDIMENT-TRAPPING DEVICE. 6. THE OBJECTIVE OF THE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO MINIMIZING THE AMOUNT OF DISTURBED SOIL, PREVENTING RUNOFF FROM OFF-SITE OR UNDISTURBED AREAS FROM FLOWING ACROSS DISTURBED AREAS, SLOWING DOWN THE RUNOFF FLOWING ACROSS THE CONSTRUCTION SITES AND REMOVING/CONTROLLING POTENTIAL SEDIMENT IN RUNOFF FROM ON-SITE DISTURBED AREAS TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION OF SENSITIVE UNDISTURBED AREAS. 7. A COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE KEPT ON SITE, FOR READY AVAILABILITY TO THE OPERATOR, AND SO THAT DIVISION OR EPA PERSONNEL CAN REVIEW IT DURING AN INSPECTION. IF AN OFFICE LOCATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE SITE, THE SWMP MUST BE MANAGED SO THAT IT IS AVAILABLE AT THE SITE WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE OCCURRING (e.g., BY KEEPING THE SWMP IN A SUPERINTENDENT'S VEHICLE.) STORM WATER MANAGEMENT NOTES: OE x PROPOSED LEGEND PROPOSED EDGE OF GRAVEL EXISTING LEGEND EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EXISTING EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE EXISTING TWO-TRACK PATH EXISTING IRRIGATION DITCH EXISTING FENCELINE SHEET INDEX C1.0 = COVER SHEET C2.0 = MASTER EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 = SUBDIVISION EXISTING CONDITIONS C3.0 = MASTER SITE PLAN C3.1 = SUBDIVISION SITE PLAN C4.0 = SUBDIVISION UTILITY PLAN C5.0 = MASTER GRADING PLAN C5.1 = SUBDIVISION GRADING PLAN C6.0 = PLAN & PROFILE STA: 0+00 - 8+50 C6.1 = PLAN & PROFILE STA: 8+50 - 17+41 C7.0 = CONSTRUCTION DETAILS >> IRR PROPOSED DITCH FLOWLINE PROPOSED IRRIGATION LINE PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVE HOGBACK VIEW ESTATESPROPOSED SUBDIVISIONGARFIELD COUNTY SEC 35, T5S, R90W, 6TH P.M. VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 2000' MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE UE PROPOSED GRAVEL SHOULDER EXISTING PRIMITIVE/TWO-TRACK DRIVE SCALE: 1'' = 150' 11-13-25 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE PROPOSED WELL LOCATION PROPOSED EASEMENT EXISTING ASPHALT ROADWAY EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE OE OE OE S S S OE OE OE OE OE OE CO TVG W W W W W W OE OE OE OEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE W LOT 1GABOSSI EXEMPTION RECEPTION NO. 620584 LOT 3 GABOSSI EXEMPTIONRECEPTION NO. 620584 LOT 4 GABOSSI EXEMPTIONRECEPTION NO. 620584 PARCEL AWILLIAMS TRUST EXEMPTION PLATRECEPTION NO. 386362 LOT 3 FIRST AMENDED SENOR MESA EXEMPTION PLAT RECEPTION NO. 533649 LOT 1 FIRST AMENDEDSENOR MESA EXEMPTION PLAT RECEPTION NO. 533649 US HI G H W A Y 6 US HI G H W A Y 6 CR 138 CR 138 LOT 2 GABOSSI EXEMPTION ±34.7 ACRES PROPERTYLINE IRRIGATIONDITCH DITCHACCESS ROAD TWO-TRACKPATH GRAVEL DRIVE GRAVEL DRIVE GRAVELDRIVE GRAVELDRIVE TWO-TRACKPATH IRRIGATION DITCH TWO-TRACK PATH OWTS/SEPTICTANK SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WATER STRUCTURES IRRIGATION RISER IRRIGATION INFRASTRUCTURE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE OVERHEADELECTRIC LINE DITCH ACCESS ROAD IRRIGATION DITCH SHED GREENHOUSE 20' PUBLIC SERVICE CO. EASEMENT 30' INGRESS, EGRESS, & UTILITY EASEMENT WELL WELL TWO-TRACKPATH SHOPBUILDING PROPERTYLINE TWO-TRACK PATH DITCH DITCH CULVERT CULVERT OWTS/SEPTIC TANK 20' PUBLIC SERVICE CO. EASEMENT CL 57 2 0 57 2 2 57 2 4 57 2 6 57 2 8 5 7 3 0 5 7 3 2 5 7 3 4 5 7 3 6 5 7 3 8 5 7 4 0 57 4 2 5 7 4 6 5902 5890 5880 5870 5860 5850 5830 5840 582 0 580 0 5810 59 0 0 58 5 0 58 0 0 5 7 5 0 5 7 0 0 57 2 0 57 0 0 56 8 056 6 0 571 8 5708 5698 5688 APPROXIMATE ALIGNMENT OF 30" CMP,IRRIGATION DITCH ±4" PVCIRRIGATIONPIPE APPROXIMATEIRRIGATION DIVERSION 5650 5660 5624 NEIGHBOR DRIVE ENCROACHMENT DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 2 - E X C O N D . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 4 7 a m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 0120 120 240 120 48060 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m C-2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O NOTE: SLOPES OVER 20% ARE SHOWN WITH LIGHT GRAY HATCH 11-13-25 x OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE S OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE W W W 20' PUBLIC SERVICE CO. EASEMENT LOT 1 GABOSSI EXEMPTION RECEPTION NO. 620584 LOT 2 GABOSSI EXEMPTION ±34.7 ACRES IRRIGATION RISER IRRIGATIONRISER IRRIGATIONINFRASTRUCTURE SHOPBUILDING WELL SHED OWTS/SEPTICTANK OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE TWO-TRACKPATH TWO-TRACKPATH IRRIGATION DITCH IRRIGATIONDITCH TWO-TRACK PATH PROPERTYLINE OVERHEAD ELECTRICLINE GRAVELDRIVE GRAVELDRIVE GRAVEL TURNAROUND 57 2 0 57 2 2 57 2 4 57 2 6 57 2 8 5 7 3 0 5 7 3 2 5 7 3 4 5 7 3 6 5 7 3 8 5 7 4 0 57 4 2 5 7 4 6 5860 5850 5830 5840 5820 580 0 5810 57 2 0 57 0 0 56 8 0 56 6 0 571 8 5708 5698 5688 DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 2 - E X C O N D . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 4 7 a m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 040 40 80 40 16020 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-2.1 SUBDIVISION EXISTING CONDITIONS 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O NOTE: SLOPES OVER 20% ARE SHOWN WITH LIGHT GRAY HATCH 11-13-25 PROPOSED LOT 2 ±2.13 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3 ±2.01 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5 ±2.43 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 7 ±6.81 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 1 ±17.09 ACRES EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE TO SINGLEFAMILY RESIDENCE US HI G H W A Y 6 CR 138 PROPOSED ROADIMPROVEMENTS TO LOT LINE PROPOSED ROADIMPROVEMENTS TO LOT LINE PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTSTO LOT LINE EXISTING SINGLEFAMILY RESIDENCE EXISTING SHOP BUILDING EXISTING GRAVELDRIVE TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 30' INGRESS, EGRESS, & UTILITYEASEMENT LOT 4 GABOSSI EXEMPTION LOT 3 GABOSSI EXEMPTION PROPERTY LINE 20' PUBLIC SERVICE CO. EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 3 - S I T E P L A N . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 4 8 a m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 0120 120 240 120 48060 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-3.0 MASTER SITE PLAN 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O 11-13-25 S W W W PROPOSED 16' ACCESS DRIVE PROPOSED LOT 2 ±2.13 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3 ±2.01 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5 ±2.43 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES PROPOSED 40.0' ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSEDLOT LINE PROPERTYLINE PROPERTYLINE PROPOSED LOT LINE PROPOSED 40.0' ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED LOT 7 ±6.81 ACRES ±17.09 ACRES PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD R20.0' R20.0' R60.0' R40.0' R48.0' R20.0' 12' ACCESSDRIVE 12' ACCESSDRIVE PROPOSED LOT LINE PROPOSEDLOT LINE EXISTING DRIVEWAY R20.0' PROPOSED 30'ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED LOT LINE PROPOSEDLOT LINE EXISTING 20.0' PUBLIC SERVICECO. EASEMENT EXISTING GRAVELDRIVE TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPOSED 40.0' ACCESS EASEMENT EXISTING SHOP BUILDING PROPOSED SHARED UTILITY EASEMENT (WELL & IRRIGATION) FOR LOTS 2, 3, & 6 PROPOSED WELL EASEMENT FOR LOTS 4 & 5 PROPOSED SHARED 15.0' IRRIGATION & XCEL ENERGY EASEMENT 25.0' SETBACK 25.0' SETBACK PROPOSED SHARED 15.0' IRRIGATION & XCEL ENERGY EASEMENT 25.0' SETBACK 10.0' SETBACK PROPOSED 10.0' IRRIGATION EASEMENT PROPOSED 10.0'IRRIGATIONEASEMENT 10.0' SETBACK 10.0' SETBACK 10.0' SETBACK PROPOSED 20'UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED SHARED XCEL ENERGY & UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED LOT 1 ±17.09 ACRES DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 3 - S I T E P L A N . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 4 8 a m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 040 40 80 40 16020 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-3.1 SUBDIVISION SITE PLAN 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O 11-13-25 UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE IR R IR R IR R IR R IR R IR R IR R IR R IR R IR R IRR IRR IRR E E OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE S OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE W W WPROPOSED LOCATION FOR 25 GPM WELL, SERVICES TO LOTS 4 & 5 100' WELL SETBACK LINE 100' WELL SETBACK LINE PROPOSED LOCATION FOR 25 GPM WELL, SERVICES TO LOTS 2,3, & 6 EXISTING UTILITY POLE UNDERGROUND ELECTRICLINE STUB TO TRANSFORMER SERVE LOTS 2, 3, & 6, DESIGN TO BE COORDINATED AND VERIFIED WITH XCEL ENERGY PROPOSED 6" IRRIGATION LINE TO SERVE LOTS 2-5 EXISTING WELL TO SERVE LOT 7 PROPOSED LOT 2 ±2.13 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3 ±2.01 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5 ±2.43 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 7 ±6.81 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 1 ±17.09 ACRES CONTRACTOR TO POTHOLE EXISTING PIPE/DIVERSIONINFRASTRUCTURE AT IRRIGATIONDITCH DIVERSION, UTILIZEEXISTING DIVERSION FOR EXTENDING 6" IRRIGATION PIPE EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING UTILITY POLE 100' WELL SETBACK LINE EXISTING 30"IRRIGATIONDITCH PIPE PROPOSED XCEL ELECTRIC LINE TOSERVE LOTS 2-5 PROPOSED 40.0' ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED 40.0' ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED WELLEASEMENT FOR LOTS 2, 3, & 6 PROPOSED WELL EASEMENT FOR LOTS 4 & 5 PROPOSED SHARED 15.0' IRRIGATION & XCEL ENERGY EASEMENT PROPOSED SHARED 15.0' IRRIGATION & XCEL ENERGY EASEMENT PROPOSED 10.0' IRRIGATIONEASEMENT IRRIGATION SERVICE & VALVE IRRIGATION SERVICE & VALVE IRRIGATION SERVICE & VALVE IRRIGATION SERVICE & VALVE IRRIGATION SERVICE & VALVEEXISTING 20.0' PUBLIC SERVICECO. EASEMENT PROPOSED TRANSFORMER TO SERVE LOTS 2, 3, & 6, DESIGN TO BE COORDINATED ANDVERIFIED WITH XCEL ENERGY PROPOSED TRANSFORMER TO SERVE LOTS 4 & 5, DESIGNTO BE COORDINATED AND VERIFIED WITH XCEL ENERGY DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 4 - U T I L I T Y P L A N . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 5 1 a m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 040 40 80 40 16020 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-4.0 SUBDIVISION UTILITY PLAN 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O 11-13-25 ^ ^ 10 . 4 % 9.2% 10.9% 8.3 % 5.0% 571 8 57 2 0 57 2 2 5 7 2 4 57 2 6 572 8 5 7 3 0 5 7 3 2 5 7 3 4 5 7 3 6 5 7 3 8 5 7 4 0 5 7 4 2 5 7 4 4 5 7 4 6 5 7 4 9 573 0 571 3569 1567 9566 3 576 8575 3573 857225708569 5 567 6 577 4 5788 5799 5810 5824 5842 5862 5881 59 0 6 59 3 9 59 3 059 1 6 58 9 1 58 9 8 59 2 3 5 8 7 2 5 8 4 9 5 8 2 9 5 8 0 6 5 7 8 4 5 7 7 1 5 7 6 5 5 7 4 6 573 2 5730 5 7 3 4 573 7 5751 5766 5782 5791 5807 582 1 5835 5848 5854 5858 5861 5864 5867 5870 5874 5878 5882 5886 588 9 5895 5779 5795 5819 5834 5848 5859 5868 58 7 2 5877 5881 5886 5884 5890 589 5 5898 5903 5907 5913 5916 5921 5924 5928 5688 5697 5705 5712 5719 5 7 7 6 5 7 8 5 5 7 9 9 5 8 1 2 5 8 2 4 5 8 3 8 5 8 4 8 5680 5690 569 9 5 7 0 5 5718 5712 5739 5728 574 9 5 7 5 8 5 7 6 5 577 3 578 1 5 7 8 6 5 7 8 5 57 8 6 577 4 57 6 1 5755 5. 9 % 6.5 % 7.2% 9.7 % 4.7% 2 . 4 % 7.2% 12.0% 13 . 9 % PROPOSEDSEMI-PRIMITIVEDRIVEWAY 57 2 1 57 2 3 57 2 5 57 2 7 57 3 0 574 0 574 2 574 4 574 6 574 8 575 0 575 2 5754 5756 5758 576 0 EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 8.4% PROPOSEDACCESS DRIVE US HI G H W A Y 6 US HI G H W A Y 6 CR 138 CR 138 PROPOSED LOT 1±17.09 ACRES -2 . 6 : 1 -3.1:1 -1.7:1 -2.4:1-2.0:1 3.5:1 2.1:1 6.1:1 -1.5:1 2 . 9 : 1 2.4:1 PROPOSED LOT 2 ±2.13 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3 ±2.01 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5 ±2.43 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 7 ±6.81 ACRES US HI G H W A Y 6 CR 138 EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EXISTING SHOP BUILDING LOT 4 GABOSSI EXEMPTION LOT 3 GABOSSI EXEMPTION PROPERTYLINE DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 5 - G R A D I N G A N D D R A I N A G E . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 5 2 a m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 0120 120 240 120 48060 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-5.0 MASTER GRADING PLAN 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S PR O P O S E D L O T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O NOTE: SLOPES GREATER THAN 20% SHOWN IN LIGHT GRAY 11-13-25 S W W W 10 . 4 % 9.2% 10.9% 8.3 % 5.0% 571 8 57 2 0 57 2 2 5 7 2 4 57 2 6 57 2 8 5 7 3 0 5 7 3 2 5 7 3 4 5 7 3 6 5 7 3 8 5 7 4 0 5 7 4 2 5 7 4 4 5 7 4 6 5 7 4 9 573 0 571 3 569 1 567 9 566 3 573 2 5730 5 7 3 4 573 7 5751 5766 5782 5791 5807 5821 5835 5848 5854 5858 5861 5864 5867 5779 5795 5819 5834 5848 5859 5688 5697 5705 5712 5719 5 7 7 6 5 7 8 5 5 7 9 9 5 8 1 2 5 8 2 4 5 8 3 8 5 8 4 8 5718 5712 5739 5728 574 9 5 7 5 8 5 7 6 5 577 3 578 1 5 7 8 6 5 7 8 5 57 8 6 577 4 57 6 1 5755 5. 9 % 6.5% 7.2% 9.7 % 4.7% 2 . 4 % 13 . 9 % 57 2 1 57 2 3 57 2 5 57 2 7 57 3 0 574 0 574 2 574 4 574 6 574 8 575 0 575 2 5754 5756 5758 576 0 8.4% PROPOSED LOT 2 ±2.13 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3 ±2.01 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 7 ±6.81 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5 ±2.43 ACRES -2 . 6 : 1 -3.1:1 -1.7:1 -2.4:1 -2.0:1 3.5:1 2.1:1 6.1:1 2 . 9 : 1 2.4:1 PROPOSED LOT ±17.09 ACRES DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 5 - G R A D I N G A N D D R A I N A G E . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 5 2 a m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 040 40 80 40 16020 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-5.1 SUBDIVISION GRADING PLAN 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S PR O P O S E D L O T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O NOTE: SLOPES GREATER THAN 20% SHOWN IN LIGHT GRAY 11-13-25 S x x x x x x x x x x x x OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE TV x xx x x x x x x x x x x ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXISTING CULVERT, NOTIFY ENGINEER >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXISTING CULVERT, NOTIFY ENGINEER, DETERMINE IF CULVERT CAN BE RESTORED. IF NOT, CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE & REPLACE WITH MIN 12-INDIA ADS N-12 OR APPROVED EQUAL. 30.0' INGRESS, EGRESS, AND UTILITY EASEMENTRECEPTION NO. 620584 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE RIPRAP OUTLET PROTECTION 56 2 4 5622 5624 5630 56 4 0 56 5 0 56 6 0 5650 5654 5660 5666 5660 5 6 3 4 5 6 4 0 5 6 4 4 5 6 5 0 56 5 4 56 6 0 5664 5 6 7 0 566 6 5 6 6 8 5676 56 8 0 5 6 8 4 56 8 8 56 9 0 569 4 5698 5700 5704 569 0 56 8 0 5684 568 0 56 7 0 LOT 4 GABOSSI EXEMPTIONRECEPTION NO. 620584 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY ACCESS ·DESIGN CAPACITY (ADT) - 21 TO 100 ·MIN ROW WIDTH - 40-FT ·LANE WIDTH - TWO LANES - 8-FT EACH, 16-FT TOTAL ·SHOULDER WIDTH - 2-FT ·DITCH WIDTH - 4-FT ·CROSS SLOPE - 3% GRAVEL ·MIN RADIUS - 50-FT ·MAX % GRADE - 12% PROPOSED LOT 7 ±6.81 ACRES P R I V A T E D R I V E T O ST O R A G E F A C I L I T Y HI G H W A Y 6 CR 138 569 0569 0 570 0 569 6 5704 5710 57 1 0 5 7 0 0 569 0 5700 57 1 0 57 0 6 5720 5730 5738 57 4 0 -2.0:1 -2.1:1 -2.1:1 -1. 0 : 1 -3 . 0 : 1 EX CULVERT 18" HDPEINV IN: ±5621.21 EXISTING BORROW DITCH TO BE CLEANED & DUG OUT, MIN 4-FT WIDE & 1.5-FT DEEP, BEGIN EDGE OF DITCH MIN 24" FROM EX FENCE EX CULVERT 18" CMP INV OUT: ±5621.60 EX CULVERT18" CMP INV OUT: ±5621.50 CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR EXISTING 18" CMP CULVERT, NOTIFY ENGINEER, VERIFY POSITIVE DRAINAGE CONTRACTOR TO RE-GRADE LOWER ROAD SECTION (±STA: 0+00 TO STA 3+75), 16FT WIDTH AT 3% CROSS SLOPE INTO HILLSIDE, 2FT SHOULDERS AT MAX 5% CROSS SLOPE,SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE PROPOSED 12" DIA. ADS N-12 CULVERT (OR APPVD EQUAL),MIN 12" COVER, ±60-LF AT ±10% SLOPE (2% MIN SLOPE) EXISTING BORROW DITCH TO BE CLEANED & DUG OUT, MIN 4-FT WIDE & 1.5-FT DEEP 12 . 0 % 3. 0 % 8.7 % EXISTING BORROW DITCH TO BE CLEANED & DUG OUT, MIN 4-FT WIDE & 1.5-FT DEEP LOT 2 BOUNDARY 5 7 2 4 57 1 2 5720 57 3 0 57 3 6 5 7 0 8 5 7 1 2 57 1 8 57 2 2 57 2 6 5 7 3 2 5 7 3 6 574 0 5 7 4 4 5 7 4 8 5 7 5 2 0+0 0 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+0 0 4+ 5 0 5 + 0 0 5+ 5 0 6+ 0 0 6+ 5 0 7+ 0 0 7 + 5 0 8+ 0 0 8+ 5 0 EXISTING BORROW DITCH TO BE CLEANED & DUG OUT, MIN 4-FT WIDE & 1.5-FT DEEP BP: 0+00.00 CONTRACTOR TO CUT HILLSIDE AT MAX 1:1 SLOPE, ADD BOULDERS AT TOE OF SLOPE FROM STA: ±6+25 TO ±7+75 3.0% 12.0%3. 0 % 2.0: 1 CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXISTINGCULVERT, NOTIFY ENGINEER, DETERMINE IF CULVERT CAN BE RESTORED. IF NOT, CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE & REPLACE WITH MIN 12-IN DIA ADS N-12 OR APPROVED EQUAL. CL SEMI PRIMITIVE PROFILE 5620 5630 5640 5650 5660 5670 5680 5690 5700 5710 5720 5730 5740 5750 5760 PROPOSED GRADE EXISTINGGRADE MAX 3% GRADEFOR FIRST 30-FT OF DRIVEWAY (MATCH EXISTING) EXISTING GRADE MAX 12% GRADE EXISTINGGRADE PROPOSED GRADE EXISTINGGRADE PROPOSED GRADE MATCH EXISTING (±STA: 3+75) 0+00 56 2 3 . 4 56 2 4 . 0 1 56 2 3 . 6 56 2 4 . 5 1 0+50 56 2 4 . 2 56 2 5 . 0 1 56 2 6 . 1 56 2 7 . 0 1 1+00 56 2 9 . 2 56 3 0 . 0 1 56 3 2 . 4 56 3 3 . 0 1 1+50 56 3 5 . 6 56 3 6 . 0 1 56 3 9 . 0 56 3 9 . 0 1 2+00 56 4 2 . 6 56 4 2 . 0 1 56 4 5 . 8 56 4 5 . 0 1 2+50 56 4 8 . 6 56 4 8 . 0 1 56 5 1 . 5 56 5 1 . 0 1 3+00 56 5 4 . 2 56 5 4 . 0 1 56 5 7 . 1 56 5 7 . 0 1 3+50 56 6 0 . 1 56 6 0 . 0 1 56 6 3 . 0 56 6 3 . 0 1 4+00 56 6 6 . 1 56 6 6 . 0 1 56 6 8 . 9 56 6 9 . 0 1 4+50 56 7 2 . 0 56 7 2 . 0 1 56 7 5 . 1 56 7 5 . 0 1 5+00 56 7 7 . 0 56 7 7 . 0 1 56 7 7 . 8 56 7 7 . 7 6 5+50 56 7 8 . 5 56 7 8 . 5 1 56 7 9 . 6 56 7 9 . 2 6 6+00 56 8 1 . 0 56 8 0 . 8 8 56 8 2 . 9 56 8 3 . 0 7 6+50 56 8 5 . 1 56 8 5 . 2 6 56 8 7 . 4 56 8 7 . 4 5 7+00 56 8 9 . 7 56 8 9 . 6 3 56 9 1 . 7 56 9 1 . 8 2 7+50 56 9 3 . 1 56 9 3 . 3 2 56 9 4 . 4 56 9 4 . 8 2 8+00 56 9 6 . 3 56 9 6 . 3 2 56 9 8 . 5 56 9 8 . 5 7 8+50 57 0 0 . 8 57 0 0 . 8 2 57 0 3 . 2 57 0 3 . 0 1 57 0 5 . 2 GRADE BREAK STA = 0+00.00 ELEV = 5624.01 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 4 + 7 5 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 7 5 . 0 1 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 5 + 0 0 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 7 7 . 0 1 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 5 + 7 5 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 7 9 . 2 6 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 6 + 0 0 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 8 0 . 8 8 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 8 + 5 0 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 7 0 0 . 8 2 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 7 + 2 5 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 9 1 . 8 2 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 8 + 0 0 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 9 6 . 3 2 2.00% 12.00% 8.00%3.00%6.50% 9.00% 8.75% 6.00%PVI STA: 0+60.00 PVI ELEV: 5625.21 K: 2.00 LVC: 20.00 BV C S : 0 + 5 0 . 0 0 BV C E : 5 6 2 5 . 0 1 EV C S : 0 + 7 0 . 0 0 EV C E : 5 6 2 6 . 4 1 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY ACCESS ·DESIGN CAPACITY (ADT) - 21 TO 100 ·MIN ROW WIDTH - 40-FT ·LANE WIDTH - TWO LANES - 8-FT EACH, 16-FT TOTAL ·SHOULDER WIDTH - 2-FT ·DITCH WIDTH - 4-FT ·CROSS SLOPE - 3% GRAVEL ·MIN RADIUS - 50-FT ·MAX % GRADE - 12% BEGIN LOWER 4' WIDE BORROW DITCH (STA: ±0+50.60) END LOWER 4' WIDE BORROW DITCH (STA: ±8+44.92) PROPOSED GRADE APPROXIMATELY MATCHES EXISTINGSTA: ±3+75 - ±9+00 DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 6 - P L A N A N D P R O F I L E . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 5 5 a m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 030 30 60 30 12015 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m CENTERLINE SEMI-PRIMITIVE ROAD PROFILE HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 30' MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-6.0 SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVE PLAN & PROFILE STA: 0+00 - 8+50 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O 11-13-25 OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE S OE OE OE O E O E O E O E O E O E O E OE OE OE OE OE O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E W W W > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > 572 0 57 2 0 5710 5700 570 0 57 1 0 5732 5 7 2 0 5716 57 2 0 5 7 2 8 5 7 3 4 5 7 3 6 5 7 4 0 571 0 57 1 6 573 0 5706 5740 5740 -2. 0 : 1 -2 . 1 : 1 -2.1 : 1 -1.9 : 1 5 7 3 8 57 1 8 57 1 6 5 7 1 6 5 7 1 8 5 7 2 0 5 7 2 2 5 7 2 4 5 7 2 6 5 7 2 8 5 7 3 0 57 3 2 5734573657 3 8 57 4 0 57 4 2 57 4 4 57 4 6 57 4 8 57 5 0 5732 5734 5736 5738 5 7 0 8 5 7 1 0 5 7 1 2 5 7 1 4 5 7 1 6 5 7 1 8 5 7 2 0 5 7 2 2 5 7 2 4 5 7 2 6 CONTRACTOR TO RE-GRADEEXISTING TURNAROUND TO 3% CROSS SLOPE (MATCH UPPER ROAD) SEE PROFILE FOR GRADING 3.0 % 3 . 0 % 1.1 % 3 . 2 % 1.8% CONTRACTOR TO CUTHILLSIDE AT MAX 1.5:1 SLOPE, CUT IN DITCH AT MIN 4' WIDE & 1.5' DEEP CONTRACTOR TO GRADE PROPOSED ROAD SECTION (STA: ±13+45 TO ±15+52), 16' WIDTH WITH 3% CROWN,WITH 4' WIDE, 1.5' DEEP DITCH, AND 2' SHOULDERS AT MAX 3%CROSS SLOPE,SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE CONTRACTOR TO RE-GRADE EXISTING ROAD SECTION (STA: ±10+16 TO ±13+00), 16' WIDTH AT 3% CROSS SLOPE INTO HILLSIDE, 2' SHOULDERS AT MAX 3% CROSS SLOPE, SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE TRANSITION CROSS SLOPEAWAY FROM HILLSIDE INTO HILLSIDE (STA: ±9+94 TO ±10+16) SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE TRANSITION CROSS SLOPE INTO HILLSIDE TO 3% CROWN (STA: ±13+00 TO ±13+45) SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE CONTRACTOR TO RE-GRADEEXISTING ROAD SECTION (STA: ±8+88 TO ±9+94), 16' WIDTH AT 3% CROSSSLOPE AWAY FROM HILLSIDE, 2' SHOULDERS AT MAX 3%CROSS SLOPE, SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE LOT 2 GABOSSI EXEMPTION ±34.685-ACRES DESIGN STANDARDS FOR PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY ACCESS ·DESIGN CAPACITY (ADT) - 21 TO 100 ·MIN ROW WIDTH - 40-FT ·LANE WIDTH - TWO LANES - 8-FT EACH, 16-FT TOTAL ·SHOULDER WIDTH - 2-FT ·DITCH WIDTH - 4-FT ·CROSS SLOPE - 3% GRAVEL ·MIN RADIUS - 50-FT ·MAX % GRADE - 12% 20.0' PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY EASEMENT -3.5:1 -4.8:1 -4.6:1 -4.1:1 -2.5:1 -1 . 5 : 1 -3.2 : 1 -2.5:1 - 3 . 8 : 1 - 5 . 5 : 1 EXISTING DRIVE ACCESS TOPROPOSED LOT 1 3:1 CATCH SLOPE 3:1 CATCH SLOPE-1.5:1 PROPOSED LOT 2 ±2.13 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3 ±2.01 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5 ±2.43 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 7 ±6.81 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES 5 7 2 6 5728 5730 5734 5740 5742 5744 5746 5752 5754 5756 5758 5760 573 6573 8574 0 573 4 573 2 5 7 3 0 5732 5734 5736 5738 5 7 4 2 5744 5746 5748 575 0 5754 5758 57 6 2 5762 5766 5768 5772 574 0 569 4569 8570 2570 6571 0571 4571 8 572 2 572 6 5730 5724 5712 573 0 573 6 5730 5728 5726 5720 8+00 8+50 9+ 0 0 9+ 5 0 10+00 10+50 11+ 0 0 1 1 + 5 0 12 + 0 0 12+50 13+ 0 0 13+5 0 14+00 14+5 0 15+00 1 5 + 5 0 1 6 + 0 0 1 6 + 5 0 1 7 + 0 0 1 7 + 4 1 EP: 17+ 4 0 . 7 9 PC: 1 3 + 4 5 . 1 3 PC: 8 + 6 3 . 1 8 PC: 9 + 5 4 . 4 6 PC: 1 0 + 9 0 . 1 5 PC: 11+89.38 P C : 1 4 + 6 2 . 5 2 P T : 1 4 + 0 2 . 8 0 PT: 8 + 8 7 . 6 2 PT: 10+89.50 PT: 11+37.61 PT: 1 2 + 7 7 . 5 4 PT: 15+ 5 2 . 0 8 3:1 CATCH SLOPE PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE: 12' WIDTH WITH 3% CROWN, 2' SHOULDERS AT MAX 3% CROSS SLOPE, SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE EXISTING ACCESS DRIVE: 12' WIDTH WITH 3% CROWN, 2' SHOULDERS AT MAX 3% CROSS SLOPE,SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALLMIN 12-IN DIA ADS N-12 OR APPROVED EQUAL CULVERT, ±30-LF AT 2% SLOPE 12-IN ADS INV IN: 5731.44 12-IN ADSINV OUT: 5730.84 3.0% 3.0 % 1.8 % 9 . 8 % 3.0%3.0% 10 . 5 % 10 . 0 % TRANSITION CROSS SLOPE INTO FROM HILLSIDE AWAY HILLSIDE (STA: ±8+50 TO ±8+88)SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE CONTRACTOR TO GRADE PROPOSED ROAD SECTION (STA: ±15+52 TO ±17+41), 16' WIDTH WITH 3% CROWN AND 2' SHOULDERS AT MAX 3% CROSS SLOPE, SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE 5730 5735 57355740 5745 5750 57 3 5 5720 5730 5710 5 7 3 0 57 3 5 5725 PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES CL SEMI PRIMITIVE PROFILE 5620 5630 5640 5650 5660 5670 5680 5690 5700 5710 5720 5730 5740 5750 5760 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY ACCESS ·DESIGN CAPACITY (ADT) - 21 TO 100 ·MIN ROW WIDTH - 40-FT ·LANE WIDTH - TWO LANES - 8-FT EACH, 16-FT TOTAL ·SHOULDER WIDTH - 2-FT ·DITCH WIDTH - 4-FT ·CROSS SLOPE - 3% GRAVEL ·MIN RADIUS - 50-FT ·MAX % GRADE - 12% PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE MATCH EXISTING GRADE (±STA: 9+02)BEGIN TRANSITION FROM 3% CROSS SLOPE TO TO 3% CROWN STA: 13+00 MATCH EXISTING (STA: ±17+30)PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADEEXISTING GRADE MIN 20-FT WIDE ROAD (INCLUDING SHOULDERS) MATCH PROPOSED END CROSS SLOPE TRANSITION,BEGIN UPPER 4' WIDE BORROW DITCH STA: 1+71.56 END 4' WIDE BORROW DITCH STA: 13+01.97 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY ACCESS ·DESIGN CAPACITY (ADT) - 21 TO 100 ·MIN ROW WIDTH - 40-FT ·LANE WIDTH - TWO LANES - 8-FT EACH, 16-FT TOTAL ·SHOULDER WIDTH - 2-FT ·DITCH WIDTH - 4-FT ·CROSS SLOPE - 3% GRAVEL ·MIN RADIUS - 50-FT ·MAX % GRADE - 12% 56 9 8 . 5 56 9 8 . 5 7 8+50 57 0 0 . 8 57 0 0 . 8 2 57 0 3 . 2 57 0 3 . 0 1 9+00 57 0 5 . 2 57 0 5 . 2 0 57 0 7 . 5 57 0 7 . 3 8 9+50 57 0 9 . 3 57 0 9 . 5 7 57 1 0 . 4 57 1 1 . 7 6 10+00 57 1 2 . 2 57 1 3 . 9 5 57 1 4 . 7 57 1 6 . 1 3 10+50 57 1 7 . 5 57 1 8 . 3 2 57 2 0 . 1 57 2 0 . 5 1 11+00 57 2 2 . 6 57 2 2 . 7 0 57 2 5 . 1 57 2 4 . 8 8 11+50 57 2 7 . 4 57 2 7 . 0 7 57 2 9 . 6 57 2 9 . 2 6 12+00 57 3 1 . 1 57 2 9 . 8 9 57 3 1 . 8 57 3 0 . 5 1 12+50 57 3 2 . 7 57 3 1 . 1 4 57 3 3 . 9 57 3 1 . 7 6 13+00 57 3 6 . 4 57 3 2 . 3 9 57 3 4 . 3 57 3 3 . 0 1 13+50 57 3 5 . 9 57 3 3 . 6 4 57 3 7 . 0 57 3 4 . 2 6 14+00 57 3 6 . 9 57 3 4 . 8 9 57 3 5 . 8 57 3 5 . 5 2 14+50 57 3 4 . 5 57 3 6 . 1 4 57 3 3 . 5 57 3 6 . 7 7 15+00 57 3 3 . 4 57 3 7 . 3 9 57 3 4 . 4 57 3 8 . 0 2 15+50 57 3 6 . 3 57 3 8 . 6 4 57 3 8 . 8 57 3 9 . 2 7 16+00 57 4 1 . 1 57 4 1 . 7 2 57 4 3 . 6 57 4 4 . 1 7 16+50 57 4 6 . 1 57 4 6 . 6 2 57 4 8 . 6 57 4 9 . 0 7 17+00 57 5 1 . 2 57 5 1 . 5 2 57 5 3 . 9 57 5 3 . 9 7 17+41 57 5 5 . 8 57 5 5 . 5 2 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 8 + 5 0 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 7 0 0 . 8 2 GRADE BREAK STA = 11+75.00 ELEV = 5729.26 GRADE BREAK STA = 17+40.79 ELEV = 5755.52 GRADE BREAK STA = 15+75.00 ELEV = 5739.27 9.00% 8.75% 9.80% 2.50% BEGIN CROSS SLOPE TRANSITION AWAY FROMHILLSIDE INTO HILLSIDE STA: 9+93.55 END CROSS SLOPE/TRANSITION STA: 13+45.13 MATCH EXISTING GRADE (±STA: 14+29) END LOWER 4' WIDE BORROW DITCH (STA: ±8+44.92) PROPOSED GRADEEXISTING GRADE 4.04.0 CUT ±4-FT TO MAINTAIN 2.5% SLOPE FILL ±4-FT TO MAINTAIN 2.5% SLOPE DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 6 - P L A N A N D P R O F I L E . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 5 4 a m N O R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 030 30 60 30 12015 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m CENTERLINE SEMI-PRIMITIVE ROAD PROFILE HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 30' MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-6.1 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVE PLAN & PROFILE STA: 8+50 - 17+41 11-13-25 DATE REVISION C-7.0 DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 7 - C O N S T R U C T I O N D E T A I L S . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 5 5 a m CONSTRUCTION DETAILS MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R 32000.01JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N CULVERT PIPE OUTLET PROTECTION 1.75xd50 D3D PIPE OUTLET TO FLAT AREA WITH NO DEFINED CHANNEL RIPRAP SIZING NOTES: RIPRAP SHALL CONFORM TO THE MATERIAL, GRADATION AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 506, RIPRAP, OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO, STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION. TABLE 506-2E IS REDUCED BELOW. TABLE 5-1 - CLASSIFICATION AND GRADATION OF ORDINARY RIPRAP RIPRAP % SMALLER INTERMEDIATE d50*(IN) DESIGNATION THAN GIVEN ROCK DIM (IN) SIZE BY WEIGHT TYPE VL 70-100 12 6 50-70 9 35-50 6 2-10 2 TYPE L 70-100 15 9 50-70 12 35-50 9 2-10 3 TYPE M 70-100 21 12 50-70 18 35-50 12 2-10 4 TYPE H 100 30 18 50-70 24 35-50 18 2-10 6 TYPE VH 100 42 24 50-70 33 35-50 24 2-10 9 *d50=NOMINAL STONE SIZE RIPRAP NOTES: 1. SEE PLANS FOR D (INSIDE DIAMETER OF CULVERT) & NOMINAL STONE SIZE (d50) 2. PLACE TOPSOIL IN RIPRAP VOIDS AND APPLY SEED PER LANDSCAPE PLANS AND SPECS (1 2 " MI N . ) 2' TO 3' 1/2H (12" MIN) FABRIC MATERIAL (ANCHORED IN TRENCH) H SILT FENCE INSTALLATION -NTS- 4" 4" 1/ 2 H H (MAX) -NTS- FLOW BACKFILL TRENCH JURISDICTION NOTE: SILT FENC E POST ANCHORED TO 15' SECTION COMPACTED 4"x4" OR AS DIRECTED BY LOCAL LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED,SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTILEROSION CONTROL MEASURES SILT FENCE DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) N.T.S. STRAW WATTLE DETAIL 16' DRIVEWAY WIDTH (TYP) 3% CROWN MIN 12" COMPACTED GRAVEL/CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. 2' WIDE, 3% GRADE SHOULDER ±STA: 15+52 - 17+41 NOTES: 1. STRIP ALL TOPSOIL, SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT MINIMUM OF 8" DEPTH TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. MINIMUM8" CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL TO BE PLACED ON TOP OF SUBGRADE 2. 12% MAXIMUM GRADE 2' WIDE, 3% GRADE SHOULDER 12' DRIVEWAY WIDTH (TYP) 3% CROWN NATIVE MATERIAL ROADWAY ACCESS DRIVE SECTION N.T.S. 16' DRIVEWAY WIDTH (TYP)MIN 12" COMPACTED GRAVEL/CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. ±STA: 8+50 - 9+94 NOTES: 1. STRIP ALL TOPSOIL, SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT MINIMUM OF 8" DEPTH TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. MINIMUM8" CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL TO BE PLACED ON TOP OF SUBGRADE 2. 12% MAXIMUM GRADE 3% CROSS SLOPE ±STA: 0+00 - 8+50NOTES: 1. STRIP ALL TOPSOIL, SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT MINIMUM OF 8" DEPTH TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. MINIMUM8" CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL TO BE PLACED ON TOP OF SUBGRADE 2. 12% MAXIMUM GRADE 4' WIDE,1.5' DEEP BORROW DITCH 16' DRIVEWAYWIDTH (TYP) 3% CROSS SLOPE MIN 12" COMPACTED GRAVEL/CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS 2' WIDE, 3% GRADE SHOULDER 3-5% GRADE, SHOULDER, WIDTH VARIES, SEE PLANS SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. 4' WIDE, 1.5' DEEP BORROW DITCH 16' DRIVEWAY WIDTH (TYP) 3% CROSS SLOPE MIN 12" COMPACTED GRAVEL/CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. 2' WIDE, 3% GRADE SHOULDER ±STA: 9+94 - 13+00NOTES: 1. STRIP ALL TOPSOIL, SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT MINIMUM OF 8" DEPTH TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. MINIMUM 8" CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL TO BE PLACED ON TOP OF SUBGRADE 2. 12% MAXIMUM GRADE 2' WIDE, 3% GRADE SHOULDER 16' DRIVEWAY WIDTH (TYP) 3% CROWN MIN 12" COMPACTED GRAVEL/CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. 2' WIDE, 3% GRADE SHOULDER ±STA: 13+00 - 15+52NOTES: 1. STRIP ALL TOPSOIL, SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT MINIMUM OF 8" DEPTH TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. MINIMUM8" CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL TO BE PLACED ON TOP OF SUBGRADE 2. 12% MAXIMUM GRADE 2' WIDE, 3% GRADE SHOULDER 4' WIDE, 1.5' DEEP BORROW DITCH 3% CROSS SLOPECOMPACTED GRAVEL/CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL TYPICAL CROSS-SLOPED CULVERT SECTION N.T.S.NOTES: 1. 6" MINIMUM CLASS 6 BEDDING MATERIAL UNDER CULVERT AND 12" MINIMUM ON SIDES. 2% MIN SLOPE 12" & 18" DIA ADS N-12 (SEE PLANS) 12" MIN COVER RIPRAP EROSION PROTECTION TO BE PLACED AT THE BOTTOM OF ALL CULVERTS FLARED END SECTION 3% CROWNCOMPACTED GRAVEL/CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL TYPICAL CROWNED CULVERT SECTION N.T.S.NOTES: 1. 6" MINIMUM CLASS 6 BEDDING MATERIAL UNDER CULVERT AND 12" MINIMUM ON SIDES. 2% MIN SLOPE 12" & DIA ADS N-12 (SEE PLANS) 12" MIN COVER RIPRAP EROSION PROTECTION TO BE PLACED AT THE BOTTOM OF ALL CULVERTS FLARED END SECTION CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANSCATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS 11-13-25 12' MIN. MIRAFIFABRIC 6" OF CLASS 2 AGGREGATEBASE COURSE EXISTINGGRADE VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL 3" (MINUS) ROCK,OR RECYCLEDCONCRETE N.T.S. 1. ALL ROCK TO BE REMOVED UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 2. PUBLIC ROADWAY TO BE KEPT CLEAN AND FREE OF MUD, DIRT AND DEBRIS AT ALL TIMES. 3. ALIGNMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACCESS SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 40-FT MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE. NOTES 6" OF ROCK PROPOSED TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH NOTES: 1. BEDDING MATERIAL TO BE CLASS 6 ABC2. MIN 4" BEDDING MATERIAL UNDER CONDUITS 3. MIN 12" CLASS 6 ABC OVER TOP OF CONDUITS 4. REMAINING TRENCH TO BE BACKFILLED WITH CLASS 6 ABC OR ONSITE SELECT NATIVE MATERIAL 5. WARNING TAPE TO BE INSTALLED ABOVE CONDUITS PER UTILITY COMPANY AND/OR COUNTY STANDARDS 6. TRENCH WALLS ARE TO BE SLOPED PER CURRENT OSHA AND COSH STANDARDS AND REQ'S7. DEPTH OF TRENCH IS TO BE MEASURED FROM FINISHED GRADE WIDTH DEPENDS ON SIZE AND NUMBER OF CONDUITS 12" MIN XCEL CONDUIT (SIZE AND NUMBER TBD) N.T.S. CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE WITHCOMPACTION DENSITY OF 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. TRENCH SUBGRADE MUST BE COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY 36 " M I N CO V E R 6" DIA PVC 4" M I N . 12"12" FINISHED GRADE SUBGRADE ANDSURFACE MATERIALS PER PLANS TRENCH CROSS-SECTION FOR IRRIGATION PIPES N.T.S. 4" MIN 48" MIN COVERSUBGRADE AND SURFACE MATERIALS PER PLANS Garfteld Coulnty Community Development Department 03111t2025 Charles Hoge 901 Cottonwood Drive Golden, CO 80401 Re: 24 County Road 138, Parcel #212335200186 Dear Mr. Hoge, The property in question is in a Planning Process to split the lot into smaller lots. To allow the process to move fonryard there is to be no code violations on the property. It has come to light that a permitted residential garage received a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) on 1010312011. The final inspection indicated that there was no insulation, no mechanical, no gas, and only a floor drain installed. Since the CO the garage has been converted to a commercialwelding operation. To bring this structure into compliance there appears to be two avenues. One is to apply for a Demolition Permit to bring the building back to the original condition of a residential garage. The other is to bring the welding shop up to compliance with the commercial use. lf chosen to bring the structure into compliance as a welding shop, it is a Change of Occupancy that requires a Building Permit to do so. The Existing Building Code Chapter 10 regulates Changes of Occupancy. A Colorado Licensed Architect is to submit drawings along with a Building Permit Application with associated drawing including architectural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical and site plans. There could be structural drawings if the mezzanine is to stay. During a site visit there were some obvious code concerns the architect is to take into consideration. This is not an all-inclusive list, the architect is to address all code related items. 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (970)94s-8212 Some obvious issues o The welding shop requires an Administrative Review with the Planning Department. This process is to be completed prior to issuance of a Building Permit.. Submit a Building Permit Application and drawings to change the Occupancy. Please see directions in the previous paragraphs. o A restroom was added, an OWTS Permit is to be applied for with Garfield County Public Health Department. (Septic Permit) o The new restroom is to be handicapped accessible. . Provide information on the well that it's approved to serve the commercial operation.o Provide proof of a State Electrical Permit and approval. o The office created is to be handicapped accessible and to be address by the architect.o lf the mezzanine is to stay, it will need approval from a structural engineer. o An accessible parking spot is required with an accessible route into the building. o Landings are required on the exterior side of the doors. o There is an unlisted forge installed. This will be required to be addressed by a mechanical engineer during the permitting process. . There is a coal burning furnace for heat. This will also have to be addressed by a mechanical engineer during permitting. o Snow guards are required on the roof over the exit doors. Since John Plano Chief Building Official 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (970) 94s-82r2 Certificate of Occupancy Building & Ptannlng Departnlent I Garfield Counfi, Colorado No ohenge ln tha cheracter of occupaney of a bulldlng ehall ba mads wlthout a Carlifiaets of Occupancl- phaplsr { lRC, IBC} This certiftcate is issued pursuant to lhe struclure was ln comPliancewilh requiremenlsof Chapterl of theIRCorChapterI offieIBCceilifylnglhatatthetlmeof lssuance,thb the vsrious codes adopted by the Gounty regulating building construclion or use fur lhe tdlowing $qlCI&As, SF{$r-Nr.e co$709 ' Penfrlt No. BLRE-9-10-1742CO Number: Group R-3 Type of Conetructlon ltB Ownar Conrad Wagner Ownar Addrees 0024 cR 138 Glenwood Sorinqs. CO 81601 Bulldlng Addrese 24 CR 138 NEW CASTLE, CO Locellty:212335200188 Gontractor Addrees SAME AS OWNER Conlractor OWNER Deta of Flnal lnepectlon t0/03t2011 Work llescdpfon: $teel garugo bullding. Chlef Building Oficial lseuance ofa Certfrcata of Occupency ahell not be conehlred s an appnoval of e vlolrtlon of the provlalona of thlg code or of otherresoludone oreonlng codea of the juriedlcllon Car$frcabe preeumlng to give authorlfy b vlolats orcencel lfie pmvlalone of thle code or of thls code or of other reeolu$ona of the lurlsdlctlon shall not bs rnlld {Ghapbr I lRC, l8Cf . PunFcard POST ON SITE Permit"o. BLRH-g-l 0-l 742 T;1pe: 'l#orir Classijl'cai'on: l,l ew. lssue DatB: 1014/2010 AGREEMENT ln consideratlon of the is$uance of the permlt, the applicant hereby agrees to comply tvlth all laws and regulations releted to the zoning, location; construction and eraction of the proposed structured for which thls permit is gtanted, and further agrees thet if the above said regulatlons are not fulty complied with in the zoning, locatiorl erertion and constructlon ef the abovo described slructurq the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Eullding department and IIJIMEDIATEIJ BT!COME NULL AND VOID. Residential Building Parcel #:212335200{ A6 Garlloid County Building atrd Planning De;:admanl 1Og Ah Sfest, Suite40l Glenwood 9ptings, CO A:601 F'hone {970)945-6?i2 Fa* (970)384-3470 Expiree: 04l02l201'l Owner's Narne: Conrad Wagner Owner'sPhone: 970"9.17-002fl Total $qlare Feet:2400 F Contractor \iVork DescripHcn: Steel building fo'garagr- Jolr Adores:i: 24 CR 138 !g!_v_c6sr.E'q.]_ Phone i I I I I J lnspectlon $cheduling Code (.L:11 LrFl Focters Fgrndariou WsllsIrarnlftg Dryrrail Flnal UG Plumblrrg Rough Plumhirrg EZE€,ry .4f W/-s TWE ADDITIONAL INSPECIIONS MAY BE REQI.IIREI} POST'l'Hls lN COilISPICUOU,S PLACE WHEN cOl'J$l'ftrJGTlON lS STARTED Fnr lnspecttc'ns Call: 1-888-868-530:t Fass Date #*j ,//-s -Jr,' &4'"rfi#fl*ffr1rr tfr-.E-ttffi) ri.s' ;120r -rf'rt.:tl.v:!t -.?:...::135 ,160' 175 NG rtl*1!rrl rllrsc Grout Mschanical ;/ 89t:{./#* d;* rhu 0i. gM Gas Form No. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEE GWS -25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 8020 303) 866 -3581 EXST WELL PERMIT NUMBER 68856 APPLICAN DIV. 5 WD 39 DES. BASIN MD Lot: 1 Block: Filing: Subdiv: GABOSSI EXEMPTION APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NW 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 35 ROCKY GABOSSI Township 5 S Range 90 W Sixth P.M. 44523 HIGHWAY 6 DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601-1250 Ft. from North Section Line 960 Ft. from West Section Line 970)'945-9673 UTM COORDINATES (Meters, Zone: 13,NAD83) CHANGE /EXPANSION OF USE OF AN EXISTING WELL Easting:Northing: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude nother owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402 -2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37 -90- 137(2) on the condition that this well is operated in accordance with the Bowles, Dorothy L Estate Augmentation Plan approved by the Division 5 Water Court in case no. 97 W162. If this well is not operated in accordance with the terms of said decree, it will be subject to administration including orders to cease diverting water. 4) Approved as a well on a tract of land of 20.22 acres described as that portion of the NW 1/4, Sec. 35, Twp. 5 South, Rng. 90 West, 6th P.M., aka lot 1, Gabossi Exemption), Garfield County, more particularly described on the attached exhibit A. This well is identified as the Bowles Well no. 2. 5) Approved for the installation of a pump in, and the use of, an existing well, onstructed on August 1, 2002, to a depth of 220 feet, under permit no. 56101 -F (canceled). Issuance of this permit hereby cancels permit no. 56101 -F. 6) The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside seven (7) single family dwellings. The ground water shall not be used for irrigation or other purposes. 7) The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 25 GPM. 8) The annual amount of ground water to be appropriated by this well (Bowles; Well no. 2) shall not exceed 2.8 acre -feet. Additionally the combined annual amount of ground water to be appropriated by the Bowles Well nos. 1 through 6 shall not exceed 12.0 acre -feet. 9) The return flow from the use of this well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of the non - evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 10) Totalizing flow meters must be installed on this well (Bowles Well no. 2) and the Bowles Well nos. 1, 3, 4, 5 & 6 and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. 11) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to pr serve these markings. 12) This well shall be located not more than 200 feet from the location specifie J on this permit and at least 600 feet from any existing well, excluding permit no. 52966 (aka Bowles Well, Division 5 Water Court, case no. W- 1358), completed in the same aquifer, that is not owned by the applicant. NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23- 2123 - 352 -00 -185 NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R040428 (totaling 20.22 acr s)o APPROVED DMW a '` - State Engi By Receipt No. 9503336 DATE ISSUED 12-22-2009 EXPIRATION DATE COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Office Use Only Form GWS -45 (07/2009) DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1313 SHERMAN ST, RM 818, DENVER, CO 80203 RECEIVED phone - info: (303) 866 -3587 main: (303) 866 -3581 REC fax: (303 ) 866 -3589 hftp://www.water.state.co.us DEC 2 8 2009GENERALPURPOSENOV23 '09 Water Well Permit Application vvTEE=NSOPURCES Review instructions on reverse side prior to completing forma O TER RESOURCES t The form must be completed in black or blue ink or typed.STATE ENGtN jar L033 E7 1. Applicant Information 6. Use eck applicable boxes) Name of applicant Attach a detailed description of uses applied for. Rocky Gabossi Industrial Dewatering System El MunicipalMailingaddressp Geothermal ( production or reinjection) 44523 Highway 6 Irrigation Other (describe): In -House use for 7 dwellingcity -state zip dole Commercial units proposed Old Orchard Sub er 97CW 162GlenwoodSpringsCOi81601 7. Well Data (proposed)Telephone #E -mail (Optional) 970) 945 -9673 Maximum pumping rate m Annual amount to be withdrawn 2. Type Of Application (check applicable boxes) 2 gp 2 75 acre-feet Total depth Aquifer Construct new well Change source (aquifer)250 alluvial Replace existing well Reapplication (expired permit)feet Use existing well COGCC well 8. Land On Which Ground Water Will Be Used Change or increase use Other:Legal Description (may be provided as an attachment): Lots 1 2, 3, & 4 of 3. Refer To (if -------- - - - - -- applicable)pr posed Old Orchard Subdivision. See attached legal description 7 . Well permit #Water Court case # 56101 -F i 97CW 162 Designated Basin Determination #Welrname or # j Bowles Well No. 2 4. Location Of Proposed Well (Important! See Instructions) If Ased for crop irrigation, attach a scaled map that shows irrigated area.) Garfield NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 A Acres B Owner 2C.22 ap Section Township N or S Range E or W Pnncipal Meridian pp._ ----- - . 35 5 90 i Sixth C. List any other wells or water rights used on this land: z Bowles Well, Bowles Pond, Bowles Springs, Williams DitchDistanceofwellfromsectionlines (section lines are typically not property lines) 1250 Ft. from ® N S 960 Ft. from E ® W 9. Proposed Well Driller License #(optional): For replacement wells only — distance and direction from old well to new well 111. Signature Of Applicant(s) Or Authorized AgentfeetdirectionTemakingoffalsestatementshereinconstitutesperjuryinthesecond Well location address (Include City, State, Zip) Check if well address is same as in Item 1. degree which is punishable as a class 1 misdemeanor pursuant to C.R.S. 24.4-104 (13)(a). I have read the statements herein, know the contents th reof and state that they are true to my knowledge_ Sig here (Must be original signature)Date Optional: GPS well location information in UTM format You must check GPS unit for required settings as follows: r Format must be UTM T Pri t name & title Zone 12 or Zone 13 F Easting 1, 13 LY k5 Units must be Meters Datum must be NAD83 rthin O Ice UseW No Unit must be set to true north p Was GPS unit checked for above? YES f Remember to set Datum to NAD83 ea ((i p 5. Parcel On Which Well Will Be Located Receipt area only YOU MUST ATTACH A CURRENT DEED FOR THE SUBJECT PARCEL) A Legal Description (may be provided as an attachment):Gd pans Number: 3643895 Current- Lot 1 Gabossi Subdivision Exemption,f f , bbW00 -28 M Proposed- Old Orchard Subdivision Total Trans CHECK s* Nunftn 934 Check Amount: 100.00i B of acres in parcel C. Owner AQUAMAP m ot20.22 applicant w v D. Will this be the only well on this parcel? [:]YES ONO (if no list other wells)W x Bowles Well, Bowles Well Nos. 1,3 & 4 c cB T gIR4 y/! 112 $ t j9 fir. 4. f 2 E State Parcel ID# (optional):TOO 2123 - 352 -00 -185 M LAR SB5 DIV V WD -? I BA MD WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY RECEIVE STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER SECEIVED 1• WELL PERMIT NUMBER 5 " x . 6 i 9'F DEC 8 2SEPo92002JVATgRFGNEE 2 Owner Name(s): Rocky Gabossi col_:. ES Mailing Address: 44523 Hwy 6 & 24 Sr ,5 R COLO• City, State, Zip: Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 919 00 7a 3 Phone #970 - 384 -2630 APPROVAL # GWS31-91-03 iWELL QC'AT15N AS DRILLED NW 1/4 NW 1/4 Sec: 35 Twp: 5 S Range. 90 W3 ' DISTANCES FROM SEC. LINES 1250 ft. from North Sec. line and 960 ft. from West Sec lime OR Northing:Easting: SUBDIVISION: Gabossi/Wagner Exemption LOT: 2 BLOCK:FILING (UNIT): STREET ADDRESS AT LOCATION 4 GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ft.DRILLING METHOD Air Rotary DATE COMPLETED: 8/1/2002 TOTAL DEPTH: 220 DEPTH COMPLETION: 220 5. GEOLOGIC LOG 6. HOLE DIANIETER (in)FROM (ft)TO (ft) Depth Type of Material Size, Color, and 9.0 0 58 000 -030 Dirt, Rocks Gravels 6.5 58 220 030 -220 Maroon Formation 7. PLAIN CASING OD (in Kind I Wall Size From (ft)To (ft) 7.0 Steel 0.240 1 58 5.5 PVC 0.250 42 180 PERF.SING: Screen Slot Size 5.5 PVC 0.250 180 220 8. Filt Pack 9. Packer Placement Water Located: 180 +Material :Type : Size .Depth . Remarks :Interval 10. GR UTING RECORD Material Atnount Density Interval Placement Cem t 5 sks 6 al/sk 1040 p oared 11. DISINFECTION Type : HTH Amt. Used: 9 oz. 12. WELL TEST DATA : () Check Box If Test Data Is Submitted On Supplemental TESTING METHOD: Air Compressor Static Level: 8 ft.Date/Time Measured 811/2002 Production Rate 15+ gpm Pumping Level: Total ft.DatelTime Measured 8 f 1/2002 Test Length : 2 hours Test Remarks heron and know the13. is punishabconten lass 1>a } to my lmowl Aawad to Section 24-4-14 (13)(a) CRS, the malting of fuse statements CONTRACTOR : Shelton Drilling Corp.Phone: (970) 927 -4182 Mailing Address : P.O. Box 1059 Basalt, Co. 621 Lic. No. 1095 Name / Title (Please Type or Print) Signature Date 8/8/2002 Wayne Shelton / President ORIGINAL FORM NO.STATE OF COLORADO For Once use c3ly GWS-10 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER qp-818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St, Denver, Colorado RECEIVED' 1303) 866 -3581 _. FOR INSTRUCTIONS, SEE REVERS SIDE SEP 16 2002 STATEMENT OF BENEFICIAL USE WATEfl RESOURCES STATE Erb WELL PERMIT NUMBER 1. WELLWELL OWNER DEC 2 g 2 NAME(S)6-\ ©S S ^ aSTAEtyrUtNEEMailingAddressJZ. I{w O__ City, St Zip a d r, s Phone 3S 3d cjs Ola3 2. WELL LOCATION: COUNTY G,v Ur OWNER'S WELL DESIGNATION 4 $a3 0 Address)City)State)Tip) S 1/4&0.1 /a, sec Twp.N. rS Range EarKw.M. Distances from Section Lines a.5' Ft. from LCI N. or IDS. Line,Ft. from E. or ® W. lane. 3. The well is being used for the following purpose(s):l' v\ a-v au c 4. Water from the well was first used beneficially under this permit number, for the above described purposes on 19 Do not report a date which is before the issued date of this permit) 5. The pumping rate claimed is gallons 'per minute 6. The average annual amount of water diverted is acre feet. 7. The land area irrigated (watered) by water from this well is:Acres or Ee nl Square feet, Number) described as: Lek ;)-1 ' Q 'k u to cnptroa s,ns P o c J or as Subdivision Lot()Block Filing/Unk B. Well drilled by t " o U Co Lic. No: Pump installed by:Lic. No: 9. Meter Mfg. by Serial No.:Date Installed: 1 (we) have read the statements made herein, know the contents thereof, and state that they are true to my (our) knowledge. [Pursuant to Section 24 -4-104 (13)(a) C.R.S., the making of false statements herein constitutes perjury in the second degree and is punishable as a Class 1 misdemeanor.] 10 Name/Title (Please type or print?ignature aaoass a Q'j i FOR OFFICE ONLY State Engineer By Date Court Case No.Div.Co.vffi Basin MD Use DEC 2 8 2009 ATTACHMENT TO N&T EISONEER t COLC' GABOSSI WELL PERMIT APPLICATION November 20 2009 LEGAL DESCRIPTIO BEGINNING AT A POINT FROM WHICH THE NORT 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35 BEARS N.45 °21'31'E. 855.56 FEET, SAID NORTH 1/4 CORNER BEING A IRON PIPE WITH AN ALUMINUM CAP, PLS N, 15710 THENCE S.26 °31'06'E. 55.72 FEET; THENCE S,26'1152'W. 62.99 FEET; THENCE S.11 °39'34 'W. 51.69 FEET; THENCE S.37 °2 '23'W, 80.15 FEET; THENCE S.49 °48'42'W. 68,45 FEET; THENCE S.22° 7'14'W. 167.65 FEET; THENCE S,04 °15'08'E. 209.64 FEET; THENCE S.40'24'52'W. 6316 FEET; THENCE S.23 °42'17'W, 160.96 FEET; THENCE S,34 °01'36'W. 250.32 FEET; THENCE S.28 °03'51'E. 69,80 FEET; THENCE S.02 °3 '42'W, 276,57 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY STATE HIGHWAY 6 AND 24; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY THE FOLL WIG 5 COURSES: 1) THENCE 358.13 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2010.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 °12'31' AND SUB- TENDING A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.72`17'01'W, 57.65 FEET; 2) THENCE S.13 °12'00'W, 50.00 FEET; 3) THENCE 270.72 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1960.00 FEET, A CENTRAL. ANGLE OF 07 °54'49' AND SUB - TENDING A CHORD WHICH BEARS N,81'21'3 'W, 270.50 FEET; 4) THENCE N.85'19'00'W, 368.00 FEET; 5) THENCE 109,74 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 5680,00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE Ol 01 °06'.25' AND SUB - TENDING A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.84 109.74 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID RIGHT OF WAY N.23 °00'10 E. 85.51 FEET; THENCE N,33'41'22'E. 273.31 FEET; THENCE N.10 °4101'E. 126,20 FEET; THENCE N.18 °00'46'E. 102.71 FEET; THENCE S.79 °05' 6'E. 44.25 FEET; THENCE N.87 °14'08'E, 373,76 FEET; THENCE S,83 °5 '42'E. 116.11 FEET; THENCE N.45 °21'31'E, 1000.98 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINS 20,220 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 1, GABOSSI SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS FILED FOR RECORD UNDER RECEPTION NO, 620584, 7 I IN 11111 Bill mill 10111111111111111111111111111111111111 IN 1 of 3 R 10,N D 70.00 GWIELD COUNTY 00 PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED I DEC ° Z 8 nosi 'Testate Estate)I Terry D` y SPIATER RESvNE . THIS DEED is made by i STATE cNr,NEEFr i personal Representative of the Estate of Dorothy L. Bowles, A Dorothy Lucinda Bowles deceased, GTantor, to MaLY An 3abo SS] anti ROC All +iw v (`a1v)SSl Grantee, 44523 HWY R ?4•I. whose legal addressts 6LENW000 S °7110` rn Alnl of the County of Garfield State of Colorado WHEREAS, the Last Will and Testament of the ab decedent was made executed in the lifethe October 29 which Will was duly aiaitted to (fornnal) ( decedent and is dated 1997 District Coin Gar for the probate on [1arCh 25 by the 977PP County of field State of Colorado, robatNC,oh 25 WHEREAS, Grantor was duly appointed personal Representative of said Estate o 19 9 , and is now qualified and acting in said capacity NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the powers confuted upon Grantor by the Colo Probate Code, Grantor does hereby sell, convey assign, transfer and set over unto said Grantee i joint tenancy " (for and in consi D )" Seven Htartdred Thousand and no 10 1)° the following described real property situate in the County of Garfield State of Colorado: i i See EKhibit A attached hereto and made a part here0l by this reference. ii I it i. I also known by street and number as: 44523 Highway 6, Glenwood SPXirl gs, Colorado 81601 assessor's schedule or parcel number islWithallappurtenances, subject to covenants, easements and restrictions of record, and subject to general Property221, and subject to patent reservations of rd, a ntof taxes for the year,as shown on First Vended FA=r Mew Plat recordedroadway on subject property grave a s iveway and Possessory i•tl Book 201 at ge 502 Septsanden4stxv 761 dated nber 1, 1999. rights Oq n p urn! to s>ngu used hereto, the stngu ar in tW P Executed April 18 2001 I: I Terry y i Pasond Represent? of the Pstata of L. Bowles Doroth Lucinda Bowles Deceased i SLSTATEOFCOLORADOfield I COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was wbwwledged before me this day of it 2001 , 1! I I by re L. Bowles Do> o Lucinda Bow I' as Personal Representative of the Estate of Deceased. Witness ray hand and official scaL My commission expires:o / via 0•a.4 iar •cb rbrrr r atio i ELLEN M. LIPSCOMB IllNOTARYPUBLIC p NNMdAd&Md i I 1 /bra - cars++w rut CI. PC46. Re% 14C PNRWNAL RRlRr5V4TA7tV 8B 11990 C%Mb) aeblbrA PaOaddn& 1743 War 3L, na.I, 00 aD207- 303.297.2300—rMati.ra 9.99 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Office Form GWS 44 (07/2009) DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1313 SHERMAN ST., RM 818, DENVER, CO 80 phone — info: (303) 866 -3587 main: (303) 866 -358 fax: (303 866 -3589 http://www.water.state.co.. RESIDENTIAL Note: Also use th' orm to apply for livestock watering NOV 2 3 WATER r INNWaterWellPermitplicationWATRESOURCLScif_ Review form instructions prio completing form.S TL E-N(dMBER The form must be complet in black or blue ink or typed.LENWOOD AE CA "V' -°, 1. Applicant Infor tion Use Of Well (check applicable b es) Name of applicant S e instructions to determine use(s) fo hich you may qualify Rocky Gabos 'El A. Ordinary household use in a single - family dwelling no outside use) Mai ling ess 44 Highway 6 B. Ordinary househol se in 1 to 3 single - family dwellings: Number of dw ngs: 7ityStateZipcode Glenwood Springs CO 81 1 El Home den /lawn irrigation, not to exceed one acre: Telephone #E -mail (optional)ar irrigated El sq. ft, [I acre 970) 945-9673 omestic animal watering — (non - commercial) 2 Type Of Application (che applicable boxes)ivestock watering (on farm /ranch /range /pasture) Construct new well E] Change source (aquifer) Replace existing well El Reapplication (expired permit) Well Data (proposed) Use existing well 1 Rooftop precip. collection Ma imum pumping rate Annual amoun be withdrawn Change or incre a use Other.2 gpm 2.75 acre-feet To al depth Aqui3. Refer To applicable)feet c 2 uvial Well permit #Water Court case # 56101-97CW162 8. Water Supplier asDesiatedBin Determination #Well name or # Bowles Well 2 Is his parcel within bou pplier: nd es of a water service ea. YES ®NO If es, provide name 4 Location Of Proposed Well (Import t! See Instructions) 9 Type Of Se Z ._ _ - Garfield NW 1/4 of the NW 1/a Septic t absoie _ _ ._ W -- - - --- - -' -- - - - - -- ------- __.,_... 7 Section Township N S - - - R e Ce I Sytem: D3550fSixthault: Location seauled to: istance of well from section lines (section li s are typically not property lines) 1250 Ft. from ® S 960 Ft. from E ® W Other (attach copng design and report) For replacement wells only dista and direction from old well to new well 1 1 . Proposed ell Driller License #(optional): feet di tlon 1 . Signat a Of Applicant(s) Or Authorized Agent Well location address (In de City, State, Zip) Check if well address is sa as in Item 1.T e maki of false statements herein constitutes perjury in the second d gre hi is punishable as a class 1 misdemeanor pursuant to C.R.S. 2 04 (13)(a). I have read the statements herein, know the contents m Optiona GPS well location information in UTM format. GIPS unit ings are as follows y knowled e. Si reof and state that the are true to n here (Must be original signature)Date For must be UTM Zone 12 or Zone 13 Ea ',9'`Z - motUnitsmustbeMeters Datum must beNAD83 Northing: Pn t name & Unit must be set to true north Was GPS unit checked for above? ES Remember to set Da to NAD83 O If Us y 11 5. Parcel On WhIC ell Will Be Located US GS map name _DWR map rid. Surface elev. YOU MUST ATTA A CURRENT DEED fFO T SUBJECT PARCEL) A. You must ch and complete one of the inp 9 eipt area only Subdiv' ' n: Name Old Orchard Subdi Lo 2,3,4 Bloc k Filing /Unit County ,exemption (attach cop f county approval & survey): Name /#Lot # Xecorded than 35 es, not in a subdivision, attach a deed with met s des ' tion recorded prior to June 1, 1972, and a curr attach a copy of the deed or su vey): Name /#A UAMAPloElacre parcel as described in IXboudescription W El5 Or more acres (attach a metes or survey)W 7 - El h metes & bounds description or survey uments) B. # of acres in parcel C. you the ow of this parcel? C CB 20. 22 YES NO (if ner no - see instructions)TOPO D Will this be the only well on this parcel? YES ® NO (if no list other wells)M LAR Bowles Well, Bowles_Well Nos 1, 3 - and 4 _ SB5 DIV WD BA MD E. State Parcel ID# ( 2123 - 352 -00 -185 7 s6 Whitehead, Dwight From:Michael Erion [MErion @resource- eng.com] Sent:Monday, December 21, 2009 3:58 PM,@ _,To:Whitehead, Dwight Cc:It so ris.net1@P Subject:Gabossi Recpt No 9503336 600 ft spacing DEC 8 2005 21 09 Attachments:Gabossi Rcpt 9503336 600 ft spacing Itr,pdf ATEK RESOURCL,WATER RESGURC;E" STATE: ENGINEEPTATENEER GLENWOOD Dwight: Attached is letter on 600 foot spacing for the Gabossi well. I confirmed there is no well within 600 feet, except the Gabossi house well, Permit No.52966. Regards, Michael Michael Erion, P.E. Water Resources Engineer 970) 945 -6777 Voice 970) 945 -1137 Facsimile MOMOM E tr0 C3 1 MV E E R I h4 E3 N C www.resource-eng.com The information contained in this e-mail is PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone and delete the original message from your system. Thank You. I 1 F" 6" 99s~ RESQU FREEES Mc 2 1 'os MENEM 1K,4TEK RESOURCE MENEM E N G I N E E R I N G I N C STATE ENGIN>R GLENWOOD Dwight Whitehead December 21, 2009 Water Commissioner, Wells ECEWFI Colorado Division of Water Resources Division 5 DEC 2 8 2009POBox396 Glenwood Springs CO 81602 WAT I ESOUck GTATE K"IR @ER RE: Receipt No. 9503336 — Rocky Gabossi — 600 Foot Spacing Dear Dwight: Resource Engineering, Inc. (RESOURCE) has reviewed potential wells within 600 feet of the well permit application of Rocky Gabossi, Receipt No. 9503336. There is no well within 600 feet of the well applied for In Receipt No. 9503336, except Permit No. 52966, which is owned by the applicant. This analysis and finding is based on review of well permits and decreed wells listed on CDSS and AquaMap, and observations by RESOURCE, John Taufer (planning consultant), and the applicant. This letter also confirms that only one awlication intended for submittal. It was not clear which form to use so Form GWS-44 and Form GWS-45 were both submitted for the same w Please eliminate the form that is not needed Please call if you have any questions or need any additional information. Sincerely, RESOURCE EN IN RING, INC. Michael J. Edo Water Resour s Engineer MJEImmm 872 -2.0 K.ICllwtsW72 GABOSSP2.0 Gabossi Subdivision 200 411t Whatehead 600 kaspackV4oc CC: Rocky Gabossi John Taufer Consulting Engineers and Hydrologists 909 Colorado Avenue 8 Glenwood Springs, CO 616m1 in (970) 945 -6777 Fax (970)945 -1 137 Account RECEhfte 1 of 1 Account R040428 DEC 2 8 2009 WATER RESOURCELocationQwnerInformationAssessmentHistoryT47E -N 1N Owner Name GABOSSI, ROC ANTHONY &Owner Name GABOSSI, ROC ANTHONY &Actual (2009)274,850 MARY ANN 2123 - 352 -00 -185 MARY ANN Primary Taxable 25,640 Parcel Numbe Owner Address 44523 HIGHWAY 6 & 24 Tax Area: 004 Mill Levy: 57.8240 Tax Area 004 - 1 -GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 Type Actual Assessed Acres Units Situs Address Improvement $263,660 $22,390 1.000 Sibling Account No Land 11,190 $3,250 20.220 Legal Summary Section: 35 Township: 5 Range: 90 A TR IN THE NW4 CONT 20.22 AC. AKA LOT 1 GABOSSI SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION Transfers Sale Price Sale Date Doc Type Book Page 07/07/2009 Deeds 06/09/2009 EAS 10/03/2005 RES B: 1732 P: 859 04/18/2001 QCD B: 1246 P: 776 Tax History Images Tax Year Taxes GIS 2009 1,482.60 2008 1,343.68 Estimated https://act.garfield- county.com /assessor /taxweb / account .]sp ?accountNum= R040428 &doc=12/21 /2009 W P D U DEC 2 8 WATER F2ISTATE O C" N 2 D(SF) c IG -DF I ON 2- D(S -F)o 0 D Q A 0 Q N a OCQD v N 00 W w 1 O N0 v N J rn N v a C) W DF IG —F IG— t> m w A Z m ni D 0G) n` I N c> TI c r NCA 3< rn N 52 Z A N N W ao N R•90 W• CAD R.89 1/2 W 0.W N Form No. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER GWS-25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 303) 866-3581 APPLICANT LIC WELL PERMIT, NUMBER 56102 -F _ DIV. 5 WD 39 DES. BASIN MD Lot: 3 Block: Filing: Subdiv: GABOSSINVAGNER EXEMPTION CONRAD WAGNER 111 PARK DRIVE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601- 970) 945-6076 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY SE 1/4 NW 114 Section 35 Township 5 S Range 90 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 1500 Ft. from North Section Line 2200 Ft. from West Section Line UTM COORDINATES Northing: Easting: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. , 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) on the condition that this well is operated in accordance with the Bowles, Dorothy L Estate Augmentation Plan approved by the Division 5 Water Court in case no. 97CW162. If this well is not operated in accordance with the terms of said decree, it will be subject to administration including orders to cease diverting water. 4) Approved as a well on a residential site of 20.85 acre(s) described as lot 3, Gabossi/Wagner Exemption, Garfield County. This well is identified as the Bowles Well no. 3. 5) The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside one single family dwelling. The ground water shall not be used for irrigation or other purposes. 6) The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 7) The annual amount of ground water to be appropriated by this well (Bowles Well no. 3) shall not exceed 0.39 acre-feet. Additionally the combined annual amount of ground water to be appropriated by the Bowles Well nos. 1 through 6 shall not exceed 11.72 acre-feet. 8) The return flow from the use of this well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of the non-evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 9) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 10) Totalizing flow meters must be installed on this well (Bowles Well no. 3) and the Bowles Well nos. 1, 2, 4, 5 & 6 and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. 11) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2123-352-00-126 NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: 040337 (totaling 59.810 acres) APPROVED DMW No.9500724 State Engineer DATEISSUEDOCT 0 By EXPIRATION DATfJrT 6 4 ?nn? Ago DIGOLmORADO WELL PERMR NUMBER 56103F VINon of Waht Aewu¢ea RECEIPT NUMBER 9500II5 ORIGNALPERMITAPPUCANIIgI APPROVED WELL LDCATIDN CONRADWAGNER Water O'rvisl0n: 5 Water DIstrat: 00 Designated Bash: NIA Management 31gr t NIA County: GARFIELD Parcel Name: GABCGSI F(EMPrICN Lot 2 Black: Ntllg: PhysIWI PAtlress: 24 COUNI ROAD 139 NEW CASTLE, CO 81647 NE 1I4 NW 1I4 Person 35 Tawnstap 5.0 S Range 90.0 W Both P.M. UTM CDORDIHITES lMeten_ IDne`13_ IL D831 Gitiig: Aglo 9 Nothing: 4383742.6 ISSUANCE OF thl PEWIT DOES NOT CONFER AWATER RIGHT CONDLIONS OF APPROVAL 1) Thc Per fiall M used n such a way as m come no mater0l IS ury to existing water ngtn. The rtnuanre of N6 cerme days not thisrund the apadant mat no unhurt will oavrm another women water rot or preclude aromer owner of a timed water right from seeking relief In a over court Acton. 2) The cmmtructon of me Per mall be In constmre want me Water WeLL Cmmtructon Rule 2 PON 40Z4, normal approval of wardance has men grandHby me State Board of balmners of Water WILL Construction am Putty Irst arum Contactors In aecoreanre with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant UP CRS P 90-1 K of an the Saudi that this well is operated In attnrdanre with the Styled, Dorothy Estate Augmentation PLn aFpmvtl by the Drvkon 5 Water Court In fame no. LO W162. If this well is not operated In accordance with the temc of said clams, It will be subject to administration Including orders to reaps dwerLing water. q Approvl as a Per an a rysuhntNrmay of l].38 acrers)demcrimi as lot a, GaMssuwagner Exenpnm, named County. This well n idemifil as me Bowles wort no. a. 5) The use of Brand water from Wm well C limited to a manrt nushold w formes inside me mingle family clack . Te grouts der short not be used for irrataNm or other onrSww. 6) The max lmu m onm ping rate o f in6 we l l sha ll not exceed 15 GPM. IS The annual amount of ground water to be doors pro Led by this well(bwln WeLL no. A) short not xcreed!0.391 food. Adlldmnally the co not red annual amount of oruM water as M aFprommdH by the bwln Wert nth. t Up tough 6 skirt not excel 11.]2 acre-Ne I. 8) The LOW on f law fman the use of this well must be through an indMNar waste water dlswar s5sdem of me mnkwarmanre ty)u Mere me water a returned to me sauce stream system in which me weLL G Lorimar. 9) This wai mall M crostructi not mare than 200 feet from me lmcatim specified an Ink penm8. 10) Tomming fray moders must M man lied an this wel I rbwlys WeLL no. 4) add the bola WeLL nth. 1, 2, 3, 5 R 6 and mainaned in good waking mredr. amendment smrds of all it perhaps; must M as inalni by me vrel ovate- recorded at least annually) and sudMNl come gesm mgnm under request. 11) The owner SU l l mark the well In a co mpkuo us place calm wai pemn I mothers), name of me a4Rer, am co u rt caps nvnMr of as ahead pro is . The caner shall take memory means and precautions as preserve these makings. NOTE: Parcel ldetti0castnn Number FIN): 23.2123.352.go 126 NOTE: Asseiwr Tax Schiure NumMr: N0337 Roaung 59.810acam) Bee QqN PAN Date Is i ee:10I412001 Named By Expiration Dare: 10/ 4/2002 Printed 02.I4.20ll For motors ebd gas m^^11 not 303.861 an q to M",11dw.cmmmuaw Pe41 W3 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 56103-F RECEIPT NUMBER 9500725 PERMIT HISTOIfY M-11-422 CHANGE IN OWNER NAMEIMAILING ADDRESS. CHANGED TG CHARLES HOGE M-11-422 CHANGE IN OWNER NAMEIMAILING ADDRESS. CHANGED TG IAURA HE$CH M-11-422 CHANGE IN OWNER NAMEIMAILING ADDRESS. CHANGED TG MICHAEL HE$CH Plnhtl @-14N]3 Fv pn'M em tlOa pm ,d1101.1b3%1 v q 10 A"://Jv.atl Am Pog3W3 Wright Water Engineers, Inc., 818 Colorado Ave., Ste. 307, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel. (970) 945-7755; Fax. (970) 945-9210, e-mail:jkelly@wrightwater.com MEMORANDUM To: Michael Resch and Charles Hoge Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Via Email <canyoncreekpartners@gmail.com> From: Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Jonathan Kelly, P.E. and Brianna Trotter, E.I. Date: August 2, 2024 Re: Report on Suitability of the Bowles Well Nos. 3 and 4 for Proposed Uses PURPOSE Wright Water Engineers, Inc. (WWE) has prepared this memorandum to describe the suitability of the Bowles Well Nos. 3 and 4 in serving their proposed uses in the future land use application to Garfield County. Bowles Well No. 3 is currently operating under Well Permit No. 335230, but a new well permit will be obtained to accommodate the proposed uses. Bowles Well No. 4 operates under Well Permit No. 56103-F, which allows for use in one single-family dwelling unit only, with no irrigation or other uses. This memorandum describes the proposed uses for both wells and the results from the well pumping test and water quality sampling that took place on June 26, 2024. BOWLES WELL NO.3 Proposed Uses The proposed uses for the Bowles Well No. 3 include drinking and sanitary uses in a small metal fabrication shop, including use in one bathroom with a sink and one additional utility sink, and vehicle washing for one vehicle twice per month. Additionally, a single-family home may be added to the well in the future. WWE used the Garfield County Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) Rules and Regulations Table 6-2 to estimate the wastewater flow for a bathroom with a sink and an additional utility sink. WWE then calculated the projected daily demands per person based on an assumed consumptive use of 15%. WWE used estimates for a water closet in Table 6-2 as estimates for toilet use of 24.8 gallons of wastewater flow per day per person and estimates from the lavatory sink in Table 6-2 as estimates for a bathroom sink use of 8.4 gallons of wastewater flow per day per person for handwashing. A kitchen sink with garbage grinder in Table 6-2 was used to estimate the potential wastewater flow in gallons per day per person for the additional sink. It was assumed that four employees would be using the facilities each day. Based on these assumptions, the total estimated water use of the shop is 0.017 acre-feet (AF) per month. Michael Resch and Charles Hoge August 2, 2024 Page 2 WWE assumed the single-family home would use a total of 350 gallons of water per day per standard engineering assumptions. The total monthly demand for domestic in-house uses is calculated to be up to 0.033 AF per month. For vehicle washing use, it is assumed that one car will be washed twice per month based on estimates from the client. The Western Carwash Association suggests that vehicle washing can use anywhere from 20 to 100 gallons of water per vehicle. Therefore, to maintain a conservative approach, WWE assumed that vehicle washing from the Bowles Well No. 3 would require 100 gallons of water per wash. The total amount of water used for vehicle washing per month was calculated to be 0.001 AF per month. These projected water demands are shown in Table 1. Based on these assumptions, the total water demand from the Bowles Well No. 3 is calculated to be 0.05 AF per month, or approximately 16,740 gallons per month. This equates to about 540 gallons of water per day in demand from the Bowles Well No. 3. Well Pumping Test and Results WWE coordinated the well pumping test with the pump contractor High Country Pump Services, LLC (High Country Pump). High Country Pump performed the well pumping test on June 26, 2024 with WWE on site to take measurements and notes. A Level Troll 700, rated at 100 pounds per square inch (psig), pressure transducer was secured within the well to log water-level readings every minute during the pumping test and recovery period. The pressure transducer was set at approximately 200 feet below the top of the well casing. The total well depth is 223 feet, with the pump set at a depth of 209 feet according to the pump installation report. Per the well construction and pump installation reports, the well casing diameter is 7 inches of steel material from 0 to 40 feet and 5.5 inches of PVC material from 38 to 140 feet, with the remaining well depth being perforated PVC casing at a diameter of 5.5 inches. The static water level in the well prior to the well pumping test was 151 feet from the top of the well casing. The Bowles Well No. 3 well pumping test began at 12:22 pm and lasted for four hours, with the pump being shut off at 4:22pm. The pumping rate used varied slightly throughout the well pumping test. High Country Pump set the pumping rate at about 10.7 gallons per minute (gpm) at the start of the test, but the water level in the well was drawing down relatively quickly at that rate, so High Country Pump reduced the pumping rate to about 8.75 gpm starting about 11 minutes after the beginning of the test. The drawdown began to slow, but did not appear to slow enough, so after ten minutes at the rate of 8.75 gpm, the rate was lowered again to about 7.89 gpm. The drawdown of the water level appeared to continue at a controlled rate at a pumping rate of 7.89 gpm, so the pumping rate was left at 7.89 gpm for the remainder of the test. With about an hour left of the test, the water quality samples needed to be collected, but the water being pumped out of the well was a dark red color from the sediment load in the pumped water. High Country Pump opined that this was likely due to the fact that the well is not often pumped for so long per day due to the small demand on the well in a typical day, so the extended pumping during the test was likely disturbing the sediment at the bottom of the well. In an attempt to get a clearer sample for the water quality testing, High Country Pump decreased the pumping rate slightly to 7.5 gpm starting at 3:08pm. After lowering the pumping rate slightly, the water color of the pumped water began to clear significantly, so WWE collected the water quality samples at approximately 3:30 pm. Michael Resch and Charles Hoge August 2, 2024 Page 3 During the four-hour well pumping test for Bowles Well No. 3, the maximum pumping rate was 10.7 gpm, and a more stable pumping rate at which point the drawdown was more gradual was approximately 7.89 gpm. The total drawdown was 25 feet. A total of 1,900 gallons were pumped during the well pumping test. The well recovered to 90% of the static water level within 20 minutes. WWE analyzed the recovery data and projected the recovery data out to 100 percent recovery to determine how long the well would need to rest to recover fully. WWE estimated that the well would recover fully within 32.4 minutes, or in just over half an hour. Water Quality Test Results WWE collected water quality samples from the Bowles Well No. 3 within the last hour of the well pumping test to ensure that a sufficient volume of water had been purged from the well and that the water being sampled was from the aquifer rather than stagnant water within the well. The water quality samples were analyzed by ACZ Laboratories, Inc. in Steamboat Springs, CO. As mentioned previously, the water being pumped from the well during the pumping test was dark red in color, indicating that there was suspended sediment in the water. The pump contractor opined that this could be due to the fact that the well is not often pumped for so long or at such a high rate, so sediment in the bottom of the well may have been disturbed during pumping, causing discoloration. The well is drilled in the Maroon Formation, which is a pliable sandstone bedrock that can easily break away. It is also possible that the well casing slot sizes are too big and allow too much sediment to break away from the Maroon Formation and pollute the well. When the water quality samples were collected, the pumping rate was decreased in an attempt to clear up the water color. The water quality results were received from ACZ Labs on July 22, 2024. Most of the parameters were within the expected range of values. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has standard maximum contaminant levels (MCLs), which are the maximum levels allowed of a contaminant in water which is delivered to any user of a public water system. None of the EPA’s MCL values were exceeded for the water quality parameters required to be tested by Garfield County. However, the levels of total recoverable iron were elevated above the Secondary MCL (SMCL) value of 0.3. This is indicative of sediment in the water, as evidenced by the total suspended solids (TSS) value of 223 mg/L. Additionally, the hardness as CaCO3 was considered to be hard water at 279 mg/L. Hardness as CaCO3 values above 200 mg/L are considered to be very hard and softening is recommended to reduce scaling and mineral deposits. However, neither of these elevated parameters has an EPA MCL value, and neither parameter requires immediate treatment. Table 1, attached, shows the water quality results with their associated MCL values. The full water quality report from ACZ Labs is attached as Attachment A. BOWLES WELL NO. 4 Proposed Uses The Bowles Well No. 4 is proposed to be used for Lot 1 of the proposed subdivision. Per the Well Permit No. 56103-F, the well may only be used for water use in one single-family dwelling and may Michael Resch and Charles Hoge August 2, 2024 Page 4 not be used for irrigation or other uses. This is to be the proposed use for the well, also, in future Lot 1. Therefore, WWE assumed that the total water demand from the well will be 350 gallons per day, as is a standard engineering assumption of demand for a single-family home. This is equal to approximately 10,850 gallons per month of demand from the Bowles Well No. 4. Well Pumping Test and Results WWE coordinated the well pumping test with High Country Pump. High Country Pump performed the well pumping test on June 26, 2024 with WWE on site to take measurements and notes. A Level Troll 700, rated at 300 psig, pressure transducer was secured within the well to log water level readings every minute during the pumping test and recovery period. The pressure transducer was set near the well’s pump at approximately 344 feet below the top of the well casing. The total well depth is 348 feet. Per the well construction and pump installation reports, the well casing diameter is 7 inches of steel material from 0 to 106 feet and 5.5 inches of PVC material from 85 to 195 feet, with the remaining well depth being perforated PVC casing at a diameter of 5.5 inches. The static water level in the well prior to the well pumping test was 231.6 feet from the top of the well casing. Therefore, the transducer was set about 112 feet below the static water level. The Bowles Well No. 4 well pumping test began at 10:02 am and lasted for four hours, with the pump being shut off at 2:02 pm. The pumping rate used was a constant rate at 14.28 gpm. The water level maintained a steady and slow rate of drawdown, so the pumping rate was left at 14.28 gpm for the entirety of the test. With about an hour left of the test, the water quality samples needed to be collected. The water being pumped from the well was clear for the entirety of the test. WWE collected the water quality samples at approximately 1:28 pm. The total drawdown was 69 feet. A total of 3,430 gallons were pumped from the well during the four- hour pumping test. The well recovered to 94 percent within 16 hours and 13 minutes. WWE analyzed the recovery data and projected the recovery data out to 100 percent recovery to determine how long the well would need to rest to recover fully. WWE estimated that the well would recover fully within 1,390 minutes, or 23.2 hours. Water Quality Test Results WWE collected water quality samples from the Bowles Well No. 4 within the last hour of the well pumping test to ensure that a sufficient volume of water had been purged from the well and that the water being sampled was from the aquifer rather than stagnant water within the well. The water quality samples were analyzed by ACZ Laboratories, Inc. in Steamboat Springs, CO. The water quality results were received from ACZ Labs on July 22, 2024. All of the parameters were within the expected range of values. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has standard maximum contaminant levels (MCLs), which are the maximum levels allowed of a contaminant in water which is delivered to any user of a public water system. None of the EPA’s MCL values were exceeded for the water quality parameters required to be tested by Garfield County. However, the hardness as CaCO3 was considered to be elevated at 246 mg/L. This is considered to be very hard Michael Resch and Charles Hoge August 2, 2024 Page 5 water but can be addressed easily with an in-home water softener to reduce scaling and mineral deposits. This parameter does not require immediate treatment. Table 2, attached, shows the water quality results with their associated MCL values. The full water quality report from ACZ Labs is attached as Attachment B. CONCLUSIONS Bowles Well No. 3 The total estimated demands for Bowles Well No. 3 are expected to be 540 gallons per day. During the well pumping test on June 26, 2024, a total of 1,900 gallons were pumped in four hours. The well recovered to 94 percent of the static water level within about 20 minutes after pumping stopped. WWE found that the well could fully recover in just over 30 minutes. This suggests that the daily yield of the well is in excess of 1,000 gallons and that the well can be expected to recover fully in under an hour. In our professional opinion, this shows that the long-term yield of the well is sufficient to supply the 540 gallons of water per day that is expected to be used for the proposed uses of the metal fabrication shop, vehicle washing, and the single-family home. The water quality test results show that none of the water quality parameters required to be tested by Garfield County exceed the EPA MCL limits. The total recoverable iron is elevated, likely due to sediment in the well, but can be addressed with additional well development or an in-home filtration system to remove sediment from the water. The hardness as CaCO3 is considered to be elevated and shows that the water is very hard. This can be addressed with an in-home water softener. However, neither of these parameters has an EPA MCL limit, and neither requires immediate treatment. Bowles Well No. 4 The total estimated demand for Bowles Well No. 4 is expected to be 350 gallons per day. During the well pumping test on June 26, 2024, a total of 3,430 gallons were pumped in four hours. The well recovered to 90 percent of the static water level within about 16 hours after pumping stopped. This suggests that the daily yield of the well is in excess of 1,000 gallons and that the well can be expected to recover to 90 percent of its starting water level within 16 hours. WWE found that the well could fully recover in just over 23 hours. This shows that the long-term yield of the well is sufficient to supply the 350 gallons of water per day that is expected to be used for the proposed uses of the Lot 1 single-family home. The water quality test results show that none of the water quality parameters required to be tested by Garfield County exceed the EPA MCL limits. The hardness as CaCO3 was considered to be elevated at 246 mg/L, which is considered to be very hard water. This can cause scaling and mineral deposits. However, this can be easily addressed by implementing an in-home water softener. Please reach out with any questions. Michael Resch and Charles Hoge August 2, 2024 Page 6 Attachment(s)/Enclosure(s) Table 1: Water Demands – Bowles Well Nos. 3 and 4 Table 2: Bowles Well No. 3 Water Quality Analysis Results Table 3: Bowles Well No. 4 Water Quality Analysis Results Attachment A: Bowles Well No. 3 Water Quality Report from ACZ Labs Attachment B: Bowles Well No. 4 Water Quality Report from ACZ Labs cc: Andie Hall, Esq. Sara Dunn, Esq. G:\WWE\241-060\000\Engr\Report\Memo - Well Pumping Tests -Bowles Well Nos. 3 and 4.docx Shop Domestic In- House Use Vehicle Washing Total Domestic In- House Use Total (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6) Jan 0.017 0.033 0.001 0.051 0.033 0.033 Feb 0.016 0.031 0.001 0.047 0.031 0.031 Mar 0.017 0.033 0.001 0.051 0.033 0.033 Apr 0.017 0.032 0.001 0.050 0.032 0.032 May 0.017 0.033 0.001 0.051 0.033 0.033 Jun 0.017 0.032 0.001 0.050 0.032 0.032 Jul 0.017 0.033 0.001 0.051 0.033 0.033 Aug 0.017 0.033 0.001 0.051 0.033 0.033 Sep 0.017 0.032 0.001 0.050 0.032 0.032 Oct 0.017 0.033 0.001 0.051 0.033 0.033 Nov 0.017 0.032 0.001 0.050 0.032 0.032 Dec 0.017 0.033 0.001 0.051 0.033 0.033 Total 0.206 0.392 0.007 0.606 0.392 0.392 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Table 1 Equals Column (5) Total water demands for one single family home at 350 gpd/EQR Equals Column (1) + (2) + (3) Assumes 100 gallons per wash and 2 vehicle washes per month. Total water demands for one single family home at 350 gpd/EQR Total water demands for one bathroom (lavatory and water clsoet) and one sink (kitchen sink with garbage grinder) for four employees in a metal fabrication shop, based on the Garfield County OWTS Rules and Regulations Table 6-2 and assuming 15% consumptive use. Month Bowles Well #3 Bowles Well #4 Water Demands - Bowles Well Nos. 3 and 4 G:\WWE\241-060\000\Engr\Water Demands\ Water Demands.xlsx Wright Water Engineers, Inc. 7/25/24 Prpd by: BBT Chckd by: JMK ANALYTE UNITS Method Bowles Well No. 3 Water Quality Results MCL1 SMCL2 Temperature °F YSI DSS Pro 62 -- pH (WWE Field Measurement)-YSI DSS Pro 7.59 -- pH units SM 4500-H+ B-2011 7.9 -- Temperature at which pH was measured C SM 4500-H+ B-2011 21.3 Total Alkalinity mg/L SM 2320 B-2011 277 -- Chloride mg/L SM 4500-Cl E-2011 2.09 -250 Fluoride mg/L SM 4500-F C-2011 <2.25 4 - Nitrate - Nitrogen mg/L Calculation (NO3NO2-NO2)0.155 10 - Nitrate/Nitrite as N mg/L EPA 353.2 0.155 Nitrite - Nitrogen mg/L EPA 353.2 <0.01 1 - Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C mg/L SM 2540 C-2011 364 Total Dissolved Solids (calculated)mg/L Calculation 363 -500 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105C mg/L SM 2540 D-2011/2015 223 Sodium Adsorption Ratio in Water -USGS - I1738-78 0.48 Sulfate mg/L ASTM D516-07/-11/-16 38.4 -250 Conductivity @25C umhos/cm SM 2510 B-2011 433 Corrosivity (calc.)SI Unit Calculation (SM 2330)0.7 Hardness as CaCO3 (dissolved)mg/L Calculation (SM 2340 B-2011)279 Total Coliform -SM 9223 Absent -- E-Coli -SM 9223 Absent -- Iron mg/L EPA 200.7 6.91 -0.3 Arsenic mg/L EPA 200.8 0.00108 0.01 - Cadmium mg/L EPA 200.7 <0.008 0.005 - Copper mg/L EPA 200.7 0.013 1.3 1.0 Lead mg/L EPA 200.8 0.00215 0.015 - Manganese mg/L EPA 200.7 0.063 -0.05 Uranium mg/L EPA 200.8 0.0123 0.03 - Zinc mg/L EPA 200.7 0.029 -5 Calcium mg/L EPA 200.7 70.4 -- Magnesium mg/L EPA 200.7 <0.02 -- Sodium mg/L EPA 200.7 18.4 -- Exceeds Recomended Concentration 2 Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level (SMCL) or National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (NSDWR) are non-enforceable guidelines regulating contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as skin or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor, or color) in drinking water. EPA recommends secondary standards to water systems but does not require water systems to comply. WWE recommended concentrations are based upon the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), MCL, SMCL, and MCLG, or professional judgment when EPA standards have not been established. Coliform Total Metals Dissolved Metals Notes 1 Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) - The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology and taking cost into consideration. MCLs are enforceable standards for Public Water Supplies. Inorganics TABLE 2 Bowles Well No. 3 Water Quality Analysis Results Field Parameters G:\WWE\241-060\000\Engr\Water Quality\From ACZ Labs\Water Quality Results\ Tables - Water Quality Results - Bowles 3 and 4.xlsx Wright Water Engineers, Inc. 7/25/24 Prpd by: BBT Chckd by: JMK ANALYTE UNITS Method Bowles Well No. 4 Water Quality Results MCL1 SMCL2 Temperature °F YSI DSS Pro 59 -- pH (WWE Field Measurement)-YSI DSS Pro 7.72 -- pH units SM 4500-H+ B-2011 6.7 -- Temperature at which pH was measured C SM 4500-H+ B-2011 21.5 Total Alkalinity mg/L SM 2320 B-2011 265 -- Chloride mg/L SM 4500-Cl E-2011 4.46 -250 Fluoride mg/L SM 4500-F C-2011 0.43 4 - Nitrate - Nitrogen mg/L Calculation (NO3NO2-NO2)0.278 10 - Nitrate/Nitrite as N mg/L EPA 353.2 0.289 Nitrite - Nitrogen mg/L EPA 353.2 0.011 1 - Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C mg/L SM 2540 C-2011 322 Total Dissolved Solids (calculated)mg/L Calculation 362 -500 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105C mg/L SM 2540 D-2011/2015 <5 Sodium Adsorption Ratio in Water -USGS - I1738-78 0.42 Sulfate mg/L ASTM D516-07/-11/-16 62.2 -250 Conductivity @25C umhos/cm SM 2510 B-2011 438 Corrosivity (calc.)SI Unit Calculation (SM 2330)0.0 Hardness as CaCO3 (dissolved)mg/L Calculation (SM 2340 B-2011)246 Total Coliform -SM 9223 Absent -- E-Coli -SM 9223 Absent -- Iron mg/L EPA 200.7 <0.06 -0.3 Arsenic mg/L EPA 200.8 0.00077 0.01 - Cadmium mg/L EPA 200.7 <0.008 0.005 - Copper mg/L EPA 200.7 <0.01 1.3 1.0 Lead mg/L EPA 200.8 <0.0001 0.015 - Manganese mg/L EPA 200.7 <0.01 -0.05 Uranium mg/L EPA 200.8 0.0258 0.03 - Zinc mg/L EPA 200.7 <0.02 -5 Calcium mg/L EPA 200.7 70.6 -- Magnesium mg/L EPA 200.7 17.0 -- Sodium mg/L EPA 200.7 14.8 -- Exceeds Recomended Concentration 2 Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level (SMCL) or National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (NSDWR) are non-enforceable guidelines regulating contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as skin or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor, or color) in drinking water. EPA recommends secondary standards to water systems but does not require water systems to comply. WWE recommended concentrations are based upon the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), MCL, SMCL, and MCLG, or professional judgment when EPA standards have not been established. Coliform Total Metals Dissolved Metals Notes 1 Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) - The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology and taking cost into consideration. MCLs are enforceable standards for Public Water Supplies. Inorganics TABLE 3 Bowles Well No. 4 Water Quality Analysis Results Field Parameters G:\WWE\241-060\000\Engr\Water Quality\From ACZ Labs\Water Quality Results\ Tables - Water Quality Results - Bowles 3 and 4.xlsx Wright Water Engineers, Inc. 7/25/24 Prpd by: BBT Chckd by: JMK ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Analytical Report Wright Water Engineers 818 Colorado Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ACZ Project ID: L88577 Brianna Trotter July 22, 2024 Project ID: Report to: Suite 307 Brianna Trotter: Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) submitted to ACZ Laboratories, Inc. (ACZ) on June 26, 2024. This project has been assigned to ACZ's project number, L88577. Please reference this number in all future inquiries. All analyses were performed according to ACZ's Quality Assurance Plan. The enclosed results relate only to the samples received under L88577. Each section of this report has been reviewed and approved by the appropriate Laboratory Supervisor, or a qualified substitute. Except as noted, the test results for the methods and parameters listed on ACZ's current NELAC certificate letter (#ACZ) meet all requirements of NELAC. This report shall be used or copied only in its entirety. ACZ is not responsible for the consequences arising from the use of a partial report. All samples and sub-samples associated with this project will be disposed of after August 21, 2024. If the samples are determined to be hazardous, additional charges apply for disposal (typically $11/sample). If you would like the samples to be held longer than ACZ's stated policy or to be returned, please contact your Project Manager or Customer Service Representative for further details and associated costs. ACZ retains analytical raw data reports for ten years. If you have any questions or other needs, please contact your Project Manager. Wright Water Engineers 818 Colorado Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Brianna Trotter Bill to: Suite 307 Page 1 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Sample ID:L88577-01 Sample ID:BOWLES #3 Sample Matrix:Drinking Water Wright Water Engineers Project ID: ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic Analytical Results Date Sampled:06/25/24 15:37 Date Received:06/26/24 Parameter EPA Method Result Units MDLQual AnalystDatePQL Inorganic Prep XQDilution Cyanide, total EPA 335.4 jqr07/05/24 9:10 Lab Filtration (0.45um) & Acidification EPA 200.7/200.8 Filter aps07/01/24 15:40 Phosphorus, total EPA 365.1 lbt*07/01/24 10:24 Total Recoverable Digestion ICP EPA 200.2 aeb/ae h 07/02/24 12:55 Total Recoverable Digestion ICP-MS EPA 200.2 jrj*07/09/24 20:34 REPIN.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. Page 2 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Sample ID:L88577-01 Sample ID:BOWLES #3 Sample Matrix:Drinking Water Wright Water Engineers Project ID: ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic Analytical Results Date Sampled:06/25/24 15:37 Date Received:06/26/24 Parameter EPA Method Result Units MDLQual AnalystDatePQL Metals Analysis XQDilution Aluminum, total recoverable EPA 200.7 6.85 mg/L 0.25 msp0.07 07/16/24 14:481 Antimony, total recoverable EPA 200.8 <0.0004 mg/L 0.002U jrj0.0004 07/03/24 15:151 Arsenic, total recoverable EPA 200.8 0.00108 mg/L 0.002B jrj0.0005 07/03/24 15:151 Barium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 0.0822 mg/L 0.035 aeb/ms p 0.009*07/12/24 13:081 Beryllium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 0.000712 mg/L 0.0005 aps0.0002*07/10/24 18:112 Cadmium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.008 mg/L 0.025U aeb/ms p 0.008*07/12/24 13:081 Calcium, dissolved EPA 200.7 70.4 mg/L 0.5 msp0.1 07/13/24 13:581 Chromium, dissolved EPA 200.7 <0.02 mg/L 0.05U msp0.02*07/13/24 13:581 Copper, total recoverable EPA 200.7 0.013 mg/L 0.05B msp0.01*07/16/24 14:481 Iron, total recoverable EPA 200.7 6.91 mg/L 0.15 aeb/ms p 0.06 07/12/24 13:081 Lead, total recoverable EPA 200.8 0.00215 mg/L 0.0005 jrj0.0001 07/03/24 15:151 Magnesium, dissolved EPA 200.7 25.1 mg/L 1 msp0.2 07/13/24 13:581 Manganese, total recoverable EPA 200.7 0.063 mg/L 0.05 msp0.01 07/16/24 14:481 Mercury, total EPA 245.1 <0.0002 mg/L 0.001U aeh0.0002 07/03/24 16:241 Nickel, total recoverable EPA 200.7 0.0120 mg/L 0.04B aeb/ms p 0.008*07/12/24 13:081 Potassium, dissolved EPA 200.7 2.26 mg/L 1 msp0.5*07/13/24 13:581 Selenium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 <0.002 mg/L 0.01U gjl0.002 07/10/24 14:152 Silica, dissolved EPA 200.7 29.7 mg/L 1 msp0.2 07/13/24 13:581 Silver, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.01 mg/L 0.025U aeb/ms p 0.01*07/12/24 13:081 Sodium, dissolved EPA 200.7 18.4 mg/L 1 msp0.2 07/13/24 13:581 Thallium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 0.00022 mg/L 0.0005B jrj0.0001 07/03/24 15:151 Uranium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 0.0123 mg/L 0.0005 jrj0.0001 07/03/24 15:151 Zinc, total recoverable EPA 200.7 0.029 mg/L 0.05B aeb/ms p 0.02 07/12/24 13:081 REPIN.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. Page 3 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Sample ID:L88577-01 Sample ID:BOWLES #3 Sample Matrix:Drinking Water Wright Water Engineers Project ID: ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic Analytical Results Date Sampled:06/25/24 15:37 Date Received:06/26/24 Parameter EPA Method Result Units MDLQual AnalystDatePQL Wet Chemistry XQDilution Alkalinity as CaCO3 SM 2320 B-2011 Bicarbonate as CaCO3 277 mg/L 20H rsc2*07/19/24 0:001 Carbonate as CaCO3 <2 mg/L 20UH rsc2*07/19/24 0:001 Hydroxide as CaCO3 <2 mg/L 20UH rsc2*07/19/24 0:001 Total Alkalinity 277 mg/L 20H rsc2*07/19/24 0:001 Cation-Anion Balance Calculation Cation-Anion Balance 0.8 %calc07/22/24 0:00 Sum of Anions 6.4 meq/L calc07/22/24 0:00 Sum of Cations 6.5 meq/L calc07/22/24 0:00 Chloride SM 4500-Cl E-2011 2.09 mg/L 2 jqr1*06/28/24 11:101 Conductivity @25C SM 2510 B-2011 433 umhos/cm 10 asn1*07/09/24 19:441 Corrosivity (calc.)Calculation (SM 2330)0.7 SI Unit calc*07/22/24 0:00 Cyanide, total EPA 335.4 <0.003 mg/L 0.01U ems0.003*07/08/24 11:450.5 Fluoride SM 4500-F C-2011 <2.25 mg/L 5.25U emk2.25*07/18/24 15:2015 Hardness as CaCO3 (dissolved) Calculation (SM 2340 B-2011)279 mg/L 5 calc0.2 07/22/24 0:00 Lab Filtration (0.45um filter) SOPWC050 cdp06/27/24 15:461 Nitrate as N Calculation (NO3NO2-NO2)0.155 mg/L 0.1 calc0.02 07/22/24 0:00 Nitrate/Nitrite as N EPA 353.2 0.155 mg/L 0.1 pjb0.02*06/26/24 23:591 Nitrite as N EPA 353.2 <0.01 mg/L 0.05U pjb0.01*06/26/24 23:591 pH (lab)SM 4500-H+ B-2011 pH 7.9 units 0.1H asn0.1*07/10/24 0:001 pH measured at 21.3 C 0.1 asn0.1*07/10/24 0:001 Phosphorus, total EPA 365.1 0.077 mg/L 0.25B mrd0.05*07/05/24 10:495 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM 2540 C-2011 364 mg/L 40 ptw20*06/27/24 13:371 Residue, Non- Filterable (TSS) @105C SM 2540 D-2011/2015 223 mg/L 20 cdp5*06/26/24 13:271 Sodium Adsorption Ratio in Water USGS - I1738-78 0.48 calc07/22/24 0:00 Sulfate ASTM D516-07/-11/-16 38.4 mg/L 25 mrd5*06/28/24 12:105 TDS (calculated)Calculation 363 mg/L calc07/22/24 0:00 TDS (ratio - measured/calculated) Calculation 1.00 calc07/22/24 0:00 Turbidity EPA 180.1 198 NTU 0.5 trt0.1*06/26/24 11:411 REPIN.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. Page 4 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Report Header Explanations Batch A distinct set of samples analyzed at a specific time Found Value of the QC Type of interest Limit Upper limit for RPD, in %. Lower Lower Recovery Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) MDL Method Detection Limit. Same as Minimum Reporting Limit unless omitted or equal to the PQL (see comment #5). Allows for instrument and annual fluctuations. PCN/SCN A number assigned to reagents/standards to trace to the manufacturer's certificate of analysis PQL Practical Quantitation Limit. Synonymous with the EPA term "minimum level". QC True Value of the Control Sample or the amount added to the Spike Rec Recovered amount of the true value or spike added, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) RPD Relative Percent Difference, calculation used for Duplicate QC Types Upper Upper Recovery Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) Sample Value of the Sample of interest QC Sample Types AS Analytical Spike (Post Digestion)LCSWD Laboratory Control Sample - Water Duplicate ASD Analytical Spike (Post Digestion) Duplicate LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank CCB Continuing Calibration Blank LFM Laboratory Fortified Matrix CCV Continuing Calibration Verification standard LFMD Laboratory Fortified Matrix Duplicate DUP Sample Duplicate LRB Laboratory Reagent Blank ICB Initial Calibration Blank MS Matrix Spike ICV Initial Calibration Verification standard MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate ICSAB Inter-element Correction Standard - A plus B solutions PBS Prep Blank - Soil LCSS Laboratory Control Sample - Soil PBW Prep Blank - Water LCSSD Laboratory Control Sample - Soil Duplicate PQV Practical Quantitation Verification standard LCSW Laboratory Control Sample - Water SDL Serial Dilution QC Sample Type Explanations Blanks Verifies that there is no or minimal contamination in the prep method or calibration procedure. Control Samples Verifies the accuracy of the method, including the prep procedure. Duplicates Verifies the precision of the instrument and/or method. Spikes/Fortified Matrix Determines sample matrix interferences, if any. Standard Verifies the validity of the calibration. ACZ Qualifiers (Qual) B Analyte concentration detected at a value between MDL and PQL. The associated value is an estimated quantity. H Analysis exceeded method hold time. pH is a field test with an immediate hold time. L Target analyte response was below the laboratory defined negative threshold. U The material was analyzed for, but was not detected above the level of the associated value. The associated value is either the sample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit. Method References (1) EPA 600/4-83-020. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, March 1983. (2) EPA 600/R-93-100. Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environmental Samples, August 1993. (3) EPA 600/R-94-111. Methods for the Determination of Metals in Environmental Samples - Supplement I, May 1994. (4) EPA SW-846. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. (5) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Comments (1) QC results calculated from raw data. Results may vary slightly if the rounded values are used in the calculations. (2)Soil, Sludge, and Plant matrices for Inorganic analyses are reported on a dry weight basis. (3) Animal matrices for Inorganic analyses are reported on an "as received" basis. (4) An asterisk in the "XQ" column indicates there is an extended qualifier and/or certification qualifier associated with the result. (5) If the MDL equals the PQL or the MDL column is omitted, the PQL is the reporting limit. For a complete list of ACZ's Extended Qualifiers, please click: https://acz.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Ext-Qual-List.pdf REP001.03.15.02 Inorganic Reference Page 5 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Alkalinity as CaCO3 SM2320B - Titration ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593460 WG593460PBW1 07/19/24 16:48PBW 10.6 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW3 07/19/24 16:58 98LCSWWC240712-1 802.8 90 110mg/L820.0001 L88841-01DUP 07/19/24 18:00 229DUP 226.4 1mg/L 20 WG593460LCSW6 07/19/24 19:09 100LCSWWC240712-1 816.4 90 110mg/L820.0001 WG593460PBW2 07/19/24 19:15PBW 11.9 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW9 07/19/24 20:49 98LCSWWC240712-1 801.1 90 110mg/L820.0001 WG593460PBW3 07/19/24 20:55PBW 12.8 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW12 07/19/24 22:54 99LCSWWC240712-1 809.4 90 110mg/L820.0001 WG593460PBW4 07/19/24 23:00PBW 12.5 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW15 07/20/24 0:49 100LCSWWC240712-1 823.8 90 110mg/L820.0001 WG593460PBW5 07/20/24 0:55PBW 15.6 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW18 07/20/24 1:47 101LCSWWC240712-1 829.4 90 110mg/L820.0001 Aluminum, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593067 WG593067ICV 07/16/24 14:28 99ICVII240710-5 1.97 95 105mg/L2 WG593067ICB 07/16/24 14:33ICB U -0.15 0.15mg/L WG592284LRB 07/16/24 14:44LRB U -0.11 0.11mg/L WG592284LFB 07/16/24 14:46 94LFBII240608-4 .942 85 115mg/L1.001 L88586-09LFM 07/16/24 14:54 U 93LFMII240608-4 .931 70 130mg/L1.001 L88586-09LFMD 07/16/24 14:57 U 98LFMDII240608-4 .979 570130mg/L 201.001 Antimony, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 92ICVMS240613-12 .01838 90 110mg/L.02002 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0012 0.0012mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB U -0.00088 0.00088mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 103LFBMS240613-7 .01027 85 115mg/L.01 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 U 104LFMMS240613-7 .01041 70 130mg/L.01 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 U 103LFMDMS240613-7 .01033 170130mg/L 20.01 Arsenic, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 103ICVMS240613-12 .05159 90 110mg/L.05 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0015 0.0015mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB U -0.0011 0.0011mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 102LFBMS240613-7 .05126 85 115mg/L.0501 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 .01 93LFMMS240613-7 .05679 70 130mg/L.0501 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 .01 93LFMDMS240613-7 .05643 170130mg/L 20.0501 Page 6 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Barium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 96ICVII240710-5 1.9278 95 105mg/L2 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.027 0.027mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.0198 0.0198mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 93LFBII240608-4 .465 85 115mg/L.501 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 91LFMII240608-4 .4542 70 130mg/L.501 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 93LFMDII240608-4 .4684 370130mg/L 20.501 Beryllium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592817 WG592817ICV 07/10/24 18:01 100ICVMS240613-12 .049789 90 110mg/L.05 WG592817ICB 07/10/24 18:02ICB .000111 -0.00024 0.00024mg/L WG592705LRB 07/10/24 18:08LRB U -0.000176 0.000176mg/L WG592705LFB 07/10/24 18:09 102LFBMS240613-7 .051171 85 115mg/L.05005 Cadmium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 95ICVII240710-5 1.9075 95 105mg/L2 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.024 0.024mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.0176 0.0176mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 92LFBII240608-4 .4613 85 115mg/L.5005 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 90LFMII240608-4 .4527 70 130mg/L.5005 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 94LFMDII240608-4 .4687 370130mg/L 20.5005 Calcium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592917 WG592917ICV 07/13/24 12:27 97ICVII240710-5 97.03 95 105mg/L100 WG592917ICB 07/13/24 12:33ICB .1 -0.3 0.3mg/L WG592917LFB 07/13/24 12:45 106LFBII240702-3 72.17 85 115mg/L67.93628 L88581-02AS 07/13/24 14:07 86.8 108ASII240702-3 160.3 85 115mg/L67.93628 L88581-02ASD 07/13/24 14:10 86.8 100ASDII240702-3 154.4 485115mg/L 2067.93628 Chloride SM 4500-Cl E-2011 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592108 WG592108ICV 06/28/24 10:04 96ICVWI231211-1 38.19 90 110mg/L39.96 WG592108ICB 06/28/24 10:04ICB U mg/L WG592108LFB 06/28/24 10:40 105LFBWI231211-4 21.02 90 110mg/L20.02 L88578-05DUP RA06/28/24 10:52 1.53DUP 1.49 3mg/L 20 L88578-06AS 06/28/24 11:00 U 102ASWI231211-4 20.37 90 110mg/L20.02 Page 7 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Chromium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592917 WG592917ICV 07/13/24 12:27 96ICVII240710-5 1.916 95 105mg/L2 WG592917ICB 07/13/24 12:33ICB U -0.06 0.06mg/L WG592917LFB 07/13/24 12:45 107LFBII240702-3 .536 85 115mg/L.5005 L88581-02AS 07/13/24 14:07 U 110ASII240702-3 .55 85 115mg/L.5005 L88581-02ASD 07/13/24 14:10 U 107ASDII240702-3 .535 385115mg/L 20.5005 Conductivity @25C SM 2510 B-2011 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592697 WG592697LCSW2 07/09/24 16:36 108LCSWPCN6270861520 90 110umhos/cm1409 WG592697LCSW5 07/09/24 19:02 107LCSWPCN6269471502 90 110umhos/cm1408 L88589-04DUP 07/09/24 20:25 1160DUP 1198 3umhos/cm 20 WG592697LCSW8 07/09/24 21:44 108LCSWPCN6269471522 90 110umhos/cm1408 WG592697LCSW11 07/10/24 0:55 108LCSWPCN6269471526 90 110umhos/cm1408 Copper, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593067 WG593067ICV 07/16/24 14:28 96ICVII240710-5 1.92 95 105mg/L2 WG593067ICB 07/16/24 14:33ICB U -0.03 0.03mg/L WG592284LRB 07/16/24 14:44LRB U -0.022 0.022mg/L WG592284LFB 07/16/24 14:46 94LFBII240608-4 .468 85 115mg/L.5005 L88586-09LFM 07/16/24 14:54 U 94LFMII240608-4 .472 70 130mg/L.5005 L88586-09LFMD 07/16/24 14:57 U 100LFMDII240608-4 .498 570130mg/L 20.5005 Cyanide, total EPA 335.4 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592565 WG592565ICV 07/08/24 11:39 99ICVWI240626-3 .2961 90 110mg/L.3003 WG592565ICB 07/08/24 11:39ICB U -0.003 0.003mg/L WG592468LRB 07/08/24 11:41LRB U -0.003 0.003mg/L WG592468LFB 07/08/24 11:42 90LFBWI240625-2 .1793 90 110mg/L.2 L88579-01LFM M207/08/24 12:14 .251 84LFMWI240625-2 .4193 90 110mg/L.2 L88579-02DUP 07/08/24 12:16 3.67DUP 3.625 1mg/L 20 Fluoride SM 4500-F C-2011 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593373 WG593373ICV 07/18/24 13:57 99ICVWC240712-2 1.98 90 110mg/L2 WG593373ICB 07/18/24 14:03ICB U -0.3 0.3mg/L WG593373LFB1 07/18/24 14:09 100LFBWC240411-1 5 90 110mg/L5 L88577-01AS 07/18/24 15:25 U 101ASWC240411-1 75.7 90 110mg/L75 L88577-01ASD 07/18/24 15:30 U 100ASDWC240411-1 74.67 190110mg/L 2075 WG593373LFB2 07/18/24 16:24 107LFBWC240411-1 5.35 90 110mg/L5 Page 8 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Iron, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 97ICVII240710-5 1.944 95 105mg/L2 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.18 0.18mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.132 0.132mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 97LFBII240608-4 .968 85 115mg/L1.003 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 93LFMII240608-4 .933 70 130mg/L1.003 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 96LFMDII240608-4 .966 370130mg/L 201.003 Lead, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 102ICVMS240613-12 .05118 90 110mg/L.05 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0003 0.0003mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB .00015 -0.00022 0.00022mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 98LFBMS240613-7 .04917 85 115mg/L.05005 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 .00024 100LFMMS240613-7 .05047 70 130mg/L.05005 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 .00024 100LFMDMS240613-7 .05032 070130mg/L 20.05005 Magnesium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592917 WG592917ICV 07/13/24 12:27 97ICVII240710-5 97.23 95 105mg/L100 WG592917ICB 07/13/24 12:33ICB U -0.6 0.6mg/L WG592917LFB 07/13/24 12:45 106LFBII240702-3 53.03 85 115mg/L49.99866 L88581-02AS 07/13/24 14:07 42 108ASII240702-3 95.98 85 115mg/L49.99866 L88581-02ASD 07/13/24 14:10 42 101ASDII240702-3 92.27 485115mg/L 2049.99866 Manganese, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593067 WG593067ICV 07/16/24 14:28 96ICVII240710-5 1.91 95 105mg/L2 WG593067ICB 07/16/24 14:33ICB U -0.03 0.03mg/L WG592284LRB 07/16/24 14:44LRB U -0.022 0.022mg/L WG592284LFB 07/16/24 14:46 93LFBII240608-4 .465 85 115mg/L.501 L88586-09LFM 07/16/24 14:54 U 93LFMII240608-4 .465 70 130mg/L.501 L88586-09LFMD 07/16/24 14:57 U 98LFMDII240608-4 .489 570130mg/L 20.501 Mercury, total EPA 245.1 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592243 WG592243ICV 07/03/24 15:22 105ICVHG240528-3 .00526 95 105mg/L.005 WG592243ICB 07/03/24 15:23ICB U -0.0002 0.0002mg/L WG592397 WG592397LRB 07/03/24 16:07LRB U -0.00044 0.00044mg/L WG592397LFB 07/03/24 16:08 92LFBHG240619-6 .00184 85 115mg/L.002002 L88717-03LFM 07/03/24 16:31 U 94LFMHG240619-6 .00188 85 115mg/L.002002 L88717-03LFMD 07/03/24 16:31 U 92LFMDHG240619-6 .00184 285115mg/L 20.002002 Page 9 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Nickel, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 98ICVII240710-5 1.957 95 105mg/L2.004 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.024 0.024mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.0176 0.0176mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 96LFBII240608-4 .4802 85 115mg/L.501 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 94LFMII240608-4 .4713 70 130mg/L.501 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 97LFMDII240608-4 .4866 370130mg/L 20.501 Nitrate/Nitrite as N EPA 353.2 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG591986 WG591986ICV 06/26/24 23:52 98ICVWI240403-6 2.366 90 110mg/L2.415 WG591986ICB 06/26/24 23:53ICB U -0.02 0.02mg/L WG591986LFB 06/26/24 23:58 104LFBWI240228-17 2.076 90 110mg/L2 L88577-01AS 06/27/24 0:01 .155 102ASWI240228-17 2.196 90 110mg/L2 L88578-01DUP RA06/27/24 0:03 .12DUP .119 1mg/L 20 Nitrite as N EPA 353.2 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG591986 WG591986ICV 06/26/24 23:52 100ICVWI240403-6 .61 90 110mg/L.608 WG591986ICB 06/26/24 23:53ICB U -0.01 0.01mg/L WG591986LFB 06/26/24 23:58 104LFBWI240228-17 1.041 90 110mg/L1 L88577-01AS 06/27/24 0:01 U 103ASWI240228-17 1.03 90 110mg/L1 L88578-01DUP RA06/27/24 0:03 UDUP U 0mg/L 20 pH (lab) SM4500H+ B ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592781 WG592781LCSW1 07/10/24 17:00 100LCSWPCN6244495.98 5.9 6.1units6 L88589-01DUP 07/10/24 18:23 8.2DUP 7.9 4units 20 WG592781LCSW4 07/10/24 19:42 100LCSWPCN6244496.01 5.9 6.1units6 WG592781LCSW7 07/10/24 22:12 100LCSWPCN6244495.99 5.9 6.1units6 WG592781LCSW10 07/11/24 0:48 100LCSWPCN6244496.01 5.9 6.1units6 WG592781LCSW13 07/11/24 3:17 100LCSWPCN6244495.98 5.9 6.1units6 WG592781LCSW16 07/11/24 4:30 100LCSWPCN6244495.99 5.9 6.1units6 Phosphorus, total EPA 365.1 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592482 WG592482ICV 07/05/24 10:43 108ICVWI240603-4 .707 90 110mg/L.65228 WG592482ICB 07/05/24 10:46ICB U -0.01 0.01mg/L WG592206LRB 07/05/24 10:47LRB U -0.01 0.01mg/L WG592206LFB 07/05/24 10:48 102LFBWI240625-5 .511 90 110mg/L.5 L88577-01LFM 07/05/24 10:51 .077 101LFM5XPT2.595 90 110mg/L2.5 L88578-01DUP RA07/05/24 10:53 UDUP U 0mg/L 20 Page 10 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Potassium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592917 WG592917ICV 07/13/24 12:27 96ICVII240710-5 19.27 95 105mg/L20 WG592917ICB 07/13/24 12:33ICB U -1.5 1.5mg/L WG592917LFB 07/13/24 12:45 106LFBII240702-3 105.8 85 115mg/L99.96008 L88581-02AS 07/13/24 14:07 5.77 113ASII240702-3 118.3 85 115mg/L99.96008 L88581-02ASD 07/13/24 14:10 5.77 107ASDII240702-3 112.7 585115mg/L 2099.96008 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM 2540 C-2011 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592050 WG592050PBW 06/27/24 13:25PBW U -20 20mg/L WG592050LCSW 06/27/24 13:29 96LCSWPCN626715964 80 120mg/L1000 L88580-01DUP 06/27/24 14:18 322DUP 316 2mg/L 10 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105C SM 2540 D-2011/2015 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG591935 WG591935PBW 06/26/24 12:36PBW U -2 2mg/L WG591935LCSW 06/26/24 12:39 82LCSWPCN62671582 80 120mg/L100 L88582-02DUP RA06/26/24 13:59 5DUP 5 0mg/L 10 Selenium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592771 WG592771ICV 07/10/24 14:05 104ICVMS240613-12 .0519 90 110mg/L.05 WG592771ICB 07/10/24 14:06ICB U -0.003 0.003mg/L WG592705LRB 07/10/24 14:10LRB U -0.0022 0.0022mg/L WG592705LFB 07/10/24 14:11 94LFBMS240613-7 .047 85 115mg/L.05005 L88696-06LFM 07/10/24 14:34 U 85LFMMS240613-7 .0423 70 130mg/L.05005 L88696-06LFMD 07/10/24 14:36 U 87LFMDMS240613-7 .0433 270130mg/L 20.05005 Silica, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592917 WG592917ICV 07/13/24 12:27 101ICVII240710-5 43.37 95 105mg/L42.8 WG592917ICB 07/13/24 12:33ICB U -0.6 0.6mg/L WG592917LFB 07/13/24 12:45 106LFBII240702-3 22.7 85 115mg/L21.42782 L88581-02AS 07/13/24 14:07 11.2 109ASII240702-3 34.59 85 115mg/L21.42782 L88581-02ASD 07/13/24 14:10 11.2 100ASDII240702-3 32.66 685115mg/L 2021.42782 Page 11 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Silver, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 97ICVII240710-5 .968 95 105mg/L1 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.03 0.03mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.022 0.022mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 87LFBII240608-4 .435 85 115mg/L.4995 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 85LFMII240608-4 .426 70 130mg/L.4995 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 87LFMDII240608-4 .433 270130mg/L 20.4995 Sodium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592917 WG592917ICV 07/13/24 12:27 98ICVII240710-5 97.53 95 105mg/L100 WG592917ICB 07/13/24 12:33ICB U -0.6 0.6mg/L WG592917LFB 07/13/24 12:45 105LFBII240702-3 105.4 85 115mg/L99.97238 L88581-02AS 07/13/24 14:07 22.5 111ASII240702-3 133.5 85 115mg/L99.97238 L88581-02ASD 07/13/24 14:10 22.5 106ASDII240702-3 128.2 485115mg/L 2099.97238 Sulfate ASTM D516-07/-11/-16 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592103 WG592103ICB 06/28/24 10:34ICB U -2.5 2.5mg/L WG592103ICV 06/28/24 10:34 96ICVWI240628-2 19.3 85 115mg/L20.02 WG592103LFB 06/28/24 11:18 97LFBWI240618-2 9.7 85 115mg/L10 L88477-01AS 06/28/24 11:26 127 106ASSO4TURB5X137.6 85 115mg/L10 L88477-01ASD 06/28/24 11:26 127 105ASDSO4TURB5X137.5 085115mg/L 2010 Thallium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 103ICVMS240613-12 .05157 90 110mg/L.05 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0003 0.0003mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB U -0.00022 0.00022mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 96LFBMS240613-7 .04817 85 115mg/L.0501 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 U 96LFMMS240613-7 .04828 70 130mg/L.0501 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 U 97LFMDMS240613-7 .04862 170130mg/L 20.0501 Turbidity EPA 180.1 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG591913 WG591913ICV 06/26/24 11:08 92ICVPCN626099183 90 110NTU200 WG591913ICB 06/26/24 11:10ICB U -0.3 0.3NTU L88577-01DUP 06/26/24 11:43 198DUP 200 1NTU 20 Page 12 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Uranium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 102ICVMS240613-12 .05103 90 110mg/L.05 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0003 0.0003mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB U -0.00022 0.00022mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 98LFBMS240613-7 .0492 85 115mg/L.05 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 .0114 102LFMMS240613-7 .06238 70 130mg/L.05 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 .0114 101LFMDMS240613-7 .06208 070130mg/L 20.05 Zinc, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 95ICVII240710-5 1.906 95 105mg/L2 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.06 0.06mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.044 0.044mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 96LFBII240608-4 .48 85 115mg/L.50045 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 94LFMII240608-4 .468 70 130mg/L.50045 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 97LFMDII240608-4 .484 370130mg/L 20.50045 Page 13 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic Extended Qualifier Report ACZ Project ID:L88577Wright Water Engineers ACZ ID PARAMETER QUAL DESCRIPTIONMETHODWORKNUM D5 Sample required dilution. Sample matrix causing internal standards to recover outside method limits. EPA 200.8Beryllium, total recoverableWG5928171L88577-01 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 2320 B-2011Bicarbonate as CaCO3WG593460 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 2320 B-2011Carbonate as CaCO3 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 4500-Cl E-2011ChlorideWG592108 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). SM 4500-Cl E-2011 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 2510 B-2011Conductivity @25CWG592697 ZZ Laboratory measured pH and temperature were used in this calculation. Sampler did not report either field pH, field temperature, or both. Calculation (SM 2330)Corrosivity (calc.)RG831070 M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the recovery of the associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. EPA 335.4Cyanide, totalWG592565 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.EPA 335.4 DL Sample required dilution due to high AL and/or FE value.SM 4500-F C-2011FluorideWG593373 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 4500-F C-2011 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 2320 B-2011Hydroxide as CaCO3WG593460 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.EPA 353.2Nitrate/Nitrite as NWG591986 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). EPA 353.2 ZU Analysis date/time preceeds filter date/time. A portion of sample was filtered and analyzed prior to the creation of a Filter workgroup. EPA 353.2 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.EPA 353.2Nitrite as N RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). EPA 353.2 ZU Analysis date/time preceeds filter date/time. A portion of sample was filtered and analyzed prior to the creation of a Filter workgroup. EPA 353.2 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 4500-H+ B-2011pHWG592781 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 4500-H+ B-2011pH measured at DD Sample required dilution due to matrix color or odor.EPA 365.1Phosphorus, totalWG592206 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.EPA 365.1WG592482 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). EPA 365.1 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 2540 C-2011Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180CWG592050 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 2540 D-2011/2015Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105CWG591935 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). SM 2540 D-2011/2015 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.ASTM D516-07/-11/-16SulfateWG592103 HC Initial analysis within holding time. Reanalysis was past holding time, which was required due to a QC failure during the initial analysis. SM 2320 B-2011Total AlkalinityWG593460 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.SM 2320 B-2011 DF Sample required dilution due to high sediment.EPA 200.2Total Recoverable Digestion ICP-MSWG592705 Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature.EPA 180.1TurbidityWG591913 REPAD.15.06.05.01 Page 14 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Sample ID:L88577-01 Sample ID:BOWLES #3 Sample Matrix:Drinking Water Wright Water Engineers Project ID: ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Date Sampled:06/25/24 15:37 Date Received:06/26/24 Locator: RadioChemistry Analytical Results Gross Alpha & Beta, total EPA 900.0 Prep Method: Parameter Result LLDError(+/-)Units XQMeasure Date Prep Date Analyst Gross Alpha 21 8.5 4.8 pCi/L *ajp07/08/24 0:04 Gross Beta 17 3.6 2.8 pCi/L *ajp07/08/24 0:04 REPRC.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. Page 15 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Report Header Explanations Batch A distinct set of samples analyzed at a specific time Error(+/-)Calculated sample specific uncertainty Found Value of the QC Type of interest Limit Upper limit for RPD, in %. LCL Lower Control Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) LLD Calculated sample specific Lower Limit of Detection PCN/SCN A number assigned to reagents/standards to trace to the manufacturer's certificate of analysis PQL Practical Quantitation Limit QC True Value of the Control Sample or the amount added to the Spike Rec Amount of the true value or spike added recovered, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) RER Relative Error Ratio, calculation used for Dup. QC taking into account the error factor. RPD Relative Percent Difference, calculation used for Duplicate QC Types UCL Upper Control Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) Sample Value of the Sample of interest QC Sample Types DUP Sample Duplicate MS/MSD Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate LCSS Laboratory Control Sample - Soil PBS Prep Blank - Soil LCSW Laboratory Control Sample - Water PBW Prep Blank - Water QC Sample Type Explanations Blanks Verifies that there is no or minimal contamination in the prep method procedure. Control Samples Verifies the accuracy of the method, including the prep procedure. Duplicates Verifies the precision of the instrument and/or method. Matrix Spikes Determines sample matrix interferences, if any. ACZ Qualifiers (Qual) H Analysis exceeded method hold time. Method Prefix Reference M EPA methodology, including those under SDWA, CWA, and RCRA SM Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. D ASTM RP DOE ESM DOE/ESM Comments (1) Solid matrices are reported on a dry weight basis. (2) Preparation method: "Method" indicates preparation defined in analytical method. (3) QC results calculated from raw data. Results may vary slightly if the rounded values are used in the calculations. (4) An asterisk in the "XQ" column indicates there is an extended qualifier and/or certification qualifier associated with the result. For a complete list of ACZ's Extended Qualifiers, please click: https://acz.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Ext-Qual-List.pdf REP003.09.12.01 Radiochemistry Reference Page 16 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Radiochemistry QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88577WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Alpha EPA 900.0 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperQCFoundTypeErrorPCN/SCN LimitRPD/RER pCi/L Error LLDLLD Units: WG592646 WG592646PBW 07/08/24PBW .04 1.460.48 0.73 WG592646LCSWA 07/08/24 110LCSWPCN6267237366.67 67 1445.7 0.7 L88597-03DUP RG07/08/24 11DUP-RPD 2.6 204.67.6 1512 124 L88597-03DUP 07/08/24 11DUP-RER 2.6 24.6 0.957.6 1512 L88597-04MSA 07/08/24 3.6 125MSPCN626723140108.7 67 144214.8 1012 Beta EPA 900.0 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperQCFoundTypeErrorPCN/SCN LimitRPD/RER pCi/L Error LLDLLD Units: WG592646 WG592646PBW 07/08/24PBW -.43 3.81.8 1.9 WG592646LCSWB 07/08/24 92LCSWRC240513-10 6166.67 82 1224.2 1.7 L88597-03DUP RG07/08/24 5DUP-RPD 8.7 2043.4 8.67.7 54 L88597-03DUP 07/08/24 5DUP-RER 8.7 240.73.4 8.67.7 L88597-04MSB 07/08/24 1.6 109MSRC240513-10 120108.7 82 1228.13.4 5.99.8 Page 17 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 RadChem Extended Qualifier Report ACZ Project ID:L88577Wright Water Engineers ACZ ID PARAMETER QUAL DESCRIPTIONMETHODWORKNUM RG Sample concentration is less than 5x LLD; RPD was not used for data validation. Replicate Error Ratio (RER) is less than 2. Precision judged to be in control. EPA 900.0Gross AlphaWG5926461L88577-01 Z1 The NPDWR required detection limit was not satisfied.EPA 900.0 RG Sample concentration is less than 5x LLD; RPD was not used for data validation. Replicate Error Ratio (RER) is less than 2. Precision judged to be in control. EPA 900.0Gross Beta REPAD.15.06.05.01 Page 18 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Certification Qualifiers ACZ Project ID:L88577Wright Water Engineers Metals Analysis The following parameters are not offered for certification or are not covered by NELAC certificate #ACZ. Barium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Cadmium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Chromium, dissolved EPA 200.7 Copper, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Nickel, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Potassium, dissolved EPA 200.7 Silver, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Wet Chemistry The following parameters are not offered for certification or are not covered by NELAC certificate #ACZ. Chloride SM 4500-Cl E-2011 Phosphorus, total EPA 365.1 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105C SM 2540 D-2011/2015 Sulfate ASTM D516-07/-11/-16 REPAD.05.06.05.01 Page 19 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Sample Receipt Wright Water Engineers ACZ Project ID: Date Received: Received By: 06/26/2024 10:47 L88577 Date Printed:6/27/2024 Chain of Custody Related Remarks Client Contact Remarks NANOYES X X X X X X 1) Is a foreign soil permit included for applicable samples? 2) Is the Chain of Custody form or other directive shipping papers present? 3) Does this project require special handling procedures such as CLP protocol? 4) Are any samples NRC licensable material? 5) If samples are received past hold time, proceed with requested short hold time analyses? 6) Is the Chain of Custody form complete and accurate? 7) Were any changes made to the Chain of Custody form prior to ACZ receiving the samples? Receipt Verification NANOYES X X X X X X X X8) Are all containers intact and with no leaks? 9) Are all labels on containers and are they intact and legible? 10) Do the sample labels and Chain of Custody form match for Sample ID, Date, and Time? 11) For preserved bottle types, was the pH checked and within limits? 12) Is there sufficient sample volume to perform all requested work? 13) Is the custody seal intact on all containers? 14) Are samples that require zero headspace acceptable? 15) Are all sample containers appropriate for analytical requirements? 16) Is there an Hg-1631 trip blank present? 17) Is there a VOA trip blank present? 18) Were all samples received within hold time? Samples/Containers X X X Shipping Containers Client must contact an ACZ Project Manager if analysis should not proceed for samples received outside of their thermal preservation acceptance criteria. Cooler Id Temp(°C) Temp Rad(µR/Hr) Custody Seal Criteria(°C) Intact? --------- -------- ------------ ---------- ------------ NA42210 9.7 <=6.0 15 Yes X Was ice present in the shipment container(s)? Yes - Wet ice was present in the shipment container(s). 1 NA indicates Not Applicable REPAD LPII 2012-03 Page 20 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Sample Receipt Wright Water Engineers ACZ Project ID: Date Received: Received By: 06/26/2024 10:47 L88577 Date Printed:6/27/2024 The preservation of the following bottle types is not checked at sample receipt: Orange (oil and grease), Purple (total cyanide), Pink (dissolved cyanide), Brown (arsenic speciation), Sterile (fecal coliform), EDTA (sulfite), HCl preserved vial (organics), Na2S2O3 preserved vial (organics), and HG- 1631 (total/dissolved mercury by method 1631). 1 REPAD LPII 2012-03 Page 21 of 22L88577-2407221341 Page 22 of 22L88577-2407221341 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Analytical Report Wright Water Engineers 818 Colorado Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ACZ Project ID: L88580 Brianna Trotter July 22, 2024 Project ID: Report to: Suite 307 Brianna Trotter: Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) submitted to ACZ Laboratories, Inc. (ACZ) on June 26, 2024. This project has been assigned to ACZ's project number, L88580. Please reference this number in all future inquiries. All analyses were performed according to ACZ's Quality Assurance Plan. The enclosed results relate only to the samples received under L88580. Each section of this report has been reviewed and approved by the appropriate Laboratory Supervisor, or a qualified substitute. Except as noted, the test results for the methods and parameters listed on ACZ's current NELAC certificate letter (#ACZ) meet all requirements of NELAC. This report shall be used or copied only in its entirety. ACZ is not responsible for the consequences arising from the use of a partial report. All samples and sub-samples associated with this project will be disposed of after August 21, 2024. If the samples are determined to be hazardous, additional charges apply for disposal (typically $11/sample). If you would like the samples to be held longer than ACZ's stated policy or to be returned, please contact your Project Manager or Customer Service Representative for further details and associated costs. ACZ retains analytical raw data reports for ten years. If you have any questions or other needs, please contact your Project Manager. Wright Water Engineers 818 Colorado Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Brianna Trotter Bill to: Suite 307 Page 1 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Sample ID:L88580-01 Sample ID:BOWLES #4 Sample Matrix:Drinking Water Wright Water Engineers Project ID: ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic Analytical Results Date Sampled:06/25/24 13:38 Date Received:06/26/24 Parameter EPA Method Result Units MDLQual AnalystDatePQL Inorganic Prep XQDilution Cyanide, total EPA 335.4 jqr07/05/24 9:50 Lab Filtration (0.45um) & Acidification EPA 200.7/200.8 Filter aps07/01/24 15:40 Phosphorus, total EPA 365.1 lbt07/01/24 11:46 Total Recoverable Digestion ICP EPA 200.2 aeb/ae h 07/02/24 13:13 Total Recoverable Digestion ICP-MS EPA 200.2 jrj07/09/24 20:57 REPIN.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. Page 2 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Sample ID:L88580-01 Sample ID:BOWLES #4 Sample Matrix:Drinking Water Wright Water Engineers Project ID: ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic Analytical Results Date Sampled:06/25/24 13:38 Date Received:06/26/24 Parameter EPA Method Result Units MDLQual AnalystDatePQL Metals Analysis XQDilution Aluminum, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.07 mg/L 0.25U msp0.07 07/16/24 14:501 Antimony, total recoverable EPA 200.8 <0.0004 mg/L 0.002U jrj0.0004 07/03/24 15:171 Arsenic, total recoverable EPA 200.8 0.00077 mg/L 0.002B jrj0.0005 07/03/24 15:171 Barium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 0.0656 mg/L 0.035 aeb/ms p 0.009*07/12/24 13:111 Beryllium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 <0.0001 mg/L 0.00025U aps0.0001 07/10/24 18:121 Cadmium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.008 mg/L 0.025U aeb/ms p 0.008*07/12/24 13:111 Calcium, dissolved EPA 200.7 70.6 mg/L 0.5 msp0.1 07/11/24 20:181 Chromium, dissolved EPA 200.7 <0.02 mg/L 0.05U msp0.02*07/11/24 20:181 Copper, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.01 mg/L 0.05U msp0.01*07/16/24 14:501 Iron, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.06 mg/L 0.15U aeb/ms p 0.06 07/12/24 13:111 Lead, total recoverable EPA 200.8 <0.0001 mg/L 0.0005U jrj0.0001 07/03/24 15:171 Magnesium, dissolved EPA 200.7 17.0 mg/L 1 msp0.2 07/11/24 20:181 Manganese, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.01 mg/L 0.05U msp0.01 07/16/24 14:501 Mercury, total EPA 245.1 <0.0002 mg/L 0.001U aeh/ae w 0.0002 07/12/24 13:381 Nickel, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.008 mg/L 0.04U aeb/ms p 0.008*07/12/24 13:111 Potassium, dissolved EPA 200.7 3.49 mg/L 1 msp0.5*07/11/24 20:181 Selenium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 0.0045 mg/L 0.005B gjl0.001 07/10/24 14:171 Silica, dissolved EPA 200.7 21.6 mg/L 1 msp0.2 07/11/24 20:181 Silver, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.01 mg/L 0.025U aeb/ms p 0.01*07/12/24 13:111 Sodium, dissolved EPA 200.7 14.8 mg/L 1 msp0.2 07/11/24 20:181 Thallium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 <0.0001 mg/L 0.0005U jrj0.0001 07/03/24 15:171 Uranium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 0.0258 mg/L 0.0005 jrj0.0001 07/03/24 15:171 Zinc, total recoverable EPA 200.7 <0.02 mg/L 0.05U aeb/ms p 0.02 07/12/24 13:111 REPIN.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. Page 3 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Sample ID:L88580-01 Sample ID:BOWLES #4 Sample Matrix:Drinking Water Wright Water Engineers Project ID: ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic Analytical Results Date Sampled:06/25/24 13:38 Date Received:06/26/24 Parameter EPA Method Result Units MDLQual AnalystDatePQL Wet Chemistry XQDilution Alkalinity as CaCO3 SM 2320 B-2011 Bicarbonate as CaCO3 265 mg/L 20H rsc207/19/24 0:001 Carbonate as CaCO3 <2 mg/L 20UH rsc207/19/24 0:001 Hydroxide as CaCO3 <2 mg/L 20UH rsc207/19/24 0:001 Total Alkalinity 265 mg/L 20H rsc2*07/19/24 0:001 Cation-Anion Balance Calculation Cation-Anion Balance -8.8 %calc07/22/24 0:00 Sum of Anions 6.8 meq/L calc07/22/24 0:00 Sum of Cations 5.7 meq/L calc07/22/24 0:00 Chloride SM 4500-Cl E-2011 4.46 mg/L 2 jqr1*06/28/24 11:551 Conductivity @25C SM 2510 B-2011 438 umhos/cm 10 asn107/09/24 19:511 Corrosivity (calc.)Calculation (SM 2330)0.0 SI Unit calc*07/22/24 0:00 Cyanide, total EPA 335.4 <0.003 mg/L 0.01U ems0.003*07/08/24 11:500.5 Fluoride SM 4500-F C-2011 0.43 mg/L 0.35 emk0.15 07/18/24 15:431 Hardness as CaCO3 (dissolved) Calculation (SM 2340 B-2011)246 mg/L 5 calc0.2 07/22/24 0:00 Lab Filtration (0.45um filter) SOPWC050 cdp06/27/24 16:101 Nitrate as N Calculation (NO3NO2-NO2)0.278 mg/L 0.1 calc0.02 07/22/24 0:00 Nitrate/Nitrite as N EPA 353.2 0.289 mg/L 0.1 pjb0.02*06/27/24 0:381 Nitrite as N EPA 353.2 0.011 mg/L 0.05B pjb0.01*06/27/24 0:171 pH (lab)SM 4500-H+ B-2011 pH 6.7 units 0.1H asn0.1 07/17/24 0:001 pH measured at 21.5 C 0.1 asn0.1 07/17/24 0:001 Phosphorus, total EPA 365.1 <0.01 mg/L 0.05U mrd0.01*07/05/24 11:041 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM 2540 C-2011 322 mg/L 40 ptw2006/27/24 14:141 Residue, Non- Filterable (TSS) @105C SM 2540 D-2011/2015 <5 mg/L 20U cdp5*06/27/24 11:241 Sodium Adsorption Ratio in Water USGS - I1738-78 0.42 calc07/22/24 0:00 Sulfate ASTM D516-07/-11/-16 62.2 mg/L 25 jqr5*07/01/24 11:045 TDS (calculated)Calculation 362 mg/L calc07/22/24 0:00 TDS (ratio - measured/calculated) Calculation 0.89 calc07/22/24 0:00 Turbidity EPA 180.1 <0.1 NTU 0.5U asn0.1*06/26/24 16:341 REPIN.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. Page 4 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Report Header Explanations Batch A distinct set of samples analyzed at a specific time Found Value of the QC Type of interest Limit Upper limit for RPD, in %. Lower Lower Recovery Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) MDL Method Detection Limit. Same as Minimum Reporting Limit unless omitted or equal to the PQL (see comment #5). Allows for instrument and annual fluctuations. PCN/SCN A number assigned to reagents/standards to trace to the manufacturer's certificate of analysis PQL Practical Quantitation Limit. Synonymous with the EPA term "minimum level". QC True Value of the Control Sample or the amount added to the Spike Rec Recovered amount of the true value or spike added, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) RPD Relative Percent Difference, calculation used for Duplicate QC Types Upper Upper Recovery Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) Sample Value of the Sample of interest QC Sample Types AS Analytical Spike (Post Digestion)LCSWD Laboratory Control Sample - Water Duplicate ASD Analytical Spike (Post Digestion) Duplicate LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank CCB Continuing Calibration Blank LFM Laboratory Fortified Matrix CCV Continuing Calibration Verification standard LFMD Laboratory Fortified Matrix Duplicate DUP Sample Duplicate LRB Laboratory Reagent Blank ICB Initial Calibration Blank MS Matrix Spike ICV Initial Calibration Verification standard MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate ICSAB Inter-element Correction Standard - A plus B solutions PBS Prep Blank - Soil LCSS Laboratory Control Sample - Soil PBW Prep Blank - Water LCSSD Laboratory Control Sample - Soil Duplicate PQV Practical Quantitation Verification standard LCSW Laboratory Control Sample - Water SDL Serial Dilution QC Sample Type Explanations Blanks Verifies that there is no or minimal contamination in the prep method or calibration procedure. Control Samples Verifies the accuracy of the method, including the prep procedure. Duplicates Verifies the precision of the instrument and/or method. Spikes/Fortified Matrix Determines sample matrix interferences, if any. Standard Verifies the validity of the calibration. ACZ Qualifiers (Qual) B Analyte concentration detected at a value between MDL and PQL. The associated value is an estimated quantity. H Analysis exceeded method hold time. pH is a field test with an immediate hold time. L Target analyte response was below the laboratory defined negative threshold. U The material was analyzed for, but was not detected above the level of the associated value. The associated value is either the sample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit. Method References (1) EPA 600/4-83-020. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, March 1983. (2) EPA 600/R-93-100. Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environmental Samples, August 1993. (3) EPA 600/R-94-111. Methods for the Determination of Metals in Environmental Samples - Supplement I, May 1994. (4) EPA SW-846. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. (5) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Comments (1) QC results calculated from raw data. Results may vary slightly if the rounded values are used in the calculations. (2)Soil, Sludge, and Plant matrices for Inorganic analyses are reported on a dry weight basis. (3) Animal matrices for Inorganic analyses are reported on an "as received" basis. (4) An asterisk in the "XQ" column indicates there is an extended qualifier and/or certification qualifier associated with the result. (5) If the MDL equals the PQL or the MDL column is omitted, the PQL is the reporting limit. For a complete list of ACZ's Extended Qualifiers, please click: https://acz.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Ext-Qual-List.pdf REP001.03.15.02 Inorganic Reference Page 5 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Alkalinity as CaCO3 SM2320B - Titration ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593460 WG593460PBW1 07/19/24 16:48PBW 10.6 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW3 07/19/24 16:58 98LCSWWC240712-1 802.8 90 110mg/L820.0001 L88841-01DUP 07/19/24 18:00 229DUP 226.4 1mg/L 20 WG593460LCSW6 07/19/24 19:09 100LCSWWC240712-1 816.4 90 110mg/L820.0001 WG593460PBW2 07/19/24 19:15PBW 11.9 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW9 07/19/24 20:49 98LCSWWC240712-1 801.1 90 110mg/L820.0001 WG593460PBW3 07/19/24 20:55PBW 12.8 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW12 07/19/24 22:54 99LCSWWC240712-1 809.4 90 110mg/L820.0001 WG593460PBW4 07/19/24 23:00PBW 12.5 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW15 07/20/24 0:49 100LCSWWC240712-1 823.8 90 110mg/L820.0001 WG593460PBW5 07/20/24 0:55PBW 15.6 -20 20mg/L WG593460LCSW18 07/20/24 1:47 101LCSWWC240712-1 829.4 90 110mg/L820.0001 Aluminum, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593067 WG593067ICV 07/16/24 14:28 99ICVII240710-5 1.97 95 105mg/L2 WG593067ICB 07/16/24 14:33ICB U -0.15 0.15mg/L WG592284LRB 07/16/24 14:44LRB U -0.11 0.11mg/L WG592284LFB 07/16/24 14:46 94LFBII240608-4 .942 85 115mg/L1.001 L88586-09LFM 07/16/24 14:54 U 93LFMII240608-4 .931 70 130mg/L1.001 L88586-09LFMD 07/16/24 14:57 U 98LFMDII240608-4 .979 570130mg/L 201.001 Antimony, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 92ICVMS240613-12 .01838 90 110mg/L.02002 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0012 0.0012mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB U -0.00088 0.00088mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 103LFBMS240613-7 .01027 85 115mg/L.01 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 U 104LFMMS240613-7 .01041 70 130mg/L.01 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 U 103LFMDMS240613-7 .01033 170130mg/L 20.01 Arsenic, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 103ICVMS240613-12 .05159 90 110mg/L.05 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0015 0.0015mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB U -0.0011 0.0011mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 102LFBMS240613-7 .05126 85 115mg/L.0501 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 .01 93LFMMS240613-7 .05679 70 130mg/L.0501 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 .01 93LFMDMS240613-7 .05643 170130mg/L 20.0501 Page 6 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Barium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 96ICVII240710-5 1.9278 95 105mg/L2 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.027 0.027mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.0198 0.0198mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 93LFBII240608-4 .465 85 115mg/L.501 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 91LFMII240608-4 .4542 70 130mg/L.501 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 93LFMDII240608-4 .4684 370130mg/L 20.501 Beryllium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592817 WG592817ICV 07/10/24 18:01 100ICVMS240613-12 .049789 90 110mg/L.05 WG592817ICB 07/10/24 18:02ICB .000111 -0.00024 0.00024mg/L WG592705LRB 07/10/24 18:08LRB U -0.000176 0.000176mg/L WG592705LFB 07/10/24 18:09 102LFBMS240613-7 .051171 85 115mg/L.05005 Cadmium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 95ICVII240710-5 1.9075 95 105mg/L2 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.024 0.024mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.0176 0.0176mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 92LFBII240608-4 .4613 85 115mg/L.5005 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 90LFMII240608-4 .4527 70 130mg/L.5005 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 94LFMDII240608-4 .4687 370130mg/L 20.5005 Calcium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592921 WG592921ICV 07/11/24 19:37 99ICVII240710-5 98.8 95 105mg/L100 WG592921ICB 07/11/24 19:42ICB U -0.3 0.3mg/L WG592921LFB 07/11/24 19:51 102LFBII240702-3 69.6 85 115mg/L67.93628 L88578-05AS 07/11/24 20:08 3.78 99ASII240702-3 71 85 115mg/L67.93628 L88578-05ASD 07/11/24 20:10 3.78 98ASDII240702-3 70.6 185115mg/L 2067.93628 Chloride SM 4500-Cl E-2011 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592119 WG592119ICV 06/28/24 10:04 96ICVWI231211-1 38.19 90 110mg/L39.96 WG592119ICB 06/28/24 10:04ICB U mg/L WG592119LFB1 06/28/24 11:28 101LFBWI231211-4 20.32 90 110mg/L20.02 L88518-01AS 06/28/24 11:29 6.58 98ASWI231211-4 26.12 90 110mg/L20.02 L88518-02DUP RA06/28/24 11:29 6.38DUP 6.36 0mg/L 20 WG592119LFB2 06/28/24 11:47 101LFBWI231211-4 20.29 90 110mg/L20.02 Page 7 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Chromium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592921 WG592921ICV 07/11/24 19:37 98ICVII240710-5 1.96 95 105mg/L2 WG592921ICB 07/11/24 19:42ICB U -0.06 0.06mg/L WG592921LFB 07/11/24 19:51 100LFBII240702-3 .502 85 115mg/L.5005 L88578-05AS 07/11/24 20:08 U 98ASII240702-3 .49 85 115mg/L.5005 L88578-05ASD 07/11/24 20:10 U 98ASDII240702-3 .491 085115mg/L 20.5005 Conductivity @25C SM 2510 B-2011 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592697 WG592697LCSW2 07/09/24 16:36 108LCSWPCN6270861520 90 110umhos/cm1409 WG592697LCSW5 07/09/24 19:02 107LCSWPCN6269471502 90 110umhos/cm1408 L88589-04DUP 07/09/24 20:25 1160DUP 1198 3umhos/cm 20 WG592697LCSW8 07/09/24 21:44 108LCSWPCN6269471522 90 110umhos/cm1408 WG592697LCSW11 07/10/24 0:55 108LCSWPCN6269471526 90 110umhos/cm1408 Copper, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593067 WG593067ICV 07/16/24 14:28 96ICVII240710-5 1.92 95 105mg/L2 WG593067ICB 07/16/24 14:33ICB U -0.03 0.03mg/L WG592284LRB 07/16/24 14:44LRB U -0.022 0.022mg/L WG592284LFB 07/16/24 14:46 94LFBII240608-4 .468 85 115mg/L.5005 L88586-09LFM 07/16/24 14:54 U 94LFMII240608-4 .472 70 130mg/L.5005 L88586-09LFMD 07/16/24 14:57 U 100LFMDII240608-4 .498 570130mg/L 20.5005 Cyanide, total EPA 335.4 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592565 WG592565ICV 07/08/24 11:39 99ICVWI240626-3 .2961 90 110mg/L.3003 WG592565ICB 07/08/24 11:39ICB U -0.003 0.003mg/L WG592468LRB 07/08/24 11:41LRB U -0.003 0.003mg/L WG592468LFB 07/08/24 11:42 90LFBWI240625-2 .1793 90 110mg/L.2 L88579-01LFM M207/08/24 12:14 .251 84LFMWI240625-2 .4193 90 110mg/L.2 L88579-02DUP 07/08/24 12:16 3.67DUP 3.625 1mg/L 20 Fluoride SM 4500-F C-2011 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593373 WG593373ICV 07/18/24 13:57 99ICVWC240712-2 1.98 90 110mg/L2 WG593373ICB 07/18/24 14:03ICB U -0.3 0.3mg/L WG593373LFB1 07/18/24 14:09 100LFBWC240411-1 5 90 110mg/L5 L88577-01AS 07/18/24 15:25 U 101ASWC240411-1 75.7 90 110mg/L75 L88577-01ASD 07/18/24 15:30 U 100ASDWC240411-1 74.67 190110mg/L 2075 WG593373LFB2 07/18/24 16:24 107LFBWC240411-1 5.35 90 110mg/L5 Page 8 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Iron, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 97ICVII240710-5 1.944 95 105mg/L2 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.18 0.18mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.132 0.132mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 97LFBII240608-4 .968 85 115mg/L1.003 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 93LFMII240608-4 .933 70 130mg/L1.003 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 96LFMDII240608-4 .966 370130mg/L 201.003 Lead, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 102ICVMS240613-12 .05118 90 110mg/L.05 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0003 0.0003mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB .00015 -0.00022 0.00022mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 98LFBMS240613-7 .04917 85 115mg/L.05005 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 .00024 100LFMMS240613-7 .05047 70 130mg/L.05005 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 .00024 100LFMDMS240613-7 .05032 070130mg/L 20.05005 Magnesium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592921 WG592921ICV 07/11/24 19:37 99ICVII240710-5 98.9 95 105mg/L100 WG592921ICB 07/11/24 19:42ICB U -0.6 0.6mg/L WG592921LFB 07/11/24 19:51 103LFBII240702-3 51.7 85 115mg/L49.99866 L88578-05AS 07/11/24 20:08 1.78 101ASII240702-3 52.2 85 115mg/L49.99866 L88578-05ASD 07/11/24 20:10 1.78 101ASDII240702-3 52.4 085115mg/L 2049.99866 Manganese, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593067 WG593067ICV 07/16/24 14:28 96ICVII240710-5 1.91 95 105mg/L2 WG593067ICB 07/16/24 14:33ICB U -0.03 0.03mg/L WG592284LRB 07/16/24 14:44LRB U -0.022 0.022mg/L WG592284LFB 07/16/24 14:46 93LFBII240608-4 .465 85 115mg/L.501 L88586-09LFM 07/16/24 14:54 U 93LFMII240608-4 .465 70 130mg/L.501 L88586-09LFMD 07/16/24 14:57 U 98LFMDII240608-4 .489 570130mg/L 20.501 Mercury, total EPA 245.1 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592795 WG592795ICV 07/12/24 11:31 97ICVHG240528-3 .00486 95 105mg/L.005 WG592795ICB 07/12/24 11:32ICB U -0.0002 0.0002mg/L WG592800 WG592800LRB 07/12/24 13:36LRB U -0.00044 0.00044mg/L WG592800LFB 07/12/24 13:37 98LFBHG240619-6 .00196 85 115mg/L.002002 L88606-05LFM 07/12/24 13:48 U 92LFMHG240619-6 .00184 85 115mg/L.002002 L88606-05LFMD 07/12/24 13:49 U 93LFMDHG240619-6 .00186 185115mg/L 20.002002 Page 9 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Nickel, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 98ICVII240710-5 1.957 95 105mg/L2.004 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.024 0.024mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.0176 0.0176mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 96LFBII240608-4 .4802 85 115mg/L.501 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 94LFMII240608-4 .4713 70 130mg/L.501 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 97LFMDII240608-4 .4866 370130mg/L 20.501 Nitrate/Nitrite as N EPA 353.2 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG591986 WG591986ICV 06/26/24 23:52 98ICVWI240403-6 2.366 90 110mg/L2.415 WG591986ICB 06/26/24 23:53ICB U -0.02 0.02mg/L WG591986LFB 06/26/24 23:58 104LFBWI240228-17 2.076 90 110mg/L2 L88577-01AS 06/27/24 0:01 .155 102ASWI240228-17 2.196 90 110mg/L2 L88578-01DUP RA06/27/24 0:03 .12DUP .119 1mg/L 20 Nitrite as N EPA 353.2 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG591986 WG591986ICV 06/26/24 23:52 100ICVWI240403-6 .61 90 110mg/L.608 WG591986ICB 06/26/24 23:53ICB U -0.01 0.01mg/L WG591986LFB 06/26/24 23:58 104LFBWI240228-17 1.041 90 110mg/L1 L88577-01AS 06/27/24 0:01 U 103ASWI240228-17 1.03 90 110mg/L1 L88578-01DUP RA06/27/24 0:03 UDUP U 0mg/L 20 pH (lab) SM4500H+ B ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG593243 WG593243LCSW1 07/17/24 11:20 100LCSWPCN6244496 5.9 6.1units6 L88976-02DUP 07/17/24 12:22 7DUP 7 0units 20 WG593243LCSW4 07/17/24 12:29 100LCSWPCN6244496.01 5.9 6.1units6 Phosphorus, total EPA 365.1 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592482 WG592482ICV 07/05/24 10:43 108ICVWI240603-4 .707 90 110mg/L.65228 WG592482ICB 07/05/24 10:46ICB U -0.01 0.01mg/L WG592206LRB 07/05/24 10:47LRB U -0.01 0.01mg/L WG592206LFB 07/05/24 10:48 102LFBWI240625-5 .511 90 110mg/L.5 L88577-01LFM 07/05/24 10:51 .077 101LFM5XPT2.595 90 110mg/L2.5 L88578-01DUP RA07/05/24 10:53 UDUP U 0mg/L 20 Page 10 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Potassium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592921 WG592921ICV 07/11/24 19:37 100ICVII240710-5 19.9 95 105mg/L20 WG592921ICB 07/11/24 19:42ICB U -1.5 1.5mg/L WG592921LFB 07/11/24 19:51 102LFBII240702-3 102 85 115mg/L99.96008 L88578-05AS 07/11/24 20:08 .85 99ASII240702-3 99.4 85 115mg/L99.96008 L88578-05ASD 07/11/24 20:10 .85 98ASDII240702-3 99.1 085115mg/L 2099.96008 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM 2540 C-2011 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592050 WG592050PBW 06/27/24 13:25PBW U -20 20mg/L WG592050LCSW 06/27/24 13:29 96LCSWPCN626715964 80 120mg/L1000 L88580-01DUP 06/27/24 14:18 322DUP 316 2mg/L 10 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105C SM 2540 D-2011/2015 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592030 WG592030PBW 06/27/24 11:11PBW U -5 5mg/L WG592030LCSW 06/27/24 11:13 82LCSWPCN62671582 80 120mg/L100 L88588-03DUP RA06/27/24 11:42 20DUP 20 0mg/L 10 Selenium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592771 WG592771ICV 07/10/24 14:05 104ICVMS240613-12 .0519 90 110mg/L.05 WG592771ICB 07/10/24 14:06ICB U -0.003 0.003mg/L WG592705LRB 07/10/24 14:10LRB U -0.0022 0.0022mg/L WG592705LFB 07/10/24 14:11 94LFBMS240613-7 .047 85 115mg/L.05005 L88696-06LFM 07/10/24 14:34 U 85LFMMS240613-7 .0423 70 130mg/L.05005 L88696-06LFMD 07/10/24 14:36 U 87LFMDMS240613-7 .0433 270130mg/L 20.05005 Silica, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592921 WG592921ICV 07/11/24 19:37 100ICVII240710-5 42.7 95 105mg/L42.8 WG592921ICB 07/11/24 19:42ICB U -0.6 0.6mg/L WG592921LFB 07/11/24 19:51 98LFBII240702-3 21.1 85 115mg/L21.42782 L88578-05AS 07/11/24 20:08 10.3 95ASII240702-3 30.6 85 115mg/L21.42782 L88578-05ASD 07/11/24 20:10 10.3 94ASDII240702-3 30.5 085115mg/L 2021.42782 Page 11 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Silver, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 97ICVII240710-5 .968 95 105mg/L1 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.03 0.03mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.022 0.022mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 87LFBII240608-4 .435 85 115mg/L.4995 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 85LFMII240608-4 .426 70 130mg/L.4995 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 87LFMDII240608-4 .433 270130mg/L 20.4995 Sodium, dissolved EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592921 WG592921ICV 07/11/24 19:37 99ICVII240710-5 98.8 95 105mg/L100 WG592921ICB 07/11/24 19:42ICB U -0.6 0.6mg/L WG592921LFB 07/11/24 19:51 101LFBII240702-3 101 85 115mg/L99.97238 L88578-05AS 07/11/24 20:08 2.12 99ASII240702-3 101 85 115mg/L99.97238 L88578-05ASD 07/11/24 20:10 2.12 99ASDII240702-3 101 085115mg/L 2099.97238 Sulfate ASTM D516-07/-11/-16 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592200 WG592200ICV 07/01/24 10:25 110ICVWI240624-7 22.1 85 115mg/L20.02 WG592200ICB 07/01/24 10:25ICB 1.4 -2.5 2.5mg/L WG592200LFB 07/01/24 11:10 109LFBWI240618-2 10.9 85 115mg/L10 L88589-01AS M107/01/24 11:12 31.4 121ASSO4TURB5X43.5 85 115mg/L10 L88589-01ASD 07/01/24 11:13 31.4 94ASDSO4TURB5X40.8 685115mg/L 2010 Thallium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 103ICVMS240613-12 .05157 90 110mg/L.05 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0003 0.0003mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB U -0.00022 0.00022mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 96LFBMS240613-7 .04817 85 115mg/L.0501 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 U 96LFMMS240613-7 .04828 70 130mg/L.0501 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 U 97LFMDMS240613-7 .04862 170130mg/L 20.0501 Turbidity EPA 180.1 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG591971 WG591971ICV 06/26/24 16:00 98ICVPCN626099195 90 110NTU200 WG591971ICB 06/26/24 16:02ICB U -0.3 0.3NTU L88578-04DUP RA06/26/24 16:19 .55DUP .56 2NTU 20 Page 12 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Uranium, total recoverable EPA 200.8 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592424 WG592424ICV 07/03/24 15:03 102ICVMS240613-12 .05103 90 110mg/L.05 WG592424ICB 07/03/24 15:04ICB U -0.0003 0.0003mg/L WG592169LRB 07/03/24 15:07LRB U -0.00022 0.00022mg/L WG592169LFB 07/03/24 15:09 98LFBMS240613-7 .0492 85 115mg/L.05 L88408-01LFM 07/03/24 15:12 .0114 102LFMMS240613-7 .06238 70 130mg/L.05 L88408-01LFMD 07/03/24 15:13 .0114 101LFMDMS240613-7 .06208 070130mg/L 20.05 Zinc, total recoverable EPA 200.7 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperRPDFoundTypeUnitsPCN/SCN LimitQC WG592916 WG592916ICV 07/12/24 12:39 95ICVII240710-5 1.906 95 105mg/L2 WG592916ICB 07/12/24 12:45ICB U -0.06 0.06mg/L WG592284LRB 07/12/24 13:01LRB U -0.044 0.044mg/L WG592284LFB 07/12/24 13:05 96LFBII240608-4 .48 85 115mg/L.50045 L88586-09LFM 07/12/24 13:17 U 94LFMII240608-4 .468 70 130mg/L.50045 L88586-09LFMD 07/12/24 13:20 U 97LFMDII240608-4 .484 370130mg/L 20.50045 Page 13 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Inorganic Extended Qualifier Report ACZ Project ID:L88580Wright Water Engineers ACZ ID PARAMETER QUAL DESCRIPTIONMETHODWORKNUM RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). SM 4500-Cl E-2011ChlorideWG5921191L88580-01 ZZ Laboratory measured pH and temperature were used in this calculation. Sampler did not report either field pH, field temperature, or both. Calculation (SM 2330)Corrosivity (calc.)RG831068 M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the recovery of the associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. EPA 335.4Cyanide, totalWG592565 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). EPA 353.2Nitrate/Nitrite as NWG591986 ZU Analysis date/time preceeds filter date/time. A portion of sample was filtered and analyzed prior to the creation of a Filter workgroup. EPA 353.2 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). EPA 353.2Nitrite as N ZU Analysis date/time preceeds filter date/time. A portion of sample was filtered and analyzed prior to the creation of a Filter workgroup. EPA 353.2 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). EPA 365.1Phosphorus, totalWG592482 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). SM 2540 D-2011/2015Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105CWG592030 Z3 Sample volume yielded a residue less than 2.5 mgSM 2540 D-2011/2015 M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the recovery of the associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. ASTM D516-07/-11/-16SulfateWG592200 HC Initial analysis within holding time. Reanalysis was past holding time, which was required due to a QC failure during the initial analysis. SM 2320 B-2011Total AlkalinityWG593460 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). EPA 180.1TurbidityWG591971 REPAD.15.06.05.01 Page 14 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Sample ID:L88580-01 Sample ID:BOWLES #4 Sample Matrix:Drinking Water Wright Water Engineers Project ID: ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Date Sampled:06/25/24 13:38 Date Received:06/26/24 Locator: RadioChemistry Analytical Results Gross Alpha & Beta, total EPA 900.0 Prep Method: Parameter Result LLDError(+/-)Units XQMeasure Date Prep Date Analyst Gross Alpha 54 11 3.2 pCi/L *ajp07/08/24 0:05 Gross Beta 8.1 2.9 2.6 pCi/L *ajp07/08/24 0:05 REPRC.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. Page 15 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Report Header Explanations Batch A distinct set of samples analyzed at a specific time Error(+/-)Calculated sample specific uncertainty Found Value of the QC Type of interest Limit Upper limit for RPD, in %. LCL Lower Control Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) LLD Calculated sample specific Lower Limit of Detection PCN/SCN A number assigned to reagents/standards to trace to the manufacturer's certificate of analysis PQL Practical Quantitation Limit QC True Value of the Control Sample or the amount added to the Spike Rec Amount of the true value or spike added recovered, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) RER Relative Error Ratio, calculation used for Dup. QC taking into account the error factor. RPD Relative Percent Difference, calculation used for Duplicate QC Types UCL Upper Control Limit, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) Sample Value of the Sample of interest QC Sample Types DUP Sample Duplicate MS/MSD Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate LCSS Laboratory Control Sample - Soil PBS Prep Blank - Soil LCSW Laboratory Control Sample - Water PBW Prep Blank - Water QC Sample Type Explanations Blanks Verifies that there is no or minimal contamination in the prep method procedure. Control Samples Verifies the accuracy of the method, including the prep procedure. Duplicates Verifies the precision of the instrument and/or method. Matrix Spikes Determines sample matrix interferences, if any. ACZ Qualifiers (Qual) H Analysis exceeded method hold time. Method Prefix Reference M EPA methodology, including those under SDWA, CWA, and RCRA SM Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. D ASTM RP DOE ESM DOE/ESM Comments (1) Solid matrices are reported on a dry weight basis. (2) Preparation method: "Method" indicates preparation defined in analytical method. (3) QC results calculated from raw data. Results may vary slightly if the rounded values are used in the calculations. (4) An asterisk in the "XQ" column indicates there is an extended qualifier and/or certification qualifier associated with the result. For a complete list of ACZ's Extended Qualifiers, please click: https://acz.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Ext-Qual-List.pdf REP003.09.12.01 Radiochemistry Reference Page 16 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Radiochemistry QC Summary ACZ Project ID:L88580WRIGHT NOTE: If the Rec% column is null, the high/low limits are in the same units as the result. If the Rec% column is not null, then the high/low limits are in % Rec. Alpha EPA 900.0 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperQCFoundTypeErrorPCN/SCN LimitRPD/RER pCi/L Error LLDLLD Units: WG592646 WG592646PBW 07/08/24PBW .04 1.460.48 0.73 WG592646LCSWA 07/08/24 110LCSWPCN6267237366.67 67 1445.7 0.7 L88597-03DUP RG07/08/24 11DUP-RPD 2.6 204.67.6 1512 124 L88597-03DUP 07/08/24 11DUP-RER 2.6 24.6 0.957.6 1512 L88597-04MSA 07/08/24 3.6 125MSPCN626723140108.7 67 144214.8 1012 Beta EPA 900.0 ACZ ID Analyzed Rec%Sample QualLowerUpperQCFoundTypeErrorPCN/SCN LimitRPD/RER pCi/L Error LLDLLD Units: WG592646 WG592646PBW 07/08/24PBW -.43 3.81.8 1.9 WG592646LCSWB 07/08/24 92LCSWRC240513-10 6166.67 82 1224.2 1.7 L88597-03DUP RG07/08/24 5DUP-RPD 8.7 2043.4 8.67.7 54 L88597-03DUP 07/08/24 5DUP-RER 8.7 240.73.4 8.67.7 L88597-04MSB 07/08/24 1.6 109MSRC240513-10 120108.7 82 1228.13.4 5.99.8 Page 17 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 RadChem Extended Qualifier Report ACZ Project ID:L88580Wright Water Engineers ACZ ID PARAMETER QUAL DESCRIPTIONMETHODWORKNUM RG Sample concentration is less than 5x LLD; RPD was not used for data validation. Replicate Error Ratio (RER) is less than 2. Precision judged to be in control. EPA 900.0Gross AlphaWG5926461L88580-01 Z1 The NPDWR required detection limit was not satisfied.EPA 900.0 RG Sample concentration is less than 5x LLD; RPD was not used for data validation. Replicate Error Ratio (RER) is less than 2. Precision judged to be in control. EPA 900.0Gross Beta REPAD.15.06.05.01 Page 18 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Certification Qualifiers ACZ Project ID:L88580Wright Water Engineers Metals Analysis The following parameters are not offered for certification or are not covered by NELAC certificate #ACZ. Barium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Cadmium, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Chromium, dissolved EPA 200.7 Copper, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Nickel, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Potassium, dissolved EPA 200.7 Silver, total recoverable EPA 200.7 Wet Chemistry The following parameters are not offered for certification or are not covered by NELAC certificate #ACZ. Chloride SM 4500-Cl E-2011 Phosphorus, total EPA 365.1 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105C SM 2540 D-2011/2015 Sulfate ASTM D516-07/-11/-16 REPAD.05.06.05.01 Page 19 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Sample Receipt Wright Water Engineers ACZ Project ID: Date Received: Received By: 06/26/2024 10:48 L88580 Date Printed:6/27/2024 Chain of Custody Related Remarks Client Contact Remarks NANOYES X X X X X X 1) Is a foreign soil permit included for applicable samples? 2) Is the Chain of Custody form or other directive shipping papers present? 3) Does this project require special handling procedures such as CLP protocol? 4) Are any samples NRC licensable material? 5) If samples are received past hold time, proceed with requested short hold time analyses? 6) Is the Chain of Custody form complete and accurate? 7) Were any changes made to the Chain of Custody form prior to ACZ receiving the samples? Receipt Verification NANOYES X X X X X X X X8) Are all containers intact and with no leaks? 9) Are all labels on containers and are they intact and legible? 10) Do the sample labels and Chain of Custody form match for Sample ID, Date, and Time? 11) For preserved bottle types, was the pH checked and within limits? 12) Is there sufficient sample volume to perform all requested work? 13) Is the custody seal intact on all containers? 14) Are samples that require zero headspace acceptable? 15) Are all sample containers appropriate for analytical requirements? 16) Is there an Hg-1631 trip blank present? 17) Is there a VOA trip blank present? 18) Were all samples received within hold time? Samples/Containers X X X Shipping Containers Client must contact an ACZ Project Manager if analysis should not proceed for samples received outside of their thermal preservation acceptance criteria. Cooler Id Temp(°C) Temp Rad(µR/Hr) Custody Seal Criteria(°C) Intact? --------- -------- ------------ ---------- ------------ 7195 4.8 <=6.0 15 Yes X Was ice present in the shipment container(s)? Yes - Wet ice was present in the shipment container(s). 1 NA indicates Not Applicable REPAD LPII 2012-03 Page 20 of 22L88580-2407221336 ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Sample Receipt Wright Water Engineers ACZ Project ID: Date Received: Received By: 06/26/2024 10:48 L88580 Date Printed:6/27/2024 The preservation of the following bottle types is not checked at sample receipt: Orange (oil and grease), Purple (total cyanide), Pink (dissolved cyanide), Brown (arsenic speciation), Sterile (fecal coliform), EDTA (sulfite), HCl preserved vial (organics), Na2S2O3 preserved vial (organics), and HG- 1631 (total/dissolved mercury by method 1631). 1 REPAD LPII 2012-03 Page 21 of 22L88580-2407221336 Page 22 of 22L88580-2407221336 May 9, 2024 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 S OPRI S E NGIN EERING • LLC civi l consultants Canyon Creek Partners LLC c/o Julie and Doug Pratte – The Land Studio, Inc. 365 River Bend Way Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Email: landstudio2@comcast.net RE: Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS), Existing Metal Shop, Lot 2 (Lot 4) of the Gabossi Exemption, 24 County Road 138, Garfield County, Colorado SE Job No. 32000.01 Parcel No: 212335200186, Current Garfield County ISDS Permits: indeterminate Dear Doug and Julie: This letter provides documentation of an initial site investigation performed by Sopris Engineering (SE), on 3-28-24, to inspect visible system components and review applicable permit documents associated with the existing Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) currently in use, serving the metal shop in operation on the site. A follow up site investigation and tank inspection was performed by SE on 4-23-24, in coordination with Down Valley Septic, who was engaged to pump the existing septic tank. SE observed the tank conditions prior to and after pumping was completed to further evaluate the existing OWTS conditions, functionality, observed components, and identify evidence of an existing soil treatment area (STA). After the site visit, an additional search of the County data base revealed documentation of a 2011 Garfield County Building Permit and a 2002 ISDS Permit associated with the property for a garage and single family home. It appears that a Single family home’s OWTS was permitted and finalized, in 2002, under County ISDS permit No. 3759 to serve a 1-bedroom residential unit plus “GHR” design capacity reported, calling for a 750 gallon septic tank. However, the application dated 11-01-02, indicates a 2-bedroom single family dwelling. The attached permit indicates that the design called for 414 S.F. of leaching chambers (24 units) assumed to be old model standard Infiltrator chambers configured in a trench(s). The permit “final system inspection and approval as installed section” indicates that a 1,250 gallon concrete septic tank, manufactured by Copeland, was installed with Infiltrator trench. This permit was finalized 12-27-02. An application for “Gabossi Subdivision Exemption” document was submitted in 2002 and indicates that the existing residence on Lot 1 has an ISDS in place. A Building permit on record, BLRE-9-10-1742, issued 10/1/2010, to serve a 2,400 SF garage, assumed not to be plumbed as the septic application and building review indicated that a septic permit was not applicable. An existing OWTS does exist that is currently serving the shop. The review of the documents indicate some confusion of what the original intent was to permit either the garage unit or single family unit both being in place on the property at different locations. It is assumed that the single family unit was assigned to the original permit and the garage/shop unit may not have been finalized under a permit. Findings The shop contains a ½ bath. A sanitary sewer cleanout was observed off the south exterior wall approximately 20-ft from the southwest corner of the building. A 750 gallon, 1-compartment, concrete septic tank with an iron ring and cover installed at surface grade, set on a 12-inch concrete access riser on the tank access, is in place approximately 40-ft south of the building at the southerly edge of the gravel drive area. Prior to pumping, SE observed a normal liquid level with a relatively dense 3-inch layer of accumulated scum at the surface and probed an approximate 16- inch layer of settled moderately dense sludge. The tank (6-ft x 4-ft x 5-ft interior dimensions) is equipped with inlet and outlet sanitary tees. The access lid, riser and the tank were observed being in good condition. Page 2 24 County Road 138As Constructed OWTS SE Job No. 32000.01 May 9, 2024 Observation of the liquid level stain in the tank indicates that discharge of effluent to a STA is occurring normally. Observation of the tank interior indicates that the concrete tank, floor, ceiling and walls are in very good condition and that the system is functioning. No surface components typically associated with a newer STA field (was observed (i.e., inspection ports), however evidence of a STA was observed just down gradient from the top of embankment below the tank. These observed features are situated in what appears to be a previously excavated area on the slope characterized by a relatively flat surface area approximately 40-ft by 6-ft within a grade break between some scattered oak brush trees. This small rectangular area has a healthy grass vegetated surface somewhat distinguished from the surrounding terrain. It is strongly assumed that a functioning STA exists that may consist of a single 40-ft long absorptive trench. No evidence of surfacing effluent or compromised system conditions was observed. The usage of the shop appears to be limited to 3-4 people per day. The daily design flow is estimated to be 45 to 60-gpd based on 15-gpd for daily workers usage of a single ½ bath. The single compartment 750-gallon tank and assumed 120-sf STA with native Type 2 silt loam soils in the vicinity, is expected to have adequate capacity to treat the limited sewage treatment requirements. Conclusions Based on the significant accumulation of scum and sludge in the tank, it is recommended that the tank be inspected annually and most likely be pumped every 3-4 years. Based on observation of the tank, sewage influent, tank effluent, assumed STA and site conditions, the system appears to be functioning and is expected to provide for effective treatment of the limited usage in the future. Recommendations for further identification/evaluation of the assumed STA, upgrades to system to be in conformance with current regulatory design criteria may be considered however it is the opinion of SE that no immediate actions or upgrades are warranted at this time or the near future to maintain the system performance to effectively treat the limited usage. Recommendations Future recommendations to consider or that may be required to permit the system include: locating and inspecting the assumed STA by TV probe and minor exploratory excavation; install appropriate inspection ports and perform any other needed upgrades; install a 300 gallon plastic septic tank with outlet effluent filter in series with the existing tank; create a permit/construction drawing with existing conditions and proposed upgrades for permit application and approval; submit record drawing of as-constructed conditions under finalized permit. If a permit and record drawing is requested by the County to support approval of planning or building processes, SE is available to address their concerns and request associated with this existing OWTS. If no significant permitting procedures or system upgrades are required by the County, it may be advisable to just locate the extents of the STA and inspect it by TV probing, field probing, and issue an existing conditions record drawing under a new permit number. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please call. Sincerely, SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC Paul E. Rutledge Yancy Nichol, PE Design Engineer Principal Version March 3, 2022 WILL SERVE LETT ER March 24, 2022 Sopris Engineering 502 Main St Ste A3 Carbondale Co 81623 Re: Canyon Creek Partners LLC - Lot 2 Gabossi Exemption Dear Sir/Madam, This letter is to confirm that Xcel Energy is your utility provider for natural gas and electric service. In accordance with our tariffs, on file with and approved by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission, facilities can be made available to serve the project at Lot 2 Gabossi Exemption. The cost, and whether any reinforcements or extensions are required, for the Company to provide those facilities will be determined by your designer upon receipt of application and project plans. Your utility service(s) will be provided after the following steps are completed: • Application submitted to Xcel Energy’s “Builders Call Line (BCL)” – once your application is accepted you will be assigned a design department representative who will be your primary point of contact • Utility design is completed – you must provide your design representative with the site plan, the one - line diagrams, and panel schedules for electric and gas loads if applicable • All documents provided by design representative are signed and returned • Payment is received (Residential Service Laterals if applicable) • Required easements are granted - you must sign and return applicable easement documents to your Right-of-Way agent • Site is ready for utility construction - the site ready information can be found on our website at may be viewed at Construction and Inspection | Xcel Energy. An estimated scheduled in-service date will be provided once these requirements have been met. It is important to keep in mind that the terms and conditions of utility service, per our tariffs, require that you provide adequate space and an easement on your property for all gas and electric facilities required to serve your project, including but not limited to gas and electrical lines and meters, transformers, and pedestals. General guidelines for requirements can be found on our website at xcelenergy.com/InstallAndConnect. Xcel Energy looks forward to working with you on your project and if I can be of further assistance, please contact me at the phone number or email listed below. Sincerely, Samantha Wakefield Xcel Energy Planner Mailing address: Xcel Energy 1995 Howard Ave Rifle, CO 81650 Samantha Wakefield Digitally signed by Samantha Wakefield Date: 2022.03.24 08:58:51 -06'00' PAGEBREAKFY2021 , .it 1!61.. A376 i 2;.1 . 20 4. l, 4 i '9 14. ./ '. E.,L F COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT Permit fee Date of transmittal 0.00 06/20/2003 Region/Section/Patrol 03/02/10 CDOT Permit No. 303120 State Highway No/Mp/Side 006D/110.160/L Local Jurisdiction Garfield County The Permittee(s); Randy Withee, Engineer Garfield County 144 E. 3rd Street Rifle, CO 81650 970-625-0973 X4001 Applicant;Ref No. 03-105 Randy Withee, Engineer Garfield County 144 E. 3rd Street Rifle, CO 81650 970-625-0973 X4001 is hereby granted permission to have an access to the state highway at the location noted below. The access shall be constructed, maintained and used in accordance with this permit, including the State Highway Access Code and any attachments, terms, conditions and exhibits. This permit may be revoked by the issuing authority if at any time the permitted access and its use violate any parts of this permit. The issuing authority, the Department and their duly appointed agents and employees shall be held harmless against any action for personal injury or property damage sustained by reason of the exercise of the permit. Location: Located on the left side of US Highway 6&24, a distance of 829 feet east of RP 110, also known as County Road 138. Access to Provide Service to: County Road 40 DHV 100.00 % Other terms and conditions: * See Attached Pages 2 and 3 and Other Enclosures for Additional Terms and Conditions. 1&2526272@4, 1 eeG N1.%\ 1 JUK %% 1 j1 ka 1 District lit 01 Traffic Co/ (N, Ok' MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY APPROVAL Required only when the appropriate local authority retains issuing authority. Date Title By (X) Upon the signing of this permit the permittee agrees to the terms and conditions and referenced attachments contained herein. All construction shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finished within 45 days from Initiation. The permitted access shall be completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit prior to 41,an ,i.0,4 .V,119 UWul. The permittee shall notify Brian Gieck with the Colorado Department of Transportation in Rifle at 970-625-2286 at least 48 hours prior to commencing construction within the State Highway right-of-way. The person signing as the permittee must be the owner or legal representative of the property served by the permitted access and have full authority to accept the permit and its terms and conditions. t. Permittee X7 ,Date / 00 739 GO -72 «< 15-(03 This permit is not valid until signed by a duly authorized representative of the Department. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By <-7 _ CP VA-Date (*ique)Title(44» " 22 2 OCR 3 Access Manager Cop*distribution:Required:t>' Make copies as necessary for: 1.Region Local Authority Inspector 2.Applicant MTCE Patrol Traffic Engineer 3.Staff Access Section Previous editions are obsolete and may not be used CDOT Form #101 8/98 .... State Highway Access Permit Form 101, Page 2 The following paragrap hs are excerpts of the State Highway Access Code. These are provided for your convenience but do not alleviate compliance with all sections of the Access Code. A copy of the State Highway Access Code is available fro m your local issuing authority (local government) or the Colorado Department of Transportation (Departmen t). When this permit was issued, the issuing authority made its decision based in part on information submitted by the app licant. on the access category which is assigned to the highway, what alternative access to other public roads and s treets is available, and safety and design standards. Changes in use or design not approved by the permit or the issuing aut hority may cause the revocation or suspension of the permit. APPEALS 1. Should the permittee or applicant object to the denial of a permit application by the Department or object to any of the terms or conditions of a permit placed there by the Department, the applicant and permittee (appellant) have a right to appeal the decision to the [Transportation] Commission [of Coloradol. To appeal a decision, submit a request for administrative hearing to the Transportation Commission of Colorado within 60 days of transmittal of notice of denial or tra nsmittal of the permit for signature. Submit the request to the Transportation Commission of Colorado, 4201 East Arkansas Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80222-3400, The request shall include reasons for the appeal and may i nclude changes, revisions, or conditions that would be acceptable to the permittee or applicant. 2, Any appeal by the applicant or permittee of action by a local issuing authority shall be filed with the local authority and be consistent with the appeal procedures of the local authority 3. In submitting the request for administrative hearing, the appellant has the option of including within the appeal a request f or a review by the Department's internal administrative review committee pursuant to [Code] subsection 2.10. When such com mittee review is requested, processing of the appeal for fornial administrative hearing, 2.9(5) and (6), shall be suspended until the appellant notifies the Commission to proceed with the administrative hearing, or the appellant submits a request to the Commission or the administrative law judge to withdraw the appeal, The two administrative processes, the internal administrative review committee, and the administrative hearing, may not run concurrently. 4. Regardle ss of any communications, meetings, administrative reviews or negotiations with the Department or the inter nal administrative review Committee regarding revisions or objections to the permit or a denial, if the permittee or applicant wish es to appeal the Department's decision to the Commission for a hearing, the appeal must be brought to the Commission within 60 days of transmittal of notice of denial or transmittal of the permit. PERMIT EXPIRATION 1. A permit sh all be considered expired if the access is not under construction within one year of the permit issue date or before the expiration of any authorized extension. When the permittee is unable to commence construction within one yea r after the permit issue date, the permittee may request a one year extension from the issuing authority. No more than two one-year extensions may be granted under any circumstances. If the access is not under construction within three years from date of issue the permit will be considered expired. Any request for an extension must be in writing and submitted to the issuing authority before the permit expires. The request should state the reasons why t he extension is necessary, when construction is anticipated, and include a copy of page 1 (face of permit) of the access permit. Extension approvals shall be in writing. The local issuing authority shall obtain the concurrence of the Department prior to the approval of an extension, and shall notify the Department of all denied extensi ons within ten days. Any person wishing to reestablish an access perinit that has expired may begin again with the applicat ion procedures. An approved Notice to Proceed, automatically renews the access permit for the period of the Noti ce to Proceed. CONSTRUCTION 1. Construction may not begin until a Notice to Proceed is approved. (Code subsection 2.4] 2. The construction of the a ccess and its appurtenances as required by the terms and conditions of the permit shall be completed at the expense of the permittee except as provided in subsection 2.14. All materials used in the constru ction of the access within the highway right-of-way or on permanent easements, become public property. Any materials removed from the highway right-of-way will be disposed of only as directed by the Department. All fencing, guard rail, traffic control devices and other equipment and materials removed in the course of access construction shall be given to the Department unless otherwise instructed by the permit or the Department inspector. 3. The permittee shall notify the individua l or the office specified on the permit or Notice to Proceed at least two workin g days prior to any construction within state highway right-of-way. Construction of the access shall not proceed until both t he access permit and the Notice to Proceed are issued. The access shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finished within 45 days from initiation of construction within the highway right-of-way. A construction time extension not to exceed 30 working days may be requested from the individual or office specified on the per mit. 4. The issuing author ity and the Department may inspect the access durirg construction and upon completion of the acce ss to ensure that all terms and conditions of the permit are met. Inspectors are authorized to enforce the conditions of the permit d uring construction and to halt any activities within state right-of-way that do not comply with the provisions of the permit, that conflict with concurrent highway constructior or maintenance work, that endanger highway properly, natural or cultural resources protected by law, or the health and safety of workers or the public. 5. Prior t o using the access, the perniittee is required to complete the construction according to the terms and conditions of the permit. Failure by the permittee to abide by all permit terms and conditions shall be sufficient cause for the Department or issuing authority to initiate action to suspend or revoke the permit and close the access. If in the determinatio n of the Department or issuing authority the failure to comply with or complete the construction requirements of the permit create a highway safety hazard, such shall be sufficient cause for the summary suspension of the permit. If the permittee wishes to use the access prior to completion, arrangement s must be approved by the issuing author ity and Department and Included in the permit. The Department or issuing authority may order a halt to any unauthorized use of th e access pursuant to statutory and regulatory powers. Reconstruction or improvement of the access may be required when the permittee has failed to meet required specifications of design or materials. If any construction element fails within two years due to improper construction or material specifications, the permittee shall be responsible for all repairs. Failure to make such repairs may result in suspension of the permit and closure of the access. 6. The permittee shall provide constru ction traffic control devices at all times during access construction, in conformance with the M.U.T.C.D. as required by section 42-4-104, C.R.S., as amended. 7. A utility permit s hall be obtained for any utility work within highway right-of-way. Where necessary to remove, reloc ate, or repair a traffic control device or public or private utilities for the construction of a permitted access, the relocat ion, removal or repair shall be accomplished by the permittee without cost to the Department or issuing authority, and at the direction of the Department or utility company. Any damage to the state highway or other public right-of-way beyond that which is allowed in the permit shall be repaired immediately. The permittee is responsible for the re pair of any utility damaged in the course of access construction, reconstruction or repair. 8. In the event it becomes necessary to remove any right-of-way fence, the posts on either side of the acces s shall be securely braced with an approved end post before the fence is cut to prevent any slacking of the remaining fence. All posts and wire rem oved are Department property and shall be turned over to a representative of the Department. 9. The permittee shall ensur e that a copy of the permit is available for review at the construction site at all times. The permit may require the cont ractor to notify the individual or office specified on the permit at any specified phases in construction to allow the field inspector to inspect various aspects of construction such as concrete forms, subbase, base course compaction, and materials specifications. Minor changes and additions may be ordered by the Depart ment or local authority field inspector to meet unanticipated site conditions. 10.Each acces s shall be constructed in a manner that shall not cause water to enter onto the roadway or shoulder, and shall not interfere with the existing drainage system on the right-of-way or any adopted municipal system and drainage plan.. 11.By accepting t he permit, permittee agrees to save, indemnify, and hold harmless to the extent allowed by law, the issuing authority, the Department, its officers, and employees from suits, actions, claims of any type or character brought because of inj uries or damage sustained by any person resulting from the permittee's use of the access permit during the construction of the access. CHANGES IN ACCESS USE AND PERMIT VIOLATIONS 1. It is the responsibil ity of the property owner and permittee to ensure that the use of the access to the property is not in violation of the Code, permit terms and conditions or the Act. The terms and conditions of any permit are binding upon all assi gns, successors-in-interest, heirs and occupants. If any significant changes are made or will be made in the use of the property which will affect access operation, traffic volume and or vehicle type, the permittee or property owner shall contact the local issuing authority or the Department to determine if a new access permit and modifications to the access are r equired. 2. When an acc ess is constructed or used in violation of the Code, section 43-2-147(5)(c), C.R.S., of the Act applies, The Department or issui ng authority may summarily suspend an access permit and immediately order closure of the access when its continued use presents an immediate threat to public health, welfare or safety. Summary suspension shall comply with article 4 of title 24, C.R.S. MAINTE NANCE 1. The per mittee, his or her heirs, successors-in-interest, assigns, and occupants of the property serviced by the access shall b e responsible for meeting the terms and conditions of the permit, the repair and maintenance of the access beyond the edge of t he roadway including any cattle guard and gate, and the removal or clearance of snow or ice upon t he access even though deposited on the access in the course of Depadment snow removal operations. Within unincorporated areas the Department will keep access culverts clean as part of maintenance of the highway drainage system. However, the permittee is responsible for the repair and replacement of any access-related culverts within the right-of-way. Within incorporated areas, drainage responsibilities for municipalities are determined by statute and local ordinance. T he Department will maintain the roadway including auxiliary lanes and shoulders, except in those cases where t he access installation has failed due to improper access construction and/or failure to follow permit requirements and specifications in which case the permittee shall be responsible for such repair. Any significant repairs such as culvert replacement, resurfacing. or changes in design or specifications, requires authorization from the Departme nt. State Highway Acces s Permit Form 101, Page 2 The follow ing paragraphs are excerpts of the State Highway Access Code. These are provided for your convenience but do no t alleviate compliance with all sections of the Access Code. A copy of the State Highway Access Code is available f rom your local issuing authority (local government) or the Colorado Department of Transportation (Departmen t). When this permit was issued, the issuing authority made its decision based in part on information submitted by the appl icant, on the access category which is assigned to the highway, what alternative access to other public roads and stre ets is available, and safety and design standards. Changes in use or design not approved by the permit or the issuing authority may cause the revocation or suspension of the permit. APPEALS 1 Should the pe rmittee or applicant object to the denial of a permit application by the Department or object to any of the terms or conditions of a permit placed there by the Department, the anplicant and permittee (appellant) have a right to ap peal the decision to the [Transportation] Commission [of Coloradol. To appeal a decision. submit a request for administrative hearing to the Transpor tation Commission of Colorado within 60 days of transmittal of notice of denial or transmittal of the permit for signature Submit the request to the Transportation Commission of Colorado, 4201 East Ar kansas Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80222-3400 The request shall include reasons for the appeal and may include changes, revisions, or conditions that would be acceptable to the permittee or applicant. 2. Any appea l by the applicant or permittee of action by a local issuing authority shall be filed with the local authority and be consistent with the appeal procedures of the local authority 3, In submitting the request for administrative hearing, the appellant has the option of including within the appeal a request for a review by the Department's internal administrative review committee pursuant to [Code] subsection 2.10. When such committee review is requested. processing of the appeal for formal administrative hearing, 2.9(5) and (6), shall b e suspended until the appellant notifies the Commission to proceed with the administrative hearing, or the appellant submits a request to the Commission or the administrative law judge to withdraw the appeal. The two administrative pr ocesses, the internal administrative review committee, and the administrative hearing, may not run concurrently. 4 Regardless of any communications, meetings, administrative reviews or negotiations with the Department or the internal administrative review Committee regarding revisions or objections to the permit or a denial, if the permittee or applicant wishes to appeal the Department's decision to the Commission for a hearing, the appeal must be brought to the Co mmission within 60 days of transmittal of notice of denial or transmittal of the permit. PERMIT EXPIRATION 1. A permit shall be considered expired if the access is not under construction within one year of the permit issue date or before the expiration of any authorized extension. When the permittee is unable to commence construction within one ye ar after the permit issue date, the permittee may request a one year extension from the issuing authority. No more than two one-year extensions may be granted under any circumstances. If the access is not under construction within three years from date of issue the permit will be considered expired. Any request for an extension must be in writing and submitted to the issuing authority before the permit expires. The request should state the reasons why t he extension is necessary, when construction is anticipated, and include a copy of page 1 (face of permit) of the access permit Extension approval s shall be in writing. The local issuing authority shall obtain the concurrence of the Department prior to the approval of an extension, and shall notify the Department of all denied extensions wit hin ten days. Any person wishing to reestablish an access permit that has expired may begin again with the application procedures An approved Notice to Proceed, automatically renews the access permit for the period of the Noti ce to Proceed. CONSTRUCTION 1, Construction ma y not begin until a Notice to Proceed is approved, (Code subsection 2.4] 2. The constructi on of the access and its appurtenances as required by the terms and conditions of the permit shall be completed at the expense of the permittee except as provided in subsection 2.14. All materials used in the constru ction of the access within the highway right-of-way or on permanent easements, become public property. Any material s removed from the highway right-of-way will be disposed of only as directed by the Department. All fencing, guard rail, traffic control devices and other equipment and materials removed in the course of access construction shall be given to t he Department unless otherwise instructed by the permit or the Department inspector. 3 The perm ittee shall notify the individual or the office specified on the permit or Notice to Proceed at least two worki ng days prior to any construction within state highway right-of-way. Construction of the access shall not proceed until both the access permit and t he Notice to Proceed are issued. The access shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finished within 45 days from initiation of construction within the highway right-of-way. A constru ction time extension not to exceed 30 working days may be requested from the individual or office specified on the per mit. 4 The issuing authority and the Department may inspect the access durirg construction and upon completion of the acce ss to ensure that all terms and conditions of the permit are met. Inspectors are authorized to enforce the conditions of the permit during construction and to halt any activities within state right-of-way thal do not comply with the provisi ons of the permit, that conflict with concurrent highway construction or maintenance work, that endanger highway properly, natural or cultural resources protected by law, or the health and safety of workers or the public. 5 Prior to using the access, the permittee is required to complete the construction according to the terms and conditions of the permit. Failur e by the permittee to abide by all permit terms and conditions shall be sufficient cause for the Department or issui ng authority to initiate action to suspend or revoke the permit and close the access If in the determinatio n of the Department or issuing authority the failure to comply with or complete the construction requirements of the permit create a highway safety hazard, such shall be sufficient cause for the summary suspension of the permit. If the per mittee wishes to use the access prior to completion. arrangements must te approved by the issuing authority and Department and included in the permit The Department or issuing authority may order a halt to any unauthorized use of the access pursuant to statutory and regulatory powers. Reconstruction or improvement of the access may be required when the permittee has failed to meet required specifications of design or materials. If any construction element fails within two years due to improper construction or material specifications, the permittee shall be responsibl e for all repairs. Failure to make such repairs may result in suspension of the permit and closure of the access. 6 The permittee shall provide construction traffic control devices at all times during access construction, in conformance with the M.U.T.C.D. as required by section 42-4-104. C.R.S., as amended. 7. A utili ty permit shall be obtained for any utility work within highway right-of-way. Where necessary to remove, relocat e, or repair a traffic control device or public or private utilities for the construction of a permitted access, the relocation. removal or repair shall be accomplished by the permittee without cost to the Department or issuing authority, and at the dire ction of the Department or utility company. Any damage to the state highway or other public right-of-way beyond that which is allowed in the permit shall be repaired immediately. The permittee is responsible for the repa ir of any utility damaged in the course of access construction, reconstruction or repair. 8. In the even t It becomes necessary to remove any right-of-way fence, the posts on either side of the access shall be securely br aced with an approved end post before the fence is cut to prevent any slacking of the remaining fence. All posts and wire removed are Department property and shall be turned over to a representative of the Department. 9 The permittee sha ll ensure that a copy of the permit is available for review at the construction site at all times The permit may require the contractor to notify the individual or office specified on the permit at any specified phases in construction 10 allow the field inspector to inspect various aspects of construction such as concrete forms, subbase, base course compaction, and mat erials specifications Minor changes and additions may be ordered by the Department or local authority field inspector to meet unanticipated site conditions. 10.Each access shall be constructed in a manner that shall not cause water to enter onto the roadway or shoulder, and shall not in terfere with the existing drainage system on the right-of-way or any adopted municipal system and drainage plan , 11 By accepting the per mit. permittee agrees to save, indemnify, and hold harmless to the extent allowed by law, the issuing authority, the Department, its officers, and employees from suits, actions. claims of any type or character brought because of i njuries or damage sustained by any person resulting from the permittee's use of the access permit during the co nstruction of the access. CHANGES IN ACCESS USE AN D PERMIT VIOLATIONS 1 It is the respon sibility of the property owner and permittee to ensure that the use of the access to the property is not in violation of the Code. perm it terms and conditions or the Act. The terms and conditions of any permit are binding upon all assi gns, successors-in-interest, heirs and occupants. If any significant changes are made or will be made in the use of the property which will affect access operation, traffic volume and or vehicle type, the permittee or properly owner shall co ntact the local issuing authority or the Department to determine if a new access permit and modifications to the access are r equired. 2. When an access is constructed or used in violation of the Code, section 43-2-147(5)(c) C.R.S., of the Act applies. The Dep artment or issuing authority may summarily suspend an access permit and immediately order closure of the access when i ts continued use presents an immediate threat to public health, welfare or safety, Summary suspension shall compl y with article 4 of title 24, C.R S. MAINTE NANCE 1. The permittee, h is or her heirs, successors-in-interest, assigns, and occupants of the property serviced by the access shal l be responsible for meeting the terms and conditions of the permit, the repair and maintenance of the access beyond the edge of the roadway including any cattle guard and gate, and the removal or clearance of snow or ice upon the access even though deposited on the access in the course of Department snow removal operations. Within unincorporated areas the Department will keep access culverts clean as part of maintenance of the highway drainage system . However, the permittee is resi onsible fo r the repair and replacement of any access-related culverts within the right-of-way. Within incorporated areas, drainage responsibilities for municipalities are determined by statute and local ordi nance, The Department will maintain the roadway including auxiliary lanes and shoulders, except in those cases wh ere the access installation has failed due to improper access construction and/or failure to follow permit requirements and specifications in which case the permittee shall be responsible for such repair. Any significant repairs such as c ulvert replacement, resurfacing, or changes in design or specifications, requires authorization from the Department STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT #303120 Issued to Garfield County June 16,2003 TERMS AND CONDITIONS Permittee and Applicant are responsible for fully reading and understanding the attached terms and conditions of this permit. Failure to comply with anv of these terms and conditions may result in the suspension of this permit. When an access is constructed or used in violation of the , J Code, section 43-2-147(5)(c), C.R.S., of the Act applies. The Department or issuing authority may summarily suspend an access permit and immediately order closure of the access when its continued use presents an immediate , threat to public health, welfare or safety. Summarysuspension shall comply with article 4 of title 24, C.R.S. If there are any questions or concerns regarding these terms and conditions, IMMEADIATLY contact the Access 0 Manager. 1. This permit replaces any and all additional access permits that may be in existence. All other access to the property shall be removed. 2. This permitted access is only for the use and purpose stated in the Application and Permit. This Permit is issued in accorda nce with the Access Code (2 CCR 601-1), and is based in part upon the information submitted by the Permittee. Any changes in traffic volumes or type, drainage, or other operational aspects may render this permit void, requiring a new permit to be applied for based upon existing and anticipate d future conditions Any subsequent relocation, reconstruction, or modifications to the access or changes in the traffic volume or traffic nature using the access shall be requested for by means of a new application. 3. The traffic limitations listed on the face of this permit shall be adhered to. The traffic volumes are listed in Design Hourly Volume (DHV) trips or Average Daily Trips (ADT) where entering the site and returning counts as two trips. Vehicle counts using the access shall be adjusted for vehicles longer than 20 feet in accordance with Section 2.3(4)(e). 4. A Notice to Proceed is required prior to beginning construction. The following items are required before a Notice to Proceed will be issued: (1) Certificate of Insurance Liability as per Section 2.3(11)(i) of the State Highway Access Code. (2) Traffic Control Plan in accordance with Section 2.4(6) of the Access Code. (3) Three copies of Construction Plans Stamped (11"x 17" with a minimum scale of 1" = 509 by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer in full compliance with the State Highway Access Code. 5. The access shall be constructed 25-feet wide with radii to accommodate the minimum turning radius of the largest vehicle or 25-foot, whichever is greater. OR curb, gutter, and radii to the requirements of the local jurisdiction. 6. The access shall be constructed perpendicular to the travel lanes of the State Highway for a minimum distance of 40 feet from the edge of roadway or the right-of-way line. whichever is greater, and shall slope down and away from the adjacent pavement edge at a rate of 2% grade for a minimum o f 20 feet. If curb and gutter are present, the slope shall be calculated from pan line to pan line. Any revisions to -1- STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT #303120 Issued to Garfield County June 16, 2003 TERMS AND CONDITIONS (cont.) this requirement shall be subject to Department review and approval prior to commencement of any work within the highway right-of-way. Slopes shall be at a 6:1 ratio on the roadway and a 6:1 ratio on the approach. The access shall be surfaced in accordance with Section 4.7 of the Access Code immediately upon completion of earthwork construction and prior to use. This access shall be hard surfaced in accordance with Section 4.7 of the Access Code a minimum distance of 350 feet from the traveled way. Where the hard surface is to abut existing pavement, the existing pavement shall be saw cut and removed a minimum of one foot back from the existing edge for bituminous, or until an acceptable existing cross slope is achieved. Surfacing shall meet the Department's specifications with minimum surfacing to be equal to or greater than existing highway conditions. 9. The Permittee shall install a culvert a minimum of 24-inch in diameter and have protective end treatments or as otherwise authorized by the Access Manager. 10. Water, sanitary, sewer, gas, electrical, communication, landscaping, and telephone installations will require individual additional permits. 11. The Permittee is responsible for obtaining any necessary additional federal, state and/or City/County permits or clearances required for construction of the access. Approval of this access permit does not constitute verification of this action by the Permittee. 12. It shall be the responsibility of the Permittee to verify the location of the existing utilities and notify all utility owners or operators of any work that might involve utilities within the State Highway right-of- way. Any work necessary to protect existing permitted utilities, such as an encasement will be the responsibility of the Permittee. Any damage or disruption to any utilities during the construction shall be the Permittee's responsibility and shall be repaired or replaced at no cost to the Department. 13. A fully executed complete copy of this permit must be on the job site with the contractor at all times during the construction. Failure to comply with this or any other construction requirement may result in the immediate suspension of work by order of the department inspector or the issuing authority. 14. Traffic control shall be provided on site during the duration of construction of access and highway improvements in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and a Traffic Control Plan prepared by a American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) or Colorado Contractors Association certified Traffic Control Supervisor in accordance with the MUTCD and Colorado Supplements. 15. All work that requires traffic control shall be supervised by a registered professional traffic engineer or by a traffic control supervisor certified by the American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) or the Colorado Contractors Association (CCA). When flagging personnel are required, the contractor in accordance with the Department standards shall certify them. 16. Any incomplete construction activity on the State Highway that must be left overnight shall be barricaded and signed in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and other applicable standards. 17. Open cuts, which are 6 inches in depth, within 30 feet of the edge of the State Highway traveled way, will not be left open at night, on weekends, or on holidays. 18. No more than 6 feet of trench areas shall be opened at any one time. Open trenches and other excavations within the State Highway right-of-way shall be backfilled and/or paved before 3:30 P.M. of each working day or be protected in accordance with the M.U.T.C.D. -2- STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT #303120 Issued to Garfield County June 16,2003 TERMS AND CONDITIONS (cont.) this requirement shall be subject to Department review and approval prior to commencement of any work within the highway right-of-way. 7. Slopes shall be at a 6:1 ratio on the roadway and a 6:1 ratio on the approach. 8. The access shall be surfaced in accordance with Section 4.7 of the Access Code immediately upon completion of earthwork construction and prior to use. This access shall be hard surfaced in accordance with Section 4.7 ofthe Access Code a minimum distance of 350 feet from the traveled way. Where the hard surface is to abut existing pavement, the existing pavement shall be saw cut and removed a minimum of one foot back from the existing edge for bituminous, or until an acceptable existing cross slope is achieved. Surfacing shall meet the Department's specifications with minimum surfacing to be equal to or greater than existing highway conditions. 9. The Permittee shall install a culvert a minimum of 24-inch in diameter and have protective end treatments or as otherwise authorized by the Access Manager. 10. Water, sanitary, sewer, gas, electrical, communication, landscaping, and telephone installations will require individual additional permits. 11. The Permittee is responsible for obtaining any necessary additional federal, state and/or City/County permits or clearances required for construction of the access. Approval of this access permit does not constitute verification of this action by the Permittee. 12. It shall be the responsibility of the Permittee to verify the location of the existing utilities and notify all utility owners or operators of any work that might involve utilities within the State Highway right-of- way. Any work necessary to protect existing permitted utilities, such as an encasement will be the responsibility of the Permittee. Any damage or disruption to any utilities during the construction shall be the Permittee's responsibility and shall be repaired or replaced at no cost to the Department. 13. A fully executed complete copy of this permit must be on the job site with the contractor at all times during the construction. Failure to comply with this or any other construction requirement may result in the immediate suspension of work by order of the department inspector or the issuing authority. 14. Traffic control shall be provided on site during the duration of construction of access and highway improvements in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and a Traffic Control Plan prepared by a American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) or Colorado Contractors Association certified Traffic Control Supervisor in accordance with the MUTCD and Colorado Supplements. 15. All work that requires traffic control shall be supervised by a registered professional traffic engineer or by a traffic control supervisor certified by the American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) or the Colorado Contractors Association (CCA). When flagging personnel are required, the contractor in accordance with the Department standards shall certify them. 16. Any incomplete construction activity on the State Highway that must be left overnight shall be barricaded and signed in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and other applicable standards. 17. Open cuts, which are 6 inches in depth, within 30 feet of the edge of the State Highway traveled way, will not be left open at night, on weekends, or on holidays. 18. No more than 6 feet of trench areas shall be opened at any one time. Open trenches and other excavations within the State Highway right-of-way shall be backfilled and/or paved before 3:30 P.M. of each working day or be protected in accordance with the M.U.T.C.D. -2- STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT #303120 Issued to Garfield County June 16,2003 TERMS AND CONDITIONS (cont.) 19. Any work within State Highway right-of-way shall begin after 8:30 A.M. and all work and equipment shall be offthe highway BEFORE 3:30 P.M. each day. 20. Two-way traffic shall be maintained at all times on the highway in accordance with the MUTCD and Colorado Supplements or as otherwise approved. 21. No work will be allowed at night, Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays without prior authorization from the Department. The Department may also restrict work within the State Highway right-of-way during adverse weather conditions. 22. Con struction traffic control devices, when not in use, shall be removed or turned away from traffic. 23. When it is necessary to remove any highway right-of-way fence, the posts on either side of the access entrance shall be securely braced with approved end posts and in conformance with the Department's M-607-1 standard, before the fence is cut, to prevent slacking of the remaining fence. All materials removed shall be reiumed to the Department. 24. Landscaping shall not obstruct sight distance at any State Highway access point. In the event the landscaping becomes unsightly or considered to be a traffic hazard, The Department may require that it be removed promptly by the Permittee and at no cost to the Department. 25. On-premise and off-premise signing shall comply with the current Colorado Outdoor Advertising Act, sections 43-1-401 to 421, C.R.S., and all rules and regulations pertaining to outdoor advertising. Please contact (advertising inspector name and number) for any questions regarding advertising devices. 26. Upon completion of the access, the applicant shall notify the Access Manager by certified mail within 10 days at: Colorado Department of Transportation Region 3 - Access Manager 222 South 6th Street, Room 100 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 -2- COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY Issuing authority APPLICATION FOR STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIl date application acceptance Instructions: - contact the Department of Highways or your local government to determine your issuing authority. - contacttheissuingauthoritytodetermine whatplansandotherdocumentsare requiredtobesubmitted withyour 4 application. A - completethis form(somequestionsmaynotapplytoyou) &attach allnecessarydocumentsandsubmitittothe 0/ issuing authority. Submit an application for each access requested. - if you have any questions contact the issuing authority.Please print or type 1) roperty owner (Permittee)2) Applicant AESKILE\.b CDot)Tl --AVel UIT WEE/, El,4,AE,t- GMZFIEL-b COONT'I -Rh,tt:Y \11331#EE fi,L; 41 2- street address, city street address, city, / 19 4 E. 1-8 STWEEr }tH E. 3·e-0 Sr 2-*- state & zip Phone # %1,\00 l state & zip Phone #REPLE 81 l50 190- LQ 5-0913 2.:ug LE 1 SIU 6 910-£95-0993A 4001 3) Adr of property to be served by permit (if known) 4).. Legal description of property: county subdivision block . lot township rangeGAE.ea-13 1 N/A 1 0/A 11>NE.EL. C 1 section/2 c 1 5 jaunt i cio W op Lmt. RM 5) What state highway are you requesting access from?6) What side of the highway? . / DYN OS O EOWEATE ALL#,JM[ 64-94 7) How many feet is the proposed access from the nearest mile post or cross street? 9/1 +circk 0 1 J - feet (NS €)W) from 8) Check here if you are requesting a Il new access O temporary access improvement to existing access O change in access use 9) What is the approximate date you intend to begin construction?AJAf> 10) Do you have knowledge of any State Highway access permits serving this property, of foradjacent properties in which you have a property interest. 0 yes o If "yes" - what are the permit number(s)?and/or, permit date 11) Does the property t3.ner own or have any interests in any adjacent property? 0 yes dp'Zo If "yes" - please describe: 12) Are there existing or dedicated public streets, roads, highways or access easements bordering or within the property? hi /A 0 yes 0 no If "yes" - list them on your plans and indicate the proposed and existing access points. 13) I f you are requesting commercial orindustrial access please indicate the types and numberof businesses and provide the floorarea square footage of each?0,24- V I business square footage businei square footage NIA ff I f; 4" 1 i 04 ,{* 4441 1 01 9 1r.Uistri*' ,f014) If you are requesting agricultural field a - how many acres will the access serve? 44 A 1 15) If you are requesting residential development access, - what is the type (single family, apartment, townhouse) and number 01 units? \422£8 02:toj,9,50/ type numberof units type -numberof units N M 1 1 1 1 16) Provide the following vehicle count estimates for vehicles that will use the access. Leaving property then returning istwocounts. Indicate if your counts are peak hour volumes O or average daily volumes 0. # of passengers cars and light trucks # of multi unit trucks kl- #ofothervehicles N/A- # of single unit vehicles in excess of 30 ft #of farm vehicles (field equipmA Total Count of All Vehicles 0/A. 17) Check with the issuing authority tocletermine which of the following documents are required to complete the review of your application. OlA (plans should be no larger than 24" x 36") a) Highway and driveway plan and profile. b) Drainage plan showing impact to the highway right-of-way. c) Map and letters detailing utility locations before and after development in and along the right-of-way. d) Subdivision, zoning, or development plan. e) Property map indicating other access, bordering roads and streets. f) Proposed access design. g) Parcel and ownership maps including easements. h) Signing and striping plans. i) Traffic control plan j) Proof of liability insurance I If an access permit is issued to you it will state the terms and conditions for its use. Any changes in the use of the permitted access not consistent with theterms and conditions listed on the permit may be considered a violation of the permit. LIC E--ECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN THE SECOND DEGREE, AND ANY OTHER \BLE FATEOR FEDERAL LAWS, THAT ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM AND ouw,kliTED FACIJF|VIEITARE TO THE BEST OF THEIR KNOWLEDGE TRUE AND COMPLETE. Applicant sigr;hturr i'n..... Jl J¥ 8 1, r·,1 1 1 -r C»9« 1 1-alle 4 -2- 63 I f theapplic,Misno Ajwnerofthproperty,werequirethisapplicationalsotobesigned6ytheproperty owneror their legall author 1Nrepresentative (or other acceptable written evidence). This signature shall constitute agreement/with this *lication bfall owners-of-interest unless stated in writing. If a permit is authorized, the property okner will lisNd as t® permittee. tth, ize ;a b Property owner sidaeture Date Previous editions may be used until supplies are exhausted CDOH Form #137 \IHE Al AN T 0 0 U H 8 LO 11 BEDDING OF CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. EXISTING GRADE - MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION STA: 2+71.49 ELEV: 5004.53 12 --1.............VITYQ)2<3<23:2*- END OF IMPROVEMENTS STA 3+65.41 , -0.49% - 2.00 4" MIN. - 12" MIN.5000 PROPOSED GRADE TYP. ON SIDES 1 -EXISTING EDGE OF HWY 6&24 STA: 1 + 5 ELEV: 5004.20 r-- PROPOSED GRADE DATUM ELEV EXISTING GRADE - / 4990.00 SCALE: VERTICAL 1"=10 HORIZONTAL 1"=50' CULVERT CROSSING DETAIL /2 - END OF IMPROVEMENTS STA: 3+65.41 ELEV: 5( Uf ) 28 5% Le 52 9 * 10 Ul * 4 9-4 4 4 :8 De 00 00 /0 &;} 00 00 8 8 ) to B tO 1010 1.0 If) 4 1+00 - 2+00 3+00 COUNTY ROAD 138 PROFILE 48 L.F. 24" ADS N-12 INV=5001.14' INV=5000.59' LEGEND:CONTRACTOR TO REGRADE BORROW DITCH FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES, MATCHING NEW - %*3 -NEW ASPHALT (8" GRAVEL UNDER 3" ASPHALT)CULVET ELEVATIONS. 142-25-/ 1 -- [7-771 N.T.S. )04.51 0 0 DE CATE T - 5 R L rpazz= *41-1403 =NEW ASPHALT ( 3" ASPHALT OVER EXISTING COUNTY ROAD) -4400 ' 10119115 #SS 23-33tFripiltz/253-7*-1- »u L SANCUT AND MATCH EXISTING . VARIES VARIES EDGE OF ASPHALT 0 0 0 0 0 STA: 1+15.07 OFFSET: O.00 R 9 \ CONTRACTOR TO REGRADE BORROW DITCH-- FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES, MATCHING NEW CULVET ELEVATIONS 2%COUNTY ROAD 138 IMPROVEMNTS 6 6 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO - PLAN, PROFILE AND DETAILS f COUNTY ROAD 138 SCALE: 1"=6' SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS SCALE: 1"=50'502 MAIN STREET. SUITE A3 DES. SJO CK. YTN FILE NO.SHEET 1 98010 5/20/03 98010SITE.DWG CARBONDALE, CO 81623 SJO DATE 10/24/03 98010 OF 1 (970) 704-0311 DR. .. It fI COUNTY ROAD 138 V \2 /4/ /0/1 , 0 1 >AL lllllllllll 1/Uumm77 1 STA: 7+39.43 . OFFSET: O.00 G . 4 I 1=.22-7 »--6+04 1 i : _. r---L- i -A - 44 Or)-Al/.,·'/</7* Ell D /\/ - - 6+00 /-00\ Jr, I.r#.'./ t.- 1'' ,1 1 3 r.z- - - V ,CD --ill ---- -1 7=mut.-- f- Ees=NG Cor,09£72 .\0AND GUARORAIL U , fb- - -9 & 1:-04 O 4 52 V 17,u EZE e, 15-4.n,T , -E-'Ent04139 VEHICLE ENTERING HWY 6&24 UNE OF SIGHT ELEVATION= 5004.29'+3.5'=5007.79'----0- Ull N / I 13+00 1Ati 4 981-- 1 1.0. L- 51@MT PISTANCE WEST=#39.43' . ELEVATION AT ROAD=5001.04' ELEVAnON OF ONCOMING EASTBOUND VEHICLE=5001.04'+4.25'=4991.77' 61*MT PISTANDE EAST=796.75' J ELEVATION AT ROAD=4987.52' ELEVATION OF ONCOMING WESTBOUND VEHICLE=4987.52'+4.25'=4991.77' PLAN VIEW OF SIGHT DISTANCE EXITING COUNTY ROAD 138 VEHICLE ENTERING STATE HWY 6&24 SIGHT DISTANCE SUMMARY -ACTUAL SIGHT DISTANCE WEST OF ENTRANCE= 639.43 FT THIS DISTANCE MEETS THE ADJUSTED REQUIRED SIGHT DISTANCE FOR PASSENGER CARS AND PICKUP TRUCKS (REFER TO TABLE BELOW). -ACTUAL SIGHT DISTANCE EAST OF ENTRANCE= 796.75 FT THIS DISTANCE MEETS THE ADJUSTED REQUIRED SIGHT DISTANCE FOR PASSENGER CARS AND PICKUP TRUCKS (REFER TO TABLE BELOW). HICLE SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIRED -2)(*TABLE 4-2) ADJUSTMENT FACTOR DOWNGRADE (*TABLE 4-4) ADJUSTED REQUIRED SIGHT DISTANCE EAST REQUIRED SIGHT DISTANCE WEST 550'1.20 660'550' 715'1.20 858'715' 935'1.20 1122'935' VEHICLE APPROACHING COUNTY RD 138 SIGHT DISTANCE SUMMARY -ACTUAL SIGHT DISTANCE OF VEHICLE TRAVELING WEST ON STATE HWY 6&24 (EAST OF ENTRANCE)=796.75 FT. THIS DISTANCE MEETS THE ADJUSTED REQUIRED SIGHT DISTANCE OF 495 FT. (REFER TO TABLE BELOW) -ACTUAL SIGHT DISTANCE OF VEHICLE TRAVELING EAST ON STATE HWY 6&24 (WEST OF ENTRANCE)= 639.43 FT. THIS DISTANCE MEETS THE ADJUSTED REQUIRED SIGHT DISTANCE OF 550 FT. (REFER TO TABLE BELOW) SCALE: 1"=100' COUNTY ROAD 138 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIRED (*TABLE 4-1) 550' ADJUSTED REQUIRED ADJUSTMENT FACTOR SIGHT DISTANCE UPGRADE (*TABLE 4-4)VEHICLE TRAVELING WEST 0.9 495' 98010 5/20/03 98010SITE.DWG ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED SIGHT DISTANCE VEHICLE TRAVELING EAST CJOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC. 550'CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREEL SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 ENTRANCE SIGHT DISTANCE ENTERING HWY 6&24 FROM CR 138 DES. SJO CK. YTN FILE NO.SHEET 1 DR. SJO DATE 5/20/03 98010 OF 2 fl 1 07 CL OF LANE AT DRIVER'S LINE OF SIGHT . ELEVATON OF LINE OF SIGHT OF ENTERING VEHICLE STA: 7+39.43 ELEV: 5007.79 ELEVATION OF EASTBOUND VEHICLE STA: 1+00 ELEV: 5005.29 5010 5000 4990 4980 UNE Q[ SlgtIT_ WESI-639.fly_ _ - ELEVA DON OF WESTBOUND VEH/CLE CNE OF SIGHT r STA: 15-1--36.18 ELEV: 4591.77 EXISTING GROUND EXISTIN 3 ELEVATION STA: 7+39.43 ELEV: 5004.29 - - EXISTING POAD ELEVATION STA: 1+OC ELEV: 5001.04 1 *A // EXISTING ROAD ELEVATION STA: ' 5+36.18 ELEV: 4987.52 -- EXISTING GROUND SCALE I \ERTICAL. 1"=10' DATUM ELEV FORIZONTAL: 1 "=100' 4975.00 Al ro O t.0 0 M *NO(\100)-0 LO 0 (0 4 4 0 0 * A 4 03 16 88823vi 4 4 4-5 43 d US id co 45 tri 4 d ch 06 <CS Lri 14 4 Mi oF K K co K 0888888 80 0 0 8 0 032 323300*00 00 CO 0 0 0 0 0 03 03 0-j· LO 10 10 1.0 t.0 4-) (.0 LO LO LO Ul tO 1.0 1.0 * r ****W Wr * f 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 ENTRANCE SIGHT DISTANCE PROFILE STATE HWY 6 & 24 NOTES: ENTERING VEHICLE SIGHT DISTANCE NOTES: 1) ELEVATION AT ENTRANCE VEHICLE 1) MAXIMUM SLOPE OF STATE HWY 6&24 WEST OF THE ENTRANCE IS 27. LINE OF SIGHT= ROAD ELEVATION+3.5' 2)2) ELEVATION OF ONCOMING VEHICLE AT CL OF LANE WEST AND EAST= ROAD ELEVATION+4.25' MAXIMUM SLOPE OF STATE HWY 6&24 EAST OF THE ENTRANCE IS -3%. *ADJUST REQUIRED SIGHT DISTANCE DOWNGRADE BY A 3) SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR ENTERING VEHICLES:FACTOR OF 1.2. (STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS CODE, AUGUST 31, 1998 TABLE 4-4) ROADWAY POSTED AT 55 M.P.H WEST AND EAST OF ENTRANCE, THEREFORE REQUIRED SITE DISTANCE PER STATE - HIGHWAY ACCESS CODE , AUGUST 31, 1998, TABLE 4-2 IS: COUNTY ROAD 138 -550'* FOR PASSENGER CARS AND PICKUP TRUCKS GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO -715'* FOR SINGLE UNIT TRUCKS OVER 10,000 LB GVW ENTERING SIGHT DISTANCE -935'* FOR MULTI-UNIT TRUCKS SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC.PROFILE CIVIL CONSULTANTS 98010 5/20/03 98010SITE. DWG 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 DES. SJO CK. YTN FILE NO.SHEET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 DR. SJO DATE 5/20/03 98010 OF . te 20 Outlook Re: Canyon Creek Partners - CDOT Coordination (32000) From Killian - CDOT, Brian <brian.killian@state.co.us> Date Tue 9/20/2022 7:59 AM To Kyle Sanderson <ksanderson@sopriseng.com> Cc Yancy Nichol <ynichol@sopriseng.com>; Kandis Aggen, CDOT <kandis.aggen@state.co.us> Kyle, The trigger for a CDOT access permit is a 20% increase or safety and operational issues. Therefore, if this development adds 8 or more trips in the peak hour a CDOT access permit is required. Back in 2003, CDOT requested that this access be realigned and paved, which it was. That's the only history I'm aware of for this access. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Brian Killian Region 3 Access Program Manager Traffic & Safety P 970-683-6284 | C 970-210-1101 | F 970-683-6290 222 S. 6th St, Room 100 Grand Junction, CO 81501 brian.killian@state.co.us | www.codot.gov | www.cotrip.org On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 3:57 PM Kyle Sanderson <ksanderson@sopriseng.com> wrote: Hi Brian, I hope you are doing well. I reached out to you and Kandis at the beginning of the year for an access permit off Highway 6 and C.R. 138 near New Castle. I have attached that permit here for reference again. We have been working through some development due diligence with our client and are ready to review any Access Permit impacts based on the proposed development. I have attached a site plan of the existing property (the red outline is the property boundary). Based on the existing permitted trips of 40 at the highway access, we are looking at subdividing the subject parcel into 7 or 8 lots with single family development on each. That number is based on adding approximately up to 8 vehicle trips which is a 20% increase in the permitted 40 peak hour trips. Would you be able to review and let us know your thoughts on this development triggering an access permit and what that threshold might be? Yancy and I would be glad to hop on a phone call if you would like after you have had a chance to review. I appreciate your help and please reach out if you have any questions. Thanks, Kyle Sanderson, PE Sopris Engineering 502 Main Street, Suite A-3 Carbondale, CO 81623 Email: ksanderson@sopriseng.com Cell: (970) 379-2131 Office: (970) 704-0311 x44 From: "Kyle Sanderson" <ksanderson@sopriseng.com> To: "Kandis Aggen, CDOT" <kandis.aggen@state.co.us> Canyon Creek Colorado River gl fk p=m^k bi =MTOR gl f k p = m ^ k b i = N N P R gl fk p=m^k bi =NNQM gl f k p = m ^ k b i = N N M V qK=R=pK qK=S=pK qK=R=pK qK=S=pK o K = V M = t K o K = V N = t K CA N O N C R E E K R D 6 BRU C E R D SLAUGHTER H O U S E R D 6 70 DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD 70 RIV E R B E N D D R COLOR A D O R I V E R R D Colorado River ZONE A ZONE A ZONE A ZONE A Garfield CountyUnincorporated Areas080205 Garfield CountyUnincorporated Areas080205 Garfield CountyUnincorporated Areas080205 Garfield CountyUnincorporated Areas080205 OVMMMMã =b OUVMMMã =b OUTMMMã =b OUSMMMã =b OUUMMMã =b QPUPMMMã =k QPUQMMMã =k QPURMMMã =k QPUSMMMã =k QPUTMMMã =k QPUUMMMã =k QPUVMMMã =k OQRMMMM=cq OQQMMMM=cq OQQRMMM=cq NSQMMMM=cq NSQRMMM=cq NSRMMMM=cq NSRRMMM=cq N R QS V NO OR PSPPPQ OU NQ ON NR NP PR NN OT NS NM OO OQ OS OP ==========PVŸ=PPD=QRDD NMTŸ=OSD=NRDD== PVŸ=PPD=QRDD ==========NMTŸ=PMD=MMDD== NMTŸ=OSD=NRDD== ==========PVŸ=PTD=PMDD ==========NMTŸ=PMD=MMDD== PVŸ=PTD=PMDD i fj fq=l c=pqr av ` l j j r k fqv k r j _bo m^k bi pr ccfu ` l k q^ fk pW Epbb=j ^m=fk abu=cl o=cfoj =m^k bi =i ^vl r qF Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FIRM k çíáÅÉ=íç=r ëÉêW==qÜÉ==Map Number==ëÜçï å==ÄÉäçï ëÜçì äÇ==ÄÉ==ì ëÉÇ===ï ÜÉå==éä~ÅáåÖ==ã ~é==çêÇÉêëX==íÜÉCommunity Number ===ëÜçï å==~Äçî É==ëÜçì äÇ==ÄÉ ì ëÉÇ==çå==áåëì ê~åÅÉ===~ééäáÅ~íáçåë==Ñçê==íÜÉ==ëì ÄàÉÅí= Åçã ã ì åáíóK EFFECTIVE DATE j ^ m=obml pfql ofbp oÉÑÉê=íç=j ~é=o ÉéçëáíçêáÉë=äáëí=çå=j ~é=fåÇÉñ bccb` qfsb=a^qb=l c=` l r k qvt fab ci l l a=fk pr o^ k ` b=o^qb=j ^m bccb` qfsb=a^qbEpF=l c=obsfpfl k EpF=ql =qefp=m^ k bi cçê=Åçã ã ì åáíó=ã ~é=êÉî áëáçå=Üáëíçêó=éêáçê=íç=Åçì åíóï áÇÉ=ã ~ééáåÖI=êÉÑÉê=íç=íÜÉ=` çã ã ì åáíó j ~é=eáëíçêó=í~ÄäÉ=äçÅ~íÉÇ=áå=íÜÉ=cäççÇ=fåëì ê~åÅÉ=píì Çó=êÉéçêí=Ñçê=íÜáë=àì êáëÇáÅíáçåK qç=ÇÉíÉêã áåÉ=áÑ=ÑäççÇ=áåëì ê~åÅÉ=áë=~î ~áä~ÄäÉ=áå=íÜáë=Åçã ã ì åáíóI=Åçåí~Åí=óçì ê=áåëì ê~åÅÉ=~ÖÉåí çê=Å~ää=íÜÉ=k ~íáçå~ä=cäççÇ=fåëì ê~åÅÉ=mêçÖê~ã =~í=NJUMMJSPUJSSOMK MAP NUMBER08045C1130E mobi f j f k ^ o v GARFIELD COUNTY,COLORADOAND INCORPORATED AREAS d ^ ocfbi a=` l r k qv MUMOMR NNPM b NFIP NA T I O N A L F L O O D I N S U R A N C E P R O G R A M PANEL 1130E PANEL 1130 OF 2075 500 20000FEET 300 6000METERS MAP SCALE 1" = 1000' 1000 300 NOTES TO USERS qÜáë=ã ~é=áë=Ñçê=ì ëÉ=áå=~Çã áåáëíÉêáåÖ=íÜÉ=k ~íáçå~ä=cäççÇ=fåëì ê~åÅÉ=mêçÖê~ã K=fí=ÇçÉë åçí=åÉÅÉëë~êáäó=áÇÉåíáÑó=~ää=~êÉ~ë=ëì ÄàÉÅí=íç=ÑäççÇáåÖI=é~êíáÅì ä~êäó=Ñêçã =äçÅ~ä=Çê~áå~ÖÉ ëçì êÅÉë=çÑ=ëã ~ää=ëáòÉK==qÜÉ=community map repository=ëÜçì äÇ=ÄÉ=Åçåëì äíÉÇ=Ñçê éçëëáÄäÉ=ì éÇ~íÉÇ=çê=~ÇÇáíáçå~ä=ÑäççÇ=Ü~ò~êÇ=áåÑçêã ~íáçåK qç=çÄí~áå=ã çêÉ=ÇÉí~áäÉÇ=áåÑçêã ~íáçå=áå=~êÉ~ë=ï ÜÉêÉ=Base Flood Elevations=E_cbëF ~åÇLçê=floodways=Ü~îÉ=ÄÉÉå=ÇÉíÉêã áåÉÇI=ì ëÉêë=~êÉ=ÉåÅçì ê~ÖÉÇ=íç=Åçåëì äí=íÜÉ=cäççÇ mêçÑáäÉë=~åÇ=cäççÇï ~ó=a~í~=~åÇLçê=pì ã ã ~êó=çÑ=píáääï ~íÉê=bäÉî ~íáçåë=í~ÄäÉë=Åçåí~áåÉÇ ï áíÜáå=íÜÉ=cäççÇ=fåëì ê~åÅÉ=píì Çó=EcfpF=oÉéçêí=íÜ~í=~ÅÅçã é~åáÉë=íÜáë=cfoj K==r ëÉêë ëÜçì äÇ=ÄÉ=~ï ~êÉ=íÜ~í=_cbë=ëÜçï å=çå=íÜÉ=cfoj =êÉéêÉëÉåí=êçì åÇÉÇ=ï ÜçäÉJÑççí ÉäÉî ~íáçåëK==qÜÉëÉ=_cbë=~êÉ=áåíÉåÇÉÇ=Ñçê=ÑäççÇ=áåëì ê~åÅÉ=ê~íáåÖ=éì êéçëÉë=çåäó=~åÇ ëÜçì äÇ=åçí=ÄÉ=ì ëÉÇ=~ë=íÜÉ=ëçäÉ=ëçì êÅÉ=çÑ=ÑäççÇ=ÉäÉî ~íáçå=áåÑçêã ~íáçåK==^ÅÅçêÇáåÖäóI ÑäççÇ=ÉäÉî ~íáçå=Ç~í~=éêÉëÉåíÉÇ=áå=íÜÉ=cfp=oÉéçêí=ëÜçì äÇ=ÄÉ=ì íáäáòÉÇ=áå=Åçåàì åÅíáçå=ï áíÜ íÜÉ=cfoj =Ñçê=éì êéçëÉë=çÑ=Åçåëíêì Åíáçå=~åÇLçê=ÑäççÇéä~áå=ã ~å~ÖÉã ÉåíK Coastal Base Flood Elevations=ëÜçï å=çå=íÜáë=ã ~é=~ééäó=çåäó=ä~åÇï ~êÇ=çÑ=MKM’ k çêíÜ=^ã ÉêáÅ~å=sÉêíáÅ~ä=a~íì ã =çÑ=NVUU=Ek ^sa=UUFK==r ëÉêë=çÑ=íÜáë=cfoj =ëÜçì äÇ=ÄÉ ~ï ~êÉ=íÜ~í=Åç~ëí~ä=ÑäççÇ=ÉäÉî~íáçåë=~êÉ=~äëç=éêçî áÇÉÇ=áå=íÜÉ=pì ã ã ~êó=çÑ=píáääï ~íÉê bäÉî ~íáçåë=í~ÄäÉ=áå=íÜÉ=cäççÇ=fåëì ê~åÅÉ=píì Çó=oÉéçêí=Ñçê=íÜáë=àì êáëÇáÅíáçåK==bäÉî ~íáçåë ëÜçï å=áå=íÜÉ=pì ã ã ~êó=çÑ=píáääï ~íÉê=bäÉî ~íáçåë=í~ÄäÉ=ëÜçì äÇ=ÄÉ=ì ëÉÇ=Ñçê=Åçåëíêì Åíáçå ~åÇLçê=ÑäççÇéä~áå=ã ~å~ÖÉã Éåí=éì êéçëÉë=ï ÜÉå=íÜÉó=~êÉ=ÜáÖÜÉê=íÜ~å=íÜÉ=ÉäÉî ~íáçåë ëÜçï å=çå=íÜáë=cfoj K _çì åÇ~êáÉë=çÑ=íÜÉ=floodways=ï ÉêÉ=Åçã éì íÉÇ=~í=Åêçëë=ëÉÅíáçåë=~åÇ=áåíÉêéçä~íÉÇ ÄÉíï ÉÉå=Åêçëë=ëÉÅíáçåëK==qÜÉ=ÑäççÇï ~óë=ï ÉêÉ=Ä~ëÉÇ=çå=ÜóÇê~ì äáÅ=ÅçåëáÇÉê~íáçåë=ï áíÜ êÉÖ~êÇ=íç=êÉèì áêÉã Éåíë=çÑ=íÜÉ=k ~íáçå~ä=cäççÇ=fåëì ê~åÅÉ=mêçÖê~ã K==cäççÇï ~ó=ï áÇíÜë ~åÇ=çíÜÉê=éÉêíáåÉåí=ÑäççÇï ~ó=Ç~í~=~êÉ=éêçî áÇÉÇ=áå=íÜÉ=cäççÇ=fåëì ê~åÅÉ=píì Çó=oÉéçêí Ñçê=íÜáë=àì êáëÇáÅíáçåK ` Éêí~áå=~êÉ~ë=åçí=áå=péÉÅá~ä=cäççÇ=e~ò~êÇ=^êÉ~ë=ã ~ó=ÄÉ=éêçíÉÅíÉÇ=Äó=flood controlstructuresK==oÉÑÉê=íç=pÉÅíáçå=OKQ=?cäççÇ=mêçíÉÅíáçå=j É~ëì êÉë?=çÑ=íÜÉ=cäççÇ=fåëì ê~åÅÉ píì Çó=oÉéçêí=Ñçê=áåÑçêã ~íáçå=çå=ÑäççÇ=Åçåíêçä=ëíêì Åíì êÉë=Ñçê=íÜáë=àì êáëÇáÅíáçåK qÜÉ=projection=ì ëÉÇ=áå=íÜÉ=éêÉé~ê~íáçå=çÑ=íÜáë=ã ~é=ï ~ë=r åáî Éêë~ä=qê~åëî ÉêëÉ j ÉêÅ~íçê=Er qj F=òçåÉ=NPK==qÜÉ=horizontal datum=ï ~ë=k ^a=UPI=d op=NVUM ëéÜÉêçáÇK==aáÑÑÉêÉåÅÉë=áå=Ç~íì ã I=ëéÜÉêçáÇI=éêçàÉÅíáçå=çê=r qj =òçåÉë=ì ëÉÇ=áå=íÜÉ éêçÇì Åíáçå=çÑ=cfoj ë=Ñçê=~Çà~ÅÉåí=àì êáëÇáÅíáçåë=ã ~ó=êÉëì äí=áå=ëäáÖÜí=éçëáíáçå~ä ÇáÑÑÉêÉåÅÉë=áå=ã ~é=ÑÉ~íì êÉë=~Åêçëë=àì êáëÇáÅíáçå=Äçì åÇ~êáÉëK==qÜÉëÉ=ÇáÑÑÉêÉåÅÉë=Çç=åçí ~ÑÑÉÅí=íÜÉ=~ÅÅì ê~Åó=çÑ=íÜáë=cfoj K cäççÇ=ÉäÉî~íáçåë=çå=íÜáë=ã ~é=~êÉ=êÉÑÉêÉåÅÉÇ=íç=íÜÉ=k çêíÜ=^ã ÉêáÅ~å=sÉêíáÅ~ä=a~íì ã =çÑ NVUUK==qÜÉëÉ=ÑäççÇ=ÉäÉî ~íáçåë=ã ì ëí=ÄÉ=Åçã é~êÉÇ=íç=ëíêì Åíì êÉ=~åÇ=Öêçì åÇ=ÉäÉî ~íáçåë êÉÑÉêÉåÅÉÇ=íç=íÜÉ=ë~ã É=vertical datumK==cçê=áåÑçêã ~íáçå=êÉÖ~êÇáåÖ=Åçåî Éêëáçå ÄÉíï ÉÉå=íÜÉ=k ~íáçå~ä=d ÉçÇÉíáÅ=sÉêíáÅ~ä=a~íì ã =çÑ=NVOV=~åÇ=íÜÉ=k çêíÜ=^ã ÉêáÅ~å sÉêíáÅ~ä= a~íì ã = çÑ= NVUUI= î áëáí= íÜÉ= k ~íáçå~ä= d ÉçÇÉíáÅ= pì êî Éó= ï ÉÄëáíÉ= ~í ÜííéWLLï ï ï KåÖëKåç~~KÖçî =çê=Åçåí~Åí=íÜÉ=k ~íáçå~ä=d ÉçÇÉíáÅ=pì êî Éó=~í=íÜÉ=Ñçääçï áåÖ ~ÇÇêÉëëW k d p=fåÑçêã ~íáçå=pÉêî áÅÉë k l ^^I=k Lk d pNO k ~íáçå~ä=d ÉçÇÉíáÅ=pì êî Éó ppj ` JPI=@VOMO NPNR=b~ëíJt Éëí=eáÖÜï ~ó páäî Éê=péêáåÖI=j ~êóä~åÇ=OMVNMJPOUO EPMNF=TNPJPOQO qç=çÄí~áå=Åì êêÉåí=ÉäÉî ~íáçåI=ÇÉëÅêáéíáçåI=~åÇLçê=äçÅ~íáçå=áåÑçêã ~íáçå=Ñçê=bench marks ëÜçï å=çå=íÜáë=ã ~éI=éäÉ~ëÉ=Åçåí~Åí=íÜÉ=fåÑçêã ~íáçå=pÉêî áÅÉë=_ê~åÅÜ=çÑ=íÜÉ=k ~íáçå~ä d ÉçÇÉíáÅ=pì êî Éó=~í=(301) 713- 3242I=çê=î áëáí=áíë=ï ÉÄëáíÉ=~í=ÜííéWLLï ï ï KåÖëKåç~~KÖçî K Base map==áåÑçêã ~íáçå==ëÜçï å==çå==íÜáë==cfoj ==ï ~ë=ÇÉêáîÉÇ==Ñêçã =k ^fm=l êíÜçéÜçíçÖê~éÜó éêçÇì ÅÉÇ=ï áíÜ=~=çåÉ=ã ÉíÉê=Öêçì åÇ=êÉëçäì íáçå=Ñêçã =éÜçíçÖê~éÜó==Ç~íÉÇ=OMMVK qÜáë=ã ~é=êÉÑäÉÅíë=ã çêÉ=ÇÉí~áäÉÇ==~åÇ==ì éJíçJÇ~íÉ==stream channel configurations íÜ~å==íÜçëÉ=ëÜçï å==çå=íÜÉ=éêÉî áçì ë==cfoj =Ñçê=íÜáë==àì êáëÇáÅíáçåK==qÜÉ==ÑäççÇéä~áåë=~åÇ ÑäççÇï ~óë==íÜ~í=ï ÉêÉ==íê~åëÑÉêêÉÇ=Ñêçã ==íÜÉ==éêÉî áçì ë=cfoj =ã ~ó=Ü~î É=ÄÉÉå=~Çàì ëíÉÇ íç=ÅçåÑçêã ==íç==íÜÉëÉ===åÉï ==ëíêÉ~ã ===ÅÜ~ååÉä===ÅçåÑáÖì ê~íáçåëK==^ë==~==êÉëì äíI=íÜÉ cäççÇ===mêçÑáäÉë=~åÇ==cäççÇï ~ó===a~í~==í~ÄäÉë==Ñçê==ã ì äíáéäÉ=ëíêÉ~ã ë=áå==íÜÉ=cäççÇ fåëì ê~åÅÉ=píì Çó=oÉéçêí=Eï ÜáÅÜ==Åçåí~áåë==~ì íÜçêáí~íáî É==ÜóÇê~ì äáÅ==Ç~í~F=ã ~ó==êÉÑäÉÅí ëíêÉ~ã =ÅÜ~ååÉä=Çáëí~åÅÉë=íÜ~í=ÇáÑÑÉê=Ñêçã =ï Ü~í=áë=ëÜçï å=çå=íÜáë=ã ~éK Corporate limits=ëÜçï å=çå=íÜáë=ã ~é=~êÉ=Ä~ëÉÇ=çå=íÜÉ=ÄÉëí=Ç~í~=~î~áä~ÄäÉ=~í=íÜÉ=íáã É çÑ=éì ÄäáÅ~íáçåK==_ÉÅ~ì ëÉ=ÅÜ~åÖÉë=Çì É=íç=~ååÉñ~íáçåë=çê=ÇÉJ~ååÉñ~íáçåë=ã ~ó=Ü~î É çÅÅì êêÉÇ=~ÑíÉê=íÜáë=ã ~é=ï ~ë=éì ÄäáëÜÉÇI=ã ~é=ì ëÉêë=ëÜçì äÇ=Åçåí~Åí=~ééêçéêá~íÉ Åçã ã ì åáíó=çÑÑáÅá~äë=íç=î ÉêáÑó=Åì êêÉåí=Åçêéçê~íÉ=äáã áí=äçÅ~íáçåëK mäÉ~ëÉ=êÉÑÉê=íç=íÜÉ=ëÉé~ê~íÉäó=éêáåíÉÇ=Map Index=Ñçê=~å=çîÉêî áÉï =ã ~é=çÑ=íÜÉ Åçì åíó=ëÜçï áåÖ=íÜÉ=ä~óçì í=çÑ=ã ~é=é~åÉäëX=Åçã ã ì åáíó=ã ~é=êÉéçëáíçêó=~ÇÇêÉëëÉëX ~åÇ=~=i áëíáåÖ=çÑ=` çã ã ì åáíáÉë=í~ÄäÉ=Åçåí~áåáåÖ=k ~íáçå~ä=cäççÇ=fåëì ê~åÅÉ=mêçÖê~ã Ç~íÉë=Ñçê=É~ÅÜ=Åçã ã ì åáíó=~ë=ï Éää=~ë=~=äáëíáåÖ=çÑ=íÜÉ=é~åÉäë=çå=ï ÜáÅÜ=É~ÅÜ=Åçã ã ì åáíó áë=äçÅ~íÉÇK cçê=áåÑçêã ~íáçå=çå=~î ~áä~ÄäÉ=éêçÇì Åíë=~ëëçÅá~íÉÇ=ï áíÜ=íÜáë=cfoj =î áëáí=íÜÉ=MapService Center (MSC)=ï ÉÄëáíÉ=~í=ÜííéWLLã ëÅKÑÉã ~KÖçîK=^î ~áä~ÄäÉ=éêçÇì Åíë=ã ~ó áåÅäì ÇÉ=éêÉî áçì ëäó=áëëì ÉÇ=i ÉííÉêë=çÑ=j ~é=` Ü~åÖÉI=~=cäççÇ=fåëì ê~åÅÉ=píì Çó=oÉéçêíI ~åÇLçê=ÇáÖáí~ä=îÉêëáçåë=çÑ=íÜáë=ã ~éK=j ~åó=çÑ=íÜÉëÉ=éêçÇì Åíë=Å~å=ÄÉ=çêÇÉêÉÇ=çê çÄí~áåÉÇ=ÇáêÉÅíäó=Ñêçã =íÜÉ=j p` =ï ÉÄëáíÉK fÑ=óçì =Ü~îÉ=questions about this map,=Üçï =íç=çêÇÉê=éêçÇì ÅíëI=çê=íÜÉ=k ~íáçå~ä cäççÇ=fåëì ê~åÅÉ=mêçÖê~ã =áå=ÖÉåÉê~äI=éäÉ~ëÉ=Å~ää=íÜÉ=FEMA Map InformationeXchange (FMIX)=~í=1-877-FEMA-MAP=ENJUTTJPPSJOSOTF=çê=î áëáí=íÜÉ=cbj ^ ï ÉÄëáíÉ=~í=ÜííéWLLï ï ï KÑÉã ~KÖçî LÄì ëáåÉëëLåÑáéK ====================================k l qf` b=ql =j ^ m=r pbop ==================cbj ^=ã ~áåí~áåë=áåÑçêã ~íáçå=~Äçì í=ã ~é=ÑÉ~íì êÉëI=ëì ÅÜ ==================~ë=ëíêÉÉí=äçÅ~íáçåë=~åÇ=å~ã ÉëI=áå=çê=åÉ~ê=ÇÉëáÖå~íÉÇ ==================ÑäççÇ=Ü~ò~êÇ=~êÉ~ëK==oÉèì Éëíë=íç=êÉî áëÉ=áåÑçêã ~íáçå=áå=çê ==================åÉ~ê=ÇÉëáÖå~íÉÇ=ÑäççÇ=Ü~ò~êÇ=~êÉ~ë=ã ~ó=ÄÉ=éêçî áÇÉÇ=íç ==================cbj ^=Çì êáåÖ=íÜÉ=Åçã ã ì åáíó=êÉî áÉï =éÉêáçÇI=~í=íÜÉ=Ñáå~ä ==================` çåëì äí~íáçå=` ççêÇáå~íáçå=l ÑÑáÅÉêDë=ã ÉÉíáåÖI=çê=Çì êáåÖ ==================íÜÉ=ëí~íì íçêó=VMJÇ~ó=~ééÉ~ä=éÉêáçÇK==^ ééêçî ÉÇ=êÉèì Éëíë ==================Ñçê=ÅÜ~åÖÉë=ï áää=ÄÉ=ëÜçï å=çå=íÜÉ=Ñáå~ä=éêáåíÉÇ=cfoj K Zone D boundary Floodway boundary 1% Annual Chance Floodplain Boundary 0.2% Annual Chance Floodplain Boundary *Referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAs) SUBJECT TOINUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD ZONE A ZONE AE ZONE AH ZONE AO ZONE AR ZONE A99 ZONE V ZONE VE ZONE X FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE OTHER FLOOD AREAS OTHER AREAS ZONE X ZONE D The 1% annual chance flood (100-year flood), also known as the base flood, is the flood that hasa 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The Special Flood Hazard Area isthe area subject to flooding by the 1% annual chance flood. Areas of Special Flood Hazardinclude Zones A, AE, AH, AO, AR, A99, V, and VE. The Base Flood Elevation is the water-surfaceelevation of the 1% annual chance flood. No Base Flood Elevations determined. Base Flood Elevations determined. Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); Base Flood Elevationsdetermined. Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); averagedepths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities also determined. Special Flood Hazard Areas formerly protected from the 1% annual chanceflood by a flood control system that was subsequently decertified. ZoneAR indicates that the former flood control system is being restored to provideprotection from the 1% annual chance or greater flood.Area to be protected from 1% annual chance flood by a Federal floodprotection system under construction; no Base Flood Elevations determined. Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); no Base Flood Elevationsdetermined. Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); Base Flood Elevationsdetermined. The floodway is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free ofencroachment so that the 1% annual chance flood can be carried without substantial increases inflood heights. Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood withaverage depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 squaremile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood. Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined, but possible. CBRS areas and OPAs are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas. CBRS and OPA boundary Boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Area Zones and boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Areas of different Base Flood Elevations, flood depths, or flood velocities. Base Flood Elevation value where uniform within zone; elevation infeet* Cross section line Transect line Geographic coordinates referenced to the North American Datum of1983 (NAD 83) Western Hemisphere 1000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid values, zone 13QVUVMMMã=k 5000-foot ticks: Colorado State Plane Central Zone (FIPS Zone 0502), Lambert Conformal Conic projectionPNMMMMM=cq Bench mark (see explanation in Notes to Users section of this FIRMpanel) River Mile Base Flood Elevation line and value; elevation in feet* COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) AREAS OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAs) 513 Ebi =VUTF QRœ=MO’=MUᴠI==VPœ=MO’=NOᴠ auRRNM j NKR A A 23 23 TO NEW CASTLE TO GLENWOOD SPRINGS SUBJECT PROPERTY CANYON CREEK PARTNERS LLC, LOT 2 GABOSSI EXEMPTION INTE R S T A T E 7 0 COLORADO R I V E R NEW CREATIONCHURCH US HIGHWAY 6 EXISTING SHOP BUILDING EXISTINGSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE PROPOSED LOT 2 ±2.13 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 7±6.81 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3 ±2.01 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5±2.43 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 1±17.09 ACRES EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAYS US HI G H W A Y 6 COUNTY R O A D 1 3 8 DATE REVISION C-1.0 DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 1 - C O V E R . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 5 0 a m NO R T H COVER SHEET MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R 32000.01JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m GENERAL SITE NOTES: 1.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL HAVE A SET OF APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE BASED ON SURVEYS PERFORMED BY BOOKCLIFF SURVEY SERVICES, INC. THE UTILITIES, AS SHOWN, MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN LOCATES OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE AND POTHOLE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES TO VERIFY DEPTH PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 4. EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE AT 2.0 FT INTERVALS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATIONS AND PROTECTION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THESE UTILITIES EITHER UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN CONTINUOUS SERVICE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO, OR INTERRUPTION OF SERVICES CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING EXISTING CONDITIONS OUTSIDE THE DESIGNATED IMPROVEMENT AREA FROM DAMAGE. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING AREAS OUTSIDE THE DESIGNATED IMPROVEMENT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL, AT A MINIMUM, BE RESTORED TO A STATE EQUAL TO ITS PRE-CONSTRUCTION STATE. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THE WORK ACCORDING TO ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENT, COUNTY, STATE, AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS. IN PARTICULAR, THE "TRENCHING" AND "OPEN EXCAVATION" OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CURRENT O.S.H.A. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL PUBLIC OR PRIVATE UTILITY OWNERS FORTY-EIGHT HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK ADJACENT TO THE UTILITY. 9. ALL GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS TO BE ADHERED TO. EARTHWORK, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: 1. EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE AT 2.0 FT INTERVALS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN SEDIMENT AND EROSION PROTECTION THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION OPERATION. 3. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION DISTURBANCE ZONE SHALL BE REVEGETATED PER LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER GRADING IS COMPLETE. SEEDING TO BE APPLIED BY HYDROMULCH TECHNIQUES BY A QUALIFIED CONTRACTOR AND/OR OTHER TECHNIQUES PURSUANT TO RECOMMENDATION BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OTHER CONSULTANTS. 4. SILT FENCE ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF ANY DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. 5. TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL ON SITE FOR USE ON AREAS TO BE REVEGETATED. ANY AND ALL STOCKPILES SHALL BE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND PROTECTED FROM EROSIVE ELEMENTS. 6. VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL DEVICES (MUD RACKS) SHALL BE PROVIDED AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF THESE DEVICES, AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY TRACKING OF SEDIMENT ONTO THE ROADWAYS. ROADWAYS ARE TO BE KEPT CLEAN THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAIN CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO THE SITE BOUNDARIES AND SPECIFIED RIGHT OF WAY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE OUTSIDE THIS AREA WITHOUT THE PRIOR EXPRESSED CONSENT OF THE OWNERS. 8. DUST CAUSED BY EXCAVATION, TOPSOIL REMOVAL OPERATIONS, OR ROAD BASE PLACEMENT SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE. THE ENGINEER OR TOWN MAY REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR AT ANY TIME TO DISCONTINUE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL DUST EMISSIONS ARE MITIGATED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH AND APPLY A DUST PALLIATIVE ON THE SITE AS DIRECTED BY THE COUNTY. DUST PALLIATIVE MAY CONSIST OF WATER OR A NON-POLLUTING SOLUTION. SPREADING OF WATER OR WATER MIXTURE SHALL BE DONE WITH ACCEPTABLE SPRINKLING EQUIPMENT. ALL DUST CONTROL SHALL EXTEND BEYOND THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PROPER TO THE SIDE STREETS ENTERING AND EXISTING THE PROJECT, WHERE MUD AND DIRT FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, AS WELL AS LOCAL TRAFFIC, MAY GET ONTO THE SIDE STREETS. CLEANUP OF THESE AREAS WILL BE REQUIRED AS NECESSARY OR AS DIRECTED BY THE TOWN. 10. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE "BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES" TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION. NO SEDIMENT SHALL LEAVE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 11. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, INSPECTION, REPAIR AND REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROLS. 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WITH UNSTABILIZED DISTURBANCE AREAS OVER 1 ACRE, SUBJECT TO EROSION, REQUIRE A CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT FROM THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT (CDPHE), WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION (WQCD). 2. THE PERMIT APPLICANT(S) IS THE OWNER AND THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE(S). THE CERTIFICATION UNDER THE PERMIT REQUIRES THAT SPECIFIC ACTIONS BE PERFORMED AT DESIGNATED TIMES. THE OWNER AND/OR THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE(S) ARE LEGALLY OBLIGATED TO COMPLY WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATION. 3. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS (SWMPs) ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL PROJECTS REQUIRING A CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND UPDATED ON SITE. THE PERMIT HOLDER MUST IMPLEMENT, MAINTAIN AND INSPECT STORMWATER AND EROSION CONTROLS DELINEATED ON THE SWMPs UNTIL THE SITE IS PERMANENTLY STABILIZED AND THE PERMIT IS INACTIVATED. THE PERMIT COVERS ALL WORK ON THE PROJECT INCLUDING WORK PERFORMED BY SUB-CONTRACTORS AND OTHER ENTITIES. IT IS RECOMMENDED BY THE WQCD THAT A SWMP ADMINISTRATOR BE DESIGNATED FOR THE PROJECT. THE SWMP MUST BE KEPT ON SITE FOR USE BY THE ADMINISTRATOR AND REVIEW BY WQCD PERSONEL OR CITY. 4. THE SWMP SHALL BE PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES, HYDROLOGIC AND POLLUTION CONTROL PRACTICES. THE SWMP NEED NOT BE PREPARED BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER. THE OBJECTIVE OF THE PLAN SHALL BE TO IDENTIFY BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) WHICH WHEN IMPLEMENTED WILL MEET THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. THE SWMP SHOULD BE AMENDED AS NEEDED TO REFLECT THE CHANGES/IMPROVEMENTS MADE. 5. THE PERMIT REQUIRES THAT INSPECTION OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BE PERFORMED AT LEAST EVERY 14 DAYS AND AFTER ANY PRECIPITATION OR SNOWMELT EVENT OCCURS. INSPECTION REPORTS MUST BE MAINTAINED ON SITE AND MADE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY WQCD PERSONEL ALL REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE COMPLETED AND MADE IN A TIMELY MANNER, NO LESS THAN 7 DAYS AFTER ANY PRECIPITATION/RUNOFF EVENT. ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ANY SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE OR AT ANY TIME THAT THE SEDIMENT OR DEBRIS ADVERSELY IMPACTS THE FUNCTIONING OF THE SEDIMENT-TRAPPING DEVICE. 6. THE OBJECTIVE OF THE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO MINIMIZING THE AMOUNT OF DISTURBED SOIL, PREVENTING RUNOFF FROM OFF-SITE OR UNDISTURBED AREAS FROM FLOWING ACROSS DISTURBED AREAS, SLOWING DOWN THE RUNOFF FLOWING ACROSS THE CONSTRUCTION SITES AND REMOVING/CONTROLLING POTENTIAL SEDIMENT IN RUNOFF FROM ON-SITE DISTURBED AREAS TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION OF SENSITIVE UNDISTURBED AREAS. 7. A COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE KEPT ON SITE, FOR READY AVAILABILITY TO THE OPERATOR, AND SO THAT DIVISION OR EPA PERSONNEL CAN REVIEW IT DURING AN INSPECTION. IF AN OFFICE LOCATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE SITE, THE SWMP MUST BE MANAGED SO THAT IT IS AVAILABLE AT THE SITE WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE OCCURRING (e.g., BY KEEPING THE SWMP IN A SUPERINTENDENT'S VEHICLE.) STORM WATER MANAGEMENT NOTES: OE x PROPOSED LEGEND PROPOSED EDGE OF GRAVEL EXISTING LEGEND EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EXISTING EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE EXISTING TWO-TRACK PATH EXISTING IRRIGATION DITCH EXISTING FENCELINE SHEET INDEX C1.0 = COVER SHEET C2.0 = MASTER EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 = SUBDIVISION EXISTING CONDITIONS C3.0 = MASTER SITE PLAN C3.1 = SUBDIVISION SITE PLAN C4.0 = SUBDIVISION UTILITY PLAN C5.0 = MASTER GRADING PLAN C5.1 = SUBDIVISION GRADING PLAN C6.0 = PLAN & PROFILE STA: 0+00 - 8+50 C6.1 = PLAN & PROFILE STA: 8+50 - 17+41 C7.0 = CONSTRUCTION DETAILS >> IRR PROPOSED DITCH FLOWLINE PROPOSED IRRIGATION LINE PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVE HOGBACK VIEW ESTATESPROPOSED SUBDIVISIONGARFIELD COUNTY SEC 35, T5S, R90W, 6TH P.M. VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 2000' MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE UE PROPOSED GRAVEL SHOULDER EXISTING PRIMITIVE/TWO-TRACK DRIVE SCALE: 1'' = 150' 11-13-25 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE PROPOSED WELL LOCATION PROPOSED EASEMENT EXISTING ASPHALT ROADWAY EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE OE OE OE S S S OE OE OE OE OE OE CO TVG W W W W W W OE OE OE OEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE W LOT 1GABOSSI EXEMPTION RECEPTION NO. 620584 LOT 3 GABOSSI EXEMPTIONRECEPTION NO. 620584 LOT 4 GABOSSI EXEMPTIONRECEPTION NO. 620584 PARCEL AWILLIAMS TRUST EXEMPTION PLATRECEPTION NO. 386362 LOT 3 FIRST AMENDED SENOR MESA EXEMPTION PLAT RECEPTION NO. 533649 LOT 1 FIRST AMENDEDSENOR MESA EXEMPTION PLAT RECEPTION NO. 533649 US HI G H W A Y 6 US HI G H W A Y 6 CR 138 CR 138 LOT 2 GABOSSI EXEMPTION ±34.7 ACRES PROPERTYLINE IRRIGATIONDITCH DITCHACCESS ROAD TWO-TRACKPATH GRAVEL DRIVE GRAVEL DRIVE GRAVELDRIVE GRAVELDRIVE TWO-TRACKPATH IRRIGATION DITCH TWO-TRACK PATH OWTS/SEPTICTANK SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WATER STRUCTURES IRRIGATION RISER IRRIGATION INFRASTRUCTURE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE OVERHEADELECTRIC LINE DITCH ACCESS ROAD IRRIGATION DITCH SHED GREENHOUSE 20' PUBLIC SERVICE CO. EASEMENT 30' INGRESS, EGRESS, & UTILITY EASEMENT WELL WELL TWO-TRACKPATH SHOPBUILDING PROPERTYLINE TWO-TRACK PATH DITCH DITCH CULVERT CULVERT OWTS/SEPTIC TANK 20' PUBLIC SERVICE CO. EASEMENT CL 57 2 0 57 2 2 57 2 4 57 2 6 57 2 8 5 7 3 0 5 7 3 2 5 7 3 4 5 7 3 6 5 7 3 8 5 7 4 0 57 4 2 5 7 4 6 5902 5890 5880 5870 5860 5850 5830 5840 582 0 580 0 5810 59 0 0 58 5 0 58 0 0 5 7 5 0 5 7 0 0 57 2 0 57 0 0 56 8 056 6 0 571 8 5708 5698 5688 APPROXIMATE ALIGNMENT OF 30" CMP,IRRIGATION DITCH ±4" PVCIRRIGATIONPIPE APPROXIMATEIRRIGATION DIVERSION 5650 5660 5624 NEIGHBOR DRIVE ENCROACHMENT DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 2 - E X C O N D . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 4 7 a m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 0120 120 240 120 48060 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m C-2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O NOTE: SLOPES OVER 20% ARE SHOWN WITH LIGHT GRAY HATCH 11-13-25 x OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE S OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE W W W 20' PUBLIC SERVICE CO. EASEMENT LOT 1 GABOSSI EXEMPTION RECEPTION NO. 620584 LOT 2 GABOSSI EXEMPTION ±34.7 ACRES IRRIGATION RISER IRRIGATIONRISER IRRIGATIONINFRASTRUCTURE SHOPBUILDING WELL SHED OWTS/SEPTICTANK OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE TWO-TRACKPATH TWO-TRACKPATH IRRIGATION DITCH IRRIGATIONDITCH TWO-TRACK PATH PROPERTYLINE OVERHEAD ELECTRICLINE GRAVELDRIVE GRAVELDRIVE GRAVEL TURNAROUND 57 2 0 57 2 2 57 2 4 57 2 6 57 2 8 5 7 3 0 5 7 3 2 5 7 3 4 5 7 3 6 5 7 3 8 5 7 4 0 57 4 2 5 7 4 6 5860 5850 5830 5840 5820 580 0 5810 57 2 0 57 0 0 56 8 0 56 6 0 571 8 5708 5698 5688 DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 2 - E X C O N D . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 4 7 a m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 040 40 80 40 16020 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-2.1 SUBDIVISION EXISTING CONDITIONS 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O NOTE: SLOPES OVER 20% ARE SHOWN WITH LIGHT GRAY HATCH 11-13-25 PROPOSED LOT 2 ±2.13 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3 ±2.01 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5 ±2.43 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 7 ±6.81 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 1 ±17.09 ACRES EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE TO SINGLEFAMILY RESIDENCE US HI G H W A Y 6 CR 138 PROPOSED ROADIMPROVEMENTS TO LOT LINE PROPOSED ROADIMPROVEMENTS TO LOT LINE PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTSTO LOT LINE EXISTING SINGLEFAMILY RESIDENCE EXISTING SHOP BUILDING EXISTING GRAVELDRIVE TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 30' INGRESS, EGRESS, & UTILITYEASEMENT LOT 4 GABOSSI EXEMPTION LOT 3 GABOSSI EXEMPTION PROPERTY LINE 20' PUBLIC SERVICE CO. EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 3 - S I T E P L A N . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 4 8 a m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 0120 120 240 120 48060 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-3.0 MASTER SITE PLAN 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O 11-13-25 S W W W PROPOSED 16' ACCESS DRIVE PROPOSED LOT 2 ±2.13 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3 ±2.01 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5 ±2.43 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES PROPOSED 40.0' ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSEDLOT LINE PROPERTYLINE PROPERTYLINE PROPOSED LOT LINE PROPOSED 40.0' ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED LOT 7 ±6.81 ACRES ±17.09 ACRES PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD R20.0' R20.0' R60.0' R40.0' R48.0' R20.0' 12' ACCESSDRIVE 12' ACCESSDRIVE PROPOSED LOT LINE PROPOSEDLOT LINE EXISTING DRIVEWAY R20.0' PROPOSED 30'ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED LOT LINE PROPOSEDLOT LINE EXISTING 20.0' PUBLIC SERVICECO. EASEMENT EXISTING GRAVELDRIVE TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPOSED 40.0' ACCESS EASEMENT EXISTING SHOP BUILDING PROPOSED SHARED UTILITY EASEMENT (WELL & IRRIGATION) FOR LOTS 2, 3, & 6 PROPOSED WELL EASEMENT FOR LOTS 4 & 5 PROPOSED SHARED 15.0' IRRIGATION & XCEL ENERGY EASEMENT 25.0' SETBACK 25.0' SETBACK PROPOSED SHARED 15.0' IRRIGATION & XCEL ENERGY EASEMENT 25.0' SETBACK 10.0' SETBACK PROPOSED 10.0' IRRIGATION EASEMENT PROPOSED 10.0'IRRIGATIONEASEMENT 10.0' SETBACK 10.0' SETBACK 10.0' SETBACK PROPOSED 20'UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED SHARED XCEL ENERGY & UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED LOT 1 ±17.09 ACRES DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 3 - S I T E P L A N . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 4 8 a m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 040 40 80 40 16020 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-3.1 SUBDIVISION SITE PLAN 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O 11-13-25 UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE IR R IR R IR R IR R IR R IR R IR R IR R IR R IR R IRR IRR IRR E E OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE S OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE W W WPROPOSED LOCATION FOR 25 GPM WELL, SERVICES TO LOTS 4 & 5 100' WELL SETBACK LINE 100' WELL SETBACK LINE PROPOSED LOCATION FOR 25 GPM WELL, SERVICES TO LOTS 2,3, & 6 EXISTING UTILITY POLE UNDERGROUND ELECTRICLINE STUB TO TRANSFORMER SERVE LOTS 2, 3, & 6, DESIGN TO BE COORDINATED AND VERIFIED WITH XCEL ENERGY PROPOSED 6" IRRIGATION LINE TO SERVE LOTS 2-5 EXISTING WELL TO SERVE LOT 7 PROPOSED LOT 2 ±2.13 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3 ±2.01 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5 ±2.43 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 7 ±6.81 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 1 ±17.09 ACRES CONTRACTOR TO POTHOLE EXISTING PIPE/DIVERSIONINFRASTRUCTURE AT IRRIGATIONDITCH DIVERSION, UTILIZEEXISTING DIVERSION FOR EXTENDING 6" IRRIGATION PIPE EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING UTILITY POLE 100' WELL SETBACK LINE EXISTING 30"IRRIGATIONDITCH PIPE PROPOSED XCEL ELECTRIC LINE TOSERVE LOTS 2-5 PROPOSED 40.0' ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED 40.0' ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED WELLEASEMENT FOR LOTS 2, 3, & 6 PROPOSED WELL EASEMENT FOR LOTS 4 & 5 PROPOSED SHARED 15.0' IRRIGATION & XCEL ENERGY EASEMENT PROPOSED SHARED 15.0' IRRIGATION & XCEL ENERGY EASEMENT PROPOSED 10.0' IRRIGATIONEASEMENT IRRIGATION SERVICE & VALVE IRRIGATION SERVICE & VALVE IRRIGATION SERVICE & VALVE IRRIGATION SERVICE & VALVE IRRIGATION SERVICE & VALVEEXISTING 20.0' PUBLIC SERVICECO. EASEMENT PROPOSED TRANSFORMER TO SERVE LOTS 2, 3, & 6, DESIGN TO BE COORDINATED ANDVERIFIED WITH XCEL ENERGY PROPOSED TRANSFORMER TO SERVE LOTS 4 & 5, DESIGNTO BE COORDINATED AND VERIFIED WITH XCEL ENERGY DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 4 - U T I L I T Y P L A N . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 5 1 a m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 040 40 80 40 16020 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-4.0 SUBDIVISION UTILITY PLAN 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O 11-13-25 ^ ^ 10 . 4 % 9.2% 10.9% 8.3 % 5.0% 571 8 57 2 0 57 2 2 5 7 2 4 57 2 6 572 8 5 7 3 0 5 7 3 2 5 7 3 4 5 7 3 6 5 7 3 8 5 7 4 0 5 7 4 2 5 7 4 4 5 7 4 6 5 7 4 9 573 0 571 3569 1567 9566 3 576 8575 3573 857225708569 5 567 6 577 4 5788 5799 5810 5824 5842 5862 5881 59 0 6 59 3 9 59 3 059 1 6 58 9 1 58 9 8 59 2 3 5 8 7 2 5 8 4 9 5 8 2 9 5 8 0 6 5 7 8 4 5 7 7 1 5 7 6 5 5 7 4 6 573 2 5730 5 7 3 4 573 7 5751 5766 5782 5791 5807 582 1 5835 5848 5854 5858 5861 5864 5867 5870 5874 5878 5882 5886 588 9 5895 5779 5795 5819 5834 5848 5859 5868 58 7 2 5877 5881 5886 5884 5890 589 5 5898 5903 5907 5913 5916 5921 5924 5928 5688 5697 5705 5712 5719 5 7 7 6 5 7 8 5 5 7 9 9 5 8 1 2 5 8 2 4 5 8 3 8 5 8 4 8 5680 5690 569 9 5 7 0 5 5718 5712 5739 5728 574 9 5 7 5 8 5 7 6 5 577 3 578 1 5 7 8 6 5 7 8 5 57 8 6 577 4 57 6 1 5755 5. 9 % 6.5 % 7.2% 9.7 % 4.7% 2 . 4 % 7.2% 12.0% 13 . 9 % PROPOSEDSEMI-PRIMITIVEDRIVEWAY 57 2 1 57 2 3 57 2 5 57 2 7 57 3 0 574 0 574 2 574 4 574 6 574 8 575 0 575 2 5754 5756 5758 576 0 EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 8.4% PROPOSEDACCESS DRIVE US HI G H W A Y 6 US HI G H W A Y 6 CR 138 CR 138 PROPOSED LOT 1±17.09 ACRES -2 . 6 : 1 -3.1:1 -1.7:1 -2.4:1-2.0:1 3.5:1 2.1:1 6.1:1 -1.5:1 2 . 9 : 1 2.4:1 PROPOSED LOT 2 ±2.13 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3 ±2.01 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5 ±2.43 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 7 ±6.81 ACRES US HI G H W A Y 6 CR 138 EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EXISTING SHOP BUILDING LOT 4 GABOSSI EXEMPTION LOT 3 GABOSSI EXEMPTION PROPERTYLINE DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 5 - G R A D I N G A N D D R A I N A G E . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 5 2 a m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 0120 120 240 120 48060 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-5.0 MASTER GRADING PLAN 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S PR O P O S E D L O T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O NOTE: SLOPES GREATER THAN 20% SHOWN IN LIGHT GRAY 11-13-25 S W W W 10 . 4 % 9.2% 10.9% 8.3 % 5.0% 571 8 57 2 0 57 2 2 5 7 2 4 57 2 6 57 2 8 5 7 3 0 5 7 3 2 5 7 3 4 5 7 3 6 5 7 3 8 5 7 4 0 5 7 4 2 5 7 4 4 5 7 4 6 5 7 4 9 573 0 571 3 569 1 567 9 566 3 573 2 5730 5 7 3 4 573 7 5751 5766 5782 5791 5807 5821 5835 5848 5854 5858 5861 5864 5867 5779 5795 5819 5834 5848 5859 5688 5697 5705 5712 5719 5 7 7 6 5 7 8 5 5 7 9 9 5 8 1 2 5 8 2 4 5 8 3 8 5 8 4 8 5718 5712 5739 5728 574 9 5 7 5 8 5 7 6 5 577 3 578 1 5 7 8 6 5 7 8 5 57 8 6 577 4 57 6 1 5755 5. 9 % 6.5% 7.2% 9.7 % 4.7% 2 . 4 % 13 . 9 % 57 2 1 57 2 3 57 2 5 57 2 7 57 3 0 574 0 574 2 574 4 574 6 574 8 575 0 575 2 5754 5756 5758 576 0 8.4% PROPOSED LOT 2 ±2.13 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3 ±2.01 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 7 ±6.81 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5 ±2.43 ACRES -2 . 6 : 1 -3.1:1 -1.7:1 -2.4:1 -2.0:1 3.5:1 2.1:1 6.1:1 2 . 9 : 1 2.4:1 PROPOSED LOT ±17.09 ACRES DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 5 - G R A D I N G A N D D R A I N A G E . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 5 2 a m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 040 40 80 40 16020 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-5.1 SUBDIVISION GRADING PLAN 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S PR O P O S E D L O T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O NOTE: SLOPES GREATER THAN 20% SHOWN IN LIGHT GRAY 11-13-25 S x x x x x x x x x x x x OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE TV x xx x x x x x x x x x x ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXISTING CULVERT, NOTIFY ENGINEER >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXISTING CULVERT, NOTIFY ENGINEER, DETERMINE IF CULVERT CAN BE RESTORED. IF NOT, CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE & REPLACE WITH MIN 12-INDIA ADS N-12 OR APPROVED EQUAL. 30.0' INGRESS, EGRESS, AND UTILITY EASEMENTRECEPTION NO. 620584 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE RIPRAP OUTLET PROTECTION 56 2 4 5622 5624 5630 56 4 0 56 5 0 56 6 0 5650 5654 5660 5666 5660 5 6 3 4 5 6 4 0 5 6 4 4 5 6 5 0 56 5 4 56 6 0 5664 5 6 7 0 566 6 5 6 6 8 5676 56 8 0 5 6 8 4 56 8 8 56 9 0 569 4 5698 5700 5704 569 0 56 8 0 5684 568 0 56 7 0 LOT 4 GABOSSI EXEMPTIONRECEPTION NO. 620584 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY ACCESS ·DESIGN CAPACITY (ADT) - 21 TO 100 ·MIN ROW WIDTH - 40-FT ·LANE WIDTH - TWO LANES - 8-FT EACH, 16-FT TOTAL ·SHOULDER WIDTH - 2-FT ·DITCH WIDTH - 4-FT ·CROSS SLOPE - 3% GRAVEL ·MIN RADIUS - 50-FT ·MAX % GRADE - 12% PROPOSED LOT 7 ±6.81 ACRES P R I V A T E D R I V E T O ST O R A G E F A C I L I T Y HI G H W A Y 6 CR 138 569 0569 0 570 0 569 6 5704 5710 57 1 0 5 7 0 0 569 0 5700 57 1 0 57 0 6 5720 5730 5738 57 4 0 -2.0:1 -2.1:1 -2.1:1 -1. 0 : 1 -3 . 0 : 1 EX CULVERT 18" HDPEINV IN: ±5621.21 EXISTING BORROW DITCH TO BE CLEANED & DUG OUT, MIN 4-FT WIDE & 1.5-FT DEEP, BEGIN EDGE OF DITCH MIN 24" FROM EX FENCE EX CULVERT 18" CMP INV OUT: ±5621.60 EX CULVERT18" CMP INV OUT: ±5621.50 CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR EXISTING 18" CMP CULVERT, NOTIFY ENGINEER, VERIFY POSITIVE DRAINAGE CONTRACTOR TO RE-GRADE LOWER ROAD SECTION (±STA: 0+00 TO STA 3+75), 16FT WIDTH AT 3% CROSS SLOPE INTO HILLSIDE, 2FT SHOULDERS AT MAX 5% CROSS SLOPE,SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE PROPOSED 12" DIA. ADS N-12 CULVERT (OR APPVD EQUAL),MIN 12" COVER, ±60-LF AT ±10% SLOPE (2% MIN SLOPE) EXISTING BORROW DITCH TO BE CLEANED & DUG OUT, MIN 4-FT WIDE & 1.5-FT DEEP 12 . 0 % 3. 0 % 8.7 % EXISTING BORROW DITCH TO BE CLEANED & DUG OUT, MIN 4-FT WIDE & 1.5-FT DEEP LOT 2 BOUNDARY 5 7 2 4 57 1 2 5720 57 3 0 57 3 6 5 7 0 8 5 7 1 2 57 1 8 57 2 2 57 2 6 5 7 3 2 5 7 3 6 574 0 5 7 4 4 5 7 4 8 5 7 5 2 0+0 0 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+0 0 4+ 5 0 5 + 0 0 5+ 5 0 6+ 0 0 6+ 5 0 7+ 0 0 7 + 5 0 8+ 0 0 8+ 5 0 EXISTING BORROW DITCH TO BE CLEANED & DUG OUT, MIN 4-FT WIDE & 1.5-FT DEEP BP: 0+00.00 CONTRACTOR TO CUT HILLSIDE AT MAX 1:1 SLOPE, ADD BOULDERS AT TOE OF SLOPE FROM STA: ±6+25 TO ±7+75 3.0% 12.0%3. 0 % 2.0: 1 CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXISTINGCULVERT, NOTIFY ENGINEER, DETERMINE IF CULVERT CAN BE RESTORED. IF NOT, CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE & REPLACE WITH MIN 12-IN DIA ADS N-12 OR APPROVED EQUAL. CL SEMI PRIMITIVE PROFILE 5620 5630 5640 5650 5660 5670 5680 5690 5700 5710 5720 5730 5740 5750 5760 PROPOSED GRADE EXISTINGGRADE MAX 3% GRADEFOR FIRST 30-FT OF DRIVEWAY (MATCH EXISTING) EXISTING GRADE MAX 12% GRADE EXISTINGGRADE PROPOSED GRADE EXISTINGGRADE PROPOSED GRADE MATCH EXISTING (±STA: 3+75) 0+00 56 2 3 . 4 56 2 4 . 0 1 56 2 3 . 6 56 2 4 . 5 1 0+50 56 2 4 . 2 56 2 5 . 0 1 56 2 6 . 1 56 2 7 . 0 1 1+00 56 2 9 . 2 56 3 0 . 0 1 56 3 2 . 4 56 3 3 . 0 1 1+50 56 3 5 . 6 56 3 6 . 0 1 56 3 9 . 0 56 3 9 . 0 1 2+00 56 4 2 . 6 56 4 2 . 0 1 56 4 5 . 8 56 4 5 . 0 1 2+50 56 4 8 . 6 56 4 8 . 0 1 56 5 1 . 5 56 5 1 . 0 1 3+00 56 5 4 . 2 56 5 4 . 0 1 56 5 7 . 1 56 5 7 . 0 1 3+50 56 6 0 . 1 56 6 0 . 0 1 56 6 3 . 0 56 6 3 . 0 1 4+00 56 6 6 . 1 56 6 6 . 0 1 56 6 8 . 9 56 6 9 . 0 1 4+50 56 7 2 . 0 56 7 2 . 0 1 56 7 5 . 1 56 7 5 . 0 1 5+00 56 7 7 . 0 56 7 7 . 0 1 56 7 7 . 8 56 7 7 . 7 6 5+50 56 7 8 . 5 56 7 8 . 5 1 56 7 9 . 6 56 7 9 . 2 6 6+00 56 8 1 . 0 56 8 0 . 8 8 56 8 2 . 9 56 8 3 . 0 7 6+50 56 8 5 . 1 56 8 5 . 2 6 56 8 7 . 4 56 8 7 . 4 5 7+00 56 8 9 . 7 56 8 9 . 6 3 56 9 1 . 7 56 9 1 . 8 2 7+50 56 9 3 . 1 56 9 3 . 3 2 56 9 4 . 4 56 9 4 . 8 2 8+00 56 9 6 . 3 56 9 6 . 3 2 56 9 8 . 5 56 9 8 . 5 7 8+50 57 0 0 . 8 57 0 0 . 8 2 57 0 3 . 2 57 0 3 . 0 1 57 0 5 . 2 GRADE BREAK STA = 0+00.00 ELEV = 5624.01 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 4 + 7 5 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 7 5 . 0 1 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 5 + 0 0 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 7 7 . 0 1 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 5 + 7 5 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 7 9 . 2 6 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 6 + 0 0 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 8 0 . 8 8 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 8 + 5 0 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 7 0 0 . 8 2 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 7 + 2 5 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 9 1 . 8 2 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 8 + 0 0 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 6 9 6 . 3 2 2.00% 12.00% 8.00%3.00%6.50% 9.00% 8.75% 6.00%PVI STA: 0+60.00 PVI ELEV: 5625.21 K: 2.00 LVC: 20.00 BV C S : 0 + 5 0 . 0 0 BV C E : 5 6 2 5 . 0 1 EV C S : 0 + 7 0 . 0 0 EV C E : 5 6 2 6 . 4 1 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY ACCESS ·DESIGN CAPACITY (ADT) - 21 TO 100 ·MIN ROW WIDTH - 40-FT ·LANE WIDTH - TWO LANES - 8-FT EACH, 16-FT TOTAL ·SHOULDER WIDTH - 2-FT ·DITCH WIDTH - 4-FT ·CROSS SLOPE - 3% GRAVEL ·MIN RADIUS - 50-FT ·MAX % GRADE - 12% BEGIN LOWER 4' WIDE BORROW DITCH (STA: ±0+50.60) END LOWER 4' WIDE BORROW DITCH (STA: ±8+44.92) PROPOSED GRADE APPROXIMATELY MATCHES EXISTINGSTA: ±3+75 - ±9+00 DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 6 - P L A N A N D P R O F I L E . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 5 5 a m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 030 30 60 30 12015 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m CENTERLINE SEMI-PRIMITIVE ROAD PROFILE HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 30' MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-6.0 SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVE PLAN & PROFILE STA: 0+00 - 8+50 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O 11-13-25 OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE S OE OE OE O E O E O E O E O E O E O E OE OE OE OE OE O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E W W W > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > 572 0 57 2 0 5710 5700 570 0 57 1 0 5732 5 7 2 0 5716 57 2 0 5 7 2 8 5 7 3 4 5 7 3 6 5 7 4 0 571 0 57 1 6 573 0 5706 5740 5740 -2. 0 : 1 -2 . 1 : 1 -2.1 : 1 -1.9 : 1 5 7 3 8 57 1 8 57 1 6 5 7 1 6 5 7 1 8 5 7 2 0 5 7 2 2 5 7 2 4 5 7 2 6 5 7 2 8 5 7 3 0 57 3 2 5734573657 3 8 57 4 0 57 4 2 57 4 4 57 4 6 57 4 8 57 5 0 5732 5734 5736 5738 5 7 0 8 5 7 1 0 5 7 1 2 5 7 1 4 5 7 1 6 5 7 1 8 5 7 2 0 5 7 2 2 5 7 2 4 5 7 2 6 CONTRACTOR TO RE-GRADEEXISTING TURNAROUND TO 3% CROSS SLOPE (MATCH UPPER ROAD) SEE PROFILE FOR GRADING 3.0 % 3 . 0 % 1.1 % 3 . 2 % 1.8% CONTRACTOR TO CUTHILLSIDE AT MAX 1.5:1 SLOPE, CUT IN DITCH AT MIN 4' WIDE & 1.5' DEEP CONTRACTOR TO GRADE PROPOSED ROAD SECTION (STA: ±13+45 TO ±15+52), 16' WIDTH WITH 3% CROWN,WITH 4' WIDE, 1.5' DEEP DITCH, AND 2' SHOULDERS AT MAX 3%CROSS SLOPE,SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE CONTRACTOR TO RE-GRADE EXISTING ROAD SECTION (STA: ±10+16 TO ±13+00), 16' WIDTH AT 3% CROSS SLOPE INTO HILLSIDE, 2' SHOULDERS AT MAX 3% CROSS SLOPE, SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE TRANSITION CROSS SLOPEAWAY FROM HILLSIDE INTO HILLSIDE (STA: ±9+94 TO ±10+16) SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE TRANSITION CROSS SLOPE INTO HILLSIDE TO 3% CROWN (STA: ±13+00 TO ±13+45) SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE CONTRACTOR TO RE-GRADEEXISTING ROAD SECTION (STA: ±8+88 TO ±9+94), 16' WIDTH AT 3% CROSSSLOPE AWAY FROM HILLSIDE, 2' SHOULDERS AT MAX 3%CROSS SLOPE, SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE LOT 2 GABOSSI EXEMPTION ±34.685-ACRES DESIGN STANDARDS FOR PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY ACCESS ·DESIGN CAPACITY (ADT) - 21 TO 100 ·MIN ROW WIDTH - 40-FT ·LANE WIDTH - TWO LANES - 8-FT EACH, 16-FT TOTAL ·SHOULDER WIDTH - 2-FT ·DITCH WIDTH - 4-FT ·CROSS SLOPE - 3% GRAVEL ·MIN RADIUS - 50-FT ·MAX % GRADE - 12% 20.0' PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY EASEMENT -3.5:1 -4.8:1 -4.6:1 -4.1:1 -2.5:1 -1 . 5 : 1 -3.2 : 1 -2.5:1 - 3 . 8 : 1 - 5 . 5 : 1 EXISTING DRIVE ACCESS TOPROPOSED LOT 1 3:1 CATCH SLOPE 3:1 CATCH SLOPE-1.5:1 PROPOSED LOT 2 ±2.13 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3 ±2.01 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5 ±2.43 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 7 ±6.81 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES 5 7 2 6 5728 5730 5734 5740 5742 5744 5746 5752 5754 5756 5758 5760 573 6573 8574 0 573 4 573 2 5 7 3 0 5732 5734 5736 5738 5 7 4 2 5744 5746 5748 575 0 5754 5758 57 6 2 5762 5766 5768 5772 574 0 569 4569 8570 2570 6571 0571 4571 8 572 2 572 6 5730 5724 5712 573 0 573 6 5730 5728 5726 5720 8+00 8+50 9+ 0 0 9+ 5 0 10+00 10+50 11+ 0 0 1 1 + 5 0 12 + 0 0 12+50 13+ 0 0 13+5 0 14+00 14+5 0 15+00 1 5 + 5 0 1 6 + 0 0 1 6 + 5 0 1 7 + 0 0 1 7 + 4 1 EP: 17+ 4 0 . 7 9 PC: 1 3 + 4 5 . 1 3 PC: 8 + 6 3 . 1 8 PC: 9 + 5 4 . 4 6 PC: 1 0 + 9 0 . 1 5 PC: 11+89.38 P C : 1 4 + 6 2 . 5 2 P T : 1 4 + 0 2 . 8 0 PT: 8 + 8 7 . 6 2 PT: 10+89.50 PT: 11+37.61 PT: 1 2 + 7 7 . 5 4 PT: 15+ 5 2 . 0 8 3:1 CATCH SLOPE PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE: 12' WIDTH WITH 3% CROWN, 2' SHOULDERS AT MAX 3% CROSS SLOPE, SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE EXISTING ACCESS DRIVE: 12' WIDTH WITH 3% CROWN, 2' SHOULDERS AT MAX 3% CROSS SLOPE,SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALLMIN 12-IN DIA ADS N-12 OR APPROVED EQUAL CULVERT, ±30-LF AT 2% SLOPE 12-IN ADS INV IN: 5731.44 12-IN ADSINV OUT: 5730.84 3.0% 3.0 % 1.8 % 9 . 8 % 3.0%3.0% 10 . 5 % 10 . 0 % TRANSITION CROSS SLOPE INTO FROM HILLSIDE AWAY HILLSIDE (STA: ±8+50 TO ±8+88)SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE CONTRACTOR TO GRADE PROPOSED ROAD SECTION (STA: ±15+52 TO ±17+41), 16' WIDTH WITH 3% CROWN AND 2' SHOULDERS AT MAX 3% CROSS SLOPE, SEE PROFILE FOR GRADE 5730 5735 57355740 5745 5750 57 3 5 5720 5730 5710 5 7 3 0 57 3 5 5725 PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES CL SEMI PRIMITIVE PROFILE 5620 5630 5640 5650 5660 5670 5680 5690 5700 5710 5720 5730 5740 5750 5760 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY ACCESS ·DESIGN CAPACITY (ADT) - 21 TO 100 ·MIN ROW WIDTH - 40-FT ·LANE WIDTH - TWO LANES - 8-FT EACH, 16-FT TOTAL ·SHOULDER WIDTH - 2-FT ·DITCH WIDTH - 4-FT ·CROSS SLOPE - 3% GRAVEL ·MIN RADIUS - 50-FT ·MAX % GRADE - 12% PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE MATCH EXISTING GRADE (±STA: 9+02)BEGIN TRANSITION FROM 3% CROSS SLOPE TO TO 3% CROWN STA: 13+00 MATCH EXISTING (STA: ±17+30)PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADEEXISTING GRADE MIN 20-FT WIDE ROAD (INCLUDING SHOULDERS) MATCH PROPOSED END CROSS SLOPE TRANSITION,BEGIN UPPER 4' WIDE BORROW DITCH STA: 1+71.56 END 4' WIDE BORROW DITCH STA: 13+01.97 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY ACCESS ·DESIGN CAPACITY (ADT) - 21 TO 100 ·MIN ROW WIDTH - 40-FT ·LANE WIDTH - TWO LANES - 8-FT EACH, 16-FT TOTAL ·SHOULDER WIDTH - 2-FT ·DITCH WIDTH - 4-FT ·CROSS SLOPE - 3% GRAVEL ·MIN RADIUS - 50-FT ·MAX % GRADE - 12% 56 9 8 . 5 56 9 8 . 5 7 8+50 57 0 0 . 8 57 0 0 . 8 2 57 0 3 . 2 57 0 3 . 0 1 9+00 57 0 5 . 2 57 0 5 . 2 0 57 0 7 . 5 57 0 7 . 3 8 9+50 57 0 9 . 3 57 0 9 . 5 7 57 1 0 . 4 57 1 1 . 7 6 10+00 57 1 2 . 2 57 1 3 . 9 5 57 1 4 . 7 57 1 6 . 1 3 10+50 57 1 7 . 5 57 1 8 . 3 2 57 2 0 . 1 57 2 0 . 5 1 11+00 57 2 2 . 6 57 2 2 . 7 0 57 2 5 . 1 57 2 4 . 8 8 11+50 57 2 7 . 4 57 2 7 . 0 7 57 2 9 . 6 57 2 9 . 2 6 12+00 57 3 1 . 1 57 2 9 . 8 9 57 3 1 . 8 57 3 0 . 5 1 12+50 57 3 2 . 7 57 3 1 . 1 4 57 3 3 . 9 57 3 1 . 7 6 13+00 57 3 6 . 4 57 3 2 . 3 9 57 3 4 . 3 57 3 3 . 0 1 13+50 57 3 5 . 9 57 3 3 . 6 4 57 3 7 . 0 57 3 4 . 2 6 14+00 57 3 6 . 9 57 3 4 . 8 9 57 3 5 . 8 57 3 5 . 5 2 14+50 57 3 4 . 5 57 3 6 . 1 4 57 3 3 . 5 57 3 6 . 7 7 15+00 57 3 3 . 4 57 3 7 . 3 9 57 3 4 . 4 57 3 8 . 0 2 15+50 57 3 6 . 3 57 3 8 . 6 4 57 3 8 . 8 57 3 9 . 2 7 16+00 57 4 1 . 1 57 4 1 . 7 2 57 4 3 . 6 57 4 4 . 1 7 16+50 57 4 6 . 1 57 4 6 . 6 2 57 4 8 . 6 57 4 9 . 0 7 17+00 57 5 1 . 2 57 5 1 . 5 2 57 5 3 . 9 57 5 3 . 9 7 17+41 57 5 5 . 8 57 5 5 . 5 2 GR A D E B R E A K S T A = 8 + 5 0 . 0 0 EL E V = 5 7 0 0 . 8 2 GRADE BREAK STA = 11+75.00 ELEV = 5729.26 GRADE BREAK STA = 17+40.79 ELEV = 5755.52 GRADE BREAK STA = 15+75.00 ELEV = 5739.27 9.00% 8.75% 9.80% 2.50% BEGIN CROSS SLOPE TRANSITION AWAY FROMHILLSIDE INTO HILLSIDE STA: 9+93.55 END CROSS SLOPE/TRANSITION STA: 13+45.13 MATCH EXISTING GRADE (±STA: 14+29) END LOWER 4' WIDE BORROW DITCH (STA: ±8+44.92) PROPOSED GRADEEXISTING GRADE 4.04.0 CUT ±4-FT TO MAINTAIN 2.5% SLOPE FILL ±4-FT TO MAINTAIN 2.5% SLOPE DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 6 - P L A N A N D P R O F I L E . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 5 4 a m N O R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 030 30 60 30 12015 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m CENTERLINE SEMI-PRIMITIVE ROAD PROFILE HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 30' MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-6.1 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVE PLAN & PROFILE STA: 8+50 - 17+41 11-13-25 DATE REVISION C-7.0 DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 7 - C O N S T R U C T I O N D E T A I L S . D W G - N o v 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 5 5 a m CONSTRUCTION DETAILS MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R 32000.01JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N CULVERT PIPE OUTLET PROTECTION 1.75xd50 D3D PIPE OUTLET TO FLAT AREA WITH NO DEFINED CHANNEL RIPRAP SIZING NOTES: RIPRAP SHALL CONFORM TO THE MATERIAL, GRADATION AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 506, RIPRAP, OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO, STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION. TABLE 506-2E IS REDUCED BELOW. TABLE 5-1 - CLASSIFICATION AND GRADATION OF ORDINARY RIPRAP RIPRAP % SMALLER INTERMEDIATE d50*(IN) DESIGNATION THAN GIVEN ROCK DIM (IN) SIZE BY WEIGHT TYPE VL 70-100 12 6 50-70 9 35-50 6 2-10 2 TYPE L 70-100 15 9 50-70 12 35-50 9 2-10 3 TYPE M 70-100 21 12 50-70 18 35-50 12 2-10 4 TYPE H 100 30 18 50-70 24 35-50 18 2-10 6 TYPE VH 100 42 24 50-70 33 35-50 24 2-10 9 *d50=NOMINAL STONE SIZE RIPRAP NOTES: 1. SEE PLANS FOR D (INSIDE DIAMETER OF CULVERT) & NOMINAL STONE SIZE (d50) 2. PLACE TOPSOIL IN RIPRAP VOIDS AND APPLY SEED PER LANDSCAPE PLANS AND SPECS (1 2 " MI N . ) 2' TO 3' 1/2H (12" MIN) FABRIC MATERIAL (ANCHORED IN TRENCH) H SILT FENCE INSTALLATION -NTS- 4" 4" 1/ 2 H H (MAX) -NTS- FLOW BACKFILL TRENCH JURISDICTION NOTE: SILT FENC E POST ANCHORED TO 15' SECTION COMPACTED 4"x4" OR AS DIRECTED BY LOCAL LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED,SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTILEROSION CONTROL MEASURES SILT FENCE DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) N.T.S. STRAW WATTLE DETAIL 16' DRIVEWAY WIDTH (TYP) 3% CROWN MIN 12" COMPACTED GRAVEL/CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. 2' WIDE, 3% GRADE SHOULDER ±STA: 15+52 - 17+41 NOTES: 1. STRIP ALL TOPSOIL, SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT MINIMUM OF 8" DEPTH TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. MINIMUM8" CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL TO BE PLACED ON TOP OF SUBGRADE 2. 12% MAXIMUM GRADE 2' WIDE, 3% GRADE SHOULDER 12' DRIVEWAY WIDTH (TYP) 3% CROWN NATIVE MATERIAL ROADWAY ACCESS DRIVE SECTION N.T.S. 16' DRIVEWAY WIDTH (TYP)MIN 12" COMPACTED GRAVEL/CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. ±STA: 8+50 - 9+94 NOTES: 1. STRIP ALL TOPSOIL, SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT MINIMUM OF 8" DEPTH TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. MINIMUM8" CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL TO BE PLACED ON TOP OF SUBGRADE 2. 12% MAXIMUM GRADE 3% CROSS SLOPE ±STA: 0+00 - 8+50NOTES: 1. STRIP ALL TOPSOIL, SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT MINIMUM OF 8" DEPTH TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. MINIMUM8" CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL TO BE PLACED ON TOP OF SUBGRADE 2. 12% MAXIMUM GRADE 4' WIDE,1.5' DEEP BORROW DITCH 16' DRIVEWAYWIDTH (TYP) 3% CROSS SLOPE MIN 12" COMPACTED GRAVEL/CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS 2' WIDE, 3% GRADE SHOULDER 3-5% GRADE, SHOULDER, WIDTH VARIES, SEE PLANS SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. 4' WIDE, 1.5' DEEP BORROW DITCH 16' DRIVEWAY WIDTH (TYP) 3% CROSS SLOPE MIN 12" COMPACTED GRAVEL/CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. 2' WIDE, 3% GRADE SHOULDER ±STA: 9+94 - 13+00NOTES: 1. STRIP ALL TOPSOIL, SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT MINIMUM OF 8" DEPTH TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. MINIMUM 8" CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL TO BE PLACED ON TOP OF SUBGRADE 2. 12% MAXIMUM GRADE 2' WIDE, 3% GRADE SHOULDER 16' DRIVEWAY WIDTH (TYP) 3% CROWN MIN 12" COMPACTED GRAVEL/CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY SECTION N.T.S. 2' WIDE, 3% GRADE SHOULDER ±STA: 13+00 - 15+52NOTES: 1. STRIP ALL TOPSOIL, SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT MINIMUM OF 8" DEPTH TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. MINIMUM8" CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL TO BE PLACED ON TOP OF SUBGRADE 2. 12% MAXIMUM GRADE 2' WIDE, 3% GRADE SHOULDER 4' WIDE, 1.5' DEEP BORROW DITCH 3% CROSS SLOPECOMPACTED GRAVEL/CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL TYPICAL CROSS-SLOPED CULVERT SECTION N.T.S.NOTES: 1. 6" MINIMUM CLASS 6 BEDDING MATERIAL UNDER CULVERT AND 12" MINIMUM ON SIDES. 2% MIN SLOPE 12" & 18" DIA ADS N-12 (SEE PLANS) 12" MIN COVER RIPRAP EROSION PROTECTION TO BE PLACED AT THE BOTTOM OF ALL CULVERTS FLARED END SECTION 3% CROWNCOMPACTED GRAVEL/CLASS 6 BASE COURSE MATERIAL TYPICAL CROWNED CULVERT SECTION N.T.S.NOTES: 1. 6" MINIMUM CLASS 6 BEDDING MATERIAL UNDER CULVERT AND 12" MINIMUM ON SIDES. 2% MIN SLOPE 12" & DIA ADS N-12 (SEE PLANS) 12" MIN COVER RIPRAP EROSION PROTECTION TO BE PLACED AT THE BOTTOM OF ALL CULVERTS FLARED END SECTION CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS CATCH VARIES, SEE PLANSCATCH VARIES, SEE PLANS 11-13-25 12' MIN. MIRAFIFABRIC 6" OF CLASS 2 AGGREGATEBASE COURSE EXISTINGGRADE VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL 3" (MINUS) ROCK,OR RECYCLEDCONCRETE N.T.S. 1. ALL ROCK TO BE REMOVED UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 2. PUBLIC ROADWAY TO BE KEPT CLEAN AND FREE OF MUD, DIRT AND DEBRIS AT ALL TIMES. 3. ALIGNMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACCESS SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 40-FT MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE. NOTES 6" OF ROCK PROPOSED TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH NOTES: 1. BEDDING MATERIAL TO BE CLASS 6 ABC2. MIN 4" BEDDING MATERIAL UNDER CONDUITS 3. MIN 12" CLASS 6 ABC OVER TOP OF CONDUITS 4. REMAINING TRENCH TO BE BACKFILLED WITH CLASS 6 ABC OR ONSITE SELECT NATIVE MATERIAL 5. WARNING TAPE TO BE INSTALLED ABOVE CONDUITS PER UTILITY COMPANY AND/OR COUNTY STANDARDS 6. TRENCH WALLS ARE TO BE SLOPED PER CURRENT OSHA AND COSH STANDARDS AND REQ'S7. DEPTH OF TRENCH IS TO BE MEASURED FROM FINISHED GRADE WIDTH DEPENDS ON SIZE AND NUMBER OF CONDUITS 12" MIN XCEL CONDUIT (SIZE AND NUMBER TBD) N.T.S. CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE WITHCOMPACTION DENSITY OF 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. TRENCH SUBGRADE MUST BE COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY 36 " M I N CO V E R 6" DIA PVC 4" M I N . 12"12" FINISHED GRADE SUBGRADE ANDSURFACE MATERIALS PER PLANS TRENCH CROSS-SECTION FOR IRRIGATION PIPES N.T.S. 4" MIN 48" MIN COVERSUBGRADE AND SURFACE MATERIALS PER PLANS BALCOMB &GREEN WATER LAW I REAL ESTATE I LITIGATION I BUSINESS ESH 1953 August 4, 2023 John Leybourne, Planner III Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, #401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 SaraM. Dunn Receptionist (970) 945 -6546 Direct (970) 928--3467 sarad@balcombgreen.com Re: Application for Hogback View Estates Sketch Plan -Canyon Creek Partners, LLC Dear Mr. Leybourne: We are writing this letter in response to your letter dated July 13, 2023. Our office conducted the mineral owner research for Assessor's Parcel Number 212335200186 and also known as Lot 2, Gabossi Subdivision Exemption (the "Property"). The Garfield County Land Use and Development Code ("GCLUDC") require an Applicant to provide notice to mineral owners in accordance with C.R.S. § 24-65.5-101, et seq., "as such owners can be identified through records in the office of the Clerk and Recorder or Assessor, or through other means." GCLUDC 4-101(E)(4). Section 24-65.5-101 requires that an applicant notify a mineral estate owner who either (1) is identified as such by the county tax assessor's records; or (2) has filed in the Clerk and Recorder a request for notification. If such records do not identify any mineral estate owners, including their addresses of record, "the applicant shall be deemed to have acted in good faith and shall not be subject to further obligations .... " By this letter, the Applicant certifies that mineral owners have been researched for the Property as required pursuant to C.R.S. § 24-65.5- 101, et seq, and Section 4-101 (E)(l)(b)(4) of the GCLUDC, as amended. On August 9, 2023 we conducted the following tasks: 1. We reviewed the current vesting deed for the Property. 2. We reviewed the owner's title insurance policy. 3. We researched the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder's index of mineral owner requests for notification per C.R.S. § 24-65.5-103(a)(I)(B) and confirmed that no mineral owner for the Property has filed a request for notification; and 4. We also confirmed that the Assessor's records for Section 35, Township 5 South, Range 90 West, do not list any active or inactive mineral owners. ASPEN I BUENA VISTA I GLENWOOD SPRINGS I LAMAR Post Office Box 790 I Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 I 970.945.6546 I BalcombGreen.com John Leybourne Mineral Owner Research August 11, 2023 Page2 Applicant acknowledges that it has reviewed C.R.S. § 24-65.5-101, et seq, and it is in compliance with said statute and the GCLUDC. This satisfies the Applicant's obligations under Colorado law and the County's Code. Sincerely, BALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. J euo.. Y}·L By: ___________ _ SaraM. Dunn Cc: Canyon Creek Partners, LLC The Land Studio, Inc. Douglas Pratte ASPEN I BUENA VISTA I GLENWOOD SPRINGS I LAMAR Post Office Box 790 I Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 I 970.945.6546 I BalcombGreen.com Garfield County CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL OWNER RESEARCH This form is to be completed and submitted with any application for a Land Use Change Permit. Mineral interests may be severed from surface right interests in real property. C.R.S. § 24-65.5-101, et seq, requires notification to mineral owners when a landowner applies for an application for development from a local government. As such, the landowner must research the current owners of mineral interests for the property. The Garfield County Land Use and Development Code of 2013 ("LUDC") Section 4-101(E)(l)(b)(4) requires written notice to owners of mineral interests in the subject property in accordance with C.R.S . § 24-65.5-101, et seq, "as such owners can be identified through the records in the office of the Clerk and Recorder or Assessor, or through other means." This form is proof of applicant's compliance with the Colorado Revised Statutes and the LUDC. The undersigned applicant certifies that mineral owners have been researched for the subject property as required pursuant to C.R.S. § 24-65.5-101, et seq, and Section 4-101 (E)(l)(b)(4) of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, as amended. As a result of that research, the undersigned applicant certifies the following (Please initial on the blank line next to the statement that accurately reflects the result of research): __ I own the entire mineral estate relative to the subject property; or ~ Minerals are owned by the parties listed below The names and addresses of any and all mineral owners identified are provided below (attach additional pages as necessary): Name of Mineral Owner Mailing Address of Mineral Owner No mineral owners were found I acknowledge I reviewed C.R.S. § 24-65.5-101, et seq, and I am in compliance with said statue and the LUDC. CCP LLC . 12/12/24 Applicant's Signature Date Wildlife Study for Subdivision Development Application 24 County Road 138 New Castle, Garfield County, Colorado 11/18/25 Applicant: Canyon Creek Partners LLC . Hogback View Estates Prepared By: MichaelResch,PhD. Co-owner Canyon Creek Partners LLC . ~~ i l .com (303) 903-8934 1. Introduction This wildlife study evaluates potential impacts on wildlife species and habitats within the proposed subdivision area at 24 County Road 138 in New Castle, CO. The study complies with Garfield County's application guidelines and provides an analysis of local wildlife, habitat conditions, and recommendations to mitigate any adverse impacts from development activities. 2. Methodology This study is based on: -A field survey conducted on 11/10/2025 -Review of existing data on wildlife in Garfield County from sources such as the Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) -Consultation with CPW regarding sensitive species and habitats Survey methods included visual observation, track and sign identification, and habitat assessments. The study also considered potential impacts based on the property's proximity to designated critical habitats, migration corridors, and nearby water resources. 3. Existing Conditions Wildfire Hazard Study Major Subdivision Development Application Location: 24 County Road 138 New Castle, Garfield County, Colorado Date: October 23, 2025 Applicant: Canyon Creek Partners LLC Hogback View Estates Prepared By: Michael Resch, Ph.D. Co-owner, Canyon Creek Partners LLC canyoncreekpartners@gmail.com (303) 903-8934 1. Introduction This wildfire hazard study evaluates wildfire risks and mitigation strategies for the proposed subdivision at 24 County Road 138, New Castle, Garfield County, Colorado. The assessment follows Garfield County wildfire hazard evaluation guidelines and identifies potential risks, contributing factors, and mitigation measures to ensure the safety and resilience of the subdivision and its future residents. 2. Existing Site Conditions Vegetation and Fuel Types: The site includes a range of vegetation types, each with varying wildfire potential: 1. Sagebrush and Shrubland -Dense shrubland with sagebrush and native grasses that can serve as surface fuels. 2. Grassland-Open grassy areas that dry quickly and support fast-moving surface fires. 3. Wooded Areas (Juniper and Pifion Pine) -Clusters offlammable juniper and pifion pine trees that can sustain crown fires. 4. Adjacent Vegetation -Surrounding parcels contain similar vegetation, allowing for potential fire continuity. Topography and Slope: The property consists primarily of gentle to moderate south-facing slopes, with most development areas located on relatively flat ground (slopes <5%). Climate and Weather Patterns: The New Castle-Glenwood Springs area experiences a semi-arid climate characterized by hot, dry summers, low humidity, and seasonal winds. 3. Wildfire Hazard Assessment Based on the Colorado Wildfire Risk Assessment Portal (CO-WRAP) and Garfield County hazard evaluation criteria, the following risk factors have been identified: -Ignition Risk: High during dry seasons, with potential sources including lightning, human activity, and mechanical equipment. -Rate of Fire Spread: High in grass and shrub-dominated areas, especially on slopes or during windy conditions. -Exposure Potential: Both residential structures and natural habitats are susceptible to wildfire impacts where vegetation continuity remains unbroken. 4. Fire Behavior and Potential Impacts In the event of a wildfire, the following fire behaviors are of primary concern: -Surface Fires (Grasslands): Rapid-moving fires that can advance quickly under wind influence. -Crown Fires (Wooded Areas): High-intensity fires in juniper and pifion pine zones, capable of ember spotting over long distances. -Spotting and Ember Transport: Embers may ignite vegetation or structures within the subdivision, especially under strong wind conditions. 5. Mitigation Recommendations To reduce wildfire risk and enhance community safety, the following mitigation actions are recommended: 1. Defensible Space -Establish defensible space zones around all structures (0-30 ft, 30- 100 ft, and >100 ft). 2. Vegetation Management -Thin tree stands and remove ladder fuels. 3. Fire-Resistant Construction -Use Class A fire-rated materials and ember-resistant vents. 4. Access and Egress -Ensure 20-ft-wide access routes and clear turnarounds. 5. Water Supply and Fire Suppression -Utilize shared well infrastructure and residential sprinkler systems. 6. Community Education -Adopt Firewise USA principles and provide annual training. 7. Emergency Planning -Develop an evacuation plan and coordinate with local fire authorities. 6. Conclusion The wildfire hazard for the subdivision site is classified as moderate under Garfield County criteria. Implementing the above mitigation measures will substantially lower wildfire risk, improve community resilience, and protect both life and property within the development. References 1. Colorado Wildfire Risk Assessment Portal (CO-WRAP): https://co- pub.coloradoforestatlas.org/# / 2. Garfield County Wildfire Hazard Guidelines (latest edition). Attachments 1. Burn Probability 2. Fire Intensity 3. Garfield County Wildfire Report Adapt, Prepare by Knowing Fire Risk Each county in Colorado is unique, with a character shaped by individual history, land, climate, people and resources. However, something every county in the state shares is the potential to be negatively affected by wildfires. In order to effectively prepare for the impact of wildfires, residents, leaders and community planners must be aware of the wildfire risk associated with living in the wildland-urban interface and recognize actions that can be taken to reduce this risk. Connecting with wildfire resources -like those listed below -can help guide wildfire adaptation efforts from a personal to a community-wide level. GARFIELD COUNTY WUI Risk This chart shows the portion of Garfield County's residents who live within the wildland-urban interface classified by level of wildfire impact on lives and property. ,..10.7% ,,....0.8% 15.3% Population: 62,150 -Not in WUI Risk Area -Lowest Risk -LowRisk _31.2% -Moderate Risk High Risk Highest Risk THE DATA: The Wildland-Urban Interface Risk Index, created by the Colorado State Forest Service, is a rating of the potential impact of a wildfire on people and their homes. It is created using housing density combined with modeled fire behavior to determine where the greatest potential impact to people and homes is likely to occur. The index is calculated consistently for each Colorado county, available in the Colorado Forest Atlas at coloradoforestatlas.org . WHAT CAN BE DONE? Colorado Wildfire Risk Viewer https:/ko-pu b. coloradoforestatlas.o rg Fire Intensity Scale - Sourounding Area Quantifies the potential fire intensity by orders of magnitude. Created on: 10/21/2025, 5:49 PM Disclaimer The user a!&lmes the entire risk related to their use rl the CohradoWildflre Risk Viewer and either the published Of derived p!"oducts from these data The CdoradoState Forest Service Is ~oviding these data "as ls" ard 6K~.,,,,nrJJl(~fA'Ahttbcr~c,l'ni)l'l<d I~ W U'O.Jt Cimk1dcr4-,lmpliedwarrantiesaf merchantability or ritressfor aparticUar~ In no event wlll Cdor.adoState Forest Service be llable to you ot to any third party ra-any direct, inr::Un!C.t, incidental, ccnequentlal, s;,«lal or exemplary damages or lest profit r5Jltingfrom any use or misuse of these data. Fire Intensity Scale • Lowest Intensity Low Intensity Legend https://co-pub.coloradoforestatlas.org ■ Moderate Intensity ■ High Intensity Counties □ □ Colorado Wildfire Risk Viewer https://co-pub.coloradoforestatlas.org Fire Intensity Scale -24 County Road 138 Quantifies the potential fire intensity by orders of magnitude. Created on: 10/21/2025, 5:48 PM Disclaimer The user a5Slltncs the entire risk related to their use r:I the Colorado Wildfire Risk Viewer ar.:I either the 11,1bllshed or derived products from these data. The C.olcradoState Forest Service lsi;ra.,ldirg these data "as ls" and dsclaims arr; and ;ill warranties, ~ther dCJ)rsedor imPied. includirg (wlthttt llmltatloo) any lmPiedwarranth!s af mm:hantablllty «-fitness for aparticular?,Jl"pa5e. In no ~ent wlll Color21doState Farest~lce be Ua~e toyoo ar to any third party ror arr; direct, Indirect, incldental, c~~ntial, ~c:lal ar exemplary damages or lost profit rBJ!tlngfran arr; use ormiS1JSeat these data. Fire Intensity Scale Lowest Intensity Low Intensity Legend https://co-pub.coloradoforestatlas.org ■ Moderate Intensity ■ High Intensity Counties □ □ Colorado Wildfire Risk Viewer h ttps://co-pu b.colo rad oforestatlas.org Fire Intensity Lowest This location only has a minimal chance of being directlyimpacted byawildfire Created on: 10/21/2025, 5:58 PM Disclaimer The user a~me5 the entire risk related to their use cl the Colorado Wildfire Risk Viewer and either the ~bll~ or derived products from these data. The Colorado State Fa-est Service ls ~dirg ~ dat.ii ·~ 1s• and ef1SClatms anv ard all warranties. ~thtt 8pres:sed or implied, 1.-.:ludirg (without llmitatl~ arrv implied warranties at merch.antabillty or Mness for aparticu1arp.rrpase. In no e\lent will CaoradoState Forest Service be llable to you ortoanv third party for any direct, irdirect. lnddental, consequentlal, si,edal or exemplary damages a-lost profit resultil'\!:from anvusearmi~af these data, Fire Intensity Scale Lowest Intensity Low Intensity Legend https://co-pub.coloradoforestatlas.org ■ Moderate Intensity ■ High Intensity Counties □ □ Colorado Wildfire Risk Viewer https://c o-pub.coloradoforestatlas.org Surface Fuels (Fuel Models) Characterization of surface fuel models that contain the parameters for calculating fire behavior outputs. Created on: 10/21/2025, 6:01 PM Disclaimer The user aSSU11es the entire risk related to their use ol lhe Colorado Wildfire Risk Viewer and either the p.iblished or derived prcduc.ts from these data, The ColoraOOState For~t Service is pr011iding tl-oese data •as is• and disclaims any and all warranties, wt-ether expressed or implied, including ('Mthout limitation) any im~ied warranti 6 cl merchantolbility or litneS'5 for apartkWarp.irpose. In ro (!',lent will Cnlorado State Forest Service be liabl!! to you or to ;m-1 third party for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, special or exemplary dam.a ges or last prolit resulting from anyuseormisuseofthesedata Legend https://co-pub.coloradoforestatlas.org SurfaceFuel.s (Fuel Models) N B2 (92)-Sn ow/ke NB3 (93)-Agrlcu ltural ■ NB8 (98)-O pen Wa ter 4 (144)-LowLoad. Hu mid Clima te • 1mber-Shrub HS ( 145)-High Load , Dry Cli mate Shrub ■ SH7 (147)-Very Hlgh l oad, Dry Climate ■ NB9(99)-Bar eGround Shrub GR1 (101)-Short,S rse DryClimateGrass ■ SH7 (157)-VeryHigh Load, Dry Climate pa Shrub ■ UCL (913)-Urban core su r rounded by Low ■ W N H(98 2)-MinorWater streams FB fuel su rrounded by High Load Fuel (high UIH (914)-lsolated urban surrounded by encroachment} High FB fuel ■ WB 0 (989)-Water Bodies ■ USH (915)-Scattered urban surrounded by High FBfuel ■ UCH (916)-Urban core surrounded by High FBfuel GR2 ( 102)-Low Load, Dry Climate Grass GR3 ( 103)-low Load, Very Coarse, Humid Climate Grass TU1 (161)-LowLoad DryClimateTimber- Grass-Shrub ■ UNB (919)-Unburnable urban area s TU2 (162)-M oderate Load, Humid Climate ASL (931)-Agricultural Low Load Fuels , GR4 (104)-Moderate Load, Dry Climate l i mb .er-Shrub with seasonal changes of its Burnable Grass ■ TU 3 (1 63)•Moderate Load, Humid Climate GR1 ( 111)-Short, Sparse Dry Climate Grass Ti mber-G rasso.Shrub -ALPINE ■ TUML1(171)-TimberUnderstory Dynamic ML(TSYL2022) GR2 ( 112)-Low Load, Dry Climate Grass- ALPI NE ■ GS1 ( 121)-Low Load, Dry Climate Grass- Shrub GS2 ( 122)-Moderate Load, Dry Climate Grass-Shrub ■ GS3 (123)-Moderate Load, Humid Climate Grass-Shrub ■ GS4(124)-High Load , Humid Climate Grass-Shrub ■ GS1 ( 131)-Low Load, Dry Climate Grass- Shrub -ALPINE ■ SH1 (141)-LowLoad Dry Climate Shrub SH2 (142)-Moderate Load Dry Climate Shrub TL1 (181)-LowLoad Compact Conifer Litter ■ TL2 (182)-Low Load Broadleaf Litter l TL3 (183)-Moderate Load Conifer Litter TLML1 (191) -Timber Litter ML (TSYL 2022) SB3 (203)-High Load Activity Fuel or Moderate Load Slowdown ■ 5B4 (204)-High Load Blowdown :::.::1 Ull (911)-lsolated ur ban surrounded by LowFBfuel ■ USL (912)-Scattered urban surrounded by LowFBfuel condition ASH (932)-Agrlcultu ral High l o ad Fuels, with seasonal changes of its Burnable condition ■ AGC (938)-Golf courses· Non-Burnable (no encroachment) ■ ANB (939)-Agricultural Fields, maintained in a Non-Burnable cond ition RNL (941)-Minor roads LowFB RNH (942)-Minor roads High FB ■ RML (943)-Major roads Low FB ■ RMH (944)-Major roads High FB ■ RNB (949)-Roads surrounded by non- burnable fuels WNL(981)-Minor Water streams surrounded by Low Load Fuel (moderate encroachment) Noxious Weed Report for Subdivision Development Application Location: 24 County Road 138 New Castle, Garfield County, Colorado Date: 11/2/2024 Applicant: Hogback View Estates Canyon Creek Partners LLC . Prepared By: Michael Resch, PhD. Co-owner Canyon Creek Partners LLC . ..c.anyancreekpartners@gmall.com (303) 903-8934 1. Introduction This report provides an assessment of noxious weeds on the proposed subdivision site at 24 County Road 138, New Castle, CO. It aims to document the presence, extent, and types of noxious weeds on-site and propose management strategies for their control and prevention as part of the development application process. 2. Survey Summary A site visit was conducted during the months July and November 2024 to assess the current vegetation and presence of noxious weeds during summer and fall. The inspection focused on identifying weed species from the Colorado Department of Agriculture's Noxious Weed List, including but not limited to List A, B, and C species, which pose a threat to the ecosystem and agricultural resources (reference 1 ). The 10-15 acres of the proposed site to be developed was previously used for agricultural practices and a runway. The area was flood irrigated from the Williams Canal. Since 2021 the area has not been irrigated or used for agriculture. 3. Noxious Weeds Identified The following noxious weed species were identified on the property: 1. Musk Thistle (Carduus nutans) -List B -Description: An invasive biennial thistle with large, purple flower heads, known for its aggressive spreading behavior. -Extent: Observed along disturbed areas and roadways . 2. Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) -List B -Description: A perennial thistle with small purple flowers, forming dense colonies that can crowd out native vegetation. -Extent: Small patches in open fields and wetland margins. 3. Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) -List B -Description: A perennial with yellow-green flowers and a persistent root system, producing a toxic sap that impacts livestock and other plants. -Extent: Scattered in various areas, especially on slopes and disturbed grounds. 4. YellowToadflax (Linaria vulgaris)-List B -Description: Known for its yellow snapdragon -like flowers and resilience, this invasive species can dominate large areas, particularly on open, sunny sites. -Extent: Present in moderate density across the project area. 5. Cheat Grass or Downey brome (Bromus tectorum) -List C -Description: Invasive annual grass that is highly flammable and spreads quickly across arid and semi-arid landscapes, especially in the western United States. It germinates early in the spring, often outcompeting native plants for resources, and dies by early summer, leaving behind dry, fine fuels that greatly increase wildfire risk. Its fast-growing, dense stands reduce biodiversity and disrupt ecosystems, making it a persistent threat to both native habitats and fire management efforts. -Extent: Present in light density across the project area. 6. Common mullein (Verbascum thapsus) -List C -Description: A biennial plant known for its tall, dense stalk and fuzzy, gray-green leaves. In its second year, it produces a spike covered in small yellow flowers that can reach up to 6 feet tall. Originally from Europe and Asia, it spreads aggressively in disturbed soils across North America, forming dense stands that crowd out native vegetation. Common mullein is highly drought-tolerant and difficult to control, often considered a nuisance in natural and agricultural areas. -Extent: Present in sparce areas across the project area 4. Recommended Management Plan To comply with Garfield County and Colorado noxious weed control regulations, the following actions are recommended: -Perform targeted herbicide treatments on existing infestations, following label instructions and guidelines for the identified weed species. -Physical removal of mature plants, particularly Musk and Canada thistle, before they set seed in spring 2025. 1. Ongoing Control During Development: -Require construction crews to regularly inspect and clean equipment to prevent weed seed transport. -Treat any disturbed areas with appropriate herbicides immediately after ground disturbance. -Monitor high-risk areas such as roadsides, staging areas, and soil stockpiles. -Active management in partnership with the Garfield County Vegetative Management program. 2. Post-Construction Monitoring and Maintenance: -Implement a 2-3 year post-construction monitoring program to address any new or re- emerging infestations. -Re-seed disturbed areas with a certified native seed mix to provide competition against noxious weeds. 3. Education and Signage: -Install temporary signage in construction zones to remind workers and visitors about noxious weed control measures. -Educate on-site personnel on weed identification and the importance of adherence to control measures. 5. Conclusion This report documents the presence of noxious weeds at the proposed subdivision site. Given the invasive nature of the identified species, it is essential to implement the recommended control measures before, during, and after development to prevent their spread and comply with county and state regulations. Additional guidance on specific control methods, will be consulted with the Garfield County Weed Management Program and the Colorado Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Program. We plan on treating the project area in the spring of 2025 in cooperation with the Garfield County Noxious Weed Program. References: 1. bttp ://a e1.co l orado .gov/conservat ioo/noxious -weeds/species-id 2. bltps://www.garfietd-county.com/vegetat ion- man_age.ment/fles_gc_co/si_tes/291G_aJfieLd..::..C_ouo1Y-=11o_x i o.us-=...w..e_e_ -man_age.ro.e _ -p.Lan -= adQp ted-f e b-4016.._P.d.f 3. ps://www.gartield-coun.w.co111/vege1aJ i o_n-_ _an_a_ge.me..□1L Attachments: -Invasive species data sheets Musk Thistle Identification and Management M usk thistle Carduus nutans L. is a non-native biennial forb that re- produces solely by seed. During the first year of growth, a rosette forms in spring or fall. During the second year in mid to late spring, the stem bolts, flowers, sets seed, and the plant dies. M usk thistle can grow up to 6 feet tall. The leaves have spines, are waxy, and dark green in color with a prominent light green to white midrib that can be seen from a distance. Leaves are dentately lobed; leaf bases some- times extend down below the point of attachment. The terminal flower heads are purple, large in size (1.5 to 3 inches in diameter) and bend over as if nod- ding . These flower heads are made up of only disk flowers. They are surrounded by numerous, wide and stout lance- shaped, spine-tipped bracts that resem- ble an open pineapple. The pappus has plumose bristles that appear barbed un- der magnification. Musk thistle produces many flower heads. The tallest shoots flower first; lateral shoots develop in leaf axils. A robust plant may produce 100 or more flowering heads . Reproduction is usually via out-crossing through insect pollination, but self-pollination also occurs. Flowers emerge in May through September. Seeds develop shortly after flowers emerge. Flower buds can contain viable seeds from self-pollination. Seeds can mature on severed bud and flower- heads. Seeds remain viable in the soil for up to about 14 years. Seeds can germi- nate and emerge from spring through fall. M usk_ thistle ha~itat is found in a variety of environments extend - ing from shortgrass prairie to alpine. It is strongly associated with heavily disturbed sites, where over-use occurs or where site conditions are poor due to land management practices. This includes over-grazed areas, large fires, trails, ditches and roadsides. Infested livestock pasturs suffer from significantly decreased carrying capacity. Because musk thistle reproduces solely from seed, the key for suc- cessful management is to prevent seed production. Once flowers emerge and start to produce seed, effective manage- ment options will become limited. Once sites are infested, musk thistle can form dense stands . Prevention, adjusting land management practices, a robust inte- L--------------:--::-------7 grated treatment plan and 2015 Quarter Quad Survey restoration are critical to Mu'l k Th is-tie .,,..~ 'l..1!11-llt•-•1 eliminating this species . M usk thistle is designat- ed as a "List B" species in the Colorado Noxious Weed Act. It is required to be eradicated; some popu- lations may be contained or suppressed depending on state regulations. For management directions for each county, refer to the most recent Rule, or visit www.colorado.gov/ag /co - weedcontacts for details. n Q , 0. s:::: s:::: V\ ~ s:::: rt- Q ~ V\ r . List B (@) C=::l ~ crtiD ....i oc:::a "' d£3 ~~ ~~ Uvi)"E 238 ~ Rev. 11/16 Integrated Weed Management Recommendations Effective integrated management means using a variety of eradication methods that also includes restoration, prevention of seed prod uction and dispersal, and monitoring . Maintain robust healthy native landscapes and restore degraded sites. Avoid soil disturbance. As w ith most biennia ls, prevent seed production i n the first and second year of musk th istle growth. Prevent seed from dispersing, such as on contaminated equipment. Re st sites until they are effectively restored . Change land use practices . Use methods appropriate for the site. CHEMICAL CULTURAL CONTROL METHODS Musk thistle is not tolerant of competition and needs light to germinate seeds. Cultural methods should aim to maintain or restore a competitive assemblage of forbs, cool and warm season grasses . Implement whole site restoration of soils, plants and water regimes where stands of musk thistle exist where needed . Use locally adapted species that are ecologically appropriate for the site to improve competitiveness . Include annual as well as perennial species . Incorporate soil amendments, soil microbes and mycorrhizal fungi in restoration and land management efforts. Minimize soil compaction and disturbance, especially in wetlands and moist soil Irrigation can increase competitive species. BIOLOGICAL CONTROL METHODS Although horses, cattle, goats and sheep may eat flower heads on a few plants, seeds pass through their digestive tracks unaltered and spread. The leaf and stalk spines can cause domestic livestock to avoid mature musk thistle . Thus , musk thistle can become an "increaser" in over-grazed systems. Properly managed grazing can improve vigor of desired species and indireclty reduce musk thistle. Trichosirocalus horridus is the only biological control agent available for musk thistle in Colorado. The other species, Rhinocyllus conicus, is not host specific and will damage native thistles, and therefore cannot be released as an agent in Colorado. For more information, visit the Colorado Department of Agriculture's Palisade lnsectary website at www.c olorado .gov/ag/biocontrol. MECHANICAL CONTROL METHODS Methods, such as tilling, hoeing and digging, are best for infestations smaller than 0.5 acres; weigh this against other plants present, ecology and site condition. Sever roots below the soil surface during the first year before the plant stores energy, and in the second year before flower production Mowing, chopping and deadheading stimulates more flower production; these methods require consecutive years of season-long treatments. All flowerbuds and heads must be collected, bagged, and disposed of or destroyed; seeds will mature and germinate if left on the ground. Prescribed fire that results in high soil burn severity damage roots and above ground biomass, but is not recommended due to -impacts on desired plants . Fire generally favors musk thistle germination. NOTE: The fol lowing are recommendations for herbicides that can be applied to pastures and rangeland. Rates are approximate and based on equipment with an output of 30 gal/acre. Follow the label for exact rates. Always read , understa nd, and follow the label directions. The herbicide label is the LAW! HERBICIDE RATE APPLICATION TIMING iAminopyrand• 6 oz./acre + 0.25% Apply in spring rosette to early bolting growth stages or in fall to rosettes. (Milestone) v/v non-ionic •Product not permitted for use in the San Luis Valley. surfactant Chlorsulfuron~ 1-2 .6 oz . product/ Apply in spring from rosette through very early flower growth stages . (Telar) acre+ 0 .25 % (Can prevent viable seed formation if app lied no later than the first viable v/v non-ionic flowers begin to open.) .. This herbicide has residual soil activity that will surfactant affect all broad leaf seedlings germinating after application has occurred. C1opyralid (Transl1ne) 0.67-1.33 pints Apply to rosettes through flower bud stage in spring, or to fall rosettes . product/acre+ 0.25% v/v non- ionic surfactant AV Colorado Department of Agriculture· Conservation Services 305 lnterlocken Parkway Broomfield, CO 80021 (303) 869-9030 www.colorado._gov/ag /weeds ~do I.Jni"usir;y Canada Thistle Identification and Management Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) is a non-native, deep-rooted perennial that spreads by seeds and aggressive creeping, horizontal roots called rhizomes. Canada thistle can grow 2 to 4 feet in height. The leaves are oblong, spiny, bright green, and slightly hairy on the undersurface. Unlike other noxious biennial thistles which have a solitary flower at the end of each stem, Canada thistle flowers occur in small clusters of 1 to 5 flowers. They are about 1 cm in diameter, tubular shaped, and vary from white to purple in color. Canada thistle emerges from its root system from late April through May. It flowers in late spring and throughout the summer. It produces about 1,000 to 1,500 seeds per plant that can be wind dispersed. Seeds survive in the soil for up to 20 years. Additionally, Canada thistle reproduces vegetatively through 2013 Quarter Quad Survey ~i..... •• ..._ 1 •1r ---11 ~l!Oft its root system, and quickly form dense stands. Each fragmented piece of root, 0.25 inch or larger, is capable of forming new plants. The key to controlling Canada thistle is to eliminate seed production and to reduce the plant's nutrient reserves in its root system through persistent, long-term management. Canada thistle is one of the most troublesome noxious weeds in the U.S. It can infest diverse land types, ranging from roadsides, ditch banks, riparian zones, meadows, pastures, irrigated cropland, to the most productive dryland cropland. Large infestations significantly reduce crop and cattle forage production and native plant species. It is a host plant to several agricultural pests and diseases. Canada thistle prefers moist soils, but it can be found in a variety of soil types. It has been found at elevations up to 12,000 feet. Effective Canada thistle control requires a combination of methods. Prevention is the most important strategy. Maintain healthy pastures and rangelands, and continually monitor your property for new infestations. Established plants need to be continually stressed. Management options become limited once plants begin to produce seeds. Details on the back of this sheet can help to create a management plan compatible with your site ecology. t21ffl•~lcf1fl Canada thistle is designated as a "List B" species as described in the Colorado Noxious Weed Act. It is required to be either eliminated, contained, or suppressed depending on the local infestations. For more information visit www. colorado.gov/ag/weeds and click on the Noxious Weed Program link or call the State Weed Coordinator at the Colorado Department of Agriculture, Conservation Services Division, (303) 869-9030 . .-O.·•~~l'i~l ......... ~..U~ ... N~~-~ r l ' z ~~ ~ / / I ' ~-' • ! -I ' ; I • I \ J ✓ \ 'l ,· Key ID Points 1. Cluster of 1-5 white to purple flowers on a stem. 2. Floral bracts are spineless. 3. Small flowers that are 1 cm in diameter. 4. Perennial, rhizomatous plant with spiny, oblong, green leaves. List B I I) ~ I I (i® @) c:=::::J ~ cc:::i cu ds~ ~~ 1:::5 (WE c:;-;::::;"t . ~ ~~ U\filu ~ ~ Integrated Weed Management Recommendations Integrated weed management is imperative for effective Canada thistle control . This weed needs to be continually stressed, forcing it to exhaust root nutrient stores, and eventually die. Mowing o r grazing can be followed up with herbicide application. Avoid hand-pulling and till ing which can stimulate the growth of new plants. . '" ., ,,... • . -~i -•~\' • ·1-,. ~, .. -_... ·,. \ ....... '.""" ••. , l f . : . " • ~ • ~ -,, • ,: :;.~.:\i' • • ... ~ ~~;,.,, -I-.•:, . -~ • :,,,: ., • " \; -· -~ I ... .>,";,':J;.-...:-, • ' . -"'>,,: ... -- HERBICIDE RATE Aminopyralid 5-7 oz/acre (Milestone) or 1 teaspoon/gal water CULTURAL Prevention is the best control strategy. Maintain healthy pastures, riparian areas, and rangelands. Prevent bare ground caused by overgrazing, and continually monitor your property for new infestations. Establishment of select grasses can be an effective control. BIOLOGICAL Cattle, goats, and sheep will graze on Canada thistle when plants are young and succulent in the spring. Follow up grazing with a fall herbicide application. Insects are available, and provide limited control. Currently, collection and distribution methods for Canada thistle rust (Puccinia punctiformis) are being refined. For more information on Canada thistle biocontrol, contact the Colorado Department of Agriculture -Palisade lnsectary at (970) 464-7916. MECHANICAL Due to Canada thistle's extensive root system, hand-pulling and tilling create root fragments and stimulate the growth of new plants. Mowing can be effective if done every 10 to 21 days throughout the growing season. Combining mowing with herbicides will further enhance Canada thistle control. CHEMICAL The table below includes recommendations for herbicides that can be applied to rangeland and some pastures. Treatments may be necessary for an additional 1 to 3 years because of root nutrient stores. Always read, understand, and follow the label directions. APPLICATION TIMING Apply in spring until flowering and/or to fall regrowth. Add 0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant (equivalent to 0.3202/ gal water or 1 qt/100 gal water). Can also add chlorsulfuron (Telar) at 1 oz/acre to the mix. Aminoclopyrachlor 5.5 oz product/acre Apply in spring from rose tte to flower bud stage and/or + chlorsulfuron (Perspective) Clopyralid + triclopyr (Prescott; others) ~y + 0.25 % v/v non-ionic fall re growth. Important: Applications greater than 5.5 oz surfactant produ ct/acre exceeds the threshold for selectivity. DO NOT treat in the root zone of desirable trees and shrubs. Not permitted for use in the San Luis Valley. 3 pints product/acre Apply in spring until flowering and/or fall regrowth. Add or 1.25 oz/gal water 0.25 % v/v non-ionic surfactant. Colorado Department of Agriculture -Conservation Services 305 lnterlocken Parkway ~o Broomfield, CO 80021 (303) 869-9030 www.colorado.gov/ag/weeds I Updated on: List B Species Colorado Department of Agriculture 305 lnterlocken Pkwy Broomfield, CO 80021 (303) 869-9030 weeds@state.co.us Rangeland, pasture, and riparian site recommendations Leafy spurge Identification and Management Identification and Impacts Leafy spurge (Euphorhia esu!a) is a non-native deep-rooted perennial that spreads by seed and extensive, creeping roots. The roots can extend as deep as 30 feet into the soil and are extremely wide-spreading. The roots are brown and contain numerous pink buds that generally produce new shoots or roots. Leafy spurge can grow from 1 to 3 feet in height. The stems are smooth, pale green, and thickly clustered. Leaves are alternate, narrow, linear, and 1 to 4 inc.hes long. The flowers are very small and yellowish -green. They are enclosed by very visible yellowish-green, heart-shaped bracts. The entire plant contains white, mi.Lky sap that exudes readily upon seem or leaf breakage. This sap can damage eyes and sensitive skin. Leafy spurge is one of the earliest planes ro emerge in the spring. Flower clusters develop 1 co 2 weeks after seem emergence which is from mid-April ro lace May. One large leafy spurge plant can produce up ro 130,000 seeds. Three-sided seed capsules explode when ripe and project the seeds up to 15 feet away from the parent plant. Leafy spurge has adapted to a wide variety of habitats in the state and is very competitive with orber plane species. Where it becomes established in ra ngeland, pascure, and riparian sites, it crowds out practically all other vegetation. The competitive, rapidly growing, and extensive root system makes leafy spurge very difficult co manage. Develop a management plan that uses several control methods char are compatible with your site. T he most effective method of concrol for Leafy spurge is to prevent its establishment through proper land management. Mainrain healthy pastures and rangeland and continually monitor your property for new infestations. New infestations are much more easily controlled than established infestations. Details on the back of this sheet can help to create a management plan compatible with your site ecology. Leafy spurge is designated as a "List B" species on the Colorado Noxious Weed Act. It is required to be either eradicated, contained, or suppressed depending on the local infestations. On the back of this sheet are leafy spurge management recommendations. For more information, please visit www.colorado. gov/ag/csd and dick on the Noxious Weed Program Link. Or contact the Stace Weed Coordinator at the Colorado Department of Agriculture, Conservation Services Division, 303-239-4100. Leafy spurge Flower phoro, top, © Norman Rees, USDA, APHIS. Invasive.org. All other phoros © Kelly Uhing. Integrated Weed Management recommendations List B Species ' HERBICIDES Inregrared ~ed Managemeor: Persistent moniroring of areas with .known or potential infesrations is crucial co ,managi ng lea.Ip spurge. A combination of man:igemenr m e thods in a long- term m anagement: pla.n is imperati ve. The m anag em ent oqj'eccive is co exh aust the r oor s;:stem :md d ep/ere cb e oil seed hanlc. NOTE: T he follo win g are rec ommen dati on s for h erb ici d es that ca n be appli ed co range and pasture.l ands . Rac e s a re a pproxima te a nd based on equipment with :tn o u.t pu t of 30 gallons per acre. Pl.ea se rea d label for exac t r aces . Always read, understand, and follow the label directions. The herbicide label is the LAW! HERBICIDE Fosamine (Krenite S) Picloram (Tordon 22K *this is a Restricted Use Pesticide*) lmazapic (Plateau) 2,4-0 Amine RATE 1.5 gal/acre or 6.5 oz/ gal water 1 qt./acre or 1 oz/ gal water 12 oz/acre or 0.4 oz/ gal water 2-3 qts/ acre or 2-3 oz/ gal water APPLICATION TIMING Spri ng o nly, during bloo m to post-bloom stage. Add non -ionic su.rfa .cranr @ 0.32oz/gal wa cer or 1 qt/100 gal water. Spring, just after full-bloom and/ or fall. DO NOT a pply near or under trees/ shrubs or where soils have rapid permeability. Add non-ionic surfactant@ 0 .32oz/gal water or lqt/ 100 gal water. Fall only treatment prior to hard freeze. Add a methylated seed oil surfactant (MSO) @ 0.32oz/gal water or 1 qt./100 gal water. Apply early spring and fall. Prevents seed formation only. Retreatment will be necessary. DO NOT apply when outside temperatures will exceed 85 degrees. Add non-ionic surfactant @ .32oz/ gal water or lqt/100 gal water. DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS HOGBACK VIEW ESTATES Garfield County, Colorado This Declaration is made on this 1st day of August 2025, by Canyon Creek Partners, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (the “Declarant”), as owner and developer of the real property described in Exhibit A (the “Property”), which has been subdivided into seven (7) residential lots known as Hogback View Estates. Declarant hereby declares that all of the Property shall be held, sold, and conveyed subject to the following covenants, conditions, restrictions, and easements, which shall run with the land and be binding on all parties having any right, title, or interest in the Property, and shall inure to the benefit of all future Owners thereof. ARTICLE I – DEFINITIONS 1.1 Association means the Hogback View Estates Homeowners Association, Inc., a Colorado nonprofit corporation formed to manage the Common Elements and enforce this Declaration. 1.2 Lot means any one of the seven (7) residential parcels shown on the recorded final plat of Hogback View Estates. 1.3 Owner means the record owner, whether one or more persons or entities, of fee simple title to any Lot. 1.4 Common Elements means all infrastructure, systems, and areas owned, maintained, or controlled by the Association for the benefit of all Owners, including but not limited to: • Private access roads • Shared wells and water delivery systems • Ditch water infrastructure and irrigation shares • Snow removal zones • Invasive weed management areas • Fire mitigation zones or buffer areas • Utility easements • Shared signage, fencing, and drainage features ARTICLE II – MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING 2.1 Mandatory Membership. Every Owner of a Lot shall automatically be a Member of the Association. Membership is appurtenant to and may not be separated from Lot ownership. 2.2 Voting Rights. Each Lot shall be entitled to one (1) vote in matters submitted to the membership. ARTICLE III – PROPERTY USE AND MAINTENANCE 3.1 Residential Use. All Lots shall be used solely for single-family residential purposes. No commercial or industrial use shall be permitted. 3.2 Maintenance of Lot. Each Owner is responsible for maintaining their Lot, including buildings, driveways, landscaping, and vegetation. 3.3 Nuisance Prohibited. No Owner shall allow any activity or condition that creates a nuisance or interferes with the peaceful enjoyment of neighboring Lots. 3.4 Invasive Weed Management. Each Owner shall actively control noxious weeds on their Lot in accordance with the Colorado Noxious Weed Act. The Association may coordinate weed control in common and easement areas. 3.5 Fire Mitigation. Owners shall comply with fire mitigation guidelines adopted by the Association or required by local fire authorities, including vegetation thinning, defensible space creation, and removal of dead fuels. The Association may coordinate community-wide mitigation efforts, including road access clearance and common area fuel reduction. ARTICLE IV – COMMON ELEMENTS AND ASSOCIATION RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 Association Responsibilities. The Association shall maintain, repair, and operate the Common Elements for the benefit of all Members. These responsibilities include but are not limited to: • Grading and maintaining private access roads • Snow plowing and winter road safety • Operation and maintenance of the shared well systems • Distribution and maintenance of ditch water systems and infrastructure • Weed and noxious plant control in shared or easement areas • Fire mitigation on common roadsides and buffer zones • Administration, insurance, and compliance 4.2 Water Rights and Use. a. Wells: Shared domestic wells will serve the Lots under applicable state permits. The HOA will manage the system and ensure compliance with water law and augmentation plans, if required. b. Irrigation/Ditch Water: If irrigation shares are included in the subdivision or deeded to the HOA, the Association shall manage the schedule, cleaning, and operation of the ditch infrastructure. Owners shall not interfere with delivery or flow. 4.3 Access Easements. All Owners shall have a perpetual, non-exclusive easement for access, utilities, water, and irrigation over shared infrastructure. ARTICLE V – ASSESSMENTS 5.1 Assessment Obligation. Each Owner shall pay annual and special assessments to fund the maintenance and management of the Common Elements. These assessments shall be a lien on the Lot and a personal obligation of the Owner. 5.2 Use of Assessments. Funds collected may be used for: • Road maintenance and plowing • Well maintenance and testing • Ditch water system upkeep • Weed control contracting and supplies • Fire mitigation efforts and fuel reduction • Insurance, accounting, and HOA operations • Emergency repairs and capital reserves 5.3 Delinquencies. Late payments may incur penalties. The Association may place liens and pursue legal action in accordance with the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (CCIOA). ARTICLE VI – ARCHITECTURAL CONTROLS 6.1 Review Required. No structures, fences, or improvements may be constructed or materially altered without written approval of the Architectural Review Committee. 6.2 Design Standards. Improvements must be compatible with the rural setting and meet all Garfield County development standards and fire safety regulations. ARTICLE VII – GENERAL PROVISIONS 7.1 Duration. These covenants shall remain in force for thirty (30) years from the date of recording, renewing automatically every ten (10) years unless terminated or amended as provided herein. 7.2 Amendment. These CC&Rs may be amended by a vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the Lots, with the amendment recorded in the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder’s office. 7.3 Enforcement. The Association or any Owner may enforce these covenants through legal or equitable means, including fines, liens, injunctions, or damages. 7.4 Severability. If any part of this Declaration is held invalid, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect. ARTICLE VIII – ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY 8.1 Photovoltaic System Requirement. Each newly constructed residence on any Lot shall include an onsite photovoltaic (PV) solar energy system designed to generate at least fifty percent (50%) of the household’s estimated average annual electricity consumption. System sizing shall be based on modeling typical residential usage in Garfield County or by using a builder-provided load analysis. 8.2 Timing of Installation. Solar systems shall be installed and operational prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy or, if deferred due to weather or supply chain issues, no later than six (6) months after occupancy. 8.3 Design Review and Aesthetics. All solar installations must be reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) to ensure that visibility, panel color, reflectivity, and mounting methods conform to community aesthetics and roof design. 8.4 Maintenance of Systems. Owners shall maintain solar systems in good working condition. If a system becomes inoperable, the Owner shall repair or replace it within a reasonable time unless excused due to technical or financial infeasibility as determined by the Board. 8.5 Site Limitations and Alternatives. If full 50% generation cannot be achieved due to site limitations (e.g., shading, roof pitch, or structural issues), the Owner may propose an alternative compliance strategy for Board approval. Acceptable alternatives may include: • A combination of smaller PV capacity and energy efficiency upgrades; • Participation in a certified off-site renewable energy subscription program; • Battery storage systems designed to enhance overall energy performance. 8.6 Future Upgrades. Nothing in this Declaration shall prevent an Owner from installing a PV system that exceeds the minimum generation requirement, provided such installation meets ARC guidelines and local permitting standards. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Declarant has executed this Declaration as of the date first written above. DECLARANT: CANYON CREEK PARTNERS, LLC By: ___________________________________ Name: Title: Date: ___________________________ EXHIBIT A – Legal Description of the Property [Insert full legal description from the final recorded plat or attach separately] • Potentially include Fire Mitigation Plan appendix and weed control plan summary ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION Hogback View Estates Homeowners Association, Inc. Article I – Name The name of the corporation is Hogback View Estates Homeowners Association, Inc. Article II – Duration This corporation shall exist in perpetuity unless dissolved in accordance with the law. Article III – Purpose The purpose of this nonprofit corporation is to manage and maintain common infrastructure, enforce covenants, and operate in the best interests of the property owners within the Hogback View Estates subdivision in Garfield County, Colorado. Responsibilities include management of shared roads, water wells, snow removal, and other common elements. Article IV – Registered Office and Agent Registered Office: 901 Cottonwood Circle, Golden, CO 80401 Registered Agent: Michael Resch Article V – Membership All record owners of lots within the subdivision are members. Membership is appurtenant to lot ownership and non-transferable separately. Article VI – Board of Directors The HOA will be governed by a Board of Directors consisting of no fewer than 3 individuals. Directors shall be elected by the members in accordance with the bylaws. Article VII – Incorporator Name: Michael Resch Address: 901 Cottonwood Circle, Golden, CO, 80401 Executed this 1st day of August, 2025. Signature: _________________________ Name: Michael Resch, Incorporator BYLAWS Hogback View Estates Homeowners Association, Inc. Article 1 – Offices Principal and registered offices shall be maintained in Colorado as designated by the Board. Article 2 – Membership Each Lot Owner is a Member and entitled to one vote per Lot. Article 3 – Meetings • Annual Meeting: Held each calendar year. • Special Meetings: Called by the Board or 25% of Members. • Notice: 10 days written or electronic notice required. • Quorum: 51% of Members (in person or proxy). Article 4 – Board of Directors • Size: 3 to 5 Directors. • Term: 2-year staggered terms. • Duties: Oversee maintenance, finances, and enforcement of governing documents. • Vacancies: Filled by the Board until next election. Article 5 – Officers • The Board shall elect a President, Secretary, and Treasurer annually. Article 6 – Fiscal Year The fiscal year is the calendar year unless changed by resolution. Article 7 – Amendments May be amended by majority of Members or 2/3 of Directors. Sample HOA Budget for Hogback View Estates (Annual) Expense Item Annual Cost Details Road Maintenance $3,000 Light grading and repair twice/year Snow Removal $4,000 December–March seasonal clearing Well Maintenance & Testing $2,000 Pump inspections, water quality testing Liability Insurance $1,200 For shared infrastructure and board liability Admin, Legal, Accounting $800 Filing fees, reserve legal costs Contingency/Reserve Fund $2,000 Emergency repairs and capital savings Total $13,000 Per Lot (7 Lots) $1,857/year ~ $155/month per lot Revegetation notes All areas disturbed during construction will be revegetated according to the following criteria. During construction, erosion which may pose a threat to surrounding properties or waterways will be contained through the use of temporary erosion control measures as deemed necessary. Revegetation of disturbed areas shall commence in the fall, prior to the first major snowfall, or early spring when site conditions allow. Erosion Control measures are aimed at controlling/confining sediment within or near the area of disturbance. The long term stability of these areas will depend on the establishment of appropriate ground cover vegetation. The primary goal of the revegetation effort is to protect water quality that will require a sturdy ground cover as soon as possible. All nat ural vegetation to remain shall be protected. Exposure of soil to erosion by removal or disturbance of vegetation shall be limited to the area required for immediate construction operations and for the shortest practical period of time. All disturbed areas shall be seeded or covered with rip-rap. Use Rivendell's native low grow Pitkin County seed mix. All topsoil shall be salvaged from disturbed areas, stockpiled and re-spread prior to revegetation. Topsoil should not be re-spread on areas of the site proposed for future building. Seed shall be drilled or otherwise mechanically incorporated into the soil ("farmed") or shall be hydraulically applied and followed by application of hydraulically applied mulch or straw. Straw mulch shall be secured in place with a hydraulically applied tackifier. If at any time the contractor or civil engineer sees the site being unstable on the proposed slopes, erosion control mats will be placed to help stabilize the ground.H o g b a c k V i e w E s t a t e s Ga r f i e l d C o u n t y , C o l o r a d o da t e : r e m a r k s : L1 Low Grow Seed Mix(Pitkin County Seed Mix) Rate: 1 lb per 1,000 sq. ft.25% Slender Wheatgrass20% Mountain Brome20% Western Wheatgrass20% Secar Bluebunch5% Thickspike Wheatgrass5% Idaho Fescue3% Green Needle2% Indian Ricegrass LA N D S C A P E P L A N OC T O B E R 2 7 , 2 0 2 5 The LAND Studio 365 River Bend Way Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970.927.3690 landstudio2@comcast.net Reseed all distrubed areas includingroad and untility construction areas. See revegetation notesIf at any point the contractorsees the site being unstable onthe proposed slopes, erosion controlmats will be placed to help stabilizethe ground. ^ ^ 10 . 4 % 9.2% 10.9% 8.3 % 5.0% 57 1 8 5 7 2 0 5 7 2 2 5 7 2 4 5 7 2 6 57 2 8 5 7 3 0 5 7 3 2 5 7 3 4 5 7 3 6 5 7 3 8 5 7 4 0 5 7 4 2 5 7 4 4 5 7 4 6 5 7 4 9 57 3 0 57 1 3 56 9 1 567 9566 3 576 8575 3573 857225708569 5 56 7 6 577 4 578 8 579 9 581 0 582 4 584 2 586 2 588 1 59 0 6 59 3 9 59 3 059 1 6 58 9 1 58 9 8 59 2 3 5 8 7 2 5 8 4 9 5 8 2 9 5 8 0 6 5 7 8 4 5 7 7 1 5 7 6 5 5 7 4 6 573 2 5730 5 7 3 4 57 3 7 5751 5766 5782 5791 580 7 58 2 1 5835 5848 5854 5858 5861 586 4 586 7 5870 5874 5878 5882 5886 588 9 5895 577 9 579 5 5819 5834 5848 5859 5868 5 8 7 2 5877 5881 5886 5884 5890 58 9 5 5898 5903 5907 5913 5916 5921 5924 5928 568 8 569 7 570 5 571 2 571 9 5 7 7 6 5 7 8 5 5 7 9 9 5 8 1 2 5 8 2 4 5 8 3 8 5 8 4 8 568 0 569 0 569 9 5 7 0 5 5718 5712 5739 5728 57 4 9 5 7 5 8 5 7 6 5 57 7 3 57 8 1 5 7 8 6 5 7 8 5 57 8 6 577 4 57 6 1 5755 5. 9 % 6.5 % 7.2% 9.7 % 4.7% 2 . 4 % 7.2% 12.0% 13 . 9 % PROPOSED SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVEWAY 5 7 2 1 5 7 2 3 5 7 2 5 57 2 7 57 3 0 57 4 0 57 4 2 57 4 4 57 4 6 57 4 8 57 5 0 57 5 2 57 5 4 575 6 5758 57 6 0 EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 8.4% PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE US H I G H W A Y 6 US H I G H W A Y 6 CR 138 CR 138 PROPOSED LOT 1 ±17.09 ACRES -2 . 6 : 1 -3.1:1 -1.7:1 -2.4:1 -2.0:1 3.5:1 2.1:1 6.1:1 -1.5:1 2 . 9 : 1 2.4:1 PROPOSED LOT 2 ±2.13 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3 ±2.01 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5 ±2.43 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 7 ±6.81 ACRES US H I G H W A Y 6 CR 138 EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EXISTING SHOP BUILDING LOT 4 GABOSSI EXEMPTION LOT 3 GABOSSI EXEMPTION PROPERTY LINE NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 0120 120 240 120 48060 NOTE: SLOPES GREATER THAN 20% SHOWN IN LIGHT GRAY The Land Studio, Inc. 365 River Bend Way • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 • Tel 970 927 3690 • juliepratte@thelandstudio.com January 30, 2026 Heather MacDonald Planner Garfield County Community Development Re: Response to Hogback View Estates Preliminary Plan (File No. SPPA-11-25-9091) Dear Heather: Thank you for providing a completeness review letter for Hogback View Estates Preliminary Plan. Responses to the comments contained in your January 23, 2026 letter are provided below. Applicant responses are shown in bold text following each comment. 1. Extend engineering plan set to include grade of the private road through Lots 6, 2 and 1. See attached additional drawings which include grades as requested. 2. Provide a copy of the roadway encroachment known as Reception No. 533649. See attached Plat and Grant of Easement for Reception No. 533649. We appreciate Garfield County’s continued review of this Application and look forward to working with you as the process moves forward. Please contact us if you have any questions or require additional information. Kind regards, THE LAND STUDIO, INC By: Julie Pratte TO NEW CASTLE TO GLENWOOD SPRINGS SUBJECT PROPERTY CANYON CREEK PARTNERS LLC,LOT 2 GABOSSI EXEMPTION INTE R S T A T E 7 0 COLORADO R I V E R NEW CREATIONCHURCH US HIGHWAY 6 EXISTING SHOP BUILDING EXISTINGSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE PROPOSED LOT 2±2.13 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 7±6.81 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3±2.01 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5±2.43 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 1±17.09 ACRES EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAYS US HI G H W A Y 6 COUNTY R O A D 1 3 8 DATE REVISION C-1.0 DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 1 - C O V E R . D W G - J a n 2 9 , 2 0 2 6 - 4 : 2 9 p m NO R T H COVER SHEET MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R 1 32000.01JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m GENERAL SITE NOTES: 1.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL HAVE A SET OF APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE BASED ON SURVEYS PERFORMED BY BOOKCLIFF SURVEY SERVICES, INC. THE UTILITIES, AS SHOWN, MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN LOCATES OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE AND POTHOLE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES TO VERIFY DEPTH PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 4. EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE AT 2.0 FT INTERVALS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATIONS AND PROTECTION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THESE UTILITIES EITHER UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN CONTINUOUS SERVICE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO, OR INTERRUPTION OF SERVICES CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING EXISTING CONDITIONS OUTSIDE THE DESIGNATED IMPROVEMENT AREA FROM DAMAGE. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING AREAS OUTSIDE THE DESIGNATED IMPROVEMENT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL, AT A MINIMUM, BE RESTORED TO A STATE EQUAL TO ITS PRE-CONSTRUCTION STATE. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THE WORK ACCORDING TO ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENT, COUNTY, STATE, AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS. IN PARTICULAR, THE "TRENCHING" AND "OPEN EXCAVATION" OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CURRENT O.S.H.A. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL PUBLIC OR PRIVATE UTILITY OWNERS FORTY-EIGHT HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK ADJACENT TO THE UTILITY. 9. ALL GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS TO BE ADHERED TO. EARTHWORK, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: 1. EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE AT 2.0 FT INTERVALS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN SEDIMENT AND EROSION PROTECTION THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION OPERATION. 3. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION DISTURBANCE ZONE SHALL BE REVEGETATED PER LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER GRADING IS COMPLETE. SEEDING TO BE APPLIED BY HYDROMULCH TECHNIQUES BY A QUALIFIED CONTRACTOR AND/OR OTHER TECHNIQUES PURSUANT TO RECOMMENDATION BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OTHER CONSULTANTS. 4. SILT FENCE ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF ANY DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. 5. TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL ON SITE FOR USE ON AREAS TO BE REVEGETATED. ANY AND ALL STOCKPILES SHALL BE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND PROTECTED FROM EROSIVE ELEMENTS. 6. VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL DEVICES (MUD RACKS) SHALL BE PROVIDED AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF THESE DEVICES, AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY TRACKING OF SEDIMENT ONTO THE ROADWAYS. ROADWAYS ARE TO BE KEPT CLEAN THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAIN CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO THE SITE BOUNDARIES AND SPECIFIED RIGHT OF WAY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE OUTSIDE THIS AREA WITHOUT THE PRIOR EXPRESSED CONSENT OF THE OWNERS. 8. DUST CAUSED BY EXCAVATION, TOPSOIL REMOVAL OPERATIONS, OR ROAD BASE PLACEMENT SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE. THE ENGINEER OR TOWN MAY REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR AT ANY TIME TO DISCONTINUE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL DUST EMISSIONS ARE MITIGATED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH AND APPLY A DUST PALLIATIVE ON THE SITE AS DIRECTED BY THE COUNTY. DUST PALLIATIVE MAY CONSIST OF WATER OR A NON-POLLUTING SOLUTION. SPREADING OF WATER OR WATER MIXTURE SHALL BE DONE WITH ACCEPTABLE SPRINKLING EQUIPMENT. ALL DUST CONTROL SHALL EXTEND BEYOND THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PROPER TO THE SIDE STREETS ENTERING AND EXISTING THE PROJECT, WHERE MUD AND DIRT FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, AS WELL AS LOCAL TRAFFIC, MAY GET ONTO THE SIDE STREETS. CLEANUP OF THESE AREAS WILL BE REQUIRED AS NECESSARY OR AS DIRECTED BY THE TOWN. 10. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE "BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES" TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION. NO SEDIMENT SHALL LEAVE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 11. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, INSPECTION, REPAIR AND REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROLS. 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WITH UNSTABILIZED DISTURBANCE AREAS OVER 1 ACRE, SUBJECT TO EROSION, REQUIRE A CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT FROM THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT (CDPHE), WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION (WQCD). 2. THE PERMIT APPLICANT(S) IS THE OWNER AND THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE(S). THE CERTIFICATION UNDER THE PERMIT REQUIRES THAT SPECIFIC ACTIONS BE PERFORMED AT DESIGNATED TIMES. THE OWNER AND/OR THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE(S) ARE LEGALLY OBLIGATED TO COMPLY WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATION. 3. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS (SWMPs) ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL PROJECTS REQUIRING A CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND UPDATED ON SITE. THE PERMIT HOLDER MUST IMPLEMENT, MAINTAIN AND INSPECT STORMWATER AND EROSION CONTROLS DELINEATED ON THE SWMPs UNTIL THE SITE IS PERMANENTLY STABILIZED AND THE PERMIT IS INACTIVATED. THE PERMIT COVERS ALL WORK ON THE PROJECT INCLUDING WORK PERFORMED BY SUB-CONTRACTORS AND OTHER ENTITIES. IT IS RECOMMENDED BY THE WQCD THAT A SWMP ADMINISTRATOR BE DESIGNATED FOR THE PROJECT. THE SWMP MUST BE KEPT ON SITE FOR USE BY THE ADMINISTRATOR AND REVIEW BY WQCD PERSONEL OR CITY. 4. THE SWMP SHALL BE PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES, HYDROLOGIC AND POLLUTION CONTROL PRACTICES. THE SWMP NEED NOT BE PREPARED BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER. THE OBJECTIVE OF THE PLAN SHALL BE TO IDENTIFY BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) WHICH WHEN IMPLEMENTED WILL MEET THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. THE SWMP SHOULD BE AMENDED AS NEEDED TO REFLECT THE CHANGES/IMPROVEMENTS MADE. 5. THE PERMIT REQUIRES THAT INSPECTION OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BE PERFORMED AT LEAST EVERY 14 DAYS AND AFTER ANY PRECIPITATION OR SNOWMELT EVENT OCCURS. INSPECTION REPORTS MUST BE MAINTAINED ON SITE AND MADE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY WQCD PERSONEL ALL REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE COMPLETED AND MADE IN A TIMELY MANNER, NO LESS THAN 7 DAYS AFTER ANY PRECIPITATION/RUNOFF EVENT. ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ANY SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE OR AT ANY TIME THAT THE SEDIMENT OR DEBRIS ADVERSELY IMPACTS THE FUNCTIONING OF THE SEDIMENT-TRAPPING DEVICE. 6. THE OBJECTIVE OF THE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO MINIMIZING THE AMOUNT OF DISTURBED SOIL, PREVENTING RUNOFF FROM OFF-SITE OR UNDISTURBED AREAS FROM FLOWING ACROSS DISTURBED AREAS, SLOWING DOWN THE RUNOFF FLOWING ACROSS THE CONSTRUCTION SITES AND REMOVING/CONTROLLING POTENTIAL SEDIMENT IN RUNOFF FROM ON-SITE DISTURBED AREAS TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION OF SENSITIVE UNDISTURBED AREAS. 7. A COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE KEPT ON SITE, FOR READY AVAILABILITY TO THE OPERATOR, AND SO THAT DIVISION OR EPA PERSONNEL CAN REVIEW IT DURING AN INSPECTION. IF AN OFFICE LOCATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE SITE, THE SWMP MUST BE MANAGED SO THAT IT IS AVAILABLE AT THE SITE WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE OCCURRING (e.g., BY KEEPING THE SWMP IN A SUPERINTENDENT'S VEHICLE.) STORM WATER MANAGEMENT NOTES: OE x PROPOSED LEGEND PROPOSED EDGE OF GRAVEL EXISTING LEGEND EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EXISTING EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE EXISTING TWO-TRACK PATH EXISTING IRRIGATION DITCH EXISTING FENCELINE SHEET INDEX C1.0 = COVER SHEET C2.0 = MASTER EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.1 = SUBDIVISION EXISTING CONDITIONS C3.0 = MASTER SITE PLAN C3.1 = SUBDIVISION SITE PLAN C4.0 = SUBDIVISION UTILITY PLAN C5.0 = MASTER GRADING PLAN C5.1 = SUBDIVISION GRADING PLAN C6.0 = SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVE PLAN & PROFILE STA: 0+00 - 8+50 C6.1 = SEMI-PRIMITIVE DRIVE PLAN & PROFILE STA: 8+50 - 17+41 C6.2 = EXISTING DRIVE PLAN & PROFILE STA: 100+00 - 108+50 C6.3 = EXISTING DRIVE PLAN & PROFILE STA: 108+50 - 1114+50 C7.0 = CONSTRUCTION DETAILS >> IRR PROPOSED DITCH FLOWLINE PROPOSED IRRIGATION LINE PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVE HOGBACK VIEW ESTATESPROPOSED SUBDIVISIONGARFIELD COUNTY SEC 35, T5S, R90W, 6TH P.M. VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 2000' MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE UE PROPOSED GRAVEL SHOULDER EXISTING PRIMITIVE/TWO-TRACK DRIVE SCALE: 1'' = 150' 11-13-25 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE PROPOSED WELL LOCATION PROPOSED EASEMENT EXISTING ASPHALT ROADWAY EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE 1/29/26 ADDITIONAL DRAWINGS ADDED AT COUNTY REQUEST1 OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE x OE OE OE OE OE OE OE O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > 57 3 8 57 3 2 5720 5720 5718 5716 5716 5718 5720 5722 5724 5726 5728 5730 5732 5 7 3 4 5 7 3 6 5738 5740 5742 5744 5746 5748 5750 5 7 3 2 5 7 3 4 5 7 3 6 5 7 3 8 5708 5710 5712 5714 5716 5718 5720 5722 5724 5726 3.0% 1.1% 3.2%-3 . 5 : 1 -4 . 8 : 1 -4. 6 : 1 -4. 1 : 1 - 2 . 5 : 1 -1.5:1 -2 . 5 : 1 -3.8:1 -5.5:1 -1 . 5 : 1 5726 5 7 2 8 5 7 3 0 5 7 3 4 5 7 4 0 5 7 4 2 5 7 4 4 5 7 4 6 5 7 5 2 5 7 5 4 5 7 5 6 5 7 5 8 5 7 6 0 573 6 573 8 574 0 573 4 573 2 5730 570 2 570 6 571 0 571 4 571 8 57 2 2 57 2 6 5 7 3 0 58 0 6 58 1 0 58 1 4 58 1 8 58 2 2 58 0 2 5 7 2 0 10 + 0 0 1 0 + 5 0 11+ 0 0 11+5012+00 1 2 + 5 0 13+ 0 0 13+ 5 0 1 4 + 0 0 1 4 + 5 0 15 + 0 0 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 PC: 1 3 + 4 5 . 1 3 PC: 10+90.15 P C : 1 1 + 8 9 . 3 8 PC: 14 + 6 2 . 5 2 PT: 14 + 0 2 . 8 0 PT: 10+89.50 P T : 1 1 + 3 7 . 6 1 PT: 1 2 + 7 7 . 5 4 P T : 1 5 + 5 2 . 0 8 9.8% 3 . 0 % 3 . 0 % 10.5% 10.0% 57 3 0 5 7 3 5 5 7 3 5 5 7 4 0 5 7 4 5 5 7 5 0 573 5 5 7 2 0 5 7 3 0 5730 5735 57 2 5 100 + 0 0 100+50 101+00 101+50 102+00 102 + 5 0 10 3 + 0 0 10 3 + 5 0 10 4 + 0 0 104+50 1 0 5 + 0 0 1 0 5 + 5 0 10 6 + 0 0 106+5 0 107+00 107+50 108+0 0 108+50 109+ 0 0 109+ 5 0 110+ 0 0 PROPOSED LOT 5 ±2.43 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 7 ±6.81 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 ±2.03 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 4 ±2.17 ACRES 3.0:1 10.0% 9.0 % 9. 0 % 11.1% 1 5 . 5 % 16.0 % 16.0% 14.2% CL-CL INTERSECTION POINT CL 12-IN ADS N-12STA:100+17.05 INV: 5731.12 PROPOSED LOT 2 ±2.0 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 1±15.3 ACRES LOT LINESTA:100+88.78 LOT LINE STA:103+76.05 LOT LINE STA:104+45.59 M A T C H L I N E M A T C H L I N E EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE EXISTING DRIVEWAYTO SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE 5 7 5 0 5 7 4 8 30.0' ACCESSEASEMENT 5790 5780 5800 5810 5820 5830 5840 5850 5850 5840 5830 5 8 2 0 5 8 1 0 5 8 0 0 5 7 9 0 5 7 8 0 57 7 0 5 8 2 0 5 8 3 0 5 8 4 0 5 8 5 0 58 6 0 5870 2.5:1 3.5:1 2 . 0 : 1 2. 8 : 1 3 . 0 : 1 1.5: 1 5 8 4 0 EXISTING DRIVE PROFILE 5730 5740 5750 5760 5770 5780 5790 5800 5810 5820 5830 5840 5730 5740 5750 5760 5770 5780 5790 5800 5810 5820 5830 5840 100+00 57 3 3 . 7 57 3 2 . 8 1 57 3 7 . 3 57 3 4 . 3 7 100+50 57 3 7 . 4 57 3 7 . 0 0 57 3 9 . 8 57 3 9 . 6 4 101+00 57 4 2 . 2 57 4 4 . 6 101+50 57 4 7 . 1 57 4 9 . 6 102+00 57 5 2 . 4 57 5 5 . 2 102+50 57 5 7 . 8 57 5 9 . 8 103+00 57 6 2 . 0 57 6 4 . 2 103+50 57 6 6 . 3 57 6 8 . 8 104+00 57 7 1 . 1 57 7 3 . 3 104+50 57 7 5 . 3 57 7 7 . 3 105+00 57 8 0 . 4 57 8 4 . 5 105+50 57 8 8 . 3 57 9 2 . 3 106+00 57 9 6 . 3 58 0 0 . 4 106+50 58 0 4 . 3 58 0 8 . 2 107+00 58 1 2 . 1 58 1 6 . 1 107+50 58 2 0 . 1 58 2 4 . 5 108+00 58 2 8 . 6 58 3 2 . 2 108+50 58 3 6 . 0 -10.0%12-IN ADS N-12 CULVERT STA: 100+17.05 INV: 5731.12' EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE EXISTING GRADE EXISTING GRADE LO T 5 LO T 6 LO T 6 LO T 2 LO T 2 LO T 1 LOT 5/LOT 6 PROPERTY LINE STA: 100+88.78EX GRADE: 5741.10' LOT 6/LOT 2 PROPERTY LINE STA: 103+76.06 EX GRADE: 5768.90' LOT 2/LOT 1 PROPERTY LINE STA: 104+45.59 EX GRADE: 5774.85' -9.0% -8.5% -15.5% -16.0% -16.0% DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 6 - P L A N A N D P R O F I L E . D W G - J a n 2 9 , 2 0 2 6 - 4 : 3 8 p m NO R T H 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 030 30 60 30 12015 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m CENTERLINE EXISTING DRIVE PROFILE HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 30' MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-6.2 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O EXISTING DRIVE PLAN & PROFILE STA:100+00-108+50 01-29-26 1 1/29/26 ADDITIONAL DRAWINGS ADDED AT COUNTY REQUEST S S OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE C O T V G W W W W W W OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE -1 . 5 : 1 -3.8:1 -5.5:1 57 6 0 580 6 581 0 581 4 581 8 5822 580 2 579 8 579 4 579 0 578 6 578 2 1 1 4 + 5 0 103 + 0 0 103 + 5 0 104 + 0 0 10 4 + 5 0 10 5 + 0 0 10 5 + 5 0 1 0 6 + 0 0 1 0 6 + 5 0 107 + 0 0 107+50 108+00 108+50 109+00 109+50 110+00 110+50 111+00 111+50 112+00 112 + 5 0 113+00 113 + 5 0 1 1 4 + 0 0 9.0% 15 . 5 % 1 6 . 0 % 16.0% 14.2% LOT LINESTA:103+76.05 LOT LINESTA:104+45.59 5790 57 8 0 5800 5810 5820 5830 5840 5850 5850 5840 5 8 3 0 5 8 2 0 58 1 0 58 0 0 57 9 0 57 8 0 577 0 58 2 0 58 3 0 58 4 0 58 5 0 5 8 6 0 5 8 7 0 2.5: 1 3.5:1 2.0 : 1 2.8 : 1 3. 0 : 1 1.5:1 PROPOSED LOT 7±6.81 ACRES EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPOSED LOT 1 ±15.3 ACRES M A T C H L I N E M A T C H L I N E 13.0% 16.0% 12.0% EXISTING SINGLEFAMILY RESIDENCE 16 . 0 % 11.0% 5 8 8 0 5890 5 9 0 0 5 9 1 0 5 9 2 0 5890 5900 5880 5870 5910 5920 5 8 9 0 5 8 8 0 58 7 0 58 6 0 58 5 0 58 4 0 EXISTING DRIVE PROFILE 5830 5840 5850 5860 5870 5880 5890 5900 5910 5920 5830 5840 5850 5860 5870 5880 5890 5900 5910 5920 108+50 58 3 6 . 0 58 3 9 . 5 109+00 58 4 3 . 1 58 4 6 . 6 109+50 58 5 0 . 0 58 5 3 . 5 110+00 58 5 7 . 1 58 6 1 . 0 110+50 58 6 4 . 4 58 6 7 . 8 111+00 58 7 1 . 0 58 7 4 . 5 111+50 58 7 8 . 5 58 8 2 . 4 112+00 58 8 6 . 5 58 9 0 . 0 112+50 58 9 3 . 3 58 9 5 . 9 113+00 58 9 8 . 3 59 0 1 . 8 113+50 59 0 4 . 5 59 0 6 . 5 114+00 59 0 7 . 3 59 0 8 . 5 114+50 59 0 9 . 0 EXISTING GRADE EXISTING GRADE -14.2% -13.0% -16.0% -12.0% EXISTING GRADE CL DRIVE EXISTING GRADE CL DRIVE DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 3 2 0 0 0 \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ S H E E T S E T \ 3 2 0 0 0 - 6 - P L A N A N D P R O F I L E . D W G - J a n 2 9 , 2 0 2 6 - 4 : 3 9 p m NORTH 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 030 30 60 30 12015 MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R JOB NO. DATE: DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SO P R I S E N G I N E E R I N G L L C 50 2 M A I N S T R E E T S U I T E A 3 C A R B O N D A L E C O 8 1 6 2 3 (9 7 0 ) 7 0 4 0 3 1 1 s o p r i s e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m CENTERLINE EXISTING DRIVE PROFILE HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 30' MA J O R S U B D I V I S I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N C-6.3 32000.01 HO G B A C K V I E W E S T A T E S LO T 2 G A B O S S I E X E M P T I O N GA R F I E L D C O U N T Y , C O L O R A D O EXISTING DRIVE PLAN & PROFILE STA:108+50-114+50 01-29-26 1 1/29/26 ADDITIONAL DRAWINGS ADDED AT COUNTY REQUEST The Land Studio, Inc. 365 River Bend Way • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 • Tel 970 927 3690 • juliepratte@thelandstudio.com February 3, 2026 Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Hogback View Estates Preliminary Plan (File No. SPPA-11-25-9091) Dear Garfield County, On behalf of the Applicant for Parcel No. 2123-352-00-186, we respectfully request a waiver from the requirements of Section 7-107.F, Access and Roadways – Design Standards, specifically the maximum driveway grade of twelve percent (12%). Waiver Request – Section 7-107.F (Maximum Driveway Grade) The Applicant requests a waiver from the maximum driveway grade requirement to allow the existing driveway serving Lot 1 to remain in its current configuration. Given the rural nature of the property, the low traffic volumes, and the fact that the driveway serves a single existing residence, the Applicant believes the existing driveway is appropriate for its intended use. Waiver Criteria – Section 4-202 Pursuant to Section 4-202, Waiver of Submission Requirements, the Applicant believes the requested waiver meets the applicable criteria: 1. Good Cause: The portion of the driveway exceeding a 12% grade serves only one existing residence that was constructed in 2003. The driveway has been continuously used since that time. 2. Project Size and Impacts: The driveway will not serve any additional lots. No new residential development is proposed that would rely on this access. 3. Complete Review: Granting the waiver will not compromise a proper or complete review of the project, as the driveway does not affect internal circulation, emergency access to other lots, or overall subdivision design. 4. Materiality: The driveway grade is not material to describing the proposal or demonstrating compliance with applicable approval criteria, given its limited and existing use. The Land Studio 2 Sopris Engineering evaluated potential modifications to reduce the driveway grade between Station 104+45.49 and Station 114 and determined that reducing the grade is not reasonable due to negative grading impacts to adjacent slopes. Retaining the existing driveway configuration avoids unnecessary disturbance while maintaining functional access to the existing residence. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or would like to discuss this request further. Thank you for your consideration. Please call or email to discuss as necessary and thank you for your attention to this request. Sincerely, THE LAND STUDIO, INC By: Julie Pratte