HomeMy WebLinkAboutAsbestos Report1RQ '1NENTAL CONSULTANTS sf'
Limited Asbestos Building Materials
Inspection Services
Client: Ashley & Roddy Stieger, 414 Pinon Drive, Glenwood Springs,
CO 81601
Project Site: 414 Pinon Drive, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
(Renovation Scope of Work)
Inspection Date: February 18, 2026
Phase Con Project #: 26-02-18D1
2166 Peregrine Court
Grand Junction, CO 81507
970-260-3341 -- office@phasecon.com
414 Pinon Drive, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Sampling Description
Phase Con provided limited (renovation scope of work) asbestos building
inspection services at 414 Pinon Drive in Glenwood Springs, Colorado
on February 18, 2026. The inspection was performed by Mr. Douglas
Close, a Colorado State and EPA Asbestos Building
Inspector/Management Planner. The client plans interior renovation
work as described by the client to Phase Con.
Discovery of hidden or covered building materials must result in
stopping demolition work until the discovered materials can be properly
inspected by a certified asbestos building inspector. Suspect materials
within the scope of work were sampled and analyzed as per Colorado
State Regulation #8.
A random sampling scheme was utilized in choosing sampling locations.
This scheme used a grid system and randomly generated numbers. The
Inspector, Mr. Douglas Close, classified the suspect materials by type
(Thermal System Insulation (TSI), Surfacing Materials, and
Miscellaneous Materials), and obtained the appropriate number of
samples of each material based upon material type, and quantity.
Tables are provided which detail the individual samples obtained, the
laboratory analysis results for these samples, the quantity and condition
of ACBM, the locations of each homogeneous area, and other material
specific information. Potential for damage to materials information is
provided in the following sampling information tables.
Discussion & Recommendations
None of the tested building materials were found to contain
asbestos.
If any previously unknown or undiscovered materials are found during
demolition activities which are suspect for asbestos content then these
materials should be tested for potential asbestos content prior to
continuing any further demolition work.
Disclaimer
Identified asbestos containing materials may be in areas which are
inaccessible or hidden due to their application during the construction
process and their subsequent enclosure or covering with building and
finish materials. Areas behind walls, inside chases, or other hidden,
covered or enclosed areas should be inspected whenever renovation or
demolition activities are scheduled which may disturb the materials
within or beneath these barriers. Care to watch for hidden or
undiscovered materials should be taken by the demolition contractor
during the demolition process. A discovery of unknown materials will
necessitate stopping demolition until the materials can be inspected by
a certified asbestos building inspector. 'Overspray' or excess materials
from the installation or application process of asbestos containing
materials is common, should be expected in the vicinity of installed
asbestos containing materials, and is often present either covered by
other building materials or in hidden or unexpected locations.
Bulk material samples are obtained in accordance with applicable
regulations, industry standard techniques and analyzed by a NVLAP
accredited laboratory; however, due to the asbestos content fluctuations
which may occur in a building material due to the application and/or
initial mixing process no guarantee can be made as to an 'exact'
percentage asbestos content (this includes 'no asbestos detected' and
trace' contents) which represents the entirety of the material (asbestos
content fluctuations can and will occur throughout a building material).
Abatement cost estimates and material quantity estimates are
approximate only (due to the hidden nature of many of the materials),
and are provided only as a general guideline to the client. More than
one licensed Colorado State asbestos abatement contractor should be
consulted to determine actual abatement costs of the ACBMs described
above. Actual material quantities can only be determined by complete
removal of covering materials.
Please call us R-h ny questions which you may have concerning this
report our re,pommend ations. Thank you.
'Q9Tglas A. Close
,Colorado State and EPA Certified Asbestos Building
Inspector/Management Planner #2930
Sample Description Table(s
0
u
U)
0)
0-
LO
0
iC
tZ
QJ
Fz
C:
0
0-
.F
u
En
Q)
0
U)
4-J
(13
2:
CZ5
E
(a
U)
:,Cn
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
LL ti
LL
LL
LL
z
'U .0" 0."'.0,
'-,Uj -"j-
0 C5
0-
0
a_
0
a_
0
0-
C)
IL
0
0-
0
(L Z:,.;J
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
Z z
0 a
U) " LU Z
0
0 4- U), LLI
Au
- ,
-z1—
-0
"F0-
C)
D �- >-
0
0
LO
0
C:)
U*) U)
0
0
LO
0
LO
0—
0
LO U)
0—
0
U') U)
0
C:)
Lr) U)
z
ce)
Cf)
co
CY)
CY)
CY)
LU
U)
U)
U)
CO
U)
CL
CL
CL
CL
0-
0-
_0 0
C.)
-0 0
-0
0
-0 0
C.)
-0 0
70
0
-a 0
" 0
co U)
0 0
(z (n
0 0
Ca U)
0 0
¢S U)
0 0
ca (n
0 0
ca W
0 0
ca W
0 0
0,
-0 E -z
Z5
E
-0 E
-0
"0
LU
E Q)
E (D 0
-0
E a) 0
-0
F= -0
E a)
-0
E a) 0
-0
E a)
-0
:n-
73 3
= 3
:3
=
=3
=
U)
U) C:
CL 0
CD
LE
(n c:
Q.--
U) C: '!
a-- 0
U) C:
0--- 0
U) C
0- —
0
U)
0) E
>1
0) E
>1 co
m E
U)
0) E
U)
0) E
>,
0) E
0) E
(n
CD
U)
U)
(n
U)
(n
0)
0)
0)
07
0)
c- <
CL <
co
cu
ca
0
cz
0
co
E ca
ca
E cz
co
(n
U)
cn
U)
U)
U) a)
a) <
CD <
C/)
Lu,
a) CD
0) a)
=3
a) a)
:3
a) CD
=3
0) a)
m
0 (D
C-) =3
0 U)
C-) :3
x
x
x
x
x
0
0
CD
0 a)
0 a)
cc
0
0
0
0
0
E 0
E 0
LU
F--
<
CL
:2
-tz
.0-
i2
Y
-tz
a
:2
!Z
i2
=3 E
U) 0
0- =
m E
U) 0
c- =
U)
ct)
U)
CO
U)
LLJ
Z.cc
<
<
Q
<
m
m
IL
C\j
Cf)
LO
co
M
N
CD
m
r\ ro
C
Ln
CD
L OL roc
C
O (a
fa zz 0
O Q+ O
4.J O 75
O CL
Q J N
� ra
d LL.
U 07 C
U Q z ro O
Q `' T: z
OLL. ..
DLr)a LL_
aazu_z
M
O
Q
N F-
O O
4-j U
N �
LO
(U Q)
v
o ru
rl �-
E
uUU
co
Field Sketch - Sampling and/or ACM Locations
Diagram(s)
10918 OZ)'SDNIHdS OOOMN319 "80 NOW VU,
isnOH NOUld
I
I dig
si
10918 OJ'S'JNRIdS dOOMN3l�J'214 NONId til4
g
N
Of
Q
/
�i
3snOH NOIVId
a
Q-
Q 4 Q Q QQ
N
Ze
I j I I Imo'
V
J
Laboratory Analysis Results
CA Labs CA Labs, L.L.C.
12232 Industriplex, Suite 32 NVLAP #200772-0
Dedicated to Baton Rouge, LA 70809 TDSHS #300370
Quality Phone 225-751-5632 CDPHE #AL-18111
Fax 225-751-5634 LELAP #03069
v
Materials Characterization - Bulk Asbestos Analysis
Laboratory Analysis Report - Polarized Light
Phase Con Environmental Consultants, LLC Attn: Doug Close
2166 Peregrine Court Customer Project: 414 Pinon Drive
Grand Junction, CO 81507 Reference #: CBR26021120 Date: 2/20/2026
Analysis and Method
Summary of polarizing light microscopy (PLM / Stereomicroscopy bulk asbestos analysis) using the methods described in 40CFR Part 763
Appendix E to Subpart E (Interim and EPA 600 / R-93 / 116 (Improved). The sample is first viewed with the aid of stereomicroscopy. Numerous
liquid slide preparations are created for analysis under the polarized microscope where identifications and quantifications are preformed. Calibrated
liquid refractive oils are used as liquid mouting medium. These oils are used for identification (dispersion staining). A calibrated visual estimation is
reported, should any asbestiform mineral be present. Other techniques such as acid washing are used in conjugation with refractive oils for
detection of smaller quantities of asbestos. All asbestos percentages are based on calibrated visual estimation traceable to NIST standards for
regulated of asbestos. Traceability to measurement and calibration is achieved by using known amounts and types of asbestos from standards
where analyst and laboratory accuracy are measured. As little as 0.001 % asbestos can be detected in favorable samples, while detection in
unfavorable samples may approach the detection limit of 0.50% (well above the laboratory definition of trace).
Discussion
Vermiculite containing samples may have trace amounts of actinolite-tremolite, where not found be PLM should be analyzed using TEM methods
and / or water separation techniques. Suspected actinolite/vermiculite presence will be indicated through the sample comment section of this report.
Fibrous talc containing samples may even contain a related asbestos fiber known as anthophyllite. Under certain conditions the same fiber may
actually contain both talc and anthophyllite (a phenomenon called intergrowth). Again, TEM detection methods are recommended. CA Labs PLM
report comments will denote suspected amounts of asbestiform anthophyllite with talc, where further analysis is recommended.
Some samples (floor tiles, surfacings, etc.) may contain fibers too small to be detectable by PLM analysis and should be analyzed by TEM bulk
protocols.
A "trace asbestos" will be reported if the analyst observes far less than 1 % asbestos. CA Labs defines "trace asbestos" as a few fibers detected
by the analyst in several preparations and will indicate as such under these circumstances.
Quantification of <1% will actually be reported as <=l% (allowable variance close to 1% is high). Such results are ideal for point counting, and the
technique is mandatory for friable samples (NESHAP, Nov. 1990 and clarification letter 8 May 1991) under 1 % percent asbestos and the "trace
asbestos". In order to make all initial PLM reports issued from CA Labs NESHAP compliant, all <1% asbestos results (except floor tiles) will
be point counted at no additional charge.
Qualifications
CA Labs is accredited by the National Voluntary Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for selected test methods for airborne fiber analysis (TEM), and
for bulk asbestos fiber analysis (PLM). All analysts have a college degree in a natural science (geology, biology, or environmental science) or are
recognized by a state professional board in one these disciplines .Extensive in-house training programs are used to augment education background
of the analyst. The group leader of polarized light has received supplemental McCrone Research training for asbestos identification. This report is
not covered by the scope of AIHA accreditation. Analysis performed at CA Labs, LLC 12232 Industriplex, Suite 32 Baton Rouge, LA 70809.
Page 1 of 5
CA Labs CA Labs, L.L.C.
12232 Industriplex, Suite 32 NVLAP #
Dedicatsd to Baton Rouge, LA 70809 DSHS #300003770
C
Quality Phone225-751-5632 DPHE#AL-7817i
Fax 225-751-5634 LELAP #03069
Overview of Proiect Sample Material Containing Asbestos
Customer Project: 414 Pinon Drive CA Labs Project #: CBR26021120
Sample # Layer Analysts Physical Description of Asbestos type /
# Subsample calibrated visual List of Affected Building
estimate percent Material Types
No Asbestos Detected.
Glossary of abbreviations (non -asbestos fibers and non -fibrous minerals):
ca -carbonate pe - pedite
gypsum - gypsum qu - quartz
bi - binder
or - organic
ma - matrix
mi - mica
ve - vermiculite
of - other
fg - fiberglass pa - palygorskite (clay)
mw - mineral wool
wo - wollastinite
to - talc
sy - synthetic
ce - cellulose
br - brucite
ka - kaolin (clay)
This report relates to the Items tested. This report Is not to be used by the customer to claim product certification, approval or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, AIHA LAP, LLC, or any other agency of
the federal government. This report may not be reproduced except in full without written permission from CA Labs. These results are submitted pursuant to CA Labs' current terms and sale, condition
of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitations of liability provisions and no responsibility or liability Is assumed for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted. Unless
notified in writing to return the samples covered by this report, CA Labs will store the samples for a period of ninety (90) days before discarding. A shipping or handling fee may be assessed for the
return of any samples.
Page 2 of 5
i
CA Labs, L.L.C.
CA Labs 12232 Industrip/ex, Suite 32 A, --
Dedicated to Baton Rouge, LA 70809 --=— -
Phone 225-751-5632 �~
Quality
Fax 225-751-5634
Polarized Light Asbestifor►a Materials
Customer Info: Attn: Doug Close Customer Project:
Phase Con Environmental Consultants, LLC 414 Pinon Drive
2166 Peregrine Court
Grand Junction, CO 81507
Turnaround Time: 4 hr
NV'LAP #200772-0
TDSHS #300370
CDPHE #AL-18111
LELAP #03069
CA Labs Project #:
C6R26021120
Date: 2/20/2026
Samples Received: 2/20/2026
Phone # 970-241-6480 Date Of Sampling:
Fax # 970-241-6584 Purchase Order #:
Sample # Com Layer Analysts Physical Description of Homo- Asbestos type / Non -asbestos fiber Non -fibrous type
ment # Subsample geneo calibrated visual type / percent / percent
us estimate percent
(Y/N)
White Surfaced White 100% qu, bi, pe,
1 1-1 Compound N None Detected ca
1-2 Grey Drywall with Paper N None Detected 10% ce 90% qu, gyp
White Surfaced White 100% qu, bi, pe,
2 2-1 Compound N None Detected ca
2-2 White Drywall with Paper N None Detected 10% ce 90% qu, gyp
White Surfaced White 100% qu, bi, pe,
3 3-1 Compound N None Detected ca
3-2 White Drywall with Paper N None Detected 10% ce 90% qu, gyp
White Surfaced White 100% qu, bi, pe,
4 4-1 Compound N None Detected ca
Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)
Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for
identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becks line method.
ca - carbonate mi - mica fg - fiberglass ce - cellulose
gypsum - gypsum ve - vermiculite mw - mineral wool br - brucite
bi - binder of -other wo - wollastinite ka - kaolin (clay)
or - organic pe - perlite to - talc pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:
ma - matrix qu - quartz sy - synthetic
Corinne Barr
Analyst
Senior Analyst Laboratory Director
Alicia Stretz Chris Williams
1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers 6. Anthaphyllite In association with Fibrous Talc
2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages 7. Contamination suspected from other building materials
3. Actlnolite in association with Vermiculite 8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for passible analysts by another method
4. Layer not analyzed - a0ached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected 9. < 1 / Result point counted positive
5. Not enough sample to analyze 10. TEM analysis suggested
Page 3 of 5
CA Labs, L.L.C.
CA Labs
12232 industrip/ex, Suite 32
NVLAP #200772-0
Dedicated to
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
TDSHS #300370
Quality
Phone 225-751-5632
CDPHE #AL-18111
Fax 225-751-5634
LELAP #03069
Polarized Light Asbestiform Materials Characterization
Customer Info: Attn: Doug Close Customer Project: CA Labs Project #:
Phase Con Environmental Consultants, LLC 414 Pinon Drive CBR26021120
2166 Peregrine Court
Grand Junction, CO 81507 Date: 2/20/2026
Turnaround Time: 4 hr Samples Received: 2/20/2026
Phone # 970-241-6480 Date Of Sampling:
Fax # 970-241-6584 Purchase Order #:
Sample # Com Layer Analysts Physical Description of Homo- Asbestos type / Non -asbestos fiber Non -fibrous type
ment # Subsample geneo calibrated visual type / percent / percent
us estimate percent
(Y/N)
4-2 White Drywall with Paper N None Detected 10% ce 90% qu, gyp
White Surfaced White 100% qu, bi, pe,
5 5-1 Compound N None Detected ca
5-2 White Drywall with Paper N None Detected 10% ce 90% qu, gyp
White Surfaced White 100% qu, bi, pe,
6 6-1 Compound N None Detected ca
White Compound Beneath
6-2 Tape Y None Detected 100% qu, per ca
6-3 White Drywall with Paper N None Detected 10% ce 90% qu, gyp
White Surfaced White 100% qu, bi, pe,
7 7-1 Compound N None Detected ca
Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E)/ Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)
Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for
identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.
ca -carbonate mi - mica fg - fiberglass ce - cellulose
gypsum - gypsum ve - vermiculite mw - mineral wool br - brucile
bi - binder of -other wo - woilastinite ka - kaolin (clay)
or - organic pe - perlite to - talc pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:
ma - matrix qu - quartz sy - synthetic
Corinne Barr
Analyst
1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers
2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages
3. Actinolite in association with vermiculite
4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected
5. Not enough sample to analyze
01:r:'-h
Senior Analyst Laboratory Director
Alicia Stretz Chris Williams
6. Anthophyllite In association with Fibrous Talc
7. Contamination suspected from other building materials
6. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method
9. < 1% Result point counted positive
10. TEM analysis suggested
Page 4 of 5
CA Labs, L.L.C.
CA Labs
12232 Industrip/ex, Suite 32
NVLAP #200772-0
Dedicated to
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
�,.
TDSHS #300370
Quality
Phone 225-751-5632
CDPHE #AL-18111
Fax 225-751-5634
LELAP #03069
Polarized Light Asbestitorm Materials Characterization
Customer Info: Attn: Doug Close Customer Project: CA Labs Project #:
Phase Con Environmental Consultants, LLC 414 Pinon Drive CBR26021120
2166 Peregrine Court
Grand Junction, CO 81507 Date: 2/20/2026
Turnaround Time: 4 hr Samples Received: 2/20/2026
Phone # 970-241-6480 Date Of Sampling:
Fax # 970-241-6584 Purchase Order #:
Sample # Com Layer Analysts Physical Description of Homo- Asbestos type / Non -asbestos fiber Non -fibrous type
ment # Subsample geneo calibrated visual type / percent / percent
us estimate percent
(Y/N)
7-2 White Drywall with Paper N None Detected 10% ce 90% qu, gyp
Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)
Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil Immersion for
identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.
ca. -carbonate mi - mica fg - fiberglass ce - cellulose
gypsum - gypsum ve - vermiculite mw - mineral wool br - brucite
bi - binder of -other wo - wollastinite ka - kaolin (clay)
or - organic pe - pedite to - talc pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:
ma - matrix qu - quartz sy - synthetic
Corinne Barr
Analyst
i. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers
2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages
3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite
4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected
5. Not enough sample to analyze
Senior Analyst Laboratory Director
Alicia Stretz Chris Williams
6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc
7. Contamination suspected from other building materials
8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method
9. < tY Result point counted positive
10. TEM analysis suggested
Page 5 of 5
C.A. Labs, LLC. Phone: 22V,51-5632
32232 Industriples Fax: 22Z 751-SGi-i
CALift Suite 32 Mobile: 225-M-3471
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
Chain of Custody
Client Name: Phase Con Environmental Consultants, lLC
Client Address: 2156 Peregrine Court Billing Address: same
Grand Junction, CO 81507 (if different)
phone number: 970•260-33 41
fax nurliber: sas-9co-ozsl Send Reports to: Douglas Close
Project Number: Project Name: Wj Z i flop r�.�lrP
Reports Results
Contact Douglas Close VIA- EMAIV FAX VERBAL
Total # Samples Submitted: Total # Samples to be Analyzed: Material. Matrix:
Ai I Hulk / Water
Ae I.ee.f..c.- nl—m rn11 nhawl fnravailahility nfAll nrch anrilnraftar hmrrta camnlPa_
TEM
TA Time
PLM
TA Time
Optical / IAQ
TA Time
CYreleancaY==dTAwnt
CYrdeaaangsttXXTAdr=
2hou
Allergen Particle:
2hour
AH3 ,RA
4 hour
Improved
4 ho
tape/bulk/swab
4 hour
EPA Level ff
8 hour
I Interim
8 hour
Cyclex d cassettes
8 hour
Drinking Water
16 hour
i
16 hour
Air-o-cell cassettes
is hour
Wipe
24 hour
; A HER A
24 hour
Anderson cultures
24 hour
Micro vac
2 days
2 days
Bulk/swab cultures
2 days
NIOSH M
3 days
Point Count -
3 days
Bacteria cultures
3 days
Chatfield Bulk
5 days
(NESMAPS)
5 days
PCM: NIOSH 7400
5-10 days
Lead:
'a 3.7ary= and TA 4-me
C.�...n1e Infnnn�Nnn•
Sample Number: Sample Location:
Sample Date/Time:
Sample Volume (L)
t
t
ldatalwordproliorrnsiChainofCustody twp Revision 2 3112J01 Page 1
Custody Information: Z la -;5�
Samples relinquished: Samples received:
Signature / Date / Time Signature / Date / Time
q- 20
/Z" Samples received:
Signature; Date / Time Signature / Date / Time
Samples
Certificates
E
o
Q o
N �' a
N N 10
■ ■ O cvi
LO �
CV LLB N
Cl) GO
Lu
o ` ''r,, TOMQ) - o
as c L) ;� % � � ° Co o
co °
ca a N
i i rA40
i s
O lL
N ® O CCU N LL
O o
aaia 'c i¢
w U Uco
O O
vs Q ,0 a6O'30 Ua��
pco Q o
a—
mo
uo
m �
® y� co
O ON Q
a
V ca o
U �
■ co) U
i cu �i
to N
N
v