Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRobin Van Norman_21_FEB-26Subject: Please Protect the Cattle Creek Confluence from Unsustainable Development from the proposed development known as the HARVEST ROARING FORK PUD Name: Robin Van Norman Email: robinvannorman@gmail.com Phone number: 13034993778 Message: Subject: Please Protect the Cattle Creek Confluence from Unsustainable Development from the proposed development known as the HARVEST ROARING FORK PUD Dear Mr. Jankovsky: I live in Elk Springs in Glenwood Springs and must use route 82 for all of my transportation. I am writing with deep concern about the proposed large-scale development, HARVEST ROARING FORK, at the Cattle Creek Confluence, where Cattle Creek meets the Roaring Fork River. My biggest concern is what this development would do to the the issues we already have with the traffic and accidents on route 82. In addition, I agree with the other concerns as expressed in the following by the Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition: This area is one of the last intact open spaces along the river and is vital not only to Garfield County, but to the health and sustainability of the entire Roaring Fork Valley — including Pitkin and Eagle Counties. Here are key reasons why this proposed project should not move forward as proposed: 1. Traffic, Safety & Infrastructure Thousands of new vehicle trips would overwhelm Highway 82 and local roads, requiring new traffic lights and stretching emergency response capacity. This puts residents at greater risk. 2. Water Quality & Watershed Health The Roaring Fork watershed is already under strain. A large development without robust stormwater safeguards would increase runoff, pollution, and sediment, degrading water quality for communities downstream. 3. Rural Character & Scenic Beauty The proposed density — 1,500 residential units, up to 375 ADU’s, a 120 room hotel, and 55,000 square feet of commercial space on 283 acres — is fundamentally incompatible with existing zoning and with the valley’s rural identity. 4. Public Services & Community Costs The proposal does not account for the strain on schools, fire protection, EMS, and utilities. This leaves existing taxpayers and communities to absorb the costs of growth. 5. Ecosystems & Wildlife The confluence is a rich ecological corridor, home to bald eagles, herons, elk, deer, foxes, trout, and migratory birds. Development of this scale would fragment critical habitat and disrupt migration and breeding grounds. This issue extends beyond Garfield County. Water quality, wildlife migration, and development precedent will affect the broader valley — including Pitkin and Eagle Counties. Our region must prioritize sustainable growth that protects natural resources and community well-being. I respectfully urge you to reject this development as proposed and to protect the Cattle Creek Confluence for current and future generations. Thank you for your leadership and for listening to the concerns of residents across the Roaring Fork Valley. Sincerely, Robin Van Norman