HomeMy WebLinkAboutpetition_16-FEB-26C., ra,4-
Stop Harvest Roaring Fork Petition
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently
under review by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon
which it is proposed and will negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and
wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns for opposing the development are the following:
1. Density The development proposal includes: �r
1500 units of residential plus up tom ADUs•
55,000 square feet of commercial space; and
A 12Q room hotel
All on less than 283 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the
surrounding area and does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone
district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to
congestion and safety concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's
own traffic projections state the site would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per
day, The current transportation infrastructure cannot handle this level of additional
vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to an emergency such as a
wildfire
3. Water Qu_alitylQuantity. This development potentially threatens water quality in the
Roaring Fork River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run
off, and encroachment into riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water
supply which is a major concern in the arid West.
4. Wildlife Disruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration
corridor which will be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical
services are already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain
these resources to the breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny
the Harvest Roaring Fork Development application.
Name Print and Sin Address r Date
V K S 3 �G o,s��1� L.--
2. f"rA,�1 ' l krfT2 2 12
0
Name (Print and 5i n j 7 n Address 7�] Date
5.
6,
7.
S.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
When completed return to: Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition
P.O. Box 799
Carbondale, CO 81623
Stop Harvest Roaring Fork Petition
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently
under review by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon
which it is proposed and will negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and
wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns for opposing the development are the following:
1. Density. The development proposal includes:
1500 units of residential plus up to ADLis;
55,000 square feet of commercial space, and
A 120 room hotel
All on less than 283 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the
surrounding area and does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone
district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to
congestion and safety concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's
own traffic projections state the site would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per
day. The current transportation infrastructure cannot handle this level of additional
vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to an emergency such as a
wildfire
3. Water Quality/Quantity. This development potentially threatens water quality in the
Roaring Fork River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run
off, and encroachment into riparian zones. it will further strain already limited water
supply which is a major concern in the arid West.
4. Wildlife Disruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration
corridor which will be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical
services are already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain
these resources to the breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny
the Harvest Roaring Fork Development application.
Name [Print and Sign] Address
C'
I 1 J
2. �-)' CA 0
nn
Date
3(�
� 1,- 5 z -L-i r
'
��
r- '
C--1 CA lh �
4.
Vy�ck
5.
7.
3� ll
,4pt`N
L� V 'FJ' 4-6 } - f
8. iL&
10.�.
,�
11Q4 �� G�
� -3 13
-4
12. --IDt
fff�
l
'� �I
14. '� ► Vi1 �
I f �
15.
15.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
Name (Print and Sign)
4.
5.
6.o��
7.
8. 7
9.
10._ �� �I c.►.�•c�
11.
12.lY,7fIlS
13.
14.L"rUl�
Address
A, tr:
Date
-tLU L-It'W 1 AP,. L/a63N\W& I LV Z--- [a- LIo
q'� A() NTs , (fj 2+-Y
J4 t 6,_ --
. Z-et'i /
I
21. i m b I rT 5� 1 7 v -C-da tr.- C2
23.
24.
25. 4*V /q��
26.
When completed return to: Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition
P.D. Box 799
Carbondale, CO 81623
CI
Stop Harvest Roaring Fork Petition
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently
under review by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon
which it is proposed and will negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and
wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns for opposing the development are the following:
1. Density, The development proposal includes:
1500 units of residential plus up to 450 ADUs
55,000 square feet of commercial space, and
A 120 room hotel
All on less than 283 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the
surrounding area and does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone
district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to
congestion and Safety concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's
own traffic projections state the site would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per
day. The current transportation infrastructure cannot handle this level of additional
vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to an emergency such as a
wildfire
3. Water Quality/Quantity. This development potentially threatens water quality in the
Roaring Fork River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run
off, and encroachment into riparian zones, It will further strain already limited water
supply which is a major concern in the arid West.
4. Wildlife Disruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration
corridor which will be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical
services are already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain
these resources to the breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny
the Harvest Roaring Fork Development application.
Name Print and Sign]
2. FAY VO; S ��
3.oV LkC(-e�0
Address
Wt)TSaR
0 MA
Date
"/I3/-Z(.
r )/l-5l�?-6 1
ivv1(0 1 jr3j7
Name [Print and Sign} Address Date
4. PrAWkk) Glom h Arl 1-?Co vvxmkv�n D r --64n_ r_JexDA A/ lal'0
S. o. s Ho 970 S K e�lr
s. r6dAd 6'e,
7. lhAi�r !' V W 1I r
8. �,+^ ozvi r 'U V?-.ew ok A?v -�IU 2 Z'l
. ' 'c kVn 5, R'`vef v,'e --" Or A-04 M211-24;
la /4 T011rcl- 4�-2 ea-27�� s1ra
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24,
25.
26.
When completed return to: Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition
P.O. Box 799
Carbondale, CO 91623
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently
under review by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon
which it is proposed and will negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and
wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns for opposing the development are the following:
1. Density. The development proposal includes:
1500 units of residential_ I� us_up to 375_A0
55.000 square feet of commercial Space; and
A 120 room hotell
All on less than 283 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the
surrounding area and does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone
district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to
congestion and safety concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's
own traffic projections state the site would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per
day. The current transportation infrastructure cannot handle this level of additional
vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to an emergency such as a
wildfire
3. Water ualit uantit . This development potentially threatens water quality in the
Roaring Fork River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run
off, and encroachment into riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water
supply which is a major concern in the arid West.
4. Wildlife Disruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration
corridor which will be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical
services are already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain
these resources to the breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny
the Harvest Roaring Fork Development application.
Name Print and )
2.
3. Iw I; rrt k
Address
} R I b �x.�
tl— t
LIP
Date
ar la6/ C
Name (Print and Sign) Address Date
4.
LAL�.yklti_
�.go JIM 7L)L -124 '�R 1 ��
7. } L
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20,
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
When completed return to: Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition
P.O. Sox 799
Carbondale, CO 81623
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently
under review by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon
which it is proposed and will negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and
wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns for opposing the development are the following:
I. Qgnsity, The development proposal includes:
1500 units ar i o 375 ADUs:
commercialspace:
A 124 room hotel
All on less than 283 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the
surrounding area and does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone
district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to
congestion and safety concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's
own traffic projections state the site would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per
day. The current transportation infrastructure cannot handle this level of additional
vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to an emergency such as a
wildfire
3. Water Quality/Quantity. This development potentially threatens water quality in the
Roaring Fork River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run
off, and encroachment into riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water
supply which is a major concern in the arid West.
4. Wildlife Disruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration
corridor which will be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical
services are already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain
these resources to the breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny
the Harvest Roaring Fork Development application.
Name (print and Sign) Address Date
2. fZ 911-5 hi
r<�
Al i-k
d
Name {PriritauL ienl Address Date
5. 0A)-4u
9. �� f -IoZ
10. LO
11. Lie—flLoic'-00 �-j 1 2 1
12. r C
13. Ca t (Z
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
When completed return to: Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition (cattlecreekcc.com)
P.O. Box 799
Carbondale, CO 81623
cattlecreekcc@gmaii.com
Stop Harvest Roaring Fork Petition
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently
under review by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon
which it is proposed and will negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and
wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns for opposing the development are the following:
1. Density. The development proposal includes:
1500 units of residential plus up to 450 ADUs-
55,000 square feet of commercial space; and
A 120 room hotel
All on less than 283 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the
surrounding area and does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone
district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to
congestion and safety concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's
own traffic projections state the site would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per
day. The current transportation infrastructure cannot handle this level of additional
vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to an emergency such as a
wildfire
3. Water 4ualityj, uantity. This development potentially threatens water quality in the
Roaring Fork River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run
off, and encroachment into riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water
supply which is a major concern in the arid West.
4. Wildlife Disruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration
corridor which will be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical
services are already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain
these resources to the breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny
the Harvest Roaring Fork Development application.
Name lPrin
1.4 •FfsC.k,er
2.
3.
Address
f---z Ce. I(Z, cc, rh&U2j,.. 916z
W U- �Kj
4koi -Mw
Date
I'2.9 I 2
Name Print and S
ign Address Date
4.. I�u
6. �p .. i�►y..db r So �.. � d ��2d !2b
7.ttiar�T
w �A A
9.
13.����,y
e.on-re �c�
S ��i Fs��,�... JZ , C���,,�� s
ZI qKI 17 6
14. AD I})
Uf04
16. L
/V7 a ol
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
25.
26.
When completed return to: Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition
P.O. Box 799
Carbondale, CO 81623
Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition Petition
We. the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently
under review by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon
which it is proposed and will negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and
wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns for opposing the development are the following:
1. Density. The development proposal includes:
1500 units of residential plus up to 325 ADLls• 55,000 square feet of commercials ace:
and a 120 room hotel All on less than 230 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land
use in the surrounding area and does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban
zone district,
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to congestion
and safety concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's own traffic
projections state the site would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per day. The current
transportation infrastructure cannot handle this level of additional vehicular traffic particularly to
the event of an evacuation due to an emergency such as a wildfire.
3. Water QuaIitylQuantitk. This development potentially threatens water quality in the
Roaring Fork River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run off, and
encroachment into riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water supply which is a
major concern in the arid West.
4, Wildlife Disruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration
corridor which will be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical
services are already strained in the area. This additional dense development could
strain these resources to the breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners
to deny the Harvest Roaring Fork Development application.
Name (Print and Sign) Address Date
I VI—? �? PKe AVM
2 e I 0 Rd 15� � r5 11 A 6
4.Sckyly- V_w 6't
1N
NJ
2(
Name (Print and Sign) Address �SPCrs Date
6. np%o�— q0 Is T-
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
When completed return to: Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition (cattlecreekcc.com)
P.C. Box 799, Carbondale, CO 81623 cattlecreekcc@gmaii.com
atts�artra,t ����iri�}G �'Cs'!c E�i��lrii�ri
We, the underSigi ted stroogly oppose 6!a 1-iarvest Ro .i= ink; Fc)r„ di" rcIriproc ni: prop osGl cur( Plit IV
under review by Garfield Couiaty. This development is- far wo dense for the property tipon
which it is proposed and will negatively impact the safery and quality of life for residents and
wildlife in the arua. Among our too concerns for opp ;•ping the d_!ve1opnv2ni are the following:
1. Dop?�Ay. The development propaFa! inc udes:
15.00 units cf resicllcntial !us up to A[li &
s<�uare feet of cgmmerr(; l soac;?Land
A 120 room hotel
All on less than 283 Gc:res. This lave: of density is far n"excess of %and Use in the
s;irrou,ndi!ag area and daps not coiaiport w;th khe underiyin.g Residential Soburhan none
district.
2. Traffic. 'f ho develc,prnent wouId greatly io-1reasf5 cr,,firic i;r- !fighwiiy 82 add':pig to
conge,ticn and safely wiccrris on a i i _,Ir. -.ady r. vr.rijuidt:ned tiig11way. The deve Ioper's
own traffic proje;:t'ioris stute the site wr,.41 i 12,000 ', dditional vehicle trips pc,
d&y. 'rho. currerit transportation ii4r,astructure (.9nnot li;.nJ1,7 this level of additional
veI11:u12r trafdc: partiGLilarly in tlau 6eIit r3F an evacua'tiort .:tie to itri emergency such ;3s a
wildf;re
1. Water CL+131it Lund-ty. This deveiopmerit po'teritiall,, thrt atet'i5 water quAity in the
Roaring Fork Mves, aiid Critt(e Creek C vi! to increased activity effluent and pcl;i�tant � un
off, and eri-;roac+inicraL into riparitan zL)nc=r. It i-� I further s t r 2 i n already limited water
supply vlla:c=a is a niajor concern in the timid West.
4. Wildlife jig! ruptiqrs. TtiP property provides ma.!or wilaiile '0abitat Eir�d a inigration
corridor which tvili be threateried b•/ th''s ievci of deve3Upmcnt.
5. PLllAC S-ifetV. Lo--al infr-nArL-CtLrL° i-r fire prizoection, k'iw ::filarce.rnen�, and e,rJic,fl
r 4i ii ai c in Y, :d
S�iViGL'S are a;re-�dy trai;iec,{ in -li.. �13��i.. riai� �t�c,l 7r]nar. _'�..l,t,' L.ii'.'J+=�..�?I�.�iii t.;Cli; S:rri
these rc,s ,!�P rce.� fu the b!e avin.f p{':int.
r ,- t:iese and {}th%-r {;1.1:31Ei v of lik reason;, {' urge the Gi �"fieiCi Col.inty l_�t:':'oi"1';is�lrxl{?r5 t[7 de!ly
Lno H rvest i' oarinpr Fork Duvell:prornt
�:cG�'11? C�rI??t 3rid `kik�niAddress tlatwL
lei 423
Icy I C'4; � V t 2.15'�
1e- }'-? L& 0e7� +
Name Print and Sign) Address & ,
Date
4.
7. 7;;.s
3(,9
f -7
8. 7rc & r�
y r `
Lo- vy) s7 're fi Gc G3 rwa L�sirly 4 S C x ty IZc1 .
` c-
1 17 �-#v .a �" ' +s (u� 41612!
9.
.:
I.1
10.�i
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
15,
17,
18.
19.
20,
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
25.
When completed return to: Cattle Creek Confluence
Coalition
P.D. Box 799
Carbondale, CO
81623
Stop Harvest Roaring Fork Petition
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently
under review by Garfield County, This development is far too dense for the property upon
which it is proposed and will negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and
wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns for opposing the development are the following:
1. Density. The development proposal includes:
1500 units of residential plus up to 3A�Us•
55,0.00 square feet of commercial space and
A 120 room hotel
All on less than 283 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the
surrounding area and does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone
district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to
congestion and safety concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's
own traffic projections state the site would generate 12,000 additional vehicle traps per
day. The current transportation infrastructure cannot handle this level of additional
vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to an emergency such as a
wildfire
3. Water ualit uantit . This development potentially threatens water quality in the
Roaring Fork River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run
off, and encroachment into riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water
supply which is a major concern in the arid West.
4. Wildlife Disruption_ The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration
corridor which will be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safet , Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical
services are already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain
these resources to the breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny
the Harvest Roaring Fork Development application.
Name Print and Sin Address Date
ZU
2. I 2q� I�Gf Uer,J L� W 1)7
3.�� 2�� j L �w5 l�lc7/7 5
Name Print and Sign)
Add s pate
(
4.Pc7 (S C4 5 s.
e. 9 Roj -ld .qtl,�T-
5.
V R>rVISQ4
9-5 COiAVVLN I 115 j! a) Z�O
6. a C� ��� ti,�.
C �,�+ %U5 �� 161Z (I
7.
R
8.
9.
76 Lj od
k ,
12.
kAL
1, r dLo,
t v32Ag;z Z%
14. &Wlylt &Orlon
3 1 [oo vh 6kvvS cep
co
QZ(p
16,f
17._ f �N� �1D
1-il )9D 7r CAg;DNDPVC
18. �f 1Y i')� J7
U 2 �Lv� Pf COY � �. �,ale i �124�1
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
When completed return to: Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition
P.O. Box 799
Carbondale, CO 81623
�TQ,up.15
Stop Harvest Roaring Fork Petition
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently
under review by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon
which it is proposed and will negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and
wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns for opposing the development are the following:
1. Density. The development proposal includes:
1500 units of residential plus up to 450 ADUs;
55,000 square feet of commercial space; and
A 120 room hotel
All on less than 283 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the
surrounding area and does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone
district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to
congestion and safety concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's
own traffic projections state the site would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per
day. The current transportation infrastructure cannot handle this level of additional
vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to an emergency such as a
wildfire
3. Water Quality/Quantity. This development potentially threatens water quality in the
Roaring Fork River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run
off, and encroachment into riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water
supply which is a major concern in the arid West.
4. Wildlife Disruption_ The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration
corridor which will be threatened by this level of development.
S. Public Safety. afety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical
services are already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain
these resources to the breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny
the Harvest Roaring Fork Development application.
Name (Print and Sign) Address Date
1.GN P 671-iv 4 zz5I2- cimvd Ave 4111125
2._ OJ rnJ�a!� .. 1�3
3, )u4�jMaAfi n .4 xCr-,'O,,33 6ras SIC,0-
Name Print and Sign)
Address
Date
k
A,�
D9
9.
n
a3
12.
d l� V r.---
i33911
b �
14.
I r
dg s
ar
2 13
16.
i i]
Zz)l
I J Y7 C e s'l 4�5'11
17.
18.
��
s ! ,n ��. J% r
D r��i 26,
19.
20.
C % f,g r
21.
n 1dz r L-SCI��
_5 Y E u cc. r J) A
Ur._._---��t��.� d I� CC)
22.
lA_�
�� K-li'CkA
klGis
23.
C� f'�kc, nN
9 n f 0
1<��C
13
24.
�7('0'
1� waj
25.Owl
[
`
When completed return to. Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition
P.O. Box 799
Carbondale, CO 81623
Stop Harvest Roaring Fork Petition
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently under review
by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon which it is proposed and will
negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns
for apposing the development are the following:
1. Density. The development proposal includes:
- 1500 units of residential plus up to 375 ADUs
- 55,000 square feet of commercial space
- a 120 roam hotel
All on less than 283 aicres. This level of density is far in -excess of land use in the surrounding area and
does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to congestion and safety
concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's own traffic projections state the site
would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per day. The current transportation infrastructure
cannot handle this level of additional vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to
an emergency such as a wildfire
3. Water QuaIit uantit . This development potentially threatens water quality in the Roaring Fork
River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run off, and encroachment into
riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water supply which is a major concern in the arid
West.
4. Wildlife Disruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration corridor which will
be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical services are
already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain these resources to the
breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny the Harvest
Roaring Fork Development application. Visit the website, https://cattlecreekcc.com for more information.
Name (Print and Sign)
1.
2. V+��•
1:1
61
r-1
Address
If1-21
- f-f--
C`2 � � c4kf, C- 11 am- �� �%�,�YL�1_ /2_6
s f f��4LO V � _Z16,/ z,,) 2s--
Z-0
ZS
Name (Print and Sign) - Address r Date
7.
9. r 3 - (e
� fl��t� Asmt e�, 4161 Z4!-
t'
12.
K4
13.
�R&A)
W C t[cV
G U
14.
!
2 Uww bt Ut21
14-z' -.�
16.
17.
AA L. ►�.�-L1
�� �7j l �p
18.
� "h LeWtt'
Po ton? LPEi pit (4-)-
19.4tl
22. w
24.1 + di n gy �I C7 -�dcxrl S C4 l -� 8i 60?1
F
2-5. �
Whe ompleted please return to; Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition (cattlecreekcc.com)
P.O. Box 799, Carbondale, CO 81623
cattlecreekcc@gmall.com
Stop Harvest Roaring Fork Petition
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently under review
by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon which it is proposed and will
negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns
for opposing the development are the following:
1. Density. The development proposal includes:
1500 units of residential plus up to 375 ADUs
- 55,000 square feet of commercial space
- a 120 room hotel
All on less than 283 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the surrounding area and
does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic ❑n Highway 82 adding to congestion and safety
concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's own traffic projections state the site
would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per day. The current transportation infrastructure
cannot handle this level of additional vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to
an emergency such as a wildfire
3. Water Quality/Quantity. This development potentially threatens water quality in the Roaring Fork
River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run off, and encroachment into
riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water supply which is a major concern in the arid
West.
4. Wildlife Disruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration corridor which will
be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical services are
already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain these resources to the
breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny the Harvest
Roaring Fork Development application, Visit the website, https://cattlecreekcc.cohl for more information.
Name (Print and Sign)
1. v�
2.
3. � 4►V+�i �����
S.
/�3
Address
/ZZ �?
� sZ'
Date
'4 ,4,e ab,-4,AJ, &) iuo� ;
Ad d ress
Name Print and S'
7. A,tP.3 &.e9,
&rc eA
9._
14.
of � c-ki
� L��G 14 Z �� � �rL�
Date
r 12yl
V
r
25. SoYlt b -v ,& Z 2 6
When completed please return to: Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition (cattlecreekcc.com) if LSj�
P.D. Sax 799, Carbondale, CO 81623
cattlecreekcc@gmail.com
Ston Harvest Roarine Fork Petition
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently
under review by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon
which it is proposed and will negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and
wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns for opposing the development are the following:
1. Density. The development proposal includes:
1500 units of residential plus uo to 450 ADUs:
55,000 square feet of commercial space; and
A 120 room hotel
All on less than 283 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the
surrounding area and does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban tone
district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to
congestion and safety concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's
own traffic projections state the site would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per
day. The current transportation infrastructure cannot handle this level of additional 6
vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to an emergency such as a
wildfire
3. Water Quality&Wantity. This development potentially threatens water quality in the
Roaring Fork River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run
off, and encroachment into riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water
supply which is a major concern in the arid West.
4. Wildlife Disruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration
corridor which will be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical
services are already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain
these resources to the breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny
the Harvest Roaring Fork Development application.
Name Print and Sin Address pate:
5-4 I Ai R, 'T ! �n In fl/ 1 •TV Yvli I ] 14�1
3. W#-ig-C►) MA-CT4'k.` oF-5
Stop Harvest Roarine Fork Petition
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently under review
by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon which it is proposed and will
negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns
for opposing the development are the following:
1. Density. The development proposal includes:
- 1500 units of residential plus up to 375 ADUs
- 55,000 square feet of commercial space
- a 120 room hotel
All on less than 283 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the surrounding area and
does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to congestion and safety
concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's own traffic projections state the site
would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per day. The current transportation infrastructure
cannot handle this level of additional vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to
an emergency such as a wildfire
3. Water QualitylQuantity. This development potentially threatens water quality in the Roaring Fork
River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run off, and encroachment into
riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water supply which is a major concern in the arid
West.
4. Wildlife Disruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration corridor which will
be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safety. Local infrastructure far fire protection, law enforcement, and medical services are
already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain these resources to the
breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny the Harvest
Roaring Fork Development application. Visit the website, https://cattlecreekcc.com for more information.
Name (Print and Sign)
Address
t—
[late
as .2d.X4 C
3. i4671 3 �' •� r ��� ' J 1 j�L-':, . ?rV i� V`� iL C _7 •'-(�v w - `I �' r L i
J pp rr
4. Td
5.
f �1ti
! 1�
Name Print and Sign)
Acid ress
Cpn �x GA_j
! C C'v
8)� S'L(
Sm if
S G
/2,G
13. Ire
:�4ACCD
14.jMN
ri ,Sim//wt, '
1; b� ' N- 'NLr . �()
15. ''Vt h Vn L0r-Ced
16.
F
VA
L' QA� . g It.,
0I0(.t
alu t-�) L7
18."3mnAu Ve�m�e.� Os� ��s Rd avk?yJd-)e ;/&/g �a
A\(V),k�VQMAC.ri t2s7 16r,�) WANA-It- ;�/gal we
20_
21.JUD
23. LJ VG 1v LL o2 .
24..
25. Lto r�U�i ��t] z/
When completed please return to: Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition (cattlecreekcc.com)
P.O. Box 799, Carbondale, CO 81623
cattlecreekcc@gmaii.com
Stop Harvest Roaring Fork Petition
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently
under review by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon
which it is proposed and will negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and
wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns for opposing the development are the following:
1 Density. The development proposal include:
1500 units of residential plus up to ZDUs;
55,000 square feet of commercialspace; and
A 120 room hotel Jam,
All on less than ;M acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the
surrounding area and does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone
district.
2. Traffic.. the development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to
congestion and safety concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's
own traffic projections state the site would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per
day. The current transportation infrastructure cannot handle this level of additional
vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to an emergency such as a
wildfire
3. Water Quality/Quantity. This development potentially threatens water quality in the
Roaring Fork River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run
off, and encroachment into riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water
supply which is a major concern in the arid West.
4. Wildlife Disruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration
corridor which will be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical
services are already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain
these resources to the breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny
the Harvest Roaring Fork Development application.
Name print and Si
Address
J i +fit �O P4
217_:�;- Imo,
Date
Dame Print and Sin Address hate
6.
7. 11 —�Z'
10. u' -T ASV-- 7 � � �, �-,� -Ave- G�- A-eic-U) ns
11.
12.��� �1is� �,,�-�.1 �:r� GIi yir t�l C❑J� <a
114. C._,,, �] L
15. 4 ' r Ic'�R Ate ; 9 4 U F� r Cam
16. 7 c ,-, Cro
17. S,�3 P.� �fl i H �CJSI Z �'
18., �
F JAA CJ)
20.Lee) I
21.
23.
24,
l
26.
When completed return to: Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition
P.O. Box 799
Carbondale, Co 81623
Stop Harvest Roaring Fork Petition
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently under review
by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon which it is proposed and will
negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and wildlife in the area, Among our top concerns
for opposing the development are the following:
1. De. nsity. The development proposal includes:
- 1500 units of residential plus up to 375 ADUs
- 55,000 square feet of commercial space
- a 120 room hotel
All on less than 283 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the surrounding area and
does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone district.
2, Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to congestion and safety
concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's own traffic projections state the site
would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per day. The current transportation infrastructure
cannot handle this level of additional vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to
an emergency such as a wildfire
3. Water Quality/Quantity. This development potentially threatens water quality in the Roaring Fork
River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run off, and encroachment into
riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water supply which is a major concern in the and
West.
4. Wildlife ❑isruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration corridor which will
be threatened by this level of development.
S. Public Safety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical services are
already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain these resources to the
breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny the Harvest
Roaring Fork ❑ eve Iopment application. Visit the website, https://cattlecreekcc.com for more information.
Name'Wrifit and SigM Address Date
Y.tQ L v �C
2. �,OXJa f' Q 0+, c le- e � I, ;?dO C--a Yeh
5.
0
5 U-5 a n Va.n e.vv 5 �`T L3 �a T� i r6analQ lc�o
s'-ACV-A ("d e- �41( Ck
CGv(,�� I c,C eIJ-ztiS
2-
Stop Harvest Roaring Fork Petition
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently under review
by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon which it is proposed and will
negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns
for opposing the development are the following:
1. Density. The development proposal includes:
- 1500 units of residential plus up to 375 ADUs
55,000 square feet of commercial space
- a 120 room hotel
All on less than 283 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the surrounding area and
does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to congestion and safety
concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's own traffic projections state the site
would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per day. The current transportation infrastructure
cannot handle this level of additional vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to
an emergency such as a wildfire
3. Water qualitylquantity. This development potentially threatens water quality in the Roaring Fork
River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run off, and encroachment into
riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water supply which is a major concern in the arid
West.
4. Wildlife Disruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration corridor which will
be threatened by this level of development.
S. Public Safety. Local infrastructure far fire protection, law enforcement, and medical services are
already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain these resources to the
breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny the Harvest
Roaring Fork Development application. Visitthe website, https://caflecreekcc.com for more information.
Dame (Print and Sign) Address
1. Lko rc�r,,t� h �obca+ cx�-Ca", (r-,Cc)&62-�
3.
a
G
2-1
7-�;
O
U
.6
D
We, the undersigned strongly appose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently
under review by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon
which it is proposed and will negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and
wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns for opposing the development are the following:
1. Density, The development proposal includes:
1500 units of residential plus up to 450 ADUs1
55,000 s uare feet of commercialspace; and
A 120 room hotel
All on less than 283 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the
surrounding area and does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone
district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to
congestion and safety concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's
own traffic projections state the site would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per
day. The current transportation infrastructure cannot handle this level of additional
vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to an emergency such as a
wildfire
3. Water Quality/Quantity. This development potentially threatens water quality in the
Roaring Fork River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run
off, and encroachment into riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water
supply which is a major concern in the arid West. a
4. Wildlife Disruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration
corridor which will be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical
services are already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain
these resources to the breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny
the Harvest Roaring Fork Development application.
L
J Name (Print and Sign) Address Date
110
2 Ana 11 tIt
LL�
f
n�
i
Juf
Name (Print and Sign)
Address
Date
�.
.y -VN� 14n
low ,
i�:�'
10.
11.
� 2 J }(,
W1661
12.
13.
�[r�
��� EUG1
0/f 4v 6-ndale 6 zS
14.Ah
t 1
}r�
11 N Of%
C� Dv��i` LP-
15.
�c
45 CZGL Le,C,ry��
IT
_ICAL�
t� [ t 2UVa it co 'i�r la C11gl�� 3
$..
a ,.
, ,` �. 'r'. ............. ��
19.
21...ff I u Y- cISANJNt
23. ►�
24. PA Ut 1v U J05 WRY CAe6o-j p LE C 0 gf&23 Ilzo'er
z#\d s4- C
zc. ���?_� ��--�� �3 t� us��tr�c�� i��. �1��-1�1�. f� �►1��-� 1 ���-��
When completed return to: Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition
P.O. Box 799
Carbondale, CO 81623
02�
g,�Z6 r
LV
4. Ir'd � t LeA 7.
Jock) L-( ►ot4 CufL0-q�-[r �-I(-eIZ/4
s. i5 e.' n L ���bo►�c{�{�
t ►o•,g ;wsa1� 3
10. L Lk L'1Y1 cZ & l b-z a
12. Ai, ' ZLA L , r•�, r� A4� f ] .1 ti.1 Cr C� Z
� . c A rr-ii 7C),av-'6r--IA hq L Nv bonne CC) I (,, 2-3
14
171,
17. S L
19. 3o2 e.rt ,F P(,—,u c' qA?,t(.r23
2Q. 1�'c� fF � If7 V iCa r 1.1 cAAr V g i &2 3
zz�°�
22. ! ► L ckC �'�fYIA►rl'S� �a(I�� f v� C�u
24.
2 r--yLj Aj 5-r c4y�3 /6 Z 3
Name (Print and Sin Address
4_ �V e,4-Z e, L !9(yv I-M 3�K � G-
Ir
iFN 6,
0
Date
A7 �,o X A
CddC
a.
�j A"R w
1a.
gaf i w 00001�'
rwe , 64,51k
z
12.
a t ei "I 6,,,
133
v" Re '3-& S6 (A
14.
CI-
i3 .s
C
15.
(�44eyto�A�
16_
18.19.
jt
20.
r _
f V V- (Ji
When completed return to: Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition
R.O. Box 799
Carbondale, CO 81623
Stop Harvest Roaring Fork Petition
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently under review
by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon which it is proposed and will
negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns
for opposing the development are the following:
1. Density. The development proposal includes:
- 1500 units of residential plus up to 375 ADUs
- 55,000 square feet of commercial space
- a 120 room hotel
All on less than 283 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the surrounding area and
does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to congestion and safety
concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's own traffic projections state the site
would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per day. The current transportation infrastructure
cannot handle this level of additional vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to
an emergency such as a wildfire
3. Water Qua I ity/Qua ntity. This development potentially threatens water quality in the Roaring Fork
River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run off, and encroachment into
riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water supply which is a major concern in the arid
West.
4. Wildlife Disruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration corridor which will
be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical services are
already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain these resources to the
breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny the Harvest
Roaring Fork Development application. Visit the website, https://cattIecreekcc.corn for more information.
Name Print and Sin Address ` Date
1.
2.
4+r' 1A W1 IJlSr-
bEEAc'CA-14 Y- 7
�y
sU a .1 77 ill45 f� t'.i. .-r7 1.?wx -A
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently
under review by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon
which it is proposed and will negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and
wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns for opposing the development are the following:
1. Density The development proposai inclje�5
1500 units of residential plus up to A Us;
55,000 square feet of commercial space; and
A 120 room hotel
All on less than 283 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land use in the
surrounding area and does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban zone
district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to
congestion and safety concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's
own traffic projections state the site would generate 12,000 additional vehicle trips per
day. The current transportation infrastructure cannot handle this level of additional
vehicular traffic particularly in the event of an evacuation due to an emergency such as a
wildfire
3. Water QualityZguantity. This development potentially threatens water quality in the
Roaring Fork River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run
off, and encroachment into riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water
supply which is a major concern in the arid West.
4. Wildlife Disruption The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration
corridor which will be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical
services are already strained in the area. This additional dense development could strain
these resources to the breaking point.
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners to deny
the Harvest Roaring Fork Development application.
Name Print and Sign)
Y k 0- so rL e.55
3
KIZ
Address
6�vp I
na-A �,e , C
Date
CO,
Name Print and Sign) Address Date
7.
6.
12 Ly4r -;1rX-- Dr-.
9. RD ' rex. _ .r told e zt
I
13-Y)AC wl E 4fV �J ( 2
CAW- P-
00, C"'(
a
19. GMl Cv- lLk
20
21. i Y�� 1 �Ms rd �l VV t - ✓� liar CLCIJ►G+ `a i l 1 0
22,U NNAVEX) ?-d /Z6
23
24
25.�rl - 3�$ Eucl Arm �� Mu�� rU) I ���.1.- .-_4__
��;
._as'�' T,._�T Cv
When completed return to: Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition
P.O. Box 799
Carbondale, CO 81623
Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition Petition
We, the undersigned strongly oppose the Harvest Roaring Fork development proposal currently
under review by Garfield County. This development is far too dense for the property upon
which it is proposed and will negatively impact the safety and quality of life for residents and
wildlife in the area. Among our top concerns for opposing the development are the following:
1. Densi . The development proposal includes:
1500 units of residential plus up to 325 ADUs• 55 000 square feet of commercials ace;
and a 120 room hotel Ali on less than 230 acres. This level of density is far in excess of land
use in the surrounding area and does not comport with the underlying Residential Suburban
zone district.
2. Traffic. The development would greatly increase traffic on Highway 82 adding to congestion
and safety concerns on an already overburdened Highway. The developer's own traffic
projections state the site would generate 12,OOG additional vehicle trips per day. The current
transportation infrastructure cannot handle this level of additionai vehicular traffic particularly in
the event of an evacuation due to an emergency such as a wildfire.
3. WatecQualftylQuaIM. This development potentially threatens water quality in the
Roaring Fork River and Cattle Creek due to increased activity, effluent and pollutant run off, and
encroachment into riparian zones. It will further strain already limited water supply which is a
major concern in the and West.
4. Wildlife Disruption. The property provides major wildlife habitat and a migration
corridor which will be threatened by this level of development.
5. Public Safety. Local infrastructure for fire protection, law enforcement, and medical
services are already strained in the area. This additional dense development could
strain these resources to the breaking point -
For these and other quality of life reasons, we urge the Garfield County Commissioners
to deny the Harvest Roaring Fork Development application.
Name (Print and Sign)
rC% A
3.
Address Date
Name (Print and Sign)
r_ A-4,—To ��
8.
a�
Address Date
3--o 1 w x-[�- �,
SS G eian 57 I - -� - Z 4
(s sy0)AA) �, ., � ��� .- 6 4, k
FO •o �ss�
eialK vie
27D!/�d���° �5�9 S�ia/
I V a�c6AO&Yat . I/
16. -C�00 2�,,, , (I, P
j2
18.�
[)v-, 0qje (fb W-3
21. we- I
79 !� IvI r, kPI ., 7-;7 7 /l'/Yi.'i7°I./i�/� ' _ r 6 -,> (
I / " e4,
25_
LI
,lid A t L [�:
When completed return to: Cattle Creek Confluence Coalition lecreek a )
P.O. Box 799, Carbondale, CO 81623 cattlecreekcc@gmaii.com