Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubsoils Report for foundation DesignIUA Kumar & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers and Environmental Scientists email An Employee Owned Company 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 phone: (970) 945-7988 fax: (970) 945-8454 kaglenwood@kumarusa.com www.kumarusa.com Office Locations: Denver (HQ), Parker, Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, Glenwood Springs, and Summit County, Colorado February 21, 2025 Offroad Design Attn: James Watson 484 County Road 113 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 jwatson soprls.net Project No. 20-7-346.A Subject: Presumptive Bearing Conditions, Proposed Residence, 484 County Road 113, Garfield County, Colorado Dear James: As requested, we are providing presumptive bearing conditions for the proposed residence foundation design based on assumed subsurface conditions at the subject site. The services were performed supplemental to our agreement for professional engineering services to you, dated February 20, 2025. We previously provided foundation design recommendations for a shop building at another location on the property, report dated August 4, 2020, Project No. 20-7-346. The proposed residence will be located on the east side of the existing driveway. The proposed residence is assumed to be a one- or two-story wood -frame structure. Ground floor could be structural over crawlspace or slab -on -grade. Excavation depth for this type of construction is expected to be relatively shallow, about 3 to 5 feet. The subject site was developed with a one and two-story residence and steel frame outbuildings at the time of our field visit on February 21, 2025. The ground surface was graded to near level benches generally sloping down to the west. Vegetation was mostly baren in the access and parking areas with scattered trees bushes and weeds between access drives. Our previous study of the subject site consisted of drilling two exploratory borings west of the main driveway. The subsoils encountered, below topsoil and fill to between 1 and 2 feet deep, consisted of very stiff, sandy silt and sandy clay to between 25 and 36 feet deep where dense, silty sandy gravel was encountered to the maximum drilled depth of 41 feet. Fill depths are likely variable and could be deeper in the proposed building area. Groundwater was encountered at depths of 20 and 32 feet deep and is not expected to be encountered in the assumed shallow excavation depth at the subject site. At assumed foundation depth we expect the excavation to expose fill or natural sandy silt soils. The fill soils are not suitable for support of the proposed residence and should be removed from below foundation areas. The sandy silt soils possess low bearing capacity and typically low to moderate settlement potential primarily when wetted. The sandy silt can be used for support of Offroad Design February 21, 2025 Page 2 spread footings with a risk of foundation settlement primarily if the bearing soils become wetted. Precautions should be taken to prevent wetting of the bearing soils during and after construction. Foundation Recommendations: Based on our review of the previous subsoil study and expected soils for building support, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 psf can be aas med for support of the proposed building foundation with a risk of foundation settlement. Footings should be a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous walls anted 2 feet for columns. We should observe the completed foundation excavation for bearing con itions. The four ion excavation may need to sub -excavated below the minimum design bearing elevation if fill soils are encountered. Sub -excavated depths to remove fill soils can be backt711cd with com acted str al fill consisting on the onsite natural or a suitable imported granular material such as CDOT Class 2 or 6 base course. Structural fill should be spread in thin horizontal lifts, moisture conditioned to near optimum and compacted to at least WM=ummMTFUr density. A representative of the geotechnical engineer should test structural fill for compaction on a regular basis at the time of placement. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be well reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for the on -site soil as backfill. Floor Slabs: The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2-inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on -site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Kumar & Associates, Inc. Project No. 20-7-346.A Offroad Design February 21, 2025 Page 2 Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls and crawlspace areas deeper than about 4 feet, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. For the assumed shallow crawlspace area an underdrain system is not required. If installed, the drains should consist of rigid perforated PVC drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum '/2% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 Meet deep and covered with filter fabric such as Mirafi 140n or 160n. An impervious membrane such as 20 mil PVC should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. Surface Drainage: Providing and maintain proper surface drainage will be critical to the long- term satisfactory performance of the proposed residence. The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be covered with filter fabric and capped with about 2 feet of the on -site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 10 feet from the building. Consideration should be given to the use of xeriscape to limit potential wetting of soils below the foundation caused by irrigation. Kumar & Associates, Inc. Project No. 20-7-346.A Offroad Design February 21, 2025 Page 2 Limitations: The findings and recommendations submitted in this letter are based on the proposed type of construction, our previous subsurface exploration and does not include subsurface exploration within the proposed building site to evaluate the subsurface conditions within the loaded depth of foundation influence. The risk of foundation movement may be greater than indicated in this report because of possible variations in the subsurface conditions. It is possible the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, Kumar & Associate James H. Parsons, Rev. By: SLP JHP/kac Kumar & Associates, Inc. Project No. 20-7-346.A