Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02153 - "«_ .__T_ •r'•'•: ,t sww n a.MwA'C;' .. ^vm?Ttl °m.nr.... e. -.r.. ... tv } GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT Permit N - 2 1 5 109 8th Street Suite 303 A is Parcel No. Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81801 Phone (909) 945-8212 This does not constitute INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT a building or use permit. PROPERTY Owner's NameMiChael 6 LInde Msnsfiel4resent Address Y.O. Sox 546, Carbondal Phone 963 -0107 System Location 2081 112 Road Carbondale Legal Description of Assessor's Parcel No. SYSTEM DESIGN 6MV Air 1? S Orr" fl Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) Other Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other) 4 Required Absorption Area - See Attached Special Setback Requirements: Date Inspector FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed) Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Installation System Installer C - - Septic Tank Capacity RC )C � ( Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name Ivf )1;.11( )rte C' (• `'" •N n f - Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface Absorption Area '� 'I%J i -F' -. Absorption Area Type and/or Manufacturer or Trade Name N t IA'7 d 47 , R, Adequate compliance with County and State regulations /requirements Other Date I2,`�2:5 RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS S .. CONSTRUCTION SITE *CONDITIONS: 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter 25, Article 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revised 1984. 2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con- nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. 3. Any person who constructs, alters, or installs an Individual sewage disposal system in a manner which involves a knowing and material variation from the terms or specifications contained In the application of permit commits a Gass 1, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine — 6 months in Jail or both). Applicant: Green Copy Department: Pink Copy ,1 2 IIVWKW16 ,1 ➢ih . W naay 1SF.. Ix. ,. ni.Ad Cw ,f0✓VU 'ice.. vY..eu.dh.h4J lu:... -.aW a..SUX a°aitlRf. i L 4 .w .. uwv,.'is Application INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM APPLICATION Approval by — — County Official: OWNER Mink AF l_ E 1.113t'1k MA NSFI Et t) ADDRESS Zoi?j) COut4T RD.1tZ CasrptIt.St'1LE PHONE %,2 --0101 l/c0 .'� CONTRACTOR_ _ ADDRESS _ PHONE PERMIT REQUEST FOR: ( ) New Installation (✓) Alteration ( ) Repair Attach separate sheets or report showing entire area with respect to surrounding areas, topography of area, habitable building, location of potable water wells, soil percolation test holes, soil profiles in test holes. (See page 4.) LOCATION OF PROPOSED FACILITY: County GARFIELD Near what City of Town CAMILA t.1l>ALF . Lot Size 4.64 pc,peS Legal Description : .c. : •. :. ■ , : ■ �► . .■ • • . ip 41 4avn1 s r kALIAF ES IAIEST CF'TNE. SIXTH 3 Atl )GAPA1 MERtt1 A$J . WASTES TYPE: ( ✓) Dwelling ( ) Transient Use ( ) Commercial or Institutional ( ) Non- domestic Wastes ( ) Other - Describe BUILDING OR SERVICE TYPE: Rg_Sit EIJC.E. Number of bedrooms 4 Number of persons 3 ( ) Garbage grinder ( —) Automatic washer ( ✓) Dishwasher SOURCE AND TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: ( ✓) well ( ) spring ( ) stream or creek Give depth of all wells within 180 feet of system: NOME. If supplied by community water, give name or supplier: GROUND CONDITIONS: Depth to bedrock: —, Depth to first Ground Water Table: Percent ground slope: DISTANCE TO NEAREST COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEM: Was an effort made to connect to community system? TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: ( ) Septic Tank .. ( ) Aeration Plant ( ) Vault ( ) Vault Privy ( ) Composting Toilet ( ) Recycling, potable use ( ) Pit Privy ( ) Incineration Toilet ( ) Recycling, other use ( ) Chemical Toilet ( ✓) Other - Describe: sEPARATIOk) O>= 612A`/ WATER FINAL DISPOSAL BY: (N/) Absorption Trench, Bed or Pit ( ) Evapotranspiration ( ) Underground Dispersal ( ) Sand Filter ( ) Above Ground Dispersal ( ) Wastewater Pond ( ) Other - Describe: WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF TIIE STATE? 00 , Pion 7 SOIL PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS: (To be completed by Registered Professional Engineer.) Minutes per inch in hole No. 1 Minutes per inch in hole No. 3 Minutes per inch in hole No. 2 Minutes per inch in hole No. Name, address and telephone of RPE who made soil absorption tests: Name, address and telephone of RPE responsible for design of the system: Applicant acknowledges that the completeness of the application is conditional upon such further mandatory and additional tests and reports as may be required by the local health department to be made and furnished by the applicant or by the local health department for purposes of the evaluation of the application; and the issuance of the permft to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and regulations adopted under Article 10, Title 25, C.R.S. 1973, as amended. The undersigned hereby certifies that all statements made, information and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are or will be represented to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and are designed to be relied on by the local department of health in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. 1 further under- stand that any falsification or misrepresentation may result in the denial of the application or revocation of any permit granted based upon said application and in legal action for per - jury as provided by law. r� �y Date R /IR AS Signed Piq Un f'•:Q.Q PLEASE DRAW AND ACCURATE MAP TO YOUR PROPERTY I�U\1 AEI) ilt Rogp at ion Weal 2osI • CAS wJyi3j w issy E2- .N wWD Page 3 •,,, PLOT PLAN AND DESIGN FEATURES: Include by measured distance location of wells, springs, potable water supply lines, cisterns, buildings, property lines, subsoil drains, lake, water course, stream, dry gulch and show location of proposed system by direction and distance from dwelling or other fixed reference object, and additional submissions in support of this application such as data, plans, specifications, statements and commitments. Page 4 • &A7ep/g1-IJ C ooNT y Copy HEPWORTH- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 7840 Highway 82 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 September 21, 1993 Fax 303 945-8454 Phone 303 945 -7988 Michael Mansfield 2081 Road 112 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Job No. 193 207 Subject: Observation of Excavation and Percolation Tests, Proposed Addition to Existing Residence, 2081 Road 112, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Michael: - As requested, Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on September 20, 1993 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our work and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. We also performed percolation tests in two possible leach field areas at the site. The proposed 670 square foot addition will be a one story wood -frame structure over a crawl space. Foundations will consists of masonry block walls on concrete footings. A new leach field area for gray water is proposed north of the existing house. At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation had been cut in one level from 1/2 to 5 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of basalt cobbles in a clayey sand and gravel matrix. The results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample (minus 3 -inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Fig. 1. No free water was observed in the excavation. Considering the conditions exposed in the excavation and the nature of the proposed construction, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 psf should be adequate for support of the proposed residence. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footings extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Backfill placed around the structure should be compacted and the surface graded to prevent ponding within at least 10 feet of the building. Percolation testing was performed on September 20, 1993 at 4 locations. The holes were dug and soaked on September 19, 1993 by the owner. Tests 1 and 2 were located in the upper leach field area and Tests 3 and 4 were in the lower leach field area. The soils encountered in the percolation holes were similar to the foundation soils and consisted of basalt cobbles in a clayey sand and gravel matrix. The percolation test results are attached. We recommend using a design rate of 10 minutes per inch in the upper leach field area and a rate of 13 minutes per inch in the lower leach field area. kt1E sysk. i nSJtr l l *if zf 4yfJtr a raa �t. •LI Michael Mansfield September 21, 1993 Page 2 The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and do not include subsurface exploration to evaluate the subsurface conditions within the loaded depth of foundation influence. This study is based on the assumption that soils beneath the footings have equal or better support than those exposed. The risk of foundation movement may be greater than indicated in this report because of possible variations in the subsurface conditions. In order to reveal the nature and extent of variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation, drilling would be required. It is possible the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations contained in this letter. If there are any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Daniel E. Hardin, P '- r , .............. �lv�•��G�STE •'q . Rev. By: S 4,4c: "0 9 ;_ • DEH /ro 1 ' ` ; , J}'. f sIONA ! l0. c •Qp�= ...... • - Attachments H -P GEOTECH 0 1 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS I IME IIEAUINVS U.S. BI ANUAIIG SEIIIES I CLEAN SWAM: OPENINGS 21 NR, 7 HR 45 MIN 15 MIN. 6014171. 19 MIN. 1 MIN, 1 MIN. ' 700 '1191 '5040'00 '16 1 1'6 '1 0 — ■1.■ ©-10 90 1: "I7 ' 60 _ .� �ni>o Q - _ az i 60 i 7 0 - O . ^�� 4 6 y. Sa._ -- _ V 9 =s7p u . i *0 = � _.� no 30 �. _ � �� ��0 10 � E= G ' I � ( � . , r as o INNMPNOM ,9 i. ! ( + 1.._.. Wes.__.. a - 0 �.. SW .4102 .005 .009 .010 .W! .011 .140 2a/ .47 5w 1.19 2.0 162 1.10 9.52 19.1 76.1. 761 ntE I2 1 Ilw DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS CLAY TO SILT I FINE 1 SANG MEDIUM 1COANSE I FINE Oit ,YC COAIISE ICC/SOLES GRAVEL , 5 % SANO 25 % SILT ANO CLAY . 70 % • % PLASTICITY INDEX 20 % LIQU10 LIMIT 45 SAMPLE OF gravelly sandy clay FROM Bottom of excavation and silt matrix I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS NNE HEADINGS U.S. OIANDAIIO 9F.IIIGS CLEM SQUARE OPENINGS 711111 7HR '10 11 MIN 15 MIN 60 MIN. 19 MIN 4 MIN 1MIN 'R) '100 •51140'7 • I'6 '1 Q 1w - (( .� ~ • 96 =1 -= a E_ -- as 20 01 • _ in 2 1 SEMIiI■00■4445 ma a 80 N i_ r_lM 1 _- W < =1_1. _ ._ +1..1 5116 1' 1 = 1 1�, --�- _.. - r— - .�. 1 = .. 0 = = 9 1EM= ®® — NI S a 30 . e=WrA,PM ,9 1 O-7� OCR SEIM III .001 .002 .005 .009 019 AN .014 .149 207 1 = 500 1.19 2:0 136 9.52 19.1 at 762 12752 I DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS I CLAY TO SILT ' FINE I SAND MEDIUM ICOAOSEI FINE OR 1 E COnnSE !COBBLES GRAVEL % SAND % SILT AND CLAY % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX SAMPLE OF FROM • • 1 93 207 HEPWORTH PAWLAK GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. • GEOTECHNICAL, Inc. • • TABLE I PAGE 1 OF 2 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 193 207 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH LENGTH OF WATER DEPTH WATER DEPTH DROP IN AVERAGE INTERVAL AT START OF AT END OF WATER LEVEL PERCOLATION (MIN) INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES) RATE (INCHES) (INCHES) (MIN. /INCH) 1 37 10 9 7 1/4 1 3/4 71/4 6 1 1/4 6 5 1 5 3 3/4 1 1/4 Water Added 7 3/4 6 3/4 1 6 3/4 5 1/2 1 1/4 5 1/2 4 1/2 1 4 1/2 3 3/4 3/4 10 2 37 10 13 3/4 11 1/4 2 1/2 1 1 1/4 9 1/2 1 3/4 9 1/2 8 1/4 1 1/4 8 1/4 6 3/4 1 1/2 Water Added 1 1 9 3/4 1 1 /4 9 3/4 8 1/2 1 1/4 8 1/2 7 1/2 1 7 1/2 6 1/2 1 9 3 37 10 9 1/2 8 1/4 1 1 /4 8 1/4 7 1 1/4 7 6 1/4 3/4 6 1/4 5 1/2 3/4 5 1/2 5 1/2 Water Added 8 3/4 8 3/4 8 7 1 7 6 1/4 3/4 13 TABLE I (cont.) PAGE 2 OF 2 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 193 207 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH LENGTH OF WATER DEPTH WATER DEPTH DROP IN AVERAGE INTERVAL AT START OF AT END OF WATER LEVEL PERCOLATION (MIN) INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES) RATE (INCHES) (INCHES) (MIN. /INCH) 4 ' 35 10 9 7 3/4 1 1/4 7 3/4 6 3/4 1 6 3/4 6 3/4 6 51/4 3/4 5 1/4 4 1/2 3/4 Water Added 8 1/2 8 1/2 8 7 1 7 6 1/4 3/4 13 Note: Percolation Test Holes 1 and 2 were In upper (each field area north of Driveway Parking Area. Percolation Test Holes 3 and 4 were in lower leach field area east of garden and west of driveway.