Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication a i t 1 tt�,, GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT Permit I�t_ 22 8 gi j 109 8th Street Suite 303 Assessor's Parcel No. r Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81801 S Phone (303) 945 -8212 , This does not constitute i INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT a building or use permit. PROPERTY 1 Owner's Name Willard 6 Sharon Alsip Present Address 1978 Hwy 133, Car Phone_ 963 -0584 System Location 0644 Rime, Mineota Estates, Lot 15, Silt Legal Description of Assessor's Parcel No. 1 d i SYSTEM DESIGN 4 ' / j n O �, Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) Other 4, Percolation Rate (minutes /inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other) @ Required Absorption Area - See Attached S Special Setback Requirements: Date 7— / 7 ( /// Inspector - et) (r / .a r 'tin -A-,_ FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed) Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Installation a t System Installer I-0 7 7_ /110Y /0 ,'. s,,c Y i Septic Tank Capacity / 2 1 (' e Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name Cr`> tOr.04fl e ., Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface Cr? C-S ,( a -!7 Absorption Area _.%(!1 -j Absorption Area Type and /or Manufacturer or Trade Name -Ltd le / < = - 7 e 471syv 7 Sr to -• - y Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements 4 +-, IA1 f Other i Date f - ,1 V 9f< Inspector 4ae._ // FLse— k L RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CON TRUCTION SITE 1 *CONDITIONS: 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter 0 d 25, Article 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revised 1984. ) 2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con- ) nect ion to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. 1 3. Any person who constructs, alters, or installs an individual sewage disposal system in a manner which involves a knowing and material variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine —6 it months in jail or both). li M , Applicant: Green Copy Department: Pink Copy . �. Application JNIDIVIDIJAI. SEWAGE DISPOSAI. SYSTEM APPT.ICATION Approval By / / / �/ County Official OWNER `✓ /�Peoivi /14 7.1 2)0 ADDRESS /7 7f / / w / /; 3 55 64 ✓Z0 ale) l3 PHONE96L° 'Y , 5 'ONTRACTOR gn ✓a /I Co ws ry a 01;"0 /✓ ADDRESS / 7rrI dltry /3.3 "tbt" , Od, k /6 Ti5 PHONE 7763-_7 7r ERMIT REQUEST FOR: O New Installation () Alteration () Repair .Mach separate sheets or report showing entire ayes with respect to surrounding areas, topography of area, abitable building, location of potable water wells, soil percolation test holes, soil profiles in test holes iee page 4). ,OCATION OF PROPOSED FAC LITY : County Get ✓ /i ✓ Ca • 4ear what City or Town —C; " t Lot Size ,ega1 Description G d r / J , � 2 /v0 7_, /4i W4i o Aa e f5t " VASTES TYPE : 00 Dwelling () Transient Use ( ) Commercial or Institutional ( ) Non - domestic Wastes ( ) Other - Describe WILDING OR SERVICE TYPE: Lumber of bedrooms (.1) fGi .'e <. Number of personsr rv� �Q Garbage grinder (X) Automatic Washer Dishwasher ;OI IRCE AND TYPE OF WATER SI JPPLY; (j well () spring () stream or creek Jive depth of all wells within 180 feet of system: f supplied by community water, give name of supplier: n%�ao �� /e r e iROIJND CONDITIONS; V Pt 11 t'`1 fln rns )epth to bedrock: u A)Haoc✓ .✓ • )epth to first Ground Water Table: 'ercent ground slope: .4 DISTANCE TO NEAREST COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEM. Y' ,sr. /es Vas an effort made to connect to community system? i✓O TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: Of Septic Tank ( ) Aeration Plant ( ) Vault ( ) Vault Privy ( ) Composting Toilet ( ) Recycling, potable use ( ) Pit Privy ( ) Incineration Toilet ( ) Recycling, other use ( ) Chemical Toilet ( ) Other - Describe: FINAL DISPOSAL BY: (?() Absorption Trench, Bed or Pit ( ) Evapotranspiration ( ) Underground Dispersal ( ) Sand Filter ( ) Above Ground Dispersal ( ) Wastewater Pond ( ) Other - Describe: WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE? G • OIi, PRRCOI.ATION TEST REMIT TS: (To be completed by Registered Professional Engineer) Minutes per inch in hole No. 1 Minutes per inch in Hole No. 3 Minutes per inch in hole No. 2 Minutes per inch in Hole No. — lame, address and telephone of RPE who made soil absorption tests; lame, address and telephone of RPE responsible for design of the system; Applicant acknowledges that the completeness of the application is conditional upon such further mandatory and additional tests and reports as may be required by the local health department to be made and furnished by the applicant or by the local health department for purposes of the evaluation of the application; and the issuance of the permit is subject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and regulations adopted under Article 10, Title 25, C.R.S. 1973, as amended. The undersigned hereby certifies that all statements made, information and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are or will be represented to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and are designed to be relied on by the local department of health in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I further understand that any falsification or misrepresentation may result in the denial of the application or revocation of any permit granted based upon said application and in legal action for perjury as provided by law. �j �� ,� Date Signed i/i�/� ^�2a'�'- 9 (/ p1 EASE DR AW AN ACCT JRATE MAP TO YOI JR PROPERTY tJJ el .0 ow. vow. s l,o+ 7'o AVE © s + Att bs +a+es s,,+ mil raxir q7 - r 7O 3IIt41 �t o eaao Nem.. To aktnbood • pi f ur PLAN AND DESIGN FRATI1RRS Include by measured distance location of wells, springs, potable water supply lines, cisterns, buildings, property lines, subsoil drains, lake, water course, stream, dry gulch and show location of proposed system by direction and distance from dwelling or other fixed reference object, and additional submissions in support of this application such as data, plans, specifications statements and commitments. L o+ p4 . 05 AcReS �IA�� L see H ++Achrd LER,h .Veld = g• 'eTANk 9/ • ? �� 3o t rt ion H a p, yO u to 7 2,1‘ � /0'X121 Z Tbs. .3 Pw ftTEa. ul ae � 2 \ 11 3' • ' TYPE OF SYSTEM TO 13E CONSTRUCTED (P" to 2'5" Cleanlravel Recnil W Unless OIherwise Approved) - TOP —fiOP P -o .0 o0 0 , 9 ° 0 0 o aq. 7, 77 — Gravel Gravel 4" perforated $' ° p& ngth deter- - - pipe • o V° ' o _ \t4 "solid pipe / t t E ?j I ° I F i! * o en ti / 0000 ooa drywell 1' e. n ., ti n ` ",„ O O p ° 0 0 •1; x . •# :+ ,. 1 . �y. . 4" hay or ;��•�•O o 0 0 0 ° o - Lc.. t „en n °' % ° Jp °0 0 0 �• Y . 40 ;g straw over rock C3 q ca .b cSo Wg s0 Oo ••�•.�♦ 4. �O A A A Q a o o _ o Q 0 U O O W R w O p o � , ee U 0 Q0 c , .0 b Q o Q O O q G Q� 4 O O P Q M ° ° Op of aj oo oo °a e-- * > 3' 1. c•r... 6' 1 3 1 � / *Size determined from perc test results - SIDE VIEW Dackfill SID 'IEW .--- Dackfill Z + X\ ill �' � v\NX�XXx or straw 4" solid pipe to tan' 0 0" x° n n s' 2'' gravel over � x• 4" hay or straw a 0 Q 0 �' o 4 " pipe in `iiil �c 1' atleft *e �j° gravel i T� ' Gravel COO O so 0 %0000a � o n00 ocn oOOcYJ 6" Gravel O D ad ° ° °� 'I, A ,� Concrete rings or 4 .o p O W Q$ j ? o under pipe cinder blocks � Olt r ^a 8 �o_p ct>° sir: f i �. I 1' of gravel in j) bottom n Seepage Bed i 'V, L 4 Yid. Drywel l n i t n 1 , 1 , , 2 / -76-0- - , . 1 t aril-Ara- !„,,, , , 4/" a .... ..,_ _ . \l s . , . .,,., .... _..... ' Other (Fon APDI TrnNTe TMrnnmATTnM1 . Ch enONorthern, Inc. Consulting Engineers and Soar 5080 Roao 154 Glenwood Springs. Colorado 81601 303 945 7458 303 945 2363 Facs,mne April 25, 1994 Mr. Willard Alsip 1978 Highway 133 Carbondale CO 81623 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Lot 15, Filing 2, Mineota Ridge Estates, South of Silt, Colorado Job No. 4 251 94 Dear Mr. Alsip: As requested, Chen - Northern, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you, dated April 13, 1994. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be single story modular structure of 'approximately 1737 square feet, located on the site as shown on Fig. 1. Ground floor will be structurally supported over crawl space. Maximum cut depths of about 3 to 4 feet are assumed. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to reevaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The building envelope for this lot is confined to a relatively flat area in the southeast corner of the property. There is a steep cliff northwest of the building envelope which drops down toward the west to a dry ravine. Bedrock outcrops at the top of the cliff and near the center and northeast corner of the building envelope. There is a small drainage north of the building site which was dry at the time of our investigation. The building site is vegetated with cedar, sage and grass. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1 and 1 -1/2 feet of silt, consist of weathered sandstone /siltstone bedrock which overlies more- competent bedrock at depths of 5.5 to 1.0 feet in Pits 1 and 2 respectively. Results of swell- consolidation tests performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the weathered bedrock indicate low compressibility when wetted A member 01 ,neiHIHJgro pd c«npanres Mr. Willard Alsip April 25, 1994 Page 2 under light to moderate loadings. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoils encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed weathered bedrock designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 psf for support of the proposed residence. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous footings and 2 feet for pads. Loose and disturbed soils and existing silt soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footings extended down to expose the bedrock material. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of 50 pcf. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavation areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free - draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on -site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Limitations: This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices in this area for use by the client for design purposes. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1 and the proposed type of construction. The nature and extent of subsurface variations across the site may not become evident until further excavation is performed. If during construction, soil, rock or water conditions appear to be different from those described herein, this office should be • Mr. Willard Alsip April 25, 1994 Page 3 advised at once so reevaluation of the recommendations may be made. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the soil engineer. Sincerely, CHEN - NORTHERN, INC. 6 1.A1 , c 0 t e, Fred R. Cameron Project Geologist Reviewed By eVvp,00 RE I . is i. / /G r. H / i 3�1 s f.; s` Thomas L. Algu . gg Q W D � Engineering h ;,�����,o • FRC /lr Attachments , 1i\i --P1- APPROXIMATE SCALE I 1' = 30' I z J J \ - a. V h 1 Q X • PIT 1 N m \ w CL z / H LOT 15 / j / o Li /RESIDENCE PROPOSED a o / / \ o w L / N ro Q / 0 PIT 2 • ----/ EASEMENT / / PROPERTY / BOUNDARIES se /' ■ ■ 4. 251 94 Huntingdon LOCATION • • OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig 1 PIT 1 PIT 2 ELEV. 90.0' ELEV. 88.0' 100 100 — 95 95 1— r- w w w — z — 90 90 — p 0 w _ r WC = 7 Orx DD = 125 — WC= 7 —200 = 55 — — 85 85 I _ - 80 80 — Explanotlon of symbols presented on Fig. 3. 4 251 94 Huntingdon LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 2 )FGFND ® TOPSOIL, silt, soft, moist, brown, slightly gravelly. SANDSTONE, hard to very hard, slightly moist to moist, gray to tan, slight organics between beds. Bedding 4 to 6 inches apart. 0 WEATHERED SILTSTONE— SANDSTONE BEDROCK, hard, slightly moist, brown. 1 SI Hand drive sample. 1 Disturbed Bulk Sample J■OTFS 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on April 14, 1994 with a backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were located in reference to building envelope staked by client. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were measured by hand level and refer to the benchmark on Fig. 1. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and the transitions may be gradual. 6. Ground water was not encountered In the pits at the time of excavating. LABORATORY TESTING RESULTS WC =Water Content ( %) DD =Dry Density (pcf) — 200 = Percentage passing No. 200 sieve 4 251 94 I Huntingdon LEGEND AND NOTES Fig 3 • Moisture Content = 7 - percent • Dry Unit Weight = 125 pc, Sample el: weathered si ltstone/ From: sandstone bedrock Pit 1 at 2.5 feet • 1, 7,..z p No movement upon wetting - t c 0 N N Q! a 2 O U 3 , ' 4 0.1 t.o 10 loo APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf .4 251 94 Huntingdon 'I SWELL- CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS t Fig. '4 • : 4 I 1 8 $ ) / 0 - ! \ )] en � � � \ |! |■ } \� � \ \ / ƒf \ § � 7 \ g G " csi § ) / \ \ \ \ / \ < 4 0 . .�: - \ a � � \ \g .400 i \ . t , . � . . . . . .. . . v y '5 .b d 4 S 1 b 934 „ 4 �s= y et 70.3 A 10 � �� a 3 cJ3 3 i K� /6 / 5'( ��6 ii c /r 8' ;