HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.0 Resolution 2011-04.pdf1111 Ml".~o ~1Wa.,',tt.lli!, ~ It'• I, rl-lJ ~LrH'tr~r. ~·~ IIIII
Receptlon#: 797513
01/17/2011 03:21:37 PM Jean Rlberico
1 of 11 Reo Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
STATE OF COLORADO )
)ss
County of Garfield )
At a regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for' Garfield County,
Colorado, held in the Commissioners' Meeting Room, Garfield County Administration Building,
in Glenwood Springs on Monday, the 3rd day of January AD. 2011, there were present:
John Martin Commissioner Chairman
Mike Samson Commissioner
Tresi Houpt , Commissioner
Carey Gagnon , Assistant County Attorney
Jean Alberico Clerk to the Board
Ed Green (absent) , County Manager
when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to-wit:
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-04
A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE APPROVAL OF A LAND USE CHANGE
PERMIT, LIPA 6377, ISSUED TO MARATHON OIL COMPANY FOR MATERIAL
HANDLING/WATER IMPOUNDMENT, LOCATED OFF OF GARDEN GULCH ROAD,
WEST OF COUNTY ROAD 215, AND APPROXIMATLEY 17 MILES NORTHWEST
OF PARACHUTE, AND WITJITN A PROPERTY OWNED BY BERRY PETROLEUM
COMPANY AND MARATHON OIL COMPANY, GARFIELD COUNTY
PARCEL NO# 2135-321-00-009
Recitals
. A The Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, received an
application for a Land Use Change Permit to be issued to Marathon Oil Company to allow for
Material Handling/Water Impoundment.
B. The 29.246-acre site is located off of Garden Gulch Road, west of County Road
215, approximately 17 miles northwest of Parachute, CO, and within property owned by Berry
Petroleum Company and Marathon Oil Company and attached as Exhibit B.
C. The 29.246-acre site is described in the application documents and located within
the parcel described in the attached Exhibit C and incorporated by this reference;
I
· 1111 ~P"* ~~i~,I~'',M' II~~ Ill« ~ ~~~,.,~tllr.~~r, ~~~~ IIIII
RecGption«: 797513
01117/2011 03:21:37 PM Jean Alberico
3 of 11 Roo Fe~:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GRRFIELD COUNTY CO
B. The Land Use Change Permit, LIPA 6377, to allow for Material HandlingfWater
Impoundment is hereby approved subject to compliance with the following conditions:
I. That all representations made by the Applicant in the application, and at the public hearing
before the Board of County Commissioners, shall be conditions of approval, unless
specifically altered by the Board of County Commissioners.
2. That the operation of the Marathon facility be done in accordance with all applicable
Federal, State, and local regulations governing the operation of this type of facility.
3. Vibration generated: the Marathon facility shall be so operated that the ground vibration
inherently and recurrently generated is not perceptible, without instruments, at any point of
any boundary line of the property on which the use is located.
4. Emissions of smoke and particulate matter: the Marathon facility, generator, pump, or
related driveway and parking area shall be so operated so as to comply with all Federal,
State and County air quality laws, regulations and standards, including CDPHE APCC
Regulation
1 for dust.
5. · The Applicant shall provide copies of the required air permit(s) to the Garfield County
Planning Department once issued by the Air Quality Control Division of Colorado
Department of Public Health and Environment.
6. No site construction for this proposed produced water facility can begin until air quality
permits are obtained.
7. Site operations shall not emit heat, glare, radiation, dust or fumes which substantially
interfere with the existing use of adjoining property or which constitutes a public nuisance
or hazard.
8. All equipment and structures associated with this permit shall be painted with non-
reflective paint in neutral colors to reduce glare and mitigate any visual impacts.
9. Volume of sound generated shall comply with the standards set forth in the Colorado
Revised Statutes.
I 0. All lighting associated with the property shall be directed inward and downward towards
the interior of the property.
11. Flammable or explosive solids or gases shall be stored according to the manufacturer's
standards and shall comply with the national, state and local fire codes and written
recommendations from the appropriate local frre protection district.
3
Ill/ WI'"• ~1,,1"-.'',~t \dl~'r.lll~lllj,lii'IL!MUW'Ill\t ~~~1 IIIII
Reception#: 797~13
01/17/2011 03:21:37 PM Jean Alberico
5 of 11 Reo Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
Dated this 11'/j. day of~ , A.D. 20_1_1 _.
ATTEST: GARFIELD COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS,
COUNTY,
c·~~D
BOARD OF
GARFIELD
Upon motion duly made and seconded the for
following vote: '-----~
~C~O~MMI~~S~SI~O~N~E~R~C~HAJ~~R~J~O~HN~F~·~MAR~~TIN~----------------'AYE
~CO~M~M=IS~S=IO~NE~R~NITKE~~SA~M~SO=N~--------------------'AYE ~cO~MMI~gs~s~JO~NE~R~TRE~S~I~H~O~UP~T ____________________ ~,AYE
STATEOFCOLORADO )
)ss
County of Garfield )
by the
I, , County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of
County Commissioners, in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that the
annexed and foregoing Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the Proceeding of the
Board of County Commissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said
County, at Glenwood Springs, this __ day of A.D. 20 __ .
County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners
5
II II ~'1~".1. ~1Wi.''J·~II'tl~~iT.I~~.rfo.l~11'ir 11(1~~~~·1 IIIII
Reception#: 797513
01/17/2011 ~3:21:37 PM Jean Alberico
7 of 11 Reo Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 G~RFIELD COUNTY CO
Gently sloping sagebrush meadows su!Tounded on three sides by aspen woodlands provide high
quality transitional and summer range for mule deer, elk, and black bear, as well as a production
area for elk as mapped by the Colorado Division of Wildlife's Natural Diversity Information
Source (CDOW-NDIS 2009). Foraging by all three species was evident.
Wild life Mitigation and Management Recommendations
Raptors. No nest sites are located where removal of the nest tree is a concern. Raptor nesting
within 0.33 miles of the facility could potentially be affected indirectly by disturbance associated
with consttuction and operation of the facility including equipment activity and human presence.
Nest sites that at·e in direct line-of-sight of constructiotl and operations have the most potential
for being adversely affected. Jf there is vegetation or terrain features that tend to protect the nest,
effects of disturbance are often mitigated. The known nest is topographically isolated from the
site (Figure 2).
fn order to reduce the potential for affects to qe,~ting raptors, it will be imp01tant to schedule
construction activities such tl1at they do not iq}~lfet'e with breeding, nesting, and brood rearing
activities. CDOW's (Craig 2002 and Klute 20,gffl recommended raptor nest site avoidance
standards are summal'ized below in Table 3. Jti:onstruction cannot be performed prior to or after
the nesting season, known nests should be re"it1ventoried by qualified biologists and nesting
habitat should be surveyed for new nests. If$ny birds are found behaving in a manner consistent
with nesting, every effott should be made to apply timing limitation and buffer distance
stipulations.
WestWater Engineering P.age 6 of II December 2009
1111 Wo~.m,l\,',lo'l~rlrl.IIJ,I'II'Y rlw'1l rltlLtlllttll'i~~~~& IIIII
Reception~: 797513
01/17/2011 ~3:21:37 PM Jean Alberico
9 of 11 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
Minimize footprint of disturbance. Reduce to the minimum level possible all soil disturbing
activities. Park construction vehicles on previously distUrbed areas during constmction to further
reduce temporary disturbance.
Re-seeding. Temporary and permanent disturbances are recommended to be re-seeded with
native grasses. These measures should be described in an Integrated Vegetation and Noxious
Weed Management Plan for this site. Best management practices such as the imprinting ofun-
vegetated slopes to reduce rill erosion should be implemented.
Fence Removal, Maintenance, and Construction. Fences harmful to wildlife are located
adjacent to the site. Unnecessary fencing is recommended to be removed to enhance safe
wildlife movement. Fences required for separating pastUres or property lines, or those in need of
maintenance should be built in a way as to reduce harm to wildlife. Some methods include using
a smooth top wire (as opposed to barbed wire) and increasing the height of the bottom wire to
facilitate game movement underneath the fence, rather than over.
Aquatic Species. Downstream fish and amphibian species would be most susceptible in the
event contaminants were introduced to surface water during construction or operational
activities. The Colorado pikeminnow and the razorback sucker are federally-listed fish species
that occur in the Colorado River and can be affected by upstream events.
Potential impacts from the water impoundment facility include water depletion in tributaries to
the Colorado River, sedimentation of tributaries, and spills of contaminated water or chemicals
from equipment. St01m water controls should be constructed so that contaminants can be
contained if necessary to prevent them from reaching and affecting aquatic wildlife downstream.
Black Bear Conflicts. Black bears have been observed on the site. It is not only unsafe, but
illegal to feed bears. Keep all food and food waste in bear-proof containers. Provide bear-proof
trash receptacles on the site and train personnel in bear avoidance measures.
WestWater Engineering Page 8 of 1 I December 2009
---------------t-
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
___________ _l ______ _
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---------r--------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-"' •"' I •
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_____ _!_ __
: ....:. ---~~--.. :... .. :,_, _____ ...: